In short
Work is Fun highlights (fun vs productivity), listener-choice guest on feminine intelligence and leadership, and the most-downloaded expert episode on harassment/inclusion in workplace management.
Guests (and backgrounds)
- Steve Kass: speaker/author; co-founded King of Pops (post-recession layoff turned ~$10M ice pop empire); argues “work should be fun.”
- Andrew Palmer: Economist Boss Class host; previously interviewed Liz Reed (Google) on AI/innovation.
- James Hawkins: co-founder/co-CEO of PostHog; builds dev tools; runs tiny autonomous teams, ships first.
- Dr. Marie Helene Pelliter: leadership psychologist/executive coach/author; strategic resilience; TEDx speaker.
- Alina Tabool: executive advisor; former Wall Street lawyer; author of Feminine Intelligence.
- Dr. Enya Doyle (“harassment doctor”): specialist in harassment, inclusion, workplace culture.
Key claims + examples
- Fun isn’t the opposite of productivity; aim for “5% more fun.”
- “Fall in love with the problem, not the solution”; avoid silencing debate with loud voices.
- PostHog ditches managers/meetings; communication via pull requests; validate by building/ship-and-learn.
- Resilience is a fluctuating state; four pillars: movement/exercise, nutrition, sleep, relationships; assess context (SWOT-like) to plan.
- Feminine intelligence is relational/intuition/creativity; not about gender stereotypes; “psychological patriarchy” harms men too; compassion prevents backlash narratives.
- Inclusion/harassment: don’t mandate Slack/tech without training/time; “unprofessional appearance” often masks bias (notably affecting Black women via hair politics); focus on performance, not clothes.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOHighlighting Favorite Guest Interviews
1:59 to 3:40
Discussion on favorite interviews and most downloaded episodes of the year.
“We've both picked two of our favourite interviews from this year.”
Interview with Steve Kass of King of Pops
4:00 to 6:40
Steve Kass discusses the philosophy that work should be fun and meaningful.
“I mean, I think I think I want to be in that bucket and feel like I am there right now.”
Interview Highlights with Andrew Palmer
6:40 to 10:00
Al shares insights from his interview with Andrew Palmer about innovation at Google.
“Actually, Al, were you there for the launch of Ricky Gervais when he basically invented podcasts?”
James Hawkins on Autonomy in Teams
10:00 to 14:03
Discussion on James Hawkins' approach to team structure and eliminating management.
“like meeting one, someone with a large salary and a loud voice will say, this is the way I think we should solve it.”
The Role of Communication in Startup Success
14:03 to 16:59
Learn how effective communication hierarchies and risk-taking can improve startups.
Insights on Resilience from Dr. MH
17:00 to 19:39
Explore Dr. MH's insights on resilience and its importance in the workplace.
“Oh, we were younger and less, I was less grey.”
Four Key Variables for Building Resilience
19:40 to 24:45
Understand the four critical factors that contribute to personal resilience.
“And even if we just think about AI and all the changes it brings in general, personal and professional life, that in itself will be probably both an acute and a chronic demand that we'll have to deal with.”
Strategic Planning for Resilience
24:46 to 27:34
Learn how to create a personalized resilience plan based on context and values.
“Like, how can I assess where I am on those four variables?”
Introducing the TEDx Talk
28:10 to 28:31
Learn about a TEDx talk that uses river crossing as a metaphor for resilience in the age of AI.
“But yes, a brand new TEDx talk called Crossing the River, Resilience in the Age of AI.”
Introducing the TEDx Talk
28:50 to 29:13
Learn about a TEDx talk that uses river crossing as a metaphor for resilience in the age of AI.
“If you're like me and you hate all this workaholic hustle nonsense on the socials and somebody's getting up at 3am to drink butter, then here is a brand new podcast that I know.”
Show all 21 chapters
Introducing the TEDx Talk
29:19 to 30:04
Learn about a TEDx talk that uses river crossing as a metaphor for resilience in the age of AI.
“The Seven Day Weekend is your weekly dose of business finance and side hustle motivation.”
Engaging with Audience Favorites
30:04 to 30:19
The hosts discuss the most shared guest episode of the year and its impact.
“Now is the time to share the guest who got our audience talking.”
Alina Tabool's Insights on Leadership
30:19 to 30:49
Discover Alina Tabool's thoughts on power, leadership, and feminine intelligence.
“And they were buying their book immediately, which is great as a podcaster.”
Understanding Masculine and Feminine Energies
30:49 to 34:58
Explore the balance between masculine and feminine energies in leadership and personal development.
“and there's political patriarchy, which is about the oppression of women.”
Addressing Current Masculinity Trends
34:58 to 39:42
Discuss the cultural shifts in masculinity and the importance of inclusivity in conversations about gender.
“And those are all great qualities and it doesn't matter about what our gender is.”
Psychedelics and Leadership Reframe
39:42 to 40:18
Reflect on unconventional leadership discussions, including the role of psychedelics.
Most Downloaded Guest of 2025
40:18 to 42:01
Reveal and discuss the most downloaded guest episode of the year, featuring Dr. Enya Doyle.
“for a balance that that works for everyone so yeah go and check it out and let us know what you think Talking of us and them and being just generally decent people, this is the moment you have been waiting for, I'm sure.”
Navigating Inclusion and Technology in the Workplace
42:01 to 44:37
Learn how to address generational technology gaps and promote inclusion.
“I want to insist older employees use our messaging system instead of face-to-face conversations in the office.”
Professional Appearance and Its Implications
44:38 to 48:49
Explore the complexities of professional appearance and performance evaluations.
“to the return to office and flexible working and et cetera.”
Bias in Professional Judgments
48:50 to 51:47
Discuss the biases related to personal appearance and work performance.
“Yeah, there's the kind of bias that we just kind of allow to run riots in there.”
Insights from Previous Episodes
51:48 to 52:58
Hear reflections on past discussions regarding workplace behavior and education.
“Now, I obviously got schooled in that entire episode.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Merry Christmas everyone.
0:08Yeah, Merry Christmas, Merry Christmas Al. Happy Christmas, Merry Christmas. Merry Christmas. Merry Christmas listeners, maybe you are joining us on your morning dog walk. Maybe you've snuck off for a nap and we're your Nodcast of choice. I don't mind that. How dare you. Or maybe it's well past Christmas Day and you are now on your daily commute and just want to see how our highlights turned out. Whatever the answer is, welcome. Welcome, welcome. This is part two of our highlights episode. On Tuesday, we brought you our favourite moments from this week in work episode. That's the Tuesday episodes.
