In short
Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics: US - Episode 160: TRUMP’S TARIFFS RULED ILLEGAL
Episode Overview
In this episode of "The Rest Is Politics
US," hosts Anthony Scaramucci and Katty Kay analyze the Supreme Court's recent landmark decision invalidating Donald Trump's tariffs. The discussion revolves around the implications of this ruling for Trump's authority, the American economy, and the broader political landscape.
Key Themes and Discussions
The Supreme Court Ruling
- Decision Outcome: The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against Trump's tariffs, with Justice Kavanaugh surprising many by siding with the majority.
- Legal Basis: The ruling highlighted that tariffs are a form of taxation, which should be legislated by Congress, not imposed unilaterally by the President under the guise of a "national emergency."
- Impact on Tariffs: Approximately $175 billion worth of tariffs were invalidated, including significant tariffs imposed on Chinese goods.
Implications for Trump's Authority
- End of an Era: Scaramucci posits that the ruling signifies the end of the "age of Trump" and a shift away from authoritarian governance.
- Limitations on Presidential Power: Katty Kay emphasizes that the ruling acts as a check on executive power, urging Congress to reassert its role in taxation and legislation.
- Trump's Reaction: Trump has described the ruling as a "disgrace" and is expected to respond with typical assertiveness.
Economic Considerations
- Consumer Impact: The invalidation of tariffs could lead to refunds for consumers, potentially amounting to $1,300 to $1,700 per person, which Scaramucci argues is significant for working-class Americans.
- Market Reactions: The discussion includes the potential for economic improvement as tariffs have been shown to negatively impact manufacturing and raise consumer prices.
Future of U.S. Politics
- Congressional Dynamics: The hosts discuss the expectation of a more engaged Congress and the necessity for Republicans to distance themselves from Trumpism to regain public trust.
- International Relations: Katty Kay notes that Trump's erratic behavior on the global stage continues to impact America's reputation, despite the Supreme Court ruling.
- Potential Actions: Both hosts speculate on Trump's possible future actions, including attempts to bypass the ruling and reassert tariffs.
Key Takeaways
- The Supreme Court ruling against Trump's tariffs serves as a pivotal moment in American governance, asserting the rule of law and the limits of presidential power.
- The ruling may provide economic relief to consumers while posing challenges for Trump’s authority and political strategy moving forward.
- The hosts emphasize the importance of restoring congressional authority and the potential for a shift in Republican strategies as a response to evolving political dynamics.
Conclusion This episode offers a detailed analysis of a significant legal ruling and its ramifications for both domestic and international politics. It underscores the ongoing challenges and complexities facing the U.S. political landscape as it moves into a new phase post-Trump.
For more details or bonus content, listeners are encouraged to visit [The Rest Is Politics: US](https://therestispoliticsus.com).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOSupreme Court's Decision on Tariffs
2:28 to 4:29
The Supreme Court invalidates Trump's tariffs, exploring implications for authority in taxation.
“Today is a historic day on a number of different fronts.”
The Age of Trump is Ending
4:29 to 6:12
Discussion on the implications of Trump's declining power and ongoing challenges.
“He's already called it a disgrace on truth social.”
Emergency Powers and Tariff Implications
6:12 to 8:16
Exploration of how national emergency claims relate to executive overreach and tariffs.
“I think the interesting question, and we can dive into the tariffs in a second, is that Donald Trump has used this idea, Anthony, of emergency powers or a national emergency frequently, right?”
Refunds and Financial Repercussions of Tariffs
8:16 to 12:08
Detailed discussion on how individuals and companies may seek refunds on invalidated tariffs.
“okay, this whole idea of emergency is a reason for executive overreach.”
A Pivotal Moment for the U.S. System
12:08 to 14:06
Analysis on the Supreme Court ruling's significance for U.S. democracy and political landscape.
“I'm not saying that it is, but it is great for the rule of law in the country.”
Impact of Supreme Court Ruling on Trump's Tariffs
16:37 to 21:08
Discussion on how the Supreme Court's decision affects Trump's tariffs and administration.
“This is a containing strategy from the Supreme Court.”
Global Political Implications of Tariffs
21:08 to 24:08
Analyzing how Trump's tariff policy has damaged global relationships and America's reputation.
“that we're not going to have this tariff in position over the next three years.”
The Future of Manufacturing in America
24:08 to 28:00
Exploring the implications of tariff policies on manufacturing jobs in the U.S.
