In short
“Token anxiety” in AI use; Swedish norms around leaving work on time; shortcuts vs “shit cuts” in business; whether vulnerable leadership makes leaders better; burnout leadership and culture when the organization doesn’t support it.
Guests
Alexis Zahner (business psychology consultant; co-host of Live+Work More Human; book releasing later in 2026 on social media’s impact on identity) and Sally Clarke (Australian; former corporate finance lawyer; catastrophic burnout; research and books on burnout; now consultancy helping individuals and organizations prevent burnout).
Key claims
“Shit cuts” happen when teams skip thinking/checks to move faster, often due to compressed timelines; productivity should be measured by outcomes/sustainable pacing, not “bums on seats.” “Token anxiety” is anxiety tied to LLM context/token limits and unused tokens. Vulnerability helps only when strategic and not oversharing or emotional dumping; expressing uncertainty can reduce perceived competence. Leaders should lead through burnout by getting outside support, running specific 1:1s, and cutting low-value work.
Notable examples
Swedish empty office filmed at 4:30pm; Anthropic lab report where Claude rushed sloppy code near context limits; onboarding as a common “shit cut” area; leader vulnerability research (critical feedback, strategic weakness disclosure, humble leadership meta-analysis).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroducing Special Guests
1:31 to 3:00
Introducing Alexis Zahner and Sally Clarke, their backgrounds and podcast.
“We've got a special episode of This Week in Work today.”
Understanding 'Sh*t Cuts'
3:01 to 5:28
Discussion on the meaning of 'sh*t cuts' and the difference from shortcuts.
“Then we're going to have a news article from Sally and then we'll have something that Al's seen somewhere.”
Consequences of Sh*t Cuts
5:29 to 7:31
Exploring how sh*t cuts impact decision-making and quality of work.
“And I must say, as a typically impulsive person, I am fairly privy to a shit cut.”
Onboarding and Sh*t Cuts
7:32 to 10:16
Discussing how sh*t cuts appear in onboarding processes.
“I would add some courage to be able to slow down to know when we actually do need to add a few more steps to that process.”
Work Culture in Sweden
10:17 to 13:14
Discussion on a viral video showcasing work culture in Sweden's empty offices.
“Yep, link to James' profile and the article in the show notes.”
Transitioning Work Productivity Metrics
13:15 to 14:02
Debating the outdated productivity metrics and their relevance today.
“I think, you know, bums on seats, feet on a factory floor has been a measurement for productivity in the industrial age.”
The Transition of Productivity Metrics
14:02 to 16:00
Explore how traditional productivity metrics are evolving and impacting workplace dynamics.
“It feels like you're setting a fair standard.”
Understanding Token Anxiety in AI
16:00 to 19:49
Delve into the concept of token anxiety and its implications for AI users and technology.
“That's what a good news article looks like.”
Exploring Vulnerable Leadership
19:49 to 22:37
Discuss the nuances of vulnerability in leadership and its impact on team dynamics.
“And, you know, we've already got enough problems with dealing with social media as Lex's book beautifully, you know, unpacks.”
Truth or Lie Segment Introduction
22:37 to 24:21
Introduction to the Truth or Lie segment focusing on leadership vulnerability.
“To be fair, I thought it might be a shit cut.”
Show all 25 chapters
Analyzing Vulnerability in Leadership
24:21 to 28:00
An in-depth discussion on the pros and cons of vulnerability in effective leadership.
“Okay, it's to our truth or lies segment.”
The Case for Vulnerability in Leadership
28:00 to 28:50
Discussing how acknowledging weaknesses can enhance leadership authenticity.
“I just can't do this because that sort of signals incompetence.”
Using Feedback Tools Effectively
28:50 to 30:20
Exploring the value of 360-degree feedback in promoting leader transparency.
“Does anyone want to throw their two cents on that?”
Balancing Vulnerability with Competence
30:20 to 31:50
Analyzing the importance of demonstrating competence while being vulnerable.
“I think what's key for me here too is as well that kind of piece that you mentioned, like, surround, not just sort of having this like, blah, here's all the things I'm bad at, lol, you know.”
Understanding Uncertainty as a Leader
31:50 to 34:00
Examining how leaders should approach uncertainty and its impact on trust.
“bit wobbly, depends on your interpretation here.”
Strategic Vulnerability in Leadership
34:00 to 36:40
Discussing how to express vulnerability in a way that builds trust rather than undermines competence.
“If you imagine you're a brand new manager, then you already feel like you've got a lot to prove, haven't you?”
Conversations on Leadership Podcast
36:40 to 38:10
Hosts describe their podcast focusing on humanity in the workplace and leadership.
“who's clear on what's going on here rather than some ignoramus who's coming in and just telling us that they're going to be a great leader.”
Addressing Burnout in Teams
39:00 to 40:55
Leaders share strategies for addressing their own burnout while supporting their teams.
“So go and look for Live and Work More Human podcast wherever you get your podcasts.”
Navigating Leadership Responsibilities
40:55 to 42:00
Discussion on balancing personal responsibility and team support in leadership roles.
“system stuff, some of the broader picture, because that's going to be a really important piece if you want to sort of prevent burnout from happening upstream.”
Understanding Leader Responsibility
42:00 to 43:06
Explore how leaders can balance their responsibilities with self-care.
“You are part of the solution, but you're not all of it.”
Navigating Organizational Culture
43:06 to 44:17
Learn how to lead a team culture when organizational values conflict.
“If you have any budget at all to get, you know, really expert consultants.”
The Intention Impact Gap
44:17 to 46:40
Discover how to identify and bridge the gap between stated values and actions.
“This is both a simple and a really complex answer, but I think it's a dilemma we see really often.”
Hiring for Diversity
46:40 to 48:25
Understand the importance of hiring diverse perspectives in a growing team.
“It's about hiring, whether you're hiring wrong or not.”
Culture Fit vs. Culture Add
48:25 to 50:52
Examine how shifting from culture fit to culture add can enhance your team.
“these are just cognitive biases and human comfort.”
Evaluating Recruitment Processes
50:52 to 52:08
Learn how to improve recruitment processes to foster a healthy work culture.
“I think there's lots of organizations out there that will recruit for culture fit without really having taken the time to understand what behaviors are associated with their culture.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Hello, hello, Editing Al here. Halfway through this conversation, we had a power cut and so my backup recorder didn't work. So I've had to use my backup backup recorder, which is why the audio isn't quite as good this week. I'm really sorry. I've done everything I can to clean it up. But good news is that our guests are fabulous. Hey, carry on. Leanne, I think it's your bit. Hello and welcome to Truth, Lies and Work, the award-winning podcast where behavioral science meets workplace culture. We are brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals.
