In short
Aiden Gomez, co-founder/CEO of Cohere, explains why AI should be deployed in privacy- and security-sensitive enterprises and democracies, arguing AI can restore growth and liberal-democratic resilience rather than destroy the world. He describes Cohere’s North platform as infrastructure for running AI agents on-prem or air-gapped, emphasizing sovereignty, independence from hyperscalers, and human-in-the-loop safeguards.
Guest backgrounds
Aiden Gomez is a Canadian AI academic-turned-founder. He grew up in rural Canada with limited internet, studied computer science at the University of Toronto (deep learning hub), worked on neural transcription using low-level GPU kernels, collaborated with Jeff Hinton’s circle, joined Google and worked on the Transformer “Attention is All You Need” paper, then earned a PhD at Oxford. He later co-founded Cohere with Nick and Ivan.
Key claims
Cohere is in “takeoff phase” as enterprises adopt AI at scale; privacy/sovereignty and secure deployment are the main differentiators; vibe-coding helps but North closes the “last mile” without requiring developers; independence and multi-cloud reduce lock-in risk.
Notable examples
morning unread-email summaries; ship telemetry monitoring with sensor-threshold automations; on-prem/air-gapped deployments; human oversight for sensitive categories; Cohere’s Canada-based resilience strategy; reference to Transformer paper’s goal (translation) and its broader impact.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUnderstanding Economic Slowdowns and AI
0:00 to 0:24
Explore the relationship between economic slowdown and advancements in AI.
“There's been a sort of slowdown in growth for these developed democratic economies.”
Cohere's Growth and Market Position
0:56 to 1:55
Aidan Gomez discusses the growth phase of Cohere and its market impact.
“You work with some big governments, some big companies.”
Cohere's Diverse Applications
1:55 to 3:26
Examine the various industries and problems Cohere addresses with AI.
“So with some of these big companies or G7 countries that are working with Cohere, what is the problem that they want you to solve?”
The Importance of Privacy in AI Deployments
3:26 to 5:35
Discussing the critical role of privacy and security in AI solutions.
“There's a deployment-level differentiation, and the other piece is within the product itself.”
Aidan Gomez's Academic Journey and Transition to CEO
5:35 to 7:34
Aidan shares his academic background and journey to becoming a CEO.
“The other thing is that for a lot of these applications, you don't need to create a product.”
The Story Behind the Transformer Paper
7:34 to 12:54
Aidan recounts the development of the landmark Transformer paper in AI.
“But you can't run from your nature, which is like, I'm a, you know, shy nerd.”
The Evolution and Impact of AI in Language
12:54 to 14:02
Understanding the significance and implications of AI advancements in language processing.
“I met my co-founders when I came back from the Valley to Toronto.”
The Transformer Paper's Impact on AI
14:02 to 17:08
Discover the transformative impact of the Transformer paper on AI research and technologies.
“But good God, like back then it was just mind-blowing.”
From Idea to Cohere: The Entrepreneurial Journey
17:08 to 20:10
Learn about the entrepreneurial journey that led to the creation of Cohere.
“I mean, we're like the world's most niche celebrities.”
The Importance of AI in Economic Growth
21:13 to 24:12
Understand the role of AI in enhancing economic growth and addressing societal challenges.
“What was so exciting about the idea or the mission of Cohere that you were like, let's commit a lot of time and opportunity here?”
Show all 17 chapters
Sovereignty and Technology in the AI Era
24:12 to 26:53
Explore the significance of technological sovereignty and resilience for democracies.
“Like restoring this 100-year arc of growth where billions of people, their lifespans got longer.”
Cohere's Role in Building Resilient Democracies
26:53 to 28:09
Learn how Cohere aims to support diverse technological capabilities in democracies.
“And so you need a decentralized, diversified set of contributors to each core technological pillar.”
Cohere's Unique Perspective on AI and Independence
28:09 to 30:05
Learn about Cohere's commitment to independence and resilience in AI development.
“You know, there's been a lot of voiced frustration about that, like different parties not contributing enough and sort of just like riding off of the efforts and expenses of one party.”
Overcoming Challenges in Building Cohere
30:06 to 33:17
Discover the pivotal moments and challenges faced by Aidan Gomez during Cohere's journey.
“You know, on the show, we talk about the upstart moment where maybe you were punching above your weight the most or you just felt like I have to really overcome something to get that idea to reality.”
The Ethical Dimensions of AI Deployment
33:18 to 36:48
Explore how Cohere approaches ethical concerns in AI usage across industries.
“You know, we haven't pivoted that strongly in those six and a half years.”