“The longer this went on, the more damage was being done to America's reputation and confidence in America.”
The Question of Trump's Tariffs Impact
28:00 to 28:24
Explore whether Trump's tariffs could indirectly benefit him amidst economic chaos.
“That was a pipe dream that we were never going to recreate the manufacturing dream of Donald Trump's 1970s and 1960s, which is what he was sort of the whole premise of these tariffs were.”
The Reality of U.S. Manufacturing Post-Tariffs
28:24 to 29:13
Delve into the effects of tariff policy on U.S. manufacturing and components.
“And I think the latest numbers that we've seen, those numbers around the trade deficit going up last year and the manufacturing jobs going down last year in the United States are a reminder of why the tariff policy.”
Show all 14 chapters
Understanding the Current Political Climate
29:13 to 29:54
Discuss the broader implications of the current political leadership and public sentiment in the U.S.
“I'm with the people that are upset at the culture in the United States.”
The Legal Checks on Executive Power
29:54 to 31:20
Examine the role of attorneys general in challenging the Trump administration's actions.
“And I just want to point out that the recourse that the president has is very, very limited on these.”
Public Response to Political Decisions
31:20 to 32:43
Analyze how public votes reflect dissatisfaction with current political dynamics.
“At this headline level from the Supreme Court, the system is holding.”
Anticipating Trump's Future Moves
32:43 to 33:38
Speculate on Trump's potential actions and strategies following recent rulings.
“Trump was driving around in a Ferrari caddy, but it turns out it's just the golf cart.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:03Katty Kay:This is an advertisement for BetterHelp.
0:06Anthony Scaramucci:In politics, Anthony and I are always talking about power. Who's got it? Who hasn't? But the systems that function best are often the ones that aren't seen at all.
0:14Katty Kay:It's the organizing, the remembering, the emotional temperature control. A lot of women carry that weight quietly.
0:22Anthony Scaramucci:March brings International Women's Day, a celebration of progress and a reminder that progress doesn't cancel expectation or reduce the demands that are placed on so many women.
0:32Katty Kay:You know, Katty, when you're the dependable one, competence can quietly turn into obligation.
0:37Anthony Scaramucci:Yeah, women do so much of all of that emotional labor and all of the labor that goes on behind the scenes. When everything runs smoothly, we rarely ask what the cost is. Therapy gives you room to step back from that role and ask what feels heavy and where boundaries might need to be drawn.
0:52Katty Kay:BetterHelp matches you with qualified therapists through a short questionnaire. And if the fit isn't right, you can switch at any time.
0:59Anthony Scaramucci:Your emotional well-being matters to you, but it also matters to everybody else in your life. Find support and feel lighter in therapy. Sign up and get 10 % off at betterhelp.com slash tripus.
1:11Katty Kay:That's better, H-E-L-P dot com slash tripus. I'm R.J. Decker, the private investigator uncovering the sunshine state's darkest secrets. Tonight, it's the premiere of ABC's hottest new crime show. R.J. freaking Decker as I live and breathe. He's a private eye. It's not a standard murder. It's someone bigger. And a public mass.
1:33Anthony Scaramucci:Trying to get someone back to prison today?
1:35Katty Kay:You go to prison one time and suddenly it's all the jokes. R.J. Decker, series premiere. Tonight on ABC and stream on Hulu.
1:46Anthony Scaramucci:Rinse knows that greatness takes time, but so does laundry. So Rinse will take your laundry and hand deliver it to your door expertly cleaned. And you can take the time pursuing your passions. Time once spent sorting and waiting, folding and cueing, now spent challenging and innovating and pushing your way to greatness. So pick up the Irish flute or those calligraphy pens or that daunting Beef Wellington recipe card and leave the laundry to us. Rinse. It's time to be great.
2:22Katty Kay:So, Caddy, we have a live stream. Where are you, Caddy? I'm actually in Switzerland. Today is a historic day on a number of different fronts.
2:31Anthony Scaramucci:We are doing better than the Trump administration today.
2:33Katty Kay:So let me bring in some of the highlights and then we'll get Cady's reaction. But in a 6-3 decision, I was surprised by Justice Kavanaugh. Actually, I thought this thing was going to go 7-2. But the Supreme Court has agreed with the appeals court. And so the tariffs are invalidated. And I want to explain that just briefly, Cady. There's something called the IEEPA. This is the authorization that Trump used to put these tariffs in place, particularly the Liberation Day tariffs on April 2nd. So this represents about 60 % of the tariffs that we're talking about. Approximately$175 billion worth of tariffs have been invalidated.