0:33My name is Al, I'm a business editor and I'm here to ask the questions you might be afraid to. And my name is Leanne, I'm a charter occupational psychologist and I'm here to answer them. And together we help you simplify the science of work and build amazing workplace cultures. We'll be back right after a quick word from our sponsors with a couple of special guests. We'll see you in a second. You know that feeling when you've decided on a content strategy. The brief is written, everyone's aligned, and you realize someone still has to sit down and actually create all this content. That someone is you, and it's due tomorrow.
1:02That someone is often me. But luckily, Bree's assistant can help. It works right inside HubSpot, drafting campaign copy, and blog posts and emails, all in your brand voice. It's grounded in your actual customer data too. So you don't just create content, you create content that converts. What a line. Check out HubSpot.com, the agentic customer platform for growing businesses.
1:30Hello, hello. Welcome back. Welcome back. We've got a special episode of This Week in Work today. We are joined by the hosts of Live and Work More Human podcast, Alexis Zainer and Sally Clark. Welcome. Hello. Hello. G'day, guys. Good to see you again. So people might remember you from being, I think we've had both of you on the podcast before, at least once. but just in case they haven't heard of you can you tell us a little bit more about yourself absolutely so I'm Sally Australian born I lived overseas for about 20 years worked as a corporate finance lawyer for a while had a really catastrophic burnout doing that and ended up delving into the research of burnout wrote a couple of books about that and then moved into consultancy so helping individuals prevent burnout and also organizations and leaders understand it so they can prevent it too.
2:15I am now based back in Australia and yeah, really stoked to be here with you guys again today. Hello, my name is Alexa Zarnan. I'm based in Australia. As I'll mention, I'm the co-host of the Live and Work More Human podcast alongside Sally here. I have a background in business psychology consultancy. I'm releasing a book later this year called Real, Reconnecting to Yourself in a World of Likes or Lies that is an exploration of the impact of social media on who we think we are. Amazing. We're so excited. We've known each other what feels like a while now. Yeah. And we've kind of bounced on each other's podcast from time to time.
2:55We've always talked about doing something like this, like a proper cross collaboration. So here it is and here's how it's going to work. Everything's the same. We're going to do news roundup. I'm going to start. Then we're going to have a news article from Sally and then we'll have something that Al's seen somewhere. online that doesn't really make sense to anyone, but we'll talk about it anyway. Then we'll go into Truth or Lie, which is going to be done by Lex, which is exciting. We don't even know what it is. No. And then we'll be going to the surgery and combined, we will be answering your questions.
3:27I'm sure it'll be flawless. What can possibly go wrong? We'll podcast professionals here. Let's see what happens. What could go wrong, Leanne? It's time for your favourite time of the week, is it not? It is. I'll keep you with that jingle, please. Yeah, it's time for the news roundup. It's a very special one. We'll start off with you, Leanne. Not so special. how dare you sir what have you seen I've got a new word what's your new word love I saw this James sent me this James Hardy who has been on the show previously and I saw it and I thought I'm going to use that when Lex and Sal are on the show because I think they'll appreciate it my new word of the week shit cut very into it tell us more as Australians we 100 % here for it but we're going to need context Lex, do you want to tell us what you think it might mean?
4:13Oh, God, this is dangerous territory straight off the bat. I think it's a way, I think the word means cutting things out unnecessarily. Nice. Sal. I think it's a shortcut that's actually a long cut. Oh, that would... Ten points to Sally. That is clever, yeah. You were never going to say that. A shortcut. That makes sense. So what is it... What would you have guessed, Al? What were you going to say? I was going to say it's probably a shortcut. It's actually a long cut. That's what I was going to say. Checks out. Oh dear. Yeah, a shit cut. Exactly. And I saw this on LinkedIn from James Hardy. Just to give James a shout out, he works with founders on scaling businesses.
4:54He's also a panelist on our upcoming LinkedIn Live on what veterans can teach us about leadership. So stay tuned for that. 5th of May, I think. But he was talking about the difference between shortcuts and shit cuts. So a shortcut is a disciplined way of saving time where you're still kind of protecting the intent and the quality of the work. Whereas a shit cut is when you move faster by skipping the thinking, skipping the checks and skipping the parts that actually matter. And that's where things tend to go wrong. Yeah, thoughts. Do we like shortcuts? An experience with a shit cut. It's an interesting one.
5:32And I must say, as a typically impulsive person, I am fairly privy to a shit cut. And it is something that I think you can lose a lot of integrity in your work. And as you mentioned, Leanne, you can lose the deep thought needed to truly make good decisions. So I'm someone who's probably prone to those. There's like a movie where someone says the quote, no such thing as shortcuts. If it was really shorter, it would just be the way. And I think that really resonates for me. I think we have this obsession with doing things faster. and I'm not really a details person, so I do relate to Lex on that level.
6:05However, that does all too often lead to, yeah, the cut ending up shit. And Bill Gates talks about, I think I'm going to butcher this quote, but it's something like, I'd rather have someone who was lazy and clever because what they do is they find the shortcuts in work. Yeah. Now, I'm guessing what we're talking about there is a slight difference, Leanne, between someone who's found, for example, written a little script in Claude to go and do something which does it well and someone who just like phones it in. Is that what we're talking about? Yeah, exactly. Exactly. It's skipping the steps. I love that, Sal, that if it's, yeah, it's not a shortcut, if it works, it's just the way.
6:44That makes total sense to me. Yeah. But yeah, that's exactly it. And what James was saying in his LinkedIn article was that most businesses don't fall apart necessarily because people are lazy. It's more that they run a straw because things get busy and inevitably the timeline compresses, there's more pressure to move quickly and then decisions just get made without the level of scrutiny that's required. So yeah, these shit cuts start to kind of creep in. He also offered some advice in terms of how to scent check if it's a short cut or a shit cut. What do we think about this? So three things he suggests.
7:18Clarity. Do we actually understand what we're trying to achieve? Checks. Do we have anything in place to catch mistakes and consequences if something goes wrong but we notice quickly and be able to fix it. I'm going to call that the sleep-pitching method. I would add C there to that as well. I would add some courage to be able to slow down to know when we actually do need to add a few more steps to that process. That's good. Yeah. And I think also we have to be careful. I mean, let's be honest. We have all taken shit cuts by opening up Chachupita or Claude or Gemini or something and we've all gone, that's good enough.
