In short
The episode discusses three current media controversies and one sports/entertainment spectacle. First, it covers Channel 4’s Married at First Sight after BBC Panorama allegations that two women were raped by on-screen partners and that there was a non-consensual sex act; men at the centre deny. Key claims include: CPL (the production company) allegedly paid men’s legal fees and emailed participants warning against talking to the press; Channel 4 removed episodes and commissioned a two-part review (legal handling and welfare protocols). The hosts argue reality TV’s “duty of care” has become reactive because producers have less control than before, especially as formats expand globally.
Second, it reviews the Enhanced Games in Las Vegas, run by Christian Angermeyer (psilocybin/crypto/AI investor) and backed by Peter Thiel. It’s framed as an “Olympics on steroids” marketing tool selling peptides/testosterone; athletes reportedly used testosterone, HGH, Adderall, EPO, and anabolic steroids.
Third, it notes Stephen Colbert’s final Late Show episode and argues the FCC/Trump-era pressure didn’t dismantle late night.
Guests
none named in the transcript.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VODiscussion on Audience Polls
1:55 to 3:16
Debate about audience awareness of various entertainment formats.
“More of our audience had heard of phenotypes than had heard of popular entertainment format Big Break.”
Introduction to Married at First Sight
3:16 to 4:18
Overview of the Married at First Sight show's recent controversies.
Allegations Against Contestants
4:18 to 5:19
Details about serious allegations of misconduct against the show's contestants.
“Another said there was a non-consensual sex act.”
Production Company Response
5:19 to 6:03
Response from CPL and Channel 4 regarding the allegations.
Duty of Care in Reality TV
6:03 to 7:40
Discussion on the responsibility of production companies towards participants.
Reality TV Evolution
7:40 to 9:22
Exploring how reality TV has changed and its implications for participants.
“And I think it's interesting because there is a sort of sense that reality TV had sort of reformed after what is popularly regarded as the kind of wild west of, you know, 20 years or a bit more ago.”
Financial Implications of Reality Shows
9:22 to 10:00
Analysis of the financial success of major reality TV franchises.
Chris Colin's Impact on Reality TV
10:00 to 10:58
Discussion on Chris Colin's approach to reality dating shows and their implications.
“And I think this is a bit like TV faker.”
The Stakes in Reality Dating Shows
10:58 to 14:00
Exploring the high stakes and emotional manipulation in dating reality shows.
“And as producers, which also includes, by the way, psychologists and people involved in the duty of care, you have some at least illusion of control over what's happening.”
The Stakes of Reality TV
14:00 to 14:50
Explore how the stakes in dating shows impact participants and producers.
Show all 27 chapters
The Illusion of Documentary
14:50 to 16:30
Discuss the fine line between reality TV and scripted content.
“And then we put another lever, which by the way, they don't really do in documentaries.”
Welfare and Duty of Care
16:30 to 18:10
Examine the reactive welfare measures in reality shows and their implications.
“what really happened and how undesirable a situation was.”
Cultural Reflections in Dating
18:10 to 21:00
Analyze how toxic dating culture influences reality show dynamics.
“and obviously the premise is absolutely crazy where you get married to someone and you've never met them.”
Future of Reality Formats
21:00 to 22:40
Discuss the implications of unregulated reality formats emerging on platforms like YouTube.
“Firstly, brilliant work from Noor and Nanji for putting this whole thing together.”
Enhanced Games Overview
24:00 to 25:40
Dive into the concept and controversy surrounding the Enhanced Games event.
“Now, Tom, it's fair to say there isn't normally a huge amount of crossover between our podcasts.”
Marketing or Sport?
25:40 to 28:00
Discuss the commercialization of sports through events like the Enhanced Games.
“Swimming, sprinting and weightlifting, I believe.”
Documentary on Enhanced Games
28:00 to 29:00
Discussion about the upcoming documentary on enhanced sports and its implications.
“but it will obviously, because it hasn't come out yet, because they will obviously have to take in the games itself.”
The Ethics of Doping in Sports
29:00 to 31:00
Exploration of doping, athlete ethics, and the financial pressures on competitors.
“Fred Curley, who was an Olympic 100-metre medalist.”
The Thin Line Between Enhancement and Sport
31:00 to 34:20
Analyzing the moral complexities and historical context of performance enhancement in sports.
“the world that they've grown up with they have grown up in a world where they absolutely are sort of put through the ringer physically and mentally for the entertainment of other people but for not very much money.”
The Reality of Enhanced Games
34:20 to 38:20
A critical look at the outcomes of the enhanced games and athlete performance.
Cultural Impact of Marketing in Sports
38:20 to 40:50
Discussion on the influence of marketing strategies in sports and society's perception.
“And, you know, this poor old Bill Wurvenhoek had to drink 16 pints before a match because he wasn't allowed beta blockers.”
The Shifting Landscape of Late Night TV
42:05 to 44:38
Explore how late night shows have evolved and the impact of audience shifts.
“By the way, I don't think you can stop any of these things because as we said earlier in this very episode, there are many, many places that will screen things nowadays and we will definitely get to that in a minute.”
Stephen Colbert's Public Access Return
44:39 to 47:06
Discover Stephen Colbert's unique return to public access TV and its implications.
“They were part of the shared monoculture.”
The Future of TV Shows and Money Dynamics
47:07 to 49:56
Analyze how new models are changing the profitability landscape for shows.
“Yeah, some sort of like small section of something from the Fellowship of the Rings.”
The Rise of Alternative Comedy Shows
49:57 to 52:08
Examine the rise of alternative comedy platforms amidst traditional losses.
“And he can take 10 people or whatever it is from the late show and they can do it.”
Documentary Recommendations and Reflections
52:21 to 56:02
Get insight into recent documentaries and their cultural significance.
“I really want to recommend Dear England, which is the new James Graham show.”
Classical Music Discussion
56:02 to 56:18
Exploration of the relevance of classical music in modern culture.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00The rest is entertainment is presented by Octopus Energy. Now, the moment someone becomes properly famous, they start travelling as a person and they start travelling as a situation. And yes, I am talking about the world of entourages.
0:12Richard Osman:It's amazing. Anytime you do a TV show and someone properly famous comes on, you can just have a spread bet as to how many people they're going to bring with them. Most people don't actually need a bodyguard and a fixer and a straw lady. But not having to start from scratch every single time you get in contact with someone is actually undeniably appealing. So Octopus Energy, you know, anytime you ever ring any company, you start from scratch right from the beginning again. With Octopus Energy, they recognize your number and that goes through to a very, very small team of around 10 people who are there to deal with you.
