20Product: Sequoia's Product-Market Fit Framework | Why the Best Product People Actually Build Less Product | Metrics 101, Good vs Great Product Strategy and more with Vickie Peng, Product Partner @ Sequoia Capital

17 Apr 2024 · 50 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Twenty Minute VC (20VC) - Episode Featuring Vickie Peng

Episode Title

20Product: Sequoia's Product-Market Fit Framework | Why the Best Product People Actually Build Less Product | Metrics 101, Good vs Great Product Strategy and more with Vickie Peng, Product Partner @ Sequoia Capital

Host

Harry Stebbings

Guest

Vickie Peng - Product Partner at Sequoia Capital, co-creator of the ARC program for founders.

Overview

In this episode, Harry Stebbings interviews Vickie Peng, who shares her insights on product management based on her extensive experience at renowned companies like Instagram and Polyvore. The discussion emphasizes lessons learned from her journey in product, mistakes made, and key strategies for achieving product-market fit.

---

Key Discussion Points

  1. Lessons from 15 Years in Product
  2. Journey into Product Management:
  3. Vickie's passion for product stemmed from a desire to organize chaos and create solutions.
  4. Significant Achievements:
  5. Scaled Instagram’s SMB advertising from $200M to $1BN.
  6. Led Polyvore to a $200M acquisition by Yahoo.
  7. Key Takeaways:
  8. Importance of building belief in a product, both externally and internally.
  9. Distinction between building a product and creating belief around it.
  1. Common Mistakes by Early-Stage Founders
  2. Storytelling Flaws:
  3. Founders often frame narratives from their perspective instead of the customer’s.
  4. Emphasis on features rather than the problem solved for the user.
  1. Perfecting Product Strategy
  2. Building Less Product:
  3. Vickie advocates for minimal viable products (MVPs) to learn quickly.
  4. The belief that successful product leaders often do less, focusing on core user benefits.
  5. Common Hiring Mistakes:
  6. Founders need to hire product teams that align with the vision rather than just technical experience.
  1. Product-Market Fit as a Journey
  2. Understanding Product-Market Fit:
  3. It’s a continuous process, not a destination; requires constant adaptation.
  4. Types of Product-Market Fit:
  5. Hair on Fire: Urgent customer problems needing immediate solutions.
  6. Hard Fact: Customers resigned to existing solutions, open to change if compelling.
  7. Future Vision: Innovation that may not yet resonate with the market but is visionary.
  1. Metrics and Measurement
  2. Setting North Star Metrics:
  3. Pre-product-market fit metrics should focus on actions that indicate customer happiness.
  4. Avoid relying on traditional measures like NPS; instead emphasize user engagement and actions.
  1. Advice for New Product Leaders
  2. Conviction and Action:
  3. New product leaders should focus on understanding customer problems and the internal dynamics of their organizations.
  1. Product Strategy Framework
  2. Vickie introduced a structured approach for product strategy focusing on:
  3. Mission: A long-term aspirational goal.
  4. Metric: A quantifiable measure for success.
  5. Understanding the Gap: Analyzing the distance between the current state and the mission.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Build Belief: The role of product leaders extends beyond product development to include instilling belief in their teams and stakeholders.
  • Focus on Customer Perspective: Effective storytelling and product positioning require understanding customer needs above all else.
  • Continuous Learning: Product-market fit is an evolving concept that demands ongoing assessment and adjustment.
  • Minimum Viable Product Philosophy: Building less and iterating quickly can yield more significant insights than overdeveloping a product prematurely.

---

Conclusion

This episode emphasizes the complexities of product management and the strategies required to achieve success in a competitive landscape. Vickie Peng's insights provide valuable lessons not only for product leaders but also for founders looking to navigate the challenging waters of early-stage startups.

For more information and episodes, visit [Twenty Minute VC](www.20vc.com).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00So pre -product market fit, the strong advice to pick a number that represents customer happiness. I recommend not using MPS. I recommend using a metric that's specifically an action in your product. So imagine anytime this user takes an at this action, they're pressing a button that says, this product is great. I love this product or I'm using this product. So it could be an API call. It could be a dashboard that's created. You are almost always going to overestimate the amount that you need to build to actually learn the thing that you want to learn. You are listening to 20 products with me Harry Stebbings.

0:30Now 20 product is the monthly show where we sit down with the best product leaders in the world to discuss how they think about building the best product teams. Today we have Vicki Peng joining us in the hot seat. Now Vicki is a product partner at Sequoia and the co -creator of ARC. Their company building immersion program for pre -seed and seed stage founders. Before Sequoia, Vicki was a product manager at Polyvore, which was acquired by ER who for $200 million. dollars and before that was an Instagram where she grew SMB advertising from 200 million to a billion dollars. But before we dive into the show's day, we're all trying to grow our businesses here.

1:06So let's be real for a second. We all know that your website shouldn't be this static asset. It should be a dynamic part of your strategy that really drives conversions. That's marketing 101. But here's a number for you. 54 % of leaders say web updates take too long. That's over half of you listening right now, and that's where Webflow comes in. Their visual first platform allows you to build, launch and manage Web experiences fast. That means you can set ambitious marketing goals, and your site can rise to the challenge. Plus, Webflow allows your marketing team to scale without relying on engineering, freeing your dev team to focus on more fulfilling work.

1:45Learn where teams like Dropbox, Ideo and Orange Theory, Trust Webflow to achieve their most ambitious goals today at webflow .com. And talking about great companies like webflow, let me introduce you to air table. Half of product managers say bad processes and tools are their biggest challenges. That's why more and more companies are turning to air table to transform their product operation. As one senior product leader puts it, it's complicated to keep everybody in the loop and air table really helps us stay in the loop. With air table, you'll build the right products grounded in what customers really want.

2:19Unify your entire product portfolio and workflows in one place and ship those products to customers faster than ever In fact one global financial services company cut its time to market for new features by half Maximize your team's impact to with air table give it a try for free today at airtable .com slash podcast That's airtable .com slash podcast to get started and finally we need to talk about Pendo a really simple way to describe Pendo's value is to simply say, get your users to do what you want them to do. What is Pendo? The only all in one product experience platform for any type of application.

