Will Drake face Kendrick in the witness box?; Los Campesinos! turn down a $60,000 ad deal – but why?; Steve takes a music superfan test; ... and what connects Taylor Swift & Five Finger Death Punch?

23 Jul 2025 · 37 min · 14 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Music industry finance and policy—streaming scale vs revenue, a Drake/Universal defamation case tied to Kendrick Lamar, UK government streaming remuneration principles, a political boycott of a Los Campesinos sync deal, and catalog re-recording disputes (Taylor Swift vs Five Finger Death Punch).

Guests

No external guests; episode is hosted by Steve Lemack and Stuart Dredge.

Key claims

  • 2.5 trillion global on-demand audio streams in H1, but streaming growth doesn’t match money growth.
  • UK DCMS plans “principles” to help “legacy” artists (renegotiation prompts, marketing support, songwriter/session musician rate changes), without major revenue-splitting reform.
  • Drake sues Universal over “Not Like Us” promotion; Kendrick is listed as a possible witness, raising the prospect of face-to-face testimony.
  • Los Campesinos turned down a $60,000 Airbnb sync due to Airbnb’s settlement listings.
  • Five Finger Death Punch re-recorded hits after a catalog rights dispute, inspired by Taylor Swift’s re-recording strategy.

Notable examples

Elon Musk defamation case (pedophile insult); PRS Foundation early-career promoter fund; Fyre Festival rights sold on eBay; Billy Childish sync anecdote.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Live Trust Charity Update

0:45 to 1:40

Steve discusses the establishment of the Live Trust and its funding for grassroots music.

“And then by coincidence, I was at the Royal Albert Hall on Friday night, attending the first night of the proms, sat next to Imogen Edwards-Jones, author of Hotel Babylon.”

Stuart's Big Number: Music Streaming

1:40 to 2:40

Stuart shares a staggering number of music streams and its implications for the industry.

“We should crack on because there's three big stories to get through this week, including one breaking news story, which we've learnt about, which is going to be announced, I think, while we're recording or just after.”

Growth vs. Revenue in Streaming

2:40 to 5:00

Discussion on the disparity between growing music streaming and revenue concerns for labels.

“So we're streaming more music collectively.”

Understanding Superfans

5:00 to 8:00

Exploration of the superfan concept, including a quiz on engagement activities.

“I mean, don't be friends with anyone in a band.”

Drake vs. Kendrick Court Case

8:00 to 13:00

Discussion of the ongoing legal battle between Drake and Kendrick Lamar, including potential court implications.

“Yeah, this is one of the ongoing dramas.”

UK Streaming Remuneration Update

13:00 to 14:01

Insight into upcoming UK government announcements about streaming remuneration fairness.

Music Industry Reforms and Streaming Payments

14:01 to 17:45

Explore the recent government initiatives aimed at improving musicians' earnings and contracts in the streaming era.

“And it has been real arguments of some people are pushing for big reforms, big changes in the way money is and other people pushing back and saying, no, we don't want to change too much.”

Los Campesinos! Rejects Airbnb Deal

17:45 to 19:49

Learn about Los Campesinos!'s decision to decline a $60,000 ad deal due to ethical concerns regarding Airbnb.

“while you have record labels down one end of the table and artists at the other believing that they're slightly unfairly treated by this current payment system, then it's a hard one, isn't it?”

The Sync Licensing Process Explained

19:49 to 28:01

Gain insights into how sync licensing works and how financial deals affect artists in the advertising space.

“Yeah, I love Welsh Indie Wizards as a descriptor as well.”

Exploring Sync Deals in Music

28:01 to 28:48

Discussing the often hidden financial aspects of sync deals in the music industry.

“when you're signing your record or publishing contract.”
Show all 14 chapters

The Taylor Swift and Five Finger Death Punch Connection

28:48 to 30:16

Examining how both artists deal with re-recording their music due to label disputes.

“What's the connection between Taylor Swift and Five Finger Death Punch?”

Navigating Streaming Dilemmas for Fans

30:16 to 31:46

Discussing the challenges fans face when choosing between original and re-recorded tracks on streaming platforms.

“And the thing it made me think is, like Taylor Swift started doing her re-recordings a few years ago now, and some people said, oh, this might become a trend.”

Grants for Emerging Music Promoters

31:46 to 33:48

Highlighting available grants for new music promoters and their impact on the industry.

The Bizarre Sale of Fyre Festival Rights

33:48 to 35:08

Recounting the odd sale of the Fyre Festival rights on eBay and its implications.

