In short
Whether “toxic” workplace cultures can genuinely change, how big companies can adopt startup-like practices, and why wellbeing leaders face perfectionism. It also covers how career plateau can predict workplace misbehavior, and how founders can measure culture for investors.
Guests/backgrounds
Matt Smeed, business psychologist and co-founder of Working Well Community; previously recognized as HR’s most influential thinker (two times). Main hosts: Leanne (chartered occupational psychologist) and Al (business owner).
Key claims
- BrewDog’s “well-being” rebrand may be PR: training mental health first aiders isn’t the same as fixing psychological safety, retaliation, and leadership/system issues.
- NatWest COO Jen Tipping describes culture change via employee “journeys,” “failure-free workplace” leadership training, and time/process redesign.
- Wellbeing leaders are held to higher standards, leading to overbuilt business cases and reduced experimentation.
- Career plateau increases withdrawal, deviance, and incivility; ego depletion mediates effects.
Notable examples
- BrewDog: 2021 open letter alleging fear/bullying/burnout; 2024 second letter claiming retaliation and loss of “transparency dashboard” and real living wage.
- NatWest: returning 385,000 hours (2024) and targeting 820,000 (2025); 6,000 of 60,000 employees in idea-councils to shelve/phase changes.
- Investors: culture can be evidenced with metrics (retention, sickness, engagement, training uptake, customer satisfaction, innovation).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOBrewDog's Culture Shift
1:53 to 4:42
Exploration of BrewDog's claims of a culture change towards well-being.
“What are you on about seven days into July, eight days into July.”
NatWest's Employee Experience Revolution
4:43 to 9:50
Discussion on NatWest's innovative approach to improving employee experiences.
“What were they called, the people before?”
Innovations in Workplace Culture
9:51 to 14:01
Innovations by NatWest aimed at transforming workplace culture and employee satisfaction.
“including organizational psychologists, to do this.”
Transforming Work Culture: Key Changes at BrewDog
14:01 to 16:41
Explore how BrewDog is changing its work culture through employee feedback and time optimization.
“but they'll basically go, yeah, we did an experiment.”
The Impact of Career Plateau on Employee Behavior
16:42 to 19:07
Learn about the negative behaviors associated with career stagnation and their implications.
“And I'm guessing, that sounded to me like really boring talk.”
Understanding Ego Depletion and Its Effects
19:08 to 21:36
Discover how ego depletion affects self-control and employee behavior in the workplace.
Addressing Disengagement and Employee Retention
21:37 to 24:18
Discuss strategies for leaders to address employee disengagement and improve retention.
“I thought it was interesting, Al, was it?”
Addressing Disengagement and Employee Retention
24:19 to 25:03
Discuss strategies for leaders to address employee disengagement and improve retention.
“and you might actually, yeah, prevent people from leaving in the autumn.”
Addressing Disengagement and Employee Retention
25:05 to 25:39
Discuss strategies for leaders to address employee disengagement and improve retention.
“the audio destination for business professionals.”
Hot Take: The Pressure on Wellbeing Leaders
25:40 to 28:00
Examine the high standards placed on wellbeing leaders and its effects on their performance.
“It's time for our hot take, which as you know, is where we bring a guest in to challenge the way we think about work.”
Show all 22 chapters
Well-being Interventions and Organizational Culture
28:00 to 34:50
Explore the challenges of implementing well-being initiatives in organizations and how cultural perceptions impact their effectiveness.
“Did they consult with the employees before they did it?”
Matt Smead's Influence in HR
34:50 to 35:12
Highlighting Matt Smead's recognition in HR and the importance of adaptation in workplace practices.
“You can see now why he's the, yeah, what is it?”
Innovation and Experimentation in Organizations
35:12 to 38:40
Discussing the necessity of experimentation in workplace well-being and how cultural attitudes towards risk influence outcomes.
Investor Interest in Workplace Culture
39:01 to 42:00
Understanding how investors evaluate company culture and its impact on business success.
“You can be competitors and colleagues at the same time.”
Metrics for Measuring Workplace Culture
42:00 to 43:34
Learn the key metrics that reflect workplace culture and employee engagement.
Understanding Employee Goodwill
43:34 to 45:06
Discover the concept of employee goodwill and its future role in organizations.
“There'll be probably a really fancy name for it.”
Addressing Burnout in Leadership
45:06 to 49:54
Gain insights on how to handle burnout when managing a team.
“The first few months were intense, constant firefighting, fixing broken processes, trying to hold things together.”
Navigating Peer Feedback Requests
49:54 to 51:03
Learn how to approach gathering peer feedback effectively in a challenging situation.
“No one said this, but if someone comes to me and says they're starting to feel a bit burnt out, they just don't feel themselves, basically describe your situation.”
Strategies for Effective Feedback Collection
51:03 to 55:27
Explore strategies to collect feedback while protecting your professional reputation.
“I've been asked to gather peer feedback, but why would anyone open up to me?”
The Importance of Anonymous Feedback
55:27 to 56:00
Understand the significance of anonymity in gathering honest workplace feedback.
“provides you enough to, with what you need.”
Navigating Feedback in Teams
56:00 to 57:25
Learn effective strategies for gathering feedback in the workplace.
“Whereas I'm like, you know, I'm just like the wallflower.”
Reflections and Behavioral Leadership
58:28 to 59:01
Explore the challenges leaders face in fostering open communication.
“I've said they've ditched top-down performative...”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Al Elliott:Coming up this week in work. Brewdog announced this week that they are now all about well-being but should we believe them? After years of public scandals and a so-called culture of fear, they are leaning into mental health. But is this rebrand a real culture change or just a PR stunt? And can a major bank really work like a startup? That where COO say that they've ditched top-down planning with small empowered teams. and it seems to be working. Could this be the future of big business? And in the workplace surgery, do investors care about culture? And if they do, how do you prove it? One listener is gearing up for a funding round and wants to know, will culture make a difference to the investor numbers?
0:46This is Truth, Lies & Work, the award-winning podcast where behavioural science meets workplace culture. We are brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals. My name is Leanne and I'm still a chartered occupational psychologist.
0:59Al Elliott:My name is Al and I am still a business owner, although a bit fed up of it now, I've heard the truth be told. In this climate. And we are both still helping you create amazing workplace coaches. We're going to get into today's episode in just a second after a quick break and a message from our lovely sponsors. See you in a second. Does your experience with AI sound a little like this? You prompt for 20 minutes, the output is polished, is confident and is completely flipping useless. Well, that's what happens when AI doesn't know anything about your business. Mm-hmm. But you know what does know something about your business?
1:30Al Elliott:HubSpot. HubSpot's AI. It works with your actual customer data. Every interaction, every signal your team has generated over time. So instead of prompting and hoping, you ask once and ship it. Check out HubSpot.com, the agentic customer platform for growing businesses.
1:52Al Elliott:Welcome back. Welcome back. How's July treating you? What are you on about seven days into July, eight days into July. How's it going? Is everything all right? Is it too hot for you? I know that a lot of Europe's on fire. UK is hot and sweaty. It sounds like the US is about the same. So maybe if you're in Canada, I don't know, is Canada cool in summer? I don't know. Tell us Canadians. Yeah. If you're from Canada, then drop us a quick email. Sorry, Canadia. Sorry, I'm saying it wrong. Then drop us a quick email. Anyway, this isn't about Canada. This isn't about weather. This is about the news roundup, which is Leanne's favourite time of the week.
