AI Model Showdown: Grok 4.1 vs. Gemini 3 | E2211

19 Nov 2025 · 47 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: AI Model Showdown: Grok 4.1 vs. Gemini 3 | E2211

Episode Overview In this episode of *This Week in Startups*, Jason Calacanis and Alex Wilhelm discuss the emergence of two significant AI models, Grok 4.1 from xAI and Gemini 3 from Google. They explore the implications of these advancements amidst a backdrop of skepticism and concerns over the impact of AI on jobs and the economy.

Key Topics Discussed

  1. AI Landscape and Model Improvements
  2. Introduction of Grok 4.1 and Gemini 3.
  3. Comparison of their capabilities and improvements over previous versions.
  4. Discussion on whether these advancements will alleviate existing pessimism about AI.
  1. Impact of Cloudflare Outage
  2. Overview of Cloudflare's recent downtime and its effects on internet services.
  3. Discussion on the implications for startup founders when their services go offline.
  1. Future of AI Models
  2. Predictions on the trend of running AI models locally.
  3. The potential shift towards individual companies operating their own language models.
  1. Job Displacement Concerns
  2. Insights from Dario Amodei on the potential for AI to disrupt white-collar jobs.
  3. Debate on the societal implications of automation and job losses.
  1. Investment Trends in AI
  2. Overview of Microsoft's significant investments in AI, including Anthropic.
  3. Analysis of the evolving landscape of AI funding.

Key Takeaways

  • AI Model Comparisons
  • Grok 4.1 shows significant improvements in reducing hallucinations and has quickly gained traction in leaderboards, indicating competitive progress in the AI field.
  • Gemini 3 also demonstrates advancements, with notable performance metrics that exceed earlier models, suggesting ongoing rapid improvements in AI capabilities.
  • Cloud Service Concerns
  • Founders should have contingency plans for service downtimes, as these can impact user trust and business continuity.
  • There is a growing concern about reliance on centralized cloud providers and the potential need for businesses to diversify their infrastructure.
  • Job Market Implications
  • Amodei's alarming prediction of potential job losses highlights the urgency for businesses and society to adapt to the evolving labor market due to AI.
  • There is a call for leaders in business to consider the long-term impacts of automation on the workforce.
  • Investment Dynamics
  • The conversation highlights the shifting nature of investments in AI, with companies like Microsoft and Nvidia making significant financial commitments to ensure their relevance and competitiveness in the AI landscape.

Notable Quotes

  • "Will the arrival of two hotly-anticipated new models stop the spread of doomerism and AI cynicism?"
  • "It's actually good. Everybody gets a little break."
  • "If we want people to have kids, they're going to need employment."

Conclusion This episode delves into the fast-evolving AI landscape, juxtaposing technological advancements with real-world implications for businesses and employees. The discussions raise critical questions about the future trajectory of AI, the responsibility of tech leaders, and the societal impact of automation in the workplace.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00I heard Gemini 3 is out. I heard Grok 4.1 is out. Everything is happening so quickly in our industry. Look at what XAI did. Grok 4.1 is really good across a number of metrics. Compared to Grok 4 fast, it's a dramatic improvement. When 4.1 was released onto the charts, it went straight to the top. And I think it just shows that there's several different AI labs here in the US that are able to successively create state-of-the-art models. And I think it also pushes back, Jason, against some of the doomerism that's been kind of building in the last three months? One of the great things is, I guess, that now that we have these leaderboards, it's motivated all these companies and gotten these teams super excited about claiming the top spot.

0:42That's where I'm just getting a little concerned of, you know, like, are we actually making progress at solving the real world problems people have? Or are we getting good at acing the SATs? And that is a question for me. This Week in Startups is brought to you by Zyte. Zite is the fastest way to build business software with AI. Build apps, forms, websites, and portals that connect to the tools you already use. Go to zite.com slash twist and get 50 % off your first project. Every. Running a startup is hard enough. Every takes care of incorporation, banking, payroll, benefits, accounting, taxes, and more so that you focus on building, not back office admin.

1:26Visit every.io. And Goldbelly. Gold Belly ships America's most delicious, iconic foods nationwide. Get 20 % off your first order by using the promo code TWIST at checkout. All right, everybody. Welcome back to This Week in Startups. There's tons going on in the news. I heard Gemini 3 is out. I heard Grop 4.1 is out. Everything is happening so quickly in our industry. I'm having a hard time keeping up. No, it's been really, really busy. I want to start though, Jason, with the Cloudflare outage. I don't know if you were awake or asleep. I know you've been going through some jet lag. The internet broke this morning.

2:03It actually made getting the docket ready kind of hard. It's funny when a news story really impacts us because services like ChatGPT and X and other kind of major planks, you might say, of the podcast economy broke. And for several hours, Cloudflare had these really embarrassing downtime outages. And the good news is that now that we're here, it has been resolved. They've come out and apologized for it. If you're curious, everyone, what drove this? They said that, quote, a latent bug in a service underpinning our bot mitigation capability started to crash after a routine configuration change we made.

2:35And Jason, you'll know this, that cascaded into a broad degradation of our network and other services. Sure, whatever that means. It was bad, though. Yeah, you know, Cloudflare is this great CDN, I guess, content delivery network. And if you have a website and you get these DOS attacks, these denial of service, DDoS, where people would send tons of pings to your server, try to slow things down and cause a disruption in service, they figured out ways to, when all those attacks come in, to just drop them. And because it's a network, you know, if some hacking group has, you know, 10 ,000 servers or maybe even individual machines on the Internet that they've hijacked to send in these denial of service attacks, just to think about it simply, they'll hijack 10 ,000 Windows machines, send a bunch of attacks to a website, and then all of a sudden you can't read the Drudge Report or New York Times or whoever their target is.

