In short
Podcast Notes: The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway
Episode Title
Prof G Markets: NVIDIA’s $1 Trillion Valuation, Pairs Trading, and Understanding Analyst Estimates
Episode Summary Scott Galloway, alongside his co-host Ed Elson, discusses significant market developments, including NVIDIA's recent market cap milestone of $1 trillion, the concept of pairs trading as a strategy to hedge risk in the current market environment, and insights into how analyst earnings estimates are derived.
---
Key Topics Discussed
- NVIDIA's Trillion-Dollar Valuation
- Key Details:
- NVIDIA achieved a market cap of $1 trillion, joining an elite group of companies including Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Saudi Aramco.
- The surge in NVIDIA’s stock value is attributed to the increasing demand for AI technologies, as they design the critical graphics processing units (GPUs) essential for AI model building.
- Sales growth reported at +19% last quarter, with revenue forecasts exceeding analyst estimates by about 50%.
- Competitive Landscape:
- NVIDIA significantly outpaces competitors like Intel and AMD, with its market cap being approximately six to seven times larger than theirs.
- Scott discusses NVIDIA’s strategy of focusing on chip design rather than manufacturing, allowing them to leverage existing production capacities.
- Market Dynamics and SPACs
- Market Trends:
- Discussion on the recent performance of the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq, with insights on the market volatility and inflation concerns.
- Scott critiques the role of SPACs (Special Purpose Acquisition Companies) in the market, highlighting the substantial losses incurred and the implications for retail investors.
- Elon Musk and Wealth Concentration:
- Reflects on the return of Elon Musk as the world’s richest person and the implications of wealth concentration in major tech companies.
- Pairs Trading Strategy
- Definition and Approach:
- Scott introduces pairs trading as a market-neutral investment strategy where an investor goes long on one stock and short on another to mitigate risk.
- He notes the current market’s unpredictability and discusses specific stocks he is considering for this strategy, such as long positions in Netflix and Google versus short positions in NVIDIA and Apple.
- Analyst Earnings Estimates
- Understanding Estimates:
- Scott explains how analyst earnings estimates are formed, primarily as a consensus of various analysts covering a stock.
- He raises concerns about the reliability of these estimates, citing a study indicating only ~18% accuracy over a three-month horizon.
- Critique of Analysts:
- He emphasizes the potential biases of analysts, particularly those working for investment banks, and suggests seeking independent analysts for more objective insights.
- Broader Economic Commentary
- Job Market Insights:
- Discussion on job openings and unemployment rates following post-COVID shifts in workforce dynamics.
- Notably, he discusses the impact of anti-immigration laws and early retirements on the labor market.
- Debt Ceiling Bill Analysis:
- Insights on the recent debt ceiling deal and its symbolic nature, particularly regarding IRS budget cuts, which Scott argues may hinder future government revenue generation.
---
Key Takeaways
- NVIDIA's Success:
- A combination of timely innovation in AI technology and a strategic focus on chip design has positioned NVIDIA as a leader in the tech market.
- Investment Strategies:
- Pairs trading can be an effective strategy for investors looking to navigate uncertain market conditions without taking on excessive risk.
- Market Sentiment:
- Current trends show a flight to safety among investors, favoring established companies that can withstand economic fluctuations.
- Critical Analyst Evaluations:
- Caution is warranted when relying on analyst predictions; investors should seek to understand the underlying reasons behind stock movements beyond just analyst ratings.
---
Conclusion This episode of The Prof G Pod provided valuable insights into current market dynamics, highlighted by NVIDIA’s remarkable growth, while also addressing the complexities behind investment strategies and the reliability of analyst estimates. Scott Galloway's candid discussions serve as a reminder for investors to critically evaluate market trends and the information they rely upon.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Support for the show comes from Panerai. For more than 150 years Panerai watches have showcased the brand's rich heritage of Italian design and Swiss horological expertise making it's perfect time for modern heroes. So this is my weakness. I have several Panerai watches. It's the only watch I wear. And trust me, Panerai is the way to go. Panerai's new Luminor Marina timepieces honor the brand's storied legacy and history of pioneering innovation while enhancing iconic aesthetics, reliability, and functionality. Visit Panerai.com to discover the world of Panerai and find the boutique nearest you.
0:35That's P-A-N-E-R-A-I.com.
0:43Support for this show comes from Aura Frames. With Aura Frames, you can send photos straight from your phone right to a beautiful Aura Frame. Just plug it in, download the free Aura app, and connect to Wi-Fi. It's the easiest way to share lifelong memories. For a limited time, you can save on the perfect gift by visiting AuraFrames.com to get$35 off Aura's best-selling Carver Matte Frames, named number one by Wirecutter, by using promo code PROPG at checkout. That's A-U-R-A frames.com, promo code PROPG. This deal is exclusive to listeners and frames sell out fast, so orders you now to get it in time for the holidays and support the show by mentioning us at checkout.