“You don't have a recommended bid, really, do you?”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:07Steve:Hello and welcome to the Price of Music brought to you by Music Ally, the show that's fascinated by the fun and games and finances of the music world as explained each week by me Steve Lemack and him Stuart Dredge. How's your week been?

0:21Stuart:Do you know it's good, it's been quiet but suddenly about 17 different big news stories are about to land I think so it's going all right How's yours?

0:29Steve:Yeah, I've had a very busy week. I was all over the place, actually, in the last week, including when it was the first meeting of the board members of the Live Trust, which is the new charity board which will be responsible for distributing money, which has been received from the£1 contributions coming in from gigs in stadiums and arenas, which so far, I think, has amassed somewhere in the region of a predicted£800 ,000, which was also boosted this week, I don't know if you saw this, by the announcement that the Royal Albert Hall in London is going to give£1 a ticket to the Live Trust from every rock or pop gig that the venue stages from October onwards, which is a terrific piece of news because that's in theory, that's around£300 ,000 a year which is going into the fund to put back into live music at the grassroots level via, well, venues and promoters and artists and small festivals.

1:23Steve:So that was very positive. And then by coincidence, I was at the Royal Albert Hall on Friday night, attending the first night of the proms, sat next to Imogen Edwards-Jones, author of Hotel Babylon. But that, as they say, is a story for another day, or possibly actually for the locking coming up later on for now. We should crack on because there's three big stories to get through this week, including one breaking news story, which we've learnt about, which is going to be announced, I think, while we're recording or just after. but we'll try and make sense of that for you in a second before all that though shall we start with as is becoming tradition with Stuart's big number can you give us an eye-watering figure at least can you make a bigger can you try harder than last week's slightly underwhelming figure this week's big number is yeah it was a thousand last week and you poked fun at me didn't you so anyway

2:18Stuart:here's a number for you 2.5 trillion there you see you can do it uh what what is what's the story behind 2.5 trillion in music terms so 2.5 trillion is a number of and this is a long sentence right number of global on-demand audio song streams in the first half of this year so basically we collectively have played 2.5 trillion songs on audio streaming services so not youtube videos in the first six months. And that is up 10.3 % year on year. So we're streaming more music collectively. Right. And do you want some dodgy maths? Yeah.

2:56Steve:I'm always up for some dodgy maths. Yeah. All our listeners are sitting there thinking, yeah, let's complicate this with some dodgy maths.

3:04Stuart:This is what we came for. So there are 8.2 billion people in the world. So that means an average of 304 music streams each if we were all using stream chances. so that's a lot of streams it is i mean it's i mean it's it's one of those times where it's a big

3:22Steve:figure but i'm i'm going to ask is it a good figure though because i i don't know is it big enough for some people because i'm asking this really because on occasion over the past year you've uh alluded to the fact that record labels are slightly annoyed that streaming isn't growing in the way that they would like, in a way that would be even more profitable for them. So is this going to reassure them or is this going to confirm their fears of potential stagnation amongst the streaming services?

3:51Stuart:Well, I think the key thing is this is consumption. This is listening. It's not money. And I think that's the big problem at the moment. So this comes from a company called Illuminate who crunched data for the music industry. I should have said that at the start. So what it says, yeah, music listening is still growing, but I think we've covered these figures before. the money being made from streaming isn't growing that fast. So that's where the concerns come in. I mean, the interesting thing, there was this big report that Luminate did, and one of the things, they had this breakdown of the countries in the world and where the most streams come from.

4:20Stuart:The US is the biggest, like 765 billion streams. But then behind that, next is India and Mexico and Brazil, which is kind of the interesting thing there, is that these countries, which historically were difficult to sell music in, you know they weren't big music sales markets but they're huge stream markets in terms of people listening and the big task now is to get people to subscribe there and figure out how much money they can generate for the industry so so that's the i think for for labels that is the exciting thing is that this streaming is not just the big famous mature music markets it's these different parts of the world so that was big i mean the other thing and i was gonna i was gonna do a little test a little quiz for you um like a personality quiz so this report also breaks down different types of music listener like it's a part of this super fan trend that we've talked about yeah um and basically it says i know 20 percent of music listeners just literally hear music sometimes on the radio like the most casual about 14 use streaming services for free so they are you know more active 30 pay for streaming or physical music so they're active fans but then you've got 18 % of fans who do those things but they also and the phrase is engage with artists on at least three of 13 different activation channels because that that's what fans think of themselves as activating on activation channels and 18 % are super fans because they engage with artists on at least five of these channels so I know what you're thinking what are these 13 things that you have to do at least five of to be a super fan so I thought I'd do a little little test on you to see which how many you and I think you might answer more than 10 here right okay okay so first one going to gigs yeah obviously uh talking about artists with your friends and family yep with or at i don't know which one um watching live streams watching live streams

