Introducing: The Rest Is Science

0:03Michael Stevens:For exclusive interviews, bonus episodes, ad-free listening, early access to series, first look at live show tickets, a weekly newsletter, and discounted books, join the Declassified Club at therestisclassified.com. Hello, The Rest is Classified listeners.

0:21Hannah Fry:I'm Michael Stevens. And I'm Professor Hannah Fry. Well, firstly, thank you to David and Gordon for letting us take over the channel. we are here to tell you about our new show for Goldhanger, The Rest is Science. Every week we take a fresh look at the familiar. We're going to be exploring the forces, the theories and the phenomena that shape how we live in, think about and see the world. We're going to pull apart what we take for granted to reveal the unexpected patterns and hidden logic just beneath the surface.

0:51Michael Stevens:Because that's what moves science forward. Not the polishing of answers, but the sharpening of questions. It's curiosity that sparks those, hey, wait, how does that actually work? Kind of a moment that changes the way we see the world.

1:04Hannah Fry:So, OK, here is a little glimpse of what is to come from our podcast. And if it sparks something unexplainable for you, then you can join us every Tuesday and Thursday for new episodes of The Rest is Science. And we'll figure it out together.

1:17Michael Stevens:How would you describe gravity to an alien from another universe that had never experienced gravity?

1:24Hannah Fry:The simplest way to think of it is that in our universe, objects are attracted to each other. And if you, without any interfering from outside, if you just have two objects near each other, they will come together. That's it. I mean, that's it, really.

1:41Michael Stevens:And at this point, the alien goes, what? That is so odd. Right.

1:45Hannah Fry:And what do you mean by an object? Anything with mass. Anything with mass. Because I think that we sort of imagine gravity as though it's like the Earth is pulling us down. But the thing is, is that we're also pulling the Earth up, right? And if you get much smaller objects than planets and you put them in space, they're pulling each other and will come together.

2:06Michael Stevens:That's right. Yeah. I once calculated that two baseballs placed in intergalactic space, a meter apart, would very slowly collapse in towards each other until they touched. It would take three days for that to happen, but it would be because of their gravitational attraction to each other. We are gravitationally attracted to each other right now. It cannot overcome the air it would have to push out of the way, the friction between our butts and the seats, but yet we are attracted. In fact, when you're born, right, you've got some zodiac constellation that's like, I don't know, it's, how does astrology work?

2:46Michael Stevens:Something, something, something Pisces. Right. Okay. So, okay. You're a Pisces if you're born in a particular time of the year, but yet the gravitational influence of Pisces on you is less than the gravitational influence of the doctor who delivered you on you. Because otherwise birth ain't working. That's why, yeah. People are like, oh, so you're an Aquarius. And I'm like, no, I'm a schnitt cookie because Dr. schnitt cookie was there influencing me at a physical level. Yeah, not just the catching, not just the physical touch, but the gravitational attraction to his mass. We've been talking a lot about very fundamental things in this really abstract way to just explain that things fall down.

3:28Michael Stevens:Because here on Earth, they're attracted to the Earth. And you were talking about how it's not just the Earth pulling things in. Things pull the Earth as well, but the Earth is so much bigger than everything else we work with. that equal attraction they have affects other stuff like a pen a lot more than it does the earth. But I once calculated that if you dropped a pen from six feet up, it actually pulls the earth up towards it nine trillionths the width of a proton. Oh, which is by my calculation, small. It's very small. So the pen falls the remainder of that distance, which is still pretty much six feet.

4:09Michael Stevens:But they are coming to meet each other. but they're coming to meet each other somewhere in between. Yeah. It just happens to be a much longer trip for the pen. And there you've got both of those senses of mass happening together, the gravitational attraction, but then also that force moves each object with very different accelerations.

4:30Hannah Fry:I mean, that pen though is particularly light. If you take an object that is heavier, denser, I mean, heavier actually, there's sort of an implication of gravity in that statement itself, right? But if you take something that has more matter, the amount that the earth would move would change too.

4:48Michael Stevens:That's right. That's right. And so when people say a feather and a hammer dropped in a vacuum, so there's no air to move out of the way, they will fall at the same rate. They'll hit the ground at the same time.

5:01Hannah Fry:I'll tell you what, why don't we just clear up the question of what is gravity according to what different people thought at different times. Because everything you're describing so far is essentially like a Newtonian view of gravity. So Newton has this idea that actually gravity is all about objects accelerating towards each other, right? You know, like forces, mass times acceleration was one of his laws. And he was saying that we are accelerating towards the Earth, which is the reason why when you chuck an apple or any object, your baseball, if you like, Like when you chuck it, it accelerates towards the earth and follows this curved path.

5:37Hannah Fry:And everyone for, you know, many hundreds of years was like, that guy Newton, he's got it made. He's done it for us. That's perfect. But there were still some lingering questions, some little things that didn't quite make sense. So for instance, where is this, how is this force sort of acting? Like let's say you took the sun and you had like a magic wand that made the sun disappear instantaneously. it would take eight, nine minutes for the light to hit us. But according to Newton's version of gravity, we would immediately stop accelerating towards the sun, which means that the earth should immediately spin off into the blackness of space.

