286. The 'Cockroaches of HR', interview hacks and return-to-office Dilemmas. PLUS! Should you hire for culture fit?

24 Mar 2026 · 53 min · 17 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Exit interviews, interview coaching tech, return-to-office policy dilemmas, age-diverse teams, and whether to hire for “culture fit.”

Guests/backgrounds

No external guests. Hosts are Al (business owner) and Leanne (chartered occupational psychologist).

Key claims

  • Exit interviews are often “cockroaches” of HR: hard to get honest, useful data and confidentiality complicates acting on it.
  • A better approach is follow-up conversations months later (e.g., lunch) to get more candid, contextual feedback.
  • “How to Job” and “Interviewly” use video-based coaching and AI-style mock interviews with real-time feedback.
  • Older workers aren’t overlooked when teams create an intergenerational climate with real interaction.
  • “Culture fit” as usually practiced is a lie for predicting job performance; it correlates more with satisfaction/commitment than performance and can mask bias.

Notable examples

  • How-to-Job success stories: five offers in a month; job at the London Stock Exchange.
  • Culture fit “airport test” and “vibe check”/likability bias.
  • Workplace surgery: enforcing a 5-day RTO; “complicit” staying amid unequal treatment; scaling culture from 8 to 35.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Cockroaches of HR

1:03 to 1:21

Discussion on the surprising nature of exit interviews in the workplace.

“Brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals.”

Rethinking Exit Interviews

1:21 to 2:05

Exploration of the effectiveness of exit interviews and an alternative suggestion.

“HubSpot makes impossible growth impossibly easy for their customers.”

Return to Office Dilemmas

2:05 to 3:20

Discussion about the challenges employees face with return-to-office mandates.

“Well, I think one of your needs is to learn what's going on in the world of work.”

Interview Techniques and New Platforms

3:20 to 6:00

Introduction of a new platform designed to enhance job interview techniques.

“But at some point, listener, in the next few weeks, I'm going to surprise you with a cool new button that is a cool new thing.”

Understanding Recruitment Processes

14:03 to 15:10

Explore how AI is influencing recruitment and the complexities of hiring.

“They're not really indigenous, even though they are indigenous, because they basically go, well, I'm going to live here now.”

Ageism in the Workplace

15:10 to 19:28

Discuss the challenges older workers face and the benefits of intergenerational collaboration.

“No, but every other, during the last 2000, it's probably not a country on earth.”

Encouraging Collaboration Across Generations

19:28 to 22:08

Learn why fostering interaction among different age groups is vital for workplace harmony.

“And I think that, you know, if you went back 20 years, then yes, there'd be like, oh, you know, the old farts are in the corner and they're just typing, they're writing out in their double entry bookkeeping system.”

The Truth About Hiring for Culture Fit

23:01 to 28:00

Investigate whether hiring for culture fit is beneficial or detrimental to organizations.

“There are so many people I speak to who say, yeah, yeah, they weren't just just weren't quite a culture fit.”

Understanding Organizational Fit and Employee Satisfaction

28:00 to 28:52

Learn how organizational fit impacts employee satisfaction and commitment.

“Because that would be squaring it, not square rooting it.”

The Limitations of Culture Fit in Recruitment

28:52 to 31:05

Discover why culture fit is a poor predictor of job performance.

Show all 17 chapters

Bias in Hiring Processes: Risks of Culture Fit

31:05 to 35:34

Explore how bias can infiltrate hiring processes through culture fit assessments.

The Weekly Workplace Surgery: Enforcing a Return-to-Office Policy

35:34 to 36:11

Gain insights on how to handle the challenges of enforcing a return-to-office policy.

Balancing Personal Comfort and Workplace Dynamics

36:11 to 37:52

Understand the complexities of staying in a job while witnessing unfair treatment of colleagues.

“So this person says, my company has announced a full return to the office five days a week.”

Navigating the Job Market in Tough Times

42:05 to 44:35

Learn how to address workplace challenges during difficult economic times.

Scaling Company Culture Amid Rapid Growth

44:35 to 47:15

Understand the challenges of maintaining company culture while expanding rapidly.

“Now the new people don't seem to feel it the same way.”

Addressing Operational and Cultural Misalignments

47:15 to 49:48

Discover how operational processes affect cultural cohesion in growing teams.

The Impact of Rapid Growth on Organizational Values

49:48 to 51:11

Explore the relationship between rapid growth and evolving organizational values.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01Nick Corcodilos:Coming up this week in work. Are exit interviews actually useless? One headhunter is calling them the cockroaches of the employment world. Strong. So if you want to know why people really left, when should you be asking them? Yeah, and we all know the job market is tough right now. But what if there was an app that you were not only able to practice your interview technique, but also got real-time feedback on how you could do better? Oh, and what if it was filled with videos all designed to help you land your dream job? Well, I think I might have found it more shortly. And in truth or lie, should you hire for CultureFit?

0:35Around 80 % of employers say it's a top priority when choosing candidates. Does it actually predict whether someone will be good at the job? I've read the research and I've got a verdict.

0:47Nick Corcodilos:And of course, in the workplace surgery, we've got three more questions. One of them is about enforcing a policy you don't believe in when you're caught in the middle of it. One listener is struggling with a five-day return to office mandate and knows their team will too. This is True Lies and Work, the award-winning podcast where behavioural science meets workplace culture. Brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals. My name is Al. I'm a business owner and I'm here to ask you the questions you might be afraid to. My name is Leanne. I'm a charter occupational psychologist and I'm here to answer them.

1:15And together, we help you simplify the science of work and build amazing workplace cultures.

1:20Nick Corcodilos:Right back after a very quick word from our sponsors. HubSpot makes impossible growth impossibly easy for their customers. And here's a perfect example. Leigh, your turn. Morehouse College needed to reach new students with fresh, engaging content. But with a massive 900-page website, even the tiniest updates took 30 minutes to publish. Breeze, which is HubSpot's collection of AI tools, helped them write and optimize their content in just a fraction of the time. The results? 30 % more page views, and visitors now spend 27 % more time on their site. If you're ready for impossible growth like this, visit HubSpot.com.

