In short
The hosts discuss Strictly Come Dancing’s launch with new presenters (Emma Willis, Josh Whittaker/Whittacombe, Johannes Radebe), the role of producer decisions after launch, and how “entertainment journalism” and social-media outrage shape coverage. They then debate BBC censorship of comedy (a Catherine Ryan joke on Have I Got News For You; and removed Mitchell & Webb sketches on iPlayer) and preview BBC’s Celebrity Traitors.
Guest backgrounds
Marina Hyde and Richard Osman are the episode’s hosts. Hyde is a comedy/journalism commentator; Osman is a TV presenter/author (notably associated with House of Games). No additional guests are interviewed in the transcript.
Key claims
Social media backlash is overstated; producers adjust after launch but viewers don’t notice. Entertainment journalism often recycles a few social posts into “reach” stories. BBC complaints processes can force “comedy VAR” decisions that may feel overly literal. Removing older comedy sketches risks erasing cultural context.
Notable examples
Strictly’s new host roles; Claudia Winkleman/Tess Daly comparisons; Catherine Ryan’s Victoria Beckham/C-word joke; Mitchell & Webb sketches involving blackface/racism; Celebrity Traitors starts this week with extra reaction episodes.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOHosts' Book Tour Experience
1:15 to 2:08
The hosts share experiences from their recent book tours.
“starring Mike Feist and Christopher Abbott as the Trask brothers and Florence Pugh as Kathy Ames, the complex anti-heroine determined to build the life she wants, no matter the cost.”
Hosts' Book Tour Experience
2:22 to 3:14
The hosts share experiences from their recent book tours.
“How are you Richard, other than extremely jet lagged?”
Discussion on Celebrity Traitors
3:14 to 4:38
The hosts discuss the anticipation for the new show Celebrity Traitors.
“And yeah, I tell you what, there has been a lot of love for the podcast.”
Strictly Come Dancing Launch Show Overview
4:38 to 5:50
Analyzing the impact of new hosts on the launch of Strictly.
“So we've had the launch show already, but this was the first show where people were actually dancing.”
Backlash Against Changes in Strictly
5:50 to 7:54
Exploring audience reactions to changes in the show format.
“They did a video showing them all signing up.”
Producer's Perspective on Viewer Reactions
7:54 to 10:40
Understanding how producers assess audience feedback post-show.
Critique of Entertainment Journalism
10:40 to 14:00
Critique of the state of entertainment journalism and its impact.
“And also, then you sit down with Johannes and go, what is it that you are?”
Critique of Strictly Come Dancing Coverage
14:00 to 22:56
Discussion on the media's portrayal of Strictly and its impact on the show's perception.
“And nothing will change about that because how can it be anything else?”
Critique of Strictly Come Dancing Coverage
23:03 to 24:12
Discussion on the media's portrayal of Strictly and its impact on the show's perception.
“And that's the thing, creatively, it's actually very, very useful to hang out with other people who are incredibly talented because you drive each other on to do things.”
Critique of Strictly Come Dancing Coverage
24:17 to 25:11
Discussion on the media's portrayal of Strictly and its impact on the show's perception.
“through love, betrayal, and the choices that shape humanity.”
Show all 24 chapters
Discussion on BBC Censorship in Comedy
25:11 to 28:00
Debate about the implications of censoring comedic material on BBC shows.
“Now, before we get into further BBC juggernauts, we are going to say that on Thursday, your interview with John Grisham is coming out.”
Discussion on Matrescence and Comedy Context
28:00 to 30:00
Explore the implications of a controversial joke made by a comedian and the concept of matrescence.
“Her explanation, she says she'd had a baby 10 days before.”
Mitchell and Webb Sketches Controversy
30:00 to 36:40
Analyze the BBC's removal of sketches from the Mitchell and Webb show and its implications for comedy.
“Yeah, I think she's even saying, yeah, you know what?”
Cultural Context and Comedy Evolution
36:40 to 42:01
Delve into how cultural shifts affect comedic content and the challenges of maintaining context in modern streaming.
“You go, I mean, yes, the public, yes, but not the online public because the online public will, they will pile onto you.”
Cultural Reflections on Banned Sketches
42:01 to 42:34
The discussion explores the implications of banned sketches and their historical significance.
“Or you can just say, do you know what, leave it for now.”
Upcoming Celebrity Traitors Series
42:35 to 43:57
An overview of the new Celebrity Traitors series, discussing its format and expectations.
“So shall we finish with Celebrity Traitors?”
Celebrity Dynamics in Traitors
43:58 to 45:26
Analysis of how celebrities may alter the dynamics of the Traitors game compared to civilians.
“The thing about all these celebrities is a lot of them basically executive produce their own shows or have certainly a executive producer credit.”
Expectations for Celebrity Gameplay
45:27 to 46:55
Exploring expectations for how celebrities will approach the game, based on last season's experience.
“Which is really, which, you know, anyway.”
Casting Predictions for Traitors
46:56 to 48:25
Discussion on potential traitors and faithfuls for the upcoming season based on character traits.
“And they, by the way, they never do a show where they haven't seen a cut of it beforehand.”
Strategic Choices in Casting
48:26 to 49:58
Deliberation on the strategic choices producers might make in casting for balance and entertainment.
“I, gosh, I'd be tempted by either Bella Ramsey or Mahala, for sure.”
Trait Selection and Audience Engagement
49:59 to 51:20
Engagement with audience preferences on who they would like to see as traitors in the show.
“And in the same way that Joe Marler is an unbelievably great faithful, Ross Kemp is an unbelievably great faithful.”
Favorite Picks for Winning Traitors
51:21 to 53:02
Hosts share their thoughts on who they believe could win the new series of Celebrity Traitors.
“So those are my three traitors, Rajan, Jammer, Acaster.”
Reflections on Music and Upcoming Events
56:00 to 58:04
The hosts share their thoughts on recent music experiences and exciting events ahead.
“all last week and feeling slightly homesick watched the incredible Paul Heaton live at Bramall Lane on iPlayer.”
Reflections on Music and Upcoming Events
59:12 to 1:00:05
The hosts share their thoughts on recent music experiences and exciting events ahead.
“Starring Mike Feist and Christopher Abbott as the Trask Brothers and Florence Pugh as Kathy Ames, the complex anti-heroine determined to build the life she wants, no matter the cost.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00The Rest is Entertainment is presented by Octopus Energy. Now, entertainment loves keeping business in the family. Yeah, it's no secret that that's traditionally been an easier route perhaps into show business. It's not necessarily the only way to get into the business. However, there are lots and lots of examples where it really has worked for people. The Coppola's stretch out beyond film into music. Nicolas Cage, though, changed his surname from Coppola. He's Francis Ford Coppola's nephew, and he changed his surname just so that he could, you know, just be Nicolas Cage. But one assumes that in LA they did know that he was a Coppola.
0:34He stands alone for me. I always think Stenestrassgaard is an interesting one because lots of his children became very, very famous. And he always calls himself a Nepo dad because as his children got more and more famous, people started to come to him more for roles. That's a nice way around. So entertainment has some remarkable family machinery, but however useful the surname, it isn't always the only way in. No, Octopus Energy, for example, didn't inherit its place in the energy industry. It's proudly independent, and one way it does things differently is having each customer's account looked after by the same small team of around 10 energy specialists.
