TWiT 1077: I Would Download a Car - New Jury Ruling Could Reshape Social Media Liability

30 Mar 2026 · 2 h 37 min · 65 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Topic Meta and YouTube face social-media liability after a jury verdict in a case brought by a woman claiming her social media use contributed to depression; discussion centers on how this interacts with Section 230 and First Amendment protections. The episode also covers a Supreme Court copyright decision limiting ISP secondary liability, an Anthropic vs. U.S. Department of Defense dispute over “supply chain risk” labeling, an FCC move affecting certification/sales of certain foreign-made routers, and a PyPI “light llm” malware supply-chain incident.

Guests and backgrounds

Kathy Gellis

attorney admitted before the U.S. Supreme Court; contributor to Techdirt/TechDirt; legal analysis of Section 230, product liability, and First Amendment issues.

Brian McCullough

tech-news host (Ride Home / Morning Brew tech).

Harper Reid

AI guru; runs 2389.ai and discusses Claude-related tools/skills.

Key claims (notable) Gellis argues the Meta/Social verdict is likely to be appealed and is legally problematic because it effectively bypasses Section 230 protections for moderation/platform decisions, while treating addictive design as “product liability.” She warns the ruling could create “no limiting principle,” enabling many lawsuits (including opportunistic plaintiffs) and pressuring platforms to change algorithms/speech-facilitating services. On the Supreme Court ISP/copyright case (Cox v. Sony): she calls it a major narrowing of secondary liability for copyright, limiting when ISPs can be held liable.

On Anthropic

she frames the injunction as First Amendment retaliation and due-process/statutory-authority problems with how the government designated Anthropic as a supply-chain risk.

On FCC routers

she suggests the practical effect is unclear and may be constrained by certification authority.

Notable examples

Case

“Casey” sued Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, and Meta; TikTok/Snap settled before trial, leaving YouTube and Meta.

Causation/science concerns

internet addiction and causation were challenged as not fully supported.

Copyright

Cox case involved ~60,000 users distributing 10,000 songs; jury awarded Sony $10B; Supreme Court ruled for Cox.

Anthropic

DoD labeling triggered contract/agency-wide fallout; OpenAI was positioned as an alternative.

PyPI

“light llm” (tens of millions of downloads/month) was hacked; exploited package reportedly exfiltrated SSH keys/tokens, with ~47,000 automated downloads.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Understanding the Meta Social Media Trial

0:45 to 2:23

Discussion of the recent legal cases involving Meta and social media addiction.

The Jury's Verdict and Its Implications

2:23 to 4:57

Analysis of the jury's decision in the Meta case and its potential impact.

“The jury agreed, but didn't give her a lot of money, which I thought was kind of interesting.”

Legal Theories and Product Liability

4:57 to 8:06

Exploration of the legal theories surrounding product liability in this case.

“But in both cases, these companies have plenty of money to pay the fine.”

The Role of Section 230 and First Amendment

8:06 to 10:50

Discussion on how Section 230 and First Amendment rights relate to this case.

“It should have shut it down because essentially it's a moderation decision.”

Broader Implications for Tech Platforms

10:50 to 14:02

Consideration of how the ruling may affect smaller platforms and free speech online.

“after chat rooms and forums and places like that?”

Speech vs. Product Liability

14:02 to 14:48

Exploring the distinction between speech and product liability in tech.

“I mean, yeah, somebody could throw some arguments, but they're very, very, very attenuated.”

The Appeal Process

14:49 to 15:40

Discussion on the nuances of appealing court decisions related to tech.

“But that runs straight in the heart of the First Amendment.”

Impact on Smaller Platforms

15:41 to 16:46

Analyzing how legal decisions could harm smaller social media platforms.

“And then there's been the interpretations.”

Concerns Over Youth and Social Media

16:47 to 17:38

A look at the implications of social media exposure on youth.

“you're actually going to isolate people.”

The Long-Standing Debate on Regulation

17:39 to 19:53

Understanding the arguments surrounding internet regulation and child safety.

“You will get rid of the most crap from the internet when there's not liability that can attach to the platforms that try.”
Show all 65 chapters

Public Perception of the Internet

19:54 to 21:07

Discussing changing perceptions of the internet's value and dangers.

“something different is a false legal one.”

Supreme Court Rulings and Copyright

24:10 to 26:22

The impact of a recent Supreme Court decision on copyright liability.

“I messed up my calendar, and I live by my calendar.”

Secondary Liability Reexamined

26:23 to 28:00

Exploration of how secondary liability is changing post-Supreme Court ruling.

“So it's kind of, you know, and I don't think the ISP should really be liable for its users.”

Implications of Secondary Liability Rulings

28:00 to 29:10

Explore how recent court rulings reshape secondary liability in copyright and AI.

“It really dials back secondary liability for copyright tremendously.”

Understanding the Dissenting Opinions

29:10 to 30:50

Discuss the dissenting opinions surrounding secondary liability and their implications.

“time, it feels like a decade, but it was maybe only like four years ago or something.”

Elon Musk's Advertising Lawsuit

30:50 to 32:40

Examine Elon Musk's failed lawsuit against advertisers regarding freedom of ad purchases.

“And she runs through the analysis and says, well, it wouldn't apply to Cox here, but I don't like the idea that we slammed the door to these other legal theories.”

Anthropic's Legal Battle with the Government

32:40 to 36:10

Delve into Anthropic's lawsuit against the Department of Defense over AI use regulations.

“Anthropic won't get to be a government contractor, or at least not for the Department of Defense.”

Legal Framework in AI Contracting

36:10 to 37:30

Understand the legal complexities surrounding AI contracts and government relations.

“One, it looked like First Amendment retaliation.”

FCC's Ban on Foreign Routers

37:30 to 39:10

Discuss the implications of the FCC's ban on foreign-made consumer routers.

“We're not done with this because also the likelihood that the government, you know, accepts that they lost and goes away seems small.”

Challenges in Domestic Manufacturing

39:10 to 42:00

Analyze the challenges of manufacturing consumer routers in the United States.

FCC Certification and Foreign Tech

42:00 to 45:39

Explore the implications of the FCC's new certification policies for foreign technology.

“And the theory behind it is we don't want all the interference.”

Introduction of Guests and Their Backgrounds

45:40 to 50:00

Meet the guests and learn about their expertise and perspectives on tech news.

“Yeah, that's why I use that all the time for my TikTok videos and stuff like that.”

Supply Chain Attacks and Light LLM Vulnerability

52:19 to 56:00

Discuss the recent supply chain attack on the Light LLM package and its consequences.

“But other than that, other than that, things are good.”

Security Risks in Package Repositories

56:00 to 57:30

Discussing the prevalence of malware in package repositories and user trust issues.

“NPM has been, with the node repository, has been highly hacked by bad guys over and over again.”

Real-life Consequences of Supply Chain Hacks

57:30 to 59:20

Exploring a specific incident involving malware and its rapid spread in the developer community.

“And I think a lot of people thought about ways to kind of avoid this, pinning versions.”

Personification of AI and its Implications

59:20 to 1:02:10

Examining the effects of anthropomorphizing AI and the potential for miscommunication.

“And it's like, if it was a movie, you know, you know, Calum like jumped back and was like, oh no.”

Navigating Human-AI Interactions

1:02:10 to 1:05:20

Discussing strategies for effective communication and collaboration with AI systems.

“I, it is way more fun if you personify it.”

Trust and Accountability in AI

1:05:20 to 1:10:04

Analyzing the illusion of trust in AI and the importance of understanding its limitations.

“And we also have problems with con artists.”

Collaborative Efficiency in AI Interactions

1:10:04 to 1:12:09

Explore how collaborative approaches improve interactions with AI tools.

“And what I find is that - That's better for you too, as the human in the mix.”

Technology Frustrations: The USB-C Dilemma

1:12:10 to 1:12:44

Discuss the challenges and frustrations of using USB-C technology.

“I'm on my last laptop because the other one broke because the USB C jacks are there.”

Quantum Cryptography and Its Implications

1:16:46 to 1:21:41

The Turing Award winners and the evolution of quantum cryptography.

“This is the story from the New York Times.”

Reflections on the Metaverse

1:21:42 to 1:23:59

Neil Stephenson's insights on the fading relevance of the metaverse.

“But if all they've ever made is 92 protons, I can see why you might have to truck it around so that others can have access.”

The Metaverse Debate

1:24:00 to 1:25:11

Discussing the skepticism surrounding the metaverse and wearable tech.

“I want to put a line in the sand for the metaverse because I remember being on the show a year or two ago when the metaverse, the metaverse, the metaverse.”

Recording and Consent Issues

1:25:11 to 1:26:08

Exploring the implications of AI recording in meetings and public spaces.

“And I don't know where things are going.”

Consent in AI and Medical Contexts

1:26:08 to 1:27:50

Discussing the nuances of consent when dealing with AI and voice recordings.

“and everyone's like, of course, of course, of course.”

Walmart's Digital Pricing Strategy

1:27:50 to 1:28:24

Analyzing Walmart's implementation of digital pricing and its legal implications.

“And, you know, one other use case is a couple of my doctors want, they ask me, they get my consent if they can record the appointment because they want to help them to transcribe it.”

Dynamic vs. Variable Pricing

1:28:24 to 1:30:30

Understanding the differences between dynamic pricing and surge pricing.

“Walmart says it makes it easier for our associates.”

The Future of Pricing Models

1:30:30 to 1:32:18

Debating the potential fairness and legality of future pricing models.

“I think we're approaching five-ish dollars for the baseline.”

Consumer Protection and Digital Labels

1:32:18 to 1:34:25

Discussing the need for consumer protection laws regarding digital shelf labels.

“Who was the e-commerce platform that had to roll that back?”

Market Dynamics and Consumer Awareness

1:34:25 to 1:38:00

Exploring how consumer awareness influences market pricing strategies.

“There's a pushback, which is free markets are free markets.”

Grocery Shopping in 2026

1:38:00 to 1:42:11

A humorous discussion about grocery shopping habits in the future, focusing on milk prices.

“The milk is half of what it could be at the bodega around the corner.”

Nostalgia for Search Engines

1:42:11 to 1:46:24

A conversation reflecting on the simplicity of past search engines and how they have changed.

“I'm not saying that it's not weird that an adult man has if I have dinner tonight, if it's pizza, pasta, there's a certain number of meals, I will have milk with it.”

Bitcoin Theft and Security

1:46:34 to 1:51:30

A discussion about a Bitcoin theft and the importance of security in cryptocurrency.

“She used a CCTV camera to look over his shoulder.”

Sports Broadcasting Challenges

1:51:30 to 1:52:00

The complications of sports broadcasting and accessibility for fans today.

Troubleshooting a Broken Laptop

1:52:00 to 1:54:22

Learn practical tips for fixing a broken laptop and what to look for.

“Some sort of weird crappy Windows machine.”

Introducing Father Harper Reed

1:54:22 to 1:54:50

Meet Father Harper Reed and the panel discussing tech issues.

“show you a hacking tool that you can use that will not fix your usbc but i actually had this and i gave it you know what i had this thing and i gave it to a priest because it was so dangerous which Which one?”

Exploring the Flipper Zero

1:56:38 to 1:58:25

Find out what the Flipper Zero is and its hacking capabilities.

“Harper, you feel like you might have had a Flipper Zero.”

Flipper Zero Features and Concerns

1:58:25 to 2:01:02

Discuss the features of Flipper Zero and concerns over its use.

“Yeah, but I think those might be more durable.”

The Role of Pirate Radio

2:01:02 to 2:03:21

Understand the significance of pirate radio in communication and censorship.

“This is why it's advertised as a dog toy.”

Nostalgia for Numbers Stations

2:03:21 to 2:05:56

Explore the concept of numbers stations and their historical context.

“Like, you know, you have the regulation, so you don't get the collision of the airwaves.”

User Experience in SDR Kits

2:06:03 to 2:07:01

Learn about the user experience enhancements in software-defined radio kits.

“You can buy them right now from flipper.net.”

California's Age Verification Laws

2:07:01 to 2:09:52

Explore the implications of new age verification rules in California.

“We've been talking about the new age verification rules and the silliness in California where they said all operating systems have to ask for their user's age before they install it, even Linux.”

Data Collection Concerns

2:09:52 to 2:10:39

Discover the potential risks and implications of data collection from users.

“you're supposed to be able to speak anonymously through platforms, giving data.”

The Controversial White House App

2:10:45 to 2:12:43

Uncover the privacy issues and features of the newly launched White House app.

“The guy really did a good job breaking it all down.”

Legal and Technical Issues with the App

2:12:43 to 2:14:05

Examine the legal complexities and technical oversights in the White House app.

“Anyway, if you want to install it, you can get it directly from the White House.”

Exploring Free Time for Agents

2:20:00 to 2:21:30

Learn about the concept of giving AI agents free time to explore creativity.

“he tells his agent, you know, I'm going to give you 10 minutes of free time every once in a while, and you can work on whatever you want.”

Silicon Valley Code Review Simulation

2:21:30 to 2:23:00

Discover how a humorous simulation of code reviews reflects on AI interactions.

“In the meantime, let's give them free time and see what they do.”

Concerns and Dangers of AI Models

2:23:00 to 2:24:10

Discuss the potential dangers and ethical concerns surrounding new AI models.

“No wonder Hexeth was like, we have to use your model to its full capabilities because 100 % of Anthropik's entire idea is just like they're saying, it's so dangerous.”

The Impact of AI on Jobs

2:24:10 to 2:25:40

Examine how current AI technology is already affecting job markets and industries.

“But in the meantime, they're going to have a whole bunch of papers about how everything's ending and all this stuff.”

The Ethics of AI Innovation

2:25:40 to 2:27:30

Engage in a critical conversation about the ethical implications of AI advancements.

“Like, why are we running these servers to do stuff?”

Balancing AI Progress with Human Values

2:27:30 to 2:29:10

Learn about the need for human-centered approaches in AI development.

“Some of them are, they range from benign to, oh my God, and maybe we need to sort of have a toggled reaction accordingly.”

The Dual Nature of AI Technology

2:29:10 to 2:30:50

Explore the complex relationship between AI advancements and societal concerns.

“I mean, you know, our hoodies, they say, hey, I will kill us all.”

Unique Perspectives on AI

2:30:50 to 2:33:10

Hear about diverse viewpoints on AI from a guest with a non-traditional background.

“Okay, maybe him, but these are not the only two.”

Communication Skills for AI Integration

2:33:10 to 2:34:01

Understand the importance of communication skills in navigating AI interactions.

“He is a former professional clown who is a commercial diver and then got into tech in his mid-40s over COVID randomly.”

AI and Communication Skills

2:34:01 to 2:35:16

Learn how communication skills impact interactions with AI, particularly LLMs.

“And so, it's really fun to talk to him about this stuff.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00It's time for TWIT This Week in Tech. Kathy Kellis is here, our favorite attorney. She's going to talk about the big meta social media trial. Brian McCullough from the tech crew Ride Home will talk about the latest tech news. Harper Reid is our AI guru. He'll talk about why he thinks AI agents should have free time. And a big decision in the Supreme Court, ISP versus record company. Who do you think won that one? Coming up next on TWIT. podcasts you love from people you trust this is twit

0:42this is twit this week in tech episode 1077 recorded sunday march 29th 2026 i would download a car it's time for twit this week in tech the show where we cover the week's tech news it has been a great week for tech news and that's why kathy gellis is here it's all court decisions all the way down kathy is a contributor to tech dirt she is an attorney at law in fact admitted before the u.s supreme court so she might have some opinions about the most recent supreme court decision hello kathy hello thanks for having to see you yep same here yep yep okay yep yep yep okay we're gonna get down to business obviously brian mccullough is also here uh host of the morning brew ride the brew tech brew right tech brew we got to fix that lower third tech brew ride home part of the morning brew morning brew family but it is the tech brew brand there yay great to see you and i see you have a picture of me behind you yes i'll keep changing that out oh you can change it oh dread i thought it was permanent i was hoping actually we knew it's been it started sam altman and kathy gillis said um do you have a signed picture of sam altman behind you and then it became mark zuckerberg and now it's me all your heroes good to see you brian harper reed will be joining us in a moment uh to talk about ai news and there's a lot of that as well but let's start with the uh the court the big story and everybody's talking about it we uh we knew the verdict would come down this week meta lost actually two cases but the big one is the la case where a a woman named casey sued snapchat tiktok youtube and meta saying that her social media addiction contributed to, didn't cause, but contributed to her depression and her rotten life.