7:55Yeah. Show notes. No, the show notes are all handcrafted. Every character is written by us. Bespoke. But then, to be fair, I mean, I've got an argument for shit, God, which is exactly show notes. Like, nobody reads show notes apart from all the algorithms and the bots and everything. So what's the point of making crafting those beautiful? Thoughts? I think it's having the discernment to know where you need to save time and what actually doesn't require urgency. because I think, as Sel mentioned earlier, we live in such a compulsively productive, always urgent culture. And I think because of that, we have so many competing priorities and we're always looking for ways to expedite things.
8:35But that's exactly where we need to be discerning between what requires the right amount of time and attention and what can we maybe use chat GPT or Claude or whatever to do, you know, the things that we don't need humans to be laboring over. One thing that James did mention, he kind of did a little list of where it seems to turn up. And there's one where I've seen it time and time again. And I think it's where we have so many problems bringing people into our business. Onboarding processes. I've seen so many shit cuts in onboarding processes. Have you ever really sound like? Yeah, definitely.
9:08And I think it's also because oftentimes when we're trying to fill a role, it means the role's been vacant for a while. And there's potentially a backlog of work around that. So we really need someone to get in and get going on things. but oftentimes we don't set them up for success because the onboarding process is a big part of making sure people have the right resources to do well so I think it oftentimes can be setting off on the wrong foot. Yeah Sal you said at the beginning that you spent a fair amount of time in corporate. I think us entrepreneurs would think that corporate got the onboarding all sorted and it's all professional and done.
9:39Is that not the case? Look absolutely not. I think that is a sort of very understandable misconception that we have, but it's absolutely not true. I think it's also a really difficult one when there is not really a deep enough understanding, I think, in most organizations of just how critical that process is and how you're onboarding a human. And that process therefore needs to be very, very human centered. I think any kind of automation or hack that is attempted to be built into the onboarding process really need to have like a second, third, fourth look at as to whether that is actually a bit of a shit cut.
10:14Love it. Yeah, pretty. Link in the show notes, I'm guessing. Yep, link to James' profile and the article in the show notes. Thank you very much. Sally. So I've got some, you know, obviously massive, massive news for us all. I found an article today that was published in Indian Media around an Indian tech professional who's working in Sweden. And she was walking around her office at 4.30 p.m. filming and the office was completely empty. No one was there. All employees had gone home or to do their hobbies or to hang out with family or friends, it was almost eerie. And in the caption she shared, and the shock was almost palpable, that what matters in Sweden is the quality of your work, not how long you warm a chair.
10:55So she shared that people are not expected to stay late or work weekends and there are really strong norms around going home and doing other things with your precious time. And it's really gone viral apparently among tech workers in India, with viewers astounded that this is even possible. Obviously, we know that there's a lot of differences in terms of culture around, particularly in high pressure or always on cultures. The badge of honor is how late you stay and how many hours you clock, which keeps people in a constant state of low-grade threat. And that's certainly what I experienced doing 18-hour days for months on end as a corporate finance lawyer.
11:34It is really just a recipe for burnout. Now, before I throw in my two cents from my current perspective as a burnout expert, I'd love to hear from you. What do you think about that kind of the virality of this video of an empty office at 4.30 p.m. in Sweden? It's kind of nice to see this as being a surprise and actually perhaps trying to make it a bit more of a norm because I think I read somewhere there's a Japanese, actual Japanese word for die by working or something. Karoshi. Right. Okay. You know it. yeah of course you know it world expo on burnout i'm surprised they know that yeah of course you know it of course you know it you're such a dude al but uh let me just mansplain to you what that actually means please do i think and i think that that was obviously something that happened a little while ago it wouldn't it be nice if there was now we could we could have like a a thing where people would just just you know record your office and go look everyone's home yeah becoming the norm that's my thoughts lady what do you think i agree i don't i don't know how we we still how we still buy into the myth that productivity is linked to time spent yeah that's just not how we work as humans we work in these states of flow and and they last only so long and i think the world would be a better place and probably a lot more productive place and that and i was looking at something the other day that was like if we can solve the disengagement problem it would add nine trillion us dollars to the global economy that's the entire gdp of russia i think yeah like when i was reading it it's massive so it's kind of like the world would be a lot better place in a richer place if if we just learn and accept it to manage by outcomes i don't know why it's It's such an interesting one because I think we're kind of stuck between two worlds here.
13:32I think, you know, bums on seats, feet on a factory floor has been a measurement for productivity in the industrial age. And I think we're well and truly transitioned out of that, yet we're still really clinging to the optics of seeing employees at a desk and that meaning that, you know, eight hours equals eight hours pay. So I think we're trying to transition, but we're just not quite getting it right. Because I think when you see people sitting at a desk as well, it feels like a fair measurement of everyone doing their work. It feels like you're setting a fair standard. Well, if I have to sit there for eight hours, so does Sally, so does Al, so does Leanne.
14:09So I feel like it feels like the most equal way to sort of enforce like a productivity proxy on your team. But people work differently. People have different working styles. I know I've recently gone back to an open plan office space a few days a week and I'm suffering because the stimulation, the noise, the everything, I cannot get things done. And I'm very used to working remotely now, but there's an expectation that I'm in there for X amount of hours for certain projects through the week. So we're just stuck between transitioning from what used to be productivity metrics now to them being sort of these proxies of productivity is what I call them.
14:48It feels like we're measuring productivity, but we're actually looking not at all at the outcomes of people's time and energy and just having that expectation that we'll have a bum in a seat, something must be happening. So I think there's still some maturing for us as leaders and as organizations to truly kind of warp the walk around what we talk about when we're saying productivity and getting clarity around what exactly that means. Absolutely. I have to say, like, the article and the video that it was talking about really made my heart glow because that empty office is not a sign of laziness.
15:23It's a sign of a system that treats recovery as normal and where work is really designed to be done in the time allocated. So I think in this Swedish example, we see that the badge of honour is getting good work done within healthy parameters. And fun fact, like years ago, I worked as a customer service representative for a Japanese company to some of Sweden and Finland's biggest corporations. and my experience totally tracks with this video. By 3pm on Friday afternoons, most of my contacts would be already out of the office as I later found out they were all fishing. And this was completely normal and encouraged in these massive, massive corporations.
15:57I think for me, the real question for leaders and organisations is are we rewarding people for outcomes and for sustainable pacing that actually has the long-term benefits to individual, to team and to the organisation or are we rewarding visibility, presenteeism and ultimately exhaustion? Yes, fabulous. We need you on every single week. Yeah, we really do. That's what a good news article looks like. You can see what the opposite of a good news article is. So I've got a new word myself because I was a bit jealous. I've got a new word myself and I'd like to hear what you think it means. So token anxiety.
