In short
Performative empathy (“empath-splaining”) in leadership; a Silicon Valley overemployment scam; leader word-action misalignment and its impact on trust; pay transparency as a cultural trust issue; workplace surgery on hiring a spouse and employer responsibility for employee well-being.
Guests
Rameez Kaleem, founder of 3R Strategy (pay and reward consultancy). Background: 20 years in pay and reward; advises organizations on fair, transparent pay structures and argues trust in the pay process matters more than pay amounts.
Key claims
Leaders can undermine trust by saying empathetic things while not acting (performative empathy). Overemployment can be fraud when work isn’t delivered; systems and hiring vigilance are implicated. When leaders’ actions contradict their words, employees’ trust, motivation, and performance drop—especially if misalignment seems internally driven; integrity buffers damage. Pay transparency boosts attraction and organizational justice; publish salary ranges and remove “current salary” questions to reduce inequity.
Notable examples
Soham Parekh (India) allegedly worked for 22 YC AI startups, earning ~$1M/year while barely delivering; visa/drone-crash excuses. Example of manager dismissing concerns as “too sensitive.” US/California/New York salary-range legislation; EU pay transparency directive effective June 2026.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOExploring Performative Empathy
1:41 to 7:48
Discussion on the concept of performative empathy and its implications in the workplace.
“Before we get into that thorny subject, it is time for Leanne's favourite time of the week.”
The Overemployment Scam in Silicon Valley
7:49 to 13:00
A detailed examination of a software engineer's audacious overemployment scam in Silicon Valley.
“We talked at length about Ted Lasso and how he was a great leader.”
Ethics of Multiple Employment
13:01 to 14:00
Discussion on the moral implications and logistics of working multiple jobs simultaneously.
“So yeah, I think the not delivering was a bit odd.”
The Logistics of Contract Work
14:00 to 15:09
Exploring the dynamics of contracting versus traditional employment.
Leaders' Words vs. Actions
15:09 to 21:16
Discussing the impact of leaders' misalignment between what they say and do.
Leaders' Words vs. Actions
21:20 to 21:50
Discussing the impact of leaders' misalignment between what they say and do.
“Yes, it's got shows that are under 30 minutes and I Digress helps eliminate complexity, complications and confusion in your business with frameworks and strategies that achieve scalable and sustainable success.”
Pay Transparency and Organizational Trust
21:50 to 28:00
Examining the importance of pay transparency in the workplace culture.
“It is time for our hot take where we ask, what do we do on the hot take?”
UK and EU Pay Legislation
28:00 to 28:42
Learn about the implications of the EU directive on UK pay management.
“but they have employees across Europe as well, they will have to do all of this for the European employees.”
Challenges in Pay Research
28:42 to 30:02
Understand the issues with relying on salary data from job sites.
“Because that data is the same data that employees have access to.”
Understanding Pay Transparency
30:02 to 31:05
Explore the difference between pay transparency and pay disclosure.
Show all 21 chapters
The Need for Transparency in Work
31:05 to 32:33
Discuss why employees, especially younger generations, crave transparency.
“managed in a fair and equitable way and it's not a case of it's not a binary issue of you either have it or you don't.”
Benefits of Pay Transparency
32:33 to 33:58
Discover how pay transparency can foster trust within organizations.
“And as we learned before the break in Leanne's segment, when people trust you, then they're much willing to forgive you if something doesn't quite go awry.”
Organizational Justice and Trust
33:58 to 35:19
Understand the importance of organizational justice in employee relations.
“And I think in terms of like, this is all very much steeped in research as well.”
Introducing the Weekly Workplace Surgery
35:19 to 35:38
Get ready for the weekly segment addressing listener questions.
Should You Hire Your Spouse?
35:38 to 39:41
Consider the pros and cons of hiring a spouse in a business setting.
“It's time for the world famous weekly workplace surgery where I put your questions to Leanne.”
Employer's Responsibility for Employee Well-Being
39:41 to 42:01
Explore the legal and ethical obligations of employers regarding employee well-being.
Employer Responsibility for Employee Well-being
42:01 to 47:26
Learn about the legal and moral obligations employers have regarding employee mental health.
“So yeah, you have a legal obligation to not to invest necessarily in employee well-being, but to measure the aspects of your work environment that may be causing stress.”
Assessing Team Dynamics with Personality Tests
47:26 to 51:38
Explore the pros and cons of using DISC and other personality assessments in team dynamics.
“help with team tensions or is there something better there's something better was there more There is more.”
Behavior-based Tools for Team Building
51:38 to 55:54
Discover alternative tools for team building that focus on behaviors rather than personality types.
“Things like the Hogan Personality Inventory could be quite good.”
Wrap-Up and Farewell
56:00 to 56:16
The hosts conclude the episode and encourage listeners to engage next week.
Introduction to Rameez and Employment Scam Discussion
56:25 to 56:58
The hosts introduce Rameez and set the stage for discussing a major employment scam in tech.
“So let's go and join Ramiz and we'll learn why this is not necessarily a legal or an ethical issue, but a cultural one.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Al Elliott:Coming up this week in work. How can you tell the difference between genuine care and emotional performance? This week we're asking whether modern leadership has become too good at sounding empathetic while quietly avoiding the hard stuff. And could the wildest employment scam in Silicon Valley history actually change the way we look at overworking? One engineer pocketed over a million dollars working at 22 startups and barely doing the work. So is this fraud or is the system just broken? And in the workplace surgery, should you hire your spouse into your team? No, no, a bad idea. Well, one listener wants our advice.
0:38Stay tuned for that.
0:39Al Elliott:This is Truth, Lies and Work. The award-winning podcast where behavioral science meets workplace culture. Brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals. My name is Leanne. I'm a chartered occupational psychologist. My name is Al. I'm a business owner. And together we help organizations build amazing workplace cultures. Yes, we do. and we will have all of that stuff and more just after this very short break. See you in a second. Does your experience with AI sound a little like this? You prompt for 20 minutes, the output is polished, is confident and is completely flipping useless.
1:11Al Elliott:Well, that's what happens when AI doesn't know anything about your business. But you know what does know something about your business? HubSpot. HubSpot's AI. It works with your actual customer data. Every interaction, every signal your team has generated over time. So instead of prompting and hoping, you ask once and ship it. Check out HubSpot.com, the agentic customer platform for growing businesses.
1:39Al Elliott:Welcome back. Okay, before we get into the thorny subject, I mean, I would never do it. Employ your spouse. No, no, no, no. Before we get into that thorny subject, it is time for Leanne's favourite time of the week. Yes, sorry. I thought there'd be more back and forth, chatter, chatter. No, it is. We'll go straight into it. It's my favourite time of the week. It's the newest round of Cue the Jingle Owl. There's no time for chatter this week. We've got to respect the listeners' time. They haven't got time for our bullshit. They really don't. Anyway, I cut out a load of stuff we talked about last week.
