Global Elections, Foreign Affairs, and National Security — with Admiral James Stavridis

11 Jul 2024 · 51 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

Episode Overview

  • Title: Global Elections, Foreign Affairs, and National Security — with Admiral James Stavridis
  • Guest: Admiral James Stavridis, retired four-star U.S. naval officer and Partner at The Carlyle Group.
  • Topics: Foreign affairs, U.S. elections, national security, the Middle East, Ukraine, and the implications of global political dynamics.

Key Themes and Discussions

Opening Remarks by Scott Galloway

  • Scott expresses his thoughts on President Biden's decision to remain in the race for presidency amidst speculation about his viability.
  • Introduces the concept of the Algebra of Happiness™: "be open-minded."

Biden's Candidacy and Political Analysis

  • Discussion on whether President Biden should step down as the candidate.
  • Breakdown of political donations and donor sentiments:
  • Three categories of donors:
  • *Whales:* Large donors threatening to withhold funds.
  • *Dolphins:* Mid-tier donors calling for change.
  • *Minnows:* Small donors with less influence.
  • Critique of the Democratic party's defensive posture toward Biden's candidacy.
  • Emphasis on scenario planning for potential futures involving Biden's candidacy.

Future Scenarios for Democrats

  1. Biden stays in the race and wins: Consequences of Biden's cognitive decline and potential electoral failure.
  2. Biden drops out: The need for a new candidate who can invigorate the party and engage the electorate.
  3. Debate Structure Proposal: Suggestion for a series of debates leading up to the convention to showcase a strong Democratic candidate.

The Role of the Military and Global Events

  • Admiral Stavridis discusses the military's non-involvement in political decisions.
  • Potential risks involving adversaries (Russia, China, North Korea) during periods of political instability in the U.S.

Middle East Conflict Analysis

  • Discussion about the ongoing conflict in Gaza and the potential for a ceasefire.
  • Factors influencing the situation:
  • Israeli military objectives regarding Hamas.
  • Pressure from Qatar and Egypt on Hamas.
  • Iran’s influence in the region.

Ukraine Conflict Update

  • Summary of the current military situation in Ukraine.
  • The impact of U.S. and European military aid on the conflict's dynamics.
  • Predictions for a likely stalemate and the long-term future of the U.S. relationship with NATO.

Implications for NATO and Global Democracy

  • Recent election outcomes in various countries and their implications for NATO.
  • Admiral Stavridis emphasizes the strength of NATO despite challenges from political shifts in member countries.
  • Importance of democratic processes globally, highlighting recent elections with surprising results.

Conclusion and Reflections

  • Scott Galloway shares a personal anecdote emphasizing the importance of open-mindedness and positive assumptions about others.
  • Encouragement to engage with different cultures and perspectives for a more interconnected global society.

Key Takeaways

  • Democratic Strategy: Need for a more dynamic and appealing candidate if Biden remains vulnerable.
  • Military Readiness: Importance of vigilance against threats while coping with domestic political challenges.
  • Middle East Peace: Complexities in achieving lasting peace in Gaza and the broader Middle East context.
  • Stalemate in Ukraine: Likely outcome of continued conflict, requiring strategic political and military support.
  • Global Democracy: The significance of upholding democratic values amidst rising authoritarianism.

Closing Remarks

  • The episode concludes with a reminder of the need for positive engagement and open perspectives.
  • Encouragement to subscribe and follow the podcast for ongoing insights into business, politics, and life.

---

For more information, visit [The Prof G Pod](https://www.profgmedia.com) and follow on social media @profgpod.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Support for this show comes from Strawberry.me. Be honest. Are you happy with your job? Or are you stuck in one you've outgrown? Or never wanted in the first place? Sure, you can probably list the reasons for staying, but are they actually just excuses for not leaving? Let a career coach from strawberry.me help you get unstuck. Discover the benefits of having a dedicated career coach in your corner. Go to strawberry.me slash unstuck to claim a special offer. From Pushkin Industries, I'm Jonathan Goldstein, and Heavyweight is back. The new season is bigger than ever. Bigger hopes. I keep waiting for this moment when he says, Mom, I get it.

0:47I'm sorry. Bigger dreams. Tom Hanks wants to meet with you. This is a real chance. And bigger heartbreaks. I thought it would be my movie moment. And maybe he would even whisper in my ear, I've always been in love with you. Check out new episodes of Heavyweight on Apple Podcasts.

1:12Episode 307. 307 is the area code serving the state of Wyoming. In 1907, the first traditional metered gasoline-powered taxi cabs were introduced in New York City. True story. One night rolling out of Lotus, my favorite night spot in the early aughts, I was incredibly drunk, and the taxi cab driver said, You throw up on my seats, it's a fine. So, I immediately threw up everywhere else. Why does that make me happy? Go, go, go!

