In short
Rep. Jim Himes discusses “what comes after the Iran war,” focusing on the U.S.-Iran escalation, leverage around the Strait of Hormuz, likely next steps for nuclear negotiations, and broader implications for Israel, Ukraine, and U.S. politics.
Guest background
Jim Himes is U.S. Representative for Connecticut’s 4th District. He serves on the Intelligence Committee (ranking member mentioned) and has deep foreign affairs/Defense expertise; previously worked in investment banking at Goldman.
Key claims
- The Iran “memorandum of understanding” is “catastrophic” (more money than the 2015 Obama deal; legitimizes the regime) but is better than returning to war.
- The U.S. has little leverage because Iran can disrupt global energy via drones over the Strait of Hormuz.
- Intelligence did not predict regime collapse in Iran; Himes argues the president ignored consistent advice.
- Netanyahu is portrayed as pushing war under multiple presidents; U.S.-Israeli dynamics are also shaped by Gaza/Palestinian policy and younger American attitudes.
- Iran will likely seek a nuclear weapon over ~5 years once Strait leverage fades; Israel will do “everything” to prevent it.
Notable examples
- Direct U.S.-Iran strikes after the MOU; drone threats over Hormuz; mention of drone attack on a Singaporean ship.
- Iran enrichment cited: ~3.7% after JCPOA withdrawal; now ~60%, with Israel fearing 80–90%.
- Ukraine: Himes says Ukraine has shifted from defense to offense; Russians are losing manpower at a high rate.
- Politics: criticism of Bill Pulte’s DNI appointment; emphasis on affordability messaging and “actually doing” policy.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VODiscussion with Rep. Jim Himes on Iran
1:26 to 1:44
Rep. Himes discusses the current state of U.S.-Iran relations and implications.
“You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome?”
Discussion with Rep. Jim Himes on Iran
7:42 to 14:00
Rep. Himes discusses the current state of U.S.-Iran relations and implications.
“Representative for Connecticut's 4th Congressional District.”
Leadership and Intelligence Failures in War
14:00 to 27:42
Explore the failure of political leadership and intelligence during the Iran War.
“Maybe they didn't get it right enough, but that the president and the president's people ignored it.”
Leadership and Intelligence Failures in War
28:04 to 29:46
Explore the failure of political leadership and intelligence during the Iran War.
“If your business runs on five different apps, 12 browser tabs, and one spreadsheet that everyone's afraid to touch, it's probably time for Odoo.”
Leadership and Intelligence Failures in War
29:52 to 30:06
Explore the failure of political leadership and intelligence during the Iran War.
“That's I am number eight, H-E-A-L-T-H.com slash Prop G, code Prop G for a free welcome kit, five travel sachets plus 10 % off your order.”
Ukraine's Recent Victories
30:24 to 31:56
Understanding Ukraine's shift from defense to offense in its war efforts.
“On the other hand, there's such a spring in the step of most Ukrainians because they now understand that they're winning this thing.”
Putin's Position and Intelligence Concerns
31:56 to 34:34
Exploring the implications of recent appointments in U.S. intelligence.
“And again, I wouldn't tell you that anybody thinks that's a high probability thing, but it's certainly a heck of a lot higher now than it was a year ago.”
The State of the Intelligence Community
34:34 to 38:17
Discussing the current state and competence of the intelligence community.
“You've said it's, open quote, probably the worst appointment into the Intelligence Committee you've ever seen.”
Navigating Political Centrism
38:17 to 42:04
Examining the challenges and strategies of centrist politics today.
“who are studiously nonpolitical, and they're human, so they will from time to time respond to the incentives that come from the very top.”
The Importance of Majority in Politics
42:04 to 46:49
Learn about the significance of majority in political messaging and strategy.
“Um, but again, back to what I said before, I appreciate that these folks that are far to my left are saying, shut up about everything, except how are we going to make healthcare and housing less expensive?”
Show all 13 chapters
Jim Himes: From Banking to Public Service
48:07 to 56:00
Discover Jim Himes' journey from investment banking to serving in Congress.
“We're back with more from Representative Jim Himes.”
Reflections on Fatherhood and Time
56:07 to 1:00:41
Scott shares heartfelt reflections on his relationship with his son and the fleeting nature of time.
“representative for Connecticut's fourth congressional district, a seat he's held since 2009.”
The Importance of Planning Experiences
1:00:42 to 1:01:04
Scott emphasizes the importance of planning meaningful experiences with children before it's too late.
“and 12 to 18 just was over in an instant.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Scott Galloway:Support for the show comes from Odoo. Running a business shouldn't feel like surviving a software group project. One app for accounting, another for inventory, another for sales, and somehow, none of them talk to each other. That's where Odoo comes in. An all-in-one business management software that brings every part of your business together. From sales and accounting to inventory and marketing, all in one powerful platform. No messy integrations, no bouncing between tabs, and best of all, no spreadsheets. Stop managing software and start managing your business with one unified system. Try for free today at odoo.com slash prop g.
0:34Scott Galloway:That's O-D-O-O dot com slash prop g.
0:43Scott Galloway:Recommendations can be amazing. I mean, maybe someone recommended that TV show you've been obsessed with lately. But when it comes to home projects, it's different. If you don't like a show, you might lose a few minutes. If you hire a friend of a friend of a friend to fix a leaky ceiling, you could end up with a flooded kitchen. Maybe I know a guy just isn't enough for your home. That's why Thumbtack works so well. They'll match you with a top-rated local pro, and you can see photos of past work, credentials, and reviews all right in the app. For your next home project, try Thumbtack. Hire the right pro today.
1:23Scott Galloway:This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required compatibility and availability varies 18+.
1:50Scott Galloway:Episode 403. 403 is the area code serving the Canadian province of Alberta. In 2003, MySpace launched. When I was on MySpace, I used to get a lot of overtures from ladies asking me if I wanted to come over and blockbuster and chill. Go, go, go!
2:17Scott Galloway:Welcome to the fourth and third episode of the Prof G-Pod. I was just in Cannes. Cannes, Cannes. I used to go and actually work, meetings all day. There's something about being in Cannes where you feel as if you're in a room with people more important than you. It makes you more important. It's like you're the average of all the people around you. So when you go to Cannes, I used to try and get in rooms with people more important than me, which was basically any room. And something about being in the south of France, I would never go to Cannes for Cannes. I would never go to Lyons just for Lyons, but Cannes and Lyons together, that's chocolate and peanut butter.
2:49Scott Galloway:Now I just hole up at the hotel. I hire a guy, a Zodiac all week, who manages to drive a speedboat, a rubber speedboat, constantly smoking. I've never seen him light a cigarette, but it always seems to be smoking. Anyways, and I feel like James Bond, and I roll up and I crash. I'm like an American invading Normandy for the second time, minus the courage. And I was trying to roll up to Meta Beach, and I walked through the croissette with a flashing of a bird in the air. Whoa, aren't I a rebel? Oh my gosh. What an intense hero I am. Anyways, what did I notice about Cannes this year? Creator economy, pretty basic.
