Outrage After Zohran Mamdani Secretly Changes Definition of Rich to Widen the Tax Net

25:09You know what, who cares? Who cares if his ego's being stroked a little bit? The simple equation is this, are prescription drugs lower today because of this than they were yesterday? And the answer to that is yes. And then, as I said before, it starts, success makes strange bedfellows of people. When your goal is success, when your goal is to help people, suddenly people who are your enemies start realizing, boy, you know that Trump guy? Sure, I did hate him and I said all that crazy stuff, but he's doing this really cool thing with prescription drugs and oh, I'm Mark Cuban and I've been doing this thing with prescription drugs, we should work together.

25:48And here they are. Mr. President, I think other than you, I've been the biggest proponent of TrumpRx.com. And the reason for that is Republicans want cheaper drugs, independents want cheaper drugs, Democrats want cheaper drugs, and together I think we're going to do something special. What makes Cost Plus Drugs different is that when you click through TrumpRx to our site, not only will you see a great price, but you'll see our actual cost and that we only market up 15 percent. And what makes this incredible, Mr. President, all the volume and all the people that are going to come from the site.

26:23As our volumes go up, our costs go down, which means we'll be ending up charging less to people over a period of time. So this is a special announcement. This is a special partnership. 559 of those drugs are ours. So we're really excited to be part of this. Thank you so much for having me. Guys, I don't think this can be overstated how cool this is. And this is what decent people do. You know, I've been very, very critical of Mark Cuban. And like, I've gone off on him many times and he really was Trump deranged. But then he's putting that aside. And Trump, who's unbelievably good at that, right?

26:55Like Trump, you can say all the horrible things in the world about him. Marco Rubio used to go after him all the time. Everybody used to go after him. Kennedy used to go after him, everybody, right? JD Vance said crazy things about him years ago. And he brings them in, right? And now they're all part of this cool thing. But there is Cuban going, I care about this thing. You care about this thing. And then he makes the point about how capitalism works and governments not the answer. First off, what a cool thing related to transparency. And I keep telling you, AI is going to make the world so much more transparent.

27:23So what he's saying is you can see our price, how much we're getting the drugs for. We're only gonna market up 15%. That seems pretty freaking fair, right? It's still a private company. They have to make some money. But then his point is the more that people buy this, and this is what the basic stuff of capitalism is, then people start buying more and then their costs start going down, right? It's why when you go to Costco, when you buy in bulk, things are cheaper, right? Everyone knows that. If you buy a little can of orange juice per liter of juice, it's very expensive. If you buy a bigger one, it starts becoming cheaper.

27:56That's basic stuff. So right there is saying, hey, this is what capitalism's about. You're now gonna put me in this exchange. And then the other cool part of it is that he's just got one of the companies that are part of this. Costco's part of it, Walgreens, there were a couple others. They will then start going, boy, you know, Cuban over there with his cost plus thing, he's doing some good stuff. They're transparent about the pricing and they're only adding 15%. Why don't we add 14 % and see what happens? And then people might start going there and then Cuban might be like, man, they beat me.

28:29I'm gonna go down to 10. That's how you actually lower costs and help people. Then just on a funny side of this, Trump was asked about Mark Cuban and how he supported Kamala. It's pretty remarkable seeing you and Mark Cuban up there and the fact that obviously Mark endorsed Kamala Harris back in 2020. Well, he made a mistake. It was a big mistake. What does this say about what you two are building here? Well, it says we love people. We love our country. He wants to. He's got a good company and he's going to do a lot of business with this. And I'm going to get drugs out through Amazon, through the whole group, and we're going to get drugs out.

29:09And Mark wanted to be a part of it. And I think Mark was very gracious. He said, this is something that really works. First time you've seen it. Guys, that's it. That's as good as government is going to get. You have Trump joking about this guy who was trying to like handicap him and make sure he was not gonna be president and probably put plenty of money into it too and everything else. And then you have Trump explaining why he's willing to work with him right now. He's got this company, he's doing cool stuff. And at the end, we both care about people and we would like people to have more access in a cheaper way to these things.

29:41The answer was not, oh, I'm not gonna work with Mark. Oh, I see Mark Cuban over there. He's got this marketplace for prescription drugs. I'm the government, I'm gonna come in and undercut him and try to destroy him. No, that's not even how the government, the government can't do that. Anyway, like the government's not functional enough to do it. So he's working with people to actually try to make your life a little bit better. Here's Mark Cuban being asked if he regrets endorsing Kamala. Do you regret supporting former Vice President? I'm not going into my politics at all. Yes, sir. I think that's fine.