2:08East and Ukraine. I would love to have Admiral Stavridis on the ticket. I find he's just incredibly measured, reasonable, thoughtful, relatable. You know, he joked to me, I could never run for public office because I'm five foot, I think he said five foot seven. I thought when you're standing on the bridge of an aircraft carrier, you're seven feet tall. This is someone who has made a huge difference and obviously is able to command the respect of thousands of people. Okay, what's happening? I am in München. I'm in Munich, where I'm taking my son to see the semifinals of Spain versus France. Got to go with Spain.

2:43Got to go with the Spaniards. Hola, Española. France wins too much in football. So I'm rooting for the Spanish, but mostly I'm excited about tomorrow flying to Dortmund and saying England beat the Netherlands. Go team England. And of course, of course, I will be in Berlin and my favorite Soho house, best gym in Europe, in my view, and going to go see the final, which I'm super excited about. And I'm hoping that it's team England versus, I don't know, versus someone. Anyways, Germany and football. What could be better than that? Beer. Beer. They also have that here. Yeah, I'm excited to be here.

3:19Okay, what else is happening? So the thing that is dominating the news cycle day after day is whether Biden should drop out of the race or continue. After July 4th weekend, the president sent an open letter to Democrats saying that despite all of the speculation, he is committed to staying in the race to the very end. On MSNBC, the president said he's getting so frustrated by the elites. What we've had here is that wealthy donors are reportedly threatening to withhold donations until Biden exits the race. I think the way I would describe it is if you bucket the donors into three buckets, the whales, the dolphins and the minnows, the small dollar donors.

3:56I think the big donors, although I just spoke with Reid Hoffman and he says they're concerned, but I think they're just sort of at a standstill, whereas the dolphins, I would consider myself a dolphin, somebody who gives thousands or tens of thousands, but not hundreds of thousands or millions, that we're sort of an open revolt that we're calling very explicitly for a change in the ticket. And one of the things that frustrates me is that the amount of incendiary pushback you get, you know, shut the hell up or just focus on Biden. We need to unite. It's almost, it feels almost like we accuse Republicans of being cultish when they have this knee-jerk reaction of being devoted to Donald Trump, regardless of the situation or how insane his behavior is.

4:38And I would argue there's just, the cult is just as strong on the far left where you get this immediate pushback of sign up or shut the hell up. And the notion that there isn't enough time, which is sort of their go-to, and also the only brand positioning right now around a path to presidency is I'm not him, specifically I, Joe Biden, I'm not him, Trump. And I don't think that's a compelling value proposition. And the notion that we don't have enough time is just, in my opinion, fucking ridiculous. Britain had an election start to finish in six weeks. France basically turned back the far right and changed the entire complexion of the race in about seven days.

5:15By By the way, I think that's going to be very interesting to see what happens because the far left, in my opinion, can sometimes be almost as dangerous. They're well-meaning, but they can be bad, maybe not as bad as the far right. I'm going to be very curious to see what happens in France over the next couple of years. Anyways, I think we could turn chicken shit into chicken salad here. What would you do? The president obviously needs to step down. It's got to be him. There's no kind of viable way to ask those delegates to go somewhere else. They've already committed to Biden, but let's assume that he decides to drop out of the race with enough pressure, enough voices, senators, congresspeople, donations come to a halt.

5:51Finally, his wife says it would not be fair of me, my dear Joe, to put you through this or to have you go through this. And I think a lot of this comes down to scenario planning, right? So let's talk through the scenarios. By the way, scenario planning is not a means of trying to predict the future, but trying to imagine possible futures and then run a strategy or a course of action through all of those futures that has the best outcome. And there's some basics here. One, or basic scenarios. One, he stays in the race and wins. Good for him. I think actually that's the worst possible outcome for Joseph Biden.

6:27As someone who has been very involved in their parents' life as they have gone into their 70s and 80s, I think President Biden, based on what I have seen in terms of his cognitive decline, is going to have a very difficult four and a half years ahead of him, much less trying to experience that decline in what is the toughest job in the world. I think this would just be a series of small private and public humiliations with people hiding him. Keep in mind the last three presidents to be reelected, Clinton, Bush, and Obama, were 52 when they were reelected on average versus 82. The worst thing that could happen to his family and reputationally for Joe Biden is if he stays in the race and he loses.

7:07He then becomes this pariah, which is the ultimate example, historic example, of malignant narcissism that not only hurt a woman's right to bodily autonomy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, delayed a lot of judges getting appointed, Dianne Feinstein. But Joseph Biden becomes the malignant narcissist that let us slowly burn to fascism when almost anyone else probably would have staved off Donald Trump. What we aren't focused on is that Donald Trump had an absolutely terrible debate and that anybody else with a pulse, in my view, and I won't even say with a pulse. The Democratic bench is incredibly strong here.

