Trump’s Social Media Advisor Reveals All: Epstein, Iran, and Mark Levin’s Israeli Propaganda

27:06And so you look at it and you're like, OK. And then Trump tweets like, if you want to get the real truth, watch Mark Levin's lowly rated show on Fox weekends. And so all of a sudden he just like pivots in one day and starts saying things that are true, in my view, brave. I'm cheering Trump when he says this and he's like, oh, we're out. This is too much. Can't deal with it. We're going to run out of oil. You're not going to be able to get gasoline. Like, that's terrible for America. We're stopping. What caused that change? I believe he felt the mission was accomplished. And it goes back to the fact that he is not somebody who wants forever wars.

27:44He's not somebody who wants forever conflict. He felt that he was able to deliver on his campaign promise of preventing Iran from ever having a nuclear weapon in a little over 90 days. and we have the Iranians now at the table negotiating a deal with J.D. Vance and our team. And I think the president is happy where things lay. And now people on Mark Levin crowd, who were the president's biggest cheerleaders, are now opposed to what he's doing because they have a different agenda for Iran. They have a different vision for how to handle Iran. and and i think that's wrong but the president's position has been consistent for you can find videos of him in 1987 saying iran should never have a nuclear weapon and he was given certain intelligence how to take it out and he did he eliminated their navy that intelligence did not come from the united states he eliminated the he eliminated the navy he eliminated their air force and he has got them at the table to ensure that they never have a nuclear weapon so but this was my complaint for the beginning, and I'm not here to defend the IC, our 18 intelligence agencies, but like there was no American intelligence that said Iran was on the brink of building a nuclear weapon.

29:02That came from Israel and they lie and they lied to Trump. And I told him that, you know, before this started, cause it was obvious. So like, why would the United States ever rely on Israeli intelligence again, if they just lied us into a war that got a bunch of Americans killed in that raise gas prices. It's very sad to see the loss of the soldiers' lives. And I know the president was certainly upset about that. Look, I think that, you know, the president accomplished his goal there. And with the MOU, I think people are confident we're in a good spot. I think the president obviously will reserve the right to respond again with military action if he feels like things are going sideways.

29:44But look, I think the president is now focused, The president is focused on domestic issues, lowering gas prices, lowering economic prices, bring job opportunities back home. I think the foreign excursions have been successful. And now it's time to focus on home. You know, on the Israeli points, again, like I think this proves that the president isn't a slave to Israel. Apparently. Or he's broken free. He's broken his fetters. You know, I don't think the president was ever a slave to Israel. And I think characterizing it as that was not fair. You know, I'm friends with, eight years ago, I became friends with Bibi Netanyahu's son, Yair.

30:31Yeah. He's a nice guy. There was a moment in time. Is he fighting in Lebanon right now? I actually haven't talked to him in a while, maybe. Oh, I think he's in Miami, but whatever. Okay. I don't think he's in Miami. I invited him to my wedding. So for the people who call me anti-Semitic, I invited the prime minister. They're calling you anti-Semitic now? They call me anti-Semitic now. So I invited the prime minister of Israel's son to my wedding because, you know, and he's a friend of mine. Yeah. But there was a moment in time where - I know him for the record. The president, after the 2020 election, and, you know, didn't have a great relationship with Bibi.

31:04Bibi was the first world leader to congratulate Joe Biden - I remember. After the rigged 2020 election. And I think that's made people feel, you know, a little bit different about that relationship. The president now has a great working relationship with him, but he's certainly not a slave to Bibi or a slave to Israel. And I think people who suggest that are not being fair. Look, I've been unfair many times in my life, and I've overstated things dramatically many times, and I certainly have been mean. and I really regret that. So I just want to offer another blanket apology for my bad behavior.

31:43Those are my main sins. But I still don't get it. Why if no one in your cabinet is enthusiastic about this, no one in your intel services says, yes, they're on the brink of like sending a nuclear tipped ICBM into Miami. If all of them are like, that's not true. You turn and you take Israeli intelligence, which is like fraudulent, obviously fraudulent, and act on that. What is that? It also goes back to instincts. Again, the president has been on this position for 30 years. And we had a war in June that he said ended the Iran nuclear program. I was, I talked to him constantly about that. And he's like, no, no, we're done.

32:20We're done. And then a few months later, we're like ramping up for another war. And I was like, well, I thought we eliminated that. Well, you can see why I'd be mystified. Sure. Slavery was the most obvious explanation, but maybe I'm wrong. It's certainly not slavery. It's certainly not slavery. I think it's the president's instincts and the president, the president wanted to do it. And so he did it. And, you know, there's this report that he's telling people, I'm president and you're not, right? So, you know, you have people on your team. Sometimes you listen to them. Sometimes you don't. Sometimes you take their, you want their opinion.

32:53Sometimes you don't. And, you know, you do it with your show. I do it with my company. I totally agree. Well, that's clearly true. It was the president's instincts. It certainly wasn't blackmail related to Epstein. It certainly wasn't being a slave to a foreign country. So I think that... But I felt that I respect Trump's instincts. They made him president twice. He's had an amazing life. And I think it's been on the basis of his instincts. So I have maximum respect for Trump's instincts and for his understanding of people and for power dynamics. Like the guy has got like x-ray vision. He's not good on details sometimes, but he's incredibly precise in his big picture understanding of people.

33:32and I felt that he went against his own instincts in launching this war. He knew the risks. He's, you know, he's not a crazy risk taker actually. He talks a big game. This is my analysis anyway, but he's not actually that reckless. Really? I mean, he's been successful. You can't live for 80 years and be that reckless, right? This was really reckless and I felt that it was, he didn't want to do it. I can't read his soul. Like maybe he really secretly did want to do it. That was definitely not my impression having talked to him a lot about it. So then I'm like, okay, you didn't want to do it. No one around you wanted to do it.

34:02Why'd you do it? I believe the president did want to eliminate their nuclear capabilities. And he also eliminated their ability to have a Navy and an Air Force and a missile program. So, you know, he, he, he, he did it. And now the, the excursion, I don't even like to call it a war because it was a 90 day blip. And, and yes, we sadly lost some lives and God rest their souls. but the excursion as you know it appears to be coming to an end and I can't imagine that these hysterical voices on social media are going to prolong it so yeah I mean that's really it we differ in our analysis of the war but I don't want to argue about it what I want to understand is how public opinion on the question is shaped and you're one of the the experts on this topic we'll love to dive in on this one okay so um and by the way if you ever discover that anti-war sentiment is being funded by a foreign power text me because i'd love to know who's paying for it how i can get on that payroll i think you're doing okay this studio is great it's so fun this is our we had this long before the show this is just to our family barn.

35:20But so there's that. But I certainly, the let's prolong the war on behalf of the Netanyahu regime, that does seem to be funded by somebody because that's not an organic position in the United States. There's not, as you said, 67 % in favor of the MOU. So like there's a groundswell of public support for following this lunatic path even further. So who is paying for that? That's a great question. and getting foreign influence out of the political ecosystem, specifically online, it's a passion project of mine. You know, I am Trump's social media guy. That's what I'm branded in the press. So you can only imagine the type of money that these countries and other companies have tried to throw at me.

36:08I do not take any foreign money. I don't take any money from the Gulf countries. I don't take any money from India. I don't take any money from Russia, China, No, no foreign countries. How much did you make if you wanted to? I've probably rejected close to$20 million in contracts over the last 15 months. Damn. Yeah. How old are you? I'm 29. That takes some restraint. So, you know, it's, I've had some, I've had a really interesting career. I've made some money. I made no money. I made, you know, and I'm not really focused on money. and I think that's what separates me from a lot of my colleagues or competitors, if you will, in Washington.

36:52However, I've actually never shared this publicly. In June of 2025, mid-June, shortly after the first Iran strike happened, I got a message from a friend and he texted me when I was on an airplane. He said, Alex, great news from Israel. And I want to read the message so I don't butcher anything that was said. At 2.47 on June 16, 2025. Good news from Israel. They have budget for the American market to make a strategy and social network against Iran. I talked about you and they want to work with you. It is through a foundation. Call me when you can and I'll tell you all of the details. I said, I appreciate you thinking of me.

37:44Likely can't get involved with this one. Good for you. So what's in your toothpaste? If you're using the brand you grew up with, you probably don't want to know. The ingredients likely include fluoride, something called SLS, glycerin, foaming agents. It's a chemical cocktail. Van Mann's toothpaste is different. Their miracle tooth powder is changing everything, and people are ditching traditional toothpaste filled with chemicals by the thousands. Fan Man's tooth powder uses ingredients with the same mineral structure as your teeth that remineralizes them and strengthens your enamel naturally. No fluoride at all and totally edible.