30:14I actually think that's a fine answer. I hope, Mark Cuban, if you're watching today, I hope your answer is yes. Not just because you're now in, you know, quote unquote business, let's say with Trump, but because you realize that this guy is not all of the crazy things that you thought, and that there are other good things happening in the country and the amount of investment that's coming here and all of those things. I hope you realize that. But I actually can completely accept, I'm just not gonna talk about that. You know what, we agree on this. This is a good thing we're doing together. I'm gonna make a little scratch.

30:44It's good for Trump because it's good for the American people. Let's leave it at that. I think that's just fine. Okay, so let's put a pin in that for now and move over to where we're at with the Iran situation. Cause you know, we've been in this, basically two to three week sort of pause as we've got the Strait of Hormuz locked down. Iran's losing$500 million a day cause they can't get that oil out. If you remember what I was saying at the beginning of this thing, I think this had a lot to do with exerting pressure on China. Trump was just in China. We'll have more on that in just a second. But apparently we were gonna resume attacks today, quite literally today.

31:19It would be happening right now because Iran hasn't come back with a counter proposal that Trump likes. However, it turns out that a couple of the Gulf states talked to Trump and we are gonna pause on that momentarily. Here's Trump. Can you speak a little bit about your post on True Social on Iran and what was the decision that why you didn't attack? Well, other countries have come to me and they've said we were getting ready to do a very major attack tomorrow. I put it off for a little while, hopefully, maybe forever, but possibly for a little while. Because we've had very big discussions with Iran and we'll see what they amount to.

31:57I was asked by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE and some others if we could put it off for two or three days, a short period of time because they think that they are getting very close to making a deal. Okay, so there's a whole bunch of other countries now, right? We know that Iran bombed probably 13 other Gulf and Arab states, and they now are saying, hey, there's some discussions here, let's pause on this. Let me just quickly recap the Trump Truth Social post on that. I've been asked by the emir of Qatar, Tamim Bel Hamad al-Thani, the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman al-Sahd, and the President of the UAE, Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahan, to hold off on our planned military attack on the Islamic Republic of Iran, which was scheduled for tomorrow, in that serious negotiations are now taking place and that, in their opinion, as great leaders and allies, a deal will be made which will be very acceptable to the United States of America, as well as all countries in the Middle East and beyond.

32:51The deal will include, importantly, no nuclear weapons for Iran. Based on my respect for the above mentioned leaders, I've instructed Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, the Chairman of Joint Chief of Staff, General Daniel Cain, the United States military, that we will not be doing the scheduled attack of Iran tomorrow, but have further instructed them to be prepared to go forward with full, large-scale assault of Iran on a moment's notice in the event that an acceptable deal is not reached. Thank you for your attention to this matter, President Donald J. Trump. So that's Trump 101, right? Like we were about to do it.

33:20Couple of these leaders are like, hey, maybe we can make some moves here. Give us a couple of days. Trump says, okay. And then what does he also say? We're ready to attack. So we will see. Now, again, I wanna point out that from, I think, day one of this thing, I kept saying this has more to do with China than anything else. China gets 13, 14 % of their oil from Iran. We get very little coming through the Strait of Hormuz, so it wasn't gonna hurt us that much. Plus we got the access to Venezuela oil and we are drilling more. Also, by doing something a little kind of nutty militarily, we might've been sending a signal to China that if they make a move on Taiwan, which is where we're getting huge amounts of these microprocessors, which we need in an age of AI, that they might be in a little bit of trouble.

34:04Well, as you know, Trump went to China just last week. There were all sorts of meetings. And now it sounds like Xi Jinping wants to make a deal that will keep Trump happy and hamper Iran. Here is Trump talking to Brett Baier. And President Xi would like to see a deal made. He would like to see a deal made. And he did offer, he said, if I can be of any help at all, I would like to be of help. He did say that. Yeah, he did say that. And look, anybody that buys that much oil has obviously got some kind of a relationship with him. But he said, I would love to be of help. If I could be of any help whatsoever, he'd like to see the Hormuz Strait open.