2:56What are the features that make Pendo so awesome? Pendo's differentiation is in its platform. Every capability from analytics to in -app guidance, to session replay, mobile feedback management and road mapping are all purpose -built to work together. What is the social validity? 10 ,000 companies use Pendo and we also manage mind the product, the world's largest community of Product Management professionals. Where do we want to drive people? Give it a try and visit Pendo .io slash 20 product hyphen podcast to learn how your team can use Pendo to start building better digital experiences. There you can also check out Pendo's lineup of free certification courses, 12 hours of in -depth training for your product management teams, on topics from AI to product analytics to product led growth.

3:40To check it out simply head over to Pendo .io forward slash 20 product hyphen podcast that's 2 -0 product hyphen podcast. You have now arrived at your destination. Vicki, I am so excited for this. I have to admit, I'm not sure if I'm allowed to say this, but it's the end of the day here and I'm just feeling a little bit loose than I normally do. Alfred normally sends quite curt emails. So he's a busy guy. And with you, recommending topics, it was like an essay of your brilliance, which you know, I wish you'd say such nice things about me. Thank you for joining me today. Thank you so much for having me here.

4:13I'm so excited to be here. Yeah, I'm excited for this and I want to kind of go through the different stages of your career until today and just extract some learning. So if we start on trial pay much earlier in your career, I had you join one as a social gaming was considered a bit of a distraction there and you turn it into this massive revenue driver. What was the single biggest product lesson from that experience with trial pay? Ooh, yeah, big question. So I've actually been in product now for, you know, reflecting on it for about 15 years, which sounds like a very long time when you say that out loud.

4:44I was originally drawn, I think, to the career mostly because I love pulling order out of chaos. You know in the movie The Matrix, where you see like the lines of code floating in the air or in a beautiful mind, he sees math formulas. I hear a big kind of like meaty question, I see bullet points or like pillars or two by choose. And I just need to structure things. sometimes people would be in meetings with me and I just have to open my laptop and start typing in a doc because I just want to make bullet points. And so product, I think, was an area that it's just like the, just this engine of being able to kind of take these problems and break them down and make them tractable and take action on them.

5:20It's like the cycle of conviction action. Build conviction, take action. Action helps you build conviction. It's just a cycle over and over again. And I find it so exciting. So Troll Pay was the first place that I was able to do that and just like jump into a space where I was able to build some sort of hypothesis and then build an actual product that tested that hypothesis. But as you said, the product that I owned was kind of like a side hustle for the company. The company was already a growth stage company. We had found product market fit in the, you know, space of e -commerce and software.

5:49And there was this little nugget of a belief like, hey, could we apply this business model to another space? Which was social gaming, which was on the rise at the time. I don't know if you remember the times when everybody had their own farm or aquarium or whatever they were tending to. between their productive life. Could this be the product that we sell in this you know kind of ad marketplace instead? Would this work? And so they kind of pulled together this rag tag group of folks across the company that were previously working on the main business and it kind of pulled us into the side business and dropped me in as a new person, a new to product, new to the company.

6:22Hey here's like this side gig. Let's see if you can make anything. The biggest lesson I learned there was there's of course you build the product, you have to to build a product that delights customers that actually delivers value. But you also, your job is also to build belief as a product leader, this belief in the possibilities that are unlocked by that product. And sometimes you're building belief for folks outside the building like your customers and your investors. But sometimes you're building belief inside the building because like you said, there are folks that we're working on the core business.

6:49Like best case scenario, this is an experiment that works. Orsk case scenario, this is a distraction and we took things away from the core business to try something new. And so why would we be doing that? What do you think is harder to build belief internally or to build belief externally and why? I was actually reflecting on my career prior to this conversation, Harry, and I realized that I somehow ended up in situations where I own the side hustle and like my whole challenge is actually I probably were that was the same, and Instagram was the same, it's a coin It's been the same where there's this like initial thesis that is unproven and then therefore not only do I have to build the product what I have to build the belief.

7:25And so for me, I would say building the belief has actually been a through line in my career, more so than I think the average product leader. Do you know I ever wanna be somewhere where the belief just is from day one? I do. Yeah, it's an interesting to your point, yes. I think you hit the ground running easier and you say, hey, we all believe in this, like let's go. But at the same time, I think the act of seeing the tide turn, the feeling of being kind of like a rebel or a pirate or a startup when then a startup and then slowly you see traction and slowly you see customers and slowly we start popping up in those farm games and people that were sept septical saying wait a second this is us this is our product like this works here in this context and you see the wheels turning and people kind of opening their eyes to oh I see I believe to that is so rewarding and I think during you know obviously I'm at Sequoia now and I work with a lot of our early stage founders all the time and for them One of the through lines that we talk them through in ARC are precedence stage company building.

8:22Immersion program is the importance of story. Like your job as a founder is building the thing, but it's also to tell a compelling story to all the people that need to hear that story. And people underestimate the power of the story and the building of that story. What do you think they get most wrong about the way that they tell stories? First thing I would say is framing it from their perspective rather than the customer's perspective. Me versus the customer and then solution versus problem. I think are the two main issues that I see where it says, we do this, our company is the best, our company is the best in the space because of this reason.

8:56We have this, we have that feature as opposed to, this is how your life will change. If you realize the possibilities of my product, this is how your life will be better, this is how your possibilities are opened. And then I think the second thing is solution over problem. We have these features, this is what our thing does, here's a full demo, Here's all the long list of super power advanced user features that we have as opposed to what problem are we trying to solve and Do you resonate with that problem? Are you deeply affected by that problem? Like how do how do how to solving that problem change your life?

9:26I think we need more purple cows as well I don't know if you know the purple cow theory like it's southgoed and such as being different is better in a lot of cases And it's like there are so many like data lake products that I've no idea what they frickin do but they all sound the same. And I just think that we need more difference to the way that we tell stories. Absolutely. But I think differentiation in the customer's voice, it's one thing for you to be able to say why your data lake is better than the others. But if your customer can't pair it that back to you in one sentence, then you haven't done your job yet.

