Raging Moderates: Trump's "Forgettable" State of the Union

25 Feb 2026 · 46 min · 17 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: Raging Moderates - Trump's "Forgettable" State of the Union

Episode Overview In this episode of *Raging Moderates*, hosts Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov analyze Donald Trump’s lengthy State of the Union address, touted as the longest in history. They discuss the contrasting narratives presented in the speech, the Democrats' response, and the implications of Trump's foreign policy remarks, especially regarding Iran and his relationship with military technology firms like Anthropic.

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Trump's State of the Union Address
  2. Length and Content: Trump delivered a lengthy speech filled with political attacks rather than substantial new policies. Key moments included:
  3. Claims of an economic boom and a “golden age” America despite public sentiment indicating otherwise.
  4. Criticism of Democrats and the Supreme Court's tariff ruling.
  5. Mixed messages on Iran, implying diplomacy while leaving the door open to military actions.
  6. Reception: Fact-checkers flagged multiple inaccuracies in Trump's claims. A notable line that generated reactions was, “we're winning so much that we really don't know what to do about it.”
  1. Democratic Response
  2. Unity but Division: The Democrats showcased a unified front against Trump, highlighted by Abigail Spanberger’s rebuttal focusing on affordability and corruption. However, there are internal divisions regarding strategy as they head into the midterms.
  3. Protests and Atmosphere: Protests occurred inside and outside the chamber, reflecting the contentious political climate.
  1. Key Moments of Analysis
  2. Bipartisanship and Celebration of Sports: A moment of bipartisan applause occurred when Trump recognized the U.S. Olympic hockey team, which Galloway criticized for diminishing the achievements of the women’s hockey team.
  3. Role Modeling: Galloway expressed concern about Trump’s influence as a role model for young men, particularly in how he portrays masculinity and the treatment of women.
  4. Perception vs. Reality: Both hosts noted a disconnect between Trump’s depiction of America’s success and the reality experienced by voters, especially independents.
  1. Foreign Policy Implications
  2. Discussion of Trump's foreign policy was considered lackluster, particularly in terms of supporting Ukraine on the anniversary of Russia's invasion.
  3. Concerns over Trump's approach were raised, suggesting he was not addressing the urgency of U.S. military engagement in foreign conflicts.
  1. AI and Military Technology
  2. The episode concluded with a discussion of the Pentagon's ultimatum to Anthropic regarding military use restrictions on its AI technology. The hosts debated the implications of government intervention in private companies' operational decisions.
  3. Galloway expressed alarm over the potential for the government to dictate how technology firms operate, framing it as a dangerous overreach that contradicts capitalist principles.

Key Takeaways

  • Trump's Speech: While it was politically charged and filled with inaccuracies, it did not significantly alter the political landscape or Trump's approval ratings.
  • Democratic Strategy: The party must navigate internal divisions while presenting a united front against Trump, utilizing effective messaging and public engagement strategies.
  • Military and Technology Relationship: The episode highlighted the ongoing tension between government interests and private sector autonomy in AI development, signaling a critical debate on the future of military technology.

Conclusion The episode provides a thoughtful critique of contemporary political discourse, emphasizing the disparity between political rhetoric and the lived experiences of American voters, while also addressing the ethical implications of government involvement in technology development. Galloway and Tarlov's insights offer a nuanced understanding of the current political and technological landscape.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Analyzing Trump's State of the Union Address

0:45 to 2:39

Discussing the highlights and false claims made during Trump's speech.

“Trump delivered the longest State of the Union in history during the speech he portrayed in America that is booming and secure, despite slipping poll numbers on the economy and immigration.”

Key Moment: Winning Too Much?

2:39 to 3:08

Highlighting Trump's absurd claim about America winning too much.

“I am sick of not winning when it comes to the economy, immigration enforcement, etc.”

Bipartisan Moments and Hockey Celebrations

3:08 to 4:25

The hosts discuss Trump's mention of the hockey team and its implications.

“It was nice to see everybody on their feet at once.”

The Role of Women in Sports and Society

4:25 to 7:21

Discussing the diminishing comments towards women in sports and its impact.

“One, just on a pragmatic level, for pure optics, if I was running comms for the White House, which I will never be asked to.”

Cultural Impact of Trump's Leadership

7:21 to 8:16

Examining the implications of Trump's behavior as a role model for young men.

“So there's certain things, cultural references, role models that get cemented into your brain when you're a teenager.”

Reactions to Trump's Speech and Its Impact

8:16 to 12:39

Analyzing how Trump's speech may have been perceived versus what was expected.

“They could have said, okay, they should have celebrated with both teams.”

Foreign Policy and the State of the Union

12:39 to 14:02

Discussing the foreign policy aspects and shortcomings of the speech.

“But I think he came out of this no worse relative to his poll numbers, no worse.”

Analysis of Trump's State of the Union Address

14:02 to 18:13

Discusses the impact and shortcomings of Trump's State of the Union address.

“The foreign policy section was a bit blah to me.”

Economic Insights Post-State of the Union

18:13 to 21:52

Explores the economic narrative presented by Trump and its implications.

“But it is very clear that Donald Trump is not capable of listening to his strategists, which I think is a very good thing for Democrats.”

Democratic Messaging and State of the Union Reactions

25:01 to 28:00

Analyzes the Democratic response and messaging in reaction to Trump's address.

“Is the president working to keep Americans safe, both at home and abroad?”
Show all 17 chapters

Reimagining the Democratic Response to the State of the Union

28:00 to 31:15

Explore the idea of transforming the Democratic response into a more engaging spectacle.

