In short
A Newsweek Royal Report episode on Donald Trump’s “bizarre” UK state visit (Windsor), the monarchy’s choreography and politics around it, Prince Harry’s recent Guardian interview about Spare and reconciliation, and Prince Andrew’s appearance at the Duchess of Kent’s Catholic funeral.
Guest backgrounds
No guests are interviewed; host is Jack Royston (Newsweek chief royal correspondent).
Key claims
Trump’s affection for specific royals (Charles, William, Kate) drives the lavish treatment; the Windsor carriage procession felt like “theatre” because the public audience was replaced by armed forces due to security. The visit is portrayed as a bid for “a pot of gold” (tariffs/trade and possibly Ukraine/Gaza concessions), with a reported 150 billion pounds in US tech investment as potential payoff. Starmer is framed as politically “groveling” despite low Trump polling in Britain. Harry’s “truth” stance is said to risk derailing reconciliation because it repeats binary truth-vs-lies thinking. Andrew’s funeral attendance is questioned given his Epstein-related scandal.
Notable examples
Trump’s past comments about Diana; 2012 topless-sunbathing blame aimed at Kate; banquet seating/protocol; Trump’s “beautiful/radiant” remarks. Harry: “conscience is clear” and “reconciliation before truth.” Andrew: viral moment trying to speak to William; Virginia Giuffre civil settlement without admitting liability.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOTrump's Arrival in Britain
0:09 to 1:25
Discussion about Trump's arrival and views on the royal family.
“Hello, listeners, and welcome to the show.”
The Bizarre Carriage Procession
1:25 to 4:24
Exploring the peculiarities of the carriage procession during Trump's visit.
“And he certainly says that he loves the individuals who make up for the royal family on an individual basis.”
Theatre of the State Visit
4:24 to 7:40
Analyzing the theatrical elements and political implications of the visit.
“This whole thing was all geared towards trying to get a specific pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.”
Trump's Relationship with the Royals
7:40 to 13:50
Examining Trump's past comments and interactions with the royal family.
“So we know Trump kind of upset the royals as well in the past several times.”
Potential Outcomes of the Visit
13:50 to 14:00
Speculating on the implications of Trump's visit for British politics.
Analyzing the Impact of Trump's Visit
14:00 to 18:18
Explore the implications of Trump's state visit and its effects on British politics.
“that really doesn't like Trump very much?”
The Royals' Experience with Trump
18:19 to 23:08
Delve into the interactions between the royals and Trump during the visit.
“So if you think Melania's in the middle, William's on her right, Camilla's on her left.”
Prince Harry's Recent Statements
23:16 to 28:00
Discuss Harry's reflections on his relationship with his father and public perception.
“Now, he didn't say anything bad about Charles.”
Prince Harry's Struggle for Truth and Reconciliation
28:00 to 37:51
Explore Prince Harry's perspective on truth and reconciliation within the royal family.
“Do you want it to the point that you're willing to sacrifice other things in order to get it?”
The Controversy Surrounding Andrew and Virginia
42:01 to 43:08
Learn about the allegations against Prince Andrew and the circumstances surrounding Virginia's tragic death.
“and was made to do it by Jeffrey Epstein and Gell-M Maxwell and feared for her safety if she refused.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01King Charles welcomes Donald Trump. Prince Harry risks blowing reconciliation and Prince Andrew makes Prince William squirm. I'm Jack Royston, Newsweek's chief royal correspondent, and this is Newsweek's Royal Report. Hello, listeners, and welcome to the show. Now, Donald Trump touched down in Britain on Tuesday night ahead of a day in Windsor on Wednesday. It will go down, I think, as one of the most bizarre U.S. state visits on record. but Trump also, you know, as one of the most effusive and positive American presidents about Britain. I was actually on the radio discussing this on Wednesday night, which was probably towards the tail end of the state banquet, and I was asked about it, and I said, actually, you know, the UK-US special relationship, it really wasn't that long ago we used to talk about it, as something that Britain was obsessed by and America barely cared about.
0:52You know, America kind of vaguely considered Britain an ally, but, you know, had bigger fish to fry. But in the Trump era, he loves the royals so much that he's actually really happy to come to Britain and to be in Britain, despite the fact that in his view, you know, in the view at the very least of the kind of MAGA milieu, Britain has, as they would see it, a socialist prime minister. Now, socialists in Britain would give you a very different take on Keir Starmer, but that's another subject. So, yeah, I mean, you know, Trump's view of Britain, his very positive view of Britain, is in no small part down to his love of the royal family.