38:20You could put it on toast. Not that you'd want to, but you could. People who use it report wetter teeth, less plaque. They wake up without that gross film on their gums. And here's the amazing part. Vivid dreams are back. You dream clearly when you stop coating your mouth in fluoride every night. Did you know that? Pretty amazing. Tells you a lot. So make the switch. Visit vanman.shop slash Tucker. Use the code Tucker for 15 % off your first order. Vanman.shop slash Tucker. Use the code Tucker. 15 % off. Vanman real ingredients, zero exceptions. So in June of 2025, it is documented that an Israeli foundation wanted to hire me, an American social media strategist.

39:05Trump's social media strategist. Trump's social media strategist to help disseminate information related to Iran. I never got on the phone call, so I don't know exactly what they were looking to get amplified, but I didn't do it. You know, and so - What was the foundation? Do you know? The foundation was never specified. However, two months later, an organization run by President Trump's former digital guy, who the president hasn't talked to in six plus years, Brad Parscale, ended up filing a FAR contract with the state of Israel for$1.5 million a month. A month? A month. Which, in comparison, Brian Ballard, who is potentially the top lobbyist in Washington, D.C., charges the country of Saudi Arabia$60 ,000 a month.

40:05Brad Parscale has no experience being a lobbyist, and he certainly isn't selling access to the president because the guy's got zero access to the president. So two months after I was reached out to to work on an Israeli social media campaign related to Iran, Brad gets this social media contract with Israel, paid through by a German entity called Havis Media Group. And I'm going to read you a part of Brad's initial FAR filing related to his deliverables for this particular contract. It says,

41:17YouTube, podcasts, and other relevant digital and broadcast outlets. Integration. Oh, here's the kicker. Integration of narrative messaging into Salem media network properties and aligned distribution channels. And then lastly on this section, paid media campaigns delivering a minimum of 50 million impressions per month with a target average CPM under USD$2 across the combined budget pool. So that's what the FAR filing says. Wow. That's what it says. And so that means that the Israeli government is paying Brad Parscale to spread its propaganda in the United States through various vectors, most of whom are MAGA influencer types.

42:11So it doesn't specify MAGA influencer types actually in that contract. I just don't know what he's getting paid 1.5 million a month for. And actually the most recent report that I saw on Twitter, on X, sorry, sorry for dead naming it. It's very offensive. Let's see. This was reported by a gentleman named Nick Cleveland Stout. Never heard of this guy. But he sent an updated filing that he found from that shows the Israeli government is now paying former Trump campaign manager and Salem media executive Brad Parscale$46 million in one year. And he also adds, for some perspective, Saudi Arabia pays Ballard, one of the most connected firms in Trump's Washington,$60 ,000 a month.

43:00$46 million? That's what it says. So who's on Salem media network? well so i don't want to speculate or accuse anybody no i just want because the fair filing says but we'll disseminate our propaganda through salem so i just that's what it says right yeah so josh hammer i'm not sure if you're familiar with him he's a very um he's got a very low rated podcast he's yes uh i think he's a columnist he was never heard of josh hammer until that he started hassling charlie kirk but yeah he was a big desantis supporter he's at salem media network He's one of the loudest critics against the Iran war. You have people like Larry Elder, which is surprising, you know, because Larry Elder is typically a pro-Trump cheerleader.

43:45He's been very critical of the Iran war. There's a lot of other of these radio hosts who are syndicated on Salem who have been opposed. Hugh Hewitt, obviously, but Hugh, you know, Hugh's always appreciated war, to be honest. So I don't think his positions have changed. Yeah. So it says right there in the contract, in this initial filing, that he's integrating messaging into Salem Properties. Salem also owns Red State, Town Hall, Podcast Network. They also have an influencer network. So I would love to know what Brad is actually doing with this money. I know certainly the part of the project is to help coach AI chatbots into being more pro-israel less anti-semitic uh and and you know look i think the anti i think there has been a rise of anti-semitism in the country you went disagree with me i think anti-semitism uh is high it's wrong you know i see some some incidents in brooklyn i think it's wrong i think hate against any religious group i couldn't agree more i've said that many times so i'm not opposed to opposing bb's foreign policy is not anti-semitism i'm not opposed to brad getting paid to combat anti-Semitism.

45:02But what does that mean? Well, that's it. What does that mean? What are the deliverables? When anti-white hate is encoded in the U.S. legal code, when hate against white men is like the foundational fact of college admissions, federal contracting, hiring, and we're spending all of our time worried about whether people are being rude to Bill Ackman, like this is just a misalignment. This is not reality. Okay. So I also want to just add for context to the viewers and the people who are going to clip this, that Israel isn't the only country that has paid for influencer support in America. I'm sure that's right.

45:38Ukraine has paid a ton. You know, there was recently a field trip with a bunch of right-wing influencers, if you will, who visited Russia. So I don't think that they paid for that trip out of their own pocket. I don't know. And so, you know, they went to Russia, they go hang out with the Russians and whatever. I don't have, I don't pay your own. I don't have particular issues with people visiting a country. My issues lie in, do you visit the country and then change the way you speak about the country or use your platform to talk about the country? Qatar had a similar situation during December.

46:13Some influencers who used to be opponents to Qatar, they flew to Qatar in December, and then they did some beautiful posts about Qatar. I also think that's wrong. My position is, if it's Israel, if it's Qatar, if it's Russia, if it's China, if it's India, you should not be able to pay. I don't think Qatar paid the influencers. I think they came on a trip and then they posted nice things about the country. I still think there should be some level of disclosure around that. I don't care what country it is. You should be disclosing if you are in any way, shape, or form promoting the interests of another different country.

46:50I think that's right. But my focus recently has been on Israel because of this massive contract that they've engaged in with Brad that nobody knows what the hell he's doing with the$46 million. So I texted him to find out because a lot of that money has gone to attacking me and my family, which obviously I resent, though I try not to think about it too much. Don't want to become what they call you. But anyway, he never—I know Brad Perscale. I've always felt sorry for him. Yeah. I still do. is troubled man. But I did think he would at least respond to my text. He didn't. Yeah. So have you called him?

47:27No, I haven't called him and he hasn't called me. He responded to one of my tweets. He responded to my tweet saying that, because I asked him, I said, hey, Brad, like, what's up with this? Why are so many Salem media personalities trashing President Trump's war? Here's the far filing saying that you're going to integrate messaging into Salem media properties. And Brad responded to me and he said, Alex, I actually want to thank you for bringing this up. I don't know who pissed in your Cheerios this morning, but what you're looking at was an original draft, not what happened. We never executed that plan.

48:08We never paid hosts or influencers to say anything. That's the beauty of FARA. The receipts exist. Well, the only receipt that exists right now is Brad's initial contract, where it says, point blank, we're going to integrate messaging. So he's saying he's not doing it. So what is he doing with this$46 million? What is, and I - You're in this business. Yeah. Obviously, you're one of the most famous people in the business. You may be the most famous person in the business. Have you ever heard of anybody getting$46 million from a single client? No, and even his$1.5 million a month, his initial FAR filing, I believe is the single largest FARA, single FARA filing for one entity in history.

48:51Really? I have no perspective. Okay. So that's crazy. If you ask ChatGPT or whatever chat platform you use, I prefer Grok to be honest. Yes. Because I trust Elon more than I trust Altman. But I asked Grok, what's the largest FARA filing for one entity to date? And it came back with some$9 million contract that I think Nigeria paid. I don't know what the hell Nigeria needs to do, but, you know, they paid it. So one country,$9 million. Brad's initial contract,$1.5 million a month. You do the math, was at$15 million a year. Now it's up to$46 million, according to a recent report. And again, they're not paying him for his relationships in the White House.

49:32I don't think Brad Parscale could get a meeting in the West Wing to save his life, specifically not in the Oval Office. You know, I don't think people still remember what he did during the 2020 election. Okay. And, but he's going around different countries. And if you pull up his website, it's called clocktowerx.com. It, he spells out exactly the services that his company offers. And so, you know, I think that he should clear the air on the, on the services that he's providing for these foreign countries. I'm going to go to his website right now. Clocktowerx.com. It starts off with a header that says, narrative infrastructure.

