Raging Moderates: How Social Security and Education Are Being Reshaped

25:56I aspire one day to go back to academia. But working in public service is picking that straight line, right, that you want to be somewhere. You want to be dedicated to it. You want to understand the ins and outs of it. And you also want to fundamentally help people. And it's been really interesting from more of a political point of view on this to see what's going on in these town halls, because I feel like the American public is now separated into two buckets. You're either outraged or you're not. And it doesn't really have a party ID connected to it. So there was a Washington Post editorial and she went to dueling town halls.

26:35One Republican, Mike Lawler, one Democrat, Pat Ryan, who we have on the show. We really like it. But Mike Lawler, a moderate, someone who's spoken out against the Trump administration, someone who folks talk about as maybe being able to run for governor of New York. And the town halls were essentially the same. Those are their Hudson Valley districts side by side because everybody is just outraged. And these are folks who voted for a Democrat and folks who voted for a Republican. Social Security, the Department of Education, which we're going to talk about in a little bit, atop the list there.

27:09How does Doge have access to all this information? We didn't talk about that. That's the central problem with what Doge is doing, that they're getting access to private information that actually leads to fraud. If you're concerned about fraudsters, look at the 19-year-olds that Musk has with their hands in everything that's precious to us. And I think that that is going to be the basic premise for the political landscape over the course of the next three to four years. Are you outraged or are you fined with what's going on? And you're going to have a lot more people on the outrage side of things than those who think that it's okay, even if they think that we are directionally going in the right direction, right?

27:46Like, is it directionally correct that we are getting undocumented people in our country who are part of a Venezuelan gang that kills Americans? Yes. Is that right? But are we outraged that there are innocent people who, you know, claimed asylum through a legal port of entry? Like this story about the gay barber from Venezuela. Tim Miller's been great on this. I agree. Amazing. There was a Time journalist that got into the El Salvadorian prison camp that they sent him to and documented this young man who had a legal asylum claim having his head shaved, crying out for his mother. His mother? Yeah.

28:26Go to his Instagram page and decide if you think he's a Venezuelan gang member. If gangs were filled with people like this man, I think the face of gang warfare would be changing a lot. So are you outraged over that? I know a lot of people who agree with Trump's immigration plans and know that we need to fix the border. Even Bernie Sanders was on with Jonathan Karl over the weekend, and he said that he thinks that Trump has done net-net a good job on immigration, that we don't have this massive flow of illegal immigration anymore. But are you outraged about something like that? Or the 54-year-old guy, American, that I talked about who was detained?

29:00Yeah. And that will hopefully unite more people. Yeah, so I couldn't get past your career journey from academia to the private sector. And now you're on The Five and doing a pod with me. What went wrong? What went wrong? Okay, let's take a quick break. Stay with us.

29:20Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start? Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to. Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin? Or what that clunking sound from your dryer is? With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro. You just have to hire one. You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app. Download today. From Pushkin Industries, I'm Jonathan Goldstein, and Heavyweight is back. The new season is bigger than ever. Bigger hopes? I keep waiting for this moment. When he says, Mom, I get it. I'm sorry.

30:00Bigger dreams? Tom Hanks wants to meet with you. This is a real chance. And bigger heartbreaks. I thought it would be my movie moment. And maybe he would even whisper in my ear, I've always been in love with you. Check out new episodes of Heavyweight on Apple Podcasts.

30:24What do walking 10 ,000 steps every day, eating five servings of fruits and veggies, and getting eight hours of sleep have in common. They're all healthy choices. But do all healthier choices really pay off? With prescription plans from CVS Caremark, they do. Their plan designs give your members more choice, which gives your members more ways to get on, stay on, and manage their meds. And that helps your business control your costs, because healthier members are better for business. Go to cmk.co.access to learn more about helping your members stay adherent. That's cmk.co slash access.

31:06Welcome back. President Trump signed an executive order to begin dismantling the Department of Education, a long-held conservative goal. While he needs Congress to fully eliminate the agency, his administration is already moving key functions, student loans to the Small Business Administration and special education programs to health and human services. Critics argue this will gut protections for students, especially those with disabilities, while supporters say it will cut bureaucracy and return control to the states. Jess, what immediate impact do you think this will have on students, schools, and families, especially with layoffs hitting the department's civil rights office?

31:41It's going to, as with everything that they're trying to do, make it harder to use. So there's this chart that's floating around social media. It starts with claim it's broken, goes to justify cuts to it, cut essential services, make it harder to use. And they want to make the government impossible to use. And because I guess it doesn't affect them personally, even though I assume they just haven't spoken to anyone who might have a kid with disabilities or that they know anyone who's poor. as Howard Lutnick has demonstrated, they don't understand some of the good that the Department of Education does.