3:29They know those IP addresses. They know what it feels like when those kind of attacks happen. They know the signature and they just drop those requests. It's pretty sophisticated. It's pretty basic. But Cloudflare has become kind of a standard for this CDN. I remember when we were running Weblogs Inc. back in the day, this 20-year-old knowledge. But we started using these different CDNs, different caching servers. We put up our own caching servers. We were handling these issues ourselves. Now everybody abstracts it to providers. What's the value of being able to abstract it to a provider like this?

4:02Is, well, you can focus on other things in your business. What's the downside? If everybody trusts, everybody's got their eggs in one basket, whether it's Amazon Web Services or Google or Azure or in Cloudflare, everybody gets affected at the same time. That's kind of what I want to talk about because normally this is a little bit outside of our wheelhouse, Jason, but there was a Cloudflare outage also in June. There was an AWS outage in October. There was a Google Cloud outage in June and there was an Azure outage in October. So you're a startup founder. And you are running a software business, as most of them are.

4:39You are using cloud services, as most of them are. Communication strategies for downtime, mitigation. Just I'm curious what your advice is to founders as they go through this apparently recurring issue. It's a recurring and non-consequential issue at this point. Like the downtime happens for an hour or two. And frankly, we're all permanently online. So it's actually good. Everybody gets a little break. Like I would be concerned if your service is down for more than a couple of hours. If it gets into like, okay, it was down this morning, but it's still down this afternoon. That's when people start to go, wait a second, maybe I should look at another option.

5:16And you just don't want to get into the, okay, it's time for me to look for another option. If you're a startup founder and your service is down in the morning for an hour, no big deal. If it goes into the afternoon, now you got a big deal. People will start looking for other solutions. When AWS and their US East One region went down, everyone kind of lost service. If you lose service with everyone else, Jason, is the penalty just not that high for your individual company? Because that's good news and better than I expected. If it was AWS, everybody gives you a mulligan. No big deal. No harm, no foul.

5:44Now, you might, if you're a financial services company, you know, if you're a Robin Hood or you're Stripe and you go down and it costs people money, that's a whole different ball of wax. You might need to give a credit, you know, and things can get, yeah, a little bit ugly. People lose money. If you are selling pay-per-view and it's Netflix and it's that boxing night, yeah, that is a big problem. So I think, you know, it's service dependent. The financial companies have a different order of duty. But, you know, if you look at the video game industry, they'll be like, hey, we're having downtime Saturday afternoon.

6:22You can't play your game for three hours. expect downtime and they communicated to you ahead of time. I don't mind that, but like, you know, Tuesday morning, I mean, I think Cloudflare likes to say they power or protect about 20 % of the websites online. That's a pretty big chunk of the internet to bring down yourself. Going back though to what you said about their footprint and how they help protect websites from DDoS attacks and they do content delivery around the world. Cloudflare just bought a company called Replicate, Jason. And this is a startup that I hadn't spent enough time looking at.

6:51raised a couple of rounds, including a series A from Andreessen and a series B from Andreessen. And what's interesting is they're kind of offering serverless AI access. So if you want to just basically not deal with an individual provider of AI services, you could go to Replicate and just kind of via one API hook access a bunch of different AI models, and they handled all the technical backend. And so it kind of makes sense to plug that into Cloudflare's global infra a footprint because then you can kind of have AI at the place of your consumers with limited lag and so forth. But like, is it kind of crazy that I didn't really know anything about Replicate before this and it raised several rounds?

7:31How many companies are there doing this sort of thing? This is a company I'm not aware of either, but yeah, being able to use an API to just send something to a model and get a result back is kind of how people are running these systems now instead of you can run your whole application on AWS or Azure or Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud, and then just be calling APIs from Grok, Claude, Anthropic, or ChatGPT. That does make it a lot easier, doesn't it? You don't have to like stand up a bunch of hardware. You don't have to stand up like a bunch of instances. So it has become quite modular. I do think at a certain point in time, people are going to want to stand up their own language models with their own data to just not educate other LLMs and to keep their data private.

8:27So I think the future is going to be, you know, a lot of people running their own deep seek instance, you know, over at a Google Cloud or Azure, et cetera. Yeah, I do think I'm just seeing it with startups. Let's say you have a startup that does some obscure thing like, I don't know, building codes, right? And you're going to fine tune this model to do building codes. And it's going to be for architects and builders, developers to understand all these different codes on a global basis. You know, your Starbucks, your opening stores everywhere, you need access to all these codes. And you're taking all the time to go collect that data and to normalize it and train the model.

9:09Do you want to train ChatGPT's model or Anthropix model, have them get the benefit of it? Or do you want to just create an island, put all your data into it and not have them see the prompts, not have them learn from your prompts, not have them learn from what are the queries you're sending from your customers to them? I think people are going to become very, very cautious about the large language models becoming competitors. And I said it before on the shows, everybody listening to me knows it's gonna be a big end of the year, November and December. You're trying to get a lot of things done at work, but Thanksgiving's coming, Christmas is coming, and you're gonna need some help gifting and hey, getting ready for your Thanksgiving table.