Measuring Success and Impact at Cohere
36:49 to 40:55
Understand how Aidan defines success for Cohere beyond financial metrics.
“What becomes the true north for Cohere there?”
Closing Thoughts and Future Aspirations
40:56 to 42:00
Aidan shares his hopes for Cohere's public perception and impact.
“And I think we'll get paid along the way.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00There's been a sort of slowdown in growth for these developed democratic economies. When that starts to taper off, you see the emergence of things like xenophobia, like that immigrant is taking my opportunity, they're taking my slice of the pie. A lot of people talk about like AI destroying the world. I really don't think AI is going to destroy the world. It might be like our best shot at saving the world.
0:27Aidan Gomez:Welcome to the Upstarts podcast, our weekly show where we talk to emerging startup leaders about their upstart moment. Upstarts are challengers who punch above their weight and take on the status quo to improve the world, all while building a big business too. I'm your host, Alex Conrad, founder and editor of Upstarts Media. And I'm delighted to be joined today by Aiden Gomez, co-founder and CEO of Cohere. Thanks for joining, Aiden. Thank you for having me. This podcast is brought to you by Mercury, banking redesigned from the ground up. Aiden, you have run Cohere now for six and a half years.
0:59Aidan Gomez:You guys have raised$1.7 billion. You work with some big governments, some big companies. When you think about sort of what Cohere looks like today, is it early innings? Is it everything you hoped for six years ago? I think we're in the takeoff phase. So we've been around for a while, but this past year was really the breakout year for For us, in terms of enterprises just adopting AI at scale across the entire company, and the importance of all the things that Cohere is good at really sort of hitting the front of mind of executives at companies all over the world. So privacy, sovereignty, and this focus on critical industries.
1:39And so last year, all of that came together, and we sort of started our takeoff. And then this year, we expect it to get even bigger as enterprises and the broader global economy really, truly adopts AI at scale.
1:55Aidan Gomez:So with some of these big companies or G7 countries that are working with Cohere, what is the problem that they want you to solve? Or where is your technology actually helping them in sort of a simple overview? view. Yeah. Well, it's super broad because we're working with a really diverse range of customers from different industries, from like manufacturing to public sector to financial services, energy. And it's as simple as like, you know, get the model to every morning at 6am, check my unread emails and send me a text with a summary of like the most important ones that I need to know. So that's like a super general, you know, any company would want that.
2:35To a hyper-specific, you know, within a specific ship, I'm going to plug north into the telemetry within that ship, do continuous monitoring on different sensors on board, and build automations around if sensors cross certain thresholds, what to do, who to notify, what sort of remediations.
2:56Aidan Gomez:But I know it's a wide range of use cases, but generally speaking, why often do they need Cohere to exist? Like, why is that an unsolved problem for them? Yeah, I think it's the privacy piece. I think the secure deployment of this tech, of this platform, is something that our customers couldn't do without. It's something that is a hard requirement in their settings. They can't send data out into a cloud. They're highly regulated. They're in these high security settings. And so they need something that's deployed on-prem or even air-gapped on their infrastructure. There's a deployment-level differentiation, and the other piece is within the product itself.
3:37It's super easy to use. It's very customizable. There's tons of administrative enterprise controls that are unique to the North platform.
3:44Aidan Gomez:So should we think of Cohere as sort of the base layer, this infrastructure layer that then the company is either building internal apps on top of or it's running these agents doing sort of all sorts of other work with sort of the info that your horsepower is providing? Or what would be the best way to sort of visualize this? Yeah, I think it's infrastructure for these high security enterprises to adopt agents and integrate it into their secure systems. That's what we do. At Coher, obviously, we're internal customers of our own product. And many of the best automations have been created by or discovered by folks who don't code.
4:22And they just, as part of their day-to-day work, they're like, oh, I could totally use North for this. And they build an automation and they share it with people. And so that's what we want to be able to enable is people just discover killer applications of the system. And then it goes viral within an organization and spreads out to all these different teams. and North really enables that.
4:43Aidan Gomez:We are in a moment where we're being told you can Vibecode anything and there are some really successful companies that are helping people come up with an app out of an idea. Is the difference here that we couldn't really run a Bolt or a Lovable or one of these tools internally in a sort of sensitive or secure environment with all our data so using North is just sort of much more viable or what would be sort of the distinction there? Yeah, I think the vibe coding stuff is very helpful for technical folks who want to get 90 % of the way there, or even 95 % of the way there. It can carry you quite far, but there's still a last mile that you need to close.
