In short
Demis Hassabis (DeepMind) discusses AGI timelines and definitions, AI scaling laws, compute/experimentation bottlenecks, missing capabilities (continual learning, long-horizon planning, consistency), open vs frontier models, post-LLM system design, AI safety and regulation, labor and inequality impacts, and energy needs—arguing AI could help science/medicine and even pay for its energy costs via efficiency gains.
Guest backgrounds
Demis Hassabis is co-founder and leader at DeepMind (Google). DeepMind research includes AlphaGo, reinforcement learning, and Transformers; he also references AlphaFold and the spinout Isomorphic Labs focused on drug discovery.
Key claims
AGI is a system matching all human cognitive capabilities; likely within ~5 years. Scaling returns remain substantial; plateauing is nuanced. Compute is the main bottleneck. Open models lag frontier by ~6 months. Safety needs international minimum standards, benchmarks (e.g., deception), and independent audits/certification.
Notable examples
AlphaGo, Transformers, AlphaFold; DeepMind’s Genie interactive world models; Isomorphic Labs’ drug design engine; grid/climate optimization and potential fusion/batteries/superconductors.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOAI Industry Breakthroughs
0:00 to 0:26
Discover the breakthroughs in AI and their impact on the industry.
“The returns are still very substantial, although they're a bit less than they were obviously at the start of all of this scaling.”
Understanding AGI
4:20 to 4:47
Demis discusses his perspective on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).
“You have now arrived at your destination.”
Bottlenecks in AI Development
4:47 to 6:03
Explore the biggest bottlenecks in AI today and the importance of compute.
“exhibits all the cognitive capabilities the human mind has.”
Scaling Laws and Model Performance
6:03 to 7:39
Demis reflects on scaling laws and their impact on model performance.
“What are the biggest bottlenecks when you look at where we are today?”
Challenges of Continuous Learning
7:39 to 8:31
Discuss the lack of continuous learning in AI systems and future directions.
“I think actually in most areas we are ahead of where I thought we would be.”
Advancements in DeepMind's Research
8:31 to 9:19
Learn about DeepMind’s recent advancements and organizational changes.
“And probably through things like sleep reinforcement learning.”
Future Directions for AI
9:19 to 11:12
Demis shares his thoughts on future breakthroughs and challenges in AI.
“Yeah, well, we made some organizational changes.”
The Role of LLMs in Future AGI
11:12 to 14:06
Explore the potential future of LLMs and their roles in AGI systems.
“at certain things when you pose the question in a certain way.”
Foundation Models and AGI
14:06 to 14:31
Exploring the future of AGI and the role of foundation models.
“But my betting is pretty strongly is we've seen how successful these foundation models have been.”
The Promise of AGI in Science and Medicine
14:31 to 15:03
Discussing the potential of AGI as a transformative tool for scientific discovery.
“I don't think it's going to get replaced.”
Show all 29 chapters
Drug Discovery and Regulatory Challenges
15:03 to 16:08
How AI can revolutionize drug design and clinical trials.
“And so I'm hoping in five years plus time we'll be sort of entering a new golden era, golden age of scientific discovery.”
AI Safety and Misuse Concerns
16:08 to 17:52
Addressing the risks of AI misuse and the need for regulation.
“But I think the real revolution will come when a few, maybe a dozen or so AI drugs get through the whole process.”
Establishing Global Regulatory Standards
17:52 to 19:52
The importance of international cooperation for AI regulation.
“could help here in terms of making sure there's at least sort of minimum standards from all of the leading providers.”
Verification and Accountability in AI
19:52 to 21:06
How to ensure accountability and transparency in AI systems.
“And I kind of like independently check whether they are meeting the right standards.”
The Role of International Bodies in AI Safety
21:06 to 21:28
Proposing an international body for AI safety checks.
Labor Displacement and Job Creation
21:28 to 21:51
The impact of AI on job markets and the creation of new roles.
“You said that about science being one of the most exciting areas of 25 years of time.”
AGI's Impact Compared to the Industrial Revolution
21:51 to 23:16
How AGI might surpass the industrial revolution in speed and impact.
“How do you think about the labor displacement problem when you look at how truly capable these systems are?”
The Dichotomy of AI Hype
23:16 to 23:56
Balancing the hype around short-term AI capabilities versus long-term potential.
“And then I try and stop myself from being too useful and think I should be more wise.”
Wealth Redistribution in an AI-Driven Economy
23:56 to 24:52
Exploring methods to ensure equitable distribution of AI-driven productivity gains.
“So there's still that dichotomy even today with AI.”
Solving Energy Challenges from AI
24:52 to 26:10
How AI can help address energy demands and promote sustainability.
“We're working on that right with with with our partners at Commonwealth Fusion.”
The UK as a Hub for AI Talent
26:10 to 27:33
Discussing the advantages of the UK for AI development and innovation.
“Because if you have an incredible energy source like fusion, then you have effectively unlimited rocket fuel because you can just still catalyze seawater.”
The Future of European Tech Companies
27:33 to 28:03
The potential for European companies to achieve trillion-dollar valuations.
“And I felt that there was actually less competition here for that sort of talent.”
Deep Thinking and Originality in Tech
28:03 to 28:32
Explore the benefits of being distanced from tech fads for deep thinking.