32:21And they are, again, to go back to the idea that they are mean and lazy. I do wonder how many people who are saying that they want to get rid of the Department of Education thinks that the Department of Education is the one that sets the curriculum because they aren't. That's done on the state level. So they don't do that. Exactly. But when they talk about critical race theory or DEI in your classrooms. Exactly. They are throwing everything that they don't like into this bucket, even though it's completely irrelevant to it. And you listen to people like Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the governor of Arkansas, which has one of the lowest rated education systems in the country, talking about the DOE as if it's not actually her fault that the kids in her state have like the 48th or 49th worst least educational attainment.

33:09So I think this is an opportunity, going back to what you were saying about Social Security, for Democrats to do something positive. So there's an education function here that you need to talk to people about how the DOE is actually a funding and civil rights enforcement agency, that this is not about setting the curriculum. But to do that, you need to also own the fact that education, public education in this country is not up to standard. And the national report card, you can use all of those stats falling behind other countries. It makes us less competitive, etc. And I thought it was really interesting to see the change in how the public views education in this country and who they think would be best to manage it, because Democrats used to have a double digit advantage.

33:53And now it's essentially tied. Maybe they have a one or two point advantage based on the poll. And you saw this in Glenn Youngkin's election to be the governor of Virginia when Terry McAuliffe came out there and said, basically, your kids aren't yours. They belong to the teachers. No one likes that. Parental rights is really important. And in New Jersey, it was a huge issue. And Phil Murphy, you know, barely got elected there. I think it was four or five points. It should have obviously been much bigger. So Democrats really need to find a way to own this space better. And that will include admitting some of your own failings.

34:26And frankly, I think going after Randy Weingarten and the teachers unions, at least to some degree. Obviously not saying we want to break up the union. Unions are an incredible force for good in people's lives, and they built out the middle class. You don't have a middle class without them. But I think that there has to be more ownership of what happened during COVID, that these schools, the public schools, especially the ones that serve, are least fortunate and needed them to be open the most, were closed when we needed them. And now we've lost, I mean, I'm sure you've seen these stats, there are millions of kids that are just lost, that disappeared from the public school system and never came back.

35:03Yeah, I went into ChatGPT and I asked, if you wanted to destroy America or undermine democracy, what would you do? And it gave me, it was really interesting the things that came back with, including have algorithms on social media to get people fighting with each other over non-important issues. But one of the things that came up was said, slowly erode public education such that people aren't critical thinkers. And I'm like, I started reading all these things and it was sort of frightening that, okay, that kind of feels like what we've done the last 20 years. So I'm of two minds on this. First, just a bit of a tangent on unions.

35:36I acknowledge that unions were an important part in American history. I think they've become ineffective with a sprinkle of corruption. I don't think we should have unions. I think they are a failed construct. People have the right to organize, but I think they're ineffective. And the states that allow them are the states that need them the least, and the states that don't allow them are the ones that need them most. We should have one union. It should be the federal government,$25 an hour minimum wage, get rid of all the corruption, the waste. UAW, current CEO, super smart, first last CEO in jail, one before him in jail.

36:10And Randy Weingarten, in my opinion, used teachers as drug mules to try and exploit schools during the weakest moments during COVID rather than focusing on the kids. Anyway, thank you for my union TED Talk. The Department of Education, I would argue, needs to be radically reformed and possibly reduced. and it's about 4 ,500 people right now. It's in charge of enforcing civil rights laws, and there are some really important things here. If your kid's disabled, the Department of Education makes sure that a bus that's handicap accessible will show up and get that kid to school. They ensure that there are the laws enforced that a kid will get a hot loan.

36:47I mean, they do important work. They also oversee student loans. I would argue that system needs to be reformed. I think one of the reasons you've seen an escalation in student tuition at 4X, the price of inflation is the access to cheap capital. And I know that sounds harsh, but I think offering kids cheap, easy credit for shitty schools does not have good outcomes. And then suspending student loan payments just creates moral hazard where a nice lady in a pantsuit with a logo behind her saying, you always get a return when you invest yourself, just sign here because they get a check right away and not putting schools on the hook for student loans has resulted in just a massive escalation in tuition costs.

