King Charles Supports an Investigation Into Andrew

13 Feb 2026 · 1 h 16 min · 33 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The Royal Report: Episode Summary

Podcast Overview Podcast Title: The Royal Report Host: Jack Royston, Chief Royal Correspondent for Newsweek Description: A podcast focused on royal news, featuring headlines and in-depth analysis about the British royal family and related topics.

---

Episode Title

King Charles Supports an Investigation Into Andrew Episode Description: Discussion on King Charles' support for investigating Prince Andrew regarding allegations linked to Jeffrey Epstein and related email disclosures.

---

Key Points Discussed

  1. King Charles' Statement
  2. King Charles III publicly announced his support for police investigating allegations against Prince Andrew.
  3. The statement indicates the palace's willingness to assist the Thames Valley Police should they request it.
  4. The investigation is not an active engagement by the palace but rather an offer of support.
  1. Current Investigative Status
  2. Thames Valley Police are engaged in an assessment phase regarding allegations of misconduct in public office tied to Andrew's role as a trade envoy.
  3. The investigation's focus is shifting from sexual allegations to potential misconduct involving confidential information shared with Jeffrey Epstein.
  1. Allegations Against Andrew
  2. Prince Andrew has been accused by Virginia Giuffre of being involved in sexual trafficking.
  3. Though Andrew has settled out of court without admitting liability, the police investigation now looks at his sharing of confidential documents with Epstein during his time as a trade envoy.
  1. Legal Context
  2. Misconduct in Public Office: A charge that could potentially apply to Andrew's actions regarding sharing official documents with Epstein.
  3. The complexities of defining Andrew's role as a public official are highlighted.
  1. Public Perception and Palace Pressure
  2. Growing public discontent regarding Andrew’s perceived immunity due to royal status.
  3. Calls for the palace to demonstrate accountability to restore public trust.
  4. The public's frustration is fueled by King Charles’ ongoing financial support for Andrew, which contrasts with the stripping of royal titles.
  1. Potential Outcomes for the Palace
  2. The discussion suggests that the most effective route for the palace might be to allow a prosecution of Andrew to show accountability.
  3. The episode emphasizes the need for the monarchy to distance itself from Andrew to preserve its image.
  1. Broader Implications for the Monarchy
  2. The ongoing Epstein scandal significantly impacts the royal family's public image, particularly amongst younger generations.
  3. Polls indicate decreasing support for the monarchy, with potential movements towards republicanism.
  1. Discussion of Omid Scobie's Book
  2. References to Omid Scobie’s new fictional work “Royal Spin” which parallels royal family dynamics and touches on themes of identity and status.
  3. The podcast hints at how real-life events may influence future narratives within royal reporting.

---

Key Discussions

  • Accountability Mechanisms: The podcast suggests that the royal family needs to implement strict accountability measures, including possible legal actions against Andrew.
  • Public Engagement Strategies: Stressing the importance of transparency and public engagement for the monarchy moving forward.
  • Cultural Significance: The monarchy's historical and cultural relevance is examined within the context of current societal expectations.

---

Conclusion The episode provides a comprehensive analysis of the implications of King Charles' support for an investigation into Prince Andrew, the current state of the royal family amidst ongoing scandals, and the potential paths for restoring public trust. The conversation also touches on broader themes regarding the monarchy's relevance in modern society amid shifting public sentiments.

Next Episode Listeners are encouraged to subscribe for continued discussions on royal headlines and deeper dives into royal affairs.

---

This markdown document summarizes the essential points of "The Royal Report" podcast episode, highlighting key discussions and implications regarding the British royal family.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

King Charles' Support for Police Investigation

0:20 to 1:18

Discussion on King Charles III's statement supporting the police investigation into allegations against Prince Andrew.

“And, of course, this is dependent on the police coming forward to Charles and asking for that support.”

Allegations Against Prince Andrew

1:18 to 2:15

Overview of the allegations against Prince Andrew, including his denial and legal settlement.

“It falls slightly short of where I'd like them to be.”

Potential Criminal Offense and Misconduct

2:15 to 3:17

Exploration of possible misconduct related to Andrew's role as a trade envoy and information sharing with Epstein.

“Andrew's obviously always denied that allegation.”

Pressure on the Royal Family

3:17 to 4:28

Discussion on the pressure for accountability regarding Prince Andrew's actions and the implications for the royal family.

“I'm going to go through some of the public statements now and read them and we can just see what they say and talk about them and then go get more into the options available.”

Analyzing Buckingham Palace's Statement

4:28 to 5:12

Breakdown of Buckingham Palace's response to the allegations against Prince Andrew and its implications.

“The king has made clear in words and through unprecedented actions his profound concern and allegations which continue to come to light in respect of Mr Mountbatten Windsor's conduct.”

Thames Valley Police Assessment

5:12 to 6:10

Insights into the Thames Valley Police's assessment process regarding the allegations and misconduct claims.

“that are being investigated or rather being assessed by the police.”

Misconduct in Public Office Explained

6:10 to 7:30

Detailed explanation of the legal concept of misconduct in public office and its relevance to Andrew's situation.

“interview people under caution and do like a whole load of interviews about it.”

Historical Context of Misconduct Laws

7:30 to 8:28

Discussion on the historical context of misconduct laws and how they apply to contemporary cases.

“As part of this assessment, we have engaged in discussions with specialist Crown prosecutors from the CPS.”

Implications for Prince Andrew

8:28 to 9:26

Speculation on the implications of the misconduct investigation for Prince Andrew and potential outcomes.

“But back at the time when these emails were sent, misconduct in the public office was the relevant law.”

Recommendations for the Royal Family

9:26 to 11:55

Advice on how the royal family should handle the situation, including transparency and cooperation with law enforcement.

“These are not exclusive to Helmand Province, but principally focused on that province.”
Show all 33 chapters

Conclusion on Accountability and Justice

11:55 to 14:00

Final thoughts on the importance of accountability and justice in the context of Prince Andrew's actions and the royal family's response.

“They need to bring in outside counsel, an outside law firm, and get them to just go through absolutely everything, even if it takes a long time, and start giving emails to the police if they're relevant.”

The Pursuit of Justice for Andrew

14:00 to 18:10

Exploring the potential for Andrew to face justice and accountability.

“And it's not going to reset the cosmic injustice of Virginia not having been properly listened to in life and now no longer being alive to testify in a criminal court case.”

Public Perception and Accountability

18:10 to 20:58

Discussing the public's anger towards perceived royal immunity and accountability issues.

“And if they can have a word in Andrew's ear to say, like, just, you know, there's still a reputational risk around what happens if it goes to trial and Andrew starts making outrageous statements in court.”

William's Connections to Controversial Figures

20:58 to 25:46

Investigating Prince William's connections to figures implicated in the Epstein scandal.

“And those who have been studying the Epstein story may well know that name because he is the man who received an email from Epstein about a torture video.”

Changing Views on the Monarchy

25:46 to 28:00

Examining how younger generations perceive the monarchy amid ongoing scandals.

“And we're already at a point where the kind of more negative view of monarchy is seeping up the age range.”

The Allegations Against Prince Andrew

28:11 to 30:26

Discussion of the allegations against Prince Andrew involving Virginia Giuffre and the implications of new evidence.

“has a very interesting subplot about divorce.”

Emails and Defense Strategies

30:26 to 36:44

Analysis of the emails involving Andrew and how they relate to the public statements and defenses made.

“Days earlier, Virginia did her first newspaper interview with the Mail on Sunday.”

The Impact on the Monarchy

36:44 to 42:00

Exploration of how the ongoing situation with Andrew affects the British monarchy and public perception.

“Not the stuff that was said privately between Andrew and his staff that Epstein and Maxwell weren't cc'd into.”

King Charles and Andrew: A Complex Relationship

42:00 to 45:20

Explore the dynamics between King Charles and Prince Andrew amidst ongoing controversies.

“partly because the king is still currently providing Andrew with his accommodation, as well as some financial support.”

Omid Scobie’s New Fiction: Royal Spin

45:20 to 47:40

Discover Omid Scobie's latest fiction book that parallels royal life with a fictional narrative.

“coming back with more and more updates hello and welcome back to the show so um omid scoby who wrote finding freedom and end game big famous royal biographer has a new book out but it's not a royal biography.”

Character Insights from Royal Spin

47:40 to 49:40

Delve into the characters of Royal Spin and their connections to real royal figures.

“and I started keeping journals and notes really since day one.”