1:21Terms and conditions apply.
1:27This week's number, 5 ,475 miles. That's the distance between London and Costa Rica, where my team was bonding on the beach. True story, when Ed got back, he went to the doctor complaining of stickers on his butthole, and the doctor said, Those are stickers from a banana.
1:47Ed, how are you? How do you feel? Too much? No, I think that's just right. That's just right. I'm getting so many emails about my profanity, I'm just going to lean into it. I'll show them.
2:09welcome to prof g markets today we're discussing nvidia's trillion dollar valuation pairs trading and earnings estimates here with the news is prof g media analyst eduardo elson direct from rica de costa so we got here last night at around six and we doing some work and then we sat down for dinner at eight and immediately as we sit down for dinner giant thundering rainstorm just starts descending down on us so i think it's i think it's a sign from the gods that they want us to keep working but that happens a lot down there it's very jungly right first off where are you staying where i don't even know where you guys are i just know you have my credit card where are staying we're in a place called tamarindo yeah i've been there cala luna wow and what's the hotel like it's awesome i'm i'm we have we have four suites and one room um so guess who got the room but i'm currently in in claire's suite right now well if you stopped having sex with bananas we might we might they might trust you to share a room anyways uh and what what are the activities plan for the team in costa rica so we're going we're going surfing tomorrow i think maybe on saturday we're going snorkeling uh they have atv rides which i'm pretty excited for and then we're going to be parting at night it's going to be it's going to be good so you can go atv riding the rest of the team cannot because it's very dangerous is that right so true story i started a brand strategy firm in my second year of business school and i pitched yamaha motors came to the high school of business and said, we need, we want to do a student project.
3:45We want someone to help us understand the youth market for motorcycles for Yamaha. And so I said to my soon to be business partner, like, this is our opportunity. Let's write them a proposal and try and launch our business. And, you know, I'm first semester, second year at the high school of business. And so I wrote a proposal saying, look, you need to be serious about this. I'm going to go out and survey 2000 teens. I just took a market research course, which makes me an expert in market research. And we'll come back and after surveying youth, we'll come up with some insights and product recommendations.
4:19I pitched them and I didn't know what to charge. So I called a friend of mine who had been recruited by and hired by McKinsey. And I said, what would McKinsey charge for this? And he said, we charge a half a million bucks. So I put$250 ,000 and my partner was like, what the fuck are you thinking? We're second-year MBAs, and you're trying to charge it from a quarter of a million dollars? You have no background in consulting. I have no background in any of this. And then I remember I had an apartment in Rockridge, Oakland, and I was paying$280 a month and went to the mailbox. This was back when I actually looked at mail, opened it, and there was a check from Yamaha Motors for$100 ,000 and a voicemail from Matt Takazawa saying, sorry, we've been really busy.
5:02We didn't get back to you. We're really excited about this project. you should have already received the first payment. And I remember when I saw the check and I looked at it and realized what had happened, I got physically scared that I had just done something illegal. And that was the beginning. That was the launch of Profit Brand Strategy, which then became Profit, which I then sold to Dentsu and is now a, I think a five or 600 person firm. And there's a lesson in all of this is that the key to starting a business is starting. and just committing to doing good work. And they were very happy with us.
5:37They used us several times. But our first engagement was with Yamaha Motors. Anyways, ATVs are really dangerous. They don't look dangerous. They're very dangerous. So you and no one else can go ATVing in Costa Rica. Anyways, talk to us about the markets, Ed. Let's start with our review of Market Vitals.
6:02The S &P 500 finished May down a fraction of a percent, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq was up nearly 6%. Bitcoin was down 3 % on the month, and the yield on 10-year treasuries closed out the month marginally up. Shifting to the headlines. Elon Musk has officially reclaimed the title as world's richest person from LVMH CEO Bernard Arnault. That's thanks to an increase in Tesla stock and a decline in LVMH. The Wall Street Journal reported that executives and early investors in SPACs made$22 billion by selling shares before they plummeted. SPACs, also known as blank check companies, they are shell firms that are created to take another company public, have lost more than$100 billion in value so far, and at least 12 have gone bankrupt.
6:49Job openings in April surged above$10 million, that's the highest in three months, And the unemployment rate rose to 3.7 % in May. That's up from 3.4 % the month before, but it's still near historic lows. And finally, Washington passed the debt ceiling bill, which will suspend the borrowing limit and rein in government spending until 2025. Notably, the deal slashes the IRS's budget by around$21 billion. Scott, what are your thoughts? So the SPAC thing is super interesting and not surprising. It's shocking, but not surprising. You can't punish people for having the wisdom to sell when a stock is high.