1:28And he certainly says that he loves the individuals who make up for the royal family on an individual basis. He describes King Charles as his friend and he says he loves King Charles. He says he loves William and William is so handsome and he clearly loves Kate. So, you know, with Trump, it really is. It's a love affair, not just with the concept of monarchy. but with the specific royals who exist and who we have. And so, you know, from the royal family's perspective as well, they were more than happy to give him the full treatment and pull out all the bells and whistles. And actually, I said, you know, it was bizarre, and I think that's true for reasons I'll explain, but that's, you know, largely that's because of this carriage procession, which was the cherry on the cake for Trump, and he was denied it the first time round for security reasons because that was in London, so they didn't want to take Trump out in these state coaches when they were going to be looked down upon from all these buildings.
2:22So this time round, to get around the security issue, they took him around Windsor, around the estate. So what the Windsor estate means is that he wasn't in the town. He wasn't going through the streets where the normal people are. He was going through parts of the Windsor estate that in the past have been open to the public, including during carriage processions. They went up the long walk. But that was part of the carriage procession. for Harry and Meghan's wedding, where, you know, thousands of people lined the route. And Windsor was absolutely heaving back then in 2018. But they actually closed off the long walk.
2:59You couldn't access it. I'd actually tried. And I was in Windsor on Monday and, you know, the cast iron gates were all locked. You couldn't get in. And instead of kind of fans or royalists or, you know, just interested people, tourists, Americans, instead of all of that lining the route of the carriage procession, they had members of the armed forces who were obviously required to be there. I mean, they may well have been fans of Trump. Who knows? I'm not necessarily saying they weren't. But they weren't there because they were fans of Trump or even because they were fans of the monarchy. And again, like I said, they may well have been fans of the monarchy, but they were there because they were ordered to be there.
3:38And that just seemed really strange to me. There was something about it that was almost like a little bit North Korea. You know, there's always those stories about how, you know, when people go out to North Korea, the grocery stores seem packed with food. But then when you go closer up, it's all plastic. It's kind of a little bit like that. It's like the plastic food in the aisles of the North Korean supermarket. Because, you know, and I have to say, before I carry on, I do want to say I do completely sympathize with the security perspective. You know, nobody wants to see even actually people who hate Trump do not want to see him assassinated on UK soil.
4:14And obviously, you know, there was the attempt on his life in America a year ago, and then there was Charlie Kirk recently, and nobody wants to see that happen on a state visit or anywhere else. So I totally get it with the security point of view, and I don't actually necessarily think they even did the wrong thing by creating this set piece, but it was in a way such a perfect symbol for another underlying point about this state visit, which is that it is theatre. and the reason it's theatre is because we know that Trump and Starmer see the world very differently from a political perspective and we know that many of Keir Starmer's cabinet, you know, many of the top politicians in Britain in Keir Starmer's government, you know, they're on record saying like really, really disparaging things about Trump in the past, saying he's racist, comparing him to the KKK and so on.
5:09And so we know that they're laying all of this on in order to appeal to Trump because they want the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, which is concessions on tariffs, trade, economics, maybe a bit of Ukraine, maybe a bit of Gaza, who knows. But that's what it's all about. This whole thing was all geared towards trying to get a specific pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. And that is what makes the carriage procession itself, which, you know, the whole point of a carriage procession is supposed to be that the king or the prince leaves the palace to see the people. And it's from that kind of playbook.
5:50You know, the queen used to say she had to be seen to be believed, and it's very much from that playbook. You know, you've got to go out and give the public a chance to see you in the flesh so that they can know that you're real and not just kind of a symbolic idea that's disconnected from their lives. Now, up to a point, I did expect the carriage procession to be like that because we were always told, oh, well, it will be around the Windsor estate. And so as soon as you see that, you know, well, they're not going through the town, that's obviously going to be to avoid the public. And then you're told, you know, armed forces personnel will line the route.
6:22So obviously, OK, well, that's going to be in place of the public lining the route. But I have to admit, even on the day when I was travelling down to Windsor, I did think there would be maybe like a couple of places where the public could go and try and watch a bit. Like, you know, maybe they wouldn't open the whole thing up, but maybe they wouldn't advertise that it was going to be possible, but that there might just be like a couple of places on the long walk or something that were accessible. Because they also put up these kind of security barriers, hoardings kind of things to also block off the public.
6:57So they could have, you know, had a lot of it blocked off, but still had a point at which it was going to be possible to see something. And they didn't. So it did almost feel a little bit like, you know, Charles, they had a kind of a make-believe fake audience of soldiers for Charles to kind of take Trump out to, you know, have the feel of being a, you know, somebody who's having a carriage procession without the kind of core reality of what it's supposed to be about. kind of like at Legoland, they have this thing where the kids can like drive a car and get a fake driving license. It's almost a bit like that.
