New genome of ancient human; 95% of us have a dormant virus that causes disease; Formula E cars faster than F1; Bill Bryson joins the pod!

14 Nov 2025 · 45 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

This episode of The World, The Universe and Us covers three science stories and a guest interview. Topic 1: Denisovan human evolution. A second full Denisovan genome was sequenced from a single 200,000-year-old molar from Denisova Cave, Siberia.

Key claims

there were at least three Denisovan populations with different histories; Denisovans interbred with an unidentified ancient human group and with a Neanderthal population not matching any known Neanderthal genome.

Notable examples

the new individual lived ~205,000 years ago; earlier high-quality Denisovan genome was ~55,000–75,000 years old; Denisovans used the cave over long periods. Topic 2: Epstein-Barr virus.

Key claims

90–95% of adults carry it dormant for life; it can drive immune changes contributing to lupus (and links to multiple sclerosis). Notable example: virus infects memory B cells, triggering gene expression that recruits immune cells to attack the body. Topic 3: Formula E vs F1.

Key claims

Generation 5 may match or beat F1 speed depending on race length; electric efficiency and acceleration are advantages, battery energy density is the bottleneck.

Guest backgrounds

Alec Loon (New Scientist environment reporter) covers Formula E; Bill Bryson (science writer; revised A Short History of Nearly Everything) discusses updating his book and science communication.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Denisovan Genome Discovery

1:32 to 2:30

Discussion about the second genome sequence of Denisovans and its implications.

“And we have a special guest with us this week, science writer, legend, Bill Bryson.”

Understanding Interbreeding and Ancestry

2:30 to 4:10

Exploration of Denisovan interbreeding with other ancient populations and its significance.

“And the DNA from this one was extracted from a single molar, a 200 ,000-year-old tooth found in this cave in Siberia.”

The Complexity of Human Evolution

4:10 to 5:50

Insights into the complexities of the human family tree and Denisovan evolution.

“Bombshell is that this new genome reveals that there are at least three separate populations of Denisovans with completely different histories.”

Bill Bryson's Perspective on Evolution

5:50 to 7:30

Bill Bryson shares his thoughts on the surprising complexity of ancient human relations.

“or has it given us an entirely new genome to look at?”

The Complexity of Human Evolution

10:52 to 11:44

Insights into the complexities of the human family tree and Denisovan evolution.

“This week, New Scientist CoLab explores Vanguard, a next-generation underwater habitat designed to allow humans to live on the ocean floor.”

Exploring Epsten-Barr Virus

11:44 to 14:02

Discussion on the Epstein-Barr virus, its prevalence, and health implications.

“OK, let's talk about the Epstein-Barr virus.”

The Impact of Dormant Viruses on Autoimmune Disorders

14:02 to 19:06

Explore how dormant viruses are linked to autoimmune disorders like lupus and multiple sclerosis.

“So that's kind of interesting there that this virus seems to be linked to two types of autoimmune disorder.”

The Rise of Formula E: Electric Cars Outpacing F1

19:06 to 21:51

Learn how Formula E cars are closing the gap with Formula One in speed and efficiency.

“We're going to get rid of combustion vehicles.”

The Future of Electric Vehicle Racing

21:51 to 24:11

Discuss the advantages and limitations of electric vehicles in racing compared to traditional fuel cars.

“And actually, it is so efficient that Formula One has taken notice.”

Bill Bryson: Updating a Scientific Classic

24:11 to 28:01

Hear from Bill Bryson on revising his classic work to reflect new scientific discoveries and insights.

“You could swap out the battery in a pit stop, right?”
Show all 19 chapters

Revising the Science Book

28:01 to 29:55

Discussing the challenges and changes in updating an old science book.

“I mean, you've said it better than I can say myself.”

Engaging with Scientists

29:56 to 34:00

Exploring the joy of revisiting scientists and understanding their work.

“And there was hardly any place that didn't have some sort of adjusting needed.”

The Excitement of the Unknown

34:01 to 36:28

Discussing the thrill of not knowing and the importance of scientific curiosity.

“There's Higgs boson you've now put in there, gravitational waves.”

Longevity and Life Hours

36:29 to 37:57

Examining changes in human life expectancy and the concept of life hours.

“And that can only have got worse with smartphones, right?”

Discoveries in Chemistry and Astronomy

37:58 to 41:07

Discussing advancements in chemistry and the surprising number of celestial bodies.

“But then I went off and watched Coronation Street.”

Science in Modern Times

41:08 to 42:00

Reflecting on the challenges of writing science in a contentious environment.

“I recently had a hiking accident in Norway, and I fell down a mountain, broke my femur, was stuck on the mountain for six days, went to the hospital, was taken by helicopter to the hospital after that.”

Bill Bryson Discusses His New Book

42:00 to 44:14

Bill Bryson shares insights on writing his book amidst current events.

“And I was just wondering if it was daunting at all to do a 2.0 in the world in which we live where this is going to be one of the books that could be burned on the pyre.”

Bill Bryson Discusses His New Book

44:23 to 44:41

Bill Bryson shares insights on writing his book amidst current events.

“then it's worth checking out our Black Friday sale, which has just gone live.”