“And most of what he's done is not illegal.”

The Importance of Presentation in Politics

31:15 to 33:52

Discuss the significance of presentation and substance in political responses.

“I think that the imagery, you know, she's in front of the drapes, Colonial Williamsburg, et cetera.”

Fact-Checking Trump's Economic Claims

33:52 to 34:31

Learn about the inaccuracies in Trump's claims regarding the economy during his address.

“But just before we take our break here, just some actual fact-checked data.”

The Pentagon's Clash with Anthropic

35:56 to 40:59

Analyze the Pentagon's overreach regarding AI regulations and corporate control.

“Anthropic says it wants safeguards against mass surveillance and autonomous weapons without human oversight.”

The Future of AI and Government Intervention

40:59 to 42:02

Discuss the implications of government intervention in AI technologies and the ethical considerations involved.

“It's another notch on the state-run capitalism belt.”

Ethics of Tech and National Security

42:02 to 43:36

Explore the responsibilities tech companies have in relation to government requests and national security.

“Anthropic is like, well, let's have a conversation about what you're going to be doing with our tech.”

Corporate Decisions and Government Influence

43:37 to 45:28

Discuss the implications of corporate stances on government relationships and public perception.

“But, you know, the DOD doesn't understand what they are asking of Anthropic or what they are threatening Anthropic with is beyond me.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Jessica Tarlov:When things get hard, how do you talk to yourself? I'm Rabin Arson, VP of Fitness Programming and Head Instructor at Peloton, and this week on my new podcast, Project Swagger, I'm sharing my strategies for how to build better self-talk. It's time to work on befriending yourself. Follow Project Swagger wherever you get your podcasts.

0:25Scott Galloway:Welcome to Raging Moderates. I'm Scott Galloway.

0:27Jessica Tarlov:And I'm Jessica Tarlov.

0:28Scott Galloway:In today's episode of Raging Moderates, we're discussing Trump's many lies during the State of the Union Address, the Democrats' fractured response, and Secretary Huxley's ultimatum to Anthropic over military use restrictions. If you aren't already, please make sure you subscribe to our YouTube page to get up-to-date coverage on everything that's happening. All right, let's get into it. Trump delivered the longest State of the Union in history during the speech he portrayed in America that is booming and secure, despite slipping poll numbers on the economy and immigration. He defended his agenda, blasted Democrats, criticized the Supreme Court's tariff ruling, and announced a new war on fraud led by J.D.

1:06Scott Galloway:Vance. Oh, God. Insert snarky comment. The speech offered few new policies and plenty of political attacks, with fact-checkers unsurprisingly flagging multiple false claims. There weren't many viral moments, but this one is making the rounds. Our country is winning again. In fact, we're winning so much that we really don't know what to do about it. People are asking me, please, please, please, Mr. President, we're winning too much. We can't take it anymore. We're not used to winning in our country until you came along. We're just always losing, but now we're winning too much. And I say, no, no, no, you're going to win again.

1:47Scott Galloway:You're going to win big. You're going to win bigger than ever. And to prove that point, to prove that point, here with us tonight is a group of winners who just made the entire nation proud. The men's gold medal Olympic hockey team.

2:05Jessica Tarlov:Come on in.

2:06Scott Galloway:Jess, are you sick of winning? I, not when it comes to hockey.

2:11Jessica Tarlov:I'm really happy about the men's hockey teams win and the women's hockey teams win. And, you know, I have weighed in on the controversy over, you know, Kash Patel and the chugging beers and Trump's horribly sexist joke. And he said that the women are coming, but that does that has not been confirmed by the women's side. But so I am not sick of American athletic excellence, especially on the global stage. I love that. I am sick of not winning when it comes to the economy, immigration enforcement, etc. And I was watching research groups do dials during these things. And they have Republicans and Democrats and independents hooked up to these dials to see how their sentiment tracks.

2:59Jessica Tarlov:And when Donald Trump talks about winning, golden age, tariffs, economy, it plummets, especially with independents. So he's not winning that way. But hockey was good. What did you think of that moment? It was bipartisan. It was nice to see everybody on their feet at once. We did not have a lot of that throughout the evening.

3:21Scott Galloway:So I felt, I grew up going to hockey games with my father. It was one of the few places we bonded. I went to the Kings games at the Great Western Forum in Los Angeles. My father, after, let's talk about me, Jess. I wanted to.

3:35Jessica Tarlov:So, honestly, it took you too long to get here. Yeah.

3:39Scott Galloway:It's good to be here, isn't it? When my parents split up, my dad had no idea what to do with me. So, we used to go to hockey games or I would go with him and watch him play golf. And so, I grew up Whitey Whiting, Marcel Dion, Rogie Vachon, people who have probably, like, died 30 years ago. But I love hockey and I have some appreciation for it. And I think they missed such—I was just really triggered by a couple things. One, the president's comments diminishing women and the U.S. women's hockey team in the midst of a celebration. I just think it so cheapens America and the Olympics. I mean, it's just wrong on so many levels.

4:25Scott Galloway:One, just on a pragmatic level, for pure optics, if I was running comms for the White House, which I will never be asked to. The opportunity for them would have been to have a cabinet member or Kash Patel go celebrate with the women. The women won eight of the 12 golds at this Olympics were won by women. And this guy just sends such a wrong message to young men. And people, and all that, he made them look bad because they said, oh, these, now all the courageous keyboard people with their purity tests are saying these young men are jerks. You're in a locker room celebrating and the president tries to be funny, you laugh.