7:29And investors at the end of the day are investors because they want to invest and then ultimately they want to sell. The question is, at some point, is it more than just reputational risks they're taking? Are they taking risks with other people's capital, retail investors' capital? And when they're on wherever they are, whether it's Richard Branson saying, this will inspire new generations. I mean, essentially, Virgin Galactic was a vessel to transfer wealth from retail investors that were excited about the prospects of the commercialization of space to his failing crews and airlines. And basically, give me money.
8:05I'm going to sell stock as fast as I can. And then I'm going to prop up my old earthbound companies. And there's nothing illegal about that. The question is, at some point, if you own over a certain amount and you go online and start promoting a stock, should there be some sort of regulation that basically makes you an insider? I wonder if SPACs should even be allowed to exist. It just seems pretty insane to me, the idea that we have a vehicle where you can raise public funds for ideas and companies that don't exist. Yeah, well, I mean, there's two ways to look at this. retail investors want to access.
8:44They don't want to feel as if they're being held out and only the quote-unquote those rich white people get to play in tech and get to invest early. So to a certain extent, there's a fulcrum between or a tension between infantilizing investors and protecting them. And so that's where you find, you know, what is, how do you thread that needle? Because as my colleague at NYU says, as Guatemala and the best regulation is life lessons. And SPACs were essentially a form of investment banking. They've been around a long time, but it was essentially a group of people who said, I'll be an investment banker and take companies public that the investment banks don't want to take public.
9:26And here's the issue. For $2 to$3 million, you get, I think, 20 % of the company. So say it's a company that goes out at a valuation of$500 million and you own 5 % of it, why wouldn't you just go on CNBC and use your Twitter following to try and get people excited about it, get it to a billion, and then hit the sell button and in exchange for a million bucks, you've just made$50 million. In terms of job openings, it's good news, bad news. It's great that the job market is strong. We're at historically low unemployment. It's bad news for inflation. And there's a bunch of things that work here. And that is because of anti-immigration laws, we've lost about 2 million immigrant workers.
10:09So there's just fewer people to staff a lot of positions. We've also had 2 million, I think it's 2 to 3 million people retire early. And that is post-COVID. They think, you know what, I've had it. They saw their stocks go up. They have some money, some retirement money. And they're like, I'm just not going back to work. And we also lost a million Americans. So the labor force has shrunk. A lot of women were taken out of the workforce because they shoulder most of the burden at home and those burdens were, you know, dramatically increased mostly because of remote schooling. What's interesting around that, just as a side note, is that female participation in the workforce has not only returned to where it was, it's now at an all-time high.
10:48But we have an absolute shortage of workers. I think there's 1.8 open jobs for every person looking for a job. Let's talk about the debt ceiling bill, too. What are your initial reactions to that? We predicted that the deal was already done and that strategically Biden, who is a pragmatist, and Speaker McCarthy, who cannot afford to have this go sideways. If it goes sideways, he's out. He'll be one of the shortest serving speakers in history, if not the shortest serving speaker. So I believe they got together a few weeks ago and said, all right, how do we get this done? And Biden said, I'm not going to negotiate with terrorists.
11:24And McCarthy said, look, I've got to throw my weirdo some red meat. give me something symbolic that I can claim as a victory that is meaningless. And we'll take this right up to the 11th hour and then we'll get it done such that I can claim victory. You don't really have to give up much. And we can get back to the, you know, we can act, at least pretend to be responsible fiduciaries for the American public. And it looks like that is exactly playing out. They've took it to the 11th hour and President Biden has given some gives that are mostly symbolic, that are almost meaningless, taking IRS budget down from$80 billion to$60 billion, which is, okay, meaningful to the IRS.
12:02Just to clarify in the IRS, it's not going down to$60 billion this year. It'll only go down$1.5 billion this year. And then$20 billion will be, over the next two years, allocated away from the IRS to other government programs. So, all in all, you're taking out$20 billion over three years. They're kind of reducing it by around 9 % each year. The meaningful budget cuts are in the IRS. And the thing that I think is that I find ridiculous is that the IRS is the one agency responsible for generating more government revenue. And that's the whole problem that we're trying to solve here. We're trying to reduce spending.
