In short
Podcast Summary: Today in Focus - "Will Andrew Bring Down the Monarchy?"
Episode Overview In this episode of *Today in Focus*, host Helen Pidd discusses the implications of Prince Andrew's recent arrest with Andrew Lownie, author of *Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York*. The conversation centers around Andrew's controversial role as a trade envoy, the ongoing investigation into his conduct, and the potential fallout for the British monarchy.
Key Topics Discussed
- Context of Prince Andrew's Arrest
- Prince Andrew was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in a public office.
- Arrest occurred on his 66th birthday at Sandringham.
- The investigation is linked to the release of documents related to his trade envoy role.
- MPs and Public Perception
- MPs voted to release documents concerning Andrew's appointment as trade envoy.
- Criticism of Andrew as "self-aggrandizing" and "entitled" is prevalent.
- The royal family's efforts to distract from the scandal include public appearances by King Charles and Prince William.
- Andrew Lownie's Insights
- Lownie emphasizes that members of the royal family, including King Charles, had prior knowledge of Andrew's questionable activities.
- Despite warnings, no action was taken to address Andrew's behavior over the years.
- Royal Family's Management of Scandals
- The episode discusses missed opportunities by the royal family to address Andrew's conduct.
- Lownie cites an incident from 2010 involving Sarah Ferguson, which could have prompted earlier intervention.
- Implications for the Monarchy
- The discussion raises questions about the future of the monarchy and its ability to modernize.
- There is a growing call for accountability and public scrutiny of royal finances and activities.
- Public Opinion
- A notable decline in public support for the monarchy, especially among younger generations.
- Concerns that Andrew's actions have significantly tarnished the royal family's reputation.
Key Takeaways
- Crisis Management: The royal family’s inadequate response to Andrew's behavior has led to a reputational crisis.
- Future of the Monarchy: The current scandal may represent a pivotal moment for the monarchy, either leading to modernization or potential downfall.
- Accountability and Reform: There’s a clear demand for reforms within the royal institution to regain public trust and adapt to contemporary expectations.
Conclusion This episode encapsulates the fallout from Prince Andrew's arrest and the broader implications for the British monarchy. Lownie’s insights highlight the ongoing tension between royal privilege and public accountability, suggesting a critical crossroads for the institution as it navigates a changing societal landscape.
For further details and insights, refer to Lownie's book, *Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York*, and ongoing coverage by *The Guardian*.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Arrest and Immediate Aftermath
0:45 to 3:00
An overview of Prince Andrew's arrest and the royal family's response.
“A man on a constant self-aggrandising and self-enriching hustle.”
Understanding Andrew's Behaviour
3:00 to 5:15
Insights into Prince Andrew's past actions and the royal family's awareness.
“Today in Focus, the fallout from the royal arrest.”
The Role of Andrew's Biography
5:15 to 7:30
Discussion on Andrew Loney's biography of Prince Andrew and its implications.
“It's a role that the future Edward VIII had had, in some ways using the soft power of the monarchy to reach places that politicians couldn't reach.”
The Trade Envoy Controversy
7:30 to 9:45
Exploration of Andrew's time as a trade envoy and related misconduct allegations.
“Another former Whitehall official says that he was shocked at the extent of what was described as Andrew's lavish lifestyle.”
Family Dynamics and Responsibilities
9:45 to 12:00
Analysis of the relationship between Prince Charles and Prince Andrew amidst the scandal.
“And as there is now an ongoing police investigation into whether Andrew committed misconduct in a public office while doing that job, we do need to be a little bit careful about how we talk about all of this.”
Missed Opportunities for Intervention
12:00 to 14:00
Examining the chances the royal family had to address Andrew's behaviour early on.
“and so I think they have to take some responsibility here they can't say sorry this is all news to us and we'll deal with it because they've knew about it and didn't deal with it.”
The Scandal of Andrew and Ferguson
14:04 to 15:06
Exploring the implications of Sarah Ferguson's actions involving Prince Andrew.