5:08Scott Galloway:And there was even one of the hockey players said two for two, highlighting immediately that the women had won. But this notion that somehow masculinity or that leadership involves diminishing women or putting them on a lower rung, that is just such an unhealthy way to portray America and for young men to perceive that. And also just on a pure athletic level, the final goal or the winning goal in overtime by Megan Keller for the women's U.S. team to win the gold, that was, in my view, arguably one of the two or three most outstanding moments of the Olympics. If you know anything about hockey, to see the move that Ms.

5:56Scott Galloway:Keller put on the Canadian to put herself in a position to score that goal, that was just—that was one of the great moments in hockey. In addition, the women's team, these are women that are probably going to go back to being lawyers and doctors. I don't know much about the professional women's hockey league, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't pay a lot. Whereas all the dudes, all these 23 and 25-year-olds from Wisconsin, they're making millions of dollars. So it was just tactically a stupid thing to do. They could have really burnished their image by celebrating with the women and the men. It sets exactly the wrong message about what is this notion that somehow masculinity is diminishing women and establishing dominance.

6:37Scott Galloway:And if you're really serious about partying and celebrating, you party and celebrate with the men, but not the women. So anyways, in an effort, my never-ending effort to Virtue Signal, we're doing an event in Minneapolis. And we invited, we're trying to get as many women from the women's hockey team there. But I just thought this was just so, like, fucking stupid. And it reminds me or comes back to something that really haunts me when I think about it. And that is, if you're a 21-year-old male, since the age of 10, the dominant figure in your life as a role model has been President Trump. And what kind of role model is that setting as a young man goes through puberty and gets his brain wired?

7:21Scott Galloway:And, you know, the music, like I love R.E.M., English Beat, and Tom Petty, and Lloyd Cole and the Commotions because of the greatest artists ever, and also George Michael, but also because I was 19 when I listened to them. So there's certain things, cultural references, role models that get cemented into your brain when you're a teenager. And the idea that this type of image, this type of behavior that's supposed to coming from who is the leader of the free world around this dominance. I don't want to call it misogyny because that's hatred of women and I don't think that's fair here. The general sexism and weirdness and smallness, I just think it's so destructive.

8:01Scott Galloway:It cements in the eyes of the world everything that's bad about this current president. Anyways, I was triggered as someone who thinks they understand hockey. And it's like, it's just such a, it was just so fucking stupid of them. They could have said, okay, they should have celebrated with both teams. I just don't.

8:20Jessica Tarlov:Yeah.

8:21Scott Galloway:Anyways, I'm focused on hockey.

8:23Jessica Tarlov:No, you're not. I mean, it's, no, it's a larger issue as it relates to Trump. And there were parts of the speech where the same kind of use of people as props came up again. He turned it into an awards ceremony. And I'm all for people who deserve Purple Hearts getting them, Medals of Honor, etc. But they were the kickoff to the theme for the night, which is Donald Trump is the one who loves America most. Donald Trump is the one who loves our troops. and Democrats are demonic. And, you know, I think that I totally get why it's exciting. This is the last thing I want to say about the hockey team situation.

9:09Jessica Tarlov:It's exciting to win gold, to go to Miami, party, to get to go on an Air Force One, go to the White House, come to the State of the Union. Everyone is obsessed with you, etc. But there are pictures now of several of the members of the team wearing Trump merch. And if they thought that they were going to make this apolitical, right, that this is about being American and celebrating your country, and then you're wearing Make America Great Again hat, or even the USA hats that are his ones, you know, like it's a distinctive font and look. I think that that damages your reputation. And it's been interesting to read some of the analyses of, you know, the players who didn't go, several of whom are from Minnesota, or the folks who are going to have to go home to Canada, who play for teams north of the border, who are not only, you know, licking their wounds because they were rooting for Canada, obviously, but are in a position where Mark Carney has had to steer the country away from a partnership with America as a result of these kind of useless threats of aggression, not only through economic policy, but through force sometimes.

10:27Jessica Tarlov:So it's much more complicated than just, oh, we're really excited about the gold medal. But I did think it was a good moment of the speech.

10:34Scott Galloway:Well, I would argue on the whole versus expectations that he actually did neutral to better than expected. I thought, yeah, because I think everyone was waiting for him to really fuck up. And there was a couple of moments where, quite frankly, he probably created the contrast visually he wanted to create. And that is when, you know, he tried to trap the Democrats by saying, stand up now if you believe. He didn't try to.

10:59Jessica Tarlov:He did try the Democrats.

11:01Scott Galloway:And I was thinking if I was a Democratic congressperson, I'm not sure how I would have responded there. And then he forced them to stand up and applaud for the, you know, the medal ceremony. I don't I think a lot of us on the left were expecting him to just be a rambling idiot. And granted, he was rambling, but I don't I think it it came across like, OK, this is a 30 trillion dollar startup and this was the earnings call. and you have, you know, effectively, it felt like sort of patriotic B-roll, standing ovations as if we're at the Duma or in North Korea. That's the thing that rattled me the most was this over-the-top civic entry from the Republican congresspeople who, I mean, do they really like what he's saying or are they worried they're going to be shot politically?

11:52Scott Galloway:You know, half the chamber clapping as if the GOP kind of just texted them back and the other half sitting on their hands like they're shorting democracy, so to speak, or shorting this administration. I was waiting for sort of him to throw up on himself. I thought he came across as more robust than most near 80-year-olds. I mean, I'm trying to be a critical thinker here and screen through my biases. The stuff I just can't stand is the lack of fact-checking and, you know,$18 trillion in new investment. Okay, what are you talking about? It is some of it, lowest inflation. He used inflation numbers that were incorrect.