12:40We're trying to fix the deficit. But part of doing that also means increasing government revenue, which the IRS is responsible for. And we've talked about this before. I mean, And a couple of years ago, we were celebrating that Biden was going to invest$80 billion into building up the IRS, into increasing audit rates, which have fallen 93 % over the past 60 years, so that wealthy people and corporations start actually paying their fair share. Instead, the Republicans and Democrats have agreed upon, actually, we'll just cut back the one thing that's going to make us money in the long term. Am I alone in feeling like this doesn't make any sense?
13:19It's insane. I mean, first off, you got to give it to the Republicans. They managed to get 47 or 48 percent of the popular vote by representing the top 1 percent. And the wealthy have weaponized and corporations have absolutely weaponized the tax code in government. They make the tax code exceptionally complex. They get from 400 pages to 4000, all sorts of loopholes, all sorts of tax credits, which means the following. If you're the IRS, it costs X to audit a middle-income, a middle-class household. I mean, your taxes are pretty simple. You'll put down what you make. You won't even automize or you do a standard deduction.
13:56Boom. If you start writing off half your rent or try to, a red flag will go up. It'll take a case officer an hour or two hours. Boom. You'll have to pay penalties. Super easy to audit you. If somebody wants to audit FedEx or if somebody wants to audit George Soros, you need a team of a dozen people for six months. And so every dollar you cut in funding to the IRS, the government needs 23 % of GDP to operate. They have to get it from somewhere. So if they're not going to get it from wealthy people because they're too expensive to audit and they just don't have the resources, they've got to raise taxes on everybody else.
14:35So any cut in budget at this point of the IRS is nothing but a transfer of wealth from lower and middle and upper middle class income households to the rich and to corporations who the IRS can no longer afford to audit because of the complexity of their taxes at the hands of a tax code that is purposely complex such that I can weave and bob when you know how to navigate by starlight, you want to run your boat races at night. And that's what the wealthy and corporations and Republicans have figured out a way to do. This is nothing but a transfer, again, of wealth from the poor to the wealthy and corporations.
15:16We'll be right back after the break with a look at NVIDIA's rise to the trillion-dollar market cap club.
15:31Support for the show comes from Train Dreams, the new film from Netflix. Train Dreams is a film that stays with you. It's about a man standing alone against the backdrop of a changing America. What makes it powerful isn't the scale of a story, but its simplicity. It's a reminder that a life doesn't have to be big to be meaningful. That quiet endurance, grace, and decency are their own kind of heroism. In a world obsessed with progress, Train Dreams asks us to take pause and reflect on our relationship with loss, nature, and the need to belong. And maybe that's the modern journey, not domination or conquest, but learning how to live with change, grief and tenderness without losing our sense of purpose.
16:10Train Dreams captures the tension between progress and preservation between the machines that build our world and the nature that still defines it. In a time when we're all searching for purpose, Train Dreams feels timeless because the frontier isn't just a place, it's a state of being. Train Dreams, now playing only on Netflix.
16:32Support for the show comes from Shopify. If you run a small business, you know there's nothing small about it. As a business owner myself, I get it. Every day there's a new decision to make, and even the smallest decisions can feel massive. What can help the most is a platform with all the tools you need to be successful, a platform like Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10 % of all e-commerce in the U.S. From household names, including Mattel and Gymshark, to those brands just getting started. That's why they've developed an array of tools to help make running your small business easier.
17:04Their point of sale system is a unified command center for your retail business. It gives your staff the tools they need to close the sale every time. And it lets your customers shop however they want, whether that's online, in-store, or a combination of the two. Shopify's first-party data tools give you insights that you can use to keep your marketing sharp and give your customers personalized experiences. And at the end of the day, that's the goal of any small business owner, keeping your customers happy. Get all the big stuff for your small business ride with Shopify. Sign up for your$1 per month trial and start selling today at shopify.com slash propg.
17:37Go to shopify.com slash propg. Shopify.com slash propg.
17:51We're back with PropG Markets. Chipmaker NVIDIA hit a market cap of$1 trillion. dollars. NVIDIA is the ninth company in history to reach that milestone, and there are only five other companies worldwide worth more than a trillion. Those are Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Saudi Aramco. NVIDIA's stock explosion is a result of the AI boom. NVIDIA is the premier designer of graphics processing units, or GPUs, which are essential for building and training AI models. Sales rose 19 % last quarter, and the company's revenue forecast for the current quarter was roughly 50 % higher than analyst estimates.
18:29So Scott, clearly NVIDIA is riding the AI wave, but there are a lot of other companies that should probably be riding it too. AMD makes chips, so does Intel, so does Qualcomm, which have historically been NVIDIA's biggest competitors. But as it stands, NVIDIA's market cap is roughly six to seven times larger than theirs. What about NVIDIA is making it such a winner? If you think about market valuation, it's really two things. It's performance and promise. And probably not in that order. It's probably more important to have promise and performance. We got to give it to them. In terms of performance, they have essentially never missed their earnings.