6:08Steve:online no not really yeah not really um but i'm i'm never in i'm always at a gig true uh buying

6:17Stuart:physical music yep uh buying downloads yeah i mean to be fair i have i have bought a couple

6:25Steve:downloads in the last month so i can say yeah i can cheerfully say yes to that yeah i said band camp as well actually buying merch buying merch yep as the as the cupboard upstairs full

6:36Stuart:of t-shirts uh verifies okay posting about artists on social media yeah yes yes occasionally interacting with artist music on chat forums and networks things like discord and reddit but basically online, you know, messaging communities? Yeah, no.

6:55Steve:I mean, don't be friends with anyone in a band. That's something I learned very early on. And it's because it's harder, particularly when you're a journalist, because at some point I found that, oh, no, they've made a terrible record. And if you're their friend, I mean, as a journalist, you've got to tell them it's a terrible record, and then you find you're not their friend anymore. So, no, no, I'm not interacting with a lot of artists,

7:18Stuart:particularly online okay signing up for artist newsletters again you probably don't need to do

7:23Steve:you no but i have though yeah yeah there's one or two yeah one or two favorites yeah okay subscribing to fan clubs no not since i was 14 or 15 i think okay well so you have done it tipping artists in person or online in person tipping them in person i did i did bump into one quite famous rock musician backstage at that fontaine's dc gig if i just put a fiver in his hand go on dave you know treat yourself there you go no uh buying

8:02Stuart:virtual merch i suspect maybe a no that's a no yeah uh and then directly funding artists through crowdfunding or sending them cash so when when they have these payment links like you can send

8:11Steve:me cash via paypal yeah um strangely not not artist actually i did i did sign up to the evil lazarus helped me make an ep um so yes yeah i have yeah but i think you're about often i think

8:27Stuart:you're about nine of those and the ones you're not are more because you're not in that technology then so and it's just interesting it was for me thinking about this as this is the definition of a superfan only five of those but i think a lot of people were listening probably on you know seven

8:41Steve:an eight nine how did how did you score did you score yourself i think i got about the same nine

8:47Stuart:eight nine um yeah i'm not in a fan club at the moment oh no well i'm in a do you know i'm in a i'm in a fan club of one band who we won't mention um so yeah maybe nine so yeah about the same um

8:59Steve:but it's nice because it look tell me later in the lock-in what the band is we promise okay okay

9:05Stuart:all right yeah so yeah this is this is the definition of what's your friend i think it's good because some of these things are about buying stuff but actually a lot of it is about talking to people engaging with things seeing bands live i think it's a good set of criteria of like what

9:17Steve:makes a music fan okay our top three stories of the week story number one um now if if drake's legal battle with universal music group ever gets to court apparently it could come face to face with kendrick lamar in the witness box uh that's going to be pay-per-view i imagine uh tell us more about that will remind us of the characters involved and the plot so far.

9:41Stuart:Yeah, this is one of the ongoing dramas. So to recap, Drake is suing Universal Music Group, who are his label partner as well, because of Kendrick Lamar's diss track, Not Like Us, which was released by another bit of the UMG Empire. He's not suing Kendrick Lamar, who wrote the track. He's suing Universal Music for releasing and promoting it. And he's suing for defamation because of the line Certified Paedophile, which he says could have led people to think

10:05Steve:that he, Drake, was a certified paedophile. That's the gist of this case.

10:08Stuart:Right. And the latest news this month is that both sides have kind of put their legal filing in saying these are the witnesses we might call. So not definite witnesses, but these are the list people we might call to give evidence. And Drake listed 63, which is going to make this one of those 700 part Netflix dramas. Various execs at Universal Music, but also he mentioned Amazon Music, Apple, Spotify, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram. So he might call people from those companies, talk about how this song was promoted and what their role in it was.

10:41Steve:Right.

10:42Stuart:But Universal lists seven witnesses, but Kendrick Lamar is one of them. So, yeah, you could have them come face to face. Because they haven't, as far as I'm aware, they haven't been face to face. I'm not even sure they've been at an awards ceremony together since this all happened. Like they haven't had a public confrontation other than through music. So this might be the first time, although, you know, Drake might not be there today, Kendrick is.