12:35Scott Galloway:So the amount of -

12:36Jessica Tarlov:Jobs numbers that were incorrect, gas numbers that were incorrect.

12:39Scott Galloway:Yeah, that was crazy. But I think he came out of this no worse relative to his poll numbers, no worse. The first 30, it was like an act, it was like a thing in three acts. It was the first act was trying to be somewhat presidential. Then the second act was now I'm going to start insulting the Democrats. And then he tried to, I think, kind of wind it down a little bit in the third act. But quite frankly, I think it's a bit of a non-event. I think we'll be talking about something 48 hours later. I was hoping to hear something more definitive about Iran other than saying we save people from being hanged.

13:15Scott Galloway:Well, OK, you inspired people. You gave them sort of this promise that you were there for them. And I do believe that we're actually going in in some fashion or bombing, but I was hoping to get more definitive, I don't know, a more definitive plan from him around, you know, if, why, and how we plan to go and, you know, what our approach is to Iran. But then again, maybe he's planning to do it sooner rather than later and didn't want to reveal anything. What are your thoughts, Jess?

13:44Jessica Tarlov:Well, that's what happened when he bombed Fordow, right? Yeah. He said it could happen the next couple of weeks and then it happened, what, within 24 hours. But he didn't make the case to the American people about it. And the American people, no matter how they vote, do not want to go into war in the Middle East. That is the common denominator now across the Republican Democrats and independents. The foreign policy section was a bit blah to me. Disappointing that on the four-year anniversary of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, he did not say we stand with you. Which I was reading some reporting. That's what Zelensky wanted to see.

14:23Jessica Tarlov:He didn't expect we're going to be sending the tomahawks that you desperately want. But he wanted to at least hear we got you and did not get that. He just said, I want to end this. You know, I'm the peace president. And those eight bullshit wars.

14:37Scott Galloway:I want to end it on Russia's terms is what that means.

14:40Jessica Tarlov:President Putin has an idea of how he'd like this to go. And I don't really mind if we go that way. I agree with you. Like this is a blip and state of the unions have become a blip. Generally speaking, President Biden's last one mattered because it was the proof of life video. So that took on a higher level of importance or salience than it would typically. But also with how quickly the news cycle is moving and how Trump does things. I would expect if we were recording this pod tomorrow, it would be the third topic, right, that we would just touch on it versus the lead. I do want to note CNN always does a snap poll of State of the Union watchers.

15:22Jessica Tarlov:It skews towards the party in power. So an extra 13 percentage points to the Republicans. Trump only got a 38 percent very positive reaction, lower than Biden in 2022, who got 41 percent. Trump in 2018 at 48 percent. Obama 2010 at 48 percent. Bush, I mean, it makes sense. It was just after 9-11 and the invasion had become 74 percent very positive in 2002. I cannot even think of an event that would unify us like that. What I think is most important about this, and there were focus groups of swing voters that were largely reflective of what I'm about to say, is that Donald Trump had one assignment, which was to make us believe that he knows the reality on the ground.

16:13Jessica Tarlov:And there was a big meeting with GOP strategists, Tony Fabrizio, Chris LaCivita, James Blair, where they were briefing the Republicans on the midterm strategy. And they laid out a pretty normal approach, which is don't tell people that their lived reality is fake. Don't do what the Democrats did. Big mistakes, right? Bragging about your GDP numbers and wages, et cetera, when people are struggling. And then they admitted in that meeting that Donald Trump was going to go out there and do whatever he wanted. And it would essentially be a bifurcated strategy. There'd be what Trump is doing and what you should be doing on the ground.

16:49Jessica Tarlov:And so they were correct. They know their guy, but it's really bad that he came out there swinging with the greatest hits. And there was not one moment of, I feel your pain, we have more work to do, etc. et cetera. And for swing voters, independents, left-leaning moderates, moderate Republicans, et cetera, all the people that are bringing his approval rating down into the high 30s, they didn't get anything out of this. There was very few new policies that he announced. I mean, he went over the Trump savings account, which we already knew about, talking about, you know, Michael Dell's investment, et cetera.

17:29Jessica Tarlov:He talked about Trump Rx, which is not nearly what he says it is. He had this new thing that I hadn't heard about with the retirement savings accounts, but that actually is a program that was implemented in 2022 that they're planning on just tweaking. So there was no, you know, sorry, I should say no tax on tips was in there, no tax on Social Security, but really that's just like a$6 ,000 credit for seniors that expires in You know, the fine print obviously tells the details of all this. Democrats, the DNC had the best fundraising day of the cycle, third best of all time with all digital ads created around the state of the union.

Read the full transcript

18:12Jessica Tarlov:I don't think the state of play changes as a result of this. But it is very clear that Donald Trump is not capable of listening to his strategists, which I think is a very good thing for Democrats.

18:24Scott Galloway:Yeah, it felt, I see everything through the lens of the markets. It felt like a quarterly earnings call for a company that's trying to convince us that fundamentals are strong while quietly guiding expectations. Lower sort of this rhetoric of the economy is resilient, manufacturing is booming, inflation is easing. And by the way, I felt like the subtext was take your glasses off when you're looking at your grocery bill. Just, you know, ignore that.

18:50Jessica Tarlov:I want to ask you about the market, because he talked about, you know, the Dow hitting 50 ,000, Pam Bondi's favorite line. But the rest of the world, their market is doing better than ours. But we never talk about that.