Thematic Elements of Workplace Fiction

49:40 to 51:40

Analyze the themes of workplace dynamics and personal growth in Royal Spin.

“It's one of my favorite things to write about.”

Speculation Around Royal Returns

51:40 to 56:00

Engage with discussions about the potential return of Prince Harry and Meghan to the UK.

“You know, I think for me, one thing that I really wanted to do was kind of bring to life some of the areas of the palace and the working palace that we don't really ever talk about whilst we're doing the job.”

Harry's Return and Public Perception

56:00 to 56:58

Discussion on Harry's potential return to the UK and its implications.

“It's not necessarily so much the divorce, but that Harry's going to come home because he's got his new threat assessment with the home office.”

Writing the Royal Narrative

56:58 to 58:34

Exploring the writing process behind capturing royal stories and perspectives.

“to influence any of the writing process.”

Character Development in Royal Fiction

58:34 to 1:00:32

Insights into character creation and the blend of fiction with royal themes.

“But this book really is about a female gaze on this royal man who's kind of at the centre of it, and also one of the royal correspondents as well.”

Challenges within the Monarchy

1:00:32 to 1:03:11

Discussion on the monarchy's challenges and adapting to modern expectations.

“there's always that feeling when you meet someone and you're like, I don't think you're right for me, but you feel really right for me.”

Future of the Monarchy

1:03:11 to 1:06:07

Speculations on the monarchy's future and the role of public perception.

“And so this was my chance to think, okay, well, what if that actually happened and what would it bring to the institution and what would that individual face within the institution as a challenge?”

The Potential for Royal Reconciliation

1:06:07 to 1:10:01

Exploring the possibility of reconciliation within the royal family dynamics.

“or we can make some really big changes, largely that involve listening to the public and what Britain needs and wants today, and seeing what that might bring in terms of longevity and a stronger future and so on.”

Exploring William and Charles' Relationship

1:10:01 to 1:11:38

Learn about the dynamics and differences between William and Charles regarding the monarchy.

“You know, we see that these are two men with very different opinions on things.”

Sequel Aspirations and Character Development

1:11:39 to 1:13:12

Discover the potential for a sequel and the evolving story of royal characters.

“I have always, regardless of the genre that I'm writing or the age I'm writing for, I just, I'm always curious about what's happening next for my characters.”

Adapting the Book into a TV Show

1:13:13 to 1:14:28

Get insights into the development process of turning the book into a television series.

“Especially with Lauren, you know, we kind of leave things on a tidy note in the first book, but clearly there's a lot more that will go on between her and the other characters.”

Visual Elements of Royal Life on Screen

1:14:29 to 1:15:27

Learn about the challenges and excitement of visually depicting royal life in the series.

“would look so impressive on screen that on the page we can describe, but, you know, it takes us two seconds to work off four pages in a book sometimes.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:19Now, we have had a bunch of really big, high profile dramatic, dramatic, dramatic, dramatic since the last podcast, including that King Charles III has actually come out and given a statement via Buckingham Palace press office saying that he would support the police in their efforts to take a look at the allegations against Prince Andrew, who we now call Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. And, of course, this is dependent on the police coming forward to Charles and asking for that support. So we're not at the stage yet where Buckingham Palace are voluntarily engaging with maybe an outside law firm to review what material they hold that might be relevant to the allegations against Andrew and then proactively approaching the police with that evidence.

1:09If they are simply kind of extending via a public statement an open offer to Thames Valley Police, if you want our help, do come and ask for it. It's a massively significant moment for sure. It falls slightly short of where I'd like them to be. So the big question then is, will the police do it? So far, it doesn't look like they have. But there have been major developments from the police too, one of which is that they've actually engaged specialist prosecutors from the CPS, from the Crown Prosecution Service. So for U.S. listeners, this is equivalent of the district attorney's office. And so they've engaged specialist prosecutors to basically give a view as to whether there's a realistic prospect that Andrew might have committed a criminal offence.

1:57Now, that could be big. Basically, what's happened is obviously we think of and know of the allegations against Andrew as being all about Virginia Jeffries, saying that she was trafficked by Epstein to London, New York, and the US Virgin Islands and forced to have sex with Andrew, fearing for her life if she refused. Andrew's obviously always denied that allegation. Virginia sued him. They settled out of court. He paid an undisclosed sum without admitting liability. But what the police are actually looking at right now is more to do with Andrew's role as a trade envoy. And he was basically sharing confidential messages, confidential information and emails and reports with Jeffrey Epstein.

2:39There is the potential that Epstein might have had investment opportunities off the back of that information. Now, Andrew was a UK trade envoy at the time, as well as being a royal family member. So there is the potential for an offence to have been committed called misconduct in a public office. Now, the police, I think, are very reluctant to investigate members of the royal family. We've had this before. But what's really different now is the pressure is so great to see some kind of justice or some kind of demonstration of the fact that Andrew doesn't simply get away with everything, purely because he's a royal and coming from a place of privilege.

3:17And what's quite unique about this is it's all there in emails in black and white. So it's fascinating stuff. I'm going to go through some of the public statements now and read them and we can just see what they say and talk about them and then go get more into the options available. And, you know, I started this by saying I think the only good option left for the palace is actually to prosecute Andrew or at least, you know, to give the police a load of material and to maybe say to Andrew, look, you need to go and give an interview to them. And actually, unless you really, really, really think that you definitely weren't guilty, then actually it might not be the worst idea in the world for Andrew to just plead guilty to something.

3:58Go to court, get sentenced and do some jail time. And that actually, you know, I'm not a member of the royal family. He's not my brother. It's easy for me to say it's a lot harder for Charles, but that actually is the cleanest and most simple way out of the Epstein scandal for the palace at this point in time, because it is knocking at their door, let me tell you. But let's talk about some of what's been said. So it all kind of stepped up a gear on Monday when Buckingham Palace issued this statement. The king has made clear in words and through unprecedented actions his profound concern and allegations which continue to come to light in respect of Mr Mountbatten Windsor's conduct.

4:39while these specific claims in question are for Mr Mountbatten-Windsor to address if we are approached by Thames Valley Police we stand ready to support them as you would expect as was previously stated Their Majesty's thoughts and sympathies have been and remain with the victims of any and all forms of abuse now for what it's worth I actually think unless there's been some kind of a massive email purge I actually think there's a really good chance that the Palace do actually have relevant emails to aspects of this story that are being investigated or rather being assessed by the police. And there are some particular aspects to it that I might have to go into in more detail at a later date because we're not quite ready to publish yet.

5:25But from what I'm looking at and the emails that I'm reading, this absolutely traces back into the palace because it involves palace staff. and there may well be therefore emails on palace servers that are really very material to this which are what any investigation that might follow if one is launched so where tvp thames valley police are is they're doing what they call an assessment an assessment is not quite the same as an investigation they it means like an initial go through all the evidence that they have been given or pointed towards look at what the law says speak to prosecutors about it and just decide whether to go into a full investigation.

6:08And it's only when they go into the full investigation that they tend to do things like arrest people, potentially, for example, interview people under caution and do like a whole load of interviews about it. So that's where they are right now. And so this is, so initially Thames Valley Police said they had confirmed receipts of reports relating to Andrew sharing these confidential trade documents with Epstein. Then they issued a, just a couple of days ago, they issued a much bigger update, which was basically saying that they'd enlisted the help of these prosecutors. So let me read that now. So this comes from Assistant Chief Constable Oliver Wright.

6:48So Chief Constable is obviously very high up in the police force. This is one down. And so he said in a statement, we can confirm today that Tams Valley Police is leading the ongoing assessment of allegations relating to misconduct in a public office, right? Hold on to that phrase, because the fact that they've used the phrase misconduct in a public office identifies this as being about the trade envoy documents and Andrew's role as a trade envoy, rather than the sexual allegations against him. So this specifically relates to documents within the United States Department of Justice's Epstein files, again, reinforcing that point that we're not talking about the sexual allegations, we're talking about the emails.

7:32As part of this assessment, we have engaged in discussions with specialist Crown prosecutors from the CPS. We will provide updates as and when they are available, but at this stage, it would be inappropriate to discuss further specifics of this work. During an investment phase, information is evaluated to determine whether a criminal offence is suspected and whether a full investigation is required. Allegations of misconduct in public office involve particular complexities. That is actually true for what it's worth. Therefore, an assessment must be conducted carefully and thoroughly. Now, one little bit of background here is misconduct in public office.