3:29Scott Galloway:It went from 400 people to 500 creators. It used to be that the creators were invited to the after party. Now they're hosting the after party. It's now more than half of marketing spend is on some sort of creator or influencer platform, whether it's YouTube or an individual showing you how to cook using, you know, whatever, Crisco. or how much fun it is to use whatever it might be. Other insight, AI has gone from being this magic trick to the plumbing. People are talking about the boring workflow and how you integrate AI and starting to talk about ROI. And there's also less fear around it. And that is there's a recognition that creativity is as in demand, maybe even more, because essentially creative or marketing is chip and salsa.
4:16Scott Galloway:You need a platform, you need the product, and then the salsa is the creativity and the design that makes it stand out. And AI can produce a bigger chip, but it's desperate for salsa. Remember Sora and how the first Coke ad that was all AI? That shit is just so fucking boring and anodyne that it doesn't break through or grab anyone's emotion. And if you think about AI, it takes everything to the median, which is the exact opposite of what creative is supposed to be. And as a percentage of their total employee base, tech firms now have more designers and more creatives than they did pre-AI. So I think there was a bit of a sigh of relief and an appreciation for creative 13 ,000 people from 90 different countries.
4:55Scott Galloway:Crazy expensive. Inflation. I'll come back to that. Let's talk about it now. About 12 ,000 new millionaires in the Bay Area because of the AI and space boom. Or as I call it, the douchebag wave or army that's about to descend on Europe this summer. If you're a 34-year-old and didn't have a lot of social capital in high school and you got a CS degree from Carnegie Mellon and then you wake up at the age of 34 after graduating, working your ass off, and you're worth$11 million, you're going to Ibiza. I'm going to Ibiza. Anyways, that's going to happen. And then the other thing, sports. When I first started going to Cannes, there was no sports.
5:30Scott Galloway:Now it's everywhere. Sports Beach, that's kind of the cultural religion. It's still the only programming that where you opt for the commercials. And I think World Cup is the biggest story playing out culturally and economically. Culturally, the world needed to feel better about itself. I would describe the World Cup as cousins who really like each other doing a sleepover without, despite the fact their parents keep arguing. And also what's happening on calcium poly market. I think we're going to find out that more gambling or more money was being wagered on the World Cup than any sporting event, anything in history.
6:05Scott Galloway:I think you're going to see that way more money was bet on the World Cup by young men, mostly young men, during the World Cup than was wagered in every gambling mecca, whether it's Macau or Vegas or Reno or Atlantic City. Anyways, why go to the casino when the casino is in your pocket? I think those are the biggest stories of what I took away from Cannes. And also just a recognition of, I still think, I think Europe's going to boom and boom. I think it's going to recover, I should say, in the next few years. And every time I'm in France, I look at the economics and I look at how hard it is to start a business.
6:40Scott Galloway:And then I end up spending a crazy amount of money just to be surrounded by that culture and that beauty. Something in the water there goes all the way back to the time of Marie Antoinette when essentially the head of the treasury said that their luxury goods, which they spent at peak 5 % of GDP, was going to be the equivalent of their Chilean gold mines. And that is, he saw that wigs and powders and makeup and incredible dresses were in fact going to be an economic engine. And it has been, whether it's Chanel or LVMH or Clarence. I mean, these companies are just absolute juggernauts. Ton of margin, ton of economic growth.
7:20Scott Galloway:Anyways, absolutely love Cannes. I don't know if there's any enormous overriding theme there other than I love just—my life has changed so much. It used to be getting up so early, trying to have as many meetings with people as possible. Now I wake up late and try to avoid meetings. I like that. Anyways, in today's episode, talk about an altitude shift, we speak with Representative Jim Himes, the U.S. Representative for Connecticut's 4th Congressional District. I really enjoy Representative Himes. I think he's fearless and very knowledgeable about foreign affairs and our Defense Department. He brings clarity to these issues, and I'm a big fan of Representative Himes.
8:02Scott Galloway:So with that, we hope you enjoy our conversation with Representative Jim Himes.
8:16Scott Galloway:Representative Himes, where does this podcast find you? I'm sitting in my office here in Washington. All right, let's bust right into it. We signed a memorandum with Iran two weeks ago, but this weekend the U.S. and Iran exchanged direct strikes. Iran hid Bahrain and Kuwait. The U.S. hit Iranian military targets, and Trump is now threatening that Iran will no longer exist if it continues. How would you describe the state of play here? Yeah, well, you know, this memorandum of understanding by any standard is a catastrophe. You know, it gives orders of magnitude more money to Iran than the Obama deal in 2015 did.
8:53It, you know, it empowers this regime. It recognizes this regime as the legitimate rulers of Iran. That has implications, obviously, for what the president told the people of Iran, which is that help was on the way and they should plan on rejecting those rulers. The one thing I can say about the Memorandum of Understanding, as catastrophic as it is, is that it's better than going back to war. which, of course, was crushing the global economy and causing, you know, people here in the States to pay a buck fifty a gallon more for gasoline. And look, the Iranians know that you quoted the president on his weekly threat to to obliterate Iran.
9:32The Iranians know that's a bluff. You know, they're savvy people. They understand the president's political imperatives and the fact that he's not going to go back to war. And so we find ourselves in a really tough spot, which is instead of fighting with the Iranians, which, you know, at least as a tactical matter, we can win. We're negotiating with the Iranians. And there's about 4000 years of Persian history to suggest that that's not a happy place to be.
9:58Scott Galloway:Do we have any leverage in these negotiations at all? Well, not really. At this point, the regime now knows they can survive the worst that we can throw at them. They now know something they didn't know a year ago, which is that they can control or at least have a profound impact on the global economy simply by flying a bunch of drones over the Strait of Hormuz. And what do we have? We can bloviate the way the president is. That has no impact. Or, yeah, we could go back to war. We could cause a lot more damage. We've kind of played that card twice in the last year, but that's the one card we have to play.
10:35But again, the Iranians know what that means. The Iranians know that that means a heightened risk that, you know, bodies are being unloaded from a transport aircraft at Dover Air Force Base, which is, you know, unacceptable to most Americans who despise this war, or that, you know, the all-important gasoline prices will once again skyrocket. So we, at this moment in time, we don't have a lot of leverage.
10:56Scott Galloway:So Trump promised or claimed that he would deliver unconditional surrender. And it feels like he's made good on that promise, but it's unconditional surrender on our part. I mean, aren't we coming out of this just much weaker and they're coming out of this much stronger? Well, I certainly agree with the second part. Again, you know, they always wondered whether we could knock over their regime. They always wondered whether the people of Iran would finally get angry enough to overthrow them. We know the answer to that question now. And the answer is no, that regime is not going to get overthrown or taken out by the United States or Israel.