“Well, in 2010, Sarah Ferguson was filmed by the News of the World selling access to Andrew for£500 ,000.”
King Charles's Accountability
15:06 to 16:30
Discussing King Charles's role and responsibilities regarding Prince Andrew.
“as we've said he stripped Andrew of his titles.”
Prince William's Concerns
16:30 to 18:49
Analyzing how the scandal affects Prince William and his future role.
“I know the Royal Family wouldn't want any debates about Prince Andrew.”
Public Opinion on the Monarchy
18:49 to 20:01
Evaluating the shifting views of the monarchy among the public.
“What do you think the public is making of all of this?”
Show all 12 chapters
The Role of the Royal Family Today
20:01 to 22:50
Discussing the monarchy's purpose and its need for transparency.
“This is their sort of crossroads moment.”
Future of the Monarchy
22:50 to 24:02
Speculating on the potential changes needed for the monarchy's survival.
“And of course, the monarchy has proved itself to be a remarkably resilient institution over the centuries.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Helen Pidd:This is The Guardian.
0:07Andrew Lownie:Today, are we witnessing the beginning of the end of the monarchy?
0:16Andrew Lownie:It's a week now since the man formerly known as Prince Andrew was arrested at Sandringham on the morning of his 66th birthday. The former Prince Andrew has tonight been released under investigation from a police station in Norfolk, where he has spent the day in custody following his arrest this morning. While police continue to investigate whether he committed misconduct in a public office, MPs voted on Tuesday to release files relating to his appointment as a UK trade envoy at the start of the millennium. They did not pull their punches.
0:47Helen Pidd:A man on a constant self-aggrandising and self-enriching hustle. A rude, arrogant and entitled man who could not distinguish between the public interest which he said he served and his own private interest.
1:02Andrew Lownie:Meanwhile, the royal family are trying to keep busy. The king went to London Fashion Week.
1:07Helen Pidd:Good afternoon, Your Majesty. Do you have any reaction to the arrest of your brother, sir? Your Majesty, how are you feeling after your brother's arrest?
1:15Andrew Lownie:And the future king went to the BAFTAs. On the red carpet, conversation turned to Hamnets, the tearjerker about Shakespeare's only son. William said he couldn't face it. Hi, you need to be in a quiet state. You'll be in a calm state where I'm not. You need to be in quite a calm state to watch it, he said. And he wasn't at the moment. It was a tiny window into the pressure Prince William is feeling, thanks to his wayward uncle. But can the royals really be so shocked at all the allegations being levelled at Andrew, when they, and the late Queen, seem to have missed so many opportunities to nip his behaviour in the butt.
1:55Andrew Lownie:One man who knows more than most about these missed opportunities is Andrew's biographer, Andrew Loney.
2:02Helen Pidd:I mean, clearly members of the family, including King Charles, knew about Andrew's activities. They were warned about his abuse of his royal position to make money for himself. I mean, that was appearing in the papers 15 years ago, and they chose to do nothing about it.
2:17Andrew Lownie:Since Andrew's arrest, Loney has been inundated with even more claims about who knew what about the Playboy Prince.
2:24Helen Pidd:It's been crazy since Thursday. I mean, I think at one point I had 1 ,200 emails I still hadn't read and I've been working from 6 in the morning till 2 in the morning. I think what's gratifying is to see other people standing up and saying, you know, the monarchy needs to modernise and reform. So I'm no longer, I think, a lone voice and others feel as strongly as I do that for the monarchy to survive, it has to adapt.
2:49Andrew Lownie:Before too long, the weight of the royal family will fall on William's shoulders. But with a potential prosecution to come, and the airing of all the dirty laundry that that will entail, can he restore the family reputation? From The Guardian, I'm Helen Pitt. Today in Focus, the fallout from the royal arrest.