0:46Richard Osman:So you'll almost certainly be dealing with someone who you've dealt with before. That's the Octopus Energy entourage that they've built around you. A great satisfaction not having to tell your story for new every single time, which I think most major celebrities also feel. So good, so good, so good. Everything you want for summer is at Nordstrom Rack stores now and up to 60 % off. Stock up and save on the brands you love like Vince, Sam Edelman, Frame and Free People. Join the Nordiclub to unlock exclusive discounts, shop new arrivals first and more. Plus buy online and pick up at your favorite rack store for free.
1:21Great brands, great prices. That's why you rack. Girl, winter is so last season. And now spring's got you looking at pictures of tank tops with hungry eyes. Your algorithm is feeding you cutoffs. You're thirsty for the sun on your shoulders.
1:39Richard Osman:That perfect hang-on-the-patio sundress. Those sandals you can wear all day and all night. And you've had enough of shopping from your couch. Done hoping it looks anything like the picture when you tear open that envelope? It's time for a little in-person spring treat. It's time for a trip to Ross. Work your magic.
2:25More of our audience had heard of phenotypes than had heard of popular entertainment format Big Break.
2:33Richard Osman:Yes, we polled our members. That's correct, right? We're going to do some re-polling on that just to see how. It's not family fortunes. I'm not saying that would be the case on the high street, but among our audience, Richard. 63 % of people have heard of, you say phenotypes, I say phenotypes. Let's call the whole thing off. And just over 50 % have heard of Big Break. I don't buy that. You know what? Members, I love you, though I do. define it. No. They are right. They are right. I bet all of those 53 % of people could define what Big Break is. Could those 60-odd percent of people define what a...
3:05Richard Osman:They heard it because they listened to the episode. I knew what both were so you should be glad. Anyway, lovely to be in a new studio. We've got a lot to talk about this week. We are talking about Married at First Sight which, as everyone knows, has blown up over the last week with all sorts of allegations to contestants alleging they were raped and further allegations are continuing to come and we'll say we'll be talking about that we're going to talk about uh there was a big event this weekend which combines a number of our um bugbears on this show which is the enhanced games which is essentially tech bros meets abuse of sport and we're also going to talk is stephen colbert's final show um a little bit of a goodbye to all that and uh what's next for both him and perhaps even late night exactly that uh and also we are looking for your questions please for following our paul mccartney interview and uh the tom hanks one coming up we're talking to steven spielberg that's fun isn't it mr spielberg mr spielberg we don't come up with questions you do you know how that works so please send any questions you have to the rest is entertainment at goalhanger.com anything you've ever wanted to ask steven spielberg and we will put your questions i'm dying for it so much so excited about that one shall we start with married at first sight married at first sight um which is a channel 4 show here it's made by cpl productions biggest show oh by by quite some it's enormous it i mean even things like bake off if you look at what the streaming figures it's unbelievable it's a million miles ahead of it the panorama investigation former contestants Two women say they were raped by their on-screen partners.
4:45Another said there was a non-consensual sex act. Some say that actual violence has taken place. The men who have been at the centre of the allegations so far deny the allegations. CPL have pushed back and say that they have sort of higher standards of welfare on this programme. Channel 4 have removed every single episode of it from their service. TUI have ended their sponsorship of it, having initially paused it. this is a show that is created by the sort of high priest of modern reality dating shows a guy called chris colin in the u.s and there's a lot of stuff of him talking about the show which i think will be interesting and we will get to but they even have a new series in the uk that's
5:25Richard Osman:yet to be aired there is and in the same way we talked a while ago about the um the bachelor in the states that they've had to can i wonder if this is where that's going to end up with this being canned i can't see a world in which that isn't where this ends up well let's talk a little bit because also noor nanji who did the bbc panorama investigations talked a bit about how the investigation it's always interesting when people sort of take you a bit behind the scenes and that's become quite a feature of she also did the the greg wallace yeah investigation in fact she talks about it she says yeah i think because she's a culture correspondent she says i sometimes think people think that that's it's sort of quite a lightweight area and she says i hope i hope i'm sort of proving that it isn't that actually a lot of what's going on in this world you know you can you can um look at via culture so i i think um the full marks to no and angie what an incredible job the premise of married at first sight sorry if anyone isn't aware of it um you are matched with someone you meet them for the first time on your wedding day actually as you know my for a long time which was my anxiety dream you meet the person you're getting married to on the wedding day and then um you sort of live together and see where it goes um it's sort of like a marriage backwards yeah yeah anyway a woman who'd been a bridesmaid at one of these sort of confected weddings at the beginning um came into the bbc and she sort of said there's made allegations of sexual misconduct and raised welfare concern noonanji says that one of that when they started approaching the men one of the men's legal firms told the bbc that their fees were being paid by CPL which is the production company which she thought was odd because the women felt somewhat unsupported for obvious reasons the morning of the panorama board broadcast nor Nanji says CPL the production company email participants warning against talking to the press well I think even the week before they they were essentially they were calling the allegations wholly uncorroborated and disputed they've got a new chief executive at channel 4 Priya Dogra um at first she didn't apologize and she said she felt sympathy.
7:26She has now apologized. Channel 4 have said that based on the knowledge they had at the time, they made the right decisions in proceeding with the welfare in the way that they did and with broadcast in the way that they did, which to me suggests that the strategy for this is evolving quite erratically, or they would probably say pragmatically, but they haven't been aware of these allegations since April because that's when the BBC first went to them and we are in late May so I would say it's quite interesting how they're handling it what they have hastily now announced now it's all become public channel 4 is that they've commissioned a review in two halves so there's one in which a legal firm will look at how channel 4 handles the allegations and allegations within the show and one which will look at welfare
8:11Richard Osman:provisions and protocols which is the key with the duty of care we would always have called it on TV reality shows, which is the responsibility you have to anyone who's a participant in a program that you've created and you've essentially put them on. Yes. So that's the background. And I think it's interesting because there is a sort of sense that reality TV had sort of reformed after what is popularly regarded as the kind of wild west of, you know, 20 years or a bit more ago. And for me, I think reality has become very sort of class demarcated that you've got the alt the biggest shows and the most prestigious shows on television are reality tv and they're celebrity reality and they're things like traitors or strictly or whatever it is it depends what you mean by reality tv but essentially we're talking about that kind of unscripted unscripted yeah game shows that have members of the public celebrities taking part in some form of artificial reality yes and you look at it and or a bubbled world or whatever it may be and which will i think is relevant here what happens with those sort of shows is that you'll get like some of the biggest stars in the world saying oh yeah i'll do it for 40 grand you know i'll go to a castle in scotland for 40 grand so you've got that then you've got a sort of middle class things like bake off and things like that but then there is this giant underclass of shows that are very very popular um i've married per se i would include love island you know there's love is blind another chris colon walmart and by the way those three shows for their respective broadcasters and in lots of territories are three of the biggest shows in the world they are huge money makers so love is blind love island married at first sight enormous franchises the money they are minting for the people behind them is yeah absolutely off the scale it's just worth remembering that married first sight in i think 33 countries maybe definitely above 30 i mean all of them are and they are hugely successful i definitely think this will be the first of a lot of stories in this area and so does i saw one of the lawyers for one of them saying oh this is just the tip of the iceberg lots more people once they see people coming forward about these things will come forward for all those shows i mean we already know that there are always concerns about those things you know there have been a number of suicides in the wake of love island there have been all sorts of things and people we know they're in the u.s which we'll get on to i mean there are numbers of complaints against these shows particularly against these Chris Colen reality dating formats.
