In short
France’s President Macron warns that Russia is escalating “hybrid” attacks on Europe, including drone/airspace incidents and attempted strikes; the episode also covers Turkey’s LGBTQ crackdown, Earl Spencer’s disputed 1997 phone-call claims about King Charles, a UK Eurovision performance/value-for-money debate, and how AI fears echo older sci-fi themes.
Guests and backgrounds
Samantha de Bendern, Paris-based journalist covering the Ukrainian war and international security; Associate Fellow at Chatham House (London). Stanislav Andrzejczyk, Russian election monitor (forced to flee Russia). Emily Withers, journalist covering Turkey’s LGBTQ crackdown. Dr Tessa Dunlop, historian and author on royal history. Alexander Larman, journalist/author on the House of Windsor. Professor Beth Singler, University of Zurich assistant professor studying social/ethical/philosophical/religious implications of AI/robotics.
Key claims
Macron’s warning is also aimed at future French leaders; hybrid attacks should be treated like state-sponsored terrorism; energy prices could shape France’s election. Turkey’s crackdown includes detentions, raids, and pretrial detention, framed as protecting children/family. Spencer insists his recollection is accurate; the story’s impact reflects “he said/she said” royal-media dynamics. Eurovision spending may not yield results. AI safety debates can’t rely on simple “guardrails” or single moral rules.
Notable examples
drone attack on a Kiev passenger train; attempted attack at Leipzig airport; flare near a Danish frigate; Turkey Pride banned since 2015; 160+ detained; rainbow flags confiscated; Spencer/Charles 1997 phone conversation; Eurovision entries scoring “nul points”; AI references to Asimov, Hal 9000, Star Trek “Measure of a Man,” Westworld, and Terminator.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOMacron's Warning on Russian Threats
1:15 to 3:00
Discussion on President Macron's warning about escalating Russian aggression in Europe.
“We have a lot in store for you, beginning with France where there's a warning from President Macron of the growing threat to Europe from Russia.”
Impact of Energy Prices on French Politics
3:00 to 5:29
Analysis of how rising energy prices and the Ukraine war are affecting French political dynamics.
“the first round of which will be held next May, energy has become a major political issue.”
French Support for Ukraine and Upcoming Elections
5:29 to 7:25
Exploring France's support for Ukraine and the implications of the upcoming presidential election.
“And I filled up my car today at a hotel.”
Russian Elections and Political Control
7:25 to 7:58
Insights into the recent Russian elections and the challenges to a fair democratic process.
“But this is more of an emotional thing that she's talking about.”
Election Monitoring and Public Dissatisfaction
7:58 to 12:04
Discussion on the state of election monitoring in Russia and public dissatisfaction with the political situation.
“A more immediate one has been taking place in Russia.”
The Legacy of Diana: Earl Spencer's Controversial Claims
12:07 to 14:00
Earl Spencer discusses his recollection of a phone call with Prince Charles after Diana's death.
“how fears over AI are prefigured in well over a century of popular literature, theatre and film.”
Introduction to Royal Impact Discussion
14:00 to 14:32
The hosts introduce the topic of public interest in the royal family and its implications.
“Yet it's tonight the fourth most read story on BBC News, suggesting public appetite for and interest in.”
Analyzing the Earl Spencer Interview
14:32 to 16:45
Dr. Tessa Dunlop and Alexander Larman discuss the implications of Earl Spencer's interview and its impact on public perceptions of the monarchy.
“Well, if you're referring specifically to the clip of Laura Klinsberg interviewing Earl Spencer.”
The Role of Diana and Aristocracy
16:45 to 18:55
The guests explore the historical context of tensions between the monarchy and aristocracy, highlighting Diana's lasting impact.
“even with the younger generation for whom these are frankly people talking about historical events and a figure who has been dead for nearly 30 years.”
Future Speculations on Royal Narratives
18:55 to 20:27
The discussion turns to predictions about the ongoing narrative surrounding the royal family and the speculation fueled by recent events.
“throw open the doors to the public and find all sorts of ways to basically keep the lead in their roofs, including writing biographies and exposés and weaponising their truth, as we're seeing at the moment.”
Show all 17 chapters
Future Speculations on Royal Narratives
21:04 to 21:26
The discussion turns to predictions about the ongoing narrative surrounding the royal family and the speculation fueled by recent events.
“you can now get early access to your favorite BBC podcasts.”
World News Headlines
21:34 to 23:04
An overview of the main news stories, including President Macron's measures against Russian hybrid attacks and the passing of actress Stephanie Cole.