2:22Al Elliott:I've taken the words out of your mouth, haven't I? It still is my favourite time of the week. Okay, I've done the jingle. Lee, what have you seen this week? Brewdog. Oh, okay. Brewdog. For those people who don't know about Brewdog, they're a UK-based, were the darling of the investment, of the armchair investors about 10, 15 years ago. My dad and my brother-in-law both invested in Brewdog, I believe. Dang. Yep, when they first started. Oh, that went well, I'm sure. It did go well. Yes. Yes, it did. Not shed any of the money with me, but why would they? So anyway, so Brewdog. It used to be a scrappy startup brewery, is that right?
2:56Yes, and quite well known for having a problematic culture. But this week it says that it's now all about well-being. So in an article in the Times, fancy, they seem quite on brand, does it? They are trying to shift. In the Times it said that they have been training 200 of their staff as mental health first aiders. Fair play, step in the right direction. but as I mentioned they have had somewhat of a problematic culture over the years. Let me fill you in, back in 2021 over 60 ex-employees signed an open letter accusing the company of creating a culture of fear. Bullying, burnout, people being treated like objects, all the really ugly toxic culture stuff and it wasn't just one-off instance, this was a pattern and it came from a group called punks with purpose and it kind of blew up if you haven't heard of brew dog it is quite a punky brand that was kind of their their kind of thing wasn't it um so anyway brew dog responded at the time with promises they said they were listening they rolled out forums a listening line and even a dashboard a nice shiny colorful dashboard that solves everything doesn't it to show how transparent they were being but then in 2024 staff were saying none of that worked a second open letter because one is bad enough.
4:18Second Opal letter, this time from current staff rather than ex-staff, claimed people were still scared to speak up, that retaliation was happening, that people worried they'd be pushed out if they talked about pay or unions. Oh, and that they've just scrapped the real living wage and that transparency dashboard, funnily, just went away. That's transparent. I'm curious, before you go on,
4:41Al Elliott:they were called the professional punks or something. What were they called, the people before? Punks with purpose. Punks with purpose. So these are now called, these were current people. So current, what have they called themselves? No, this was the first open letter. Oh, I see. So this is kind of like ex-workers. Now it's current workers. Disgruntled, called themselves punks with purpose. Second open letter is from, have they not got a name? Brew doggers with beef. Brew doggers. I like that. Brew doggers with beef. Okay, so brew doggers with beef. They were saying that it wasn't working. Yeah.
5:14Al Elliott:I interrupted you. Sorry, go on. It just wasn't working. Right, okay. Serious, serious issue with psychological safety. Everything they talked about there is what happens when you don't have psychological safety. You're scared to speak up. Retaliation is happening. Worrying that you'll get pushed out. All that type of thing. So this was just last year. So now in 2025, you can imagine my surprise when I saw this article in The Times that BrewDogger are leaning into well-being. They do have a new CEO, though. The original founders, I believe, have now been pushed out. a new leadership charter and a rebrand that in terms of its product as well has also ditched the kind of what they're known for the shock tactics the dead animals I think they used to pour beer into and yeah all very strange but yes mental health first aiders and talk of well-being is now central to their strategy it's a puff piece do you know what I mean it's all just like oh look at us and look at all the amazing things that we're doing because let's be honest i don't believe this is real culture change because training first aiders is not a culture change make because first aid is a brilliant mental health first days are brilliant and actually as an initiative in your organization probably one of the most impactful things that you can do to support your support your people and create that psychologically safe environment everything though that has been claimed by previous employees and current employees points to issues with systems processes people culture not individual levels of well-being to the solution for me isn't matching with the problem that employees are speaking up about the leadership charter more interesting that is good leadership charters typically map out behaviors we expect to see in leadership and those behaviors may well drive the culture change um but i must admit i'm not really convinced al what do you think yeah there's there's there's kind of a famous thing in in startups saying what get what got you here won't get you there and I think that applies to both marketing.
7:06Al Elliott:So yes, all right, getting dead animals and being all like shock. Marketing probably did really well when they were a scrappy startup. Now they're an established company. What, probably 15, 20 years old. That's not going to work. Same. When you're starting up, the temptation is to go, well, culture's great and we'll be doing our very best and see, look, you know, we're trying, but it's not everything's perfect. Now it needs to be a bit more formalized. I don't know. I mean, the leader was the founder, I think I've got this right. The founder and his new fiancé or new wife were on LinkedIn about three months ago going, there is no such thing as work-life balance.
7:41Al Elliott:You just don't understand. You don't love your work. That showed that they were going down the wrong route. And it's just no massive surprise. Lee, is there a way they can fix this? I think that they've taken a good step with the leadership charter. I think that's a really positive step. I'm removing problematic founder. I think this is a sad thing for founders and often where that that the innovation that kind of created the initial brand is is lost. I agree that it's very naughty, isn't it? All the guerrilla marketing type stuff and it needed to kind of be updated a little bit with what people are actually interested in now.
8:17But I think this is a problem when founders get a bit to continue to be too chaotic as the business grows. that's not the energy that scale up or even at that point a small medium-sized business needs and I think often we see that in founders it's too disruptive they get pushed out and ultimately they'll come back in some way because a brand would have lost you know like Steve Jobs would lost its little magic something but I think it's understanding as a founder am I the best person to be in charge of people and culture of operations am I more now stand back a bit work on you know the product development, that side of it.
8:53Yeah, I think it's understanding when, as a founder, you're not the right person to be CEO.
8:59Al Elliott:Yeah, and obviously it's not an either-or thing. It's not like, oh, right, I can't be in charge of culture, so I have to go and get a chief people officer at 90 grand a year. No, there's fractional people, like Leander's fractional stuff. So fractional chief people officer, somebody just does a day a week or even just a day a month or something. Maybe you find someone who is interested in the culture and they can take it as part of their role. Obviously, speak to Leanne about that because you need to make sure you get the right training, get the right person, and you make sure that you do it properly rather than just promoting someone who goes, oh, right, now you're head of culture and actually what they were doing before was filing.
9:31Al Elliott:True story. But anyway, yeah. So, cool. Brewdog. Anything else to say on Brewdog? I think the only thing, what I'd be more convinced about this was actually an actual proper intentional culture change is talk of who they're working with to do that. Because I don't mean to be rude, but your average CEO, even your exceptional CEO, is not necessarily going to be an expert in culture change. They're going to be the expert in bringing the right consultants, including organizational psychologists, to do this. So for me at this point, there's not enough there to actually, for me to actually believe it.
10:00I think it's a puff piece, and I think we'll see similar complaints later in the year from Steph.
10:04Al Elliott:Well, talking of change, I read something in a website, which I've not written down what the website is, but actually it's part of the PWC. There's the links in the show notes. Not that you ever go there and look. We know, we check. But it was part of a PwC publication, and it was an interview with the COO, Chief Operating Officer of NatWest Bank, UK bank. Quite big, probably one of the big three or four. Oh, yeah. Yep. And it's only like 50 years old, so it's not like super, super old like some of the old, old banks, but it does own like Cootes, which is like a, you know, where the Royal Family Bank, and there was a big palaver about that recently.