1:08They know exactly who you are. This episode is brought to you by Netflix's new series, East of Eden. A bold reimagining of John Steinbeck's masterpiece following generations of the Trask family through love, betrayal, and the choices that shape humanity. starring Mike Feist and Christopher Abbott as the Trask brothers and Florence Pugh as Kathy Ames, the complex anti-heroine determined to build the life she wants, no matter the cost. Watch East of Eden, October 1st, only on Netflix. Mr. President, my company formed me of the explosion on our rig on October 2nd. Causing massive water displacement and triggering a tsunami.
1:47They all heap the blame on me. Tom Cruise is. Digger got us into this mess. And Digger's gonna dig us out. From the director of Birdman and The Revenant. What would happen if I stopped doing it? You stalled, you freeze to death, that's what. With great power comes great deniability. I'm not the first daddy. Digger, see the trailer online. Only in the years October 2nd. Rated R. Under 17 on a minute without parent.
2:15Hello and welcome to this episode of The Rest is Entertainment with me, Marina Hyde. And me, Richard Osman. Hello everyone. Hi Marina. How are you Richard, other than extremely jet lagged? Yes, I've been on my US book tour this week, but I landed yesterday and I'm ready to go. Absolutely. I love that thing that you did in Dallas. I went to Dealey Plaza to see where Kennedy was shot. And while I did it, I was listening to the Restless Histories podcast about that day. It was so moving. Yeah. So you kind of recognize the place and you're on the grassy knoll and you can see the book depository and there's just a tiny little X on the road where he was shot.
2:56And I was listening to Tom and Dominic do this stuff. It was very, very, very moving. But it was a testament to the podcaster's art. Yeah. I'll say that. So thank you to the gents. How's your week been? You've been on a book tour as well. Also a book tour. Yeah. also booked a more book tour coming. And yeah, I tell you what, there has been a lot of love for the podcast. So I really like meeting all the audiences and there's been a lot of love for the podcast. One thing that I have noticed is that the first mention of Celebrity Traitors, there is like a sort of tremor through the audience. We are going to talk about Celebrity Traitors later today.
3:39I mean, it's like, we need this show. It's really interesting. People are, you feel something in the energy. It's really interesting. So we're definitely going to be talking about that. We are, yeah, because that launches this week. So we'll be giving you our preview. We're going to be predicting who's going to win. And I'm going to be, well, you can do it as well. But I want to say who I would choose as traitors if I was the producer. Well, also, it's a BBC special, really. So we're going to talk about strictly what happens when you launch a big show with new hosts. And essentially, what will the producers be doing on the Monday morning after a launch show?
4:11And we're also going to talk about incidents of cuts or censorship or remonstration after the complaints unit came down on a joke that Catherine Ryan made last year about Victoria Beckham on Have I Got News For You? And some Mitchell and Webb sketches have been taken off iPlayer because they no longer fit with our times. Or do they? Anyway, we will discuss this. Should we start with Strictly? Yeah, let's start with Strictly. So we've had the launch show already, but this was the first show where people were actually dancing. The first show where you really see Emma Willis, Josh Whittacombe and Johannes Radeby being the new hosts.
4:53Spoiler alert, people don't like it when you have new hosts or if you've changed anything at all about your show. It's interesting. Looking at the rating, I thought, OK, let's just see what we do know. We know about the ratings. Last week, the sort of launch show, which began with that incredible one shot, was ridiculous. That got 5.8. This week got much less, but you're up against the England game. It was up against the football, yeah. You're up against England versus not a rubbish international opponent. And you're also in that two and a half hour period of the show that is extremely long. In a way, if I was the producer, I'd be delighted I was up against the England game.
5:31So would I. Because you know the ratings that go up next week. Yeah, you've got cover. Because you won't be up against something that gets 4 million, 4.5 million on the other side next week. So the changes are, I mean, I find it quite difficult to understand the degree to which there is some form of backlash or not. And we can get into that. The changes are things like the way the dancers were revealed. They did a video showing them all signing up. And you can see why they've done that because it gives you clips of socials and this is what they're trying to do. Obviously, people want familiarity.
6:03and if you don't think there was a massive backlash when Bruce Forsyth left, there was one. I know. And then it settles into this thing where this is the only version of the show that can possibly be tolerated. Yeah. So the way the presenting duties divide, it was interesting because at the start, everyone said when the new hosts were unveiled, oh, I see, Emma will be like Tess down in the ballroom. Josh will be in the claudatorium doing the funny interviews afterwards and johannes will be a roving reporter now when you did your interview with them they corrected that and what they did actually say was oh we're going to be quite fluid actually yeah josh described as total football yeah everyone doing everything yeah well i think there might be tweaks to it because at the moment what happens if you haven't seen the show but you kind of maybe know the format.
6:53Down in the ballroom is Josh and Emma. Yeah. And Johannes is up in the doing the interviews once they run up the stairs and kind of have the diffusing moment. I have to say, I think that I would not have added another person. It's we've talked before about the unbelievable technical challenge of that little bit where people think it's so easy, which is so much harder than hosting general election coverage, as I've mentioned before, the bit that Emma has to do when you've got two exhausted people come off from doing their dance, they have to sort of get their breath back. You have to have a bit of chit chat with the judges.
7:29Then the judges have to do their judging. I felt adding Josh in to do some jokes as well, it's quite complicated down there. I think that, and they've gone with three people, and I absolutely see why they've gone with three people. It makes a lot of sense to do that. The one thing I know for a fact is that's the first time the producers will really understand what it is that they have to do so whatever twitter and all this stuff say and by the way they i think even even but it's funny even by the end of the show they're going oh no actually it's okay you know after the first 20 minutes where they go oh this i never watch this again in the end again oh no sort of i get i guess it's okay um as i say when you're a producer and you just launch that show and it's a huge deal to have new hosts on a big show like that i'm just a huge deal so enormous they started again with that sort of it felt a bit like a one but it wasn't but backstage it's very cool unbelievable and you realize just the scale of the production going all the way through all the backstage corridors and everything i mean it is an unbelievable technical masterpiece every week but i can't stress too much that however many pilots you've done and launch shows and run throughs and stuff that the the producers are watching that more carefully than viewers are watching it the producers know and and by the way the hosts are watching it more carefully than viewers are watching it because you know you don't get it completely right the first time and they know they've got three very different um bits of talent there all of whom can do slightly different things all of whom will want to do slightly different things as well uh and you watch the first one you go okay i see what works what doesn't work yeah i think i think that uh the johannes thing is interesting because he at the moment he's doing exactly what claudia did which is you throw to johannes the producers have given him two talking points like oh here was the thing from the vt um here's the thing that the judges just said just raise those two things with the uh celebrity and their dancer but the manner is very different well that's the thing because the reason that it became that is that's the thing that claudia is incredibly good at which is honestly give me a couple of bits of vanilla content and it yeah god bless you this vanilla content saying oh and i hear you call your arm something when you're you know in it's always been that but it's always nothing and claudia is very very good at turning that into something that's what claudia could do now that's not what johannes can do that's not it's not his it's not who he is he's a trained dancer he brings something else so you have to work out what it is that johannes does instead at the moment they're doing you do exactly what claudia did we'll feed you these two bits of vanilla information you talk to the dancer and the celebrity and then we'll you throw it back to Emma and Josh.
