No Mercy / No Malice: People Are The New Brands

21 Dec 2024 · 19 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway: Episode Summary

Episode Title

No Mercy / No Malice: People Are The New Brands Episode Description In this episode, Ed Elson discusses the evolving landscape of branding, arguing that individuals have become more influential than traditional brands in the current socio-economic climate.

Key Themes and Insights

  1. The Shift from Brands to People
  2. Trend Analysis: Elson observes that America is experiencing a shift where individuals are increasingly viewed as brands themselves. This shift is evident across various sectors including politics, media, and consumer behavior.
  3. Cultural Context: The pervasive influence of social media and the digital transformation have led to a decline in brand loyalty, with consumers gravitating towards personalities over companies.
  1. Loneliness Epidemic
  2. Statistical Evidence: Elson cites alarming statistics regarding friendship and loneliness:
  3. 12% of Americans have zero close friends (up from 3% in 1990).
  4. 50% of Americans report struggling with loneliness.
  5. Impact on Society: The epidemic of loneliness has consequences for consumption patterns and media engagement, leading consumers to seek connection through individuals rather than traditional brands.
  1. Parasocial Relationships
  2. Definition and Relevance: Elson explains the concept of parasocial relationships, where fans feel a personal connection with influencers and celebrities despite never having met them. This phenomenon is essential in understanding the appeal of influencers.
  3. Influencer Economy: Research shows that many in Gen Z view influencers similarly to friends, significantly affecting their purchasing decisions. Approximately 40% consult influencers before making purchases.
  1. The Influence of Individuals in Media and Politics
  2. Podcasting Dynamics: Elson compares the influence of Joe Rogan to traditional media, emphasizing that personal connection and authenticity are more appealing than brand-name news outlets.
  3. Political Strategies: Referencing Donald Trump, Elson discusses how personal branding can be more compelling than party affiliation, illustrating the effectiveness of authenticity in political messaging.
  1. Corporate Responses to the Trend
  2. Examples of Change: Companies like Tesla and Meta are highlighted for using individual personalities (Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg) to drive brand identity rather than traditional advertising.
  3. CEO Transparency: Elson encourages CEOs to utilize social media platforms like TikTok for authentic communication instead of polished press releases, aligning with the preference for personal connection.
  1. Importance of Human Connection
  2. Call to Action: Elson stresses the need for businesses to recognize the changing landscape and the fundamental human craving for connection. He cites Surgeon General Vivek Murthy's declaration of loneliness as a national epidemic, underscoring its significance for both societal well-being and business strategy.

Conclusion Elson concludes by reflecting on the profound impact of loneliness on consumer behavior and the necessity for brands and companies to adapt by embracing individual personalities over traditional branding strategies. He shares a hopeful note about the importance of friendship and connection, particularly during the holiday season.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Individuals as Brands: The rise of personal branding reflects a societal shift in how people connect with media and products.
  • Loneliness: A significant factor affecting consumer behavior, leading to a preference for personal over corporate connections.
  • Parasocial Relationships: Understanding this dynamic is crucial for marketers and brands aiming to connect with younger demographics.
  • Corporate Strategy: Emphasizing genuine human interaction in branding is essential for contemporary business success.

This episode highlights a critical paradigm shift in branding and consumer culture, encouraging listeners to reconsider their perceptions of influence and connection in a digitally dominated world.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Rinse takes your laundry and hand delivers it to your door. expertly cleaned and folded. So you could take the time once spent folding and sorting and waiting to finally pursue a whole new version of you. Like tea time you. Mmm. Or this tea time you. Or even this tea time you. So did you hear about Dave? Or even tea time, tea time, tea time you. Mmm. So update on Dave. It's up to you. We'll take the laundry. Rinse. It's time to be great. Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start? Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to. Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is?

0:43With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro. You just have to hire one. You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app. Download today. Not all journalism is the same. Take The Guardian. Our coverage has something unique. Fierce independence. Nobody owns us or tells us what we can and can't say. So we're free to report the whole picture. We connect what's happening in Washington to the rest of the globe. Expose corruption wherever we find it. And give fresh perspective on everything. From wellness and soccer to culture, the climate and more. Read, watch and listen to The Guardian for free at theguardian.com.

1:26What sector boasts the strongest brands in the world? Tobacco, universities, tech companies. No, the strongest brands in the world are people. People are the new brands. By Ed Elson, as read by George Hahn.

1:52Scott's away this week on a safari. I'm not sure what a Prop G safari looks like, but it likely involves tented camps with fine china, zacapa, and remote NAD treatments. In his absence, I'm keeping the lights on. Yes, me, Ed Elson, Scott's 25-year-old co-host on Prof G Markets. I get paid to make Scott appear younger and more relevant, i.e. keep him abreast of trends in business and tech, plus wardrobe advice. The guy dresses like an aging skateboarder. This week, I'm sharing my thoughts on a long-brewing trend that came to a head in 2024. It's simple. America has fallen out of love with brands and in love with people.