37:29So I think the Department of Education, I mean, I'm torn here because I'm also the beneficiary of Pell Grants, and that kind of saved my ass. I came from a household that was in the lowest or lower quartile or lowest quartile of income. So I got unfair advantage. I got grants. And so I feel some obligation. But the DOE of all of these or many of these institutions, I would argue, If you have a thoughtful argument for pushing funds out to low-income areas that needed help, okay, I get it. And getting rid of federal bureaucracy. And also, the Department of Education oversees this mandatory national testing, which was a good idea, and it ended up not working.

38:08Teachers hate it. Parents hate it. Students hate it. It kind of isn't working. And it's taking valuable time away from just trying to lift kids up. So I do think that's a department that warrants a radical audit. The problem is you don't trust them. They're bad actors. They're not trying to help kids. They're trying to just gut the system and do away and implement their own sort of, and they say they're going to replace it with vouchers, which is nothing but a transfer of wealth from the lower middle income households to you and me who don't need money for our kids to go to school. It even reminds me of the debate on a woman's rights to pregnancy where we're not even willing to have a conversation around whether there should be restrictions in the third trimester because we can't trust the other side.

38:56They're using that just as a cudgel to outlaw all of it. And the Department of Education, in my opinion, is probably a department that if they put in place more local assurances around funding, especially in low-income areas, you could see, quite frankly, doing away with it. But no one trusts them. No one thinks you're actually concerned about our children. No one says, all right, are you really being an honest broker here around ensuring our kids have access to some decent education? And again, the mother of all own goals. The districts that need this the most are the ones that are like rooting them on.

39:35It's like, I mean, I hate to say it, but look at what happens when you're no longer getting your Medicaid. There's no longer a school within driving distance and there's no one to enforce it. Your kid that is severely autistic, there to enforce that this kid has a place to go to school. It's like, folks, be careful what you're asking for here. So I don't I feel like the Department of Education was ripe for reform, that this is just people who aren't sincere about helping kids. Yeah. Well, that's the theme, right, of everything that's going to go on for the next few years. If you have bad actors in positions of power, I'm going to dig in and say you can't have access to anything because you're not going to be doing this in a responsible, well-intentioned way.

40:21And the Department of Education is already one of the smallest cabinet departments,$268 billion a year, 4 % of the U.S. budget. McMahon, Linda McMahon, who is in charge of it, wants to cut staff by 50%. So I don't know what the right number is in terms of cuts to keep it functioning or at least the key things that it does functioning. But that feels really scary to me. And when they say, oh, we'll just shift the things that we do that are important, like Title I funding or making sure that we're protecting disabled kids to other departments, they say, oh, we'll send that over to the DOJ. No thank you to Pam Bondi being in charge of these kinds of policies.

41:03I don't know her personally. Maybe she's perfectly nice, but I don't get the vibe off of her that she cares at all or that there's anyone in a kind of top lieutenant role that understands how important it is that those dollars get to those kids. In February, there was a group of top education officials from GOP-controlled states that took a meeting with Linda McBann, and they want this money as block grants, right? They want to say, send it back to the states and we'll deal with it. So your point about vouchers is well taken. And we talked about this a few weeks ago, and I got some really thoughtful feedback from people who live in red states explaining to me what would actually happen if we moved to a voucher system where they are.

41:49So not only would kids not have a school option anywhere near them, and they'd end up priced out of the private schools anyway, but that it was a move to get people into religious schools, to be able to turn, you know, one nation, quote unquote, under God into the policy across all areas of life. And I hadn't seen this quote before. This is from Betsy DeVos, who was the former Trump education secretary, who openly called it advancing God's kingdom, that that was the plan for how they wanted to do education in this country. So I hear that. And then I think about even what I was saying about vouchers, like, should there be some optionality, especially during a once in a century global health pandemic, that you should be able to get$78 ,000 to be able to go to the Catholic school down the street, or to the temple down the street that has a good program.

42:41And that scares the living daylights out of me. The Oklahoma superintendent wanted three or four million dollars to buy Trump Bibles because, of course, everything is branded and everything's a grift to put those in the schools in Oklahoma. And so if you hand the keys over to these religious zealots that have demonstrated no care or concern for the children who need a good public education the most, I feel that I can't abide by that. And I'm going to become even more dug in about the Department of Education, which probably does need some level of reform. And this has been going on since Reagan, right?

43:22It went in under Jimmy Carter or became through the act of Congress that it was created. And we should note it can't be abolished. That has to go through Congress and that will never happen. But starting just a year later, Reagan is crusading on this. And every Republican since then has been making its goal to abolish it. But Trump is clearly showing that he will spend his last term or hope, you know, hopefully his last term. I don't know. He's certainly going to declare something funky can go on at the end of this, but to destroy every aspect of the federal government. I think that kind of the strategy or the thing that unifies everything they're doing is the following.