11:02Steve:who's who's going to blink first do you think will someone try and settle or to or to save face do they have to go through with this court case now i don't know i don't think it does either

11:14Stuart:any good because if this case happens one there could be dirty laundry being out about how things are done but also even just stuff that it's secret like how universal promotes songs it doesn't want other labels to get the full skinny on how it promotes a big track and what what kind of deals it does because that's its kind of secret sauce, like any label. I mean, I was looking at the previous case that kind of almost compares quite well to this. Do you remember when Elon Musk was trying to send a submarine down to rescue some people who were trapped underwater? And he got into this public argument with a British diver on Twitter and he called him pedo guy, I think.

11:52Stuart:And this went to trial for defamation, exactly the same thing. The guy was like, you defame me by calling me that. And Elon Musk was actually cleared of that. And one of the arguments his lawyers made was like, when you have an argument, you insult people. You don't mean it. No one thinks you mean it. And he was cleared in the end for various reasons, including that. So in a way, that doesn't really augur well for Drake, because it sort of suggests that if people understand that you're not saying this person is really what I'm saying they are, it's just for the purpose of an argument. so in that sense i think there's a good emphasis on on drake to settle too i don't think you know if he went to court and he lost that would be embarrassing and costly um but yeah and i think we've talked about the issues here like this is this is a big this this is kind of it's quite fun everyone is getting their popcorn in the hope it might go to court but it's a big issue of free speech i guess like can you throw any insult you like in a rap battle and people understand you don't mean it and if you can't is that like a restriction on free speech and artistic expression these are the things that people are kind of talking about could be but but again i think it makes most sense for this to be settled and neither side to have to to go through this in court because yeah no one's got a lot to win i think from from a verdict either way story number

13:05Steve:two this week we are recording this episode on tuesday is it still morning yeah it's just coming up towards midday on tuesday and at any seconds or within the next hour we think there'll be an announcement um in the house of commons about this um it's from the department of culture media and sport it's it's a further push to try and make streaming remuneration fairer for artists i think that's the gist of it from what from what you've heard so far from your contacts um it's a big announcement and it's about streaming um fill us in a little bit more with

13:42Stuart:what you know yeah and to stress this is very much my me and my contacts and nothing is being

13:47Steve:announced officially until the government announces it yeah and that seems to be a deadline

13:51Stuart:it's moving and but yeah so this goes back a few years when we had a big streaming inquiry in the UK in the parliament where I think the upshot was labels got quite a big kicking it wasn't just streaming services getting criticized it was labels and talk about bad contracts with artists and how money didn't flow through um and one upshot was this working group that was created under the government's watch so where all the music industry bodies representing the labels the publishers, the collecting societies, but also the creators of music, have basically been sat in a room for two years arguing about how to improve the lot of musicians.

14:23Stuart:And it has been real arguments of some people are pushing for big reforms, big changes in the way money is and other people pushing back and saying, no, we don't want to change too much. It could be harmful. So as I understand it, this announcement is going to be a set of principles that have been agreed by everyone in that room to help creators. So it's a bit about legacy artists. So they're kind of artists who are assigned to deals back in the CD day, who haven't been doing well from streaming partly because of those deals. Maybe they haven't recouped the advances they were paid, maybe they're on a terrible rate for digital.

14:55Stuart:So there's some stuff on that, I think, of labels. I don't think they're going to change the contracts, but they're promising to reply if the manager or artist requests it and says, I want to renegotiate my contract, it's unfair. There's some promises there. they're going to help those legacy artists to increase their number of streams and that's more about helping them do marketing so if you are a band who was signed in the 90s the label might say okay we're going to help you market your catalog better and double your streams you know do well yeah there's some songwriter stuff so if you're a songwriter going in to do songwriting for an artist you'll get paid per dms which is you know 75 quid a day for your time rather than being expected to work for free that's been something that's been campaigned for a while and there's some i think there's a rise in rates for session musicians as well people are going in and working on recordings and that's so it's kind of a little a package of measures that um i'm trying to think how to put it it it's all welcome and it's all good stuff and the thing i'm interested in is seeing the reaction to it because it's not the big changes that some other campaigners have been pushing for so pushing for stuff like we've talked about equitable remuneration where money from streaming is split more equally between labels and artists

16:01Steve:that doesn't appear to be on the table here so it's more sorry to sorry to jump in but that that crucially is one of was one of the big bones of contention at least particularly from the artist side so it still feels that labels and artists are still at loggerheads over something which is quite crucial with the streaming services in the middle i think that's it and i sort of i