10:09But Janice can't do anything with that. He hasn't got anything. So you go, oh, this is just two bits of vanilla information. Yeah, and it feels very reverential and very... It doesn't diffuse the tension in the way that having a laugh with Claudia used to get rid of the sting of the judges or whatever it is. And it doesn't become more than the sum of its parts, which is what you want. So they'll know that no one watching that will have thought anything other than that. No producers watching that thinking, I think we've absolutely nailed it there. Okay, they'll work out. And also, then you sit down with Johannes and go, what is it that you are?
10:45I mean, you're technically, you're an incredible dancer. You've been there before. So you have that kind of ex-player vibe as well. So there's different stuff that you can do. The two-hander between Josh and Emma, again, it's tricky because there is a history on that show of that being written for. and writing for two people, one of whom is a comic and one of whom is not a comic, is sort of impossible. You know, that is sort of impossible. Now, when you're a producer, when you're making that show, you've got a billion different things to think about. So the first thing you do is, okay, we'll put Jojo up there, we'll do what we used to do with Claudia, we'll put Josh and Emma down there, we'll do what we used to do with Tess.
11:24I think probably that's not going to work going forward. Because it was completely assumed that Josh would be up there by everybody. Yeah, exactly. and it sort of makes sense but it's did they try and do something really counterintuitive yeah you try and do something counterintuitive as well and also you think well jojo could go backstage because actually we don't have a lot of that candid stuff and it would also make great extra content and maybe those vts could be 30 seconds shorter i don't know that's uh but i've always thought that yeah um so it's absolutely one of those things of uh the one thing i'll tell you for a fact that no one's paying any attention to is twitter that's a really interesting thing so I went on Twitter just almost as a nostalgia kind of thing to see what they were saying about it and you could I mean you could you can just work out exactly what they're saying which is I mean everyone say well I'm never going to watch again that's it for me and strictly I'm afraid I'm never going to watch again I miss Claudia yeah I think there's a very small self-selecting group of people on that platform who are sort of effectively live tweeting it yes some of them are saying that yes and then the son of the mail are sort of saying well that viewers turn against strictly anything so the thing i wanted to talk about is what it actually is to be like the the producer on monday morning and the one thing i will say to you is no one is paying any attention to that because they know exactly what they have and they'll just find the way of just tweaking it slightly to show that on screen but no one is going to be looking at any social media and going oh my god what are we going to do this is a crisis because it definitively is not it is done purely to drive headline engagement and i really find you know if you look at the outlets all the reach titles i don't know express mail i i find to be honest i find these kind of genuinely pathetic stories and by the way the people have to write them yeah privately will tell you that they hate doing this sort of thing because it is a form of journalism where you take one or two or three social media comments and you spin them into a here's what people are saying story I find it like it's really difficult to understand the sort of death spiral of quite significant parts of journalism and decide you know and sort of chicken and egg it I don't know whether people being made to do this has compounded the kind of full-scale failure of entertainment journalism in lots of ways or whether just deciding to do this has it's very difficult to understand what came first but whatever it is it's just it's the most kind of plastic food it's so unnutritious it's just it's a nothing and there are about 10 of these things on even on something like mail online which is not so kind of we've talked before about people like the express or or the mirror and being stuck and having to do millions of different types of stories about Martin Lewis or whoever it is because it because it you know you can kind of repackage them all slightly differently but actually even on Mail Online there are huge numbers of stories about this I'm not at all sure how significant the public kind of outrage it reflects is I don't think it is and it's just a sort of nothing you can just find anyone to say anything and it's that kind of journalism has fled right out of entertainment and gone all sorts of other places but i do find it just very very poor and the other thing i would say is it fundamentally misunderstands what the show is this is a show about dancing journeys endurance and sort of self-discovery and also discovery of who the hell these people are it doesn't matter you know please let everyone tell me that they knew every single part of karen khani's personality at the start of last because i don't want to hear it okay but by the end you're like i'm in love with this person and you look at someone like lacey turner who i think is just so completely charming and you can feel that there's something about her that like lacks masses of types of confidence even though she's very very charming and incredibly sort of winning but and you feel like oh you could definitely go on a journey and you're trying to pick the horses that can go on the journey as it were in these shows that is what the show is ultimately about it really isn't about and i i should think that you know claudia and Tess would be the first people to say it, they understand that this is what the magic of that format is.
15:41Yeah, always has been, always will be. And nothing will change about that because how can it be anything else? Yeah. So I find the kind of, the predictability of it all difficult and really depressing. And actually it's a really pathetic form of journalism. And when I sometimes see people sort of whinging about cuts in journalism and things like that, I think, yeah, well, partly you're doing it to yourself. Yeah, I think when you look at the Strictly in Crisis headlines, you think, well, something's in crisis and it's not Strictly. Yeah. But something really is in crisis. I mean, because, again, it was nostalgia to go on Twitter.
16:18It really felt like nostalgia to go on Twitter because it used to be such a big deal when you had something like Strictly. It used to really add to it. And now it just doesn't. It feels like a thousand years ago. But is it because there's no one sort of good and funny doing it? Is it just like a series of bitter comments rather than people making funny jokes? Is there any of that left? No, you still hear that there are voices in the wilderness and there's still lots of nice comments. But you have to wade through a lot to get there. Now, you do have to wade through the 50 most obvious opinions a human being could have.
16:55So has that type of second screening already sort of gone away? Well, no, because here's the interesting thing. And there's a point on – and this is why the journalism side of it and the Twitter side of it is so deeply irrelevant. We know what they're doing on Strictly this year, which is they're trying to do to it what they've done to Dancing with the Stars in the States, which has been a huge success story. They've really, really turned it around. For a show on our network, it's been a huge success story. And they've done it by talking to the TikTok generation, the Instagram generation. and that's what this show is absolutely squarely aimed at there's there's a point at which Anton sometimes Anton will say the the quiet bit out loud uh and I love Anton by the way Anton is the absolute these days the beating heart of that show in my opinion everything flows through him you could see Josh and Emma anytime there was an issue we go to Anton anytime we need to get ourselves out of a corner we go to Anton and Anton always delivers listen people could watch it and disagree with that but as a producer while we were watching yeah but like you know when a manager says oh my god so-and-so midfielder was the best player on the pitch you go huh does the manager see so as a producer you're going Anton is helping us out but when uh Cash Mercer from Love Island did his dance and he does he does like a street dance version of a ballroom dance and so it gets marked down because of it but but Anton says he says uh he said well you're a man for the TikTok era this will be all over tiktok and you go but that's thank you but thank you anton because you're you're exactly right just say the word name of the platform say the name of the platform and then they know where to second screen it but you know i think there was a particular worry that um you know the male celebrities weren't quite as strong but then you watch it and this is why the casting directors are brilliant you look at john nellis and you look at graham hall you look at sean white phillips and everyone's going to fall in love with them the women are absolutely taken care of you've got Danny Dyer, you've got Jamie Winston, you've got Dame Sarah Story, Delta Goodrum.