“But I think it's very conducive to thinking deeply about things, being more original about how you think.”
Europe's Path to a Trillion Dollar Company
28:32 to 29:28
Discussing the potential and challenges for European tech companies.
“Will Europe have a trillion dollar company?”
Investment Challenges in European Tech
29:28 to 30:04
Understanding the lack of billion dollar funding for tech growth.
“I think we're brilliant at doing the startup idea and getting it to a certain level like we did with DeepMind.”
Meeting Elon Musk: A Personal Encounter
30:04 to 31:05
Demis shares his experience meeting Elon Musk for the first time.
“Okay, we're going to do a quick fire round.”
The Ambition to Cure Diseases
31:05 to 31:42
Discussion on the vision for curing major diseases through AI.
“Those are the ones we're focusing first, but eventually it should be applicable to every disease error.”
Philosophical Questions of AGI
31:42 to 32:18
Exploring the philosophical implications of AGI development.
“What are you thinking about that you're not reading about or seeing anyone talk about?”
Legacy and Advancements in Science
32:18 to 32:39
Demis expresses his desire to be remembered for benefiting humanity.
“Thomas, thank you so much for putting up with my meandering conversation.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Demis Hassabis:The returns are still very substantial, although they're a bit less than they were obviously at the start of all of this scaling. I would say about 90 % of the breakthroughs that underpin the modern AI industry were done either by Google Brain or Google Research or DeepMind. Those labs that have capability to invent new algorithmic ideas are going to start having bigger advantage over the next few years. The last set of ideas are sort of all the juices being wrung out of them. I sometimes quantify like AGI, the coming of AGI is like 10 times the industrial revolution at 10 times the speed.
0:33Harry Stebbings:This is 20BC with me, Harry Stebbings, and I'm so excited for the show today. I walked to this interview and I described it to my mother like this. We have amazing guests on the show, but very few honestly will be considered in the same realm as Newton, Turing, Einstein. Our guest today is one of the greatest minds on the planet, and I consider myself incredibly lucky to have had the chance to sit down with him and discuss what we did today. This is a truly special one, and one that I'll remember for a very long time. Enjoy the episode, and I so appreciate the time we had with a very special human being.
1:09Harry Stebbings:I'm thrilled to welcome Demis Osalbus at DeepMind. But before we dive into the show today, did you know the industry average for booking a business trip is 45 minutes? That's a massive waste of your team's time. Well, with Navan, your employees can book a trip in just seven on average. Navan is the AI-powered travel and expense platform designed for companies that value efficiency. It drives real business impact through high employee adoption and automated policy control. Now, the built-in AI approves in-policy bookings and blocks the rest automatically. This allows finance teams to stop chasing receipts and skip the month-end chaos, and you get this real-time visibility that can save your company up to 15 % on your travel budget.
1:50Harry Stebbings:And that's why leaders like Visa, Stripe, Figma, and even Anthropic rely on Navan these days. Go to navan.com forward slash 20VC today to see for yourself, and you'll get a chance to win two business-class flights anywhere in continental US. No purchase necessary, rules apply. head over to nivan.com forward slash 20VC now. Once nivan simplifies the travel, Airwallet simplifies the spend behind it. Founders, let's get real about the growth tax. You've raised VC funding and you're scaling globally, and it's no longer about shipping product. It's about orchestrating operations across continents. But suddenly, your payments and finance stack is choking your growth.
2:28Harry Stebbings:You're logging into lots of different banking portals, waiting days for transfers and reporting across entities. It's operational drag and it's at your scale. It's costing millions. That's why I'm so excited to partner with Airwallex. Airwallex are more than just a banking alternative to HSBC or Citi. Airwallex brings you an intelligent financial operating system that powers how global businesses operate and grow, allowing you to manage and automate banking, treasury, payments, and spend. The most exciting part for me, they're heavily investing in agentic finance. If you're scaling globally, you need a banking and finance platform that's borderless, real-time and intelligent.
3:04Harry Stebbings:Check out Airwallex today and see how they're helping thousands of businesses like Canva, McLaren and Deal. Scale at airwallex.com forward slash 20VC. Terms and conditions apply. Your monies are safeguarded, not FSCS protected. See airwallex.com for more details. While Airwallex helps your money move globally, Vanta helps your security keep up. Security and compliance done wrong is a giant headache. Security and compliance done right though Well, that's Vanta. Vanta helps you earn trust and speed up growth. No spreadsheets required. For startups low on time and resources, Vanta becomes your first security hire, using AI and automation to get you compliant, fast, and unblock really big deals.
3:46Harry Stebbings:And if you're big enterprises, Vanta is your AI-powered hub for compliance and risk, bringing together data from across your business and automating workflows so you can prove trust at any moment. Vanta scales with you at every stage. That's why top companies from startups like Cursor to enterprises like Snowflake choose Vanta. Do security and compliance right. My listeners can get$1 ,000 off Vanta by going to vanta.com forward slash 20VC. That's vanta.com forward slash 20VC for$1 ,000 off Vanta.
4:20Demis Hassabis:You have now arrived at your destination. Demis, I'm so excited to be doing this.