10:41But anyway, so just to give you a bit of context,
10:44Al Elliott:It's 2007. What's that fancy word you use for the financial crash? You go the IF9 or something. The GFC, the Global Financial Crisis. I think that's just what it's called, Al, to be honest. Such a loser, GFC. So during the GFC, they almost went under and the UK government bailed them out by$45 billion, which they've just recently got back. The NatWest has just paid it back. Do you know what? We've got a mortgage with NatWest. Yeah. It's not bad, that. Yeah. Yeah, what's not bad? The time it took them to pay that back, what, 15 years? 17 years? Yeah, yeah, yeah, 17 years, yeah. It kind of took the wind out of my sails there, that's about what I was going to say.
11:21Al Elliott:Anyway, going back to this interview. Going back in. Thank you very much. I'm resailed. So this person that was being interviewed was a lady called Jen Tippin. I love the names on here. Oh, that's a nice name. Tis, isn't it? Jen Tippin. I prefer Jenny Tippin. Jenny Tippin, oh, that sounds lovely. But Jen, nice, Jen. It sounds like it should be in Postman Power or something. Now we're going to Jen Tippin who owns the local sweet shop. And this is what she's been doing. Right. So originally what they were doing was they didn't really, they were like the normal banks. They didn't really listen to employees.
11:54Al Elliott:They just basically went, right, this is what's happening. Here's the changes. They started a couple of years ago to realizing that actually they have what they call customer journeys. So they've got customer goals and journeys mapped out really, really clearly. so they know that if a customer gets a credit card or joins them, then ultimately the goal is to get them to have a credit card, you know, a mortgage or whatever. And so they map out the journey in like intricate stages with ideas of what happens on each one. Some bright person, probably our Jen Tipping, said, why don't we do the same for employees?
12:25Al Elliott:So they did. Oh, crazy talk. So basically what they're having... People have started to focus on the employee experience. Well, what they've started to do is they'll have now a journey, which starts off where someone sees a job ad and ends up with them being six months in and a happy employee. So they've passed their probation. So that's the entire journey. And of course, they've got mini goals throughout it and they've built this entire thing up so they can actually monitor where people are up to and more importantly, have sort of little mini interventions. So at one point, you know, they're two weeks in and perhaps a little bit like disillusioned, this wasn't the job they thought they were going to be.
12:59Al Elliott:Then there's like a pulse check or a manager check and going, how are you finding it, John? Are you enjoying it? And they're going, no, I think you're a set of ruthless, capitalistic bastards. All right, John. John's very, very left wing. To be honest, I don't know why John applied in the first place. No, it was a bad fit, John. It's what happens when you feel pressured to just take the next job that comes along. But then John should have been filtered out, perhaps, earlier in the history journey. True, yeah. So that was the first thing they did. The second thing they did was they've, now you talked about this just a few seconds ago, they've now got what they call a failure-free workplace.
13:35Al Elliott:They've redefined what failure means, it just doesn't exist. So what I've got down here is they've trained their top 170 leaders to see every experiment as valuable data regardless of the outcome. This is what Jen says, this created psychological safety where teams felt empowered to try new approaches without fear and the culture shift encouraged innovation because people weren't afraid of getting things wrong. People just treat them as experiments now and they learn from each other's success and they're like, they won't boast but they'll basically go, yeah, we did an experiment. Didn't work at all, but do you know what's weird?
14:05Al Elliott:We found out that John is not a great fit. Imagine John's experiment. He's like, I just wonder if I can unplug the server and take down this entire establishment. Yeah, so that's the number two. Any thoughts so far, Lee? No, I'll save said thoughts. Okay. Carry on. Cool, cool, cool. So, and then number three they did, out of five, they gave their team nearly half a million hours back. So basically they did what they call process simplification and smart automation, they returned 385 ,000 hours to employees in 2024. And they're on track to give them back 820 ,000 hours in 2025. That's like giving every one of their employees an extra week of time.
14:47Al Elliott:Now, this is not time off. This is just of time at work. Number four, the courage to kill your own ideas. This is a big one. What used to happen was they go, right, we're going to roll out a lot of change. And then do you like it? I don't care. John's not going to like it, but everyone else doesn't like. Instead, what they've done now is they have 6 ,000 of their 60 ,000 employees are part of like kind of a, almost like a council where they can just say, this is what we're planning on doing. And they had huge changes planned. And the 6 ,000 people said, no, I don't think we're going to like that.
15:15Al Elliott:It's too overwhelming, all this change. So they rolled it back and said, right, we're doing it in phases. Jen says, and I quote, we've even shelled ideas when they've not met the reality of what our colleagues really care about. And that's great because we're listening and experimenting before rolling out the change and investing too much of our time. Lee, thoughts so far? I'm loving the giving value add time back. I've seen that work really, really well in organizations, both in terms of providing a more manageable workload and also allowing people the time to focus on more value add activities, like innovation research, blah, blah, blah.
15:51And I think that's the biggest thing when I speak to a business owner and I say, you know, unsurprisingly, John, the workload is come back as a bit too high in your organization and they're like yeah what do you want me to do about that I might understand but what I want you to do about it is how can you find efficiencies automations like you say it's those administrative tasks that just annoying and particularly now there's no excuse look at AI you know there's loads that you can do so I love that very much appreciate that I'm very I'm very impressed with the um the level of consultation they're going through with employees I think that's a fine balance because you don't want to put everything out to a committee that will kind of you know stall some progress potentially um so i think that needs to come with kind of guidelines of what those things are very interesting how this is all going to shake out in a very heavily regulated industry in terms of making mistakes and fails and i'm sure i'm sure there's some very clear boundaries around that so they're not breaking
16:45Al Elliott:any rules yeah she did actually say um and i've not got the full article in front of me but you can go to the show notes click on it and you can read it at one point she said we started off by putting in a load of guardrails. And I'm guessing, that sounded to me like really boring talk. But now you've said it, I'm guessing that was to ensure that the experiments didn't bring down, you know, probably John wants this to happen, but didn't bring down the UK financial institutions. Yeah, no, I applaud it. Interesting how it'll work out. Be very interested to see how, what employees would say about it.
17:14But from what you said, it sounds pretty cool. And I'm fairly impressed, not Wes.
17:20Al Elliott:I'm glad you said that because I haven't told you this, but I'm going to try and get Jen. Jen on the pod. Oh, we like Jen. Yeah, I was hoping that you wouldn't go, well, she's made a right mess of this. And I'd be like, oh, no. Awkward. No, no, no, I think Jen's got some cool ideas. So if you're listening to this, Jen, we want you. Okay, my love, what have you seen this week? I've seen some research, and you know how I like my research out. You love a bit of research. Honestly, when Ian goes to bed, she'll just sit there and read research. You can imagine her with a little nightgap, little half-moon glasses, and like a big journal in front of her.
17:52Al Elliott:It'll be something called like the Journal of Psychological Safety Practices in the UK. That's a point. Yes, that's exactly what I do. That's exactly what I do. So if like John, you feel like you're in a dead end job, that was a completely unintentional segue. We didn't make up John until like three minutes ago. I didn't know John existed until I started saying his name. I started giving his attributes. No, no. So anyway, this was research that suggested that people who are hitting a career plateau are more likely to slack off, bend the rules and even mistreat others at work. Not because they're lazy or me, but because being stuck changes how they see themselves.