16:32Thoughts, do you want to start, Sal? It's a confusing one for me because it almost sounds like there's a falsified aspect to the anxiety. Like everyone else, you're in an anxious environment, so you become anxious as a tokenistic kind of move. No idea. Lex, what are your thoughts? I really don't know where to go with that other than to say, because I feel like anxiety and this language now is far more commonplace. So maybe it's something along the lines of feeling like you have to have some sort of form of anxiety to sort of assimilate into a setting. I don't know. It's really bizarre. That's bizarre.
17:07Good guesses. I mean, I wish it did mean that because that is so highbrow and intelligent that I'm going to look like the biggest. So what does it mean? No, actually, I think this is actually really good, Al. And I'm not going to guess because you were telling me about this the other day and I was like, what? Token anxiety is the tokens that you use on ChatGPT, on Claude. You get anxious when you start to hit your context window. I know. See, I told you it was nowhere near as clever as what you guys just came up with. And the point, but I've got more on this. That checks out. It gets better. It gets better.
17:45So basically, there's two types of token anxiety. There's the people who rely on ChatGPT or Claude or any kind of LLM, and they've been using it for a while, and it says you're about to hit your limit. So they get anxious about it. Oh, gosh. I've never hit the limit, so that's why I've never had this experience. I'm not on there enough, I guess. What? I don't have original thoughts. You don't take shit calls. Like, no. thank you we're tight I spend all day talking to Claude you do he was in the garden the other day like pacing around chatting on the phone I was like he was like Claude wow besties so just a quick quick one I think I said this a couple of weeks ago I made a massive error in the way that I put things because I'm very much I'm kind of an extrovert so I do like to talk things out loud before I've made a decision Leanne's introverted so I said to Leanne no I got I bought Claude so I wouldn't have to talk to you now what I meant was rude wow that couldn't have gone worse I know you're absolutely right it could not that was the worst choice the meaning was there that I was talking to Claude so when I came to Leanne I got fully formed thoughts but yeah I totally messed that up anyway I feel you on that Al I must say yeah oh man anyway it was nice sleeping in a different room it was really nice checked out doghouse is uh underrated exactly a little colder outside but you know that's that's the german way to sleep with the window open that's token anxiety this is what we're talking about come on let's get back to this token anxiety so first of all you got the anxiety that you're hitting your limit secondly you've got then you've got the anxiety which i quite often get i'm going there are tokens unused overnight i should be using these so i lie in bed sometimes thinking i should get up and just get clawed to do something because overnight i've got all these tokens I can use.
19:34I know. I know. I, I, Sal's, you can't see this because of an audio podcast, but Sal's just covered her mouth in a way to go, oh my God, my friend, you need some help. But I think it's like, for me, it just, I feel kind of sad for the world because it just is, it's this additional version of addictive behavior that we are, that is so easily sort of normalized. And, you know, we've already got enough problems with dealing with social media as Lex's book beautifully, you know, unpacks. But I think this kind of, this new thing for us to be worried about and anxious about, like, great. Well done, tech companies.
20:10I'm finding yet another way to make us feel worse about ourselves. And well done to Al for bringing it to the world and just telling people they should be feeling this anxiety. Well, let me just tell you one last thing about this. When I was doing a bit of research, there was a lab report from the Anthropic Lab. Anthropic, just in case people don't know, own board. And they're like the open AI. I can't say that. They're basically on Claude. And they're continually running this research. And one of the things they did was got Claude, they gave them sort of like a load of context, got Claude to build a game.
20:39Took Claude four hours to build this game. What they found is when Claude was getting close to the context, it would just submit sloppy code. It would just rush it, put it in at the very end because it got token anxiety because it was like, not much context left. So Claude's like, oh my God. Oh, fine. Yeah, just do that. It'd be fine. and then go back to the user and go, I've done it. And it's a bit like, you know, you're like, yeah, you're like, this project's due. Oh, they'll be fine. Yeah, yeah, submit. Isn't that weird? It is weird because it's, yeah, it's like the film Inception where it's like a layer in a layer.
21:16It's like our AI is getting our token anxiety. I'm so baffled. It's just a weird, weird thing. and I brought this up because I thought it was quite interesting. It is, yeah. But obviously we know it's not good and yeah. We do, but I wonder if this is the moment that people might get it because tech organizing especially or just business leaders, business owners have never really got that the more pressure you put on somebody with limited resources to achieve something in a short period of time, the more likely it is to break. The person is to break, the work is to be poor. Now we're seeing that in technology.
21:57The more pressure you put on it with limited resources and unrealistic timeline, AI is starting to break. Yeah. That's interesting. Is it finally going to be the thing that helps us connect what's required to produce great work? I think it's honestly, Leanne, I feel like that's a beautiful hypothesis. It does feel quite optimistic to me because I do feel like, and I'm a bit of a, I won't give you my full anti-capitalism rant, But I do think we're probably going to need something that's much more of a threat, much more of a this quarter threat for, I think, true change to happen in terms of making the workplace a more human friendly one to be.
22:36So there you go. That's the end of the news roundup. That was a really good one. Was it? Was it? Yeah. I thought it was a bit rubbish. To be fair, I thought it might be a shit cut. New terms. I love this. Yeah. Shit cut, token anxiety. This is amazing. Anyway, so, right, we are going to take a very quick break. And after that, we're coming back with our Truth or Lie segment. This is where we ask a professional something we've heard. And we say, is it true or is it a lie? And it's not going to be Leanne this week. No, it's not. It's going to be someone who's got beautiful birds in the background.
23:06If you're hearing those birds, it's coming from us. And it is beautiful. So you did say, should we shut the windows? No, leave them. Right, we'll see you in a second. I don't suppose you've got any good podcast recommendations. Do you know what I do? and coincidentally, this podcast is on the HubSpot Podcast Network. Who knew? The audio professional. We're going to come to that. This old marketing is hosted by Joe Polizzi and Robert Rose and it's brought to you by the HubSpot Podcast Network. The audio, Leanne, together. The audio destination for business professionals. Where all podcasts, good podcasts live.
23:37Exactly. Joe and Robert are two of the most well-known experts in the content marketing space and they talk about the latest content marketing trends and discuss how businesses can use content to attract and retain customers. Lovely. Yeah, I've actually been listening. Each podcast show features a discussion of content marketing headlines. We like headlines. Love them. Rants from Joe and Robert on what's going on in the industry. We like that too. And this old marketing example from the past that we can learn from. It's always useful, entertaining and never more than 60 minutes. Yeah, I love the recent episode about alternatively influential.
24:07These are the micro-influencers who have real impact, but they don't have massive follower counts. Listen to this old marketing wherever you get your podcasts.