10:36If you're a UK production company and a UK public service broadcaster as Channel 4 is running one of these things, you must be expecting this to happen because you can look around the world and see that it happens everywhere that people eventually start complaining. And I think this is a bit like TV faker. We're going to see lots of stuff coming out now.
10:54Richard Osman:I think that's right. And it's interesting to think what CPL are thinking, what Channel 4 are thinking. And it's very, very easy to get swept along on a tide of what's new in television and to understand that something like Married at First Sight is a phenomenon around the world and to kind of say oh there's a new generation who grew up with reality TV and when you put them on it they really understand what it is they are doing it's not like you know the first series of Big Brother when everyone was walking into a situation they didn't understand I think people think oh no it's they think this generation are cool I think they understand it more than we do uh I think you know so that's handy yeah isn't it handy and I think that when reality tv started duty of care is a very interesting thing because as you say it has it's always been there there's always psych tests everyone that always undergoes you know criminal records checks and all those types of things and it's been tightened and tightened and tightened over the years and you know follow-up uh kind of interviews with people have got more and more and more but what has really changed is the the form that reality tv is taking When you look at that early reality TV, Big Brother, even the early series of Love Island, Survivor, it is a closed world.
12:03Richard Osman:It's a closed set. And as producers, which also includes, by the way, psychologists and people involved in the duty of care, you have some at least illusion of control over what's happening. Because you have an entire world and every single inch of that world is covered because you have a camera on every single thing. The only time something isn't covered is if someone is under a sheet. You know, that's literally, but every single thing, you've got every single bit of footage, every single interaction between everybody throughout. So there's a world in which you can spot things very, very quickly.
12:34Richard Osman:There's a world in which you can kind of convince yourself that you can be the master of that world. However, now reality shows are far more out in the real world. And married at first sight, it's much less of a precinct. You know, it expands outwards. the sense you're in a bubble for the participants absolutely does but the sense they are in a bubble for the producers does not and that's the worst combination of all because people still have that Stockholm syndrome people still think they have to do what the cameras want people still understand that there is fame to be got from either being lovable on a show or being dramatic on a show all those things still exist but the producers have less control over the real world aspects of it and i think that um that's what's playing out here and i think the avalanche begins now i want to talk about chris colin shows particularly because i think he's rinsing he's talked a lot about this type of thing because they have had lots of lawsuits against their shows in the u.s he's created these shows where you can't quite believe the premise like married at first sight obviously you know well you can't believe the premise because it's not real no because they're not really getting married but it's sort of so extreme compared to what we used to see on in and he does all about it's all dating you know there's um love is blind you know when they're sort of dating through a wall perfect match which is i don't think anyone's looking for long-term love there but that's quite interesting he calls it the summer fling to those are these other shows then the ultimatum the spouse has um all of these things the reason he says he's really obsessed with dating shows is because he thinks the stakes are so high yeah and he says that married at first site is not format driven it is um story driven yeah he says you know what the shows are sort of asking is how does attraction work how can you tell if people are really in love can you fake can you manage it can you create it chris colin will always say oh it's all a choice you know i'm making a documentary that's what he loves to say it's not a format no you're not making a documentary you're aware of the um fibrility is that a word something is febrile yeah of the situation you're putting people in and you are ratcheting that up time and time and time again because that gets ratings and ratings equals money so we listen and which by the way is that's the age-old story of television you want ratings and you want money and that's what he's doing but it's disingenuous to say anything other than that he's not turning a camera on and just seeing what happens you know he's not uh he's not david the producers have always had an unbelievable amount of control within these environments and by the way when people say that because people sometimes say just to be clear oh all these things are scripted the end of the edit is x y and z really what the technique is to throw in a mechanic that changes everything and then sit back and see what happens it's not yeah oh we're gonna do this and then we're gonna do that and then we're gonna do that and then we'll film that and that's gonna make that story genuinely the idea is like like on any tv show like on a panel show is we have this structure we do this we ask this question we press we pull this lever and then we just see what happens that's the thing that they want to do until the point where that runs out of steam.
15:37Richard Osman:And then we put another lever, which by the way, they don't really do in documentaries. No. What's gone wrong here is really a function of the idea itself in a way, because it is all so unreal. You may be married, but you are divorced from reality by design. Any welfare is reactive. I've read a lot of people this week talking about it, former contestants in these types of shows. There's an interesting article by someone who is in Love Island who said all the welfare and duty of care stuff is reactive and not proactive and the fact is that when you are removed from everything and you're a bubble as I you know it's a bit like Karen in Goodfellas saying after a while it gets to feel normal and a lot of people don't understand when you're in a big immersive world and you're isolated from your friends your families maybe even your phone from all sorts of things it's often that we already know this about sexual assault or alleged sexual assault or anything.
16:29It's only afterwards that you realize what really happened and how undesirable a situation was. And that happens anyway in cases of sexual assault. We understand far more about it than we ever did before. Never mind when you're in a sort of bubble and you really have almost all of your kind of normal checks and balances removed from you you then also have a welfare team who work for and are paid by the production
16:58Richard Osman:would not accuse a single one of them by the way of entering into this with any sort of ill intent i think people are trying to make a great television program and this is the show you know there's a big hit around the world i think started in denmark but you know australia was the one where britain really fell in love with this format so of course you're going to make it and channel 4 excited and they go we'll make it but we do have to understand that there are lots of issues here and we have to be very careful with it. And the producers would have taken that very, very seriously. It got so huge, such a huge show.
17:25Richard Osman:So the marriage is sort of meaningless in a way. It's what it leads to and the fame it leads to and the Instagram followers that it leads to. And it becomes such a juggernaut that the people I think who commission it and produce it do not have the capability. And these are very capable people. They do not have the capability to control the thing that has been unleashed. They have created something that feels like the sort of cutesy reality experience we used to do and becomes a real world thing and becomes an incredibly complex and difficult real world thing. And it's not appropriate for that to be run by the people who are running it.