Bill Bryson Discusses His New Book

44:47 to 45:12

Bill Bryson shares insights on writing his book amidst current events.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01I'm not giving up. I am selling the building. The final season of FX is the Bear. The restaurant is flooded. Everything's either going to be okay. Or not. We are outgunned and we are outmanned. We have each other. FX is the Bear. The final season. All episodes now streaming on Disney+. In what has been described as a bombshell finding, this week we hear about the second genome sequence made for a Denisovan. Denisovans are those enigmatic early human relatives of ours. We're going to find out what the new genome tells us about our relationship to them and the interbreeding that went on between us and them.

0:46It's obvious that it's all so much more complicated. They're kind of exciting.

0:50Bill Bryson:Yes, also on the show this week, Formula E electric cars are on the verge of outperforming Formula 1 petrol cars. Formula E is saying that the next car, the Generation 5, will probably be as fast or faster than Formula 1. But it depends how long the race is. We're finding out what that means. And we're also going to be discussing new findings about Epstein-Barr virus. It causes a range of diseases. You may know it as mono, kissing disease, glandular fever. 95 % of us have it and we're still finding out what it's doing to us. I did not know that. All I knew was that if you have a cat, you're likely to have feline.

1:23Toxoplasmosis. That feline virus. I probably got that.

1:31Bill Bryson:Welcome to The World, The Universe and Us from New Scientist. I'm Dr Penny Sarchet. And I'm Dr Rowan Hooper. And we have a special guest with us this week, science writer, legend, Bill Bryson. And when I mentioned in the office that Bill was coming on the pod today, people reacted like, you know, Ryan Gosling was coming in or David Beckham or something. It's my looks, it's my looks. Bill's book, A Short History of Nearly Everything, was published in 2003. It sold like absolute billio. Best-selling non-fiction book of the 21st century. And he's now revised it. And we're going to talk about that later in the show.

2:07But we thought it would be great to have you on the podcast with us ahead of that. Welcome to PodBuild. Very honoured to be here. Thank you, Rowan.

2:14Bill Bryson:Let's talk about one of our favourite subjects, the human family tree. Well, it's a bush, isn't it? A shrub. A hedge. A kind of hedge row. The story this week is that for only the second time, researchers have obtained the full genome of a Denisovan, and that's a group of ancient humans who lived in Asia. And the DNA from this one was extracted from a single molar, a 200 ,000-year-old tooth found in this cave in Siberia. Yeah, and you may be thinking, well, how interesting is that really? David Reich at Harvard described this as a bombshell paper. Why is that? Well, so these Denisovans, they came out of nowhere.

2:52I checked the first edition. They're not in it because they weren't discovered back then.

2:57Bill Bryson:15 years, isn't it? We've got 15 years of knowing that they existed at all, even though they're a really close human ancestor. Yeah. So they were the first ancient human to be discovered by DNA alone. And I just read in your new book, Bill, the origin story of the name Denisovans. Oh, yes. It was from a cave in Siberia that was said to have been inhabited by a saint named Saint Denis. I did not know that. A hermit. A hermit, yeah. Fantastic. Well, it reminded me of the hermit in life of Brian, you know, in that cave. He was living there. And then, you know, hundreds of thousands of years later, he's got a species named Arthur.

3:38Bill Bryson:Well, not quite a species, but that's a whole thing. We might get to that. Yeah. So the story of the discovery is that Svanti Pabo, he basically invented paleogenetics. He was sequencing DNA from Neanderthals and he was sent this fragment of bone from this cave. He expected it to be a Neanderthal and he found something completely different. Yeah, and we've talked about Denisovans a lot on the pod before. For a really long time, all we had were those fragments of bone and the DNA sequence. And there's been a flurry of findings recently, especially this year. So what's the new bombshell finding now?

4:10Bombshell is that this new genome reveals that there are at least three separate populations of Denisovans with completely different histories. So it shows that the early Denisovans interbred with an unidentified group of ancient humans and with a previously unknown population of Neanderthals.

4:30Bill Bryson:So there's a whole other ancestral group out there that we didn't know about before. Yeah. So the ancestral branch that led to Neanderthals and Denisovans, they left Africa well over 400 ,000 years ago. Our ancestors then sort of carried on evolving in Africa, became Homo sapiens, and then they left 50 ,000 to 60 ,000 years ago. But yes, since that first identification of Denisovan in 2010, we found a few more samples from, but all from around Asia, East Asia. Because we recently reported on a skull found in China that has now been ID'd as a Denisovan. It's the first time we've actually known what their faces look like.

5:13Or their skulls. Well, you can infer that, right? Yeah, you can. So we've only got these fragments of DNA, despite the fact that we've got these other bits and bobs, the skull and other fragments of bone. We've only managed to get fragments of DNA, not enough to make a whole genome. but they've been going back to that Denisovac cave over and over and in 2020 they found this molar there and as we know teeth are a great place to get DNA from and that's what they've managed to do now

5:44Bill Bryson:And so was this tooth yielding the same genome that they were studying back in 2010 or has it given us an entirely new genome to look at? Yeah, so that's the interesting thing based on the number of mutations in the new genome and comparisons to other ancient humans, the team now have estimated that this individual lived about 205 ,000 years ago, so really long ago, and supporting that, the sediments where the tooth was found were about 170 ,000 to 200 ,000 years old. But the other high-quality genome that we already had was from a Denisovan who lived only 55 ,000 to 75 ,000 years ago. So in other words, the genome we've just got from the tooth is from a much earlier stage of Denisovan history.