5:27And oftentimes, you do need to be technical to close that last mile. And for north, you don't need to be technical to do that work. You have a sort of like builder view and you can just chat to the model and there's no need for you to be a developer yourself to do the work. So I think that's one thing. The other thing is that for a lot of these applications, you don't need to create a product. You don't need to create a whole new piece of software to solve it. All you really need is like it to have access to the right tools with the right authentication. And then you need to be able to build a series of steps that you want it to accomplish.
6:03and that's a much simpler problem and there's an easier way to solve that rather than for each one of these that I want to create I'm going to have to create an entirely new code base and program and ask an agent, coding agent to go build it for me. So I think it's a more simple and elegant solution to the problem.
6:23Aidan Gomez:Very cool. There's an interesting question of are startups reflecting the personalities or sort of backgrounds, preferences of their founders, or is it vice versa? And I'm curious, is this the kind of business that you would have always imagined running or building? Yeah, I don't know. I don't know. I definitely appreciate my own privacy as an individual, but I try to be open. I think for people to trust you, they have to know you. And so I talk about where I grew up, how I grew up, my family. So I try to be somewhat open, but I'm certainly, I'm not the type, I'm not a great marketing or sales guy.
7:04Like I'm not out there screaming, you know, my own name or coheres name constantly. My background is like, I'm an academic, right? Like I like came into this through research. And I think there's a very different type of personality that thrives in research than in company building. And I've been, you know, doing my best to adjust to being a CEO and having to be a spokesperson and a salesperson for the company. But you can't run from your nature, which is like, I'm a, you know, shy nerd.
7:39Aidan Gomez:So that doesn't go anywhere. Just a very tall. It's tall, shy nerd. Yeah, got it. Well, so when you were in academia, you were privileged or you had earned your way to be at sort of the epicenter of some of the earliest work with LLMs, you know, this famous Transformer paper. Could you talk a little bit about how you first, you know, got into this field, why it was exciting to you, and sort of how the journey really starts there? Yeah, I grew up in the middle of the woods in Canada without, like, any internet. At some point, we got, like, a satellite dish, because before that it was a dial-up, but this was, like, pre-Starlink, and so it was, like, these, like, geostationary, like, if there's a cloud, because it has to be like super high up.
8:21If there's a cloud, you're screwed. Like goodbye internet. And I think that scarcity from technology, like it was just so hard to use my computer and like I couldn't watch YouTube. It was impossible. I could like watch pixels load one by one on an image. That scarcity made it super appealing to me. It was like just out of reach. And like, you know, my friends were gaming online and doing all this cool stuff. And when I went home, we had a computer in the house, of course, but it wasn't the experience everyone else was getting. So that made me deeply appreciate computers and be very excited about them, invested in them.
9:07I was always trying to make my computer faster at home or let me access the things that other people were accessing through my limited setup. Was it working?
9:15Aidan Gomez:Were you hacking a faster computer? I mean it got me into like web dev and that type of I wanted to understand why this fucking web page wouldn't load faster and so you know I inspect element blah blah but yeah that's what got me into coding like first it was just like going through websites and trying to understand all this text on my screen and then I took a course because I was interested in that then I started a little small business in my tiny little town of Brighton Ontario building websites for the little businesses like there was a really nice lady who had a knitting uh store and you know yarn and patterns and stuff and so i helped her build like an online catalog for her customers and you know she's been an incredible customer of mine but i started that little business and then i just decided this is what i want to do so i went uh into computer science uh at uft that was my local university right like toronto was the nearest big city and i just happened to go to university at like the epicenter of deep learning like jeff hinton was there the guy who won the noble prize uh and the turing award for his work creating deep learning which is like the thing that worked it was like the breakthrough system that let us reach where we are today.
10:41Aidan Gomez:And were you immediately like, this is an area that I want to throw myself into, or was it more grounded? I was obsessed. I just remember every waking minute of my day thinking about it. I would walk around with a stack of papers. Initially, to read one paper in the field would take me a month, actually, because I would be going through and I'd run into like a word that I don't understand. And then I would have to go start the process of, you know, researching what the hell is that? You know, like what's Bayesian or, you know, what's a Gaussian? You didn't have LLMs to short-cut for you. No, no.
11:20It's just Wikipedia pages and like research papers. And then gradually I just got more and more familiar and comfortable with the material. And I went to a startup in Vancouver where I worked on, it's called polyphonic transcription, which is like listening to music and transcribing music into sheet music. So you listen to someone playing and you write down the notes that you're hearing. Super difficult problem at the time, but we used neural networks to approach it and got some pretty good results. And I had to, this was before, you know, before Jax, before TensorFlow, before PyTorch, before any of these frameworks really existed.