18:36Al Elliott:I'm liking the way you say plateau. Plateau. I like it. Yeah, so I think there's a lot of people who are in jobs at the minute that they're not particularly happy with, particularly given the current climate. and I understand it you know you feel lucky enough to have a job and have that that wage coming in when you're seeing these thousands and thousands of redundancies happen equally maybe you need to be mindful that this might have a detrimental impact on your professional reputation but also potentially your own psychology your own identity your own opinion of yourself and that's important so this research anyway it's quite good decent sample as well 450 employees um they looked at how career plateau um so that feeling if you're not sure what i mean by that i think you stopped advanced advancing stop growing you're just a bit stagnant languishing i think it's been called as well um so yeah they looked at career plateau and how it affects behavior work so they tracked three different types of what they define as bad behavior uh withdrawal so disengaging skipping meetings putting in minimal effort deviance breaking rules or behaving unethically so i thought you said deviance as in like you're a bit of a deviant you and you're a sexual deviant deviance i'm sorry sorry carry on yeah um incivility being rude dismissive or disrespectful um and then they also measured employees self-control and ego depletion which is a sense of having no psychological resources left to manage stress or resist impulses quite interesting isn't it like how these behaviors show up and particularly in this lens anyway these are some of the the results that stood up stood out and i thought really interesting um so feeling stuck did trigger bad behavior so employees who felt they were in dead-end jobs were more likely to act out not in dramatic ways but in everyday disagreement passive aggression and bending the norms and i think that's very typical as well in terms of that kind of rust out burnout isn't it that disengagement from from work when you're not feeling it um ego depletion um explained why so the link wasn't just emotional feeling plateaued drained people's mental energy and left them less capable to regulate their own behavior which makes sense and they did find that self-control buffered the effects so employees with higher baseline self-control were less affected but still felt stuck um they were able though however to resist those more um negative um impulses and behaviors um and also what i thought was really interesting is the behavior was reactive not premeditated so it's not like you're sitting there and i think there's always the argument quiet quitting wasn't it like i'm making an intentional you know choice to not do anything and i don't think for the majority of people that is necessarily the case I think it's more that it's people just running out of fuel they're running out of out of cares I don't stop myself but yes um so yeah so it's not really a rebellion people just kind of like meh um but I think the key thing um in that as an individual is recognizing that if you are starting to lash out and and enact these bad behaviors it could actually start to to really impact your reputation at work and just how you feel about yourself you don't want to be an old you you know you don't nobody wants to be few people want to be and in terms of an organization why does this matter i think this is a real key sign that rather than kind of seeing people who are showing these signs of maybe quite quitting or elements of incivility is maybe thinking am i pushing them enough am i challenging them enough are they in the right role is the things i could do around what we call job crafting to um to enrich that role and give them more meaningful work.
22:22I think there's things we can do as leaders to fix it while I go, oh, well, if you don't want to forgive 110 % to my organisation, like the Brewdog fella, there's things that we can do that means you're not going to have the disruption and the cost of actually losing a member of staff. I thought it was interesting, Al, was it?
22:39Al Elliott:Yes, yes, it was. In the end, it was. No, no, actually, it was. It was. I think, to be fair, I think anyone who's been in the workforce for like five years plus will have felt plateauing at some point and it's just like you say it's demoralizing because you wake up you're like what's the point yeah because i go in there i do my job and nothing happens like that because famous like friends line uh chandler says well i don't go in there and do my get to work early nothing's gonna happen it's like that isn't it so so i think we're um yeah yeah plateauing if you're do you know what this would be an interesting episode to do it on we're happy to do it anonymously if you're listening and you are plateauing we are happy to do it anonymously or if you have experienced the past and you're willing to talk about it the opposite of anonymously which is anonymously i'm guessing um then then get in touch because that will be an interesting episode to do in the in the autumn i think yeah and i think i think that's where we're going to see a lot of um a lot more movement actually in terms of yeah in terms of people resigning well we think we talked about didn't we it's kind of that august is the peak months in the uk i know the phrase you call it temporal milestones is that right landmark landmarks yeah yeah exactly yeah different to prone tempura yeah so i think that's i think we're going to see the resignations in august and a lot of activity in terms of movement in in the autumn um so yeah but you can stop this business owners if you're seeing people who are being a bit a bit naggy who aren't particularly happy who aren't maybe giving everything rather than just assume that they're the problem maybe think about how you could offer these type of stretch opportunities or even just check in and see how they're doing is always just a nice start, isn't it?
24:15Yeah, it doesn't need to escalate is what I'm saying. Pick up on these behavioural cues and you might actually, yeah, prevent people from leaving in the autumn.
24:24Al Elliott:Which is what I suppose you want to do unless it's John, in which case you want to encourage John out the door as soon as you possibly can. Talking and getting out the door, we're going to have a very, very quick break and we're back with a hot take from a guy who I've only met him once and I feel like he's my best mate. I really like him, Matt. Yeah, I really like Matt. as we're back with a hot take. And then we've also got the World Family's Weekly Workplace. So if you're right, put your questions to the end. Don't go anywhere. Don't go anywhere. Don't go anywhere. Welcome to the break. Yes, my favourite part of the show.
24:49Al Elliott:These two idiots have stopped talking. Yes, I want to tell you about my new favourite podcast. No, that's a lie. It's my old favourite podcast. I've been on this one for a while. Didn't know where that was going. Didn't know where that was going. It is called I Digress. It is hosted by Troy Sandidge and it is brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals. Yes, it's got shows that are under 30 minutes and I digress helps eliminate complexity complications and confusion in your business with frameworks and strategies that achieve scalable and sustainable success at least that's what it says here and if you do want to hear a really personal story go to episode 136 this is Troy's honest account of fatherhood killing hustle culture and what really matters when you stop performing and start living with intention listen to I digress wherever you get your podcasts that concludes the break let's return to the scheduled programming back to the studio.
25:44Al Elliott:Welcome back. Welcome back. It's time for our hot take, which as you know, is where we bring a guest in to challenge the way we think about work. And today we are asking an important question. Are wellbeing leaders held to a higher standard than everyone else? Yeah, it's a really interesting one. And this is coming from Matt Smead, who is a business psychologist and two times named HR Influence Voice of the Year. Yeah, apparently. HR Influential Voice. Yeah, I've been told something and I can't tell you. No, you can't. I checked with Matt and we can't. I can't tell you. No, no. There is something coming.
Read the full transcript
26:16So Matt is obviously a very engaging person and a very influential person in the world of HR.
26:20Al Elliott:Or he pays a lot of bribes. Indeed, all three things can be true. Matt is also the co-founder of Working Well Community. He works with organisations to design better, more evidence-based approaches to well-being. Hurrah! But today he is calling out the perfectionism that is creeping into the field. So Matt's here to ask what that pressure we're all putting on these leaders about well-being is actually doing to the profession and whether it's time we'll add a little bit more trust and a lot more experimentation. Let's go meet Matt. My name is Matt Sweed. I'm a business psychologist and I am the co-founder of the Working Well community and two times HR's most influential thinker.