19:07They've only missed their revenue projection seven times out of the last 75 quarters. They either meet or beat all of their expectations. So the street and analysts just say this company just continues to deliver. It's also better to be lucky than good. They make graphic processing units, and it turned out that the exact type of processor to do this, the exact type of chip, foots really well to the needs for generative AI. And now Intel is playing catch-up. And essentially, AMD, NVIDIA, and Qualcomm focus on chip design, and TSMC focuses on manufacturing. Intel tried to do both. They were vertical.
19:44And what's interesting, and I've said this a lot, is that most companies beyond a trillion are vertically integrated. but NVIDIA is a designer, not a manufacturer. In sum, NVIDIA was just able to see around the corner better than the other folks. I mean, it's just incredible. It's up 163 % year to date. I think it's responsible for something like 10 or 15 % of the S &P's gain. The question is, what does this mean in terms of valuation? There's just no doubt this company is incredibly well positioned with a market cap of$952 billion. It's worth as much as, get this, Intel, AMD, Qualcomm, and TSMC combined.
20:19And it's trading at an enterprise value to EBITDA of 145 versus 18 at Meta or 22 at Apple or 17 at Google. The question is, is this company overvalued or is it an amazing company, really well positioned? And I think the answer is yes. I think relative to valuation, I wouldn't get near this thing. So something you mentioned, Intel's strategy, which used to be a juggernaut, it's down 45 % in the past five years. Their strategy was, okay, we're going to design and we're going to manufacture their chips. That's very different to NVIDIA, which outsourced manufacturing to TSMC and Samsung. And now here we are, and their GPU is 39 times faster than their previous one.
21:02It's the premier GPU in all of AI training. NVIDIA is clearly making the case that businesses should strive to be specialists versus generalists. Do you think that that applies to all business and where does it not? This is a tough one because I've been preaching for a long time that you can't get above a trillion dollars without vertical integration. Because in order to get above a trillion dollars, you have to have such an incredibly strong culture and brand. You need to control the entire consumer experience. You know, verticalization is kind of the trend over the last 30 or 40 years. These guys have bucked the trend and they've been focused more on design.
21:37Now, what they have done is they've sort of taken the Uber and Airbnb model and said, we're going to leverage other people's massive multi-billion dollar investment in chip making plants. I mean, chip plants cost billions. And I think what they may have correctly assessed was that there's a lot of manufacturing capacity. What's lacking is truly differentiated chip design around a very specialized IP as it relates to graphics that ends up being really relevant to generative AI. And they just hit the bullseye here and they probably have better margins because they don't have this five or seven year lag or wait time trying to build a multi-billion dollar chip plant.
22:20Now, the question is, does that make them vulnerable at some point when they don't control the manufacturing? And if manufacturing capacity slows, are they stuck out in the cold? I think that's the question around whether this company can get much further beyond a trillion dollars without controlling its manufacturing we should talk about the ceo as well this guy jensen huang who i had never heard of until a couple weeks ago just some interesting character traits he always wears a leather jacket in every public appearance mia found this stat which is that there are only two photos on the reuters photo database that show him not wearing the leather jacket.
23:01He has an NVIDIA tattoo on his arm. He's got this massive Reddit following. The NVIDIA subreddit page has over 1 million members. Are we kind of witnessing the birth of the next storyteller CEO, sort of the next Elon Musk? Well, again, this goes back to instinct. And our instinct is that we need a super being. Our brain is big enough to ask very complicated questions, but not big enough to answer them. So into that void slips a super bang. When societies become more educated their reliance on a super being and church attendance goes down But we still need those super beings. So the jesus christ of an information age is no doubt steve jobs technology is the closest thing we have to spirituality and mysticism No one has any fucking idea how their iphone works.
Read the full transcript
23:46So it feels Magical and godlike and these individuals are also billionaires, which means that we really it's like Sex appeal on top of godliness and that's the reason why Elon Musk can say these terrible things and act so recklessly and everybody decides that it's genius, not just a mendacious behavior. So you have kind of Steve Jobs and maybe Elon Musk is competing for kind of the Jesus Christ of our information age economy. And then you have sort of the 12 apostles and they all sort of maintain certain traits. One, they leverage a new medium. If you want to outperform your competition, whether you're a CEO or a company, you need to leverage a new medium.
24:26Burberry was great at Instagram. Kennedy was great at television. And Mr. Huang has clearly picked Reddit. In addition, visual metaphors are really impactful. Steve Jobs had a unique look. And whether it's a black turtleneck or a leather jacket, the personification of a company, trying to personify it such that you like it, such that you will take the multiple on EBITDA up, such that you can raise capital more cheaply, such that you can then invest more in IP and chip design than your competitors, which creates an upward spiral. Think of all of the CEOs of these companies. They're iconic. They have very strong personalities.