2:04Nick Corcodilos:hello hello welcome back welcome back lee has it been a good week what can we say it's only tuesday and it's already been a really bad week yeah well it will not we'll we'll not get too much into it because um yeah there's the i think our friends will know and i know jeremy will know because i told him i had to move his call today but yes so um in short in a few weeks time we might be coming to you from a different country who knows who knows here we go again anyway here i go again almost i don't know the second line to that if i did i'd try and do something clever around residency but let's let's just say that if you do want to live in a particular balkan country then it's never simple it's never simple no sir what is simple though is you leanne you're a very simple I'm a very simple person with very simple needs.

2:57Nick Corcodilos:Well, I think one of your needs is to learn what's going on in the world of work. Is that the weakest, worst segue I've ever done? No, I like it. Yeah, you like it? I like it. I think we can do that through the News Roundup. So why don't you do my favourite and do that thing more? Yes. All right. I'll press that button. Okay, Lee. By the way, I told you, haven't I? I found a new thing on my disco box on my roadcaster. Yeah. Have you changed the music for the News Roundup? No, no. But at some point, listener, in the next few weeks, I'm going to surprise you with a cool new button that is a cool new thing.

3:26Nick Corcodilos:Leigh, what have you seen this week, my love? Our exit interviews are cockroaches of the employment world. I mean, that's pretty strong. It is pretty strong. It is. This was, yeah, this guy, a headhunter called Nicholas... Oh, man, I should have practiced this. Nicholas Korkadilos. Can I have a guess at where his name's from? Yeah. i would guess he's greek oh maybe yeah yeah maybe maybe well if this was in ink i think i didn't actually write that down i will leave a link but i think it was in ink and yeah nick was saying that he thinks exit interviews and the whole idea of them are the cockroaches of the unemployment world he reckons nobody really knows why they exist no one can quite justified them and yet they never really seem to go away i mean in theory exit interviews should give companies useful data shouldn't they it makes sense why you're so this is what is an exit interview i was just about to say just in case someone's like exit interview what does it mean so exit interview is when an employee has resigned from the company and on their last day or a few days before they leave you sit them down and basically try and find out why try and get some feedback in terms of the organization so yeah basically why they're leaving maybe what's broken what needs what needs fixing and and i think the telling the truth in a situation like that is quite difficult isn't it because at that moment those employees still need references they don't want to burn any bridges so instead of kind of going oh my manager's an absolute nightmare actually they're the reason i'm leaving you know they're probably just more likely to give safer generic answers.

5:08I do run exit interviews with employees of my clients who leave on the occasion they do because my clients enjoy very high levels of retention. And even as a third party speaking to them, you know, you really need to dig around to find out something useful. And even then, say you did find a name. Say you did find out, what are you going to do with that? Because you need to hold confidentiality for that person. So if you're then going to the person that is the reason they're leaving then that breaks it so it's all just a bit complicated anyway so nick had an idea right instead of asking them on their way out the organization doing that interview then what if you reach out to them directly six months later and ask them to go for lunch oh that's an idea so it's not a formal interview it's more of a conversation six months on his thought is the time will change dynamic thoughts yeah i totally agree because also and

6:07Nick Corcodilos:the other thing i suppose is that in an exit interview if it's like three or four days before you leave you're already in the next job and you don't really want to be thinking about this job because you've already like mentally moved on so asking someone to go okay how can we make it better if it's if it's one of those situations where someone is leaving because they hate a manager or um they just don't like the organization what like you said you're not going to get honest answers and even if you did they're not going to be particularly helpful because this one person has decided this is not for them the data doesn't seem you know it's not a longitudinal study it's not it's not got lots and lots of data points it's got one person's opinion who's probably a little bit knocked off with you yeah i should say they've already they've already psychologically moved on haven't they so what's in it for them to really sit down and give you brutal feedback in that moment but six months later maybe maybe they will and this is what what nick nick's theory is he reckons that a relaxed conversation over lunch will produce very different answers to a formal meeting in HR room and the advice is to treat it as a genuine conversation.

7:08He also thinks the second benefit is that by that stage the former employee has seen another organization so they can compare. So sometimes they'll confirm your issues, sometimes they'll realize that things weren't actually as bad as they thought. So it kind of gives the feedback some more context. that makes sense yeah i think it's quite i think it's a good idea i have questions around how you can reach out to somebody who's no longer in your organization i i think well maybe whether you ask permission of that beforehand if that's going to be your

7:40Nick Corcodilos:i don't see that being a problem i mean there's there is a there's a tiny little platform it's infancy it's called linkedin yeah i know but it's like i think you're going to have much more chance of somebody participating that if you ask them as they laugh look would you mind if we got in touch in six months time and and see what ask some questions about your experience or maybe just like grab a hot dog grab a hot dog where are you in new york city are you in suits is this harvey spectra's left for someone else five guys or something i'm all more you can get hot dogs in the uk what the hell's five guys the burger place why is it called five guys oh god you're so old what's wrong with donald's i bring back wimpy that's what i say i loved wimpy anyway uh yeah I think just you could just solve that really simply, I think, just by saying, is it OK if we keep in touch?

8:26Nick Corcodilos:Who's going to say no to that? Yeah, yeah, sure, sure. And do we send your email or should we connect on LinkedIn? Yeah, cool. OK, that'd be great. By the way, this is our new business is what we're going to do. We are going to be the exit interview guys. We're going to get in touch with Nick. We'll pay him a commission for coming up with the idea. And we just go for lunch every day. And the company will pay for our lunch. And we just ask, we just do the exit interviews. Someone would be like, unload. Who's the biggest arsehole in the organisation? Tell us everything. Tell us all. Spill the tea.

8:58Nick Corcodilos:Oh, and you can make it fun because you can have all the managers in the organisation like a Guess Who board. You can say like, does she have curly hair? Brilliant. That would be quite funny. Guess Who needs to be something to do with the organisation. Work edition. Yeah, you need a work edition of Guess Who. Yes, that would be brilliant. I worked in this one company where everybody looked really strange and it genuinely looked like, when you looked out, it was a guess who board because it's like people with big long heads and someone with a big beard down to their knees and stuff. And then there was a mustache.

9:30Yeah. Who's the dude that looked like an egg?