3:19Katty Kay:And this is also a lot of the Chinese tariffs that were put in place in February of 2025 invalidated. And before I bring you in, I'm just going to say three very quick things. Number one, for those of you living outside of the United States, the rule of law is still existing in the United States. 24 cases, the court ruled with Trump. In this case, they say no. And it's pretty much a landmark decision about where the authority lies in taxation and the powers of taxation. Now, the court is partisan. Very surprising that this was not a 9-0 decision, because if you just look at the letter -
4:01Anthony Scaramucci:Which is what the Chief Justice wanted.
4:03Katty Kay:He wanted, which is why he was lobbying for it. He probably was 5-4 and got Amy Comey Barrett towards the end here, which is why he released the case once he realized he wasn't going to go more than 6-3. But this should have been a 9-0 decision. And I'll just say one last thing, turn it over to Cady. For those of you that are worried about the United States, you should be very optimistic today. The age of Trump is ending. I just want to repeat that to everybody. The age of Trump is ending. Trump is going to be nasty about this. He's already called it a disgrace on truth social. He'll probably be acrimonious and whiny at the State of the Union address and maybe even castigate some of the Supreme Court justices that will be present in the nation's capital.
4:47Katty Kay:all. But I think it's very important for people to understand the age of Trump is ending. And the United States between the Minnesota ridiculousness with ICE, the Supreme Court, people are taking a stand against authoritarianism and Trumpism. And I view this as incredibly positive. And I see Trump now going into full on grifting mode, Katty Kay, and trying to avoid the scandal related to Jeff Epstein. I'll turn it over to you.
5:17Anthony Scaramucci:Okay, so I think all of that is valid. I think it's worth people still remembering he has another three years and we're facing the prospect of America taking military action against Iran. So even though the era of Trump may be ending, that doesn't mean that on the international stage, Trump can still not, you know, try and wreak havoc around the world and take action around the world. Back to these tariffs. The key here in this Supreme Court ruling is that the Supreme Court has said to the White House, you cannot use this idea of a national emergency to impose tariffs. Tariffs are a form of taxation, and taxation has to go through Congress.
5:57Anthony Scaramucci:So in a way, the Supreme Court is saying to Congress, guys, you've been asleep at the wheel. This shouldn't have to be up to us, but Congress needs to reassert itself. There are three branches of government, and one of those branches has been kind of AWOL for the last year. I think the interesting question, and we can dive into the tariffs in a second, is that Donald Trump has used this idea, Anthony, of emergency powers or a national emergency frequently, right? In his presidency, he has expanded as much as he can the power of the presidency, this idea of a unitarian presidency where he tries to grab as much power as he can.
6:35Anthony Scaramucci:And the reason he is giving when he writes all of those little executive orders with that big Donald Trump signature that we keep seeing time and again. Repeatedly, the reason that he gives for having to bypass Congress and write an executive order and get something dramatic done in the country, what do we keep hearing? Well, there's a national emergency. There's a national emergency on immigration. Scott Besant went on television and said, we have to have Greenland because it's a national emergency to stop a national emergency. I mean, it got that sort of bizarrely Orwellian when it was around Greenland.
7:12Anthony Scaramucci:But I think what the Supreme Court has said here, and I've reached out to a constitutional lawyer in the last kind of half hour to check this, on the issue of tariffs, and we don't know how the Supreme Court, as you pointed out, the Supreme Court has actually ruled in Donald Trump's favor very many times. But on this particular issue of tariffs, and we don't know how much this extends to other issues, the Supreme Court is saying no, that this, you cannot say that there is a national emergency and impose these sweeping tariffs. We heard it specifically, right? Trump said around China that there was a national emergency, around Brazil that there was an emergency.
7:46Anthony Scaramucci:He's invoking this idea. Why is he sending National Guard troops into Washington, D.C. and Los Angeles? There's an emergency. And that premise of an emergency has been central to his overreach of power during his presidency. I guess my question for you would be, do you think as this constitutional lawyer I just spoke to seems to be saying that this is just about the tariffs. Should we see this as a narrow ruling around tariffs? Or is this Supreme Court trying to say, Justice Roberts trying to say, okay, this whole idea of emergency is a reason for executive overreach. We actually don't think that's valid.