6:15Hannah Fry:But that sort of doesn't really make any sense, right? Because isn't it that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light? So how can it be that we would feel the loss of the gravitational pull of the sun before the light switched out? Right.

6:29Michael Stevens:Yeah. And so we know for a fact today that gravity travels how fast? Speed of light. Speed of light. No faster.

6:37Hannah Fry:It's the universal speed limit.

6:40Michael Stevens:Yeah. Certainly it's not instantaneous.

6:43Hannah Fry:Absolutely. Which means that if the sun suddenly vanished, we wouldn't know about it at all. But was that a problem for Newton? Newton, no. But as the time went on, people were like, there's something a bit fishy going on. There's something a bit weird. I'm not sure I like this. The other one that was a bit weird that people just couldn't quite work out is Mercury's orbit. The thing about Mercury, closest planet to the sun, it has this elliptical orbit. But that elliptical orbit is itself spinning around. It's affected by the other planets. So it doesn't trace out the same ellipse every single time it orbits the sun.

7:16Hannah Fry:That ellipse is moving around. It's called the perihillion of Mercury's orbit. Which sort of makes sense, right? Helion meaning sun. And everyone was cool with that. Everyone was absolutely fine with that, that they knew that, you know, the orbit was going to change because of where different planets were. But when they ran the calculations, according to Newton's version of gravity, that it's essentially just objects accelerating towards each other, something was off, right? It was like the number of arc seconds of Mercury's orbit just didn't totally make sense. And for a long time, you know, the telescopes weren't that accurate.

7:50Hannah Fry:People were like, maybe we've just made a miscalculation. It's sort of a bit, I don't know. And this was for a long time, like hundreds of years. And then when Einstein came along and he was like, I think there's something else going on here. Einstein has this great intuition that it's not just that objects are magically accelerating towards each other, but that space-time itself has this curvature to it. So the sun, for instance, this giant gravitational force is literally bending and warping space-time between us and it. And so if you got a magical wand and you made the sun disappear immediately, there would be this ripple that was sent out from the absence of that sun.

8:30Hannah Fry:Imagine taking a bowling ball on a rubber sheet and then removing it. That rubber sheet is going to kind of bounce up and down and ripple as you remove the weight. And that that ripple would reach us at the speed of light. He had this great intuition, worked out all the calculations for it. And one of the very first things that he turned his equations to was the per hillion of Mercury's orbit to see if his new theory came up with a more accurate prediction than Newton's. And he absolutely nailed it. Nailed it. Level of precision. I mean, he said that he was happy for days after he looked at those calculations and was like, I've absolutely got it.

9:09Hannah Fry:I found the missing piece to the puzzle.

9:10Michael Stevens:So two things. first that leap from there's a force acting on things maybe it's mediated by some particle or whatever from to leap from there to actually maybe gravity is just a change in the shape of space time is really gigantic gigantic because space time is such a bizarrely abstract thing it's it's It's the canvas that we are on. If we were two-dimensional, this would be easier. We could say, you know, a two-dimensional creature could be painted onto this curtain. And if I crumple the curtain up, they're still stuck on it. And they're going over all of these crinkles, but they don't even know it.

9:53Michael Stevens:I can bring them together and push them apart. If it gets crumpled up or curved, you're just going to follow along that curve. You cannot leave it. And so, yeah, Einstein is like, but what if it's the shape of the canvas that we are on? Exactly. Even the shape of time and how quickly time runs for you. If we allow that to change, then Mercury's orbit makes sense.

10:15Hannah Fry:Exactly right. It's that they're crumpling the curtain. That's really, that's a really nice way to do it.

10:19Michael Stevens:Yeah, I think you need analogies because we're just talking about things that are so outside of our normal day-to-day activities.

10:26Hannah Fry:Totally.

10:27Michael Stevens:We understand forces. We understand pushes and pulls. But to say that space and time themselves push and pull, It's kind of more like you're just in them.

10:39Hannah Fry:But here's the thing, right? The implications of this idea that space-time is like a crumpled curtain, it means that across the surface of the Earth even, the gravitational effects are slightly different. So I did some calculations. Boulder in Colorado, right, which of course is like a very high altitude compared to Greenwich in London where I am, the gravitational effect in boulder is 9.796 meters per second what is it in greenwich

11:09Michael Stevens:uh 9.812 wow i've got higher gravitational effect than yeah so you are more attracted to the center of earth than i am in boulder yep because i'm further away yep and the inverse

11:21Hannah Fry:square law says exactly further away gravitational effect is yet diminishes except that what that means given Einstein's version of gravity is that the way that time changes in Boulder is different to the way that time changes in Greenwich because the gravitation what gravity is doing is it's bending and warping space time so what this means is that time travels slower in Greenwich than it does in Boulder and the difference is about 5.6 microseconds a year so what I will say is that you are aging faster than me.