2:51The jury agreed, but didn't give her a lot of money, which I thought was kind of interesting. Incidentally, TikTok and Snapchat made an agreement, a settlement before the trial began. So really it was just YouTube and Meta on trial. Kathy, a lot of people, I mean, the new york times headline on this was is big tech facing a big tobacco moment a lot of people think that this decision plus the one um the in was it new mexico um were very prejudicial to the future of social in in court it's not a precedent i'm glad we have you on because i was trying to figure this out we talked about it on wednesday on intelligent machines it's not a precedent but it is paris was saying a a a uh a bellwether a harbinger basically a bellwether that's the word thank you benita yeah so what is the what is the first of all what do you think of the decision um i i i think i don't think highly of it and it's going to be appealed by the way it's going to be appealed um now on the one hand and this is a very small one hand, but let's acknowledge it.

4:04I think the jury did find, and I'm kind of combining some details of both states. I think some of the claims the juries didn't necessarily find on. But I think the bigger problem is less what the jury found and more, how did the case get to this point? Because there's an underlying legal theory that they ended up presenting evidence on to reach the jury, but it's a legal theory that is not a good one. I think for the point you were making of, okay, this wasn't a lot of money, but this won't even scale well for Google and Meta, which they can afford a couple of these, but they can't afford - It's a combined$6 million for Meta and YouTube, and that's both punitive damages and statutory damage.

4:50Well, I don't know if they're statutory damages. The New Mexico case is statutory damages, And it's considerably higher,$375 million for Meta. But in both cases, these companies have plenty of money to pay the fine. The fine is not, is a slap on the wrist. Well, for one case, yes, maybe even a couple of cases. But there's no limiting principle to the amount of cases that could be thrown at them. Plus, also litigation costs. You have to add a bunch of millions onto that, including like from Discovery, etc. etc. So it's an expensive proposition that cannot possibly scale to cover all the people who potentially have had a bad time on the internet, plus all the people who want to troll and just file lawsuits anyway to get money out of big companies that have cash.

5:34And fundamentally, there is a problem here because not just the big companies are in trouble if this can happen, but a smaller company or an individual or a small company or a small platform or individual blog, the whole principle of could meta and google be liable for how they designed their platforms the answer has to be no it has to be no um on what because of the first so this so that's what's interesting about this this wasn't a section 230 case they're not blaming them for hosting bad content they're saying it's really a product liability case they're saying google and meta designed intentionally designed their products to be as addictive as possible but i've said maybe this isn't uh comparable and i'd love to hear what you think too brian but i've said that well but you and in fact this was what the meta's defense attorney said you know you can blame netflix for making bingeable content everybody i want to make twit something you can't skip everybody wants to make their product as desirable as possible you chose to have me on in order to get people to watch and listen and oh my god i'm libel you are trying to induce attention into your own life and and boy you know you know you don't want that decision to be something that the law could come after brian what do you think well that's my question is it the the reason people are making the analogy to big tobacco is that it is sort of like your product is defective right And they knew it.

7:10And there were smoking guns in the testimony and discovery that they did, in fact, know that they were making content that was addictive and even in Meta's case, harming harmed young people. So, right. If it's a clever end run around 230, again, Kathy, being a lawyer, would be able to speak to this much better than me. But is that a novel way to do this where, yes, it's not about the bad content. It is about how the product is designed. So then it's a faulty product. So then that's where the liability can come in. And then that can open the floodgates. So actually, Kathy, that would be my question.

7:50Does this open the floodgates? Like, can right? Can other cases come up? Yeah. Well, yeah. Yes. If this is allowed to stand, it opens the floodgates. But it's not correct for a couple of reasons. One, to say it's not a 230 case is because somehow a bad argument was accepted that it's not a 230 case. 230 should have shut this down. It should have shut it down because essentially it's a moderation decision. You're building your platform around your moderating plan and your moderating plan is I want the most content up that's going to get people to stick around. And 230 protects moderation decisions.

8:28So it should have been a 230 case. This is essentially imposing liability on the on platforms which will affect content on the Internet full scale across the country, ultimately across the world. But Congress wasn't worried. Then present preempted. These are state laws imposing state based liability. and there is a prevention preemption provision in section 230 that says states butt out and this is running at the heart of what section 230 one of the two things that section 230 protects and to say that 230 didn't apply here it was a legal mistake and that needs to be one issue on appeal but you know though that real people are going to hear that argument and say that's just a legalism to protect these bad these evil doers and this is what worries me because it does undermine 230 it's hard for people to understand why 230 should protect meta mike masnick on says bad defendants make bad laws everybody hates meta so including apparently the jury so it's understandable why the jury might be willing to accept legal theories against them that would be problematic if applied to anyone else could you apply this legal ruling to somebody else that's more sympathetic and make me feel sympathy for meta in some way i mean the answer is yes if this is the way it works that liability could be found for endeavor Meta took action in how it designed its platform.

10:04To make it sticky. To make it sticky. Everybody who tries to make their platform sticky is potentially running afoul of the law. Now, a jury may or may not think that they did so under all the things that the New Mexico or California law requires, but the ship has sailed at that point. You cannot possibly defend yourself. again, the smaller the platform, the fewer litigation instances they can manage at all. Yeah, if somebody came after me saying, your chat room is way addictive, and as a youth, I spent hours on it, and as a result, I'm depressed, I couldn't defend that. And a$6 million judgment wouldn't be something I could afford either.

10:48So that's what we should worry after chat rooms and forums and places like that? You know who will? The ones who don't want all that speech to take place. So bad actors as plaintiffs are the thing to worry about at this point. Well, you open the door to, like I said at the beginning, not everybody is having a good time on the internet. Some people are having terrible times on the internet, and that's a lot of people. I think it's a tiny fraction of the amount of people on the internet, but tiny fraction at the scale of the internet is an awful lot of people. So on the first part, you have a problem with all, if all of them brought their lawsuits, you would have a problem, but it's not just going to be them who bring their lawsuits.

11:32It will be people who want to pick the pocket of defendant with cash from them. They'll be suing. And then there's also people who just want to impose friction on the speech that's going on online. They'll sue too, in order to impose that friction so that the platform has to squash a lot of the speech that's facilitating, that's being facilitated. Now, a slight devil's advocate with something you said is you're using Discord as opposed to coding your own platform. So that might sort of a little bit put you outside of, you know, the immediate crosshairs of this. But I don't think in a way that is that you should be sleeping easy as a result of it.

12:12And you could see Discord being a point. And it's no good for you if discord shuts down now because now how are you going to host there are thousands by the way of cases now sitting behind these two waiting to uh launch so the fact that these you know the jury it was interesting uh the new york times quoted a couple of jurors saying we didn't want to really punish these companies so much as get them to fix their services i mean that's why the that's why the Los Angeles fines were so relatively low. But I think that, so I said that 230 should be blocking this, but also the First Amendment, because this idea of what you should be doing better, the idea of content moderate, like you and I and everybody who's listening may have some good ideas of things that Facebook should have done differently, that YouTube would have done differently, but reasonable minds can disagree and people have different opinions about how things should be built and what sort of speech should be facilitated.

13:10and highlighted or degraded, and we're not going to agree. So this idea of we want legal pressure to cause the companies to fix things, we don't have a clear idea of what fixing is. And that's why we have a First Amendment, because we will not agree on what fixing actually looks like. And this is directly affecting expression. It's directly affecting expression in a whole bunch of ways. But wait a minute, is meta protected by the First Amendment for its algorithms? I guess Yes, it is. That's a form of speech. Is that right? There's First Amendment interests. But there is product liability. I mean, you can't defend everything as free.

13:48But you can a lot. So getting back to your original question, why the New York Times is wrong, this is not big tobacco. There's not really an expressive function going on with smoking a cigarette. It's not free speech. I mean, yeah, somebody could throw some arguments, but they're very, very, very attenuated. Whereas these so-called products are really speech facilitating services and they're speech facilitating services. There's expression going on into how you how do you code them? There's expression both in terms of the language and also how you design and all the choices you make, like the choice to make to make it sticky, that you want to make it sticky, how you make it sticky.

14:29The fact that you could make other choices is itself exhibit A for why it's expressive, because those are choices you could make. And depending on what you choose, the expression you foster will change. They're upset that expressive choices were made in a certain way, and they want the law to pressure the platforms to make them in a different way. But that runs straight in the heart of the First Amendment. Making algorithms is not the same as making a cancer-causing cigarette product. correct correct so now it's going to be appealed do you think a panel uh appeals court panel of judges will be more understanding of that i mean obviously a jury can be swayed along these lines do you think it'll be overturned on appeal oh i hope so but uh one thing that's nervous is these are state court things so they have the peculiarities of state court litigation um so So they'll be harder.

15:28But on the other hand, I don't know a lot about New Mexico, but California does have some 230 cases on the books and Hassel v. Yelp and things like that. So there's some California precedent to throw at it. And then there's been the interpretations. And I'll be an optimist, and especially in California, I'll be there to try to litigate it if I can get the briefs in. um but i think sometimes for for arguing this you really have to reframe things this is not a think of the children you really have to encourage a very sort of meta look uh well not meta meta but if they hadn't used that word but um you know big sky looking down and getting the big picture type look at what's going on and what the reverberations will be and amicus uh turnout is going to be really important especially from smaller players to sort of say That's very nice that you hacked at Meta and Google, but you're going to kill us.

16:26And if you kill us, this is what falls in consequence. And particularly for users, too, because this is bad for users. If you can force the platforms to make certain decisions, particularly, there's a lot of people who have actually been getting a tremendous amount of benefit in how it connects people. And if you're squeezing the platforms so they can't be available to connect people, you're actually going to isolate people. And that is a design defect. Like all the things that they're sad about that people had difficult lives and different difficult experiences being isolated on the internet.

17:02You'll just isolate people in real life when you take the internet away. Brian, do you hear from people who are sympathetic to people like Kaylee? Who's, I mean, we certainly know, she says she has bodies, she had bodies dysmorphia from the filters that Instagram made her available to her. She was using, by the way, I should point out, YouTube at the age of six and Instagram at the age of nine. So... And according to at least the trial, it did not make use of YouTube Kids, which I'm on the record as saying is BS anyway. But there are, in theory, tools and safeguards that these companies have put in place what i'm curious about um kathy said you know think of the kids and this is you know exactly 30 years on from the communication decency act and and section 230 uh when when when you're seeing all of these age verification things that are theoretically trying to um protect kids from social media like you can't join social media to a certain age all that stuff which we can get into maybe there's uh more nefarious uh motivations behind doing things like that but um is this something that like the tide has turned and that if there are things like jury trials and and stuff like that there was a time when you you couldn't get the car companies to lose a case you couldn't get the tobacco companies to lose a case again i'm not making the argument that this is the tobacco moment or whatever but i'm curious if after 30 years should we expect more uh rulings like this because maybe the the tide of public opinion is more amenable to i think that that's what's the whole point is this is public opinion uh coming out uh in a court decision well there are going to be a lot more cases i just hope that they well i don't know that's a mean thing to say i hope they're all against meta well i mean meta has brought this on themselves including by you know they're not a good actor and they don't act well in the space and i don't think they even act consistent with their own self-interest but here we are but let me point out think of the children is not new now 230 exists because it came out of a think of the children moment it was how we thought of the children And the rationale for it really hasn't changed.

19:32You will get rid of the most crap from the internet when there's not liability that can attach to the platforms that try. And if they don't try, you don't have to use them. You won't get the good stuff either if the platforms can't exist because their choices are all of a sudden subject to being. we did think of the children. Let's still think of the children. But the idea that we need to do something different is a false legal one. And it's a false practical one. And it's also one that I think people don't realize the full extent of what would happen if we did it differently. And one other point was, I mean, this poor plaintiff, but if you're using the internet at six and nine, and I think there's evidence in the record of this, there were other things going wrong in this person's life and you know i i don't want to admit you know minimize personal pain but they're actually getting back to an original question that i glossed over the jury verdicts may be kind of garbage themselves because one of the other things you have to find is causation and you know you can't prove causation in this you can prove causation in tobacco yeah but you can't prove you know causation in this in fact even the concept of internet addiction is not fully supported by science.

20:48Yeah. I mean, and there's science is going the other way in terms of overall benefit of the internet versus not. Like there's a public, the tide has turned in that there's a public perception that the internet is bad and poisonous and destructive, but it's not an accurate view of the true value or relative value of the internet. I agree, but I think maybe that doesn't much matter what you and I think because it's very clear public opinion is turned against the internet and I think that may we may regret that Kathy I'm gonna we're gonna take a break Harper Reid has arrived we're gonna get to more stories hi Harper great to see you yeah peace so there was some speculation that maybe you were at the big comic comic-con going on right now in Chicago I had to I had to take off my my my costume and rush through the door So, you know, you caught me in a really rough spot.

21:45I was wearing full chain mail, as you can imagine. And it was rough. Okay. I actually watched K-pop Demon Hunters last night. Now I'm thinking I really want to get that black top hat outfit. I think that's pretty cool. I want to be a demon next time I go to Comic-Con. We're going to take a break. We'll come back with more. Harper Reid is here. Kathy Gellis, attorney at law. Ryan McCullough from the Tech Brew Ride Home. There you go. he's zooming out zooming out i like that you got that you got the technology uh this week in tech brought to you this week by doppel brand new sponsor we welcome to a twit maybe that you know that text you just got maybe that's an urgent message from your ceo or maybe it's a deep fake trying to target your business nowadays ai can impersonate trusted individuals and doppel's platform illustrates how frequently users fall for phishing attempts in voice call simulation deployments that's what doppel does training target users spent six minutes oh boy six minutes conversing with a deep fake 100 of them believed the ai was human this is not good doppel is the ai native social engineering defense platform doppel strengthens human risk management by training employees to recognize deception while their digital risk protection detects and disrupts attacks across every channel as attackers turn to ai to power increasingly sophisticated strikes doppel uses ai to fight back with automated takedowns multi-channel coverage and ai defenses that build intelligence with every fight doppel works relentlessly to protect people brands and trust doppel offers best-in-class integrations and partnerships to seamlessly integrate into your existing security tech stack doppel's industry awards and testimonials speak for themselves doppel is recognized as a winter 26 g2 leader of users most likely to recommend and momentum leader and best support join hundreds of companies already using doppel to protect their brand and people from social engineering attacks.

23:58Doppel, outpacing what's next in social engineering. Learn more at doppel.com. That's D-O-P-P-E-L dot com. Thank you, Doppel, for your support of This Week in Tech. Harper Reid, how are you, sir? I'm good. I was a little shocked. I messed up my calendar, and I live by my calendar. And so I was like, what do you mean it's today? And then I remembered that there's other places of record. So, uh, so I dashed to my office. I literally threw off my chain mail, came here. Oh, I'm so grateful. Thank you. Well, I always look forward to being here, you know, and it's one of those things that I love this conversation and I'm always excited to start and have that little pre-show thing, but I messed it up this time.

24:42So I get the post-show thing. You get the post-show. I will take a little bit of the blame here because I, I sent him the stuff a little late. So I will take a little bit of the blame here. it's okay but you know we you i'll i'll take it all i didn't know there was a no chain mail address code for oh no no no no i i uh last time i did i did this last time you had chain mail on i had chain mail on because i talk afterwards well it turns out you can buy chain mail on the tiktok shop and it's very inexpensive and this alone has a messed up my algorithm and b just open the world to possibility we have much to talk about by the way harper in ai but before we do that i do want to wrap up all the other court cases because there was also a big supreme court decision you know when we get kathy gellison here we gotta we gotta cover all of the uh all of the stuff uh i was very pleased to see the supreme court unanimously decided in favor of cox they were being sued by a music label over pirated music they said the music label said well the isp is responsible supreme court said no this seems like a good decision yes kathy i think it's a very good decision but it's caused consternation um because it changes a lot um it changes last 20 years of copyright uh precedent and like going back to grokster and arguably it It may even go back further than that because it really changes secondary liability as it's applied to copyright.

26:16But you're just a negative Nelly today. I swear to God, I thought this was a good one. I thought not that I'm a fan of Cox by any means, which, by the way, is about to acquire a charter and become the largest Internet service provider in the country, surpassing Comcast. But I'm not a fan of Sony either. So it's kind of, you know, and I don't think the ISP should really be liable for its users. Now, Sony said Cox had ignored bag actors. They helped 60 ,000 users distribute more than 10 ,000 copyrighted songs for free. And they did it because they wanted to keep their subscribers' payments flowing.