34:45He said, if I could be of any help whatsoever, I would like to help. Yeah. Do you guys get it now? All these people that pretended, even these influencers on the right that pretended, Trump has no idea what he's doing. He's going to end the civilization thermonuclear World War III. We're panicans. the sky is falling, chicken little, blah, blah, blah. It's like there was and has been a plan. Trump just told you right there, because China gets an awful lot of their oil from Iran, suddenly Xi Jinping is going, hey, can we figure this thing out? Because they need that oil. Now, Brett Baer did push Trump a little bit.

35:25He said he was asking here about whether we underestimated Iran's ability to withstand an American attack. Take a look. So why are we where we are? Did you underestimate the pain tolerance that Iran has? I didn't underestimate anything. We hit them unbelievably hard. Look, we left their bridges. We left their electricity capacity. We can knock that all out in two days, two days, everything. We left Cargill Island other than I said, hit it except for the valves where the oil comes out. Because when you hit that, that means you're gonna lose a little oil. I think I might've said that the first clip was Brett Baier.

36:08That was obviously Hannity. The one we just showed you was Brett Baier. But I think it's a good question by Brett because even though I think of this thing has gone pretty spectacularly well, right? A 40 day war and now just a blockade and we're getting some sort of deal and China's coming to the table, right? Because we've got them over a barrel, no pun intended, because they want that oil. I think it's a completely legitimate question because basically Brett's saying, how are we in this situation? Meaning that the optics around this, there's a certain set of people that think that we're in another forever war.

36:40Now we just aren't, but Trump lays out, hey, we could have blown that place apart like this if we wanted. Like we could absolutely do it. We didn't, but we are making sure that they are gonna come to the table and be fair. And by the way, we've taken out all their leadership and the Navy and the Air Force and everything else. Here is Ro Khanna, and we've put a couple of videos of this guy lately. He wanted, he pretended I suppose to be a moderate Democrat, but he's just a far lefty. Here he is explaining that the now deceased Ayatollah didn't want nukes, but the new Ayatollah does. On Iran, look, they're still enriched uranium there.

37:16Yes, we defeated a lot of their Navy and defeated their Air Force, but the regime there is more hardline now. Kamene Jr. actually wants to develop nuclear weapons, which is fathered in. Oh, that's interesting. How do you know? Well, first off, there's enriched uranium there. You are right about that. And we're talking about how we can get it out of the country. But so there is, you're admitting there is enriched uranium there. The Iranians admitted 100 % that they were enriching beyond civilian use. And you're saying that the former Ayatollah didn't want to develop weapons? but the new guy does?

37:51Well, let's tell you a little bit about the new guy. The new guy, Mojtaba Khomeini, he hasn't been seen in public in weeks. He has severe burns to his face. He may be missing both legs. And according to US intelligence, he is a homosexual. I'm gonna guess that his reign of terror is not gonna last very long. But what Roe is really saying there is basically, if we do anything, it makes people more angry, right? And this is such a, it's a dim view, but I would also say it's a very defeatist view. You know, if America does anything, if we fight to stop an apocalyptic regime from getting nukes, which was the policy of America for 40 years and all these other presidents said they were gonna do it and Trump just did it, we're just gonna make people angry on the ground.

38:36And by the way, I'll try to give the devil his due there. That might be true to some extent. Some people are gonna be pissed. But do you do what is right to protect the world and to protect your people? Or do you placate people that probably don't like you very much in the first place. That is something that I think Trump sees very clearly. And actually that's quite a segue here because today there is a major election. It's the Kentucky House primary race, which is up for Thomas Massey's seat. Now, before we do this segment, I wanna say I've interviewed Thomas, I don't know, probably a half dozen times.

39:09I've enjoyed chatting with him very much. I am very in line with a lot of libertarian ideals. Actually, about a year ago, he was in Miami. He called me up, I had dinner with him, with his, no, this must be two years ago because it was with his wife who has since passed away, about two years ago after their kid got married, one of their sons got married not too far from me. He called me up, I had dinner with him and a few other people, we had a great night. So I like him personally. I think some of his policies have gone a little kooky, but putting that aside for a moment, there's now a big fight for this primary election and Trump is supporting Ed Galleran, who is his competitor.

39:44And Trump's argument basically is Massey as a libertarian. Well, first off, Massey keeps putting all the Epstein stuff on Trump and everything else, but even getting over the Epstein stuff. Massey often votes with Democrats or doesn't vote with Republicans for libertarian reasons, meaning he has his ideals and he just doesn't vote. So he didn't vote for the big, beautiful bill. He didn't vote for certain things related to closing the border, a series of other things. That's his libertarian beliefs. Trump wants people that will be on board with him, especially because we have such slim margins.