9:55And we've got the perfect partner, my favorite, Gold Belly. Yum, yum. Get yourself some amazing gifts for your partners. Get some amazing food for your table like Martha Stewart's salted caramel chocolate cake. How about this? John's of Bleecker Street, New York style pizza. Amazing. Lombardi's Pizza. These are some of the best pizza makers in the world. It's a great way to reward your team members. I do it. I order great stuff from around the country. Just surprise my team with it when we have team meetings. So if you're looking to reward your team for doing a great job in 2025, maybe you want to surprise your loved ones with a special holiday treat.

10:32Here's how you do it. You go to goldbelly.com, Use the promo code TWIST and you get 20 % off your first order. That's goldbelly.com and use the offer code TWIST. Some of them are positioning themselves as like neutral third parties. They're not going to be in your business. Other ones, you know, that have to spend a trillion dollars. Quite possible they need to make two trillion dollars. How are they going to make that money? I think they're going to compete with you. So for this startup that was working hypothetically in building codes, and they took the time to go find all these building codes.

11:07Let's say they hired a hundred researchers to full time for a year and they spent$10 million on these hundred researchers to go collect all this information, normalize it, whatever. And then they feed it into somebody else's language model and now they learn this information. Not good. So in that case, Jason, the corollary or the follow-up question is just, are the startups that you're seeing that are kind of rolling their own models, are they using, I presume all models from China than the open source stuff from your moonshots, your deep seeks, et cetera? I think this is the year this is happening.

11:42So TBD. But we'll, you know, let me ask a couple of them if they're willing to talk. So producer Marcus, like maybe we should see if there's somebody in our portfolio who's doing this. We can just ask in founder university, et cetera, anybody working on open source AI models and training themselves and running themselves and maybe they can come on the show and talk a little bit about it. But it is definitely a trend that's going on. And I saw Andreessen Horowitz was publicly saying, hey, a lot of our startups are using DeepSea. That's what I was going to say. Martin Casado, I think, said that it's like 80 % of startups they see are using open source models from China.

12:16They're probably using other models as well, by the way. It's just... Not exclusively, but I mean, like, you know. I think that's how people took that quote, though. People took it as like, oh, they're picking the open source Chinese model over open AI's model. I think it's in addition, or maybe they're experimenting with them. So in other words, they're aware of them. They've got an instance running and they're sending some jobs to it. And why wouldn't you? I mean, I think ultimately what's going to happen is we're going to have a large language model on our Mac mini M17. If it's an M, I think I have an M4 right now, and I guess someday I'll have an M5, you know, somewhere around m10 you know i'm gonna have four m10s or an m10 will have four microprocessors in it and some amount of bandwidth and ram that will give it the ability to run my language model locally then when i do that search and i say hey show me all the photos of us skiing and uh you know a bulldog in the background because i'm looking for those pictures of the bulldogs playing on the mountains while we're skiing uh it's just going to do that locally not in the cloud it's going to index my photos locally.

13:24It's going to have all my Gmail local. It's going to, you know. So do I then have like a server in my basement, Jason, that has like my family collection of GPUs or am I just running a single Mac mini pro 2015 edition or 2030 edition, whatever? I think that the ultimate manifestation of all this is going to be Apple will have local language models and they'll be pitching us on they're encrypted they're private your data's safe just like they do for iCloud we can't get your iCloud stuff if the government comes and asks us to crack it open we can't get there just like you know I guess Sam Waltman gave a warning like hey if somebody sends us a letter we're sending them everything you've talked about and when this kid tragically committed suicide recently they had all the logs right like yeah they're gonna dump the log.

14:16So if you're in a relationship with ChatGPT, they have all that. Whatever you said to your ChatGPT, they've got it stored. But the Apple Point's great though, Jason, because if you wanted to have that model succeed, you would need to have a smartphone, a desktop computing experience, a Slate computing experience, a headset computing experience, a future glasses computing experience, and you need to be in cars, perhaps do something like CarPlay. They literally have all the surfaces already that they would need. Whoever has the operating system, I think is going to have of a real operating system plus privacy is going to be a really interesting combination.

14:51I've talked ad nauseum about my love of the Comet browser and watching my browser, you know, go to United Airlines and find a flight for me and put it into, you know, the shopping cart was like, hmm, that's interesting. Or I used it the other day. I said, go to Blue Sky because I don't have, I'm not following anyone in Blue Sky. And I just said, I think I said, follow anybody on the Explore page. um, who's like featured, just follow like 200 people. And it went and it followed like 20 people. It's like, ah, 20 is the limit. And I was like, why is 20 the limit? Okay. Do it five times. It wasn't good five times.

15:26The idea that Apple is watching what you do on your phone. And there's, um, this give Apple intelligence. I don't know if you've seen this setting, you can pull it up. We've talked about this. Yeah. Give Apple intelligence access to what you're doing on this app. So if you go to the settings for any app on your phone, there's a thing like give Apple intelligence access to it. What does that mean? What that means is Apple intelligence is watching how you use your phone and they're watching how you use, I don't know, the Contacts app, your phone app, your superhuman app. And then over time, you're going to be able to say, go do this in the StubHub app.

16:07Go find Nick's tickets. But it will have recorded and studied it over and over again. People asked online quite a lot about how to turn this off. But to me, if you're going to use any sort of intelligence on your iOS device, you're going to want it to connect into other applications, Jason. So just. So Apple Intelligence Siri, yeah, learn from this app. Next on the docket, we have Grok 4.1. We'll talk about Gemini 3 in a second, but I think it's worth stopping and saying, look at what XAI did, because this is a company, Jason, that started later than OpenAI and has really done, I'm just going to say, impressive things.