0:40And today we're sharing our favourite guest interviews and the most downloaded expert interview of the year. That's our Thursdays. Are you keeping up? I think they're up to it, yeah. What a year it's been, Al. I'm sure you guys and work. The award-winning podcast where behavioural science meets workplace culture brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals. Did you see what I did there? That was very smooth. Thank you. If it's your first time, it's not a place to start, but I like it. My name is Leanne. I'm a Chartered Occupational Psychologist.
1:11My name is Al. I'm a business owner. And together we help organisations build amazing workplace cultures. I think you know what's coming up next. We're going to be going into part two of our highlights after a very quick word from our sponsors. See you in just a second. If you've ever done sales for your business, then I bet this is going to be familiar. Your pipeline looks full, activity looks great, but you're not sure which leads matter, which ones are wasting your week and which call you should have made three days ago. It can all be very confusing, Al. Very confusing. But luckily, HubSpot's prospecting agent gives you a clear way forward.
1:43It shows you who's actually ready, gives the details of the reps you need and points them towards the conversations worth having. So reps know exactly where to focus and what they're walking into. Check out HubSpot.com, the agentic customer platform for growing businesses.
2:04Welcome back. So this is how it's going to work. We've both picked two of our favourite interviews from this year. That's 2025, actually, technically not this. Is it this year? It's Christmas Day, Al. Yeah, it's Christmas Day. Not at all pre-recorded. Not at all. No, we're literally just waiting here. We just put the turkey in. Yeah, exactly. We've got nothing to do with it. We'll just jump on and talk to you guys. So basically what we've done is we've gone back through all the emails and the messages to see which of our experts you seem to love most. We've got all the feedback together and we're ready to crown our listeners choice of the year.
2:35That's very grand. I like it. Yes, it is. It is very exciting. As if that wasn't exciting enough, we'll also be crowning our most downloaded expert guest episode of the year. So recorded this year, downloaded this year. We know Rory Sutherland continues to top that most downloaded list of all time. So I mean, and in terms of what was the most downloaded this year, it was certainly an episode that resonated and I'd imagine got a lot of shares as well. So stay tuned to find out who gets crowned, listener's choice and the most downloaded episode of 2025. But before that, we're going to kick off with this absolute legend.
3:09He turned a post-recession layoff into what's now a$10 million ice pop empire and one of Atlanta's most beloved brands. Of course, I'm talking about King of Pops. And he's done all this holding on to one quite radical notion that work should be fun. We agree. We do. He is now sharing his philosophy as a speaker and author of Work is Fun, Seven Ways a Successful Ice Pop Company Makes Work Meaningful and How You Can Do It Too. Let's join Al interviewing Steve Kass about exactly this. I think there's going to be a lot of people sitting there going, work is fun. Yeah, yeah, yeah. How are you going to make it fun, but also keep people productive?
3:46Are they thinking the wrong way? Yeah, I think people think of work and fun even like just to put it more directly oftentimes as opposites and yeah i think that's a big argument of the book is that if you just truly ask yourself like why can't this be fun or why can't this be more fun maybe it's not going to be your warren buffett like i already said tap dancing once i love that i said it twice but i think i had such why that was in my mind i think he has a he talks about tap dancing to work each day and he's obviously wealthy and still loves to go to work. And we all have to be that. I mean, I think I think I want to be in that bucket and feel like I am there right now.
4:27But I don't think that I'm under the illusion that everybody is going to find that all of the time. But what is the harm in trying to make it 5 % more fun? I'd say that to the skeptics. What is the harm in just thinking about and trying to make it more fun for your employees what would be the downside of that obstacles i've already said it on on on the on the podcast not that serious in the grand scheme of things so yeah brain surgeon should they be you know you know being silly while they're doing surgery probably not but there's there's that's probably a small percentage of their time and they're probably actually having fun when they get to that part that's probably something they studied for and probably lit up their brain is probably ticking on all cylinders and i think they're probably enjoying that part it's probably like the whatever the cleanup is or the prep some of the parts that they probably could enjoy figure out ways to enjoy more if they weren't already having fun they might be having fun already those guys are great i always think the measure of whether you are doing something right in life is whether you wake up in the morning thinking about the problem you're trying to solve at work yeah i think that people are saying that that problems are bad, but actually good problem.
5:43Some problems are really good to work on. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I like the way you said that. And I think one thing when we're going through our, our meeting structure, sometimes I think this goes to like the point of tension or like the, the naysayer. So I think if you ever just feel really frustrated, and this is another thing I borrowed from Zingerman's, but when furious, get curious, like if you're really mad about something, it's probably like, it's probably a pretty good issue. And you probably need to kind of like check in on like why are you mad about that like it's a piece of the business that maybe you want to improve or a piece of your work that you want to improve um but if you're getting mad about it it's it's worth checking in on that emotion like why why am i getting mad on that and it'll probably help you improve it or so that was just a little taste of the awesome steve cast go back to episode 181 for the full episode a link to that and all the episodes talk about are of course, in the show notes.
6:36Now, my first pick was a proper pinch remorment. So Al and I have been obsessed with podcasts for years, like 12, 13 years. Actually, Al, were you there for the launch of Ricky Gervais when he basically invented podcasts? Was it back in the 90s? Kind of, yeah. Because you introduced me to podcasts. Did I? Yeah. I did know that. Do you know what? A big shout out to my friend from school, Quentin James. He first told me about podcasts 20 years ago. Wow. Yeah, I know. Yeah, 2005 Ricky Gervais, which is sure. Wow. I know. Like I said, we're huge fans. And we do like to keep an eye on the charts. Of course we do, to see how Truth, Lies and Work is faring against the greats.
7:16And over the summer, we started to get into a bit of a leapfrog competition with the one and only Andrew Palmer from Economist Boss Class. Yeah, now we could do one of two things. We could slag him off and say his podcast is rubbish and you shouldn't listen to it. or you can do the sort of thing that I would do, which is basically drop a message, told him we were at war and said he might as well come on the podcast so we can be friends instead. And to our surprise, he actually said yes. To my surprise, he did say yes. And it was such a fabulous interview. Picking a clip from it was actually really, really difficult.