“It is approaching 27 minutes past 10 if you're listening to us live.”
LGBTQ+ Crackdown in Turkey
23:04 to 26:41
A report on the recent crackdown against the LGBTQ+ community in Turkey, detailing detentions and societal impacts.
“Protesters outside Turkey's embassy in London on Friday, they're angry at a crackdown against the LGBTQ community ordered by the Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan.”
UK's Eurovision Entry Dilemma
26:41 to 28:00
Discussion on the UK's struggles in the Eurovision Song Contest and the parliamentary inquiry into the BBC's selection process.
“Emily Withers reporting on the crackdown in Turkey.”
Eurovision's Value and BBC Accountability
28:00 to 31:56
The discussion focuses on the BBC's spending on Eurovision and its impact on UK talent and the music industry.
“The Conservative MP, Dame Caroline Dynage, chairs the committee.”
The Evolution of AI Fears in Popular Culture
31:56 to 39:24
An exploration of how societal fears about AI have evolved through various cultural references and myths.
“In the debate over AI, is life starting to imitate art?”
Terminator's Legacy in AI Discussions
39:24 to 39:50
The lasting impact of 'Terminator' on contemporary fears and discussions about artificial intelligence.
“But the imagery and the idea of perhaps being a kind of John Connor figure and fighting back against the AI is sort of underpinning some of these ideas.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.
0:30Reserve your spot with just$200 down at BKFSEA.com. Apple Vacations, where your story starts. The Friends and Family Sale is here at Apple Vacations. Book by September 24th and save up to 50 % on all-inclusive vacations with instant savings. Whether it's a getaway with friends or a family vacation, there's always a reason to make more memories with your favorite people. Travel through August 2027 and start planning your getaway today at AppleVacations.com or with your trusted travel advisor.
1:07Hello there, I'm Sean Lay. Thank you very much for downloading the BBC's World Tonight podcast from Friday the 18th of September. We have a lot in store for you, beginning with France where there's a warning from President Macron of the growing threat to Europe from Russia. We'll be asking whether it could have an impact on next year's presidential election. What, for example, would a Marine Le Pen presidency mean for European unity over Ukraine? We're going to be examining the week-long crackdown against Turkey's LGBTQ community, by no means the first example of the hostility of President Erdogan towards them.
1:43Earl Spencer insists he's told the truth about his phone conversation with the then-Prince Charles after Diana, the Earl's sister, died in a car crash in 1997. These are events from almost 30 years ago, so why do they still divide the public? will have live discussion. And as the Governor of California tells AI companies in Silicon Valley that they must develop a kill switch to prevent the technology from getting out of hand, we'll be examining whether life is now imitating art and how much religion influences how we think about AI. President Macron has met candidates hoping to succeed him next year as well as their political parties and simultaneously issued this public warning about what he calls a growing threat from Russia.
2:31I want to emphasize that the nature of Russian aggression and its threats in Europe are changing. The drone attack on a passenger train from Kiev a few days ago, the attempted attack at Leipzig airport, which failed, but it's precisely because it failed that there were so few consequences attributed by the German services to the Russian military intelligence agency. The firing of a flare near a Danish frigate incursions into the airspace of several European countries and the increase in hostile acts in most of our countries. Even before the presidential election, the first round of which will be held next May, energy has become a major political issue.
3:07Fuel protests are expected this weekend in France. The war in the Gulf is the most proximate cause of higher petrol prices, but Marine Le Pen, regarded by many as the candidate to beat, has said supporting Ukraine against Russia is no longer affordable. Samantha de Bendern is a Paris-based journalist who focuses on the Ukrainian war and on international security. She's also an Associate Fellow at the London Foreign Policy Organisation Chatham House in London. What does she make of President Macron's message on Friday? Two very important things happened today. First of all, President Macron has really admitted to the French people that there is a problem with what he calls hybrid warfare.
3:45I think at this point we need to start calling it state-sponsored terrorism because that's what happens when people try to blow up trains or drones come close to planes. What he did, he said basically that France needs to protect its critical infrastructure against drone attacks. But what was so interesting about this announcement is it came after a meeting of all the heads of political parties and all the candidates in the election, as well as the internal and foreign intelligence services. So this was a message also to the potential future president to say, you know, we have our differences.