12:02and I had to write kernels in metal, which was like Apple's GPU language for forward and backward propagation. So I just had to learn everything at like the lowest level imaginable.
12:17Aidan Gomez:You're like, you know, basically writing machine code. Not really, but, you know, just super low level, stupidly low level. And then I came back to Toronto and I messaged Hinton and I was just like, hey, I have this idea, this activation function that you've made. I think there's a better one. And he actually responded. And then he sent me in the direction of Roger Gross and others inside the U of T ML group. And from there, started doing work with them, eventually ended up at Google down here in Mountain View and was on the Transformer paper. And the rest is kind of history. Then I went off to Oxford.
12:56I met my co-founders when I came back from the Valley to Toronto. Ran into Nick and Ivan. Nick was working for Jeff at Google. It was like Jeff's first report at Google. And then I went off to Oxford to do my PhD. And then from Oxford, I called up Nick and Ivan and just said, guys, we have to start something. I saw the first few results of language model scaling. And it was very much a zero to one. You know, we could barely get these models to string a sentence together to this was like plausible, fluent, ostensibly human-written text coming out of a machine. And now we take that for granted. It's so normal.
13:39It's like this is kind of not surprising. But back then it was like it was surreal reading a machine. I think people sort of take for granted the fact that like we're talking to some rocks and metal. We're literally talking to our pet rock at this stage, which is, it's so insane. It's normalized. We do it every day. But good God, like back then it was just mind-blowing. And so like, what else could you want to work on?
14:10Aidan Gomez:We talked about the Transformer paper, which was called Attention is All You Need. I don't know what the best comp would be. Maybe the Magna Carta of AI research. Very seminal paper that you were a part of. For folks who are not deep in AI world, what would be the TLDR of what this paper was? Yeah, well, it was done when I was at Google. And in particular, it was done as a collaboration between Google Brain, which was like the AI research department under Jeff Dean, and Google Translate. And the two teams came together. And really, the objective was to improve translation, improve the state of the art of translation.
14:50The architecture itself was designed to better and more scalably model language. And what I mean by that is, you know, language is a sequence. It's a sequence of characters. It's a sequence of words in order. The order matters. And you want to be able to model that or represent that data in the most efficient way possible. So the transformer was, that was the problem we were trying to solve. How do we just make this a more efficient model for language? Turns out the transformer became extremely effective beyond language. And you can phrase many different data modalities like video, et cetera, as a sequence.
15:31The fact that the model was so efficient made it a very good option as we were going through this process of scaling up models. And they're called large language models because they're really big. the transformer as an architecture just scaled better than the alternatives because it was so efficient and so as we went through this process of the field building bigger and bigger models training on larger and larger computing clusters it was the best thing available and so people poured effort into optimizing chips for it and coming up with better uh you know libraries for training these models and then over time the transformer just kind of took over everything It took over the domain of images, took over the domain of audio, it took over pretty much the whole field.
16:17But it certainly was not designed for that. It was just designed for this one narrow problem of, like, we want to make translation 3 % better.
16:25Aidan Gomez:And now people are saying, what comes after the transformer? No, I've been hearing that for a long time now. Yeah, I don't know. Like, I've gotten so excited before. I thought SSM, state space models, which was like this thing that came out three or four years ago, I thought that was going to kill the transformer. I get excited. Discrete diffusion models. But would that be like killing your own baby? No, not at all. No. If you're a researcher, you really hope humanity comes up with something better than what you've created. Otherwise, progress has ended. When you published the transformer paper, the group of you, did you think this is going to be, like, we know this is going to be huge?
17:04Aidan Gomez:we're all going to end up rock stars in this category now. I mean, we're like the world's most niche celebrities. There's like 13 people that know us. But no, we didn't know the impact it was going to have. Or at least I didn't. I don't want to speak on behalf of all the Transformer paper authors, but we can't take credit for what happened with the Transformer. Like we put it out there. Our effort was around improving translation performance. That's the thing that we set out to solve and to come up with an architecture that was better suited to language and sequence modeling. And I think we did that.
17:43But then the community took it and applied it to everything. And they've taken it so far. They've optimized the hardware for this specific architecture. Sort of set the ball in motion. but the work has been done by thousands of others who have actually turned this into what it is today. We still call all these models transformers. I think, I'm not trying to be like overly modest but if it wasn't us, something else would have come out that kind of looked and felt the same. There were ideas along these lines with like WaveNet and ByteNet and all these different architectures that were emerging at the time.