4:25Harry Stebbings:Thank you so much for joining me today. Great to be here. Now, there are many places that we could have stopped, but I was watching actually the documentary that you did, which was fantastic. And I actually wanted to start on AGI. Definitions are very varying. You've been very thoughtful about what it means to you. And so I wanted to start. Can you explain to me how you think about it today? So we get that as a kind of ground center.
4:46Demis Hassabis:Yeah, we've been very consistent how we define AGI as basically a system that exhibits all the cognitive capabilities the human mind has. And that's important because the brain is the only existence proof we have that we know of in maybe in the universe, that general intelligence is possible. So that for me is the bar for what AGI should be. It's the worst question.
5:06Harry Stebbings:How close are we? Everyone says different things. And it's very difficult when you have very prominent figures saying it could be as early as 2026, 2027.
5:16Demis Hassabis:Yeah. I mean, I think, look, I've got a probability distribution around the timings, but I would say there's a very good chance of it being within the next five years. So that's not long at all. Is that closer than you thought? Has that changed over time? Not really. I mean, actually, when you, when you, it's funny, my co-founder, Shane Legg, who's chief scientist here, when we started out DeepMind back in 2010, he used to write blog posts sort of predicting about when AGI would happen. And bearing in mind in 2010, when we started, almost nobody was working in AI and everyone thought AI basically didn't work.
5:47Harry Stebbings:No one was reading the blog post.
5:49Demis Hassabis:No, but they're still there on the Internet for people to check. And we used to do this extrapolation of compute and algorithmic progress. And basically, we predicted around 20 years it would take from when we started out. And I think we're pretty much on track.
6:02Harry Stebbings:What are the biggest bottlenecks when you look today in the documentary that you just never have enough compute? What are the biggest bottlenecks when you look at where we are today?
6:11Demis Hassabis:I think compute is the big one, not just for the obvious reason of scaling up your ideas and your systems as the scaling laws, as they're called, keeping on building bigger and bigger architectures with more and more parameters. And as you do that, you get more intelligent systems. But the other thing you need a lot of compute for is for doing experiments. The computers, the cloud is our workbench, basically. So if you have a new idea, a new algorithmic idea, but you want to test it, you kind of got to test it at a reasonable scale. Otherwise, it won't hold when you actually put it into the main system.
6:44Demis Hassabis:So you need quite a lot of compute if you have a lot of researchers with lots of new ideas. You mentioned the word scaling laws.
6:50Harry Stebbings:A lot of people suggest that we're hitting scaling laws and we're starting to see that plateauing effect.
6:55Demis Hassabis:Do you think that's true? No, I don't think so. I think it's a bit more nuanced than that. So, of course, when the leading companies all started building these large language models, you're getting enormous jumps with each generation of new system. You know, maybe they're almost like doubling in performance. At some point, that had to slow down. So it's not kind of continuing to be exponential. But that doesn't mean there isn't great returns still for scaling the existing, you know, systems up further. So we and the other frontier labs are getting a lot of great returns on that kind of compute expansion.
7:27Demis Hassabis:So I would say the returns are kind of still very substantial, although they're a bit less than they were, obviously, at the start of all of this scaling.
7:36Harry Stebbings:Where are we behind where you thought we'd be?
7:39Demis Hassabis:I think actually in most areas we are ahead of where I thought we would be. If you think about things like the video models or even now with our newest systems like Genie, they're interactive world models, which I think is kind of incredible if you sort of step back and think about it. I think if you'd shown me that five, 10 years ago, I would have been pretty amazed. So I think in most domains, we are ahead of where the field thought. There's still some big things missing, though, like continual learning. These systems don't learn after you finish training them, after you put them out into the world.
8:11Demis Hassabis:You know, they're not very good at learning further things. And I think some critical capabilities are missing. Why is that?
8:16Harry Stebbings:I'm sorry to ask blunt and basic questions. Why do we not have continuous learning?
8:20Demis Hassabis:Well, people haven't quite figured out yet. And all the leading labs are working on this, like how to integrate new learning into the existing systems that, you know, you spent months training. Of course, the brain does this very elegantly, right? And probably through things like sleep reinforcement learning. So, you know, you just kind of get consolidation. It's called in the brain where, you know, your memories during the day are replayed. And then some of that information is elegantly incorporated into your existing knowledge base. And perhaps we, I thought for a while, maybe we need something like that to incorporate new information along with the existing information base.
8:57Harry Stebbings:You mentioned video models. You mentioned kind of media and image. It seems that DeepMind has progressed very quickly and caught up slash overtaken other providers. I think I've tweeted. I think you liked it. But I basically tweeted what I used and how it's changed over time. And DeepMind now is my number one for research for new shows. It wasn't that way before. What has led to the acceleration and progression of DeepMind in a way that it wasn't maybe there two to three years ago?
9:25Demis Hassabis:Yeah, well, we made some organizational changes. So I think we've always had the deepest and broadest research bench at Google and at DeepMind. I mean, if you look at the last decade or plus, you know, 15 years, I would say about 90 percent of the breakthroughs that underpin the modern AI industry were done by either by Google Brain or Google Research or DeepMind. So one of our groups, if you think of like AlphaGo and reinforcement learning and, of course, Transformers, you know, these are all the key breakthroughs. So I would back us to sort of make those breakthroughs in the future if there are any missing ones.
