20VC: Affirm Max Levchin on Why Grading Talent by Letter (A or B) is Total BS | How to Create a Culture of Post Mortems and Writing | Why You Should Only Study Failure Not Success & The Biggest Surprises Scaling to $18.7BN Market Cap

5 Feb 2025 · 1 h 2 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Twenty Minute VC (20VC) - Episode with Max Levchin

Episode Overview In this episode of *The Twenty Minute VC*, host Harry Stebbings interviews Max Levchin, founder and CEO of Affirm, a leading company in the buy now, pay later space valued at $18.7 billion. Levchin is also a co-founder of PayPal and an angel investor with a notable portfolio. The discussion revolves around hiring practices, management of extreme personalities, the culture of post-mortems, writing practices, and insights gained from failures.

Key Discussions and Concepts

  1. Hiring the Best People
  2. Extreme Personalities: Levchin notes that brilliant individuals often have extreme personalities. While this can be challenging, it’s crucial to recognize their value.
  3. Managing Extremes: The importance of finding a balance between allowing strong opinions and maintaining team harmony.
  4. Opinionated People: Levchin emphasizes that having strong opinions is valuable, as long as it is expressed respectfully.
  1. Grading Talent
  2. A and B Players: Levchin criticizes the practice of assigning letter grades to employees, arguing that it oversimplifies talent assessment.
  3. Hiring B Players: As companies scale, it becomes impossible to only hire A players. B players can be valuable contributors and should not be dismissed outright.
  1. Risk Management
  2. Calculated vs. Uncalculated Risks: Levchin shares insights on the importance of doing calculations before taking risks and reflects on his own experiences, including successes and failures.
  3. Post-Mortem Culture: Affirm has established a culture of post-mortems to analyze decisions and learn from failures, which Levchin believes is crucial for growth.
  1. Writing and Communication
  2. Creating a Writing Culture: Levchin advocates for a culture where every team member writes regularly, as it enhances clarity and accountability.
  3. Simplicity in Writing: He stresses that communication should be concise, as people tend to lose focus with lengthy documents.
  1. Leadership Lessons
  2. Handling Layoffs: Levchin reflects on the emotional toll of layoffs, emphasizing empathy and direct involvement in the process to support affected employees.
  3. Team Dynamics: Good leadership involves understanding team dynamics and ensuring that all team members are motivated and aligned.
  1. Competitive Landscape
  2. Affirm vs. Klarna: Levchin discusses Affirm's competitive position in the U.S. market compared to Klarna, citing growth figures and strategic advantages.
  1. Company Culture and Values
  2. Post-Mortem Implementation: Levchin provides practical advice on how to implement a post-mortem culture, including creating a documentation process and ensuring accountability.
  3. Maintaining Trust: The importance of trust in leadership and how it affects team morale and performance.
  1. Personal Insights
  2. Influences on Leadership Style: Levchin shares personal anecdotes about his upbringing and how it shaped his approach to leadership and entrepreneurship.
  3. Views on Public Companies: He speaks about the pros and cons of being a public company CEO and how market perceptions can impact leadership decisions.

Quickfire Round Highlights

  • Biggest Misconception: Levchin believes that many underestimate the complexities of managing a team of diverse personalities.
  • Future Aspirations: If he could start a company with anyone from the PayPal mafia, he would choose Peter Thiel for his brilliance and familiarity.

Conclusion Max Levchin’s insights provide valuable lessons for entrepreneurs and leaders, particularly in areas of team dynamics, leadership, and creating a culture that embraces learning from both successes and failures. His experiences underline the importance of empathy, direct communication, and the careful management of talent in fostering an innovative and resilient company culture.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00I think opinionated is exceptionally valuable. The hard red line for me is always, once I can't trust you, the story about knowing the letter grade of every person you hire in your company, whether it's 2000 people like a farm, but that's just silly. This is 20 VC with me, Harry Stebings, and today we have an incredible guest. Simply put, Max Levchin is one of the great technologists of our time. As the founder and CEO of a firm, Today, he's built an $18 .7 billion monster in the buy now pay later space. Prior to a firm, he was one of the original co -founders of PayPal. Max is also the co -founder and chairman of Glow, a data -driven fertility company.

0:40He's also an extremely successful angel, with a portfolio including the lights of Yelp, Pinterest and Evernote. Before we dive in today, here are two fun facts about our newest brand sponsor, Kajabi. First, their customers just crossed a collective $8 billion in total revenue. Wow! Second, Kajabi's users keep 100 % of their earnings with the average Kajabi creator bringing in over $30 ,000 per year. In case you didn't know, Kajabi is the leading creator commerce platform with an all -in -one suite of tools, including websites, email marketing, digital products, payment processing, and analytics for as low as $69 per month.

1:18Whether you are looking to build a private community, write a paid newsletter, or launch a course, Kajabi is the only platform that will enable you to build and grow your online business without taking a cut of your revenue. 20 VC listeners can try Kajabi for free for 30 days by going to kajabi .com -4 -20VC. That's kajabi .com, k -a -j -a -b -i .com, forward slash 20VC. And after building your online empire with kajabi, it's time to scale your global team with remote seamless hiring solutions. So every business is a global business in 2025. But how do you do payroll for your global business and team?

1:56And comply with international labor laws. We'll remote handles payroll, benefits, taxes, stock options, and compliance to help companies of all sizes, pay and manage full time and contract workers all over the world. No matter where your team lives or works, remote global employment solutions keep your team, your finances and your intellectual property secure. Remote never charges hidden fees just best in class global employment solutions for a low flat rate. The world's top remote companies love remote. GitLab, the world's largest all remote organization, trust remote to run their global team.

2:30Remote is funded by index vanses, Sequoia Capital and the host of the greatest podcast ever, Harry Stebbings and 20 VC. Ready to learn more? Head over to remote .com forward slash 20 VC, that's 20 VC, and begin hiring within minutes. Enjoy 10 % off your first three months by using the promo code 20VC at checkout. Now that your team is up and running worldwide, make sure your finances work just as hard with Brex, the ultimate financial stat for startups. So when Brackse was founded, it wasn't just about creating another financial product, it was about solving the really gritty challenges that founders face daily.

3:07Let's be honest, building something from the ground up is hard enough. Without dealing with clunky outdated banks, the pile on fees and leave your cash idle. Brackse is different, it's the financial stack that scales with you, no matter where you are in your journey. From corporate cards to maximizing your runway, to earning yield on your cash. Bracks was designed with founders in mind to make every dollar go further so you can focus on building. And here's what really stands out to me. Bracks combines the best of checking, treasury and FDIC insurance in one powerhouse account. You can send and receive money globally at lightning speed, earn yield from day one and still access your funds whenever you need.

3:44Plus, with 20X the standard protection through program banks, your cash is not just working harder, it's working safer too. It's no surprise that one in three venture -batch startups in the US, with companies like Anthropic, Coinbase and Robinhood, I mean my god these companies are incredible, trust BRACS to help them grow. If you want to join the smarter startups on the planet, head over to BRACS .com forward slash startups and see what they can do for you. You have now arrived at your destination. Max, I am so excited for this dude, it has been a long time, so thank you so much for joining me today.

