No Mercy / No Malice: Techno-Narcissism

17 Jun 2023 · 19 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: No Mercy / No Malice: Techno-Narcissism

Podcast Overview Podcast Title: The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway Episode Title: No Mercy / No Malice: Techno-Narcissism Episode Description: In this episode, Scott Galloway, with commentary read by George Hahn, critiques the current discourse around AI, exploring the themes of techno-narcissism and the conflicting narratives of techno-solutionism and techno-catastrophism.

---

Key Themes and Concepts

  1. Techno-Narcissism
  2. Definition: A term used to describe the self-importance exhibited by tech innovators and leaders, who often believe they can change the world.
  3. Characteristics: A tendency to over-estimate their contributions, viewing themselves as saviors or "Jesus Christ" figures in tech.
  1. The AI Discourse
  2. Contrasting Views:
  3. Techno-Solutionists: Believe AI can solve major societal issues.
  4. Techno-Catastrophists: Warn about the existential threats posed by AI.
  5. Critique of Extremes: Both views are criticized as products of techno-narcissism, detracting from genuine discussion about AI's implications.
  1. Real-World Implications of AI
  2. Positive Aspects: AI has the potential to bring significant advancements and efficiencies.
  3. Negative Aspects: The danger lies in the current lack of regulations and oversight, leading to potential misuse and harm.
  1. Fear-Mongering in Tech
  2. Motivation Behind Catastrophism: Some tech leaders may promote fear of AI to stifle competition and maintain their industry dominance.
  3. Example: OpenAI's CEO pushing for heavy regulation, which could serve to protect established players from emerging competitors.
  1. Historical Context and Responsibility
  2. Past Lessons: Analogies drawn from nuclear non-proliferation efforts and the eradication of diseases highlight the importance of cooperation and regulation to manage new technologies' risks.
  3. Need for Action: The episode emphasizes proactive measures rather than panic or inaction regarding AI.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Balance in AI Discussion: A nuanced approach is necessary, moving beyond sensationalism to engage in practical solutions for the societal challenges posed by AI.
  • Regulatory Needs: Emphasis on creating better business models and regulatory frameworks to mitigate potential harms from AI technologies.
  • Human Impact: AI’s potential to disrupt job markets and social structures requires a focus on safety nets and support for displaced workers.

---

Conclusion Scott Galloway presents a thought-provoking analysis of the tech industry's current obsession with AI and the narratives that surround it. He argues for a balanced understanding of both the opportunities and challenges presented by AI, advocating for responsible action and cooperation to harness technology's benefits while minimizing its risks. The need for better oversight and ethical considerations in tech development is paramount as society navigates this complex landscape.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:28Support for this show comes from Aura Frames. This deal is exclusive to listeners and frames sell out fast, so orders you now to get it in time for the holidays and support the show by mentioning us at checkout. Terms and conditions apply.

0:46It's tempting to think that if you have a good idea and work hard, success is inevitable. But the truth is that no matter how brilliant the idea or how steadfast the founders, every company will encounter unthinkable obstacles that can make or break them. Crucible Moments is a podcast that takes listeners into the inflection points that made today's most influential companies what they are today. Listen to Crucible Moments and hear about unlikely triumphs at Supercell, Palo Alto Networks, and more. Check out cruciblemoments.com or listen wherever you get your podcasts.

1:23I'm Scott Galloway, and this is No Mercy, No Malice. The hype around AI is a shouting match between techno-solutionists and techno-catastrophists. In fact, both are flavors of the same bullshit techno-narcissism. Techno-narcissism, as read by George Hahn.

1:53I'm at Founders Forum in the Cotswolds, which they assure me is somewhere outside of London. There are a lot of Teslas and recycled mason jars, as we're making the world a better place. As at any gathering of the tech elite in 2023, the content could best be described as AI in the Seven Dwarves. The youth and vision toggles between inspiring moments and bouts of techno-narcissism It's understandable If you tell a 30-something male he is Jesus Christ, he's inclined to believe you The tech innovator class has an Achilles tendon that runs from their heels to their necks They believe their press Making a dent in the universe is so aughts Today, membership in the Soho House of Tech requires you to birth the leverage point that will alter the universe.

2:50Jack Dorsey brought low-cost credit card transactions to millions of small vendors. But he's still not our personal Jesus, so he renamed his company Block and pushed into crypto because Bitcoin would bring world peace. It may sound a little bit ridiculous, but like you fix that foundational level and everything above it improves. My hope is definitely peace. Side note, if anybody knows Jack's brand of edibles, WhatsApp me. Elon Musk made a great electric car, then a better rocket, and recently appointed himself NOAA to shepherd humanity to an interplanetary future. When techno-narcissism meets technology that is genuinely disruptive, versus crypto or a headset, the hype cycle makes the jump to light speed.