24:20Welcome back. Welcome back. Okay, it's to our truth or lies segment. This is where we take a widely held workplace belief and put it to the test. Today's claim is being put to the test by Alexis. Alexis, this is what I've heard. I've heard the phrase, the more vulnerable a leader is, the better they are. Go. Tell us the truth. Tell us the lies. It's both, isn't it? Really, I think this is a term that we hear a lot in recent years, especially in leadership, workplace, culture conversations. I think the problem with it is that vulnerability has now been made synonymous with a lot of other words.
24:56And I think we're kind of missing what vulnerability means. So we can answer this question with a little more depth. So in short answer, it does and it doesn't make you a better leader. And the long answer we'll discuss. But perhaps before we do that, does anyone want to throw their two cents into the mix on the statement as an initial take? Sal, you're itching, I can tell. Always. You know that I love the words that you hate. Authenticity, vulnerability. So for me, I think, and I'm also a very definitions-oriented person. For me, vulnerability, my definition is it's a discerning share of something that is quite personal in order to create deeper connection with your team.
25:41Now, the discernment component of it is really important because if we just do it willy-nilly, then that can turn into oversharing. So it really does need to be something that I think leader develops a lot of skills around identifying when is appropriate and what is appropriate. That's my two cents. I am looking forward to hearing the behaviors that the research is attaching to the term vulnerable, because I do believe that pro-social skills are important in leadership. And I think there's research that shows that that's linked to the good stuff. But I'm looking forward to being schooled on this one.
Read the full transcript
26:14Lex. I love it. And I think pro-social behaviors is key here, Leanne, because I think that is really what we're going to dive into is some of those behaviors. because I think, again, Sal has done a really good job of sort of looking at vulnerability more as a definition. But I think that's the challenge we see with leadership is it sort of lacks a discernment and it's become synonymous with oversharing and, you know, perhaps talking about your weaknesses without any strategy behind that. So let's go into the evidence perhaps for vulnerability as a leader. And I looked at a few studies here. One of the studies that was published in Organizational Science in 2022 actually found that a specific kind of vulnerability, and that is when leaders actually openly share critical feedback about their own performance.
27:04So what they did well, what they could do better next time actually showed that they could create environments with higher psychological safety in their teams. So basically what we're saying here is a very critical, humble assessment of your capacity. So what you did well, where there's work to sort of happen there actually sort of creates that playing field for your team where they can perhaps feel safe to do those own internal self-assessments and bring forward some challenges that they might be facing as well. So another study that I looked at was a 2022 study as well that looked at sensitive self-disclosure.
27:43So this is basically where leaders were revealing what they deemed to be some of their weaknesses. And the body of research here said that leaders who spoke about their weaknesses in a strategic way, so again, not just sort of throwing your hands in the air and saying, oh, I'm bad at this. I just can't do this because that sort of signals incompetence. But leaders who were able to demonstrate that they were aware of their weaknesses and they were strategizing to overcome them were actually seen as more authentic. Another word that I know you love, Sel, that I despise. But that was another piece of research there.
28:21And then the last one that I'll just speak to here was a 2022 meta-analysis that looked sort of more generally at the term humble leadership. And they found that skills such as acknowledging limitations, appreciating others' strengths and actually the leader being more teachable demonstrated. They were skills within the vulnerability realm that actually demonstrated trust and reliability and things like that within your team. So that's the argument for vulnerability. Does anyone want to throw their two cents on that? I have a question. Please. So when you were talking about, I loved it, the kind of the critical analysis of performance.
29:01In an organizational setting, to make that, I'm sorry to trigger you, authentic. Would something like a 360 be a good tool to use to kind of facilitate that critical reflection process? Potentially. I think that giving employees opportunity to provide feedback to a leader is really, really critical. But I do think, and I'd love to hear both of your or all three of your sort of ideas here, I do think sometimes that a leader stepping into their fallibility a little more by sort of disclosing their weaknesses or disclosing that they've sort of introspected on that a little bit makes it feel like it's less coming from the employee.
29:45Because I think we have to really acknowledge the power dynamics at play here. So I think 360s theoretically are a great tool, but I do think as a leader asking employees, we're never going to get 100 % disclosure on the things that we could be doing better because whether we like to say we're open and all of those things, it will impact potentially on our relationship with our employee if we're not able to receive that feedback well. So definitely think that's a tool for it. But I think there's an element of leaders actually being open to disclosing that themselves that the research seems to say can actually sort of help facilitate that openness as well.
30:22I think what's key for me here too is as well that kind of piece that you mentioned, like, surround, not just sort of having this like, blah, here's all the things I'm bad at, lol, you know.
30:34But I think being able to say and having this kind of, I think, part of your leadership ethos being, and I'm learning about it and I'm curious to improve, or I've got things in place to make sure that I don't actually need to be focusing on that, because that's, I know that I'm not good at it. And I think being, having that kind of approach to it, both the curiosity, the humility, the transparency, these are all great things for a leader to be able to demonstrate that there is that, you know, the fallibility that we all have, but also that I can still be trusted as a leader because I'm not only aware of it, but I'm doing something with it or about it.
31:11Yeah, I agree. I think it's that idea of recognizing it, but taking action that shows you're doing something about it. Otherwise, I feel like sometimes we're kind of weaponizing vulnerability a little bit, like we're low-key using it as manipulation. And I don't love that as a leader, you know, like sort of disclosing in a way to try and build that trust and reliability, but there's no real follow-through in that. It's just, I'm trying to be relatable, but I'm not actually demonstrating to you that I'm going to work through these things. Great. I love those thoughts. So now I want to look at the evidence against vulnerability as a leader.
31:49And it's interesting because, again, it can be a bit wobbly, depends on your interpretation here. So looking at specific behaviors, one of the papers I looked at was published in 2025 in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. And the paper was called, Does Expressing Uncertainty Help or Harm Leaders? And I really liked this word uncertainty because I think, again, vulnerability is often, And, you know, it's an umbrella term for things like uncertainty expressing that we might not know the answers to things. And so what the evidence actually suggested is that leaders who express uncertainty can be viewed as less effective, less warm and less competent.
32:30So I think this is a really interesting one and I'd love to unpack this further because I think we have to be strategic in how we speak about uncertainty or times of uncertainty as well. because I think what people expect from inner leader when things are uncertain is not for them to have all the answers, but to show that they're willing to create a plan or have some conviction to actually work through the challenges. So what is everyone's thoughts on this? Can I dive in? I've been thinking a lot about the definition that someone's used recently of trust, which is having a confident relationship with the unknown.