50:15The system already shapes what people believe. We help determine who prevails. Elections, narratives, markets, we don't react. We shape the conditions they operate in. Talks about how they've had$2 billion plus in influenced outcomes. No clue what that means. It says that they work in 10 plus countries. They're deployed in 10 plus countries. uh then it says if you if you've heard about our work it wasn't ours and then it gets into some of the services that they offer they offer narrative intelligence continuous monitoring of the information landscape to identify leverage points before competitors audience segmentation behavioral mapping across millions of data points to identify the nodes that move markets, message testing.

51:04Here's one. Influencer ecosystems. Managed networks that amplify narratives through credible distributed voices. That's on this guy's website that he gets paid millions and millions of dollars. 46 million. Yeah. So right there on his website, influencer ecosystems. So I think Brad should, you know, if he's doing it, I think it's wrong. I can't say for definitively that he's doing it, but these are the services that are offered on the website, cross-channel distribution, performance analytics, you know, and so. Well, I must say I've noticed that every Salem media property that I'm aware of has the same view.

51:45You know, more war is good. I'm an anti-Semite. You're both, those are two lies, by the way, not an anti-Semite and war is not good. You're an anti-Semite. They all have the same view now maybe it's just that every salem host or influencer or whatever they're calling themselves is like crazy in exactly the same way but maybe there's more to it than that maybe maybe and a lot of these same influencers have been um you know organized against you for the last couple for like the last year consistently against you for the last year A lot of these, this one account, for example, named Yale Yacobi. I'm not sure, you probably have never heard of this kid.

52:29But all he does every day is he tweets about you. The only time I see any of your clips are on the accounts of people attacking you. Really? I don't watch, similar to you, I don't really watch podcasts. Yeah. You know, but the only time I see people's clips are people attacking you. Your clips are when people are attacking you. Yo, Yacobi, I was looking this morning. Who is he? You know, just some influencer, if you will. And non, these are non-influential influencers, I call them. But I, he certainly is involved in, he's certainly been paid for some of his tweets. Do I know that he's been, do I know that he's been paid for tweets against you or against the Iran war?

53:16I can't say that for certain, but he was not honest. He's not honest about tweets that he is paid for. And then, uh, and so, so would I be shocked if he was paid for some of, I don't know, but he's tweeted about you probably 1200 times in the last eight months. All complimentary. No, no, all negative, unfortunately for you. But you know, and look, I agree with some of his criticism. I don't think it's, but I don't see it organic. People, you know, he's one of the loudest voices who keeps tagging me in posts. Alex, you criticized Mark Levin. Why don't you criticize Tucker? Well, I criticized you to your face here.

53:55Yeah. You hurt me, man. But all of these social media accounts that have been targeting you are not targeting me. And they were targeting J.D. Vance when he appeared on Megyn Kelly's show. Because, oh, how dare he go on Megyn Kelly's show? That's what they said. So slowing down happens gradually. You work hard, show up for your family, but slowly but surely your energy dissipates. You feel tired. People often hear that this is a byproduct of just getting older, meaning you should just live with it. That's not true, actually. Feeling run down is not a symptom of physical failure. It's a signal that your hormones, your metabolism, your nutrient levels are off.

54:30Your balance is off. Joy and Blokes exist to help you break free from this cycle. First, you'll undergo comprehensive labs that show what's happening inside you. Then you'll have a one-on-one consultation with a licensed clinician, someone who listens, explains, and connects the dots between how you feel and why you feel that way, what your body is telling you. It's not an algorithm or a chatbot. It's an actual human being who's there to help you. Next, you get your personalized plan, hormone optimization for men and women. Targeted supplements designed by clinicians who understand the body as a system.

55:01It's all connected. It's not just a symptom checklist. So no more settling for okay. A, visit joyandblokes.com slash Tucker. Use the code Tucker for 65 % off your labs and 20 % off your supplements. That's joyandblokes.com slash Tucker for some excellent deals. Get your edge back with Joy and Blokes. Isn't this exactly why we all voted for Trump in 2016, 2020, and 2024? Because we don't like cancel culture? The idea that if I don't like you, no one is allowed to talk to you, that's a left-wing idea, or I thought it was. It turns out it's like a human idea, but I reject it just the same. But Trump was elected in November of 2024.

55:39That was like 20 minutes ago. Yeah. And within just months, all of a sudden you had the Josh Hammers of the world who I'd never even heard of. Yeah. Saying that if I don't like somebody, nobody's allowed to talk to him because he's got naughty intentions or he's a bigot of some kind or whatever. How is that any different from screaming racist? You're right. It's the same thing. Right. And that's why I'm here because, you know. But are you shocked by this though? No. What the hell? Yeah. I mean, these people aren't the most honest dealers and brokers. You know, I'll say this. One of the people who's been the loudest on this issue is actually a friend of mine, Laura Loomer.

56:19I have not liked seeing a lot of the vitriolic messages towards Loomer, people calling her, you know, mean names. I know that she dishes it out as well, but she's a friend of mine. and during the 2024 election, everybody kept telling us, disavow Loomer, disavow Loomer. She's bad news, disavow. I wouldn't, and they would put pressure on me. Are you friends with Laura Loomer? I'd say, yes, I am. Oh, do you think she's trouble? No, I think she's actually a very good ally to us when she's focused. And so I would never disavow Loomer. Similar, I would never disavow you because you've been good to me.

56:54I consider you a friend. So it's okay to have different opinions. I think telling people that they shouldn't have conversations with people or telling people that you should disavow someone, I'm not about that life. Not just telling, but demanding that it's the price of your good name. That how dare you talk to this person at dinner with this person, and if I find out that you do, I'm going to hurt you. yeah that's the definition of witch hunt that's what the george floyd era was about that's black lives matter that's everything i despise and to see it happen among people i know who i thought i agreed with is like the most shocking thing that's ever happened to me since when did all the neocons just become flat out like college level liberals uh they have been that way for at least my entire adult life i guess you're right i i right this is a process of me losing my name to Tay, I guess.

57:49Those particular characters. But no, I won't disavow Loomer. I won't criticize Loomer. Even if I disagree with her, I'm not going to take to Twitter and say, hey, Loomer, I think you're off base and you're wrong, wrong, wrong. Same with you. Like, if I have an issue with you - For the record, I would never attack someone's family or daughter in law. So I think that that, I just want to say in reference to no one in particular, that attacking people's families for crimes they had nothing to do with, just because they're related to someone, suggests a view of the world based on blood guilt, which is not a Christian view.

58:23It's disgusting. It's a North Korean view. We don't punish people's families. Yeah, I think those are low. I was actually a big defender of Buckley when he was facing some of those attacks. But just like not having anything to do with me or my family, just in general, as a principle, because what matters are principles. It's not about what you do to me. It's about what you do or what I do. We're all held to the same standards because there's one God. And those standards apply to the Israelis and they apply to the Russians and the Ukrainians. They apply to me. They apply to you. They apply to every human being, all of us created by God.

58:55And one of the core standards is you do not punish the innocent ever. That is the basis of all justice. You punish people who commit crimes. You do not punish people who don't, no matter who they're related to. The Israelis reject that view. That's what they're doing in Gaza. They're killing people because they're Palestinian. The North Koreans did that. I think the U.S. has done that over the year. It's always wrong. It doesn't matter who does it. And I just feel like that is that principle, that one specific principle is the basis of our country. That's why we welcomed all these people from random countries.

59:27We're like, you may be from a country we hate, but like, are you a good person? That's all that matters. It's the content of your character that matters. And if we give that up on the right, then the whole country is gone. That's all I'm saying. Yeah, I'm strongly against targeting innocent people and I'm against targeting family members. Yes. And to be honest, that's why I find a lot of the attacks in Erica Kirk to be repulsive. I totally agree. There's a lot of people who have made a name for themselves on social media by spreading certain theories about Erica. And I think Erica is a good person.

1:00:00She's a friend of mine. I've known Erica for almost as long as she's probably known Charlie. And I was with her a few weeks ago in Palm Beach. And you can see that, you know, the attacks affect her and they hurt her. But she keeps moving forward. So I think that, I think having vitriolic targets on families is certainly wrong. Certainly you can't punish people for something they didn't do. Yeah. It's just that simple. That's why segregation is wrong. That's why the anti-white racism that dominates American life is wrong. That's why anti-Semitism is wrong. That's why any worldview that punishes people who didn't commit a crime is always and everywhere wrong.

1:00:41And that would include attacking people's families if they didn't do anything. Yeah. You know what I mean? That's true. Anyway. That's why also, you know, like the blanket Jew haters. There's people who are critical of Israel. And then there's people who tweet things like totally anti-Jew things. I think the anti-Jew, the Jews control everything crowd, I think they are not the brightest as well. Yeah, look, attacking people for things they didn't do is wrong, period. I would like this administration to take the anti-white stuff seriously and stop lecturing me, telling me that anti-Semitism is the biggest problem in America.

