In short
Podcast Summary: Today in Focus - Oscars 2026: Who Should Win… and Who Actually Will?
Overview
- Podcast Title: Today in Focus
- Episode Title: Oscars 2026: who should win… and who actually will?
- Hosts: Lucy Hough, Catherine Shoard (Film Editor at The Guardian)
- Focus: Analysis of the upcoming Oscars, discussing nominations, potential winners, and the dynamics of the awards campaign.
Key Discussions
Oscars Campaign Dynamics
- The Oscars serve as a culmination of a lengthy awards season, marked by red carpets and promotional campaigns.
- The race is notably competitive this year, primarily between two films:
- Sinners (directed by Ryan Coogler)
- One Battle After Another (directed by Paul Thomas Anderson)
Key Nominations
- Best Picture Contenders:
- Sinners: A vampire horror film set in 1930s Mississippi, nominated for a record 16 Oscars.
- One Battle After Another: Gained significant recognition, winning the BAFTA.
- Best Actress: Jessie Buckley is a frontrunner for her role in Hamnet.
Changes in Voting Rules
- A new rule requires Oscar voters to prove they have watched the nominated films before casting their votes, leading to significant late campaigning and voting.
Recent Events Impacting the Oscars
- A controversial incident at the BAFTAs involving a Tourette's campaigner shouting a racial slur has brought renewed attention to Sinners, potentially influencing voting.
- Public relations missteps, particularly by nominees like Timothée Chalamet, have the potential to impact their chances.
Potential Outcomes and Implications
- Ryan Coogler could become the first Black director to win an Oscar if Sinners secures Best Picture and he wins Best Director.
- The conversation touches on the historical context of racial representation within Academy Awards, highlighting the significance of Coogler's potential win.
- A failure to award Coogler despite a win for Sinners would reflect poorly on the Academy, reminiscent of past snubs of Black directors.
Critical Opinions
- Catherine Shoard's View:
- Skepticism about the quality of the frontrunner films, suggesting they may not represent the "best" of cinema.
- Noteworthy mention of the Oscars serving more as an industry self-congratulation rather than a celebration of the finest films.
- Previous controversies and the evolving nature of awards campaigning have shifted focus from artistic merit to strategic positioning.
Conclusion
- The episode wraps up with insights into the nature of awards campaigning and the subjective criteria of "best" in film.
- Listeners are encouraged to follow The Guardian's live coverage of the Oscars for real-time updates.
Additional Notes
- Follow-Up: There will be continued coverage of the Oscars by Today in Focus, highlighting the aftermath of the awards ceremony.
- Support for Journalism: Call to action for listeners to support independent journalism at The Guardian.
---
This summary encapsulates the various discussions and insights shared in the podcast episode, providing an organized and comprehensive overview of the key themes surrounding the upcoming Oscars.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Oscar Race: Current Dynamics
1:16 to 2:45
Discussion on the ongoing dynamics of the Oscars campaign and the films involved.
“I think to not give him Best Director would be terrible.”
Exploring Controversies and Impacts
2:46 to 4:55
Analysis of controversies surrounding nominees and their potential impact on the Oscars.
“It wasn't immediately tipped when it came out in April, I think, last year.”
Critiques and Predictions
4:56 to 7:40
Critiques of the leading films and predictions for the Oscars outcome.
“who is widely tipped to win Best Actress for Hamnet which is nominated for nine awards.”
Audience Engagement and Industry Influence
7:41 to 11:40
Discussion on how actors engage with audiences and the industry's own self-congratulatory nature.
“Yeah, and I mean, it would be a terrible look for them to give Sinners Best Picture and him not win Best Director.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Catherine Shoard:This is The Guardian.
0:30Catherine Shoard:innovation. Scotland. For the head, heart and the spirit. Discover more at theguardian.com forward slash brand Scotland. This message was paid for by Brand Scotland.
0:46Catherine Shoard:Everything leading up to the Oscars is an audition for the Oscars. It's now a sort of tipping point. It's very rare that the best film will win.
0:54Lucy Hough:But I think this campaign perhaps does to show the sort of real genuine risks of gaffes.
1:00Catherine Shoard:And I don't want to be working in ballet or opera or, you know, things where it's like, hey, keep this thing alive, even though it's like no one cares about this anymore. He's so Marmite as a person. Had the opera thing come out a couple of days earlier, it absolutely would have taken all his chances. With something like Sinners, I think to not give him Best Director would be terrible. Remember, no black person has ever won Best Director.
1:23Lucy Hough:The Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles as rolling out the red carpet again for this year's Oscars ceremony on Sunday. So who should win and why? From the Guardians today in Focus, this is The Latest with me, Lucy Hart. I'm joined by Catherine Shord, the Guardians film editor. It's great to see you, Catherine. Thanks for coming up. So we are at the end of what has felt like quite a long Oscars campaign trail. It feels like it's a real face-off between two big films at this point, doesn't it? Sinners and one battle after another. How would you describe the dynamics of the race at this point?