9:57Before we dive into that, I think I jumped around Polyvore, did incredibly well. It turned a fashion community into this incredibly monetized, to bloggy by banner ads, a 200 million acquisition by Yahoo. What was the biggest product lesson from that in the experience with Polyvore? Build only what you have to, I think, is one of the lessons I learned. At that time, there was lots of performance marketing and I mean, Google existed, product listing ads existed. So there is a way to build a really, really sophisticated ad engine that we could have just taken a page of other book and then really started there.

10:27We started with a spreadsheet. So we ran our entire performance marketing engine off of a Google spreadsheet for, we did I think it was a full year that we ran it on a spreadsheet and all the bids from all the advertisers like you have sacks with Avenue, Neiman Marcus, you know these people are coming to us saying hey like they had to email their account manager to change their bids. So they would say hey can I change but my bids for dresses up from 250 to 275 and they can't manage it would let us forward it to us and then we jump into the spreadsheet and change it from 250 to 275. And I think the lesson I learned was just it's so surprising how far you can get like building so little.

11:03Do you think you always be embarrassed by your V1. It's a common statement. Some people agree some don't. How do you feel? In general, I agree with the premise of that, that you are almost always going to overestimate the amount that you need to build to actually learn the thing that you want to learn. I think the goal of building, like I said, this kind of cycle of conviction and action, the goal of building is to either move an impact metric that you care about, or to learn something about how to move the thing that you care about. And both of those things require way less product that people think.

11:33Like, my job as a product leader is almost to scope down the product that I build. To build less product, I consider it successful. Do you agree with the other statement that to scale, you have to do things that don't scale? I think it's PG that commonly said that at YC. I think so. I think, or at least, open your mind to the possibility. We actually do have this scoping MVP framework that we teach during ARC, that I teach during product week. And it talks about there's three columns, of course. There's three pillars that we break it into. and the first is what does the product actually need to do?

12:02And the second is what can you fake? And that's when people say unscalable things. We're talking about things you can fake operationally, wizard of Oz, behind the curtain. What are the things you can do that maybe someday your product can do? But it doesn't have to do it today for you to learn the thing that you need to learn. That's a great way to phrase it. And of course there's three. So I feel like McKinsey could also have been a sponsor for this show. But I want to move to the final segment really being Instagram in terms of the operating career. A scanning SMB ads from 200 million to a billion.

12:33What was the biggest takeaway from that? Once again, this continuing, this parade of building belief, most of the vast majority of the ads business was focused on obviously makes sense. More concentrated, larger, deeper pocket advertisers. And if you have any experience with Facebook or Instagram's ad platform, it is complicated. It's very sophisticated. There are lots of knobs and dials and levers that you can pull. And when you apply that to the SMB space, you know, people are saying, hey, this is a long tail. There are secondary audience like let's leave them by the wayside and maybe kind of just retrofit or dilute what we have and Ship it to them and it'll work.

13:08And so I think it was always a little bit of a second order customer and I inherited this team that basically was saying, you know, our goal is to grow because this is the long tail We make up for price with volume like they're not gonna have the budgets, but there's millions of them So let's go get a million of them, right? So the problem statement is acquisition, it's growth. Our metric is monthly active advertisers, and you just want that number to go up into the right. And I think the thing that I most learn there is the power of asking the question, what problem are you trying to solve? At Instagram, the problem statement being framed as acquisition, when I spent some time taking into the numbers behind the numbers, we had an awful, awful, awful retention problem.

13:47For every 10 customers that tried the product, six of them the next month would go away. Even though, even despite that, the number of monthly active advertisers keep going up, because we're just pouring new advertisers in the funnel. I did like evangelize the idea that the problem is not acquisition. It is retention. And if we don't fix this retention problem, we are going to be at a serious cliff. In some amount of time, I don't know if it's six months, 12 months, but eventually we are going to run out of advertisers, according to top of the funnel, and we will have nothing. Just reframing the problem and really understanding what problem it is you're trying to solve.

14:21is probably my biggest lesson. You mentioned that kind of the core metric of like actually focusing on retention, not on activation or acquisition. We often hear about product missions. So what is a good versus a great product mission? Yeah, that's a great question. So this is actually taking from a framework that I do teach during ARC. And so this framework aims to basically demystify and break down the active product management into a framework. And so it's a four part framework. It has, as you suggested, mission is that kind of like the top of the framework and all of the remaining factors kind of like cascade down from mission.

14:54So first you have a mission, which is a qualitative statement of what success looks like. So we usually use an image of a mountain, and it's like the flag at the top of the mountain. What does it look like to achieve, you know, to scale this mountain? What would an example of that be? Would that be like the number one CRM provider for SMBs? Oh, that's a perfect yes. Okay, so there's two core things I think that make a great product mission. One is that it's customer centric. It should describe what it changes for the customer and their world, how it changes the customer's world. Two is that it is a thing that you can imagine working again, store working towards for the next decade, not the next quarter.

15:30So one problem statement that a lot of early stage founders have is that they're so hyper focused on what's right in front of them. This week, this inbox, this meeting, this feature, this ship date, and it's really, really hard to think way bigger than that. And when we see way bigger, we don't mean before your series A. We mean the next decade or two. The one great example I use that because most of us are customers of this company is Airbnb. Their mission is belong anywhere. That just immediately kind of like rounds the idea of, okay, for you as a customer, they're hoping that they can produce experiences and places for you to stay that help you feel like you belong wherever you go, wherever you travel in the world.

16:04It is a customer -focused statement and it is pretty massive in terms of, I can imagine 10 years from now, maybe Airbnb doesn't feel like that box has been checked, right? It's something that you kind of almost work towards but never achieve. Is it measurable? Is there any, you could look at customer on PS, but different customers like different things. So it may not actually suggest home from home. How do you think about the importance of whether it's measurable in a mission statement? What a great segue, Harry. The next part of this framework, the four part framework, is actually the metric.

16:33So the whole point of the mission is inspiration, aspiration, also clarity around what it is that you want your team to achieve. the metric is the quantification of that aspiration. So at any given point, there is one number that is the best determinant, and if you're talking about the mountain analogy, the best compass, to tell you what is up the mountain and what is down the mountain. And that thing can change over time. So pre -product market fit, for example, we give our arc founders the strong advice to pick a number that represents customer happiness. And you mentioned MPS. I recommend not using MPS.