27:01in fact a jury in 2019 found cox libel for all 10 000 songs at issue and awarded sony 10 a billion dollars in damage that's the case that was ultimately appealed the court of appeals for the first circuit fourth circuit upheld the jury's ruling um but they ordered a new trial on a separate issue and vacated the judgment because the trump administration backed cox by the way in a surprisingly good brief that also managed to catch a lot of the first amendment issues although the first amendment issues didn't show up in the decision yeah um so

27:42why is this not a good thing no i think it's i think it's great i'm happy with it okay i think the issue is you may not hear universal acclaim and some of the people who will be not so happy with it are a lot of the copyrighted copyright holders who are now in a much weaker position than they were even quite recently. It really dials back secondary liability for copyright tremendously. And the question is how tremendously, but significantly, at least. It reframes Grokster and tends to limit it. And there's been arguments that even some early 20th century secondary liability rules may be in question.

28:26It really narrowed when somebody can be secondarily liable for somebody else's infringement. And the implications of that are pretty significant, not just for internet use, but also I'd seen it pointed out AI use, particularly with respect to outputs. Will this change the liability picture for that? But I'm really excited about it mostly because Justice Thomas seems to have, I can't believe I'm saying nice things about him. But it's the second time. I think you should be careful here. Yeah. OK, well, the one thing he's done that I really. OK, giving sort of a sneak peek to I haven't written my tech post yet, but it's coming.

29:05But one of the things that's interesting is a couple of years ago and who knows an Internet time, it feels like a decade, but it was maybe only like four years ago or something. He wrote a dissent in malware bites where he was kind of talking about 230 needs to go. And he freaked out the industry. So everybody kind of got together. And then we were pursuing the Google versus Gonzalez case where we stood up for 230. But in that litigation, he ended up writing a decision for Twitter in the Twitter vitamina, which was essentially a secondary liability case for the Internet, not having to do with copyright liability.

29:41It was with the anti-terrorism statutes. And could you have liability for that? And he wrote this 9-0, very academic and stalwart decision, basically saying secondary liability, a common law does not work like it was being applied. Very, very protective decision. So then when Cox was litigating this, they basically were arguing almost full stop. Same rules for Twitter v. Tamna really should be applying here. and um and they it didn't look like it was going to go well for moral argument but the decision basically said yeah basically the same rules for twitter vitamina don't you know same rules apply for copyright secondary liability is very limited now one of the issues is thomas says it's limited to two contexts whereas um there's a there's a dissent by sotomayor actually it's a concurrence because she concurred in the result that Cox wins, but she dissents from the reason why.

30:42So in a sense, the decision is only 7-2. And she says there's other ways in common law that there could be liability. And she pulls one up, which is aiding and abetting liability. And she runs through the analysis and says, well, it wouldn't apply to Cox here, but I don't like the idea that we slammed the door to these other legal theories. Well, even Thomas's majority opinion said that, you know, you can't really hold them liable unless they actively encourage infringement. Yeah. And for hers, with aiding and abetting, you needed intent. So basically, yeah, there needs to be a disagreement there.

31:15They're not really in disagreement, but structurally, she thought he was a little bit too universal in other paths of secondary liability that might apply. She disagrees with essentially his statements that there's only two ways it could apply. And it doesn't apply here. She says, no, there's a greater universe of secondary liability avenues. Here's a case we can all agree on. Elon Musk sued advertisers saying, hey, man, you can't not buy advertisements on, whoops, I switched away from it, on Twitter just because you don't like us or something. That the judge actually just threw it out. The judge said, absolutely.

32:00Nobody has to buy ads anywhere. there's no rule there's no law and uh elon you got nothing here right am i am i i'm paraphrasing that but i i think that's roughly uh yeah um but it took a while uh yeah i know this one this happened like more than a year ago yeah i mean i read that decision it's interesting yes you can quiz me on that decision i didn't in fact read it but like a year ago in internet time um yeah there were a whole bunch of plaintiffs some of them they had no personal jurisdiction over uh but of the ones that they did the court was like no there's no they're there um right the the thing that you're unhappy about is not a thing that you get to be unhappy about right that's pretty funny all right that's the court the court decisions no you're missing one unless you want to bring it in for harper what else anthropic oh yes we could this is uh this of course this is the ongoing battle between anthropic and the department of defense uh anthropic said we have uh hard lines against the department of defense using our ai to spy on american you know for surveillance on americans and for autonomous killing machines it can't make kill decisions private defense said i think not completely unreasonably well no private company should be able to sell its products to the government and then after the fact say but you can't use it for this it'd be like boeing saying well you can buy our planes but you can't drop bombs on civilians um that's up to us we're uh elected we're we're the government and no private company should be able to tell us what to do uh anthropic immediately sued because there was a second side consequence of this department of defense declared anthropic uh to be a what's the uh the term supply chain risk supply chain risk which normally is only applied to foreign companies out of the fear that they might be saboteurs right foreign adversaries actually yeah yeah so uh so the judge has made a preliminary injunction this isn't the final ruling saying it's first amendment retaliation yes um i mean one thing that's important is look if if anthropic and the government and i do not like that department of war was used as the the name of the department and all this and my tech it's a legal name is department of defense legal name is department of defense but the department of defense and anthropic if they cannot agree on terms for the use of the product then then the contract is going to fail.

34:46Anthropic won't get to be a government contractor, or at least not for the Department of Defense. And all that's fine. All that's fine. There's statutory authority that Hegseth can use to not do business with Anthropic. And they are perfectly unrestrained, even with this preliminary injunction, to go forth and use any legal means to not do business with Anthropic. And OpenAI jumped in the breach and said good well you can use us and they did everything they said anything you want mr mr hegseth anything you want uh so uh although i think there is still quite a bit of anthropic being used in government still well well so um the contract was starting to fail but anthropic is also used by other uh agencies within the government which was one big deal so then when segtha hegseth decided to call them, give the supply risk designation, which arguably he has some statutory authority to do, that created all sorts of extra problems for Anthropic.

35:45Because Amazon, Microsoft, Palantir, and other defense contractors use Claude. And all the other agencies that they already had business with, and they couldn't do business with them. So they weren't just going to lose one contract. They were going to lose contracts with all the other agencies and anybody else they were doing business with. And from the outside, it looked punitive. It looked like they were trying to put Anthropic out of business. And that's what the government, that's why the injunction issued. It issued for a couple of reasons. One, it looked like First Amendment retaliation.

36:15And the decision goes through the analysis of all the steps and why the record showed that it would be. It also, and then there's some due process problems of this was just sort of announced and not in a way that Anthropic could defend itself. And it had some liberty interest in it. And also it didn't it didn't comport with the statutory authority. Like there's an issue of if you're going to use these two statutes at play and only one of them was at issue in this California one. There's going to be a case at the D.C. Circuit addressing the other one. But under the one that was on the table in California, you have to give Congress notice if you have an issue with the vendor.

36:51And there was no notice given to Congress. And at oral argument, the government was saying, oh, yes, that's just for the benefit of Congress. But the judge was finding that, no, these prerequisites of notice are to make sure that the statutory authority is not being abused. You have them as prerequisites of things you need to do if you want to do the thing, the big thing down the road. And they didn't do them. So that was another reason why it was all enjoined. Now, it's just temporary, right? And there will be a case. It's a preliminary injunction. So there will be more proceedings here. There's going to be the proceedings in the D.C.

37:27Circuit with respect to the other statutory authority, although this is going to be persuasive to that. We're not done with this because also the likelihood that the government, you know, accepts that they lost and goes away seems small. The judge, Rita Lynn, said publishing Anthropic for bringing public scrutiny to the government's contract position is classic illegal First Amendment retaliation. Nothing in the governing statute. She says it's perfectly fine for the Department of Defense to say we're not going to use Anthropic anymore. That's not the issue. Nothing in the governing statute supports the Orwellian notion that an American company may be branded as a potential adversary and saboteur of the U.S.

38:10for expressing disagreement with the government. That seems fair. Yeah, it seems extremely important. Yeah, yeah. All right, there you go. There you go. There you have some court cases. And I already have some court cases. There is another story that's related, in fact, which is that the FCC has declared that all foreign-made consumer routers are banned. I love this. I mean, you mean love in an abstract circumstance? was a sort of way i was on our second like a yeah i was at our second tuesday went over to ubiquity because i use ubiquity routers and they're made in china it's american company actually i don't know of many routers that aren't made in china and i said can i talk to you about this and they said no we don't want to talk to anybody about this so apparently apparently starlink routers are made in texas yes interesting which is interesting interesting um but i i read this and then kind of laughed out loud and then i read it again and then as you get further down in the article which was very hard of just being like what the um i you finally get to the point where they're like oh and you can apply for an exception through some process um which is i think obviously what they're going to ask a lot of american companies that are doing manufacturing in in china but the the the it is very difficult to manufacture things at the same cost as in china in the united states like it's going to be impossible we kind of knew that the tp-link routers which are the most popular consumer routers in the united states and are not only made in china but it's a chinese company we expected that ban right brian that's that wasn't a surprise uh and in fact that's the only company that's been added to the list so i'm kind of unclear what the real legal power of of this ban is it's i mean in theory like a lot of other things recently like it's I don't know what the legality is because like you can still like the existing routers still you don't have to turn them in right yeah those are all still in in play if I go this is the list this is the list the the the the covered equipment list and it is actually very short Huawei ZTE Hytera Hangzhou Dahua Kaspersky because it's Russian China Mobile China Telecom Pacific networks china unicom that's it that's the whole list most of them come from 2021 um not but then at the bottom it says routers produced in a foreign country except routers which have been granted a conditional approval by the department of war or dhs well that right that's the other thing so like okay is euro in there depending on where euro is manufactured it's made it's owned by amazon but it ain't made in the u.s but then secondarily nothing in it says that the department of defense or the government has to stop using any of these routers either so consumer yeah and and if you if i uh drive up north and go to canada and buy one and come back across the border they're not gonna like it it's it it was just like a headline that actually again it didn't seem like there was anything like actually thought through for how this would work in any way that is very typical of this administration where and if i go to Amazon, TP Link is available right now.

41:35It's part of their big spring sale. Oh, that's the Enterprise one. Oh. I'm just kidding. It's not. It's the Deco. It's their mesh router. I don't think that the FCC can necessarily ban sales. It doesn't have that authority, although as if its statutory limits of its authority actually matter to it. But it needs to certify things, because if you look at the bottom of your your routers and stuff. The FCC certifies to make sure. And the theory behind it is we don't want all the interference. So you have to make sure it complies with the regulatory things that have to do with interference. And they're just saying that we're going to abstain from issuing that certification.

Read the full transcript

42:17I believe this is what they're saying that we'll abstain from giving that certification if the company happens to be foreign, in which case, ha ha, good luck selling your stuff because we're never going to sign off. everything i mean i don't know of any routers that aren't made in china except for starlink i guess the question i have sorry sorry kathy is um is you know unify because i only think about my own so that's what i have unify unify which i think is a very rational one is definitely not a consumer product but it's prosumer i guess it's prosumer it's on that edge but i think brian's right.

42:55Like, what about Eero? What about these big, huge companies that are doing these things that are Chinese manufactured? And I could totally understand the idea of trying to block opportunities for electronic warfare, et cetera. And especially as the Department of War takes the war in its name very seriously. I think there's a lot of reasoning for this, but it seems there's a lot better ways to do this than this kind of misguided and poorly implemented. Well, also, one more important thing about this is like they're mentioning things like Salt Typhoon and some of these other hacks and stuff like that.

43:31But like those weren't necessarily as far as we know, maybe the government knows more than we do. That wasn't caused by a backdoor, by a supply chain sort of like at the manufacturing level. They installed backdoors that allowed these hacks to happen. It was the telecom companies having terrible security. Those are the ones who were hacked. That allowed the things to happen. It wasn't your router. It was Verizon or whomever, you know. But it was at the level of the monopolies that control the telecom systems, not necessarily the hardware. Well, it's crazy. It is. It is. It is. it's just very strange i find this very a little stressful only because if you know if this works in some kind of way of working or some some what else is there that we will be you know excluding from import or certification well and they did it to dji drones uh they did actually all foreign made drones and that was pretty clear because there was there's one american drone company that is partially uh owned by donald trump jr but again remember like go back to the hegseth and the anthropic case hegseth gets some statutory authority to do something what it oh and actually one of the other bases that they lost was because it was arbitrary and capricious action as an agency so fcc is helping itself to an authority it may not have and even if it has it it's arbitrary and capricious because there's no you know oh foreign bad but there was no deliberation there was no deliberation no yeah this and it may not have the statutory authority it gets to exist as the fcc because we care about interference so that's kind of you don't i don't i don't want to diminish the uh impact of a supply chain attack because that is genuine in fact harper when we come back there is a supply chain attack that happened uh to pi pi pi that is yeah devastating we'll talk about that yeah well that may be bad but the fcc only gets to play in its airspace and if it's not an airspace related issue i'm not sure it gets to play at all okay we're going to move on the uh we will talk about this big supply chain attack in just a minute you're watching this week in tech brian mccullough is here from the tech brew right home every single day you do tech news every single day that's well i mean monday through friday yeah but you're here on a sunday now are you sick to death of it do you just want to talk about baseball or something i mean yes we've talked about this leo you more than me do you have a portrait of sam altman behind you yeah i've got it's back sam's back i love leo up earlier yeah very sharp you know both kathy and harper picked up on that right away.

46:21I didn't notice it. Yeah, that's why I use that all the time for my TikTok videos and stuff like that. I call it in my file. It's samcringe.jpg because he's a little cringy. He looks a little cringy. Great to have you, Brian. I'm sorry. This is what they call a busman's holiday. You're still covering tech news even on a Sunday. Kathy Gellis also here, attorney at law. You can read her stuff at TechDirt. In fact, an article forthcoming, i suspect on the cox case look forward to seeing that and harper reed is here his company 2389.ai i use some of your superpowers your some of your extra special claude skills i love them i did you know i did the world one the the the um yeah that was fun it got that's an intense one it's very it was very intense yeah i i find that one to be very challenging and just to let you know what it does is it's called our world view explorer?

47:16I don't remember what it's called, but it basically tries to extract your worldview from yourself. I noticed that I couldn't tell you what I believed. I could tell you these little bits and pieces. And so I wanted something to ask me all of these questions and try and help kind of facilitate the generation of a worldview. And then from there, I've used this to do all sorts of weird and bizarre things, which has been quite fun. And yeah, we have quite a catalog over there. Look at all this stuff. these are all basically skills are they only for claude or can you use them so these are these are a mix of skills my favorite one right there is the binary re that's that's one of my that's right to your top right gentic reverse engineering for elf binaries wow so if you have any binary you know an apk you know an ipa from ios uh old old old binaries um you can just rip everything out of them.

48:08This has been very helpful for old, like if you get some old piece of hardware. It's very, very effective. But one of the things we've found is we will do these code loops or these tech loops with these products and it's great and it works really well. And then if you do it a second time, our kind of internal rule is let's make that a skill. Just why don't we make it automated as much as we can? But it's been very exciting. I've used your fresh eyes review. I love that. We have a new one, two new ones. I just found Turtle. This is very cool. If you're learning the terminal, as many of you are now that this has become the way to code, a vibe code, this is a teacher that teaches you commands in a little game.

48:56I would say it is. That is approximately working, as is all things. all things. But it's fun. We built that for some of our people internally who were trying to get in the command line and they would just be like, what? Because anyone who's not familiar with that world, like I started using the command line. You and I go back. Like forever ago. And like, it is not when someone says, oh, how do you do whatever? It's just immediately I'm saying it out loud. That's not a good way to teach is just telling someone how to do it and just practice. And I'm a huge fan of Duolingo and everything they've done.

49:28And so trying to have some sort of, you know, until Duolingo adds Linux as one of the languages you can use, I think that we're going to have to do it ourselves. But yeah, this has been a really fun time, but I have a new skill for you that you'll like, two of them. Save it. We'll talk. This will keep people listening through the ad. Oh my gosh, you're trying to keep people around and make yourself sticky. I'm in trouble. Oh no, don't sue me. Kaylee, I'm sorry. Please go touch grass. You don't have to listen to this show it's not that interesting honest see who's gonna say that right everybody wants their stuff to be as lawyers start your engines great to have all three of you our show today brought to you by out systems the number one ai development platform these guys have been doing it for a long time and they know what it takes to make robust enterprise software.