9:34Nick Corcodilos:Oh, Bernard. You think the dude with a ginger beard? No, Bernard had a, it begins with E, Bernard had a hat. This might have been Eric. Eric looked like an egg, I believe. And you always wished, you always hoped that the other person pulled out a woman yes because like all inequality there was only like four women in guess who underrepresentation actually helped exactly exactly anyway moving on lee let's what have you seen love okay so i want to talk a little bit about something i teased in the intro um there's a platform called how to job uh the name how to job and the job has now seemed to become like a verb.

10:12Nick Corcodilos:We job. I job, you job, he jobs, she jobs. Look at me conjugating the word, the fictional verb job. Do it in Spanish. Soy. Soy. What's job in Spanish? You should know that. Oh, travel. I'm thinking of work. Yeah. Travallo is work. What is it? Well, while Leanne's googling that, I will tell you. So basically, it's called How To Job and it's been introduced by a guy called Milo Seville. He, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm saying that name, that surname wrong. Basically, he has got 15 years in HR and talent, and he knows exactly what he's doing. He looked at the job market and was like, it is a bit, this is not his word, these are my words, it's a bit shit at the moment.

10:54Nick Corcodilos:And so he said, right, let's just do something really simple. Let's stop guessing what employers actually want and actually help or coach people through the entire process. So he does things like CV overhauls, LinkedIn optimization, personalized outreach strategy. This is what's really interesting. When you log into How to Job, it's like Netflix. It's got like one big video at the front playing and you can unmute it. And then you can just scroll through like shelves of other videos. And he's got loads of techniques. So it'll be, I can't remember, he's got the four horsemen of something, I think.

11:22Nick Corcodilos:I can't remember, I should have written this down. The apocalypse. No, but it's like four horsemen of the career eclipse or something. Basically, he's got loads of different cool ways of getting a job. So he talks about rather than just applying for a job, you go and find the chief executive officer or the chief operations officer and you make friends with them. you take them out for lunch and you, it doesn't really say that, but it's that sort of like really cool things. There are loads and loads of brilliant success stories on there as well. One student apparently got five offers in just over a month and another landed a job at the London Stock Exchange.

11:51Nick Corcodilos:Very, very fancy. Nice. Now, if it was just that, you'd be like, well, that's pretty cool. Yeah. But there's also something called interviewly. Now, what I don't know is whether that's in, whether that's like an extra payment for it or not. It's called interviewly or it's called interviewly. Oh, I never thought. it's called interview lee lee yes interview lee um and basically what it'll do is you open it up it says right what job position are you going for what what company are you going for yeah and then it will create this sort of simulated job job application process um you can record into it your response it'll say ask your question you record your response you get up to three attempts to record your response you can listen back choose a favorite one submit it you go through and these questions aren't just like tell us about your life you know these are genuine questions that will probably be asked in that sort of interview how do they know how does he know how does he know i don't know because he's got 15 years and talent and he's a he's a clever he's a he's a clever fella uh so anyway uh so the point is at the end of the cookbook clever cookbook side note and i had this thing about three weeks ago i think towards the end of the week we start to run out of things to talk about so it all gets a bit unhinged we were talking about how like what if like every the way you describe somebody had to be bird related yep so you pesky little partridge oh you dirty little duck dirty duck was one of the good ones what was the other one grumpy goose grumpy goose was a great one yeah a curious kookaburra is that what i just said yeah i think so we did we did we had one for starling but or swallow but that was probably that's probably a maybe not maybe maybe not go for that one can i get back to yes please to how to job uh anyway so you've so you've done your little mock interview um and at the end it'll come back and say right you answered this pretty well this wasn't so good here's some tips for it thought really really cool anyway lee thoughts yeah nice i think anything that helps people get more comfortable talking about themselves and answering questions i think there's lots of people who who yeah will read through their notes and maybe even write out an answer to a question but to actually speak it out loud and feel comfortable with it is is really useful useful practice i think it also sounds as though as though yeah it's very much helping you understand recruitment processes what they look like what competencies they might be questioning love the use of of ai i'm guessing it uses ai if it's yeah i guess what doesn't these days exactly yeah no i like it sounded i think it sounds very very cool i'd like to i'd like to poke around yeah yeah clever so so milo you're a clever little cuckoo.

14:26Nick Corcodilos:That's what you are. Cuckoo borough. No, I prefer cuckoo. Cuckoo. No, it's indigenous to the UK. Creative cuckoo. Yeah, creative little cuckoo. Yeah, so, how-to job. Is it indigenous to the UK? Cuckoo? Yeah. Well, isn't it weird with a cuckoo? They're not really indigenous, even though they are indigenous, because they basically go, well, I'm going to live here now. So, a cuckoo will knock something out of a nest, won't it? So, basically, a cuckoo is probably more like a digital nomad of the bird world where it'll go, this is where I'm staying now, but a bully digital nomad. Oh, we don't like police.

14:56Nick Corcodilos:No, and in fact, to be fair, in history, there's quite a lot of, we're not going to go into it, but there's quite a lot of countries where we've gone, oh, we might just cuckoo our way into the next country, like in 1939. So maybe we just move away from that subject entirely. Oh, we didn't. The UK is worse for cuckooing. Not during the Second World War. No, but every other, during the last 2000, it's probably not a country on earth. We've not just rucked up and gone, hey guys, like what you've done here. Do you have a flag? I like what you've done here, but do you know what would make it even better?

15:30Nick Corcodilos:Is if we ran this shit. That's how we're going to do it. Please nobody ever take that quote from Al out of context because we will never be able to live in another country other than the UK ever again. We wouldn't be able to live in the UK. We barred. No, no, no. We wouldn't. No, the UK is a strange place right now. It'd be fine. Anyway, Lee, what else have you seen? I am wondering, Al, whether older workers are being overlooked. Right. How about, you know, it would be really funny if you said, I wonder if shorter workers are being overlooked. Okay. Older workers are being overlooked. It's just ageism, pure and simple.

16:08Yeah. Yeah. Yes. And it's extreme. Yes. I also think, I hear a lot of people talking about, oh, you know, there's going to be six generations in the workplace, like it's something to manage and not like it's something that could be useful or could be leveraged necessarily. Luckily, there are some other psychologists did think that maybe this is a better question to ask if it could be useful. I saw this in the dupe.