2:37This is evident in every corner of American life, from politics and business to technology and media. People are the new brands. Some context. What I lack in age and wisdom, I make up for in screen time. I spent almost seven hours scrolling the internet yesterday. Average for me, below average for my generation. I am a product of the greatest digital transformation in history, and the erosion of traditional brand value is happening downstream of this transformation. Scott concurs. Where our views differ, however, is that while he believes digitally-enabled products and services have replaced brands, I believe people have.

3:25First, some numbers. Gen Z spends an average of 109 days per year looking at a screen. 80 % of our waking hours are spent consuming information, up from 40 % in 1980. We see 208 ads per hour, 10 times more than our parents did at our age. As a result, we are more anxious, distracted, and depressed than any generation in history. We all know this, but do not comprehend it. Like frogs in boiling water, we've been slow-cooked by screens. The most important number is 12%. That's the share of Americans who say they have zero close friends, up from 3 % in 1990. Indy. Meanwhile, half the country says they're struggling with loneliness.

4:19These numbers took off when Apple put computers in our pockets, and they've been climbing ever since. There is an epidemic of loneliness in our country that extends far beyond the lives of Gen Z. We've underestimated its impact. Loneliness touches everything, from the media we consume and the products we buy to the relationships we don't form. When we reflect on the winners and losers in 2024, we will bucket them into two categories, those who capitalized on loneliness and those who didn't. Moreover, we'll realize that in this society of lonely people, we find a lot more to love in a person than a brand.

5:06Meta naturally insists the loneliness epidemic has nothing to do with social media. Common sense suggests otherwise. We now spend 70 % less time with our friends than we did a decade ago. There is no question, the phone has replaced our friends. Research shows our bodies are not okay with this. Loneliness has a neurochemical impact similar to that of hunger, in that it activates the same parts of the brain. The longer we go without social interaction, the more we crave it. Interacting with other people is not a human desire, but a human need. For the past decade, we've starved ourselves of this essential nutrient.

5:53The implication is simple. Whether they know it or not, near everyone you know is craving a friend. The best visualization of this subconscious craving is the internet, which has been overrun by billions of people in search of other people. TikTok is an endless stream, not of landscapes or products or experiences, but people. Same for YouTube, where the highest performing videos are those with thumbnails featuring a giant human face. Meanwhile on Instagram, pictures with human faces are 38 % more likely to get a like than those without The algorithm is the truest reflection of our cravings And the algorithm has been very clear We crave people most For lonely people, however, simply seeing someone is not enough What we really want is to know them, to understand them, to be familiar with the intimate details of their life and for them to understand us In other words, we want a friend Many have watched in confusion the extraordinary rise of online influencers People who make millions posting videos of their daily coffee routine or workout regimen Much of this can be explained by our chronic lack of friends Research shows Gen Z views their favorite influencers in the same way they view their friends.

7:22We know what clothes they wear, what food they eat, and what brands they buy. This has radically transformed the retail economy, so much so that 40 % of us now consult an influencer before we make a purchase. The technical term for this phenomenon is parasocial relationship. Per the Tech and Science Dictionary, quote, A relationship a person imagines having with another person whom they do not actually know, unquote. Parasocial is mostly used in reference to Instagram and TikTok, but I believe our parasocial relationships affect everything. If I had to describe 2024 in one word, it would be parasocial.

8:09This is evident in my industry, podcasting. Joe Rogan has become more influential than the world's largest news networks. His podcast gets three times more downloads than the average primetime viewership of CNN and MSNBC combined. Many have misdiagnosed this tectonic shift as a left versus right phenomenon, i.e. CNN is woke or liberal, Joe Rogan is anti-woke, conservative. In the context of loneliness, however, that's a red herring. The key distinction between CNN and Joe Rogan is that one is a brand and the other is a person. This distinction is embedded in everything from the name, CNN versus Joe Rogan, to the logo, red letters versus a face, to the product, the news versus normal conversation.

9:06In a world of chronic loneliness, the person is more compelling. It's no accident the name of our pod is Prof G. One might argue that Abby Phillip is a person, but this neglects the intimate nature of podcasting as a medium. Abby Phillip reads off a teleprompter, wears makeup and a suit, and sits in a multi-million dollar production studio. Rogan wears a t-shirt and talks with his buddies in a room that looks like a converted garage. For millions of Americans, Rogan isn't a newscaster or even a celebrity. He's a friend. And you will find this dynamic at all the top podcasts in America. Side note, I surveyed 10 friends on their preference between Abby Phillip versus Joe Rogan.

9:54None of them knew who Abby Phillip was. Hollywood is suffering at the hands of the same trend. The 2024 Academy Award for Dumbest Purchase goes to Larry Ellison's son, David, who after getting caught up in a bidding war with the children of two other billionaires, spent$8 billion on Paramount Global. Every character in this transaction suffered from Hollywood derangement syndrome, believing the Paramount brand still holds any cultural currency. It doesn't. Meanwhile, they didn't comprehend and that Hollywood is up against the same unbeatable enemy that cable news faces. People.