19:06Scott Galloway:That's a great point. Of the 21 Western markets or whatever it is, I think we're 20th. The KOSPI, the South Korean market was up 72 % last year. Almost every market in Europe, including the U.K., was up substantially more than the S &P. And also, if you take into account that the dollar is down on average about 10 % against foreign currencies, the S &P has dramatically underperformed the rest of the Western world over the last 13 months. So that headline up 17 % last number feels good. But in the context of the weakening dollar and how other markets have performed, it's not. We're the, you know.

19:47Jessica Tarlov:It's just New Zealand and Denmark below us.

19:50Scott Galloway:Is that right? Yeah. And everybody else is substantially above us.

19:54Jessica Tarlov:Let's go to Austria. Now I'm talking. Spain, Finland, Ireland. Market on fire there.

20:01Scott Galloway:There you go. And then you've had, you know, this isn't kind of our ballywick, but the markets have been very strange recently with private capital, business development companies shitting the bed, a trade out of AI into what's called halo companies, which are defensive stocks versus AI. But the economy right now, I think you'd have to say it's grinding on and is better than people thought. And the catastrophizing hasn't manifested yet. But it does feel kind of, it does feel weak and it's definitely not, definitely not what he's talking about. And the thing that no one wants to have an adult conversation about, you know, I wish there was just some sort of chyron that could run like, okay, we're spending$7 trillion on$5 trillion in receipts.

20:49Scott Galloway:It's just not, that's just not sustainable unless you're planning to inflate our way out of this deficit. it. And I didn't see that his State of the Union, I would say it was an attempt in all caps to provide reassurances, but there was really no new ideas. I was in bed before this thing came on, but he teased it with some with an off the record preview with some journalists. And they said that he was going to propose new tax cuts. And I was really interested to see what is he thinking?

21:19Jessica Tarlov:The corporate tax cuts. Yeah, it wasn't in there.

21:21Scott Galloway:And I didn't hear anything. So I don't know if at the last minute they said, you realize like we're still spending 40 percent more than we're taking in. This is not the time to talk about tax cuts and that the bond market might go fucking apeshit if they see that we're not going to be able to pay our debts back if we keep this level of kind of irresponsible spending. So I would love to see more than an exaggeration of the State of the Union. You know, and I'm a technocrat. I would like to see a State of the Spreadsheet. Okay, let's take a quick break. Stay with us.

21:56Jessica Tarlov:Support for this show comes from Prolon. We all have healthy habits we wish we could stick to. Keyword is wish. Because you can wish all you want, but you won't see results without a plan. Prolon's five-day fasting mimicking diet is a real plan. It's a revolutionary plant-based nutrition program that nourishes the body while keeping it in a fasting state. It's a simple, science-backed way to turn intentions into action, so you can stay focused and see results you can actually build on throughout the year. The Mimicking Diet is based on more than two decades of research developed with USC's Longevity Institute.

22:28Jessica Tarlov:Prolon has been shown to support fat-focused weight loss, energy, metabolic health, skin appearance, and more. With Prolon, you get everything you need prepackaged and ready to go. Each kit comes with five boxes labeled by day so you know what to eat each day. No guest work or planning required, which is a relief during busy work weeks. Right now, Prolon is offering our listeners 15 % off their five-day nutrition program for your post-holiday glow-up when you go to prolon.com slash profg. That's P-R-O-L-O-N life, L-I-F-E, dot com slash profg for 15 % off. Prolonlife.com slash profg.

23:11Jessica Tarlov:This is advertiser content brought to you by Stonyfield Organic. Our cows, them going out to pasture, they love it. They're so excited to go out. Every day, they wait right at the door. In fact, we milk them and we just open up the laneway and let them just go right out to pasture. I'm Rhonda Miller Goodrich, and I'm a dairy farmer in Cabot, Vermont. Our farm is Molly Brook Farm. We're an organic dairy farm, and we are a supplier to Stonyfield. Molly Brook Farm has been in my husband's family since 1835. We started our organic transition in 2015. We had 53 acres of corn ground, and of course we had to use herbicides and pesticides, and the soil was dead, really, for all intents and purposes.

23:59Jessica Tarlov:We stopped growing corn and stopped using herbicides and pesticides, and we seeded that down to perennial grasses. After that, we began to see biodiversity in that soil again. To be organic certified, our cows need to be in pasture at least 120 days. I think the organic practices really benefit our animals. You know, having good feed, good water, a nice light area, that's what's important to us and that's what's important to Stonyfield. Visit stonyfield.com to find Stonyfield Organic Yogurt near you.

25:00Scott Galloway:EU und Großbritannien bis Ende 2026.

25:30Jessica Tarlov:affordable for you and your family? Is the president working to keep Americans safe, both at home and abroad? Is the president working for you? So that number two question about is the president working to keep Americans safe, both at home and abroad? She might get a response for people say, yeah, I think that he is right for people who are immigration hawks. That border is shut. It is sealed. Right. And, you know, I believe that he wants to protect Americans who are abroad. He talked about, you know, bringing hostages home, which I did think was a big foreign policy win. And I loved hearing about both the alive and dead hostages who were being held in Gaza being returned.

26:12Jessica Tarlov:But I thought that she really just kind of got to the regular discussions that we're all having in life, whether you're grabbing coffee with someone or it's your family dinner table. She emphasized Trump's corruption a ton and the personal enrichment, saying Republicans are making your life harder. They're making your life more expensive. And they're even making it more difficult to see a doctor, which is the opening for Democrats to talk about health care, which is always a good issue for us. But you're seeing this corruption theme popping up absolutely everywhere. You know, every Democrat worth their salt is talking about this.