7:50But I think when you hear Google and Apple in the same sentence, it seems like a pretty good place to start. So let's go and join Al and Andrew. Is there anything else that like, that any other conversations you've had, which have just like blown you away or you've gone like, oh, that's such a great point, never thought of it this way? So I think probably one that sticks in the mind is a recent one with Liz Reed, who's the head of search at Google, who was talking about how that company thinks about innovation and in particular, talking through their process for developing AI. So we all now see these AI overviews when we do a Google search sort of at the top of the screen.
8:31So that was a super interesting conversation just in terms of how they think about things. The one line that stuck was this line which was, you know, fall in love with the problem, not the solution, which was advice that she had been given as a young product engineer and now sort of recites to her teams and is meant to kind of encourage a problem-solving mindset within the company, which allows for people to sort of pivot, change direction, recognize when something has not worked and you might park it and change course. I just think it's a really nice little aphorism to latch onto, whether you're trying to innovate or just trying to solve a different kind of problem entirely, the first answer or the one that occurs to you may not be the right one.
9:27So again, have the open-mindedness to change course if it turns out that you're wrong. I mean, I think it's not fall in love with any problem. It's fall in love with the problem as opposed to the solution. So it's important that you define a problem that matters. So lots of user research, common sense will tell you, is there an issue with how this product is working? or is there a need that isn't met? But once you identify the problem, approach that with an open mind rather than, okay, and this is the way we're going to solve it. Because you will often have, like meeting one, someone with a large salary and a loud voice will say, this is the way I think we should solve it.
10:09And potentially that's the end of the discussion. So ways to sort of avoid that problem are important and I just like that phrase as a way of thinking about it. You say loud voice which immediately when someone thinks of a boss they tend to think loud booming voice. Some of the people who have had the, I'm sorry volume wise but the loudest voices have been the likes of Jobs, have been the likes of Musk but by all accounts they're not amazing managers, not great leaders. So does that mean that we can say, if you're loud, you're not a great leader? If you're quiet, you are a great leader? It's not as simple as that, is it?
10:48It totally isn't. By loud, I really mean the one that kind of silences debate before it's happened. Yeah, I think that Steve Jobs is a sort of problem because he sort of gets wielded as this ace card in any kind of story or debate. And he was both a kind of one-of-a-kind genius and apparently a bit of a jerk. And so, you know, neither of those things are particularly helpful in a normal workplace. You know, most people are not going to invent the iPhone. Their range of achievement is going to be slightly less high. and most workplaces could, I mean, maybe we should talk about jerks because I think actually you can get, zero tolerance of jerks is not good.
11:45But that's definitely not code for you should behave badly. So Jobs got away with it because of what he'd done and I'm not sure that's a useful lesson for anyone. Fall in love with the problem, not the solution. This is such good advice, such good advice. And it applies all across your business, including people, obviously. Of course. Yeah, no, he's such a cool guy. And as we've chatted about for a while, I did enjoy how he said that Steve Jobs was a problematic leader. Yes. It might be time to move on from glamorising that kind of toxic start-up culture. It's very 1998, Alan, not in a good way.
12:18No. So go back, go talking, go back, go back to episode 217 for the full interview with Andrew. Right, my turn. Back in April, I interviewed a guy called James Hawkins. Now, you may not have heard of him unless you like salty people on Twitter, stroke X because that's where he basically just puts loads of stuff on there which get people really angry and it's quite funny. He's the co-founder and co-CEO of PostHog which is a company you almost certainly will have heard of. He's grown a 10 million dollar dev tools company by ditching managers and ditching meetings. Instead PostHog runs lots of tiny little autonomous teams where engineers ship first and ask questions later and nobody gets special treatment just because they have a fancy title clearly my kind of guy one of the ways to not get hired at post dog is to say i want to manage loads of people for example um we'll hire people that are just very passionate about building stuff in general and that's kind of what motivates them it's not really money it's not um kind of empire building um because i think this corresponds with the this correlates with engineers who will want to keep building even when stuff's harder because they just love the underlying work um and some of them are a little bit curious so i think it's almost like a development point for some people and we might wind up saying hey you're getting kind of effectively more senior like because you've been leading the team that's influencing this now um but it won't guarantee any kind of correlation kind of thing so um i think people often can end up as stronger individual engineers if they have managed a few people because they kind of get the they might have a slightly broader picture of the business for example they have a slightly better understanding of what the company cares about so which is kind of nuanced or i think people who'd be managers are easier to that they require less work to manage i think often as well because they can empathize with what it's like when you have to deal with a bunch of people um so yeah there's like some interesting stuff but yeah we absolutely will get pushback and we've had people refuse before um to do this then we've also had managers swap with one of their direct reports and the manager has proposed it going hey i think joe blogs who reports to me mary should actually be my boss and i should report to them i think both of us will be happier and then we'll just pay and then often we'll just end up making that change and you just explained that the managers they get out the way yeah they're there to to make things easier yeah but we've still got the problem of meetings and the problem of all these slack messages or emails or whatever have you got a different way of coping with those yeah um so we have kind of a communication hierarchy that we've published into i think it's our handbook as well but it's basically like um a preferred method of communication is a pull request as in like here is the code so it'd be something like uh so yeah communication could be like do you think i should build this thing or whatever but we prefer that an engineer is just like i've built this thing um let's test um as opposed to like okay i'm gonna spend a month thinking about it it's like no i've just spent a week building it in practice let's find out one of the other learnings i think we've had is one of the things that's been quite different in our experience compared to what it looked like it would be on the internet when we're learning about how to do everything um as a startup was i think if you read a lot of like product management stuff online it's all kind of um thou shalt uh validate your ideas up thine ideas i don't know you should evaluate your ideas up front before you waste time but i don't think this is really i think that's like a cultural thing from really risk-averse extremely large companies that might spend like 20 billion on some new thing and they need to be ultra risk averse whereas with a startup like you're screwed by default like you're going to fail like you're on a dying path as soon as you start hiring people spending money and so you need to like you shouldn't be working in a risk averse way you should be really embracing stuff um and i think the when we've tried to validate stuff up front like we've just had the we've had clearer lessons still when we've just built something put our energy into building it in a like way where we're happy to throw it away if it doesn't work and getting it into people's hands.