25:04They have very strong public images. They're manicured by hundreds and hundreds of people. They manage their brands very tightly. And this individual is doing exactly that and is paying off.
25:23NVIDIA's meteoric rise is indicative of another structural trend. Investors are betting that the biggest companies will get even bigger. So far this year, the 10 largest market cap companies in the S &P 500 have gained roughly 45%. Without them, the entire S &P 500 index would be in the red. Instead, it's up 10%. Now, this applies not just to tech, but to banking, healthcare, energy, and a whole host of others. In fact, in every US industry except for telecommunications, the top 10 stocks have outpaced the rest. Now, the thesis that many believe is that this is a flight to safety. Investors are scrambling to buy shares in companies that can withstand economic volatility and technological change.
26:05In other words, they're de-risking. Now, Scott, when we discuss this, particularly in relation to NVIDIA, you mentioned that you're taking up a new strategy called pairs trading. Can you explain to us what that means and what your thesis actually is? Well, so first off, I just want to say, I want to lay down the context that unless you have the capital to wildly diversify and you sort of do this for a living, and I would argue I sort of do this for a living, the best investment strategy is low cost ETFs, diversified, invest regularly, force yourself, any sort of tax advantaged, you know, IRA, Roth, any sort of employee match, max all of that out, put it in low cost funds, diversified funds, and then just ignore it.
26:47And when you're 65, you'll be able to retire. I can't help it. I invest in stocks. I do invest a lot in funds. I'm hugely diversified. But an interesting strategy, if you want to take out market risk, is pairs trading. And what that is, is the following. I can't get a grip on this market. It feels, on the one hand, it just feels historically expensive to me in terms of a price earnings multiple, given some of the clouds on the horizon and the insecurity in the world. At the same time, I can see something like generative AI unleashing this incredible tech age with all sorts of productivity. And I could see the market just catching fire.
27:24You could tell me the market was off 20 % in the next year or up 20%. And I would say, well, of course it is and give you reasons why for each. So a market neutral strategy is to pick two or three stocks to go long on and then pick two or three to go short on. Just looking at NVIDIA, it looks very expensive. So you might say, all right, I think that's in trouble. Apple's had an incredible run-up. It's trading at 23 times EV to EBITDA. It's at$3 trillion. So maybe we think those are overvalued. Great companies, but overvalued. I look at a company like Netflix. I think Netflix is going to come out a winner from the rider strike.
27:59I think that most likely other unions will join the riders. There'll be a pause in spending. The kind of second tier players in streaming, which is basically everyone but Netflix, will recalibrate and bring down their spending. And I think Netflix will see the opportunity and pursue their continued Amazon strategy of just drowning everyone in capital. And I think they're going to reignite growth again. So I can see, I like Netflix as a long. I like Google as a long because it's been punished. It's trading at EV to EV to 17, which by the way, is not much higher than Intel and lower than Apple or Meta now, which has run up a lot.
28:35I believe that the amount of intellectual capital they have around janitor of ai is huge and that they're going to be able to catch up fairly quickly so you would go short nvidia and say apple and you'd go long netflix and google and the reason why you do that is like i don't want to take a market bet i want to bet on companies technically this is what hedge funds are supposed to do the typical hedge fund is 60 % long, 40 % short, and then they ramp it up with leverage, but we won't talk about that here because they have a bias towards the long position because the natural trajectory of the markets over time is up.
29:14The markets do go up over the medium and long term, but they take out a lot of market risk. That way, if the market gets absolutely hammered, they're still okay because they're short on 40 % of their stocks. And keep in mind, market dynamics will always trump individual performance. So you can be amazing, but if we go into a depression, you're getting laid off. You can pick a great company that performs, but if the market gets cut by 30%, you're going to wake up and find that that amazing company stock is down. So this is a means of taking out some of that risk if you're confident that you have some insight into which companies you think are undervalued or overvalued.
29:52And I'm thinking about doing it because I want some exposure to the equity markets. I do think there are some companies that have gotten carried away in the hype cycle of AI. I do think there are some other companies that have been caught on the wrong side of the AI hype cycle, see above Google. And this is a means of exiting from market risk, but still being exposed to some trends and some dynamics in the equity markets. And then finally, just returning to the original stats we were talking about, you know, the S &P would be down if it weren't for the top 10 biggest companies. I think last year, we had this feeling that big tech was kind of fading out.