40:15So a lot of people are trying to make this about all sorts of things. I think this is Trump wants people who will back him because he realizes how tenuous the Republican grip on the House is. Anywho, it's gotten a little nasty. The election is today. Hopefully we'll have a result tonight, but this from Trump on Truth Social. The worst congressman in a long and storied history of the Republican Party is Thomas Massey. He's an obstructionist and a fool. Vote him out of office tomorrow, Tuesday. It will be a great day for America. So look, I don't think he's a fool. If I'm not mistaken, he's an electrical engineer and literally built a battery for his house using a Tesla battery, like that's pretty cool.

40:49So he's not a fool. Now is he an obstructionist? Yes, you can argue that, right? Again, because he has libertarian beliefs and there's a difference between libertarian and conservative and usually libertarians, unfortunately are making something like seventh grade arguments that are nice in theory but don't work in the real world. Trump is a real world guy and Trump's going, boy, it's hard for me to govern with such slim majorities when I have guys that have an R next to their name who vote against the big, beautiful bill, who vote against the border wall, this, that, the other thing. So that's why Trump is pissed about this.

41:25But now there's some interesting numbers coming out of this. And again, we will see what happens tonight. But Trump has an unbelievable track record. If Trump endorses somebody, they win. But don't take my word for it. Here's that little hopped up guy, Harry Enten, over on CNN with his big screen and his numbers. So President Trump endorsed an opponent here. How does President Trump do in general when he endorses a Republican primary? You know, we've quoted the movie Good Burger every single time, basically, when we've done this. When, in fact, you go against President Trump, you go on the grinder, and you could just see this.

41:57Times Trump endorses have won in GOP primaries. It's about 95 % each of the last four cycles. Now, I will note, you know, sometimes he endorses and there's no real challenger. But even in those cases, the challengers to the incumbent have won a majority of the time as well. The power of a Trump endorsement is still sky high. And we'll see tomorrow if that happens with Thomas Massimo. OK, so you can't really argue with the numbers on that. When Trump endorses for whatever reason, and yes, he pointed out sometimes it's a weak primary candidate or whatever it is. But 95 percent of the time, the Republican that Trump endorses wins.

42:32And that shows you that Trump, for all the Tucker screaming and Megyn Kelly screaming and everything else, everyone's abandoning Trump. It just simply isn't true. I mean, Harry Anton, again, CNN is no friend to Trump, but they put the poll up two weeks ago, about 97 % support amongst the base. So he's got huge support amongst the base. And when he endorses someone, they win. Maybe this will be an outlier. I don't know. We'll find out tonight, I suppose. But here's a bit more from Anton talking about how Massey's odds since Trump just got involved in this over the last couple of days have seemingly collapsed.

43:05Look at this chance that Massey is in fact the Kentucky Ford GOP nominee. It has been falling considerably over the last 10 days, according to the cash prediction market. Look at this. It was 71 percent 10 days ago. Look where that number is now. It's 44 percent. So chances more likely than not, though it is very close, very close, that Massey will, in fact, go down to defeat. But again, we're just going to have to wait and see the votes getting cast and counted because this is quite close. But any time that incumbent member of Congress goes down, he has done something seriously wrong in the minds of the voters.

43:38And in this case, if Massey goes down, it is that he crossed Donald John Trump. Right. So 71 percent to what was that, 44 percent, something like that. Like that's a massive collapse in about two weeks. And it's only in the last two weeks that Trump got involved in this thing. He's running against this guy, Ed Galleran. Here he is talking about how Massey basically votes with the Dems. To that, I say this race is a referendum for sure. It's a referendum to see if coastal elite liberal Democrats can buy a seat in Congress under the guise of a rhino Republican who has served for 14 years and is nicknamed Miss Representative Massey.

44:21Our term limits, Tom, depending on what county you're here in my district of 21 counties. He's got a problem for every solution. He continues to be the MVP of the squad. He won that in 2025, hands down. He's the front runner for 2026. It's a pretty low bar, as we say in Kentucky, when you get the endorsement of the New York Times, that left wing liberal congressman from California, Roe Conner, Joey Mayhart and the ladies from The View, and to put a bow on it, that Crockett lady from Texas. Right. So that's what I want to address here. Again, I want to make it clear. I am not going after Massey personally.