17:04I recommend using, for this purpose, I recommend using a metric that's specifically an action in your product. So imagine any time this user takes an at this action, they're pressing a button that says, this product is great, I love this product, or I'm using this product. So it could be an API call, it could be a dashboard that's created, it could be a query, it could be image that's created. There's something that they're doing in your product that is the core action of your product that suggests that they're finding value out of it. And that is the thing, that is the quantification of their happiness at this current stage.

17:33I'm so agree with you because I get so pissed off when I shouldn't be as vocal as this but I am anyway, so fuck it But when people are like oh, like or metric is MRR and I'm like there's 10 different input metrics that lead to that as the output Matrix it means nothing. Yes If you're talking early stage pre product market fit the farther you are from customer Happiness and like I literally imagine them pushing a button or raising their hand like every time this thing happens they're happy or they're getting value. And there's like you said, so many output metrics and downstream metrics that you can measure, great measure them all you want, but goal on the thing that makes your customer happy.

18:12And one example from a recent ARC company that I worked with was a robotics company. The whole point is that the robots are set up in your lab and helping you kind of like automate what otherwise would be done by human work. And so they have, you know, they have a long sale cycle, they have a long implementation cycle and you can goal on any number of those things, you know, timed implementation, robots live, contracts, you know, signed, things like that, but really what you should be going on is robot hours life. How many hours, how many actions, how many things are the robots actually doing in the lab environment that are driving value?

18:44All those other things are either upstream or downstream of like the moment of value delivery for the customer. We have the mission. We have the mattrache. Yeah. Okay. Product strategy wise, what's the first step in defining a good product strategy? Yes, okay, so it follows from the mission and the metric. The product strategy piece is the most mystical black box thing. Like people either think you have product intuition or you don't, or you can't follow formula because every product is different, so you just kind of weigh it. From my perspective, you can break it down into its component parts.

19:15The first component is to have the mission, the second is to have the metric, and the third is to understand the metric. So basically, let's say we have repy monthly advertisers or maybe it's retention, the pick a number. You basically analyze your metric and determine why and what the gap is between what the led rule is today and what the optimal or ceiling of that number is. So if you know your monthly retention is 20%, and you know that amazing world class monthly retention is 60 or 70%, there's a huge difference there. And so you have to either break down the gap and understand or have a hypothesis as to why there's a gap.

19:48And the key there is that there's a user facing hypothesis. So this is users are not coming back. They're voting with their feet and their behavior that this project is not sticky and they don't want to return. What are the top three reasons why that is true? How do you find them out? How do you find out the hypotheses? Good question. I think it's through the feedback loop into your business. So it's the data. It's their actual data. Where are they retaining? Where are they not? What types of users are retaining? What types of users aren't? It could be by geo. It could be by platform. It could be by flow.

20:15Step of the flow. So data is a really good tool here. And then secondly, actual qualitative feedback. When you talk to users, they will tell you. Why they're not coming back. What was the biggest product mistake that you made and what was your biggest lesson from it? If we think about tactics, hypotheses, I'm just intrigued. I think we learn a lot from things that don't work out. Yeah, I think I actually fell into the trap early on when I was at Instagram adopting the mindset of, I kind of like failed one of the first tests I would say, which is to build the product for the customer, don't build the product and then find a customer for it.

20:48We really did just take this big, massive ad platform and try to water it down for SMBs. And you're imagining you have big, deep pocketed advertisers that have millions of dollars, agencies, whole teams that are working on their ad platform. The whole job title is to work on Facebook ads on behalf of this advertiser. And we're taking this platform and then we're shoving it into the hands of a baker who is running a local bakery and they're baking cakes and, you know, Queen of Mons. And then they're trying to figure out this like ad platform during the day. In what world do we actually think that that would work?

21:20I think this was kind of before the awakening or the realization that hey, like diluting this product for this person is not going to work Even if that's the most efficient path. It is not the most effective path And I think it took a few cycles to actually break out of the growth mindset and then break out of the hey Let's take what we have off the shelf and see what we can do with this That's what I find so funny about that product market fit in the way that I think it's such a challenge statement because product market fit changes with every segment with every product that you're using, with every pricing customer.

21:47Absolutely. If you're going to SMB with the Instagram products, you have to refine the product market fit in a new segment. I think product market fit, I mean, this is going to sound very meta. It's a journey and not a destination. I mean, I truly believe that. Even growth stage companies, you're either finding product market fit in a new area, you're struggling and you're finding to keep it because of what's changing in the competitive environment, or you're trying to expand it to different places. And so nobody ever actually gets and keeps product market fit. It is an ongoing battle or an ongoing journey that nobody ever really just conquers and says, okay, I'm done.

Read the full transcript

22:22I've done that. Did you really just say it's a journey and not a destination? I really did. I really did. That's also part of yes. I'm a lot of people. I don't know. We'll put that as the title. Yeah, it will be great. I'm really inspired. Yes. This is good. You can do a mountain top illustration as well. It's perfect. Okay. I want to move into the actual kind of archetypes themselves. Yeah. because we've highlighted it if you can believe it, three. So what are the three different types of PMF? A lot of PMF content talks about your product as if it existed in a vacuum. It's like how do you get your product in front of the right customer?

22:55How do you get your product used? How do you get your product to the retention number? How do you get your product to hit this benchmark? But what about the market? And specifically, what about the customer mindset? So that's really what this whole framework is anchored on is the product that you build has to follow from the mindset that your customer and the relationship that your customer has with the problem that you're solving. And how they, how actively, or either actively, they're trying to solve it, urgently, they're trying to solve it, or how even aware of the problem they are, really factors into how you build the right product and how you get to PMF.

23:25So that's kind of the core insight of the framework. And so there are three basically archetypes of customer mindsets. So the three archetypes that we'll start with, the first one, which is hair on fire, I think that's pretty self -explanatory in terms of a name. But this cluster obviously is in the mindset of help me now help me yesterday I am urgently trying to solve this problem. I'm out there actively comparing my solutions that are available I'm you know doing feature comparisons. I'm also probably inundated you mentioned earlier There's millions of data lakes. I am inundated with messaging that all sounds the same But I need to solve this problem.