16:40I know a lot of my friend group aren't the biggest Elon fans, but I do think it's important to give credit where it's due. And Grok 4.1 is really good across a number of metrics. One, they did a lot of work on reducing the hallucinations, which I think is a very important step compared to Grok 4 fast. It's a dramatic improvement. And I think most importantly, based on the usual kind of panoply of things that Ella Marina tracks in its battleground for different AI models, when 4.1 was released onto the charts, observe. It went straight to the top. Grok 4.1 and Grok 4.1 Thinking took the absolute pole positions.

17:17But this is a real accomplishment. And I think it just shows that there's several different AI labs here in the US that are able to successively create state-of-the-art models. And I think that's very encouraging for startups. I think it's encouraging for the AI economy writ large. And I think it also pushes back, Jason, against some of the doomerism that's been kind of building in the last three months. It feels like AI needs a win. And I think this is an example of such a win. Less hallucinations, obviously better. And one of the great things is, I guess, that now that we have these leaderboards, it's motivated all these companies and gotten these teams super excited about claiming the top spot.

17:55So kind of cool that these things, you know, somebody came up with this, this concept of the arena and all these different tests. I do wonder if building for the tests at a certain point is kind of like kids mastering the SATs. And like at a certain point, maybe that's not what's important. Maybe like there are other things. So I wonder if these tests are changing. I don't have enough information on that. Like how are these tests changing? I know early on, some of these, one of the tricks that was occurring is when you give people an incentive, like a leaderboard like this, people then try to game the leaderboard.

18:38What's a way to game the leaderboard? Doing unnatural acts. Like if you know it's gonna ask certain types of questions, then studying for those types of questions or feeding those exact questions or those multiple versions of those questions into your training set. In other words, kind of gaming the system. Precisely. And I think that that's where I'm just getting a little concerned of, are we actually making progress at solving the real world problems people have, or are we getting good at acing the SATs? And that is a question for me. People are worried about, I'm trying to remember the exact phrase of this, but it's like diffusion or when the model gets so suffused with people knowing how it asks questions that it kind of loses meaning because you can tune.

19:26And if you think back to Meta's launch of Llama 4, Jason, if you recall, they actually made a bunch of different versions of Llama 4 and then ran them through the same test to get the best results. And they got mocked for this pretty mercilessly because it was clear they were trying to cook the numbers to appear impressive. The reason why I shared LMArena information versus just kind of a raw rundown of individual benchmarks is that this is their users in a head-to-head battle choosing which result is better with the model names masked. And so it shows what people that are actually using these models think.

19:56And I'm hoping that provides a better perspective on actual progress here. I'm a big enough deal now that I can afford to hire my own admin team. Look at me. They handle all the details of running my company. But if you're a startup, you need to spend your time obsessing about your product, not filling out paperwork and doing all these books. That's why I want to tell you about Every. They've worked with over 1 ,000 startups from first-time founders to VC-funded teams and more. And they've got the experience to help your company navigate whatever's coming around the bend. Maybe it's time to incorporate your startup so investors take you seriously.

20:29Every is going to take care of those filings for free without any unnecessary delays or legal fees. Hey, maybe you just got some new funding and it's time for you to scale up with every. You'll get 3 % cash back on every dollar you spend on your company's card. Hey, maybe it's time to say goodbye to a member of your team. It happens. Well, they've got an employee offboarding checklist. And you know, I love a checklist. It's going to help you ensure a smooth transition while protecting your business, both legally and financially. Plus, you'll get a$2 ,000 bonus when you move$250K or more into your Every account.

21:01So for your incorporation, banking, payroll, benefits, accounting, taxes, and other back office administrative needs, visit every.io. That's E-V-E-R-Y.io. But anyways, let's move on to this morning's big news. Similar idea, new AI model, this time from Google. Gemini 3 Pro is out. So limited early access. It's rolling out as we speak. Earlier, Jason, you mentioned how the benchmarks are a little bit dodgy. So I don't want to over-index on this particular data set, but I think it is worth just sharing with people what the numbers show. So here's the Gemini 3 Pro benchmark results. I just wanted to talk about the difference in how things have changed.

21:44If you look at their Humanities last exam results, Claude Son at 4.5 gets about 14 % right versus about 38 % for Gemini 3 Pro. big improvements in math and screen understanding. And these numbers really are materially better than other models that are kind of currently state-of-the-art. And I just really think this pushes back against the idea that AI improvement has slowed dramatically. So I view this all as very, very bullish. And there's a little bit of a teaser though. One last thing here. If you take a look at this chart right here, there's an upcoming variation of Gemini 3 Pro called Gemini 3 DeepThink.

22:23does even better and is crushing the Arc AGI benchmark, which I think is very important. So I believe the kids say that Google cooked here and that a lot of folks are really going to dive into this pretty much right away because this is going to be. Looks incrementally better. You know, to be honest, we need to have an expert on here to tell us if it's actually better or not, or like the actual extent, because this history's last exam, I do know, having talked to some folks, they are some pretty hard questions. I would like to have an expert on here who created that. I wonder who created histories.

22:58Somebody created this. Somebody creates the new questions on it. I want to know who that person is. In a more real world application than Jason, to put it into more kind of functional context, browser use, a Twiz500 company, gave it very strong marks. Instead, it was much better than previous models from the company. Box's Aaron Levy compared it to Gemini 2.5 Pro and found that in the box context, it was much better across a number of metrics. And Stripes' Patrick Collison gave it a pretty strong review. You might say he gave it a pretty hard task and was very impressive when he put together a compendium of recent research into genetics.