8:06Actually, we know much more about it in the modern world than we did previously. It's a really old, arcane piece of law from years and years, I think actually literally hundreds of years ago. and it was replaced really soon, or not quite replaced, but really soon after all these allegations against Andrew, something called the Bribery Act was passed, which created a more modern codified law. But back at the time when these emails were sent, misconduct in the public office was the relevant law. And basically, it's very loosely defined. The defences to it aren't defined at all, but essentially it amounts to this.

8:41An offence is committed if a public official willfully misconducts themselves, So they have to know that what they're doing is wrong without reasonable excuse. There can't be a justification for it in a manner that would represent a serious breach. It can't be trivial of the trust placed in the public official by the public. So that's really interesting in this particular situation because it's about the public's trust. It's not about what the royal family think of you. And it's not even about the British government thinks of you. It's about what the public thinks of your actions. so it will be really interesting to see where it goes but also if they investigate will they only be investigating Andrew or will that investigation start to spread to Palace staff who were CC'd in on some of these emails including here's one that Andrew sent to Epstein Attached is a confidential brief so he said it's confidential, produced by the Provincial Reconstruction Team in Helmand Province, obviously that's in Afghanistan in a war zone where British Armed Forces had been operating, for international investment opportunities.

9:52These are not exclusive to Helmand Province, but principally focused on that province. I'm going to offer this elsewhere in my network. That is straight off the bat. That's an indication that the palace might have additional emails that are relevant. I'm going to offer this elsewhere in my network. including Abu Dhabi, but would be very interested in your comments, views or ideas as to whom I could usefully show this to extract some interest, to attract, sorry, some interest. So he sends that to Epstein. Now, Thames Valley Police are obviously looking at it, but it's not just what's said in the emails that matters.

10:30It is how you apply that law on misconduct in a public office to Andrew's situation, including, you know, does he count as a public official? He is he was a trade UK trade envoy, which is, you know, the kind of manual for trade envoys says that it's not a civil servant job, but does attract confidentiality. But then also he was a royal family member. So if this winds up tanking because somebody decides that royals aren't public officials, that, I mean, is going to raise serious problems and questions about democracy in Britain for a start. But obviously, you know, I get booked on a lot of TV debates and that kind of thing.

11:11And I often get asked, you know, what should the palace do? What should the royals do? And what I've generally been saying is they should do something similar to what the British government has done in relation to Peter Mandelson, who was the ambassador from Britain to America. You know, I won't go into his whole story because that could be a whole separate podcast. But essentially, you know, the prime minister was under a huge amount of pressure. so he got a handle on the story. It hasn't necessarily saved him, actually, but he proactively went out, and they're trawling through old emails dating back to Peter Mendelsohn's original time in government, which was during the Blair Brown years, back at the start of the millennium.

11:51And they've handed material to the police to help the police investigation, and that's what the palace needs to do. They need to bring in outside counsel, an outside law firm, and get them to just go through absolutely everything, even if it takes a long time, and start giving emails to the police if they're relevant. And that involves, you know, where else Andrew was potentially sending these confidential documents. Because of course, our predominant interest in this is in the fact that Andrew sent these confidential reports to a convicted paedophile. And Epstein had been convicted by that time.

12:25This was 2010, 2011 kind of time. And so Epstein pleaded in 2008 to soliciting a minor for prostitution. Andrew said Epstein kind of lied about it all and they didn't know how serious it was, but for what it's worth, it was a 14-year-old girl who he pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from. Obviously, we now know even that charge alone was a kind of very soft plea deal that he managed to strike, and in reality, he was a horrific sexual predator and sex trafficker. But it's not just about Epstein. It's also about Andrew's kind of abuse of power and the privilege with which he just assumed that all the power that he was given was there for him to use in whatever means he wanted for himself.

13:11And in that respect, as much as it is kind of heartbreaking to move the Epstein scandal away from the sexual abuse of these girls and on to something dry and complicated like, you know, the confidential adcy surrounding trade reports, actually is really important because it still speaks to the same root cause of this scandal for Andrew, which is, you know, he felt perfectly entitled to get Epstein to arrest. range for him to have dinner with a Russian, 26 year old Russian woman, for example, he felt perfectly entitled to kind of make preposterous denials to the BBC in 2019 and perfectly entitled to do all of these things, all of these horrific things, because he felt that he could act with impunity.

13:58And so it's really important, even if it requires leaving momentarily behind some of the sexual allegations, perhaps for maybe even for another time, who says it's over, it might not be, But to pursue something that has potentially a higher prospect of success, of conviction, actually, it creates the possibility of finally getting Andrew inside a courtroom and potentially facing some kind of justice. And it's not going to reset the cosmic injustice of Virginia not having been properly listened to in life and now no longer being alive to testify in a criminal court case. that injustice will never be undone.

14:40That is forever. It's a permanent injustice. It will never be undone. But I think it really is important that if there is a chance of some, not just justice, but accountability for entitlement and privilege and abuse of power and position, that is still very worth chasing. And now, so I want to come back to the point I started with, which is that actually not only that, But it is in the palace's interest, the monarchy's interest and the king's interest and Prince William's interest that the police do pursue a prosecution against Andrew. Because the biggest thing that is causing this to bleed into and infect the wider institution of the monarchy is the perception that Andrew will literally never face justice purely because he's a royal family member and because he was a prince, even if he's not anymore.

15:34And so if the police were to show British society that actually somebody in Andrew's position can be prosecuted, can see the inside of a courtroom and put it in the hands of the jury, it's up to them to decide whether they want to go guilty or not guilty. But if these kinds of allegations can be put before a jury, then that will restore some faith potentially in the system to work and in royal family members to not be completely unaccountable. So, you know, in other words, to put it another way, like anger is really building in the public and disbelief around this idea that Andrew is being shielded from justice.

16:18And so the palace so far have stripped him of his royal titles in an effort to say, no, look, we are willing to see him face some accountability. We've stripped him of his titles. But at the same time, Charles is still giving Andrew a house and financial support to enable him to live in Sandringham. And so, you know, many people, you know, the public are still thinking, well, hold on a minute, if it was me, I would go to prison. And so they still have this really deeply ingrained sense that Andrew's being protected from justice and that these forms of accountability that have been inflicted on him, which undoubtedly have left a very significant impact on him emotionally and psychologically are still not the justice that would be experienced by a normal person.

17:01So if the CPS were to authorise the police to charge Andrew and to put him before a jury and let them decide on the strength of the evidence, then that would show the public that actually, you know, the palace aren't shielding Andrew. So, for example, you know, Andrew would have to attend a police station at some point, might be arrested. did. All of these things, the royal family, the institution of monarchy, the royal protection officers guarding Sandringham would have to, in some ways, facilitate. And so that would help to show the public that Andrew's not being protected and that justice can be done.

17:38Now, people might still be very upset that Virginia's allegations were never tested in court, but there's realistically probably nothing the palace can do about that anyway, unless they're sitting on some kind of incredibly like game changing email that we have no real reason to suspect exists. Like we have no real reason to think that there's some kind of like, I don't know, confession or maya culpa from Andrew in his inbox somewhere. Um, in which case realistically, this is the best chance. So, um, so that's my view. You know, if Charles brings an outside counsel, get finally gets on top of this, lets them go through the emails and make their own assessment, an outside law firm make its own assessment about what information is relevant to the police investigation and can and should be given to Thames Valley Police, then that will help them to move past this.

18:36And if they can have a word in Andrew's ear to say, like, just, you know, there's still a reputational risk around what happens if it goes to trial and Andrew starts making outrageous statements in court. If they spoke to him and said, just plead guilty, that is the simplest, quickest, easiest solution that would protect the institution of monarchy from generational damage to its reputation. And the numbers, the popularity numbers are getting worse. In fact, actually, let me read to you because Ro Khanna, the Democrat representative he kind of waded into the whole question of the damage that Andrew's been doing to the monarchy this week and let me read you what he had to say.

19:23So he was asked in DC and this is what he had to say By the way, I think this is the most vulnerable the British monarchy has ever been I heard that they were asking the Queen questions about the Epstein class. I don't think he meant the Queen. I think he meant the King. Various questions have been shouted at the King, some by members of the public, some by journalists. Can I continue? They ought to ask the King and Queen questions, and maybe this will be the end of the monarchy. He said, well, if they don't have answers, if they're implicated within the Epstein class, not a good look for the British monarchy.