1:01:20It's not. You have a much tougher time getting into the Ivy Leagues. You would not know this from the behavior of the Justice Department if you're white than if you're Jewish. So that's a fact. it's provable that these numbers came out in court and like it's unfashionable to say that i don't care and by the way if jews or blacks or filipinos or anybody was being discriminated in the way that whites are being discriminated against i would be opposed to it vocally and i'm opposed to it well if you look at a lot of the job creation in our country a lot of the new jobs have gone to natural born white americans uh in in the trump presidency look i don't know those numbers i don't know if that's true.

1:01:56Also, I don't know if I want more Americans going to universities. I just think all I'm saying is as a principle, this is the core principle of America, that you are judged by who you are as a person, not by the group you're from. I don't think that the administration is overly prioritizing the protection of Jewish communities. Are you joking? I don't think that. Have you listened to Leo Terrell recently? That's a nutcase. That's Leo's job. His job? Is there an anti-black czar? Is it anti-black racism? Is there an anti-white racism are this is insane. I think there should be, you know, maybe there should be.

1:02:28How about we just treat everybody the same? So I agree with you on that point, but I don't think that the department - That's just identity politics. I don't think that the Department of Justice wakes up in the morning and thinks, how can we personally protect Jewish Americans over - Yes, they do. Are you joking? I don't think so. There's been, they reached a settlement with the, look, I just want to be clear, as clear as I've been all along, that I oppose any kind of discrimination on religious grounds and on secular, humanist grounds. It's just wrong. Always judge the person, not the blood type.

1:03:01However, they went after Harvard and Yale and Columbia and Cornell and Princeton and Dartmouth, the Ivy League, on the basis of antisemitism. Well, to the extent they're antisemitic, they should not get federal money. I totally agree with that. But everybody knows, because it's been proven, that the barrier at those schools is being a white Christian male. Yeah. And no one mentioned that. Yeah. So it's like, what the hell are you doing? You're telling me I live in a world and have for 57 years in this country where being a white male is a disadvantage in official America in hiring, federal contracting and school admissions.

1:03:39And no one says anything about it. That's fair. That's fair. I think that obviously they've also discriminated against Asians at the 100%, which is totally wrong. It is wrong. And I mean, David Hogg got accepted into Harvard. That's how you know that the institution failed. All right. Bill Ackman went to Harvard. The guy's a moron. Yeah. But how do these people get into Harvard? I think that higher education totally needs an overhaul. And I don't encourage young people to go. Of course, you know, I agree with you passionately, strongly. But I just think even more important than overhauling college is reminding every American that you're judged on your own merits, period.

1:04:18And to the extent the federal government, we have laws on the books. We have a civil rights division that's supposed to be enforcing this, which is not making it a priority. I'm sorry. Sorry, they're not. And I got a call today from someone in the administration. We'll stop. You know, they're doing some work. It's like they could end it tomorrow. We will not allow discrimination in our country, period, no matter who you are. Whether you're black, Jewish, white, Asian, doesn't matter. And they won't do it because their donors are single-mindedly focused on one of many forms of discrimination, which is not the most prevalent form.

1:04:48So I'm pissed. And I'm going to keep saying this until they change their ways. Well, I'm not going to tell you to stop. Sorry, sorry. I was just like, I had this like furious text exchange with some of the administration. It's like, we're doing stuff. I was like, this is one problem we could actually solve. No more discrimination. It's totally unchecked on the left too. They're always like lecturing about white men. Yeah, definitely. I mean, the left is certainly the worst offenders at that. Just openly racist. Right. They are openly racist and they're proud of it. And so I think that's why, you know, we're talking, I know that you said you're leaving the Republican Party.

1:05:27Yeah. Which, you know. I want to come back. I understand your frustration with the party. I have the frustration all the time as well. I'm frustrated right now. I'm sitting here on this podcast while the Senate refuses to pass the Save America Act. That would enforce voter ID. But we're doing - That's not hard. Why can't they do that? Well, maybe they don't want to save our country. So maybe they don't want to save our country, but we're doing the best. Can I just ask you a question? Why? That's such an easy one. Yeah. That's a priority that I strongly share with the administration. Like, why not have voter ID if you're going to be a country who chooses leaders through elections?

1:06:00Right. I think this might be the most common sense piece of legislation that's ever come through the Senate, but for whatever reason, there's obstruction to it. But who's obstructing it? Do you know? Well, we have a leader in the Senate who just can't get the job done. And maybe he can get it done, but he hasn't shown that he can get it done and he hasn't really made it a priority. I think this is a major priority for Republican voters. It's a major priority of President Trump, who is the only reason that we have a Republican-controlled Senate and we have a Republican-controlled Congress. And I think oftentimes Republicans forget that.

1:06:28And in Congress, they forget that. The only reason Republicans have any power in Washington, D.C. is because of Donald Trump and the MAGA movement. And time and time again, Congress drops the ball. And so I hear your frustration. That's it. Like if you vote for Republicans, they can't even get a voter ID law passed. That's why the primaries are so important. And we're working in the primaries. We took out Tillis. We took out Cornyn. We took out Cassidy. We're taking out some of the weakest Republicans on our team. And so the primaries process is where I believe that people like you should be taking out your anger.

1:07:03I just think you've gotten behind some of the wrong candidates. I think like James Fishback, by the way, that guy tried to scam me. James Fishbeck hit me up asking me for$50 ,000 into an investment fund before he was LARPing as a governor candidate. You don't like Fishbeck, but I like him, but I don't know that much about him. I just don't think that the state of Florida should be limiting the First Amendment, the God-given First Amendment rights of Floridians because Israel demands it, which is exactly what they did. That's not acceptable under any certain—my family's been here for like 400 years.

1:07:35Like, I'm not going to stand by and let that happen without saying something about it. period. I hear you. I hear you on that. There was probably a different candidate you got behind than Fishback because that guy's bad news and he's not an honest person. I don't know. And I think you have a massive platform. When you put your platform to use and with, you took out, you helped take out Dan Crenshaw. So I thank you for that. And president Trump didn't endorse Dan Crenshaw. So we've used this primary. But he didn't endorse that creepy fat guy from Florida who endorsed genocide, who laughed at a picture of a dead child in Gaza, that disgusting, I can't even remember his name, but he's the only can that ran in that seat.

1:08:12Why don't get someone new? Like, why would you endorse that guy? That's why I said you're going to be a slave to Israel. But now we have the flip side. You have Dan Bilzerian, right? We have two extremes running that race. Both. I don't agree with. Okay. So we have Dan Bilzerian, maybe one of the people who's helped bring the generosity to young men in America more than anybody. I don't know about that. And Randy Fine, you know, maybe we need some better choices. Florida's been a great state for a long time. In my opinion, it's kind of hard to F Florida up. Florida's got low taxes. It's got beaches.

1:08:43It's got great weather. They get crowded and you'll destroy it. I think that's been a major, I think that's been one issue. Let the developers run the state. But this is happening under DeSantis. I agree. I completely, look, and there are things about DeSantis I really like. Like he's a very impressive guy. I mean, you know DeSantis. There's a lot about him that's impressive. That's just a fact. He's smarter than I am. But you have to take the big picture. Like you have to care about the people who live in the state, not just people who send money to your campaign. Whether it's APAC, whether worse than APAC, or the strip mall developers and the people who just want to pave the state, like want to destroy nature to make a quick buck.

1:09:20Like those people are worse than APAC, in my opinion. Yeah. I've had some conversations with some data center. Don't you agree with that? You live in Florida? I don't think that the Floridians want to, I don't think the Floridians want major data centers coming to their communities. I don't think they do. But a lot of them are already there. And I've actually been talking to some data center developers who say, you actually don't need that much land anymore. And so there's a concern. But you need a lot of water and energy. There's concern from some of the data centers that they're overbuilding.

1:09:47That, you know, in a few years from now, the technology will be better. The energy resources will be better. And so you're not going to need a 2 million square foot. Can I say one thing about Fishbeck, though? Like, the effort in Florida has been to prevent Fishbeck from back or back. I don't know what close friends I am with him. But I like the guy. But why not just have a debate between Byron Donalds and Fishbeck? That's a good question. So voters can decide. I would debate him. But Byron Donalds won't because he's smoking. Well, no, part of it's because he's 60 points up. Fishbeck, I don't even think he can qualify to become governor.