23:32So some people in the field are actually reporting. That's good to know. Got rave reviews from some leaders who actually use it at their major company. So Aaron Levy likes it. Stripe boys like it. That's pretty good endorsement that they're seeing a difference. It's at least as good as people hoped, unlike GPT-5, which was not as good as people hoped. So at a minimum, the vibes are persisting. So that's pretty good. And then just for fun, Jason, I thought we'd talk about the Polymarket perspective here. There's a funny little wiggle here in this Polymarket. If you're on the audio version, we're looking at which company has the best AI model by the end of 2025.

24:06The end date, of course, is December 31. And there was this really interesting wobble, Jason. We're zoomed into a one-day context here. But look, Crock 4.1 came out and people got really excited about it. Maybe XAI is going to win. And then Gemini 3 came out and got and crushed it again. So the market is once again betting that Google is going to run the AI game through the end of 2025. How does this one resolve? I always bring the same thing up, which is we need to understand how the bet resolves. So how do they define which one has the best AI model again? The market will resolve to, yes, if any model owned by Google has the highest arena score based off the chatbot arena LLM leaderboard.

24:43So it's the chatbot subset of the LLM arena leaderboard that we discussed earlier. Again, head to head, no models listed. People just pick which one they think is best. So it's kind of a blind taste test. And Google has to have the highest score in that area. And it didn't when Grok 4.1 came out. And now it does again, now that Gemini 3 has come out and surpassed it. That means Google is going to have the best model. Period, full stop. Like if the sharps are saying it, there's somebody on the inside who's making this bet, I bet. I bet there's people inside the, there's some group of developers.

25:18This is my hypothesis. There's some group of developers who run LM Arena and there's people inside of Google who are betting on themselves. Like a basketball, like Michael Jordan betting on himself to win a game or cover the spread. It's like, it's in his control. so when I see like every that sort of level of consensus I kind of think it's the developers themselves working on the language model or the person and or the people who actually run the leaderboard who are watching uh the leaderboard activity and they have some inside information this is why these you know polymarket is like really changing the world because there's an opportunity to make money from your knowledge.

Read the full transcript

26:06People have some proprietary knowledge, some inside line, or they're in control of it. But this is what makes these things so interesting. Do you want to see a funny little addition then, Jason, while we're talking about this? Sure. If you look at this, this is the same chart, but zoomed out to the entire year for this kind of end of year bet. And you can quite literally see people's enthusiasm for a GPT-5. And then it came out and just collapsed its percent chance of being correct. So not everyone trading on here has inside information because some people are still reacting to news as it comes out to the public, but you can make a lot of money if you know what's going to happen before everyone else.

26:41You can see right there. I think I'm with them. It does seem like Google is going to run away with it for this year. And they also have this massive advantage with their profit machine and the number of searches growing they can build out their capex yep off of profits and so that also gives them a massive advantage in all of this and it makes sense they bought deep mind back in the day and they can just keep using all the data they have from browsers gmail youtube i mean you think about their data advantage gosh what is and have they come out with an agentic chrome browser yet? Is there a bit of any rumor about them releasing an agentic Chrome browser?

27:26I think they're taking the same approach to adding AI to Chrome as Microsoft is with Windows, which is trying to slap it on the top so they don't disrupt what currently works. And I think that's why they're right for disruption. I know there's plugins and extensions. I don't think there's a hardcore agentic Chrome version, Jason, or at least I know I don't think there is. Gemini is in Chrome, like in the top, there is like a, a Gemini button that will like, I don't know, summarize the page you're on and do basic stuff like that. I'm not playing with this. Okay. This is better. I never actually clicked that button until now.

28:00So sorry if I'm behind, but like, I don't think I ask, okay. You can chat to Gemini inside of Chrome about your current page and you can change the tab, but this seems kind of bolted on to me and not as as deep of an integration as we've seen with comment atlas and other browsers yeah i think they'll do like some basic things like create a calendar event for you um but i don't think you can have it go do a task for you like comment does where you can say like hey go find me 10 camping put 10 camping supplies i should have for my camping trip this weekend into my, you know, shopping cart and give me two versions of each flashlight, two versions of each sleeping bag, and I'll delete the one I don't want.

28:50Give me the highest rated and average price. And I think those are the kind of features people are going to be looking for. But integrating with like, you know, summarizing your YouTube video or making a calendar event, I guess those are nice. But when they if they are studying everything you do inside your browser. We were talking about Apple intelligence earlier, studying how you use an app. Now I think about that with your Chrome browser, plus your Gmail, they're going to know everything you shop on Amazon. So then they could, every time you're, this would be super aggressive and probably trigger some antitrust stuff.

29:24But imagine if they were studying your purchasing and then just taking that into account with an AI agent for like, Hey, I can build your shopping cart for you for your groceries next week based on, you know, what I've seen you do in the past, right? I think you're going to be out of milk. I think you're probably needing more eggs. It'll be very interesting. Your startup needs custom software, but building your own secure production ready apps is hard, right? And not every founder has the expertise or time to get started. Well, now you don't have to just use Zite, Z-I-T-E, make whatever you need from idea to a working app in just minutes easily all on your own.

30:03Plus, you can fill it in with forms, apps, databases, and other automations that you need as part of your product. So many of the no-code and vibe coding tools are just flashy demos, or they work on legacy systems that take so much time and effort to learn, let alone master. But Zyte is both easy to use and powerful enough to build out the apps you want, and it quickly connects all the other tools you're already using. For example, earlier this month, they added the ability to bulk create and update records. So it's easier and faster than ever to design data heavy apps that are constantly syncing between systems.