18:51I mean, that's great. But the men who people think, oh, I don't know who they are. Those are the journeys that we're going to watch. I mean, John Nellis could win the whole thing. And everyone in the world is going to know who John Nellis is. Listen, I mean, spoiler alert, a huge amount of the world already knew who he was. It's just they consume different media to the media that are consumed by another generation. Okay. But, you know, John Nellis is now going to, you know, he's going to become the singularity that unites us all. The Nellis singularity. The Nellis singularity, as I call it. But it's aimed at a different place now.
19:25It's aimed at a different audience. And it's aimed at being sort of visible across the week in different ways and in different forms and spreading the idea that there is this program on Saturday night to a generation of people who would not ordinarily be watching it. And yeah, just looking at that reaction last night, and I was looking in the places that I used to look and you do just think oh okay so this sometimes you go I see I see that this is completely changed now the old days versus the new days but um it's weird isn't it it just feels like it feels like we're in the olden days when you look at those yeah reports just don't cover it like that yeah it really is you could simply not cover it like that it's just old-fashioned and for people who are constantly saying the BBC need to innovate and be commercial and go where the audiences are why do you write like this then yeah exactly why do you say i haven't heard of these people when there's someone with 10 million followers he it's your job to know who they are you know it's okay if the public don't know they are but literally you should know exactly who they are and you should know that there's a big deal to get some of those people you can't just write he's somebody's hairdresser how is that a celebrity when he's you know the kardashian's hairdresser For 20 years.
20:36But I really enjoyed it. I loved Strictly. And there were people there I hadn't heard of, for sure. So what? That's not the show. I watch it with my House of Games head on. It's my last ever week on House of Games this week. Oh, God, is it? Yeah, so Michael Sheen takes over next week. But I'm always like, who here, who has not been on House of Games, would I love to have on House of Games? And, you know, you go, I'll have John Nellis immediately. I'll have Lacey immediately. I'll have Graham Hall immediately. I mean, there's loads and loads of names. And I always think that's a good sign. I think Josh will want, you're saying they're all happy.
21:11I think Josh will want a new formation. I think the one thing, but they know this already, they don't need advice. Johannes needs a slightly different role in the Claudatorium. He needs not just to be fed what Claudia used to be fed, because Claudia would turn that into something. And Johannes needs something, something a bit more it takes too, where you go into maybe some of the technical details or something a bit more. I'm not sure he can do the emotional journey in the same way that Claudia can or the comic stuff in the same way that Claudia can. Or the diffusing of the tension. Or the diffusing of the tension.
21:37But, you know, he can do other things. But if I was a producer, I'd be excited. And as they said, they've said it's going to be fluid. So now they can do what they like. Now it will be fluid. Yeah. The one bit of feedback I give to the producers, they don't need feedback. They don't want feedback. But I have one bit. And I'll only say this because I've said it a million times on shows that I've done. Please, please, please, can we never have another celebrity introducing themselves by saying, um you'll probably know me for or i'm best known as it is so embarrassing for every single person it's embarrassing for the show it's embarrassing for the celebrity it's embarrassing from the viewer you can just say look i train dogs on channel five right you it's almost certain you don't know me but here's a clip of what i do i i promise i promise you'll like me you don't have to say you may know me from i just come on fortunately we've got through that show but Just as a memo for autumn 2027, let's never see it again.
22:34That is the only criticism I think that is acceptable of the first Strictly show. Now, we're going to talk about the other BBC One juggernaut after the ads, which is Celebrity Traitors, a few predictions, and also should we be censoring comedy as well. So we'll see you after these.
22:56this episode is brought to you by lloyds now show business loves a club i love all these sort of unofficial groupings of people there's two brat packs i'm a big fan of there are two brat yeah there's two brothers because there's the movie brat pack all of the judd nelson and you know rob lowe and charlie sheen and all those guys everyone in the breakfast club yeah and then And there's also the Brat Pack of those kind of turn of the 90s novelists, Bret Easton Ellis, Jay McInerney, Donna Tartt. And that's the thing, creatively, it's actually very, very useful to hang out with other people who are incredibly talented because you drive each other on to do things.
23:31Because a lot of the British novelists in the 80s, Martin Amis, Julian Barnes, Ian McEwan, they all used to sort of go and have lunch and go and have dinner. And you could just tell, you know, they would talk about stuff and they would make each other's work much better. And that's the benefit of being in a group, being in a club. It becomes more than the sum of its parts. Clubs really do have benefits, like Club Lloyds, an elevated everyday bank account with exclusive benefits, plus a lifestyle perk like cinema tickets. And you get no fees on debit card spending and withdrawals abroad, an exclusive mortgage rate discount, interest on your balance.
24:00To join a club worth being in, search Club Lloyds. You must be a UK resident aged 18 or over to apply. This account has a£5 monthly fee refunded each month you pay in£2 ,000 or more. This episode is brought to you by Netflix's new series, East of Eden. A bold reimagining of John Steinbeck's masterpiece following generations of the Trask family through love, betrayal, and the choices that shape humanity. Starring Mike Feist and Christopher Abbott as the Trask brothers and Florence Pugh as Kathy Ames, the complex anti-heroine determined to build the life she wants, no matter the cost. Watch East of Eden, October 1st, only on Netflix.
24:41Mr. President, my company told me of the explosion on our rig. On October 2nd. Causing massive water displacement and triggering a tsunami. They all heap the blame on me. Tom Cruise is. Digger got us into this mess. And Digger's gonna dig us out. From the director of Birdman and The Revenant. What would happen if I stopped doing it? You starve, you freeze to death, that's what. With great power comes great deniability. I'm not the first daddy. Digger. See the trailer online. Only in the years October 2nd. Rated R. Under 17 on a minute without parent.
25:18Welcome back, everybody. Now, before we get into further BBC juggernauts, we are going to say that on Thursday, your interview with John Grisham is coming out. Yes, well, my interview, but with questions from our listeners. Yes, so the Q &A will be a John Grisham special. It was an absolute treat meeting him. And also to say that your Brilliant Big Brother series is continuing for members with Tim Hinks and Kate Lawler. The Bond series that we're in the middle of, don't worry, that's just on hiatus because that's talking of juggernauts. There's going to be a lot more episodes of that. So it's just on a brief pause.
25:51So we're doing the Big Brother thing. We will be back to Bond, I promise. Yeah, we're picking up that thread. Don't worry. But I loved the first Big Brother episode. It's great to hear. Oh, that's so great. It's great to hear Tim Hinks on a podcast. God, he's so good. I absolutely love it. So is Kate. Fantastic. Yeah, yeah, yeah. She's really so clear-eyed about it. You can see, actually, she's so strategic. You can see how she won. Yeah, no kidding. Yeah, we said, why did you do it? £70 ,000, tax-free? Yeah, everything about it is super. So that's the rest of the week. But for now, traitors we're about to talk about.
26:20But let's start now with BBC censorship and sort of getting rid of jokes and... Offensive material. Offensive material. There we go. You might have seen a Catherine Ryan joke that she made on her I Got News for You when she was hosting a bit less than a year ago has been censored and she's been admonished for it by the BBC Executive Complaints Unit. Complaints have been upheld. Yeah, the AC12 of BBC Complaints Unit. So we'll get to that. And also, some Mitchell and Webb, as part of the sort of 20th anniversary of that Mitchell and Webb look, they've put the show back on iPlayer and they've taken out some sketches because they say they no longer sort of fit with our times.