18:04Yeah, there is something else that Chris Colan says that he aspires for his shows to teach empathy and so on, but also that the conversations around the shows evolve with and reflect the culture. And one thing that I've just been thinking about this all week, and because I've been thinking about it before, and I know I've talked to you about this before, but there's a sort of wider point about how toxic dating is in contemporary culture. and obviously the premise is absolutely crazy where you get married to someone and you've never met them. Only in a world where already everyone is being sort of matched by machines and people are completely exhausted and twisted by the apps.
18:43How much do you hear about app fatigue and all of this? What used to be an organic human connection has become a sort of algorithmically controlled market. It's an aspect of platform capitalism. It's twisted in its best sense, you know, not in its best sense, but, you know, your real world, if you're not on one of these shows or not on anything, even that experience for people is kind of miserable and awful.
19:09Richard Osman:Why not get married to someone I've never met before on TV because everything else has failed? Well, only against that general real world backdrop that everyone is going through can these kind of bizarre, weird, artificial premises seem somehow, maybe it's more real, maybe it's more desirable than just many of the kind of tech mediated alternatives. alternatives and it's you know sitting around the table thinking of tv shows something i did for many many years and it's it's a it's a fun thing to do and it seems that we're at a stage now where you think well just because you can doesn't mean you should yeah but it's you know it's hard not to when people we have to talk about the complicity of everyone here which is the program makers which are the channels and the viewers it is one of those things where it's built and built and built and you know we've seen different versions of this different iterations of it we love the drama watching the drama of it and it is very easy as a broadcaster as a program maker and as a viewer to step away from the reality of the thing you think no i want to hold on we're in a very very very toxic culture at the moment we are putting young people on television who absolutely are digital natives but perhaps they're not you know emotional natives perhaps they you know they don't have absolute control over their place in the world.
20:30Richard Osman:And the moment something like this happens, you have to stop and go, yeah, do you know what? That's probably too far. That was probably enough. And I think that that's what I can't imagine they're going to show the next series of Married at First Sight. I just can't see it because I just don't think it feels an appropriate thing to put people through with the knowledge we now all definitely have. That was always at the back of our brains, But it wasn't the pleasure centre at the front of our brains. One thing it does tell you about our culture is we do at least take these things seriously. Firstly, brilliant work from Noor and Nanji for putting this whole thing together.
21:08Richard Osman:And the real measure of our culture is what happens next. Yes. I think it's a horrific story. And it's not just on the channels and the producers. It's on us viewers as well. so we all have to I think kind of get around the table and just go what is okay and what isn't okay and this feels like maybe it's on the other side of the line of what is okay and here's the real issue that's going to happen is you know we're in a situation now where CPL have duty of care and Channel 4 have duty of care and we as viewers are you know part of a long lineage of reality TV shows. But if we think it's the Wild West now, all of this stuff is now starting on YouTube.
21:53Richard Osman:All of these new formats are starting on YouTube where there is not that oversight. The money you can get for making a reality show on YouTube now is absolutely immense. The sort of personalities you could run these sort of shows are as well. So we are going to get an awful lot of experiments in the next two, three, five years along these lines, which we have almost no oversight over whatever. So the whole situation is going to get much, much, much, much worse because all of these protocols that broadcast television has had to develop over the years, they do not apply to this new generation of programme makers and they will make new mistakes.
22:35Richard Osman:Talking about the fall of civilisation, after these adverts, We're going to be talking about the Enhanced Games, which was on Sunday. And I would say it's quite a spectacle, but perhaps not in the way that the organisers were hoping. This is the athletic competition where all competitors are allowed and, in fact, encouraged to take performance enhancing drugs. Yeah.
22:58This episode is brought to you by Lloyds. Now, I love it when characters are part of a club. You wouldn't know anything about that, would you, Richard?
23:04Richard Osman:The Thursday Murder Club, in some ways, reminds me of the A-Team. I now would like to map each of those characters onto the A-Team and feel I probably could. I mean, Elizabeth is Hannibal and it's not even close. Yeah, that's exactly right. And Ron is howling mad Murdoch. While there are definite perks to being in a club, just ask the members of Club Lloyds. Because with Club Lloyds, you can bank on Lloyds to give you more wherever you are. If you join Club Lloyds, there's all sorts of benefits you can choose between. There's, for example, six free cinema tickets. They've got an annual coffee club and gourmet society membership, which would be mine.
23:35Richard Osman:And also something that the Thursday Motor Club would enjoy very, very much indeed. To top it all off, you have fee-free spending abroad, which means wherever you are, you won't be charged by Lloyds to use your debit card when you're travelling. Now, joining this club costs£5 per month, but that is refunded in any month that you pay£2 ,000 into your account. Now, that is a club that's worth being part of. Check out Club Lloyds today. You'll need to be a UK resident and aged 18 or over to apply. Hello, it's Marina Hyde from The Restless Entertainment. Now, Tom, it's fair to say there isn't normally a huge amount of crossover between our podcasts.
24:07Well, Marina, I know that we have both on our respective podcasts discussed Vin Diesel's ambition to play Hannibal. So I've always thought that perhaps there is potential here for The Restless History and The Restless Entertainment to combine and produce something beautiful. Yes, in a crossover nobody saw coming, the worlds of reality TV and historical high society collide live on the South Bank Centre stage. Yeah, the real housewives of Regency England will see us cast a TV reality show eye onto the women of the early 19th century. And when we say the women of the early 19th century, we are talking about some of the most extraordinary, most charismatic, most scandalous women in the whole of British history.
24:53Exactly. Think Lady Hamilton, Jane Austen and my chaotic queen, Caroline Lamb. Yeah, so Marina and I are planning to pull out all the stops for a reality TV tour of Regency London, complete with superb dramatic recreations and unbelievably exciting, a special celebrity guest from the world of the real Real Housewives. The Restless Fest is running from the 4th to 6th of September at London's Southbank Centre. Members of The Rest Is History and The Rest Is Entertainment can get tickets on the 28th of May. General Sale goes live on the 2nd of June at 10am. Visit southbankcentre.co.uk to find out more.
25:40Welcome back, everybody. Now, the enhanced games, Richard. Swimming, sprinting and weightlifting, I believe. Yeah. 42 athletes.
25:50Richard Osman:I was going to say, not as you know it, but maybe as you know it, because everyone's on drugs. It's described as the Olympics on steroids, but in this case, literally. And it happened on Sunday. You'll be shocked to learn where it happened. Actually, there's two places it might have happened. One was Riyadh. It wasn't there. The other was Las Vegas, and it was there. Perhaps next year it'll be in Riyadh. And it is a competition where athletes, some of whom are genuine Olympians in the swimming sprints and in weightlifting, attempt to break world records by using performance enhancing drugs. It's run by a guy called Christian Angermeyer who made a fortune from psilocybin tablets, magic mushrooms.