27:00Al Elliott:So hit me, what is your hot take? My hot take is that wellbeing leaders, people who are responsible for wellbeing within organisations, hold themselves to too high a standard. So I'm going to unpick that a little bit. So I want to preface it all by saying that I'm a huge advocate of things like evidence-based practice. And I don't want people out there doing a crap job and adding no value within their organisation. So I'll just preface all this by saying that. And actually, we'll probably go on to this, but is there a risk that sometimes this whole space turns into the Wild West? Perhaps. And I think we should talk about that at some point.
27:35But if we talk about a lot of the well-being leaders that I meet and I come across, there's sometimes a feeling that they need to present a watertight, bulletproof business case, evidence base for every little thing that they do in a way that I don't see in other industries. You know, so for example, I go into organizations and they're constantly moaning about this new IT system that they've implemented. And you think to yourself, was a business case presented around that IT system? Did they consult with the employees before they did it? Did they properly talk it through as a board before they implemented it?
28:10Probably not. They probably just did it because it's IT and we need to keep up and it's a core part of the business. So therefore, we're just going to do it right. whereas if it's a well-being intervention even something seemingly really really small it has to go through all these loops they've got to fight for the budget they've got and i almost wonder i don't necessarily know what that means in terms of um how we how we switch that because i don't just want well-being spend being you know being agreed at the drop of a hat but i feel like there's a pressure for well-being leaders within organizations so there's a desire for a legitimacy so perhaps they they overcompensate to be taken seriously i see that um there's a scrutiny and skepticism on that area of work that i don't see in areas like sales or marketing or it or whatever it may be well-being initiatives are seen as optional rather than core part um maybe the fact that well-being professionals are so deeply passionate about their job means that they hold themselves to such a high standard they're perfectionists almost i like that i think
29:19Al Elliott:most people would expect someone in your position to go well you need to really think it through you can't do this this is about people you know you've got to be careful but you're saying no people do overthink it is that have i got that right um to a certain extent yeah do you know the other thing that comes into my head and this is an even hotter take is is it is it affected by the gender demographic of people who work in that industry which is primarily female rather than male. And you'll have seen these studies that have come out, and I'm sure Leanne's talked to you about these, where, you know, you look at how men and women apply for jobs, and women want to be able to tick like 80 % of the things on the job description, whereas men, it's like 20%, you know, oh, I can do those two things, so I'll just apply for it, you never know, it'll be fine.
30:03And I do wonder sometimes whether you get a lot more females comparatively working in the world of well-being, but I'd also broaden it out to people functions, you know, HR more broadly. um and whether that contributes to them feeling that they need to you know have ticked every single box whereas in a maybe a sales role or as i say it sounds like i'm having to go it or operational roles maybe you get a bit a few more men who it's yeah this is the right thing to do of course it is you know and it's pure pure ego we're saying that we're potentially over well
30:36Al Elliott:that people are implementing it could have the potential to overthink it or need to provide a business case. So let's imagine it's a dream scenario. So you can pick the organization, IBM, someone we've heard of. You're going in to help them implement something decent around well-being. How much business case do you need to put together? How would you approach implementing something like that in a larger organization? Well, so I think the dream case scenario for me would be that you're working with an organization that are already bought into this stuff, you know, who already view wellbeing as not just a nice thing to have, but as a fundamental aspect of the way that the organisation works.
31:14So therefore, absolutely, you know, if you want to put a specific intervention into place, again, I'm a huge advocate actually of evidence-based practice and collecting data and, fancy word, but participative design. So basically talking to employees so that they have a voice in what you're creating, not just sitting with the board or the exec team in a dark room and working out what people need. So I would do it in a very consultative, very participative way from the bottom up, if possible. I would collect the data. You'd think about piloting it, all that sort of stuff. But that's all in the context of the organization pretty much being brought into well-being being a good thing to do, full stop.
31:55You know, this wouldn't be, it's not competitive. It's not, I need to reach a certain threshold where now I'm suddenly allowed to try something out. because I sometimes worry that that's a risk with some of this stuff, that if we hold ourselves to too high a standard where we feel like everything needs to be perfect, does that lead to a lack of experimentation? Does that lack of just trying something out to see if it works? I was recording a live stream the other day and I was trying to use the analogy, which I'll try and butcher again today, of likening this to almost what I was looking at was the environmental movement, right?
32:33So how do we reduce climate change? And it's very interesting that obviously, well, I was about to say everyone believes that it's an issue. I'm not sure everybody believes it's an issue. It seems to be the majority of people think we need to do something about it. So that's a given. Now, what that thing is, we haven't necessarily worked out. So the example I was using was plastic bags. So in the UK, certainly we use far fewer plastic bags. You have to pay 510p for them or 30p in Marks and Spencers. and we're replacing those. And that seems to have been a really positive thing. That's something that seems to have created large-scale cultural change.
33:08People don't use plastic bags as much as they used to. Great. The other one that I used as an example, though, is plastic straws, moving to paper straws. Now, I don't know if you've used a paper straw, but they're absolutely useless. They're absolutely useless. And I get to the point where I'm like, that's just not the thing. That's not the thing. I don't think paper straws are going to save us from the next apocalypse rather than plastic straws. but back to my experimentation point i think that it's good that we tried it i think it was good that we tried to tried something like that what then is interesting and this is where the plastic straws analogy kind of falls down a little bit is sometimes it's then difficult to roll it back you know so so can you imagine the uk government coming out and saying right we're banning paper straws now we're bringing plastic back like that would go down very very poorly so if you give all this back to the organizational context I want practitioners and organizations to be able to try stuff out without necessarily perfectly knowing the impact it's going to have on their workforce to try it out because you might find the next plastic bag but if you find the next paper straws maybe you need the flexibility again to kind of roll that back without that then being seen as a failure because that in itself and this is where all the cycle comes in is then held against the well-being professionals well you brought that in it didn't work so therefore your job's useless and it's like well no why am I always constantly having to prove myself in this an IT system might be implemented it might be a complete disaster they don't abolish IT and say right we're not using computers now because that last IT system didn't work they go that wasn't the one let's find let's find one that does work that was the awesome Matt Smead I told you he was great You can see now why he's the, yeah, what is it?
34:53The voice of, influential HR voice of the year.