18:21I'm so grateful that the community leaned in on the transformer but someone else would have done it three months later.
18:28Aidan Gomez:I do think that sounds kind of modest to me, but I respect it. I think it's true. I think it's true. Modest, but true. On your entrepreneurial journey, so it sounds like at Oxford you're like, okay, we've got to build something here. Would you have kind of always had in the back of your mind, maybe I'm going to do a company, or did it need to be the right moment, the right idea, to feel excited to really go into company building? So Ivan, my co-founder, he had been messaging me being like, man, like, you know, I'm kind of done working where I'm working. He's working at some other startup. I want to do a startup.
19:05And I was in the middle of my PhD, so I was like, good luck. But I was like, dude, I really don't want you like wasting, like a company is such a huge commitment. I don't want you wasting, you know, years of your time on some stupid idea. Let's come up with a cool idea together. And so we were sending each other ideas back and forth. We had a bunch of ideas. And then eventually there was this one which I think precipitated Cohere. And it was train a model of the web. And we didn't know how that was going to be a business. But we had seen these, like internally at Google, there were results on modeling Wikipedia with language models, produced incredibly compelling text.
19:49GPT-2 came out. We saw the result of training on a much broader source of text. And so we just said, okay, what if we treat the entire internet, like all the pictures, the videos, et cetera, as a data set to train on? I bet you something interesting is going to fall out of that. And that eventually is sort of what led to Coher. We started to see these results like GPT-2, and it just gave us the conviction that there was some direction of travel here which was going to be pretty important. We went from a world where you couldn't speak to computers in natural language and certainly they couldn't speak back to you in natural language to one where that seemed like a plausible future.
20:32Aidan Gomez:As a year-old startup, we experienced a lot of firsts at Upstarts Media. So when it was time to process our first international wire following a London event, I braced myself. This is going to be a painful lesson. Instead, Mercury made the process easy. Issuing an invoice, sharing routing numbers, and processing the wire with just a couple clicks. No phone calls, no paperwork, no learning curve. We're still figuring plenty of stuff out. When it comes to our banking, Mercury's already got it all figured out for us. Visit Mercury.com to learn more and apply online in minutes. Mercury is a fintech company, not an FDIC-insured bank.
21:08Aidan Gomez:banking services provided through Choice Financial Group and Column NA members FDIC. What was so exciting about the idea or the mission of Cohere that you were like, let's commit a lot of time and opportunity here? Because you predate and saw, for example, the team leave OpenAI and start Anthropic, and then all of a sudden Anthropic is growing super fast and Cohere is continuing along the journey. Why not just be like, we can do a better OpenAI ourselves or let's go for sort of the most obvious piece of the pie here? Well, the attractive thing for us was the technical project. Like that's what was the most exciting.
21:49We wanted to train this model of the internet. That was really the objective. We didn't initially know how we were going to monetize that. Quickly, we did decide we want to be B2B. Like the impact that we want to have is driving this technology into the economy. That was a very, that was like within the first 12 months decision that we made. And I still think that is like the most compelling application of this technology. That is like the best impact we can have is by driving growth for the world and driving growth for the global economy. If we can make people more efficient, that in itself is a good.
22:29A lot of the issues that I think are very prominent right now, have sort of been stewing over the past 15 years. I'm from Canada. I live in the UK. The same is true for Japan, Korea, much of Europe. There's been a sort of slowdown in growth for these developed democratic economies. When that happens, when GDP per capita or pick your metric, when that starts to taper off and the pie isn't growing for everyone, you start to see like zero sum thinking start to dominate. If the pie isn't growing, then my slice isn't growing unless I'm taking it from someone else. And vice versa, I feel very threatened that someone else is eating into my slice of the pie.
Read the full transcript
23:20So you see the emergence of things like xenophobia, like that immigrant is taking my opportunity. They're taking my slice of the pie. Get them out. I don't want them. This is my pie. You see things like territorial conquest. War is back on the Eastern Front of Europe, and people are fighting for land, for resources. These traits, they're not inevitable. I think they come out of scarcity and people feeling they need to fight each other to get better off. The big promise, a lot of people talk about AI destroying the world, and there's all this like, you know, X-risk, EA, fear. It's important that we think about that, but I really don't think AI is going to destroy the world.
24:09It might be like our best shot at saving the world, right? Like restoring this 100-year arc of growth where billions of people, their lifespans got longer. They were healthier. They were living longer, better lives. Their education got better. Their access to medicine, to technology, their wealth everything was just improving because the pie was growing and we were all growing with that pie but the past 15 years as that started to stagnate i think a lot of disturbing political trends have come back in and so my hope is that by integrating ai into the economy we can restore growth and carry forward this broader project of liberal democracy and these values that have lifted so many over the past 100 years.