11:33And again, they know that they, with minimal technology, can control the flow of energy and helium and fertilizer out the Strait of Hormuz. So they're obviously hugely empowered. You know, whether that weakens us, I don't know. That's a more complicated question. You know, all of the president's military adventures have shown how spectacular our military is. And I include Venezuela in that. That's got to cause pause amongst people like Vladimir Putin and, you know, President Xi in China. It is a slow bleeding, right? There's requests to the Congress for, you know, 80 billion additional dollars.
12:18That's dollars that didn't get spent on infrastructure or education. So it's probably a slow bleed associated with these crazy wars that we keep getting into in the Middle East. But I'm not sure it makes us obviously weaker the way our attacking NATO does. You know, when we attack NATO, Vladimir Putin says, huh, that's interesting. My chief objective of breaking up the Western alliance seems to be working. I'm not sure that that's happened in this case.
12:45Scott Galloway:You're on the Intelligence Committee. You're the ranking member on House Intelligence. So believing that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, that felt like a pretty big intelligence failure. Isn't the inability to predict what would happen with the Strait of Hormuz and effectively handing the IRGC what is arguably more powerful than a nuclear weapon, isn't this arguably one of the greatest intelligence failures in recent history? You know, I don't necessarily see it that way, Scott. And the reason I don't necessarily see it that way is because we see a syndrome similar to what happened with the George W.
13:24Bush, Dick Cheney administration. The intelligence was on, you know, on weapons of mass destruction back then in Iraq. The intelligence was at best ambivalent. In fact, if press reports are to be believed, four months ago, John Radcliffe, the director of CIA, told Trump flat out that the regime was not going to fall in Iran and that, you know, there would be very real dangers associated with them closing the Straits of Hormuz. So in both cases, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, and recently with Donald Trump, you could argue that the intelligence committee, sorry, the intelligence community didn't get it wrong.
14:04Maybe they didn't get it right enough, but that the president and the president's people ignored it. So I'd contrast the two examples you gave maybe with September 11th, 2001, where that was obviously a massive failure. You know, the information was all there. It just didn't get knit together in a way to allow us to prevent it. what we're talking about here is the most powerful man in the world either having a political agenda the way George W. Bush did or not being particularly interested in reality the way Donald Trump is not.
14:37Scott Galloway:And so you're saying it's a failure of leadership. You think the intelligence was there. It's just the president decided to ignore it. Yeah, I didn't. I didn't. And I look at an awful lot of intelligence. I didn't see a single bit of intelligence that suggested that the regime would crumble. In fact, much to the contrary. You know, our people were watching pretty closely when those protests were set off and ultimately the Iranians killed tens of thousands of Iranians. The intelligence did not in any way, shape or form suggest that this was a regime or a country that was just going to go belly up, you know, after a couple of bombs.
15:12So my guess is the president got pretty consistent advice to go a different direction and just simply ignored it. I think some people got in his ear and just said, you know, what you know you need to say to Donald Trump to persuade him, which is you will be the greatest leader since Napoleon if you end this regime and painted a picture of, you know, Trump as conquering hero and Trump towers being built in Shiraz and Tehran and that sort of thing.
15:40Scott Galloway:And let's talk a little bit about U.S.-Israeli relations. There's a feeling that, or among some people that Trump was co-opted into this war or that Netanyahu is now acting unilaterally. Can you give us sort of provide some color on the U.S.-Israeli relationship? Look, I don't think there's any doubt at all that Netanyahu, who is a very wily guy, probably the wiliest leader I have ever met, no doubt in my mind, and I wasn't in the Oval Office, but, you know, in the many hours they were speaking prior to the decision to go to war. No doubt in my mind that the prime minister was telling a little bit of that story of greatness and how quickly the regime would fall.
16:21Remember, the press reported that Netanyahu made that case and that John Radcliffe, DCIA, said, no, it's fantastical. Anyway, you know, I've watched now the prime minister try to get America to go to war under several presidents and none took him up on it. You know, Obama didn't, Biden didn't, Trump didn't in the first term. Well, this time, this time he did. And, you know, we're paying the price for that now. More broadly, because of Prime Minister Netanyahu's decision to cater entirely to the Republican Party in the United States, to disdain the Democratic Party, starting with when he showed up in Washington to argue in front of the Congress against the Iran deal that President Obama was negotiating.
17:09And the examples go on and on. But, you know, he was the first prime minister to decide that he would be partisan. And then, of course, more obviously, you know, the plight of the Palestinians has always been, for most people, kind of a slow burn issue. You know, I think most people and by most people, I mean, just, you know, folks that don't work inside the precincts of Washington, D.C., probably felt that, you know, the Palestinians have had a raw deal for some time, support Israel strongly the way there was a consensus in this country for a long time. But of course, a combination of the Gaza war with its tens of thousands of dead civilians, with its, you know, pulverization of all of the urban areas there, the treatment of the Palestinians in the West Bank, the brutal treatment of the Palestinians in the West Bank.
18:00And then, of course, the rhetoric of the more extreme members of the prime minister's government. I'm thinking of Smotrich and Ben Gavir here who openly call for the commission of war crimes. I think that turned a real corner for the way a lot of Americans, not just members of Congress, but certainly anybody under the age of 40 in this country, thinks about it. And if you're our generation, you know, you are more swayed by the story of survival, of the establishment of the state and the survival of the state in the most improbable circumstances than you are if you're 28 years old. And that seems like textbook history.
18:41So it feels as if you're an investment banker.
18:46Scott Galloway:I was an investment banker. Memo of understanding was a business term that one party would issue to another party, perhaps in the context of an acquisition. And I loosely estimate that somewhere between a third and 50 percent of memos of understanding actually resulted in a deal. I'd never seen that term used in a geopolitical context before. What do you think happens from here? Look, the MOU is what it is, right? It's a statement of intentions. It has no legal effect. And even something that did have a legal effect in this case would have all kinds of outs, right? And we're seeing that just turn on cable news, right?
19:25I mean, all weekend long, though we have a ceasefire, the U.S. and Iran were trading munitions. They attacked a whole bunch of our bases this weekend, and we undertook bombing raids along the strait there. So, you know, no legal effect. It's a statement of intentions that was very convenient for both parties, right? The president absolutely positively needs to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. And the Iranians obviously would love to get their hands on a whole lot of money. Now, the Iranians are starting to get their hands on a whole lot of money. The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz remains an open question, right?