26:49Jessica Tarlov:and it's resonant with the American people, whether, you know, you're thinking he's protecting himself from the Epstein files or he's making$4 billion off of various deals. I mean, there's an expectation now that Donald Trump is not taking a meeting with anybody who can't line his pockets. And I love to see that out front in Democratic messaging. So those were my Spanberger thoughts. Did you catch any bit of her rebuttal or how did you feel also generally about how Democrats behaved, I guess, during the State of the Union.

27:22Scott Galloway:I'm really torn here because I don't know if when my blood sugar gets to a certain level, I'm like, they should be more disruptive. But at the same time, I don't want to become that nation where it becomes standard. One of the real mistakes or declines of the American experiment has been that we, over the last 50 years, have transferred more and more power to the president, believing that norms would hold. and they have for the most part until this president who has said, well, I don't need Congress. I can raise tariffs and because the Supreme Court is slow and, you know, is packed with my people, I can basically ignore co-equal branches of government.

28:01Scott Galloway:And most of what he's done is not illegal. It's just a violation of norms that presidents, Republican and Democrat have held to. So it's, you know, I was trying to summarize to a friend what the State of the Union was. And it felt to me like a kind of a 90-minute or 100-minute LinkedIn post, you know? Economy strong, inflation cooling, jobs booming.

28:25Jessica Tarlov:With like rocket ships and star emojis next to various lines.

28:29Scott Galloway:Yeah, it was, I had a, and I'm anonymous name dropping. I had a Democratic senator who's listed as a presidential candidate call me and say, what ideas do you have around the State of the Union? And I didn't know, I'm struggling with if the Democrats should be more disruptive or just maintain a certain decorum that befits the prestige America has around the world. But my idea was the following, and I want to get your response. I would hire Jay-Z, his rock nation, the people who do the halftime show, to be in charge, and I would spend some money on the Democratic response. Because it's always like a big fucking thud.

29:10Scott Galloway:It's always sort of like, oh, we're drinking and then we move to water. It's just it is very hard to match the majesty of the rotunda and the intensity. And ladies and gentlemen, I would pack I would find a venue. I would pack it with 5000 rabid Democrats. I'd have star power, punchlines, moments. I would make it what the halftime show is to the Super Bowl. I would make the Democratic response because they have the content and the substance. She was outstanding. What they lacked was the production values and the majesty of the rotunda. And you can buy that with money. So this senator laughed at that.

29:49Scott Galloway:I'm like, I'm serious. Take 10 million bucks. You'll raise money and put on a halftime. The halftime show used to be an afterthought or just not, you know, people went and got a beer during the Super Bowl. Now it's oftentimes more viewed. What was that great stat? that there was a water shortage in Brooklyn right after the halftime show ended, which meant no one was peeing or going to the bathroom during the halftime show. People were fixated by it. I think that the Democrats would be well-served to try and turn the Democratic response into a more awesome, cool, entertaining spectacle because it always feels like...

30:33Scott Galloway:She did... It's the worst job in the world. Look at what, you know, remember when Rubio did his, it's just so difficult. The little water bottle? Yeah, the whole thing. But I thought in terms of substance, these female former intelligence officials, they just are a fantastic contrast. So I thought she did a fantastic job. I think the Democrats arguably did their job by elevating somebody to the national stage. She was probably going to be a player at some point. And so I give it, you know, I give it an eight out of 10, but the Democrats need to go more Hollywood on the response.

31:09Jessica Tarlov:All right. So if it was Spanberger plus Beyonce, we really would have nailed it. 100%. How about this? Because I think we can do both. I think that the imagery, you know, she's in front of the drapes, Colonial Williamsburg, et cetera. You know, Abigail Spanberger is a very serious person. Yeah. She is a, you know, a person of great substance. And I think that we should have, since this year, we did have a ton of counter-programming. You know, a lot of Democrats didn't go. There were a lot of empty seats. You could feel that in the chamber, these big gaps. I'm not sure I'm mad about it because to your point about decorum or tradition, it's all over.

31:55Jessica Tarlov:Like, even people who love these institutions and, you know, yearn for a time where everybody would show up for each other and be polite have accepted the fact that we are irrevocably broken when it comes to our politics. and we have to be devious and as Mitch McConnell about it as possible to just win as many seats so that we can get through policies that will benefit the largest amount of Americans. That's it. Like none of this playing games, like just I'm kind of stab me in the front, right? And not in the back anymore. So I'm cool with it. If you don't want to go to the State of the Union, you want to do the counter-programming.

32:39Jessica Tarlov:Midas Touch had a huge thing. There were speeches that were being given outdoors from people in the pro-democracy movement, elected officials who weren't there, etc. I think that we could have had Spanberger plus the Roc Nation event. And that would have also indicated to people, maybe not even making it that heavy on politics, but just saying, like, we're going to have a party that has democratic norms in mind. I'm workshopping this. I don't know how that invitation goes. But where especially with young people who don't want to sit around listening to long speeches, they don't really want to sit around listening to fuck Trump, which is what from what I saw a lot of what people were saying.

33:23Jessica Tarlov:And so I think that you could have both. Right. Like you could have a good hang and you could have the serious weight of an Abigail Spanberger just won this enormous victory. And you could have both. I want everything.