16:30Nick Corcodilos:Do you remember what the dupe is? Journal of Organisational Psychology? Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology. The dupe. I'm sure there's a perfume called dupe or something. Yeah, there is. It's aftershave, isn't it? Anyway, so what they did, they wanted to look at if there was any actual Bennett for both parties when older and younger employees worked together. So to test this, they did two experiments. First, they paired up 142 older and younger employees and looked at how they interacted, how much they shared knowledge, and how employable older workers felt. Then they followed up with a larger survey of 385 older workers across different industries to see the same pattern held over time.

17:16Very classic methodology, this.

17:18Nick Corcodilos:Yes. I feel like I'm aware of methodologies after you explain them. What they found is that the more contact there was between generations, honestly, I've had a really bad week. I think that's the least of your problems, whether it's a was or were. Yeah. The more contact there was between generations, the more employable older workers felt. And not just in terms of confidence, but things like saying they felt more relevant, they felt more adaptable, they felt more capable in their role and it wasn't just about working together it's what actually happened when people interact so it's they need to kind of they can't just sit next to each other do you know what i mean they need to be having some kind of interaction because you can't just say we're going to have a team with a boomer an ex a millennial and a gen z and they shall create diversity in its nature they have to actually interact so you might have to want to encourage some of that interaction at times because that's where it's valuable apparently the environment matters as well so the study talked about something called intergenerational climate which is basically whether your workplace feels open across age groups or whether there is a bit of a divide so in places where that climate is positive unsurprisingly everything works better people share more they ask more they collaborate more where it's not people hold back and older workers reported stopping asking for help oh that's a problem yeah and then younger workers reported knowledge sharing reducing and so does the sense for older workers of staying relevant so if you are leading a multi-generational team you really want to encourage this mutual collaboration and and learning because from an older workers perspective what they started to also report in the worst of scenarios where the kind of intergenerational climate was poor was that they start to feel very, very isolated.

19:19And we already know that loneliness in workplace is already a bit of a problem and has been for some while. So yeah, what do you think of that one, Al?

19:28Nick Corcodilos:Well, it makes perfect sense. And I think that, you know, if you went back 20 years, then yes, there'd be like, oh, you know, the old farts are in the corner and they're just typing, they're writing out in their double entry bookkeeping system. and then the young kids are all on the computers and stuff. I think it has changed massively now. And I think also, do you know what, weirdly? I think TikTok and Instagram has actually helped quite a lot with that because I know that there's a guy, and I'm sure, listening, you're going to know who I'm talking about and saying, ain't no way. I love that guy.

19:57Nick Corcodilos:Yeah, and he's not 40 anymore. He's probably pushing 50. But the fact is that he comes on and his story, his hook line is, you're telling me that I can do this thing really simply and I'm 40 years old and I didn't know this. So I think that there's that. There's also a lot more older people who are on TikTok who are just talking about work, talking about anything really, that just younger people are perhaps listening to and going, oh, they actually do know. They're not ancient. They do actually know a little bit of something. There's that woman who, red-haired woman from Cambridge University. I forget her name.

20:31Nick Corcodilos:You know her. You love her. I'm not saying she's by any stretch old. I don't think she's that old, is she? But she's not like 19. And she gets so many views. And I think what's really cool about that is... Hannah Fry. Hannah Fry. Oh, she's my age. There we go. A little bit older, February 1984. So she's an ancient geriatric millennial. She's 42, yeah. There you go. And I just think that then you've got someone who's maybe 15, 16 going, this is pretty cool, she's pretty cool. So I do think that social media is helping a little bit that way. But then maybe it's not always, I don't know. Did that make any sense?

21:05Yeah.

21:05Nick Corcodilos:Was that just like a real old person just going, oh, well, it's all down to social media, you know? No, I think you're right. There does seem to be a bit more respect and appreciation in pockets of the internet, isn't there? In others, I think it's also just very divisive. But yeah, I think the point is, all these generations into the workplace, it's less about kind of, I guess the assumption and the narrative we're getting is that it's going to be difficult and it's going to be hard. It's like, oh, we're going to have to manage six generations in the workplace. It's like, well, how can we get excited about this?

21:34How can we put people together in teams with certain tasks or projects where we're going to start to see these wonderful things happen, this kind of skill development for the older person and knowledge and wisdom from, you know, the younger person getting knowledge and wisdom from an older person. So I'm all for it. I like it. I will leave a link in the show notes.

21:55Nick Corcodilos:Yeah, and obviously you need an organisation where you've got psychological safety and who can feel like they can ask for help. And did we not do an article last week or week before Or something about asking for help actually makes a workplace nicer or something. Maybe I dreamt that. Talking of dreaming things, we've got a very short break. And then after that, we are talking about culture. This is our truth or lie. This is where I'm going to say, Leanne, I've heard this. Is it true? And she's going to tell us whether it's true or not. We're talking about culture fit after the break. So we'll see you in a second.

22:26Nick Corcodilos:Billion Dollar Moves, hosted by Sarah Chen Spellings, is brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination of business professionals. Join venture capitalist and strategist Sarah Chen Spellings as she asks the hard questions and learns through the triumphs, failures and hard lessons of the creme de la creme. So you too can make billion dollar moves in venture, in business and in life. Maybe start with episode 124 where you're going to hear how industry giants from Canva to YouTube define leadership. Listen to Billion Dollar Moves wherever you get your podcasts.

23:00Nick Corcodilos:Welcome back. Welcome back. this is truth or lie we're probably about four months into this now and with truth or lie maybe even a bit longer i have no idea i'm really enjoying it i really really like it so and i like it because i basically go leanne um is this true and then i just go go and have a cup of tea and then you sit there and you're like make all your notes and do your research and all that clever stuff today's claim leanne is it true should you hire for culture fit now to be fair I know that just anecdotally, that is one of the most common used criteria in hiring. There are so many people I speak to who say, yeah, yeah, they weren't just just weren't quite a culture fit.