19:59Every time I open up my Twitter feed, it's either closed or open, or they're saying it's closed or saying it's open. Behind this, of course, is two other huge things. The nuclear negotiations, right? I remember watching Obama and his, you know, merry band of two dozen experts negotiating this thing. It's hugely complicated. And, you know, there's a saying about the Iranians, right? They never win a war, but they never lose a negotiation. And, you know, the idea that in 60 days, you know, Jared Kushner and, you know, a bunch of real estate guys are going to get a deal negotiated on the on the nuclear stuff is crazy.
20:36It's just not going to happen. And eventually Trump will forget about it and, you know, it'll be the usual neocons that remain angry about it. But Trump will stop talking about it. And then you have the other stuff, by the way, that Obama was deeply, deeply criticized for not including in the deal, which is, you know, the Iranians ballistic missiles. We've already heard President Trump say, well, everybody else has got them. What do you want me to do? So we know we're kind of done on that. and the Iranian sponsorship of terrorists, right? Which, again, Obama got brutally criticized for not including those two things in the nuclear deal.
21:09You know, good luck. Good luck, even if the Iranians do commit to stop funding Hezbollah and Hamas, which I don't think they will, how you're going to verify that. And, you know, I just think, just to end this long speech, you're exactly right to say an MOU. that doesn't seem like much because it's not.
21:31Scott Galloway:How do we insure, though? It feels to me that just by demonstration of their willingness to fly drones over the Strait of Hormuz and an inability for insurance companies to insure vessels don't, I mean, it feels to me like they've got total control. And I don't see under what circumstance they give it back. The free flow or the freedom of navigation may recommence under their terms. But what is the scenario under which they do not control the Strait of Hormuz? Well, at one level is there is no scenario, right? I mean, you could put treaties and agreements and everything else on the table. But when push comes to shove and they need to, again, they'll just fly a bunch of drones.
22:24They don't need a Navy. You know, Pete Hexeth is in his testosterone fueled, you know, orgasm of manliness is, you know, focused entirely on the Navy at the bottom of this. They don't need that Navy. Right. Again, you made exactly the point. You don't actually need to sink a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz to stop the flow of stuff. You just need to fly a bunch of drones, maybe fly occasionally fly one into a cargo ship the way they did last weekend in that into that Singaporean ship. because at that point, the insurers, Lloyds of London and all those guys, they say, you're not going anywhere near that place.
Read the full transcript
22:57And so there's really nothing we can do to stop them from controlling it. Now, the way I think this will play out is, and I'll give you the sort of medium term and the long term. In the medium term, the president's going to make some kind of deal and it's going to be ugly, right? The Iranians are going to reserve the right to provide services and insurance to ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz. Well, the magic is going to be in the fees and services and insurance that the Iranians reserve the right to provide. So it's going to be a really crappy deal. And then secondarily, while that is in place or not, you know, we'll be working like mad with the Gulf states and Saudi Arabia to basically make the Strait of Hormuz irrelevant to the flow of energy in particular.
23:40So we'll build more pipelines across the Arabian Peninsula. We'll figure out other stuff. And the reason I highlight that, this is really important. The reason I highlight that is that the Iranians, again, they're very savvy, very, very savvy. And they know that they know that having played this card, it runs out bad metaphor, but having played this card, it's no longer valuable five years from now when we've built pipelines across. So guess what I think they're doing to maintain the leverage they've acquired. I think that over the next five years, they're going to work like mad to develop a nuclear weapon because they look at Pakistan, they look at India, they look at North Korea, and they say, you know what doesn't happen to those three countries?
24:21They don't get invaded. They don't get bombed. And so one of the byproducts of this war, I think, is going to be taking an awful regime that was ambivalent about having a nuclear weapon and creating a regime more ideological, more extreme, who now says, guess what? Now we have to build a nuclear weapon, because eventually the Strait of Hormuz is not going to be a point of leverage.
24:41Scott Galloway:And how does Israel respond as they get intelligence? My understanding is when we ripped up the air, when President Trump ripped up the JCPOA, the IRGC had nuclear material that was enriched to 3.7 percent. My understanding now is that intelligence says it's around 60. If it gets to 80 or 90 and they get within, you know, spitting distance of a nuclear weapon, do you think Israel most likely preemptively strikes? I mean, aren't we just setting ourselves up for what could be a pretty ugly confrontation here? Yeah, yeah. You know, except for that period of time when the JCPOA, the Obama-Iran deal, was in place.
25:24You know, the Iranians have always had 60 percent. They always had little bits of 90 percent. There's no peacetime use for 90 percent. And that's probably where they are right now. Now, it just so happens that all this stuff is at the bottom of a lot of rubble in three or four locations in Iran. It's still there. Um, but yeah, I mean, the answer to your question is a hundred percent clear, you know, the Israelis, uh, you know, the Israelis, and this isn't even a Netanyahu thing. They will do everything, literally everything in their, um, in their arsenal to keep, uh, Iran from getting there. The question is, can they, you know, if this 300 billion reconstruction fund gets set up, how many of those 300 billions get used to get used to build a, you know, hardened, a hardened facility, even more hardened than the old ones that the Israelis can't get to.
26:18So, yeah, at one level, of course, Israel is always going to regard a nuclear Iran as as unacceptable. But it's an open question about whether they'll be able to. I mean, look, if this rift between J.D. Vance and President Trump and, you know, and the growing alienation of the American political apparatus from providing weapons to Israel, if that were to go further south, that could be a real military problem for Israel.
26:49Scott Galloway:We'll be right back after a quick break.
26:56Scott Galloway:Support for the show comes from Nutrafol, the number one dermatologist recommended hair growth supplement brand used by over 1.5 million people. We all have unique grooming routines. It's a normal part of upkeep for everyone's confidence. So if it ever takes a hit, you can always go back to the basics and revisit your routine, specifically your hair care. That's where Nutraful can help. Nutraful has formulas built for men at different life stages. There's Nutraful Men for guys 18 to 49, plus the new Nutraful Men 50+. It's the first product of its kind specifically made for men over 50. Wherever you're at in life, you can address the key root causes of thinning.
27:32Scott Galloway:grow visibly thicker fuller hair in three to six months with neutrophil it's backed by peer-reviewed studies and nsf certified for sport which is the gold standard for supplement quality start neutrophil today and make the hat optional visit neutrophil.com and enter promo code prof g for ten dollars off your first month subscription and free shipping find out why neutrophil is the best-selling hair growth supplement brand at neutrophil.com spelled n-u-t-r-a-f-o-l.com promo code PropG. That's Nutraful.com promo code PropG.
28:09Scott Galloway:Support for the show comes from Odoo. If your business runs on five different apps, 12 browser tabs, and one spreadsheet that everyone's afraid to touch, it's probably time for Odoo. Odoo is an all-in-one business management software that connects every part of your business into one powerful, easy-to-use platform. So instead of wasting time switching between disconnected systems, your entire business works together in real time. Your team moves faster, your data stays accurate, and you can actually focus on growing your business. Let one unified system run your entire business. From the first opportunity to the final payment, everything works together in one place.
