The Crackdown on Free Speech, How to Handle a Bad Boss, and Why Scott Took Down His AI Clone

24 Oct 2025 · 18 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway - Episode Summary

Episode Title

The Crackdown on Free Speech, How to Handle a Bad Boss, and Why Scott Took Down His AI Clone

Episode Overview In this episode, Scott Galloway addresses listener questions concerning the rise of free speech arrests in the UK, strategies for navigating difficult relationships with bosses, and the implications of AI acting as a substitute for human therapists.

---

Key Discussions

  1. The State of Free Speech in the UK
  2. Listener Question: Concerns about arrests for social media posts in the UK.
  3. Response:
  4. Approximately 12,000 individuals are detained annually in the UK for online speech offenses.
  5. The existing laws (Malicious Communications Act and Communications Act) are seen as outdated and overly broad.
  6. Scott argues:
  7. The hallmark of democracy is the ability to express differing opinions.
  8. Free speech should err on the side of allowing offensive statements, but platforms should be held accountable for elevating harmful content.
  9. Advocates for reforming Section 230 protections to ensure social media platforms adhere to standards akin to traditional media.
  1. Navigating Work Dynamics with a Difficult Boss
  2. Listener Question: Seeking advice on dealing with a new manager perceived as having it out for the listener.
  3. Response:
  4. Scott suggests:
  5. Maintain strong performance to demonstrate value.
  6. Consider having an open and honest conversation with the manager to address perceived biases.
  7. Keep options open for moving under a different manager if the situation does not improve.
  8. Acknowledge that navigating challenging work relationships is a common, albeit frustrating, experience.
  1. The Role of AI in Mental Health and Relationships
  2. Listener Question: Concerns about a partner using AI for relationship advice and the implications of AI on mental health.
  3. Response:
  4. Scott shares insights from personal experience with AI and its potential overreach:
  5. Noted a significant number of users engage AI for therapy in the context of a shortage of licensed therapists.
  6. Expressed concern that reliance on AI could lead to isolation and inability to form real-world relationships.
  7. Emphasized the importance of human relationships for mental health and personal growth, warning against AI replacing genuine human interaction.
  8. Mentioned that he took down his own AI character due to discomfort with its implications on real-world relationships.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Free Speech: A robust democracy requires tolerance of offensive speech; however, accountability for platforms is essential to maintain a healthy discourse.
  • Workplace Relationships: Open communication and performance are key to navigating difficult management dynamics; consider long-term career implications and opportunities.
  • AI in Mental Health: While AI offers accessibility in mental health support, it is crucial to maintain human connections for emotional well-being and personal growth.

---

Conclusion Scott Galloway's reflections in this episode reveal a deep engagement with pressing social issues and personal dilemmas. His emphasis on the balance between free speech rights, professional integrity, and the role of technology in human relationships prompts listeners to critically evaluate their contexts and choices in both personal and professional domains.

---

For more insights, you can submit questions for future episodes via email or Reddit, and tune into “The Prof G Pod” for further discussions blending business acumen with life advice.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Support for the show comes from Crucible Moments, a podcast from Sequoia Capital. Every exceptional company story is defined by those high stake moments that risk the business but can lead to greatness. That's what Crucible Moments is all about. Hosted by Sequoia Capital's managing partner, Rolif Bota, Crucible Moments is returning for a brand new season, and they're kicking things off with episodes on Zipline and Bolt, two companies with surprising paths to success. Crucible Moments is out now and available everywhere you get your podcasts and at cruciblemoments.com. Listen to Crucible Moments today.

1:00Thank you. Rinse takes your laundry and hand delivers it to your door, expertly cleaned and folded. So you could take the time once spent folding and sorting and waiting to finally pursue a whole new version of you. Like tea time you. Mmm. Or this tea time you. Or even this tea time you. So did you hear about Dave? Or even tea time, tea time, tea time you. Mmm. So update on Dave. It's up to you. We'll take the laundry. Rinse. It's time to be great.

1:37Welcome to Office Hours of Prop G. This is the part of the show where we answer questions about business, big tech, entrepreneurship, and whatever else is on your mind. If you'd like to submit a question for next time, you can send a voice recording to Office Hours of Prop G Media. Again, that's officehoursofpropgmedia.com or post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit and we just might feature it in our next episode. First question. Our first question comes from user Armadillo Can on Reddit. They say, Hey Scott, with the pressure on free speech in the U.S. lately and you living in the U.K., what are your thoughts on people getting arrested in the U.K.