7:31But, you know, like I said, maybe it's worth it. I don't know. It just feels very weird. I'm not even necessarily saying they shouldn't have done it. It just feels so bizarre. And that's the other thing as well. So we know Trump kind of upset the royals as well in the past several times. So the first one was actually, you know, he made comments not long after Princess Diana died, saying that he could have slept with her on the Howard Stern show. And Howard Stern was, you know, being Howard Stern, was obviously egging him on, and Stern probably said some of the worst stuff then. But it wasn't the only time.
8:05You know, Trump then later in 2012, actually, bizarrely, on September the 17th, the same date as the state banquet. So what's that? 13 years ago to the day from the state banquet, Trump went on Twitter and basically blamed Kate for the fact that Kate had been photographed sunbathing topless by a French magazine. Now, we know how upsetting Kate found that experience because Kate and William sued the magazine and took it all the way to court. I think that might even be their only ever actual civil lawsuit they've ever filed. William obviously took on Murdoch when he reported phone hacking allegations, but that's a different story.
8:42So, you know, it's a difficult thing that Kate went through. Trump kind of mocked her for it and said, you know, why are you doing, of course, someone's going to try and photograph you if you do the nude sunbathing thing. Come on, Kate. So I kind of goaded her over it a little bit and suggested it was her fault for doing it to begin with. And then she was sat down next to Trump at the state banquet. And there was actually this kind of awkward moment when, you know, they're all sitting down and there's these kind of footmen behind them who are getting ready, who are there, you know, their specific job is to help each person push the chair in.
9:14So there was a guy there whose job it was to help Kate push her chair him, but Trump had to reach over and kind of tuck Kate in under the table at the state banquet because she was sat next to him, which was not done specifically for Trump. They did the same thing when Macron visited and when the Korean delegation visited previously. So it wasn't done just for Trump that they wheeled Kate out to be the kind of icing on the cake for him. It is the protocol and the choreography for state visits. is, you know, the Princess of Wales sits next to the visiting head of state. But I did wonder what was going through Kate's mind.
9:48And there was this other photo as well of Trump. And he's kind of, he's kind of, you know, they have that thing about the body language where they draw a line up the kind of center of gravity of the person. And Kate is sitting straight upright and Trump is leaning kind of all the way over towards her. And there's a moment of eye contact between them that the photographer perfectly captured. And actually, you know, Kate almost does look like she's looking slightly adoringly at Trump. Trump's certainly looking adoringly at her. But I would love to know what was actually going through her mind during that whole banquet.
10:23And then in his speech, Trump called her beautiful and, you know, radiant and all of these things. Trump said, His Majesty has also raised a remarkable son and His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales. Really amazing. I've gotten to know you and you will have unbelievable success in the future. Melania and I are delighted to visit again with Prince William and to see Her Royal Highness Princess Catherine so radiant and so healthy, so beautiful. It's really a great honour. Thank you. So that was his speech. But yeah, you know, it's like it does kind of, you know, this is the thing is you just know how Trump talks about women.
11:02Like he, there was, you know, you might remember Caroline Leavitt, and he started talking about how great she was and then he got into saying something about her mouth or her lips or something like that and it all got a bit creepy. And yeah, the whole thing, at certain points, it was just a tiny bit creepy, I do think. And I felt sorry for Kate. And I have to point out, like I said, she wasn't wheeled out for Trump. It's really easy when you see these things to think, oh gosh, they've sat Kate next to Trump because it's Trump. But that's not the case. They do always sit there. You know, they sat her next to Macron.
11:39They sat her next to the Korean visiting head of state back in 2023 or four. 2023, I think. So it is it's the standard way of doing it. But obviously it does look like she's the eye candy. and you know the whole thing is kind of the emperor's new clothes trump even said on sunday and then again on monday that it was the first time it had happened at windsor castle and buckingham palace is great but they say windsor castle is the ultimate um but you know they uh the privilege those buildings are historic buildings and the reason they're so important yeah sure it's partly because of the incredible artwork and all of the kind of gold in them and all of these huge state rooms, but it's also the history that makes them special and that makes it a privilege to be hosted at these buildings.
12:28And both of them have an incredible history. And the reason they didn't do it at Buckingham Palace, they couldn't do it at Buckingham Palace, is because of the building works there, which is actually like a really mundane reason for Trump to be hosted in Windsor instead of London. But so they didn't move it to shine Trump's ego. And actually, Trump isn't the first person to stay overnight at Windsor Castle either. That was Ronald Reagan in 1982. Trump is kind of technically right because 1982 wasn't a state visit and this one is um but it's kind of like yeah it's weird two things happening at once one is trump makes everything about his own specialness and he inflates his ego at every possible opportunity um but then also this is a point you know a moment in which britain is actively trying to inflate his ego so you have in tandem these two things where trump is like overblowing minor details like whether it happened at windsor or buckingham palace um while at the same time like they really were trying to lay it on as thick as humanly possible in order to please him so it kind of is actually like it really was about his ego so that then begs the question you know will there be the payoff you know if you're going to put on this big theatrical performance all in order to tell the emperor how amazing his closer, then you're doing it for a reason.