23:37Nick Corcodilos:I'm looking at the note you've given me here. It says apparently 80 percent of employers say it's a top priority when selecting candidates. The idea is really simple. Find someone whose values and ways of working match the organization and everything else should follow. Lee, though, does the evidence actually support this? should you hire for culture fit is that true or a lie i sometimes wonder i drag out the answer do you want me to just tell you the verdict now just cut to the chase do you know what yeah if you're listening listener leanne's we're gonna ask leanne to say it's truth or lie and then go and tell us the reasons why yeah tell us whether you prefer this or you prefer the suspense yeah okay so is it true or is it a lie it's a lie so you should not be hiring for culture no so should we go for normally you do the the case for hiring for culture and then you do against is that fair to do yeah yeah okay so what what's the case for hiring for culture so this is i think a lot of this stems and where it comes from right so it kind of has its roots in terms of research in the 1980s late 1980s and specifically a theory from a psychologist called jennifer chapman and she looked into a person organization fit and develop this model that was kind of picked up by tech companies like your apples your google's all that type of thing in the 90s and noughties and became really popular as a hiring strategy because it was also quite visual wasn't it culture at that point because they had these big complexes like the googleplex whatever it's called what's it called yeah i think it's called the googleplex i think so yeah oh there you go so so it became something that people could see and when you can see it and somebody cool is doing it and it sounds cool you want to do it yourself so yeah by the 2010s some studies have suggested up to 84 percent of hiring managers have used it as a key factor in selection okay huge so the idea basically is if you find somebody whose values personality and ways of working align with the organization then they'll slot in more smoothly work better with colleagues and they'll be more likely to stay but in practice it can often come down to something far more subjective and what has also been kind of reported is is the airport test when talking about culture fear you heard about this no so basically would you want to be stuck in an airport with this person if the answer is yes and they're fit if they don't then they're not oh so so this is like so instead of going we're hiring for culture um what really is people are doing going do i like this person when i spend time with them if it's a yes then go oh miraculously they seem to match with our culture if it's a no they're Like, no, they're an idiot.

26:12Nick Corcodilos:I don't want to spend any time with them. Yeah, people are unfairly associating culture fit with likability. Got it. And usually we like people who are very similar to us. Which does not make a good organisation. No, it does not. But there is actually some genuine evidence that culture fit matters. Okay. It's just about how it matters. The strongest evidence comes from a 2005 meta-analysis. What's a meta-analysis, Al? Oh, no, I knew you were going to ask me this. I think it's when there are multiple, they analyze multiple research projects and put them together as one mega research. One mega research sample.

26:49Exactly. So this meta-analysis looked at 172 studies that measured 836 relationships between culture fit and an outcome. So like job satisfaction, organizational commitment, performance. what it found was that when employees feel aligned with the organization's values they are significantly more satisfied with their jobs they are more committed to the organization and they are less likely to lead to leave so in terms of culture fit it's really important for being happy at work being committed to my organization and not wanting to quit yeah the correlation was was fairly chunky so when we say correlation that's kind of the the strength and direction of relationship between two things.

Read the full transcript

27:33So this research looked at organizational fit and job satisfaction and found that it had a correlation of 0.44. Cool fact, if you square root a correlation, it gives you a predicted percentage.

27:45Nick Corcodilos:What? I know. Hang on. I have to do it. Keep talking. I'm going to square root this. Square root 0.44. 0.44 square root. Where is it? On my calculator. I have to turn it aside. Oh, man. I can't find myself. Why don't you just do 0.44 times 0.44? Because that would be squaring it, not square rooting it. Sorry, square it, not square rooting. Oh, square it. Oh, times 0.44. That gives me 0.1936. So is that 19 %? Yes, it is. So organisational fit accounts for around 19 % of what determines how satisfied employees feel at work. Oh, now that's a cool... Right, okay, if you've listened this far listening, you've just got yourself a cool little fact.