44:02I think they're trying to turn America into an operating system that just transfers wealth from the bottom 99 to the top 1%. And this is yet another example, because if you send your kids to private school, you want to literally starve all public education of all funds such you have more money for other things that you benefit from, whether it's tax cuts or investments in technology or investments in infrastructure. So I think about 10 % of U.S. households send their kids to private schools, which is probably less than most people think. But once you get into the top 1%, see above the tail wagging every dog here, about half those households send their kids to private schools.

44:39And that's even misleading because if you're a household in Woodside, if you send your kid to the public school in Woodside or in Portola Valley, it's a private school, folks. Let's be honest. They have an auction. They're so overfunded. And one of the great inequities in the U.S. is a disproportionate amount of funding levels are based on local property taxes. So this is just transparently saying we don't want to pay for anything that will primarily affect the bottom 99. And the top 1%, this doesn't mean anything. Your kids don't need a public school. You have the resources to ensure that your kid has the special ed he or she might need.

45:20You don't need to worry about how your kid gets to school. uh and literally everything they're doing is like okay how do we tilt everything from the bottom 99 to the one i just see that as another example here it's the strategy behind everything it's the explanation behind i think almost every activity is they're decided america is an underlying engine to try and create prosperity or more prosperity for the top one percent which folks, spoiler alert, I mean, the NASDAQ and the Dow Jones, which we're obsessed with, they're basically just a litmus test for how the top 1 % are doing, who own 80 to 90 % of all outstanding equities.

45:59And guess what? They keep hitting record highs. Everything we do right now, I would say in America, and Trump to a certain extent encapsulates this, is how do we cut services from the bottom 99 such that we can provide more money and more opportunities for the top 1%. Yeah. To add to that, I saw the CBO releasing the data on the implications for the revenue we're going to collect with the cuts to the IRS, another$500 billion into the deficit. And guess who's not going to have to pay their taxes? The wealthy who can navigate around the system, who don't actually need to get an IRS agent on the phone.

46:36And I don't want to hear ever again from the right about the debt or the deficit. I'm just over it. If these tax cuts are going to go through, which is going to be trillions over several years, what is it, the 800 billion a year adding to the deficit and things like getting rid of the IRS so we can't even pretend that we're going to collect money from folks who are prone to tax cheat, just like save it. And Alan Simpson, who died last week, I was reading again about the Simpsons Bowls Commission. And like people would be laughed off the stage if they tried to do something like that again. And I mean, it didn't even work when they first tried it.

47:17But now I feel like it's just a massive joke that anyone is actually concerned about the deficit. Well, to your point about, and this is my favorite thing, taxes. Aren't you a hoot? I know. I'm fond of parties. But what other department do you give$1 to? and within a year they give it 12 back. And the Republicans don't want to claim that like they're harassing people. They're not harassing anyone. IRS agents are overworked and trying to figure out a way just to get people to pay the taxes they owe. And what happens when the tax code goes from 400 pages to 7 ,600? Those incremental 7 ,200 pages are there to fuck the middle class because what they are is full of all sorts of loopholes and Byzantine means of corporations in the top 1 % being able to engage in massive loopholes and tax avoidance.

48:01And when you have an IRS, AI will help, but AI will be able to start from the bottom and audit in a millionth of a second someone's fairly simple tax return, i.e. a middle-class household. Once you get to people who are in the top 1 % making$700 ,000 a year or have net worths of over$10 million, their tax returns purposefully get really complex. And you need highly skilled, well-resourced, and expensive groups of people to hold those people accountable. And this is what's happened with our tax code. It's created an incentive of the following, an incentive structure of the following. If you're really, really wealthy or you're a corporation, the incentive is to be absolutely as aggressive as possible.

48:49Because if you've got a parking meter in front of your house that costs 50 bucks, but the ticket is 10 bucks, you're going to break the law or you're going to be as aggressive as possible. And our current tax system, as it relates to the wealthiest Americans, basically incents them to be as aggressive as possible in terms of what they write off. Because A, probably there's no sheriff in town. There's a lack of agents. And B, even if the sheriff shows up, the penalties are fairly minimal. So the notion and then this trope that somehow the good people of the IRS are mean or harassing people. No, they're not.