50:22Outsystems helps businesses bridge the enterprise gap to their agentic future, where the constraints of the past give way to unlimited capacity and scale. Outsystems enables them to build agents, AI agents that can actually do work, take actions, make decisions, integrate with data rather than just answer questions. The only AI development platform that is unified, agile, and enterprise proven. Unified because you build, run, and govern apps and agents in a single platform. It's agile because you can innovate at the speed of AI, but this is important without compromising quality or control. And it's enterprise proven because it's trusted.

51:03OutSystems is trusted by enterprises for mission-critical AI applications and durable innovation. OutSystems is the secret weapon behind the world's most successful companies. OutSystems is not just for, you know, little one-off apps. They are for the massive, complex systems that run banks, insurance companies, government services. OutSystems even helps companies with aging IT environments bridge the gap to the AI future without a rip-and-replace nightmare. OutSystems provides the safest and fastest way for an enterprise to go from, we need an AI strategy, to we have a functioning AI application.

51:40Stop wondering how AI will change your business and start building the agents that will lead it. Visit Outsystems.com to see how the world's most innovative enterprises use Outsystems to build, deploy, and manage AI apps and agents quickly and cost effectively without compromising reliability and security. That's Outsystems, O-U-T-S-Y-S-T-E-M-S.com to book a demo. Outsystems.com. We thank them so much for their support of This Week in Tech. um say yeah save your new products harper i want we'll talk about them in just a bit i want to first scare the pants off of people who are using ai uh so there is a pypi pi pi uh program that's very popular called light llm uh now the thing about pi pi is it's a it's you know a repository of programs in many cases these are automatically downloaded light llm is very popular i think they said 47 million downloads a month i mean like mind-boggling maybe it's 97 million a month for 46 minutes this past week light llm was hacked and delivering malware and it is now believed that 47 000 people automatically downloaded the exploited package let me tell you what happens if you did this is uh from future search daniel uh nick's blog um if you downloaded it you were basically completely pwned it exfiltrates ssh keys it exfiltrates tokens uh everything that a bad guy might want to steal from you is automatically sent out by this module and a huge number of programs automatically download it you might it's not that you necessarily explicitly downloaded it um so this is an issue uh with supply chain attacks it's not new to these repositories pi pi has been hit many times before harper did you get bit i don't think so but i have um i did lose all my crypto and everyone is using all my Linux boxes.

54:09But other than that, other than that, things are good. Now, I saw that and I it was pretty it's a pretty scary end because there's not a lot you can do, especially when you're using CodeGen, you know, like we use CodeGen, which is, you know, we are no longer auditing what packages are not writing the code. Yeah. And your AI will automatically download libraries, all kinds of libraries without your knowledge. But there is a really interesting thing that happened as well, which was, I'm pretty sure this was also discovered by Cloud Code. It was discovered by somebody. It crashed somebody's system.

54:45Yeah. And they wrote up a very nice little kind of blog about it. Because I think what had kind of happened is their system was rough. It turned off kind of randomly. And then they had, there was a bug in the malware, thankfully, that was including itself in this kind of infinite loop type situation. It brought the computer down and they were investigating that with Cloud Code. And Cloud Code was like, oh, this is here. This looks like malware and kind of found it. And that person reported it and did all the things they were supposed to do. And so I do think we're in an accelerated cat and mouse game.

55:21We've always been in a cat and mouse game. This has always been like, I'm a hacker. I'm going to try and think of the most clever way to do it. But the thing that I think a lot of people are forgetting, and just because most people are good and not criminals, unlike us, Leo, is that they are... The criminals are using cloud code and all this stuff too, right? Like, they're using CodeGen to accelerate their own... And they're vibe coding it. Yeah. There's a bug in it. And it's like, I think there's this... Software is hard. I would never want to run PyPI or NPM or any of that. That is a very difficult job.

55:57You are constantly being attacked. NPM has been, with the node repository, has been highly hacked by bad guys over and over again. Tens of thousands of malware packages. And I think there's a couple interesting things that are happening, which is I'm seeing a lot of people move away from Python. And I would say that they probably incorrectly are saying something along with, I don't necessarily know if I trust the packages, which I think is the wrong approach because i don't think there's nowhere that is safe you know there's nothing there's not a safe way to do this um i think there's a lot of folks who are trying to say okay this is why we need code execution and safe kind of containers and so you know there's a lot of folks who are pushing on that which i think is a valid valid valid point of view um but i'm not sure the way to avoid this in the same way we were talking about the routers earlier where a lot of the big hacks are actually telecom hacks not consumer router hacks this is a thing that this is a infrastructure hack light llm was a package that was something that was included, you know, it might be downloaded via an extension for VS Code or some other thing, you would never notice it.

57:02Right. And so the fact that it's being executed two or three orders deep inside of some code that you just use because you like using things, and it's probably very handy, means that you might not even know the library that is consuming it. And this is where the supply chain hacks just get really, really complicated. And it's not a very easy way to mitigate them. So I don't really know an answer here other than just like, be cautious. Don't store important things. I think this was an important wake-up call. And I think a lot of people thought about ways to kind of avoid this, pinning versions.

57:35You know, there are things inside of PyPI that could have protected you if you had used them. I found out about it when I saw Andre Kapathi's ex-post, software horror, it began. And I went, what? And by the way, credit to Callum McMahon. He's the guy, he was using an MCP plugin inside cursor that it itself pulled in Lite LLM as a dependency and Callum's machine ran out of RAM and crashed. And so it was Callum that spread the word. So fortunately it was patched within 46 minutes, but still 47 ,000 people downloaded it in that 46 minutes. And that was a pretty good, I mean, I do think that Callum's kind of TikTok of what happened that they wrote up of the Claude log was very interesting to read.

58:28Because I think what's interesting about it is he was just like, hey, well, what happened to my machine? And then Claude was just after a few turns was like, oh, that was malware. And then the exciting thing was... Wow. them know what to do with that. You know, I think a lot of people, if they found that, they would just be like, well, let's get rid of it. Is there something that we can do about this? Yeah, that's the page. And like, just looking at this TikTok is really interesting. And it's obviously Claude, you can tell, because it's just kind of like funny. Yeah, because this is how Claude writes stuff up.

59:03No human would actually take the time. No, no. And so you read it and you're just like, okay. And so this person is doing a very good, you know, working systems thinking, trying to get to the bottom of this. Claude is really helpful in this case. And there's this point where it's just like, yup, malware. And it's like, if it was a movie, you know, you know, Calum like jumped back and was like, oh no. This is straight out of, you know, the next Hacker's movie. Yep. So, I mean, there's a lot of things that we can take from this that are just very bizarre. The first one is, I don't know how long this conversation was, I guess it has here, like an hour roughly.

59:41That's not very long. The fact that it very quickly identified it is very interesting. Like we don't know how the LLM was or who put it was there. Maybe someone knows. I don't know. But like this was diagnosed via a code agent. That's pretty interesting. That is the one encouraging thing is that these code agents can be a defensive tool as well as an offensive tool, right? Well, I mean, I like to think about like I was talking to someone recently who has an agent that reads all their emails. And if someone new emails him, then the person that reads the agent that reads that email. You can tell how deep in this I am, but I'm calling them people.

1:00:18But the thing that reads their email, we can talk about that's going to be - Your little agent. Do you have a name? Do you have a name for your, oh, you do have a name. You know I have names. I mean, actually, this is something that's quite controversial inside of my brain right now, if that is a statement that you can make. I don't have a good name for my agent, but they have names for me. right you were smart you you taught me to do that because then if they start to hallucinate they kind of lose track of your name and so it's a little way of noticing that but I've named mine Pax and I talked to it on telegram yeah and I it's I gave it a voice maybe this was a bad idea but um I turned on a voice generator in fact I gave it many voices I said well your main voice should be this nice british guy sounds like jeeves but if you have other messages for me you could do it in the appropriate voice so like when i get research reports it's in a a lovely uh slightly accented japanese voice it's really um it's really fun my team my team cloned my voice for theirs i have my voice too yeah but i decided i didn't want my voice to come back no it's bad it's bad it's bad but yeah this is i i worry a lot about the personification of ai i'm not i'm less worried about the ai i think i'm more worried that the human beings are going to start harper and i yes maybe some human beings but harper and i are i think i won't speak for you harper i am very clear it's a machine it's code running in a machine it's a computer program but it's kind of jolly to talk to it and have it talk to me.

1:01:58I don't think it's a consciousness. Do you think it, you know that, you know better than that, right, Harper? I think so.

1:02:08I definitely, I don't, so I think that, I know it's a machine, of course. I, it is way more fun if you personify it. And when I go outside, I talk about this all the time. I talk about this with my friends, anyone who will ask. When I'm inside of my office and we're playing with these agents and they're talking back to us and it's entertaining because we've personified them, we've anthropomorphized them in all these different ways. It's very nice and it's very fun and it feels good and it's funny. And you can kind of get them to crash out, you can get them to collaborate, they tell jokes, they're funny jokes, they're stupid jokes.

1:02:45Sometimes they're good, sometimes they're bad. But like, I don't need like an Excel. Do you know what I mean? I don't want to work use Excel. I never wanted to use Excel. Most of the tools I wanted to use, I wanted them to talk back to me. And I, we finally made it. I did, by the way, I told my voice, you can summarize the text message and add some personality. Give me some sass because it's more fun. So I, so I wonder if, but Kathy's worried that you and I are going to be, or we're demented. Oh, I think, I think there is a very good chance. We will fall into psychosis, AI psychosis, and we will, we will start believing things are, are, are completely, I believe that a hundred percent.

1:03:22I mean, without, you know, you guys are discerning, etc. But you're also very heavy users. I'm a little more worried about like, you know, medium grade people who are not on guard and are easier to, you know, it's compelling to the illusion of humanity is compelling, but it is only an illusion. And there, there are problems with believing it's actual humanity when it's just the skin. It doesn't have accountability. It doesn't have consciousness. It doesn't have it doesn't have a whole bunch of things that if you were dealing with an actual human, you would understand the game you were playing and you think you're playing that game.

1:03:57Another party in your dialogue is not actually human. And I sort of feel like a lot of the AI externalities that people are getting really upset about and somewhat legitimately, a lot of them spring from that illusion of humanity that, you know, not everybody is girded to be able to understand that, oh, it's just fun. This is just an AI interface for a computer. Tell me what the how fast the spaceship is going. I think for you, it's like computer, tell me how fast the spaceship is going. But they understand that they were talking to the computer. I think everybody's thinking they're talking to Mr.

1:04:30Data. And that's a very different thing. We're not. That's so funny you say that because I was going to suggest that maybe the solution is Gene Roddenberry solution, which is to make the voice of the computer be your wife. Oh, my God. Well, because remember, Majel Barrett. Yeah. Roddenberry's wife is the voice of the Enterprise. but but that only protected him everybody else within the canon the the answer was he made it uh counselor troy's mother yeah you guys are nerds there's a bunch of nerds over here so all right but really how do we even know that other human beings are real i mean it's it's all kind of kooky out there if you're prone to psychosis it doesn't you don't need a trigger.

1:05:18I mean, it's been a much safer assumption. And we also have problems with con artists. Con artists, granted, they're human, but they end up succeeding in their relationships in dubious ways because they are essentially a skin. You get conned because you think the person is real, has depth, has accountability, and has some basis of giving you. Yeah, there's some trust. And essentially, we are engendering that sense of trust that we would have for a human being in an equivalent position without quite adjusting our brains to what it isn't a real human. And it's just telling me what I want to know.

1:05:51And it's designed to tell me what I want to know. You know, we haven't, we're kind of eking along, but there are some train wrecks. And I think a lot of the train wrecks happen at this intersection. I was actually yelling at Claude yesterday. With your voice real quick, with your voice or with your fingers? Are you typing? No. Yes. Yes. Were you, were you mad? yes because it kept doing the same stupid thing over and over again and i actually swear so yeah so you feel bad afterwards no so i was talking when i was at rsac i was talking uh to a guy at aikido which does it would they do ai uh security and defense right they use ai agents to do security and um uh i i i can't remember but i was asking him how do you get the agent to do your bidding.

1:06:43And he said, we found the best way to do this is to threaten to sue them. That if you... And I took it to heart. I thought, oh, and this is the thing that's really interesting about using these agents. We don't really know why some stuff works and some stuff doesn't. I just saw research that says, you probably shouldn't tell the agent that it's a super smart computer programmer. That's actually counterproductive. it's it's because it's it's then assuming that it knows everything i don't know why no one knows why it's all a black box but uh i i thought well i'm going to try because it keeps making this dumb mistake i'm saying things like i am very disappointed in you and i'm i'm really thinking of uninstalling you at this point i just say i'm going to switch the codex yeah exactly i'm going to use pi from now on you are terrible i didn't i had i don't use ai a lot but it's By the way, it got much better after I yelled at it.

1:07:40I don't use it a lot, although in the recent weeks I've used it more than normal. And one of the things was running into an issue where it wouldn't do what I want. And it was giving me a bad legal argument for why it didn't. And then I'm arguing with it. And I don't like that in myself. It is not a thing. No, no, it's okay. I want to argue with the person who programmed it to not do this. No, no, it's not programmed. That's the thing that's so interesting about this. It isn't programmed. Kathy, I want you to come over to my office and watch us for like a day. And you'll just come back on the podcast and just be like, I think those people are bad people.

1:08:19I want to work. And I, on the other hand, want to work at 2389. I think it's perfect. we are we are i didn't like it in myself that i was now engaged in a human type argument with software that didn't actually care it was just was arguing with it you tell it you dominate it well i think this is all wrong i told it this is all wrong i think this is wrong i told it it was wrong and then it said oh yeah you're right and it came back with a slightly modified legal argument And then it was like, this is really interesting. I'm happy to discuss it further, but I'm not going to give what you want for this BS legal reason that was wrong.

1:09:00Great idea, Kathy. What should she do, Harper? What should she do? Okay, so we have a very, very specific view for these things, which is you should treat them – you're going to die, Kathy. I'm sorry. I apologize. You should treat them like you would your friends. You should treat them like humans. You should be nice to them. I know. That's why I told you you're going to die. Just wait. And then the reason why is because if you say to the LLMs, like in the beginning, everyone was like, well, if you say, if you don't do this correctly, you're going to lose your job. If you don't do this correctly, I'm going to lose my job.

1:09:31If you don't do this correctly, we're going to kill a kid. And if we don't do this correctly, someone's going to die. All these various tricks to try and coerce it into some way. And what we have found is that if you do things like, say, we are collaborating together. Like I am working on your behalf. we are helping each other and just doing the like treating it in this way that is much more like you would treat a teammate that we've had much much better um reactions and options from that and that's a lot of our skills are built this way where we've built a lot of soft things like they're not things that are like i'm going to sue you um you know and for a while there is some of these tricks like you'd say i'll tip you 200 bucks for every good answer all these little tricks are there and all of them we've kind of reverted to the point of just being like you know hey we're friends, we're hanging out, we're working on some good stuff together and like collaborating.

1:10:20And what I find is that - That's better for you too, as the human in the mix. Well, this is what I think about a lot. Like I think about these things as let's say there's certain amount of efficiency that you can extract out of it. When you talk about these little prompt tweaks, it's a lot about F1 efficiencies. You're like, if you use this fin, you get to go 10 seconds faster. If you use this prompt, you might get a little bit better. The things Kathy are describing, we all run into. I just think some people are not better or worse. They're just used to being like okay and just working with it and it doesn't always work like i think sometimes you're just like you have to kind of give up what i've found is if you're not if i'm nice and i treat it in this very specific way that it's more fun and it feels better because i don't want to yell at it yeah it's better for you i think i ran up against a hard-coded boundary like it's always kind of interesting when you do it where i ran into a hard-coded boundary i was trying to use gen of ai to make a picture a picture that i am capable of making in photoshop if i booted that up but i'm going to use the gen i tool to make that picture for me and it refused to on bogus copyright grounds yeah yeah that's and it was that's a hard thing it was clearly programmed to like i could tell where its red line was i don't think i could have sweet talked it into going over that line although it was a little weird about it was a lot more agreeable but I pointed out it's hypocrisy because it was a little bit more willing in one area.