30:27I think you use the term or someone used the term biggest tech, referring only to Apple because Apple felt like the big winner. But now you look at the performance of all of these other tech companies, and year to date, Microsoft's up 37%, Google's up 39%, Amazon 42%, Meta 118%, and then obviously Nvidia's up more than 170%. So I guess the question is, have we officially returned to the big tech era? And if we have, how should investors be responding to that? Well, I think what's happened is every time there's a massive innovation or kind of the next thing, the next, you know, the next big, big thing, if you will, that usually the value creation accretes to traditional players or to new players.
31:13So e-commerce benefited the new guy, Amazon. The phone went to existing players. I think you'd argue that metaverse didn't really go to anyone. crypto, the crypto surge went to new players. It looks as if generative AI, if you think it's the next big thing and it looks as if it is, is going to go to existing players. I mean, open AI has a$30 billion market cap or valuation, I should say, in the private markets. But I would imagine that Microsoft has increased probably a couple hundred billion dollars since they made that initial investment. So we have kind of the existing players swelling in value.
31:51And now I I think 25 % of the S &P is just four or five companies. And the thing about a pair trade, just going back to that, it plays on a couple other things. One, the reversion to the mean. Everyone says a compound interest is one of the most powerful forces in the universe. I've always thought reversion of the mean is really powerful. And that is when a stock becomes just crazily overvalued in terms of PE, eventually it kind of finds its footing again. And the same when it's too low. I mean, just sitting here eight months ago, not even eight months ago, seven months ago, Ed, Meta was trading at a PE of like nine.
32:26I mean, it was trading as if it was Ford Motor and had no growth prospects. And it was sitting on top of a massive cash volcano. And what do you know? It's back to where most big tech play. So reversion to the mean and collapsing that with a market neutral strategy, again, are sort of the attraction here. But we're seeing a crowding again to the big guys. And Tim Wu, professor at the Law School of Columbia, says that the biggest threat from AI is that we're again concentrating more power in the hands of fewer and fewer people. We'll be right back after the break to take a listener question on analyst estimates.
33:36Thank you. of medications to their clients' plan members at an affordable price. Interested in more affordable care for your members? Go to cmk.co slash stories to learn how they can help you provide the affordability, support, and access your members' need.
33:58Zoe, the mall's about to close. It's impossible to do anything in 15 minutes. Oh, it's possible, Harvey. I mean, you can switch to T-Mobile in just 15 minutes. So, you think you can find your auntie a sweater? Come on, you spent an hour buying jelly beans. I know, I do love jelly beans. Trust me. Now you can switch to T-Mobile in just 15 minutes. Plus, you'll get America's best network. No. See? No! Yes, see? Maybe I should switch to T-Mobile right now. This holiday, switch to T-Mobile in just 15 minutes from your phone. Check out in 15 minutes or less per line, T-Mobile is the best mobile network in the U.S.
34:26Based on analysis by Uklos Speedtest Intelligence Data 1H 2025.
34:34We're back with ProfG Markets. For our third segment, we're taking a listener question. This is from Muffin. That's not the real name. That's the username on YouTube. Muffin says, can you please do an in-depth explanation about Wall Street expected earnings? For example, are expected earnings made up from a collected average of different predictions, or is it just one entity that formulates predictions? In sum, an earnings estimate is a consensus around the earnings estimates of all the different analysts that cover it. And based on the size of the company, the profile determines how many analysts there are and how reliable are the confidence interval, you could say, of that consensus estimate.
35:13There is a wisdom of crowds. Moderna probably has a couple dozen people following it or analysts. A micro-cap company might be likely to have one analyst. So they group all of them and they look for the mean or the average or the consensus estimate, if you will. The problem here is that, one, analysts are typically sycophants and stenographers, And that is they're paid by an investment bank that wants to play golf with the CEO of that company and get their wealth management and their follow-on equity-raised business. That's not to say they're not good at what they do, but they have the wrong incentives.
35:52So ideally what you want is an independent analyst. They get paid by investors just to give no mercy, no malice analysis. I think Samford does the same thing. So there's been an emergence of independent equity. I think Lynn Alden is a fantastic analyst. And as far as I can tell, she just calls balls and strikes based on what she thinks. So when you have an analyst from Goldman and Morgan Stanley and a company agrees to take them public, you can bet the analyst is going to come out with a bullish buy report. And then they tend to be very rear view looking. and that is once the company announces a better quarter, the analyst, what do you know, takes the price target way up and keeps taking it up until the company throws up on itself and then decides the target price for the stock should have been lower.