34:56Al Elliott:Most important person in psychology ever. Right. I think was what he got. He got it twice. Two years running. Two years running. Yeah, yeah. It's like the Nobel Peace Prize for the psychologists. Yeah. I mean, I'm not offended at all that I haven't even nominated, but whatever. I've nominated you. Did you? No, I'm going to though. Well, I'm not sure now. Anyway, not quite the same, is it? um well do you know what i really liked it and i think what was what i really liked we talked about a bit on this episode as well actually with the nat west thing is allowing in time for that experimentation i understand when things are pressured it can be really hard to to feel as a business owner that's an important thing to to do but really that's where people feel creative that typically work that gives us energy doesn't suck our energy away and ultimately way there's going to be ideas that will change the the organization in terms of its operations or the products it offers or the customers it serves um innovation is what keeps businesses moving forward so i like that um and and reminding ourselves that as scientists we too can be creative yeah and also he makes a really good point about rolling out an it system and you go well just roll it out if it doesn't work you go back and you change bits and pieces whereas you need to have like this sort of 12 page business case for rolling out something to do with people well i tell you there's one function in in in most businesses where they deal with people and they don't have even they experiment every single day and that's marketing and so like in marketing you don't sit down and go well let's do a case i'm going to a business case for running this particular ad with this particular headline all you do is you run the ad and you see if it works now i'm not saying you necessarily do that with your people but again be more gen on from nat west maybe say look this is what we're planning on rolling out what are your thoughts because let's be honest in terms of business case if you're having to prove a solid business case with an roi to some nerd who's got a calculator going excuse me how much will this cost you're probably not going to make a huge amount of inroads in that organization anyway but if you are worried about what the impact's going to be we'll just go and ask your people here we are here's our plan this is what we're thinking of doing what what's good about this what's bad about it and if you've got psychological safety then they'll come back to you and they will give you their opinion like they did in that west yeah and it's tough isn't it and i can i can understand i understand why organizations thinking that way you know being brutal marketing is a revenue generating function well-being is a cost function yeah in in the most strict commercial terms i think it actually is it's a money saving um function because you're keeping your people engaged you're keeping them well you're keeping them healthy you're keeping them productive and performing at the highest level that's really difficult to measure in a tangible way that a business owner or senior leader is going to buy into easily so I can see why well-being practitioners is a need to overcompensate a little bit in building that business case and I think ultimately it comes down to leadership as Matt said doesn't it you know those organizations that are already bought into it like NatWest for example so yeah it's a really really tricky one a really tricky one but I think I think it ultimately comes down to there are some businesses in the world that see well-being as a nice to have and there are other businesses in the world that see it as a fundamental part of their operations and their organizational success and performance and i think maybe where we're wasting our energy as well-being practitioners is trying to convince the ones that just aren't that interested well said well said if you want to go and follow matt which you should jump onto linkedin he's got it he's the one the yellow banner and the best profile picture in the world you've got to go and just go and look for him s-m-e-e-d go and look for matt because he's got a great profile picture and also go and look at um it is workingwell.community is his website um i think from what i understood it's totally free you join and you get loads of really good stuff now we are launching something similar i did mention that to matt so we're not copying him um but it sounds like yeah just go go enjoy working well and then we will launch our thing join ours as well and then you can tell us which one is better yeah matt also has a podcast um but didn't copy us you're allowed to do similar things there You can be competitors and colleagues at the same time.
39:05Al Elliott:The two can be possible. Yeah. So I'll leave a link to Matt's podcast in the show notes as well. Fabulous. It's time for my favourite time of the week, which is the World Famous Weekly Workplace Surgery, where I put your questions to Leanne. Leanne is a chartered occupational psychologist. She's an expert in work, the world of work. And I don't think we've ever had a letter that stumped you. There's a couple which have shocked you. I don't think we've ever had a letter. I'm so old. I'm so old. I remember back in the day, Saturday morning, TV, and it was brilliant because you sit down and they'd have a big sack of letters.
39:35Al Elliott:They'd pull them out and open them and go, this one is from John, who wants to grow up to be a banker. Okay, so question number one, Leanne. Do investors care about culture? And if so, how do you prove it matters? Hi, Alan Leanne. I'm preparing for our first round. Most of our focus has been on the usual SaaS metrics, MRR, monthly revenue, monthly recurring revenue churn growth rate all of that but i keep coming back to our team this is nice this is nice so far i hope it turns out nice we've worked hard to build a place where people want to stay turnover is low morale is good culture wise we're in a strong spot it feels like a real asset but i've no idea how to show that to investors in a way they'll actually value do investors really care about culture and if they do how are you meant to measure it in a way that resonates so i understood this that basically he wants to put a number on his culture so he can go on the balance sheet yeah got it lee what are your thoughts excellent question yes really good question um and yes you absolutely can prove um in metrics what your your culture is saying and doing um i think i think investors are getting increasingly interested in this and i know when we have spoken to some investors um through the podcast they are absolutely interested in in that type i think it was sarah chan spellings from billion dollar moves who always looks at that when she's um makes decisions around vc funding i think yeah particularly in the current climate that we're in and and yeah the way the world of work is going I think it is it is important and also just from a risk perspective you know if you're going to invest in a business and then 60 70 % of the team leaves and that could be your IP that could be what you paid for there's all sorts of considerations in terms of how you do it there's a really useful scorecard that was developed in a book about well-being actually all this is crossed over culture well-being employee engagement all crossed over um so it's Sheena Johnson Kerry Cooper and Ivan Robinson wrote this book on well-being love it really good very practical um i would show you but i don't have it with me um but it has a scorecard in there that breaks it down to basically four different areas that you can look at that will be um give an indication of how healthy your culture is or how how um how well it's working um so i'll i can leave a link to the book in in the show notes but it's things like you look at business and financial indicators that's the first category so that's things like sickness rates, retention rates, the cost of having to use agency staff, the number of ill health retirement, stress-related referrals to occupational health, all that type of thing.
42:05Then you've got internal process indicators so that's things like stress levels, levels of work-life balance and your stress risk assessments that's either going to be your HSC risk assessment management standards that you should be doing annually anyway as a UK business or a more sophisticated employee engagement and well-being survey like mine will also give you all this data as well so everything around kind of engagement quality of management leadership all that stuff you can be able to show through metrics as well and then also you can get quality indicators so that's things like customer satisfaction levels that's reflecting of you know how good your staff are service quality the number of complaints and then you also have things like engagement in training and in development so how people how many people have signed up for certain interventions or training feedback from those things and level innovation that you have if you have that that what NatWest is doing in terms of that ideation time how engaged people are with that and what's been produced from that is a really good indicator as well um so they're the kind of the four main areas um and as you can see there's lots of different metrics that you'll already actually be generating in your business or be able to put your hands on within your business that you can show to demonstrate how your culture is currently functioning functioning and how it's impacting the business the only one you might need to invest in is some kind of employee insights um which you can either do free with the hse or with people like me
43:39Al Elliott:excellent answer lee and um yeah that book if anything is if anything's by sir carrie cooper then then it's going to be good although he has written over 200 books um where did he get the time um oh and fun fact a little bit of link back because his his company was consultancy robertson cooper um was where matt used to work yes yes nice nice little loop there yeah very good i should say the lead writer on that book is actually sheena johnson um who was my lecturer at manchester to business school really yeah she's awesome why is she not on the pod oh well she will be there we go so i'll go after nat west and you go after shana yeah there's something about goodwill now it's funny goodwill has been measured on balance sheets for quite a long time now and it's basically you know how likely it's a little intangible it's probably quite a lot intangible but perhaps when that first came people were a bit like oh i'm not sure about measuring goodwill but actually now it's kind of a standard thing that's what goes on your balance sheet so just fast forward five ten years and you're going to have employee goodwill.
44:37Al Elliott:There'll be probably a really fancy name for it. Maybe you should come up with it and it'll be known as the Elliott test or something. Well, it's a bit like discretionary effort, extra role effort, as the Americans call it. Basically, how willing somebody is to go the extra mile is a really good indicator of how engaged your staff is. And again, a good employee engagement survey like mine will measure such things. Okay, on to question number two, Lee. Should I tell my boss I'm burnt out or should I just push through and hope it gets better? I've been in a leadership role for about seven months, managing a team of 11 in a company of around 70.