49:32They're trying to make sure that people pay what they're supposed to pay, such that we can afford SNAP food payments and the Navy. So again, another example, cutting funding from the IRS. Who does that benefit the most? Cutting funding of the IRS. Does it benefit all taxpayers who are aggressive? No. It benefits the top 1%. Full stop. See above my unifying theory of everything, Jess. I do like that you've reduced it all to one short TED Talk. Break it down. That's why I'm here. All right, let's take one more quick break. Stay with us. In business, they say you can have better, cheaper, or faster, but you only get to pick two.

50:13What if you could have all three at the same time? That's exactly what Cohere, Thomson Reuters, and Specialized Bikes have since they upgraded to the next generation of the cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. OCI is the blazing fast platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs, where you can run any workload in a high availability, consistently high-performance environment, and spend less than you would with other clouds. How is it faster? OCI's block storage gives you more operations per second. Cheaper? OCI costs up to 50 % less for compute, 70 % less for storage, and 80 % less for networking.

50:54Better? In test after test, OCI customers report lower latency and higher bandwidth versus other clouds. This is the cloud built for AI and all your biggest workloads. Right now, with zero commitment, try OCI for free. Head to oracle.com slash vox. That's oracle.com slash vox.

51:17Mercury knows that to an entrepreneur, every financial move means more. An international wire means working with the best contractors on any continent. A credit card on day one means creating an ad campaign on day two. And a business loan means loading up on inventory for Black Friday. That's why Mercury offers banking that does more, all in one place, so that doing just about anything with your money feels effortless. Visit Mercury.com to learn more. Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank. Banking services provided through Choice Financial Group Column N.A. and Evolve Bank and Trust members FDIC.

51:55The pumpkin spice latte is back at Starbucks. Crafted with our signature espresso and real pumpkin sauce. Then topped with whipped cream, cinnamon, and nutmeg. The PSL. Get it while it's hot or iced. Only at Starbucks. Welcome back. I just want to call out. you are entering that stage with little kids where you are going to be, you're going to have a cold for about the next 10 years. Thank you. And I apologize to our listeners that I'm just like snotting through all of our conversations. It's crazy. We were at the pediatrician yesterday. The baby had crazy hives all over her body, but we thought it was, it's okay.

52:35Zyrtec, kid Zyrtec, fantastic. And she woke up without it, basically got rid of everything, but we thought it was hand, foot, and mouth, and I was having a meltdown. Did the boys ever have that? No, but their parents had a lot of meltdowns. It's really a, I think mothers, I think women may know this is going to happen. I don't think most dads realize the panic and stress you're going to feel when one of your kids is not doing well. I mean, something, God really does reach to your soul and turn on a switch that says, not only are you going to love this thing, but you are not going to be able to relax for a millisecond when your kid isn't doing well.

53:18The few times my kids have not have had a health issue. I mean, I remember when my son had a breathing issue or a respiratory issue and he would Google on this, I forget what we call it, a breathing mechanism that they would put medicine in it and he would breathe through this thing. And I was so freaked out that the medicine had gone bad and somehow I might be like, poisoning him. Yeah. You get so paranoid, so neurotic. And I'm not someone who, at least until the last few years, was ever neurotic, worried about anything. And then Ted Sarandon's wife wrote this book. And I love this statement that grief is the receipts for love.

53:54I think anxiety is the receipts for kids because, you know, you do get a lot of joy from them. But anyways, I feel for you because I never, ever anticipated the type of crazy stress. I mean, when your kid does break out in hives, there's no like, oh, it'll probably be fine. It's like, what the fuck? Get to the emergency room. Or even how you would treat yourself. Oh, yeah. Right? I'm like, eh, no, it's fine. I'll just go to work, right? Whatever. Man up. I'm like, he's big and strong. Everything's going to be fine. And then, you know, your little almost one-year-old has these huge splotches all over her and you're like running around the house like a crazy person like did you see this one did you see this one and you know anyway pediatricians are saints also and all the nurses that work there as well one of the lowest actually of course one of the lowest paid provider let's back to me did you know when i applied to ucla i thought i was going to be a pediatrician that's what i put in my application really yeah and then chemistry disavowed me of that when i got a d in it sent me from south campus to the north campus you would be such a weird pediatrician.

54:59Just your vibes. Thank you for that. I guess they would be different. I'm good with kids. I'm shockingly good with kids. Anyways, but it sent me from North Campus, I'm sorry, from South Campus to North Campus where the people were much hotter and the parties were much better than the South Campus. So everything worked out for you. Everything worked out. But I actually thought, I actually believed I was going to be a pediatrician for about a year. Anyways, before we go, we're getting clear insights into what happened in the 2024 election. Blue Rose research's analysis shows that key voter groups, including Hispanic, Asian, young, and disengaged voters, shifted towards Trump, mainly due to his perceived strength on economic issues, including inflation and the cost of living.