9:58Demis Hassabis:And I think we've basically helped put together all the talent from around the company, sort of pushing in one direction. And then we talked earlier just about compute resources. It was also about combining all of our resources together so we could build the biggest models rather than having two or three versions around the company. So I think a lot of it was assembling together all the ingredients we already had and then kind of pushing with relentless sort of focus and pace, acting almost like a startup, really, to get back to the frontier and be ahead in many areas.
10:30Harry Stebbings:You say if anyone's going to do the breakthrough, it could and should be us. Yes. When you think about that, is continuous learning the next breakthrough that you're most excited by?
10:37Demis Hassabis:I think there's quite a few things that are missing. There's continual learning. I think there's a lot of mileage in looking at different memory systems. At the moment, we have these long context windows, which are kind of a bit brute force. You just put everything in them. I think there's a lot of interesting, probably, architectures to be invented there. And then there's stuff like long term planning, hierarchical planning. These systems are not very good at planning at long time horizons. many years into the future, which with our minds, we can do. There's quite a lot of problems, I think, that are still left to overcome.
11:09Demis Hassabis:Maybe one of the biggest is consistency. So I sometimes call these systems jagged intelligences because they're really amazing at certain things when you pose the question in a certain way. But if you pose a question in a slightly different way, they can actually still fail at quite elementary things. So a general intelligence shouldn't be that sort of jagged. When you reposition files and you set up agents to perform in certain ways. And then the files no longer configure, it completely falls over.
11:35Harry Stebbings:Exactly. 100%. That's a disaster.
11:38Demis Hassabis:Yeah. Well, I mean, the general intelligence, you know, if you think about how our minds work, it shouldn't have those kinds of holes in it. We said about a plateauing of scaling rules.
11:46Harry Stebbings:Everyone talks about a commoditization of models in terms of capabilities. Do you think we see that? Or do you think we see ones to continuously accelerate ahead of the others?
11:54Demis Hassabis:Yeah, I feel like maybe, you know, the three or four leading labs now, which we're one, I think the gap is sort of starting to pull away because a lot of these tools also, of course, help you build the next generation. So things like coding tools, math tools, and it's getting harder and harder, I would say, to kind of eke out the same gains from just the same ideas. So I think those labs that have capability to invent new algorithmic ideas are going to start having bigger advantage over the next few years as the last set of ideas are sort of, you know, all the juices being wrung out of them.
12:29Harry Stebbings:You were very open with a lot of your research for years and we see many very good quality open models. How do you think about the future of open? I have many portfolio companies that kind of use frontier models and then they use that to set a benchmark and then they use open models to kind of get as close as possible but with more cost effectiveness. What does that future look like?
12:46Demis Hassabis:Yeah I think it's probably similar to what we're seeing today. I mean we're big supporters of open science and open models and we've done many many things obviously from the original transformers to AlphaFold. You know, these are all things we've sort of given out into the world and to help the research community. And we plan to continue to do that, especially in applied domains, you know, scientific domains, applying AI to science, which is obviously my passion. But increasingly, you know, what you're going to see is the open source models are probably one step back from the absolute frontier.
13:17Demis Hassabis:You know, it usually takes about six months for the open source community to sort of reimplement and figure out what those ideas are. But we are also pushing hard on a kind of suite of open source models called Gemma, which are, you know, we're determined to kind of make best in class for their sizes. So specifically for small developers or academics or, you know, the beginnings of a startup, I think they're perfect for that. And also edge computing, too. So we're very interested in open source models for certain types of applications. How do you think about a world post LLMs? You have different people with different views.
13:50Demis Hassabis:You're Yalana Koons with very different views. For me, I don't think it's, you know, I kind of disagree with Jan on a few things in terms of, I think there might be, there's a 50-50 chance there's some things maybe missing that we still need to make breakthroughs in, perhaps their world models, these kinds of approaches. But my betting is pretty strongly is we've seen how successful these foundation models have been. They can do incredibly impressive things. I don't think that's going to go away. We're still seeing, you know, gains from the returns from the scaling laws. I think the only question really is when you think about a future AGI system is, is an LLM foundation model going to be the key component only or is it the total system?
14:30Demis Hassabis:Right. So I just think it's it's a question of, you know, is there anything else needed? Not is it not? I don't think it's going to get replaced. I think it's going to get built on top of these foundation models, just like the way we do with our world models.
Read the full transcript
14:40Harry Stebbings:When we think about that future five years out, as you said, potentially with AGI, what does that world look like? Many people have different concerns. If we just start generally, what does that world look like to you?
14:52Demis Hassabis:I think on the positive side and the things obviously I've spent my whole career and life building towards AGI is I think it will be the ultimate tool for science and medicine. So in terms of advancing scientific discovery, finding cures to diseases, I think we need that kind of technology. And so I'm hoping in five years plus time we'll be sort of entering a new golden era, golden age of scientific discovery.
15:15Harry Stebbings:So my mother's got multiple cirrhosis. So it's like something that is the thing that I'm always most excited about. The thing I worry about is actually kind of drug discovery, the process of getting it through all the trials and knowing that it takes a decade before my mother will actually get any benefits from it. How do we solve that?