2:07Al Elliott:Fair enough. Yeah, fair enough. Lee, what have you seen this week, my love? I've got a new word. Okay, tell me what the new word is and do I guess it? Yeah, you do, yeah. Okay, what's the new word? Empathsplaining. So mansplaining is when a man explains something to a woman that doesn't need explaining. so empath explaining is explaining something empathetically that doesn't need isn't empath no i'm i'm in the weeds yeah no you're almost there you're almost there finish that thought so is it trying to be empathetic when you're not empathetic yeah really yeah performative empathy basically give us an example so it's when someone looks like they're being empathetic so they're saying all the right things like i hear you you matter we care deeply about your experience in this organization but when it comes to actually doing something effective then they don't so they'll make layoffs and they won't give you promotion they won't invest in training development but they understand they hear you oh that's what they want yeah what you want yeah pretending to care uh whilst being a snake essentially is the kind of bottom line of that um it's a term that you can't pull lines out but i've got a mouthful of water it's a term that comes from our mate Jeff LeBlanc, who was on the podcast not too long ago talking about kindness in leadership and what it actually is.
3:21He is a workplace strategist, a very fancy lecturer and researcher and is getting massive traction online because he's naming something that we're all experiencing, but we don't have the words for it. So basically, it's performative empathy. So he says it can show up in four main ways strategic so empathy used to soften a blow or win influence performative or talk no follow through we've all known people like that um conditional so empathy only when it's
3:51Al Elliott:safe or easy right okay to be fair i think i've probably been a little bit guilty of that yeah and i think a good example of that that we've seen recently is around um pride month in june lots of people pulling budgets like i'm going to support you when it's safe for me to do so and finally undermining so pretending to listen then calling you too sensitive oh that's I've been in situations like that like what? well like I've been I've been a one-to-one with a manager who's been like I can see something's up something's bothering you talk to me what's wrong and I was just really open about how I felt there were certain things happening in the organisation that weren't fair that weren't supporting my performance and I didn't think were reflective of the culture that senior leadership were trying to build and I was told that I was too sensitive so just go over it.
4:37Wow. Yeah. And do you know who that was?
4:39Al Elliott:Go on.
4:43Al Elliott:Oh, really? Yeah. If you're listening, Alec, I bet you might be able to guess who that is. I bet you might be able to guess. Brum, brum. Okay. So anyway, back to the story. Back to Jeff. This isn't about you, Leanne. Sorry, I thought it was an example. I thought it was an example. So yeah, so basically what Jeff went on to say, because he does a lot of work and research around Gen Z, is that they can see straight through it. They ain't buying it. They're not getting on board. They've been around too many caring cultures when nobody actually does anything that matters. So for business owners and managers, the important bit here is this performative empathy, this empath-splaining is just a trust killer.
5:26People see through it. They don't buy into it. It undermines any credibility and authority you have in an organisation. Just don't do it. of course it does mean actually having to invest in how to um engage in genuine empathy and what that looks like and how to demonstrate that and go back to jeff's episode for some tips on that and actually a week no thursday's episode is some good good tips on that as well in terms of empathic leadership oh with tim yes yeah yeah um so come back for that as well um so really the question that jeff is asking all business owners leaders out there are you being empathetic or are you just empathsplaining our thoughts i mean i just i don't know maybe i'm just thinking too
6:06Al Elliott:nicely and too too optimistically of people but you know we had the thing about psychopaths on a little while ago didn't we um we had the episode about psychopaths and actually there's actually more than you think but still far fewer than you're actually going to meet um and so unless you're a psychopath or a sociopath i think we've all got the the ability to be empathic have we sure oh no have i got that am i just being one of those really optimistic like wishy-washy rainbows and cupcakes kind of person maybe slightly dinning but i mean we've got the people who are like um we talked about dark empaths didn't we on the show not so long ago it's that dark triad of personality traits um which are much more common dark empaths were actually about 25 percent of the population um so it's a bit just remind us what dark empath was so dark empath is basically somebody will have um dark triad personality traits so things like um narcissism mark of alienism that type of thing but will also have high levels of emotional intelligence they can quite manipulative in how they use empathy so I guess in Jeff's example that would be the strategic so empathy often used to soften a blow or win influence we've had a guest on recently who I think falls into that really?
7:15Al Elliott:of course I'm not going to say do what I did no I'm not going to say but I'll tell you afterwards tell you we'll stop recording but yeah no I think they fitted perfectly really? tea I know and all the previous guests listening are going is it me? is it me? No, no, it's not you. Don't worry, it's not you. It's definitely not you. It might be you. But yeah, anyway, there you go. I think, yeah, I enjoy your optimism and seeing the best in people. I think we should do that. It should be our default position whilst being mindful and aware that some people might not always have the best intentions. So yeah, there you go.
7:47That's the word of the week. I'll leave a link to Jeff because why wouldn't you want to know him in the show notes?
7:52Al Elliott:If you don't know Jeff, you should. Everyone should know Jeff. He's just the nicest guy in the world. He also knows an awful lot. We cut a little bit of the interview. We talked at length about Ted Lasso and how he was a great leader. He was a kind leader, but not soft. Again, that's a bit of a foreshadowing for this Thursday's episode. Anyway, what have I seen? So this is my favorite story I've seen for a very, very long time. Basically, it's Silicon Valley's great employment heist is what I'm going to say I came up with. But actually, Claude came up with that. So a software engineer in India named Soham...
8:29Al Elliott:Software engineer. Sorry, did I say that too briefly? I don't hear you. So this software engineer in India whose name is Soham Parekh. I hope I'm saying that right. I doubt he's listening. Probably too busy working. He filled up what might be one of the most audacious employment scams ever in Silicon Valley. He simultaneously worked for multiple AI startups, earning around about a million dollars over three years. No, annually, sorry. million dollars annually while barely doing any actual work kind of like if you've seen that movie catch me if you can i love that movie me too i've seen it twice and i would i would say i saw what i saw about six months ago and i didn't watch it again yeah i absolutely would uh but this is basically like code me if you can or something i don't know there's probably claude will come on with a quip with a better quip than that uh so let me just tell you the scale the scale is actually quite staggering 22 companies were involved uh me interviewed for some and hired by others Most of them were Y Combinator AI startups.
9:24Al Elliott:Just in case you don't know what Y Combinator is, it's the place to be for a startup in Silicon Valley. We've had PostHog. James Hawkins was our previous guest about 10 episodes ago. He's YC alumni. So it's like a good gold standard of startups. Yes, absolutely. The best of the best. So the likes of Coinbase came out of there. Stripe didn't come out, I don't think, but something else did. There's lots of major companies you've heard of which are YC. So you'd think they'd be a bit more vigilant in the hiring process. To be fair, and just in case Gary Chan's listening, because he's a bit annoyed, he's the guy who runs it, he's a bit annoyed on X at the moment.