26:58We'll get to those later. Let's talk first about the Catherine Ryan thing. The joke was, it's really weird. It's one of those jokes that sort of, when you're hearing, every time I read it, I keep thinking, at the time, this must have made lots of sense. I yield to absolutely no one in my admiration for her. I love her. They'd quoted David Beckham's email when he was raging about not being given a knighthood when he called the Honours Committee, I think he called them a bunch of C words. See you next Tuesdays. Yeah, it's a bunch of see you next Tuesdays. And then later in the show, she says, I don't know that we're allowed to broadcast the C word, but you did reference Victoria Beckham earlier.
27:32and we'll allow that. It's quite a sort of convoluted... Anyway, and then there's a sort of a little bit of a reaction in the room and she says, oh, I didn't expect that. I like her really, I didn't expect that reaction. And two viewers said it was gratuitously offensive. Now, anyway, they've had a long investigation into this and they've said they've upheld this complaint. Jimmy Marville, who runs Hat Trick, who may have I good news for you, has issued a big statement. And by the way, Jimmy Marville never met a row he didn't like. Yeah. Now, Catherine also, she fronts up to everything. Her explanation, she says she'd had a baby 10 days before.
28:06I mean, she is amazing. She's like such an unbelievable workhorse. Got three really young children and an older daughter. She said, I was suffering them from a condition called matrescence. It's going to be a tough one for the feminists because I was a woman going to work, but I did call another woman a C-word. Sometimes I forget celebrities aren't my friends. If I'd called Jimmy Carr a C-word, he wouldn't have minded. Joanne McNally, C-word, she wouldn't have minded. but this was described by the BBC as a slur, as though C words are part of a protected group. I mean, I have enjoyed all the statements about this.
28:38And she says, if you watched it on the day, it was clearly a joke. The whole audience went gasped. And then I said, whoa, I love her. I don't know about this one. I don't love what they've done here. First of all, I think the joke is oblique. What the BBC have done here. Yeah, no, I don't. I think the joke is so oblique. And okay, two people found it gratuitously offensive. Two people can find anything. I actually think they should have sort of left it. Jimmy Marvel has gone in really hard against it. I mean, Catherine's sort of tried to, yeah. I don't know. People complain that it's not near the knuckle enough, have I got news for you.
29:10And then when something like this happens, she said, you know, she wrote to Victoria Beckham and said, I'm really sorry, I just, you know, I don't think it's that big of a deal. I think it's a tricky one. I think that the issue is if you complain to the BBC, they have to investigate. I mean, that's part of the charter. And even if two people do, they have to investigate. And I guess if you investigate that joke and you see it in black and white and you take it slightly out of context, I guess it's hard to say anything other than, yeah, I suppose it is sort of offensive. It's so hard to understand the joke when you read about it.
29:42And that tells you everything about what we're probably going to end up talking about for the rest of this particular item, which is context. But, you know, Catherine herself, you know, by the fact that she's sort of, you know, she got her apologies just brilliant. That's how to own something. Yeah. She's so smart. She's a sponsor of everything. I really like it. Yeah, I think she's even saying, yeah, you know what? Yes, I sort of get it. Yes, I sort of inferred the C word against another woman who I don't particularly know, slightly out of nowhere, without a huge amount of justification. But I did it because it was sort of funny in the context of what I was doing.
30:18It was funny or shocking in the room. Yeah, exactly. So it's not, no one has, apart from two viewers, no one has actually taken offence. But if you have to, it's like VAR, when you say, look, someone's fingertip means that someone else, that a goal is offside or onside. At some point you have to go, by the absolute letter of the law, we have to disallow that goal. Comedy VAR, wow. But it is comedy VAR. A more deadening poor manto, I can hardly imagine. If you are going to force me to give a judgment on this one way or the other, and you are forcing me to do it because of the way the BBC charter is done, then I guess I sort of have to go I suppose it's a bit offensive I mean even the BBC are not kind of going we will make sure this is never ever repeated Catherine will not be working with us again we will not be working with the producers of this show Yeah it's not one of those BBC rows No one actually cares No one cares Yeah but it is exactly VAR and have I gotten news for you because it's edited overnight and it's been going forever you're going to have that stuff every now and again I mean that's the point of it so I do think it's In a way you should be glad you have it because it shows that you're still at times, you know, you go beyond the line or whatever because otherwise people will always tell you you're too cosy.
31:28But does Victoria Beckham care? No, I'm absolutely certain she doesn't. Does Catherine Ryan come out well out of it? Yes, she does. Is Jimmy Mulville happy because he gets to slag off the BBC? Yes. So it's sort of everyone's happy. I do think the Michelin Webb thing is more interesting. Yeah, let's get into that. More intriguing because there's more sides to that, I think. To go over it, the BBC's removed 11 that Mitchell and Webb look sketches from iPlayer. This show ran between 2006 and 2010. And so it's kind of like a 20-year anniversary. That's why they're putting it back on. The sketches were, and again, it's even hard to explain.
Read the full transcript
32:04I'm short of seeing the whole sketch, which we're not going to be able to do. And again, this is literally comedy VAR. We're having to watch everything in slow motion from a shed in Osterly. War re-enactors in blackface, an indigenous tribe living in a garden centre, a joke about Jimmy Savile, David Mitchell in a burka. There are various things. And the statement from the BBC is, which I will read in full because it's fair to give them their justification, that Mitchell and Webb look has been made available on BBC iPlayer. This is a 20-year-old sketch show in consultation with the programme makers.
32:37We have included the ones that still work today and not the ones that don't. so a lot of those sketches and it's interesting they have not said anything about it mitchell and well they probably think it will go away quicker if they don't yeah they were sketches that mocked racism and i've i've i mean i this is i've done this one complaining to my desk at the guardian sort of saying something this is offensive and it's really annoying and i apologize this because it's such a sort of pretentious thing to say but they have confused the subject of the joke with the object of the joke. And these were sketches that quite clearly were mocking racism.
33:14I think it's very difficult when you're dealing with stuff like this. And it's completely a sort of function of the era in which we live, which is that in the old days, things were much more evanescent and programs happened and then they weren't available forever as these kind of permanent after facts. And it's sort of the way with newspaper things as well, in that, you know, once it was just chip paper and you never saw it again. And now you've kind of created this permanent online artifact. But you've stripped it of its temporal context always. And that's what's happened here. Stop stripping things of their temporal context, for goodness sake.