4:18Thank you for having me. Not at all, but I'd love to start with actually something that you've said before when it comes to hiring brilliant people You said brilliant people have extreme personalities more often than not and when I thought about that I thought do you want them in your team as a result of these extreme personalities? You mostly do Everything is a range and so you inevitably Find yourself asking the question, you know how extreme is extreme and And what will it cost me if this person blows up or goes into some sort of a behavioral tailspin. But most of the time, truly, really, people are worth the quirks.

4:58And it's a hallmarker with a good manager who knows how to bring out the best from the people, even if they are extreme. When we think about extreme levels, often the extremes are dislikable. They're not that amiable. They're very opinionated. How do we think about that being a pro versus a con? I think opinionated is exceptionally valuable. The sort of pinnacle of teamwork achievement is to have really strong opinions, not hold them back, and yet manage to not so profoundly offend the person or the teammate that you're judging or providing feedback to, that they choose to opt out, whatever that means for the problem.

5:36But you want someone who can walk into a room and say, that is a pile of garbage. And I love all of you. You're amazing people. I'm proud to be part of this team. but what we've built here together is not going to ship because it's terrible. And now we're all going to regroup and rethink and build something better. Like that is the way of trying to couch the blow, but if you don't give the blow, you're going to ship garbage. Teach me. I do that. And people get offended. They get emotional and they get upset. And I get told that I'm too direct. What do I do? Empathy is important. Understanding that when you're judging someone's work, There's two possibilities.

6:11It's bad. It's they've done the best and circumstances intervened and they can do better But it wasn't it isn't good enough and they need to know But you know they can do better and the moment is about telling them this isn't your best work But I know what you can do and this is just it's an embarrassment But it's not an embarrassment of your ability. It's the embarrassment of the time you had or the effort you've been able to put in and that's okay Like that we can fix Sometimes you look at work and you say, wow, like this person cannot do better, full stop. Don't worry about being direct. The conversation you're going to have with them at some point very soon is, I don't think you have a place on this team anymore.

6:46That's a much harder conversation, but you have to have it too. You always have said to me, and I, in this year you said this year's year, you said, when I was down, there's no doubt. And I always loved it and I always think to that. But on the extreme element, where does extreme good transition to extreme bad, have you had that before? And what have your lessons been? In any form of narcissism or selfishness, self -orientedness, is probably the most important trigger of churning an extreme personality from good to bad or in the opposite way. You can be as great at throwing tantrics or as directing your criticism as you want to be if you maintain a good degree of humility.

7:27and just remember that the second it becomes about you being better than everyone else, everyone else will start hating you. And if you're their boss, they're gonna hate you quietly. And that's the worst possible situation. And so what you really want is to constantly remember that you are but a part of this team. And when you're criticizing someone's work or telling them this has to be redone, you're always redoing the work together. Like maybe you're not going to personally move the bits, but you're gonna have to be involved because they're not gonna be happy with a second round of the, well, this is still garbage.

7:57That's really important. I think there are many ways where extreme personalities flip into being toxic. And so you just have to constantly watch out for it. But it is the price you pay. Brilliant people are often over the top. And that's part of the ingredients that make them brilliant. When they flip him to toxic, is there a redeeming root back or is that generally a one way road? I believe in second chances in general in life, except it matters of integrity. The hard red line for me is always, once I can't trust you, I can't ever trust you. From that one, in my worldview, there is no walking back.

8:33It's not true with kids' lives because they're exploring, but even with my own kids, I've had very, very difficult conversations where I said, look, this is the thing that in my professional and personal world of adults, it's the hardest thing to come back from, and the fact that you just told me something that isn't true is really hard for me to hear. And saying that to a teammate, you're not going to talk to them like you're talking to a 13 -year -old, you're going to say, look, I can't trust you over again, get out. So other than that, I think there is a way to walk back a lot of the, no matter how crazy toxic a situation could be, if it's a situation, the judgement you have to make as a leader is, is the person profoundly toxic or the situation in turn toxic.

9:09Situations come and go, people don't really change that much. You said earlier, has the person done all they can to execute on the task and to achieve what they want to? Where I struggle is we have differences in expectations around what one should and can do. If you are a head of sales, listen, there's always more you can do. There is always another gift you can send, like you can click, thoughtful comment you can do, additional resource you can send, I will do everything to fucking win. And people on teams don't always think quite as bluntly obsessively as that. How do you think about that alignment between what is rational to expect?

9:48So my brilliant wife frequently reminds me that more often than not, it's about incentives. The unlock for you, the reason you are so obsessed with fucking winning is because it's your company, it's your project, it's your passion, like you've been doing this since you were 14 years old and like the only goal is to do more of you. And so you don't need motivation like your incentives are aligned like you were essentially born with a microphone in your mouth to just trying to get bigger and literally yeah, and I don't think it's you know, nothing to be ashamed of it drive and grit that is the other side of that coin a rare in people who have it end up being entrepreneurs or something resembling entrepreneurship because it is such an unstoppable force which is amazing like if you don't have it it's a thing you can't really teach on the flip side there's plenty of other people that you not just need, you require to achieve your goals.

10:40Like no one is an island in pursuit of their entrepreneurial ambition, and you have to figure out what it is that motivates them. And in many cases, the motivations are not at all relatable for you. Like you had decided at some point that you're willing to work, strategies, and Sundays to succeed. And that's just it. And like, yeah, some people go to the pub and others go skiing and everybody has their thing. And you decided, no, I'm just going to work. And that's what I'm gonna do. And having that conversation with someone who's just joined your team, like, hey, we're all gonna work on Saturday and Sunday because I wanna succeed is not gonna do anything for them.

11:16What do you need to do to figure out what is it that they're looking out for and what is their goal? And if their goal is to go skiing three days a week instead of two, you may have been a hiring mistake, but if their goal is to feel great about their work, the investment you have to make isn't about beating them up about this work quality's garbage or telling them go work harder to say, Like, hey, I know you're motivated by quality. Let me spend all available time to just get to a place where you look at every pixel you put down or every sound you record, and you just falling out of your chair about how good it is, and it can't really get any better.

11:48That's what motivates you, I know, and that's what we're gonna do together. That's what team leadership is all about. The difficult part of leadership of teams is always deciding that this is irredeemable, because you want people to have second, third, fourth, chances, but at some point you're like, well, okay, you're great, but you are hiring a stake, and I'm so sorry. At what stage do you force to hire B team players? I find it absolutely absurd that we think we can only continuously hire 18 players. 18 players by definition are exceptions. And you can for the first 50. Maybe a hundred, I still learnt things over the hundred.

12:20But when you are the size of a firm, you know, it's impossible to only have 18 players. When are you forced to hire B team? How do you think about that? I think at any given time you're hiring the story about knowing the letter grade of every person you hire in your company, whether it's 2000 people like a farm, but that's just silly. Like, you don't know. People are these days coached and trained and fine -tuned to be exceptional in a Vue East. And so somebody coming in and telling you their life story, like, you know they have watched probably an interview. You conducted with someone who's a professional interviewer who spelled out what it looks like when you're hiring an A player.