26:30He's like AI, psychedelics and crypto. Yes. The absolute perfect storm.
26:35Richard Osman:Although the more I read about it, the more I liked him. I'll say that. Yeah, we will get to him. It's also backed by Peter Thiel. Donald Trump Jr.'s venture capitalist firm are investors as well. Now, it's called the Enhanced Games, not because it's games, but it's Enhanced. It's called Enhanced because it is sponsored by a company called Enhanced. And that is Christian Angermeyer's company. And they will essentially sell you peptides and testosterone and all of these things. All of these things that we've spoken about before when we talked about Luxmaxing and all that stuff. This world in America seems to be getting less and less regulated, especially with the rise of RFK, where you can improve who you are.
27:14All the biohacking, all the self-optimization, all the longevity, particularly, that these guys are heavily invested in. And the event was connected to a platform where you can...
27:24Richard Osman:The event was connected to a shop. Yeah. Let's call it what it is. I mean, when it first came out, Seb Coe, he was chairman of World Athletics at the time, said, oh, this is all bollocks. I don't get sleepless nights over it. No one's going to watch it. People thought no one would screen it. It's like, have you looked at the media over the last few years? Don't worry. Someone will. And it was actually on Roku's YouTube channel. Yes, which is not nothing, by the way, these days. No, no, no, not at all. We live in a completely different media landscape. And as we've just talked about before the break, don't think that no one will screen it because someone will always screen it.
27:54They had it last night, but they had a training camp a few months ago in Abu Dhabi.
27:58Richard Osman:That was in Abu Dhabi. Yeah. And again, it's all like, I don't know where the stage of this is, but it will obviously, because it hasn't come out yet, because they will obviously have to take in the games itself. But really, Scott's company was going to make a documentary about it. and it was going to be produced by Rob McElhenney, obviously, welcome to Wrexham. It's all just content, isn't it? Yes. Well, it's not even just content, it's an advert. And it's fascinating. We talk a lot about how sport is the only game left in town, really, on broadcast television because you have to watch it live and because it has this sort of genuine drama.
Read the full transcript
28:30Richard Osman:But, you know, if you look at... So Enhanced, which had an IPO and is worth over a billion dollars, this company that will sell you peptides and all sorts of things, you know in their entry to the securities exchange when they had their ipo they described the enhanced games as simply a marketing tool this this this is not their company they're not building this thing you know this is literally a marketing thing and you know they've encouraged um all these sports people to come and do it and they put it on on sunday and lots of people watched it now the interesting thing about it is the sports people who were doing it and there's all sorts of people who did it.
29:04Richard Osman:Fred Curley, who was an Olympic 100-metre medalist. He did it clean, weirdly. There's a few athletes in this, Hunter Armstrong, the swimmer as well, who competed clean. Yeah, I saw him beat everyone clean. Which we will get to. He's literally the only clean athlete. You've ruined the advert. Yeah, you've ruined our advert, Hunter. Whether they are clean or not, because they can't dope test them. We have to get to the basics of, for how many years have people said about the Olympics, oh, I don't know why they don't just let them all take drugs and get on with it well okay firstly because it's dangerous and also it's ethically bankrupt etc this is a more interesting thing than it first seems because the first site it seems like a circus you think oh great the tech bros of course are pumping people full of drugs and then you know winding them up like toys and looking to see if they can break world records but actually you look at someone like ben proud who's the the british swimmer who's a silver medalist in the olympics i mean that's about as good as you can get in any you know lots of people swim it's really difficult and he's one of the very very best in the entire world and you know he says i don't make any money out of it so i don't make any money out of it someone has said to me i'll give you a million dollars if you break a world record yeah that's the prizes at this games were extraordinary really like really big money someone has also said i'll give you 250 000 pound if you win the race and there's only four people in the race by the way he says well that's 13 years of national championships that you know i would get the same money i saw 46 percent of elite athletes earn under 15 000 a year there's track and field and swimming and weightlifting they've chosen very very wisely because these things are high profile but you don't make an awful lot of money if you're usain bolt you make a lot of money most people do not make a lot of money so there there is a group of people who are incredible athletes who by the way throughout their entire career have been at the absolute cutting edge of how to train you know the cutting edge of this is a new way to do it a cutting edge of perhaps you can take this powder the cutting edge of seeing people who they're in a dorm with taking something illegal and not getting caught this is the world that they've grown up with they have grown up in a world where they absolutely are sort of put through the ringer physically and mentally for the entertainment of other people but for not very much money.
31:17Richard Osman:So when someone says to them, what we will do, we will take you to Abu Dhabi, we will give you a series of chemical interventions, all of which are legal in the real world. And then you come to Vegas and if you win a race against three other people, I'll give you 250 ,000 pounds. And if you break the world record, I'll give you a million pounds. Very, very hard to imagine what other than some internal morals would stop you doing that as an athlete. Because how else are you making the money? Ben Proud would have been training since he was a child you know just all day every day putting his body through extraordinary things now Ben Proud will be aware that there will be children watching this happening and they might be tempted to follow him and that's on his conscience but everything else involved you think well I sort of get it how long how much longer have you got in this sport five years six years you want to finally make some money and so that's that's what he's doing so I understand why the athletes are doing it and WADA quite rightly is saying that we don't know what these drugs do and he said yeah but these people they're like Formula 1 cars you know they've been put through like unbelievable training regimes which are absolutely not natural and which bodies are not supposed to do people have always harmed themselves you know from the Coliseum and probably before I think it was less voluntary the Coliseum but we've watched people harm themselves for our sporting entertainment what about boxing?