8:24Anthony Scaramucci:What do you think, Anthony?
8:26Katty Kay:Well, listen, I don't want to bring my constitutional legal background into it because I'm not a constitutional lawyer, but there was a very famous case called Youngstown Steel, where the court said, hey, there is a delineated separation of powers. It's a very flat, decentralized system, and you can't step into the lane of the other article of the Constitution. And so the court is basically upholding the Youngstown Steel case. And so I'm going to respectfully disagree with that man this is a huge case uh this is a repudiation of trumpism this is a repudiation of authoritarianism uh trump will try to make it like it's a microscopic case but it's not a microscopic case this is the court telling you back the f up you don't have this authority and you're not a king okay and i think it's an interesting thing because it's coming as at a historical time.
9:28Katty Kay:They gave him a break on 24 cases. This one, they said no. Gorsuch and Barrett, he's going to excoriate them because he put them on the court, sided with Roberts. Okay. Kavanaugh is a weenie, by the way. And so, Kavanaugh used to be a George Bush, Reagan conservative. Okay. The other two guys are packed and gone, Alito and Thomas. But Kavanaugh is a weenie, by the way. And Kavanaugh writes in the dissent, Katty, because I read the dissent in preparation for this, that the refunds would be messy. Dude, it's not about that.
10:05Anthony Scaramucci:Anthony, back up a little bit and explain that, because I think a lot of people are asking questions. We've got people in the chat asking about whether they're going to get some money back. And I'm sure a lot of businesses are at around the world. But back up with this whole premise of refund. Explain what you mean by that.
10:19Katty Kay:On this program, Cady and I told you that the Supreme Court was going to rule against Trump prima facie. It was just against the Constitution. The law that he's citing had no tariff power. Tariffs are a tax, despite the president's rhetoric. Nobody pays the tariffs other than the American people, somehow, some way. The consumer pays them. And the court saw that. I would have thought that the court would have taken a split the baby approach and said, OK, listen, we're going to grant that the president used this authority erroneously, a result of which the refunds are not going to take place.
10:55Anthony Scaramucci:So, by refunds, just to be clear to everybody, this is already America has brought in like a hundred to something between a hundred to two hundred billion dollars. It's a little unclear in tariff revenues. The question is, if we've paid a tariff, do we get the money back now?
11:12Katty Kay:Yeah, exactly. So the CBO estimate is$175 billion. That's the estimate. It could be plus or minus that. But what basically is happening is there was a duty paid at the port to bring the goods in. If that duty was on your wine, let's say you bought some wine from France and it was held up by DHL or FedEx.
11:33Anthony Scaramucci:Not that we're going to call up my French wine habit, but anyway, yeah, okay.
11:37Katty Kay:Okay, but you may have had a duty at the port, and now you can go and apply for a refund. Okay, a lot of people probably won't do that. There will now be places on Wall Street that will suck up all these refunds. They'll call people and say, hey, you got a refund coming. You don't want to go through the hassle of it. We'll go through the hassle of it, sort of like a class action suit, if you will. And they'll get the money from the government. But it's$175 billion, which is not great for the U.S. deficit, by the way. I'm not saying that it is, but it is great for the rule of law in the country.
12:13Katty Kay:So what's going to happen now? Whoever paid that tariff has the right to go to the IRS, go to the Department of Treasury, said, by the way, I paid this after Liberation Day. You owe that back to me. Now, there are tariffs in place that were voted on by the U.S. Congress. those tariffs are in place you know there's 296 billion dollars worth of revenues that have come in from the tariffs being you know in place uh 175 of them are the trump erroneous tariffs now you guys uh somebody is uh alex here in the chat is saying weren't the lutnik kids buying tariff refunds they were uh and so a lot of people were buying the tariff refunds and they were trading at 10 cents on the dollar.
12:59Katty Kay:So some poor corporation that paid the tariffs, like, I'm never getting this money back. How much did you pay? A hundred thousand. Okay, we'll offer you$10 ,000 and it'll give us the right to claim your refund. So those things are in the money now. So anybody that made those bets are correct. And, you know, listen, I mean, I'm not gonna, you know, Trump said we're in a golden age. You guys know we're in the golden age of corruption, caddy k that's the golden age that we happen to be in but there's something going on in the united states that people should really listen to me on this this shit is over okay this is a pounding this is an ass kicking by the supreme court of the executive branch and i'm going to tell you right now these republicans that met with trump's people uh over the election strategy knock it off back the F up.