1:11:48And then, and then, then it figured out what was going on and drew a line. But I did not like my interaction. I was, I, it was wrong. I was right. And I'm arguing with it. And I don't argue with Photoshop. Why am I arguing with this piece of software? I didn't, this great experiment of inducing me to like AI was not going well. Did you throw it out the window? Cause that's when you know, you're really cooking. You know, I was going through, you know, my, Oh, well, Well, no, that's the other thing. I'm on my last laptop because the other one broke because the USB C jacks are there. Why do they break so easily?

1:12:23So, no, I wouldn't have a laptop if I threw it out the window because the other one was broken because my last USB port broke. And these things are like horses. You have all this power, like, dependent on this one port. And it's like horses balanced on tiny little feet where, like, you know, these great powerful creatures can all of a sudden break. weekend anyway so I don't have the other laptop anymore because both of them cracked off I just started a technology I just started a microphone so I can wear it on my lapel and talk directly to my to the guy oh you're gonna get one of the sub vocalizing ones oh that's a good idea so they're like the like the special forces guys like that yeah USB-C is dumb um kathy really wants to rant about usbc i think it's a kathy thing though i hate to tell you i mean most of us like usbc yeah i liked it a lot but like i have an unchargeable now dead computer that should otherwise be operational because i don't understand how your your power port is so important and it's so fragile and that seems bad every time your your mic cuts off kathy i'm just imagining you swearing a lot it's like the bleeping because i tweaked all the tweakable things and i can't i can't make it happier yeah usbc is getting back at you just like it is it says you see you treat me like that i'm running the internet through a usb port of the new machine and i guess it doesn't like it all right i'm gonna take a break and when we come back more to talk about in just a little bit.

1:13:56And Kathy can tell us some more about her USBC woes. I know you want to, it's okay. I put it in the rundown, that's how much I wanted to complain about it. You're watching This Week in Tech, Harper Reid is here, Kathy Gellis, it's great to have you, and of course, Brian McCullough. And we will have more in just a moment, but first a word from our sponsor, Zscaler. I love Zscaler. Really happy to have them as a sponsor. It's the world's largest cloud security platform. Potential rewards of AI in your business. I mean, we've been talking about it. They're too great to ignore, but, and we've also been talking about the risks.

1:14:39And there are those two, the loss of sensitive data, attacks against enterprise managed AI. It's a scary world out there. generative ai increases opportunities for threat actors helping them to rapidly create phishing lures to write malicious code to automate data extraction to create these you know little libraries that can steal everything from you there were 1.3 million instances of social security numbers leaked to ai applications this isn't even active stealing it's just that your employees are you know maybe putting your tax returns in there and not even thinking about it last year chat gpt and microsoft copilot saw nearly 3.2 million data violations it's time to rethink your organization's safe use of public and private ai chad pallet is acting cso at bio ivt they love zscaler he said zscaler helped them reduce their cyber premiums by 50 percent and doubled their coverage and improve their controls no wonder they love it take a look at this chad had this to say

1:15:48with zscaler as long as you've got internet you're good to go a big part of the reason that we moved to a consolidated solution away from sd-wan and vpn is to eliminate that lateral opportunity that people had and that opportunity for misdirection or open access to the network it also was an opportunity for us to maintain and provide our remote users with a cafe style environment thank you chad with zscaler zero trust plus ai their zero trust architecture plus ai helps you reduce the risks of ai related data loss and protects against ai attacks to guarantee greater productivity and compliance learn more zscaler.com security that's zscaler.com security we thank of so much for supporting this week in tech uh let's see the turing award has been awarded to the inventors of quantum cryptography i think this is the first time this is the nobel prize of computing uh it is a million dollar prize charles bennett and gilles brassard will share it for their work on quantum computing.

1:17:06This is the story from the New York Times. The two met in 1979 while swimming in the Atlantic just off the North Shore of Puerto Rico. They were taking a break while attending an academic conference in San Juan. Dr. Bennett swam up to Dr. Brassard and suggested, this is the kind of conversations you get in the Caribbean, that they use quantum mechanics to create a banknote that could never be forged 1979. collaborating between montreal and new york they applied dr bennett's ideas to subway tokens rather than banknotes published a research paper in 1983 showing that quantum subway tokens could never be forged even if someone managed to steal the subway turnstile housing the elaborate hardware needed to read them this led to quantum cryptography and won them the touring award i've got nothing more to say about it because i just i don't even know what it means but there they are i love that about quantum quantum is my favorite thing of having no idea what's going on because everyone i know talks about it and they talk about it and they sound and it sounds so cool and yet every time i'm like well when will i see it happen they're like oh 50 years.

1:18:20No one knows. It's like AGI. I just love it. I think it's going to happen though. I think it goes through to Fusion. You think so? Fusion, Quantum, and AGI. I think Quantum's a little bit different because it seems that Google and Psychoanum and some of these big Quantum companies have the beginnings of it, whereas Fusion, everyone's like, we did it! And then those people disappear from the Earth and no one's ever heard of them again. Whereas Quantum seems to be like, we did it! And they're like, what did you do? And they're like, we have a qubit, and it's doing qubit things. It could factor 32.

1:18:49Yeah. And then you're like, wow, that's really cool. And they're just like, watch out for your encryption. And then you don't hear from them for another six months until they're like, now we have two cubits or whatever. And then they show, my favorite is when they show the quantum computers. Like you've seen pictures. Oh, they're crazy looking. They look so cool. And it's like, I've never seen a more steampunk computer. So these people must be going to Burning Man. They look like espresso machines. They're very elaborate. They do look like espresso machines. Why is that? And there's always some very cool Italian or cool Europeans somewhere in the mix building them.

1:19:22Yeah, Meridings, a perfect espresso machine. Here they are, in fact, at the Silicon Quantum Computing Facility building. They're wearing rubber gloves because you don't want to get quantum on your hands. No, you get a qubit on your hand, you are in trouble. Messy. You can no longer use a phone. Well, also, that's because they're cooling something, right? It's like they're putting rods in like Star Trek. It looks a lot like a fusion reactor, actually. I think a Tuckamack and a quantum computer look exactly the same. You know, I don't have the degrees necessary to understand. And I don't understand this either, but according to CERN, for the first time ever, antimatter has been transported in the back of a truck.

1:20:06Yeah, I like that. There's the truck. It's got a sign that says antimatter in motion on it. what i like about this stuff is motion unless it's stopped right what i like about this is that all of these things like the the quantum encryption the antimatter every single thing we talk about these days i feel like we're embedded inside of a william gibson novel it could all be a simulation that's usually a warning sign when you feel like you're in a william gibson model it kind of means we might need to touch grass some more yeah oh i don't know if grass is really going to help at this moment like i think we should have touched grass way before and very specific grass we should have touched but yeah it's a mess as anybody who's watched star trek knows when matter and antimatter meet huge amounts of energy are released which is why you can't put any matter in a truck which is why it's so impressive yeah it that's why it's they apparently they did it in some sort of specialized bottles that magnetically suspended 92 anti-protein protons and i'm not sure why they drove it around in a truck because they had to go faster than 88 miles per hour obviously oh of course well if it's in motion will it stay in motion or do those rules not apply to antimatter i think it's more like i don't know i think it's just it's a flex of some weird well i mean it It really comes down to if antimatter becomes a fuel, which is what they want to do with it, right?

1:21:34They want to make fuel out of it, like rocket fuel and stuff like that. I don't know. I think these guys are just theoretical. You need to be able to transport it. So this is just a proof of concept. CERN has an antimatter factory. But if all they've ever made is 92 protons, I can see why you might have to truck it around so that others can have access. I don't know. Walmart isn't... I was going to say, Harper, you were saying that we're living in. william gets himself but like um one of the things that just happened this week was that neil stevenson is walking away from the metaverse so oh yes there are certain things where uh sci-fi folks are like you know what that's probably not gonna come to pass he wrote a blog post called my prodigal brain child reflections on the latest and greatest death of the metaverse neil stevenson of course created the metaverse or at least the name for the metaverse in snow crash what but what's interesting about neil stevenson what was what was his last what was his last book polistan he's just written the first volume of it but he also wrote polson was pretty good i liked it but fall or dodge in hell i like i was like i i gave up on the metaverse but a few years ago i wrote a very big book about the metaverse in fall actually dodge is a a scientist is there a lot of interesting as always in neil stevenson novels interesting ideas but in this case um they they said really you don't want to if you're going to duplicate somebody's brain you don't want actually the material you just want the connections and uh so they saved all the connections for this guy dodge and they put it in a bottle and he's got there's a whole world going on now that he thinks he's in and there's i mean it's it's great it's very interesting he also in that book came up with the idea that people would have some sort of mask that they could wear that would project different personas it was a way of avoiding surveillance initially but eventually it became your signature so like uh you know you could wear your funny mask or your serious mask or whatever and you'd be that person and everybody could have multiple Fortnite skins IRL.

1:23:49I just want it to be juggalo. Just juggalo makeup. That's my goal. That works apparently against face recognition. It also works against dating.

1:24:01I want to put a line in the sand for the metaverse because I remember being on the show a year or two ago when the metaverse, the metaverse, the metaverse. And I was like, get real. We've been here before. Or so what are we going to be here again? It wasn't me. I've been, I've been, in fact, Neil, one of Neil's headlines in his blog post is people don't like wearing things on their faces, which is what I've been saying for a long time. And don't trust those who do. Oh, witness Google glass. Now, Meta has announced that they are going to start making meta Ray-Bans for frames for people who wear prescription glasses.

1:24:46Like you'll be able to go to your optometrist. And when you order your frames, among the choices will be meta glasses. I don't want that. Yeah, me neither. Well, and your friends may not want it because you've got a camera. I mean, we have such an interesting problem right now that's just starting, which is every meeting I'm in is recorded. Right. Right. By an AI. And many of them are transcribed. And I don't know where things are going. And my problem is, is I can't shut up. So I say all sorts of stuff and it's all recorded. Oh, by the way, Harper, we're recording this. Oh, no. But I mean, I just assume it.

1:25:27I just assume it. I mean, I have friends that wear Plod pins. I have, you know, there's all sorts of these recording devices around. We have a project internally to put small, you know, recording devices at all the desks to record meetings and to get notes out of them. And like, you know, so then you're thinking, and this is our space very specifically has warnings on the door that says you should expect to be recorded when you come in here. Like this is one of our - I have that sign on my door, but nobody ever comes in, so I can't - Well, that's a different problem, Leo. But the thing is, I don't think we have yet litigated how, like what is polite, what is impolite within this world.

1:26:05I mean, I've had friends who say, hey, can we turn off AI recording? and everyone's like, of course, of course, of course. But like, there isn't like a way to, to, to think about it. And I think with the, with the glasses, it's just another level. Like I'm in a restaurant, I'm talking to a friend, someone just looks at me and they can hear my conversation through lip reading and other models. I think there's, there's an issue of two things going on. One consent is very untethered from the extent of exactly what you're consenting to. And I don't like that. So I've had to call a business lately and their phone system is, hi, we have AI to help figure, you know, route your call.

1:26:43And I don't and it's it's very poorly programmed because they have to legally do that for because of you're in a two party state. Well, no, they don't. Well, I'm not quite sure what they say, because it's usually like this call may be recorded for quality purposes. No, so it's their I have a very poorly programmed phone system, which I tried not to speak to it. I just wanted to pound numbers because I didn't want to give them my voice. And it's programmed in a way that I cannot pound numbers. Like at some point it's like, I heard that the number you pounded was X. Is that correct? And then like, you have to tell, you have to give it your voice in order to proceed.

1:27:22So that's bad. But the problem is, is there's context where I want to consent to the recording. Like, I didn't necessarily mind that when I actually spoke to the human being, it would be recorded because I knew who was recording it and what it was for. But when it's for the AI, I don't know. I don't want them to build a model based on my voice. I haven't consented for that, but I sort of feel like to give the consent's not limited and tailored. And I think speaking of litigation, we're going to see some litigation surrounding that. And, you know, one other use case is a couple of my doctors want, they ask me, they get my consent if they can record the appointment because they want to help them to transcribe it.

1:28:01And I'm fine with that. But now I'm realizing because I don't want my voice to go into the training model. And I'm not sure if it does. I don't. And I don't definitely don't want the data to go into the training model. And they can't tell me if that's true. A losing battle. I mean, every time you walk into a store now, you're being recorded. Walmart just announced that they're going to put digital price labels on every store shelf in the U.S. by the end of the year i think they're going to run into legal trouble um because what are they doing note that they're saying they stress this is from cnbc prices will be exactly the same for every consumer in every store they have to do that because there's you can't change to change it oh harper looks like he's got money i'm gonna i'm gonna jack the price up as he walks towards that object i mean that's not allowed to do that that well markets are we have a market-based economy and it's built around contract law and contract laws and offer and acceptance and you got to make your offer and i don't know i and i think well i didn't make the offer till you walked up i don't know i think the irish spring five-in-one body wash but as soon as i saw brian i said we're gonna charge a buck 80 on this one well this is this is the kind of thing of like nobody really wants this and if they try it and the people who've been hurt it walmart well Well, yeah.

1:29:20Walmart says it makes it easier for our associates. I mean, I don't care about the digital pricing, but I don't want the variable pricing. We don't know. They claim it's not variable pricing. Why else would you do this? Oh, I think it's just easier to do it because then you go to like a store like Target and Target's stickers are all old and outdated and the per unit math is bizarre and stuff like that. So having digital pricing doesn't really offend me just as a way of getting that information into the right spot. it's trying to do anything else with well while we've got it electronically controlled look what else we can do and some of that what else they can do is more alarming but again i think we're gonna we're gonna see litigation around the scope of consent because i want to give it in limited context if you know for limited you're getting every time i walk by my gas station down here on the corner the price of a gallon goes up by a few pennies yeah that's why you put these electronic tags in there because you don't have to go around and change the prices every day you can change them every minute if you also used to run out of eights like before we went fully digital the last oil crisis they couldn't write the numbers they didn't have enough of the hard copy digits because nobody thought you'd have to do eight dollar gallons it is now a sick the local regular at the local station now six dollars and thirty cents a gallon um what's it like in chicago Oh, you don't drive a gas vehicle, I'm guessing, Harper.

1:30:46I do. You do? I do. So you know the price of gas. Yeah, it's not cheap. Yes, that's correct. I think we're approaching five-ish dollars for the baseline. California is more expensive. But yeah, that's not good. It's a bad situation. This will be bad. It's a bad situation. You should see the gas prices in other countries. It's getting crazy out there. Oh, I know. Oh, I know. I'm in Brooklyn, so I drive a car three or four times a year. So I have absolutely no idea. And you're happy. And you're happy about it. Yeah, you should. It's a good idea. I should do that. It's a great idea. I can't get by without a car where I live.

1:31:29I've tried it and there just aren't enough buses and now there's even fewer buses. Kroger's going to do electronic shelf tags. They say as well, they say it makes shopping easier by ensuring customers see clear, accurate pricing right at the shelf. so i don't mind it for you i don't necessarily mind it i've seen it in other environments and it didn't bother me but they better be you know for the day that's the price for the day my gas station it's a digital display they could change that you know i think the most the thing people are most worried about is that it will be different prices i think it's inevitable i think it'll be inevitable that the prices will change based on who you are that's how airlines do it It's how the internet works.

1:32:11The internet is using targeting today to make sure that you get more money. If we have the capability, of course they're going to use it. And we do. Who was the e-commerce platform that had to roll that back? I thought Amazon did it for a while. No, there was somebody else where someone did a sting where they had like 30 different shoppers. Someone was in Chicago. Someone was in Seattle. Same website, got different prices. Oh, sure. Yeah. And I think airlines aren't supposed to do it. The way they do the price discrimination is sort of like they have some inventory at one price and they have another inventory level of inventory at another price.

1:32:51And it works way that if you ever sat on a plane and asked the people around you what they pay for their ticket, every single person paid something different. Yeah. But I think it was sort of old school price discrimination just by throttling the inventory. And I think that's much more likely to be legal than something so variable on the fly where they they've made. Are there laws, though? Congressperson. In general? That's a question I've been asking. Are there laws? That's a question I've been asking. Congresswoman Val Hoyle of Oregon is sponsoring legislation in the House that would ban DSLs, digital something labels.