25:01Aidan Gomez:Would that help explain why Cohear has sought out or prioritized these sovereign customers so that other nations benefit or have their own sort of, you know, AI models, AI foundation they can trust that isn't dependent on one central place? Or is that more sort of incidental of where the tools, you know, flourish? Yeah, well, definitely over the past quarter century, sovereign capabilities in particular in technology have really declined outside the U.S. and China. Like U.S. and China are still incredible strongholds of progress in technology. but where I'm from in Canada or where my parents are from in Europe, yeah, there just hasn't, there's been a gradual sort of, I don't know whether to describe it as like complacency or a hollowing out of the technological ambition and capability of the various nations and a hollowing out of sovereignty.
25:58We depend so much on a single source. We depend so much on one of a couple different places where we can buy things from, but we can't do it ourselves. And the reality is we can do it ourselves. We've just grown too comfortable. In part, founding Cohere in Toronto and keeping it a Canadian company, it's been an intentional choice to support this notion of resilience. And we're only going to have resilient democracies if more than one player can provide to the group capabilities. It doesn't mean we all need to do everything, right? We don't all need to build language models. That is like hyper inefficient.
26:40But we need a diverse supply chain. We need a diverse set of dependencies so that it's not all concentrated in one place. And that's something that I want to contribute to. and I think is, I actually think it's existential to democracy. If you love democracy, if you love people having self-governance and having a say in how they're governed, you can't have these single lines of dependency on any one country because if something happens to that democracy, suddenly everything breaks. The whole project falls apart. And so you need a decentralized, diversified set of contributors to each core technological pillar.
27:29Aidan Gomez:And because Cohear is operating at this infrastructure layer, these other countries or cultures can be building on top of it and feel more comfortable than if they were getting everything as an application from Silicon Valley? Exactly. Yeah. Like it's not just you're not just reliant on one place. You have options. And you can build resilience through interdependence with multiple different parties instead of just one. That's really what we've seen kind of hollow out is this notion of multiple parties inside this broad democratic coalition contributing. You know, there's been a lot of voiced frustration about that, like different parties not contributing enough and sort of just like riding off of the efforts and expenses of one party.
28:20And I think there's really a deep truth to that. And we need to step up to fix that. And I think Cohere is part of, on the AI file at least, but across many files, right? Like on energy independence and manufacturing and all these different fundamental parts of building a country. Those of us in liberal democracies need to contribute and step up and invest at the scale necessary to support developing these fundamental pillars of the economy.
28:52Aidan Gomez:When you come to a place like San Francisco where we are today, do you feel like an upstart or a contrarian by holding those views? Or do you feel like maybe more people have come around to see this? Or what is it like to kind of share these principles with your peers in AI right now? I think some people see it. It's definitely not, like, I don't think this is a particularly broadly held view. I don't, if you ask other people about these sorts of questions, I don't know if they view it as actually that significant. I think there's more ideology behind it or sort of political awareness than I think, you know, at least some very, you know, growth obsessed AI startups today really worry themselves with.
29:36Aidan Gomez:It seems like it's very intentionally intertwined with Cohere to be thinking about this, you know. We're also like just uniquely positioned to be able to contribute to that notion of resilience, right? Like being a Canadian company, like we're one of a very small group that is building this capability outside. And so we're uniquely positioned to be able to deliver on that mission. I don't know if folks here are positioned to deliver on that mission. I don't think they are. How did you get there? Like what has been the hardest piece to overcome? You know, on the show, we talk about the upstart moment where maybe you were punching above your weight the most or you just felt like I have to really overcome something to get that idea to reality.
30:20Aidan Gomez:When you think back on the journey so far, what would that moment have been at Cohere? Oh, there were many, many different moments that kind of fit that character. There's been many hurdles to overcome and, you know, just like challenging strategic questions of like, do we, don't we? It seems like the B2B choice was our first really important junction. Yeah, the second one was do you sell off a huge chunk of your company to one of the hyperscalers? That's the thing that OpenAI did with Microsoft and Anthropic did with AWS that we saw and considered but ultimately did not pursue. There was always this notion in Coher, Even before, there's a lot of geopolitical stuff happening now that wasn't happening in the past six years.