9:59Al Elliott:So just in case you are listening, Gary, I'm not saying that you employed these guys, I'm saying that these were all YC Combinator companies and they were targeted by this guy, Soham. So those companies were paying him$10 ,000 a month each. It went on for two years, between 2022 and 2024. before he only got caught because Y Combinator founders started talking about him going, I've got this great guy, but I haven't seen him for a while. However, Chi gets caught, catching that too wide, people start chatting. Absolutely. So I'll just give you a little bit of background on this. He's mid-20s, based in India.
10:33Al Elliott:Apparently, he's genuinely brilliant. He describes the top 0.1 % of software engineers. So it is very much Catch Me If You Can because he's a genius. He aced every single interview. He had strong business acumen and he created an incredibly convincing personal persona I've got written down here. So basically what you do is he would go to interview, he'd interview really well. They'd be like, oh my God, we've got to have this guy. And he'd go, I'm sorry, well, it's 10 grand a month minimum. That's what I worked for. And they went, all right, well, he's such a good guy. Yeah, we'll have him. And then just started making creative excuses for why he wasn't delivering the work over that time.
11:07Al Elliott:He also said that he got UK, UK, sorry, US visa status and he hadn't. He once said, I didn't do the work because a military drone crashed into my house in India. And then if he was confronted, he denied everything until the evidence was undeniable. This is a movie. This is a catch-me-if-you-can movie. This is absolutely brilliant. So why did this happen? Well, engineers are in massive demand. Like top 0.1 % of engineers, there's very, very few of them out there. AI isn't helping because everyone's now, I've talked about vibe coding the other day, everyone thinks they're an engineer because they can write two prompts and claw it and and create a to-do app.
11:41Al Elliott:That's not the way. That does not make an engineer. The top ones are 200 ,000 easy a year. And so obviously, you know, you can multiply what he earned. That's how he worked out at about a million a year. Nice. I know. So, I mean, this is... What do you think? Do you think that he was a genius? Do you think he's criminal? Do you think this is just a... What's your thoughts? Well, if it's criminal, I don't know. I guess it depends on the contracts he signed, unless it specifically says you're not allowed to have another job. It could be if you've got a good lawyer, and if you've got a million dollars, you can probably get a good lawyer.
12:16True. Probably get you out of that one. Telling lies, though, to get a job, like you don't have US visa status, that might be a bit more of a pickle. I mean, morally, ethically speaking, it's not super cool, is it? Particularly in an environment where there's lots of people from tech out of work. So I'm not sure that's cool. the fact that he's not doing the work is my beef like if he'd if he'd been holding down these 10 jobs and delivering all the outcomes i'd kind of be like well what's what's the problem he's hustled um just because he can deliver that in a fraction of the time um that allows him to do it for 10 different companies and fair do so i think it's a fact i think this is more the fact that he didn't deliver the work so therefore yes i think this this it's kind of forward isn't it and yeah They won't end well.
13:06Al Elliott:I think it's such a shame because if you're that level of an engineer and there's AI agents, to be fair, there wasn't in 2022, but still, you can probably create systems that are going to be able to do half the work for you. So yeah, I think the not delivering was a bit odd. To be fair, this is actually a trend. There's a subreddit on Reddit called Overemployed and it's full of people who've got stories of working multiple jobs at the same time. Most of them, I think, deliver the work and therefore everything's okay. Obviously, you know, if you want to do that for like four or five years, trowels are half a million dollars.
13:40Al Elliott:You'd be burnt out and it's going to be a tough thing, but you've got half a million dollars. It might take you 20 years to make that as a junior engineer. I've seen people on LinkedIn lose about this as well. That's why we can't trust people to work remotely because they hold multiple jobs. And it's like, we're just focusing on the wrong thing. If somebody's doing the job to the standard that you want, it's not just indicating that maybe you don't need an employee, you need a freelancer or a contractor. you know as a contractor i have multiple contracts yeah i have multiple ways of earning money from different people like it's no different i don't get what the beef is as long as you're getting delivered what it is then it's just logistics so if we took that to a marriage as long as i was doing the washing up and as long as i was a nice person then you wouldn't mind if i was actually legally contractually obligated um as my legal husband in life so yeah well we found out didn't we that maybe our marriage wasn't even registered because we got married in gibraltar yeah we did maybe maybe it's not even mentioned maybe not even married there's a good chance we're not legally married in the uk excellent so this is this is a good opportunity for me anyway i don't think there's a great manager i know or work with that wouldn't catch on within a couple of weeks that somebody isn't doing the work yeah and that's even before hiring them in the first place without doing the thorough check so i don't know it's kind of like it's the same with catch me as you can isn't it if you can get away with it then it's not all on him so leanne anything else to add or should we move on to what you've seen move on let's move on um i guess it's a similar theme really i saw some research that basically looks at what happens when leaders say one thing and do another right i'm loving how accidentally we're coming up with a bit of a theme in our news roundups recently we must be just on the same wavelength yeah i want you to say at the same time oh sorry we finish each other's sentences sandwiches yeah I like that sandwich anyway yes what happens when leaders say one thing and do another and what well it's I guess what does happen Al you tell me people not good things not good things not good things so this research basically looked at what happens I like how you bought a bit of time to check your notes there that was very clever thank you I was this research I was always way back so yeah keep it together come on i'm not editing this bit out so what the researchers looked at is what happens when there's a gap between what they just say and what they do so it's things like preach about inclusion don't know anything about it have favorites promise flexibility then call people back into the office schedule meetings during like deep working time all that type of stuff so not stuff that's like outrageous but irritating frustrating um so a new study has basically found that all of this has a massive impact on trust motivation and performance um but what is interesting is the reason behind this misalignment in terms of um saying one thing and doing another the reason why it might be more important than actually the misalignment itself now that's a hook yeah go on put that at the beginning and cut out all the crap i've just been saying what what is it you can't tell me oh i'm just shaking my mic tell me but you want to learn more now yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah i'm involved so basically i have some researchers ran a scenario-based experiment where 308 employees were asked to examine leader word action misalignment that's what they called it's that mismatch between what leaders say and what leaders do so they tested um whether two things shaped how employees responded one and i'm going to explain these terms okay but the leader locus of causality so what that basically means is whether the leader's misalignment was seen as their fault like the actual fault the leader or is outside of their control i'm loving that that the research is rather than say outside of their circle of control they go leaders locus of sub causality yeah yeah why use why use simple words and complicated ones would do number two because we're scientists because you're scientists you're clever when you want the world to know you're clever indeed um and the second one that they looked at was perceived integrity and so how honest and principle of the leader it seemed overall um so they then measured how these factors influence how employees felt um in terms of trust job motivation and job performance so three really important things so these are the the findings that stood out so why it happens matters so employees believed that this misalignment between what is said and done was due to external factors like organizational organizational constraints they were more forgiving oh okay but when they saw it as internally driven so it's just me deciding to be a bit of an arse then they lost trust completely so if it's outside their locus of causality causation indeed then um they'll be like oh well it's not his fault or her fault or their fault exactly but if they suspect for a second it is their fault yeah premeditated yeah yeah exactly so integrity was also important so even when leaders were inconsistent if they were seen as having high integrity the damage was softer um so integrity basically acted as a buffer um for its impact on trust and motivation so if you see me as a decent human being in where i am inconsistent and what i say i do you kind of like i'll let it slide fair yeah um trust which is the emotional belief that leader has your best interests at heart in this specific scenario um was kind of the the real key bit um so without that trust both motivation and performance took a hit well that makes sense if someone if someone trusts you or you are trusted and someone's genuinely seems like a good person and something happens that you feel is outside their control yeah okay that makes sense yeah it does make sense but it's not an excuse no it's not excuse but at the same time i see i see that's the reason why being a decent leader and a decent human human at work because when something does happen that is outside your control but people have perceived you as being an asshole then it'll go it'll go the other way for you won't it yeah yeah but i think this is the the thing is i wouldn't want anyone to listen and go oh well i am i am integrity my team do trust me i don't mean to do it's often outside of my control sure but that doesn't mean it doesn't have an impact right so even though there are scenarios the impact wasn't as big but it was still negative on performance on motivation and trust.