7:42How do we turn chicken shit into chicken salad? You have an eight, six, and then four-member series of debates all held the two weeks before the convention. You have Julie Louis Dreyfus host the convention. It's a real convention where we nominate and select somebody. America gets to know just how incredibly strong our ballot is. And we mature a candidate that not only scares the shit out of Biden and tears him limb from limb in a debate, which any of these would. Whitmer, although publicly she said she's out. But can you imagine a Newsom on a debate stage with the president? Can you imagine the contrast in terms of height, youth, hair, how articulate he is, how compassionate he is?

8:23How many people and how many IHOPs across the nation, when interviewed by Fox, CNN, the BBC, PBS, would say, I'm going to go with that young, good-looking guy? A lot. A lot. We would go from being six points down, which, by the way, is the greatest margin to the upside that Trump has ever enjoyed since he started running for president in 2015, to being up probably five or six. We would see the greatest swing in presidential politics if we matured any one of these candidates. And even more powerfully, as we sometimes overestimate the power of the president, would be the down-ballot impact. Because if the nation got a chance to see, and they would, this would be the media spectacle of the last decade.

9:03If they got to see how powerful, smart, impressive Josh Shapiro is, you know, if they got to see Vice President Harris on the debate stage where she shines versus what has been a fairly mediocre tenure as vice president, if they got to see Raphael Warnock, if they got to see there's just so many governors, there's so many talented people. Let Amy Klobuchar back on stage to talk about antitrust. These are Pete Buttigieg. I mean, this is an impressive team and the team of the best players wins and Democrats would win up and down the ballot. It would basically be a two week long commercial. What do the voters who decide this election have in common?

9:42They don't give that much of a fuck about politics. They're like me in my 20s. Oh, it's the election this week. Maybe I should vote. And then they just start thinking about general perception of these folks. Folks, let's strengthen the perception of the Democratic Party from the top of the ticket all the way down and have a competition here, not a coronation. But I believe if President Biden decides to stay in the race, the strategy and the positioning of I'm the other guy, which is his primary foot forward, is going to not work as someone who's been in branding his entire life. I would love to be if I was a mendacious fuck and didn't care about our country and had somehow decided to develop a fondness for fascism and was advising the Trump administration to be pretty easy.

10:22It'd be a three point communications plan. One, run a video loop of the zombie apocalypse of useful idiots at our elite colleges and say this is what happens when institutions become 98 percent democratic, as many of the faculties are of these elite institutions. Two, run another video loop of what's happened in the downtown metro areas of some of the biggest cities on the West Coast that are democratically controlled and say this is what happens when Democrats get control of a city. And finally, three, run a series of edited videos that basically portray the president as a vegetable. And I just think I think Biden, as good a man as he is, as successful as a presidency as he's had, as better a president as he would be, I think he's going to get slaughtered against the media machine and the perception of a more vigorous former President Trump.

11:16I really hope that people who have influence over the president sit him down and convince him that, look, boss, you drop out of this race and this is scenario three. And every room you walk into for the rest of your life, you get a standing ovation and you are a top contender to be chiseled into the side of Mount Rushmore. This is the path to a better America, simply put. And that is the president who has done an amazing job needs to drop out and we need to mature, battle test and rally behind another candidate such that America continues to push back on the greatest threat to democracy and the greatest threat of the 20th century.

11:54And it's emerging again. And it's a threat we thought was going away. But similar to Jason, but just with a different hockey mask, fascism is rearing its ugly head and we need to push back on it. And this is not the guy to do it. America has been the front line against fascism. We will continue to need to be the front line against the gender apartheid that's taking place globally, anti-Semitism, polarization, divisiveness, extremism, climate change, an expansionary Russia, a China that has its eyes on Taiwan, income inequality. and let's be honest, America is the most impressive country in the world.

12:29We need to mature the most impressive person in the party to lead the Democratic Party and be the front line, and that is not the president. That's the bad news. The good news is we have a ton of people who could hold that line. It is time. We need someone else to enter the race. President Biden needs to step down. We'll be right back for our conversation with Admiral James DeBretis.

13:24Jimmy Fallon, series premiere Tuesday on NBC. I'm Christian McCaffrey, pro running back, and Abercrombie is an official fashion partner of the NFL. I'm not kidding when I say NFL by Abercrombie broke the internet last year, and I think this season's lineup is even cooler. And so does my wife, who keeps stealing all my hoodies. Stay fit for the season and Abercrombie's newest arrivals. Shop NFL by Abercrombie in the app, online, and in store.

13:55The spirit of innovation is deeply ingrained in America, and Google is helping Americans innovate in ways both big and small. From improving emergency response times to protecting against cyber attacks, local, state, and federal governments are innovating with Google AI. This is a new era of American innovation. Find out more at g.co slash American Innovation.

14:28Welcome back. Here's our conversation with Admiral James Stavridis, a retired four-star U.S. Naval Officer and currently Partner and Vice Chairman of Global Affairs for the Carlisle Group, a global investment firm. Admiral Stavridis, where does this podcast find you? I am in the northern part of Florida near Ponte Vedra Beach. It's one of the beach towns for Jacksonville. So I would just love to get your thoughts. As someone whose name was constantly floated as a potential vice presidential candidate for Secretary Clinton and other Democratic hopefuls, give us a sense for what you think is going on here.