31:10We've been around like six and a half years. But even before all this geopolitical stuff, one of the core value props of Cohere was independence. So not getting locked into any one cloud ecosystem, et cetera. Oh, you want to run on AWS? Great. OCI? Great. Azure? Great. Sort of a friends with everyone approach. And we were pretty dogmatic about that. We were quite dogmatic that we're going to serve everywhere. and that is part of our value. We've always had that nature of strategic independence is important. It's important at the company level. If you're a large enterprise, you don't want to be completely locked in to your cloud provider, one ecosystem, because they're just going to keep squeezing you and squeezing you and squeezing you for margin over time.
31:57And you'll dig yourself so deeply into that ecosystem that you'll never be able to get out. It'll be too expensive to get out. So at the company, you want this strategic, independence to be able to negotiate different clouds off of each other, find like a fair and actual competitive price. At the company level, at the country level, right? Like you can't over depend on any one third party. You need to be able to not only provide for yourself, but have a diversified set of suppliers in case one goes down, you can continue to work with these others. And then at the individual level as well, I think it's important to expose yourself to diversity, to expose yourself to different ecosystems, different products, and not get into a bubble or into an echo chamber.
32:40Aidan Gomez:But you would have gained notoriety, maybe a much higher valuation early on, at least like a lot more of some of the typical tech trappings of momentum. So there is a trade-off there. Like you could argue maybe you guys were playing on hard mode a little bit. Yeah, no, we were definitely, I mean, like founding in Canada is playing on hard mode. Like it started right there. But, I mean, we're not looking for, like, the easiest path. We're looking for the right path and something that is a meaningful contribution to the market, to the world, to our customers. And, you know, we've been, like, quite earnestly dedicated to that for six and a half years.
33:21You know, we haven't pivoted that strongly in those six and a half years. we've kind of always been saying the same thing, that privacy and security is essential. Independence is essential. And the market has moved towards us. And I think that's what we've watched is like, first off, no one was buying LLMs six and a half years. Nobody knew what LLMs, there was like a group of 100 to 200 people who knew what LLMs were six and a half years ago. And then consumer took off. blew up, was super popular. We never did a consumer service. We were always like...
33:59Aidan Gomez:Was there any debate internally? Oh my God, so much. So much. Such a hotly... But we were just like, are we going to spend our time chasing what other guys are doing? Are we just going to replicate whatever these people are having success with? We didn't want to do that. We sort of wanted to carve our own path. And we still do. It's fantastic that the market has moved towards us. that suddenly like sovereignty and independence is the most important thing in the world enterprise is like the highest margin best business and we've seen the tailwinds of that like you know our revenue success thing last year uh it'll do another big multiple this year i don't know if i believe in karma but i do believe that like an earnest dedication to an idea that is like a good one and a useful one for the world will be rewarded and it might not be the fastest rewarded it might not be the easiest rewarded uh might not be the easiest path might not be the fastest path but it'll be rewarded like for like jensen and video he's been like the longest serving public company founder ceo and man like for 30 years he just like yeah i don't know what you I mean, he appeared out of nowhere four years ago with the most valuable company in the world.
35:21No, no. He was just, he knew this was useful. Like, it's hard to describe, but he knew that there was a need. And he could have just done CPUs and he could have just, like, folded and rolled into, like, everything Intel was doing and whoever the, you know, whatever the latest fad was. and I'm sure he got told a million times this is irrelevant this is never actually going to take off it's niche it's niche it's not going to scale um people don't need this but you know it's the biggest company in the world and uh well deserved like no one has had as long a conviction and has like worked harder for this than Jensen has and I think he deserves all the success he's gotten and And that sort of conviction to an ideal, that sort of conviction to his beliefs over decades is something I really admire.
36:20Aidan Gomez:How do you balance your own sort of, maybe idealism isn't the right word, but your values here and the vision of the world that seems to matter a lot to you with the sort of idea of letting these customers or this sovereignty do things that maybe you wouldn't agree with? We're in a moment where one of the big AI labs has had a very public spat with the government about use of its tools. You are used by a bunch of governments. Is this something that you have to grapple with or that you feel really comfortable with? What becomes the true north for Cohere there? Yeah, it's super important. And this technology, it's going to be integrated everywhere.
37:00Every single industry, public sector, private sector, defense, civil, we just have to accept that it will be. The way we approach it at Cohere is we're fortunate in that because we work directly with our customers, we have a lot of opportunity to educate and engage with them. So we're able to be a partner to them in thinking about where is it right to deploy this? Where is the technology ready to be deployed? And what sort of safeguards need to be in place? And we try to build those into the model. We try to build those into North, the product around the model. Human oversight is a key component of it.