6:29Bill Bryson:So amazing to think that it goes back that far. And also that all the way throughout that time, they were using this cave on and off. Yeah, what a historical site for humanity, really, in the broadest sense. And based on comparisons with the other remains, the team say that there are at least these three discrete Denisovan populations. So in the cave alone, you find these two. the oldest group that's where the male this new genome comes from the second group then replaced that population thousands of years later and so what's the third group? third group is not from the cave but from other remains and they're the ones that interbred with us not me personally you're not that old are you?

7:13Bill Bryson:yes because we do know that we carry Denisovan DNA and some people carry as much as 6 % I think so there clearly was interbreeding but does that mean we haven't actually yet found a genome of this third population that we interbred with we we still don't really know much about them no that's right um we know there was interbreeding from other denisovan dna from elsewhere but we don't know about them genetically really because we haven't got their genome yet right so there's there's still loads to discover here and unpick about the denisovans and their intertwined history with us i mean it's like a soap opera isn't it going on over hundreds of thousands of years here with all this stuff that's going on.

7:52So the new genome also reveals that this thing about the interbreeding with Neanderthals, the Denisovans and the Neanderthals, who also lived around this Denisova cave. The genome had traces from a Neanderthal population that we know lived 7 ,000 years or so before this Denisovan who lost his tooth there. And these traces don't match any known Neanderthal genome though. So the suggestion then is that the Denisovans interbred with a Neanderthal group that has never been found. So this is another sort of part of the jigsaw that there's a missing gap there. The Denisophans also seem to have interbred with an unidentified group of ancient hominins that evolved independently of Denisophans and modern humans for hundreds of thousands of years.

8:41Bill Bryson:So it really is looking like a shrub. Like you say, there's all of these different populations of different types of human, including Homo sapiens and our closest relatives. and we're discovering these genetic hints all the time that there were these other groups, not just in Africa, all over the place. And there's still so much more to sort of understand what was exactly going on at this point. Yeah. Bill, has this surprised you over, you know, when you wrote the first edition of your book? Was it starting to look quite straightforward? Yeah, it was. It actually, it was. I think, I mean, not just to me, but I think to people in the field were pretty confident that they had kind of figured things out.

9:18And then all this new stuff, not just the Denisovans but also the Homo floresiensis and just various other archaic human groups that have been found since that were never suspected. And it's obvious that it's all so much more complicated but kind of exciting too. And the thing that fascinated me as a complete outsider to all this is how did these people all get around? I mean, how did they disperse? And what happened when they came upon each other? You know, there must have been – I think there's a tendency to think that it would lead to some sort of tension, fighting. But actually, it ended up with – Interbreeding.

9:58Interbreeding. Quite a lot of introgression, as they say. Yeah, yeah. And, yeah, I think that's amazing. I think it's kind of heartwarming, too, the idea that these people were living side by side and together for long, long, long periods. because modern Homo sapiens don't do that very well at all. No. I mean, obviously the tragedy is they all went extinct apart from us. Yeah. But I guess one nice thing is that we do find these remnant bits of their genome in us still, so they live on in some kind of way.

10:28Bill Bryson:I'm sure I've mentioned this before, but there's cool genes we have from the Denise Burns, and some of them lived up on these high Tibetan plateaus, and some people have genes from them that make it easier to breathe oxygen. at those altitudes. So it's amazing the sort of genetic footprint or, well, fingerprint that they've left in some of us. The reach they have still. Yes, absolutely. This message is sponsored by DEEP. This week, New Scientist CoLab explores Vanguard, a next-generation underwater habitat designed to allow humans to live on the ocean floor. Built to withstand the pressures of the sea and even the force of a Category 5 hurricane, it represents a major leap forward in engineering and marine science.

11:09Roughly the size of a shipping container, Vanguard offers comfortable, high-tech living for researchers spending a week or more beneath the surface. It will allow marine scientists to live where they work, observing the ocean real-time over extended periods, testing new technologies and expanding our understanding of the oceans and how to live in an aquatic environment. Vanguard isn't just a habitat, it's the start of a new era of exploration where humans and the ocean coexist more closely than ever before. Find out more at newscientist.com slash deep.

11:44Bill Bryson:OK, let's talk about the Epstein-Barr virus. Did you know, Rowan, that most of us have a dormant virus that can cause autoimmune diseases within us? I did not know that. All I knew was that if you have a cat, you're likely to have that feline virus I probably got that. And I know that the human genome is riddled with bacterial DNA. Yeah. And I guess our microbiome is full of viruses. But I didn't know about this thing about the Epstein-Barr virus at all. Yeah. Even if you don't think you've ever had glandular fever or monomononucleosis, kissing disease, all of the different names for it. If you're an adult, it's almost certain that you do have it dormant in you.

12:23Bill Bryson:It's the Epstein-Barr virus and it's thought to infect 90 to 95 percent of adults globally. Wow. Yeah, it's huge. And once it's in your body, it's in you for life. Wow. So that makes it a really successful organism, if we're calling viruses organism. Well, really successful. So the story this week is that there's further evidence of why dormant viruses such as these are not just sort of secretly, you know, they can be a long term health problem. Yeah, because you'd like to think if we're going to have to live with these things, they're not doing anything, but that they may not be as dormant as they appear.