15:07And if you were to attempt to speculate what might play out over the next week, this is, I don't know if it's the strangest political moment I've ever experienced. Maybe I'm just, I'm much more attuned to it now, but obviously a tremendous amount of doubt around the Biden campaign, but their camp says they're steadfast in their commitment to stay in the race. But there's sort of this drip, drip, drip of party elders coming out and suggesting that he stepped down. Give us a sense as someone who's been pretty close to this and somebody who thinks a lot about strategy, what do you think is going on here that the public does or does not see?

15:42And what do you think plays out? I'll give you the historical piece. And I at least am old enough to remember a similarly difficult moment to absorb. And that was, of course, Watergate and the resignation of a president in advance of criminal proceedings being brought against him, Richard Nixon. That's a long time ago. So, yeah, we're in 50 years of kind of uncharted territory by comparison. although we've seen now three impeachments, one of Clinton and two of Trump. So we're not complete innocents in this sort of strange season. But here's where I'm at on this one. As I watched that debate, I felt sad for the country.

16:30The choice we're being presented is, at this moment, a convicted felon with multiple, multiple character flaws on full display. And on the other side, an individual for whom I have a lot of affection, a lot of respect, but Father Time appears to me to have caught up with him. And he is not, from all that I can see, in a good place to be prepared for four more years. I think you could have a conversation if we were looking at it for a year in advance, but four more years when you look at the progression. So a bad set of choices. In terms of how it plays out, I can answer that in three words, I don't know, and nobody does.

17:19Literally nobody does. Not even Joe Biden, in my view, knows how this one's going to play out. So what I think will happen over the next week to 10 days, the Democratic Party is going to have to make a choice of either putting itself 100 % behind a president who seems physically frail and weak and hope for the best in the fall, or they're going to have to find a new path. And I'll conclude with this, Professor, There is nowhere in the Constitution where it says Republican Party, Democratic Party. Someone said to me the other day, oh, they have to go with Biden because the Constitution demands neither constitution nor law govern political parties.

18:07We've had a plethora of political parties in this country and they get to make up the rules. And so they have every opportunity to conduct a mini primary or they could pass the baton the Kamala. They've got a convention coming up. I think we are in extremely unpredictable waters. Does the military or the arms, do they have a voice here? No. And you ought to be very glad that they do not. Every military member at every grade raises his or her right hand and swears an oath as follows. I state your name to solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

18:52That oath is sworn to the Constitution. The military will resolutely avoid being embroiled in this, and that's the kind of republic we want to be. That's well said. There's a lot that's uncomfortable about this, but one of those things is, do you see our adversaries being more emboldened while we're in a state of chaos? Do you think they sense weakness and tumult and are more inclined to be more offensive or bold in their actions? I do. And that is a significant risk. And you can break it down, frankly, into two significant periods of high risk. One is from now through the election, I think there the risk is going to be a malactor deciding now would be a good time to launch a, for example, massive cyber attack against the United States.

19:47There's distraction. There might not be a resolute response to that. It's a little ambiguous. That period between now and the election, simply because malactors, Russia, China, North Korea, et cetera, will have a tendency to believe we're too distracted to respond. That's one package of time. After the election, Scott, unfortunately, I think we're going to have this inner regnum in which it would seem to me at least a better than even chance of one side or the other if it's a close election, which it appears it probably will be. There'll be a further series of legal challenges. There could be untoward events like January 6th.

20:35Who knows? That second period of time until the inauguration of the new president, I think, is a second and somewhat even more risky period. So yes, we need to be leaning forward. You asked about the military. The military is not looking internally, but I assure you, the intelligence agencies, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the combatant commanders in a position in which I served for eight years, two different combatant commands, they are looking outward to try and see any signs of risk directed against the country during these very, I think, concerning periods from now through the inauguration. Let's talk about the Middle East.

21:21On MSNBC, you said that you believe there's a one in three chance at best for a ceasefire in Gaza. Talk us through how you landed there. Number one, the Israelis feel as though they have not yet completely dismantled the military capability of Hamas, but they're close. And you hear that even from Prime Minister Netanyahu, certainly from the Israeli general staff. So I think, temporally speaking, the Israelis are closing in on eliminating Hamas. And I believe I've said this to you before, Scott, but the military center of gravity is actually not Hamas. The military center of gravity is that tunnel complex.

22:09400 miles of tunnels, the Israelis are destroying those. When those are done, Hamas loses its opportunity to train, equip, organize, and launch attacks as they did in October. So that's a military equation that is coming to fruition. I think that's pretty close. So that gets me to still more combat opportunities and actions, but probably the Israelis are getting in a position to make an accommodation. On the Hamas side, what I see is a lot of pressure. It's been insufficient so far, but increasing pressure from both Qatar and from Egypt to get to the point of pressuring Hamas to take a deal. I feel both sides are kind of closing toward it.