15:32Demis Hassabis:Yeah. So I think we'll get to that point soon. First of all, what we're doing is, you know, after we did the alpha fold project to do protein folding, then we spun out a company called Isomorphic Labs, which is doing extremely well. and that is supposed to, you know, the idea there is we're focusing on solving the rest of the drug discovery process, which is a lot of chemistry, designing the compounds, checking it's not toxic and all the different properties you need for drugs to be safe. I think we'll have that whole drug design engine ready in, you know, the next five plus five to 10 years. Then you're right.
16:03Demis Hassabis:The next problem is the clinical trials still take many, many years, right? But I think AI can help there in terms of simulating parts of the human metabolism, also stratifying patients to make sure that certain patients get exactly the right type of drug that's suitable for their genomic makeup. And so I think AI can help there too. But I think the real revolution will come when a few, maybe a dozen or so AI drugs get through the whole process. And then the government and the regulatory body see that and they have enough data to sort of back test the predictions of those models. And then maybe what we can do will be in the future where maybe 10 further years where we can really just trust the predictions that the models are making and actually then maybe skip out some steps, perhaps like the animal testing is not needed anymore.
16:50Demis Hassabis:Maybe we can go up the dosage ladder quicker because you can rely on these models. So I think we've got to do it in two steps, solve the drug design problem first, and then look at the regulatory length of time it takes.
17:02Harry Stebbings:Speaking of regulatory, AI safety is a big topic and a big concern. I think it was, again, I watched it last night over dinner, which was a great watch, which is obviously the documentary. And I think it was Stephen Hawking who said, we must get it right because we might not get another chance. Do you think that's right?
17:16Demis Hassabis:Yeah, I do think that's right. I think that is the stakes that we have to deal with. And there's two things I worry about. One is the misuse of these systems by bad actors and they can be repurposed. These are dual purpose technologies. They can be used for incredible good in science and health, as we just discussed, but they can also be repurposed for harmful ends by a bad actor. So that's one issue. Second issue is a technical one, making sure these systems, as they get more powerful, not today's systems, but maybe in a year or two's time when they become more agentic, more autonomous, as we get towards AGI, can they be kept on the guardrails that we want?
17:51Demis Hassabis:And I think regulation, the right kind of regulation could help here in terms of making sure there's at least sort of minimum standards from all of the leading providers. But it needs to ideally be a kind of international standards. What is the right kind of regulation?
18:07Harry Stebbings:And again, I'm kind of quoting yourself back from this documentary. You're like, I think we need more global coordination, which worries me because we're getting worse at it. Yes. Which I think would be an unwavering truth.
18:17Demis Hassabis:Yes, for sure. I mean, it's sort of crazy the timing that we're in, right, with this most consequential maybe technology the world's ever seen at the same time as a very fragmented sort of international system. And it's not ideal, but I think we're going to have to try and do the best we can to at least come up with a sort of set of maybe minimum standards, some benchmarks that test for undesirable properties, for example, deception. Nobody should be building systems that are capable of deception because then they could be getting around other safeguards. And then I imagine if things go well, some kind of certification process that basically it's almost like a kite mark of quality, that this model has certain safeguards and certain guarantees.
19:03Demis Hassabis:And so therefore, consumers and companies can safely sort of build on top of it. And I think that is how it should go, ideally. But it does have to be international, because of course, these systems are cross-border and they're cross-territory.
19:18Harry Stebbings:Who is that ultimate verification system? You obviously started with Theme Park.
19:22Demis Hassabis:Yes. A long time ago. Yes, brilliant. Don't put the burgers down too close to the roller coaster.
19:29Harry Stebbings:But, you know, obviously as a media company, I go through any media platform saying, I don't know what's real or fake. I'm always having to ask what's real or fake. Who is that arbiter of verification?
19:39Demis Hassabis:Yeah, well, I think there are, I mean, ultimately it's got to be government, I think. But, you know, the kinds of technical bodies that would be able to do the technical work would be like maybe the AI safety institutes. You know, there's a very good one in the UK that, you know, was set up under Prime Minister Sinek. and I think it's doing great work. And there's one in the US and maybe some of the leading countries that have the best research should also have an equivalent body that is staffed with high quality researchers too that can actually evaluate and audit these kinds of systems against certain benchmarks.
20:12Demis Hassabis:And I kind of like independently check whether they are meeting the right standards. If I could give you like a magic wand
20:19Harry Stebbings:that was only applicable to AI safety, sadly, What would be your implementation idea program that you would put in place with this magic wand?
20:27Demis Hassabis:Yeah, I think we need some kind of international body, maybe similar to the Atomic Agency, something like that, that perhaps the AI Safety Institute sort of feed into. And the research community has to also do this and be involved in like, what are the right set of benchmarks to check what types of traits, what types of capabilities? Maybe there are other safeguards too, like it wouldn't be desirable to have AI systems, output tokens that are not human readable. So in some kind of machine language that we couldn't understand, I think that would introduce a new vulnerability. So there's quite a few sort of things like that, which I think most of the leading labs would agree probably not best to do.
21:05Demis Hassabis:And then these bodies would, these institutions would test against those things. And I think that would give the public confidence and academia could be involved as well, as well as civil society, that these systems, which are going to get incredibly powerful, have been independently checked and audited. That's it. Your magic wand's done now. Yeah, sure. That was the one. Maybe I used it on the wrong thing.