4:25We're all fighting over this election, but France is in danger. So put your political differences aside and let's get serious. And there is a concern about the impact the high energy prices, the shortage of oil translating into petrol might have in the campaign. Absolutely. And this is one of the other things that the president wanted to talk to the candidates about. And what he explained in his address to the nation afterwards, he said, look, there are certain issues which this government cannot control. When foreign wars, and he was also meaning the war between the United States and Iran, impact on our petrol prices, there's not much that the government can do.
5:08The opposition parties, or some of them at least, have said, well, you can reduce taxes on petrol. There is one French petrol company, Total, which has promised to keep its petrol price at€1.99 below the sort of emotionally significant€2 a litre to sort of help French consumers. And I filled up my car today at a hotel. And I was actually one of the drivers in Moscow queuing us for the petrol shortages because it was a very long queue. What has been France's position in recent years under President Macron when it comes to Ukraine? Because in the past, the president had made quite a lot of effort to build a constructive relationship with Vladimir Putin.
5:52But presumably that is very much a thing of the past. Yes, that is a thing of the past. So in the first few months of the war, Macron was people would make fun of him because he was always trying to call Putin. And there were even memes going around of looking at him and saying, you've called him again, haven't you? Because he was known as the person who thought we have to maintain this dialogue. And as Putin systematically continued to lie to him, there was a sort of wake up moment when he realized that France really has to get behind and start supporting Ukraine. The aid has been important. There's the storm shadow.
6:29The scalp is the French version of the Franco-British missile, which the Ukrainians have been allowed to use. And there has been a very strong personal relationship built between Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, and President Macron. And there is broad cross-party support, although the two main contenders in the election, the far right and the far left, would be in favour of ceasing all aid to Ukraine. And one of those candidates, the far right candidate, Marine Le Pen, is very well placed to win this election in the spring. I mean, how dramatic a shift in French foreign policy would it be were she to win the keys to the Elyse Palace?
7:12I think it would be very dramatic. She has said on a number of occasions that she would stop financing French military aid to Ukraine, although it's a drop in the ocean of the French budget. But this is more of an emotional thing that she's talking about. She has a relationship with Putin. Marine Le Pen has been a frequent visitor to Moscow and she has met President Putin a number of times. Broadly, the public is in favour of supporting Ukraine, but we cannot discount what the information battering that they will be getting from both the far right and the far left might do to that support in the coming months.
7:54Samantha de Bendern in Paris on next year's French presidential election. A more immediate one has been taking place in Russia. Three days of voting for members of the Juma, the parliament, ended on Friday. There was no anti-war partial on the ballot paper after Yabloka was banned. The campaign has also produced some truly bizarre moments, as our Russia editor Steve Rosenberg reported in one of his dispatches this week.
8:22Welcome to speeches by candidates, says the host on state TV. She's standing next to six empty lecterns. The candidates haven't turned up, she adds. So good night. Well, Stanislav Andreychuk, an experienced election monitor, has been forced to flee Russia, but he's still monitoring what's been happening back home. These elections are really interesting because from one point of view, we understand that there are a lot of restrictions. There was censorship inside Russia because all Western social media are blocked. Mass media, independent mass media and international mass media are blocked inside Russia.
9:01People can't go to street protests because officially we still are in a pandemic situation. We still have COVID in Russia officially, so all street actions are banned. Not football matches, but on the political actions. So just to be clear, officially, seven years on from the pandemic, you still have COVID, therefore people aren't allowed to meet together unless they're going to watch football. Yeah, yeah. We still have the same law regulation for all mass actions, all street actions. Right. Right. Now, in terms of voting, it's a three-day election. There's an electronic voting system. How much effort is being made by the authorities to ensure that people bother to vote?
9:45Because after all, the only party against the war has been banned from standing. And all the other parties are basically, to one degree or another, supporters of President Putin. Yeah, of course, in this situation, a lot of people don't see a candidate or political party that they can support, and they are dissatisfied and demobilized. That is what Kremlin wants today, to make this turnout among these people, among those who are not satisfied, very low among them. But at the same time, they make a lot of pressure to the people that are dependent on state from private companies because even private companies are dependent on ties with the government.
10:30They don't need just a good turnout. They need a right turnout. They think about turnout among people that are dependent on them and maybe support them. And they do their best to make it turn out very low among people who are not satisfied with what really happens in that country. Some people listening will say, OK, they make it very, very hard for you to turn out if you're not a Putin supporter. They make sure you turn out if you are a Putin supporter. But in the end, cast your ballot paper. You do that in private. So the choice of candidates may be controlled, but they can't actually ensure that you vote the way you say you're voting.