13:54Katty Kay:We're going to get smoked in the midterms and you're doing things outside of this system that has made us by and large very free and very prosperous.
14:05Anthony Scaramucci:Okay. We're going to take a quick break and come back and take more of your questions. We're not going to do this for a terribly long time because of course we'll be back with next week with more on this, but we'll take a quick break and come back and answer some of your questions.
14:21Katty Kay:This episode is brought to you by AuraFrames. Now it's Mother's Day coming up, and AuraFrames is perfect for the mom who says she doesn't need anything. Yeah, and moms are always tricky to shop for. Every year, the fallback gifts, flowers, books, random gadgets, you know, come on, they end up in the garbage. You know that, and I know that, but not an AuraFrame. AuraFrame is irreplaceable.
14:44Anthony Scaramucci:And what I love is that you can preload it, right, Anthony? With photos, you can personalize it. So even if your mom isn't great at tech, you can make it easy for her.
14:51Katty Kay:That's right, Katty. You can preload before it ships, add a personal message, share photos instantly. Aura Frames, the perfect gift every time.
Read the full transcript
15:00Anthony Scaramucci:For a limited time, save on the perfect gift by visiting auraframes.co.uk to get£35 off Aura's best-selling Carver Matte Frames. That's the one I have. named the top frame by The Independent by using promo code POLITICSUS at checkout.
15:16Katty Kay:That's A-U-R-A frames.co.uk, promo code POLITICSUS. This deal is exclusive to listeners, so order yours now to get it in time for Mother's Day. Don't forget to add POLITICSUS at checkout. Terms and conditions apply. When you want your spring break to feel like and your kid's pool day to feel like and your hotel bed to feel like and room service to feel like because at Hilton, hospitality feels like
15:50Anthony Scaramucci:Your cabana's ready. Would you like fresh towels?
15:52Katty Kay:It matters where you stay. Book now at Hilton.com. Hilton. For this day.
16:01Anthony Scaramucci:LinkedIn is pretty amazing at helping you grow your small business. We cannot make your email response time faster. We can help you sell, market, and hire in one place. We cannot help you find space for your three desk drinks. Why do you have three? And while we can't help you find the perfect volume for your presentation video, LinkedIn can help you find the perfect audience for your business. Grow your small business on LinkedIn. Learn more at linkedin.com slash small business.
16:36Anthony Scaramucci:I think that's all right, Anthony, that this is a blow to the Trump administration. This is a containing strategy from the Supreme Court. We have several checks and balances that are kicking in. We're still waiting to see whether Republicans in Congress stand up to Donald Trump. He has ever since 2016 had this curious hold over the party, which hasn't broken. But I don't think that we should be saying to audiences around the world that this suddenly means that Trump, Donald Trump, is not still going to be a huge, erratic, potentially wayward player on the global stage. Because I think there is a chance he has three more years left in office.
17:18Anthony Scaramucci:I don't see him just deciding to go down to Mar-a-Lago and play golf. I think we're going to see more of the grift. We're going to see more of the kinds of actions that we might be on the doorstep of in Iran. I don't think the whole issue of Greenland has necessarily gone away. And I don't think and if it's not Greenland, it's going to be something else. The Donald Trump himself has said that he thinks this is a disgrace. He's told people he's in a meeting in the White House. It's being reported. He also says that he has a backup plan. So I think he is going to try and carry on implementing these tariffs.
17:48Anthony Scaramucci:But I still think we have it's not like this ruling is going to suddenly make Donald Trump a normal, calm, moderate president who's going to turn around the Republican Party in Congress and suddenly say, OK, guys, you know, let's get back to normal. I just don't think that is where he's going to go when Donald Trump's back is up against the wall. His instinct is to fight. So I still think we could have other actions around the world on the tariffs and these refunds. there's a lot of people asking about the refunds. Is the money still there? Sam Risseter is asking or already funneled to the rich friends.
18:21Anthony Scaramucci:I think you're right. It's what you said recently that people are already buying these for 10 cents on the dollar. Some people are going to get very rich on this. I don't think many of the businesses that paid the tariffs and it was businesses, often small businesses in Italy, France, China, Norway, you know, Brazil, who swallowed the cost of these tariffs. I don't think those small businesses are suddenly going to get a whole load of refund checks. But Donald Trump, he has a bit of a problem because he's already promised quite a lot of this money. I mean, he's promised it in payments to farmers.