33:35Scott Galloway:Yeah. And I would make it a response. I would spend the first 10 minutes talking about how corrupt he is in this criminal gang and how this is a failed talk show host who's enriching himself at your expense. But then I would immediately move into really bold, big ideas. But just before we take our break here, just some actual fact-checked data. The unemployment rate now is at 4.3%. A year ago, wrapping up Biden's last month, it was 4%. The job growth over the previous year in January of 25 was one point one and a quarter million. Job growth over the last year has been 360 ,000. Core inflation is now three percent and core inflation last year at this time under Biden was 2.8 percent.

34:22Scott Galloway:So on nearly every metric that he quoted, he was incorrect. And if you actually fact checked it, it doesn't it doesn't paint a good picture. OK, let's take a quick break. Stay with us. What are the main takeaways of the foreign policy section from Donald Trump's State of the Union address? I do think they've made a decision to elevate domestic issues as we head towards the midterms. We'll see if that sticks because he keeps getting drawn back to the foreign policy issues. I'm John Feiner. And I'm Jake Sullivan. And we're the hosts of The Long Game, a weekly national security podcast. This week, we'll react to President Trump's State of the Union address, the situation with Iran, and the eruption of violence involving cartels in Mexico.

35:05Scott Galloway:The episode's out now. Search for and follow The Long Game wherever you get your podcasts.

35:11Jessica Tarlov:This week on Net Worth and Chill, I'm joined by Her First 100K, a.k.a. Tori Dunlop, a fellow personal finance creator who's changing how an entire generation thinks about money. Tori's journey is a masterclass in turning personal finance wins into a platform that empowers millions. She opens up about the real strategy behind hitting that six-figure milestone without the typical privileged blind advice and how she's redefining what it means to be a wealthy woman in 2026. We're diving deep into investment strategies for real people with real budgets and why financial feminism isn't just a buzzword, it's a movement.

35:44Jessica Tarlov:Get ready for an unfiltered conversation about money, entrepreneurship, and what it really takes to build both personal wealth and a business empire. Listen wherever you get your podcasts or watch on youtube.com slash you're rich BFF.

35:56Scott Galloway:Welcome back. Before we go, the Pentagon is escalating its clash with AI firm Anthropic, issuing an ultimatum that could force the company to lift restrictions on how the military uses its technology or risk being labeled supply chain threat. Secretary Hegseth has warned that he may invoke the Defense Production Act if Anthropic refuses to allow its model to be used for any lawful military purpose, effectively forcing the software company to comply, where the Pentagon threatens that it will cancel Anthropic's government contracts. Anthropic says it wants safeguards against mass surveillance and autonomous weapons without human oversight.

36:26Scott Galloway:The Pentagon argues contractors can't dictate battlefield use. Jess, I have a lot of thoughts on this, but first I want to get your thoughts.

36:34Jessica Tarlov:No, I want your thoughts first. I mean, because I'm in a very dark, scary place about this, and you certainly know more about it than I do. So you go first, and then I shall respond.

36:47Scott Galloway:I think you're being generous. The reason we've recognized such unbelievable prosperity, one of the reasons in America that we've recognized, the best performing organization in the world is U.S. military. A close second is the U.S. corporation. We've added more shareholder value in the last 17 years than all of Europe has added since World War II. One company, NVIDIA, is worth more than every publicly traded company in Germany and in Spain. Anthropic, the company at hand here, was founded six years ago. And if it was founded in Europe, it would have been one of the 10 most valuable companies in Europe.

37:25Scott Galloway:So obviously that's about access to capital, a risk culture, great universities. But it's also about a limited amount of regulation. So let me talk, let me sound like a Republican. But when I say a limited amount of regulation, you don't have failed talk show hosts deciding which industries and which companies should be acquired by which companies, who they should or should not put on their boards, if we should take a interest in U.S. steel or have input into chip manufacturers such as Intel. The idea is neither President Obama and especially President Trump have any fucking idea how to build a company better than the full-body contact violence of capitalism and a regulated competitive market where the president and to the extent possible regulators and bureaucrats stay the fuck out of the private sector.

38:17Scott Galloway:When the UK decided that DeLorean was the car of the future, you ended up with tens of thousands of unsold cars in a storage facility in Ireland. When companies decide, there's certain strategic reasons why you might want to ensure you protect your steel industry so we can always build battleships. But weighing in on what a company can or cannot do in terms of its own policies, which they're doing here with Anthropic, is like saying you should remove certain board members and call them racists. Oh, they did that with Susan Rice at Netflix. By the way, famous racist Susan Rice calling her a racist.

38:53Jessica Tarlov:Yeah, she posts eight videos all the time. That makes sense.

38:56Scott Galloway:Right. So whether it's a Democrat, let me sound like a Republican. One of the reasons we've had such extraordinary growth and prosperity is we err on the side of lighter regulation, which includes less government interference and not some fucking narcissist who's a rich kid. who if he'd invested his father's daddy's money and the S &P would be much wealthier now and is grifting off the American public to try and increase his wealth. That is not the person, nor do you want any regulator or any bureaucrat or any cabinet member telling companies how to run their business. And just as Josh Hawley has his head up his ass and basically the Ellisons using him as a coin-operated senator to accuse Netflix of having half their children's content infused with LGBTQ content, which is total fucking nonsense, a private company, whether it's Netflix or Anthropic, are allowed to do pretty much whatever the fuck they want.