3:14Andrew Lownie:Andrew Loney, you've written a biography of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor called Entitled, The Rise and Fall of the House of York, which involved, I think, you asking 3 ,000 people, not all of whom replied, about the prince. So I think it's fair to say that you are a scholar of him and his lifetime of scandals. This episode is going to go out a week after Andrew was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in a public office. Did you ever think it was going to come to this?
3:39Helen Pidd:No, of course not. I just sought to write a biography, the best I could do. I spent four years researching it. I thought it would draw attention to his sexual and financial misdemeanors, but I didn't expect any impact. And to be honest, the book came out in August and we didn't have people knocking on his door and taking him in for questioning. The tipping point has been the new Epstein revelations in the last few weeks, which of course have confirmed all the things that I said and people didn't believe six months ago. So that's very gratifying that my sources proved to be accurate. And it is exciting that a book can have some sort of impact.
4:15Andrew Lownie:Yeah. And The Arrest, of course, is related to Andrew's position as a UK trade envoy, a role that he held from 2001 until 2011. And I find it quite curious, actually, that he was given a job like that at a time when he was already considered a bit of a liability, wasn't he? Like, all throughout my childhood in the 90s, he was the Playboy Prince. He was Randy Andy.
4:36Helen Pidd:The Queen called her second son Andrew Albert Christian Edward, but his nicknames give a better clue to his personality. Randy Andy is the best known. The Prince has a practiced eye for the ladies, and his romantic adventures have been well publicized. Is it very difficult for you to
4:52Andrew Lownie:meet a girl and to, I mean, ask for a telephone number, for example, and know that that person perhaps is terrified of all the press attention that you get?
5:01Helen Pidd:Yes, I think to a certain extent they probably are. But if you remember, I didn't get your telephone number.
5:08Andrew Lownie:Can you just help us understand why he was given this job? And was it a real role or just sort of a pretend one to keep him out of trouble in some way?
5:16Helen Pidd:Well, it was a real role. It's a role the Duke of Kent had had. It's a role that the future Edward VIII had had, in some ways using the soft power of the monarchy to reach places that politicians couldn't reach. I mean, the Liberals have now called for a debate to get all the papers to show how that appointment was made, because, as you say, people had some idea of what he was like. But it was pushed through by the Queen and basically very hard to turn down anything the Queen wanted. She wanted a son who basically had run out of road in the Navy to have a big job, and they thought that this would be a big job.
5:48Helen Pidd:Britain's Duke of York, Prince Andrew, is travelling to Egypt this weekend to co-chair the World Economic Forum on the Middle East. like Davos earlier in the year. All the movers and shakers are due to be there from President Bush and Egyptian President Mubarak to Tony Blair. For the last seven years, he's been around the world travelling, promoting British business. 25 countries in one year last year, I think. It was against the wishes of King Charles, pushed through by Peter Mandelson and Tony Blair, both of whom, of course, figure in the Epstein papers. But I think the problem was there was no proper supervision and he was kind of left to do what he wanted.
6:26Helen Pidd:And he kind of took advantage of the situation to exactly do as he wanted, chase women, play golf and make money.
6:32Andrew Lownie:And so you say that the Prince of Wales, as was the king as he is now, was concerned at the time and raised his concerns. What was he worried about?
6:41Helen Pidd:I think he knew his brother. He knew his brother could be very boorish. He could put people's backs up. He was socially gauche. He thought he knew it all. And he was absolutely right. And the whole thing was kind of contained. In the end, the ambassadors didn't request Andrew because he was counterproductive. Andrew kind of imposed himself with Fergie on his coattails, trying to pick up business cards wherever she could. And he was kind of left to do his own thing. He would go to places like Thailand on the taxpayers' tab and then have what he called private time. So we'd pay for a week, basically, in effect, in some resort in Thailand.