1:58Catherine Shoard:Yeah, it's got very exciting just in the final reel, just as the final crunch has happened. And there's a number of reasons for that. One of them is that there's a new rule that if you're an Oscar voter this year, you have to prove that you've actually seen the films that you're going to be voting. You wouldn't think you'd do that. Was that not normally the case? You know what people are like, dreadful. But you literally can't physically sort of click it, click that one, until you've sort of shown that you've watched the others. So that means a huge flurry of late votes, which makes the last of three weeks very, very important.
2:31Catherine Shoard:So Oscar voting closed, I think, a week yesterday. And so the award ceremonies just preceding that take on a huge significance. And they both sort of, well, one of them went to Sinners. That was the Actors Awards, which were formerly known as the SAG Awards. And that was a huge sweep for Sinners. It got Ensemble and it got Michael B. Jordan for Best Actor, crucially. and then before that you had the BAFTAs and although One Battle did triumph at the BAFTAs So this is One Battle After Another
2:59Lucy Hough:directed by Paul Thomas Anderson and Sinners is Ryan Coogler and it's this vampire horror film set in 1930s Mississippi that was quite a I think when it came out last year it was safe to say it wasn't immediately obvious that it was going to be such an Oscar juggernaut but it's been nominated for 16 nominations which would be a record
3:20Catherine Shoard:It is, it's a record by two It's not even, it's a sort of far away record. So yeah, I mean, that's true. It wasn't immediately tipped when it came out in April, I think, last year. But I think now, what with all the sort of consolidation of controversy and so on. I mean, so at the BAFTAs, one thing that happened was the big N-word incident where a Tourette campaigner shouted out the N-word whilst the two stars of Sinners, Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo were presenting an award. And actually, that may ironically turn out to be the way in which the BAFTAs have the most leverage over this year's events because Jordan and Lindo sort of handled that with such dignity and poise and presence.
4:00Catherine Shoard:And it sort of renewed the topicality of the film in an inadvertent way. And so I think, you know, Delroy Lindo wasn't in with a shout before. I think he's the front runner now. Really? Yeah, yeah. And so I think all that has sort of given it the edge. And because, as I say, it happened just as sort of voting was closing in, it's sort of newly relevant. I mean, one of the things, the interesting things this year you've also had is in these, the trade magazines like Variety, they run these brutally honest Oscar ballots where Oscar voters reveal what they've actually voted for anonymously. And all of them or practically all of them have said, I think one battle will win best picture.
4:37Catherine Shoard:And I think Paul Thomas Anderson will win best director. so I voted for Sinners and Ryan Coogler.
4:42Lucy Hough:So it sounds like it's going to be very close but it could be a really good night for Sinners. I mean there have been these obvious people who've been on these major PR campaigns Timothee Chalamet, Jessie Buckley who is widely tipped to win Best Actress for Hamnet which is nominated for nine awards. But I think this campaign perhaps more than others or maybe not, maybe it's always like this does show the sort of real genuine risks of gaffes. So Timothee Chalamet made these comments where he kind of dissed the ballet and opera industry saying he was glad to work in film because it was still relevant.
5:18Lucy Hough:That has been met with justifiable anger for people working in those sectors, not least because it's an artist, you know, kind of seemingly punching down at other people in the arts industry. He did make those comments before voting has closed, but quite late in the days. Does stuff like that really have an impact on how awards are given out on Sunday?
5:35Catherine Shoard:Oh, yeah, 100%. I mean, if you think of something like the Amelia Perez controversy last year, where the sort of dreadful social media of the star was sort of unearthed. And oh, yeah, I mean, it can completely total your chances. And had the opera thing come out a couple of days earlier, it absolutely would have totaled his chances. Actually, I still think he's not going to get it because he's so marmite as a person. The voters are kind of looking for a way not to give it to him. Really? I think so. And he's also very young.
6:03Lucy Hough:Not even because he's a big Gen Z star, it would bring in a younger audience for the contest.