12:58You know, someone's giving that, hmm, extreme personality. It's very important. Next, left hand said, so, how do I give myself more extreme? what I need. And so I don't think you can really judge ape or be overall grade at hiring time. I think you can assess someone's coding ability, but a really, really good assessment test requires a take home because like you can implement quicksort on camera very quickly, but so can a see player these days. And so you have to give people a lot of time and giving people a lot of time, they will inevitably stray from the rules of whatever the test is. So anyway, the point is you can filter out C players, you can definitely filter out D players.

13:37Differentiation between V and A is what happens once you brought them in. You're like, oh my god, that is a brilliant hire. And more often than that, you say, I thought there's going to be a great hire. It's a good hire. Like, I'm happy. I'm happy we have them. And the question there is, what do you do to get the absolute best work from this person? And will they have the Steve Jobs quote, A players, higher A players, D players, high C players is profoundly true. There should be an asterisk explaining why this is true. And reason for it is fear. A players love working with other A players because they know the demands of the job and the team dynamics just make them better.

14:13So you want to have people who challenge you and tell you, hey, I know you're an A player, but that just wasn't good. Let's go redo this together or you go redo it, whatever. So A players just want to escalate away or accelerate away from the pack. B players frequently say, look, I'm a worker B and I know I'm out on a player and that's okay, I'm just going to grind out good, code, art, sound, whatever. But some of them are fearful and say, well, if I have too many B players around and let alone A players, I will look terrible. It will be very obvious that I'm just not that good. There are people here who are a lot better than me.

14:47So the way to fix this is for me to become a manager and for me to hire a bunch of people who aren't very good at all, like much worse than me. And then I'll look like that, tell this mushroom, and that'll be great. And so that is the real danger of V -Players. Like having people who are perfectly willing to do good work, day in and day out, is not the worst thing in the world. There's plenty of things that A -Players will turn their notes from because it's just not that challenging. It's not accelerating them out of the A -Pack. And these are very, very good for that. And a lot of D -Players over time grind their way to being A -Players, so you're investing in their future, and they know it, so that's also positive.

15:22But be players who have fear of being found out are the ones that you have to watch out for. In terms of the actions that they take, I loved this statement. You said, you said, we take calculated risks, do the calculating. And what I wanted to ask that was, when you review the journey, what was the biggest calculated risks that you took? And success or fail, what did you learn from it? When I started the company, I said down to the bunch of bankers and said, that hey, I'm gonna start a company where I'm going to do away with this imbalance. I'm going to eliminate fine print. So consumers do not have to read fine print of, you know, to find out what the business model is.

16:00And so many others for ideas like this, several of them, including some very well -known people whose names will not be reeled, laughed at me. And so like you're insane. Like this is not just like the way you make money in this industry is the way you make money. It's the only way. competed down to the only money you have is in the form of things that the customer doesn't understand because everything else has been wiggled out. And I said, you know, I don't think so. And I don't actually have a full model in Excel or in my head or a paper proving that I'm right. So this was a not a calculated risk.

16:35But I think it's not really worth running a company that fits neatly into the mold of screw the customer makes a money. Like, I want to run the one that says, never screw the customer, let's see if we can make some money. And like at this point, we're public or our financials are visible. We do very well financially. And so it was totally possible, but this was a non -calculate risk at the very beginning of the mission that I just sort of decided, like we're gonna do it. And so the calculus of the first bet was like not a calculus at all. It was just like, ah, I think it's gonna work, but I'm okay finding out that I'm wrong.

17:06Well, highly calculated risk did not work out. why your process was right, but the outcome was wrong. We have a whole culture of post -mortems at a firm where we record every decision we make, especially, I'll give you a very retail one, and now that I said post -mortem, post -mortem culture comes from engineering, and obviously I'm an engineer by training and past, and so it's easy to reason in those terms. But years ago, we had decided to very rationally scale our infrastructure because we expected a giant launch with just a crazy amount of transactions and it was all going to be 10x bigger than what we were at the time.

17:42And so we were prepping at breakneck pace and scaled up every part of our back end in front and then our front end in front and everything, everything. And then the day off, it just fell apart massively because we basically overloaded our back end with our front end. And so we were all dressed up with no place to go. And the entire database data layer of a firm was just in shambles for several hours while we were cleaning it up. But it really was a self -inflicted one where we were like, well, we would just don't know how big it's going to be. So let's assume it was going to be super huge. It was very modestly sized at lunch and turned out to be just a giant stuff.

18:21What do you not do the calculating? This was not an on -forcible error. Someone should have said down and said, all right, so we're scaling the frontier faster than we're scaling the back tier. At some point, given the architecture of the system, you will have what's called an over -subscription of front end connections to the back end and the back end will start choking because even a friend doesn't do anything just to hold these connections expensive. If you have a 10x mismatch, you're going to bring that in the database, and that is what happened. So someone should have done that work. That would have been a calculate risk that did not have backfired, but this time it did.

18:51You mentioned the post -mortem culture there. People always say you learn so much from your failures. Do you learn more from your successes or from your failures, Max? Fairly, for sure. It's boring to analyze success. Like, well, we did well. It's good. I'm tired. I'm going to go to sleep is kind of the natural like your oxytocin is. Do you know what the thing that you can actually learn the same thing? We just don't analyze success because it's successful. It's like, yeah, move on. And actually, if we analyze why you were successful, it's because we actually were really thoughtful about, you know, um, CAC over time.

19:22The problem is that with successes, the texture of each individual decision is much harder to detect. If you look at the world as a funnel analysis, which is a really good way of thinking about a lot of things, You start over here, become aware of a thing, start thinking about it, start considering it, start deciding, deciding, succeeding or failing. There's a real kind of a blur between the first five steps. And this is true of web apps and checkout funnels and advertising and all kinds of other things. If everything has gone pretty well, there's a lot of effort that has to go into like, all right, well, that step to this step of the funnel, the conversion rate was 95 % and the next one was 95 % and the next one was 95%.

20:00Well, which one did the best? I don't know, they all seem like 95 % it's pretty good. Now, you should ask the question, what could it have been 96? Like, why didn't we do better? And so you're inevitably asking the question in terms of failure again. You're not really saying how were we so good and smart that 95 was, you know, that's really high? It's really good. Should we have done 94 without a bit enough? Like those questions are kind of boring and pointless to ask. I really believe in asking the question in terms of what should we have done better, even if it's the most successful thing ever.

20:30It's nice to take a victory lap and to reply five to the team, but ultimately the question has to be, like this is the, uh, of a friend who grew up in a very managed parenting environment where his parents would ask him when he showed up home from school with a 98 % result in a test, like what happened to the other two percent? And, uh, you know, I'm not sure it's a great way to have a childhood, but it's a great way to run a company. Can I ask you if I'm a founder listening to this and I'm going, well, I really want to have a post -mortem centric culture, But I didn't really know how to do that like as of today implementing that.