13:45And that means you have to get something out of it. And so my big question going into this was, you know, is there a risk they're taking here? Like, if they don't get the payoff of Charles and Starmer, and if they don't get the payoff from this, and there isn't a tangible win for Britain, what does it do to their reputations in a country that really doesn't like Trump very much? Trump polls very, very badly in Britain. So was it worth it? You know, we're on Thursday now and it's early days, but just as I've pretty much started recording this, they have actually announced a deal. It's not, it doesn't look like a change to the tariff deal that was already signed, but it is 150 billion pounds potentially of tech investment into Britain from American technology companies.
14:28So like I said, it's only just happened. It might take time for the dust to settle and people to work out how good they think the deal really is. but if it is as good as they're making it out to be, I literally just watched them sign the pieces of paper, then yeah, maybe they did. Maybe they got their payoff and maybe everybody will go home, including the king, thinking that this was worth it. I have to say, though, I think Starmer will still pay domestically for this because we're living in an age where people pay so much more attention to what they can see than they do to what they read. And the way in which 150 billion pounds of investment from US technology firms benefits ordinary people's lives is slightly indirect, number one.
15:08You know, they won't necessarily immediately realise that it's come from this as it benefits them, but it also won't benefit them right away. It will take time for it to kick in. So in the short term, I do actually think there is still potential that Starmer's slight fakeness during this period will blow up in his face. And that's because it chimes with a problem that British people already have with Keir Starmer, which is that they think he's a political robot and not a real human being. And they don't feel like they can connect with a real person. They just, you know, they think he's kind of too polished and not natural enough.
15:45And so this is kind of the perfect example of that. And I'm sure that actually, you know, Starmer might well genuinely have enjoyed hanging out with Trump at points. After all, I never particularly expected Michelle Obama to be friends with George W. Bush, and yet they are. So sometimes people who are in that statesman class do put politics aside and have genuine human connection with each other. But there are a few realists and way more idealists in the modern era on both sides of the fence, actually, on both sides of the political divide. And I can't help thinking that they will still see this as another example of Starmer being kind of spineless and too eager to grovel to Trump.
16:28and that it will blow up in his face even though he did win this big prize at the end of the rainbow that he was chasing. But I would love to know more about what the royals themselves thought of the whole experience. And I'll return, I just want to describe something else first, but I'll return in a minute to that concept of actually liking people who the public don't expect you to like. But I would love to know more than anybody, I would love to know what Kate actually thought of it all. and I actually, I felt sorry for Kate. I felt sorry for Camilla too and there was one moment that involved both of them that really took off on social media and it became massive and it was when Kate kind of sidled up to join Camilla and Melania who were mid-conversation and it was just outside Windsor Castle so long before the state banquet and Kate and Melania chatted for a bit and Camilla kind of kept looking away and she looked a little uncomfortable and wasn't saying that much and then in the end she seemed to kind of like lose her patience and kind of shoo Kate off kind of encourage her out of the conversation and just kind of ease her out of the conversation.
17:28And I felt really sorry for Kate because she then went and she looked like she was nearly about to go and join William's conversation. He was speaking with Trump and King Charles, and then she thought better of it. And so in the end, she just seemed to go and stand by herself for a bit, which was slightly heartbreaking. I mean, it's almost like school, isn't it, where somebody can't get themselves into a conversation and then just has to go and stand in the corner by themselves. And so that was heartbreaking. But then, and it's tempting to think, gosh, that was really quite cold from Camilla. But then at the banquet, while Kate was being forced to schmooze Trump, Melania was sat between Camilla and Prince William.
18:07And it was another heartbreaking moment because Camilla just did not seem like she could get into the conversation. And Melania just wanted to talk to William and Camilla got the shoulder, basically. So if you think Melania's in the middle, William's on her right, Camilla's on her left. she was just turned to her right chatting to William. And Camilla was like, you could see Camilla's mouth moving as she was trying to talk to Melania. And Melania was just still chatting to William and ignoring her. And Camilla did all this while battling acute sinusitis, which, you know, I actually had really bad sinusitis recently, which is deeply unpleasant.
18:42It actually hurt my teeth, which just seemed really weird. It's like, why does having sinusitis hurt my teeth? But apparently it does. I had like really bad toothache over the summer. So maybe there is something going around. But Camilla had it bad enough that she had to pull out of her attendance at the Duchess of Kent's funeral on the Tuesday and was still recovering by the time the Wednesday, which was the substantive day of the state visit, came around, only to then kind of be snubbed a little bit over dinner. So that was also heartbreaking, you know, for Camilla, heartbreaking for Kate. But I guess you can kind of take a step back and say, well, you know, it's all a bit of a scramble and whatever happens, neither of them are going to lose their jobs over it or anything like that.