23:57So what do I do? The hurdle to overcome here mainly is it's a crowded marketplace You're not the only person that has discovered this customer has a burning need somebody else is tackling and many multiple people are tackling this problem as well. And so the key hurdle is really differentiation and overcoming noise. And we come full circle, I know we touched on that earlier in our conversation. But the nuance here is not just differentiation in the product, which means that you're actually solving their problem in a way that is compelling, but also that they get the difference. Because like we said, there's a million other people trying to sell them, something that sounds the same.

24:29I think the true test of this is whether the customer can say in one sentence, clearly, what is this point of differentiation and whether it compelling because if you still have a gap to that, I think there's still a lot of work to do in a market like this in hair on fire. Do you not find that every founder over -emphasizes their customers' pain to the problem that they think they have? Every founder I know is like, oh, my customers are dying of this pain and then you speak to customers and they're like, ah, it's like top 10 but not massive. Do they not always overestimate it? Yes, and I think that's one of the things that we teach also in ARC is ask the terrifying question.

25:04You want to believe, right? We've talked about having a room of believers that is all kind of, you know, moving and rowing in the direction of bringing that belief to reality. Sometimes you got to have somebody that's sanity checking you, right? There's always at least one terrifying question. What sort of thing is a terrifying question? Is this problem actually that bad? If you got the real answer to exactly what you just said, that happens over and over and over again, like this problem statement of, this is a huge problem. It is a big deal. It's the most urgent number one problem, budgets are there, and you hear the customer literally tell you the exact opposite, it maybe top 10, it's not that big of a deal.

25:36I think the terrifying question is, does this problem actually matter in many cases? I think when you face the terrifying question, you get answers very quickly. And I think on the hair on fire in the hair and fire path, it is specifically the differentiation point around does this problem matter and are you solving it compellingly? My job is like, you said before, is your customer compelled by your difference as a clarifying statement around that? Again, the difference is the really hard part, product marketing, I think it's actually done really poorly today. Again, I'm in trouble for this. How do you think about advising founders on standing out in supremely competitive markets?

26:12And what works and what doesn't? I think I would go back to using their words, not your words. The number of times that I have seen a founder describe this is what my product does. This is what it is. This is the category we're in. This is the feature set we have. And then you go and ask the customer and say, how would you describe this product? And it is completely orthogonal to the way that the founder either describes it or thinks it exists in the world. For me, it fits here. For me, it is this useful. For me, this is the biggest benefit. And the words just don't align. Question for you. What do you do when you've got horizontal products?

26:48Yeah, look at your notions. I look at your air tables. They're not vertically applied to problem statements. And so it's like very difficult to come up with compelling, casual statements that you can put on a billboard. How do you think are effective horizontal product marketing? I would actually challenge that in that at least every truly engaged and evangelist customer has a way that they describe notion and why they think notion is head and shoulders above the rest. Basically what you have with a horizontal product is you have to collect that data point across a lot of different customer profiles and use cases and pull together a thread of similarity across those.

27:23But you still have to do the work of understanding how a customer uses that product. Same thing with I always use Excel as the example because Excel is, you know, there's so many different ways that you can use Excel. But it didn't start as a, hey, here's a spreadsheet, use it for whatever you want, right? There was somebody that was like a more compelling and deeper use case for that, whether that was, you know, financial analysts or people that really need to manipulate data to do their day -to -day job. You have to actually pull the true value prop and the evangelism out of people that actually see that value prop clearly.

27:52Challenge accepted. That was the most interesting to you. I'm challenging. I'm like, oh, I didn't realize it was a challenge or jewel. How wonderful. I want to go to the second, which is a hard fact. What's a hard fact, Vicki? Yeah, a hard fact. I think I would, I love that this comes right after Hair and Fire, because these people are, you know, please help me now. Hard fact, customer mindset, is literally we use the phrase, it is what it is. It's just resignation. It's not the best. Yes, it's a problem statement, but I hack together something. I'm using something that existed for 20 years. There's no better way to do it.

28:29I've got what I've got. It is what it is. This is a hurdle of not noise and crowded in competition, but this is a hurdle of habit. It's a hurdle of inertia. It's a hurdle of people who have just lived their lives this way and they're not. This is I think the most eye -opening path, I think, for many of the founders that we walk through this framework with, that there is any other path outside here on fire. Because I think the conventional wisdom is build something people want. And so that means you go out and build a thing that people urgently are saying that they need, which is not what hard fact is.

28:59Hard fact is, somebody has accepted that this is just a hard fact, a hard truth of their life. And you're trying to get them to accept that, no, this is a hard problem that I am now solved for you. What do you think is an example of that? It is what it is. Yeah, oh, for me, I have so many. So we work with a lot of great marketplace companies. I think Marketplace is actually fallen to this mindset very clearly in that. I need a cab and if there's no yellow cab on the street, I'm standing out here for five minutes. Can't find a cab. I guess I have to take the subway or walk and it's just like it is what it is.

29:28That's just how it works, right? And you have something like Uber come along and say, actually, there's an completely different source of supply that you have not thought of for getting you from point point A to point B and that kind of jars you out of I have a I actually started my career in investment banking and I used to working downtown San Francisco and so I would get out of the office at two or three I would call up a cab company and I lived not in the city, but I lived like across the bridge in Berkeley. And these cabs would come and show up to the office and then they would see that I'm going over the bridge and they're like, I don't want to go over the bridge and they would just leave me.

29:59And I'd have to call off sometimes two, three, four cabs at two or three in the morning to get one to agree to take me across the bridge. And that's how I lived my life. And I think that's one of these things about hard fat companies is, why was I living my life that way? Are they not inherently so hard because you have to fundamentally reprogram human brains around habits? Yes. And it may sound almost like, I think as I found it, oh wow, there's not a bunch of competition to elbow out of the space. That sounds great. But no, I mean, I think breaking people's habits could, in many cases, be way harder than kind of standing out amongst competition.