20:04So it really is consistency that is really important. So the research has basically concluded that employees don't need flawless leaders. They need believable ones. And the study shows that what saves the leader from losing their team's trust isn't sticking to a script, it's being honest about why the script has changed. Oh, I love it. Yeah, nice.
20:21Al Elliott:I have no notes. No notes. Nice bit of research there. I will leave the link in the show notes. There are some limitations, of course. It was based on hypothetical scenarios. The sample size was limited in size and scope, and they only focused on short-term outcomes. But that doesn't mean it's not valuable, Al. I love how that was a psychologist or researcher's version of terms and conditions apply. Your house may be at risk if you do not give up repayments. Other researchers are available. Okay, right. After this very, very short break, we'll be back with another hot take. We'll be back with a weekly workplace surgery.
20:52Al Elliott:I'm back with more rubbish from Leanne and myself. Don't go anywhere. Welcome to the break. Yes, my favorite part of the show. These two idiots have stopped talking. Yes, I want to tell you about my new favorite podcast. No, that's a lie. It's my old favorite podcast. I've been on this one for a while. Didn't know where that was going. It is called I Digress. It is hosted by Troy Sandage and it is brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals. Yes, it's got shows that are under 30 minutes and I Digress helps eliminate complexity, complications and confusion in your business with frameworks and strategies that achieve scalable and sustainable success.
21:31Al Elliott:At least that's what it says here. And if you do want to hear a really personal story, go to episode 136. This is Troy's honest account of fatherhood, killing hustle culture, and what really matters when you stop performing and start living with intention. Listen to I Digress wherever you get your podcasts. That concludes the break. Let's return to the scheduled programming. Back to the studio.
21:57Al Elliott:Welcome back. It is time for our hot take where we ask, what do we do on the hot take? Lee, I've forgotten. We ask our guests to challenge the way we think about work. Yes, we do. And today is something that every single employee wants to tackle. That is how much they get paid. Because most companies say they want to be fair, but it's very difficult to justify the decisions they make around how much they pay and who they pay. Our guest today is Ramiz Kaleem. He is the founder of 3R Strategy, a consultancy that helps organisations build fair, transparent and well-communicated pay structures. He's spent two decades working in pay and reward.
22:35And he says the issue isn't just how much people earn, it's whether they trust the process behind it.
22:40Al Elliott:So let's go and join Ramiz and find out why pay transparency isn't just legal or ethical issue, it's a cultural issue. My hot take today is that if you look at new graduates and upcoming graduates, around 85 % of them are saying that they're less likely to apply for a job where the recruiter doesn't mention the salary range. And we've seen this data is higher for Gen Z employees. And so our ability as an organization to attract candidates is significantly reduced if we're not transparent about pay. In the past, we've always, you know, when we go to a job ad, we always see those words, competitive pay, which can mean anything.
23:25And the way that the pay for the role is often decided or has been decided in the past is we then ask a candidate to say, what is your current salary? What do you expect? And then based on their expectations, based on their current salary, a salary range is provided to them. And I think we've seen that change because a lot of organizations are, some are being forced into it because you see some websites saying that they're not going to publish any job ads if there's no salary range. And then we're seeing legislation come in, for example, in the US, across the EU, that are forcing organizations to do this.
24:00So some organizations are still reluctant, but we're seeing many more organizations do this than they have in the past.
24:06Al Elliott:If I had a small business and I didn't have a huge budget for a role, I'd be very wary about putting the pay range on there because it's going to be smaller than working for IBM, for example. What do I do in that situation? I think candidates realize that if you apply to work for a small organization, again, I run a small organization, there's nine of us, and we do some of the work that might be done, for example, by PwC or Mercer, and we're not going to be able to pay those salaries. but when people apply to work in smaller organizations what they realize is that instead of the higher salary they might be getting other things that they value more which is flexibility possibly a nicer working environment not being a not having to give up their weekends and their evenings and you know more development being able to work in wider projects so there's different priorities, when we look at the data, and I shared the data with you around graduates and recent graduates, and that's obviously a younger generation, and you look at numbers of 85%.
25:15If you looked at that across the population, that might be more like 50%. So there's definitely a generational difference, but that doesn't mean that there isn't a higher expectation now, even from, you know, Gen Y employees or baby boomers, that they are expecting more from their organization. But I think Gen Z in particular, research has shown that they're the first generation that is willing to compromise on pay or to accept a lower salary to work in an organization where they feel a sense of purpose and they see much greater transparency. I've spoken to HR directors where they've said to me, we have people applying for jobs that might have a particular salary and it says, you know, you need to be in the office every day.
26:03And what some candidates, and particularly Gen Z, might be saying to them, you know what, I would be willing to accept a lower salary than this if you allow me to be flexible and work from home most of the time. Or hybrid working, working from home three days a week. So there definitely is an employee population, particularly the younger generation, that is willing to sacrifice on pay because they see having a sense of purpose, they see transparency, they see a good working environment as a higher priority than, you know, getting that much higher salary. So you alluded to before there's been some legislation around this.