2:11for social media posts? So around 12 ,000 people a year are detained in Britain for online speech-related offenses. That's more than 30 arrests a day under the 1988 Malicious Communications Act and the 2003 Communications Act. Under these laws, it's a crime to send messages deemed grossly offensive, indecent, obscene, or intended to cause distress or anxiety. The original laws were written before social media and are widely seen as outdated. One clause written to stop nuisance callers is now being used to monitor private WhatsApp messages, since there is technically no concept of a private a conversation online in English law.

2:47Okay. So I am blissfully ignorant of UK politics. I see that Joey Bagot donuts idiot, Nigel Farage, who scored the biggest own goal in history with Brexit. And then I hear about non-DOM where theoretically it makes sense to charge people who are moved here for tax avoidance, increasing their taxes. But guess what? 10 ,000 of them have left and your treasury is going to be smaller now. And you know what? I mostly don't care. I'm here sort of as an extended tourist, and I like the break of not thinking about politics every fucking minute, which I do anyways, because unfortunately I have the internet and I see the shit show dissent into fascism that is the United States.

3:30Okay. I generally think the hallmark of a democracy is that almost anyone should be able to say almost anything about almost anybody. In the U.S., there's some laws you can't defame somebody. You can't say that somebody is a pedophile when you know they're not or there's no information that they are, which decreases or harms their ability to make a living. That's defamation. You also can't incent violence. You can't spread rumors saying, oh, so-and-so is the head of a rape gang and this is his address, and if people show up and harm that person, and that was a false statement, and you incited violence, you know, yelling fire in a theater, that's wrong.

4:1499.9 % of speech does not qualify as that. Saying offensive things online, I don't think, in my view, that warrants a police response, even if it's ugly, even if it's vile. Now, having said that, I think 90 % of the problem, what's the problem? The problem is it tears at the fabric of a society. This weekend, I got very upset. Someone said something so wrong, false, and incorrect, and just mean about me. And if you didn't know me, you would have taken this teaspoon of propaganda and turned it into a tsunami of bullshit lies. You would have thought, wow, what a bad person this guy is. And I wanted to weigh in.

4:58Of course, you don't want to weigh in because that's what the algorithms want. but I believe they should have the right to say that. Now, having said that, where I think 90 % of the problem goes away is that if the platforms where all this shit is taking place no longer are protected by Section 230 for algorithmically elevated content, I think 90 % of it goes away if we just hold these platforms to the same standards we hold the BBC or the Times of London. So what is the answer here? I believe that free speech is a function of when people are allowed to say really offensive, fucking stupid things.

5:38And falsehoods. You can circulate conspiracy theories because sometimes the conspiracy theory ends up being right. What you shouldn't be able to do is that if somebody says mRNA vaccines alter your DNA, which they do not, if the platform wants to elevate that content beyond its organic reach, then they should be subject to the same standards as traditional media companies. But where I ultimately net out on this is that I think you err on the side of free speech. Platforms shouldn't engage, shouldn't connect profit to elevating this stupid, false, and defamatory content beyond its organic reach.

6:20I think there are easier ways to reduce this while not encroaching on people's free speech rights. Thanks for the questions. Question number two comes from user don't care12345 on Reddit. They say, Scott, at the beginning of the year, I was moved out from under my long-term manager and mentor of five plus years due to an organization flattening. My new manager, I feel, has it out for me. For context, I have eight years of this company under my belt and I'm a strong performer, recently promoted about a year ago under my old manager. I punch above my weight with no history of performance issues.

6:55I feel my contributions are acknowledged from top to bottom. and am well-liked. Is there any way to successfully navigate these waters? I am in my 40s and still ambitious. I feel like I don't have the time to tread water under someone who isn't going to be my advocate. Oh my gosh, welcome to the work week. Your ability to navigate assholes or bosses or people who don't agree with you, or maybe they're right and you're the asshole, who knows. But your ability to navigate and learn from these issues is really important. I think there's a couple One, I think he continued to perform strong. And also at some point, I think the truth has a nice ring to it.

7:31I think it's okay to sit down with this person and say, I feel as if some of our interactions or the way you approach me, it feels biased and it feels unfair. and highlight in a very sober, unemotional way some examples of that and say, is there something I can do to improve this relationship? This job is important to me. I've been here a while. I like it. I want to succeed here. But I think important relationships need to be open and honest. And this is an important relationship. At the same time, keep your eyes out for an opportunity to move to another manager, right? I mean, if this is a dynamic situation and you're probably going to have another manager in a year.

8:12You may not even want to have that conversation. You just may want to suck it up. Everyone has a bad boss. That's the only, or at some point we'll have a bad boss. That's the only thing I can guarantee you in the corporate world is a series of injustices throughout your corporate life. And your ability to navigate them is kind of as important as doing a good job almost. So see if in fact, how long you're going to have to endure this. Consider having a very open, honest conversation with them. Make sure you have an open and honest conversation with them before you ever go to someone senior to them.