23:04If you'd asked me three months ago, I think I was saying about a one in five chance. Now I'm up to about a one in three chance. The forces pulling against it are, in addition to the two sides we just discussed, Iran. Iran would like nothing better than to see Israel continue to be targeted, as resources drained, see this fighting go on in Gaza. So Iran is kind of pulling against it. But I'll conclude with this. Now the Iranians have had an election, elected somebody, I hate to use these two words in the same sentence, Iranian moderate, but by Iranian standards, a relatively moderate candidate, there might be a little loosening of some of those activities.

23:55So when you put all that together, it's not a slam dunk, but I think it's getting close to one in three, maybe even a little better than that right now. You referenced that one of the strengths of America, and I agree, is that our good men and women in uniform basically say, all right, good or bad decisions, it's the Oval Office's decision, and we respect the command and control structure here. I thought it was really unusual or extraordinary that the IDF publicly came out and said, we need to see an end of the war or calling for an end of the war. That struck me as if you at some point came out and said to Trump or Obama in a conflict, it's time to end this.

24:41I thought that was pretty bold. Your thoughts? beyond bold. And from a U.S. norm perspective, that officer, she or he would have been fired the next day. We do not want our admirals and generals, no matter how senior, opining publicly about what is, in essence, a political decision. Closest I can come to that, by the way, would be Douglas MacArthur, five-star general, a general of the armies, victor of World War II. Now he goes through and is in charge of Japan, all going well. He comes back in command for the Korean War and ultimately the president, Harry Truman, had to fire him for his insubordination because he advocated ramping up the campaign, possibly using nuclear weapons and attacking China.

25:36We're not paying the generals to opine about that in public. So, yes, I was quite surprised, verging on shock. And finally, I know the IDF extremely well. Spent four years when I was NATO commander. My other side hustle was I was in charge of U.S.-Israeli military-to-military relations. So I was in Israel quite a bit, became very good friends, for example, with General Benny Gantz, the former head of the IDF, General Gaby Ashkenazi, former head of the IDF. I can't imagine either of them, while in uniform, opining on that level of political controversy. Really shocking. Benchmark the IDF's capabilities and technology and personnel relative to the other fighting forces in the Middle East or even, say, for example, Russia?

26:33The IDF has advanced technology. I'll give you three very concrete examples. One, they reportedly have nuclear weapons. Two, the Israelis have among, I'd say, the top four, certainly top five cyber capabilities, offensive and defensive alike, and they have a superb Air Force that has the ability to conduct long-range bombing attacks, has fairly good refueling, although they're buying additional capability from the U.S. Nobody else in the region remotely is at that level with them. What they don't have is massive manpower. They're a nation of about 9 million, about 7 million Jews. So it's a limited manpower pool compared to Iran, compared to any other potential opponent in the region.

27:33They don't have the big pool of manpower to draw on. But if you ask me which hand of cards would you want to play as a general or an admiral, I'd grab the Israeli military. It's a jewel. You mentioned the tunnels, and it strikes me that every time there's a major conflict, out of it comes, not a surprise, but a piece of technology that played a bigger role. Like we saw tanks in World War I, but my sense is they really had their day when Hitler rolled his tanks into Poland and was met with the Polish cavalry. And we saw, okay, tanks are better, right? And then we saw aircraft and jet engine, you know, all sorts of stuff, radar.

28:17It's, you said, or there's two words, and you said one of them that struck me that we're going to hear a lot more about in terms of military strategy and technology and machinery. One is tunnels and the other is drones. I'd love your thoughts on that. And if I, if there are others that are coming out of this conflict. Yeah, tunnels actually have been with us in warfare for centuries, but the degree to which Hamas was able to build this underground complex, pretty striking given the restrictions on Hamas. Comparably, the North Koreans have a very sophisticated underground tunnel connectivity system.

Read the full transcript

28:57So yes, tunnels, I think, are something that is old but is new again. Drones, let's expand that idea. Let's say unmanned. So that means everything from satellites in space. A satellite is a drone, right? It's an unmanned vehicle. Long dwell surveillance drones, command and control drones, what you think of as reapers and predators, attack drones, carrying missiles, surface drones, The Ukrainian Navy is using surface boats, drones, to strike Russian warships. And drones go all the way to the bottom of the sea. Here's the third piece of the triad that I would mention. It's artificial intelligence.

29:43And we're seeing the edges of that emerging now in Ukraine, where AI is being used to direct these drone swarms on both sides of that firing light. Still very nascent, but as I look at the future of warfare, it's unmanned cyber. It is tunnel complexes. I'm going to throw in special forces into that mix, and above all, it's artificial intelligence that will knit all of this together. The truce that Biden outlined, kind of this five-step truce, and it includes rebuilding of Gaza. Realistically, and I don't mean to sound like a nihilist or a fatalist here, isn't any truce, given the history here, just kind of ready to be broken again?