12:57Bill Bryson:And the discovery this week is that epstein-barr can cause changes in the immune system that can contribute to lupus an autoimmune condition um that involves the immune system attacking your body's tissues causes things like rashes joint pain hair loss fatigue yeah i mean i have to say lupus made me think of werewolves but it's because apparently it's because the the rash it causes it looks a bit like the bite of a wolf right so it's called lupus okay of course cancer yeah is caused is called that because people thought it looked like the skin cancer looked like the clip of a crab when you got bit.

13:31That's beside the point. That is beside the point. But what is not beside the point is, well, what's the, how concerned should we be? Like 95 % of us might have this virus, but it only causes problems in, you know, 0.1 % of people.

13:45Bill Bryson:A fraction. Yeah, exactly. So even though almost all of us have this virus, it causes disease in very few people. But there are two reasons that I still think this is really interesting. So first off, this isn't the first time that Epstein-Barr really common virus has been linked to an autoimmune condition. I've been keeping an eye for a while on its strong links to multiple sclerosis. So that's kind of interesting there that this virus seems to be linked to two types of autoimmune disorder. So we're starting to get a picture now that it does mess with your immune system and cause these nasty conditions.

14:18Bill Bryson:And I'm always interested in autoimmune ones because they're horrible conditions. They affect women more often and we still don't understand them or treat them that well. But then on an even broader level, we do have, you know, this isn't the only virus we have dormant within us. There are loads of them. If you ever had a cold sore, you've got one of those. A lot of us who weren't vaccinated with chickenpox as kids, we've got that one lying dormant in us. HPV is a famous one. And increasingly, we're learning that they're involved in, you know, that you don't have them get over the acute infection and then you're fine for life.

14:51Bill Bryson:They can cause problems later on. And that's why we now vaccinate against HPV to prevent the cancers that it causes. And Epstein-Barr, we've known about it for about 61 years, but we're still learning quite a lot about it. So we first discovered it, or one of the first things we knew about it is it's linked to cancer too. But it also might be implicated in things like post-viral conditions, chronic fatigue syndrome, ME and the like. So it's really important that we understand what these dormant, supposedly dormant viruses are actually doing in our bodies. Yeah, yeah. So I had really, I have to say, hardly any idea about any of this.

15:23So that's really intriguing. And about lupus. So how do we know how it might shift over into causing this disease?

15:33Bill Bryson:So this is the new finding this week. The virus infects a type of immune cell called memory B cells. And these are really clever. What they do is they, when you've been attacked by something, they remember it. So if you then encounter that pathogen again, you can respond to it much quicker, much stronger and stamp it out. And so the new study looked at what the virus does in these cells. And they found that it triggers the expressions of genes that kind of recruit other immune cells and kind of ramp up this nasty cascade where all of these immune cells start attacking your own body rather than finding a repeat pathogen.

16:07OK, and that's what causes lupus. And does that mean we can interfere with that cascade and cure it?

16:13Bill Bryson:You'd hope so. But lupus, unfortunately, is a very varied condition. So it's thought that there's probably multiple mechanisms involved. However, this particular pathway might be the main causative pathway in some patients, but it's still early days, so we don't know. But you'd think any unpicking of this is going to be useful, hopefully, for treatments. yeah so you can imagine how there are so many different factors that tip you down a path into developing one of these things and there's multiple sclerosis too yes and do we know any other of these reasons why yeah you know you might get tipped into a pathway yes exactly if 95 of us have this virus why does such a small number stress or something oh yeah so environment is we don't know that much about yet but environment is very complicated and it's probably involved but genetics really is probably a large part of the factor um to predispose you or otherwise to autoimmune disorders um and then also as i mentioned women are more likely to have autoimmune conditions that's probably due to the fact that women have stronger immune systems um and and that seems to be we're gradually sort of unpicking this and we've got a great feature recently a new scientist on this about it's to do with how many copies of the x chromosome you have and the role that that chromosome plays in immunity.

17:31Bill Bryson:So that must be playing some kind of role in this as well. Wow. So what about vaccination? Are people thinking about this, vaccinating again? Well, I am, right? If we have one of these viruses sitting in us and we're gradually discovering that they can cause all kinds of issues later night. Well, they might do a lot of good, though. Can you name a virus that does us good? Not offhand. Okay, listeners, right in. but yeah i mean i guess we don't know part of our virome hollow biome yeah yeah the virome you know i wouldn't want to get rid of them all that's interesting yeah interesting um i mean yeah because that's where my mind went is okay we know this virus does a thing can we not just vaccinate it against it there has been preliminary work on that we don't have a vaccine at the moment some of the really interesting work has looked at um using specific vaccination against epitome bar to treat the cancers that it causes.

18:27Bill Bryson:So maybe you wouldn't vaccinate the entire population, but if someone has a cancer that's being driven by that virus... I'd be happy to be vaccinated for that one. Yeah, fine. But ultimately, it's all about working out the costs and benefits, right? And I'd be surprised if Epstein-Barr is doing something good for us, but I guess you can't rule this out, and that's why they do this kind of research, right? But I do think, you know, what? We've known about this virus for 61 years. There's still so much we don't know about it. But increasingly, there is this trend of realising that we have these things dormant in us that are actually potentially causing harm.

19:00Bill Bryson:And it's great to start shedding some light on what they're actually doing. Now, we talk about electric vehicles from time to time on the pod, mostly in the context of like loads are being sold in China. We're going to get rid of combustion vehicles. Hooray. And get rid of fossil fuels. This week, we have an electric car story that's a bit different. Environment reporter Alec Loon is here. Alec, your story is about Formula E electric race cars and how they could soon outperform Formula One regular fossil fuel cars. So what's the story? Well, yeah, that's absolutely right. They're getting very close to Formula One.