26:41California and New York, and in fact, more than 10 other states have started to do this in the US. So many states in the US have started to do this. And it's, you have to publish salaries on job ads. And it's about not asking candidates about their current salary or the salary history during the recruitment process. And in fact, research in the US found that the single biggest factor that led to an adjustment in the gender pay gap was eliminating that question in interviews of what is your current salary, because then decisions were being made more consistently. What tends to happen is, let's say you are underpaid in your current job, whether it's due to ethnicity or gender, and then your employer asks you what your current salary is, and they make an offer based on that current salary.
27:30all that happens is we're transferring that inequity or discrimination from one organization to another so that is a big part of legislation in the u.s and we have the eu pay transparency directive coming in which is going to be effective from june 2026 which means across europe all the eu countries will have to do both of these things can you see it coming into the uk anytime soon So there's two parts to this. One is, if you have an organization that is based in the UK, but they have employees across Europe as well, they will have to do all of this for the European employees. And a lot of organizations are saying they don't want to treat their UK employees any different from the European employees, because otherwise they're going to feel, oh, this is not fair because my colleagues are able to see this information.
28:20And then the other part is, you know, we now have a Labour government that says they want to align more closely to Europe. So I don't think they're going to, because the EU directive is probably the biggest change I've seen in the last few decades to how organisations have to manage pay. So I don't think the UK is going to suddenly adopt all of it, but I would expect that they might start bringing in parts of the legislation. I'd imagine if I was advertising for a job, I'd be like,
Read the full transcript
28:47Al Elliott:right okay they're going to be my content content manager i'm like how the heck do i find out what a content manager should be paid what a lot of um hr teams and organizations will do well they will go online and they will look for a content role and see what the salaries are and there might be going on indeed glassdoor other recruitment surveys but i always say to those organizations, you know, when we do this, all we're saying to the employees is, and if there's a disagreement on pay, that our internet research is better than your internet research. Because that data is the same data that employees have access to.
29:30So what we always suggest is to use salary surveys that are formal surveys that are not based on advertised salaries, but they're based on actual salaries of employees.
29:42Al Elliott:What happens if there's pushbacks, the CFO pushing back? Are you seeing that? And if so, how do I defend my position that I want to pay a certain amount? There isn't a lot of investment to be made. There are obviously some adjustments to be made because there might be equal pay risks because people are significantly underpaid. But ultimately, whether it's Gen Z or any employee, what they want to know is that are we being treated fairly? and it goes back to people are less interested in what everyone else is earning around them but they want to know is there a process in how you're deciding pay for me and that's the same process for everyone else so that we are being treated fairly and then once we start sharing the context around how we make pay decisions we start sharing with them the pay approach to pay is equitable and that helps to build trust with them and once we have that trust what people tend to do is they start to not focus on what they get paid but they just start focusing on doing a good job for you.
30:43I feel the topic of pay transparency is so important it can sometimes be confused with pay disclosure so if we talk about pay transparency some business leaders they'll say well I don't want everyone to know what I get paid or I don't want my colleagues but that's not what pay transparency is about. Pay transparency is about giving people context, treating them like adults to say this is how we make decisions and you know making sure that they realize that the pay is managed in a fair and equitable way and it's not a case of it's not a binary issue of you either have it or you don't. It makes you wonder doesn't it Al like why some employees are still reluctant to list salaries when all the data suggests that it's good for them and all the people want it it kind of it kind of makes you think that it can only be for a shady reason well yeah for shady
31:35Al Elliott:reason but also like think about when you're buying cars recently over the last sort of seven eight years in the uk certainly but i think in the in the us there'd be lots of companies to come up who are saying we are very transparent about our car prices the olden days when you got some dodgy guy with a fag hanging out his mouth sorry that's a cigarette for just in case you don't know what talking about in the US that's the great hanging out the mouth going how much you want to pay how you know oh we'll do you a good deal those have gone so I feel like I feel like that has been revolutionized but we've not yet tackled the sort of pay transparency side of it yeah and I think that's kind of the the crux of it isn't it really that as Ramiz was saying about Gen Z and their need for transparency and I think this has also kind of been bubbling with millennials and probably younger gen x as well because there's been so much disruption and so much ambiguity and so much turbulence in our working lives that we just crave some kind of transparency some kind of control or clarity wherever we can get it i think it's absolutely true as well um with what he was saying around um the world of work has fundamentally changed people might may well be happy to take a lower salary if it allows them more remote working and flexibility and that just makes sense when i was when i was doing my biggest commute i was spending about 130 40 pounds a month on travel and that was back in like 2011 2012 be easy double now yeah triple it's a lot so so yeah i can i can see why that would be a factor as well and there's so much in the news about people hiding stuff and you know not being honest about stuff so you immediately think if someone's not being honest or won't be transparent about their pay what else are they not being transparent about which gives you such an opportunity to flip that on his head to be able to say we are transparent like jeff roberts phenomenal guy currently traveling his way around europe some of the most amazing places they keep sending photos of but he's from outsetter and they've got such a transparent way that everyone earns money and equity and can just work one day a week or six days a week or whatever they want there's the other guy i don't remember his name but remember about four or five years ago and he paid everyone 72 000 a year yeah yeah yeah yeah and so you kind of feel oh well i trust them So even if it's going to cost you a few thousand more to make sure everyone's on equal footing, the transparency means that people are going to naturally trust you more.
33:57And as we learned before the break in Leanne's segment, when people trust you, then they're much willing to forgive you if something doesn't quite go awry. Yeah, absolutely. And I think in terms of like, this is all very much steeped in research as well. This is what psychologists call organisational justice. and it's as much about understanding the reasons why a decision was made um so it's not necessarily a case of of having transparency to the the level that i'll just mention that everyone is paid the same amount it's transparency around how salaries are calculated how they're decided how bonus structures work how promotion or or salary bands and how you move up in them how that works um all of that feeds into organizational justice and without organizational justice um we can very quickly feel very detached from an organization not want to put in um extra role effort um and really it's usually a yeah it's the start of disengagement if we don't trust our organization then that relationship isn't going to go very far is it absolutely not i know you did a bit of work
34:54Al Elliott:with the nhs about 15 years ago and that was making sure that everyone was getting paid the same but that was just too much wasn't it they went too much the other way so that people it was more of a fight to get what you're worth rather than yeah it was the old person knew how to um how to rig the system as well which i respect but yeah was it the uh was it was it the equivalent of sohill so soham yeah yeah yeah pretty much pretty much but yeah okay so all the links to ramiz are in the show notes i suggest you go and check out his website um and also he's just got he's got so much experience in this in this field he's such a measured calm guy he's got a book out which i thought was about to come out but actually it actually came out a year or so ago so you can go and buy it right now check the show notes the links will be in there and now Well, I believe it is your favourite time of the week.