Read the full transcript

16:23Stuart:mean you could describe this as kind of tinkering around the edges of stuff but welcome things but the steps but i the other thing i've picked up and this comes from everyone actually the one thing they can all agree on is that they they all seem to have respect for the minister who's Chris Bryant you've talked about before he's the culture minister it seems like he came in when the government was pointed he came in kind of did a bit of light banging heads together and has pushed for there to be something they can agree on and something to put out and some changes so I think part of the reaction will be well this isn't these aren't the big changes that have been campaigned for but I think there is a recognition that the government is at least trying to make stuff happen and is keeping a watching brief like i expect what the digital is like we're going to do this stuff see how it goes and maybe in a year we'll come back and say has this changed things and look at anything further then so it's kind of a it's not a thing that fixes streaming suddenly but it it does sound like it's going to be some good welcome small steps that maybe do pave the way for this more in future i mean it feels like it's it's one

17:22Steve:way of saying look we are getting somewhere because there were a lot of frustrations waiting around for people to say anything about streaming as you say it's it's years now since that streaming it's a hundred years since that streaming inquiry wasn't it yeah nothing nothing much has really changed for the beleaguered artists so they need to get to a point where they have some positive news before they can then push on to what's you know the the next important points but as i say while you have record labels down one end of the table and artists at the other believing that they're slightly unfairly treated by this current payment system, then it's a hard one, isn't it?

18:10Steve:Sir Chris Bryant is very good at trying to find a middle ground, but, I mean, it will be a Herculean task. I suppose the next thing is who's just going to have to start chipping away, saying is there any give on your side and bring about some compromise yeah and it's funny it's

18:25Stuart:been very funny actually as journalists seeing this because normally when this sort of thing when something is announced people like to tell journalists the day before under embargo yeah get on the phone to you tell you what it means give you their side of the story but with this and this is i think to do with like the way the parliament works and the speaker of the house gets very cross if the government announces things not in parliament first that's kind of a long-standing tradition. And he puffs it up to his full kind of annoyed randomness and goes, how dare you do this? So there's been a lot, no one's been allowed to kind of do that sort of pre-announcing stuff.

18:55Stuart:So it really is going to be government first, then everyone will put out their press releases, and then we'll see if everyone is, if this kind of entente cordial is holding, or if someone comes out and goes, I think this is a load of old bollocks and I'm going to complain. So that'll be what happens tomorrow. Okay, all right.

19:14Steve:I'll tell you what, next week, we'll come back to this next week because I think the reactions, as you say, will be really interesting because everyone involved in streaming, especially representatives of artists or artists themselves, will be responding to this annoyingly over the next 24 hours after we've posted this. But we'll come back to it maybe next week, unless they have sorted out all the music industry's troubles and in which case we will do an emergency. We've never done an emergency podcast. so we could do an emergency podcast um i doubt it's going to come to that but we'll come back to that story um big story number three oh now yeah tell us about this because i mean there's not a lot of money floating as we know uh talking even last week about how bands make money uh it's hard for groups to make a living but even offered um this quite a large chunk of money The Welsh Indie Wizards Los Camposinos have revealed now why they turned down a$60 ,000 sync deal for use of their music for an Airbnb advert.

20:23Stuart:Yeah, I love Welsh Indie Wizards as a descriptor as well. Obligatory. Yeah, this came out of the blue. So there hadn't been a rumour about this or a leak. The band themselves announced it on X, formerly Twitter, and said, yeah, in April, we declined an offer of 60 grand to license somewhere else to Airbnb. And the reason they gave was Airbnb has been used to rent out properties in Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories, which is about as hot as hot potatoes come to discuss politically right now. but this is like an old story. Airbnb banned listings from these settlements a few years ago, then reversed the ban.

21:00Stuart:It's been in the news again recently about how should they be allowing people in these settlements to rent out their rooms and make money. And the band said, we don't want our music to be associated with this. We don't want to fund this. And so we'd turn it down. And yeah, you're right. I think it comes, I mean, it's one of the few times when a band has talked about not just the issues and principles around it, but they've talked about actually how much they were offered for this kind of usage. and Sync can be a very mysterious area, I think, for a lot of music bands. But here was a hard number.

21:29Stuart:This is how much this band got offered to do this kind of ad for this brand.