20:59What advice would you give to me on how to implement and start a post -mortem centric culture? So for everything, create a document space. So every time we have a blip for whatever definition of in our systems or in our processes or in our models, anything, a separate conversation is carved off on Slack. A separate conversation is documented in a Google doc or a notion or any whatever tool we're using for this topic, but it segregates. It's very difficult to peel away details having to do with event one if you're comingly at with event two. And so first sort of most important thing is make sure you have separation of data streams.

21:44Because if you get good at post -mortem culture, you will gather a lot of data and a lot of it will be irrelevant. Like people will say, well, Well, this also happened at the same time. I see it in the logs, like something just went down and it was like, no, that's unrelated. This was because of whatever or something else. And so you want your data plentiful. You want as much of it segregated into a separate pipeline of raw content as soon as possible. You want preservation of this information in a special place. You want someone responsible for writing it up and distilling it from pages and pages of kind of raw data into a, essentially a white paper, and then you want the entire team to go and comment on it.

22:23And the most important thing you can do about the entire process is you have to completely separate any form of apologizing, responsibility taking, you know, we should do better next time, like, you have to be clinical about it. Like, this happened, it wasn't good. Here's why. You have to give people who were feeling directly responsible for the flop, whatever the flop was, to feel very free to comment on what happened. Like you need to encourage them to speak to the fact that they screwed up yet without any sense of like, well, I need to make myself look better, I need to create a cast of certain lights on decisions that I made.

23:00Like just get rid of all emotion exactly describe what happened. Do we have a structured time for these post mortems? This is like, hey, we have a weekly post more and more on what happened last week. How do we make sure that we don't just go? Yeah, it's a really nice idea. And then actually not do it. You have to give people responsibility to do them. You have to have a very direct responsible individual for authoring and presenting the postmortem. That's very important. You need to make sure their manager knows that their list of responsibilities has now been enhanced by this postmortem and they're on a hook for it.

23:28We typically try to say, hey, it's a week, maybe two weeks. Like, that's the most you're allowed to take to generate a real postmortem. And then there is a weekly review that takes place within the teams that are postmorteming something basically going through like, hey, this happened, the post -mortem has been prepared. And then someone even more senior will say, that's a reasonable explanation. I buy it. Or like, you know, this is not quite deep enough. Like, we need a better analysis of what down or I don't actually think these are accurate. And this is where you need your E -players in the room because they will have the experience in the intuition and sort of past knowledge of how these things go to kind of say that that's a deep enough post -mortem or this is just like you describe what happened but he didn't explain it.

Read the full transcript

24:11Outcome. Well, highly differentiated in opinions. These days, the ones that I see are very matter of fact. It is never about the individual. It's always about the events. Always come down to a this happened. This choice was made either by a program or a human. And if it's a program, it's a bug or a poorly calculated outcome. If it's a human, it can be a judgment error. Like I thought I would flip this switch and a lights would go on. It turned out to disable power for the entire city. That's a conversation we've had here, but it's never controversial. It's in the past. We need to do better What do you do?

24:44Like you add a big garden to switch that says before you're gonna turn off the lights for the entire city Please read this to a two -line warning and speaking of kind of the decisions that lead to the post -mortems You said before make reversible decisions fast and it kind of makes me think of the one -way two -way doors Honestly, I think everything's really a one -way door I mean there are very very few things that are two -way doors. How do you respond and think about that? I don't agree. Things to change your reputation, things that change relationships with partners, decisions that do that sort of thing are basically irreversible once you.

25:18But do you think so? Like, when you look at, I always use this in these examples. When you look at the transience of news and reputations, you know, Chimath on all in said about the, you know, Uighurs and they're being below his line. A week later, he was number one on Spotify and Schemaath is Schemaath and honestly it has not impacted his reputation one bit. There are probably some people who would disagree with you on that topic. I don't know exactly who they are but I think we can guess. But I agree that superficial statements, even explosive or incendiary even fall off the newsline faster than you would expect them to.

25:56I think people of reputations recover and get managed and manipulated and maybe it's true for companies to, but I think rational people have long memories and do not forget are not easily persuaded by Spotify, top 10 or whatever is the front page of the Wall Street Journal today. The decisions that are probably I care about a lot more are architectural decisions. You can decide to invest a year into rebuilding your systems in some new fashion and if that's a bad decision, you're going to look back and say, well, we're too far in. of the terrible call, but you know, it's just, you know, it's so far and like, what do we, we can't just uproot this.

26:32Somebody be able to be upset, or you agree to a deal that is economically non -viable and you have, you're staring at a giant black hole and you want to get out of it, but you sign the contract and you can't. And it may be it's like not that much money, so you don't care, but sometimes it can be a lot. So I believe in one way, Dors. And part of the post -mortem culture is all about identifying one way, Dors, that you thought were two way, Dors, and saying we shouldn't have done that because that turned to be not a thing we could easily come back from. I agree that a lot of decisions that seem like one way doors are not.

27:02That's probably a very fair statement. Is there a decision that you thought was really reversible? Make it fast and it turned out not to be so reversible? I think for every 10 of the ones that I thought were not reversible, only one, maybe two, were irreversible. The evilsus had something that I love, which is, care about how we make things, mind the quality of the invisible parts. I really like that and I love Fido, he's bound on it. Yeah, that's another reference to Steve Jobs. He was obviously such a brilliant product guy. And I aspire to be a good product guy myself. I think the notion of, so it's an oft repeated story where they signed the insides of the motherboard on I think the first Mac or something like that.

27:44And so the team put their signature on it and the narrative around it was, if you built something beautiful and amazing, you don't mind, in fact, you take pride in signing the insides because if anyone ever looks, they will be blown away by just how beautifully the whole thing is designed and so that's where you want your artist signature. There's definitely a natural and very healthy tension between shipping fast and building things beautifully and building things beautifully requires design and time and consideration of what the next version would look like so you don't have to rebuild from scratch.

28:14There's not a hard and fast rule to know what matters so much that you want to do a great job. And therefore, you will always have a team cleaning up or refactoring code or dealing with tech debt like that. That's a property of every startup that's been a startup for a decade. But there are parts that are obviously going to be important and valuable and could be as simple as some basic UI decision or something as complicated as a machine learning model that deals with credit underwriting, which is one of our crown jewel type achievements. We have some very, very advanced ones. Those things, you know, matter.

28:53You know you cannot let them be anything but the absolute best you can possibly produce. When somebody tells me we're doing X and it's going to be a month late, my natural reaction is to jump out from my chair like, you know, how can it possibly, how dare you be so late with this thing like, why can't we ship it yesterday? I absolutely make exceptions for things that I know are going to be crucial for months and years to come. That's where you have to mind the quality of the invisible parts. A lot of times these are in the back end, be it credit or scalability or, you know, infer, etc. It doesn't make me, doesn't make it any easier to cope with to hear someone say it's slipped by a month because we found something that has to be redone.