30:34Well, and I think there's like the inherently entrenched incumbents, which is, I think which is like banking traditionally was always on phone contracts. It's like, you know, AT &T it is what it is. They're paying the Christmas other sucks, but what are... But AT &T, the infrastructure requirements, the brand, I mean, it's just so entrenched. Yes, it's a hard fact. Remember not just for the customer, but also for potential competitors. And so it's a hard fact for everybody. Everybody has just accepted it, both as not a problem they want to solve and also not as a habit that they want to change.

31:02And your job is to shake them loose of that belief. It has its challenges for sure, and I think the two ingredients to really overcoming this habit one once again Pick a problem that people care about if I have a habit in a space that you know sure It's not the best, but I'm not trying to bend over backwards to change my life over this behavior If you pick a problem that is actually a you know a soft fact I guess using the hard -facred analogy right if it's a soft fact and not really a problem then you're you know Dead on arrival and I think the second one is to actually have a compelling or novel enough solution to shake them out of their habit Another example I often use is Instacart prior to COVID.

31:37I have two young kids. At that time, my son was one year old. And I used to, before COVID, I would like, schlep him to the grocery store. I was like a first nervous first time mom. So I would use the shopping cart cover. And I have to bring all the toys and the snacks and prepare, it was like a whole journey just to get our groceries for the week. And then because of COVID, I tried Instacart. I think I have now, I don't know, 350 orders on Instacart lifetime. And it's truly a, why was I living my life that way? They broke this habit that wasn't even, it wasn't great. I didn't enjoy schlepping him to the grocery store and schlepping all the stuff back, but I thought it was just the way that I had to live life.

32:11And Instacart broke me out of that habit. That, but I think also Blanny COVID also broke a lot of happen around consumer patents. Which is a really interesting for an investor, like the why now we always have to ask and a site. And an external event can cause a hard fact to become shakeable. Exactly. Yes. In often cases that is actually exactly what happens. A hard thing is to understand whether it's enduring. Like you've seen a lot of e -commerce which has not been enduring. That's definitely true. That's the challenge. I want to move to the third which is again kind of completely different one.

32:42It's future vision. What is future vision and how does that compare? Yes future vision is for all the dreamers out there. So future vision is a place where you have some deep expertise in some area that causes you to see a world that not everybody else sees yet. Think Elon Musk, think Jensen Huang, you know. Think yet these are the types of folks that not only see a product that can change people's lives, but a paradigm that can change people's lives. The thing, you know, we said in the first path, the hurdle to overcome was competition. In the second, the hurdle to overcome is habit. In the third, it's actually disbelief.

33:16It's sure. I'd love flying cars. I'd love teleportation. I'd love all kinds of things. Great. Yeah, but I'll believe it when I see it. And I think your job as a founder in this path is mostly validation to prove the validity of your vision of the future, a almost little technical validity, and then secondly, applying that and finding the right stepping stones to your ultimate vision. I'd like to use OpenAI as an example here. Their ultimate vision of the future is that AGI exists. And so it's crazy to think that chat GBT and all their GPT models were a stepping stone to realizing the vision of AGI.

33:49They found a commercial application that solved problems that people were compelled by to adopt for one use case or another on their way to the actual ultimate future vision, which actually hasn't come to fruition yet. And this is something that, you know, future vision founders, there's one thing about going into a cave for 10 years and emerging and then everybody wants the thing that you have, but there's another thing to actually prove the hypothesis in bite sizes, and in milestones and in stepping stones and finding the right stepping stones. I would say 90 % of the companies that I see as an investor are in the first category, which is obviously the harrowing firm.

34:24Is that true for you and is that reminiscent of how the art portfolio looks? Oh, that's interesting. When we actually look through our portfolio, I would say it was actually pretty representative across the different paths, surprisingly enough. Hard fact is really comes through a lot, I would say, actually surprisingly so. A lot of founders find that's why I think a lot of founders found it so illuminating because they realized, wait a second, so all this struggle I have with skepticism and kind of waking people up to like, you doesn't have to be this way. It's because I am actually not on the hair on fire path.

34:55And so I think that was the biggest aha moment I saw from founders that actually were on the hard fact path, not realizing that that path existed. So the profile was actually pretty representative, I would say across the path. One interesting thing I would add is that I would say both from a founder perspective and also from an investor perspective. Certain investors gravitate towards certain paths. Oh yeah, Harron Fy, I think is an inherently shit one to be part of. Why do you say that? Why? You require a lot of marketing spend to actually differentiate. That's if you even have great product marketing, which I think is very rare.

35:28You have incredibly competitive markets and so your retention is generally lower and it's harder to keep them. Also people forget about the marginal cost of software dev and if there's hugely competitive markets, they will expect continuous incredible improvements very frequently versus much more stale market, whether there's not many alternatives. So actually your margin really changes because you have to have to keep you amazing software updates, amazing CS. They're inherently worse business. And then also you've got no price, sorry, I'm just really getting on high horse to price and college.

35:59I feel your energy around this area. Yeah, the monetization is real. But don't forget though that the demand is given. There's pros and cons to each. Like it's kind of like, oh, another thing that I, you know, go really deep on the rabbit hole on is personality tests and frameworks. But there's not, you know, you say in those that there's not a good one or a bad one, right? Like there's just pros and cons to each and the pros here, like you said, you've run into so many founders that say they're solving a problem that's number 10 on people's lists. In hair on fire in theory, the demand is clearer which is why it is hair on fire and then usually in that space that there is actual budget there's actual spend there's people ready to write checks, which the other tube has made on necessarily see such a clear, you know, line towards.

36:38I get you, but like, oh, so I have a very clear play but for the deals that we do, which is like, I love huge markets with fuck all competition, no competition. What are examples of those? Okay, I'll let a series A for Business that does commodities pricing. It prices the world. To the full circle, the commodities. But there's like one big player in the world. That's it, and no engineers out of Stripe like commodities. We're going to do commodities. None. And so I look for large markets with no competition, huge market. So to me, that reads very hard fact, but how do those customers actually view those problems?

37:11Like, where would you put them on this? It's kind of a combination of hair on fire in terms of recognition of problem, but hard fact as well. So it is kind of, because they hate it and they are very aware of the need for change. But no one is. But it is what it is. Because no one's building for us. I almost like to build for the unheard. What a soft -wrenching is. Bluntly, and this time I'm getting in trouble here, DevTools, what a shit market. Dev's like to build their own tools. They don't believe anything you tell them. And so they just are inherently skeptical. They expect insane product. They're very cynical.