44:56I've only had good experiences with him and I hope I can interview him again. And he's always been very gracious to me. there is something, to me, the issue he's facing right now is he went so deep on that Trump is either a pedophile or involved in the Epstein thing or protecting the Epstein thing, that Trump was like, I'm not gonna deal with, I'm just not gonna have it with this guy anymore. On top of that, and that's, by the way, that's the secondary thing. The first thing, the primary thing is that Massey often votes with Democrats, or at least does not vote with Republicans. So to the point of how the New York Times is endorsing this guy, You know, what this reminds me of is sort of like when Marjorie Taylor Greene was hated by everybody on The View, right?

45:38And then she turned on Trump and what happened? They bring her on and they glaze her. What happened? Liz Cheney was hated by everybody on the Democrat side of things. Then she goes against Trump and then she's on The View and on all of the other shows and they're telling you how great she is. And then of course she loses her primary to Harriet Hagelman by 80 points or something. But look at this list. I saw this on Twitter. Look at this list of people and organizations supporting Massey right now, and you just have to take it for what it is. Code Pink, they are a far left, communist, loony organization.

46:11Ro Khanna, we've discussed him. New York Times, Al Jazeera, Hassan Piker, the craziest of all the far left influencers, Mother Jones, a far left rag, AOC, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Summer Lee, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson. That's pretty nutty. Now to give you just a little more context, the average Republican in the House votes with Trump 95 % of the time, 95 % of the time. Massey has voted with Trump 77 % of the time. So it's not that he's never voting with Trump, but that's a pretty significant difference, an 18 percentage point difference on when he votes with Trump.

46:48And again, because the margins are so slim, Trump wants people that will back him. That fully makes sense. So anyway, let's leave that there. We will see what happens. I wanna jump to one or two other things, because there's another interesting fight, and one of the things I'm really trying to do on the show, especially, I've always tried to do it, but especially in the backdrop of America's 250, is paint that there is an incredibly bright future on the horizon, and AI is so going to change things, and it's going to make things cheaper, and we are going to have abundance, and the world of robotics and AI is just gonna look so fundamentally different.

47:21If you think about the difference between your grandparents' life, some of whom maybe didn't have even have the radio, right? Or certainly didn't have TV. And then the world that they got to see, like the world that we are in right now is gonna be our grandchildren are gonna think we were so simple like cavemen basically. So I wanna talk a little bit about AI here. And there was an interesting decision because as you probably know, Elon Musk and Sam Altman, who basically both created OpenAI together and then had a falling out over the direction of which way it was going. They got into a lawsuit and Elon was basically suing Altman.

48:01He actually lost the initial portion of the case. Let's take a look. Musk has lost his lawsuit against OpenAI and its top executives. Musk contended they betrayed him by turning his vision of an artificial intelligence nonprofit into a money-making enterprise. Fox Business correspondent Kelly Saberi has the verdict tonight from Los Angeles. Good evening, Kelly. Hi, Brett. After less than two hours of deliberations, a federal jury rejected Elon Musk's claims against his OpenAI co-founders, now CEO Sam Altman and President Greg Brockman. Jurors decided unanimously that the claims of breach of charitable trust were filed outside the statute of limitations, ultimately dismissing all other claims within the case.

48:46Musk, who left OpenAI before the release of ChatGPT, accused his co-founders of abandoning the company's charitable mission to make certain that no single person or company controls artificial intelligence by creating an open source nonprofit. Okay, so Elon believes that he and Sam had agreed we were going to do this open source and it was going to be nonprofit and it was going to be as sort of fair and equitable in terms of information as possible. Well, the grand jury apparently, I mean, it basically came down to statute of limitations. They're basically arguing there must've been something in the contract as to when Elon would be able to make a claim and apparently that statute of limitations had passed.

49:27So I'll just go on the assumption that that is right. I'll read Elon's statement in just a second. But now, as you know, Elon is now doing Grok. Grok happens to be, because I'm an ex guy usually, and obviously the respect I have for Elon and free speech and everything else, Grok is the agent, the AI agent that I use, but there is ChatGPT, which was based off OpenAI. There's a gajillion others, and there's gonna be an AI war to basically see who is gonna be the king. And once you are the king of AI, you will be the king of information. And as, oh, I got a good one here, as...