16:03And so our preferred method of communication from an engineer is not to spend ages like super validating a product, blah, blah, blah, blah. Just build something real, ship it. You'll get feedback from the team afterwards being like, hey, why did you build this? It seems weird or dumb. Most of the time it won't though. And they're like, cool, we can actually just learn clearly if it was dumb because we'll see if anyone used it or not. So we'd rather have some risk-taking over what gets built in an extremely low consensus environment is our preferred way of building stuff. What I'm enjoying about listening back to these interviews that you and I probably haven't heard for a couple of months either um is we're starting to hear those themes that we've been talking about with psychologists more recently as well so with james i'm seeing there a bit of danny warham's constellation leadership yep yep and the learning environments we heard about from andrew palmer psychological safety from basically everyone everybody i mean as a business owner i do like a bit of chaos because it keeps things exciting but when you're running a company the size of post hoc you need to get the balance just right and post hoc really have i think and so does james they're innovative they like to experiment and they like to make sure the right person is sat in that manager role yeah really good stuff uh the full conversation with james is in episode 189 definitely worth a listen and do you know what else is worth a listen now um i think i do because i've got a note down in front of me but tell everyone episode 171 the science of resilience with dr marie helen pelliter and this one takes us all the way back to february 2025 off the hope that we had for the world in February.
17:26Oh, we were younger and less, I was less grey. Yes, I was almost a full year younger. So yes, Dr. Marie Helene, or MH as she likes to be called, is a leadership psychologist, executive coach, author, and two times TEDx speaker who specialises in strategic resilience. Two words you've probably never heard together before. No, not until now. Now in this clip, MH explains, we need to get MH and MFD on the pod. MH explains that resilience isn't just about surviving, the tough moments is about growing from them. And we're going to hear about the four most important things that contribute to resilience.
18:01Steve Carse:If we step back on definition of even mental health from the World Health Organization, our ability to cope with stresses of life, realize our abilities, learn well, work well and contribute to our community. If we look at the definition of resilience, and there are many in the academic literature, but one that most researchers and practitioners use, and the one I use as well, is our ability to go through adversity and come out even stronger. So there is this element of the stressors of life, basically, both acute and chronic. And then the resilience aspect adds this component of growth, of learning.
18:44Steve Carse:Right. And so if we're going to want to bring our best, both professionally and even personally in our personal lives, because it's all connected. Right. We don't there isn't a lane specific for work and a lane specific for personal. We will want to invest proactively in our resilience. It's going to help with everything. And why is it so important today in the world of work we're operating in in 2025? I would say always been important. We're talking more about it. And I love that. And we're also talking more about it, I think, because on one hand, it's become a word we're used to. On the other hand, we're still not fabulous at it.
19:25Steve Carse:So we need to talk about it more. The other thing is that we are facing even more challenges, even looking at recent statistics from World Economic Forum, talking about businesses noticing that 44 % and more of workers will see their skills disrupted by 2027. And even if we just think about AI and all the changes it brings in general, personal and professional life, that in itself will be probably both an acute and a chronic demand that we'll have to deal with. And there are many others. So that's normal. That's fine. We almost want to turn these challenges into the way life is. And at the same time, recognizing that for us humans, these demands are taxing.
20:13Steve Carse:They are requiring some of our resources. And now we'll dive into how a workplace is a system. It's not all in us as individuals. And that's a very, very important aspect of this overall picture. And even in that system, we do have an impact, an opportunity to impact our resilience. The key aspect being, or one of the key ones, is that it is not a personality trait. Sometimes we'll tend to think that it is because we've been so resilient in so many ways so far, recently, that's great. And so, well, that must be who I am. And no, it isn't. It's a state. So that means it will fluctuate. And it also means we can influence it.
20:59Steve Carse:We have agency and we want to use that. So if resilience fluctuates, how do we know when we might be in need of building our resilience and doing something proactive to build that back up? Always. It's similar to if it's not exactly that. But if we said, well, you know, hydration is important. How often should we drink? Well, all day, every day. And it's not because we did yesterday that we don't need to do it today. No, always. And if we know there's going to be a demand, say a phase where we can't drink much water, then yes, we want to front load. And we want to replenish as soon as we can shortly after.
21:36It functions the same way in a number of ways.
21:40Steve Carse:And so how will we know if it's particularly suffering, right? We will start to see things like maybe our concentration not being as good. For a lot of people, they will see themselves being more impatient than they usually are. If you're always impatient, maybe that's not a sign. But even an impatient person sometimes will reach even higher levels. Sometimes it will impact your sleep. It will impact your eating habits, your consumption of alcohol, for example. Often an easy way to think about it is you're just not being your usual self. So when we recognize that in ourselves, if we have that awareness, or maybe it's the feedback we get from others.
22:27I might have been told that before from Al, perhaps, that I'm having less patience than I normally would. If I recognize that, what can I do? What practical things can I do to start to better manage the stress and build my resilience?
22:42Steve Carse:So during the pandemic, especially, everyone, we've all heard the things, the key things that would likely help us build our resilience. And they are solidly research based. We're not talking about a few studies. We're talking about body of research, meta-analysis, systematic reviews, like very established. So four key variables we would want in that equation. The problem is not so much knowing those variables. It's an implementing, which is why I'm arguing we need to be actually strategic about it. But just so we're all on the same page, those four variables. First one is, yeah, movement or exercise.
23:27Steve Carse:Three categories, subcategories in there. One is cardio, one is strength training, and another one is meditative type activity. Yoga, meditation, tai chi, all of these. Okay, so that's variable number one. And actually, number one in the me listing them right now. They're not in order of priority necessarily. Another one is nutrition. A lot of research is focusing on the Mediterranean type diet. Fish, leafy vegetables, that kind of thing. Huge impact on our resilience. We do it for physical health. It's huge for mental health. Sleep, seven to eight hours a night. And no, the phone is not something to do in your bed or your laptop.
24:09Steve Carse:No, not doing that either. And fourth category is our relationships. Spending time with people we enjoy spending time with. And I'm seeing most leaders and professionals let that one go. They'll prioritize exercise. They'll prioritize specifically cardio, maybe strength training. They'll say meditation's not for them, even more of a reason to do it. They'll sometimes compromise on nutrition, often compromise on sleep, and very often cancel any social plan to work. And yet these four variables would have the most impact on our resilience. So you say to approach it strategically, what would that look like?