37:49Margin's generally quite crap. The CS is required high. Just crap. And so not those, that's how I feel. But I would say it kind of falls in those two. But the important, sorry, additions. The incumbents in these markets, they need to have terrible sought -down problems. terrible talent brands and they need to be built on terrible infrastructure. Yes. So many founders that we see are going off to like Shopify. I mean, all Stripe in some way and I'm like, unbundling Stripe and going up against the Colossans seems like a really stupid idea. Would you believe that we have a framework for this? We've talked about that.

38:24No, we've talked about that. We've talked about three. No, strangely, it's a number four. Okay, it's the Delta four. It's really simple. I mean, one of our partners internally just started calling this term, but basically out of a 10 point scale, are you at least four points better? And I think to your point about unbundling and taking on the callasons, if they're an eight or a nine, are you a 13? Is a very different question than if you are the port operating system of 20 years ago is a three out of 10 and you can be a seven. Those are very different kind of beasts to tackle. Okay, I've got a one and another one there.

38:59I don't think it matters if your product is better anymore. Whoa, hot tea, Carrie. distribution trumps all. We see so many products today where it's like I've seen so many unbundled open AI solutions. Are they enduring? Are they enduring? It's because there's a hype, you know, now and everybody's able to. They are better products than a medical transcriptioners market. There are 10 different medical transcription products that are better than Microsoft's. But bundled into Microsoft's products suite, selling to large incumbents and enterprises, there's no way that they're going to I would argue that's exactly the Delta 4 test of like to your point.

39:38Is it 5 % better or is it 5x better? Because these unbundled ones are not 5x better and therefore there's no reason for me to take on the cost of unbundling that sweet managing all the different types of disparate technology when I could just have all in one here. Same thing with like Google Sheets and Google Docs versus Office. You know originally it is definitely not Google spreadsheets are not better than Microsoft Excel. Like period from a person that used to come from finance. I know what the power tool is and people still in this building still use PC so that they can access Microsoft Excel.

40:08That's how hard -core they are about it. But it was good enough for most of us, right? We didn't need a 5X better spreadsheet. We just needed to do a little quick math, you know? And so how much better does it need to be? I believe you. I think we agree, actually. Yeah, I totally agree. It's a magnitude of product difference there completely. How many products you actually believe a 5X better than, honestly? It's a good question. and how much, and to the point of, do they need to be five X better to shake either, what are you breaking through? You're breaking through the competition, you're breaking through habit, you're breaking through disbelief.

40:38How much does it take for the product to be better in order to break out of one of those kind of shake one of those things? And one of the things probably depends on less enterprise buying cycles versus consumer adoption are probably two different, absolutely, use of product better. Working on these frameworks, it's just like a scaffolding to have these conversations, I think, and to think through all the different nuances, because not everybody knows the product market, there's no one path, and there's no one formula. But the way that we talk about it, I think, is a little bit one size fits all sometimes.

41:06So it's kind of nice to be able to identify patterns, but allow for nuance, I think. And then you're bringing up some really great examples. There's one I love about investing in. There's no right way to invest. Exactly. Okay, I want to do a quick fire on. So I say a short statement, and you give me your immediate thoughts now. I have no friends, and I've probably lost every founder that's building in dev tools for the rest of my career. You can edit that out, it's fine, right? No, I never wanted to meet them anyway, it's fine. Literally, my team's listening to this and I, oh, Harry. Not again.

41:36Not again. Okay, first one, what's the most common reason you think founders don't get product market fit? Like, one reason. Not solving a problem that matters with a solution that's compelling enough. You fail in part A, you fail in part B, you fail in both. I think it's as simple as that, actually. It's funny, I sat down at the start of the video and I said to the team, I want to have a smaller audience. I want us to deliberately get smaller as a media company because I want to Me more to fewer people. What's the biggest product marketing mistake you see founders make? I'll go back to say it again.

42:06Say it in their words. Not yours. Your words. The way that you see your product, you are too close to this thing. It is not actually how they experience it. And in some cases, like in these markets that you're talking about, like dev tools, You know, where you believe that you are your own customer because you are also an engineer. Like I think we just have to break ourselves from that. Like you've got to hear it in their voice. What would you say is the biggest mistake founders make when hiring product teams? The thing that I actually warn both founders and product operators against is joining as a product leader too early in a company.

42:35And what I mean by that is there's kind of three layers of product. There's product vision, there's product strategy, and there's product execution. And when you are very, very early on in a company, I would hope that at least the first two come from the founding team. Some is anchored on the founding team. And if you're joining to provide one or more of those things, There is often some tension, basically, between what swim lanes people live in. And I've seen that happen where the founder thinks that they're ready to give up product vision or product strategy, and it turns out that that's not actually the case.

43:03It's a difficult conversation to have once you find yourself there. Tell me, what other function does product have the most tension with? Ooh, is there a spicy question? I think it really depends on the context, and it really depends on how willing the other functions are to step out of their own function. I believe in a cross -functional team. Sure, my job is to do product strategy. I set the stage for why we're solving this problem and what the problem is. And then maybe an engineer's job is to figure out what we're actually going to do to solve the problem and how we're going to implement that.

43:33But we all have a say in all of those voices and rooms. And so I think that the tension usually comes from, that's your lane. This is my lane, staying your lane. Here's the wall. And I think that's even a bigger macrocosm when you think about product development versus sales or marketing or some of the more business functions. You're saying you're laying, I'll see in my lane. I think many of the tensions arise there and are easily, maybe not easily, but they are definitely surmountable. So a friend calls you up and they've got the first day as a new product leader at this new job tomorrow. What advice do you give them going to stay one as a new product leader?

44:08I would go back to conviction and action. The first thing you should do is build conviction in your problem and your customer. So probably meet a bunch of customers, figure out how to get in front of the customer, or get absorbed all these resources has been done. What are we doing here? What does success look like? Who is this person? What do they care about? And then the action side. So that's outside the building. I think action is more inside the building. How do things get done here? How do we make decision? Who has influence? How does the process work? How do I fit into this thing to actually make things happen?