19:42Formula E, which started a little over a decade ago as a way to kind of showcase EV technology. In the first four years, they had to actually swap out the car in the middle of the race because the battery didn't last long enough to finish the race, right? So, you know, nobody was really looking at it as, you know, top class racing then. Okay, jump forward to today, and you have the Generation 4 Formula E car has just come out, and it has 815 horsepower. So that's almost as much as a Formula One, which is about 1 ,000 horsepower. and it can reach speeds of 220 miles per hour, which is almost as fast as Formula One at about 235 miles per hour.

20:25So it's within touching distance of Formula One. And Formula E is saying that the next car, the Generation 5, will probably be as fast or faster than Formula One. So it kind of raises this interesting hypothetical. if you put these two cars on a track together, could the electric car beat the Formula One, which for 50 years, Formula One has been the fastest road vehicle going around a track. And the answer is probably very soon it will be able to beat the Formula One. But there's a big caveat because it depends how long the race is. So anyway, the big advantage of electric vehicles is they're very efficient at converting energy into motion.

21:14You look at a combustion engine, it's only about 25 % conversion rate. So the majority of the energy is actually just being lost to the atmosphere as heat. You run a combustion vehicle for a while, the engine gets very hot, right? Well, that doesn't happen in an electric vehicle. Well, so do electric vehicles not heat up? The battery heats up. Okay, but the engine. The engine's pretty cool because it converts 90%.

21:41Bill Bryson:90 % compared to 25%. Compared to 25%. So up to 90 % of the energy that's going into the engine is converted into pushing the car forward. And the Formula E teams have gotten that up to 96%. And actually, it is so efficient that Formula One has taken notice. and Formula One has put batteries into their petrol cars to help with acceleration and to help with that energy conversion and Formula One's able to get now 50 % energy conversion with the help of batteries. Yeah, because the acceleration in an electric vehicle is their big thing, isn't it? It is nuts. So F1 cars are now using that at the beginning when they start off.

Read the full transcript

22:25They're actually driving electrically. The battery assists the petrol engine in pushing the car forward. And so they get the benefits of a little extra acceleration because electric conversion, it is maximum torque immediately, right? There's no shifting of gears. There's no building up to that. It's just, I mean, so these Formula E cars, they do 0 to 60 in 1.8 seconds. So they already have the fastest acceleration. Formula E is already faster than Formula One in terms of just pure acceleration. And so Formula One uses the battery, regenerates some of the energy during braking and stuff, and uses that energy to help push the car forward.

23:09Bill Bryson:So if Formula E cars are that good, why do they only have the edge on shorter races over Formula One? Right. So the big drawback is the battery. That's the bottleneck. The thing, the genius thing about liquid fuels, the reason that they power our transport is because they're so energy dense. You can just put, you know, a couple gallons in the tank and you can go for hundreds of miles, right? And so batteries are nowhere near that stage yet, even though they have been progressing in leaps and bounds. So battery powered electric vehicle could beat it over the first lap. But, you know, a Formula One race can be 70 laps.

23:46I mean, it's dozens and dozens of laps over the course of two hours. And so eventually the battery would just die and the Formula One would continue to go because as one of the race car team captains who I was talking to told me, we haven't figured out how to put 80 liters of petrol into a battery yet. We don't have anywhere near that energy density in the battery. And there's a debate whether that's going to ever get there or not. You could swap out the battery in a pit stop, right? And they do do pit stops in Formula E where they do a quick charge. I mean, they should do a... What would happen if they allowed an E car in a Formula 1 race?

24:28Like, maybe you could get ahead enough to still stay ahead of doing really quick, like, swapping the battery out and then just accelerate out again. Yeah, it's an interesting question. The Formula E guys and the Formula 1 guys are all, you know, they would never entertain that because they say, well, we have different rules, and Formula E has added a couple, you know, because they lack the kind of vroom, vroom of the engines, the really loud engines, they've added a couple other features like an attack mode, they call it, which is the cars go around a loop on the outside, lose some speed, but then they get, they unlock an attack mode where they can actually, rather than 450 kilowatts, they can draw on 600 kilowatts of power and zoom ahead.

25:12It's like a video game, isn't it? Yes. Attack mode. And literally it was inspired by the stars in Mario Kart, the video game, where it gives you a speed boost. So, yeah, Mario Kart is to thank for that. So the question going forward then is how good can batteries get? Can they get good enough to rival that liquid fuel? Is there a point at which acceleration becomes so great that you can't control the car anymore? That's a really good question. We haven't been reaching that limit yet. It's an interesting question because the human reaction speed, there was a study recently that found that humans, it takes 390 to 600 milliseconds for a human to react to something when they're driving and there's something on the road.

26:00So, you know, and you'd think a race car driver, these were just average people, so you'd think a race car driver would have slightly faster than that, I don't know, maybe 300 milliseconds reaction time, maybe 200 something. But there's still that gap. And so, yeah, at what point does the car get so fast that you don't, that the human reaction can't keep up with it? But I think there's a long way to go with the car speed because, I mean, the land speed record for a car, not on a racetrack, but just driving straight, is 760 miles per hour. and race cars are doing 235. So it seems like there's room for them to get faster before they reach the human limit.