50:03Oh my God. When you control the mail, you control information. The fat guy in Seinfeld. Newman. Newman, thank you. Oh my God. As Newman said to Kramer, When you control the mail, you control information. And that's really what this war is about, that when you control AI, you will control information. Here's Elon's response. I can't believe I just forgot Newman's name. That is just weak. You know, I'm crashing because I had all the carbs in New York and then I was sharp yesterday and then now I haven't had any carbs. Here's Elon on the judgment. He said, regarding the open AI case, the judge and jury never actually ruled on the merits of the case just under calendar technicality.

50:43I just addressed that. There is no question to anyone following the case in detail that Altman and Brockman did in fact enrich themselves by stealing a charity. The only question is when they did it. I will be filing an appeal with the Ninth Circuit because creating a precedent to loot charities is incredibly destructive to charitable giving. In America, OpenAI was founded to benefit all of humanity. Okay, so he just addressed what I acknowledged. He's acknowledging that the statute of limitations as to when he could file and go against them legally, he passed. He's acknowledging that that is the truth.

51:16What he is then saying is that is not enough because this thing was created as a charity and now it has become a profitable business that he has nothing to do with. That all can be fought out in the courts. The reason I think that this story is important is because again, all of these AI models, you're all probably using them already, right? Like I'm trying to figure out what we're doing in August when I go off the grid. And it's like three years ago, I was just Googling things and Googling hotels and venues and all of these places and everything, and flights and everything. I'm doing everything via Grok right now.

51:49So there has been a shift, right? It's sort of think of the world, I don't know, pre-Google or something. We say you're gonna Google it, but before that, there were a couple search engines, then Google became the ubiquitous one. So this actually is a huge story. Here's Elon talking to Tucker. This is a while ago before Tucker went off the deep end, talking about how he doesn't trust Sam Altman and what he might do with OpenAI. I don't trust OpenAI. I mean, you know, I started that company as a nonprofit open source. I named a company, OpenAI, as an open source, now extremely close source and maximizing profit.

52:23Altman got rich, didn't he? At various points, he's claimed not to be getting rich, but he's claimed many things that were false. So I don't trust Sam Altman, And I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy. Okay, so it remains to be seen as to whether open AI will become the most powerful AI in the world. He's working on Grok. There's, what other ones are there? There you got Chad, JBT, you got Grok, anything else you got, you got Claude. I mean, there's a whole bunch of these things. And again, we will see where the winner is. I believe we have the video.

52:56We have to show it in honor of the great postal worker, Newman of the Upper West Side. Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, I hear you got some lip reader working for you. You gotta let me use it for one day, just one day. Can't do it, Newman. But, but Jerry, we got, we got this new supervisor down at the post office. He's working behind this glass. I know they're talking about me. They're gonna transfer me, I know it. Two hours, give me two hours. It's not gonna happen. All right, all right, all right, you go ahead. You go ahead, you keep it secret. But you remember this. When you control the mail, you control information.

53:32And I think that clip explains the AI race. Did that make sense? It sort of does make sense. All right, let's end on this though. Look, they'll fight it out over AI. We have this interesting election in Kentucky today. You see which way New York's going with taxes. All of the stuff we covered today. Well, what kind of future do we want? I think that most of us want a future where there's abundance, where there's opportunity, where there's, I don't know, love, Elon? Let's say you're praying to God and you ask for a given future. What future do you want God to give you? And probably a future where there's amazing abundance for all, where everybody has incredible medical care and we have this, you know.

54:18And in fact, we're saying anything can be cured, where no one is hungry and people are free to do what they would like. I think that's probably the best future. And peace, peace and love. Well, yeah, yeah. I mean, always worry about, like, if you wish for something, does it actually become some dystopian version of that? But certainly love. I mean, I think we want a future with love. That seems like a no-brainer. All right, so love would be nice, but if we can go into a technological future where we can create things faster and cheaper and we can make a government that is more transparent and there's more competition, I mean, I think you can see how we've tied this all together here.

54:55Like, there's a chance. There's a chance. but it won't be with people who just have the dimmest view of the world, which is give up your autonomy and your hopes and your dreams to a system that probably doesn't care about you that much. I, however, do care about you, and that's why we do a post-game show every day at rubenreport.locals.com. We'll see you there in 30 seconds. Thank you for watching. Goodbye. Bye-bye. Okay, we have it in our side. Fire. Boom.

55:31Thank you.