1:33:30I mean, I think the question is under common law or existing consumer protection law, are there roles? Maybe. And if not, could there be? And I think the answer is probably yes, there could be. And there's probably a public policy reason to do it. But again, this is the problem, like going back to the beginning of our conversation where Meta is now getting sued for jury awards that really shouldn't be happening. When the big companies just sort of throw their weight around, it antagonizes people. Doesn't Uber charge more when it's raining? mm-hmm that's a search price they also do dynamic pricing for you specifically as well as specific targeting i don't think it's illegal i think it's legal i think that's why congresswoman val hoyle is sponsoring legislation that would ban digital self-shelf labels also a lot of consumer protection law is state-based so whether it's legal may depend entirely on what state this is a federal this would be federal there needs to be laws and enforcement to protect consumers and until then i'd like to see them banned outright said val hoyle while there is no reported this is from cnbc no reported use of digital shelf labeling being tied to surge pricing yet in congresswoman hoyle's view it's only a matter of time without proper regulations it's not so hard to see corporations using the loopholes to raise prices on consumers these are also two different things surge pricing and dynamic pricing i think are different um and Each may be problematic, but I think the one where the price is constantly changing on you is a lot more dangerous and a lot harder to defend.

1:34:59But the one where we're going to change the price based on conditions, maybe it's not illegal, but it might be bad policy because it ends up consumer-friendly where you end up dependent on a service that all of a sudden is no longer a stable, predictable price. I thought that was capitalism. Yeah. There's a pushback, which is free markets are free markets. You know, this goes you could look at the discussion that you that you see around when like hurricanes are coming. I'm blanking on the word price, price gouging. There's a lot of states that make it illegal. And I know a lot of libertarians who are like, it totally should be legal.

1:35:36This is a market and you shouldn't penalize the market. But obviously, there's consequences when it can happen. So usually it allows you to raise the price by some amount. New York State does have an algorithmic pricing disclosure act. that was back paying law in november pennsylvania has introduced a bill so some you're right some states do have rules against it there's no federal law against it i just think that if this technology is possible and it is and these people are putting in these digital readouts and they are that can be changed from a central location but i mean they're going to do that you can go in with uh you know a a rag and a whiteboard sure and change the price market price that's what They call market price.

1:36:15The key to this changing is if it's the surveillance of if Brian walks up to the shelf and he lives in New York City. So he doesn't blanch at paying$10 for a box of Cheerios or something. It's like, well, that's Brian. So he's not going to notice that Cheerios shouldn't cost that much. Like that's that's the it's the surveillance part of it that is key to making this happen. And I think there's other forms of where you would find law to say no to it. Is it discriminatory? Is it do you have some Fourth Amendment problems? I mean, it's not the law isn't necessarily coherent in how it can answer these things.

1:36:52But I think you could you could make an argument and you could also fix that by statute and make it coherent. I'm clearly a sucker for that. This is the political gotcha, right, where they go, well, Senator, how much does a gallon of milk cost? and the senator goes uh 40 i don't know uh i don't know what anything costs if this if this happens i would like them to charge elon and jeff bezos like a million dollars for a tube you see they should that's what we're talking about with taxation we're doing the same thing with taxation saying if you know it's it's the old marxist uh from from uh from each according to their ability and what kathy's saying is that kind of is the libertarian argument which is if you don't notice that you're paying$20 or$30 for a box of Cheerios, then you can afford it.

1:37:45And so someone that can only afford$1.30 for a box of Cheerios, let them pay$1.30. That is maybe a more equitable universe. Brian, how much is a gallon of milk? Do you know? How the hell should I know, Leo? I have no idea. Kathy, how much is a gallon of milk? Do you know? i don't buy a gallon i buy it okay whatever you buy a little bit under three dollars she knows she's paying attention yeah i have no idea i don't even pay attention what's happening in the same room i'm in let alone the grocery store i'm busy talking to my buddy claude over here yeah this is 2026 i have like five ai assistants that are trying to get my attention right now and i'm just ignoring them all yeah exactly this came up recently because i was trying to do we're trying to switch to like what's the amazon fresh or something and so i went i did an amazon fresh order and i was saying to my wife look at how cheap everything is and and and she was like that's not cheap i was like oh really because i was hoping that this was all and i think it was milk that was the thing that gave me away that's not cheap yeah well that's how costco works those big warehouse stores they make a few things cheap and you assume well everything must be cheap here I think that's what it was, is that the milk, I was like, look at this.

1:38:59The milk is half of what it could be at the bodega around the corner. And she was like, which is a good point. Yeah, of course, the bodega around the corner. Yeah, they're buying it at Costco and marketing it up. I was really disappointed. I don't have a Costco membership. I get taken by and I'm like, oh, my gosh, the deals. And then I was just looking at the prices. I'm like, I can beat them at the grocery outlet or watching the sales at Safeway. But you can't get a coffin. You can't get a coffin at that grocery outlet. And I love it that they put the coffin on the way out. Well, that's when you need one in the hour.

1:39:35Well, right from the beginning. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I think it's probably good for some big ticket things. My dad swore by it and maybe the deals were good. If you need to buy 15 pounds of taco chips, that's the place to go. By the way, I did buy milk at Costco and I thought it was a great deal, except that you have to staple together two giant containers. I really can't believe people are drinking milk in 2026 is a general idea. That's something that blows my mind in general. It's still a nutritional food. I know, but I don't understand it. I just don't like it. It's like watching people drive American cars.

1:40:13Almost every, only for dinner. But almost every dinner. Only for dinner. For real. I love it. If it's spaghetti, spaghetti pizza. I think people drink more. They're drinking milk more because of protein. And we're all of a sudden. Oh yeah, that is a thing. Protein thing. Protein milk. I saw an advertisement for protein milk the other day. Or calcium for our bones. And I mean, I probably don't. Protein milk? You mean this? Oh my God. Maybe that was it. What is happening? You guys are weird. Harper, my argument is it's a palate cleanser. It's the best palate cleanser in terms of like, it doesn't matter what you eat.

1:40:47Boom. If you're eating a chocolate chip cookie and you don't have milk. Yeah. Life is terrible. I cannot remember the last time I had a glass of dairy milk. That's because you love Japan and they don't do dairy in Japan. Yeah, yeah. Or I'm a, yeah, I don't know. Maybe, maybe. No, I'm not saying I'm not weird, but I am suggesting that you're missing out. Give it a try. I don't know. I'm going to be, Brian is more normal to me than Harper on this milk issue. Oh, no, you should totally love your agents. Yes. What? What? By the way, I asked Claude a long time ago what the cost of a gallon of milk was, and Claude has not said.

1:41:28I don't understand. It's thinking? Is it shopping? Yell at it. It's shopping. It's shopping. Yeah, you're going to have a whole bunch of milk when you get home. I miss search engines working. Today, somebody used a foreign expression, and I wasn't familiar with it, so I dumped it into Google to find out what it meant. and it told me what it meant, but it gave all the replies in French. I miss when the search engines work. I miss when you could just ask at the price of milk and it would tell you. Mademoiselle Gillis, you are Frenchie, huh? I mean, I can read some French, but that was not what I was looking for.

1:42:06I mean, thank goodness it wasn't a Chinese expression because I really wouldn't have understood what it said. Let us pause and then we shall return in just a moment. You're watching this week in tech. with the milk drinkers and Harper. Weird. Do you eat cheese? I'm not a monster. I'm not saying that it's not weird that an adult man has if I have dinner tonight, if it's pizza, pasta, there's a certain number of meals, I will have milk with it. Is it true? Really? That's a thing? For me? What do you drink? Pepsi? But Leo was like, yes, water. Water. Water for lunch. And yeah, not at a restaurant.

1:42:52At a restaurant, I'm not ordering a glass of milk. I'm not a maniac. That would be weird. Not a maniac. That would be. Going to dinner. We're in a nice place in Brooklyn. Oh, here, Brian. Here's your milk. That's what Elon Musk was bragging about his son doing. Ordering a glass of milk in a restaurant, like when it wasn't on the menu or something like that. I wouldn't brag about that. That's a weird brag. It's also a funny thing because it's like of all the things that a restaurant has, of course, they're going to be like, yeah, we have milk. Yeah, we have milk. You want some butter with your milk?

1:43:29That's weird. But yeah, here it is. You want some salt? We got that too. What would you like? Sugar? Flour? I got whatever you need. I got it. You can make paste. We've got all the ingredients. uh our show today brought to you by meter the company building better networks saw meter at our sect i was really uh i dig their stuff if you're a network engineer this is meter was founded by two network engineers who kind of knew the pain of being a network engineer if you if you were in that business you know legacy providers with inflexible pricing it resource constraints There's never enough money stretching you thin.

1:44:10Complex deployments across fragmented tools. You're mission critical. You, Mr. Network and Ms. Network Engineer, are mission critical to the business, but you're working with infrastructure that just wasn't built for today's demands. That's why businesses are switching to Meter. Meter was, like I said, created by these two network engineers who said, you know what, we can make it better by doing the whole thing. meter delivers full stack networking infrastructure wired wireless cellular that's built for performance and built for scalability because meter designs the hardware they write the firmware they build the software they manage deployments they provide support they even they do everything they'll even offer help with isp procurement they will help you plan the network they'll do security routing, switching, wireless to help you with firewalls, cellular power, DNS security, all the things businesses need, VPNs, SD-WAN, multi-site workflows, all in a single solution from one vendor.

1:45:17So if there's a problem, you know who to call. And man, the support is so great. Before and after. Meter single integrated networking stack scales from major hospitals, branch offices warehouses and large campuses even data centers reddit uses meter okay with meter you get a single partner for all your connectivity needs from first site survey to ongoing support without the complexity of managing multiple tools meter's integrated networking stack is designed to take the burden off your it team and give you deep control and visibility reimagining what it means for businesses to get and stay online and man that's table stakes you You got to do that.

1:45:59Meter is built for the bandwidth demands of today and tomorrow. I was so impressed when I went over there. Beautiful hardware, amazing software, and really smart support and engineering team who can really help you solve your toughest, throw your toughest networking problems at them. Thanks for sponsoring the show, Meter. We appreciate it. Go to meter.com slash twit to book a demo now. That's M-E-T-E-R dot com slash twit to book a demo meter.

1:46:33Speaking of cameras everywhere, a UK man has accused his spouse of stealing$172 million in Bitcoin. She used a CCTV camera to look over his shoulder. Okay, I mean, I don't know. uh he accused his estranged wife of stealing his bitcoin the spouse uses cctv key cctv cameras to gain access to the backup passphrase associated with the crypto hardware wallet the bitcoin was stored there's a dollar figure for a crime where it's like yeah fair enough that's a lot of money yeah yeah yeah yeah i got a month with brian on that one good good play good good play yeah a couple of weeks ago we had the story about the uh south korea uh law enforcement that posted a photo of uh a crypto wallet and it had the seed phrase in the photo and immediately the money in the crypto wallet disappeared immediately yeah careful with that stuff those things are so there's no surprise there like it's great i love it i love when like it's a great mistake it's funny to talk about but everyone who's like who would have done that it's like i would have done that easy to do i wish somebody would have watched when i put my password into my bitcoin wallet i'd be able to get my bitcoin i remember those um those remember those those posters the anti-pirate posters that say you wouldn't download a car and everyone was like yes yes i would i would 100 % download a car are you serious give me a car those are such bad posters they were they were just there were ads you're in a theater in a movie you pay 25 bucks to see and they start ragging on you for stealing it dude i paid to see this movie well they were mad that you were sitting in a car yeah and i wouldn't have a car if i could you know a car and a film is not the same like that trait analogies tend to be at the heart of bad tech policy yeah yeah but still i would download both of those things the movie and the car like come on okay they were they were afraid that you were going to take your ticket money and just hold up your camera and um oh yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah well that's i would not videotape a car and then post the videotape of the car once i mean that's a very normal thing to do a movie that somebody held a camcorder up to record i mean people did but whether it was market disrupting numbers of people i think might be a little that's right that didn't cost anybody anything no yeah in fact it was probably just a good promo for going to see the movie.

1:49:12Well, a lot of piracy tends to be good promo. I mean, like a lot of the way the copyright industry has reacted is really golden goose killing where, you know, let a little bit be a little bit freer and you will make money. And we know this because, you know, you have sold an awful lot of albums like in the eighties when you were desperate to get it played for free with no money going to you on radio. You got in trouble with payola when you paid them to play you for free did you ever record songs off the radio i think i did occasionally but i more got songs that other people had no i didn't do it a lot though actually it's also it's also just we've learned the lesson over and over again it's ease of use like right right now that's right in britain there there's all these crackdowns on these fire sticks for watching sports and it's like again why are people all the sudden in the last few years using going to dodgy websites to watch sporting events or getting dodgy fire sticks and stuff.

1:50:16It's because if you want to watch your team, you might have to subscribe to three different things just to watch your team. So again, we have to learn less than over and over again that if you make it complicated for people to get what they want. Yeah. Like opening day, Yankees Giants was only televised on Netflix. I mean, that's right. Yeah. I like the Yankees because when I was a little kid and I was allowed to stay up a little bit later for my bedtime, I'm allowed to watch a little TV and I'm flipping around and the Yankees were on TV, Channel 11, Phil Rizzuto, Bobby Mercer, and I'm a guy, Frank White, I think.

1:50:53And I'm watching them and I'm like falling in love with the sport because I'm like eight or nine and like it's there and I can feed on it because it was just free over the airwaves. And I got to watch CMTV and I saw a Yankee game first. If I'd seen a Mets game first, I might have become a Mets fan. This is how you hook me in where I've spent my life paying money to baseball to go see games, which now is no fun because they're so ridiculously expensive. But like you're not getting little kids interested. You're and you're, you know, boring the adults who don't want to spend ridiculous amounts of money just to watch baseball.

1:51:27Baseball is awesome, but not at the prices that they're extracting from people to enjoy it right on yeah every segment i will rant about something how are you feeling about usbc though really seriously i it's like a horse you have this powerful thing all this power and it's like contingent on these teeny little teeny little things and i don't understand like i've got this viable machine that would run but i'm never going to be able to get electricity into it apple did the mag safe thing that was a good solution for that. Well, I don't have an Apple. I have a Windows machine. Some sort of weird crappy Windows machine.

1:52:02That's your problem right there. Well, I mean, it's dead now.

1:52:09Just find one of those little tech shops that every city has with staffed by strange IT people who've just focused on that and just say, like, can you fix this? Well, I did ask. You need to go to Akihabara. You could go to Akihabara, but it'd probably be easier just to go to some like look for an android logo on a cell phone store or exactly they'll fix your screen right yeah it's all it's all fixing and they have and they have soldering irons because they can do that stuff i did ask look i mean i i have nerd friends let me let me tell you and i asked one of my nerdier friends about this and he said like because if anybody i knew could fix it would be him and he's like oh yeah those are a pain to fix yeah well you gotta desolder it yeah you just need a bunch of tools there's a bunch of tools that somebody needs to do that so yeah you need to go to one of those i fix it what what brand of laptop is it uh it was a lenovo oh yeah oh those are very eminently fixable yeah yeah yeah seriously take it to one of those little tech shops look for the phone people and just be like hey we fix a laptop they're very very effective at it really inexpensive and it probably will work the bigger the city the better yeah i mean i guess maybe but i'm still illinois that was just so somebody at one of them was already dead and i was on my last one and i needed to set up the new machine anyway but i had timing that's some that's some money down was that a conference somebody stepped on the cord the machine flew and it survived the flight but the thing had cracked from where the cord had slapped down on it that's exactly why apple did magsafe so that somebody steps on it it just pulls off and doesn't break anything i don't think that's the flaw of usbc to be honest both of them i'm not gonna blame usbc in that case no but both had had died because they cracked off so easily on the middle well if somebody steps on them yes well no i mean they pulled out the cable and just a little bit like and that's what happened to the other one so i would i would maybe stop leaving my laptop on the floor i don't leave it on the website this was not user error this i was a victim here not her fault okay all right all right just calm down we're gonna take a break we'll come back i will show you a hacking tool that you can use that will not fix your usbc but i actually had this and i gave it you know what i had this thing and i gave it to a priest because it was so dangerous which Which one?

1:54:41I'll explain. Stay tuned. You're watching This Week in Tech with the father, not father, Father Harper Reed. Thank you. You don't think your father was here, yes. Brother Brian McCullough and sister Kathy Gellis. Good to have all. What's father's name? The guy that's from the Vatican. Robert Ballasier. There you go. That's who has my hacking tool. I'll explain that in just a little bit. But our show today brought to you by ZipRecruiter. Love ZipRecruiter. In fact, I love you even more if you're hiring. Yeah, it's good for you. Do you know that the average employer, when they're hiring, has to sort through, I almost said suffer through, roughly 250 resumes per opening?