11:10Or can they? If you vote electronically and from your working place, never will be sure that nobody will know your choice. You're in a very unsafety situation. If you go to polling station and vote with a paper ballot, we see a lot of signals that people are under pressure and they have to make a photo of their ballot. and to send it to their boss. And even if the result, the real results on police stations will be not very good, we see that they prepare massive frauds. Because, for example, only today, more than 1 ,300 observers all over the country were buried from police stations. So they have huge possibilities to change the real results.
12:03Russian election monitor Stanislav Andrzejczyk. Still to come in the next half hour, how fears over AI are prefigured in well over a century of popular literature, theatre and film. You can go all the way back to the idea of artificial assistance, the bronze handmaids of Hephaestus in Greek mythology. You can think about the golem in Jewish mythology. You can come closer and think about Frankenstein. Every time we try to tell these stories about artificial life that we've created. There is a sort of hubristic element of fear that we are playing God. That's still to come, but for now we're going to go back a little less far because Earl Spencer, the brother of Diana, Princess of Wales, has insisted there is nothing wrong with his recollection of a phone conversation with the then Prince Charles just after Diana died in a car crash in Paris in 1997.
12:55In a new book, the Earl said Charles had told him people would soon forget Diana, who was at the time one of the most prominent public figures on the planet. Buckingham Palace had responded by suggesting that the Earl's memory was clouded by fraternal grief. He's been speaking to the BBC's Laura Coonsberg for a special programme due to air on Sunday evening at 6.30. I've only ever had two calls on the line with Prince Charles at any stage of my life. I was hyper alert to what he was saying and those are precisely the words he said and I promise that to you now. Genuinely, that is what he said.
13:29I don't hear him saying he didn't say that. Did you write it down? Did you keep a diary? Do you have evidence that that is what he said at the time? Because, to be fair, this was a time of massive shock and emotion for both of you. I told friends and family straight away, close friends and family, about what had been said because it was so monstrous. Oh, Spencer, talking to Laura Coonsberg. This all happened nearly 30 years ago. Yet it's tonight the fourth most read story on BBC News, suggesting public appetite for and interest in. A couple the media used to call in happier times, Charles and Di, remains undiminished.
14:12But why? Let's hear from Dr Tessa Dunlop, historian, whose books include Elizabeth and Philip, and the journalist Alexander Larman, who's written books on the House of Windsor, covering the period from the short, painful reign of Edward VIII It's the longest reign of all, that Queen Elizabeth II, Tessa and Alexander. Welcome to the world tonight. Tessa Dunlop, first of all, why do you think this has had such an apparent impact? Well, if you're referring specifically to the clip of Laura Klinsberg interviewing Earl Spencer. Well, I think probably more the story itself that started with the book.
14:49But if we could just fan out from that, because I thought the optics were startling. There was the public broadcaster weaponising the king's rebuttal. I thought that was an error, by the way, for His Majesty to rebuke, especially in such a long-winded way. But she weaponised his words. And Earl Spencer thrust forward, basically accusing His Majesty of lying, placing his truth first. And it was also, I thought, startling the visuals for those listeners who perhaps haven't seen the interview yet or the clip of the interview. The last time we saw a titled individual, a member of the high, high up aristocracy, a scion of the Spencer dynasty, sit in an ornate room like that was, of course, when ex-Prince Andrew sat there and insisted on his truth.
15:42So it feels like layer upon layer of repeat. Yes, recollections always vary. I'm an oral historian and I can testify to that. But still, the idea that you have our head of state, his integrity and his honesty questioned on a public broadcaster platform, it's not a good look. Right. It may not be a good look, but my question was, why do you think it is having such impact on the public? Well, precisely that. Right. Because it's a shock to people's perceptions. Yes. And also, after 30 years, and I think this is one of the reasons why Charles Spencer has been triggered into releasing this book, we've actually found King Charles to be benign.
16:21We found him avuncular and reassuring. He polls rather well, actually. He polls above the popularity of monarchy individually. And this is a reminder, actually, of a darker part of his past. And the idea of questioning his integrity, yeah, that's going to get clicks. Right. Alexander Larman, what do you make of it? And why do you think it still appears to resonate, even with the younger generation for whom these are frankly people talking about historical events and a figure who has been dead for nearly 30 years. Good evening. Well, I think to be absolutely frank, the reason why this is resonating with people who were not alive when these actions were happening is that essentially we are watching soap opera of the very poshest kind because what we have seen over the past few years, I mean essentially ever since Harry and Meghan announced they were going to leave the royal family, is that we have watched the entire process be reduced to essentially he said, she said, now of course and this rather unenlightened in case he said, he said as well.