1:10:19Because no one will give him money and no one will give him a hearing. And that's why I gave him a hearing. I don't think that he's even qualified because he's not lived in the state long enough, per my understanding. Byron Donalds is from New York. But he moved there 20 plus years ago. Fishbeck was living in Washington, D.C. until just recently. If you want to get into people's past. And also. I think actually Fishbeck is from the state. His family's been there for a long, long time, many generations. Byron Donalds moves to Florida and like immediately gets arrested on a felony charge. So like that's not disqualifying, but as long as you're comparing backgrounds.

1:10:50My personal, my biggest gripe with Fishbeck is he tried to scam me. Personally tried to scam me out of$50 ,000. I don't know anything about that. When he was pretending to be a financial expert running different funds. How'd you know him? I met him through Twitter. You know, he used to be, he used to be, you know. Buyer beware, Alex. He used to be, he used to be one of the president's biggest offenders. Do you do a lot of your investment deals through Twitter? No. Okay. I don't. I don't do any of them. However. Well, anyone who approaches you for an investment opportunity on Twitter probably know.

1:11:27So he was a, he's not just a Twitter guy, but he was a economic pundit on Fox. He was an economic pundit on CNN. He was the head of a, you know, different funds, right? That's what he said. Azoria fund. And so he also really wanted a job with the Trump administration. He really wanted to go work for the Trump admin. He wanted to be on the commissioner for some agency. And he asked me to advocate for him. I'm sure there are a lot. Do you want me to compare this to Byron Donald's biography, which I know a lot about? I don't think you do. What I'm getting the background on, what I'm getting to here is how I met Fishback and him asking me for money.

1:12:00On Twitter. In person. Did you send him money? No, I didn't send him money. Then we're square. Two weeks later, though, his fund shuts down. Yeah, well, maybe he's not a great fund manager. I don't know anything about it. So my question is, what was he going to do with the$50 ,000? Do you want to talk about Byron's arrest record? When he was a child? Or not a child, he was a teenager. Not a child, actually. He was a teenager. No, he was not a teenager. He was an adult. But whatever, whatever. I don't care about that, actually. And all I care about is like, are you A, committed to serving the people on whose behalf you're going to be elected?

1:12:31And two, are your ideas right? And right for those people. Who are you serving? That's it. Do you think, I'm asking you, not just Byron. If you think, if somebody got arrested when they're 19 or 20 years old for selling weed and they're now 45 or 50. I don't care. You don't care? No. So. I'm only throwing that out because it's like, okay, whatever. But no, what I do care about, I mean, I guess I care. I'm against weed for the record, by the way. That's fair. But it's not even that. I am too, by the way. I'm just throwing, good for you. You know, I'm totally fine with medical cannabis. I don't like cannabis, you know, recreationally.

1:13:08Being high all the time does not make you better. I've done it, but I smoked weed as a child a lot. It's not, come on now. So life is amazing. Experience it, you know. Yeah. But no, I was just throwing that back to be like, okay, great. But the point is, A, we should have a democracy where the people get to decide who they vote for. And they can decide that on the basis of a maximum amount of information about those candidates. And so why would the Republican Party of Florida be, you know, shutting down debate? I want to hear the issues. I don't care so much about the people. That's why I get mad at Trump.

1:13:42It's like, I like Trump. I'll always like Trump. I just like the guy. Well, speaking of debates, one of my favorite moments ever was during the Republican, first Republican primary debate of 2024. And, you know, we had something called counter-programming when Donald Trump sat down for an interview with a guy named Tucker Carlson. Yeah. Remember that? And you guys crushed the ratings. Hundreds, millions of views on social media compared to whatever the RNC debate pulled. Then why do they suck up to, then why, here's a question that I have. I know you're not running the comm shop directly, but like, or indirectly, or you're certainly involved in thinking through messages and how to get them out there.

1:14:23Fox News, like why the emphasis on Fox News, all these Trump employee employees, all appointees all on Fox News. It's got a tiny audience. It's controlled by people who hate Trump, the Murdochs. I know that personally, because I know them personally. And they're like against his agenda on a core level. But no one ever gets sent out to podcasts. You're like the first Trump person who's been here in a long time. Have you sought out anybody? Of course. Well, that's a good question. But Fox News, like it's irrelevant. Why make it relevant? So the podcast, that's a great question. The, you know, we had great success with the president going on podcasts.

1:15:01I know. Theo and Joe Rogan and yours and Andrew Schultz. And I really like these guys. And they've been critical of the admin on issues. That's okay. I still like them personally. But they don't want to have a lot of the people on anymore. They don't make enough. They don't want to have the president on. They haven't sought out an interview with the president. And I'm sure if they asked, I'm sure you would do it, but they haven't asked. No, but it's not just about the president. I mean, he is the president. But also people like the admin. I think these guys... No, those requests got shut down.

1:15:34my my request got shut down and i was like i felt like i had been a pretty faithful trump supporter certainly like a lion you saw an interview with the president no no no i could always i just call him directly for that but like you know the secretary of awesomeness or whatever you have all these secretaries in charge of things get him on nope can't do it and i'm not whining it was fine my life turned out okay but i don't understand the emphasis on fox news like well Sometimes it's the only platform that will have us on. Dude, that is not true. I mean, CNN, for example, Fox refused to have Stephen Miller on.

1:16:11Okay, that's CNN. But again, who cares about CNN? Nine people watch it. Right. I don't know. I think that if you start inviting people on the show again, maybe they'll come. But why, just why continue to make, I mean, once Trump is gone, CNN and Fox are done. Yeah. They're literally done. Without Trump to talk about, but no one's going to watch them. They will probably close down, literally. And you know this better than anyone. You're the new media guy. Why keep them on life support? I don't understand when they hate you. They hate you at Fox. They hate you at CNN. MS probably likes you more than those two things.

1:16:48Like, why do this? Well, it's important to get the message out and people are comfortable going at Fox, I suppose. And a lot of the administration officials, they have relationships there. So they get booked there. I think there's some truth in that. It's just muscle memory. Also, a lot of the podcasters, they don't want to interview random cabinet members. Maybe you do, but other podcasts in, I guess, the podcast ecosystem, they don't want to interview a rank-and-file Republican congressman or a senator or - I interviewed Ted Cruz. That was a fun interview, by the way, which, you know - It was for me.

1:17:21I have disagreed with a lot of what you've said over the last, you know, year. Any takedown of Ted Cruz is fun for me. I don't like that guy. But Ted Cruz's views are identical to Randy Fine's. So why is Ted Cruz bad, but Randy Fine is good? I wouldn't say that Randy Fine's opinions are good. I think Ted Cruz's personality is just worse. Than Randy Fine? I do. I do. I think Ted Cruz is not a likable guy. Well, that's obvious. And so do I agree with everything? I think Randy Fine has tweeted some ugly things, really ugly things. And his views do not represent the views of the Trump administration or my views.

1:17:58but I think Ted Cruz is just an unlikable guy. And I want to share with your audience a little story. In January, a few days before my wedding, I did this Trump accounts event, which I think Trump accounts is actually one of the great programs of the Trump administration. Every baby that is born in America for the next four years gets$1 ,000 invested in a tax-free vehicle that they can access when they're 18. And every year the parents can contribute to it, et cetera, et cetera. So I did an event to help introduce this new initiative. The president was there and I brought a very famous rapper named Nicki Minaj.

1:18:36And Nicki Minaj and I, we did a little panel on stage. When we got off the stage, we were going to go to the White House to see the president and show Nicki the Oval and have a good time. We were walking out and all of a sudden and I hear like these footsteps running down the hallway. And I turn around and Ted Cruz and his team chasing after us. Nikki, Nikki, Nikki, please. Can we get a picture? Can we get a nightmare scenario? I'm like, holy shit. This is Senator Ted Cruz, who probably hasn't ran in a while. No, not in a while. Running down the hallway, chasing Nikki, begging her for a picture.

1:19:11Like he was a fangirl at a concert. And just to be fun, I said, sorry, Ted, we're out of time. we can't do any more pictures his face was so pissed and he like cornered us he was trying to and nicky was like you know i feel bad because nicky's now kind of collateral in this because she i mean she doesn't know who the hell ted cruz is and and so like i'm blocking him from getting a picture with her and his team's like trying to snap angles of it and they're all blurry pictures but i prevented it and as i was leaving one of his staffers goes we'll remember this, Alex Bruzowitz. And I'm like, ah, this is good.