28:27Nick Corcodilos:I love this. I could be doing this all the time. Yeah, yeah. Do you want to do another one? The correlation for organisational commitment was 0.51. So 0.51 times 0.51. So it's got 20, so it accounts for 26 % of... Yeah. And 26 % of what determines how committed employees feel to the organisations. Yeah, it's kind of cool, isn't it? So culture fit is important for how people think and feel in our business. it absolutely is it also influences how people potentially will select themselves or put themselves forward for roles so a 2010 study looked at 256 undergraduate students and evaluated recruitment materials they had to basically two hypothetical companies what do we think of this company one was with a competitive high salary culture one was with a supportive lower salary culture the majority of both men and women so 60 percent of men and 74 percent of women prefer the supportive organization even at lower pay really yeah so culture in other words is a recruiting tool before it's a selection criterion so criterion thank you you said criterion before i was like well i remember that one so culture fit might predict quite well whether someone's going to stay or whether someone's going to be satisfied with their job which is only half of the equation because if they stay and they're satisfied with it but they're rubbish at it or they're just not contributing much okay how many clients have we worked with though that have said oh they're brilliant they're so lovely but they're just not quite right for the job they're not quite at the level i want them to be but they're lovely and you know they're so committed to the organization that's what we're seeing there they're probably more than likely someone's been recruited because they seem like a good culture fit their values are very aligned and they're happy in their job and they ain't going anywhere but that doesn't necessarily mean they're very good at it excellent okay so that's the case four which is not shaky but it's not conclusive by any stretch yeah yeah so in terms of where it started to get a bit uncomfortable for culture fit the meta-analysis we talked about the same one they found that culture fit as we've just been saying predicts satisfaction and commitment that same study looked at whether it predicted job performance yeah the correlation there was 0.07 oh okay i can do this so 0.07 times 0.07 oh that's like half a percent yeah it's less than one percent so culture fit accounts for less than one percent of what determines whether someone performed well in their role interesting so as as typically assessed it tells you almost nothing about whether somebody's going to be very good at their job or not to put that into perspective there is other other research has been done to look at different hiring methods and how predicted they are of culture of work performance because that's what we're trying to do in a selection process isn't it we're trying to figure out we're trying to predict how well this person will perform in said job in the future so culture fit we know is a fairly low score less than one percent by comparison structured interviews Al have a correlation of 0.58 do you want to do your trick again oh not okay no worries so 0.58 0.58 times 0.58 oh 33 percent so structured interviews where every candidate is asked the same questions in the same order accounts for yes 33 34 percent of performance it predicts cognitive ability so that's things like your IQ tests those types of assessments as a score of 0.65 i'm gonna mentally it's gonna be around about 44 42 right yep 42 so yeah one percent culture fit whereas if you're using structured interviews that's around 34 percent cognitive ability around 42 personality isn't great it's usually around 10 work sample tests off the top of my head i think around 20 odd percent but the idea is if you're using a mixed method process to what's the word assess yeah to assess to assess these competencies and you're using different methods so you're using cognitive ability you're using a structured interview and you're using a work sample test what we know in the literature is when you actually add them on their predictive validity goes up right so when you combine methods are even more predictive of future and job performance stronger together and all that love it but yeah basically culture fit isn't isn't very useful um i've got loads of other ones to be honest but i think probably the main research to share with you is a study from 2023 so pretty recent we like we like recent studies our psychologists makes us feel better well what they found is that culture fit is typically used at three different points of the recruitment process it was used to brief recruits on candidates on what they're looking for it was used during the recruitment phase and it was used as a final selection and what they found is that each stage it allowed bias to operate without any type of challenge so what we were saying before in terms of people liking people who have liked themselves that was happening throughout the process so recruitment consultants described employees as using culture fit to justify excluding other candidates whether they were pregnant where there are visible religious or cultural markers basically one recruiter described it as an unchallenged excuse yeah because it wasn't formalized it wasn't really explained it was just that person wasn't the right culture fit i think i heard somebody else describe it as like culture fit is like is yeah just like a really good marketing spin for discrimination that makes sense yeah and would you say that culture fit is also like a vibe check is that the sort of like the cool name for culture yes vibe check yeah yeah vibes based hiring right absolutely yeah so is it truth or is it a lie you already know but it's a lie culture fit in hiring processes the way most organizations do it does not predict whether somebody will be good in the job and that's the entire point of a recruitment process and actually if you're not running a recruitment process that is based on some type of evidence of what you're asking people is going to help you predict future job performance that could even fall into unlawful hiring practices because inevitably then your recruitment process is bias so it's it's a really bad idea actually what it can be useful for is a little a little bonus tick because if you use lots of different ways to figure out if somebody's going to be good at their future job and they align with the values of your company you know they're going to be really good at their job they're going to be really committed they're going to really enjoy it and the less like to leave your organization so yeah it's almost like that extra bit of stickiness but you need to be very very careful that you don't yeah don't make some mistakes that bring wrong people into your business cost you a lot of money and it might not even be lawful okay so it does have its place it's just it's it's it's just little sugar to add on top rather than yeah i mean i think i think actually i can't remember the exact number but i think handwriting analysis used to be used in recruitment processes and that was i think it's called yeah graphology and that was predictive of about five percent future performance really so more so more than five times more than so you're better just asking for a sample of somebody's handwriting good luck doing that when was the last time you wrote something by hand i don't remember anyway it is thank you for that if you have your own truth or lie then get in touch with us uh we have got a few coming up as leanne alluded to last week we've got i think we've got three psychologists are coming in to do a little segment um we will tell you more about that in the coming up weeks if you are a psychologist um and a proper psychologist not just someone who's decided they're a psychologist proper psychologist you want to come in and do this let us know the links are in the show notes okay so i think it is time for the world famous weekly workplace surgery where i put your questions to leanne i have three leanne question number one is about enforcing a policy they don't particularly believe in.

36:41Nick Corcodilos:So this person says, my company has announced a full return to the office five days a week. I don't think it's the right decision and I know my team feel the same. However, I'm the one who has to implement it. Oh my God, this is tough. I'm the one getting the questions and people are asking me directly if I think it's fair, which I don't. Now I don't want to be dishonest, but I also don't want to put a target on my back. We're pushing a bit too hard. How do you handle this without being caught in the middle? This sounds a bit like, I know Liz Truss wasn't our best Prime Minister but at the same time I think it was like didn't she vote against Brexit and then had to push it through or there was someone who did that Not Liz Truss No it was the other one Liz Truss was the one that like a lettuce outlived her wasn't it What's her name?

37:27May May Theresa May We've had so many in the last few years we just can't keep up with them all

37:33Nick Corcodilos:Anyway we're not talking about Theresa May we're talking about this person who has to push through an RTO mandate and they don't think it's a good idea lee thoughts tricky tricky tricky isn't it i think tricky little turkey tricky little turkey i put you off there didn't i sorry you did i was gonna go i was gonna go with something else but i'm glad you saved it with turkey okay moving on uh it's a bird um i think the first thing to do is go and take all your questions and if you don't know them just say i will leave that question with me go and speak to hr or leadership team or whoever it is that's put this policy in place and go look i know you don't need to give us a reason because anybody who who is doing this type of mandate i'm not guessing they're really going to be a fan of employee consultation you know so kind of going to go look i don't you don't need to give us any reasons why but these are type of questions that i'm getting asked and i think be actually really useful to know why as an organization we've made this decision whether it be down to whatever bullshit stories you want to tell me about collaboration or creativity or whatever else but you know whatever the official line is to why we're coming back into the office five days a week take that back to your team the thing is that people are going to be freaking out about the flexible work that they've lost rather than necessarily being brought back into the office there may be some reasons there may be some financial considerations it may be that some people have moved since you know you've been remote or you know have commuting costs have gone up significantly there could be there could be some some real worry points as to why people are pushing up against this but one of the main ones is going to be around flexible working flexible working has kind of been been a right for you for uk employees for a couple of years now I think it's like April 24 that this came in and this is a HR policy that you're going to be able to lean on to help people with this adjustment so employees can request flexible working they can do it from the first day of their employment those requests I think you can put up to two requests in a 12-month period employers have to take it seriously they They have to consult with the employee.