21:33Steve:Yeah, I mean, it's actually quite an opportunity to dig into Sync a little bit. I mean, and also how attitudes have changed because, I mean, going back in time, I mean, all manner of alternative artists turned down having their music used in adverts in the late 80s and early 90s. I mean, I'm pretty sure both Pop Will Eat itself and Carter the Unstoppable Sex Machine were amongst those who turned down the use of their music in ads. I think one of them was something like KP Nuts, which, I mean, is quite an innocuous product, but, you know, it was different times then. One, you could still make some money out of actually selling records, but also I think artists were far more worried possibly about claims that they'd sold out, artistically sold out.

22:17Steve:um but uh yeah i mean the process is um just as an aside but you know bleeping off from the story if you've ever wondered how music gets on an ad as far as i well you know as i understand it uh i'm not the biggest expert but the client uh that's whatever product it is let's say it's a chocolate bar manufacturer the chocolate bar manufacturer goes to an ad agency then the ad agency comes up with an idea for the advert and then the ad agency will choose a soundtrack to the ad even i i mean years ago was approached once by an ad agency saying if you've got any ideas for music we could use in this ad so they canvas a few opinions uh they're probably these days hounded i imagine by labels and publishers and sync um uh sync companies saying we've got this music uh do you think you can use it anywhere um but anyway and then eventually obviously the artists will get an approach and the ad agency will whether they'll make an offer for what they think that piece of music is worth for them to use in the ads and usually they'll set a time limit on it so say they're going to they'll say we're going to do a six-week campaign for which we'll offer you x thousand pounds and then if they decide to extend the campaign if it's a successful campaign they'll come back to you and offer you some more money.

23:44Steve:The money, obviously, will depend on how big the artist is or how desperate the company are to use your music. So money, this will vary tremendously. So no disrespect to Los Camposinos, but I imagine Noel Gallagher was probably offered a little bit more for use of a cover version of Half a World Away and that John Lewis ad at Christmas the other year. I sense he sat back contemplating how he was going to enjoy his Christmas from that particular royalty check. Although actually the best one, do you know the best one? Do you remember Billy Childish's version of the Dad's Army theme, which was used, I think it was Asda, it was used in a commercial for Asda.

24:29Steve:And whatever Billy was paid by Asda, all pretty much pure profit because the original track was recorded on one of those old, You know, those four-track home recording studio things that you could get, which, I mean, the track was recorded onto a cassette, because I remember the man who put the song out as a single from the label saying, do you know what the biggest recording cost was for that track? Billy Childish's version of Who Do You Think You're Kidding, Mr. Hitler? The biggest outlay for that song was the C60 cassette it was recorded on. wow that's good business so he did i think he probably did all right out of that but um yeah and then obviously you know apart from you know what the agency offers you financially to say it will vary dramatically but then you have to dig into what the artist actually gets paid um which and that's you know subjects of all kind of variables again because it depends on the terms of your record or publishing contracts i got in touch with someone actually just to try and test out what I knew about this.

25:38Steve:Someone who knows loads more than I do. And he explains it this way. This is how the payment is made. So say out of the$60 ,000, it could be split up like this. He says, usually a sync deal will be 50 % for the master and 50 % for the writer. So that's 50 % for the recorded music. 50 % is publishing. Whether it goes on, whether or not those monies make it to the artist or writer is based on the terms of their deals. Sync licenses on the label side are usually 50-50, he was saying. So 50 % going to the label, 50 % to the artist, that's how they split the money. But the 50 % to the artist, if there's a clause in their contracts where income counts against recoupment, then that money's just going to go off and basically, if you're i don't know 25 30 grand down the hole to your record label then the money that comes in from that advert if you have a certain deal it will basically say right we're taking that to recoup the money that we loaned you when you signed your deal i mean it's like it could clear

26:46Stuart:your debt i guess couldn't it if it was big enough then so it could be a good thing in that sense it could clear your debt and then you start earning from all the other things yeah absolutely yeah

26:53Steve:I mean, although psychologically, if somebody came up and said, I'm going to give you 30 grand, you go, yes, brilliant. And then somebody else came along and said, I'm going to take that 30 grand. You are 30 grand better off, but it doesn't feel like it. It's a bit better with publishing because it's more likely that money goes to writers. And my contact said, yeah, money goes to writers. The publisher will take their percentage, which is 20 % or lower. But again, if the terms of your deal say, we're going to have that back because we loaned you some money, then off it will go again. So I think there's two morals to this tale, isn't there?