44:35And I think that is probably the more challenging job for somebody just dropping into a role for the first time. Final one. Which product strategy recently have you been most impressed by? Linear is a really interesting one because they took this thing that is normally mostly used by, you know, issue tracking mostly used by PMs and managers, AMs and they targeted the engineer instead because those people hate this thing. And I've worked with so many teams and the more senior I've gotten my product career, the more senior engineers around me have gotten and the more jaded, specifically around process and stand up and issue tracking tickets and things like this, they're like they want none of it.

45:09And I was in this position where we adopted Linear here at Sequoia with my team, and we actually had another issue tracking tool that we also had licenses for. Some teams use this, some teams do that. But the EPD solely used Linear. And we were being, there was a threat of us consolidating. You know what? There's more seats open here. Why don't we just take everybody from Linear and move them over here? My team revolted. They wrote a four -page manifesto on why you cannot take Linear from them. And like, literally it was a memo. We actually ended up sharing it with the Linear team. They cared about this so much.

45:41They've been through the trend. These are jaded, big tech survivor type engineer. Like I've seen every issue tracking tool and like I've never actually not hated one, except for this one. And what's really fascinating is I think from a product strategy standpoint, most of these issue tracking tools go for PMs first, right? It's like you're the manager, you're the planner, you're planning the development, the roadmap, the cycle, all this kind of stuff, that's the target customer. And the fact that they kind of flip that a little bit and like went for engineers and now they're actually now able to expand up and down the stack, up and down the development process.

46:08They are building products from PMs. They are building products from managers now, but they did it now from this core of love from engineers rather than hate. I find that super fascinating. I love that and I also love Carrie. And so I totally agree with you in that respect. Vicki, I love this. It's been a really fun hearing. She's always so much fun to have. So thank you so much for putting up with me and you've been incredible. Thank you so much. Thank you for having me here. This is great. I have to say, I really so enjoy doing these vertical lead episodes on 20 product, 20 growth and 20 sales.

46:40I think there's so many tangible lessons to founders in scaling their businesses there. If you want to see more, you can check us out on YouTube and watch the full video interview by searching for 20 VC. But before we leave you today, we're all trying to grow our businesses here. So let's be real for a second. We all know that your website shouldn't be this static asset. It should be a dynamic part of your strategy that really drives conversions. That's marketing 101. But here's a number for you, 54 % of leaders say web updates take too long. That's over half of you listening right now, and that's where webflow comes in.

47:15Their visual first platform allows you to build, launch and manage web experiences fast. That means you can set ambitious marketing goals, and your site can rise to the challenge. Plus, webflow allows your marketing team to scale without relying on engineering, freeing your dev team to folks on more fulfilling work learn where teams like Dropbox, IDO and Orange Theory, Trust Webflow to achieve their most ambitious goals today at webflow .com. And talking about great companies like Webflow, let me introduce you to AirTable. Half of product managers say bad processes and tools are their biggest challenges.

47:51That's why more and more companies are turning to AirTable to transform their product operation. As one senior product leader puts it, it's complicated to keep everybody in the loop and an air table really helps us stay in the loop. With air table you'll build the right products grounded in what customers really want, unify your entire product portfolio and workflows in one place and ship those products to customers faster than ever. In fact, one global financial services company cut its time to market for new features by half. Maximise your team's impact too with air table. Give it a try for free today at airtable .com slash podcast.

48:26That's airtable .com slash podcast to get started. And finally, we need to talk about Pendo, a really simple way to describe Pendo's value is to simply say, get your users to do what you want them to do. What is Pendo? The only all in one product experience platform for any type of application. What are the features that make Pendo so awesome? Pendo's differentiation is in its platform. Every capability from analytics to in -app guidance, to session replay, mobile feedback management and road mapping, or all purpose -built to work together. What is the social validity? 10 ,000 companies use Pendo, and we also manage mind the product, the world's largest community of product management professionals.

49:05Where do we want to drive people? Give it a try and visit pendo .io slash 20 product -yphone podcast to learn how your team can use Pendo to start building better digital experiences. There, you can also check out Pendo's lineup of free certification courses, 12 hours of in -depth training for your product management teams, on topics from AI to product analytics, to product led growth, to check it out, simply head over to pando .io forward slash 20 product hyphen podcast, that's 2 -0 product hyphen podcast. As always, I so appreciate all your support and stay tuned for an incredible episode this coming Friday with the founder of FreshWorks, one of India's most successful companies of the last decade.

From the publisher

Vickie Peng is a Product Partner at Sequoia and the co-creator of Arc, their company-building immersion programme for pre-seed and seed stage founders. Prior to Sequoia, Vickie was a product manager at Polyvore (acquired by Yahoo for $200M) and Instagram, where she grew SMB advertising from $200M to $1BN.

In Today’s Episode with Vickie Peng We Discuss:

  1. Lessons from 15 Years in Product

  • How did Vickie make her way into the world of product?

  • How did Vickie turn a small side business into a massive revenue machine at TrialPay?

  • How did Vickie scale Instagram SMB ads to $1BN? What were her takeaways?

  • What was Vickie’s business model at Polyvore that eventually led to the $200M acquisition by Yahoo?

  1. Lessons from Scaling 100+ Companies in Sequoia

  • What does Vickie believe are the biggest mistakes early stage founders make when telling stories?

  • Which 2 components does Vickie believe every great product mission should include?

  • How should pre-product-market fit founders set their north star metric?

  1. Perfecting Product Strategy

  • What was Vickie’s biggest product mistake? What were her lessons?

  • Why does Vickie think the best product people build less product?

  • What is Vickie’s advice to product leaders starting their first day on the job?

  • What are the most common mistakes founders make when hiring product teams?

  1. Product-Market Fit Masterclass

  • Why does Vickie believe product-market fit is a journey not a destination?

  • What are the biggest reasons founders fail to get product-market fit?

  • What are the 3 types of product-market fit?

  • How does Vickie advise founders to differentiate themselves in competitive markets?

  • What is Vickie’s framework for competing against incumbents?

 

More from The Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch

All 521 episodes
20Product: Sequoia's Product-Market Fit FrameworkThe Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch · 50 min
Listen in VO