18:53Anthony Scaramucci:He's promised it in Trump bonds. He's promised it in refunds to people. What's he going to do, for example, with those farm payments, Anthony? I mean, how many times can you spend this money? And if he's already spent it, what happens then? I mean, as Justice Kavanaugh said, this is messy yeah it's going to be messy it doesn't mean it shouldn't happen but it is going
19:13Katty Kay:to be messy so what happens well listen it's going to be it's going to be messy but uh you know the government obviously has uh taxing power caddy uh the government also has uh borrowing power and if necessary they'll end up borrowing the money uh and again despite the deficit in the united states we can step into the united states can step into the capital markets and more or less borrow at will. So I don't see that as a problem. The benefit here to the U.S. consumer, depending on which statistical study you're looking at, it's$1 ,300 to$1 ,700 per consumer. You and I have always told people that these tariffs are very regressive.
19:56Katty Kay:That's real money for the working poor. And so that will be a positive. I think one of the things that Trump's got to be very, very careful of, if his economic team has any brains left, they'll be saying, hey, listen, this is going to widen the deficit due to refunds. If you start to impose replacement tariffs, you're going to create even more chaos and you're going to potentially create even higher inflation expectations, which is going to make it harder for the Federal Reserve to cut rates. You'd be better off yielding to the Supreme Court on this, going to the Congress and trying to get some taxing power if you can.
20:38Katty Kay:The chances of that are unlikely because of people like Rand Paul and Thomas Massey and normal Republicans. But, Caddy, I hear you that he'll still act like a rogue with Greenland and Canada and things like that. But this has weakened him. Trust me, in the corridors of power. They are talking to each other and saying, thank God. And there are economic people. There are people on his economic team that are saying, okay, good. This is good for the US economy, that we're not going to have this tariff in position over the next three years. And so, you know, and listen, I mean, Tony's asking, I just want to address this mooch newsflash, who on the planet wants to buy US bonds and treasuries at the moment, But the honest answer is everybody, because just go into the capital, just go into the capital markets and take a look despite our problems.
21:35Katty Kay:And we have many, many problems. The confidence level in the U.S. paying back that debt is enormously high. And this actually this case, if you don't mind me saying so, this case makes that even more confident, Caddy. The system is holding this against Trumpism.
21:56Anthony Scaramucci:And so I think that's very important. Let's look a little bit at the politics of this, both the domestic and the international politics of this, because at Worcester Rooster is asking, how does America recover from the global relationships he has destroyed? How do we revalidate ourselves? He's already blown up the neighborhood. The neighbors aren't going to want to move back. I think you've got a very good point there that even if I think in terms of the you can hear a sigh of relief coming from many countries in the world, particularly from the European Union. I've been texting with people from the EU in the last hour who are saying, and the official version is we're just looking at this, but there is definitely relief.
22:33Anthony Scaramucci:They were the ones that were finding it trickiest, negotiate with Donald Trump around tariffs. They see a vindication for having tried to hold the line against tariffs, against Trump on tariffs. And they hope that there will now be more stability. So countries around the world are hoping that this could lead to more stability, at least on the tariff front. It's been a nightmare for them for the last eight months trying to deal with this. But even if he can't, even though he's saying right now today, I have a backup plan, even if he can't reimpose these tariffs, even if that backup plan fails and we get back to some degree of normality, this has caused, as you and I found, Anthony, right, when we went to the World Economic Forum in Davos, this tariff policy combined with Greenland, combined with bombing Venezuela, combined with are we going to bomb Iran, take out their nuclear program, program, we've obliterated their nuclear program, oh, sorry, six months later, we've got to go back in again.
23:30Anthony Scaramucci:All of that, I think the damage from Liberation Day has been done. I think that it's going to be very hard. It's part of what has undermined the dollar, undermined confidence in the United States as a global leader. And even if this gets unwound, even if there were to be refunds for countries around the world, we know this. Other countries have already done big trade deals that they weren't able to do before, the EU with Latin America, the EU with India, the Canadians with the Europeans on supply chains. And that is all because of this Liberation Day. Would it have been better if the Supreme Court had ruled on this much faster?
24:12Anthony Scaramucci:The longer this went on, the more damage was being done to America's reputation and confidence in America. Inc.