3:42Late last year, OpenAI's ChatGPT reached 1 million users in five days. Six months later, Congress asked its CEO if his product was going to destroy humanity. In contrast, it took Facebook 10 months to get to a million users, and it was 14 years before the CEO was hauled before Congress for damaging humanity. The claims are extreme, positive and negative. Solutionists pen think pieces on why AI will save the world, while catastrophists warn us of the risks of extinction. These are two covers of the same song. Techno-narcissism. It's exhausting. But AI is a huge breakthrough, and the stakes are genuinely high.

4:35It's notable today that many of the outspoken prophets of AI doom are the same people who birthed AI. My worst fears are that we cause significant, we, the field, the technology, the industry, cause significant harm to the world. If this technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong. Specifically taking up all the oxygen in the AI conversation with dystopian visions of sentient AI eliminating humanity isn't helpful. It only serves the interests of the developers of non-sentient AI in several ways. At the simplest level, it gets attention. If you are a semi-famous computer engineer who aspires to be more famous, nothing beats telling every reporter in earshot, quote, I've invented something that could destroy the world, unquote.

5:25Partisans complain about the media's left or right bias, but the real bias is towards spectacle. If it bleeds, it leads, and nothing bleeds like the end of the world with a tortured genius at the center of the plot. AI fear-mongering is also a business strategy for the incumbents who'd like the government to suppress nascent competition. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told Congress we need an entire new federal agency to scrutinize AI models and said he'd be happy to help them define what kinds of companies and products should get licenses, i.e. compete with OpenAI. Quote, Licensing regimes are the death of competition in most places they operate, unquote, says antitrust scholar and former White House senior advisor Tim Wu.

6:18Total gangster. Similar to cheap capital and regulatory capture, catastrophism is an attempt to commit infanticide on emerging competition. Granted, we should not ignore the dangers of AI, but the real risks are the existing incentives and amorality in tech and our ongoing inability to regulate it. The technocatastrophists want to create a narrative that the shit coming down the pike is not the result of their actions, but the inevitable cost of progress. Just as the devil's trick was convincing us he didn't exist, the technologist's sleight of hand is to absolve himself of guilt for the damage the next generation of tech leaders will levy on society.

7:05This has been social media's go-to for years, obfuscating their complicity in teen depression or misinformation behind a facade of technical complexity. It's effective. Dr. Frankenstein, having lost control of Frank, should have warned, quote, I'm worried Frank is unstable and unstoppable. So when his monster began tossing children into lakes, he could shrug his shoulders and claim, I told you so. To be clear, the monster is in fact a non-domesticated animal. It's unpredictable. The techno-solutionists promising the end of poverty and more avocado toast, if we would just get out of their way, are not to be trusted either.

7:49AI sentience is a stretch, but there are plausible paths to horrific outcomes. Even dumb computer viruses have caused billions of dollars in damage. My first thought after witnessing all the hate manifest around a light beer was that we'll likely see AI-generated deepfakes of woke commercials produced by brands for other brands to inspire boycotts by extremists. As Sacha Baron Cohen said, quote, Democracy is dependent on shared truths. and autocracy on shared lies. Unquote. AI, like the products of many of our big tech firms, could widen and illuminate the path to autocracy. On a more pedestrian level, we're going to witness a tsunami of increasingly sophisticated scams.

8:40The first AI-driven externality of tectonic proportions will be the disinformation apocalypse leading up to the 2024 presidential election, and in other NATO country elections as the war in Ukraine continues. Vladimir Putin's grip strength is weakening. His historic miscalculation in Ukraine has left him just one get-out-of-jail-free card, Trump's re-election. The former president has made it clear he would force Ukraine to bend the knee to Putin if he gets back in the White House. Do you want Ukraine to win this war? I don't think in terms of winning and losing. I think in terms of getting it short.

9:25Putin has generative AI at his disposal. Expect his fancy bear operation to compile lists of every pro-Biden voice on the internet and undermine their credibility with smears and whisper campaigns. Also, a barrage of deepfake videos of Biden falling down, mumbling and generally looking like someone who's, wait for it, going to be 86 the final year of his term. Side note, President Biden will go down as one of the great presidents and it's ridiculous he's running again. Yes, I'm ageist. So is biology. But I digress. Anyway, expect information space chaos. There's more. AI has shortcomings and limitations that are causing human harm and economic costs already.

10:15Both the catastrophists and the solutionists want you to focus on sentient killer robots because the actual AI in your phone and at your bank has shortcomings they'd rather not be blamed for. AI systems are already responsible for a keystone cops record of blunders. Starting with the cops themselves, the deployment of AI to direct policing and incarceration has been shown to perpetuate and deepen racial and economic inequities. Other examples seem lighthearted and then insidious. For example, a commercially available resume screening AI places the greatest weight on two candidate characteristics, the name Jared and whether they played high school lacrosse.