20:01The King has to answer what he knew about Andrew, just stripping Andrew of the title is not enough. Andrew needs to come before our committee, I presume that he means the House Oversight Committee, and start answering questions. If you have an allegation of raping a young girl, I don't think the appropriate punishment is you no longer get to be a prince. There's got to be more than that. They need to answer the king and queen. So, you know, the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, I'm sure, They requested Andrew's testimony months back, and I'm sure that they will continue trying to create pressure for that to happen, potentially also on the king as well.

20:40The big thing that the king could do, he does have some leverage over Andrew. He's giving the bloke a house and financially supporting him. So he is in a position to apply some pressure for Andrew to come clean. But of course, really prominent within that now is the question of whether the police investigate, game because if the police do launch an investigation there's no way andrew is going to go and testify about um about this issue um so one other thing that is probably worth mentioning is that this whole thing started to um there's a slight risk that william starts to be dragged down by all of this because actually he uh has as an official partner to the earthshot prize He has a company called DP World, which is the chief executive is a man called Sultan Ahmed bin Suleyem.

21:29And those who have been studying the Epstein story may well know that name because he is the man who received an email from Epstein about a torture video. And, you know, he's mentioned elsewhere in the Epstein files, too. So Prince William, obviously, you know, DP World donated a million pounds to the Earthshot Prize in a parallel universe somewhere. where maybe you could say, oh, well, it's the company. It's not the individual who runs the company. Unfortunately for William, it's not really possible to make that case because back in 2022, William went to Dubai and this£1 million donation was announced at an event where William and Suleyem were chatting to each other and were photographed together and were posing for photos.

22:12So it was presented at the time very much that the money was coming from the individual and not simply from the company. so there's a major Canadian pension fund called I think it's pronounced LaCasse which is has paused all future deals of DP World and is demanding answers from them about all this you know there is pressure building around Soleim and let me read you some of the material that's in the Epstein files about him so Epstein and this is in April 2009 wrote to Soleim and where are you? Are you okay? I loved the torture video. That is actually not the only one either. There is another one where they're talking about girls.

23:00Bin Suleyem writes to Epstein and says, by the way, the Ukrainian and the Moldovian arrived. Big disappointment. The Moldovian is not as attractive as the picture, while the Ukrainian is very beautiful. And Epstein simply replied photoshop so um look it's obviously horrific stuff and um i think you know william might need to think quite serious seriously about cutting ties with dp world obviously the money has been donated at the time that it was donated they were kind of dp world were kind of like a founding partner of the earth shop prize the earth shop prize was built using private money that was donated um and uh this is what soleyam said at the time in in a press release that also quoted William and was on the DP World website as well as on the Royal Foundation's website.

23:51And it says, as Global Alliance founding partners with Expo to buy 2020 and as a logistics business with a network across 69 countries around the world, we look forward to working closely with the Royal Foundation and the promotion of the Earthshot Prize. So he kind of made the case for this being an ongoing partnership. And DP World is still listed among the partners on the Earthshot Prize website. So they haven't actually taken it down. William did give a statement. He didn't mention or praise Sulayem or DP World in his statement, but this is what he said at the time. We have reason to hope our future is not yet set.

24:25And while the task ahead is great, we still have the ability to repair our planet and create a better world. The Earthshot mission is more than just a prize. It's a global team effort to spark urgent optimism and game changing innovation to transform our future. The Royal Foundation's website, though, does say that William applauded the donation. So this is what it says. Prince William was joined today, it was published at the time, back in 2022, by His Highness Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed al-Maktoum. No indication, as far as I'm aware, that he is mentioned in the Epstein files. He is just another man who was at this event.

25:07and His Excellency Sultan Ahmed bin Saloam, Group Chairman and CEO of DP World at the first ever Earthshot Prize Innovation Showcase. During Prince William's visit to the Middle East, His Royal Highness attended the event at the DP World Pavilion at Expo 2020 Dubai and applauded DP World's announcement of the£1 million investment to two Earthshot Prize finalists designed to scale their work in the UAE and the Middle East. so it's something that William's going to need to keep an eye on I think that the royal family need to just have an absolutely ruthless approach to the Epstein scandal now which is just to come down like a ton of bricks on absolutely every aspect of it because this has been rumbling on for 15 years now like that is such a long time and for a lot of young Brits you know it's different for the older Brits people in their 60s 70s but for young British people like this has been absolutely formative in creating their impression of the monarchy and especially this time like imagine that you're 18 19 now like you're reading the news or engaging with like with news in a way that maybe you didn't before maybe you're at university maybe you've just started a politics degree and you're starting to engage with you know with with politics at a higher level like this is going to be absolutely formative to your impression of the monarchy and what it's about and what it symbolizes as you move forward into later life.

26:32And we're already at a point where the kind of more negative view of monarchy is seeping up the age range. And really now it's like everybody under 50, it's starting to be everybody under 50 has a different view of monarchy. And, you know, I don't mean like 100 % of people under 50 hate the monarchy. I just mean that that if you look at the polling data, you don't get into a category of people, a demographic of people who are definitively pro-monarchy until over 50. And that's wild. Like there was polling out just this week. It was commissioned by a republic. People sometimes think that makes a difference, but it was also done by a respected polling agency, Sivanta, which showed that support for keeping a monarchy dropped to 45 % in the wake of the Epstein scandal, the latest round of it.

27:22and that support for abolishing the monarchy and becoming a republic, becoming a country with a democratically elected head of state, is now in the 30s. And that makes grim reading for the palace. And just know that it is also particularly, it is the older generation that are propping up those numbers for the monarchy. If you imagine, if you want to fast forward 10 years, if these trends continue for another 10 years, obviously those numbers are only going to get worse. and you're at risk of getting to a point where there could actually be a groundswell of support for abolishing the monarchy. And on that note, I'm going to take a quick break, but please remember to check out my Twitter account.

28:04It's at Jack underscore Royston and you will find all my latest stories for Newsweek. And when I'm back, Omid Gobi's new book, Royal Spin, has a very interesting subplot about divorce.

28:19We have had Gillian Maxwell appearing in private emails to confirm that Andrew did meet Virginia Jeffrey. We've had Epstein saying similar things, but now we have a new email from the Epstein Files, which Newsweek's reporting on today, which appears to show that even Andrew's closest, most senior aide actually drafted a statement intended for release by Gillian Maxwell, appearing to confirm that Andrew did, in fact, meet Virginia Jeffrey and have his photo taken with her. And she sent that draft statement to Andrew, who sent it on to Jeffrey Epstein, without contradicting any of the factual content on it.

28:56Now, what's really, really interesting about this is that Andrew was actually asked by BBC Newsnight in 2019 about all of this, obviously, and one of the things he said was when the allegation first came out, His first thoughts about it were that he couldn't remember ever meeting Virginia. And here we have an email from his team containing a draft statement appearing to confirm that they did meet. So nowhere does he articulate this feeling that he says he had about Virginia never having met him. And not only that, but just think about this. his most senior aide, a royal household staffer, paid for, no doubt, by public money, writing a draft statement for release by a woman now serving 20 years in jail for sex trafficking.

Read the full transcript

29:41This is obviously extraordinary stuff, and it further undermines Andrew's defence that he put forward. So let me take you through it all step by step. Obviously, I'm sure by this point nobody really needs to be reminded of what the allegations are. but just for the record Virginia Jeffrey accused Andrew of raping her when she was a 17 year old sex trafficking victim she said that she was flown by Jeffrey Epstein and get her Maxwell over to London and then to New York and the US Virgin Islands and made to have sex with him fearing death if she refused Virginia sued Andrew in 2022 and he settled in 2022 settled out of court, paid an undisclosed sum while denying liability and he has always denied all her allegations so that is the background But let's have a look at the actual emails themselves.

30:29So this all happened in March 2011. Days earlier, Virginia did her first newspaper interview with the Mail on Sunday. That got published. It printed for the first time the famous picture, which probably you've all seen, of Andrew with his arm round Virginia Jeffrey's waist, taken in Ghislaine Maxwell's house. Maxwell is visible in the background. Jeffrey said it was taken on her disposable camera that Epstein was holding at the time. So this is the statement itself.

31:24nor did they have sex. There was no orgy in Little St. James. So this relates to, there's a little bit of explanation needed here. This relates to three allegations by Virginia. The first is London. That's when the photo was said to have been taken. The second is New York when another Epstein victim said that Gillian Maxwell presented Andrew with a puppet version of himself, which he then used to grope Virginia's breasts. And so that was a second Epstein victim who told that story, which is why there's two names there. And then Little St. James was Jeffrey Epstein's Island in the US Virgin Islands where Virginia said an orgy had taken place.