33:07And I really thought of that as you were speaking likes because I think that's what leaders need to be able to really elicit from their teams is this confidence in the unknown and I completely agree that there is you know simply presenting everything's uncertainty full stop is probably going to harm the trust factor in our teams but being able to sort of talk about it and acknowledge I think you know as well that it's there is like uncertainty permeates everything in our lives right now and not talking about it or pretending that everything is solid and fixed and never going to change is frankly idiotic and will certainly break trust but there's this kind of nuanced space of being able to hold space for it but also inspire people's courage that you're going to be able to know how to navigate the uncertainty as well yeah I think it's the nuance here isn't it because it's you know you could say oh you know uncertainty being comfortable with that could look like oh my god guys what are we going to do oh my god the world's falling apart exactly yeah like how exciting what opportunities we've got with the pace of things that are changing what can we do for our clients it's going to support them do you know what i mean it's and i think a lot of that and i know it's kind of a word that was overused last year but emotional regulation plays a part in it as well in terms of how leaders show up as being you know quote unquote vulnerable or um yeah so But it also probably takes a certain amount of maturity as well.
34:33If you imagine you're a brand new manager, then you already feel like you've got a lot to prove, haven't you? And for you to go up there on day two and go, yeah, actually, do you know what? I'm not really 100 % sure what I'm doing is like, that's... Yeah. Yeah. You've got to get that balance right, haven't you? So, I mean, just asking for necessarily some in-depth advice, but I mean, if someone was a new manager listening to this, Lex, how much of this do they need to take all of it in? Well, it's an interesting one. And sort of what the three of you who kind of just elucidated there as well is that it's oftentimes not the content of the message, but the delivery.
35:08And I think you can not have the answers or you can be totally green to certain tasks, but it's how you go about perhaps asking for help or how you go about expressing where the gap is for you and how you might rely or lean on your team that can shift it from being I'm incompetent to I'm empowering people. or I'm hitting the freaking panic button to, hey, we don't know the answers here, but we've got this. So I think it's all in the actual delivery, the tone, the body language, how thoughtful you are in what the downstream impact of your communication might be so that you can sort of pre-plan the delivery of that.
35:49Can I just give the example of a friend of mine who recently stepped into a leadership role and they'd come into a new department and there was some, they knew that there were some concerns from some of the people they were going to be leading about their capabilities because they didn't have all the technical skills that a lot of the people in the department have and they got some really great advice I think from their coach which was to acknowledge in their sort of you know gathering the team together first team meeting to say to acknowledge a couple of those things like I know I like there's a bit there's a bit here that I'm not not up to speed on and I also know that the team is far ahead of me in this particular way and this is what I'm doing to bridge that gap or this is how this is the book I'm reading and this is the coaching I'm seeking so that I can be the best possible leader that I can for you because I think sometimes getting ahead of those knowing and getting ahead of those concerns that people have can be a really powerful way of proving oh yeah no that's that's an intelligent person who's who's clear on what's going on here rather than some ignoramus who's coming in and just telling us that they're going to be a great leader.
36:46So Lex can we come down one side or another is it truth? Is it a lie? Is it both? Well, it's a little bit of both. And one thing I do just want to acknowledge before we give our final verdict is I actually want to just double click on Lee's word there around emotional sort of regulation. Because one study that I also found was that when leaders lean on their team for emotional support as a form of vulnerability, this actually undermines their perceptions of competence from their team as well. So I think it, again, it all comes down to the behaviors and how we express vulnerability in a really strategic way.
37:21So if we're oversharing or dumping on our team or gossiping and whinging about things that aren't going well, because we think that's vulnerable, these are all the kind of skills or the kind of behaviors rather that are actually going to undermine us. So the verdict is, I think vulnerability when done well, when done thoughtfully, and when done with a bit of a plan in place around what it is you're trying to achieve as a result of expressing it, I think really can build bridges, build trust and build psychological safety in your team. But vulnerability done thoughtlessly, done from a place of emotional reactivity, most certainly is going to undermine your perceived competence as a leader.
38:05So that's my verdict. Fabulous. Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant. Thank you so much for that. Before we go on to the workplace surgery, just wondering if you want and tell the listeners a little bit more about your podcast. Oh, sure. So Live and Work More Human is really conversations around how we can bring our humanity into our work lives and into everything that we do in a more empowered and aware way. We have lots of amazing conversations with incredible thought leaders. And we also have some conversations, just the two of us, sort of talking about our own experience and what we're seeing out there in the world.
38:39As you guys well know, we started as we are human leaders and we've shifted the lens to be less around just leadership because we really believe that everyone has the capabilities within them to be leaders. So it's inviting more people into the conversation and more of our lives into that space. Lex, what did I miss? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Love it. Ditto what Sal said. We'll leave it there. Give us a listen. You have fabulous guests on there. So go and look for Live and Work More Human podcast wherever you get your podcasts. We'll leave a link in the show notes. Okay, so it is on to my favorite time of the week.
39:11It's time for the world famous weekly workplace surgery. I put your questions to normally, Leanne. Not this week. Not this week. We're going to put the questions to the guests. So we're going to start off, I think, because this is our burnout, Sal, I think it's going to be for you, isn't it? So I'll read the question. So this person's writing, and basically the problem is that their team's burning out, and so are they. So they write, I can see my team is burning out. The energy's gone. People are just going through the motions. and a couple of my strongest performers have gone quiet in a way that worries me.
39:38The problem is I'm not in a great place either. I'm supposed to be the one fixing this, but I'm running on empty myself. I don't want to be fake, but I also don't know how much of my own burnout I should share with the team. How do you lead through burnout when you're feeling it too? Sal, the floor is yours. Great question and one that I get with remarkable and increasing frequency, Al. I think the first point that I would say is to leaders to seek some outside help for themselves immediately. And I mean pronto now. Engage a coach, perhaps a therapist, get a support team, get an entourage around you to support your own well-being at all levels because your well-being is critical to that of the team.
40:16So that is really your first starting point. Secondly, I would say schedule in some one-on-ones with your team. And if you're not doing this already, just start to have those conversations around how they're doing. But be more specific than just how's it going because you'll probably just get a fine nothing to see here. but really digging into some questions around how their workload's going, where they're finding challenges and what you can do to support them in this particular week or period of work. So some proactive and specific questions that are really going to elicit answers around how you can support them better is really a really helpful place to start.
40:52Once you've been able to get to a point where you're feeling a bit better, then it's time to look at some of the system stuff, some of the broader picture, because that's going to be a really important piece if you want to sort of prevent burnout from happening upstream. But as a sort of emergency alarms flashing, red flags flying everywhere sort of approach, start with self, start with conversations and focus on exactly what Lex just referred to, that sort of discernment in your vulnerability as well. Lex, anything to add? I mean, just to really build on the system stuff, Sal is really our expert here on burnout.