19:24It is just like a feeling of emotional rejection. That's it. And they're both adults. You know, they're not kids. And I suppose, you know, the other thing is what it tells us actually is probably more significant than many situations they're in. Because in a way, people are most themselves and are most honest in reality when they let themselves down a little bit. And so what we can tell from all of this is that the Trumps do both really love Kate and William, including Melania. Like, you know, we're not at all a surprise to know that Trump loves Kate. And he's also been very vocal about William.
20:00but I didn't really know where Melania stood on the whole thing and so very interesting to see that she really did want to speak to Kate and was very interested in Kate and very interested in William too. And then perhaps more interesting still, Camilla clearly really wanted to get into that conversation both times, both at the state banquet and outside Winter Castle. She wanted to have that conversation with Melania and didn't want to be frozen out and just left sitting there like a lemon. while Melania, you know, forgot that she existed. And I don't think that it is purely status anxiety. I don't think it's all boredom.
20:36And I don't think it's pure competitiveness with the younger generation either. I have a sneaking suspicion, you know, I'm not claiming to have any inside information. It's just a hunch. But I have a sneaking suspicion that actually, you know, deep down, the Queen thinks the Americans are shiny and special in just the same way, actually, as the Trumps think that the monarchy is shiny and special. and I think her desire to get in on the action, Camilla's desire, was genuine. And it goes back to that thing about Michelle Obama and George W. Bush being friends despite being from opposite parties, is that sometimes you really don't expect people to be friendly because of their politics.
21:13Camilla brought up her whole life in Britain. Most of Britain, including Conservative Britain, are very anti-Trump. But when you get to that statesman level, it is very different. and clearly, you know, she wanted to have that conversation. So, in short, the theatre of the state visit was a bit odd, the royals sucking up to Trump was a bit transparent, and the dynamics between family members were endlessly fascinating. But ultimately, it might just go down as a big win, not just for Keir Starmer, who walks away with his shiny bauble and this tech partnership, but also the royals have proven their worth to the government in King Charles' reign.
21:53So that is a big, big factor in the long-term picture from this state visit, is that the monarchy's reputation, you know, with the public, their popularity with the public is continuing to slide. We actually had some new data out about that last week, which showed just how far it's tumbled since the 1980s. Quite far is the short answer. And succession was the perfect time for a republic to mount a new kind of assault on the reputation of the monarchy. But here, Charles will feel that he's earned his money for the country and proven the importance to Britain's national interest of keeping the crown during his reign.
22:29So in that sense, if Harry got mission accomplished when he saw the king a week ago, this week it was Charles' turn. In 2025, the monarchy has been perhaps the biggest asset to the British government in its biggest international partnership. And that is not in the era of Queen Elizabeth II. It is in the era of King Charles III. And so at political level, diplomatic level, foreign office level, Whitehall level, that's the civil service at that, establishment level, do not expect anyone to even pay lip service to the idea of abolishing the monarchy anytime soon. Right, on that note, I'm going to take a quick break.
23:09But before I do, remember to rate and review The Royal Report on Apple Podcasts or Spotify or wherever you get your favourite shows. And when I'm back, Prince Harry has been to Ukraine.
23:23Hello and welcome back to the show. Prince Harry has doubled down on the contents of his book Spare during an interview with The Guardian just days after his meeting, his tea with King Charles, which we all said was a step in the right direction to reconciliation. Now, he didn't say anything bad about Charles. In fact, he said some things that were kind of positive about Charles, such as that he wanted to focus on his relationship with his father over the next year. but he also repeated certain lines of argument that do seem to indicate he hasn't actually necessarily moved on that much in terms of how he sees the past and how he sees his own public pronouncements over the past five years.
24:03So let's start with a little bit about what he actually said. So Harry told the Guardian, I don't believe that I aired my dirty laundry in public. It was a difficult message. This is in the book, but I did it in the best way possible. My conscience is clear. And he added, I know that speaking out annoys some people and it goes against the narrative. The book, it was a series of corrections to stories already out there. One point of view had been put out and it needed to be corrected. Well, I suppose there's there's partial truth in that, although obviously the book was more than just correcting stories in the media that Harry disagreed with.
24:43And it's more than just correcting versions of the palace perspective that had already been articulated. The book goes into detail about all kinds of things, you know, that had never really been written about at all by the media. So, you know, in that respect, it was just such a there was a huge amount of detail on all kinds of subjects and things that there was no particular reason to get stuck into from frostbite to circumcision, stuff that was purely private, quite literally. And then on the other hand, there were bits that were, you know, probably raking back over past disputes, but putting information out into the public domain that wasn't there already.