26:42But I honestly don't know what the human limit is.

26:46Bill Bryson:It's amazing. And I guess the whole point of, well, to an extent of Formula E is to show the potential of and make exciting electric vehicles. But, you know, a lot of people have them now. Does the sort of advances that we're seeing in Formula E mean anything for those that we have on the street? Does it trickle down? Yeah, trickle down cars. Yeah, well, you're not going to be able to buy a Formula E car in a dealership anytime soon. But it does trickle down. So already high-end EVs, and not only high-end ones, but pretty much all the EV makers are now offering an 800-volt EV, whereas 400 volts was the previous standard.

27:24And so 800 volt, that unlocks more power, so the car can be more powerful, go faster, have better acceleration. But it also unlocks faster charging, which is something that regular EV owners can get excited about. And that 800-volt architecture was developed in Formula E. Bill Bryson, you're revered in the new scientist office for writing a short history of nearly everything in 2003. As we said, it was a massive bestseller, still selling. And you thought, well, actually, it's a bit out of date. Now I need to update it. Exactly. I mean, you've said it better than I can say myself. That is precisely what happened.

28:06I looked at it. It was over 20 years old. And obviously, as you will be well aware, science has moved on a great deal. I mean, we already talked about the Denisovans. When I wrote the book, nobody had a clue of all these archaic peoples that we now know about through genetic studies. and the book was becoming just conspicuously out of date in lots and lots of different places, so much so that even somebody like me who's not a scientist could see that this is, you know, this has got to be more. And the problem is it was still selling. If no one was buying it, it wouldn't have mattered. No, it didn't die a quiet death, so it was still selling and I began to feel like, well, this is slightly fraudulent, that I'm still making money and the publishers are still putting out their book that really is kind of becoming hopelessly out of date.

28:53So I thought, okay, well, I will try and bring it up to date, thinking that now with the Internet it would be really a simple matter of doing a lot of fact-checking and just changing numbers here and there. Yeah, but it wasn't. Well, it was to a large extent. I mean, the Internet is just a dream for that. If you want to know how many exoplanets there are, I can tell you exactly how many we know today in a way that could not do that before. but when I wrote the book in the first place I think the number that was known was like 30 or 40 nearly 6 ,000 so it was really good for that but then there were so many other things like not least archaic humans Denise of Vincent Homo Floresiensis and so on so certain chapters had to be more or less completely rewritten with Human Origins I rewrote almost totally two chapters of the book just to try and bring it up to where we are now in the first quarter of the 21st century.

29:56And there was hardly any place that didn't have some sort of adjusting needed. But it also became a real pleasure for me because I got to go back and re-interview a lot of the people that I spoke to 20 years ago and I hadn't been in touch with. And that was just what you've been doing for the last 20 years and what's new. And that was really, really interesting. And they were all, without exception, they were all very, very happy to talk to me again and to be very, very helpful. That is one of the joys of being a science reporter, isn't it? The time that scientists give to you, the pleasure it is, and the privilege of getting the time of world experts.

30:33Well, if I can be candid, I think a lot of scientists, nobody's ever really expressed much interest in what they do. And the more technical work they do, the less likely that people in a pub are going to say, oh, tell me more. But here am I saying, you know. This is amazing. Tell me all about it. And, you know, I'm not faking it. I find it amazing, even if what you're doing is basically quite dull to me, and I can't imagine why any human being would devote their life to that particular thing, study lichens, for instance, or mosses. One of Rowan's favorite topics. But the very fact that you do it, the very fact that a really brainy person that you're having the privilege of talking to does that and can explain to you why they do that.

31:18The question I always ask them was, you know, what got you started in that field? What was the magic moment that made you want to spend your life studying lichens or algae or whatever? And then, of course, very often they haven't asked that question for a long time. They haven't even thought about it for a long time. And that led to a lot of really, really very nice conversations. And, of course, I learned a huge amount by doing that. Let me turn that on you. So what was the magic moment for you and science? The thing with me was that I was terrible at science at school. I'm bored out of my mind by, I think there's a tendency all over even now, but certainly when I was a kid growing up in America in the 50s and 60s, you know, in high school when they taught you physics, it was like they were trying to make you into a physicist.

32:04Or if they taught you chemistry, it was like they were trying to create new generations of chemists. And there's loads of people like me that are never going to be scientists, but ought to be able to engage with science at some level. Yeah. You know, I watch Horizon and read about science stories. Read new scientists. Read science stories. You know, obviously, science explains everything there is to know. It tells us who we are, where we're going, and what we have to do if we want to get to where we want to go. And so I just thought there's got to be some level at which I can engage with science and understand it and sort of marvel at the wonder of it without having to go into lots of equations and formulas and all that sort of blackboard-type stuff.

32:46And that was the whole idea. And I put this to my publishers and they all said, no, that's just a really dumb idea. You're not qualified. You shouldn't be doing this. Leave that to Stephen Hawking. It's like not signing the Beatles or something. It's a go away. These were all publishers I had good relationships with. And luckily they let me do it. And luckily it turned out that there's lots of people like me in the world who want to know what is. the whole idea of the book for me was not so much what we know, but how do we know what we know? How do scientists figure these things out? I could never think of a way to work out how much the Earth weighs or how hard it is on the surface of the sun or any of those marvelous things that scientists know and can tell us.