32:01So all of this had been included in this draft statement that Amanda Thirsk was suggesting be released. And because it says my home in 2001 in London, that seems to suggest the intention was that Ghislaine Maxwell would release it, not Epstein and not Andrew. Obviously, it also talks about the Duke of York in the third person. So it's definitely not her drafting a statement for Andrew to release. So she sends that. This is days after Virginia's first interview gets published. And then Andrew appears to forward that message to Epstein. And as he forwards it, this is what he writes. This is what is suggested.

32:38Make any changes that suit you both and make it relevant to your particular case. There are two competing issues to deal with. One is to clearly state that this is fabrication. and two, to distance me from any of this if you can. As is said at the bottom, we are now getting questions from the MOS as well. So that MO is Mail on Sunday, and that is indeed correct. So Amanda Thursk, she attached that draft statement, and then she added more questions coming directly to us from Mail via Ed. Ed, I think it's probably Ed Perkins, Buckingham Palace press officer. And, you know, the Mail were asking the Palace a lot of questions at the time.

33:16So where the statement says it addresses you have published a photo that's referenced to you being the male on Sunday. So this is Andrew's opportunity to say, I've never met her. If this statement had gone out, there's nothing to suggest that it actually did go out. But it was Andrew and his team that were suggesting going to Maxwell release this. And if it had gone out, it would have gone out stating that Andrew and Virginia Jeffrey met each other. and that a photo was taken when they met, now published in the media, i.e. confirming the reliability of that photograph of Andrew with his arm around Virginia's waist.

33:56Now, obviously, he suggested to the BBC that the photograph was fake and that he had never met Virginia. He didn't just say that he'd never had sex with her, as in the statement, he said he'd never met her. So let's talk about exactly what Andrew did say to the BBC. So he said, when the allegations came out originally, I went, well, that's a bit strange. I don't remember this. And then I've been through it and through it and through it over and over and over and over again. And no, nothing. It just never happened. So obviously, when somebody like Prince Andrew comes along or Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, as we now call him, and gives this detailed kind of defense or accounts of himself that's supposed to explain away all the allegations against him, one thing that's really interesting is to take that account that he's given and compare it to the kind of incontrovertible, definitive, factual evidence that we are able to find and gather, which the Epstein files released, three million documents has been brilliant for that.

34:50And so we then, as journalists, we ask ourselves, is there anything to corroborate Andrew's account? And so here we are going back to the very time when the first allegations came out, as he said, and does it support the contention that he thought, it's a bit strange, I don't remember this ever happening. And there's nothing in there to suggest that. In fact, quite the opposite. His team were effectively on the cusp of telling the public that in fact they did meet in the photo were real, albeit through Ghislaine Maxwell as an intermediary. So that is all wild in and of itself. But then you've got this fact that Amanda Thurston would not have realised at the time what was going to come of Ghislaine Maxwell.

35:33But we now know, obviously, that she's been jailed for 20 years for sex trafficking and grooming girls, specifically grooming girls for Epstein to abuse. So that was what the allegations were. It's sometimes misunderstood as having been about Ghislaine Maxwell herself sexually assaulting girls, because there was actually one narrative description of that in the evidence. But that was not the charge against Maxwell. well, the charge against Maxwell was sex trafficking. And it was that she brought these girls into Epstein's life. And then her presence helped to reassure them that Epstein was a trustworthy man.

36:07You know, her being there as a woman, she helped to kind of ingratiate them and to smooth Epstein's path to grooming these girls into accepting that they were going to be victims of horrific sexual abuse. So that was what she got jailed for. And she's serving 20 years in prison. And here we have a household staffer paid for by public money, writing a statement for her to release in an effort to exonerate Andrew. It is extraordinary stuff. And it also sheds light on the potential unexploded bomb of the actual palace email chain, you know, the emails that the palace have, because what we're getting now is only the slice of it that got forwarded onto Epstein and Maxwell, or rather predominantly Epstein, and not Not the stuff that was said privately between Andrew and his staff that Epstein and Maxwell weren't cc'd into.

36:57So there could be a whole load more emails if a situation were to arise where Andrew was being sued and there was discovery. And the second accuser who's come forward, who I've mentioned in previous episodes of this show, who was in her 20s, if she gets her case off the ground, the palace emails might come into play. So, a little bit about Virginia's original interview. So, the version that ran at the end of February in 2011 actually didn't accuse Andrew of having sex at that point. But it said that she was paid$15 ,000. No doubt, the newspaper, Gell-Maxwell references orgies and sex and so on in this draft statement.

37:40No doubt that's because of the questions that were being put to her by the mail. The actual version that was published in the first interview in February, clearly they legaled out those specific allegations out of fear of being sued. And so they don't appear in the coverage. But what it did say was that Virginia was flown across the world to meet Andrew and paid$15 ,000 to do that. And the article read, Her shocking account of her four years as Epstein's personal masseuse is supported by court documents and eyewitness photographs and flight details of Epstein's private jets. One picture said to have been taken by Epstein during Andrew's first encounter with the girl in March 2001 and published today by the Mail on Sunday shows the prince with his arm around her waist.

38:21And it quotes her talking about having had to sleep rough in her younger life and sleep with men for food, not even for money, but for food. And it quotes her as saying that she was a paedophile's dream. It then goes on to quote her talking about the night that she says she was forced to sleep with Andrew in London. And she says, Gillen served tea from a porcelain pot and biscuits. She knew Sarah Ferguson, who's obviously Andrew's ex-wife, and they talked fondly about Andrew's daughters. Then Gillen asked Andrew how old he thought I was, and he guessed 17, and they all laughed. Gillen made a joke that I was getting too old for Geoffrey.

39:01She said he'll soon have to trade her in. It was widely known that he, as in Epstein, liked young girls. so the article said they went to Tramp Nightclub in London which obviously you know this is information that has been out there for a long time we always knew it but it said they danced together and then Virginia said after about an hour and a half we drove back to Gillen's and all of us went upstairs and I asked Geoffrey to snap a picture of me with the prince I wanted something to show my mum Gillen and Geoffrey left us after that and later Andrew left in the morning And Gillen said, you did well.

39:32He had fun. We flew straight back to the States. So obviously the palace would have seen all of that and they would have known what Andrew was being accused of. And it's crazy that they would think it was a good idea to then try to get Gillen Maxwell to release a statement on their behalf. You know, not attributed to them, obviously, but that an actual royal household staffer, somebody who works for the palace, i.e. the equivalent of a White House aide, the British equivalent of a White House aide, wrote a statement to be released by somebody who is now serving 20 years in prison for sex trafficking.

40:09It's completely crazy. But, you know, this is all going to put more and more pressure on the monarchy. And at a time when they're already under a huge amount of pressure, we had just today a second incident where King Charles has been heckled. He went to Clitheroe in England and he was doing a kind of walkabout, meeting the public at a train station and somebody shouted out a question saying, how long have you known about Andrew and Epstein? The crowd were quite royalist and so they sort of booed and jeered at the heckler. But this is the second incident now. Last week as well, he was on a visit in Dedham.

40:42And again, somebody shouted out about the Epstein scandal. And then a journalist shouted a question to Charles about the Epstein scandal. We had last week, Prince Edward got asked by CNN. and he gave this slightly weird statement saying, you know, quite rightly that everyone's got to think about the victims. But then he said, who are the victims in all of this? And he left this long dramatic pause before saying there's a lot of victims, which almost sounded a little bit like he was preparing to suggest that maybe Andrew might be one of Epstein's victims, which is obviously completely absurd. But needless to say, you know, he got asked about it.

41:19This is becoming a regular thing just today. William and Kate's spokesperson broke his silence, released a statement on behalf of William and Kate saying that they were really concerned. In fact, let me actually read you the statement in full. It's short, but it's worth reading. I can confirm the Prince and Princess of Wales have been deeply concerned by the continuing revelations. Their thoughts remain focused on the victims. So there you go. I mean, William has long been thought to be the big driving force behind toughening up the palace stance on Andrew and ensuring that the monarchy really does deal with this.

41:58But of course, the monarchy is still under a huge amount of pressure, partly because the king is still currently providing Andrew with his accommodation, as well as some financial support. And there's been stories in the British papers just over the weekend saying basically that the king doesn't really feel like he can actually just definitively cut Andrew off because Andrew's vulnerable. And what would he do without the king's help? And partly, I can understand to a degree where that's coming from. I mean, it would be morally perfectly acceptable, I think, for Andrew to be cut off. But also, what does he do if you completely not just cut him off from financial support, but kind of cut the lead?