27:33Steve:One, this is another example of never, but when you see a figure, any financial figure, any money being given to a band for anything, not all that money is going to go to that artist when we talk about how much you've made from streaming, not all that money is going to the artist. When you hear somebody's been offered this for the use of their music in a film, not all the money is going to the artist. The other moral of this tale is do check the small print

28:01Stuart:when you're signing your record or publishing contract. It's interesting because I think we only ever hear about the amounts in sync when someone is complaining generally. Artists don't tend to boast about how much money they made. The other one I remember other than this was do you remember heaven 17's martin ware he got an offer from grand theft auto developers to oh yeah uh and i think it was like seven and a half thousand dollars and he was like this is ridiculous look how much money grand theft auto makes and that sparked a big debate because people were saying well look look how many tracks they license yeah you know that's a lot of money but that that was the last time i remember sync being in the spotlight in this sense where an artist saying i got offered this and i'm not happy although in that case it was the amount rather and the principles around it okay uh all right any other business what were you saying you um

28:48Steve:uh what was that story about five finger death punch you because you wouldn't tell me what it

28:53Stuart:was no okay what's the connection between taylor swift and five finger death punch oh i'm no good

29:01Steve:at these questions do they both demand i don't know bejeweled hair dryers on their rider i don't But hang on, are they both banned somewhere? Are they both banned in China? That's not it, is it? Possibly. I don't know. I concede. What's the connection between Taylor Swift and Five Finger Death Punch?

29:20Stuart:I can't disprove either of those guesses. It may be true. But yeah, well, it's re-recording your hits. So Taylor Swift famously re-recorded a bunch of her albums when her catalogue was sold without her permission. And now Five Finger Death Punch, a very successful rock band. I think they're like seven albums in, or they had seven albums as part of this. Right. They used to be signed to a label called Prospect Park, which sold the rights that it owned in the albums to a company called Spirit Music Group. So one of those catalog deals. And the band weren't happy. And what they say, and so far we've only heard one side of, they say they didn't get a chance to buy those recordings themselves and they might have bought them back and owned them.

29:57Stuart:And they've also been in litigation with this label for a while. So there's kind of no love lost on both sides. But what they've done is they've re-recorded a bunch of their hits for this new compilation called Best of Volume 1, which is one of those things that kind of suggests that there'll be a Volume 2 coming along if it works. And they said Taylor Swift was direct inspiration. They saw what she did and thought, well, we could do that. This might be a solution. And the thing it made me think is, like Taylor Swift started doing her re-recordings a few years ago now, and some people said, oh, this might become a trend.

30:28Stuart:Like loads of other artists might look at what she's doing and say, yeah, we could do that. We could have the rights of things. And it did really happen. There haven't really been that many examples, which maybe is a testament to the fact that when that dispute has emerged, people have preferred to negotiate and sign settlement with the label rather than go nuclear. But this is probably one of the highest prominent examples of this happening. That's not Taylor Swift. And like Taylor, it means that these new recordings will be sitting on streaming services alongside the originals. It's a dilemma for fans.

31:00Stuart:Which ones do you stream? do you kind of switch to the new ones in support of the band um assuming they're as good um but also streaming services if you're a playlister at spotify or apple music and you're putting a five finger death punch song on a playlist do you choose the re-recording or the original like it's a little political moment for you and then that's before we get to the algorithms like when when someone when spotify's algorithm goes oh i think you'd like five finger death punch you know there's a lot of that happening of like of sort of bands who've been going for a long time having catalog stuff resurfaced in recommendations which one will it choose and and that is something i doubt even spotify will be able to tell you that because it will be depending on how many people are streaming the new stuff you know who likes what likes things similar to them yeah but it does it does mean this is what happens in these situations like the you can't delete the old versions that you're protesting about so you have to compete with them yeah um yeah so yeah um i've

31:56Steve:got um one little bit of any other business uh which i think is worth uh a mention because we do always like to bring musicians attentions to available grants and funds that might be open to although in this case this is this is one for you if um if you happen to put on gigs uh any any promoters out there particularly running shows at grassroots level this is another thing i ended up at last week i went to the prs foundation summer drinks event last week which was held to mark the first year and a bit of their early career promoter fund which launched last may and it's it's aimed at giving new promoters a bit of a bit of a bit of help take some of the take some of the worry off their shoulders i think it's sort of about getting their business off the ground more likely as helping emerging promoters to get to the next level uh so they give them some money to be a bit more ambitious or to give them the confidence to promote shows uh with a sort of financial safety nets but it's doing all right apparently since the fund began it's already dispensed more than 170 grants in just over a year to early stage promoters grants or if you can get up to three and a half thousand pounds apparently and they reckon that the money that they've put into the live system so far has helped spawn an additional 500 gigs since they got going with this which is very heartening because I mean anything at the moment to encourage new promoters would be good because i mean it can be a very precarious business to be in financially but there was a lot of positivity in the room though i have to say there was a lot of very enthusiastic emerging promoters there um so if you happen to be uh one of them uh or you'd like some more information um just go to the it's on the prs foundation website you just uh if you go to the prs foundation website click on funding and then click on funding for music professionals you'll find the details there and finally for this week uh interesting things you can buy