35:40Al Elliott:It is. It's time for the world famous weekly workplace surgery where I put your questions to Leanne. Leanne is a chartered occupational psychologist, an expert in work. She's also pretty awesome. And there's not been a question that's stumped her yet. So let's go and see if we can do that now. I've got three questions here that I'm going to ask her. If you've got your own question, you know what to do. Go to the show notes, send us an email. I'll put it to Leanne next week. Okay, so question number one. Should I hire my spouse into my small team or is that asking for trouble? Just in case you're wondering why I'm laughing at that, then Leanne is my spouse and I am Leanne's spouse and we now work in a small team.
36:15Al Elliott:So yeah, this is very close to home. So I run a small consulting business with a tight knit team and my partner's been out of work for a couple of years now. He used to be in a professional role, but after losing his job, he decided to step away from work entirely. Financially, he doesn't need a job, but I've been thinking about bringing him into the business. Would this actually help the team or just blur the lines too much between home and work oh and the ps here is any upsides to hiring your spouse right let's let's let's find out what leanne really thinks about working with me i don't think it's about working with your spouse i think that's the wrong question i think the question should be does your spouse have the expertise that is required within your business and if they do then you should consider hiring them too many i think this is very true of of every small business owner that will always look to the people they know and typically that will include family to fill roles and functions within their business and I think that's fine so long as they are part of the same recruitment process you'd put everyone else through and this starts by understanding the job that you need in your business what's the role that is required in your business what is it going to deliver how does it fit into everything else and how that's delivered that's what psychologists call a job analysis that is where you start if you start at that point and then look at actually the type of experience and skills and knowledge and capabilities you're going to need to fill that role if your spouse meets that criteria then yeah it might well be worth bringing them into the business there are complications that come with that and I think unless your your partner really really wants to work in your business I wouldn't advise it I think it would blur lines it sounds like it's not necessarily something that has to happen if there's an underlying turn here that you think they need to be engaging in some type of work there's lots of different things they could look at if they were in a professional or previously they'd look at um non-exec roles they could look at board advisory more voluntary stuff charities public sector lots of fulfilling roles out there for somebody who has expertise but doesn't necessarily need to earn a paycheck um so overall i would say the way you've asked the question i'm not sure you've entirely thought this through so it's a high level simple answer no don't hire your spouse do the work to understand what your business needs do the work to understand what your partner needs and then go from there yes i think and i think you've hit the nail on the head something which bothered me about this question was it felt like the person asking the question was basically going well i have to go to work and so this person so my partner needs to put it's not fair they sit at home because they don't talk about kids or anything or any child care or any caring or caring stuff that may well be but i don't know uh so i got the sense that they were a bit like a little bit jealous of going well i would love to be able to sit at home and and watch bargain hunt and um that's a very british daytime tv show by the way uh referees there for all us all us brits um the other thing which i was thinking was if they have got expertise why not bring them in as a consultant or even just just this this new term that i've just made up called a silent consultant and that's where they would they would do the work but nobody actually knows they're delivering the work you're just you just go oh i've got a consultant um even i mean you could even just try that anyway that might be an idea to start off with is just get them in as a consultant whether it's a silent consultant or not your dark consultant that's what i'm going to call it from now on dark consultancy so it's my word of the week um and bring them in and see if they actually do bring value just do it like a two or three weeks project because you'll soon find out a if you can work with them b if they actually are bringing in um sort of like you said value and c most importantly whether they actually want to do it because they might even be telling you they want to do it but actually they might just be they feel like they have to say that any other thoughts lee i think what do they say are there any upsides in hiring your spouse careful upsides are you can speak very openly very clearly what's on your mind you can bounce ideas around they'll become equally obsessed with you over an idea that nobody else in your organization will quite get to that same level um i think it ultimately gives you quite a lot of flexibility if you're working the same organization because you're working to the same schedules the same hours the same kind of yeah peaks and troughs of what's happening the thing is I think you suddenly become everything to each other when you work with your spouse you become colleagues you become friends you become enemies from time to time um it's a lot so you I think you have to be really confident in your relationship um to really to really yeah get the benefits from it lots of people say to us oh i don't know how you do it how you do it and that to me is a sign well then you shouldn't do it because if if it's not even like couldn't even imagine it then probably not i don't what do you think though are there any upsides there aren't many upsides being truthful um there's um yeah look i think some of the upsides are that uh that work that you're sitting down at night and you can't and i'll say to leanne you okay to talk about work should go yeah yeah you're fine and we'll chat um that's cool some of the other upsides are they know you so well that if you say you're going to do something they'll call you out and go but you're not going to hire you um or if you say i will do this they'll be like cool i know you've got this um downsides are you just can't really turn off um because if if you know you sit there on a saturday and you want to chat about something you go what have you done this week well i've done the same thing as you've sat opposite me for most of the day um so there's that um and the other downside which is also potentially an upside is that you tend to be able to take the same time off shall i say so currently in bulgaria it is now it is 36 degrees today beautifully sunny um a lovely time to go and sit in the pool and i think if liana half said to me al should we just sack off this recording and go and go and sit in the pool part of me were like maybe maybe yeah it's easy to skype your spouse that's for sure anyway so i hope it works out for you and and if any of those things start to you know ring true a little bit just ask yourself that question what what's my motivation for bringing my person into into work so question number two to what degree is an employer responsible for the well-being of their employees as this person says i run a small business and this question has been on my mind more and more lately in a perfect world i'd want to support my team as much as i can but in the real world things aren't always that simple especially in trying to keep a business afloat what are your thoughts deanna excellent question very simple answer if you are a uk business that employs two or more people you have a legal obligation to order the stress risk factors within your business every 12 months and if you have more than five people on your team you have to share the feedback with them too interesting but most people don't know that no most people don't it's not it's not very much in first it's enforced this is under the health and safety executive and all the health and safety laws that go with it.
43:12So yeah, you have a legal obligation to not to invest necessarily in employee well-being, but to measure the aspects of your work environment that may be causing stress. You then have a moral obligation. If not, it's a gray area, whether it's a legal obligation to actually do something with that. So I think this is where often business owners will get a bit confused around well-being. they'll see well-being as like oh do i need to have an eap program do i need to have mindfulness at lunch and do i need to you know offer free counseling or um sessions around financial well-being and that's yes that's nice to have you don't have a legal obligation to do any of that they're what we call a psychology individual level interventions they're things that help an individual um manage stress build their resilience which is half the story the other half the story which is why it's in HSE law, or health and safety law, is that you have a responsibility as a business owner to create an environment that is psychologically safe for your workforce, much as you have to make it physically safe.