6:08Catherine Shoard:Well, that's absolutely right. He is. And he's sort of money. You know, his movies make money. Wonka, June, things like that. And they want that because they want to be a bit relevant. Yeah. And as you say, to appeal to a younger audience. But they do tend to err on the side of older people winning. So he's 30 now. So he'd be the second youngest ever if he won. Michael B. Jordan is 39. That feels much more age appropriate thing. I think he's polarizing and he's sort of seen as a disruptor. you know like he does his own sort of marketing stunts and all this but it doesn't matter and in the case of jesse buckley it doesn't matter because there's no other contender she has sort
6:42Lucy Hough:of um hired the the cat world or cat lovers by saying that when she met her boyfriend she didn't like his cats um and that seemed to have exploded and she was then forced to issue a public apology
6:53Catherine Shoard:like why yeah i mean to be fair to jesse buckley it was partly i mean the cats have to take some of the blame there I think I mean she said that they pooed on her pillow they were jealous and I mean I can imagine that that's true that tracks yeah it was really annoying yeah and I mean I think and actually in the same interview that that sort of originally emerged in Paul Muskell said fuck cats so you know and that hasn't done him he's not nominated but it's still he's Teflon he can say that kind of outrageous thing but I think also a lot of people don't like cats
7:25Lucy Hough:a lot of people are dog lovers in Hollywood people do like dogs yeah it's LA isn't it's much more dog friendly but I suppose what I think the point of this is that actually they are it's a PR campaign type situation isn't it rather than about being the merits of the film which is interesting so I mean in in your view is the the right film going to win this year and are there really good films that have been completely overlooked uh I don't I'm not a particular
7:50Catherine Shoard:fan of either of those two films actually so sinners are one battle after another yeah I think Sinners is a bit of a soup a bit of a genre soup and it would be even better sticking to one although it is definitely sort of ambitious uh in a way that um other films are not one battle didn't work for me at all I find it I really love Paul Thomas Anderson I just didn't like it at all I loved it oh I'm so sorry you're wrong but yeah I didn't I found what it it you know it said about black women problematic I found Sean Penn splashy and obvious so the interesting thing that has happened with this race and particularly in the wake of the BAFTAs actually is that it's now a sort of tipping point the Oscars are now a tipping point and if they don't give it to Sinners now and particularly if they don't give it to Ryan Coogler for Best Director it's a problem it's a real problem and you know the thing about Ryan Coogler is he's very eminently rewardable remember but no black person has ever won Best Director at the Oscars, which is quite something.
8:53Catherine Shoard:That really is something. Yeah, and I mean, it would be a terrible look for them to give Sinners Best Picture and him not win Best Director. That's happened before with Moonlight and with 12 Years a Slave where Barry Jenkins and Steve McQueen didn't win Best Director. But with something like Sinners, I think to not give him Best Director would be terrible. The issue for some people is that Paul Thomas Anderson has never won an Oscar, and that's obviously mad but he will win an Oscar this year because he'll win best adapted screenplay and he's still quite young so it'll be all right he'll win another one but I think what has happened sort of in a slightly surprising sudden way for something that now seems so obvious is that it will that the backlash to them snubbing sinners will be a big problem.
9:38Lucy Hough:Yeah so you did a Q &A a live Q &A with on the Guardian site earlier this week and someone asked a really interesting question, which is that why do film stars, never actors, never thank their fans when they come up on stage? And I suppose my follow up question to that is, does that suggest that no one actually really cares about the Oscars? It's just people within the industry congratulating themselves? Or do you think that's not true?
10:03Catherine Shoard:I think to some extent, that's true. It's certainly much more true now than it was 20 years ago, when, you know, 60 million people would watch the Oscars, because lots of people cared about Titanic and lots of people went to see Titanic you know the the amount of money that Titanic made compared to say Nomadland in 2021 which won one best picture is quite quite you know stark so uh so there's that actors are very much more than say musicians or something like that they're incredibly guarded they're incredibly on message they don't really ever say anything interesting in interviews. And when they do, it's in sort of soft environments where they've been kind of led to believe that they're fine, like Timothee Chalamet was being interviewed by Matthew McConaughey.
10:51Catherine Shoard:So not a tough inquisitor. All the ceremonies, all the red carpet appearances, everything leading up to the Oscars is an audition for the Oscars. And so what they have to do in their speeches and their interviews is simply tell voters why they should vote for this film and this performance and why it's important and so so that's quite dull really and you hear the same lines again and again and again
11:15Lucy Hough:and it is quite nerve-wracking so does that mean that's more about how a star or a director performs on the campaign trail around awards season rather than the merits of the film i like the right best
11:27Catherine Shoard:film being chosen by the judges it's a lot to do with that the right film you know what's the right film it's a subjective thing and you know so on and so forth. Sinners is clearly the right film this year and it probably will win. That doesn't mean it's the best film or anything like that. It's very rare that the best film will win the Oscars.
11:45Lucy Hough:Thank you Catherine we'll be following your live blog on Sunday very closely. Thank you for your time. That's it for today. Thanks again to Catherine Short our film editor and you can follow The Guardian's live coverage of Sunday's awards over at theguardian.com. Thanks for listening to this episode of The Latest the a new evening edition of Today in Focus. And do give us a watch over on YouTube, where we've just reached 100 ,000 subscribers. Thanks to everyone who's been watching, and do subscribe if you haven't already. Today in Focus, we'll be back with you on Monday morning as usual. The latest we're back on Monday night.
12:16Lucy Hough:This episode was presented by me, Lucy Hough. It was produced by Annie Levespa. The senior producer was Ryan Ramgobin, and the lead producer was Zoe Hitch.
12:30Lucy Hough:This is The Guardian.
12:55Catherine Shoard:Transcription by CastingWords