30:35That's the kind of attention to detail that sets Zyte apart. Start using the number one AI powered business software generator on the market. I'm going to give you 50 % off your first project. Go to Zyte.com slash twist to get started. That's Zyte.com slash twist for 50 % off your first project. we just did confirm jason that the current instantiation of gemini in chrome is non-agentic um i bet you if you count to like 35 they're going to update that because even edge microsoft's current browser has the same kind of right rail agentic interface that's very similar to again atlas and uh and comet from perplexity yeah um speaking about data and which companies have it Microsoft has a lot of data because they run, of course, the Office suite and have for a thousand years.

31:23And they are going to invest in Anthropic. This is the other enormous AI news story from today. Both NVIDIA and Microsoft are going to invest into Anthropic, up to$10 billion from NVIDIA, up to$5 billion from Microsoft. Wow. Also, yeah. Also, Microsoft is going to become a compute provider for Anthropic. So you're going to be able to use Anthropic's clawed models inside of the Azure ecosystem. and they're going to buy compute from Azure as well. So it's kind of one of these classic AI multi-part deals in which Microsoft's going to work with Anthropic and invest in it. Anthropic's going to work with NVIDIA to ensure that its models can run efficiently on NVIDIA GPUs.

32:04And everyone's very excited about this. This is going to be fun. Now, no matter what cloud you're on, Google Cloud, Azure, or AWS, you can get access to cloud models. I think it's the first AI company to be available on all three major clouds, which I think speaks to their business focus. They're very much don't want to compete on an application level with their customers. They want to be a neutral third party, although they do have a coding product. I think they're not going to do what OpenAI is going to do, which is try to, you know, invest in every single space. But Microsoft investing$5 billion after just settling their OpenAI deal, I think that's probably why this is happening now.

32:47Yes. Is the OpenAI deal closed and they seem to have worked that out, that they're going to go public and they have certain ownership. And now this drops. Microsoft investing$5 billion. Anthropic will use$30 billion worth of Azure compute potentially. So that's pretty amazing. And, you know, these contracts are now starting to say we'll invest up to. So I think people want to understand the contours of these deals a little bit more. Wall Street, that is. And so now you're starting to see that those qualifiers come in up to$10 billion, up to$5 billion. Although here in the notes it says they're going to purchase$30 billion worth of Azure.

33:31I wonder if that is actually locked in or that's based upon certain targets being hit. But that's kind of big news. And Anthropic has committed to purchase 30 billion of Azure compute capacity and to contract additional compute capacity up to one gigawatt. That's pretty sturdy language. To my point, like, I think you're starting to see more precise language in these deals because people are wondering, like, is this going to actually show up or not? So when they put up to and they put committed, like, there might be, there could still be an out in that, by the way. They committed to this amount and there could be caveats.

34:04caveats. If they can cancel this, they could push out this spend. So it could occur over 10 years, it could occur over 20 years. There's all kinds of contours and qualifiers being put on these things. These companies want each other to succeed. So I don't think they're going to be so hard nosed about individual contractual things that they're going to cause a ruckus. Microsoft doesn't want Anthropic to look weak, nor does NVIDIA want Microsoft to look like it made a bad deal. They want everyone to look brilliant and profitable and then there's just revenues raining from the sky so i kind of presume there's some goodwill built into these jason maybe i'm being naive but um you know if they are making commitments to buy a certain number of nvidia's chips well nvidia needs to actually make those so there could be outs they're time-based obviously so the nature of these is rising tide lifts all boats and we need more power, more GPUs.

35:06But Dario was also on 60 Minutes this weekend and there was an interesting clip of him talking about white collar jobs. And it was exactly in line with some of the reporting I've had. He basically is saying for the early stage, and I'll summarize it, but he's concerned that rote work in the next couple of years. In the short term, it's going to be really cataclysmic. And he just kind of comes out and says it, which is refreshing. Let's hear the clip. You've said AI could wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs and spike unemployment to 10 % to 20 % in the next one to five years. Yes.

35:47That's shocking. That is the future we could see if we don't become aware of this problem now. Half of all entry-level white-collar jobs? Well, if we look at entry-level consultants, lawyers, financial professionals, you know, many of kind of the white-collar service industries, a lot of what they do, you know, AI models are already quite good at and without intervention. It's hard to imagine that there won't be some significant job impact there. And my worry is that it'll be broad and it'll be faster than what we've seen with previous technology. This is interesting because he's pretty concise.

36:26Again, back to contours, qualifiers. He thinks this could be 10 % unemployment. Now, we've had 10 % unemployment quite recently amongst young people. It's 8 % right now coming out of college. So saying 10 % to 20 % is basically not that 4 % number you'll hear me quote all the time. That's like the sort of national. But amongst young people, unemployment is like 8%, 9 % already. So going to 10 % to 20 % is not that big of a jump. This is the unemployment rate amongst 16 to 24-year-olds. And you can see what's that? It climbed from the bottom of 6.6 in April of 2023 to a high of 10.5 % as of August.

37:05Recall government shutdown, data delays. That's the most recent data point. Yeah. So it's already at 10 % amongst the 16 to 24 group. The higher group, which is like, I think 20 to 27, I think it's 8 % or so. That group is an important one to look at because that includes like the college grads who've been in the market for a couple of years. The point is, what he's saying is not far-fetched and it's not doomerism. It's actually really well thought out. And you will hear people dismiss it as doomerism. And the people you hear maybe dismiss it as doomerism. Maybe they have horses in the race, Maybe they have political agendas, et cetera.