30:36I'm just I'm struggling. You know, I recognize that you're a military man, but as someone who's been considered for these diplomatic posts, what do you think? Is there a sustainable state of being there right now or could could there be? one phrase that has always stuck in my mind from a former chairman of the joint chief general pete pace was asked a question roughly along those lines and he said war will continue in the middle east until the people of the middle east learn to love their children more than they hate their enemies. That's a very profound line. And it gets to your point that is it possible to undo centuries, frankly, millennia of bitterness, particularly between these three competing religious groups in the Middle East.

31:33There's a fabulous book about this written probably 20 years ago. It's a great title, The Battle for God. It's by Karen Armstrong, and it's a book about Judaism, Christianity, and Islam in their seemingly endless ability to find their way to war and to bitterness and hatred. So the short answer to the question is, until the people of the Middle East collectively decide they are going to reject that nihilistic aspects of their religious bitterness and disagreements and free themselves from the past and the bitterness over previous jihads and massacres in camps, and there are plenty on all sides.

32:20Until that happens, I don't think there's a quick solution. Now, on a more positive note, if there is a path forward, I think the table stakes are a reconstruction of Gaza. I think table stakes are an Arab security force, not an Israeli security force, an Arab security force that takes over security for Gaza. And third, and most difficult for the Israelis to accept, some kind of a path towards statehood. I think if you could get in that zip code, then you could build on the existing diplomatic relations between Israel and some of its Arab neighbors. That's the point where the kingdom of Saudi Arabia can come in, Scott, and bring a lot of resources to bear on this problem.

33:12All those are possible, but we talked percentages before. I think it's a one in 10 chance that we can really resolve this with something as simple as a five-step plan. We'll be right back.

33:30Hey, business owners. We know you know the importance of maximizing every dollar. With the Delta SkyMiles Reserve Business American Express card, you can make your expenses work just as hard as you. From afternoon coffee runs to stocking office supplies and even team dinners, you can earn miles on all your business expenses. Plus, you can earn 125 ,000 bonus miles for a limited time through October 29th. The Delta SkyMiles Reserve Business card. If you travel, you know. Minimum spending requirements and terms apply. Offer ends October 29th, 2025.

34:26installed by independent contractors see associate for details contiguous us only for a limited time at mcdonald's get a big mac extra value meal for eight dollars that means two all beef patties special sauce lettuce cheese pickles onions on a sesame seed bun and medium fries and a drink we may need to change that jingle prices and participation may vary since we last spoke a few months ago uh the state of play in uh ukraine yeah let's let's catch up since you and I spoke last, Russia has been on the front foot, making some gains in the northeast of Ukraine, putting some pressure on the second largest city, Kharkiv.

35:10You could kind of see Putin with some air under his wings. What has changed, and how often do you get to put these words in one sentence, the U.S. Congress did a good job. I'll say them again. U.S. Congress did a good job, finally, having exhausted all other possibilities. They did a good job in that they provided$60 billion in military aid, which matches the roughly$70 billion the Europeans have put toward this project. So now there's real combat equipment flowing forward, and I feel the momentum is shifting back. Bottom line, however, is, as I think I told you probably six months ago, ultimately, I think this will end in a stalemate.

35:58It'll end probably roughly where the battle lines are now drawn with Putin in control of about 15 % of Ukraine. Ukrainians will hate that, but the quid pro quo for them would be security guarantees, a path toward membership in NATO probably in the three-year future, and a membership in the European Union. That's a complicated problem boiled down to a few sentences, but I think that's how this one ends up, and therefore I think we'll probably see more stalemate, a little bit back and forth on these firing lines through the fall U.S. election. That'll be the moment for a negotiation. The elections are, there's a, there's a, there feels like there's a leftward breeze coming out of Europe, which has shocked people.

36:48And I was reading about the elections in France and many of us were kind of celebrating the notion that it was great that they kind of left, the center left and then the far left got together and decided to coordinate to stave off the far right. And I think initially there's a feeling of celebration. But when I look at some of the far left policies that I think the center left will have to accommodate, they're fiercely anti-NATO, is my impression. What do these recent events and elections and new parties, what is the impact on NATO as an alliance moving forward? I will come to that essentially tactical question in a moment.

37:28Can we just step back for a moment and celebrate democracy? In the last month, over 2 billion people voted in elections that, from what I can see, were free and fair and delivered some surprising results. 900 million people voted in the Indian election, and the outcome was kind of a surprise, a body check to Mr. Modi. Mexico elects the first woman and the first Jew in the most Catholic and patriarchal country, arguably, in the Americas. In South Africa, the ruling party gets a very significant body check. In the European Parliament, another 500 million people vote, and it's a, like you said, a little bit of a right wing, left wing, kind of hard to read, depends on the country.