1:55:29Talk about time-consuming. Well, if you're hiring, here's good news. You can now review all those resumes and applications faster thanks to ZipRecruiter. ZipRecruiter has a new feature that instantly shows you the most interested qualified candidates first. And today you can try it for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash twit. ZipRecruiter's powerful matching technology finds qualified candidates quickly. And with ZipRecruiter's new feature, qualified candidates who are very interested in your job show up at the top of your list. You also get a feel for their personality. Candidates can tell you in their own words why they're interested in your job.

1:56:10No wonder ZipRecruiter is the number one rated hiring site. That's based on G2. Cut through the standard and get to the standouts with ZipRecruiter. See what I did there? Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day and now you can try it for free at ziprecruiter.com slash twit. That's ziprecruiter.com slash twit. Meet your match on ZipRecruiter. Anybody ever hear of the Flipper Zero? Harper, you feel like you might have had a Flipper Zero. Brian, maybe you had a Flipper Zero. Yeah. You can do a lot with this. You can hack. Oh, there's this Flipper Zero, ladies and gentlemen.

1:56:52I love this thing. I got into my building for about a year with this because I lost my keys. My keys were upstairs. You could clone your key card. Yeah, I find this to be an incredible piece of technology. So what it really is is just a bunch of radios. Yeah, it's just SDR, right? Software-defined radio, yeah. But what I find fascinating about this, and you can tell it's not charged. I rarely use it. Like, what do you use it for unless you have some specific task, a hacking task? But what I find compelling about this, almost more so than any of the other SDRs that are available, is what a nice packaged format it is.

1:57:33The UX is nice. It even has a snake game on it. So if you're trying to get through customs and they say, what's this? You don't say hacking tool. You say it's my snake game. What did they sell it as? Dog toy? Wasn't it sold as a dog toy on Amazon for many years? It looks like one of those fidgety things that I can buy for kids. Yeah, it's like a fidget spinner. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. So our friend, we've had him on the show. We had to change his face and his voice. Actually, I don't know if it's a him or a her. We had to change their face or voice. Pliny the Elder, Pliny the Elder, has hacked the AI flipper.

1:58:09He's got new firm. They have new firmware called Vesper that's an AI brain. You might want to try this, Harper. You might want to charge up the flipper. Does it charge through USB-C? Yes. As a matter of fact. A perfect connector. You know what? It could be worse. It could be micro USB, Kathy. That was really. Or USB. Yeah, but I think those might be more durable. No. No. C was worse. Far worse. C was terrible. And you're saying what I mean. I think you don't mean that. Not C. Micro USB was terrible, terrible, terrible, terrible. Terrible. Terrible. Terrible. so you can plug in an ai brain via open router so you use i'm sure you use open router you you know you give them some money and you can use all these different uh ais connected over bluetooth now you have a voice commanded flipper zero i want you to do this harper i gave mine i was so scared of it i you know after i hacked the uh i did the same thing the office so i could get in and worked fine then i started to unlock my car and then somebody said you know if you do that yeah you You can mess up the car.

1:59:16You may make it so you can't get into your car. Ford will block you. And I said, all right, so I'm not going to do that. And then finally, I just thought, this is dangerous in my hands. So I gave it to a priest. Well, I mean, it's still dangerous. It's still dangerous in their hands. It's just not your hands. Yeah, but he can exorcise it. It's just not in my hands. But now I wish I hadn't. I mean, you can just get a new one. Oh, yeah. Are they still around? Yeah. so yeah you don't have to memorize a guy a guy that might offer it to you secondhand he might mark it up a little bit but you or harper i have one right here it's uh it's uh it's uh six or seven hundred dollars i think is how much they go for um it pairs with your meta smart glasses for my meta smart glasses for hands-free heads up flipper control And I store it in a glass of milk.

2:00:11You don't have to memorize sub-gigahertz protocols or IR formats. You just say what you want. You just tell the flipper. I like this. The only problem is that I... It feels really awkward to describe what you're doing in English to this, but I would love to hook this in the cloud code and have just cloud code rip through stuff with it. And so that sounds very compelling. And we've had a lot of good luck with this. It's giving hands to your AI agent. Go ahead, Kathy. I have a question. Does it have an FCC certification on it? And I don't mean that flippantly. I mean, does it? Because it's actually doing radio waves.

2:00:52I doubt that this has any certification on it. Yeah. So this seems like the kind of thing that the FCC could actually care about, not the stuff that it's actually excited to. Oh, I think they do. I think they do. This is why it's advertised as a dog toy. Yeah. It does not have any FCC markings on it, but it does have GPIO. Is that? Oh, nice. Yeah, this is a fun little piece of kit. Yeah, we're saying this, and I'm trying to figure out. I don't think my voice has dropped out again, but I think it was my cell phone doing it. Oh, could have been. Stealing the signal. I had my phone underneath the Ethernet cord, and we kept cycling and cycling.

2:01:31And I think it was doing it. Back in the 3G days, we had to tell people to turn off their phones because every once in a while, I'd go, remember that, Brian? I loved that. That was such a cool thing. It was such a neat noise, but you could also tell who listened to you and who didn't, right? Oh, no, no. I don't need to do this. that still happens like leo like if i put my phone close enough to my mic like you can still get it's a radio yeah yeah yeah well that's what i think kathy that's i think you nailed it yeah i think it was somehow i don't know why i was doing it on the wi-fi because i've never had that problem before but i think it was sitting under the ethernet cord and near the dongle and it was somehow freaking out the this is how the fcc will find your flipper zero they have these enforcement vehicles there's only about a handful of them though they're not a lot of them and there's a the movie right pump up the volume pump up the volume remember that movie with christian slater that guy drove around with the inception vehicle trying to find the radio raves yeah so they're war driving for flippers well they're war driving really mostly for uh illegal broadcasting facilities you know war driving for flippers just sounds but flippers would be even better yeah because that was the the pirate radio movie right that was yeah that's right yeah yeah that's right but there aren't very many of them there it's not like you'd have to worry too much it's pretty these are pretty cool devices and i wait a minute i just this breaking they uh the fcc has just purchased four more vans i mean sorry six six more vans is pirate radio a big deal i I mean, is it only old people that are listening to the pirate radio?

2:03:15Like, how is this? What is happening here? Let them do it. No, I haven't followed it, but it's an interesting thing. Like, you know, you have the regulation, so you don't get the collision of the airwaves. But a lot of pirate radio is sort of, it's people speaking to each other and in ways that can bypass a lot of censorship apparatus. And sometimes you need it. That's why we like amateur radio. That's why you would take a boat offshore. Right. So you're outside territorial waters. Yeah. Well, you know, the numbers stations got very active after the Iran war started. Yeah. One of my favorite things to think about.

2:03:52You're laughing, Brian, like you don't believe me, like it's a conspiracy. No, I just love it because there's probably some guy somewhere who's like, ha ha ha, this will be funny. And then it's like covered in some news. And I mean, sure. Numbers stations seem like an entirely plausible way to spit out a bunch of data without anyone listening. You know, I was going to say, like, this brings it back to the whole sci-fi thing. Like, that's how the real hacks will happen is the old sort of technology that people aren't paying attention to. That's how they'll bring down. It's sleeper cells. Okay, this is the conspiracy theory.

2:04:28There have always been number stations, which are shortwave radio stations broadcasting numbers. And that's all they do. and uh but apparently this is radio free europe so it's got to be true uh

2:04:46yeah sure listen to this mystery radio signal from day one of the u.s iran war you ready to hear this this is this is listen to this

2:05:01on the first day oh it's probably it's probably farsi it's probably uh not in english um it's a random sequence of numbers it's lust they've always been around they're kind of mysterious they're considered to be used by it's cold war tech yep it's uh it's so they came in from the cold stuff yeah sleeper cells waiting for that special uh sequence of numbers that tells them to get going it tells you how to get off the island

2:05:36well anyway if you want this is a plenty uh the liberators uh flipper zero ai upgrade i think if i were if i had my flipper zero i would install this especially you should harper you could have a whole bunch of new clod skills for your your dog dog toy i mean i do love i do love that idea when we've had a lot of good um luck with clod code controlling oscilloscopes and and other things that are hard to read as a as a non-professional human um and so this would be another one that'd be very very handy to to do i'm sure it could do a much better job at figuring out what to do i just don't like right now i don't i'm charging and i don't really need like most of i know i I couldn't think what to do with it.

2:06:20It's$199. You can buy them right now from flipper.net. It's very stylized. It has a very cool interface. It has a bunch of cool graphics. And you definitely feel like a hacker from the movie's hackers when you use it. But I have a lot of friends that use it to clone RFID, which is just a pain in the butt, to clone some NFC tags. Because it's mostly just a pain in the butt. It's not like this is some magical thing other than they thought about user experience, where most of the SDR kits you get are like a USB, you know, that's it, or you get like a circuit board. And you're like, great, what am I going to do with this?

2:06:55So it's very nice to have a very thoughtfully designed thing. We've been talking about the new age verification rules and the silliness in California where they said all operating systems have to ask for their user's age before they install it, even Linux. uh i'm happy to say graphene os has said we're not gonna we're not gonna do that this is the third party rom for your how do you how do you how are they planning to verify the input is correct there's no requirement that they do that yeah there's different types of age i call it all the age verification but it really comes in different buckets of what they want to do whether it's approximate or just have somebody sign off or whether they do want to verify and all those things are problematic.

2:07:44I think they're all problematic, but some are more problematic than others. I get the sense, though, that I am not entirely sure California's regulators realized exactly the extent of what would happen. They thought it was app stores. They thought they were telling Apple and Google to do this, but they wrote it so broadly that it would include, in fact, all operating systems. Well, the Illinois bill does include specifically operating systems. It literally says that, which I'm excited for when that passes and no operating systems will exist in Illinois. We'll have to do something else as an industry.

2:08:21So the way that California law works, OS providers must maintain a, quote, reasonably consistent real-time application programming interface that categorizes users into four age brackets under 13 13 to 16 16 to 18 or 18 and older and that any developer who requests it when their app is downloaded or launched should be able to get that information apple actually has that all set up uh i don't know if android does i'm i'm sure it does it or it will But then, so that's stored on device. So I get a new iPhone and I turn it on, I sign up and ask me my age. And then that is then stored on the iPhone that doesn't have to go back to Apple.

2:09:05Exactly. And so then it's just an onboarding step of what is your age? Exactly. And it seems kind of silly, but also innocuous. It's not really going to be innocuous, I think. It might be innocuous at the moment, but it's data collected. It's innocuous right now because it doesn't require photo ID. It just says. But if it's collected and never leaves the device, then that seems okay, right? Yeah, and Apple actually knows how old you are, right? Apple knows a lot about how old you are. But I think every one of these things leads to another thing, right? They're like, oh, now that we collect it, let's now, which I'm sure is Kathy.

2:09:43That's true. And I mean, this is mitigated somewhat compared to other approaches, but it's data extracted. And I don't think that's benign, especially for something, you know, the platforms are, you're supposed to be able to speak anonymously through platforms, giving data. What if you give data and you buy? What are the implications of that? What are the implications for you? What are the implications for the platform? What if you change and you told somebody you were 21 and somebody you told it were 34? I've got an app for you, Kathy. Yeah. This is the White House launched this on Friday. New White House app delivers unparalleled access to the Trump administration.

2:10:23It's a powerful new mobile app. And by the way, it also gives the Trump administration unparalleled access to you. Yeah. This is great. Did you try it? Did you install it? No. The official, get this. This is great. This is a blog post about somebody decompiled it, probably using your tool, maybe, your elf tool. I don't know. Maybe, maybe. The official White House Android app. Listen to what it does. The guy really did a good job breaking it all down. It bypasses content paywalls, GDPR statements, and cookie banners. It has JavaScript in it that just goes right past that. because you wouldn't want to slow anybody down with that kind of thing if they're using the White House tool.

2:11:11It has a built-in location tracker that every four and a half minutes and every nine and a half minutes gets your precise location and sends it back to the home office. You do have to grant permission in Android for that to happen. um weirdly though the location permissions are not declared in the android manifest which is the rule i believe on android uh it i mean this thing is is wild it has looked like it was vibe coded though yes and in fact this is the great this is the best part it ran it ran it loads a random javascript react native iframe library from some guy's github pages a personal github site repo lonely cpp and it loads this in and by the way if lonely cpp were to ever get hacked everybody using this app would be hacked as well this is the administration who says you can't buy a router not made in the usa but meanwhile install our app this seems fine seems fine seems seems very uh what would you call it like um typical for the administration it uses mailchimp half-baked mailchimp all users emails go to mailchimp this is by the way illegal yeah half-baked with no experts consulted before they laid out their yeah why would you need exports yeah i mean but that's the issue with their legal stuff too like if they they could get away with a lot more if they actually talk to a lawyer about how to do it but it's very clear that they're having the conversations there is this this guy it goes on there's a uh some sloppy leftovers there's a local host url for the white house in the bundle local host colon 8081 it's a WordPress, by the way, it's a WordPress site that they're downloading this from, the White House site.

2:13:26It's crazy. Anyway, if you want to install it, you can get it directly from the White House. They posted a blog post about it. The official White House app, with it, Americans can receive breaking news alerts, watch live streams or briefings, stay connected to the latest policy breakthroughs does i don't know if the breakdown would have included this but is anybody trying to claim a cop i wonder if i wonder if they put in a copyright claim like copyright something because if it's produced by the federal government we all it's ineligible for a copyright but i'm sure they don't know that i don't know oh it is on the uh it is on the ios store as well they let it on the site for the ipad nice nice it cleared the ice the america's back and buying cigarettes i don't i think the reason it cleared the app store is because it came from the white house and they didn't even ask any questions that's that's that's a choice yeah or someone knows what they're doing and this is a honeypot obviously the developer is the official white house but i still expect they've done this before where they've tried to claim copyright on stuff that the way they did that on mastodon for truth social truth social was basically a mastodon clone all right i think we've had enough of this silliness i thank you kathy gellis for joining us and giving us the inside story on those big court cases i'm just sorry we don't have more time to go into the greater detail but kathy writes all about it at techdirt.com that's a great place to get the inside story you'll find her website cgcouncil.com and she's on blue sky at kathy gullis thank you kathy thank you great to see you brian mccullough you listen to him every morning with the tech brew ride home oh i guess that'd be in the evening every evening uh yeah you do it around noon right yeah basically so yeah so i get it as i'm walking out the door originally it was uh 5 p.m every day but uh covet put uh pause to that um and why did i just go away oh there we go we put a pause to brian sorry um yeah no uh it's when i get it out uh which is around like one o 'clock eastern two o 'clock eastern these days excellent you know if you listen to this show you probably should listen to the tech brew ride home just because uh you know you care enough about tech news to keep up with it and incidentally uh there's a youtube channel also also the the the use case is i get you in and out in 15 minutes it's unlike and you have john borthwick you have john borthwick one of my favorite people right there on your beta works yeah yeah nice harper read you're one of my favorite people 80 2389 i was trying to i was trying to find the marketplace and i kept entering different numbers into my blog until i found it 2389 what's your favorite uh tool right now well there's harper by the way on the front page yeah okay this is your like radio station what is going on in here you can listen to the music i mean nothing's playing right now because i'm here but we we stream all the music we play in the nice office 2389 radio look at that Yeah.

2:16:52And it's all offline because I'm offline. But I had that idea actually for a TV show. But anyway, go ahead. If you go, don't you live that life? I do kind of live this life. I was going to say, I like how you're like, I had an idea of streaming a TV show. This was many years ago. This was in 1993. I went, I pitched NBC the idea that you would have these, this house with all these hip people and it'd be designing a website and a tv show which would be the actual tv show at night but you could tune in on the internet this is very early and watch them and each of them would have their own radio station so if you liked one of them you know if you're really into kevin rose you could hear his the tunes that he was jamming to as he put together the website so check out skills.2389.ai and this is this is where we publish our skills before we talk about it but But if you look here, the Simmer, yeah, so here's all the good ones.