37:45And they don't want people to be as matter of fact about this. But he is exactly right. If you were to look at an entry level PR person or an HR person or an entry level researcher, entry level, apprenticeship level, accounting person or legal person, a lot of what they do is a drag on the senior people. and the senior people are now able to do that young person's grunt work with AI. So then you have to ask yourself, if you're a senior level person, do you want to mentor these two or three annoying kids who are just learning how to show up at work and they can't even get in on time or they're goofy and they fool around or they do some stupid stuff at work?

38:30Everybody's had this experience. Mentoring people is hard. It takes time out of your day. Some people find it rewarding. Most people find it annoying. Sorry, it's just the reality of it. And then, you know, you could just have run a query with your LLM or use your co-pilot from a legal provider, a tax provider, a coding provider. Or, you know, if it's an HR person and they're like, I'm going to put people on recruiting for these new positions and writing the job descriptions, then I've got to go edit the job descriptions. It's just easier for me to do it myself. You take a senior person like yourself, Alex, or somebody like Lon, you know, you got to prepare the docket.

39:05You have a young person prepare the docket. You edit them. It's like, uh, I could have just done this myself with a large language model and it would have been done already. I think we're going to have to make a civilizational decision here because everything you're saying, Jason, is right. Often mentoring people slows you down. It burns time and it makes the senior person who's more expensive, less productive net because they have to go back and do a lot of busy work. But if we want people to have kids, they're going to need employment and stable employment is better. And yeah, so you're thinking on the societal basis, but that's not how people work.

39:37That's not how business leaders work day to day. But maybe that's what I'm saying. We need to change our mindset because if we do automate these jobs away and we take a lot of careers that should start right after college and begin to accrete value and income and therefore wealth and therefore the ability to buy a house and have children. If we short circuit that process at the beginning, we're going to have a lot of people that are just 45 with two roommates and a shared dog. Yeah. It's already happening. Yeah. So, I mean, these conversations that people don't want us to have because they don't want us to, you know, tell people the truth about what's coming.

40:10I mean, who's offering? Is anyone even trying to find a solution to this other than just throwing their hands up? Because I agree with you and it scares me. It doesn't need to be scary. It should be concerning that smart people building in this space, Dario, Elon, myself, myself uh not that i'm on their levels but uh and bernie sanders and other folks are saying hey this is a little bit concerning and we should be thinking about it individual businesses are not going to think collectively the government is like they're they're never going to be able to like get in here and solve these problems so what i'll say is um you're on your own young people the message to young people you're on your own nobody's coming to help you and you got to figure it out for yourself.

40:56That's my best advice. Because businesses are just going to do what businesses do, which is lower costs and be more efficient. They're going to adopt the technology. They are adopting the technology. Oh, quickly. Yeah. And so they are not going to think about this overall society issues. Our government has never been able to manage any of this stuff. They never will. They're not going to do it. There'll be like 10 years in the review mirror by the time they get involved. I mean, they're just thinking about breaking up Google search monopoly in year 30. So they're out to lunch. Government moves slow.

41:30But what about making conscious decisions, like putting together a consortium of leaders of businesses and say, hey, we are not going to stop hiring young people. We are going to keep investing in the future generations because we would like to not only have a society in 50 years, we'd like to have senior people in 50 years. This is a thing that businesses could get together and choose to do if they wanted to. I'm trying to figure out if there's any precedent for what you're saying. It's idealistic, but these are competitive businesses. So it would be like during the, I don't know, the banking era saying like, oh, we're going to put in teller machines.

42:04Let's all the banks get together and we'll coordinate having more tellers to do more things, which eventually exactly happened. You go inside the building and they had more services they offered other than just counting you money and giving you a deposit. They moved those people to work on other offerings, I think, in some cases. They often have, but it's different this time. The thing is, I don't think this is just another introduction of a specific technology that impacts one slice of one part of the labor force. Like ATMs are automated teller machines. They automated tellers in a machine. Tellers were not 10 to 20 % of the workforce, right?

42:41So when Dario says this and you say he's right and he's being upfront, we are implying that we are going into a Great Depression level of unemployment because we're going to automate away tens of millions of jobs. I think it will be low millions of jobs. I don't think it will be tens of millions, but I think it will be low millions per year will be automated away. So then the question is, like, do we catch up with new work? Just start a company, go to founder university. I think nobody's solving these problems. I think it's going to be a tragedy of the commons kind of situation. Nobody's going to be looking out for the interns and the apprentices.

43:20They're just going to adopt the technology, go faster, lower their costs. Amazon's just going to be a machine. They're not going to think collectively about anything other than faster deliveries at a cheaper price. You better get accustomed to Mondami winning in New York City. because what you're saying here is that there's no way for businesses to look out for their own interests. And that's surprising to me because you're saying essentially it has to be such short-term thinking. They can't think long-term. And that's an indictment of the capital formation process. They can't think collectively.

43:51They can think midterm, long-term, but it's not like Amazon's going to go, you know what? We need to keep adding staff to do this instead of robots so that our staff can buy stuff on Amazon or can go to Starbucks on their way to work. That's just not how businesses think. They're just going to be radically pursuing efficiency. Now, the question is, do people want to create more companies and products and services using these new tools? If you know these tools, you're going to be infinitely employable. And that's the best advice I can give any young person who is going to be faced with 15 % unemployment amongst their peer group.