33:32And that, to me, just fascinates me. And I think when I went out into the world and started interviewing scientists about those sort of things, I think very often they were kind of flattered that somebody admired them for what they do. But it was sincere admiration because I think it is incredible what scientists can figure out and what they can tell you. And also quite fascinating what they can't tell you. That's just as amazing too.

33:57Bill Bryson:And so just thinking about the last 20 or so years, there's been some amazing big physics, hasn't there? There's Higgs boson you've now put in there, gravitational waves. Have you been sort of going back to catch up? Yeah, I've tried. I mean, I put in quite a lot about the Higgs boson, But with particle physics, what I find is that very quickly you get into a level of complexity that is not particularly compatible with popular science books. I mean, you really need to understand a lot to do it. I just struggle with that to keep it accessible. And I don't know maybe if I simplified it too much.

34:32I was also very fascinated. I spent quite a lot of time with Carlos Frank, a cosmologist from Durham University, who was also just by chance an old friend. And he was very, very helpful. He spent his whole career trying to figure out dark matter and dark energy. And that I found really, really fascinating. He was very, very helpful with that. But, of course, we're no closer to knowing the answer to that now than we were 10 or 15 years ago. I mean, he's been working that for 40 years. But I find that interesting, too, and kind of exciting. I mean, one of the things that I hadn't expected was that the amount of things we don't know is actually exciting.

35:10It would be awful if we knew everything, you know. There's a lot we could do with knowing. But just the very fact that we don't know how many insect experts, we have no idea how many insect species there are in the past. How sad would it be if we did know, you know, if there was nothing left to find? Well, I mean, what that straight away makes me think is they're going extinct before we even know how many there are. And that leads me to think of climate change as well, which is not in the book, in either of them. And I wondered about why you made the decision to leave that out. It was a tough call.

35:43But the idea of the book is really to try to understand how we got to where we are now. Our current state of knowledge, insofar as I'm capable of understanding it. So the book is a lot about the history of science. It's more about Newton than there is about climate science today. And the one thing I don't do anywhere in the book, really, is try to forecast the future or look ahead. It's a dangerous thing, I think, anyway, but it's a particularly dangerous thing for somebody like me who's just a layperson to try to do. I mean, I personally am very worried about climate change, but I just felt if the book, that is actually a separate book.

36:26I mean, that's not something that I should be trying to deal with here because a lot of these things can change very quickly if new knowledge comes along. so I might have been a bit cowardly in that way but you can't cover everything

36:39Bill Bryson:We talk about longevity science quite a bit on the podcast and one thing that's changed between the original version of your book and the new one is that back in 2003 a long human life lasted about 650 ,000 hours somehow that doesn't sound enough 74.2 years but now it's 700 ,000 hours 80 odd years and that's something to be really pleased about right that's quite a beast in longevity over that time yeah yeah yeah and I'm embarrassed to say that it was actually quite late on in putting the book together that I thought oh I better check that figure and yeah I was I mean I was surprised because I mean the point I was making originally was that you know we only live for 650 thousand hours if you think about the number of hours of your life you've wasted just fooling around doing idle things just watching coronation stream it's not wasted time Well, you know.

37:32Bill Bryson:And that can only have got worse with smartphones, right? In the time that we're talking about. Absolutely. And you only have 650 ,000 of those hours. Well, now we know you have more like 700 ,000 of those. It's still a pretty meagre number if you think. When you put it in hours, it does, it's somehow shocking. And I remember once I calculated my life so far in hours and then how many would be left on average. And that gave me a really chilling feeling. Oh, yeah. Well, you wait until you get to my age. But then I went off and watched Coronation Street. wasted it all. Every week your smartphone tells you how many hours you spent on the smartphone and it's chipping away at that number.

38:10Another thing that is in chemistry, you know, that's moved on even in this 15 or 20 odd year period. We've discovered more elements and that's another thing that we perhaps thought we were getting. I mean, there's this island of stability, isn't there, that chemists, this hallowed island of stability that they look for. So there may be extra elements there but you feel like that that should be done and dusted but they're still finding more yeah and it's i mean i think it's interesting that nobody really knows how many more there are to be found but again i'm speaking as an outsider here so perhaps i don't do the field justice but it does seem as if i mean they're spending an awful lot of effort just to make things that vanish almost as soon as you've created them and you have to you have to sort of wonder what's the point of that i mean that you know if you've made element 118 great but actually you know what you get to name it yes you get to name it uh but but even that takes years to get everybody to agree to it so i mean i i'm sure there are good sound reasons for continuing that kind of research i'm all in favor of research that doesn't have necessarily have an economic obvious economic benefit but but that is one of those areas where you wonder well if something only exists for a zillionth of a second.

39:26Why did you do that? Why have you invested so much energy, time, and effort in doing that?

39:33Bill Bryson:This might be too hard a question, but was there anything that stood out to you when you were revising it that was just a kind of unexpected delight, like a surprise that you weren't expecting and you really enjoyed sort of visiting? The one that just sort of rocked me on my heels. I went through the book Chronological Order. I just started chapter one and went right through. So right at the very beginning, it was discovering that there are twice as many known moons in the solar system as there were when I wrote the book 20 years ago. And I thought, how hard is it to, you know, identify a moon?