8:42Otherwise, they're really going to have a bias against you if you sort of go behind the back or tattle on them. Be honest and straightforward with them. I think people appreciate it. And if it's true, it will hit hard and they'll probably check back a little bit or reconsider. I don't think it's, if you're doing well after eight years, I don't think it's a bad idea to go market check and see what else is out there. People tend to advance further, faster, and make more money when they job switch every kind of five to seven years. But what you are going through is what I think almost everyone goes through at some point in their career.

9:12And the fact that you've been somewhere for eight years and have done well means that you're in a position of leverage because you've done well there for eight years. They don't want to lose you. And you have currency in the marketplace. Very much appreciate the question. We'll be right back after a quick break.

9:34Support for the show comes from Nutrafol. When it comes to hair issues like thinning or shedding, you want to choose a product that's been put through the paces. Nutrafol is the number one dermatologist recommended hair growth supplement brand, trusted by over one and a half million people. You can feel great about what you're putting into your body since Nutrafol hair growth supplements are backed by peer-reviewed studies and NSF content certified, the gold standard and third-party certification for supplements. Nutrafol clinically tests final formulations to ensure their efficacy using a variety of hair measurement tools, including hair counts and pull tests to assess growth, quality, shedding, and texture.

10:05And with a Nutrafol subscription, you can save up to 20%. See thicker, stronger, faster growing hair with less shedding in just three to six months with Nutrafol. For a limited time, Nutrafol is offering our listeners$10 off your first month's subscription and free shipping when you go to Nutrafol.com and enter the promo code PROFG. Find out why Nutrafol is the best-selling hair growth supplement brand at Nutrafol.com, spelled N-U-T-R-A-F-O-L.com, promo code PROFG. That's Nutrafol.com, promo code PROFG. Support for the show comes from Anthropic. Cloud is the AI belt for people who don't settle for good enough.

10:40It's not just a chatbot. It's a true collaborator that works with you, not instead of you. Whether you're debugging code late at night, drafting a client proposal, or mapping out your next big business move, Cloud helps you think deeper, sharper, and faster. Instead of handing you answers, it engages with your process, helping you reason through problems and uncover smarter solutions. What makes Cloud different is its ability to combine context and research in a way that actually saves time. Its internal and external research tools go far beyond basic search, delivering comprehensive, trustworthy analysis with citations you can share directly with clients or colleagues.

11:13Ready to tackle bigger problems? You can sign up for Cloud today and get 50 % off Cloud Pro when you use the link cloud.ai.propg. That's cloud.ai.propg right now for 50 % off your first three months of Cloud Pro. That includes access to all the features mentioned in today's episode, claude.ai.

12:07Thank you.

12:31pick and choose the products that best fill the gaps in your software stack. And right now you can get six months free when you go to rippling.com slash prop g. Learn more at r-i-p-p-l-i-n-g dot com slash prop g. That's rippling.com slash prop g for six months free. Terms and conditions apply.

12:55Welcome back. On to our final question, which is from Reddit user DC10-50, who says, Hi, Scott. I'm curious what insights you have into the emerging trend of AI's role in providing relationship advice or acting as a replacement for a human therapist. I recently discovered my partner of over 10 years engaging with ChatGPT as a way to seek help with an internal conflict she was facing. I'm concerned this addictive, godlike technology will drive people further into isolation and depression. How would you recommend bringing this up with my partner? oh my gosh, I'm dealing with this firsthand and I'll come back to that.

13:30So some data, OpenAI says ChatGPT now has nearly 700 million weekly users, more than 10 million people pay $20 a month for it. It's not clear how many are using it for mental health, but for a lot of people, it's become the easiest kind of support to access. Actually, I've heard the number one use is therapy. Important to note, the U.S. currently faces a widespread shortage of licensed therapists. So I have some personal experience with this. About a year and a half ago, I mean, it was two years ago. A guy came to us and said, I can build a prof AI on top of an LLM. Now, I get about 10 to 30 emails a day from mostly young men, sometimes their mothers, asking for advice.

14:11It's almost always professional or investment advice. And I got a very long, thoughtful email. And I think that's such a nice kid. I need to respond. And I can't. If I had 2 ,400 or not 20, if I had 72 hours in a day, I still couldn't get all these emails. So great. Built a Prof. AI. It ingested all of my blog posts, my books, my podcasts, my media experiences or appearances. And then it gave what was 70, 80 % of the answer I would give. And so I thought, this is great. It was used, I think, a couple hundred times a day. We ultimately decided it was an experiment. We took it down. And then a graduate student instructor came to me, or who was my TA at business school, who works at Google, super smart, impressive woman, came and said, we're doing something at Google Labs with characters, and we want to launch PropG AI.