25:29And with a level of detail that maybe wasn't necessary, for example, you know, Harry could have said a lot of the stuff he wanted to say about the argument over bridesmaids' dresses and Princess Charlotte without saying that Charlotte cried because her bridesmaid dress was too big. So, you know, with all of these things, it's very difficult to just give a blanket defence of something like that. And I guess really, though, when it comes down to it, the bigger issue is, why did Harry do this? So obviously the simple explanation is he was asked. He was asked a question about it and he answered the question.
26:05And I think that probably is kind of what happened, that Harry just kind of feels like if he gets asked something, he just has to be honest about it and say whatever he really, truly feels. But that kind of means that these efforts to rebuild the relationship with his father have this time bomb sitting underneath them, which is what happens if Harry gets asked a question at some point by a journalist in an interview that he might want to do in the future, feels he has to answer honestly about it, and then just blows the whole thing up again. If he does want to hold on to his relationship with his father, then I think he can only do that so many times before Charles really will decide that he's had enough and he just can't do this anymore.
Read the full transcript
26:44So I think Harry needs to probably think really clearly just about what his priorities are. I mean, that's what it comes down to. There's nothing necessarily inherently wrong with wanting to tell the truth, but also there's a reason why we don't always speak our minds. There's a reason why we don't say everything that pops into our brains, and we all do it. We all kind of self-censor to a degree. we all restrict what we say because we don't want to upset and offend other people. And there might be times when that's kind of, you know, not wanting to offend people politically, like not wanting to offend the whole public by saying something other people disagree with.
27:21But also just like, I don't really mean that. And the kind of politicized sense of it, I just mean in a much more simple way. You know, I don't go around telling people every single thing I think about them and the way they behave and the way they act, because sometimes like that's just mean. It's just not a very nice thing to do to go and tell everybody when you disagree with them about stuff. So yeah, I mean, I think Harry's going to need to really think about how like this is something that actually gets said to politicians sometimes. It's like, oh yeah, you know, you want to be in power, but how much do you want it?
27:54And that's kind of the question for Harry right now. So you want your relationship back with your father, but how much do you want it? Do you need it? Do you want it to the point that you're willing to sacrifice other things in order to get it? Or do you expect it? Do you feel like you're entitled to have it back and you're not willing to sacrifice anything? And I don't actually think that that is where Harry is. I think he has shown a... I think it really knocks him for six when Charles, A, got diagnosed with cancer, but also, B, he then didn't get a proper meeting with him. I think that absolutely knocked the stuffing out of Prince Harry.
28:33and so I think he is in a position where he is willing to make sacrifices but maybe I think it needs to be perhaps made clear to him that he could like he's not out of the woods just because he's had this meeting which went well I'm sure and I'm sure that he's thrilled that he had it. I don't necessarily think he's out of the woods yet. Actually the Guardian journalist a guy called Nick Hopkins clearly asked him whether he was being stubborn. Hopkins wrote being called stubborn slightly rankles with him so presumably Hopkins said something along the lines of do you know when you say your conscience is clear and you know you don't regret anything are you being stubborn and that seemingly upset Harry and he said it's not stubbornness it's having principles you cannot he added you cannot have reconciliation before you have truth so this is the position that Harry has been adopting for the last few years that he had to speak his mind in order for there to be peace.
29:32And obviously the, you know, the comebacks that is sometimes if everybody feels the need to constantly speak their minds all the time, then you just go round and round and round about arguing over things over and over and over again, because everybody just puts their own perspective and never bends and never compromises and never moves towards the people they're trying to reconcile with. And so that I guess is the other point here is that if Harry really hasn't doesn't think he's ever done anything wrong then you know but also is determined to speak the truth all the time that does kind of create this potential unexploded bomb because you know he's not moved to Charles's position like Charles has had to put up with some really difficult stuff from Harry and that's not to say Harry doesn't of a point about some things.
30:19I'm sure he does. But some of Harry's biggest, his most excoriating interviews about the monarchy, in which he threw his biggest hand grenades at Charles, were at times of grief. And Charles is not going to have enjoyed that experience, mourning his father first and his mother second. So, you know, if you're not going to kind of put your hands up and say, well, actually, I really upset my father. That really hurt his feelings. If you're not going to tell that truth, then it is anyway, a partial version of the truth that you're putting across. Um, it's about, I guess it comes back to that point that I've made on this podcast before, which is that the distinction is objective truth versus subjective truth.