33:51But they want them to live forever on streaming because then they make more money. and after George Floyd in the death of George Floyd in 2020 lots of US shows removed kind of blackface scenes or sketches 30 Rock was a particular one Tina Fey came out and said take it and I'm going to come back to that specific episode in a minute Mad Men kept an episode where Roger Sterling performed in blackface and they added a card sort of contextualizing saying you know this was the 60s or whatever when this happens you've kind of got a few options you can either cut the whole episode and say we're not going to show that any longer you can remove the scene none of these are kind of great you can have a sort of title card warning saying this is going to happen you can have a title card contextualization saying like the mad men thing this is how or you can just leave it completely but it's very difficult to provide the context at the time and I mean I find it quite difficult as I've read a lot of interesting stuff I remember reading a lot of interesting stuff around the time of this that moment in the wake of um george floyd's death and black lives matter and people saying the same picture of blackface could be obviously route one just a racist caricature yeah it can also be that the character wearing it is being lampooned as a kind of grotesque idiot who has done this thing or it's a sort of wider satire designed to expose either the history of blackface or the absurdity of it or the awfulness of it and it could be the same image doesn't there's anything other than number one don't immediately make it harmless but it's clearly a different context and i i think it's difficult just taking this stuff out yeah i mean they say look we've done this in consultation with the program makers and i'm absolutely certain they have and if i was mitchell and webb or mitchell or webb then i would ask them to take it out and i the reason i would do that is because in 2006 you could probably just about have predicted where we are today but it would be hard to predict the culture in which we live in which nuance has been stripped out of public discourse yeah that's what it is it's not that the sketches have sort of become embarrassing kind of artifacts i'm sorry i mean you know possibly some of the little britain ones yes sure yeah those are just like what what was actually happening here yeah but that isn't the case with these mitchell and webb sketches but if you are mitchell and webb you just think well look, they can put these things out.
36:18There'll be 11 sketches missing, which, you know, they still exist somewhere, but they won't be there. And it means I don't then have to be at the centre of a storm because a group of people online have chosen to take them. Every single week for the next however long people watch them. So why on earth would you put them out? And it's not because you don't think people can take them. You know, you see a lot of commentators saying, I think you can let the public decide for themselves. You go, I mean, yes, the public, yes, but not the online public because the online public will, they will pile onto you.
36:48But we're losing something culturally because of the online public. Of course. And we know this. Yeah. You know, that 30 Rock episode is actually a good example, even though Tina Fey, for obvious reasons, just like take it out. Yeah. It's from 2008. It's called Believe in the Stars. And Jenna and Tracy, who are the two sort of stars of their SNL analogue, they conduct a really stupid experiment to see if white women or black men experience more discrimination. um jenna ends up being in blackface tracy is in drag and alec baldwin jack tells them to stop um other characters explain to jenna how offensive blackface is she is clearly the object of the joke and you know the character matters look at the things that carmen has said and still says every week in south park yeah i mean every single week and those the thing about those two creators this thing about Trey Parker and Matt Stone is that they are very very kind of mentally strong and they do not care and they've always been sort of equal opportunities offensive and they're now sort of leading the vanguard about the only people who seem to be really really going for the Trump administration or whatever but they don't care about things like that and I think they would go to the wall over like you don't get to take this out yeah but most most people aren't like them Yeah.
38:04So I think it is, again, if you're the BBC, you know, things like taking one of the episodes of Fawlty Towers off because of a racial slur. And you kind of think, what do you want them to do? Genuinely, what do you want them to do? You understand the culture we live in, right? And a lot of the commentators, you are part of the culture that we live in. You understand that you're using it as a stick to beat them with. and you know that it will be used as a stick to beat them with if they kept it in as well so what do you want them to do i mean literally what is it that you would like them to do other than why don't we all just stand back and say no let's have the culture let's look at these things as artifacts but we that's not where we live because the discourse is is so dominated by people who want to either take online bad actors who either want to take offense online bad actors or take offense at people taking offense but you know that's that's where we are and if it was something unbelievably important and i would argue actually that an episode of 40 towers probably is an unbelievably important cultural artifact i would definitely say that but for 11 sketches in michelin webb which honestly they would ask you to take out as well and there is absolutely no doubt the spirit in which those sketches were written which is about racism and incredibly anti-racist But I mean, who would take the risk in the culture that we currently live in?
39:22I mean, no one would take that risk, right? So, you know, just take it out. The interesting thing, you talk about Little Britain. And I remember, you know, those are my contemporaries, really, those comics who came up in the 90s. And just for anyone who is under 30, when you talk about context, and throughout the 80s and early 90s, there was a very, very, very big movement of what we would now call woke. We used to call it PC in those days. So comedy became very, very, very PC. And in a good way, by the way, there was a real kind of course correction about who we joked about, what we joked about, how we joked about it.
40:00You get to the end of the 90s, and in the same way in politics that everyone thought, oh, we've sold all the problems. Liberal democracy is going to be here forever. that's, gosh, it's great news that we got rid of fascism. History has ended. History has ended. We had the same in comedy, which is, oh, I think we've sorted all those issues out. I think we've sorted out a lot of the race stuff and a lot of the gender stuff. And of course, you look back and it was white men had worked all those things out and sorted those things out. But there was this kind of thing of, oh, we can now be anti-PC.
40:30And it's a comment. Because we're fundamentally good people and we won't, you know, if we do it, it must axiomatically be funny and allowed. Yes, in our hands, we are dealing with this safely and we're doing jokes about the world of political correctness and about the world of racism and about the world of misogyny. There was definitely that thought process in lots and lots of performers and lots of the stuff you see now where you go, oh my God, how on earth did they think that that was okay? And it was because they weren't thinking in the way of, oh, I'm going to do something offensive. I'm doing jokes about the prevailing culture, the prevailing culture being there are sacred cows and a generation of people thinking, I think we're probably beyond that.
41:09And I'm so clever. I think I can probably handle this material and do it in such a way that kind of adding to the conversation. We sort of there was an idea that we were sort of post-isms at that point. And we were reader. We were very much pre-isms still. And no one understood what streaming would become and that these things would sit there forever and ever. But I do think ultimately it is a sort of commercially driven, not necessarily with the BBC, but in a lot of these other things, it's commercially driven. And it is a form of erasure because it denies how mainstream culture operated in those periods purely in order to make things more palatable and therefore more resellable as kind of permanent, you know, as permanent kind of library content.
41:53But if you take those 11 sketches that two things can happen to them. One, you can put them on the content mountain and have to put up with the discourse around it. Or you can just say, do you know what, leave it for now. And in 30 years time, an academic will go, oh, actually, I tell you, the 11 most interesting sketches from that era are these ones that were banned. And I can write about this now and I can understand that era through these 11 sketches and what was behind them and why they decided not to put them out. That's interesting, culturally. Putting 11 of them out now, when Mitchell and Webb would get grief from them, and the producers would get grief, and the writers would get grief, I get it.
42:29If I was them, I'd say, cut them out. Let history decide. Yeah, it's not worth it. You finished on that. That's a very good point. So shall we finish with Celebrity Traitors? It starts this week. It starts this week. The transmission, they're even more confident, because last year it transmitted on Wednesdays and Thursdays. This year, they reckon they can take Friday night. they can compete with you going out. Maybe this plucky little underdog. So it's going to be on Thursdays and Fridays. Starting this Thursday. I know. We're going to be doing extra episodes, reaction episodes to it. Again, we've said this before, but it is worth saying it's really fascinating.
43:05This is a particularly, lots of shows have celebrity formats that are in some ways quite close to the civilian formats. This particular show, because of the very nature of what it is, is different, very different. it will play out in very different ways it was such a prestigious thing last year you know we didn't you didn't know that it was going to be like by far the biggest show of the year and that everyone was going to go insane over it it's like listen to your brilliant big brother episode the people going to that first big brother didn't know they were in big brother yeah right the people going to the second big brother knew they were in big brother and that's that i think is what's happened i think celebrity traitors we're not going to do any spoilers but i think we can give you i mean we can give you some sort of background vibes can i say because normally if we're doing any show like this our entire week beforehand would be asking every single person from every single angle just off the record yeah what's happening what's this this is the one thing where we are not doing that so we can't give you spoilers because we don't have spoilers because we are saying to everybody please don't tell us we can give you a couple of vibes but that's it because Richard and I have spent our entire summer saying to people don't tell me anything do not tell me we would go we would be so mad if we couldn't enjoy it in that way We have heard some vibe stuff, which I quite like.