32:40what about what we know now about contact sports and degenerative disease i mean we know all these things and in some cases people are trying really slowly to find out because they don't want to stop watching those contact sports or they don't want to have to change the rules of those contact sports because maybe it's just a blip or maybe it's this or that we know this we already know that people are being made to do extraordinary and awful things to their bodies in the cause
33:04Richard Osman:of our sporting entertainment yeah that ucyk fight over the weekend which ended very controversially you think so that's sport so that's sport that's okay and this thing in vegas is not okay all i'm saying is morally it's a very very thin line between the enhanced games and what sport is anyway the one thing you definitely don't want is to encourage the massive amounts of putting drugs together in untested ways you know so all the doctors are saying we don't know what's gonna happen and of course you don't know what's gonna happen but is it like that scorpion fight in jarhead where they just like you'll watch anything and you'll bet on anything and it's just sport attainment and i think you know most sport most sports governing bodies the absolute key thing they understand and really know is people want what they're watching to be fair that's that is but also most sports governing bodies are some of the worst people out there and they do it very very badly and they have mismanaged their sports for so long that now other opportunities are suggesting themselves i'm not saying that that's necessarily this but many many other things and you can see like all sorts of breakaway things will happen because people will feel like i'm sick of this you run it badly and i get no cut of it and there's all sorts of different ways in which these kind of hegemonism monopolies are going to break up yeah now that you won't ever say oh well who'd screen it yeah now that you know there's there's there's so many sporting billionaires now that there are people in lots and lots of sports who are going to start saying I mean I can I might just do this myself I might just find a way to make this slightly more interesting for me because the sports people are the ones who were drawing the crowds not the sports administrators and I think that if I was an administrator in pretty much any sport I think people have got a lot better I think that's definitely true but this feels like when you look at it at first sight it looks absolutely appalling and when you actually pull back the covers you go this is sort of what's always been happening but they are being very they're sort of telling the truth about it that's their narrative and if james magnuson the australian swimmer i'm sure that his body can probably take more than say mine you know and if i was on the same regime as james magnuson who by the way came fourth in both of his races i think you can take two lessons one sport has always been very very very dodgy and this is almost no less dodgy than most sport has always been but on the other side the reason that sport makes so much money is people love it and when people love it you have that phrase again a duty of care to the people who are watching and if you're enhanced this company then you sell these products anyway and so obviously you believe them to be positive then you know you have to have a little look in the mirror and not just be thinking god i look young rfk is about to is about to sanction more and more peptides and more and more of these things so that you know lots of these things are going to be legal in america doesn't mean they should be legal and this is an advert for that so sport on this side i think it's fascinating what this says about sport and how actually as a sporting thing i kind of go we've always done that on the other side it's my god what sort of a society we're becoming i agree the one thing I would say as a positive was I don't think it played that well for them in some ways because the thing that you and I adore almost above all things in sport is its complete unpredictability and the fact that some of the people who take the most drugs were far behind and clean athletes won you can never fully control this thing and I sort of love that yeah you couldn't control it it didn't work the way they wanted to the first thing they had was one of the women's weightlifting.
36:46Richard Osman:They had two events. They were fairly sure they were going to get a world record in, so I think they must have done in training. One was the women's weightlifting, which didn't quite come down to a world record. And the other was Christian Colomayev in the swimming, because he'd already broken a world record on drugs. He'd already been given a million dollars last year as part of their marketing push. And he was the only one who broke a world record. So he's now made$2 million out of this, which is quite something. But, you know, Ben Proud won one of his races. So he's got a quarter of a million dollars.
37:17Richard Osman:You know, I sort of get it. But as you say, Hunter Armstrong wasn't on drugs. He was winning. Fred Curley, the sprinter, he wasn't on drugs. He won the 100 meters in, I was going to say, a slow time, like I can run 9.7. But, you know, he won 9.97 or something like that, which is, I mean, it's competitive. It would have put him last in the Olympic final. But, you know, he beat all the drugged up athletes. athletes but they reminded me of advertisers particularly the organizers because beforehand they kept saying oh you're going to see so many wild records broken a bit like when i look at an advert for some face cream you're going to exercise i was like yeah no you're not okay it's all listen i'm gonna buy it anyway i'm gonna buy it anyway but it's all a big load of hype and when it actually happens i'm not seeing exact i'm not seeing the thing you told me which is really what happens with all of these things yeah and also you know a lot of the swimmers are wearing the speed suits which are illegal as well i mean it is that they show the interesting thing is the regime they have been on had made very very very little difference to their performance i don't know if that's always going to be the case because what we want to think is oh my god if you did take all of these things then suddenly you know you'd be running 9.4 or something it's just like any old retail of in the sort of health beauties you know in five years time if they keep doing them surely they're going to beat world records because also more and more and more people are going to do it because as i say if you are an athlete and suddenly it's happened this first time and you know the world didn't end and you haven't made very much money in your career but you do feel that your body has been abused and you've been pushed to do things you don't really want to do and you feel like you've been running against people who are doped up and all of those things through your career i don't know why athletes in their kind of early 30s wouldn't be going oh do you know what next year i'll do enhanced games you know we'll go to abu dhabi there's doctors there i get it's all supervised it feels like more and more athletes would do it it feels like where you go i can't name the particular football club but it feels like where you go where they have the special medicine and the special doctors there's a there's a football not in our country where people used to go towards in their twilights and and do very well sometimes and maybe it will be a sort of twilight staging post Yes, like the senior snooker.
39:35Which I want to say is clean. It's drug free.
39:38Richard Osman:There's no drugs in that sport. There are no beta blockers. They used to have beta blockers. And, you know, this poor old Bill Wurvenhoek had to drink 16 pints before a match because he wasn't allowed beta blockers. Now, the organisers, they didn't release individual athletes' regimens, but they revealed that 91 % of the athletes used testosterone, 79 % used human growth hormone, 62 % used stimulants such as Adderall, 50 % used metabolic modulations, great band. 41 % used EPO and 29 % used an anabolic steroid agent, such as Deca and Durabolin. So these are all the things that people have been banned for over the years, lots of which are perfectly legal in lots of places.
40:16Richard Osman:But they're sort of finding different combinations of these things. And we don't know what happens when you combine all of these things. I thought it's, listen, as a spectacle, it wasn't amazing. They didn't break any records. I think it's a fascinating sign of things to come. though but as parents or as you know just human beings be wary of the huge amounts of money that are going in now to marketing peptides to you and marketing things to make you look younger train harder essentially that whole thing in vegas was an advert treated as such right well the last episode of the late show with stephen colbert and indeed the late show at all has gone out remember that CBS axed it in the midst of the Paramount Skydance deal, which they needed approval from the Trump administration from and ended up getting it.
41:10Stephen Colbert said it was an honor and a privilege, you know, the honor of my life to be here is in that sort of very goodbye to all that way. The President Trump, needless to say, posted about it in very, very derogatory ways, like he's talent is he's whatever i mean and it's all gone the end of a huge era not just his era so in some ways i can't really say the sun is setting on late night but you know what i mean yeah but i think the
41:35Richard Osman:the really interesting thing about it is is when this first happened and colbert was taken off air it was absolutely seen as a as a harbinger of oh okay now we have state-controlled media and this is straight out of a of a playbook that we're very familiar with and then you know when kimball was suspended as well. We think, oh, here we go. The whole of late night is being dismantled. Satire is being dismantled. We know this playbook. We've seen this a million times before. But actually, in the time between them announcing that Colbert is coming off air and now Kimmel is still there. If anything, he's got more powerful.