1:19:46Oh, you're on Ted's list. I'm on Ted's list now. But no, I think Ted's a joker. I think that him saying his number one priority as a U.S. senator is to be a defender of a different country. I think that was a stupid thing to say. And I actually do think he believes it, though. Why do you think he believes that? That's his position. That's his position. I don't know why he believes it. But I'm not a fan of Ted. Ted still thinks in the back of his mind that one day he can be president of the United States. I don't think it's going to happen. It won't happen. And it won't happen. And I think, I actually spoke at the Jerusalem Post conference a couple of weeks ago.

1:20:21And Ted prides himself on being Israel's number one defender. Oh, yeah. He loves Israel. And I think he genuinely loves the country, though. But he has hurt the country. And I gave that speech at Jerusalem Post. I said, I'm here today as an ally and a supporter of Israel, somebody who wants to see America and Israel have a strong relationship for decades to come. I truly believe that. And I highlighted how I think they're a great battlefield proven partner. We've, you know, they have great technologies that also can benefit American companies, medicine, et cetera, et cetera. And I said, however, Israel's approval rating in America, especially with my generation, Republicans under 30, is at an all-time low.

1:21:10And that's not great. And one of the reasons I think it's so low is not because necessarily of podcasters who are anti-Israel, but because of some of Israel's most ardent supporters in the United States, people like Senator Ted Cruz, push people away. and this was in early June right after there was this idea that an Iran deal was close and nobody knew what the Iran deal was etc. Ted Cruz took to X and he slammed any prospects of a deal. You can't make a deal with the Iranian regime you can't do this you can't do that. I'm like dude this guy has no idea what the hell the deal what's in the deal of course and he's trying to get out in front of it to trash the president and undermine the administration and I'm looking at this guy and if he actually wants to help Israel, he would shut up.

1:22:02So I said that at the Jerusalem post conference, and mind you, these are all Jewish people with love for Israel. They all cheered for me after I said, Ted Cruz should shut the hell up. Yeah. And so, um, if he truly loved Israel, I think that he would be better served. He would better serve them by not constantly defending him on social media. I think that's a very wise point. And it's not just head crews. It's Mark Levin has inspired more people to join BDS than, you know, a campus group ever. I mean, Mark Levin is like a - He's currently trying to get me fired, by the way. So that's the question.

1:22:41It's like, okay, Mark Levin hates Trump. He's always hated Trump. He's worked against Trump openly for a decade. and then Trump does something that he agrees with and he's the gatekeeper to Trump and Trump's best friend. Now he hates Trump again and he's attacking Trump. How long does Trump continue to be friends with this guy? I don't know. You know, the president is unique. He can handle people who criticize him. And, you know. He can. You know. He doesn't think they're low IQ crazy people? Only some. fair and uh and and look uh but but i don't think mark levin was ever the president's best friend you know the president has different opinions around tweeting out well i don't think trump likes him so that's my opinion potentially he was just saying it to f with you you think about that it's totally that's totally possible by the way that's literally possible so look i think mark is i think he is part of a republican party that has been left in the past um and they are desperately trying to remain relevant and they use conflicts whether it's in the middle east or mark thyssen for example the conflict in ukraine these they use these issues to to have a little bit of relevance to maintain their presences on on fox news um but the people aren't with them and you see it in polling again 67 percent of americans support mou you look at mark levin's twitter feed he acts like everybody's against it nobody's against it except for mark and his friends who are probably coordinating in their messaging and talking points but can i ask you one last question yeah i think that's a i think it's a totally correct analysis and we and by the way i fall for it and i always try to remind myself mark levin is not a player in any affairs global or local he's irrelevant and his job is just like make me mad and suck me into his fantasy world and like i should just ignore this and you clearly have already figured that out so good for you don't take the bait and i don't take the bait that's so real quick and a little x psychology yeah i tell my clients ignore the comment section yeah because yeah because and and because you're not changing opinions on X.

1:25:09Nobody sees something on X and go, oh, wow, I changed my mind on something. X is a nasty place. It's where you battle people. It's a war of ideas. And some people cheat in the war of ideas. They use bots. They use coordinated influencer campaigns. Sometimes they cheat in the war of ideas. But it's not a place that you should get any, like you shouldn't think that's reality. Because it's all manipulated. I agree. So, and that's the final question I wanted you to unpack. You've alluded to this a couple of times. You said if somebody, I'm embarrassed, I forgot who you're referring to. You said, I know that this person, oh, that Yacobi kid.

1:25:48Yeah. I know that this person has taken money for other opinions and not been honest about it. And that's almost exactly what you said. What were you referring to? Well, there's a few different tweets that, you know, he's posted about. And to his credit, actually, I did see a paid partnership post underneath this one, but in the Georgia, in the Georgia, most recent Georgia election, he was paid to go. Country or state? State for governor. Yeah. He was paid to go after this guy named Rick Jackson. And it says, Rick Jackson brands himself as aligned with conservative priorities, but his businesses tell a different story.

1:26:31DEI initiatives, diversity-focused leadership and roles supporting gender-related procedures. Voters should look at actions, not slogans. And right at the bottom, it says paid partnership. And then right above that tweet is another tweet that's very similar in language, but it didn't say paid partnership. Was he paid for it? I don't know. But it certainly looks like it. And here is the talking points that went out by a company that word for word spells out what he wants, what Jacobian ended up tweeting. Messaging. Rick Jackson claims to want to ban DEI. His own company has a track record of advancing the ideas of DEI.

1:27:14So all of these influencers were sent this memo here, as you can see. and then I did a screenshot, put it side by side with Jacoby's tweets. It's verbatim. And the company that was hired for this project just happens to be associated with Brad Parscale. So, you know. So it looks like you don't have evidence that this kid is working for Brad Parscale. No evidence of that. I notice. For the Iranian campaign. For the Iranian campaign. So I notice on those rare occasions when I like look at the stuff, because it's designed to make you mad and limit your ability to think clearly. So I really do try and stay away from X and cigarettes because both are just so addictive.

1:27:59But I break down occasionally and I notice that there are people who are constantly sending these long tweets about how we need endless war who are also promoting like some very specific kind of car insurance. Yeah. What is that? Yeah, that's another one. This girl, Arian Wexler. This girl. Who is that? That's a great question. Nobody knows. She came out of nowhere in 23, 24. What is her name? Arian? Arian Wexler. Arian. Yeah. Nice name. Kind of a suspicious name. I don't know about that. You know, and she's a pretty girl, and she started showing up at conservative events, and I got introduced to her on the campaign trail.

1:28:41She really wanted to get involved with the Trump 24 campaign for whatever reason. But the girl sussed me out. you know I'm very suspicious of people who come out of nowhere and they have a big following almost instantly and but nobody knows who the hell they are you know and so she really wanted to get involved with the Trump 24 campaign I said no you know it never actually never even entertained her uh and I would text I actually texted some of my friends like this girl is she a fed you know yeah and you know I don't know if I don't think she's a fed but fair question there's a lot of that but she came out of nowhere.

1:29:15So, you know, she's one of your biggest critics on social media. Mine? One of yours, absolutely. So back to this Wexler chick. By the way, like I did see something that you were on a podcast yesterday and you said you think Israel killed Charlie Curry. I did not say that. What was the clip then? I said, I've never said that. Okay. I know a lot of people, including in the Trump administration, who think that. However, there's no proof of that. Yeah. What I said was two things. One, I don't know when the command came down and from whom that we have to trust everything federal law enforcement says, but I'm not obeying that.

1:29:54We have a moral obligation to push federal law enforcement to do the job we pay them to do, which is to investigate the crimes fully. And so, for example, if there are people who predicted Charlie's death on Twitter, I think the rest of us can expect that they've been hauled in by the FBI for questioning, and I don't think they have been. I don't know about that, but I do know what you're talking about, the discord chats no i'm talking well i'm specifically talking about i'm talking about the twitter posts that seem to predict charlie's death maybe that thing yeah i would i i don't know if that's been investigated i would love for that to be yeah so that's number one number two just because someone is shot by one person doesn't mean others weren't involved and don't like berate me into accepting that assumption because i would never accept that Why would I assume that?

1:30:39And three, to tell me that you know the motive before the trial even starts, that he was killed for his views on transgenders. Maybe he was. Maybe it was more complicated than that. How would you know? You don't know. So stop yelling at me to accept a conclusion that you can't prove. I hear you. Why would you do that? This is my friend. I'm not, there's, and by the way, if I was murdered, I would expect people who loved me not to jump to unwarranted conclusions, but to press federal law enforcement to do its freaking job. Yeah. And stop calling people names because they're asking you to do your job.