44:14Many emotional men. I like to know that this has occurred. But I have heard a version of... The thing about all these celebrities is a lot of them basically executive produce their own shows or have certainly a executive producer credit. And there is a real tendency to want to executive produce your arc on this show. 20 people are trying to say, yeah, and you can't. who you are in the outside world is a big part of this show, which isn't in civilian version, and which is why people who are kind of younger and like someone like Sebastian Croft or whatever, you're at a sort of disadvantage because the ones who everybody knows have a kind of advantage and they do slightly pick off the kind of younger and less well-known members of the herd.
45:00Also think that the way that they play is so different because they are somehow, they think they're more aware of the stakes, even though there's no particular reason they should be. It's just that they think they're professionals and no one's a professional once you get into that institutionalized setting. And someone like Joe Marler last year would have been fated in the civilian version of the game. First of all, because he's good at sport. It's so weird that they don't respect sport, the celebrities in the same way. There aren't any sports people this time. No. Which is really, which, you know, anyway.
45:31But he would have been fated as a traitor hunter. I hope they play much more like the civilians and say things like, if I'm wrong, vote me out tomorrow. I hope they do things like that because they can learn a lot of the civilians, I must say. Yeah, I think my sense of it is, is that this series starts at the same intensity that the last series ended. That's what I heard. Yeah. And because you're going to, you know, the last news ends on such an incredible emotional high and ratings and just being part of the public conversation. And as 21 celebrities come into the new one, it's impossible to come into that environment not thinking about the last thing we just saw, which was Alan and Nick and, you know.
46:13And Joe and the betrayals and all of that stuff. So I think it's quite heightened. Listen, it will absolutely settle. And like all series of traitors, it will become a series of the traitors. but yeah i i i think it was it was a uniquely interesting experience everything i hear by the way is it's brilliant that's that's the absolute by the way it is i hear from everyone it is totally compelling but i think the thing that we you and i said when we first found out they were doing a celebrity version of it we talked about it before it had even filmed i think we said it can't this format can be exposing and you know you think it isn't because you've got you don't have to talk about your personal life they don't have to see you brushing your teeth like they do on some other shows and i think everyone on that will have been lulled by last year into thinking just an immediate minting of national treasures yes and i think as you say i think that this time it will be a very different game which is what's so amazing about the format is that each time it's played out it's iterated and what happened last time is fed into it and i think that's what's so completely fascinating you can also tell with every celebrity who's been in it or certainly the ones you talk to, and again, we know nothing, we genuinely know absolutely nothing, is they're all still in the position now where they haven't seen a cut.
47:26And they, by the way, they never do a show where they haven't seen a cut of it beforehand. Oh, they've asked for them. If they want to. But they are not given them. Of course they're not given them. And so everyone is nervous because they are professionals and they do understand, oh, what if they just keep in that one thing that I did and they don't keep in that thing? So everyone will worry. I think because the way Studio Lambert make television and the way that the BBC will edit it, everyone's going to be okay. but people are naturally paranoid beforehand because of course you go to sleep and you wake up thinking oh my god but what if i'm edited in this way and this is such a huge deal and such a huge program and what if this is not understand so i absolutely get it i don't think it will be an issue i think people will just fall in love with the show again but yeah it starts on uh thursday which is very very exciting i just wanted to get your take and then i'll give you my take and people at home will have their own if you were the producers i know they always say claudia chooses the traitors i mean yeah i'm okay uh she probably tells the producers um if you were the producers who would your three traitors be i've got mine who would you choose for for television and for and for kind of uh longevity it's tricky isn't it okay this by the way okay would be the best it's one of the single best things about being a tv producer yeah is this was actually somebody's job there was a group of people sitting around the table saying who are our three original traitors going to be what a nice gig that is i think i'd choose julie hesmond house because i think there's something very good about those incredibly nice kind of motherly figures being absolute homicidal maniacs and i enjoy that a lot um does that tell us anything about your upbringing Yeah.
49:08I, gosh, I'd be tempted by either Bella Ramsey or Mahala, for sure. And then, I mean, we have this, we have this thing and I think they will disrupt it now that, you know, there's got to be, they can't choose three men or they can't choose three women or they can't choose not a person of colour. I hope they've forgotten all of that because I think that's become something that even the people at home can spot. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So I don't know who... Maybe I'd do those three. So you've gone Julie... Mahala. Mahala and Bella. And Bella, maybe. See, and this is why, with all due respect, I'm the TV producer.
49:50Okay, go on then. Yeah, I'm going to just imagine the first meeting... You've chosen Ross Kemp, haven't you? No, I haven't chosen Ross Kemp. Oh, really? I haven't chosen Ross Kemp because when you choose traitors, you also have to choose faithfuls. And in the same way that Joe Marler is an unbelievably great faithful, Ross Kemp is an unbelievably great faithful. You want someone whose just desire for justice will just not be able to be contained. And with Ross Kemp, it would be that. Just the idea that people are lying to him, you know, means he would be an absolutely great faithful. Do you want the traitor group to stay strong for quite a bit?
50:26because if you get like someone in who can't do it and messes it up, then it's already a leaky shit and it's dangerous. Yeah, you can have a wild card in there. You've seen a number of series of traitors where there's a sacrificial lamb who's put in the turrets immediately. And listen, maybe I've got one. Here would be my traitors for TV and for longevity. Amol Rajan. I was thinking of him. Oh my God, how funny would it be if Amol is a traitor? He could be a sacrificial lamb, let me tell you. Because Amal would love to be a traitor hunter. There's nothing more than Amal would want going to that place than be the man who seeks out truth and justice.
51:08And if on day one you say to him, okay, you're a traitor, I just think he'd be a funny traitor. I think he'd know the thing that the traitors can control the game and consequently would think I would like to control the game. So I disagree on. But anyway, carry on. Maya Jammer. She'd be very good. incredibly high status almost untouchable yeah in a way of all the people here not richardy grant not jerry hall i think she's the big dog oh for sure you know you know what i mean yeah there's something about her that sort of feels like it would it would take a very very brave faithful to start going what about maya i think about maya it might be her never go it's not maya come on and there's i've got those two then i go for a wild card just to get amongst them because you Amal Amaya, who's actually doing, who's throwing the grenades there, James Acaster.
51:57So those are my three traitors, Rajan, Jammer, Acaster. I just think imagine... He's going to go to pieces. Imagine them in the turret rather than what you've come up with. All right. Well, I think mine would be good. Oh, listen, the great thing about traitors is all combinations of three people. They asked the public who they think, who they'd like to see as a traitor. Do you want to know the top three? Who? so 20 % of people the joint third Miranda Hart and Hannah Fry I sort of see both of those I mean Hannah Fry I think people will assume is going to be a traitor because she's got that kind of she's the kind of clever one I think it would be hard for her to be a traitor I hope they don't do it which is why I mean also Romesh because people he's too strong yeah exactly 26 % Michael Sheen yeah which again I sort of I mean Michael will be a big character in there for sure I think I mean, I think too big to be a traitor.