24:50Like, how can I assess where I am on those four variables?
24:54Steve Carse:I know this, this I think is truly the game changer here. And here's the way even I got to realizing this is the missing piece. I was working with leaders, business owners, that kind of thing. And some of them were saying, well, you know, what's my problem? Why am I just not implementing those things that I know I should? I believe in them. I believe in research, like crystal clear. I've done this before and felt better. Everything is there. I'm still not doing it. Then at some point I said, well, it's similar to in business when you have a great idea about a new thing to launch, new service, new product.
25:34Steve Carse:Would you just have this great idea and say, great, let's do it. Or would you have this great idea and say, OK, who else is offering it? How much are they charging for it? Who is buying it? What forces in the near or far future might impact the demand for it? You would do all this. This is evaluating the context. This leads to a strategy. So a higher level direction on how you're going to launch the thing. So same thing here for us with our resilience. So we have this great idea. We know some of the things we think that we should do. And what I'm saying is, let's be strategic, which means your plan, Leanne, and mine will be different.
26:18Steve Carse:My plan will be different from my plan in three months from now because my context is changing. And I'm saying three main ways to get to designing a plan that's yours, that's uniquely aligned with your context. We're focusing on your values. We're focusing on a realistic assessment of your sources of supply and your sources of demand. We're assessing your context using the same framework as the SWOT analysis in business, looking at your strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, so that you can create a plan that is actually doable. and that's what then changes everything because now it happens it builds self-efficacy that sense of yes i can impact my resilience and now we're actually on our way i love mh's approach because it's just it's practical it's relatable and it's all still backed by science i think the big takeaway for me again we're listening to that interview is remembering that resilience is state it's not fixed It's not part of our personality.
27:23It moves, it fluctuates, but we can also influence it as well. Yeah, and remember those four pillars. Move, eat properly, sleep well, and spend time with people who lift you up. That's what I do every day. Yeah. Yeah, I spend time with you who lift me up. I think, to be honest, a lot of us do sort of push those aside when work gets busy, which is why MH says we need a plan that fits real life, not just some perfect version of it. And when you do that, you're going to find your resilience will genuinely grow. Yeah, it's such a great one. Add it to your January listen list when we're all just running a little low on energy, aren't we?
27:57That's episode 171. And I wanted to mention as well, MH has a brand new TEDx talk out, literally out at time of recording very recently, time of listening, maybe a couple of weeks ago. But yes, a brand new TEDx talk called Crossing the River, Resilience in the Age of AI. As you'd imagine, it's brilliant. And it does use a crossing the river as a really brilliant analogy for dealing with all this disruption and building resilience in a strategic and sustainable way. So I'll leave a link to that as well in the show notes. Okay, we're going to go to a very quick break. Those are our favourites. And coming up now, we're going to be talking about your favourites, the ones that got you talking.
28:38Is that right, Leigh? Yes, we've got listeners choice and most downloaded guest of 2025. You have to come back. You have to come back. Otherwise, we'll come and find you. See you in a second. If you're like me and you hate all this workaholic hustle nonsense on the socials and somebody's getting up at 3am to drink butter, then here is a brand new podcast that I know. If you're like me and you hate all this workaholic hustle nonsense that's all over the socials, You know, that dude who's getting up at like 3am to drink butter. Well, here is a brand new podcast that I know you will love. It is called Seven Day Weekend and is, of course, brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals where all good podcasts live.
Read the full transcript
29:22I'm going to try and get through this. The Seven Day Weekend is your weekly dose of business finance and side hustle motivation. So go subscribe and get brand new episodes featuring a mixture of guests and Laura's hard-earned tips that'll teach you how to build the digital tools necessary to build your own seven-day weekend, no butter required. For a taste of what's to come, go and listen to A Day in the Life of an Anti-Workholic, where Laura explains how to maximise your productivity with some fun and quirky techniques while living your best life. This is so up my street. Listen to Seven Day Weekend wherever you get your podcasts.
30:03Did you come back? Did you come back? Good. Well done. Well done. Now is the time to share the guest who got our audience talking. This was by far one of the most shared episodes of the year. People were posting on LinkedIn. They were messaging us and obviously the guests to say how much the episode really made them think. And they were buying their book immediately, which is great as a podcaster. Not so great if we don't get any kind of a kickback on it, but we never get a kickback. Don't worry. Of course, we are talking about the incredible Alina Tabool. Yes, Alina was on the show back in May.
30:32She is an executive advisor, former Wall Street lawyer and author of Feminine Intelligence. Elena really does challenge assumptions about power and leadership and success and offered us a very radical reframe that might just define the future of work. So I'll dive right in here because I think this is this is really important is, you know, we throw around this idea of the patriarchy a lot. and there's political patriarchy, which is about the oppression of women. And that's one thing. But then there is psychological patriarchy. And I think a lot of men have really suffered under psychological patriarchy because they have been conditioned from a very young age to believe that showing emotion, showing vulnerability, tapping into their intuition, even their creativity is somehow not masculine.
31:25And that is for women. And as a psychologist and as someone who has worked with extremely successful business leaders who have been actually predominantly men, equally men and women, I would say, but many, many very successful men, I find that they're often missing a part of themselves. They're often not able to tap into their emotional side and that impacts their relationships very heavily. That also impacts their business leadership, that impacts their ability to tap into joy and awe and authenticity. And so when I say, you know, for men to tap into their feminine intelligence, it is by no means saying anything around being like effeminate or I guess people used to use like weird terms back in the day, like metrosexual.
32:15I don't think I've heard that one for a while. But it's none of those things. It has nothing to do with an outward perception of kind of femininity that I can completely understand why many men would not want to be associated with. And that's totally fine. and what and you can be outwardly masculine in the traditional definition and yet be able to tap into these energies which is really fantastic for for inspiring others for having good relationship and for for finding wholeness so men in the room please join us so i think that a lot of people would think, all right, it's as straightforward as masculine energy is logic and feminine energy is emotions.