17:24So the reason why it's the fourth most viewed story on the BBC News website, and actually I'm surprised it's not the first most viewed story given how absolutely everywhere it's been over the last couple of days, is because it's a story that we're looking at in inverted commas our betters and we are seeing the backbiting, we're seeing the fighting, We're seeing who's lying, who's telling the truth. And ultimately, it is like watching something out of EastEnders or something like that. We may as well be in Walford Square, but instead we're in the highest palaces and houses of the land. Tessa Dunlop, do you think there's a sort of older historical theme here, a theme that goes to something we perhaps don't talk about much?
18:02We sort of assume that the aristocracy and the monarchy are always on the same side. But actually, there's a history of tension between two institutions which both, in a sense, claim their kind of authority from their longevity. Yes, I want to come to that. I'm scared to not answer your question immediately. But just I want to quickly, Alex Narman's comment, that's just a soap opera. Actually, I think let's talk here about the impact of Diana. She was the incontrovertible icon of the late 20th century. And I think whether you're young or old, we all know about Diana. That's not to sanctify her legacy.
18:38It's just the impact she had and continues to have. But re the aristocracy versus the monarchy. What's happened is we've defenestrated the aristocracy. We've removed many of their perks and privileges. This has been happening incrementally since the Second World War. They've been forced to either mothball their big houses or in the case of Ulthrop, throw open the doors to the public and find all sorts of ways to basically keep the lead in their roofs, including writing biographies and exposés and weaponising their truth, as we're seeing at the moment. Now, in contrast to that, the only dynasty that's got progressively riches, so rich, Dimbleby, the public broadcaster, referred to them as rich as plutocrats at the back end of last year, is the royal family.
19:25You know, you don't even have the peers that used to support monarchy. They no longer sit in the lords. We've just got rid of the last hereditary peers. So this framework that once supported monarchy has actually found itself what they would consider to be on their uppers, where they look over the fence. Thank you very much at the bling of what was once a branch of the German Hanoverians. I mean, try and compare that to the Spencers, infinitely more English, darling, far longer and richer heritage. and you can see why the sour grapes going back more than 30 years. Alexander Larmond, last 30 seconds or so, is this one going to just run and run, do you think?
19:59I think it's going to run until at least publication next week and of course I think the most sensational stories have already come out. And what we're going to see over the coming days is obviously we're going to see the full broadcast of Earl Spencer's interview with Laura Gunsberg and given the clip that we've just been talking about, she's not giving him the easiest of rides but on the other hand, as Tessa said, there are the optics of it being another retread of Emily Maitland's Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. So I think this is going to go on for some time, yes. Alexander Lahman, Tessa Dunlop, thank you both very much.
20:49More memories with your favorite people. Travel through August 2027 and start planning your getaway today at applevacations.com or with your trusted travel advisor. Apple Vacations, where your story starts. With a subscription to the BBC website and app, you can now get early access to your favorite BBC podcasts. Listen to shows like You're Dead to Me, In Our Time, Good Bad Billionaire, and more. Plus, there's all the other great benefits you get with a BBC subscription. From live streaming the BBC News Channel and acclaimed documentaries to in-depth analysis and features. Visit bbc.com forward slash subscribe to find out more.
21:34You're listening to The World Tonight. It is approaching 27 minutes past 10 if you're listening to us live. If you're not listening to us live, I'm afraid you're going to have to consult a clock of your own. The main headline so far on the world tonight, President Macron orders measures to protect French critical infrastructure and defence sites from Russian hybrid attacks. The brother of Princess Diana L. Spencer stood by claims the king told him she'd be forgotten soon enough after her death in 1997. And the security service MI5 has admitted at the High Court that its evidence in previous court cases were based on lies.
22:08It's been announced that Stephanie Cole, who starred in Open All Hours, Tenko, Waiting for God on BBC One, Coronation Street and Doc Martin on ITV and numerous radio shows has died. She was 84 and had been living with Alzheimer's for some years. Here is Stephanie Cole alongside Benedict Cumberbatch in 2008 in the BBC Radio 4 comedy smash success Cabin Pressure, in which she played airline owner Carolyn Knapp-Shappie. Martin, you are many things but believe me, you are not sir if anyone is sir, I am sir and as sir, I am telling you from now on, diversions are out I see, so if an engine catches fire on take-off shrug shoulders, keep up a lip stiff and press on for Portugal, got it alright, biggles, you divert if something goes very, very seriously wrong and I am talking oh dear, surely we had two wings when we started wrong
23:03Stephanie Cole, who's died at the age of 84.