38:23And then you live in London, Scott. We see a complete shift in the government there coming from the left. And of course, as you allude to the results in France. Now you can like it or lump it on a variety of those different candidates and outcomes, but I say hail to democracy, it's delivering some surprising outcomes in some what appear to me to be free and fair elections. That's a good thing in my view, especially as we constantly, as we should, wring our hands about the authoritarianism in the world. Let's keep democracy in perspective. As Churchill said, the worst form of government except for all the others.

39:04So that's the strategic chapeau. In terms of NATO, it's a mixture of reactions that I have. UK won't make a bit of difference. UK is going to continue to strongly support NATO, particularly having walked away from the European Union. In France, you're right to worry about the tendencies of the far left. Macron, I think, has his strengths and weaknesses, don't we all? But he has come around on NATO, and I think he will work with the left to at least ensure that Ukraine continues to get support and that's the main ball right now. Germany, I think, is going to continue to increase its defense budget.

39:51Poland is now spending as much on defense as the United States on a per capita basis, maybe a little more, believe it or not, and there are other examples in the alliance. So overall, well, the elections are going to cause that transatlantic bridge to creak just a little bit. But I think as I look at the NATO situation going forward, I think the alliance is going to continue to be in a pretty strong position. And by the way, I'll ask the follow-on question. Well, wait a minute, Admiral, what if Donald Trump is elected president? Someone who has talked publicly about pulling out of NATO. I don't see it.

40:34I think Trump, like all of us, has strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, he's pretty transactional. I think if the Europeans continue to increase their defense budget and their spending goes up, Trump would ultimately say, yeah, that's pretty good value for the dollar for us to stay with NATO. So I think NATO comes out of all of this, certainly not in a blaze of glory, but as a pretty solid alliance. So it feels like going back to Ukraine, there's some winners, right? I would imagine the industrial military complex or weapons producers in the U.S. are winners. I also imagine that China is a big winner.

41:18They're getting cheaper oil, and all of a sudden, you know, they become an integral, crucial partner for Russia. Give us your read on China as it relates to the war in Ukraine, and what that means in terms of everyone's favorite, you know, bogeyman, the possible invasion of Taiwan. Yeah, I'd love to. Let me start with a bit of advice for Vladimir Putin. and I despise Vladimir Putin. You may or may not know I have 50 medals from 29 different countries. The foreign decoration I'm proudest of is that I'm sanctioned by the Kremlin. I'd put that at the top of my medal stack. So I despise Vladimir Putin.

42:05But if I were going to give him advice, I would say, President Putin, be very careful of your relationship with China. You are about to become an extremely junior partner in that relationship. And think of it this way, Scott. You're the economist. You sit in Beijing, you look north, what do you see? You see Siberia, this vast, empty land space. It's the size of the continental United States. Maybe 25 million people live there. That's it. That's Russia to the east of the Ural Mountains. Here's what is there. Oil, gas, diamonds, rare earths, arable land, timber, fresh water. You get the picture.

42:50The Chinese look at that like my dog looks at a ribeye steak. It looks really good. Putin is really taking Russia down a strategic rabbit hole here. In terms of how the war in Ukraine looks from Beijing, you know, if I were President Xi, I would be scratching my head. But just over two years ago at the Olympics, President Putin told his best friend forever, President Xi, hey, don't tell anybody, but I'm going to invade Ukraine. And in five days, I'm going to sweep that country. I'm going to grab that little comedian, Volodymyr Zelensky. I'm going to throw him in LaFordo prison, never to be heard from again.

43:33and then I'm going to have control of Ukraine, which is full of all kinds of wonderful natural resources, oil and gas in the Black Sea, a huge agrarian factory. It's all going to be mine. That's what she heard. Here's what he's seen. He's seen two and a half years of the Russian military stumbling around, incapable of overrunning a nation that it should have swept in the first week or two before the Western aid got there. Now, Putin has missed the window to do that. So Xi, his first question is, in terms of himself, you know, those Russian generals are pretty bad. I wonder what my Chinese generals are like.

44:17He has no idea. He hasn't had a general here. He's shot, fired in anger. Not a single Chinese general. They haven't been in a war of any kind since a dust-up with Vietnam and not in a serious war since the Korean War. That's 70-plus years ago. So the point is Xi has a lot of doubt watching that. He also has a lot of doubt about sanctions. He knows there would be sanctions imposed if he attacked Taiwan. He's looking at what's happening to Russia. So that's, I think, a second warning shot for him. And thirdly, if he's smart, he's looking at how those Ukrainians are fighting like hell. You know, I don't know if the Taiwanese will fight, but I've been to Taiwan.

45:02I've met Madam Tsai, the former president, President Lai, the new president. I've met their national security team. I've seen their military in training exercises. I think they'll fight. I think they'll fight hard. And by the way, that island would be a resistance fighter's dream. It's mountainous, wooded, surrounded by water. That's not an easy nut to crack across 100 miles of very difficult sea. So bottom line, I think Xi is playing this one very intelligently. He's getting tons of free oil and gas from Russia. He's insisting they hard pipe it to the east to him so that can't be undone. He is doing everything possible to create that sense of junior partnership on the part of Putin.