42:39You know, if you cut the lead, you have no control over him. So if you're giving him something like somewhere to live and some money, then you have some control still, because if he starts threatening to do something that's horrific and terrible, then you can say, well, we can't fund you if you're going to do that. We've got to kick you out of your house. So I can kind of understand the kind of real politic of it, the kind of pragmatic reality that if you keep him a little bit in the fold, then you can exercise power over him still. Whereas if you cast him out completely, he'll need money. What does he then do?

43:10Does he try and write a book or do interviews with major publications for money? All of that kind of thing. So I can understand where they're coming from. I can understand the thinking, but it doesn't stop it from potentially damaging the monarchy. And if this second accuser who's come forwards tries to file a civil case against him and needs to serve him papers and he's hiding out at Charles's house on the Sandringham estate, that is going to look like the monarchy is shielding him from justice. So all of this stuff is adding more and more and more pressure. And it's going to be really interesting to see where that goes.

43:43Also today, we've had another set of bombshell emails suggesting that Andrew passed confidential material from his work as a trade envoy to Jeffrey Epstein. This has been sent by Republic, the pressure group, to the police, who are now assessing this as well as the previous information from the second Andrew accuser. So they are now assessing two sets of new information about Andrew. It's all extraordinary stuff. And it happens alongside a separate kind of investigative line where the police are looking into the former British ambassador to America, Peter Mandelson, and that puts additional pressure on the police because if Peter Mandelson gets charged, the question will be, well, why aren't you charging Andrew?

44:32And part of the reason for that, part of the answer will be the government is actively cooperating with the police investigation, whereas there's been no indication yet that the palace are actively cooperating with police over Andrew. So the secondary pressure that may well start to build on the palace is to actually themselves proactively review what emails they hold, release information to the UK police as part of their investigation and start actively cooperating with police. And because if they don't then, and you know, this, the storm builds and builds and builds again. Let's say Peter manderson gets prosecuted he obviously denies all wrongdoing but let's say he does anyway um what will people then think about andrew not being prosecuted it's uh it's obviously this is not over it's gonna run and run and i will obviously keep coming back with more and more updates hello and welcome back to the show so um omid scoby who wrote finding freedom and end game big famous royal biographer has a new book out but it's not a royal biography.

45:37It's not fact. It is explicitly fiction. It is called Royal Spin. He co-wrote it with Robin Benway and it's a kind of, it's like Emily in Palace. You know, it's like a royal version of Emily in Paris. And so it's about like this American White House press officer who, her life disintegrates in America so she jumps on a plane, flies to Britain to be crashed in as a kind of crisis comms new press spokesperson for the royal family. and has various kind of romances along the way, which I will not ruin for you. But it's really, it's an interesting direction for Roman to have gone down. And one of the things that struck me most about it is that one of the main characters really feels quite a lot like Prince Harry, but is also going through, has gone through, not even going through, but has gone through a divorce from a kind of more successful wife.

46:32So that fascinated me because obviously there's been loads of kind of divorce gossip around Harry and Meghan, but also this Duke of Exeter, he's called Jasper, returns to Britain in order to kind of restart as a working royal, having, you know, had his life fall apart. So I really wanted to ask Omid whether that was deliberate, whether he wrote a book kind of theorised in part around the concept of Harry and Meghan divorcing and Harry coming home to Britain and all the gossip and the rumours and the speculation being true. And I will not spoil what he said. I'll let you wait and see for yourselves.

47:11But do have a look at the interview, because it's quite interesting. It was a very warm, friendly chat. And see what you think of the book, basically. So, Omid and Robin, thank you so much for joining me. Do you want to start by just telling me the history of this project, where it came from, and how you divided up the labour? Yeah, I mean, as you know, Jack, I spent a number of years on the Royal Bee. And, you know, during that time, your sort of imagination runs wild. And I always would kind of picture a lot of the things that we would see behind the scenes in the format of a book or a television show.

47:47and I started keeping journals and notes really since day one. And, you know, when I came to what I felt like was the end of the chapter of the Royal kind of reporting career that I was in, I really wanted to focus on telling another story against a similar backdrop to one that we're familiar with, but with a completely different cast of characters and figures. And it was actually around the time that I'd handed in the Endgame manuscript that I wanted to do something with perhaps a TV show based on the book that you've just read. And the writer's strike was on at the time. And so rather than sit on my hands, it made sense to do something more with it.

48:30And so we suddenly realized we had time for a book. Having never written fiction before, it made sense for me to kind of lean on someone that does know exactly what they're doing in this field. and you know my agent had connected me with a number of different ghost writers and authors and I think as soon as I read Robin's previous works the thing that stood out the most was just the way the rich way in which he brought to life characters not just the kind of main protagonist but like every single side character background character in this really kind of multi-dimensional way and that was exactly what I wanted for Royal Spin that it wasn't just about Laura and it was about this cast of characters in the palace and around her and so when Robin and I met it just kind of completely clicked into place and here we are So Robin, tell me about well obviously I've read the book but viewers won't have so tell me about some of these characters and it does feel, reading it, like there is some love for some of these people even the kind of villains of the palace and the kind of stiff upper lip Brits so tell me about the characters, do you have a favourite?

49:37I do have a favorite. So we have I love the idea of found family in fiction. It's one of my favorite things to write about. And I feel like in Royal Spin, we've got this sort of motley crew of characters. We have Lauren, our main character, who is working at the White House, kind of goes through a personal and professional disaster and ends up being headhunted by Buckingham Palace and ends up going to work for their PR crisis department. and um there is a like i said a motley crew of people in this office people who have done it for a very long time who are certainly let's say not necessarily open to a new way of doing things a new way of conducting the press the way they do it um and lauren is sort of fighting an uphill battle um but that's also her favorite thing to do is fight an uphill battle she enjoys a challenge i think though and i think omid and i would agree on this i think one of my favorite characters is joy she is a woman who works at the palace she has been brought in as the diversity czar so to speak a title that she's you know not exactly thrilled by the second half of that title but she just has like this joy for lack of a better word and this also this gravitas she's extremely smart and when lauren starts going up against some more dangerous decisions especially in her personal life joy is somebody who is like stop and definitely tries to help lauren as someone who's maybe a little bit older than her, but she just has like this fun spirit.

51:02She's kind of like who I want to be when I grow up, I think in a way. Great. And so it's not like, it's not a thriller, but it's like a, it's a work, it's workplace fiction with a romance twist. Is that fair to say? It's kind of like an Emily in Paris for the palace. Yes. There's definitely that kind of coming of it or second coming of age element to it in terms of Lauren's story. You know, I think we often focus on that kind of like teenage to adult coming of age but not many people or not many books sort of delve into that kind of awkward late 20s to early 30s where you're expected to have life together but you haven't quite actually figured it out and as we see with Lauren her life is seemingly together at you know before the book even starts and you know what we're seeing her is kind of rebuild that in London um but yeah you know ultimately this is about a workplace kind of ensemble and the culture clashes between Lauren and the royal institution and just kind of like British culture in general.

52:02You know, I think for me, one thing that I really wanted to do was kind of bring to life some of the areas of the palace and the working palace that we don't really ever talk about whilst we're doing the job. You know, we're always talking about the royals in front of us, but who's behind the scenes? How does it work? What actually does the back of the palace look like? And so, you know, all of those areas within the book are based on places that I found myself over the years where I'm like, oh, my God, people would be fascinated by this. You know, the Palace Cafeteria or whatever it is, just to see kind of like how the cliques work and who's sort of like ruling the roost.

52:39And, you know, how exactly does comms work? Because I think we do break it down often in our news coverage, but we don't really talk about like the politics between these characters and how much say does a comms director even have. So that's the kind of like real life aspect of this. Obviously, the people, the places, even the royal family themselves are fictionalized. But I wanted people to feel as they read it that this is Buckingham Palace come to life. and on that subject particularly of politics one thing that really fascinated me about it is it feels like the duke of exeter is very similar to the duke of sussex if i might be so bold as to point that out so which makes one aspect of it really interesting which is that so it joins the duke of exeter when he has been living in new zealand for a very long time um he works on a sheep farm there which is quite similar to harry he obviously works on a cattle ranch in australia but this particular the Duke of Exeter has just divorced his wife who was this big high-powered entrepreneur who was earning all the money and she's divorced him left him broke and so he's gone back to the palace to become a working royal again having had this period away and it's very difficult for me reading as a royal correspondent not to feel like this is like theorizing a Harry and Megan divorce?