7:16Helen Pidd:And he just took advantage of the system and he was sticking, as we know, all sorts of expenses on this, including his massages, insisting on private jets when commercial flights would do. We've heard from two former civil servants, one of whom said that he was so annoyed at Andrew's attempt to claim for massage services that he tried to block that expenses payment, but he was overruled by a more senior member of staff. Another former Whitehall official says that he was shocked at the extent of what was described as Andrew's lavish lifestyle. And it was all sort of rubber stamped and sent through.
7:57Helen Pidd:So it's not entirely Andrew's fault. He worked the system, but the system allowed him to behave like this.
8:03Andrew Lownie:And there's one anecdote in your book where apparently Andrew's staff, while he was abroad, was often requesting that attractive women be invited to events, to which one consul replied, I'm a diplomat, not a pimp. So it was fairly blatant, was it, his behaviour when he was abroad?
8:20Helen Pidd:Yes, it was, absolutely. And numerous stories of him veering off from shaking hands with VIPs to talk to a pretty girl. Sometimes he just disappeared with someone he'd picked up. He was always going to nightclubs with girls being provided in the VIP room. the ambassador sometimes lost sight of him. He would stay in hotels rather than in the ambassador's residence, particularly ones with nice nightclubs that he could go to. So yeah, he used this as just an opportunity to pick up women. And of course, there are plenty of women who are quite happy to be picked up by the son of the Queen.
8:53Andrew Lownie:Indeed. And was there a specific trip that Andrew went on where we know now that it didn't go to plan behind the scenes and you had essentially diplomats tearing their hair out about his behaviour?
9:05Helen Pidd:Oh, countless trips. I mean, there was a whole file at the Foreign Office of complaints from ambassadors, though they learnt that if they did complain, it might jeopardise their career. But, you know, people eventually gave up complaining. I mean, I've got stories in the book of, you know, for example, a diplomatic incident with the Sultan of Oman because Andrew was trying to catch money off him. People in the Gulf complained that he was trying to sell his house Sunninghill to them. So yeah, numerous complaints and nothing was done. I mean, some of these complaints were appearing in the papers from ambassadors.
9:36Helen Pidd:So yeah, no one could be on any doubt that this guy was a liability to Britain.
9:50Andrew Lownie:And as there is now an ongoing police investigation into whether Andrew committed misconduct in a public office while doing that job, we do need to be a little bit careful about how we talk about all of this. And we should, of course, stress that Andrew has consistently denied any wrongdoing. But we know, of course, that his arrest was prompted by the release of the Epstein files. Can you just remind us, what were the key allegations contained in the files relating to how Andrew behaved when he was trade envoy that raised questions of whether or not he broke the law?
10:20Helen Pidd:Well, there were a series of stories, many of them which were actually in my book and didn't seem to make much impact in August. He was looking for investment opportunities in Helmand province just after the war there, when troops were still, I think, serving there. I mean, just basically everything that came across his desk, almost immediately it was sent off to someone like Epstein. And then there was almost a quid pro quo. He would then ask Epstein for some money for Fergie's bills. So this was in effect selling information. There's also claims now, which I believe, that he was betraying military and diplomatic secrets.
10:50Helen Pidd:So there is actually a more serious charge that could be levelled against him of treason.
10:54Andrew Lownie:Goodness. And as you say, there were concerns raised about Andrew's appointment as trade envoy at the time and we may soon learn more about that appointment after MPs voted this week to release paperwork relating to how he actually got that job.
11:08Helen Pidd:Can there be many people more symbolic of the rot that eats away at the British establishment than the former Duke of York and special trade envoy?
11:16Andrew Lownie:How damaging do you think that could be both for Andrew and the rest of the royal family as well as for the Labour government at the time.