21:26Harry Stebbings:Time will tell. Yes, exactly. You said that about science being one of the most exciting areas of 25 years of time. I have to ask it because it's one of the biggest concerns. It's the labour displacement problem. I just had Marc Andreessen on the show, actually, and he said that I was a Marxist.
21:41Demis Hassabis:I know, which I thought was like, it's a bit harsh. Yeah, Marc's wonderful.
21:46Harry Stebbings:So I'm not blaming him, but he was like, it's completely rubbish. I don't agree with that at all. We've always overcome it. How do you think about the labor displacement problem when you look at how truly capable these systems are? Yeah. And what that does to labor markets?
21:59Demis Hassabis:Well, certainly, you know, in the past, with every new revolutionary technology, there's been a lot of jobs disruption. So that's for sure. And I think that's definitely happened. So a lot of old jobs, you know, go away or not viable anymore. But then actually, the history of it is that a whole set of new jobs arrive that maybe one can't even imagine before. And those are higher quality, higher paying. So that's the normal course. Of course, you have to be very careful to say this time is different. And I guess that's what people like Mark are claiming is like, you know, it's the same as as as the last sort of, you know, 10 massive breakthroughs like the internet, mobile and so on.
22:33Demis Hassabis:I do think this is going to be bigger than all of those previous breakthroughs, technological breakthroughs. I mean, I sometimes quantify like AGI, the coming of AGI is like 10 times the industrial revolution at 10 times the speed. So unfolding over a decade instead of a century. You know, I've been reading a lot about the industrial revolution. There's a lot of great books about it that caused a huge amount of upheaval as well as a lot of advances. I mean, we wouldn't have modern medicine today. Child mortality was at 40 % back in pre-industrial revolution. So you wouldn't want it not to have happened.
23:06Demis Hassabis:But ideally, this time around, we mitigate some of the downsides a bit better than we did during the industrial revolution.
23:12Harry Stebbings:I often listen to amazing voices like yours. I get very excited by how fast it's coming. And then I try and stop myself from being too useful and think I should be more wise. And I'm told that we always overestimate what can be done in a year and underestimate what can be done in 10. Is that the truth here? Or is it actually coming faster than we know?
23:30Demis Hassabis:No, I think that's still the truth. I mean, maybe both timescales of short-term and long-term are nearer than other technologies. But I do think literally today, as of today and in the next year, things are a bit overhyped in AI. I mean, there couldn't be any more hyped in some ways. But on the other hand, interestingly, I still think it's still very underappreciated how revolutionary this is going to be in the sort of timescale of about 10 years. We could call that long-term. So there's still that dichotomy even today with AI. With the concern around labor markets, there's also a concern around income inequality and the concentration of wealth to few players.
24:07Harry Stebbings:How do you see that shaping out with the comment on the industrial revolution and what happens there?
24:13Demis Hassabis:Well, I think there's different ways that could play out. So, you know, maybe pension funds should be buying into all the big AI companies and making sure that everyone has a piece of that or sovereign funds. Maybe everyone, every country should have a sovereign wealth fund that does that. That would be the investment way of doing it. I think also there needs to be thought about if there is this massive productivity gain, but it's sort of narrow where that accrues, you know, how do we redistribute and how do we distribute that so that everyone benefits from these huge gains? And I can see all sorts of ways that could be done, including like providing sort of infrastructure and other things with that additional productivity gain.
24:51Demis Hassabis:I mean, there could be unbelievable things happening in the five to 10 year timescale, including like a breakthrough in some kind of renewable free energy. You know, maybe we solve fusion. We're working on that right with with with our partners at Commonwealth Fusion. I think AI is going to usher in, you know, maybe we have amazing new superconductors, better batteries, you know, material science. There's all sorts of ways I could see that completely changing the nature of the economy.
25:16Harry Stebbings:How do we solve the energy crisis that comes with an AI revolution? What it means in terms of energy requirements is unprecedented. I know it's an incredibly hard question, which I'm delving from really hard question to really hard. But how do we solve that unprecedented need for new energy?
25:29Demis Hassabis:Well, I think actually AI will in the medium to long run more than pay for itself, I think, in terms of energy costs. So, you know, we work on all these projects of like optimizing existing infrastructure, like optimizing the grid. I think we could probably get 30, 40 percent more efficiency out of our national grids. And then there's like modeling the climate and weather. And we have all sorts of the best kind of weather modeling systems in the world. So that helps us work out where the effects are really happening to mitigate that. And then finally, the most exciting maybe is like these new breakthrough technologies like fusion, like new batteries, superconductors that I think AI will be essential for helping us reach.
26:09Demis Hassabis:And then I think we'll be in a completely new energy situation than we've ever been as humanity where and then that will, of course, help with things like the climate and environment and eventually also help us get into space much more cheaply. Because if you have an incredible energy source like fusion, then you have effectively unlimited rocket fuel because you can just still catalyze seawater. I'm not going to ask you to solve space, don't worry. My question was on being in the UK.
26:39Harry Stebbings:You're in London. I'm in London. I'm very proud to be in the UK. You have been, I'm sure, pushed or prodded at every turn to move to the US. Why have you stayed?