33:03Now, I am being deliberately generalistic here, so I'm not saying that I necessarily believe that, but I think that seems to be a perception. What are people getting wrong? What are the nuances? Yeah. And again, this is because it's not about gender, then we can say that there are certain strengths and values and principles associated with the feminine archetype. And those are things around intuition, about creativity, really this right brain intelligence that taps into the present moment that's very relational. Relational is a key element of this. It's not individualistic the way that the left brain, the way that the masculine is.
33:41And it also, for me, a lot about connection to nature. So I think that we have kind of perverted our relationship with nature, where we think we are somehow above it, we're supposed to control it. But the feminine is certainly deeply associated with the archetype of nature consciousness, of climate consciousness. And the masculine is, again, this is the archetype of the masculine, and it is associated with linear, rational, logical thought with the left brain, with more individualistic as opposed to relational, with a more kind of dominant. And if you think about the yin and yang, the yang energy, which is more about action and orientation, and the yin energy is more about receptivity and actually, and darkness and reflection.
34:30And so, yes, these are stereotypes, But actually, these stereotypes have been in our collective consciousness for generations. And there's nothing wrong with them. They're actually quite helpful. And instead of saying that some of these are weak and soft and we don't need them, I think the point here is to recognize that we can't just bifurcate our humanity into two separate parts and say that somehow they're related to our gender. We can say that the feminine is softer and we can say that it's more intuitive and it's more creative and it's relational. And those are all great qualities and it doesn't matter about what our gender is.
35:08It's really the balance of both and society and culture. And we have predominantly over indexed on the masculine, which creates deep disconnection for us on an individual level, but also a lot of societal problems. And so bringing in these feminine intelligence qualities is really about, you know, naming them, yes, and also understanding that there's nothing wrong with them. We don't have to say that somehow we're going to be soft and weak if we tap into them. There seems to be a resurgence quite recently of these like tech bros in Silicon Valley, you know, the ones who are jet skis holding beers and the American flag and all that kind of stuff.
35:52That seems an odd thing to have happened because traditionally Silicon Valley always felt more like it was more the nerds like me, the coders, the introverts. But is this something to do with the feminine energy? Are they trying to rebel against it? What's going on there? I think it's true that the pendulum always swings one way and then over-indexes and swings the other way. What's happened, I think, in the last decade or more is there has been a lot of emphasis on women and on women's progress and making sure that women are included in the conversation, that women have a seat at the table. and I think what's happened is that we've forgotten about the men in some ways, about the young boys especially.
36:37I recently heard Professor Scott Galloway say something very interesting in this regard. He acknowledged his privilege as a white male and he said that he's now in his 50s and so he very much grew up with that privilege and he understands a lot of his success today is based on that. But what's really unfair is that 15, 16, 17, 18-year-old boys today are the ones who are paying for that privilege. And so this resurgence of, you know, the tech bros and really leaning into this masculinity, I think this is saying we've been forgotten. and there's been so much emphasis on other cultural groups, on other genders.
37:22And what about us? And so this is them trying to take back their power, which is, I think, fully understood. Now, I have two children. I have a daughter. She's nine. And I have a son. He's 11. And I remember when Annabelle, my daughter, and I, we went to go see the new Barbie movie. I don't know if you saw it, if you remember it. It was probably about two years ago now. And we had a lovely time and we laughed about girl power and, you know, it was nice. But the whole time I was thinking, I really hope my son never sees this movie. Because it villainized men so much. It doesn't have to be that women's power and women's progress is at the expense of men.
38:07And that's why I always say that feminine intelligence is not about feminism. It's about bringing everyone together and about understanding that if we're creative enough, we're brave enough, we're open enough, then we can grow a bigger pie and make sure that everyone is included and that certain groups are not forgotten. Because what happens when certain groups are forgotten is then the pendulum swings aggressively in the other direction. And then we end up in the situation that we're in today, where the narratives around masculinity are really shifting. And you have people like Andrew Tate, who's becoming really popular.
38:44And I understand why he's popular. He's popular because he's speaking to an audience that has been forgotten and that has been villainized. And instead of telling them that they're responsible for other people's pain, if we bring them into the conversation and we, you know, we help them to be the best versions of themselves, then they don't have to turn violent and they don't have to turn aggressive. And I think this is the idea for me of feminine intelligence is always approach with compassion and curiosity. And it's very easy to villainize someone. It's much harder to say, wait a minute, where is this coming from?
39:20Can I understand this? Can I impact this? Can I approach with love the underlying root cause of the situation so that it actually doesn't happen? That's how you take the power away from someone like an Andrew Tate, is you approach those boys with love and compassion and opportunity instead of saying that they're responsible for the demise of women in other groups. And so I'm not surprised by what I'm seeing in the political climate, because, again, it's not just about leveling the playing field and giving women the rights that they fully deserve, but it's also about including everyone in the conversation.
39:55elena and i covered quite a lot in this interview including psychedelics didn't think that was going to come up but if you want to listen to the entire thing then go back episode 197 yeah it's really interesting you know whether you agree with all of it or not isn't the point it is just a really interesting concept and way of reframing leadership away from gender away from us and them and looking for a balance that that works for everyone so yeah go and check it out and let us know what you think Talking of us and them and being just generally decent people, this is the moment you have been waiting for, I'm sure.
40:29And if you haven't, then please just join my excitement. The most downloaded guest of 2025. It's not really a surprise that this episode and the guest went down extremely well, albeit maybe on the quiet. Yeah, it was also one of our most shared episodes of the year. And again, I think that makes sense when we consider the subject matter. But enough of the suspense, Al. Al, can you give me a drum roll? Is that possible?
40:55The winner of Most Downloaded Guest 2025 is... Open the envelope. The harassment doctor herself, Dr. Enya Doyle, from episode 175, The Workplace Rules No One Explains. Yes, I mean, this episode is a pure masterclass in handling those awkward or messy or terrifying situations that managers can find ourselves in. and clearly is a masterclass that is needed, even if it was very quietly needed. Quietly needed, yeah. Quietly shared by a lot of people, I think. If this is the first time you've heard of Dr. Enya, aka the harassment doctor, she's a specialist in harassment, inclusion, and workplace culture.
41:36Al interviewed her in February and asked her, it's a very different format that went down well, asked her the top 10 questions we'd seen around harassment, inclusion, and sexual assault in the workplace. So basically, he asked the questions that most managers are afraid to. And as you'll hear, Dr. Enya handed them all like an absolute pro and with a little bit of salt, which is what makes her so brilliant. So the question I've got here is, I want to insist older employees use our messaging system instead of face-to-face conversations in the office. But would this be an inclusion issue, seeing as the majority of them prefer to walk over to a desk and have a chat rather than jump on Slack?