31:04And the truth that Harry describes often when he does these kinds of interviews, it's his subjective truth and you know subjective truth it has a validity to it but objective truth exists too and if you if the two cannot kind of bounce off each other then you can wind up with a very one side of perspective at the end of it um so you know i don't think what harry said to the guardian is enough to derail peace and not to mention that charles has probably had a lot of other stuff on his plate. You know, he had the state visit to plan for or knew it was coming down the line. So he might as well have just been able to compartmentalize this interview.
31:45And I might well even have found it mildly irritating, but I don't necessarily think anything Harry said was bad enough to completely wreck the chances of peace. This is an interesting thing he said, though. The Guardian journalist, Nick Hopkins, said he only mentioned Meghan once and he mentioned her in order to say that she has this mantra that telling the truth as the most efficient way to live. And he said, she said, just stick to the truth. It is the thing I always fall back on always. And if you think like that, who would be stupid enough to lie? It takes up too much time and effort. But, you know, I could already kind of hear the sound of royalists, monarchists, pro-monarchy people screaming into Twitter saying, what about all the stuff you said that other people are challenged?
32:33You know, I did a kind a little praisey of a few things in a story we did. There was the, whether they got married in the back garden or whether it was the official, you know, public wedding at St. George's Chapel was the correct one. And Justin Welby said, actually, you know, if they had, if the legally binding wedding had not been the one at St. George's Chapel, then he would have committed a serious criminal offence by signing the marriage certificate. There was also a passage in spare, which kind of suggested that a press spokesperson for Queen Elizabeth II had warned Harry and Meghan they could expect no mercy in a story in the Daily Mail or had agreed with a Fleet Street jury which said it.
33:15And it wasn't true. The quote had actually come from Sir Trevor Phillips, not Dickie Arbiter. Dickie Arbiter was quoted in the story, but he was quoted saying something else. So there are these examples scattered over Harry and Meghan's narrative of things that aren't quite true. And of course, as I've mentioned before on this podcast, they both describe the famous curtsy to the Queen differently. You know, Meghan says she messed it up and she did this big medieval times dinner and tournament bow and Harry in Spare says it was perfect. So, you know, and actually the whole, the saga of the allegation that Charles commented on Archie's skin tone before he was born.
33:57It's another classic example of a situation where it's not about truth versus lies. It's about, you know, the dispute there is, did Charles express concern about how dark Archie's skin might have been, or did he voice curiosity? And Megan had used the word concern. And so whether Charles was concerned or curious is really hard to demonstrate. And Megan, you know, who said all of this stuff was actually not in the room when Charles said it, which means that she is only experiencing it secondhand through Harry's subjective perception of Charles's motivations. So that is another classic example of something that doesn't neatly fit into this dichotomy between truth and lies.
34:38Like there is a whole gray area in between truth and lies, which is about like misunderstandings. And a lot of Harry and Meghan's narrative is about motivations, which are really difficult to prove. So beyond the issue of whether, you know, whether this is a time bomb that sits underneath efforts to reconcile. There's also the fact that Harry clearly does still have that very kind of quite simplistic worldview, which is about truth and lies and doesn't really understand, but doesn't have a little box in his brain for this category in the middle, which is misunderstandings or things that are unknown, such as like you know what is this this came up a lot in the police protection lawsuit where you know harry says that you know charles could just go and make it all go away and get him his police protection back but is that true like i don't necessarily think harry's lying i think he fundamentally believes that the palace say it's not true that charles doesn't have that power so what is the truth you know is anybody is anybody lying or do they just misunderstand each other.
35:51So, you know, I would love to see Harry try to work on having a slightly more nuanced and less binary view of the world, which accounts for the kind of like, I mean, this is a lot of what journalism is. It's the struggle to find the truth. Like, it's not about truth versus lies. It's about like a process, which can sometimes be drawn out over years to try to gather evidence and find the truth among, you know, often wild claims on both sides, you know, wild and inaccurate sometimes claims on both sides. And I actually have said many times, I have not seen, I don't believe, a royal biography that didn't contain some kind of a mistake somewhere.
36:39They all do. So, and yet nothing that I've said about spare containing these areas is particularly designed to kind of hit Harry over the head with it, with the fact that they're there. It's just, I just would love him to get away from this binary worldview where it's true versus lies and understand that like sometimes the world is a more nuanced place than that. But let's see where it goes next. I mean, yeah, this is the other thing Harry said is he said he wants to spend the next year focusing on Charles. So what does that mean? I mean, presumably that means he must be coming back to Britain at various points and he wants to see the king again.
37:13So let's see what happens. or maybe they establish some kind of a basis for phone conversations or something like that going forwards, and he will have more of a means to speak to his father by phone or something like that. He didn't really explain it, but whatever his plan is, he clearly thinks or wants this relationship to be more present over the next year. So let's just see what happens. Maybe it will all become clear, and they'll be walking side by side through Windsor before we know it, and everything will fall into place. But I'm going to take one more quick break, but before I do, a reminder to follow me on X, formerly Twitter.