36:42What I find is really interesting is taking a basic finance course, basic balance sheet, finance valuation. You can take that on YouTube. You can take Demodron's course, who is literally the dean of valuation, and then reading through the earnings transcript on seeking alpha and trying to come up with your own valuation. It's just a really interesting exercise and it gives you insight into the markets. Going back to your point about accuracy, there's this one study that found that on a three-month time horizon, analyst earnings expectations are only roughly 18 % accurate. Put another way, just very often wrong.
37:14To what extent do you pay attention to analyst estimates and expectations when you're analyzing a stock? or do you just look at what the company says, its forecasts are, and also its historical performance? I read analyst reports to understand the company and get a better feel for the company, but I ignore the price target. I think their earnings estimates are worth looking at. Generally, they do get ranked and evaluated based on their ability or their accuracy around earnings estimates, but I don't look at their price target. A lot of times I have a lot of insight into the company and you should read both sides, find independent analysts.
37:51I mean, some of you just want to read everything you can about the company and try and get a real feel for it. I find that there's new sources of information that are really valuable, and that is just doing word clouds on the earnings call just to get a sense for their strategy. Doing an analysis of Google keyword searches, and that is how many people are searching for Airbnb versus three months ago, which will give you a sense for bookings. how many job openings in AI does a company have? We'll give you insight into its strategy. There's so many new sources of information. People say, well, information is new oil.
38:27Not really. What's really expensive and valuable is refining capability. And that is intelligence that looks at all of this data and these new data sets and says, how does that all bubble up to a buyer or sell recommendation? And just a reminder to our listeners, we're reading your questions and comments on YouTube, on Twitter, in our inboxes. So keep them coming and we'll be happy to answer them.
38:51Okay, let's take a look at the week ahead. It's a very quiet week for earnings and economic data, but Apple is hosting its Worldwide Developers Conference today and is expected to release its Reality Pro headset. Scott, do you have any predictions? I think that Apple's headset is going to be one of the biggest tech failures. I think it's going to rival the Oculus and it will officially be the most elegant final nail in the coffin of this sort of headset-driven VR consensual hallucination. Yeah, I just want to add on to that prediction. I think it's also going to seriously harm Apple's brand from an investor relations perspective because if you look at the history of Apple products, Apple has basically never launched a product that has failed.
39:40They've launched a couple slight failures in the 80s and the 90s. Since you've been alive, bottom line. I mean, you don't remember the Lisa, the Newton, or the Cube. Yes, correct. They've had some stinkers. But ever since 2000, so that's 20 years, when all of these other tech companies have been releasing a slew of products that have been failures, as you've pointed out, they've had no failures. The only things that have gone slightly wrong have been basically Siri and Apple Maps had sort of a shaky launch. And the thing that you have praised about Apple in the past, and so has Aswath, is that they've decided to not do a lot of things.
40:19Everyone said you should create a car, you should do a TV, you should do a smart fridge. They intentionally chose not to do any of these things. And then what's the one thing that they have landed on after years and years of not creating a new product? It's the fucking headset. So I would add on to that, that I think that if they launch this thing, Apple stock is going to take an immediate hit in this erosion of the brand and erosion of the trust and building up for so many years. I like it. I like it. We should do a Paris trade. This episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered by Benjamin Spencer.
40:55Our executive producers are Jason Stavros and Catherine Dillon. Mia Silverio is our research lead and Drew Burrows is our technical director. Thank you for listening to Prop G Markets from the Vox Media Podcast Network. Join us on Wednesday for office hours, and we'll be back with a fresh take on markets every Monday.
41:32The waters
41:36And the dark flies In love
41:49What do walking 10 ,000 steps every day, eating five servings of fruits and veggies, and getting eight hours of sleep have in common? They're all healthy choices. But do all healthier choices really pay off? With prescription plans from CVS Caremark, they do. Their plan designs give your members more choice, which gives your members more ways to get on, stay on, and manage their meds. And that helps your business control your costs, because healthier members are better for business. Go to cmk.co slash access to learn more about helping your members stay adherent. That's cmk.co slash access.
42:32Support for this show comes from Nordstrom. Oh, what fun. Holiday invites are arriving, and Nordstrom has your party fits covered. You'll find head-to-toe looks for every occasion, including styles under$100. Dresses, sets, heels, and accessories from Bardot, Princess Polly, Dolce Vita, Naked Wardrobe, Coach, and more. Free styling help, free shipping, and quick order pickup make it easy. In stores or online. It's time to go shopping at Nordstrom.
From the publisher
This week on Prof G Markets, Scott examines why NVIDIA has left other chip makers such as Intel in the dust. He also explains why he’s thinking of taking up a pairs trading strategy to hedge against today’s market dynamics. And finally Scott and Ed take a listener question about where analyst estimates come from.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