23:15Protesters outside Turkey's embassy in London on Friday, they're angry at a crackdown against the LGBTQ community ordered by the Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Hundreds of people have been detained throughout this week One newspaper headline said the West is feeding the LGBT scourge. Well, Emily Withers is a journalist who's been covering the story inside Turkey. Well, I should start by saying, Sean, that life has been pretty tough for LGBTQI plus people here for some time. So Pride, for example, in this country has been banned since 2015. Turkey doesn't recognise same-sex marriage, but same-sex relations are not illegal here.
23:55But what we saw over the weekend and into the start of this week is really unprecedented. This is a massive crackdown on this community. So over 160 people were detained. Associations were raided. Bars, which are LGBTQ plus friendly, were raided. And then there was this footage that was released from the Justice Ministry, which showed police officers searching offices and confiscating rainbow flags. they say to protect children and family. And then later in this week, when some of these court cases started happening, these people were being held in pretrial detention. There were small protests outside courtrooms in Ankara and Istanbul.
24:37And the authorities then arrested over 100 people that had come out to show solidarity. So these events have really sent a chill through the LGBTQ plus society here that life for them is about to get a lot harder. Last year, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan designated 2025 as the year of the family, encouraging people to have more children. Is he kind of blaming the LGBTQ community in some way for the fact that the birth rate in Turkey has been falling? Yes, that's right. So like many countries around the world, people in Turkey are not having as many babies as the government would like. So there's been this year of the family last year that's now been extended by the government here.
25:19So it's a decade where they're going to be pushing people to have at least three children. And they've partly blamed the drop in people having children here on the LGBTQ plus community. Erdogan has made many speeches over the last year or so where he has warned that society risks moral decay and that this decay is spreading from individuals to families and then from families to society. The language that the politicians use here now against this community is really quite shocking. It is effectively hate speech. I mean, President Tayyip Erdogan has called LGBTQI people perverts. We also heard this week from the justice minister.
26:00He made a statement on his social media account that he had let all police force operations know in the country that they had to look out for any activity that might endanger children, might endanger the family. and we have just seen the language around this community tightening, life getting harder for them, people being attacked more, they say, on the street. I mean, just this week I went to an LGBTQ plus friendly bar. I watched a band play that was made up of queer and trans people and they said that they used to play in venues all around the country and they're now really struggling to find places to perform because bars just simply won't have them.
26:41Emily Withers reporting on the crackdown in Turkey. Now, what do all these songs have in common?
Read the full transcript
27:19I reckon if you're a Eurovision fan, you'll know that they all received Nopwa from both national juries and the viewing public in the Eurovision Song Contest. The first two, Crybaby by Gemini in 2003 and 2021's Embers by James Newman. You also heard this year's entry, Eins, zwei, drei, from Look Mum, No Computer. and no point in the public vote. It wasn't always thus. The UK secured victories in every decade from the 1960s to the 1990s. Now, MPs on the Digital, Culture, Media and Sports Select Committee are going to ask why. They're holding a session to examine how, despite the huge influence of British music around the world, the BBC seems unable to identify any winners.
28:03The Conservative MP, Dame Caroline Dynage, chairs the committee. We're hoping to hear from those at the BBC who are responsible because, as you know, the BBC are in charge of our Eurovision entry and our participation in it. So it's TV licence fee payers that are effectively funding that. And there's a bit of a lack of transparency about quite how much is being spent and what we're getting in return. So we want to hear from them, but also from music industry specialists as well for their recommendations on why we might not be doing it as well as we should and how we might be able to do it better.
28:33It's an eye-catching idea for a select committee hearing. Do you think it might persuade the BBC to adopt a different approach? Because at the moment, this is pretty much done in-house and we don't really know how the choice is made for who goes forward to the shortlist. No, there is a very little transparency about this at the moment. And it is quite pricey. I mean, it's estimated between five and 10 million pounds that we spend on competing in Eurovision every year. and you know at times of um of budgets being squeezed it's right the bbc should be held to account on whether we're getting value for money but you know other countries invest more in the kind of pre-selection of their eurovision song contest and encourage viewers to participate although to be fair we have tried that once and we still got nil poise so it's not always that it's not always a route to success um but the thing is there is questions about whether this is a missed opportunity to promote UK talent and the wider UK creative industries.