42:08Richard Osman:Seth Meyers is still there. Everything else is still going. It feels like the FCC, who were Trump's lapdogs in this, as in so many other things seem to have lost some of their bite you know they tried to have a go at the view and the view bit back so it feels like it's unfortunate for Stephen Colbert of course but it feels like this was the wake-up call perhaps that the American media industry needed. Yeah it's interesting the last series I saw got three times its normal audience because you know if you say to people you're not gonna have this thing anymore and this is why people actually showed up for it in the way that after Kimmel came back off his suspension, there was a huge sort of surge of viewers.
42:52But we have to accept equally. By the way, I don't think you can stop any of these things because as we said earlier in this very episode, there are many, many places that will screen things nowadays and we will definitely get to that in a minute. We have to say that Late Night itself used to be massive and even though it was incredibly expensive to produce, you've got huge writing staff, you've got big production, you've got all sorts of other things like that it was profitable and you had sponsors and you had lots of ad revenue because people watched it in a linear way and when you look at all the wars the late night wars of the 80s but most particularly the 90s even then though these shows were mega expensive and it's a little bit like buying sporting rights or something like that it's you kind of want to have it going through your pipes or you want to have it shown your channels but it it it does because it's and it's also it's something that's always been there you know some people will say now to to you about comedy commissioning why am i commissioning comedy i mean just because we always commission comedies why am i doing that because actually people aren't watching them and definitely the point at which i think the late show had got to it cost 100 million dollars a year to make and it made 60 million so you can see that it is it's just there It's there for prestige, yeah, a lost lead.
44:09And also it's there because we've always had things like this. It's interesting, all the other rival shows ran reruns sort of out of respect.
44:17Richard Osman:Against this last episode. Against this last episode. You can see what's happened. The clips are bigger than the shows. I mean, the clips get huge amounts of the opening monologue or some funny sort of moment or vignette from that night show. But they are also part of the old monoculture that is dead. In the old days, obviously, you know, you would, to put it in the most crude terms, And Red and Blue State or, you know, Republicans, Democrats, all watched these shows. They were part of the shared monoculture. Now, all of these shows are seen to be kind of hotbeds of kind of democratic degeneracy or whatever it is.
44:51And all of them, they are part of one complete siloed side of things, which was extraordinary and never existed in the old days. There is not a shared monoculture anymore that these shows sat at a sort of broad center of. yeah it doesn't exist anymore um and yeah as i say yeah it was hallowed and whatever it's interesting what he did next stephen colbert and i find this really interesting because he did this he popped up on public access tv which as you know is like mega lo-fi and back in the old days we thought oh my gosh i can't believe america has this thing where like almost anyone can make tv in waynesworld and it's not like all right we live in a culture where almost everyone makes tv all the time you know whether you're putting on tiktok or youtube or whatever and he hosted only in Monroe which is a community access program I it's a town of Monroe Michigan is a town of I think 20 ,000 people and he did this actually the night before or just before he took up the reins at the late show back in 2015 and on his last night in um in the actual late show chair he said the last thing I did before I took up this job was I hosted this public access tv show called only in Monroe and 12 people watched and to show business being what it is I'll probably that's probably where you'll next see me indeed 23 hours later he was hosting only a munro he made it really incredible he interviewed the two women who are the usual host this is a town of 20 000 people munro is a tiny and when you see that i mean this is very sophisticated they don't have a sophisticated setup as this that we're sitting in our podcast studio they have some sort of chairs and a little pot plant in the middle but he got jack white to do the music off a stereo and a reel to reel he got um eminem came on it's kind of like you know um they called byron allen and talked about what he was doing.
46:35Jeff Daniels was there. Steve Buscemi, they happened to find that there was somewhere in Monroe called Buscemi's Pizza or something like that. Steve Buscemi, zero relation, did an advert for them. So they had all sorts of fun things. And obviously he can create something wonderful. But it is the first thing that's on his new YouTube channel. There is now one thing on Stephen Colbert's newly minted YouTube channel. And it is his appearance hosting only in Monroe. It's sort of interesting. Lots of people are wondering what he'll do. we do know he will be writing with his son a Lord of the Rings movie.
47:06Richard Osman:Yes, that's crazy. That is nuts. Yeah, some sort of like small section of something from the Fellowship of the Rings. So I'm sort of imagining something a bit like Rogue One. It's kind of a Star Wars story and it sits within the whole lore. But anyway, but then why would you not go and do a show if you felt like it on YouTube? Leaving aside the political side of it for now. And that's, you know, why I prestige this by saying that all these other shows are still on. And there's quite a lot of them. They don't really need that many. is the truth. But as you say, that's... There are only three daily ones and then John Oliver's a totally different thing.
47:38It's just like a one night a week. But it's still a lot. Yeah.
47:42Richard Osman:Yeah, this was... It didn't make any money at all for CBS. Stephen Colbert was obviously paid. Now, there is zero way that Stephen Colbert is going to earn less money next year than he earned on that CBS contract. Because of his name and because of YouTube and because he can directly get paid, you know, the advertising money, he will be making more money. he will be making much more money but the show itself will be profitable if you because because everything has become we're on one now you're on a form of tv chat show now you're on a a screened visual chat show so he will make a fortune in the same way that conan makes a fortune from his show cbs are not only saving that 40 million dollars they're making a lot more because the thing that's replacing colbert and the daily show i think is very very interesting which is byron allen who's this amazing guy he started as a gag writer for stand-ups at 14 byron allen and then he did a bit of um stand-up and he just absolutely loved tv he's now a multi multi he's a billionaire his company which is uh entertainment studios it's worth over four billion dollars he has always run the show called comics unleashed which to us would be like a panel show really but it's it's comics doing a monologue and is sort of lightly kind of tied together he also does another show called funny you should ask which is very similar to celebrity squares so he's run those two shows for years and years and years byron and with loads of different comics um and if you want to know by the way how satirical they are they are norm mcdonald uh once said uh about comics unleashed i think it would be impossible to be more leashed uh so you know and byron allen will always say don't do anything topical because i want these to run and run around i want to be able to repeat these whenever whenever I want to do them so he does these two shows and they've been going out after um the late show funnily enough and now he said to CBS I will pay you for that slot I will give you money for that so I will buy that slot from you if you let me keep the advertising which he was doing years ago Byron Anna he's really fascinating he's made a load of money by always having smarter ideas than anyone else so now instead of Colbert you will have comics unleashed or comics leashed and funny you should ask just yeah all day every day cbs are saying we're doing this until we can work out how to replace the late show but i don't know why you would not just keep doing it because they're getting paid for it you know byron allen is taking all the risk he's keeping the um the advertising money he thinks he can find a way of of doing it he can run that without making a 40 million dollar loss that cbs was was making so that's what's replacing it which is hugely more vanilla for sure it is hugely more vanilla but does america really really need another show that's costing an absolute fortune and not paying its way that does the same thing as other shows because stephen colbert can go and do that because he will be doing that elsewhere you know everyone wins every yes he can make a show for i don't know for 20 million dollars a year and literally 15 of that will be profit.