41:25But I think the one thing I've experienced as a leader, and it's a saying I use all the time now, everything is a priority, nothing is a priority. So the first point of call is to just clarify and cut the crap. Cut and defer low value work, give people permission to just not be working on faffing stuff. Like what are your needle movers? How do you just dial in the focus so that people don't feel like there's a million and one deliverables and there's just too much on their plate? So I think that's kind of the start, the key start for the systems change side of things is just looking at why are people so laterally spread and what do we really need to be focused on well said legs yeah absolutely love that and and the irony is that the word priorities is pluralized which just seems a bit ridiculous doesn't it yes we'll go on to our next question just that in the question they said i'm something like i know it's on me to fix it and i think that can be a burden managers and leaders can put on themselves and you're not the only one who's I mean it's not your sole responsibility you're working within an organization where there should be other other support and advice available so I think it's I see this and I hate to say go back to generations because I there there isn't that much when we actually dig into it difference between us but I do hear our Gen X colleagues talking about this more like holding that responsibility to fix it um and I think Like, yeah, I think maybe just reflect on that a little bit and take some of that accountability off your shoulders.
42:53You are part of the solution, but you're not all of it. And can I give two points? I'm sorry to keep going. Two points there, Lee, to build. One is to put your own oxygen mask on first. And that's a really important thing for leaders that kind of I need to help all my people really starting with your own self-care as well. But also engaging some outside support. If you have any budget at all to get, you know, really expert consultants. I'm not going to name names, but, you know, I can think of some. to come in and help you with understanding stress management, understanding nervous system regulation, so that it's not on you as a leader to be delivering that information or coaching or therapizing people through this, but getting that external support in, making them aware of the EAP, all that kind of stuff as well.
43:35Fabulous. And Sal, what's the name of your book? Protect Your Spark. There you go. So that's also a very good resource. Great. Okay. Now question number two, how do you lead the right culture when the organization won't? So my organization talks a lot about values like psychological safety and I genuinely believe them but this person writes when I try to lead that way with my team I get pushback if I give people autonomy I'm told I'm being too soft if I push back on deadlines to protect them I'll tell them not a team player I feel stuck between doing what I think is right for my team and what the wider organization seems to reward so I think this is probably one for you Lex how do you build the right culture in your team when everything seems to be pulling you in a different direction?
44:18Thoughts? This is both a simple and a really complex answer, but I think it's a dilemma we see really often. And it's often because we hear organizations, like the amount of times we have organizations coming to us with a pre-diagnosed problem that demonstrates that they're really fluent in the language of what a good culture should be, but they are awful at actually rewarding the behavior that creates it. So culture really simplistically is what you do consistently. So if you are consistently rewarding overwork, staying at the organization too long, toxic behaviors like undermining colleagues or whatever it may be, these are all of the things that actually are the summation of your culture.
45:03So I would say the most simple place to start is observe the behavior that's accepted and observe the behavior that's being pushed away. Again, a lot of organizations say they value psychological safety. It's just the hottest word in leadership right now, trust, well-being, autonomy. But if you're promoting things like urgency or presenteeism, we've had a conversation today about productivity and productivity proxies. Bums in seats doesn't equal good work. If you're prioritizing micromanagement, controlling what your employees are doing. There's just an incongruence between what you're saying and what you're doing.
45:41And we call this the intention impact gap. So when that happens, employees also, you have to recognize, have quite a good bullshit detector. So they're very aware when what you say and what you do don't align. So this is just going to continue to sort of snowball your culture in the wrong direction. It's going to create insubordination. All of these things that are just going to feel like the culture spiraling more and more outside of your control. So I would say the foundational element in understanding what your culture actually is, is to understand what behaviors are actually being rewarded.
46:13And then you can recalibrate from there. But until you have that awareness, I think there's no point in looking at workshops or a training around psychological safety or this and that, because you don't even understand what needs to be changed first and foremost. Fabulous. Any thoughts, Sal? I'd say what everything that Lex just shared. The only bill that I'd have is potentially the listener said that they're being told these things. I'd be really curious who's telling them because if that's things that the feedback that they're getting from their team on these initiatives that they're trying to take then I think there's perhaps a little bit of lack of understanding from the team side why these things are important and why it matters so there might be some like values or a vision alignment training that'd be really helpful to get everyone on board and understanding why these behaviors matter so much to us if that pushback is coming from your leadership um then there's bigger issues uh at hand and that's a very different conversation.
47:07Fabulous. Leanne? I agree with everything. 10 out of 10. Brilliant. Nothing to add. Full marks. Fabulous. No notes. Thank you so much. No notes. Okay. So on to question number three. It's about hiring, whether you're hiring wrong or not. When I started my business, I hired people just like me. I'm sure we'll have some comments on that. Same value, same energy, same way of thinking. It worked really well at the start. Now we're growing. I'm being told I need to bring in different perspectives. People will challenge how we do things. But every time I try, it creates friction and they don't seem to last.
47:39So I'm questioning this. Is this a problem with my hiring approach or am I the one struggling to adapt? Guys, who wants to take this first? I mean, the short answer is it's both. It's probably your hiring approach and your adaptability. And I think just to really drill down into human behavior here, We all say we want people around us who challenge us, but often that means challenging us in ways that feel comfortable. But to truly invite divergent thinking and diversity and things like that into your organization is uncomfortable. So you need to be willing to adapt to things, not looking, feeling, sounding like you.
48:20That's just the bottom line there. So I think there's an element of developing your capacity to sit in the discomfort of difference, which, you know, these are just cognitive biases and human comfort. That's just how we're wired. And then the second thing I would say to that is that this is where the distinction between what you say you value in your organization and working styles really, really matters. Because if you're talking core values, such as, I don't know, they might be integrity, care, accountability, excellence, They're the typical things we see stuck on the walls of organizations.
48:55Get really clear on what those mean because you can have people with very divergent thinking styles from very different backgrounds from yourself that share those core values because you're really clear on what behaviors model those core values. So that means someone might have a different communication style to you, a different velocity of work or a different way of solving problems or even a different office setting that they like. But if they're modeling the behaviors that underpin your values, they are a culture fit. It's just that the culture is now growing and evolving and looking different to cater to these people.
49:31So what we're seeking in hiring is not conformity, but an opportunity to bring new and different people into an organization who share in our core values because what those core values mean to us is really clear and explicit so everyone can actually understand that from the get-go. Fabulous. Sal thoughts? I think it is, we saw some language change a few years ago, this shift from culture fit to culture add as being not just hiring a carbon copy of ourselves, but seeking people who add that diversity of thought to avoid things like groupthink. I would say that if people are rapidly leaving your organisation, as you've suggested, that's a massive red flag for me.