1:31:09I think a lot of people did jump to unwarranted conclusions. Maybe. I don't know if they're warranted or not. And, you know, right after the assassination, many people were with big platforms, not you, were saying that Israel was behind it. Many people with big platforms were saying that he was killed for his views on transgenderism. And we don't know that, actually. We don't know anything. But Charlie was killed as he was talking about transgender. and this guy, Tyler Robinson, seems to be in love with transgender people. That may be absolutely true. For me, and I think a lot of Americans, that seems like the most plausible situation.

1:31:45But you're never going to catch me saying, because I don't know it, that Tyler Robinson wasn't involved. I'm merely saying to foreclose the possibility that others were involved is irresponsible and then to attack other people. Yeah, I'm certainly not here to attack you. No, no, you're not doing it. I'm just saying like, but and it's interesting the people who have been like i've been a journalist my entire life i'm not proud of that because journalism is pretty gross in the way that it's practiced in this country as you've just proven i mean you tell us like how fake a lot of this stuff is but the basic process of journalism is not so different from the process of gathering evidence in a criminal investigation which is you like all leads should be run down that are not utterly preposterous.

1:32:28And if you're not doing that, then I have a right to ask, why are you not doing that? And if Joe Kent, who until the day he left at highest level security clearance in the Trump administration, if Joe Kent says, hey, I referred these leads to the DOJ and they ignored them and then got mad at me for referring them, what the hell is that? And if no one can answer you other than to call you an anti-Semite, I'm like, that's not a real answer. Yeah. I don't think Joe is an anti-Semite. No, me. I'm like, yeah, I don't think you're an anti-Semite. I'm not alleging Israel did it. I can't prove that. But that will, so then I guess that is an example of a clip of yours that was being taken out of context.

1:33:02That Israel did it? That was the message yesterday. And that's what I saw. And so it's just interesting that I will say this. It's interesting that all the people who are telling you to shut up and accept a conclusion that hasn't even been reached in the court yet, they're all neocons. So why is that? What is that? Who's running that campaign? Talk about a campaign. And I, as his friend, here's what I want. And I've said it to the folks at Turning Point, who I talk to, who I like in some cases. No, everybody who loved Charlie has an obligation to push for the most rigorous, open-minded, exhaustive criminal investigation possible.

1:33:40And if you're not doing that, why are you not doing that? That's fair. And I had this conversation and I called people at the FBI directly, not being paid to do this? I did because I love Charlie Kirk. And it's like, what is this? And they didn't give me a good answer. Did you see that recently at the court hearing that they're not making Tyler Robinson's lover testify? They're basically giving them spousal privilege. What is that? That's a great question. And I think 30 points. And who's this guy who jumped up and claimed credit for the murder seconds after it happened? Who's that guy who all of a sudden gets busted on kiddie porn charges and we can't talk to him?

1:34:10I don't know what this adds up to, but I know weirdness when I see it. And by the way, is there not footage of Tyler Robinson pulling the trigger? Apparently they say that there is. No one has seen it, who I know, including high level people who have asked to see it, haven't seen it. Why? I'm not saying it doesn't exist. I'm saying, why are you acting like this? Sure. But I think it's, and I trust you that you weren't saying it was Israel, but some people have definitively said that. And I think that's also reckless. And so - I've said it's Israel? I haven't. I'm not, I trust you that you said, I trust what you're saying right now.

1:34:41You can look at the clip. I don't, if I had proof there was Israel, I would just say so. Right. people have speculated that though and have definitively said that not you others i think that's reckless and irresponsible and does a disservice to to the investigation i agree that we should 100 i mean investigations the way that it's unfolded has allowed the space for all of the speculation to take place sure and that is also the new media environment the new social media ecosystem but it's just funny everyone's mad at the podcasters for it the podcasters, you've got a freaking Department of Justice that we pay for billions a year that has the right to shoot you.

1:35:20They have unlimited police powers. They can tell you any lie they want, and it's fine. If you lie to them, it's a federal crime. They have all the power. Therefore, they need all the accountability. I mean, that's just kind of how it works. And no one seems to be mad at the FBI or the Utah State authorities for not answering simple questions about this stuff. And if you can't answer a simple question, maybe there's a good reason. What's that reason. Shut up, anti-Semite. I'm just not going to take that under any circumstances ever. Well, right now, what it seems like though, at least in the right-wing media ecosystem, you know, I agree that we should have a thorough investigation.

1:35:58Half the side, or actually probably more than half the side says Tyler Robinson did it. And then there's a pocket of the internet that personally, 100 % says Israel did it. And I think that, But, you know, why don't we have the tiebreaker with the DOJ giving us real information on this and answering the question? And I actually called it, as I told you, I'll say it again. I called the FBI highest level. Have you guys interviewed the people who appeared to have foreknowledge? We've got that covered. Have you interviewed them or not? This is just a common sense question. Couldn't get an answer. Maybe they have.

1:36:30I saw some TikTok posts the day before Charlie died that basically said, oh, Charlie's going to regret coming here and discord. Thank you. You know, we're certainly aware of those posts. So that should be, but aware of, yeah, everyone's aware of it. It was on TikTok and Twitter. But have the people who posted those things been interviewed? If I go on TikTok and threaten the life of a federal official, I get an immediate visit from the FBI. Immediate. And I should. I get it. I'm not against that. Have these guys received visits from the FBI? And last time I checked, the answer was no. So I think it's totally fair as a friend of Charlie's or just as an American who believes that justice has to be done to demand an answer.

1:37:09And I'm not going to be deterred from having people scream Candace Owens anti-Semite in my face. I'm just not ever going to be bullied by that under any circumstances because why would I? Do you see what I mean? I hear you. I just think that jumping to, to your point, jumping to conclusions could be reckless. And so - Well, a lot of people are jumping to conclusions that Charlie Kirk was killed because of his positions on transgenderism. That's jumping to a conclusion. We don't know that. There's been no trial. But there was the letter that was picked up, right? Okay, but what do we know about that letter?

1:37:39Nothing. That was a press release. There's more evidence leaning towards the transgender issue. Show me all the evidence. So that's why we're having a court hearing. Exactly. But hopefully some of these questions All sides are jumping to conclusions. Anyone who says, shut up, he was killed by the trannies. Do you know that? I think what makes the whole process worse, though, is social media. Oh, definitely. That's why I haven't tried to stay out of this. And you have your teams and you have the clashing opinions. But how did it wind up? How did Charlie Kirk's murder wind up a contest between people with different views on foreign policy?

1:38:15I think that's the weirdest thing I've ever seen. Good question. It's a good question. I think a lot of people are nefariously using Charlie's passing for self-gain. And I think that's wrong. But also for ideological ends and foreign imperatives. Like, that's really clear to me. Like, how did this become about that? If it's really just about transgenderism, then why is every person insisting it's only about transgenderism also attacking the MOU? Like, what are we looking at now, Alex Bruce? So it's like, I don't know. I'm a medium IQ person, maybe even a low IQ person. But I'm just like noting what's happening and asking, what does it add up to?

1:38:55And I don't know. Good question. But it's weird. I hear you. I hear you. You should be a shrink, man. You have such a, like, a calming, I hear you. So I think that the whole thing was terrible. I remember where I was when he got shot. I was actually in a meeting in Washington, D.C. And I got bored in the meeting, so I started looking at my phone. And I saw Charlie got shot. I'm like, what the? And once I saw the footage, I actually started crying because I thought there was no way that he was going to survive that. I did, too. And, um, look, it was, it was, uh, it was tough. And the aftermath has been, uh, even tougher.

1:39:35And, you know, I think that Erica gets treated incredibly unfairly by the media, by the pundit class. I think she's got such a, I mean, a tough thing going on for her. It's the worst thing I can imagine. And, you know, she wanted to be strong and, you know, Charlie, Charlie put on a show, everything he did, he put on a great show. Yeah. And people are criticizing Erica for continuing in Charlie's footsteps with the fireworks. I haven't read a, I haven't read a word of that. I think it's been, I think it's been. Be honest with you. I think a lot of it's been pretty unfair. I think they asked some fair questions.

1:40:13But I think the treatment of her generally has been horrible. And I think people should apologize to her. Well, I, I was texting with her yesterday and, uh, about, yeah. So whatever personal stuff, but I, yeah, I, there are a few people I feel sadder for than her. Yeah. Cause the fact is no matter where you are in anything, here's a woman who's a widow with two small kids. Yep. And those two small kids just, uh, had their first father's day, uh, without Charlie. I'm aware. Yeah. And no, we want justice for Charlie and. Well, we should be demanding it. Yeah, but I think it's a disservice to use him for political gain.