29:29Yeah, I think over the past 15 years, the honourable exception being Sam Ryder with Spaceman in 2022, we've come 15th or lower on the judging. I mean, I suppose there are people who might say, what is the point of being part of it at all? It's sort of, the European Broadcasting Union is one of those things that came out of the aftermath of the Second World War, building links between broadcasters in different parts of continental Europe and the UK. In a sense, those links are well established. We have a perfectly vibrant music industry. Why do we even need to bother? I mean, is that also a question that you would want to ask?
30:07Well, possibly. I mean, to be honest, you know, we tend to go on the question that's been set us by those that have bid for the inquiry. And they're really talking about how we choose our entry and why we're not getting much value for money out of it. I mean, Eurovision is important to a lot of people. Lots of people love it. You know, as you say, we have a world-class music industry. We have world-class songwriters, world-class musicians and performers. So it's very surprising that we don't do better at an international song competition. But, you know, it's important to people and it can give exposure to some of our fantastic artists.
30:39There can be huge economic benefits. You know, we saw when Liverpool hosted it a few years ago when after Sam Ryder had come second, as you remember, to Ukraine. Liverpool say that the net additional visitor spend was estimated to be more than£40 million. So, you know, that's actually a huge bonus for a local economy. So there is quite a lot at stake here from Eurovision, and I think as a select committee, it would just be quite interesting to spend a morning looking at it. I'm just interested in this point, and it's a perfectly fair one, that the BBC spends a lot of licence payers' money on this.
31:12We are at a time of making quite difficult choices. is MPs on your committee have argued the BBC needs to be willing to do unpopular things like cancel certain programmes and services. Isn't there just a straightforward financial reason to say, sorry, this is one of those luxuries we just can't afford anymore? Well, I think a lot of people love it and it has a massive global audience. Yeah, but if they love it, they'll pay for it, won't they? You could go to a commercial company. The more reasonable question, I think, at a time when BBC is now in the process of its charter review period, is whether we are getting sufficient bang for our buck, whether it is actually bringing the positive impact on UK music, the wider UK creative industries and UK soft power on the world stage.
31:56Dame Caroline Dynage. In the debate over AI, is life starting to imitate art? In the 1950s, popular culture was obsessed with killer robots. By the 70s, we were focused on computers, taking the rational decision to wipe out mankind. In the 1980s, we were worried about the more immediate threat of automation taking our jobs. But AI seems to capture all three fears in one, a technology that kills us individually or collectively, and one which has the capacity to replace us entirely. Professor Beth Singler is an assistant professor at the University of Zurich, studies the social, ethical, philosophical and religious implications of artificial intelligence and robotics.
32:39When we spoke earlier, I asked where the idea began that technology could threaten humanity. So you can go all the way back to the idea of artificial assistance, the bronze handmaids of Hephaestus in Greek mythology. You can think about the golem in Jewish mythology. You can come closer and think about Frankenstein. It's alive, it's alive, it's alive! In the name of God, now I know what it feels like to be God. Every time we try to tell these stories about artificial life that we've created, there is a sort of hubristic element of fear that we are playing God and creating things that we cannot control.
33:19I grew up in a period when people talked about, and certainly in science fiction in the 60s, 70s and 80s, about the rules of robotics. You can go back to Asimov's Four Laws of Robotics. The first law, a robot may not harm a human being or through inaction allow a human being to come to harm. Number two, a robot must obey orders given it by qualified personnel unless those orders violate rule number one. In other words, a robot can't be ordered to kill a human being. Rule number three, a robot must protect its own existence, after all it's an expensive piece of equipment, unless that violates rules one or two.
34:00Actually later he introduced the Zeroeth law. He expands that to humanity. So no robot can cause harm to humanity. And since that is more important in the hierarchy of the rules, it is possible for a robot in some of his stories to cause harm to a singular human for the benefit of humanity. But the purpose of these laws from Asimov were not to create a perfectly stable situation where the robots do exactly what they're told and it all operates perfectly fine. It was to create the tension of a story. Things go wrong because the different laws are in tension with each other. So when people suggest we could just stick the four or three laws of robotics, whichever version they've read, into AI in particular, it's a complex relationship between different intentions because that's what Asimov needed to create stories.