53:59It's interesting because I did, as we wrote these characters and we wrote the stories, I thought, oh my God, what are people going to pull from this or connect to real life? And, you know, obviously I've long had a strong connection to Harry and Megan and the public eye when it comes to my royal work. And I wanted to make sure that this book didn't have any parallels with their lives. But I think if you were to really try and connect it to something, this is more the story of like what if Archie one day decides to return to the royal fold because with Jasper the Duke of Exeter his parents are that couple that broke away from the royal fold and started life somewhere else and then had children that they wanted to take a completely different path and so we're seeing what happens when one of them decides to return so I think if you had to make a connection, it would be that rather than me trying to kind of say anything about Harry and Meghan.

54:55In fact, as much as we are dealing with someone who is, I guess, in a similar sort of like position of tabloid interest as Harry, I didn't want to have those parallels with his life. I think what I would love for this book to feel like is in five years time, 10 years time, that it still feels evergreen, that we're not ripping things out of the headlines, that there isn't a Prince Andrew, that there isn't a Meghan, that there isn't, you know, a Prince William, so to speak. So the Duke of Strathairn is not Prince William? I mean, he's the heir to the throne, so it's as close to William as I guess you can get.

55:32But other than them both being white men in line to the throne, there aren't really many similarities. I tried to make sure that I wasn't leaning on things that I knew and that I was inventing, rather than trying to kind of make those mirror images of real characters. And so just to be really clear, you definitely haven't heard anything about Harry coming home because what's crazy about it is that this is the kind of big speculative rumour and gossip in royal reporting right now. It's not necessarily so much the divorce, but that Harry's going to come home because he's got his new threat assessment with the home office.

56:11You've probably deliberately been ignoring all of this noise. And trying to shield yourself from this life you used to live. But he's got this new threat assessment from the Home Office. We're expecting Harry and Meghan back in London over the summer. And there's kind of a lot of chatter about whether there might be some signs of a Harry return. Yeah, you know, obviously this book went to print some time ago. This was written long before conversations about whether Harry and Meghan would be spending more time in the UK or visiting the UK or whatever would be the outcome of his kind of security dramas within the British courts.

56:48But I think intentionally, and I think Robin feels the same, we intentionally kind of stayed away from what was happening within the real world because we didn't want that to influence any of the writing process. And I actually really struggled at the beginning to kind of realize that this is a position where, this is, you know, writing this book is a position where I can just like pick stuff out of thin air and it doesn't have to be based on something of experience. And that's something that Robin often had to do was kind of just to remind me that there doesn't need to be a who, what, where and when to this.

57:21This is a world in which you can kind of like pick and choose as you will. I have intentionally stayed away from what Harry and Meghan are up to because I just almost don't want to know. You know, it's not my job anymore. But, you know, I have kind of seen some of the more recent stories And I think that that's what's interesting about this book is that whether you read it today or in two years time, there'll always be something in it that resonates with the real royal story that's happening at that time. You know, within the book, we have the Strathans twins who are kind of only mentioned a few times throughout the books, but they're about to come of age and go off to college.

58:00And I'm sure in a couple of years time, some of the details about that will feel more relevant to what the Wales children are doing, for example. but I think that like ultimately this is kind of just following the typical patterns that we've seen over the kind of sort of 20th and 21st century when it comes to royals and the decisions that they make but ultimately this is about the people behind the scenes and you know the royals themselves are very other than Jasper are very much secondary characters it's sort of like glimpses over their shoulders rather than in front of their faces. So Robin one thing that's quite interesting i mean i don't suppose i should give too many spoilers so i won't get into i won't get i won't get into what happens at the end but i suppose what i can maybe say is um that it's quite interesting because as royal reporters there's i think and omid let me know if you agree or disagree but it feels like the primary interest is always in the royal women um first you know it's just not to say that the royal men are not interesting to people but there's so much attention and pressure on the royal women all the time.

59:07But this book really is about a female gaze on this royal man who's kind of at the centre of it, and also one of the royal correspondents as well. So what was it like to write that? Was that like a lot of fun or yeah, how was that for you? I mean, it's always fun to write, I don't want to say romance, but that initial attraction, you know, that energy between two people, whether they happen to be, you know, a Duke returning to the fold or a reporter who's trying to get the actual scoop from somebody who is trying to control what the scoop is. So I loved that just as purely as a fiction writer.

59:41I think I, when I was focusing on Lauren, especially, and when Oman and I were developing her character together, my whole thing was she was on the cusp of having it all and it all fell apart. And going back to what you were talking about initially about Jasper, the Duke of or they he was also on the cusp of having it all and it all fell apart they are just in such similar places but such different places as well and it was just I loved also as an American and writing with a Brit like a lot of Lauren's struggles to understand how the palace works to understand why we can't try something new that you know the idea of history being the rule is was really fun to explore in fiction I really I learned a lot I'll say that much about how it works behind the scenes.

1:00:28And I hope that translates into the book as well. But I think there's always that feeling when you meet someone and you're like, I don't think you're right for me, but you feel really right for me. And then Lauren experiences that twice. And she knows she is going down a path that could be quite dangerous. And everyone around her starts to realize that as well. So, I mean, you need plot in a fiction book. And anytime there's a romance with someone who may not be the right fit for you, that's a great way to do it. And so that creates obviously tension, but do you think the danger makes the romance more of an exciting prospect for the reader?

1:01:03Like, do you think the danger is part of the fun? Yeah. I mean, that's true in fiction and real life, I think. But Lauren is not always making the best decisions. And I think that was very important for both of us because you do do. I didn't want a character who was perfect because A, that's boring and B, that's not relatable. possible and so I really wanted to see Lauren making choices that maybe the reader themselves would not have made or they think that they wouldn't have made I wanted to see her struggle and have to learn from her experiences that is something that I personally went through as a woman in my late 20s and that was very important to both of us to show that this idea of again being on the cusp of having it all and losing it the idea of returning to Saturn how when you're 27, 28 years old, things tend to circle around you quite quickly.

1:01:50Yeah, I would say anytime there's a little bit of danger in the romance, it's more fun. I think it's more fun for the reader as well. And interestingly, she is respected, isn't she, by the palace? It's not a situation where you've just gone, right, she's an American coming into a stuffy old British institution, so they're all going to be evil. They're all going to hate her. James in particular does seem to have a lot of respect for her from the word go. Yes. Well, I think there is a lot of respect for Lauren because she is coming from DC, from the White House. She is known for being somebody who can move quickly, put out fires very quickly.

1:02:22But I think there's also a circle of protection around the monarchy. And I think that's where a lot of the tension comes from is not only are they scared of someone new coming in, but they're very protective of their job. One thing that Oman and I really talked a lot about was this idea of the people who work for the palace And behind the scenes, they're not doing it for the money. They're doing it for the honor of it, for the honor of working for the queen at the time in our book, at least, or for the monarchy. And I feel like that was something that we really wanted to show. It's not necessarily that they're like, you're an American, get out of here.

1:02:55But they're more very protective of what they have and what they've built. And you can see that start to Ebb away as Lauren starts to prove herself. But in the beginning, everyone's very nervous of what could happen. so omid one thing that's really interesting to me is so end game you kind of theorized like the slow death of the monarchy basically that's why it's called end game so you're coming to a situation where the queen's passed away we've got the reign of king charles the third um there's not going to be any jubilees for ages there's not going to be any more royal babies for ages and there's not going to be any royal weddings for ages and young people are standing against the monarchy and it you know it felt reading a book like the energy is draining out of the monarchy but then here you have kind of also bet again on the longevity of people's interest in monarchy as a concept so do you what do you what do you think the future holds basically for the royals both you know as an idea in fiction but also the real life monarchy as well yeah some of those parallels between our world and royal spin and real life were inevitable because regardless who the cast of characters are within the ballast, it is still going to be the same challenge of how do you keep a kind of long-standing, somewhat staid institution relevant and interesting and kind of at the center of like kind of society today.

1:04:19And so although we have a cast of characters with different troubles and problems of their own, the institution's crises and dilemmas are going to be exactly the same and you know it was one of the things that we were able to kind of explore with uh with jasper introducing jasper back into the royal fold is like what would that look like if you were to bring in kind of a more youthful element to the monarchy again how would one connect with the public again like even with the the introduction of joy as our diversities are you know you'll remember that was something that was kind of banded around by the palace for a long time and then never actually happened.