52:51I think, again, he will have that Ross Kemp thing, which is Michael will take it very, very personally that he's not finding traitors. And that's what you want to see, that passion and that emotion. Oh, I think we'll see some of that this year. Yeah. And 27%, the person that most people would like to be a traitor, who is actually not a bad call, is James Blunt. Yeah. I mean, I'd be very tempted to put him in my three. I've gone with Amal, Meyer and James, But funnily enough, Julie Hesman-Helge and James Blunt were just bubbling under for me. And in terms of winners, I'll tell you who I want it to be.
53:27And I think she's very strong. I absolutely love Joanne McNally. By the way, listening to this podcast, subscriber bonus members. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I met her at What I Lied To You. I think she's so terrific. She's very strong. She's got that thing where people don't know her. Like, you know, she's not sort of Romesh. but I think she's very strong I think she'll be strategic I think she can also completely underplay herself in that way that Alan Carr was brilliant at I really want it to be her because I think she's absolutely terrific she's a real swashbuckler and very cool yeah and she's she's completely authentic which is incredibly helpful which is what Jo Marder had last year which is what you see is what you get and for a comedian to go in there and to be her own true self she was going to be who I was going to choose so given that you've chosen her whether when you get down to the last three yeah she gets side bodied by the way the last three yeah anyone can get in their own head and it's a crapshoot i totally agree it's very difficult to say but i would hope she'd get really deep into the show because i think she's terrific what about okay you're gonna have to say a second choice maybe yes uh okay if it's if not mcnally kemp if he doesn't blow himself out if he doesn't if he doesn't yeah if he doesn't blow himself out i absolutely see so do i i think he can be i can see him if he's not a traitor proving himself to be a faithful in such a way that it's i don't yeah i i just think this there's something about him but it's you know it's often the people that stay under the radar but you know i if it is a caster uh amal rajan and my jammer as uh traitors by the way there's no kind of uh oh i know who it is and i'm gonna make myself sound great no no i've literally no idea but uh that's why i just said who I want to win because I want her to win but Maya Jammer as faithful or traitor feels like a last three player as well yeah Jammer Kemp McNally would watch the hell out of this final but we'll all be watching it whatever yeah we will indeed so it starts on Thursday on BBC One we're incredibly excited as you say we'll be doing reaction episodes to that I'm doing a reaction episode on Friday I know which I sadly I can't do yeah you can't do because of pre-existing broadcast commitment.
55:37I will be doing it with Charlotte Berman who pretended to be Welsh in the Civilian Traitors. She's great. She is very, very clever and brilliant. So I'm really looking forward to doing that. So that's directly after the episode on Friday, right? Yeah. I'll be listening. I'm really sorry I can't do that. I know. I will do it. It's all right. It's just this one week. Never mind. Yeah. All right. Any recommendations? Recommendations, yes. Can I recommend that I was in America all last week and feeling slightly homesick watched the incredible Paul Heaton live at Bramall Lane on iPlayer. And, you know, doing House Martin songs and Beautiful South songs.
56:10And he's just, he's one of my absolute heroes, Paul Heaton. And it made me feel like, it made me feel incredibly proud of him, incredibly proud of Britain as well. If you, if it made me think of anyone kind of under 25 watching this whole, and it was a certain demographic in the audience, my age, singing along to every single word. And one of those things, if you're under 25 going, I had no idea who this man is. How is there literally a stadium and completely full of people singing along every single word to this guy who just looks like you would pass him in the street i think he's one of our great uh songwriters paul heaton so that i would recommend that how about you i really like the madonna charlie xcx um dance interior after hours single the collaboration i i told you i really loved confessions to her album and there's a song called dance material on that but they kind of mix their backstories and i just there's something about the pair of them together i i really enjoyed it and i've listened to it many many many many times because there's so much about you know how they got into it that kind of club club start anyway it's really cool i like it a lot yeah and two very different musical styles there from uh from the two of us yes so yeah a busy week up ahead john grisham q a um on thursday The Big Brother thing continues for members.
57:28I say the Bond thing will continue later. And Friday night, live Traitors reaction with Marina and Charlotte. I'm so excited about Traitors. Everybody is. Yeah, everybody is. We need it. Yeah. Thanks, everybody. Thanks, Marina. Thank you. See you on Thursday. See you on Thursday.
58:03Hi, everybody. It's Dominic Sandbrook here from The Rest is History, and we are here to tell you about a thrilling new series on the blood-soaked climax of the French Revolution, the reign of terror. So the French Revolution is one of the most significant episodes in the whole of world history. It essentially lays the foundations for contemporary politics as we know it, but it is also unbelievably dramatic. We'll be discussing the murder of the firebrand Jean-Paul Marat in his bathtub. We will be going to the guillotine with Marie Antoinette. And in our final episode, we will be telling the story of the extraordinary and grotesque downfall of one of the chief architects of the terror, one of the most evil men in history, some would say, Maximilien Crobespierre.
58:56So if you want to hear this epic series, search for The Rested History wherever you get your podcasts. This episode is brought to you by Netflix's new series, East of Eden, a bold reimagining of John Steinbeck's masterpiece following generations of the Trask family through love, betrayal, and the choices that shape humanity. Starring Mike Feist and Christopher Abbott as the Trask Brothers and Florence Pugh as Kathy Ames, the complex anti-heroine determined to build the life she wants, no matter the cost. Watch East of Eden, October 1st, only on Netflix. Mr. President, my company formed me of the explosion on our rig on October 2nd.
59:40Causing massive water displacement and triggering a tsunami. They all heap the blame on me. Tom Cruise is... Digger got us into this mess, and Digger's gonna dig us out. From the director of Birdman and The Revenant. What would happen if I stopped doing it? You stalled. You freeze to death. That's what. With great power comes great deniability. I'm not the first daddy. Digger. See the trailer online. Only in the years October 2nd. Rated R. Under 17 on a minute without parent.
From the publisher
Did Strictly make a mistake by casting three presenters? Who would Richard cast as the next Traitors? Is the BBC erasing comedy history?
Strictly Come Dancing’s new presenting setup has seen headlines claiming the show is in ‘crisis’. Does the new hosting trio have a fundamental flaw, or is the real crisis elsewhere?
The BBC has upheld complaints against Katherine Ryan's racy joke about Victoria Beckham on Have I Got News For You. Where should the BBC draw the line on comedy censorship?
A new flock of Celebrity Traitors enters the castle this week. Richard and Marina reveal their picks for a turret trio.
The Rest is Entertainment is brought to you by Octopus Energy, Britain's most awarded energy supplier.
Lloyds. 250 years on and still backing the nation's aspirations.
Join The Rest Is Entertainment Club: Unlock the full experience of the show – with exclusive bonus content, ad-free listening, early access to Q&A episodes, access to our newsletter archive, discounted book prices with our partners at Coles Books, early ticket access to live events, and access to our chat community. Sign up directly at therestisentertainment.com
For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com
Video Editor: Louis Mealing & Josh Smith
Assistant Producer: Imee Marriott
Senior Producer: Joey McCarthy
Exec Producer: Ami Bennett
Social Producer: Emma Jackson
Filmed at www.westdigitalstudios.com
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