10:41The individual who's levied the greatest damage in Hollywood is YouTuber MrBeast, whose portfolio includes hits like, I survived seven days in an abandoned city, and I built 100 houses and gave them away. Mr. Beast has mastered the art of the parasocial relationship Put simply, he's a friend who gets up to interesting stuff Last year, Mr. Beast racked up more than 1 billion hours of viewing time More than any of the top shows on Netflix He's one of the millions of YouTubers Swinging the pendulum of power away from brands And toward individual people This trend has been well-documented. Search the creator economy.

11:29But it was ratified this year when analysts valued YouTube at$455 billion. That's 20 % more valuable than Netflix, and more than twice as valuable as Disney. Streaming or AI didn't take down Hollywood. People did. As with podcasting, this presidential election was also less about left versus right than it was about people versus brands. No one understood this better than Donald Trump, who doubled down on his parasocial relationship with millions of Americans while actively disassociating from the Republican brand. It was the ultimate people over brand strategy. What drove this home for me was a leaked video of Trump watching the Democratic National Convention with his team.

12:23Too many thank yous, he says about Harris's speech. Is she crazy? At first it looks like a watch party. Then the tone changes. Get that out right away, he orders. A staffer types out his exact words, then blasts them across social media channels. Throughout the rest of the speech, Trump live dictates his thoughts. She's talking about how great San Francisco was before she destroyed it. With each thought, another tweet. A lot of talk about childhood. We've got to get to the border, inflation, and crime. They said these out. The things of which she complains. The things of which she complains. The team's job is to publish anything and everything that pops up into his head.

13:12No edits or cuts, just the raw Trump. Call it narcissism or flooding the zone with shit, but what's most striking is Trump's determination to live stream his persona to his followers. He's so determined, he hired someone to type out his thoughts. Think of the millions of lonely people watching that convention, craving Trump's live commentary, perhaps because they share his politics, but almost certainly because they want his friendship. Now compare this to the Harris strategy of carefully written speeches and manicured interviews. The Harris team managed its candidate the same way a corporation manages its brand.

13:54Every detail was consumer tested. Every message board approved. By November 5, it was clear that the candidate was not Kamala Harris, but the Democratic Party. She had become a brand, not a person. And the person won. The corporate world has started to wake up to the power of the person, but the movement was started years ago by Elon Musk. From the beginning, Musk knew he was Tesla's greatest commercial. This is why the company never ran ads. Instead, like Trump, he plastered himself everywhere, at every conference and on every network. His tweeting frequency went from mildly obsessive to clinically insane.

14:39He quickly amassed nearly 200 million Twitter followers, then bought the platform. People wonder how Tesla commands a valuation premium 10 times greater than its peers while spending only four ad dollars per vehicle sold. The answer is Elon Musk. Other companies have picked up where Elon left off, most notably Meta. Meta's worst rebrand happened three years ago when the company tried to wash away its sins by switching from Facebook to Meta. It didn't work and brand trust tanked. Its best rebrand, however, came this year When Mark Zuckerberg went from awkward, coat-and-tie-wearing Senate hearing prop To gold-chain-donning, T-Pain-loving jiu-jitsu fighter In addition to leaning into his personality, Zuckerberg has made himself more public He posted 71 Instagrams this year Documenting everything from Taylor Swift concerts to UFC fights In 2021, he posted just 29 times, mostly product announcements.

15:46The extent to which the Zuck has put himself on display this year is astounding, but more important, effective. Since the rebrand, Zuckerberg's favorability score among what was once his most hostile cohort, 18 to 34-year-olds, has increased 73%. This is what it means to choose person over brand. Honorable mentions go to Spotify and Shopify. I've spoken before about the need for CEOs to ditch highly polished press releases and embrace TikTok instead. In line with my belief that people are greater than brands, TikToks show us who is running the company in a way press releases can't. This is starting to happen Spotify's Q2 earnings update this year Came in the form of a short selfie video Filmed by CEO Daniel Eck Shopify president Harley Finkelstein did the same Memo to CEOs This is the way to do it Brands and logos and press releases do not resonate with us anymore We are interested in your people who they are, what they care about, and what they have to say, not your brand.

17:07The most overvalued firm in tech, Palantir, isn't a tech company, but a CEO, Alex Karp, masking as a public company. The premise of my argument is more important than the argument itself. We have become a society of lonely people, and our loneliness is permeating everything we do. This is a harrowing truth, and I'm grateful that Surgeon General Vivek Murthy has lent the issue the gravity it deserves by declaring it a national epidemic. I remind you that more than one in ten Americans today have no close friends. Single-person households now make up 29 % of all households, up from 13 % in 1960.

17:55We are more socially isolated than ever before. These are important facts for businesses to know if they're to understand their customers, but they're also important facts in and of themselves. It's the holidays, which means cheesy movies and trite truisms. I personally find myself increasingly confident that these movies and truisms are correct. This Christmas, I'll be watching It's a Wonderful Life, and I look forward to Clarence's always timely reminder to George Bailey at the end of the film. Remember, no man is a failure who has friends. Happy holidays, Ed. Life is so rich.

From the publisher

By Ed Elson, as read by George Hahn.
https://www.profgalloway.com/people-are-the-new-brands/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

All 879 episodes
No Mercy / No Malice: People Are The New BrandsThe Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway · 19 min
Listen in VO