45:49I think he's succeeding at doing that, and I think he's too smart to launch an invasion of Taiwan, at least for the foreseeable future. Admiral James Stavridis is a retired four-star U.S. naval officer. He is currently partner and vice chairman, global affairs of the Carlyle Group, a global investment firm, and is chair of the Board of Trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation. Admiral Stavridis has published 13 books on leadership, the oceans, maritime affairs, and Latin America, as well as hundreds of articles in leading journals. His forthcoming book, The Restless Wave, a novel of the United States Navy, will be published on October 8th.

46:26He joins us from his home in Florida. In terms of economy of words, Admiral, I feel as if our listeners get so much insight in so little time. So thanks for your crisp insights. Thank you, sir. I'd love to come back and talk about World War II with you when the restless wave comes out. I would love that when things subside a bit. I would love that. Thank you, Admiral.

47:00Algebra of happiness, it's difficult, but you need to train yourself to try and see the best in people when you don't know what's going on. I'm getting, I don't know if the term is paranoid, but I'm here in Europe and something I've noticed, I was in Turkey. We were on a boat in Greece and then we disembarked in Bodrum, which is a beautiful part of the world. And we'd spent time there 10 years ago and we decided to go back. Turkey has had, what's the term? I don't like Turkey's policies on Israel and I probably would have rethought the trip had we had more notice and it didn't involve rearranging the travel plans for other people.

47:34But the thing I noticed that really bummed me out when I was in Bodrum is that it felt like there were just no Americans and no Western Europeans there. And it bummed me out. I thought we were just withdrawing from one another, that we're sequestering. It seems like we're turning into Western Europe and the U.S. versus everybody else. Or it's not true. That's probably not true. But it does feel like we're separating. And it's really disappointing. And I was thinking about how wonderful my life has been as an adult because of commercial jet transportation and a fairly neoliberal viewpoint across all nations, including Turkey and the Gulf and Asia, that really welcome people from different cultures and appreciate them.

48:20And we sort of lay down our differences and enjoy each other's food and company. And one of the things I love about American universities is it brings in people from all over the world. I just think you're less inclined to declare war on a nation if a lot of people in that nation have spent a lot of time with people from the other nation. I think mingling, mixing, interracial marriages are really important. We are supposed to mix. There's a reason that mutts are healthier and happier. We're not supposed to sequester and fall in love and be friends and have political alliances only with people like us.

48:52We benefit from this diversity, and I worry that we're in fact sequestering and bifurcating, if you will. Anyways, having said that, I was at a table today, and I'm staying here in Munich, and there was a table of four or five people next to me, four guys. And I don't know if they were speaking Arabic. I think they were. And they started passing around a phone, and I didn't know what was going on. And it was clear, it became clear, they were showing videos of me and then all turning around and staring at me. And I found it sort of threatening and intimidating. and I went to kind of a dark place and then I thought about it and I thought, they're probably just a group of guys here like me to see the semifinals of Spain and France and recognize me from one of my videos and we're talking about it.

49:44And so when they got up, I said, hey guys, and I just tried to be friendly and nice and they were friendly and nice back. And I use it as a cautionary tale that it's easy to digress as you get older into this sort of, the walls are closing in on you and you become less and less comfortable with odd situations. And you have, especially if you struggle a little bit with depression or anxiety or anger, as I do, you have a tendency to make snap judgments and think the worst of people. And the reality is the vast majority of people out there are like you, they're good people who love their families, looking for a nice time, good citizens.

50:19But it was sort of a, I don't wanna call it a cautionary tale, but it reminded me that if I want to be happier and I want a better world, I need to assume the best. I need to see the world and see people as a glass half full. This episode was produced by Caroline Chagrin, Jennifer Sanchez is our associate producer, and Drew Burrows is our technical director. Thank you for listening to the Prop G pod from the Vox Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Malice, as read by George Hahn. And please follow our Prop G Markets pod, wherever you get your pods for new episodes every Monday and Thursday.

50:54The Prop G Markets pod was number one in business. I think it's one of the best or most successful new pods in a while. We're really excited about it with my co-host Ed Elson, the 14-year-old Irish person. Not sure he's 26 and he's British. But anyways, please tune in to Prop G Markets wherever you get your pods every Monday and Thursday.

From the publisher

Admiral James Stavridis, a retired four-star U.S. naval officer, and currently Partner and Vice Chairman of Global Affairs for The Carlyle Group, joins Scott to discuss foreign affairs and the wars in the Middle East and Ukraine. 

Scott opens with his thoughts on Biden remaining in the race. 

Algebra of Happiness™: be open-minded. 

Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice
Buy "The Algebra of Wealth," out now.
Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod:

Instagram

Threads

X

Reddit

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

All 879 episodes
Global Elections, Foreign Affairs, and National Security — with Admiral James Stavridis The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway · 51 min
Listen in VO