28:44Scott Galloway:Whether you're a small business or managing a large operation, Odoo gives you one flexible platform built to grow with you. Try today for free at odoo.com slash prop g. That's O-D-O-O dot com slash prop G.
29:03Scott Galloway:Support for the show comes from I Am 8. Every day it seems like there's a new fad diet that wants to tell you what to cut out and what to add in. But before you go and fill your fridge with beef tallow and salmon skin, ask yourself if you're actually getting the full scope of vitamins and minerals you need in a day. Here's a tip to help you fill in the gaps. I Am 8's daily ultimate essentials drink. I am 8 uses clean ingredients. It's NSF certified, which means all the ingredients are third-party tested for purity. Our colleague Ed Elson has been enjoying I am 8. Ed, I am 8. Love it. Hydrating, refreshing, makes me feel like I'm healthy.
29:39Scott Galloway:I hope I am healthy, but this makes me really feel that way. So big fan of I am 8. Nice. Give your body what it deserves with I am 8. Go to im8health.com slash prop G and use code prop G for a free welcome kit. five free travel sachets plus 10 % off your order. That's I am number eight, H-E-A-L-T-H.com slash Prop G, code Prop G for a free welcome kit, five travel sachets plus 10 % off your order. I am made health.com slash Prop G, code Prop G. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
30:24Scott Galloway:let's move on to sunnier sky so to speak let's talk a little bit about ukraine and the sense or the thesis i would put to you is that this has been an incredibly pivotal or positive few months that ukraine has gone from playing defense to playing offense which is a victory for the west specifically europe and ukraine itself what's your assessment of the situation there yeah i was just there three or four weeks ago um and i'd been three times i I would completely agree with your assessment. I was in Kiev and Odessa, and I'll tell you, it's a weird schizophrenic feeling there now because on the one hand, missiles are flying in and hitting schools and, you know, creating five, six, seven fatalities a day or whatever, really tragic stuff.
31:07On the other hand, there's such a spring in the step of most Ukrainians because they now understand that they're winning this thing. You know, they're taking the fight to Moscow. They're imposing shocking, I mean, the brain doesn't process the number of Russians that the Ukrainians are killing every day. I mean, between now, you know, between now and the weekend, the Russians are going to lose the same number of men that we lost in Vietnam in 13 years of war there. And so the Ukrainians really feel like they're winning. Now, they're realistic, right? Winning doesn't mean that, you know, all of a sudden the Russians are pulling back to the pre-war borders, but they do know two things.
31:47Number one, that anything that gets negotiated is going to be a radically better negotiation for them than it would have been a year ago. And number two, I think they think that there's some chance that the Russian people are going to do what they do every 50 years or so and decide we've got to get rid of the czar. And again, I wouldn't tell you that anybody thinks that's a high probability thing, but it's certainly a heck of a lot higher now than it was a year ago.
32:14Scott Galloway:Do you think we're close to some sort of negotiated settlement or peace?
32:43years from now may very well try this in Estonia with all of the implications that has for us as a NATO partner. And so, you know, quite apart from my own belief, I think the Ukrainians feel the same way, which is we're on the march. You know, let's position ourselves even better for an ultimate negotiation.
33:07Scott Galloway:How insecure do you think Putin's position is amongst Russians right now? You know, I'm not a Russia guy and I listen to people, you know, and there's the school of thought that says the Russians are the people that fought the bottle of Stalingrad, right? You can never break them, you know, and then there's a school of thought that says, you know, the oligarchs that support this guy, you know, are getting pretty tired of not being able to go to their houses in London and seeing their bank accounts emptied and their yachts confiscated and their, you know, kids denied admission to Stanford and Oxford.
33:47So the honest answer to your question is, I don't know. What I do know is that the situation for the average Muscovite or, you know, So a middle class person in St. Petersburg is a hell of a lot worse than it was two years ago.
34:05Scott Galloway:You're the ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee. And most recently, the president appointed Bill Pulte as acting director of national intelligence, replacing Tulsi Gabbard, who announced her resignation at the end of May. And Bill Pulte currently heads a federal housing finance agency, no national security background. He's led many of Trump's legal crusades against opponents, including Lisa Cook and Jerome Powell, pushing for mortgage fraud charges. You've said it's, open quote, probably the worst appointment into the Intelligence Committee you've ever seen. Can you share more about your reaction and the intelligence community's reaction to this news?
34:43Yeah, I mean, you walked through the resume challenges there. you know, you could have just pulled somebody off the street in Cleveland, Ohio, with zero national security experience, and you'd have Bill Pulte. The problem is, you know, what did Bill Pulte spend his time doing at this obscure federal housing agency that almost no one's heard of, the FHFA? What did he do? He dove into records to find, you know, to examine Adam Schiff's mortgage history, Letitia James, the Attorney General of New York's mortgage history, to look at Lisa Cook, you know, governor of the Federal Reserve's mortgage history.
35:22And then he tried to get court cases built up against him. So we know who this guy is, right? And he's a hell of a lot worse than that guy off the streets of Cleveland, Ohio, because he's dedicated to being a servile, you know, eunuch to Donald Trump. And, you know, I mean, even when he gets elevated to a national security position, does he change his stripes? You know, does the sort of seriousness of his office change him? No. Like, look at his Twitter feed right now. You know, every 14 hours, he's posting a loving Pyongyang-like portrait of the dear leader. And there's a couple problems with that.
35:58One, you got a lot more tools in the, you know, in the intelligence community to go after Americans. None of them are legal or acceptable because they're all designed to be used against our enemies abroad. But, you know, the intelligence community has surveillance authorities. It's got skills. It's got, you know, in the extreme, guys who know how to repel out of helicopters dressed in black with guns. So it's just a much more serious thing. And I worry about that. And then secondarily, you know, it's not a much discussed thing. But the intelligence community is comprised of tens of thousands of extraordinarily capable patriotic people who could be making far more money in the private sector because they're mathematicians or linguists or you name it.
36:41Wonderful analysts. And, you know, when they have to deal with sort of nonsense, it's just that many more of them head for the doors. And, you know, there's serious threats out there. And I don't want those folks heading for the doors.
36:55Scott Galloway:It feels as if VALT has taken precedence over competence. Is this just at a senior level in the intelligence community, or has it been hollowed out? How worried are you about the general corpus and competence of the intelligence community? Yeah, it really varies by agency. And by the way, it's not uniform. I've been a little tough on Pulte. But, you know, the director of CIA, John Radcliffe, I know him very well. And we used to serve together. and I wouldn't put him in the same category. Anybody who works for Trump needs to do lots of annoying North Korea genuflection. But I think differently about John than I do about Bill Pulte.