44:15So you can't have broken steps and just holes in the middle of the office. It's really easy to get compliant with this. The HSE themselves have a management standard survey that looks at kind of the five main aspects that can cause stress in the workplace that's things like relationships level of control somebody has over their role um the amount of change that happens in an organization um and you can just send that survey out to your people they also have a score sheet um that comes with that and it'll give you an idea of kind of how people are thinking and feeling in your business and where your stress hot spots potentially are um it's not always very transparent and giving you an exact reason why so it might tell you that relationships in your business are a bit strained and are a source of stress but won't necessarily go into the detail of why that is and the impact it's having on your business if you want to do that you need a more detailed employee engagement survey but it's a really good starting point and of course it's a legal obligation um so I'd start with that um because yeah the other stuff is nice to have the other stuff is important but it's half the story and I think for most individuals they will rarely cite individual level interventions that aren't working for them like you're not going to hear people go oh do you know what I went to meditation at lunch today and the instructor was really bad like they tend to say my manager is awful and is ruining my life or i have such a high workload right now because they're the actual organizational elements that impact stress and that's where you have a legal obligation nicely put and i think
45:43Al Elliott:that's that's a key thing to remember is that i think a lot of people think oh well-being of my employees is like you say wellness app it's mindfulness it's journaling and all that kind of thing whereas as leanne said that's the equivalent of i don't know i don't know anything about fitness but that'll be equivalent of of of warming down but the actual important thing is going out for a 5k run and that is like having decent managers and i mean if you're interested in this there are seven hours for an amazing workplace culture which leanne has designed it's called the rx7 uh seven times r get it and and some of those are role responsibility recognition, relationships.
46:21Al Elliott:These are the core things. And these are things, if you get them right, then you don't need a wellness app. Or in fact, if you do, then it's just like, oh, brilliant. Everyone's doing so well that they're like, wouldn't it be nice to have a bit of yoga together at lunch, you know, in the park or something. So yeah, I think that's really, really important, but it's a great question to ask and a brave question. I think a lot of employers wouldn't necessarily want to ask that question. Be fair, it was anonymous, us but wouldn't want to ask that question and i think just my last bit of advice would be as a fellow business owner who doesn't i know i know more about this than most people do just because we talk about it twice a week but before leanne and i started doing this i would have gone oh god what i need to do don't worry there's very little you actually have to do have to do there's one thing train your managers that's what leanne always says but just get leanne's email jump on it jump on the call with her for 20 minutes and she'll talk you through like the quick 80 20 wins and you can just employ someone for like once a month just to help you with this you don't need to have a full-time person yeah absolutely um i'll leave a link to the hsc stuff in in the show notes you can read more about what your legal obligations are um and the tools that they offer to use them which are completely free brilliant okay so question number three can disk d-i-s-c actually help with team tensions or is there something better there's something better was there more There is more.
47:39Al Elliott:Now, this person runs a marketing agency, 14 people, and they're recently having some personality clashes. One team member in particular asks endless questions. I think it's about them getting it right, but it's winding the rest of the team up. Some are actively avoiding her now, and I don't want this to get worse. I'm thinking about using DISC, which we'll explain what DISC is in a second, to help everyone understand each other a bit better. But I've never used it before. Is there something better I should be looking at instead? Just so I know, is Disc, is that the red hat, blue hat, or is that Edward de Bono?
48:10Al Elliott:Yeah. No, not the hats, but it's colours. Right, okay. Yeah. So tell us what Disc is and what your candid thoughts are on it, Leanne. Disc was invented by the same person who wrote the Wonder Woman comics. I knew that. I think that's all you need to know about the scientific validity of Disc. Yeah, it's very popular. It's very popular. and I understand why because it gives teams a really nice clear vocabulary and visual representation of their role within a team and that's really nice but as John Amici said how we distill the complexity of human behavior to four primary colors it's just not that simple and I think that's the same with any kind of type-based personality assessment by type-based I mean it puts you into a box or it puts you into color um so disc puts you into into red blue yellow green um myers briggs will put you into intpf and j and all that nonsense so tempted to give you another one what no i can't oh i know i know which one you yeah yeah yeah yeah you're as well from a scientific perspective having a team building afternoon with your staff and talking about everyone's different horoscope you know it's it's it's as useful as that in terms of a valid way of building relationships and self-awareness and understanding between your team.
49:34There are some psychologists and some psychologists who've been on this show that will say, I don't see the harm if it's for team building, if it's a caveat, it's not being used as anything towards recruitment or formal development, it's just a team building exercise. I don't see the harm. I kind of see the harm just because business owners like this stuff because it's just so easy to understand then they'll go oh do you know what that was great and they said we shouldn't use it for recruitment but do you think we should because looking at our team we don't really have any yellows we should probably hire a yellow so for me it kind of the danger is there because that quick fix is just so tempting understandably to a business owner when it comes to recruitment so i personally don't don't enjoy recommend recommending these types of tools in any scenario type based ones if you really want to do a type base the only one that i would say is fairly useful with belbin right the team was that's like the real old school one but i think it still stands in terms of of a useful type-based assessment that helps you understand roles within a team so that's things like you a plant do you have the ideas and the creative you're complete a finisher um i think there's eight eight or nine roles so it's a bit more
50:43Al Elliott:extended than just four are they the ones where it usually has two words you're a complete a finisher you're a starter and yeah monitor evaluator or something yeah um so i think that can be quite quite helpful particularly if you've got somebody who's asking lots of questions it might help you them understand kind of um why they do that and where they sit in in the role they sound like a bit of a duck shuffler as we talked about the other week a perfectionist um and how that can rub up a complete or finish the wrong way because i just want to get the job done um and also build that self-awareness that this is my you know default behavior maybe at times I need to modify that a little bit to you know meet the objectives and deliver the outcomes that the team needs to deliver so I think for understanding that can be really helpful and it's really simple it's not a long questionnaire so it's not too time intensive so Belvin could be a good one I prefer behavior-based tools because I think they're just a bit more a bit more useful in a team dynamic when we're talking about behaviors underpinning culture I also think from a um scientific perspective there's a bit more validity to them even the very best personality inventories are only you know so much effective in terms of predicting job performance um even the very best ones i respect them and i think they play an important role um but i i think for these type of things i prefer behavior based um intervention so i'd be thinking things like um Tools from the Real World Leader Group are really great.
52:12They do a 360. They do an individual one as well. Things like the Hogan Personality Inventory could be quite good. That's based on the big five model of personality, which is probably one of the most researched and validated in the field, but again, links it to behaviors. So they would be my go-to in terms of doing this. but there are also other things you can do within a team building exercise to build that understanding and awareness. I think it was Sophie Wood that gave us a really great one on her episode a few weeks ago about trans inclusion. That's about how you write down circles of like what's made me me up to this point and the individual experience I've had.