29:28But you know it's important and you sort of try to try to cope. How do you feel about the concept of like the lean start up and MVP ship? My name's Rhett, just like the first thing you can get into customer's handship, does that lead to a generation of shit, software, or is it actually a great way to get customer feedback? I think there are definitely things that you want in hands of the customers quickly to possibly can. We have a prototyping team at a firm that is trusted, slash, empowered to ship stuff that is not really beautiful or production quality even to get customer feedback because it's really important to find out if something, it's an crazy idea that we have has any sort of odds of success.

30:10Once it's out there and you get data and you think the data tells you that this is great, you don't just say cool, let's leave it out there and go to the next one. We basically pull down the feature, pull down the product and say, okay, now we're going to do right. We're going to make it scalable. We're going to make it beautiful. We're going to make sure that it actually stands a test of time. The idea of finding out of the idea was really important, but if you believe that ideas speak for themselves so much that it can be garbage, you will end up with a collection of garbage and generational garbage software.

30:38And you just have to know when the moment is to say actually that really does have traction. Someone will build a better version of this if I don't do it myself. And that's what you have to do now. Do you think speed is the most important to top of an S6Sas and startups? It's one of the most important. It's very rare that I cannot think of more than like fewer than a handful of companies who had gotten to huge success, huge scale by just kind of rolling along. I'm sure I don't know the inside story and what seems to me like rolling along is probably not rolling along. In fact, they were probably feeling like it's a breakneck pace on the inside.

31:14They just didn't show it very well. There's some founders and some CEOs who have the duck foot property where they're like plastic above water and the feeder going at crazy pace below water. I am not one of those. You can always tell if I'm trying to go faster from the feed up. But there are people who are capable of maintaining composer and maybe their teams are composing themselves to. That's interesting. You said we are a writing culture. Favour short, pithy, one pages to novels or live -rants? I personally like a live -rant being born a micro -friend in my hand as you kindly suggested. What does a writing culture truly mean to you Max?

31:50And why do you think it's optimal? So it feeds back into that notion of post -mortem straight. If you have a depository and we literally have a post -mortem depot where people can go and review every major or minor thing we did going back to the beginning of a firm time and learn from it. It's really valuable. We have a library of case studies that are internal to the company saying, well, that was a screw up. The great knowledge of XYZ. What happened there? Oh, we managed to overload the back end with a front end and so on. So it's just very valuable to have these things not in a form of oral tradition, but like written down.

32:26And then to do that well, you have to have writing culture where people are typing up random words that come into their mouth and are in their minds and basically say, all right, well, read this, make sense in my head, but maybe you'll make sense of it too. So you have to have some baseline quality requirement for writing and basically the most important thing about technical writing and business writing. is simplicity. Like if you're reading a 12 -page thing describing a feature, you're probably gonna miss details. And so if it's a feature that's meant to be confined to like 25 by 25 pixels, the description should be two pages, maybe three.

33:03You should not have many, many, many pages of prose describing the impact on the world you expect to have and have this relates to World Hunger, et cetera. Pithy is important. Liver ants are good as motivation sometimes. they're good at sort of aligning the team around a story and a strategy that the story represents. In my experience, and I host an all -hands -meeting at least once every two weeks, more often than that, usually you end up saying 12 things and people remember two. So the short of the better, like just being short and pithy is way more valuable, even spoken. But in writing, people just run out of time, way of distractions, notifications are popping up, like you have a 12 -page to read and like, oh man.

33:46And some people are very good at focusing, but I think majority of people are less focused than they'd like to be and less focused than they think they are. My seat back in the office now. It's quite hybrid and it really depends on the geo. So we have offices now worldwide. And by offices, I mean places because some places do not have an office. Our world headquarters notionally is still San Francisco. So that's where I'll be today. And I think it'll be on the order of half full, maybe a little more than half full. Our other coast office in New York will have San Eruon Lee. There will be not enough seats, not enough cubby holes to hide in because people will be there in such quantities.

34:21And everything in between is not true that we are fully back. We have not seen you like to be fully back if you could. Every CEO I speak to says, I wish we were fully back or we are fully back. I think there's a ton of value in being fully back. Again, like everything else, this texture to this value. If you have a sea level team, one way of pushing them into B level is you make sure they all sit together and are surrounded by A players who are constantly telling them, like, hey, go better, do more. If you have a great team, some people are actually more productive when they are able to cut out all distractions.

34:57And so they can hide themselves in their spare bedroom and just write code for 12 hours or design product for 12 hours or whatever it is. And so I care a lot more about output and productivity that I care about where you are physically, but the thing that I'm completely not compromising about, there has to be enough together time. And so the notion of everybody back in the office, even if all of your meetings are in Zoom because you're talking to our team in Madrid from San Francisco, it's hard to make that argument. It's just not a very productive use of commute time. If you live in these bay and you need to get in barred and you ride across and you get to the office and you get into a cubby hole and then you're in Zoom for 12 hours or 5 hours or six hours, whatever it is, it's hard to make the argument that you should have been in that bar train coming in and coming back.

35:39The argument of, I've never met my team, but I'm as productive in person. I only see them on Zoom is a stupid argument that's just not true. Like you form relationships, you understand each other's decision making style, you break bread together, you form camaraderie, that has to happen. Like that, that is entirely non -optional. And I think everyone who's saying I can be fully remote and these people don't ever have to meet person is getting themselves. What was Moral lowest in the company and what did you learn about leadership from that period? We had to do a layoff two years ago. That was Moral lowest point for me and I think everyone around me.

36:14And those are never easy and I've had to do more than one in my life and every time it doesn't get any easier, it's always brutal and no matter how... Did you learn anything about messaging from the first time taken to the second time? Very first time I had to do it was certainly not a firm, which, and every time I have done it, I said I hope to never do it again. But the very first time I did it, I didn't know what I was doing, and I was terrified of owning the responsibility that I screwed up. I was the CEO every single time I had to do a layoff, and the first time you feel like everyone's gonna blame me, it's my fault.

36:49I just want to run and hide. This is terrible. I have to go through with this, but I can't wait for the moment to be over for the day to be over. I just need to like not be here. Actually a good friend of mine who was at the time and exec that company took me aside and said, hey, this sucks for all of us. You are the leader. Like you have to be out there helping people pack their boxes. Like you have to be part of the goodbye. This is not a death sentence. It's a professional event. It sucks. No, no less than any other really major trauma. But you can play this from the comfort of your office or in the middle of the floor that's crying and like go be with the people, it'll feel better in the end, and they will feel better in the end.

37:28And so that's what I did. It was sort of between cathartic and therapeutic and that was a really important lesson to learn. You cannot hide from the grief that a layoff is. And then the other thing that I learned over the years of watching my friends have, you know, having to do it and certainly having to do it a couple times myself. Empathy is really important. The other thing is that you will find if people actually, If you've built a great culture, this isn't the thing you can fix in the moment. But if the culture of the company is great, the blow is much softer than you think it'll be. Because people understand that you had tried with every possible strategic or tactical idea to not have to go through this.