24:23Katty Kay:Yes, I think that it was that's the process. Unfortunately, it had to go through the district court and the court of appeals. He moved it. If you remember, this is a case that should have hit the docket in February of this year with the decision rendered in June of 2026. So he moved the case to the end of 2025 to get the decision out. This is six months early for the Supreme court but yes you're right you know this is definitely something that uh you know we we wish we didn't have to deal with but but i you know i i just want to say to the people because i'm reading some of the comments here i just want to say to people uh you know listen uh it's we're in a tough spot the u.s i'm not going to say otherwise we have this miscreant running the white house he's got willing sycophants and he has a spineless republican congress and he has a very disorganized opposition.
25:21Katty Kay:So the opposition is fighting with itself as opposed to consolidating to fight him. So we're in a very, very tough spot. But if you think about the Constitution, Caddy, the Constitution is holding because these nine people, six of them just said, hey, we're not going to go in that direction. And so, you know, Trump is sitting there muttering to himself that he only got a 33 % return on his investment, meaning he had three Supreme Court justices that he picked.
25:52Anthony Scaramucci:The only one he likes is the middle pick.
25:55Katty Kay:Right, right. Exactly. The one that likes beer. I like beer. I like beer. This is dope. Okay. But in any event, you just have to think about that even his own judges wouldn't bail him out on this. And so, that's the big thing. I think that we will - It's a big deal. It's a big deal. Somebody just said that we're going to overcome this period of chaos. I absolutely believe that. But this is a big blow to them. And I just want to point out to you guys, I know we have to go. He really has limited backup options, okay? In section 22 of the trade deals, the cariffs would have to be capped at 15%. So, this nonsense of going to 25 and 35 and all this other stuff is crazy.
26:41Katty Kay:He can only do that, by the way, for 150 days. Okay. And the other sections, 301 and 232, they require formal investigations and congressional oversight. So this is a big, big blow to him. But Trump is also a lucky SOP. Okay. This is a big blow to him, but weirdly, this is going to help him, Katty Kay, because this is going to improve the economy. Right. So this is a good question. Bacent is saying to himself, okay, thank God this is happening. Right.
27:15Anthony Scaramucci:Because actually what happened last year, the trade deficit went up. Guess what happened to manufacturing? It went down in the United States. The whole premise of these tariffs. Donald Trump, there's one word that Donald Trump goes round and round his head all the time, and it's nostalgia, a feeling that he has that things used to be better. And the underlying reason for these tariffs was that he was going to recreate an America that manufactured T-shirts and shoes and all these things that it stopped manufacturing, that it's outsourced long ago, and Americans were going to go back and work in factories.
27:48Anthony Scaramucci:And it hasn't actually worked. I mean, maybe the administration would say, well, we didn't have enough time. It was too choppy. It was too up and down. We needed longer in the tariffs. This was going to be the year that it worked. But every economist that you speak to said it was never going to happen. That was a pipe dream that we were never going to recreate the manufacturing dream of Donald Trump's 1970s and 1960s, which is what he was sort of the whole premise of these tariffs were. So Matthew Byrne 4223 is asking, does this indirectly benefit Trump now that he may have to reverse his tariffs?
28:19Anthony Scaramucci:This may benefit the economy or is this the latest violent swing of the tariffs, which will further chaos? I think, Matthew, you're right. And I think the latest numbers that we've seen, those numbers around the trade deficit going up last year and the manufacturing jobs going down last year in the United States are a reminder of why the tariff policy. I mean, I don't know. Are we wrong, Anthony? Could the tariff policy have produced a manufacturing glory days back in the United States? Of course, it didn't. It didn't, and it wasn't going to.
28:49Katty Kay:The Wall Street Journal had a great article about this last week. If anything, it hurt manufacturing in the U.S. because lots of components that are coming into the United States have been tariff. They've increased the prices of the goods that are being made here in the United States. An example, if you have a flat screen in your car or an airplane, well, guess what, Katty Kay? You got to import that. We don't make those anymore. So, you know, listen, I'm with the people that are still upset at the U.S. I'm with the people that are upset at the culture in the United States. I understand many Canadians are boycotting travel into the U.S.