37:35I would say the same, by the way, for the president's original nomination of Jay Clayton. I happen to know Jay very, very well. And if I were president of the United States, would I appoint him DNI? No, I wouldn't. But in the Star Wars cantina of cabinet secretaries and purported leaders, you know, Jay would be very much on the good side. So it's a, it's a little bit of a mixed bag, but I think the most important thing I can tell you, Scott, is that, um, these political types don't penetrate too far into the agencies, right? So, you know, just down the road here at the defense intelligence agency or up the road at the national security agency, you know, 99 % of the people are, are, are, are real professionals who are steeped in a culture of objectivity, who are studiously nonpolitical, and they're human, so they will from time to time respond to the incentives that come from the very top.
38:28But by and large, I think they're doing a good job. I have no doubt that if Bill Pulte ordered the CIA to hover a bunch of helicopters over Adam Schiff's house, that you would see mass resignations at the CIA rather than compliance to that. So, you know, there are some safeguards in the system.
38:44Scott Galloway:I want to speak more broadly. You chair the New Democrat coalition, the centrist caucus, and that lane feels increasingly uncomfortable, even untenable in today's party. Where do you think the center actually lives right now? Yeah, I always object a little bit to the notion of the center. You know, it's not a mathematical thing. You know, the way I think about it, I've been around this place for a while. The way I think about it is that there are people who are more inclined to do what the software of the Constitution and Washington demands, which is to make the compromises to actually get legislation passed.
39:24And look, it sucks. But if you don't have 60 votes in the Senate and you have a filibuster, you're going nowhere. And it sucks that you have to pull together big coalitions to actually move something in the House. But the software of the system demands that. And there's some people who are really comfortable with that. And then there's some people, and I'm making no value judgment here because I think both instincts are important. There's some people who are kind of more activist in orientation and say, no, here's the North Star and there's where we need to go. You know, so it's It's more, which camp do you fall into rather than, you know, centrists are trying to measure the extremes and get halfway between.
39:58But let me put forward just a couple of principles quickly, Scott, that I think are really important that are maybe being lost here. First, this country of 350 million people has two political parties, two. That means both of those parties are going to have internal dynamics that are really, really hard. So the fact that I, representing Fairfield County, Connecticut, don't have quite the same orientation, you know, that Zoran Mondani does, it should not be a surprise and should not be a problem. And I've argued this on the right side of the party before. I've lost enough elections and seen Donald Trump reelected enough times.
40:37I haven't personally lost elections, but I've seen the House lost. I've seen the Senate lost and the presidency lost to know that you better lean hard into including diverse viewpoints. Right. So I've usually thought about it like, gosh, in the Democratic Party, could we tolerate somebody who's pro-life? There are people who say no. I would say, you know what, if you share 70 percent of the values, but you disagree on some, you know what you need to govern this country? a majority. So here's my take on the folks that just won primaries in New York. First, it's New York. You and I know New York, right?
41:16It ain't America in any way, shape or form. Number two, those candidates, including the mayor, tapped into something really important, which is that people are pissed off, and rightly so, our lifetime, financial crisis, Iraq war, catastrophic mistakes done by the establishment. And they are pissed off. You better grapple with that rather than what we all did in the Biden administration, which is to say inflation is transitory. My God, right? And so number one, it's New York. Number two, they've tapped into something important, not just on substance. And by the way, I'm not validating the substance.
41:51I happen to believe that rent control is not a good idea. And every fact out there suggests that that is true. I think if you want to lower the price of housing, build a hell of a lot more housing. So I'm not validating the, the, the policy positions. Um, but again, back to what I said before, I appreciate that these folks that are far to my left are saying, shut up about everything, except how are we going to make healthcare and housing less expensive? Now I may disagree with their prescriptions, but I think it's great that they're doing that. My one request to them back to what I was saying about the majority is you're joining a team.
42:29And I'm not on the Gottheimer team that says that if you call yourself a socialist, you don't get to be on our team. The critical aspect of being on our team is acknowledging that you go nowhere without a majority. If you don't have a majority, you're just talking. That's all you're doing. You're getting paid$174 ,000 a year to talk. So you want a majority. And if you want to win a majority, say and do things that don't damage our ability to win seats in North Carolina, Ohio, Michigan, Georgia. Because if you put out crazy stuff that alienates those people and in this era of social media, when you say something a little crazy in a basement in Brooklyn, it is about three milliseconds before it gets broadcast in Arizona and Michigan.
43:15comport yourself in a way that is consistent with winning a majority. That's my one. That's my one. Oh, and by the way, don't be anti-Semitic. I'm cartooning things here.
43:27Scott Galloway:Right now, it feels as if the Democratic platform is, can you believe he said that? And I would say that we need to move from indignance to ideas. As the Democrats think about their messaging around 26 and 28. What does Representative Himes believe is the right message that moves just beyond the anti-Trump message? I have one obvious thought and one non-obvious thought for you. The obvious thought is that we need to be ruthlessly focused on the cost of healthcare, the cost of food, the cost of energy, and resist the temptation to chase the squirrel. And that sounds like a no-brainer, but we're terrible at it.
44:15We're terrible at it. You know, we're going to, some crazy immigration thing is going to happen in Houston and we're going to take three days to stop talking about affordability and talk about that crazy immigration thing in Houston. And then the next week, you know, something is, some vile thing is going to happen to a transgender individual in the United States Marines or whatever it is. And we're going to chase that for a week. And we're going to get to the end of the month and we're going to realize we didn't actually talk about affordability. Now, now let me be very clear here. I'm not saying that immigration policy, cultural issues don't matter.
44:48On the contrary, you know, I'm enormously proud of my party that we fight for decency and immigration and equality for the transgender population. But how you sequence these things again, back to winning the majority. If you're not convincing people that each this is what Momdani did, right? If you're not convincing people that you are all over the thing they care about most, which is expenses, the expensiveness of life, they're not listening to you on the other stuff. So we got to get that right. Second thing, this is the non-obvious piece. We got to actually do it. You know, I've been thinking a lot about why there are always these swings, right?
45:2206 and 08, big swing to the Democrats under Obama. 2010, there's, you know, we get obliterated. 2018. I think the way we stop that pendulum and actually gain traction as a party is not because we have a perfect housing policy, but because we actually do something. I mean, I can't tell you how frustrated I am thinking back over the four years of the Biden administration. When I campaigned in 2024 on we passed the biggest infrastructure bill since the Eisenhower presidency and we passed the biggest investment climate change, you know, ever. And you know what we actually did in the state of Connecticut?