11:24Helen Pidd:I mean, I've been trying for five years to get access to the files on this time as a trade envoy, and they've used every exemption possible to stop me having them. I think the shredders are working 24 hours at the moment in Whitehall. I don't think we're going to get any paperwork that will have a smoking gun on anything. So good news for the government, good news for the royal family. But the royal family are clearly being drawn into this. I mean, clearly members of the family, including King Charles, knew about Andrew's activities. they were warned about his abuse of his royal position to make money for himself I mean that was appearing in the papers 15 years ago and they chose to do nothing about it and so I think they have to take some responsibility here they can't say sorry this is all news to us and we'll deal with it because they've knew about it and didn't deal with it.
12:11Andrew Lownie:Yes and yet the king put out a statement last week saying I have learned with the deepest concern the news about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. So he doesn't even say about my brother, very much distancing himself from his brother. Have they always had a bad relationship, these two, or has it just worsened over the decades?
12:31Helen Pidd:Well, the relationship, I think, was not too bad to start with. I mean, Charles is 12 years older. He treated him very much as a younger brother. I mean, he's a very kind man, and he would write children's stories and read them out to Andrew, but they're very different temperaments. I mean, Charles is intellectually curious, he's sensitive, thoughtful, modest, self-deprecating, whereas Andrew is bumptious, pompous, arrogant, stupid, has no hinterland. So there's not much in common between them. And of course, Andrew's created huge reputational damage for the monarchy. He's been a pain at home.
Read the full transcript
13:03Helen Pidd:So there's no love lost there. I mean, I think they'd be secretly pretty pleased if he went to prison. It would kind of solve their problems.
13:10Andrew Lownie:And King Charles said in his statement, the law must take its course. Earlier this year, of course, he stripped Andrew of his titles. Do you think that he went far enough, quickly enough, given what you know about all of the warnings that must have reached Charles's desk over the years?
13:28Helen Pidd:No, it was always too little too late, just enough that hopefully to satisfy public opinion. But public opinion was way ahead of actually where the palace was. So there were always, you know, small concessions in the hope that would make the problem go away. and all it did was allow the crisis to get bigger and bigger. If they'd nipped it in the bud much earlier, we wouldn't be where we are today, which is, you know, where people are calling for Charles to abdicate.
13:51Andrew Lownie:And could you just give us a sense of the opportunities over the years that Charles, and indeed his mother, would have had to, as you say, nip this behaviour in the bud and stop him from carrying on like this?
14:04Helen Pidd:Well, in 2010, Sarah Ferguson was filmed by the News of the World selling access to Andrew for£500 ,000. I mean, did you take the money? At one stage you had$40 ,000 cash sitting in front of you. Did you take it? Absolutely, yes. And it was given to me and I got it in the car and then returned it straight away. Once the scandal broke? As soon as I knew it was a scandal, not once it broke. Now clearly the two of them were working together. This wasn't an isolated incident. That would have been one opportunity to really come down on them.
14:36Andrew Lownie:And why do you think the Queen in particular turned a blind eye?
14:39Helen Pidd:Well, exactly like Margaret Thatcher did to Mark Thatcher. Love is blind when you're a mother. And she didn't want to hear when stories were brought about him. She just dug her head in the sand. He was her favourite and she wanted only the best for him. And I think there was a sense, even with her, of entitlement, that basically because they knew they wouldn't be caught, there was no scrutiny, they could do what they wanted. And that kind of went to their head.
15:03Andrew Lownie:The Queen obviously is not with us anymore. Charles is on the throne. as we've said he stripped Andrew of his titles. Is there any further action that he as king could take to punish his brother?
15:15Helen Pidd:Well I don't think it's a matter of punishing his brother I think it's a matter of being honest about what he knew when he knew it and what he did because I think the question now is about the king's accountability for this. The law will take its course with Andrew I think as long as Charles cooperates fully makes any internal reports for example of the complaints that were brought available, makes sure that all the people who accompanied Andrew on these trips speaks to the police. They don't have NDAs hovering over them. I mean, I've seen letters from December telling police that they have obligations of confidentiality and must keep quiet.
15:49Helen Pidd:So if the Crown is prepared to cooperate with the state, then that's fine. But I think there's an awful lot of window dressing going on, an awful lot of saying things in public, but actually very different things going on behind the scenes.