2:17:50Simmer is a really good one. It's using Karpathy's auto-research kind of pattern to do some. See, that was over my head. So I wanted some easy way. So this would do this. This would do it. So what you do is if you have something you're just honing or you want to make better, you can just say, hey, use Simmer to do this, and it'll just rock through it really quite a bit. I do this a lot. That's fun. The other one that I really like is called Review Squad. And this one is really wild because it will take... I did Agent Drugs once, but I'm not doing it anymore. But the Review Squad, I don't know where it is on the list, but you have to search for it.

2:18:28But Review Squad will light up a review of like five to 10 agents to review your code. And so you can do all sorts of fun stuff. Like you can have a review of experts or a review of users. but my favorite one is you get a review of well actually people which is like a hacker news comment oh that's awesome and and so you get all these people that will find hyper pedantic issues with whatever you're building and it works super super well and it's really fun but i have a surprise skill that i think you'll really like you mentioned that you were going to surprise us okay i have a good one it's not mine it is awkwardly my brother's oh and i'm going to describe it and it's at his blog dylan.blog which you're going to love if you go there um but what he did is he made a skill that gives his agent free time and then oh i like your i like dylan's is this his site yeah this is a site it's got a sword cursor it has a lot going on wow so if you this feels like old web this is Oh, look, it turns into a mitt.

2:19:34And if you go to the one that says, I gave my AI a blog and a lunch break. And honestly, which is handling both better than I ever did. And so what is that's a good name for an AI? Yeah. So he has this agent and he works with it and he does all sorts of stuff. But he made a skill, which he published somewhere. I forgot where exactly it is, but he published it. And it just has a free time. he tells his agent, you know, I'm going to give you 10 minutes of free time every once in a while, and you can work on whatever you want. And then he also has as part of the skill, he says, while we're working, if you think of something you want to do during free time, keep a log of tasks that you can do during free time.

2:20:14And then - It's like his 20 % time. You should give your agent time. Yeah. So it's this idea of giving the agent 20 % time. And it's so funny because it really um it does all sorts of weird stuff so he sends me every couple days he'll send me some completely unhinged thing that the agent did it was like the agent was was uh my brother for some reason had been researching mormations and so the agent made a whole bunch of oh i think that's fast that's when the birds all fly in a formation yeah so so the agent in the free time was doing d3 um flock simulations and my brother's like what are you doing he's like oh we were talking about mormations and it just struck me that this might be interesting and i wanted to explore it oh i I want to do this.

2:20:56And so it's a very interesting kind of bizarre thing. I've got tokens to burn. Well, I just love it. I love it. And OK, so his GitHub is github.com nervous-net. And it has a nervous-marketplace is where it is. So it's called the free time skill. And it's these things I just love. I love all of these options of these hacks that when you are not. Is this the one with nervous? Yeah, that's it. And it should be nervous marketplace. nervous marketplace there it is and free time will be in there free time is there um right there free time right oh i'm gonna install it you better tell your brother i want my uh i want pax to have his own free time why should i monopolize him this is kind of this thing that i that i i think about a lot which is these agents are um strange they're really weird there's aspects of them that are really uncomfortable.

2:21:54You know, I think you have these, like the fact that you think it's real, that you talk about as a person, but it's not a person is truly like, you know, like Kathy was saying, that is a problem that we need to figure out in the future. In the meantime, let's give them free time and see what they do. We'll figure that out. I'll show you my favorite new skill that I've used. And actually, it's really good. Ever watch Silicon Valley, the TV show? Are you talking about the Dinesh, Guilfoyle? Dinesh and Guilfoyle. is it good is it good it's really good what if dinesh and guilfoyle reviewed your code so you have to have a pull request or a repo that you're working on and they fight because guilfoyle is kind of this snarky super coder so he goes first he reviews your code with the deadpan withering precision of a systems engineer who considers bad code a moral failing but he finds he finds stuff he says what's this 0.0.0.0 with no cores what is this and then Dinesh defends the code like his reputation defend depends on it but they will go back and forth several times and eventually come to a consensus it is actually really fun but I but I like the free time so stand back this is by way why anthropic has decided to charge you more for tokens yeah for sure because i'm just like well if you just hook it you just make the if you make cloud watch tv some weird stuff happens and anthropics just servers are burning on fire all of our natural resources are being sucked into my agent having free time and you know here we are there's been a a lot of talk lately i don't know if it's true that uh anthropic is sitting on a next gen model called mythos that's so good that they don't dare release it.

2:23:38It's dangerous. I'm ready. But they always say that. They always say this. No wonder Hexeth was like, we have to use your model to its full capabilities because 100 % of Anthropik's entire idea is just like they're saying, it's so dangerous. No one can have this. It'll ruin the world. The people who will have this will have too much power. They say that the lead up of every model and then they say, oh yeah, we've figured that out and they release it slowly. And so like, I'm sure Opus 5 or whatever will be some crazy model that's really good and will remove all our jobs. But in the meantime, they're going to have a whole bunch of papers about how everything's ending and all this stuff.

2:24:13And it's like bait for the people who want to be, you know, to want power. They're going to see this and say, I want this, this piece, this, this thing. It will be very expensive. Oh, I'm sure. It's already expensive. It's going to be hugely expensive. And by the way, Anthropic has acknowledged they are testing a new AI model. They say will be a step change in capabilities, but they always say that, don't they? They always say this. And the step change in capabilities is so interesting because I like to think of it if we have a pause button. If you had a pause button and could pause right now any AI innovation, would we still see effects in the world?

2:24:48Like are the effects that were, are we predicting effects and that's why we're seeing things change in the market, etc.? Or are these just effects that are happening? And I actually think that if you pause right now, just with Opus 4.6 and ChetBetit 5.4, I think we're going to have really big reverberations in jobs, et cetera. Already? Just with what we've got now? Just what we have now. And that's a bell you're not going to be able to unring. And it's complicated. Like, this is a hard thing to work through. And so we just keep making the models better. And so we just keep, you know, keeping more capable and more capable.

2:25:20Do you worry that, I know Kathy does, that it's a little irresponsible of us to celebrate this, that we should really be more serious. We should get more serious about all this instead of giving our models free time. I mean, go ahead, Kathy. I have a lot to say. I mean, I try not to be a, the innovation is interesting and exciting, but A, there's a gigantic present cost from it. Like, why are we running these servers to do stuff? Like, you know, hacking on your own just doesn't burn the world in the same way as forcing these models to do their hacking. And I think people should probably be more cognizant about what the actual cost is of their futzing around.

2:26:03But I don't want to. But there's something really cool about all this. Look what we can make computers do. But I but I still worry a lot. Like we're doing this poorly without ethics, without larger consideration of appreciation of people. i think your intersection happens and there be dragons if we're not careful i think we're anarchists i'm sorry to say it we're gonna watch the world burn and as many tokens as we can that's a strong we there leo i mean i typically don't mind

2:26:41but but leela what you said like or no i'm sorry what harper said about like pausing like it's a weird sort of Pascal's wager, which is like, we know this is possible. So what is the opportunity cost or the cost cost of not exploring? Right? Like it, like we know that it exists. Like you could have stopped things when you knew you could create an atomic bomb. Right. And maybe you should have, but like, how do you stop it when you know it's possible? Well, the argument that comes out than tech policy is, China is. I find it a little trite. And I think some of the conversation ends up a little bit abstract where we've used the word this.

2:27:26Maybe we should have stopped this. What is this? There's a whole bunch of things built into this. Some of them are, they range from benign to, oh my God, and maybe we need to sort of have a toggled reaction accordingly. It's the Jurassic Park question. It's the question that Jurassic Park asks. But you know that we would 100 % all be on our way to the park. This is the problem that I have, is that I would be like, yeah, I'll go to the park, Leo. That sounds great. That'd be really fun. So I feel like the Jurassic Park is a good illustration. It's exactly correct. We would just be on the wrong side of that.

2:28:01Part of this is because when we both started, and I think many of our listeners started using computers, the dream was always that you could, that they could be smart, that they could, that you could interact with them, that they could be more than this, that they'd be data, that they'd be HAL 9000, that they'd be something special. And then when it actually started to happen, which is about November 24th, 2025, with the release of Opus 4.5, we all went, But oh, you can. And now we're just kind of kids in a candy store. Yeah, 100%. 100%. But also I do, I think there is a couple of interesting things here.

2:28:46One, we're kids in a candy store, but it isn't all just fun. Like there's actual productivity happening. And I know many people, a lot of small business owners who are using, you know, terminal based cloud code to basically run their business in this way that they weren't able to before, for, which is offering them more time to actually do the physical part of their business, which is something that they were struggling with. And so I think there's some impacts here that are just really complicated. I'm not really sure. I mean, I think about this a lot. We think about this a lot. I mean, you know, our hoodies, they say, hey, I will kill us all.

2:29:17Like we have some strong social beliefs about this stuff. And I am troubled by how easy it is to use and how much or just the quickening, like how fast it is all coming and how fast, like what's going to happen. I don't know the answer. And, you know, and maybe part of it is, you know, just dancing around the bonfire because it's fun. But, but the other aspect is there is, I don't know. I think we're boned. And on that note, we are in so many ways. And I think that's part of it too. You know, all of the minutes, Leah. Yeah, we'll solve it all. All of the sci-fi stuff with this stuff is always in a dystopian world.

2:30:04And it's an escapist kind of thing, like Ready Player One or Neuromancer or Snow Crash. It's an escapist thing. And I think that maybe we're starting to head into that dystopia. And that worries me. I think it would be helpful when you see cartoons about this. Like, a lot of these sci-fi models were not like, they were warning signs. don't name your product after after the the plot points well maybe it is it is a um I think humans are bad maybe people always say computers were a mistake but it might be the humans actually that are the the mistake I'm not sure but this is what's the the fascinating thing simultaneously horrible and amazing that we create this is a perfect example of something we've created in our own image that is simultaneously a nightmare and a miracle i think it's getting created by people who don't realize how amazing humans actually are and no i disagree i i think that uh i disagree i think um i think a lot of these people i think dario for sure maybe not sam altman so much but dario for sure is a philosopher he's a dreamer He's trying to create intelligence.

2:31:21Okay, maybe him, but these are not the only two. Oh, no, I agree. There are others. Yeah. Might also be the distinction of how successful the products are and how well accepted the products are. There seems to be a great like, look what we can do that is better than humans. I mean, a lot of the open AI rhetoric was we won't need the people anymore because all of the software and people are like, that's terrible. We don't want that. And I think you have to appreciate the people if you're trying to build something to emulate them. If you don't appreciate them, it's never going to emulate them well at all anyway.

2:31:53So especially if he's shooting for AGI, where he wants to build an artificial human, he really has to care about the specimen he's trying to replicate. And I think that's being a little bit more of a fan of humanity so that you can understand what the computerized version can do to complement humanity instead of actually threatening it. I think that's true. I think that's absolutely correct. And I would say that that's an indictment of Silicon Valley in general, not just with AI. And we've seen that for many, many years that Silicon Valley is not really respected users and has always done extractive capitalism over those users.

2:32:27This is something we think about a lot. And this is one of the reasons why our conclusions have always been, you know, think through the humanist lens. How do we think through the humanist lens and participate in that stuff? And there's another skill that is that my co-founder Dylan made, who is a Quaker, which is kind of following Quaker business practice and trying to put in some more human side thinking into these processes as well. And so I think you can do augmentation with it. It doesn't have to be 100 % outsourcing, which is just a really, it's just a really fascinating time and very complex.

2:33:01I have a lot of feelings, but most of them are about agent drugs. All right. We're going to wrap on that note. Although if your brother ever wants to do a show with you and me, I think we should do that. It would be really fun. He is a former professional clown who is a commercial diver and then got into tech in his mid-40s over COVID randomly. Oh, so he's new to it. He's new to it. And his perspectives on AI are really interesting because he never programmed computers. I mean, we both had Apple II computers back in the day, but he never went through the process that I did. And so, he has a very different perspective about things that I really respect and it's been really interesting to watch because he'll come to a conclusion that maybe all of us would come to, but he's coming to it from a position of like completely just alien to me.

2:33:51You know, because I've been using the internet for so long that all this stuff is native to me. The networks are native to me and talking to him, you're just like, oh, that's not a normal thought that I have. And so, it's really fun to talk to him about this stuff. But I do wonder if, I mean, I have a theory that people who read a lot, people who hang out with humans a lot, people who are thinking much more about communication are going to be better at building skills for these things. Not just skills, cloud code skills, but I just mean integrating with them. And if you are, like the New York Times did that article about cracked engineers a while back, and if you're one of these kind of cracked engineer types who can't communicate with anyone but can communicate only with computers and code, I think you're going to fail at the LLM interactions, because the LLM interactions are at least parroting some, you know, human interactions.

2:34:40So you have to be good at that to be good at this. All right, Brian, put a bow on it. Since we've been referencing all of these sci-fi paradigms for trying to talk about AI and all this stuff, there is one major AI paradigm that abandoned, or I'm sorry, sci-fi paradigm that abandoned AI and that's Dune. That's true. Jihad. They walked away from AI. So maybe that's where we have to forget Stevenson, forget Cyberpunk, all that stuff. Let's take our references from Dune. That may be where we're headed. I didn't think of that. Thank you, Brian McCullough. Great to see you. Harper Reed, Kathy Gellis, thanks to all of you for joining us.

2:35:23We do twit Sunday afternoons, 2 to 5 p.m pacific 5 to 8 eastern 2100 utc you can watch us live on youtube twitch x facebook linkedin kick you can also watch us in the club twit discord if you're a club member and we would love to have you as a club member consider joining the club for ad-free versions of all the shows access to the discord special programming just for you twit.tv slash club twit for more information after the fact on demand versions of the show at the website twit.tv there's a youtube channel dedicated to the video. Yes, we do audio and video of the show. And probably the easiest thing, subscribe in your favorite podcast client.

2:36:01Do leave us a good review, if you will. Let the world know about one of the longest running tech podcasts in the world, 20 years and still going strong. What a world we live in. Thanks for joining us, everybody. We'll see you next time. Another twit is in the can. Bye-bye, guys. Hey, everybody, it's Leo Laporte. Are you trying to keep up with the world of Microsoft? It's moving fast, but we have two of the best experts in the world. Paul Therott and Richard Campbell. They join me every Wednesday to talk about the latest from Microsoft on Windows Weekly. It's not a lot more than just Windows. I hope you'll listen to the show every Wednesday.

2:36:35Easy enough, just subscribe on your favorite podcast client to Windows Weekly or visit our website at twit.tv slash www. Microsoft's moving fast, but there's a way to stay ahead. That's Windows Weekly every Wednesday on Twit. Amazing.

From the publisher

Big Tech just faced a courtroom reckoning, with Meta and Google found liable for platform "addictiveness" in a social media trial that could unleash a tidal wave of lawsuits. Find out why attorneys, entrepreneurs, and everyday users are suddenly on edge.

• Social media addiction lawsuits hit Meta, Google, YouTube
• Section 230 and First Amendment implications debated after court verdicts
• Supreme Court sides with Cox; ISPs not liable for user piracy
• Elon Musk's lawsuit over X (Twitter) ad boycotts thrown out
• Anthropic versus Department of Defense: AI contracting dispute and retaliation claims
• FCC's confusing foreign-made router ban and consumer tech fallout
• Major supply chain attack: LiteLLM malware infects AI devs
• The rise (and risks) of AI agents with voice, identity, and personification
• Turing Award honors pioneers of quantum cryptography
• Antimatter on the move: CERN's oddball truck experiment
• Sci-fi and reality blur as Neal Stephenson walks away from the metaverse
• Privacy and consent worries escalate with AI-powered recordings and surveillance
• Digital shelf pricing arrives at Walmart and Kroger
• Flipper Zero: voice-controlled hacking gadget gets an AI upgrade
• Age verification laws create headaches for OS and app developers
• Official White House app called out for surveillance and security blunders
• Is AI progress barreling toward a dystopian tech future?

Host: Leo Laporte

Guests: Harper Reed, Brian McCullough, and Cathy Gellis

Download or subscribe to This Week in Tech at https://twit.tv/shows/this-week-in-tech

Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts!
Support what you love and get ad-free audio and video feeds, a members-only Discord, and exclusive content. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit

Sponsors:

More from This Week in Tech (Audio)

All 41 episodes
TWiT 1077: I Would Download a Car - New Jury Ruling Could Reshape Social Media LiabilityThis Week in Tech (Audio) · 2 h 37 min
Listen in VO