37:50I'm at Jack underscore Royston. You will find all my latest stories for Newsweek. When I'm back, Prince Andrew just cannot stay out of the limelight.
38:03Welcome back to the show. Now, the royal family were out in force on Tuesday to pay their respects to the Duchess of Kent, who passed away recently, and it was her funeral at Westminster Cathedral. Now, it was always going to be a significant moment because it was actually the first Catholic funeral that the modern British royal family has ever had. Obviously, the king is the ceremonial head of the Church of England, so they are generally Protestant and go to Protestant churches. But the Duchess of Kent was a Catholic, and King Charles is a man who believes in a kind of multi-faith approach to religion.
38:42So they all went. They had it there. And in fact, actually, the Pope submitted a kind message about her. But who else turned up? None other than Prince Andrew. And he does like to turn up to church. He kind of is very difficult to stop him because he's a Christian and he's entitled to worship. This is a funeral of someone he knew. But the funny thing is, is when he turns up, he really does have a knack for thrusting himself into the spotlight. and that is exactly what he did at Westminster Cathedral not to be confused by the way of Westminster Abbey which is the Protestant church just down the road and yeah so they were protesting out of the church there's a point when William and Kate are in front I think William looks over his shoulder and can kind of see the looming figure of Andrew approaching on the horizon they try to kind of manoeuvre themselves slightly so that there are other family members between them you almost sense that they thought they were safe and it's a bit like that moment in the horror film when you think they've got away from the monster and then the monster comes back again.
39:47But yeah, Andrew popped up out of the crowd behind them and sidled over to Prince William, started trying to speak to him and, you know, kind of laugh away at him and, you know, have a good camaraderie chat with him. And William just kept stony silent and just watched. He kind of nodded his head a bit. you could see like the sheer kind of force of will required to just not respond at all to somebody who's determinedly talking to you it was quite an interesting yeah it's a good study in body language but i mean yeah william managed to basically blank him um andrew kept on talking for a while and then stopped and then there's just a little flicker of a moment where andrew just shoots him some side eye and then that was it um so you know the guy will not stop trying he just will not stop trying it went obviously very viral loads of people saw it i suppose in some ways the fact that william blanked him kind of saved the royals a little bit but like why uh not just you know charles and william but the whole family like why are they allowing andrew to go to these events.
40:58He obviously must have had an invitation. Nobody, even Andrew, would not turn up at a funeral without an invitation. And the guy, you know, he's persona non grata for a very good reason. You know, Britain's ambassador to America, Peter Mandelson, just lost his job over Epstein. And Mandelson's gay. Like, there's no way he slept with any masseurs because, you know, his bread's not buttered that side. And yet he lost his job as British ambassador to America because he turned a blind eye to what Epstein was doing and continued to speak to him after Epstein's original conviction in 2008 and referred to him as a pal and all of these kind of horrible things.
41:40So if Mandelson's out the door, then why is Andrew being invited to this funeral? It seems crazy to me. Who knows? Maybe he was incredibly close to the Duchess of Kent, but I've certainly not heard that at any point. Andrew obviously was accused of sexual assault by Virginia Jeffery, who said that she was a 17-year-old Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking victim and was flown to London to sleep with him and was made to do it by Jeffrey Epstein and Gell-M Maxwell and feared for her safety if she refused. Andrew denied all of this, but she sued him at civil court in New York. He settled out of court without admitting liability, but paid her a substantial sum of money, thought to be in the millions.
42:21to settle out of court. And when they did that, he released a statement, it was a joint statement, in fact, in which he said he acknowledged that she was a trafficking victim without admitting any kind of wrongdoing himself. So he is maintaining his denials that he made in 2019 to Emily Maitlis on the BBC. And one of the things he said to her was, I'm not in a position to know what she's trying to achieve, as in Virginia, but I can tell you categorically I don't remember meeting her at all. I do not remember a photograph being taken, and I've said consistently and frequently that we never had any sort of sexual contact whatever.
42:57Very sadly, Virginia is no longer with us. She passed away and we maybe will find out a little bit more about what went on there but an initial family statement suggested it was a suicide. Other family members have questioned that. And that's it for this episode of The Royal Report. Be sure to join me every week when I visit the latest royal headlines, embark on some royal deep dives and riff on all things royal. Until next time, I'm Jack Royston. Thanks for listening, everyone, and a curtsy to you all.
From the publisher
King Charles welcomes President Donald Trump, Prince Harry risks blowing reconciliation, and Prince Andrew makes Prince William squirm.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