16:02Andrew Lownie:Right. And what do you make of the move led by some Labour backbenchers to effectively remove Andrew's right to ever reach the throne, unlikely as that is, given that he's eight in the line of succession? Do you think that that's something realistic that could ever happen?
16:20Helen Pidd:No, I think that's complete gesture politics. He's never going to come to the throne. He's never going to be a councillor of state. This is using up parliamentary time, which I think could be better spent. I know the Royal Family wouldn't want any debates about Prince Andrew. I mean, they've already got the problems of the Crown of State being looked at by the Public Accounts Committee. I think there's a debate going on, which will look at some issues with Andrew. And we finally got round this Erskine May directive that, you know, you can't ask any questions about the Royal Family. I think we are moving to a position where there could be some scrutiny.
16:51Helen Pidd:So no, I mean, it's a ridiculous thing. And it's just people jumping on a bandwagon, thinking it's a good thing to do. Much more important of a parliamentary inquiry into Andrew's time as a trade envoy, and get all those people who may well, I would suggest, have abetted him, or certainly would know what he was up to in places like Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, you know, people who are meant to be supervising him at the UKTI, etc. Those are the people who should be talking so that we can make sure this doesn't happen again.
17:20Andrew Lownie:And how do you think this is all being viewed by Prince William? We know, of course, that his father is battling cancer. He's well into his 70s. So it's only a matter of time before Prince William will ascend to the throne himself. He was at the BAFTAs earlier this week saying he just wasn't in a calm enough state of mind to watch a particularly harrowing film, Hamnet. Do you think he's watching all of this play out very nervously.
17:48Helen Pidd:Yes, absolutely. I mean, I think William has seen the reputational damage that Andrew is bringing. Sir, to what extent do you think the royal family has done enough around the Andrew and Epstein issue? Sir, to what extent do you think the royal family has done enough around the Andrew and Epstein issue? He's wanted to deal with him much more ruthlessly and earlier than Charles, who's kind of dithered over this. And he's going to have to pick up the pieces when he comes to the throne and he's keen that Charles in some ways cleans out the stables before he gets there because there'll be no throne for him to inherit.
18:20Helen Pidd:I mean that may actually not upset William. He may be very happy to have the life of a country gentleman and not have all these pressures but he's certainly worried about what his birthright's going to be given the way the royal family have dealt this. This is as I said a crisis they've brought on themselves because they've handled it so badly.
18:39Andrew Lownie:Coming up, can William and Kate turn the tide of public opinion?
18:55Andrew Lownie:What do you think the public is making of all of this? It's been striking, I thought, reading the coverage that even the Daily Mail, which arguably was the most loyal to the royal family seems to be turning against them and sort of expressing disgust in what Andrew in particular has been doing.
19:12Helen Pidd:Yes, I think it's very interesting that the debate has got much wider into royal accountability and privilege. And I mean, papers like The Times, The Telegraph, and as you say, The Mail, which you would think were pretty sympathetic, are now very openly saying, you know, we need to look at this again. But I've been calling for greater accountability for at least a decade now, very much a lone voice and slightly sort of vilified for it. But I think, you know, so many people are now saying these things, including distinguished royal commentators like David Dimbleby. I mean, obviously, there's a key question.
19:43Helen Pidd:Why on Peter Mandelson's recommendation was he made trade envoy. But then who paid the 12 million pounds to Virginia Dufresne to shut her up? Who was that? Was that our money? Or was that the Queen's private money? I mean, these are big issues. Where does their money come from? We're never really told. This is their sort of crossroads moment. They can redefine themselves the 21st century by making themselves less secretive, or they can basically bring on their own demise by being so intransigent and just being so unaware of actually what public opinion is.
20:18Andrew Lownie:And what is public opinion? What do we know about how Britons are feeling about the monarchy now compared with in decades past?