42:14You've really got something against older people, Al. Are you eating badly?
42:23that'd be great to have you on tape being really offensive to me yeah that would be good yeah yeah please just put that out as the sidebar that'll be nice amazing um okay i think the the main things that i would say are yes it's probably not great if you're assuming that they that they don't want to do it rather than they just haven't been trained like taking the kind of reasonable adjustments approach to this the assumption that junior members of staff will just know how to use slack or will figure it out doesn't apply to older members of staff who have never had to use it and say they've been working in your company for 25 years and they've got away with the kind of you've never said to them i need you to be on teams or i need you to be on slack or i need you to whatever um whatever part of it it is if you've never held them accountable as that's been changing then you don't suddenly get to mandate these things without saying can I help you do you need to do you need to guide you through it would you like some additional time to get like on the clock paid time not in your own time at 10 p.m when all of your 19 year old colleagues are learning how to use all of these fun social whatevers but on on the clock we'll pay for you to go on a course or we'll sit you with you know a colleague in your team who does know this really really well IT will help you with whatever you need and being patient with the fact that you know the world has changed rapidly and is changing rapidly for colleagues of all of all ages but thinking about the kind of grace that you give to them in learning new stuff and if it is complicated which a lot of it is like replying to all in emails was a massive thing still is people still reply all to emails when it's abundantly clear that that's not a reply all situation and for some people that's like oh I usually use hot outlook and now I'm on gmail because I've just started a new job and I don't know where the don't reply all button is and that happens to people of all ages but I would say you need to you need to put the kind of take the barriers down for people before you start mandating things for them.
44:37And also, you know, there are pros and cons as we kind of talk about the return, the mandate to the return to office and flexible working and et cetera. You've got to find a hybrid model, but you've also got to train your colleagues and you've got to provide them with the tools in order to mandate those sorts of models. You can't just insist things and then be like, oh, it's because they're old. Like, no, it's because you're a bad manager. I want to stick with the inclusion idea, but I don't know whether this is actually comes under inclusion. So let me tell you, and you can tell me where I've got this right or wrong.
45:10So an employee's appearance has become unprofessional, wrinkled clothes, messy hair. How do I address this without it being a harassment or, and I've added, or inclusion issue? And again, you can see what I'm wondering. I don't know whether it is inclusion, whether it's just a potentially a personal situation. What are your thoughts? I think there are probably actually very few workplaces in which the way that you dress is actually unprofessional. And this is something, this is probably a kind of like, and you gets cancelled perspective. perspective but I think unless you're like kind of cabin crew is the obvious ones if we think of like they are the people that if their uniform looks a certain way you're like oh you know I flew with this company and their uniform was impeccable and so was their service like it's an indication of the sort of we take care in the little details kind of vibes but most people that work in offices that work from home or wherever are like it really doesn't matter what I'm wearing but if you're considering me unprofessional because of the way my hair looks or whatever else then we're probably into an issue where you have a problem with me rather than a problem with my clothes or if you have a problem with my output then that's actually nothing to do with the clothes that I'm wearing or how frequently I wash my hair like let's focus on the fact that I'm not doing my key performance objectives I'm not keeping up with what you want me to do in the workplace you don't have to make that about my clothes or what I wear and we learned that lesson really well during Covid when everyone was wearing their jammies on the bottom half and then had the the shirts and the blazers on and there's really funny pictures online of people being like come into work wearing what you wore during Covid and part of that is like you know tongue-in-cheek of like you would never possibly do that now but I'm like okay but were you happy with with their outputs during that period of time?
47:12Did it make any difference to how the client perceived them? Did it make any difference negatively to the way that they were seen? And the kind of other side of that is like, you know, if you're not happy with their work, then you need to tell them that. You can't just be like, I think you're dressing unprofessionally and that's my problem with you. Because most workplaces don't actually have a consistently applied code of conduct when it comes to the clothes that you wear. So when you start bringing that one out, it's almost like, are you not able to tell me that you don't like my work, so you're going to try and take me down personally?
47:49That's often how it plays out. The final thing related to the inclusion point is that the people that tend to be called out for this more often are black women. And so it definitely has an additional inclusion strain to it, which is that very often it is people who have additional barriers to success in the workplace systemically that end up being put on performance reviews for this sorts of stuff. Why would it be black women? I've not spent time in an office for a very, very long time. So as a genuine question, innocent, why would it be more likely to be black women? It's about the politicisation of black women's hair in particular.
48:29There's a lot of stuff around how black people have their hair in the workplace and are being perceived to be unprofessional um we see it a lot in schools as well um with uh the kind of it's called the halo code um there's a really amazing project doing amazing work on this like who's more likely to be written up for detentions based on their appearance um and we see the same in the workplace it's most likely to be people who it's like for some reason i just don't like the way you look is it is it because of the color of my skin no is it because of my sex so let's just stay with this because i've got a follow-up question you mentioned something before which is a really great example you said that uh cabin crew then uh cabin crew you look at i like i flew jet two recently and the service was great and they looked immaculate and i just really enjoyed the experience compared to some of the other i'm sorry i know you're iris but some of the other some of the other airlines that may may come from your home country um however i made a judgment i think initially when i sat down on how everyone was presented they looked very clean tidy whatever and so i thought well this is probably going to be good it's the same you walk past a cafe the windows are dirty yeah you go well i'm not going in there yeah so could the same be applied if a manager looks at someone who doesn't take any care in their appearance looks scruffy doesn't care what they wear hair's all over the place hot you know missed a bit when they're shaving does that then suggest perhaps that they might be missing stuff in their work.
49:59Yeah, there's the kind of bias that we just kind of allow to run riots in there. But the question, the thing that I often say in that context is, who do you think designed all of the tech that we use now? It's the tech bros in Silicon Valley who are in their shorts and their t-shirts that have got stains the whole way down. Not exclusively, but there are lots of people who are doing amazing work. Like I think of my time in academia, and I spent most of my time writing my PhD, which everyone is like, objectively, that's really amazing. 2 % of the population have a PhD. And I wrote most of that in a hoodie.