55:37Despite concerns over democracy, voters felt Trump was the better option. Now, with Trump's popularity dropping, the Democratic Party is left scrambling, unsure about their identity and next steps. The analysis reveals that if those who stayed at home had voted, Trump would have won the popular vote by almost five points. While Trump's favorability remained steady, Vice President Harris and the Democratic Party saw significant drops. And voters cared most about issues where Dems lost trust, like the economy and inflation, though they still trusted them more on health care. Jess, this is kind of your wheelhouse.

56:10Which findings from the Blue Rose data really caught your eye? Any surprises or patterns that stood out to you? I mean, the pattern that stands out to me is that it's real bleak. I was expecting at least something that felt like a sunny day. And it was all a torrential rainstorm of information coming down. I listened to David Shore on with Ezra Klein. And I don't know, I guess now because how prevalent podcasts are. And again, thank you to the listeners. It's great that you're paying attention to what we're talking about, like that that's the best way that I'm absorbing information at this point.

56:48And I was walking, listening to it. And I didn't actually shed a tear, but I felt my ducts start to activate as David Shore kept bringing out chart after chart and saying to him, like pointing at something and saying, you see this quadrant? We have nothing in this quadrant. And it was like the success quadrant, right, of the chart. Things that stuck out in particular, the idea of if we vote, we win is now over, is deeply problematic because I also don't want to become the party who wants folks to stay at home. Like that was always the Republicans thing. And now I guess it has to be our thing, because if we all vote, we lose and we lose by a lot.

57:33I mean, the idea that Republicans could win a popular vote by 4.8 percentage points didn't won the popular vote in 20 plus years anyway. But like, that's our thing, right? That folks turn out to vote and we do super well. So that's over. Everybody, please stay home.

57:52I'm just kidding. I'm not. We'll fix it and we'll make it so that we win back the voters. But that was deeply concerning. The one that really stood out, because I feel like it flies in the face of everything that we thought about the way Trump was campaigning and how people were receiving his message, was this change that Biden won the immigrant population vote by 27 points. And it looks like Trump won it by one this time. Like that level of sway. Yeah. Especially when the guy is out there, you know, they're eating the cats and the dogs. And, you know, Puerto Rico is just a floating island of garbage and all the xenophobia.

58:33And it didn't matter at all. And obviously, this is different amongst, you know, various immigrant populations. And we always know that there are more conservative groups like the Cubans, for instance, have always been that way. But it feels like we've been going through 20, 30 years of a particular political reality, and now it has been completely upended. And this idea that we are trying to, quote unquote, rebuild the Obama coalition has to go out the door. It is dead and buried at this point when you lose, you know, some polls, you know, 12 to 24 percentage points with Latino voters. You're not rebuilding anything, even if you get some of those folks back.

59:20So we have to do a full burn it down strategy that's really focused on attracting working class voters back of all races and ethnicities. but I don't know if we're going to win national elections again it's going to look wildly different and David Shore was pointing out that we did surprisingly well in the senate map and we had good candidates and they had bad candidates and that has been a feature of the Trump era that he goes and he backs people that can't win elections and we get lucky because of that like Ruben Gallego who we have on the podcast this week actually going to interview him he won in Arizona, where Trump won Arizona by five points.

1:00:02Now, he was running against Cary Lake. Are they going to run Cary Lake again? I don't think so. Or a Cary Lake adjacent type person. And a lot of that is for what the world looks like in a post-Trump era, you know, 2028 and beyond. But deeply concerning is how I felt. How did you feel looking at the data? Well, I love this stuff, but I like to bust the solutions. In my view, Even the poll is the problem with the Democratic Party's platform. And that is, in my view, how you get Latin voters back or Hispanic voters back is you stop talking about them. The way you get black voters back is you stop talking about them.

1:00:40And what do I mean by that? The Democratic Party has to make it verboten to continue to engage in identity politics. And they should focus on the economy through the lens of the middle class. there's been too much advantage crammed into the most the most advantaged group in america right now are non-white children of rich people because we have based affirmative action on race and our entire politics in the democratic party through identity and it made sense 20 40 60 years ago the academic gap between black and white 60 years ago double was double what it was between rich and poor, and now it has flipped.