39:54Scott Galloway:And if Anthropic and LLM says, you know, we have decided we don't want to work with companies who may be engaged in massive surveillance of its own citizens, they get to make that decision. And if Netflix were to ever decide we want to have a bunch of LGBTQ kids or content in our kids programming, which they don't, that is their right. And if Fox wants to have a show called The Five where they have four people spewing traif and to have one person pushing back on them, they're allowed to do that too. So this socialist, communist, Duma-like, autocratic notion that the government and the Pentagon get to start telling companies how to behave and what their policies are is the exact opposite of the reason and the theme and Republican ideals, which I respect, that the private markets are much smarter and much better at creating shareholder value, which we then tax such that we can protect our nations and offer kids food stamps.

40:53Scott Galloway:So this is directly in opposition to everything we know about what works in the private markets. Anyway, speech over. Your thoughts.

41:01Jessica Tarlov:It's another notch on the state-run capitalism belt. That's generous, I mean, versus this just being a straight-up communist proposal, essentially, or threat. I think that Anthropoc has until Friday to decide what they're going to do about it before the government unleashes on them. And we know how terrible that can be if you are on the other side of the desires of the U.S. government, no matter who's in charge. But it feels like an enormous overstep. And when you read about Anthropik's response and you see also, I'm sure you've been noticing the spate of interviews that people who have worked at these enormously powerful and influential AI companies have been doing, saying how scared they are about where the technology is going and that we are so close to the point where we're going to have no control.

42:01Jessica Tarlov:over the code, the robots, however you want to say it, that you can understand why the head of Anthropic is like, well, let's have a conversation about what you're going to be doing with our tech. We don't want mass surveillance of Americans. The Fourth Amendment still does matter to some people. And then these autonomous weapons. And I'm not saying that the Department of Defense has to turn over all of their plans to a private company. But if you want to use their tech, you have some responsibility to be above board about what you're going to do with it and probably to have some sort of relationship in managing it.

42:41Jessica Tarlov:I mean, over the years, there has been an enormous amount of brain drain out of the government for a whole host of reasons. But I always think about, remember the San Bernardino terrorist attack when they couldn't get into the iPhone, right, of the shooter.

42:56Scott Galloway:Oh, yeah, they couldn't unlock it. Right.

42:57Jessica Tarlov:And the government was like, well, what are we going to do? And they had to beg Apple to work with them in order to do this. And it was a national security reason, et cetera. And there was a big conversation, obviously, about protecting people's rights and that they don't want their reputation out there that they are going to go into your phone, right? Now, this guy was a murderer. It's a little bit different than if you left your phone on the subway and someone picked it up. But there's a balance that these companies have to strike. And a lot of them were founded on core American principles to some degree, including, I don't know, core American principle of capitalism.

43:35Jessica Tarlov:I'm not sure about that. But, you know, the DOD doesn't understand what they are asking of Anthropic or what they are threatening Anthropic with is beyond me. And I saw a lot of people posting this, journalists who are writing about this standoff between the Pentagon and Anthropic saying in a normal news cycle, this would be the lead story everywhere. I mean, the implications for this are so massive. And because we're being inundated with so much news constantly, like this is a blip. I bet if I walked outside right now, I'm going to leave here to walk out and I'm going to go up to work. I bet if I asked 10 people on the street, maybe one, maybe would know about this story and what's going on.

44:18Jessica Tarlov:And that's really scary to me.

44:20Scott Galloway:So when back in the Biden administration, when people decided to be like what I call cheap hipster wokesters, and that is I'm working at Google. I'm making$400 ,000 a year, and I decided that the Defense Department is bad, and so I'm going to walk out during lunch. I'm like, okay, that'll show them. Palantir, to their credit, zigged when everyone was zagging and saying, we're proud to work with the U.S. government, and we want to help them track and kill bad guys. And it was kind of a brilliant move. They wrapped themselves in the flag and said, we're going to work with our Defense Department.

44:57Scott Galloway:Underworld did the same thing. We're going to produce weapons. We're going to bring some of the Silicon Valley innovation and speed and agility to help the good guys. And we are the good guys. I think – and they have the right to do that. If you don't want to work there, you don't want to buy their stock, you don't like Chick-fil-A, don't eat at Chick-fil-A. But at the same time, if the people at your organization and your shareholders and your board said, you know, this administration in our view has taken a lot of license with the Constitution and is potentially involved in violating people's privacy.

45:27Scott Galloway:and we don't want to participate. That, just as Andrel and Palantir have the right to work with the defense department, Anthropic has the right not to work with the defense department. So this, again, is government overreach intervention. It's a cross between socialism and autocracy, and it is always bad for the economy. Firms get to decide if and who they work with. Before we go, if you're watching us on YouTube, make sure you hit subscribe. That's all for this episode. Thanks for listening to Raging Moderates.

From the publisher

Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov break down Trump’s marathon State of the Union — the longest in history — and the alternate reality he painted of a “golden age” America, even as most voters say the country is on the wrong track. They dig into the speech’s biggest moments: the attacks on Democrats, the swipe at the Supreme Court over tariffs, and Trump’s mixed message on Iran — diplomacy, but with the door wide open to military action. Did the speech help him? And are we actually edging toward war? Then, the Democratic split screen. From Abigail Spanberger’s affordability-focused rebuttal to protests inside and outside the chamber — the party showed unity in opposition to Trump, but real divisions on strategy heading into the midterms. Finally, the Pentagon’s escalating clash with AI firm Anthropic. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is threatening to invoke the Defense Production Act unless the company lifts restrictions on how its models can be used by the military.

Follow Jessica Tarlov, @JessicaTarlov. 

Follow Prof G, @profgalloway.

Follow Raging Moderates, @RagingModeratesPod.

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@RagingModerates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

All 879 episodes
Raging Moderates: Trump's "Forgettable" State of the UnionThe Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway · 46 min
Listen in VO