45:54Nothing. Nada. Zilch. and voters know that, right? They listen to some blowhard like me say, oh, we passed this incredible bill. And they're like, wait, wait, I'm looking around here. The shitty little bridge on the post road is still not built. And so anyway, the non-obvious thing I have to say is that actually doing it is going to be as powerful as getting it right. So, and I got nothing good to say about Donald Trump, but I do admire this administration's bias to action. Now, half the time it's illegal, but I'll tell you what, the Democrats better get a big infusion of no, no, no, no. When we allow for Medicare to negotiate drug prices, it happens tomorrow morning, not five years from now, because, you know, Americans are just so sick of the rhetoric and the blowhards in office and not seeing anything change.
46:49Scott Galloway:We'll be right back.
46:55When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It gives your job post the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications, and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a$75 sponsored job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast. That's Indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs.
47:24Scott Galloway:The Colonel's cooked up a new$10 bucket of the day just for you. Monday, 24 nuggets for$10. Tuesday, 8-piece fried chicken for$10. Wednesday, 10 wings for$10. Thursday, 8 tenders for$10. Friday, 24 nuggets for... Ooh, you guessed it, didn't you? $10. The$10 bucket of the day deal. Every weekday, only at KFC. It's finger-lickin' good. Prices and participation vary. Supplies last. Not available on third-party ordering platforms. Tax extra. Tomorrow morning is knocking. Stock your fridge now. How about a creamy mocha frappuccino drink or a sweet vanilla? Smooth caramel, maybe. Or white chocolate mocha.
48:04Scott Galloway:Whichever you choose, delicious coffee awaits. Find Starbucks frappuccino drinks wherever you buy your groceries.
48:13Scott Galloway:We're back with more from Representative Jim Himes. We were talking off mic a little bit about our backgrounds. Can you provide us with your backstory? story? Yeah. As I mentioned to you, it weirded me out a little bit because it's a lot like your own. Single mom from age 10 onward. My parents split up. Little town in New Jersey. Worked in the hardware store, the pizza place, the drugstore, delivered papers, etc., etc. And then went off to college. And I don't want to paint too much of an Oliver Twist story here. my parents had good college educations, ultimately wound up after grad school, like you, in investment banking.
48:53Like you, didn't love it, but I learned a hell of a lot. I got pulled in because the first 10 years of my life were in South America, and I was fluent in Spanish. And so the bank said, doesn't matter that this guy doesn't know a thing about banking, he speaks Spanish. And so they hired me on that basis. And now I'm doing what I sort of suspected I would always be reasonably good at doing, which is public policy. And it's crazy polarized times, but I'm very lucky to represent a thoughtful, pragmatic constituency.
49:25Scott Galloway:So you're at Goldman for 12 years. I imagine you're a VP or maybe an MD. I don't know where you were at that point. And you're making really good money. I know you didn't grow up with a lot of money, or at least that's my sense. And what's the decision to leave a job and take a pretty substantial pay cut and go to work in public service? What led you to public service? You know, the answer is I never really thought about it that way. In fact, I think I stuck around the bank too long. You know, like you, it didn't move me. It didn't sort of satisfy my soul in any meaningful way. It was great. I learned a lot, made a little money and got skills that I use to this day, but it didn't move me in any way the way policy always had.
50:08And both my parents were service-oriented. My dad was at the Ford Foundation with UNICEF. My mom did a lot of education stuff. So that was always kind of my inclination. And this comes through a little bit in your book too. The question is more, if you do go into a bank, you had the wherewithal to say the hell with it after two years. I sometimes counsel young people, go to the private sector, go investment banker, or be a consultant, but have an exit strategy because you can get pretty used to the lifestyle. And you can get 10 years in as I did and say, wow, I'm a little off track of what I thought I would be doing.
50:47And as you know, those organizations make it pretty hard to leave. I was a little lucky in that I was doing technology banking when the technology market went completely belly up. So I sort of looked around and went, wow, not much going on here. But yeah, so then I was able, you know, and the one thing I give, you know, a lifetime spent following directions and decisions. The one thing I do give myself credit for was in 2007, I'd gotten pissed off about George W. Bush and Republicans at the time. Little did I know what was coming. But in 2007, after helping a woman who ran for this seat twice, and she lost twice, I said, what the hell?
51:29I'm going to run. I'm going to lose. I know I'm going to get my clock cleaned, but I'm at least going to be proud of myself for having tried. And I would have lost, but out of nowhere comes Barack Obama. And man, I grabbed those coattails in 08 and hung on for dear life.
51:45Scott Galloway:And having served in public service for now, what, 17 years? Is that right? Yeah, coming on 18, yeah. Coming on 18. Compare and contrast working in the private sector versus the public sector, and what surprised you most to the upside and the downside around serving in Congress? Yeah, you know, I get irritated with the, you know, the mantra that, oh, government just needs to be more like business, right? It's a fundamentally different thing, right? Every business has as its objective to make money at the end of the day. They have lots of different ways of making money, but it's just a very clear objective.
52:21And good leaders and CEOs, you know, get rewarded for making lots of money. Government is a fundamentally different thing. We don't have a bottom line. Government is the division of power and resources amongst a massively fractured population of 350 million people. It's an exercise in compromise. It's how you bring the evangelicals in Idaho together with the Amherst graduates in Westport to have some sort of coherent national policy. There's no bottom line and there shouldn't be. Now, by the way, government should be efficient, no question about it. And it makes me nuts that it's not. But it's a fundamentally different exercise.
53:00So I really reject that. My own view, Scott, is that a life well lived and maybe in the service of our country should include a little of each. And obviously, I'm talking my own book here. Maybe it's just me rationalizing and being self-satisfied. But I do walk around the hallways here and see folks who have spent time in the military or in law or in the private sector. And it tends to be those members who really bring the kind of perspective to legislating that I think is hugely valuable.
53:35Scott Galloway:You're a father of two girls and married. Any thoughts? A lot of young men listen to this, listen to this pod. Any thoughts or learnings on what you've gotten right and what you've gotten wrong in terms of being a dad and a good partner? A couple of thoughts. Number one, I got way too old before I learned the power of saying, I don't know. I mean, it's funny. Now that I'm a guy of some power, I guess, coming on 60 years old, I feel very comfortable saying, I don't know. But when I was in my 20s and 30s, I was uncomfortable saying that because I thought that it would indicate that I was dumb and that people would be like, oh, he's the idiot in the room.
54:13And as a consequence, I learned a lot more slowly than I might have. This bleeds into something that I think is denigrated by MAGA conceptions of manhood, listening. Listening is a more general characterization of what I just said about asking for help. I think good leaders listen more than they transmit. I was in a couple of, I've been in the company, both in the private and the public sector of people and, you know, powerful people in rooms, board rooms, you know, cabinet rooms. And usually the individual with real influence, the real leader is the one who doesn't speak first, who reserves his or her counsel.