44:30I think it would be 15%, which I think when I graduated college in 93, I think I remember 14 or 15 % unemployment amongst that 20 to 27 year old. If you look at that. Okay. Here's the 20 to 24 year old unemployment rate historically. Okay. That's interesting. That's like really graduates. If you go to the 93, it was like 12%. It was just starting to decline from about 10 and then it fell consistently down to six. Right when I was graduating, it was over 10%. Now it's at under 10%. It could be faster, as he's saying, than people anticipate. If it's not faster than he's anticipating, then we're spending too much on AI.

45:10And if it's going to go as fast as he says it is, we're going to end up with socialists running every single major city in this country. So something for business people to think about as they approach productivity. So we're going to host our Dim Sum Demo Day in San Francisco. We'll have our latest accelerator class. Maybe I'll do a fireside chat with one of my friends or besties and we'll eat some dim sum. And it's just going to be great networking for investors. I'm going to invite 150 investors, everybody from my high net worth LP base, the syndicate members who like to write 10 to 50K checks into startups, as well as all my seed fund and venture friends in Silicon Valley.

45:50you can apply to come if you're an active investor. You have to be an active investor. This is only going to be like 150 seats, I think, or even 100. There's no room for, you know, friends to just hang out or other founders to hang out. You have to be an investor. You have to be able to prove your investor. You can apply launch.co slash dim sum, D-I-M-S-U-M. Launch.co slash D-I-M-S-U-M, dim sum. So jealous. That's going to be so much fun. I love dim sum. I loved in San Francisco and I love me some nerds. So that's like my three favorite things. It's going to be in San Francisco area. I like to make it like, you know, these demo days, I think 70 % of the value is to get to catch up with other investors candidly.

46:30And then 30 % is to get to see the companies and get to meet them. So there's the reason to come. If you want to fly in to San Francisco, you got a reason to do it December 5th. And I think December 6th is the all-in holiday party if you happen to be coming in for that. Awesome. And that'll do it for us today.

From the publisher

AI Model Showdown: Grok 4.1 vs. Gemini 3 | E2211


Register for Founder University Japan’s Kickoff! https://luma.com/cm0x90mk


Today’s show:

*Will the arrival of two hotly-anticipated, intensely powerful AI models snap the Doomer cycle?

On a new TWiST, Jason and Alex consider the current AI landscape, one where cynicism about insider mega-deals, fear of job displacement, and concerns about bubble bursts seem to rule the day. Will the arrival of two powerful new models — xAI’s Grok 4.1 and Google’s Gemini 3 — help the industry to course-correct? And how do we decide how much these models have improved anyway?

PLUS we’re investigating Cloudflare’s recent downtime and their acquisition of Replicate. Are we heading toward a future in which everyone runs their own models, locally? And how worried should founders get if their products or sites go down for a few hours?

Finally, if you’re an investor, and want to come to Jason’s Dim Sum Demo Day in San Francisco, here’s the link: http://launch.co/dimsum

Timestamps:

(2:01) Why the internet got broadly degraded when Cloudflare went down

(5:00) How worried should founders become when their sites go offline?

(6:44) Downtime aside, what did Cloudflare want with Replicate?

(8:12) Why Jason predicts one day we’ll run our own local language models

(9:39) Goldbelly - Goldbelly ****ships America’s most delicious, iconic foods nationwide! Get 20% off your first order by going to Goldbelly.com and using the promo code TWiST at checkout.

(15:25) How to turn off “Learn From This App” on your iPhone

(17:29) Will the arrival of hotly-anticipated new models stop the spread of Doomerism and AI cynicism

(20:00) Every.io - For all of your incorporation, banking, payroll, benefits, accounting, taxes or other back-office administration needs, visit every.io.

(23:53) Checking back in with the “Best AI Model” Polymarket… why has ChatGPT dropped so low?

(29:43) Zite - Zite is the fastest way to build business software with AI. Build apps, forms, websites and portals that connect to the tools you already use. Go to zite.com/twist to get started.

(31:14) ANOTHER AI mega-deal? Nvidia and Microsoft are investing in… ANTHROPIC

(33:06) Why so many AI deals now include “up to…” language around investments

(35:04) What Jason thinks of Dario Amodei’s warning about white collar job displacement

(39:39) If we all agree AI job displacement is coming… what can be done?

(45:16) All about Jason’s Dim Sum Investor Demo Day in San Francisco!


Subscribe to the TWiST500 newsletter: https://ticker.thisweekinstartups.com

Check out the TWIST500: https://www.twist500.com

Subscribe to This Week in Startups on Apple: https://rb.gy/v19fcp


Follow Lon:

X: https://x.com/lons


Follow Alex:

X: https://x.com/alex

LinkedIn: ⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexwilhelm


Follow Jason:

X: https://twitter.com/Jason

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasoncalacanis


Thank you to our partners:

(9:39) Goldbelly - Goldbelly ****ships America’s most delicious, iconic foods nationwide! Get 20% off your first order by going to Goldbelly.com and using the promo code TWiST at checkout.

(20:00) Every.io - For all of your incorporation, banking, payroll, benefits, accounting, taxes or other back-office administration needs, visit every.io.

(29:43) Zite - Zite is the fastest way to build business software with AI. Build apps, forms, websites and portals that connect to the tools you already use. Go to zite.com/twist to get started.


Great TWIST interviews: Will Guidara, Eoghan McCabe, Steve Huffman, Brian Chesky, Bob Moesta, Aaron Levie, Sophia Amoruso, Reid Hoffman, Frank Slootman, Billy McFarland


More from This Week in Startups

All 653 episodes
AI Model Showdown: Grok 4.1 vs. Gemini 3This Week in Startups · 47 min
Listen in VO