1:04:57And so this was my chance to think, okay, well, what if that actually happened and what would it bring to the institution and what would that individual face within the institution as a challenge? And I think it was kind of fun to almost play make-believe with some of these characters to almost sort of test out certain scenarios to see if it would even work, you know? And I think that this is kind of a version of that reality that the current monarchy could follow. I think ultimately one of the things that's learned within the institution when it comes to dealing with Lauren is that despite how scary it may be to entertain new ideas and doing things in a different way, the outcome isn't always going to be what was feared all along.

1:05:45It can actually result in a better connection with modern Britain. It can result in more interest from a younger generation of people. And I think it's kind of like, that was one of the things I often spoke about in Endgame, is that it wasn't me declaring the end of the monarchy, but it was saying that we had reached this pivotal moment where we can see the end of it, or we can make some really big changes, largely that involve listening to the public and what Britain needs and wants today, and seeing what that might bring in terms of longevity and a stronger future and so on. So then in that category, you've got having a kind of diversity, or somebody who's responsible for trying to make the palace more diverse.

1:06:29And then you've got, you also have press conferences in there. So is that another thing you think the Royal should have a go with? Yeah, you know, I think that we live in an era where transparency is so craved by the public, not just from members of the royal family, but from all of our publicly funded officials and figures. You know, we we don't trust the press in the same way anymore. So the written word doesn't have the same value that it once had. Anonymous source quotes are a really tired way of getting the message across. And tidy social media packaging also doesn't work. But when one is able to sit and watch a press conference and you only need to look at the White House, for example, we can kind of deduce our own summary of what is going on.

1:07:15What is the tone that is coming from the institution? What is the actual question being asked by the reporter? And listen, I'm sure there would be many people within the royal family and in the institution today that would be horrified at the idea of bringing in the press in that kind of way. But I think that there is a version of that that would actually probably go to some help, to putting out fires a little earlier on, to giving the press the access that is deserved, because as you know, it's very selective. It's very sort of pick and chosen. And a lot of the messaging that's put out these days is still via the same channels of anonymous source quotes.

1:07:55And I just don't know if that works so well anymore. Yeah, fair. So one more question for Omid is, if Harry did what the Duke of Exeter does, let's say he came back to Britain, potentially with Meghan even but came back to Britain anyway and tried to become a working royal again obviously there would be huge barriers to that happening for views of the Prince of Wales for example but would it work? Would the public give him the incredible reception that the Duke of Exit gets in the book do you think or would it be more complicated than that? I think if we were to ever see and I have no idea whether they're even interested in that.

1:08:36But if Harry and Meghan were to return to the UK and Harry was to take on some kind of working role or sort of side by side role with the institution, I think they would be up against a really big challenge of acceptance because what Harry and Meghan have become are almost kind of like proxies within this kind of culture war of woke versus non-woke, shall we say. And I think that the people that have sided with the royal institution, the people that still believe certain things about the couple that may or may not be true, are very much wedded to those beliefs and thoughts. And I don't think suddenly showing back up is going to really change that.

1:09:18I also think that a lot of the things that Harry and Meghan stand for clash with the beliefs and actions of the royal institution. And so it might look a little bit hypocritical to them. But I think one thing that everyone could be on the same page for is that they would love to see some of that unity within the family fold. If we could see a son with his father in his kind of later stages of life, if we could see some of those moments that show that regardless of the kind of really awful things that have happened in recent years, that people are able to grow up, move on and kind of maybe not forget, but to forgive and move forwards.

1:09:57yeah i mean we interestingly don't actually see that much of william and charles together and that was something that i really went deep into in endgame you know this is a couple of years old this book now but there was almost a whole chapter dedicated in there to the downfall or the kind of like fractures between william and charles and how much of that is political and down to their positions and the the kind of warring houses within the institution but also how much of that is down to personality differences and different outlooks on life and different positions when it comes to what is right for the future of the monarchy.

1:10:32You know, we see that these are two men with very different opinions on things. And I really think that in terms of the royal story, and granted, I haven't followed it that closely in recent in the last year or so, I think that that's still an emerging story that we'll see a lot more of in the months ahead and robin so two questions for absence one first one is will there be a book too and second one can you tell me anything at all about the tv version when we can expect it and you know any more details and omit actually if you want to jump in i don't know who the best person out of the two of you to ask is about the tv show um i will definitely defer to omit on the tv show he is far more involved than i am um i decided to take a what they call a non-working role which i've waited my whole life to get paid to be happy can i have a non-working role i mean yeah family's so proud um but i think we would love to write a sequel omen and i we had lunch a few months ago we sat down and i was like i have this idea for this and he was like i love that and we immediately i often say that our writing style together is like children playing with legos stacking he just i had an idea then he'll have an idea then i have an idea and suddenly we have a book.

1:11:44And I would love to write a sequel. I have always, regardless of the genre that I'm writing or the age I'm writing for, I just, I'm always curious about what's happening next for my characters. And I think when you're talking about the Royal Family as it exists in our book, per se, as you're talking about the people who work behind the scenes, there's always going to be material forever. And there's always going to be ways to see people grow and change and come into the fold and leave the fold however we decide to make that happen in our world um so yeah i would love to write a sequel i think omid feels the same way can i can i ask quickly before we jump into the tv aspect of it is it was it a two book deal or a three book deal or the contract or was it just for one book one or is that like you can't talk about it but we have a publisher that has ever since day one spoken about and wanted to hear about the kind of plans for uh these characters and beyond, spinoff opportunities.

1:12:39You know, I think we've, we're very fortunate to be working with a publisher that see the vision for the universe here and have done since day one. It's always been part of the conversation. It was always the first things that we asked about. And there are also just so many things that I feel we didn't get to fit into this book, let alone like where the characters are headed to next. As you know, like there are, there's a wealth of kind of like history to, to pick from and be inspired by when it comes to taking these characters into their next chapters. Especially with Lauren, you know, we kind of leave things on a tidy note in the first book, but clearly there's a lot more that will go on between her and the other characters.

1:13:25And you can kind of figure out where some of those challenges may lie. Lauren's nature is not to end things in a tidy way. I believe, I think for nature is to maybe create a little more chaos, which is great news for us. Set off some bombs. And you asked about the show. You know, the show is very much in development at the moment. We've working with Universal Television, a brilliant studio. We have a brilliant partnership with one of the network streamers that will be announced shortly. And yeah, Emily Fox, who's our showrunner, and I have been really busy working on the pages of the scripts. and kind of just like we're sort of just about to enter into the next stage of that which ties in really nicely with the time that the public get to know these characters in the book and we can start to sort of see some of the impressions and feedback that people give and what people want more of you know i think there's a lot in the book that works so well on the page and there are so many things that work great as a visual gag or a moment on screen and i think also just being able to bring to life some of the kind of like larger scale kind of pageantry type moments that I think would look so impressive on screen that on the page we can describe, but, you know, it takes us two seconds to work off four pages in a book sometimes.

1:14:45So there's a lot of fun to be had with that. Yeah. I just, you know, even though I know what happens in the book, I can't wait to see it on a screen. Like I want to see the trip to Singapore. I want to see a state dinner. I want to see these characters in these moments like you can describe it in five pages but to see it on a screen is something very different and i just am so excited to have access to both yeah it'll be really interesting to see them try and recreate like the in in a palace i know it was interesting for me i'm interested because obviously a lot of people don't know how kind of grotty at the back end of a palace is just feel a little bit like you're walking through the back end of a tv studio or something and yeah like trellis tables piled up and all the rest of it so it will be very interesting to see visually how they recreate it well guys thank you so much for coming on and it's been fascinating to talk to you and all the best of luck with it i'm sure it's going to fly off the shelf and everyone watch the show nice to meet you jack thank you so much and that's it for this episode of the royal report be sure to join me every show when i visit the latest royal headlines embark on some royal deep dives and riff on all things royal until next time i'm jack royston thanks for listening and a curtsy to you all.

From the publisher

King Charles' only way out of the Epstein scandal may be prosecuting Andrew, the latest email blowing up Andrew's defense, and Omid Scobie's new book is a royal romance.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

More from The Royal Report

All 46 episodes
King Charles Supports an Investigation Into AndrewThe Royal Report · 1 h 16 min
Listen in VO