38:07And so this is the decision, this is the last decision of a long list that you could have taken. And they are inevitably more understanding and less hard on you than you are on yourself. Like one of the more amazing and sort of emotional events for me of the Affirmale off a couple years ago now was every single person I talked to it said Hey, I get it this happened we grew too fast we over hired I understand I even understand why me and not the next person I hope there's an opportunity to come back I really love this place I want to come back is over hiring and calculated risk yes it's certainly yes that's a good answer in retrospect to your question about Calculate Risks that did not pan out.

38:47You decide that you want every incremental engineer to build more features while the fundraising is good and then suddenly it's not and what do you do and there's nothing you can do other than to say, so sorry, but some of you cannot have a seat anywhere. And so the theory was, hey, the features will pay off and that will return cash good and it didn't or it was like, hey, we will have a continuous cash tap of fundraising that didn't The analysis is typically about how fast something will grow, how well you can have the market protect your cash flow. If it doesn't, how profitable something will be, it's roughly what you said, but the calculus is a little bit more complicated.

39:27You're typically estimating more than a few variables. One of my favorite internal lines at a firm is a firm is a constant multivariate analysis problem solving. Like it's very rare. It's like, well, that thing, do we think it's five or is it 10, or is it going to be 500? Like, those are very easy to estimate. It's like, well, we have nine variables and they're all non -linearly distributed. And some of them multiply with the others and some of the other ones we don't really know how they relate to the first pack. Or we're going to have to estimate all of them and predict the outcome based on that.

39:55And so it's our problem to solve, not just for a firm, but for any company. You're inevitably evaluating a bunch of variables concurrently. Man, as you said about growth there, I ask you a blunt one. Is Clona growing false than the thumb? And how do you think about that in terms of Clona's US expansion? I think they announced that they grew 32 % last quarter. I think we announced that we grew 35%. In the last few quarters, and their numbers aren't public. They're about to go public, so it's, it will be a little bit easier to track their numbers, I think, for all involved. But for the last several quarters from estimates, that we have been taking share in the market against all competitors, not just them.

40:37That's a good sign for us. We offer more services though. Majority of our competitors specialize in paying for or something very, very specific. We made the decision from day one to provide every possible service from the 45 day super short term loan all the way out to four years. Very, very few people do everything. And so it should be a natural consequence of our ability to serve all that we would take this proportionate share. The answer to the market is pretty well done. Is that the size of the market? Is that the not grabbing the opportunity from your side? How do you analyze that? Because it's a big toss to go off the US market from Sweden and all places.

41:15Respectfully. How do you think that is? That like fuck we dropped a ball? Or like fuck it to massive market? You're asking me to analyze their strategy? That's a post -mortem they will have to write for themselves. I'm not sure I'm qualified. I don't have all the information. I think it's very healthy incidentally for CEOs of startups to spend very, very little time on other people's strategy. The competitive analysis is valuable at the product level and sales strategy level and sort of like, what do they do that we could do better? Is it really a question to ask? What is their strategy is like asking what whether we'll be 12 movies for that.

41:53No, because they say, hey, they've been really smart in this part of I go to market or that partnership. We do lots of that. Like we tear down all competitor products, all their sales products, sales efforts, like everything we can get our hands on, we learn from because it's free. Like someone is making mistakes for us, we should learn on those two. Is regulation a front end of buy now, pay lacer, or an inhibitor to growth? I think we're always on the record as pro thoughtful regulation. I think you should be paying any late fees, but late fee cap, I was very happy about because I think that's a good development.

42:24People should not be building their profit models based on, I'll just raise the amount of late fee. Do you like being a public company, see? Uh, some days, yes. Other days, no. I think it's a day to - One of the days where you're like, yes, and one of the days where you're like, no. Days when it's yes is when it's not very different from being a private company, see, yo. But being a public company, generally speaking, gives you access to more capital, exposes you to really smart investors you can engage with. So there's lots of things to like. There's some investors out there that will only invest in public equities and they are brilliant people.

42:57Like they've seen it all before. They could write books about what a great public CEO looks like. And you want to go spend a half an hour with them and ask them teach me how to be as good as blank. If you're a private company CEO, they might take your meeting, but they're probably busy. If you're a public company CEO, they might own your stock. And then they want to talk to you because they want to assess you as much as they want to help you. And so that's an cheat code to access some of the best brains out there. The days where you're like, oh man, is inevitably when you're like, well, I now have to go read this filing that we have to make because it's part of my responsibilities to make sure I understand everything we're putting out there in the public and can't avoid that.

43:31And those are small prices to pay, but you do have that responsibilities that were not what you thought you'd be getting into when you were getting computer science degree. Is your mentality tied to the market cap of the company? It's so difficult to detach yourself from the valuation of your company. What's been your biggest lessons on that? The short answer is, I'm sure it is, but I'm sure I put an enormous amount of effort into making sure it's not. And so it's a balance here constantly trying to strike where the thing that is hard, harder is when you think you're doing a fantastic job and you can look at the internal numbers and you look at the external numbers you're like, I am absolutely crushing it.

44:11And so sometimes it's very tempting to say, well, by now the market should know and they should just give us high marks and that means the stock goes green, green, green. And more often than not, you have a temporal mismatch where you're doing great, you know you're doing great, and the market thinks you're not. And if you're a startup or fairly high volatility stock, you end up with, well, I did great. Why am I getting punished? And the short answer is it's the market. Like you just don't get to tell it to react to good news or bad news and how. So the more you sort of convince yourself that in the end, there's a great, I think it's attributed to Warren Buffett, but it's actually from Graham, his mentor.

44:48In the short term, the market is a voting machine. In a long term, it's a weighing machine. I take great comfort in saying this to myself whenever the market, I think, Ms. Judge is me. But I also, I've gone through some great links, by the way, to make sure I don't accidentally stumble on my ticker. So my Apple desktop, if I click the top right corner and stock drops down, I cannot see my stock ticker. So I don't accidentally discover that today's a red day or a green day just to make sure I stay focused. You have to think long -term. If you are catching yourself thinking short -term and by short -term, I mean, let's have an amazing quarter and you're in trouble.

45:27Do you see a dip in employee morale that went stock right out? I don't, but I think I make it my business every time I talk to our outcomes as a company. I take great pains not to talk about the price of the stock. The only time I talked about the price of our stock to our employees at length when it was flying very high after the IPO and it's really the head -e -days of 21, I'd actually repeatedly said, look, do not get accustomed to whatever numbers you're reading on the screen today. Like, we will not know what this company's worth for years. Just like, if you think it's too low, good for you, if you think it's too high, it may well be.

46:03Just do not look, do not get conviction that this is actually correlated to some tangible metric. Like, first we have to get profitable, then we have to show revenue growth rates, then we have to show net income growth. And that's what, you know, long term, the weighing machine, that's what that weighs. It's not weighing sentiment. It should not be weighing sentiment. Max, we're going to do a quick fire on. So I say a short statement. You give me your immediate thoughts. Does that sound okay? Sure, but sometimes I will take a very long time. He'll have to edit out the awkward silence as the choice of podcasting.