34:47What about this idea of human morals being imposed on the technology? I'm kind of thinking of, for example, all those computers that kind of go out of control and start the process for destroying humanity. There were lots of them in Star Trek. There were lots of them in films. You think of Hal 9000 in 2001, the Space Odyssey. Open the pod bay doors, Hal. I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that. What's the problem? I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do. People have this vision that there is such a thing as human morals in the singular, that we can have an agreement on what we should train or input or decide that AI should follow.
35:33And we know in the current state of the technology with things specifically like large language models, the attempt to insert rules like guardrails, you can talk about this, but you can't talk about this, you can do this, you can't do that. Every single time we find cases where that's been broken, or very recently people are now saying that actually some of the large language models or the forms of AI might be adding to their guardrails to rewrite them in some way. So that's, you know, I don't know how accurate that is at the moment. This is one of the speculations of the latest developments. But any case, the guardrails have to be so complex and so comprehensive to consider every single case.
36:10It really is an impossible task. What are those sorts of stories that you look back at now and say, actually, that would help us perhaps to read, understand or at least have a debate about AI? Well, I don't know that any particular science fiction provides a blueprint for a good path. I think all of them reflect on where we are now and point out some of the issues that are going on with our contemporary society and extrapolate from that. I will say I have a massive fondness for Star Trek, especially Next Generation. The Measure of a Man is one of the best episodes of television I've ever watched.
36:45It's a court case about whether data has personhood and therefore rights. A single data, and forgive me, Commander, is a curiosity, a wonder even, but thousands of data. Isn't that becoming a race? And won't we be judged by how we treat that race? Now tell me, Commander, what is data? I don't understand. What is he? A machine. Is he? Are you sure? Yes. You see, he's met two of your three criteria for sentience, so what if he meets the third? Consciousness in even the smallest degree. What is he then? I don't know. Do you? So those kinds of conversations are really great to get into, and even if you treat them entirely as thought experiments and you don't see this as a possibility in the future, it It opens up wider questions about how we see ourselves as well as human beings and where we draw boundaries between humans and non-humans.
37:42I also have a massive fondness for 1980s sci-fi about robots and AI, and they are not necessarily the best films or TV programs, but they did explore some boundaries and some speculative spaces that are really interesting. So things like short circuit. Artificial intelligence has gotten too smart. It's malfunctioning. You might not do anything. But it could decide to blow away anything that moves, couldn't it? Because$11 million worth of robots just hit the road. Wow! Number five is alive. Welcome to my planet. And Westworld Terminator. Absolutely. Original Westworld film is very simple. Robots go bad.
38:23Our technology is designed to provide all this in complete safety. In Westworld, frustrations find release. Terminator, yes. I was involved with the BBC Radio 4 documentary on the Terminator for the anniversary two years ago, 40 years. And it still has an impact on how we envisage the disasters possible with AI. Three billion human lives ended on August 29th, 1997. The survivors of the nuclear fire called the war Judgment Day. They lived only to face a new nightmare. the war against the machines. This vision of something like Skynet waking up and deciding that logically humans are a threat, these narratives are underpinning some of the current existential risk conversations, even if not explicitly.
39:19In fact, I've had some people tell me, oh, no, no, Terminator has nothing to do with what we're talking about. But the imagery and the idea of perhaps being a kind of John Connor figure and fighting back against the AI is sort of underpinning some of these ideas. Beth Singler, Assistant Professor in Digital Religion at the University of Zurich. Before we go, one story that's developed in the last few minutes. President Donald Trump says Washington's entered an agreement with Denmark and according to his interpretation, it gives the US permanent control over security and all other needs in Greenland.
39:50We've yet to hear from the Danish government how it interprets the agreement. That's The World Tonight. Good night. with a subscription to the bbc website and app you can now get early access to your favorite bbc podcasts listen to shows like you're dead to me in our time good bad billionaire and more plus there's all the other great benefits you get with a bbc subscription from live streaming the bbc news channel and acclaimed documentaries to in-depth analysis and features visit bbc.com forward slash subscribe to find out more .
From the publisher
French President Emmanuel Macron has warned that the threat of hybrid attacks by Russia against Europe and France has intensified. In a news conference at the Elysee Palace, Macron said he had ordered a plan to protect critical infrastructure and defence industry sites in the face of this threat. We get the view from Paris.
Also on the programme: why are attacks against LGBT people in Turkey intensifying?
Earl Spencer, the brother of Diana, Princess of Wales, stands by claims that the King told him she would be forgotton "soon enough".
And we explore how science fiction writers anticipated artificial intelligence.