50:12And I would be fairly confident in saying that it probably has a lot to do with you as a leader. And if this is your response, your discomfort is probably rippling out through the organization and making it really difficult for that person to find a sense of belonging and finding a sense that they are welcome there. So I think there's some hard conversations perhaps to have with a coach and potentially completely support everything that Lex said around looking at values and really understanding how you want this organization to be and why so that the next diverse hire is welcomed in and you can start to really build that culture that's thriving, that's robust, that's different, and that's actually a much better, healthier, and more exciting place to work.
50:50Fabulous. Leanne, have you got any thoughts? I agree with Lex and Sal. I think there's lots of organizations out there that will recruit for culture fit without really having taken the time to understand what behaviors are associated with their culture. So culture just becomes people like you and me, whether that's how we think or look or where we're from. So I think defining culture and getting those behaviors nailed down is really really important the thing I'd add to then is that we know culture fit is a really useful thing for employee engagement and belonging and job satisfaction people who are a good fit with our culture tend to stay in it longer and they're happier for it that doesn't necessarily mean they're going to be good at their job so are these people leaving the organization because they're not a culture fit because they're not very good at their job because in recruitment processes culture fit is predictive of about two percent of future job performance whereas something like a structured interview that's really diving into the competency of the role and the behavioral aspects of the values we're going to get somebody in that very robust recruitment process that is good at the job and is a culture ad however you want to call it so i think it's it's yeah figure out what your culture is and then really look at your recruitment process in And my favorite thing in the world, job analysis.
52:05If you've not done it, do one now. Nerd. Fabulous. No, I love that. Love that, Lee. And I just want to add to that because I hear this all the time, that hire for attitude. And I think, you know, this is like a slogan we see bandied around all the time. But I do really think you need to be hiring people with the right skill set to achieve what it is you need that role to achieve as well, as well as being, you know, an alignment for culture fit. so yeah i love that fabulous thank you so much okay so i think that's the end can we do this every week please please yeah brilliant it would be brilliant if you have your own question that you want us to want us me to put to leanne or potentially other people who we have in the surgery in the future then the links are in the show notes the emails in the show notes um also make sure you do check out the show notes because it's the first time that you actually do need to check out the show notes because you need to go and find lex and sal now you can go find the podcast actually to go and subscribe, like, leave a comment, tell your mum, do everything that you need to do.
53:05Normally at this time, I would tell you what was going on on Thursday, but I have no clue. Absolutely no clue. It'll be a surprise for us all. It's a surprise for everyone. It's someone really great, though. Of course it is. Cliffhanger. Cliffhanger. Exactly. Exactly. So thank you so, so, so much, Lex and Sal. Anything to add before we say goodbye? Thanks so much for having us. It's lovely to see you both. Yeah. It's so good. Thank you so much. And we will see you next week. Thank you.
From the publisher
Welcome back to Truth, Lies & Work, the award-winning podcast where behavioural science meets workplace culture. This week is a very special "cross-over" episode as we are joined by Alexis Zahner and Sally Clarke, hosts of the Live+Work More Human podcast. Together, we tackle the "bums on seats" myth, the stress of AI limits, and why being a "vulnerable" leader is more nuanced than you think.
🔥 Stories Covered
1. The "Sh*tcut": When Speed Kills Quality
Leanne introduces a new term from James Hardie: the sh*tcut. While a shortcut is a disciplined way to save time while protecting quality, a shtcut* is moving faster by skipping the essential thinking and checks. We discuss why businesses fall into this trap and how to use the C Method (Clarity, Checks, and Consequences) plus Courage to avoid it.
Read more here: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/really-shortcut-shtcut-james-hardie-rouye/?trackingId=aTyABh%2F%2BTgCbctmdoTx97w%3D%3D
2. The 4:30 PM Empty Office
Sally shares a viral story of an Indian tech professional in Sweden who was stunned to find her office completely vacant by 4:30 PM. In Sweden, the emphasis is on quality of work over "warming a chair." We dive into why the "always-on" badge of honor is a recipe for burnout and why recovery must be treated as a professional norm.
Watch the video: https://www.google.com/search?q=viral+video+of+swedish+office&oq=viral+video+of+swedish+office&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigATIHCAMQIRigATIHCAQQIRiPAtIBCDQzNDlqMGo5qAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:d0449930,vid:iMc8VrcsfQs,st:0
Read the story: https://www.ndtv.com/feature/empty-office-at-4-30-pm-indian-techie-highlights-swedens-work-culture-11275625
3. Token Anxiety: The New AI Stress
Al reveals a bizarre new workplace stress: Token Anxiety. Whether it's watching your daily AI allowance creep up or feeling guilty that your AI isn't "working" while you sleep, it's a very modern FOMO. Interestingly, research shows that even AI models start to produce "sloppy code" and cut corners when they near their context limits—just like an overworked human on a Friday afternoon.
🧠 Truth or Lie: Does Vulnerability Make You a Better Leader?
Alexis puts the "vulnerability" gospel to the test. While popular, the research shows it’s a double-edged sword.
The Truth: Sharing critical feedback about your own performance builds psychological safety.
The Lie: "Willy-nilly" oversharing without strategy signals incompetence.
The Verdict: Leadership vulnerability only works when paired with discernment, humble self-assessment, and a clear plan for growth.
💬 Workplace Surgery
Our panel of four experts answers your burning questions:
Leading through your own burnout: How do you support a team when you’re running on empty? Sally suggests seeking outside help pronto and putting on your own oxygen mask first.
Leading culture "uphill": What to do when the organization rewards speed but you want to protect your team? Lex discusses creating a "micro-culture" and using the language of business to defend boundaries.
The "Hiring Like Me" Trap: Why hiring for "culture fit" often leads to groupthink and how to move toward "culture add."
📬 Connect with Al & Leanne
– LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/truthlieswork
– Al Elliott: https://www.linkedin.com/in/thisisalelliott
– Leanne Elliott: https://www.linkedin.com/in/meetleanne
– Email: hello@truthliesandwork.com
– Book a call: https://savvycal.com/meetleanne/chat
Connect with our Guests
– Alexis Zahner: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexiszahner/
– Sally Clarke: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sallyclarkeevolve/
– Website: https://liveandworkmorehuman.com/
Mental health support
UK & ROI — Samaritans Call 116 123 or visit https://www.samaritans.org
UK — Mind Call 0300 123 3393 or visit https://www.mind.org.uk
US — Suicide & Crisis Lifeline Call or text 988 or visit https://988lifeline.org
Australia — Lifeline Call 13 11 14 or visit https://www.lifeline.org.au
Global helplines: https://findahelpline.com
Truth, Lies & Work is part of the HubSpot Podcast Network, the audio destination for business professionals.