37:41The ability to say there's a certain category of activities or actions that we're never going to fully automate. We will always have a human in the loop for. We ensure that within North, that can be implemented in an extremely accurate and reliable way so that you know a human is involved in making that decision. And there are many, many ethical questions about how AI gets deployed into some of these more sensitive sectors. Of course, defense like you're referencing, but also healthcare and financial decisions. And all of these have meaningful consequences on people's lives. So we try to be very conscious of that and provide the tools to make effective decisions.
38:24And then we also choose who we work with, right? We can actually, from our position, make a decision of who we do business with and, in particular, which countries we engage with. And with democracies, the fantastic thing is that it's a better way of governance. It tends to have much better checks and balances. When someone does step out of line or when an agency does break the law, there's a reckoning with that. And then fixes are implemented. And the system self-repairs through those issues. And so we trust the democratic process to produce results that protect people and ultimately end up in the best possible policy environment to support the right sort of adoption of this technology.
39:15But of course, we do choose who we work with and what governments we engage with versus which ones we don't.
39:20Aidan Gomez:When you think about your overarching mission or sort of what winning or success would look like, is it measured by impact? Is it measured by the scale of how big Cohere grows? I don't know if a trillion dollar IPO is a goal for you as it seems to be for some of your peers, but is that something that you'd be happy to have incidentally? When you think where this ends up, what's on the vision board? Yeah, I don't care about the valuation of the IPO. I do care about IPOing because I think people need to be able to, private citizens need to be able to take a stake in a company. I just think that's good.
39:56Like if we stay private forever and it's only like institutional investors that have access to taking ownership of Cohere, that's a bad outcome. And the other good thing about IPOing is just the, you get additional scrutiny. People can see your finances. You know, you have to report them. You have no other choice. You're way more. You're better governed because you're under higher scrutiny. And so I think Cohere should IPO on the basis of those two things, better governance, more scrutiny, and the fact that more people will get to participate. But obviously I want the valuation to be fair and high for my investors.
40:35Aidan Gomez:For your investors, not for you, though. I don't know. I'm rich enough already. It's okay. I don't know if it really matters that much anymore. But it matters to me the impact that Cohere has in the world and that we're able to support this broader mission of helping countries be more resilient, in particular helping democracies be more resilient no matter what comes. So if we can contribute to that mission, if we can help countries become more sovereign, to have more autonomy, to be able to feel like they're on more secure footing so that they can push back against bad behavior and make decisions that are right for the values that they believe in, that's a success.
41:21And I think we'll get paid along the way.
41:23Aidan Gomez:Awesome. Well, I hope that the impact you're having with these customers makes its way into the public eye more and more. So maybe if it's not Cohere being the household name, you know, the products or the infrastructure run off of Cohere models is still having that huge impact as well. Yeah. Well, we sponsored an F1 team. So Aston Martin. Was that just so you could go to the race? That was so that I could go to the race. But our sticker is there. So people are going to be seeing it now. So maybe our profile will race. Well, thanks so much for coming on the show, Aiden. Yeah. Thanks for having me.
42:01Thank you.
From the publisher
A self-described "shy nerd" from rural Ontario, Aidan Gomez doesn't like to scream his startup’s name from the rooftops.
But the co-author of the landmark ‘Attention Is All You Need’ paper is quietly building one of AI's most important infrastructure companies — one focused on bringing its benefits to the wider world outside Silicon Valley.
Toronto-based Cohere works with major enterprises and G7 governments, providing secure models for them to build everything from email-summary apps to onboard ship telemetry on top. Revenue grew 6x last year, past a reported $240 million; with $1.7 billion in total funding, an IPO is in its sights.
On the Upstarts Podcast, Gomez talks about his journey to co-developing the Transformer architecture that underpins modern AI; why he sees AI as the best shot at restoring global growth and democratic resilience; and why it’s so important that more nations than the world’s biggest benefit.
Plus, he shares his Upstart Moment: building on ‘hard mode’ by not taking money from Amazon, Google or Microsoft early on.
Chapters:
00:00 Introduction
01:11 Cohere’s ‘takeoff phase’
05:09 Where vibe coding falls short
08:05 Smalltown Canada to AI epicenter
14:27 Co-authoring the Transformer paper
18:52 Starting up Cohere
25:22 Why AI sovereignty matters
30:25 Aidan’s Upstart Moment
32:56 Playing on ‘hard mode’
36:55 Ethical questions of AI
39:44 Why Cohere should IPO
For more, visit https://www.upstartsmedia.com/
Season 1 of the Upstarts Podcast is presented by Mercury
Produced & edited by Eric Johnson from LightningPod