55:04And then, you know, 20 minutes in the meeting says something and everybody just sort of turns around and says, wow. And so, you know, I think that's an attribute to be admired and, you know, strived after. A couple other things. I just jotted down the notes. Maybe it's elsewhere in your book. I think one of the most transformative things that a boy or man can do, and I don't mean this to be exclusive. It's probably true of women as well, but is to develop competence in something. You know, the discipline and the artistry and the commitment and all the things you need to do to become a great piano player or rower or beekeeper or speaker of the Farsi language.
55:51I think the process itself, you know, helps you become a, I'll say a man in full since we're talking about men, but I would not in any way exclude females. It helps you become a person in full by pursuing something, really chasing competence. I think that can be transformative.
56:09Scott Galloway:Jim Himes is the U.S. representative for Connecticut's fourth congressional district, a seat he's held since 2009. He's also the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, serving as its ranking member. He joins us from our nation's capital. Representative Himes, very much appreciate your time today and your good service. Thank you, Scott. Pleasure being with you.
56:48Scott Galloway:Algebra of Happiness My son's high school graduation was on Friday And it's been the fastest four years a lot of mixed emotions and not all of them positive. Some of that is my depression and anger kicking in. When my son and his mom decided it would be a good idea for him to go to boarding school, I now look back and I kind of resent the decision and I feel like my son was taken for me early. I did not like having him at boarding school. He was told to me that he'd be home Friday and leave Sunday night. He comes home Saturday afternoon. He's gone Sunday afternoon. He's basically at home for just a day.
57:29And I missed him terribly during those years.
57:34Scott Galloway:And the first thing I remember when he got into these two boarding schools, I took him for a walk and I told him which boarding school I thought would be better. And he agreed or, you know, I thought it's either here or there. But driving up to this school, and this is a story of privilege, because he went to an amazing school and most people don't have that opportunity. But the first thing I remember thinking is, I wish my mom were alive because she just, it's a boarding school outside of London. She just wouldn't believe that her grandson got to experience something like that. And his first year was tough for him.
58:09Scott Galloway:I didn't realize how tough until later, but he didn't do well academically. I think he felt a little bit ostracized as one of the few Americans at his school. I thought that'd be a feature, it wasn't. I don't know. He did fine, but not great. And one of the reasons he ended up getting into a great school was his momentum kept building. Anyways, the thing that just struck me and that has made me sad, I was fine Friday night at his graduation celebration, but I got very upset Saturday morning or melancholy, is that there were all these things we were going to do, right? We were going to, or I planned.
58:44Scott Galloway:I wanted to buy an old car and try and renovate it with him. I think it would have been a ton of fun. I'm not handy, but, you know, I wanted to, you know, I wanted to go to Alaska with him. I had never been to Alaska and I thought you and I are going to go to Alaska together. There was all these things I was planning to do with him and now he's gone. And when he was a young kid and it was the right decision, I focused on work and economic security. So I was there, but I wasn't, I was gone a lot. I would sometimes be on the road for two or three weeks. If I had speaking gigs or work in Europe, it just made sense to stay over there.
59:20Scott Galloway:And I would come home and notice that my sons had physically grown. So I missed a lot, kind of zero to eight. And then eight to 12 was great. And then he kind of left when he was 14. And I just feel like there's this part, this real sadness, like there was so much we were going to do that we didn't. And now he's gone. And it's kind of heartbreaking. and I'm very proud of him. He's done really well. He's going to a great university in the fall. But this, you know, you lose your kids. It's like, I think the reason we're so in love with our kids is the same reason why luxury brands are successful.
1:00:00Scott Galloway:It comes down to scarcity. The 10-year-old you have at home is not going to be there in a year. They're just going to be different. And you still love them and you still have a similar relationship, but they're an entirely different person. And I had so many plans. for us. And a lot happened. We went to a lot of Premier League games. We traveled a lot together. We took trips on our own. I took them on a college tour. I think I've been more present than most fathers, mostly because I have the resources. But I just am haunted by this notion that there was so much we were supposed to do that we didn't.
1:00:38Scott Galloway:And it just goes, zero to two went slowly, two to eight less slowly, eight to 12 went kind of fast, and 12 to 18 just was over in an instant. And there's no profound insight here or wondrous aha other than the following. To the extent you can, plan those things. If you want to go to, you want to show your son the Imperial War Museum, buy tickets and go. If your kid's into Pokemon and you think I should go to one of those Pokemon conferences with him and take the train to Heathrow and go to that thing because what they say is true it goes fast and there's just no getting around it. I have a pretty large
1:01:29Scott Galloway:void about the things we were supposed to do.
1:01:36Scott Galloway:This episode was produced by Jennifer Sanchez and Laura Janere. Cami Reek is our social producer. Bianca Rosario Ramirez is our video editor. And Drew Burrows is our technical director. Thank you for listening to the Prop G pod from Prop G Media.
1:01:58Scott Galloway:I have a really dirty one. Do you guys want to hear that? It's pretty bad. Okay, you asked for it. I didn't want to do it, but you guys asked for it. All right. episode 403. 403 is the area code serving the Canadian province of Alberta. In 2003, MySpace launched. My ex used to get her sexual fetishes and her social media platforms mixed up and kept asking her friends to come on my face.
1:02:34Scott Galloway:Uh... Uh... Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for$15 a month is back. So I thought it would be fun if we made$15 bills. But it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three months,$90 for six months, or$180 for 12-month plan required. $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy. See terms. Uncovered windows can make your home feel up to 20 degrees hotter.
1:03:11Scott Galloway:Stay cool and save up to 50 % off custom window treatments during the 4th of July mega sale at blinds.com. From outdoor shades to room darkening blinds, finding the perfect fit is easy. Get free samples, expert design help, and professional measure and install services. Or DIY with confidence and support every step of the way. Shop up to 50 % off site-wide, plus huge savings on doorbusters, right now during the 4th of July mega-sale at Blinds.com. You want to get your backyard summer ready, but you don't want to break the bank? Wayfair gets it. Planning on dining al fresco or relaxing poolside?
1:03:44Scott Galloway:Wayfair has everything you need to prep your space. Shop now and save up to 70 % off during Wayfair's 4th of July clearance. Score huge deals on outdoor furniture, area rugs, and more. We're talking thousands of products for every style and budget. Plus, surprise flash deals July 6th. Don't wait! Shop Wayfair's 4th of July clearance now through July 6th at Wayfair.com.
From the publisher
Scott Galloway speaks with Congressman Jim Himes, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, to discuss the fragile ceasefire with Iran, whether the U.S. has lost leverage in the Middle East, the future of Ukraine, and what Democrats need to offer beyond opposition to Trump.
Algebra of happiness: the memories never made.
Want to listen to this and other episodes ad-free? You can, if you subscribe at profgmedia.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