1:01:20And the swing voters have one thing in mind. Swing voters have the economy in mind. And this is the opportunity because it's dynamic, meaning some cycles people see Democrats as better on the economy, some Republicans as better on the economy. And what the Democratic Party, in my view, needs to do is say, look, we are going to restore the middle class. The most prosperous nation in the world should have the following table stakes. Young people need the venues, opportunities, and means to meet someone, fall in love, and should they desire, own a home and have kids. So we're gonna have mandatory national service, more freshman seats, vocational programming, more interaction for less anxiety.

1:02:00We're gonna have 7 million manufactured homes in cool little areas that cost 30 to 50 % less than homes built on site. We're gonna make it affordable. We're gonna have low interest rate loans for anyone under the age of 40. We're gonna have a tax holiday for anyone under the age of 30. We're going to have$25 an hour minimum wage. And if you don't want to get married and you don't want to have kids, fine. You can spend all that money on brunch and St. Bart's. But we are going to get out of this lens of trying to shove advantage and talk about the needs and the wants and the injustice of people based on their gender, their sexual orientation or their race.

1:02:34And we're just going to say we are here to reverse engineer everything we do to the following. The middle class in America and young people are going to have the opportunity to be able to have kids and have a home and live in relative prosperity. And these are the 8, 10, 12 programs. And stop rolling out every special interest group, which all it says to the 24 % of people that don't qualify for a democratic special interest group, that we're not going to discriminate against you. We're about the poor and the middle class rising up. That's it. That's your only identity politics. Because even these polls are like, how do we get Hispanics back?

1:03:11No, you don't want Hispanics back. You want the middle class back and you want to stop telling people you should vote for me because you're Hispanic and I'm better for you. Hispanics don't want you to talk about them as a group. Try and group Mexican-Americans in Los Angeles into the same group as Cuban-Americans in Florida. They have entirely different priorities. and the notion that the daughter of a Taiwanese private equity billionaire needs affirmative action is just fucking stupid. All of our programs should be focused on color, specifically money. If you don't have money in America, you need more.

1:03:46And corporations and the top 1 % should be paying a lot more. Lowest taxes in history for corporations since 1939, 25 wealthiest Americans paying an average tax rate of 6%. And everything that has happened over the last 30 years is an attempt to cram more money into the top 1 % of corporations. But for God's sakes, get away from these polls and this discussion of how do we get black voters back? No, how do you get the middle class back? Stop the identity politics. I want to agree with something and then I want to disagree with something. So definitely color green, most important, 91 % of voters said cost of living was their top issue.

1:04:23There's an argument to be made that incumbents lost all over the globe. And Kamala Harris was also an incumbent. She was Biden-Harris administration. And as an interesting corollary, Mike Donilon, who's top advisor to Joe Biden, was speaking about what happened in the election. And he said it was crazy that they pushed Biden out. I think that the party went insane. And we all thought that that was crazy, right? Like that we breathe new life into the campaign, getting Kamala out there. and we would have lost by, you know, Trump could have won 400 electoral votes if it had been Biden. But the way that favorability ended when we went into Election Day, Kamala was negative six and Biden was plus six.

1:05:07Now, would that have drifted down further had he stayed the candidate? Possibly. But it was interesting. David Jor kind of entertained the premise that Mike Donilon wasn't insane. On the identity politics front, I agree with you in general. I'm not mad about the idea that we move away from having all of these special interests conversations. But you used Black voters, for instance, where Kamala Harris was trying really hard to just have an agenda for all Americans. Her best testing ads were ones that appealed to everybody in the lower and middle classes. She wasn't necessarily going after the wealthy voters.

1:05:43She said, you know, you'll just come with me. And that is what ended up happening. But then she had to go and do a town hall with Charlemagne on the Breakfast Club for Black men. She had to release an agenda for Black men because she was hearing from all of her key stakeholders that Black men in particular didn't think that she had any proposals specifically focused on them. So what do you do about that when you're trying to run a general campaign where the economy is your central issue. These are the kind of policies that I'm implementing to help you. I want to build more housing. I want to go after price gouging.

1:06:21Those hugely popular policies. And yet a target demo comes back to you and says, well, what's in it for me? You haven't told me specifically with my name on it, like the black man agenda. What do you do? I think you have your sister soldier moment. And I say, you grow the fuck up. I'm not here to play identity politics. I'm here for young people. Programs to focus on young people would right now disproportionately impact and benefit young men who are struggling. It would disproportionately impact young men of color who are really struggling. And look, Democrats need to come out of the closet and acknowledge the following data and truth in America.