33:56Stuart:on ebay yeah i really so you know some people go to the pub have a few pints go home and then buy something unsuitable on ebay yeah um someone may have done this so yeah someone has paid 245 000 for the rights to the fire festival on ebay which i mean that's a tiny figure isn't

34:17Steve:Mind you, I mean, you know, it's fraught with danger. But what was the recommended bid? You don't have a recommended bid, really, do you? Well, the guy... Look, that's a small figure. That's not a big figure in this case, is it?

34:32Stuart:That's why it's at this end of the show, you see. But, yeah, so, I mean, just to recap, the most disastrous festival in recent memory, I suspect. Certainly the most disappointing cheese sandwiches at the festival. So bad, so problematic. Its founder went to prison as a result of it. But then he got out and decided, you know what the world needs, Fyre Festival 2. And he was trying to put that on this year. And then that didn't quite happen. It was postponed. And so he said, I'm going to sell the rights. Make me offers for the rights, the branding rights. And then it went on eBay, which made me suggest that no one did make an offer.

35:04Stuart:And it sold for$245 ,000. But this guy, Billy Barland's name, he was live streaming the closing stage of the auction online. and apparently his verdict on the price was damn this sucks it's so low so i don't think he was very happy which i think anyone who's done on ebay has knows that feeling don't you when you're there waiting for the last five minutes and then it doesn't explode in bids so you know we've all been there but not not quite to this this extent all right that's where we'll leave it for this

35:33Steve:week unless you are one of our kindly patreon subscribers if you are stay listening we'll have another lock-in for you nice people an extra section of the show uh if you'd like to join us for that or support what we're doing you can sign up to become a fan or super fan of the program at patreon.com slash the price of music uh otherwise uh it's still be lovely to hear from any and all of you any correspondence including questions about the industry you'd like us to try and answer drop us a line the price of music podcast at gmail.com we will definitely be covering some of your questions on the next edition of the price of music so it's the price of music podcast at gmail.com if there's anything you'd like us to help out with thank you very much for listening and take care bye for now

36:36Thank you.

From the publisher

In this week's show, Steve and Stuart get to grips with government legislation and bands turning down big bucks:

  • Stu’s Big Number: after some gentle ribbing from Steve on last week's (small) Big Number, Stu returns with a whopper: 2.5 trillion - but what is it?

  • Will Drake face Kendrick Lamar in the witness box?

  • Steve takes a 13-point "personality test" to see if he's a music Superfan

  • Breaking news from the UK governmental inquiry into streaming payments to artists and songwriters;

  • Los Campesinos! turn down a $60,000 offer from Airbnb to use their music in an advert – but why?

  • ...and how does music sync – where songs get put into TV ads and movies, etc – work anyway?

  • What's the connection between Taylor Swift and Five Finger Death Punch?

And in the special post-show section just for our Patreon Superfans, Steve and Stu get classical and chat about:

  • Which fanclub Steve was a member of as a 14-year-old;

  • Steve visits the First night of the Proms

  • Is classical music expensive – or actually cheap in the era of £250 tickets?

  • Are too many heritage bands touring now? Will people stop buying tickets?

  • What's the average price of a gig ticket now, anyway?

  • In the era of no physical tickets, are selfies at the show the new "keeping the ticket stub"?

As ever, we welcome your feedback, emails and – in particular – any questions you might have about how the music biz works!

Email us: thepriceofmusicpodcast@gmail.com

See you next week!

Steve and Stuart

======

Support The Price of Music on Patreon:

https://www.patreon.com/ThePriceofMusic


Follow Steve on X - @steve_lamacq

Follow Stuart on X - @stuartdredge

Follow The Price of Music on X - @PriceofMusicpod


For sponsorship, email - joe@musically.com

More from The Price of Music

All 63 episodes
Will Drake face Kendrick in the witness box?; Los Campesinos! turn down a $60,000 ad deal – but why?; Steve takes a music superfan test; ... and what connects Taylor Swift & Five Finger Death Punch?The Price of Music · 37 min
Listen in VO