46:38What do you believe that most around you disbelieve? Have this conviction that I can learn anything very, very quickly and eat at a 10 time, right? And two at a 10 time, I'm completely wrong. I decided two years ago that I was just going to read the attention paper and become an expert in LLM's, to read all the papers after that. And I'm still in a process of getting anywhere near expertly status. I try to keep up. It's a lot of really interesting stuff happening in the AI. I just have Mark Batty on the show about 12 hours ago and he said we're getting to the upper limit of LLM efficiency. Agree or disagree?

47:11Agree. But I don't think we are going to stay with LLMs forever. I think we're going to expand the systems that use LLMs. Reasoning models already are not pure LLMs. They have some iterative processes within them. I think we'll invent more really interesting things with that. Light what? And obvious idea, which I know has been explored and will be explored more is a notion of multiple competing LLMs basically debating each other for the right answer. Like that's not a pure LLM model. You can amplify intelligence of humans by having three smart people in a room instead of just one person. As a public company CEO, do you have to have an AI story today?

47:49I generally really dislike stories that have no substance. So I think you have to ask yourself, are we taking full advantage of the best available tools and the most interesting available tools right now are AI. So if you sort of look through your closet and say, hmm, when I'm really using any of this stuff, I got to have a story for the market. You're doing two things wrong. You're telling a story that isn't true and you're not using the most interesting available tools. If you're using the most interesting available tools, your investors might be happy if you told the story. But if you didn't, I don't think they should really care that much.

48:20As you go public, a lot of this becomes, are you growing at the right scale? Are you taking appropriate risks? Are you managing to profitability? The storytelling hour of like, oh, by the way, we have this shiny item that we're so excited about that feeds the voting machine and I'm sure some of it is important, but I spent a lot more time feeding the weighing machine. Max, what would you do if you need couldn't fail? Basically do exactly the same thing I do now. So before a firm was a thing I made a list of difficult problems that I thought required solving. I decided that But financial services are money at the core is one that I am well suited to solve, just given my past experience that I bring.

49:00But if I knew I couldn't fail anything, I would revisit my list of hard problems and that inevitably had things like food, water, shelter, energy, just solve them all. If you could start a company with only one member of the PayPal mafia again, who would it be? Peter. Why? He's amazing. He's brilliant. More so than that Elon? Elon is brilliant too. If I could have a choice between starting a company with Peter or starting a company with Elon, be very hard choice to make. I think Peter is a more known quantity for me. That's why I answered the way I did. So we started the company together and Elon, Elon's company merged into PayPal to form the modern PayPal.

49:39So I know exactly what he's like under pressure and stressed out and trying to raise money and not succeeding for a time and dealing with personal life issues And so I've seen him go from mid -20s to older. And so the risk... How's he changed at the time? When you observe someone closely for a long time, you don't actually notice the change. You see the episodes, but you don't know how the person really changes. We've all grown up. We've all become probably more measured and slightly more careful, slightly less crazy. Maybe slightly more crazy. I don't know. He hasn't changed very much. The thing that makes Peter is, and by the way, actually very similar to Elon in that sense, so there's a really interesting echo between the two.

50:22They both have this amazing quality that I spent as much time absorbing as I could over times that I worked with them, where they bring out the best effort in people around them. They somehow make you feel that you can and should do better work. The conversation with Peter always left me thinking, the problem that I thought was really too hard to solve, I should go give it another try. Like, I think I can, I think this is actually doable. And he is genuinely excited about you solving this problem through the capacity that you have. And I think that's an amazing thing to work with someone on anything because they're just fueling your desire to stay late and do more work.

51:02What's your favorite consumer brand? And why them? I love Airbnb. Less so be caught. Like, the overall brand is amazing. and obviously it's a super successful company, but their tagline, at least the one they promoted for a while, was belong anywhere. I think it's such a profound, two -word brand statement. Like, you know exactly what it means, you know exactly what they stand for. It's evocative, you imagine yourself, and all kinds of crazy places, you're in a Himalayas or in the Amazon. And, you know, like that is an amazing story told with two words. Look back to my brevity, love of brevity.

51:34I think kind of the old world, They probably my favorite brand that I look at every morning. So I'm a huge fan of coffee and bicycles. Not at the same time, frequently, but sometimes at the same time. So every morning I roll out of bed, I stumble downstairs and make myself an espresso. My favorite espresso machine brand is La Marzoca. It's this, I don't actually know that much. They're an informed customer, so I have to fill this closure. But they were a huge favorite of mine long before I convinced them to give a firm a try. It tells this amazing story of Italian manufacturing and the someone with a moustache, smelling the coffee fumes, going, oh, this is perfect espresso.

52:14And it's this sort of a story and a cup that you just think it has to go hundreds and hundreds of years back. They must have been making coffee in Venice with mortar and pestle or something. I don't think it's nearly that old. I think it's maybe on the order of 60 to 100 years old, but it's just this timeless coffee awesomeness that I love. And I use it every day and every time I look at it, I can like, yes, yes, my coffee machine. I love it so much. You can be CEO of any other company for a day. What's company would you be CEO of? I have all these unfulfilled dreams of running a much smaller company that makes, which is, I spend my entire life making things out of bits.

52:52I would love to make things out of atoms. One of my favorite executives came up with a brand name for a company that would sell pickles. called lethal pickles. It has to do with the story in the very early days of a firm where I try to teach people how to make pickles because I love pickles soon. I managed to screw it up badly enough where they eventually turn toxic and grew mold and it was terrible and I was briefly trying to persuade people that it's fine. It's actually not a problem. You should eat them. Almost single -handedly wiped out the entire firm team, but unfortunately no one ate any and we threw them away.

53:25But the story of Max's lethal pickles survives in the annals of a firm, post -mortem history. Someone said, well, you should eventually go fulfill your dream of making things out of atoms and molecules in this case and sell pickles online called lethal pickles. So one day I'll start lethal pickles .com. I have the domain. We're going to name the show Matt says lethal pickles and say, have us. Final one for you. You're asked questions by employees, by investors, both private and public, by a lot of people every day journalists. What question are you never It just be nice to be awesome. It'd be interesting to be awesome.

54:02If you are a careful student of my Sherho the Letters, of which I have now written, it cannot possibly be 16, but I think it's 16 or 15. You will see that every single one of them contains a reference to the movie Big Lebowski. You have to look sometimes hard to find it, but no one's ever asked me what's with the Big Lebowski in your Sherho the other way. What is with the big Lebowski? I'm a huge fan of movies. When I was freshman in college, all I wanted to do is take computer science classes. And I came into my university thinking, I'm just going to take every possible computer science class and nothing else because everything else is stupid and boring and I just want to write code and I still love writing code.

54:44If I knew I couldn't fail, I'd solve the world's problems and then I would just write code from that point on for fun. But it turned out that you actually had to take some required courses so you couldn't just take computer science. So I took film study as like a, this will be easy, it'll be fun. I got to watch things that are actually like gems of movie making world, things like North by Northwest and like Hitchcock movies and all sorts of stuff that blows your mind. And if you don't know about it, you wouldn't watch it because these are old black and white movies, why would you care? Then you watch them and you're like, oh my god, like these are stories that have to be required viewing.