26:48Demis Hassabis:Well, I should ask you that question too. But I think I saw in London when we started DeepMind as a place and the UK in general and Europe to some degree, there's incredible talent here. We've always had, I don't know what it is, three or four of the top 10 universities in the world with Cambridge and Oxford, Imperial, UCL, these kind of universities. So we're producing the envy of the world, really, these amazing graduates and PhD students. We have incredible scientists here. We've got rich heritage of that all the way from, you know, Turing and Hawking and Darwin, Newton. So, you know, we have this incredible history of scientific breakthroughs and having great thinkers.
27:27Demis Hassabis:So I felt we had all the ingredients and the talent and great engineers here, but it just hadn't been galvanized into an ambitious startup idea, deep tech startup idea. But I felt it was possible. And I felt that there was actually less competition here for that sort of talent. And we could even draw in the best talent from the top European universities. And that's what it was like in the early days of DeepMind. So I think it was a huge structural advantage for us. And then the final thing is maybe being a bit away from the valley, there is some disadvantage in that you're not plugged into the network and the gossip and the latest trends and vibes and all these things.
28:02Demis Hassabis:We're a little bit out of it here. But I think it's very conducive to thinking deeply about things, being more original about how you think. And I think that's great for things like deep tech, where, you know, you don't want to be distracted by the latest fad. You know it's going to be a 20-year mission, which is what we knew at the beginning of DeepMind. So I think being a little bit away from that maelstrom is quite good. I mean, Palmer Lucky at Angel often talks about being 400 miles away from the valley.
28:27Harry Stebbings:It's core to his kind of innovative thinking. Yes. We're a few thousand miles away, but yeah. Terrible question. Will Europe have a trillion dollar company? You see the Americans always bash us for our lack of large companies. I ping Daniel Ek and be like, come on, dude. Yes, exactly. But we don't have a trillion dollar company. Not yet.
28:43Demis Hassabis:I mean, Daniel might well get there with one of his companies, you know, Spotify, Helsing. I think those are two good options. I think there's no reason why we can't have that. I'm going to try and do that with Isomorphic, which is headquartered here and I think has the potential to be that. But that's one of the disadvantages of Europe is obviously we're a combination of smaller markets. So that's one thing we have to kind of overcome. Maybe this EU Inc. thing could be a good innovation. I'm pulling out the magic wand again. Yes. You can change one.
29:10Harry Stebbings:But this time applied to European technology. Yeah. What would you do to implement a growth mindset, a ability to build that trillion dollar company that we don't have to?
29:19Demis Hassabis:I think in the UK, I mean, this may apply to other European countries, too. I think unlocking what pension funds can invest in or just for the kind of growth stage. I think we're brilliant at doing the startup idea and getting it to a certain level like we did with DeepMind. But then if you really want to cross that sort of chasm into the trillion dollar global player, then where are the billion dollar rounds going to come from where you can really take on the existing incumbents? And I think that certainly was missing 10 years ago when I was doing fundraising for DeepMind. And I think it's still kind of missing today.
29:53Demis Hassabis:Just that kind of level of ambition and the amount the capital markets can support. I read about some of your early rounds raising in the Seb Maliby book.
30:01Harry Stebbings:Yes, it was quite hard work. Pitching families, kids. Yes, exactly. Exactly. Okay, we're going to do a quick fire round. So take me to meeting Elon for the first time. How was that?
30:10Demis Hassabis:Oh, yeah, it was amazing. It was at a founder's fund because we were both, SpaceX and DeepMind were part of a same portfolio, kind of amazing portfolio that Peter Thiel had at Founders Fund. I think we were both invited. I think I was invited to my first portfolio kind of conference. I think it must be back in 2011 or 2012, very early days. So we were the small little upcoming thing and I had a small speaking slot. And then Elon was the big thing in that portfolio. So he had the keynote. But then we met afterwards. I think it was in, Elon says it was like we were passing each other in the bathroom or something.
30:42Demis Hassabis:We said hi and we both hit off you know immediately like uh as sort of you know people that were almost too ambitious in their thinking perhaps and love sci-fi and and and i really wanted to visit his rocket factory so i was sort of trying to get an angular invite to to spacex and in la and i think i got there a couple you know he invited me at the end of that meeting and and that was our second meeting in
31:05Harry Stebbings:in the space effects factory i love it now i'm speaking slots as big as his yeah i don't know about that healthcare revolution disease eradication that you're most excited about again for me it's specifically with multiple cirrhosis yeah well look i want to literally
31:20Demis Hassabis:cure cancer i know people said that's the cliche but i actually what we're building at isomorphic is general purpose so we're trying to build a platform a drug design platform that will be applicable to any therapeutic area so ideally it will help with everything from neurodegeneration cardiovascular, immunology, cancer. Those are the ones we're focusing first, but eventually it should be applicable to every disease error. What are you thinking about that you're not reading about or seeing anyone talk about? So I think a lot of people are worrying about the economic questions around AGI. I worry a lot about the philosophical questions around it.
31:55Demis Hassabis:Like when it comes, let's assume we get the technical right. Let's assume we get the economics part of it right. Both of those are hard. Then there's a philosophical question of what is meaning, what is purpose we'll find out maybe what consciousness is what does it mean to be human i think that's what's coming down the road and i think we need some great new philosophers to help us to help us uh navigate that hard final question there are many different ways you could describe
32:18Harry Stebbings:what you do what would you most like to be remembered for your legacy to be i would like
32:24Demis Hassabis:my legacy to sort of be remembered for like advancing science building technologies that bring incredible benefits into the world, like curing terrible diseases. Thomas, thank you so much for putting up with my meandering conversation.