39:52They have to give an answer. I think it's within two or three months of the request. And if it is refused, employees can only refuse for very specific business reasons, such as additional costs or an inability to organize work or a detrimental impact on performance. It's unlikely that they're going to be able to do that if you've had an element of remote working already. so it's things like you know if somebody wants some some flexibility around start and finish time because of child care that might be a reason that somebody can put in a request for flexible work and a company would have to work really hard to find a reason as to not seeing as you've been working remotely already so I think that's the other thing that you can do is as you talk to your employees and it might just be you know it might just be the change that people are annoyed with and actually when you dig into it the only reason is is that they just prefer working remotely rather than they have a really specific reason as to why this is now detrimental for those employees where there is a very specific reason then you can lean on this kind of flexible work policy in the uk um if you're elsewhere then good luck to you and godspeed sorry i just assumed you're in the uk yeah god that was a bit racist of you wasn't it

41:08Nick Corcodilos:I assume you're British. No, it's because that's where most of our letters come from. Good point, good point. Okay, thanks for that, Leanne. Okay, so question number two is all about being complicit for staying. So, hi Al and Leanne. My employer treats me really well. I'm paid fairly. I've got flexibility and I feel supported. But I've seen colleagues treated very differently. They've been managed out, spoken to badly, or overlooked in ways that just don't happen to me. I can't quite tell if it's bias, favouritism, or just inconsistent. It's left me feeling conflicted. like i do like my sorry i like my job and i need the income but part of me feels uncomfortable staying when others aren't being treated the same lee this is a tough one this person they're saying am i complicit just by being there and i'm guessing by complicit i don't come across that word i think does it mean am i basically just joining in by just saying but keeping quiet yeah yeah it's a tough one it is it is a tough one i mean i think ultimately given the current job market given the economy giving the state that the world is on fire it's very very understandable that you need a job and you need an income right now so i wouldn't feel too too guilty in the short term about that because that is just how what you need to do to survive to support you and your family survival you know in these times comes comes very high up on on the list doesn't it i mean there's different things you can do i think it's how much you want to engage with this you could try and challenge it you could see what your company's whistleblowing process is if you think this is falling into bullying and harassment or discrimination in an obvious way you could you know try and have come if you've got relationships with these managers try and have a conversation with them try and have a conversation with someone hr about what you're seeing it all going to come down to the type of organization you're in in terms of the psychological safety you have by raising concerns like this and not then having negative repercussions on you it sounds as though maybe given this situation psychological safety won't be very high in the organization so that's going to come down to how much you trust your HR team if you have one internally or how you know what type of relationship you have with your with your manager that's kind of your only option really is do nothing or flag it and by flagging it you are potentially putting yourself in a risky situation on an individual level I think what you'll start to find over time is that having these mismatched values having this dissonance in terms of how you believe people should be treated and how you're seeing them being treated that's going to start to cause some tension I have called seen it called moral burnout in the literature where it isn't necessarily about workload necessarily but it's about the environment that you're in and that dissonance that mismatch can over time have a very detriment impact on your health in the same way burnout does so you'll start to detach from your work you'll start to get very cynical you'll start to get physically and emotionally exhausted so from an individual perspective if you do nothing or say you do something and nothing changes long term this is this is going to be really difficult environment for you to stay in so that might mean that you need to start looking around out there or other you know jobs other organizations yeah i think that's i'm not sure there's much advice i else i can give you other than you speak up if you feel safe and if you don't just know that this is going to have to be a short term a short-term role for you even though you do need the income because over time it is going to start to have a really negative effect yeah i i think you're i mean i have a feeling the person who wrote this probably already knows that those are their choices but it's good to hear it from a proper psychologist and go look that is really all you can do you sounds like it's not a long-term position for you um because let's be honest it sounds a bit shit doesn't it anyway okay question number three and i find one leanne how do you scale culture without losing it so this person writes uh we've grown really quickly from eight to 35 people in about 18 months wow and i can already feel the culture starting to slip yes i bet you can when When it was a small team, things were simple.

45:16Nick Corcodilos:There was trust, speed, openness. Now the new people don't seem to feel it the same way. And some of the original team are getting frustrated. The truth is I used to be the culture. I'm guessing this is the founder writing here. But now I'm so busy running the business, I can't be everywhere. So how do we make that shift from culture being me to culture working without me? That sounds like, yeah, that's, go on, Lee. Good luck. Good luck doing that in about four minutes. Okay. So how do you scale culture without losing it? You don't. you can't because the culture that you need as a scrappy start of eight people is very different to the culture you're going to need as an organization of 35 and culture really is is often a reflection of what you need the organization to be doing at that point in time you know culture is very much aligned to strategy is it all about growth so what behaviors do we need to see to grow the organization is it about more about innovation is it more about stability because culture is just behaviors the behaviors of you and your team within the business so depending on what your strategy of your organization is you're going to have to evolve and flex your your culture so you can't scale cuts without losing it nor should you the second thing you are not the culture my friend i know what you mean i know what you mean you're the kind of that center focal point you have the vision it's your business you're you know pulling it up by its bootstraps that what people you say so i know it can feel like you're the culture in and you used to be center of this and leading this and and i guess the only truth of that might be that you would be moderating behaviors by encouraging behaviors that you felt were necessary in the organization discouraging those that you didn't want to be seeing you were actively policing behaviors that was probably your role sorry that's right drop the pencil so the fact that you're you're now not able to do that then you have to ask how can your team moderate these behaviors and how much do they believe that these behaviors are what are needed for their role the success of their role and the success of the business that is something we could talk about for probably an hour so that is the case jump on the show notes you'll see my link in there book a meeting and we will chat my initial thought is that right now this isn't a culture problem this is an operational problem this is a structure problem because going from 8 to 35 in 18 months is probably going to mean you've got lots of clunky processes things are a bit maybe long-winded a bit broken there's a lack of understanding a lack of transparency do you have a very clear onboarding process do people learn the same things when they come into the organization is that why some of the original team members are frustrated because there isn't a formal onboarding and people know different things so my thought is that really this is about looking at what we call the psychosocial risk factors you've heard me talk about those before things like you know you flag trust as being being an issue there so what's happening with relationships and where is trust feeling down how is this change being managed in terms of maturing your processes bringing new people into the business how is that impacting on people role clarity does everyone know what they're doing these eight people I'd imagine their role has changed quite significantly in the last eight months so they still understand what it is that they should be doing what their priorities are and why I think there's probably a fair bit of of lack of understanding about people's roles and responsibilities understandably because you've gone through a very quick change so my thought would be to start with something like that HSE management standards is a free tool that you can use you can also use the RX7 which is our tool at Oblong just to give you an idea of where things are breaking and my feeling is it's going to be a little bit relational of course it is because you've got you know new people coming into business and that can feel quite us and them in those initial stages of growth I think a lot of that's going to be going to be solved by improving structural process operational processes working on that task cohesion and then I think once you've kind of got all of that right because that's easier to fix then you can start looking at right yeah do we need to revisit our our values and the mission of our organization and the behaviors that underpin those values that are going to help us succeed because then once you've got clarity over the values and the behaviors associated with them you can start to look at ways to police them in real time and that's going to be basically the team agreeing whether it be through a team charter or a leadership charter that this is what the organization needs right now so yeah different things you can do but i think i'd start start with the relatively simple fixes first yeah excellent advice i would also say to you as someone who has founded companies and grown quite quickly um is that imagine you're building a house all right so you're building your dream house and you have the house is the company and the garden is your culture if you're doing it fast you're going to have people trampling all over your flowers bringing furniture in you're going to have loads of rubbish being pulled out and thrown onto your cabbages you've been carefully cultivating this is this is a very strange analogy i like it yeah yeah so but if you're doing it fast you are going to break things so what you don't want to be doing is going i want to build a house fast and also keep the garden looking beautiful keep adding to it no the garden's going to get wrecked to a certain extent because it's going fast same with your culture so i think yes of course it's great that you want to think about your culture at this point but if you are growing so fast you probably the culture might change in 90 days it might be a totally different culture yeah so don't worry too much about your flowers when you're when you're building your house fast so that uh and growing it yeah yeah that analogy did well up until the end yeah it's just that last that last line i think but i liked in that analogy i enjoyed that thank you very much okay tell you what else you'll enjoy Julian.