50:42And he can take 10 people or whatever it is from the late show and they can do it. And we already know that fun viral TV does not have to be as we've always thought of it. But the other thing is that show can't be controlled by anybody. Even if Brendan Carr and the FCC and all these people want to play sort of whack-a-mole with people getting out of line or people speaking against the great dictator, so what, okay? There is a massive democratized thing out there that anyone can be a hit on and you can be sure if he decides to be a hit Stephen Colbert on it, he will be. And really good people will come there and then no one will control them and they won't get to YouTube and they won't stop because he can't possibly control any of that because otherwise, I mean, it's impossible for him to do that.
51:24So against legacy, old-fashioned things, he might be able to exact a measure of revenge or whatever, but you are just growing a whole load of other rebels and as well as dispatching a rebel to someone, you just can't be controlled at all.
51:37Richard Osman:Yeah, that's the irony of the thing. They're shooting themselves in their foot by releasing these people from late night because late night they have levers that they can pull. On YouTube, they don't have the levers. So I think Colbert is going to make more money from it. CBS is going to make more money from it. The shows that are competitors to The Daily Show are stronger than they were at the time when Colbert was taken off the air. So, you know, watch this space, but Colbert is going nowhere. You won't be able to keep these people down. Of course you can't. And that I think is very, very positive.
52:08Richard Osman:Conan has never been bigger or richer than he is now. Your reminder that we'll be talking to Steven Spielberg soon. Any questions you've ever wanted to ask Steven Spielberg, if you send them to thewrestisentertainment at goalhanger.com and we will ask him the best or the most interesting. Any recommendations? I really want to recommend Dear England, which is the new James Graham show. It's based on his play, but it's expanded beyond the Gareth Southgate verse into the Thomas Tuchel era. And I actually appeared in front of a select committee last week. We haven't talked about that. We haven't talked about it, I know.
52:44How was it? It was really interesting in lots of ways, but it was an absolute privilege to sit next to James. I think it's so fascinating. He's so interested. He talked a lot about local stories and he talked a lot about doing stuff in Nottingham and doing stuff with Sherwood, But he's also interested in these kind of very popular populist kind of national stories and to write something about the England football manager, just as when he did that play quiz, which became a brilliant TV series about the millionaire coughing scandal. He just does things that people are really interested in. And I think he is a most fascinating and interesting person.
53:21And it was a privilege to sit next to him, Dear England, about the Gareth Southgate era and beyond as part of the start of World Cup programming.
53:31Richard Osman:Can I say, because I watched the whole of that committee. I thought you were terrific. But all the way through, and he was great. He made lots of very, very good points. but he did keep saying and as Dear England which is on BBC on Sunday you never once plugged the podcast I couldn't believe it you could have just said and by the way we're talking to Steven Spielberg if you have any questions for him I don't want to talk about only in Monroe and what it normally gets as public access television but I can assure you that committee hearing would have got considerably fewer viewers than that so I'm sorry I didn't plug the podcast on it you thought you'd save you'd save your ammunition okay I actually didn't think it was necessary to do that and I didn't want to use any of my time that I could have been giving them useful statistics to plug our podcast Richard and I have to say that I don't think it is a huge audience that particular live stream A, B, C, always be closing always be closing I'm going to recommend three different documentaries so they're all on Netflix and two of them have something in common the Jamie Vardy documentary which is part of the Untold story that I watch all of the American Untold which are just sort of smaller stories from sport.
54:37Richard Osman:They've told Jamie Vardy's career. It's not, you know, Waikath O 'Kristi or anything like that. It's just this extraordinary story of him going from non-league and, you know, really becoming a pro at like 25 and what happened and then Leicester City is really, really great. And also The Miracle of Istanbul which is about the Liverpool Champions League triumph as well is in the same series. That's great. And the Kylie documentary which is wonderful. It's so great. Both that though, actually, the Vardy one and the Kylie one again how many times we have to see this the tabloid press were scum they were scum they were the worst of the worst every time you look into what they did you're like wow there must have been people there you think how on earth are you sleeping oh yeah I mean the Jamie Vardy one they do something so unnecessary and so cruel that is boggles the mind and Kylie as well it boggles the mind anyway that aside those three documentaries I enjoyed them all very much they're all on Netflix now for our members Marina you've just started this incredible series last week's one on Tradwise I absolutely love but you have it which was free to everyone but now it's for members only this week's one is about I'm talking to the brilliant pollster James Kanagasorium who's plugged into masses of currents in a much more technical way of our times than I am just doing it all on vibes and this one is talking about you know was Chalamet Timothy Chalamet write about ballet and opera and we get into whole like is classical music a dead art form or actually people listen to it but they don't really realise they're listening to it and stats based really he's got everyone's yeah it's so fascinating anyway so that is for our members if you want to join for ad free listening and bonus episodes it's the rest is entertainment.com otherwise we will see you on Thursday see you on Thursday
56:43Richard Osman:Turn it up! Storm has zero sugar and 200 milligrams of caffeine, so you can turn that workout up a notch. Good energy in, good energy out. Energy for life.
From the publisher
Is this the end for the hit reality dating show, Married At First Sight? Were the inaugural ‘Enhanced Games’ a hit or flop? And what does the end of Stephen Colbert’s Late Show tell us about where late-night TV is going?
Channel 4 has pulled Married at First Sight UK from streaming in the wake of sexual abuse allegations by former participants. Richard Osman and Marina Hyde unpick what this means for Channel 4, and whether the controversial format is too toxic to save.
The Enhanced Games saw elite athletes flock to Las Vegas for a contest where performance-enhancing drugs were encouraged, not banned. Will this herald a new age of sporting entertainment?
Stephen Colbert has bid farewell to The Late Show, an institution of America's small screen. But what will happen to late-night TV without it? And what will Colbert do next?
The Rest is Entertainment is brought to you by Octopus Energy, Britain's most awarded energy supplier.
Lloyds. 250 years on and still backing the nation's aspirations.
Join The Rest Is Entertainment Club: Unlock the full experience of the show – with exclusive bonus content, ad-free listening, early access to Q&A episodes, access to our newsletter archive, discounted book prices with our partners at Coles Books, early ticket access to live events, and access to our chat community. Sign up directly at therestisentertainment.com
For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com
Video Editor: Joey McCarthy & James Clayden
Assistant Producer: Imee Marriott
Senior Producer: Joey McCarthy
Social Producer: Bex Tyrrell
Exec Producer: Sam Psyk & Neil Fearn
Filmed at www.westdigitalstudios.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