32:36Harry Stebbings:You've been fantastic. I really appreciate it. Thank you very much. But before we leave you today, did you know the industry average for booking a business trip is 45 minutes? That's a massive waste of your team's time. Well, with Navan, your employees can book a trip in just seven on average. Navan is the AI-powered travel and expense platform designed for companies that value efficiency. It drives real business impact through high employee adoption and automated policy control. Now, the built-in AI approves in-policy bookings and blocks the rest automatically. This allows finance teams to stop chasing receipts and skip the month-then chaos.
33:13Harry Stebbings:And you get this real-time visibility that can save your company up to 15 % on your travel budget. And that's why leaders like Visa, Stripe, Figma, and even Anthropic rely on Navan these days. Go to nivan.com forward slash 20VC today to see for yourself, and you'll get a chance to win two business class flights anywhere in continental US. No purchase necessary, rules apply. Head over to nivan.com forward slash 20VC now. Once nivan simplifies the travel, Airwallet simplifies the spend behind it. Founders, let's get real about the growth tax. You've raised VC funding and you're scaling globally, and it's no longer about shipping product, it's about orchestrating operations across continents, but suddenly your payments and finance stack is choking your growth.
33:56Harry Stebbings:You're logging into lots of different banking portals, waiting days for transfers, and reporting across entities. It's operational drag and it's at your scale. It's costing millions. That's why I'm so excited to partner with Airwallex. Airwallex are more than just a banking alternative to HSBC or Citi. Airwallex brings you an intelligent financial operating system that powers how global businesses operate and grow, allowing you to manage and automate banking. treasury, payments, and spend. The most exciting part for me, they're heavily investing in agentic finance. If you're scaling globally, you need a banking and finance platform that's borderless, real-time, and intelligent.
34:32Harry Stebbings:Check out Airwallex today and see how they're helping thousands of businesses like Canva, McLaren, and Deal. Scale at airwallex.com forward slash 20VC. Terms and conditions apply. Your monies are safeguarded, not FSCS protected. See airwallex.com for more details. While Airwallis helps your money move globally, Vanta helps your security keep up. Security and compliance done wrong is a giant headache. Security and compliance done right though? Well, that's Vanta. Vanta helps you earn trust and speed up growth. No spreadsheets required. For startups low on time and resources, Vanta becomes your first security hire, using AI and automation to get you compliant fast and unblock really big deals.
35:15Harry Stebbings:And if you're big enterprises, Vanta is your AI-powered hub for compliance and risk, bringing together data from across your business and automating workflows so you can prove trust at any moment. Vanta scales with you at every stage. That's why top companies, from startups like Cursor to enterprises like Snowflake, choose Vanta. Do security and compliance right. My listeners can get$1 ,000 off Vanta by going to Vanta.com forward slash 20VC. That's Vanta.com forward slash 20VC for$1 ,000 off Vanta.
From the publisher
Demis Hassabis is the Co-Founder & CEO of Google DeepMind - working on AGI, responsible for AI breakthroughs such as AlphaGo, the first program to beat the world champion at the game of Go; and AlphaFold, which cracked the 50-year grand challenge of protein structure prediction and was recognised with the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Demis is revolutionising drug discovery at Isomorphic Labs. Ultimately, trying to understand the fundamental nature of reality.
AGENDA:
00:04:00 — What Actually Counts as AGI; and Where Are We Today?
00:05:00 — What Are the Biggest Bottlenecks Holding AI Back Today?
00:06:00 — Have We Hit the Limits of Scaling Laws?
00:07:00 — Where Is AI Ahead of Expectations; and What's Still Missing?
00:07:30 — Why Can't AI Systems Learn Continuously Like Humans?
00:08:30 — How Did DeepMind Go from Behind to Leading the Pack?
00:11:00 — Are We Heading Toward Model Commoditization; or Winner-Takes-All?
00:12:00 — What Does the Future of Open Source Really Look Like?
00:13:00 — What Does a Post LLM World Look Like?
00:14:45 — Can AI Really Fix Drug Discovery—and Cut the 10-Year Timeline?
00:17:00 — What Does "Good" AI Regulation Actually Look Like?
00:18:00 — Who Should Be the Ultimate Arbiter of Truth in an AI World?
00:19:30 — If Demis Had One Shot to Fix AI Safety, What Would He Do?
00:21:00 — Is This Time Different for Jobs; or Will History Repeat Itself?
00:22:00 — Is AGI Bigger Than the Industrial Revolution; and Faster?
00:23:00 — Are We Underestimating AI Despite All the Hype?
00:23:30 — Does AI Lead to Massive Inequality; or Universal Prosperity?
00:24:30 — How Do We Solve the Energy Crisis Created by AI?
00:26:00 — Why Stay in the UK Instead of Moving to Silicon Valley?
00:28:00 — Will Europe Ever Build a Trillion-Dollar Tech Giant?
00:29:30 — Meeting Elon Musk for the First Time?
00:31:00 — What Big Questions About AI Is No One Talking About?
00:31:30 — What Does Demis Want His Legacy to Be?