11:07These systems are nearly impenetrable. It required an audit to suss out the model's obsession with Jared. Who knows what names or hobbies the AI was putting into the no-pile. Amazon scientists spent years trying to develop a custom AI resume screener, but abandoned it when they couldn't engineer out the system's inherent bias toward male applicants, an artifact of the male-dominated data set the system had been trained on, Amazon's own employee base. AI driving directions plot courses into lakes And systems for assessing skin cancer risk Return false positives when there's a ruler in the photo Generative AI systems, like ChatGPT or MidJourney, have problems too Ask an image-generating AI for a picture of an architect And you'll almost certainly get a white man Ask for social worker, and the systems are likely to produce a woman of color.

12:09Plus, they make stuff up. Two lawyers recently had to go before a federal judge and apologize for submitting a brief with fake citations they'd unwittingly included after asking ChatGPT to find cases. It's easy to dismiss such an error as a lazy or foolish mistake, and it was, but we are all sometimes lazy and or foolish. and technology is supposed to improve our quality of life versus nudge us into professional suicide. Over the long term, productivity enhancements create jobs. In 1760, when Richard Arkwright invented cotton spinning machinery, there were 2 ,700 weavers in England and another 5 ,200 using spinning wheels, 7 ,900 total.

13:0227 years later 320 ,000 total workers had jobs in the industry A 4 ,400 % increase However The path to job creation is job destruction Sometimes societally disruptive job destruction Those 2 ,700 hand weavers Found themselves out of work And possessing an expired skill set A world of automated trucks and warehouses is a better world, except for truck drivers and warehouse workers. Automation has already eliminated millions of manufacturing jobs, and it's projected to get rid of hundreds of millions of other jobs by the end of the decade. If we don't want to add fuel to the fire of demagoguery and deaths of despair, we need to create safety nets and opportunities for the people whose jobs are displaced by AI.

14:00The previous sentence seems obvious, and yet...

14:30The humanization of technology walks hand in hand with the dehumanization of humanity. Less talking, less touching, less mating. Then affix to our faces a one-pound hunk of glass, steel, and semiconductor chips, and you have crossed the chasm to a devolution in the species. Maybe this is supposed to happen because we're getting too powerful and other species are punching back. Shit, I don't know. In sum, AI is here and generating real value and promise. It's imperfect and hard to get right. We don't know how to get AI systems to do exactly what we want them to do, and in many cases, we don't understand how they do what they're doing.

15:19Bad actors are ready, willing, and able to leverage AI to speedball their criminal conduct, and many projects with the best intentions will backfire. AI, similar to other innovations, will have a dark side. What's true of kids is true of tech. Bigger kids, bigger problems. And this kid at two years old is seven feet tall. The good news, I believe, is that we can do this. We haven't had a nuclear detonation against a human target in 80 years, not because the fear of nuclear holocaust created a moral panic, but because we did the work. World leaders reached across geographic and societal divides to shape agreements that diffused tensions and risks when nukes and bioweapons became feasible, in no small part thanks to huge public pressure organized and pushed forward by activists.

16:19The Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty that de-risked U.S.-Russian conflict throughout the 90s wasn't just an agreement, but an investment that cost half a billion dollars per year. All but four of the world's nations have signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Blinding laser weapons, though devastatingly effective, are banned. So are mustard gas, bacteriological weapons, and cluster bombs. Our species superpower, cooperation, isn't focused solely on weapons. In the 1970s, the world spent$300 million,$1.1 billion today, to successfully eradicate smallpox, which killed millions over thousands of years.

17:09Across domains, we come together to solve hard problems when we have the requisite vision and will. technology changes our lives but typically not in the ways we anticipate the future isn't going to look like terminator or the jetsons real outcomes are never the extremes of the futurists they are messy multifaceted and by the time they work their way through the digestive tract of society more boring than anticipated and our efforts to get the best from technology and reduce its harms are not clean or simple. We aren't going to wish a regulatory body into existence, nor should we trust seemingly earnest tech leaders to get this one right.

17:55I believe that the threat of AI does not come from the AI itself, but that amoral tech executives and befuddled elected leaders are unable to create incentives and deterrents that further the well-being of society. We don't need an AI pause. We need better business models and more perp walks. Life is so rich.

18:39holiday season, take advantage of savings on the wide selection of top smart home security products at The Home Depot. The Home Depot has everything you need to make your home smarter with the latest technology and products that let you control and automate your home. And with brands you trust like Ring, Blink, Google, and more available in-store and online, often available with same-day or next-day shipping. So you can protect your peace of mind, whether you're away or at home this season. The Home Depot. Smart homes start here. If you're tired of database limitations and architectures that break when you scale, then it's time to think outside rows and columns.

19:20MongoDB is the database built for developers by developers. It's asset compliant, enterprise ready, and fluent in AI. That's why so many of the Fortune 500 trust MongoDB with their most critical workloads. Ready to think outside rows and columns? Start building faster at mongodb.com slash build.

From the publisher

As read by George Hahn.
https://www.profgalloway.com/techno-narcissism/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

All 879 episodes
No Mercy / No Malice: Techno-NarcissismThe Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway · 19 min
Listen in VO