45:07Al Elliott:The first few months were intense, constant firefighting, fixing broken processes, trying to hold things together. Things are more stable now, but I'm running on empty. I'm showing up, I'm getting things done, but the spark has gone. My head's foggy, I can't switch off properly, and I'm starting to worry what this might be doing to me in the long term. Now, this isn't the first time either. I've ended up being the fixer in a few different roles, always stepping into chaos, and I think that finally it's all caught up with so do i open up to senior leadership about how i'm feeling or keep pushing and hope i bounce back little psc i worry that being honest could change how i'm perceived but staying silent feels risky too lee oh this poor poor person conundrum i think at this point without a significant change in in the way that you're working um or the way that you're managing your your life and work together i don't think there's much of a scenario where you're just going to bounce back and this will be fine um it sounds like you're in early stages of burnout um and without some fairly significant changes that typically continues to escalate and i think what what sounds absolutely sure is it isn't necessarily this organization is is to blame it sounds like this has just been compounded over roll and roll and roll if you're a fixer um if you work in in transformation and again very common when you touch um such levels of change and ambiguity and the emotional load that comes with that as well not just the actual workload um is is exhausting and it sounds like you're exhausted which is one of the the three main symptoms of burnout the second being disengagement which it sounds like you're also doing as well in terms of kind of going through the motions and doing the bare minimum in terms of whether you should tell your leaders i really i really can't answer that confidently without knowing more about the organization the relationships you have with your leadership i want to say of course yes of course you should speak to your leaders that should be the first people you go to to understand what your options are either in terms of of taking some leave or reducing your work hours down or being put on a different project that isn't as as um as transformative that said if your leaders aren't supportive in that way then it could impact your reputation it could impact your longevity in that organization i'm not saying it's right not it's not it's not right no i'm not saying it's right and it's not okay um but yeah there are more sadly more bad leaders in the world than there are good ones as we've heard over the last few weeks um so i would say prioritize yourself for the moment and what you can do within the boundaries of the organization to start to rebuild some of that resilience so i think in terms of um the work that you're doing is it is that stability going to continue is that what your predictable role is now going to be because that's good and over time um you'll start to regain that energy back um and start to want to invest it in in your role again can you um yeah take some time off whether it be some um annual leave whether it be um a few long weekends um whatever it is it sounds like you need to detach from work in a very literal way um to allow some rest and recovery time and I think finally it's looking at other things you can do to build your levels of individual resilience so things like setting those clear boundaries between work and life making sure you're investing time on things that will build energy so connections your friends your family doing things outside of work staying active is really helpful eating well is really helpful getting enough sleep is really helpful all of those things that are going to help so long as you're in a position where you can control your organization environment to an extent where it's not as chaotic it's not as change heavy you've got the support of your team around you you've got the support of your leadership in terms of the work that you're doing there's no incivility there you know it's not that this is a toxic work environment it's just been a chaotic work environment and now that that busy level has returned to something more sustainable you will know if you can trust your leaders I appreciate it's only been seven months but I think you'll have a feeling my feeling is for you to ask the question you have some doubts um but maybe have a think if there's somebody you can speak to whether it may be somebody in HR or another manager who maybe you don't directly report to or even a colleague within the organization around you know how does what's the general um you know efforts around mental health and well-being here and maybe get a sense sense for that um but i think i'd start by looking at what you can control um and then continue to reflect and explore um leadership and and how they might respond to this and if you if you feel that they will be if you're getting all those clues it'll be a positive conversation i would absolutely have it yeah good advice and i think i i mean the two key questions are is that what do i do and do i tell the uh do i tell my bosses um i think leanne's explained exactly what you should do that's again and also go back and listen to so many of our episodes on burnout we've got sally clark is it was she on burnout one recently about kate donovan donovan um yep all of those so yeah go back and listen to those um secondly a little bit of a tip i would well not a tip maybe more i would do in your situation is because you're a manager i would go to whoever you were going to go and speak to about this problem and say, hey, look, I just want a bit of a guidance.
50:25Al Elliott:No one said this, but if someone comes to me and says they're starting to feel a bit burnt out, they just don't feel themselves, basically describe your situation. You know, what should I be saying to them? Should I be helping them? Should I be like, is this a performance management thing? And then you're going to sneakily find out, I think, how your boss and your boss's bosses think about this kind of thing. Yeah, that's a really good idea. It's that fact gathering, isn't it? Getting that more information to understand the level of psychological safety that you have, the level of commitment the organisation has to well-being.
50:52That's a really good idea. I like that.
50:54Al Elliott:Thank you. Thank you. See, once a year, I bring a really good idea. Oh, it's more than that. Once a month. Less than that. Yeah. Okay, on to question number three. I've been asked to gather peer feedback, but why would anyone open up to me? My managers ask me to speak to my teammates and gather feedback on our team culture and work environment, basically to act as a go-between. him i'm not in hr i'm not particularly close to anyone and honestly it really feels awkward people seem confused about why i'm even doing it now he says he's ruled out i'm guessing this is the manager manager he's ruled out an anonymous survey and wants it done quickly but i don't think i'm the right person for it should i give it a go and hope for the best or push back on doing it at all that's a tough one yeah so he's so the manager has said he doesn't want to do an anonymous survey this person's got to go individually to the people and go what's wrong with the culture can i write this down and put your name against it and take it back to my boss oh this is this is not the way to do it this is not the way to do it and nobody is going to be honest and give you any useful data um equally not your circus not your monkeys my friend um this is just all about appeasing your boss at this point isn't it um i'd be more tempted to kind of you know have this conversation of like probably with your so is he the supervisor or just his teammates just his teammates teammates he describes him as this person this right in fact he doesn't have to say it doesn't have the gender so my manager asked me to speak to my teammates i would be inclined to go to a teammate that you're closest to and i said you're not super close i'm gonna go to a teammate you're closest to and kind of go look this is what i've been asked to do i i don't think it's going to be particularly effective and i don't you know i may probably don't feel safe myself being very giving very honest feedback in this type of public scenario unless everyone actually loves the culture the tone of it i'm guessing there are some issues there yeah i'm not sure why this would be a question a problem of everything with rosie um so kind of having that honest conversation with with one of your colleagues and kind of going this is what i'm thinking we just kind of sit down together and do a bit of a SWOT analysis because i think a SWOT analysis is for something that's fairly fairly neutral and well known to managers and yeah can be can be put together in a way that you can provide some indications of what's happening and where things need to be fixed but probably in a bit more of a commercial business process kind of way if you've not heard of SWOT analysis it stands for strengths weaknesses opportunities threats and it's like a matrix yeah so it could be things like right what do we think the strengths are the organization right now or the team or how we work together and I see that a lot in surveys that I do is that people really aren't getting on with senior leadership but they found these little these little safe havens within their team where everything is really nice it might be that you have that so yeah what are the strengths what are the weaknesses I would focus on process I would focus on things that are very transactional rather than the leadership behavior I'm not saying this is going to be effective in any way it won't be but this is just about protecting yourself and appeasing your manager because he's just thrown you under the bus essentially um so weaknesses i would focus on very transactional process-led things opportunities is maybe your um your opportunities to actually provide feedback that might be useful so for example if the it system you're working with is really annoying and clunky and causing extra time there could be an opportunity to upgrade your id systems to better serve customers or to introduce new product that people keep asking about um that could actually be the opportunity section the chance we actually can provide some some feedback and threats as well um it's always useful i think typical typically business owners are interested in that if there's things that you've heard from competitors or things that are going on or things in the market um ai was an obvious one it's both a threat and an opportunity um i'd maybe focus on that so it sounds like your manager as well it sounds like he's been asked to do this by a senior leader i was just gonna say this it sounds like he's been asked to do it doesn't really believe in it when i'll just give it to someone yeah so i think you want to give your manager something back that's useful and will make him look fairly competent in front of his senior leaders um and actually i think it'll be something that that might might be easy enough for you to put together with with some of your colleagues i think then it's also making it very clear that you know this isn't something you felt entirely comfortable with it's not within your wheelhouse and you're more than happy to support with this type of thing again the future but you'd want to speak to somebody who does have some expertise around that either in terms of HR or organizational psychology.