55:16So one of the movies I watched was Seven Samurai and it became like this obsession and where I've seen it over a hundred times. And no one asked me about that one either. But the silliest movie with yet a similarly profound kind of a cultural and at least to me, intellectual impact on me is the Big Lebowski. It's this comedy, tragedy, who done it, commentary on 1980s, the United States. It's like everything in two hours of cinema that if you haven't watched it, you should watch. And it is unbelievably funny. It's one of the funniest movies ever made. And somehow over the years, how do you interview talent?

55:52One of the things you can do is you can figure out if you share cultural artifacts at the time of the interview. And so when I was interviewing a good half of my management team I found out before our after I decided that they were the right ones. They were at huge fans of the Big Lebowski. And so the team that writes the letter with me is this group of people who lost the big Lebowski and we sort of made it our business of sticking Lebowski quotes into our shareholder election. I have one final one, P that I know you won't have been asked. I don't think you've been asked. But it's kind of a meaningful one.

56:22What about the way that your parents brought you up? Have you deliberately decided not to apply to the way that you bring your children up? That's a deep question. So I grew up in an academic family and for them, the notion of advanced degrees was the latter to climb. And so it was embarrassing that my mom never got a PhD to her mom, who was an exceptionally important influence in my life and my mom's life. And so this notion of the way you achieve in the world, the goal to set the ways to think about success and failure in life is measured through academic success. My grandmother has papers in the Harvard Library.

57:05She's long gone, but she was a Soviet scientist that managed to have her astronomy, me PGD thesis referenced in like dozens of academic papers in the United States. So she achieved the academic peak early in life and stayed there. And as she was very old and quite ill, she'd asked me, well, what about the PGD track? And I was just about to start my third company and I was like, you know, I'm going to get a bachelor's and basically because of you, otherwise I would have long dropped out and moved to a parallel time started a company already. It all worked out in the end. So I'm not complaining, but they grew up in a world where entrepreneurship was not a factor.

57:41So the union was not a place where entrepreneurship meant anything in those days. I would love for my kids to at least explore entrepreneurship and decide that it's important so telling them you must spend a decade on the school bench is counterintuitive to that. And so I never told them, you know, your story, grandmother with her multiple PhDs is just, you know, waiting for you to get your first advanced degree and keep going. And I felt very guilty about it. The day we took PayPal public, my mom asked me, well, will you finally move back to Chicago and get a PGD? And I was like, but this is not the response.

58:12Yet that is what I was brought up with. And it weighs on me and I don't want it weighing on my kids. Have you ever been asked that question before? I don't think so. Good try. I like it. It's a really revealing question. Max, did it so lovely to see you again. I so appreciate you doing this, opening up, being so brilliant. You are fantastic. And I just so appreciate the time. Thank you. You're always fun to talk to. Good to see you again.

59:01Customers just crossed a collective $8 billion in total revenue. Wow, second, Kajabi's users keep 100 % of their earnings with the average Kajabi creator bringing in over $30 ,000 per year. In case you didn't know, Kajabi is the leading creator commerce platform with an all -in -one suite of tools, including websites, email marketing, digital products, payment processing, and analytics for as low as $69 per month. Whether you are looking to build a private community, write a paid newsletter, or launch a course, Kajabi is the only platform that will enable you to build and grow your online business without taking a cut of your revenue.

59:3820 VC listeners can try Kajabi for free for 30 days by going to kajabi .com -4 -20VC. That's kajabi .com -k -a -j -a -b -i .com -4 -2 -0 -VC. And after building your online empire with Kajabi, it's time to scale your global team with remote seamless hiring solutions. So every business is a global business in 2025, but how do you do payroll for your global business and team and comply with international labor laws? Well, remote handles payroll, benefits, taxes, stock options and compliance to help companies of all sizes pay and manage full time and contract workers all over the world. No matter where your team lives or works, remote global employment solutions, keep your team, your finances, and your intellectual property secure.

1:00:25Remote never charges hidden fees, just best -in -class global employment solutions for a low flat rate. The world's top remote companies love remote. GitLab, the world's largest all -remote organization, trusts remote to run their global team. Remote is funded by index ventures, Sequoia Capital, and the host of the greatest podcast ever, Harry Stabbingson 20VC. Ready to learn more? Head over to remote .com forward slash 20VC, that's 2 -0VC, and begin hiring within minutes. Enjoy 10 % off your first three months by using the promo code 2 .0VC at checkout. Now that your team is up and running worldwide, make sure your finances work just as hard with Brex.

1:01:06The ultimate financial stat for startups. So when Brex was founded, it wasn't just about creating another financial product. It was about solving the really gritty challenges that founders face daily. Let's be honest, building something from the ground up is hard enough. Without dealing with clunky outdated banks, the pile on fees and leave your cash idle. Brexit is different, it's the financial stack that scales with you, no matter where you are in your journey, from corporate cards to maximising your runway, to earning yield on your cash. Brexit was designed with founders in mind to make every dollar go further, so you can focus on building.

1:01:38And here's what really stands out to me. Brexit combines the best of checking, treasury and FDIC insurance in one powerhouse account. You can send and receive money globally at lightning speed, earn yield from day one and still access your funds whenever you need. Plus, with 20X the standard protection through program banks, your cash is not just working harder, it's working safer too. It's no surprise that one in three venture back startups in the US, with companies like Anthropic, Coinbase and Robinhood, I mean my god these companies are incredible, trust Brex to help them grow. If you want to join the smartest startups on the planet, head over to Brax .com -thrash -start -ups and see what they can do for you.

1:02:18As always, we so appreciate all your support and stay tuned for an incredible 20 -product episode coming on Friday.

From the publisher

Max Levchin is one of the great founders and technologists of our time. As the Founder and CEO of Affirm, he has built am $18.7BN monster in the buy no pay later space. Prior to Affirm he was one of the original co-founders of PayPal. Max is also the co-founder and Chairman of Glow, a data-driven fertility company. Max is also an immensely successful angel investor with a portfolio including the likes of Yelp, Pinterest and Evernote. 

In Today’s Episode We Discuss:

04:19 How to Hire the Best People in the World

05:05 How to Manage Extreme Personalities

08:18 Biggest Lessons on Trust and What Happens When Lost

12:05 Is Grading Talent A and B Players Total BS?

15:31 How to Think About Calculated vs Uncalculated Risk

27:18 How to Create a Culture of Post Mortems: Step by Step

32:08 Why Every Person Must Write and How to Create a Writing Culture

36:01 Leadership Lessons from Layoffs

38:38 Is Affirm Losing or Beating Klarna in the US?

47:03 Peter Thiel or Elon Musk: Who Would Max Rather Start a New Company With?

48:37 Quickfire Round

 

More from The Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch

All 521 episodes
20VC: Affirm Max Levchin on Why Grading Talent by Letter (A or B) is Total BSThe Twenty Minute VC (20VC): Venture Capital | Startup Funding | The Pitch · 1 h 2 min
Listen in VO