1:07:02And that's the following. You would rather be born today, and this is a victory we should celebrate. You'd rather be born today non-white or gay than poor. And that's great. That's a sign of our victory. So who are we going to help? We're going to help the poor, and we're going to help young people. And by the way, the way you calm special interest groups down who are used to Democrats showing up and pandering to them is you say, folks, do the math. There's a 70 % overlap between many of the special interest groups who count on the Democratic Party to represent them and poor and middle-income households.

1:07:45As MLK said, if you don't bring along the white poor, you're never going to make that much progress because it creates resentment. It also creates accidental racism where when you're at a school or anywhere, you immediately look at someone left and right and think, okay, did they get in? 54 % of gay men are attending college. it's 38 % of straight men. I mean, at some point, we just have to acknowledge the data and be the party of the middle class instead of rolling out every special interest group and having Michelle Obama, who I adore, go, who's going to tell them this might be a black job. That is not helpful.

1:08:20That is not helpful. And the only people that don't parade on stage are young men, when they're, in fact, are the ones who have probably fallen further faster than anyone. So get away from the identity politics. The discussion around how we get back Hispanics is only going to alienate more Hispanics. It's to say we've made tremendous progress. We are here to lift people up who are poor and make sure the middle class is the most prosperous middle class living in the most prosperous country in the world. And here are a series of programs. And if you want me to talk about what goodies you get because of the color of your skin or your sexual orientation, or whether you have indoor or outdoor plumbing, other than protecting a woman's rights to family planning, I'm not going to engage in that conversation.

1:09:01I'm here for the middle class, full stop. I think that message really resonates. It gets a lot of moderates back in the fold, and it gets the white poor back in the fold. And I think a lot of non-whites are absolutely ready to have that conversation. They're sick of being categorized and taken for granted that I'll vote for Democratic because you're going to throw more goodies at me because of the color of my skin. Or that the other side is racist. They don't think that anymore. No. And Trump can point to a bunch of data from 16 to 20 that non-whites actually did okay during his administration.

1:09:35Now, granted, it was all debt-fueled, which is a tax on young people, but that's the argument. We've got to stop these deficits. They're going to fuck our children in 10, 20, 40 years. It doesn't matter what color you are, what sexual orientation. If we keep running up deficits, you're all going to be fucked. That's the argument. Now that's a sexy message. Right. That's not a bumper sticker, is it? Yeah, I can see that. That's perfect for Galloway 2032. We sold out the Y. We sold out the Y. Oh, my God. I'm so excited about that. I keep rubbing it in Kara Swisher's face. I don't know if you heard.

1:10:09I know. I can also hear Pivot. It is publicly available. I'm like, I don't know if you heard, but me and the much younger Jess Harloff sold out the 90-second Y in about three minutes. I'm like, we've never done that, have we, Kara? Well, in Kara's defense, apparently you're not open to doing these things. You don't want to go to Paris with her. So I'm going to go to Paris with her. There you go. Actually, now all of a sudden I feel a little threatened and a little jealous. Do you? Yeah. I think you guys, yeah, that's an interesting thought. Don't get any ideas. Remember who discovered you. All right.

1:10:42That's all for this episode. Actually, I think Rupert Murdoch discovered you. All right. That's all for this episode. Thank you for listening to Raging Moderates. Our producers are David Toledo and Chinenye Onike. Our technical director is Drew Burrows. You can now find Raging Moderates on its own feed every Tuesday. That's right. What a thrill. Its own feed. Folks, we're doing great, but we need you to subscribe to our own feed so we can hit certain benchmarks and bring in the big advertisers. That means exclusive interviews with sharp political minds. You won't hear anywhere else if you subscribe to our distinct feed.

1:11:16This week, Jess will be talking with Senator Gallego. Make sure you follow us wherever you get your podcasts so you don't miss an episode. Jess, I'm glad that your little girl is doing just fine. And again, I don't know if you've heard, we're doing an event in the 92nd Y and we're sold out. I heard something. I also heard we're sold out. We are. We're sold out. Thanks, everybody. Support for this show comes from Airbus. It took 100 years for electric vehicles to catch on. Modern solar panels? Half a century. Lithium batteries? Decades to go from their debut to daily use. It's a pattern. Energy tech breaks through, stalls, and then something tips the scales.

1:11:57But for every success, there are even more almosts. So what if there was a breakthrough sitting at this crossroads right now? SAF, or sustainable aviation fuel, could forever change the future of flight. Learn more about how Airbus is contributing to accelerate this journey at fly.airbus.com slash the flight path.

1:12:40on innovation. Time's running out. Claim one of the last few spots at daily.com slash VA25 before the checkered flag waves.