40:04Where were they all? Well, I'm just, it's me. I mean, the number of moons of Jupiter, known moons of Jupiter, has troubled in 20 years. And I just thought, well, what were they looking at 20 years ago? But it turns out, of course, that a lot of these moons are very small. They're just big rocks. And apparently the definition of a moon is anything rocky that orbits a planet. So it can be just, you know, anything. Well, we lost a planet in that period, right? And Pluto, yeah. Well, I knew that it happened. But that was actually, turned out to be a much more interesting story than I expected because Pluto turns out to be a much more interesting planet than anybody or non-planet, planetoid or whatever they call them.

40:44I mean, I grew up with it being taught that it was just this distant icy ball that was of no consequence. But actually, it's got quite a lot more interesting things going on, the tectonics and all kinds of stuff. And we've only learned that in the last 20 years, oddly, just after we've demoted it from the status of being a planet. So, Bill, a little bit of a personal story. I recently had a hiking accident in Norway, and I fell down a mountain, broke my femur, was stuck on the mountain for six days, went to the hospital, was taken by helicopter to the hospital after that. And I was sitting in the hospital with all these injuries and didn't have much to do.

41:25And my sister brought me the original short history of nearly everything to read in the hospital as reading material. And I had read it years before, many years ago, but suddenly it reappeared in my life. And I was just a little curious because, you know, years ago it was in such a more benign kind of atmosphere or climate that we received this book. And now, you know, people talk about a war on science in the United States for sure. It's, you know, it's not even interesting to debate anymore. It's just so clear. And I was just wondering if it was daunting at all to do a 2.0 in the world in which we live where this is going to be one of the books that could be burned on the pyre.

42:14Well, first let me say I'm very honored that you read my book after what you went through. I think in your shoes I would have just asked for a P.G. Woodhouse novel. But in terms of writing the book, first of all, Dear President Trump came into our presidential lives quite recently. I mean, I'd more or less finished doing the writing of the book. And then I thought about what do I do about all this? And it's – you know, the whole idea of the book is that – because it's been out there for 20 years, I'm hoping I've done it for another 20 years. And I'm hoping that this current administration will look back on it some years from now and just see it as a kind of a blip.

42:55I cannot believe that not just with science but with so many of the things that are going on in America at the moment that that will become permanent. I mean it would just be tragic if those sorts of policies and that kind of vindictiveness and just sort of institutionalized anger became a permanent feature of the country we both grew up in. So I'm hoping that it was a good idea not to get into that too much of the book because I'm hoping things will change. But it is worrying. And it's also such a big topic that it would have unbalanced the book if I tried to address it. I would either have been accused of just trying to deal with it in a couple of pages or to do it justice.

43:39I would have had to give it at least a couple of chapters. And I think that would have – the book just wasn't about that in much the same way it's not about climate change. because it's not about the future. It's about what we know that got us to where we are right now. Well, you have to send a review copy to Fox News and hope that somebody there, you reach them through the cosmos. I don't think this book would change. Well, maybe somebody at Fox News might be influenced by it, but I don't think there's many people in the White House that would just use it as a doorstop, I think. Well, that's all for this week.

44:15Thanks to our guests, Alec Loon, Bill Bryson. Thanks to you for listening.

44:18Bill Bryson:We'll be back next week. Goodbye. Bye for now. If you've enjoyed today's episode and want to continue feeding your curiosity, then it's worth checking out our Black Friday sale, which has just gone live. Get 50 % off our annual subscription price to New Scientist. Gain unlimited digital access to all our latest reporting and premium articles available on our app, website and print. Visit newscientist.com slash sale and unlock a deeper understanding of our world.

45:11Thank you.

From the publisher

Episode 332

For only the second time, the genome of an ancient Denisovan has been sequenced - thanks to the discovery of a 200,000-year-old tooth found in a Siberian cave. This ancient member of the human family has long been a mystery, so this genome is being described as a bombshell moment, revealing an early stage of Denisovan history. We explore how this reshapes our understanding about the origins of our species.

Some 95 per cent of us have a dormant virus, lurking in our bodies - waiting to strike when the moment’s right. Epstein-Barr virus causes glandular fever - also known as mono or kissing disease - but only in a small number of people. Though new evidence is showing that even dormant viruses may still cause long term health problems.

Formula E electric race cars may have surpassed their fossil fuel counterparts. From greater efficiency to faster acceleration, this is a big turning point for the sport - but they don’t have the edge on F1 cars in all areas just yet. We find out where they’re winning and where they’re falling behind - and how this could translate to better electric road cars for us.

And the legendary science writer Bill Bryson joins the team to discuss the process of revising his bestselling book A Short History of Nearly Everything. He explores some of the most fascinating (and surprising) facts he’s had to update in the 20 years since the book came out.

Chapters:

(00:00) Intro

(01:45) Second Denisovan genome sequenced

(11:15) We all have dormant viruses that are causing diseases

(18:37) Are Formula E cars faster than F1?

(27:17) Bill Bryson on revising his bestselling book

Hosted by Rowan Hooper and Penny Sarchet, with guests Bill Bryson and Alec Luhn.

To read more about these stories, visit https://www.newscientist.com/

Check out the CoLab feature with DEEP at https://newscientist.com/deep 

Shop our Black Friday sale at www.newscientist.com/sale
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from The World, the Universe and Us

All 94 episodes
New genome of ancient human; 95% of us have a dormant virus that causes disease; Formula E cars faster than F1; Bill Bryson joins the pod!The World, the Universe and Us · 45 min
Listen in VO