50:35I wrote most of it in the same hoodie. Like we can be impressive in ways that we don't expect, but it comes from a kind of, I think the protection element of it and the curiosity about it is, you know, some people do want to dress really well for work and some people kind of go back again into the school uniform situation of you know if we were told that we were on non-uniform day it was like we're going rioting this is amazing and not in the northern irish rioting way but in the like we're having like the best day this is a fun day at school this isn't a learning day at school and for some people it's like i have to be in my uniform i have to be really immaculately dressed i have to do my tie i have to wear a blazer in order to be in that kind of head space to concentrate well and if that is you that is a bias that you hold about how other people do work really well and what what they need in order to concentrate and we see the same in kind of bullpens and whether people would prefer to be in their own space and you then get into neuro inclusivity and all of that sort of thing too but I would say that a lot of it is personal preference and as long as you're setting good objectives for your team and they are fulfilling and unless there's a business need for them to be dressed immaculately, you're probably just being picky.
51:53Now, I obviously got schooled in that entire episode. And if you want to hear me basically being told that I'm completely wrong, then go back and listen. Multiple times. Multiple times. However, it was really important. Leanne talked about this. Leanne and I talked about this quite at some length. And it was really important that I did it being a middle-aged, middle-class white male who wasn't an expert. And so I could ask her on your behalf. I could ask these difficult questions. And I learned that I probably shouldn't be stalking female employees on Instagram. I don't really. I don't really.
52:23No, you don't. Well, but you don't have Instagram for a start. That's true. I don't. That's okay. Such an old man. And I'm the only female employee. So if you were stalking me, that's still not okay. But, you know. I can just do it in real life. I'll just follow you around the kitchen. Oh, dear. It was a brilliant one. Dr. Enya has such a unique and brilliant approach to this stuff. She makes it fun somehow. Yeah, sexual assault. But you know what I mean? In terms of learning about being educated about it, it makes it so accessible. So yes, go and have a listen to the full episode of Dr. Enya.
53:00There's more questions in there. I think we featured two in that clip. So there's more around compliments, around grief, around swearing. It covers them all. So head back to episode 175. five uh the link to that and all the episodes we featured today are in the show note not that you guys ever read them but that's the end of our highlight episode big thank you to steve kass andrew palmer james hawkins mh alina tabool and dr enya doyle and a huge huge thank you too to all of the guests who've come on the show in 2025 genuinely you brought great insights to our listeners and we literally couldn't make the show without you yeah truly thank you and to all of our lovely listeners as well thank you so much for staying with us for getting in touch telling us what you're loving what you're sometimes not loving so much um and downloading the show throughout the year it does mean everything to us um when we know we're putting stuff out there that is valuable and maybe enjoyable as well um so thank you all merry christmas to all those listening who celebrate it we'll be back on tuesday with part one of our predictions episode and until then me and i'll are going to be on the baileys and mince pie we absolutely are See you soon.
54:05Bye bye.
From the publisher
Merry Christmas! And welcome back to This Year in Work!
Today we’re back with Part 2 of our 2025 highlights series, and this time it’s all about our guest interviews.
If you’re new here, welcome along. This is Truth, Lies & Work, the award-winning podcast where behavioural science meets workplace culture. Brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network.
⭐ Our Favourite Guest Interviews of 2025
Steve Carse — Work Should Be Fun
Episode 181: https://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/181
We kicked things off with King of Pops founder Steve Carse, who turned a layoff into a $10M ice-pop empire built on one radical belief: work should be fun.
Andrew Palmer — Fall in Love With the Problem
Episode 217: https://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/217
Then came an absolute pinch-me moment for both of us: talking to Andrew Palmer, senior editor at The Economist and host of the Boss Class podcast.
James Hawkins — Chaos, Autonomy and Building Better Teams
Episode 189: https://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/189
Al’s pick was James Hawkins, co-founder of PostHog — the dev tools company that ditched managers and meetings in favour of tiny autonomous teams.
Dr Marie-Hélène — The Science of Strategic Resilience
Episode 171: https://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/171TEDx talk link: “Crossing the River: Resilience in the Age of AI” - https://youtu.be/JEdr2cvHF5M?si=OB07KHvgSjldYKmg
Leanne’s pick was Dr MH, who reframed resilience as a state — not part of your personality. It moves, fluctuates, and can be strengthened through movement, nutrition, sleep, and relationships.
💬 Listeners’ Choice Award 2025
Elina Teboul — Feminine Intelligence and the Future of Leadership
Episode 197: https://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/197
Your messages, comments and LinkedIn posts made this one clear.Elina Teboul, executive advisor and author of Feminine Intelligence, challenged assumptions about power, masculinity, intuition, balance and the psychological patriarchy. Whether listeners agreed or disagreed wasn’t the point — the episode sparked reflection everywhere, which is exactly what great conversations do.
🥇 Most Downloaded Expert Episode of 2025
Dr Enya Doyle — The Workplace Rules No One Explains
Episode 175: https://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/175
No surprises here.
The episode you downloaded most — and shared most quietly — was with Dr Enya Doyle, the harassment and inclusion specialist known online as The Harassment Doctor.
This was a true masterclass in navigating messy, awkward and sometimes frightening management moments.
From appearance standards to ageing workforces to tricky inclusion issues, Dr Enya cut through the nonsense with clarity, humour and absolute precision. A must-bookmark episode for every manager.
🎧 Episodes Mentioned Today
Ep 181 — Work Should Be Fun with Steve Carsehttps://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/181
Ep 217 — Andrew Palmer on Better Bosseshttps://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/217
Ep 189 — James Hawkins: Autonomous Teams & Faster Deliveryhttps://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/189
Ep 171 — The Science of Resilience with Dr Marie-Hélènehttps://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/171
Ep 197 — Feminine Intelligence with Elina Teboulhttps://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/197
Ep 175 — The Workplace Rules No One Explains with Dr Enya Doylehttps://truthliesandwork.com/episodes/175
Support Links:
Mind UK — https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/
Samaritans — 116 123 or jo@samaritans.org
Connect with us:
LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/company/truthlieswork
Al — https://www.linkedin.com/in/thisisalelliott
Leanne — https://www.linkedin.com/in/meetleanne
Email — hello@truthliesandwork.com
Book a chat — https://savvycal.com/meetleanne/chat