20:24Helen Pidd:The support for the monarchy is falling. I mean, clearly Andrew is deeply unpopular. William and Catherine seem to still be popular. But I think I saw a poll on Friday saying that 79 % of those under 30 have no interest in the monarchy. So it's kind of withering away. It's losing any relevance to the new generation. And as a monarchist, I think the monarchy serves a very useful purpose. I want it to stay, but I want it to stay with something that we can respect.
20:49Andrew Lownie:And you say that for you, the monarchy does serve a useful purpose. What is that purpose now? And what would it look like with William and Kate, Catherine, as I should call her, at the top of the tree?
21:00Helen Pidd:Well, I think there's always a role for the royal family to exercise soft power in support of the government. We saw this with Trump recently. It's a singular privilege to be the first American president welcomed here. This is truly one of the highest honors of my life. Such respect for you and such respect for your country. We see it in the way the royals clearly are very popular in the Middle East. You know, they are a focus for national grief, for example, or national success. You know, they hold the nation together and they personify the nation. And what we want is this family devoted to public duties who do good works, who highlight issues.
21:38Helen Pidd:but it does depend on respect and trust, and that has been lost through the activities of Sarah Ferguson and Andrew and the fact the royal family turned a blind eye to this now for 40 years.
21:48Andrew Lownie:And how optimistic are you that William and Kate can turn the tide, especially among younger people who, as you say, the majority of whom are just not interested in the royal family? And in an age of social media where everything is scrutinised, authenticity, emotional honesty is the order of the day. And when they're competing with influencer culture, people like the Kardashians, their celebrity star power is arguably not what it once was.
22:13Helen Pidd:Things have changed. I think William and Catherine realise that. They're doing much more direct engagements through social media themselves rather than relying on, for example, the Royal Rotor. But, you know, people do expect a bit more accountability from people in public life. And I think they need to accept that. You know, they need to be less opaque about their finances. They need to have a proper records management system about their archives. The way that they communicate with the press needs to be, I think, more open rather than secret briefings and quid pro quo arrangements. They just need to operate like any business does, as openly and honestly as possible.
22:50Andrew Lownie:And of course, the monarchy has proved itself to be a remarkably resilient institution over the centuries. They weathered all kinds of storms, beheadings, abdications, Diana's death, Megsits, when Harry and Meghan sort of stomped off in a mood to California. How serious do you think this is for them? And is it overstating it to suggest it could be the beginning of the end of the monarchy as we know it?
23:13Helen Pidd:No, I don't think that's out of the question. I think this could be the beginning of the end of the monarchy, depending on how they play it. It could be the making of the monarchy or making of the new modern monarchy. but at the moment they don't seem to have woken up and smelt the coffee yet and they're sort of stumbling they've lost the narrative they're stumbling into I'm afraid their demise and they need to really I think make some announcements about how they're going to reform the institution and become much more open I mean they need to be paying tax they need to be seen to be paying tax we need to know what it is they need to have their royal wills unsealed they need to be removed from the exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act.
23:49Helen Pidd:They need to accept parliamentary scrutiny. They need to have a royal register of their business activities. And the most important deal, they need to start acting properly rather than using their position and privilege for their own personal gain.
24:02Andrew Lownie:Well, thank you very much for talking to us today.
24:05Helen Pidd:Not at all. Pleasure. Thanks a lot.
24:07Andrew Lownie:That was Andrew Loney. His book entitled The Rise and Fall of the House of York is available now. My colleague Zoe Williams had a great interview with Andrew, the author, not the former prince, which you can find at theguardian.com, along with all of our coverage of this unfolding scandal. And that is all for today. This episode was produced by Natalie Katenner and Tom Glasser and presented by me, Helen Pitt. Sound design was by Brian McNamara and the executive producer was Maz Ebtahosh. We'll be back later today with the latest.
24:49Helen Pidd:This is The Guardian.