1:40:49I totally agree. Or for gain of viewership on their podcast. It was a disservice for Netanyahu to make it about Netanyahu, which he did. That was a unique press guy. It was disgusting. Yeah, I don't think that was necessary. You know, that's the one guy. I think he's chronically online. I don't think there's anything overtly nefarious. I think Bibi's chronically online. Really? I think he very much cares about the sentiment about him on social media in America. That's why he saw, and he has the problem of people that are chronically on. Ron DeSantis was chronically online. We took advantage of him for being chronically online during the 24-prime.

1:41:26Like personally checking his phone? Yes. Scrolling, seeing what people say about him. Really? And if you remember, DeSantis really had a moment when Trump was kind of in no man's land after the 2020 election. Yes. DeSantis started having his moment. and what he would do is he would see what was trending on right wing x that day the next day he would do a press conference yeah or come on my show or go on your show addressing that issue and it made him seem like he was one of us when in reality he was just reading what we were talking about and then taking action oh that's smart it was a good political no it's totally right but he was chronically online.

1:42:05And so in 2024, when he ran for president, we muddied the water for him. Every time he looked on Twitter, people like me were tweeting about his boots and his choice of footwear or the makeup he was using that day. And we made X a place for him that he didn't like. And he kind of lost his mojo. He couldn't really figure out what's in his head. So we got in his head. Live by the algorithm, die by the algorithm. I agree. I think BB, you know, there's theories about him that he's this grand mastermind of all these no no no i think he's chronically online he's a day trader i totally i think he sees what people say about him on social media and he reacts to it and i think that's when you're the world leader i think it's terrible and that's why i love the president for not feeling the pressure from the chattering class on these issues and he's not hearing it from the chattering he's not hearing he's not taking the opinions of these paid influencers who want the war to continue.

1:43:04I think that's great. But I also think, you know, you need to synthesize your own opinions with those of the people you represent. Sure. But I don't care about gas prices. I think they care about the I think cares about the Iranian nuclear program. Like talk about getting in people's heads, convincing Americans that the Iranian nuclear program is more important than gas prices is like the craziest. I don't think X pundits are a place where I don't think X is a place you can get the sentiment. I totally agree with that. So but public opinion polling over, you don't have to respond to every poll, of course, but like what are Americans' priorities?

1:43:35Where President Trump gets his opinions from is when he goes to Pennsylvania where he went to a truck factory yesterday. Well, Miriam Adelson also calls. So like, that's bad. I'm sorry. It's bad. I think the president takes more direction from the patriots who showed up at the Pennsylvania rally yesterday for him than his donors. Well, he, I think he always has. And that has been his great strength. That has been his great strength. And everyone would always make fun of Trump for doing these endless rallies and giving these endless speeches or whatever. But I always felt, and I didn't want to watch them all because there's just too many of them, but I always felt like it was important for him.

1:44:13It was like, he loved it for one thing, but it was good. He could feel the energy from the crowd and like their interest. You can engage people's interest by their response to your lines. Yeah. Super important exercise. Well, I encourage you, if you like those, I encourage you to watch as many Trump rallies as you can, because they're not going to be here forever. And, you know, actually, I've been to a lot of Trump rallies. One of the things I regret now in my life is Charlie and I both spoke at this, Charlie Kirk and I, we both spoke at this event in South Korea. I spoke before him and I was tired, you know, the jet lag.

1:44:47And Charlie was about to go on stage and he's like, Alex, you stick around, you know, let's speak. I said, no, I got to get out of here. I got to go. I mean, I'm tired. And it was Charlie's last public speech. And I didn't, you know, stick around to watch it because I was tired. So, you know, same with Trump, you know, look, Trump is not perfect. I think he, but I think he is the best that we've had, at least in my lifetime. And I think he loves the country. I think he loves the people of the country. I think he genuinely cares about the people that he goes out and he wants to represent in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin and Ohio and Florida.

1:45:21I think he genuinely cares. And do we have the greatest team around us in the Republican Congress and Senate? Absolutely not. But we have two years left of the Donald Trump experiment. And if the Democrats win, that experiment's going to be muddied by impeachments and bullshit. And so, you know, I do encourage your audience to get involved in the primary process as much as they can. If they don't like the Republican who's currently in office, go get somebody that you do like. but we have two years left of the Donald J. Trump experiment in our country and I think people are gonna miss him when he's gone.

1:45:58I want the last two years to be wholly focused on the United States and not on Netanyahu's concerns or Zelensky's anyone else's concerns like that's kind of your problem and you know we don't hate you but like deal with your own problem. You know we were having a discussion before this about Latin America yeah right I think it's exciting what's happening in latin america i totally agree and and administrations before this one were more focused on the middle east and countries that were thousands and thousands of miles away where while our own backyard has been suffering and and because of the suffering in the backyard all of these illegal aliens came into our country you don't even tell me man and that's why i'm so mad about the iran war it's like this administration this administration has prioritized strengthening strengthening some of these countries not not at not at the cost of hurting our country but but helping these countries become more stabilized become more economically strong because if they have if they have strong countries the migrants are going to come to ours on the hemisphere i mean you're i think that preacher choir yes no doubt so i think that i think that the the president has been more focused on this hemisphere than that despite the excursion there um he's certainly more focused on domestic policies.

1:47:14And I think that as we get to the next four or five months of, you know, as we ramp up into the midterms, you're going to see a lot more of a domestic agenda. Last question. Can you ask him to just stop listening to people who don't like you, don't have your best interest or the nation's best interest at heart? Just ignore those people, whether it's whatever Mark Fiesen, as you called him, or Mark Levin, as I call him, or the Murdochs or whoever, people who are just like, and just return to the concerns that, you know, your voters love you for, caring about, you know. Did I say Thiessen incorrectly?

1:47:51I don't know. Who even cares? Like, what is that? I've never heard of this guy except for when I see him on social media. I don't know what he does. I see him in the Fox green room. I think that the president hears the opinions of as many people as possible. and he'll ask if the janitor was in the room, he would ask the janitor about his opinion on a topic. You know, he doesn't, you know, he's got his advisors, he's got his cabinet members, but then he has the public sentiment. He goes to a rally and he polls the crowd. Do we like Sleepy Joe or Crooked Joe better? You know, and that's a cute example, a silly example, but he feels the energy when he says something in a speech.

1:48:29He can feel - Let me ask you, if the janitor, and I love that about him. I try to be that way. You know, just like, keep your filter course so you get a lot of information and then winnow through. I text with janitors, literally. I'm with you on that. But if the janitor says to you, I got a hot stock tip for you. Take$500 million and, you know, go into this IPO. And the IPO tanks and you lose all the money. Next round, you're not taking investment advice from the janitor. You're like, you cross him off the list of people to consult for investment advice. if Mark Levin and Mark Thiessen and Sean Hannity and Rupert Murdoch all come to you and are like, I've got a great idea.

1:49:05Regime change, one and one. All you got to do is kill the Ayatollah. The place will collapse. They're going to put some pro-Israel, pro-America guy to run the place. You're like, okay, you do it. It doesn't work. You got to have to cross them off the list of people to consult for future foreign policy advice. I don't think it went down exactly that way, But the president seeks out counsel from many people and he doesn't take the opinion of one person and make a decision on that. And so – but I do hear what you're saying. I personally don't want any advice from Mark Levin personally. And I think he's incredibly unhelpful to the country.

1:49:44I don't think he's brought any voters to the Republican Party. I think he pushes people away from the party. and but but it's it's not up to me you know and and you know then there's people on the other sides of issues that i also should think have no say because they're crazy they're crazy the other way but again it's not up to me and so you know the president i think what's so great about him is he's willing to have conversations with people does he act on everything that people tell him No, sometimes, you know, he might be more aligned with that group. Sometimes he might be more aligned with the way you think.

1:50:22But he he's the president for everybody. He's focused on doing, in his opinion, what's best for the American people. That's his focus. And so, you know, we get the fun part of just being cheerleaders on the sidelines for whatever the hell we believe in and want to do. So, you know, that rides, you know, the Trump experiments gone. in two years. And I think we're all going to miss it. So I encourage you, even if you disagree with him on something, even if you, if you don't like what he's doing, I know you still love him personally. Just remember that two years from now he's gone and we're going to miss him.

1:51:03And we're going to be complaining that the whole process is so fucking boring again, because everybody before Trump was so fucking boring. Unless it gets way more exciting in a bad way, which I'm against. Who knows? We'll find out in two years. I really appreciate your breaking the embargo and coming to see me. It was great. Great to see you, Tucker. Thanks. All right.