55:21I think it's fair to kind of go, you know, I think if we're going to do this, I'm not the right person to do it. But, you know, hopefully this time provides you enough to, with what you need. But yeah, protect yourself.
55:33Al Elliott:Yeah, there's a couple of things. There's three things I thought of when you were talking. The first one was, which you mentioned before, is that this is a phone in. The manager's not taking it very seriously. So don't stress too much because it's a box ticking exercise. They want to go back to their boss and go, yeah, I've done that. Secondly, if you do want to do it properly or as properly as you possibly can, go and find someone in the team who's like outgoing, who's like the team favorite. Everyone loves them. Go to them and just say, can I borrow you for a minute? Look, I've been asked to do this.
56:01Al Elliott:Everyone loves you. Whereas I'm like, you know, I'm just like the wallflower. I sit at the back and don't really do anything. How would you approach this if you were given this task? And I bet they'll be like, look, I'll go and have a word with the guys. Don't worry. We'll do something. still be careful about taking negative feedback particularly about the manager because if they've been asked to do it the last thing they want is information about them or the third option is a little bit sneaky but you could you could just go back to the manager without speaking to anyone go yeah I've spoken to a few people and basically they want anonymous surveys that's the feedback and then you just go right we want anonymous survey so then you go no one will really talk to me and they go well what did you say well I said we're doing this and no one really talked to me they want anonymous surveys oh god we're having to do anonymous surveys and they'll go well luckily i listened to a podcast episode the other day where leanne does anonymous surveys so uh yeah go in touch with her and buy that well you can look at the hse management standard survey or you can buy one from leanne um if he doesn't want to do an anonymous survey doesn't mean that that you couldn't oh good point um yeah it's all just it's all just lip service really isn't it it's not going to provide any useful data at all which is why i'm thinking the swot analysis might at least be something productive and useful i don't think yeah anything around sentiment or employee attitudes is really what this manager is looking for or cares about um so if you're going to take the time to go through this exercise and your colleagues are as well i i just think something like that might might make it somewhat useful yeah totally agree if you've got your if you've got any questions you want to put to leanne then uh check out our show notes because there's links in there where you can submit your question i believe that's the end of the episode uh join Join us next week for another This Week in Work on every Tuesday, as there will be, but there might not be soon because we're going to change things around for summer, but we'll talk about that in a second.
57:46Al Elliott:Leigh, what's going on Thursday? We are joined again by another expert guest. This week, we are talking to someone who is leading a team of bona fide geniuses. Genie-eye? Geniuses. And we're going to get a masterclass on how to recruit and manage people who are smarter than you. Not you, than Wand. And maybe you. How? No smarter than Al. It's not on me yet. Okay, well, thanks very much. If you've enjoyed this, then leave us a review, please, because that really helps us. Also, if you haven't enjoyed this, then send us an email and tell us why you didn't enjoy it because we do want to make it better.
58:18Al Elliott:If you just genuinely don't like British people with stupid sense of humour, then this probably isn't a guest for you. I'm not sure you've got this far. No, I don't think you would. It'd be interesting anyway. We'll see you next week. Bye. Bye-bye.
58:37Al Elliott:I've said they've ditched top-down performative... Don't know what that means. I've just made that word up. The award-winning podcast where behavioural science meets work... And today's is all about leaders and specifically don't know what I'm talking about. It's to gather peer feedback, but why would anyone open up to me? I made a mess of that.
From the publisher
Welcome back to Truth, Lies & Work, the award-winning podcast where behavioural science meets workplace culture — brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals.
Hosted by Chartered Occupational Psychologist Leanne Elliott and business owner Al Elliott, this is your Tuesday news round-up, workplace surgery, and expert take — all in one.
🔥 Stories Covered
📌 1. BrewDog says it’s all about wellbeing nowAfter years of scandal and staff walkouts, BrewDog is trying to clean up its act — training 200 mental health first aiders and rolling out a new leadership charter. But are we buying it? And what does real culture change actually look like?
📰 Source: https://www.thetimes.com/uk/scotland/article/brewdog-leaves-punk-era-behind-to-focus-on-staff-wellbeing-d03xht2rx
📌 2. NatWest starts thinking like a tech companyFrom giving back nearly half a million staff hours to killing off bad ideas fast, NatWest’s COO is leading a culture shift inside one of the UK’s biggest banks. Is this the future of large-scale transformation?
📰 Source: https://www.strategy-business.com/article/The-new-way-NatWest-Group-is-making-work-better
📌 3. Stuck employees act out — and here’s the science behind itNew research finds that career plateaus don’t just hurt motivation — they drain people’s mental energy and make them more likely to break rules, disengage, or behave badly. Not because they’re unprofessional… but because they’re burned out and stuck.
📄 Study: Zhao, Chen & Xie (2025), Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
🔗 https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12532
🔗 Follow-up: https://medium.com/@truthlieswork/stuck-in-a-dead-end-job-youre-more-likely-to-lash-out-2de4f22ccdca
🔥 Hot Take: Matt Smeed on Why Wellbeing Leaders Are Held to Impossible Standards
Matt Smeed — Business Psychologist and co-founder of the Working Well Community — joins us to ask a simple question: why do wellbeing leaders have to be perfect?
Other departments are allowed to try, fail and iterate. But when it comes to wellbeing, the bar’s sky-high. Matt argues it’s time to ditch the perfectionism and make space for progress.
More from Matt Smeed:🌐 Website: www.workingwell.community🔗 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/matt-smeed-b6033922/
👨💼 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@workingwellcommunity
💬 Workplace Surgery
❓ Do investors care about culture — and how do you prove it?A founder gearing up for their first funding round wants to show off their strong team culture. But will investors actually value it — and how do you make it measurable?
❓ Should I tell my boss I’m burnt out — or just push through?They’ve been the fixer, the firefighter, the one who holds it all together. Now they’re running on empty. But will honesty help… or backfire?
❓ I’ve been asked to gather peer feedback — but no one wants to talk to meTheir boss wants them to be the “culture go-between.” They feel awkward, underqualified, and unsure how to do it. Is it OK to push back?
🎧 Enjoying the show?Follow, share, and leave us a review wherever you listen — and don’t forget to join us Thursday for a masterclass in managing people who are smarter than you (yes, really).
🧠 Support with Mental Health and Well-being
Mind UK: https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/Samaritans (UK): Call 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org
📬 Connect with Al & Leanne
LinkedIn (Show): https://www.linkedin.com/company/truth-lies-and-work/Al Elliott: https://www.linkedin.com/in/thisisalelliottLeanne Elliott: https://www.linkedin.com/in/meetleanneEmail: hello@truthliesandwork.comBook a call: https://savvycal.com/meetleanne/chat