29:26Katty Kay:or boycotting purchases. A lot of people have turned on us because of the way we've turned on them. But I think the message here from the United States is that this is a group of people that are running the executive branch temporarily. The Constitution, which is, you know, it's going to be 236 years old. The country is going to be 250 years old, but the Constitution is 236, 237 years old, is holding. And I think this is a really big thing. And I just want to point out that the recourse that the president has is very, very limited on these. and he's now because i know his personality he's now going to be uh he's going to be more sheepish with these political leaders he doesn't have the power well and maybe that he tried to pretend that he had it and maybe those political leaders will
30:23Anthony Scaramucci:feel a little emboldened so we asked you guys a poll question during this live stream thank you for joining you all of you particularly those of you who are founding members we love having you with us. If you're not a founding member, you can join at TheRestIsPoliticsUS.com. Anyway, here's the poll results. The question was, do you think the system will ultimately hold against Trumpism? Results 66, yes. 35, no. I agree. And I have always believed that the American system will hold. And this reminds me of something that Senator Coons said to you and I that has not got a lot of attention in the press, but I think is really worth people knowing.
30:58Anthony Scaramucci:over the course of the last year, attorneys general around the country have brought, how many lawsuits was it, Anthony? Hundreds of lawsuits against the Trump administration and they have won 75 % of the time. And all of those lawsuits have been checks on executive power, the misuse of executive power. So at a quiet level, the system is holding. At this headline level from the Supreme Court, the system is holding. One person has asked us on the chat, I just want to take this last question, and this is from Ellie Pheasants. So what happens if Postas just ignores the ruling? Didn't they themselves basically give him a free pass to obeying any laws while in office?
31:39Anthony Scaramucci:He's not going to ignore the ruling. My prediction here is he's not going to ignore the ruling. And I think if he did ignore the ruling, this is what constitutional lawyers have said to me right from the beginning of this administration. The moment to pull the ripcord is when Donald Trump ignores a Supreme Court ruling. I don't think he's going to ignore this ruling. I mean, the people around him will end up going to jail.
32:00Katty Kay:Maybe Trump, and I get the point of the question, maybe Trump will have immunity for that, but the people that he'll need to execute ignoring the ruling will all end up in jail, Katty. And by the way, the people have had enough, you know, the people have had enough. And we're seeing that in votes, by the
32:21Anthony Scaramucci:By the way, we're seeing that in votes. There have been dozens of votes that are swinging against.
32:24Katty Kay:Bad for the world. Yeah. Bad for the economy, bad for the world. And the people have had enough.
32:29Anthony Scaramucci:And we're seeing that in votes around the country. You're getting state Senate votes, special elections, and time and again, there has been this 13-point swing away from Republicans to Democrats. So the people are making it clear that they're not happy. The polls are making it clear they're not happy. And now we have this very important Supreme Court ruling, which will be a containment on the president and his use, I think, of trying to use this idea of emergencies to expand presidential power in a way that the American Constitution doesn't understand.
33:03Katty Kay:Trump was driving around in a Ferrari caddy, but it turns out it's just the golf cart. That's the irony of the whole thing. He doesn't have the power that he thought.
33:11Anthony Scaramucci:Which doesn't mean he is not going to make his presence felt both domestically and on the international stage. There is still going to be an awful lot for us to cover because this president is not going to sit and be quiet for the next three years. He's going to shift to more grifting, Gatti.
33:25Katty Kay:Trust me, he's going to shift to more grifting. His goal right now is to keep the F-15 file suppressed and make himself a couple billion dollars. That's his goal now. He's going to shift to the grifting.
33:37Anthony Scaramucci:okay guys we'll be back next week thank you so much for joining us uh we just thought this was worth hopping on and doing a quick emergency pod on thanks for joining us guys thank you guys
33:55Anthony Scaramucci:ryan reynolds here from mint mobile i don't know if you knew this but anyone can get the same premium wireless for 15 a month plan that i've been enjoying it's not just for celebrities so do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three-month plan equivalent to$15 per month required. Intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. Default terms at mintmobile.com.
From the publisher
What does the Supreme Court’s decision mean for Trump’s authority? How will this affect the American economy? What does this mean for the pockets of American people?
Join Katty Kay and Anthony Scaramucci as they answer all these questions and more.
Become a Founding Member: Go deeper into US politics every week with ad-free listening, members-only miniseries, early access to live show tickets and a bonus members-only Q&A podcast every week. Sign up at therestispoliticsus.com
Instagram: @RestPoliticsUS
Twitter: @RestPoliticsUS
Email: therestispoliticsus@goalhanger.com
Producer: Fiona Douglas, India Dunkley
Video Editor: Kieron Leslie
Social Producer: Charlie Johnson
Senior Producer: Callum Hill
Head of Digital: Sam Oakley
Exec Producer: Tom Whiter
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