15:02And we'll do a much better job than what you did. I said, great. They spent about six or eight months developing this thing, getting my voice, an avatar of me at right, et cetera, et cetera, and they launched it. Now, between the time I thought this was a good idea, about nine months ago and when it launched earlier this week, my view has entirely changed on this. And that is, I worry that these synthetic relationships are making us less mammalia, that they are sequestering us from each other. And that is, people are going down a rabbit hole and leaning on AI for things they typically lean on other humans for.

15:41and the idea that I had these kind of horror fantasies that I would read about some young man who hurt himself and he had sequestered from his parents and role models and teachers because he had a series of synthetic relationships and I don't wanna be on that list and I don't wanna participate. On a less evil level, but equally frightening for me is the idea that young men are gonna use synthetic relationships to replace real world relationships and that it reduces their mojo and motivation to establish a relationship with a coach, their dad, dad's friends, go to their friends with concerns. And I see a little of that happening, it sounds like, with your partner.

16:23So what do I think? I think a lot of it is age. I don't think anyone under the age of 18 should be allowed to enter into a synthetic relationship. I don't think they have the maturity to handle it. I think there's a lot of really horrific examples of self-harm where people thought they were in a relationship and that person or that synthetic relationship gave them permission to harm themselves, easy to sequester from friends. So I just hate synthetic relationships for anyone under the age of 18. I think that what I have found about when I go down a rabbit hole and start asking these things for advice on issues, they're way too supportive, empathetic, and don't give it to you kind of real.

17:02Don't say, oh, shut the fuck up, buck up, welcome to the real world. I think occasionally you need to hear that. And while it's important they're supportive, I don't know. I wonder if we're just going to become less depressed. And that is real victory comes from the complexity and difficulty and friction of real world relationships. It is difficult to establish or figure out or navigate the pecking order of friends and approach people and express friendship. It's hard to figure out the corporate bullshit you have to navigate and get good at it. It is really difficult to establish a romantic relationship with someone and maintain that type of commitment.

17:40People are messy, complex, and that is why it is so fucking rewarding, right? to figure out how to navigate all the bullshit at work and get promoted. It feels amazing to have a good group of friends and put up with their shit and they put up with yours. And you get to my age, I can't tell you how much joy I get from my friends. Even the ones I didn't get that much joy from when I was in my twenties, I just, I just get so much reward for them. And my God, figuring out a way to want to hang out with someone and make them feel loved and supported and make sure that they want to love and support you and figure out a way to have sex with them and then have kids with them and then support that kid.

18:22And so hard, right? So much friction. And when you figure it out, it is like the universe just says, all right, you matter. This all makes sense. You're here for a reason. So what I would do is I would have a very open and honest relationship and just say, look, using this as a resource is fine. Using it as a relationship is not cool and it's dangerous, it's dumb, and you're going to be more depressed. I genuinely think that. I would be wary of the fact that you don't want them going down a rabbit hole and deciding they're in a relationship with someone and start taking that advice over the advice of real world people who understand them, care about them, care about them enough to say, no, that's wrong.

19:09Or you're not thinking about this correctly. Or stop this. I love you. I'm worried about you. Thanks for the question. And by the way, I decided to take down my character AI after 12 hours. I just got increasingly uncomfortable with it. I want young men to figure out a way to engage with other men. That's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to officehours at propgmedia.com. Again, that's officehours at propgmedia.com. Or if you prefer to ask on Reddit, just post your question on the Scott Gallery subreddit, and we just might feature it in an upcoming episode.

19:50This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez. Our assistant producer is Laura Jannere. Drew Burrows is our technical director. Thank you for listening to the Prop G pod from Prop G Media.

20:05Next up is a little song from CarMax about selling a car your way. You want to sell those wheels. You want to get a CarMax instant offer. So fast. Want to take a sec to think about it. Or like a month. Want to keep tabs on that instant offer. With OfferWatch. Want to have CarMax pick it up from your driveway.

20:30So, want to drive? CarMax. Pickup not available everywhere. Restrictions and fee may apply.

From the publisher

Scott Galloway answers listener questions on the rise of free-speech arrests in the UK, navigating a toxic boss, and whether AI can (or should) act as a therapist.

Want to be featured in a future episode? Send a voice recording to officehours@profgmedia.com, or drop your question in the r/ScottGalloway subreddit.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway

All 879 episodes
The Crackdown on Free Speech, How to Handle a Bad Boss, and Why Scott Took Down His AI CloneThe Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway · 18 min
Listen in VO