52:52And it's those types of conversations that are going to build openness and honesty and understanding. So I think that's the objective, isn't it? Is how do you build self-awareness and mutual understanding? and for me I'm not sure that DISC is going to be a very effective way of doing that the other problem with something like DISC in any type-based psychometric to be mindful of and be careful of is that once people know that they're a red or a green or an INTP they cling on to that identity with everything they have and some people will do it in a way that's like well that means that these areas I need to work on and develop myself as a professional there are others that will use it as an excuse yeah i can't do that i'm i'm a i'm a complete finisher i'm not a plant i can't do that i'm a blue i'm not red um and you really want to avoid that use of that shared vocabulary um so you kind of want somebody to deliver this in a way as well that helps explain that these things are indicative of what our preferences are they're not written in stone because we've all noticed those important you know annoying people that are kind of like you know i'm an i'm an arsehole because i'm a scorpio what can i say yeah um and it's that's not cool so I'll leave links to Belbin and the HPI and the show notes but in terms of disc nah
54:04Al Elliott:Leanne did her dissertation on Hogan and we've actually had we had the chief scientific officer from Hogan on Ryan maybe oh back in the early early days so if you are he's been on a couple of times he has actually yeah so if you're interested just search Truth, Lies and Work Hogan and you'll find the episodes we'll try and put them in the show notes if you remember but yeah I've got nothing else to add to that Leanne's the expert in that and I think the main thing is I wanted to make the point and you made at the end that as soon as you decide someone is a red, then you've made up your mind about them.
54:33Al Elliott:And as soon as you decide you're a blue, you've made up your mind about yourself. And if you're not careful, then you get, well, that's the reason why I don't get on with them. Because they're a red. And it's like, well, hang on. Maybe it's because you're just a bit of an arse. I don't know. Anyway. So all the links will be in the show notes. Lee, anything else to add before we say goodbye to these lovely people? No. Okay. So we're back next Tuesday with another This Week in Work, where we have a hot take, of course. we have a news roundup and the same you've just listened to the world famous weekly workplace surgery probably why i put your questions yeah nearly got it out there nearly got it out and on thursday we have got the nicest man in business we do tim lupicini he's giving us a master class on humility in leadership um and i think i think you might be surprised he's certainly not soft he's wildly successful um and just can't kind of shows that that being a good person is half the work.
55:25Al Elliott:Yeah, and if you're wondering, oh, right, there's another person who leads three people and has got a good idea. No, this guy has got 24 offices, law offices across the US. There's thousands upon thousands of people and still manages to just be a really decent guy and a great leader. So if you manage a lot of people or you want to manage a lot of people, then this Thursday episode is right up your street. Lee, people need to subscribe, do they not? Yeah, if you wouldn't mind subscribing wherever you listen to your podcasts. leave a review that would be really nice thank you to some of the couple of reviews we had in this week that's always good get in touch come over to LinkedIn join the conversation that's why we have all the chats bear our souls and pretend that everything's okay actually we don't pretend that everything is okay that's the point anyway come over have a chat just to be clear the answer bear our souls not bear our souls just to be we will see you next week bye bye bye
56:24Al Elliott:And could the wildest employment scam in Silicon History Valley? So let's go and join Ramiz and we'll learn why this is not necessarily a legal or an ethical issue, but a cultural one. You might want to say pay transparency. So let's go and join Ramiz and find out if pay transparency is illegal, unethical or a cult. That's not right. And they suddenly come out and go, oh, well, well, look at this. Do that again. I think I was on to a good point. Oh, this is a really short one. I'm sorry. I should have read this properly. Do that again.
From the publisher
Welcome back to Truth, Lies & Work, the award-winning podcast where behavioural science meets workplace culture — brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals.
Hosted by Chartered Occupational Psychologist Leanne Elliott and business owner Al Elliott, this is your Tuesday news round-up, hot take, and workplace surgery — all in one.
🔥 This Week’s Stories
📌 1. Empathsplaining: Are today’s leaders all talk, no trust?From “I hear you” to “we care deeply,” modern leaders know how to sound empathetic — but are they actually avoiding hard conversations? Leanne explores a growing trend of emotional performance without action — and why Gen Z isn’t buying it.
📰 Source: Jeff LeBlanc – https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jeff-leblanc-93212510a_leadership-workplace-management-activity-7347583849054302208-Fzy0
📌 2. Silicon Valley’s million-dollar scammerOne engineer, 22 startups, $1 million a year — and barely any work. Al breaks down the most outrageous employment heist in recent tech history, what it tells us about the future of remote work, and the ethical chaos of overemployment.
📰 Source: The Pragmatic Engineer – https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-10x-overlemployed-engineer
📌 3. What really happens when leaders break their word?A new study reveals that it’s not the gap between values and actions that kills trust — it’s how leaders explain that gap. Leanne digs into the psychology behind word–action misalignment, and why high-integrity leaders are judged more gently.
📰 Study: https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/joop.70030
📰 Medium write-up: https://medium.com/@truthlieswork/when-leaders-break-promises-this-is-what-saves-trust-198a94a6220b
🔥 Hot Take: Let’s Talk About Pay, with Rameez Kaleem
Why are companies still scared of pay transparency — and what’s that fear really costing them?
Rameez Kaleem, founder of 3R Strategy, says pay isn’t just a finance issue — it’s a culture issue. He explains why younger workers are demanding honesty, how pay secrecy fuels inequality, and how transparency builds trust even without revealing everyone’s salary.
🗣 Guest links:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/rameezkaleem/
https://3r-strategy.com/
https://podcasts.apple.com/sa/podcast/a-case-of-the-mondays/id1691526371
💬 Workplace Surgery
❓ Should I hire my spouse into my small team?A listener wonders if working with their partner will strengthen trust — or spark chaos.
❓ How far should employers go to protect wellbeing?What’s realistic when you want to care for your team — but you’re also trying to survive as a small business?
❓ Can DISC fix team tensions — or is it just a fad?With personality clashes brewing, one leader asks whether DISC assessments can help — and what other tools might work better.
🎧 Enjoying the show?Follow, share, and leave us a review wherever you listen — and don’t forget to join us Thursday for an expert masterclass on how to manage people who are way smarter than you.
🧠 Support with Mental Health and Well-being
Mind UK: https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/
Samaritans (UK): Call 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org
📬 Connect with Al & Leanne
Truth, Lies & Work on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/truth-lies-and-work/
Al Elliott: https://www.linkedin.com/in/thisisalelliott
Leanne Elliott: https://www.linkedin.com/in/meetleanne
Email: hello@truthliesandwork.com
Book a call: https://savvycal.com/meetleanne/chat