51:12Nick Corcodilos:On Thursday, we are joined, you know all this anyway, but we were joined by Kate Young, who's the head of people's science at sapia.ai. Sapia are doing some really, really cool work with AI in hiring. Not that kind of bad stuff you're doing in hiring, the good stuff. They're helping companies like Costa and BT and Holland and Barrett, and they make their recruitment fairer and a lot more human. That is something you need to tune in for, because how can you use AI to make it more human? Well, Kate knows exactly how to do that. She's bringing behavioral science into these systems and how they're built and used we're going to get into all kind of things well we won't because it's leanne interviewed but we'll get into job analysis why most companies get it wrong and how ai might actually have the solution yeah it's a really interesting conversation i learned a lot yes a lot from kate so definitely tune into that if you're having any any issues with your hiring processes right now if you're still thinking culture fit is the way to go definitely to tune in on tuesday no thursday thursday yes so we'll be back on thursday unless claude has released a new um a new podcasting thing between now and then which basically make all podcasters obsolete which let's be honest might happen again now yeah yeah we'll see you soon bye

From the publisher

Welcome back to Truth, Lies & Work, the award-winning workplace podcast where behavioural science meets workplace culture. This week we’re deconstructing the "cockroaches of the employment world," exploring a new AI tool that helps you nail your next interview, and digging into the data to see if hiring for "culture fit" is actually a good idea.

🔥 Stories Covered

1. The $75 Lunch That Beats Any Exit Interview
Headhunter Nick Corcodilos calls exit interviews the "cockroaches" of the employment world—they serve little purpose, yet they never die. Because departing employees often fear burning bridges, they give safe, generic answers.

The Alternative: Wait six months after an employee leaves and invite them to a casual lunch.

The Benefit: Time changes the dynamic. Former employees are more objective and willing to provide grounded feedback for the price of a meal.

Source: Inc. Magazine - https://www.inc.com/suzanne-lucas/the-75-lunch-that-beats-any-exit-interview/91319277

2. Stop Guessing, Start Coaching: HowToJob & Interviewly
Al explores HowToJob, an all-in-one platform built by HR veteran Milo Sevelj to help candidates navigate a brutal job market.

Interviewly: A standout feature that generates role-specific interview questions and provides structured feedback on your recorded answers.

The Impact: It moves beyond practicing in a mirror by giving candidates real-time data on what landed and what didn't.

Connect with Milo Sevelj: https://www.linkedin.com/in/milosevelj/

3. The Power of Intergenerational Teams
New research suggests that age diversity isn't just something to "manage"—it’s a competitive advantage.

The Findings: Older workers feel more employable and capable when they regularly interact and share knowledge with younger colleagues.

The Key: It’s not just about sitting next to each other; it’s about a two-way flow of experience and new skills.

Source: Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology - https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.70061?af=R

🧠 Truth or Lie: You Should Hire for Culture Fit
Around 80% of employers prioritize "culture fit," but Leanne digs into the evidence to see if it actually predicts success.

The Truth: Fit does predict job satisfaction (19%) and organizational commitment (26%).

The Lie: It is one of the weakest predictors of actual job performance, accounting for less than 1% of the variance.

The Verdict: "Culture fit" is often a subjective "airport test" that lets bias in the back door. Instead, look for "Culture Add."

💬 Workplace Surgery
This week, we tackle three tough listener dilemmas:

The Policy Trap: How do you enforce a 5-day return-to-office mandate when you don’t believe in it yourself?

The Complicity Crisis: If your employer treats you well but treats others poorly, are you complicit by staying?

Scaling Culture: How do you move from "being the culture" to building a culture that works without you as the team grows?

📬 Connect with Al & Leanne
– LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/truthlieswork
– Al Elliott: https://www.linkedin.com/in/thisisalelliott
– Leanne Elliott: https://www.linkedin.com/in/meetleanne
– Email: hello@truthliesandwork.com
– Book a call: https://savvycal.com/meetleanne/chat

Mental health support
UK & ROI — Samaritans Call 116 123 or visit https://www.samaritans.org
UK — Mind Call 0300 123 3393 or visit https://www.mind.org.uk
US — Suicide & Crisis Lifeline Call or text 988 or visit https://988lifeline.org
Australia — Lifeline Call 13 11 14 or visit https://www.lifeline.org.au
Global helplines
https://findahelpline.com

🎧 Truth, Lies & Work is part of the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals. Listen to all the shows here: https://www.hubspot.com/podcastnetwork

More from Truth, Lies and Work

All 134 episodes
286. The 'Cockroaches of HR', interview hacks and return-to-office Dilemmas. PLUS! Should you hire for culture fit?Truth, Lies and Work · 53 min
Listen in VO