In short
Jonathan Nolan discusses how businesses should actually use AI (redesigning processes and measuring bottom-line impact, not just buying software), the “agentic wave,” and how hype vs reality is playing out. He also argues AI won’t make film/TV cheaper, draws a line against using AI to write his own work, and explains what he hopes Fallout’s retro-futurist optimism means for rebuilding after catastrophe. He connects these themes to mass surveillance, education/democratization, and the need for regulation.
Guest backgrounds
Dan Swan (McKinsey) is referenced via a separate Wired/McKinsey interview segment; no personal guest is present in this transcript besides Nolan.
Key claims
Value comes from integrating AI with people and process redesign; IT bottlenecks are a major drag. Nolan is a techno-optimist but distrusts “froth.” LLMs may be “glorified search” or could reach cognition-like behavior. AI writing would trap him in a creative crutch; AI is great for research. Film costs won’t drop like managers claim.
Notable examples
Interstellar robot crew; The Dark Knight mass-surveillance twist; Westworld’s AI/LLM discussions; “regulate me” PR by Zuckerberg/Sam Altman; Fallout Season 2 production moving back to California after fires; Fallout’s 1950s Americana framing; Sean Baker’s Tangerine (iPhone) then later film shoots on 35mm.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOWarm-Up Questions with Nolan
3:17 to 4:04
Engaging fast questions to warm up the conversation with Nolan.
“Jonathan Nolan, welcome to The Big Interview.”
AI and Science Fiction
4:04 to 5:24
Discussion on AI in science fiction and its portrayal in literature.
“I needed to go and take them aside and think about them for a while.”
Personal Insights and Reflections
5:24 to 8:15
Nolan shares insights about creativity, technology, and personal reflections on parenthood.
“But it's very clear we're in this moment.”
The Intersection of Tech and Storytelling
8:15 to 14:01
Exploration of Nolan's relationship with technology and its influence on storytelling.
“So you would want to live in a digital simulation of your reality with relatively young kids who still love and adore you and think you're the best thing ever.”
Feeling the Inflection Point of Technology
14:01 to 15:12
Explore the emotions and anticipations surrounding the current technological wave.
“So I wrote him a letter and the letter that I wrote had a line and it was a thought that had occurred to me walking home one night and it went like this.”
Navigating Between Hype and Reality
15:13 to 17:05
Discuss the challenges of separating genuine advancements from marketing hype in AI.
“I'm sorry, as the editor-in-chief of WIRED, to be saying that.”
Westworld's Connection to AI Progress
17:06 to 19:06
Discover how the production of Westworld intertwined with real advancements in AI.
“And, of course, a lot of that was genuinely fascinating advances in this research and in these tools.”
AI as a Transformative Force
19:07 to 21:45
Consider the transformative potential of AI technologies and their societal implications.
“So staying close to it and listening to it.”
AI as a Transformative Force
23:17 to 23:46
Consider the transformative potential of AI technologies and their societal implications.
The Keys to the AI Rooms
24:00 to 28:03
Examine who controls AI technology and its implications for society.
“you've already got 40 new emails, six new pings, and a browser with, honestly, I've stopped counting the tabs.”
Show all 22 chapters
Creative Process and AI's Role in Filmmaking
28:03 to 29:18
Exploration of how quitting smoking relates to the use of AI in creative processes.
“Because it becomes a crutch that you use to, I think, many writers.”
The Cost and Impact of AI on Production
29:18 to 30:20
Discussing the misconception that AI will reduce costs in film and TV production.
“The sort of like AAA productions, big movies, big shows.”
The Future of Filmmaking and New Technologies
30:20 to 31:56
Insights on how new technologies can empower a new generation of filmmakers.
“I mean, it's literally like the delegation from Northern California comes to visit with the Southern California delegation and we'll sit, right?”
The Importance of Celebrity Culture in Film and TV
31:56 to 34:15
Examining the connection audiences have with movie and TV stars and its implications.
“And I would point to Sean Baker, terrific filmmaker.”
Financial Pressures and Production Challenges
34:15 to 35:21
Discussion on financial pressures and challenges within the film industry.
“that touch on the midbrain rather than the neocortex.”
The Impact of Tax Rebates on Filmmaking
35:21 to 37:30
Exploring how tax rebates have altered the economics of film production.
“And it reminds me that there is one technology over the years that has radically altered the economics of film.”
Challenges of Global Production Practices
37:30 to 39:51
Critique of the global production practices and their impact on Hollywood.
“We shot part of Fallout Season 1 in Namibia.”
Legislation and Future of Filmmaking in California
39:51 to 41:34
Insights on legislative efforts to keep filmmaking competitive in California.
“I think culturally it's sort of become how you make movies.”
Exploring Fallout: The Show and Its Themes
43:00 to 47:48
Jonathan Nolan discusses the complexities and themes of the Fallout series.
“So as listeners probably know, but in case you don't, the show is of course based on a video game franchise that has many, many decades of history.”
Political Themes in Fallout
47:49 to 50:55
Nolan shares insights on the political themes woven into Fallout's narrative.
“No, sadly, because I really love that community.”
Control-Alt-Delete: A Quick Game
50:56 to 55:02
Nolan plays a game discussing technology he'd control, alter, or delete.
“And I don't want to put too much on you, but, you know, we're talking about this show that looks at the world after collapse at the hands of, you know, a very powerful conglomerate.”
The Value of Technology in Organizations
56:05 to 57:32
Learn how organizations can effectively leverage technology for transformation.
“Some people are buying software and calling it a transformation.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00I recently chatted with McKinsey's Dan Swan about how businesses successfully transitioned to AI, the coming agentic wave, and even the sad loss of tennis line judges. Here's a sneak peek. Some people are buying software and calling it a transformation. The people that are really getting the most value from it are fundamentally doing something very different, which is they're taking that technology and they're incorporating it with changing the capabilities of their people, fundamentally redesigning their processes, and tracking the impact through the bottom line. There's much more in the full interview with Dan Swan, which can be found in its entirety on Wired.com.
0:37Also, check out McKinsey's playbook, Rewired, available at your favorite bookseller. Every company says AI will make employees more productive, but most employees are still stuck waiting on IT. Waiting for app access, waiting for password resets, waiting for someone to fix a laptop issue so they can get back to work. That operational drag adds up fast, and IT teams are overwhelmed trying to keep up. Serval was built to automate that work. You describe what you want automated in plain English, and Serval builds it for you. No complicated workflow builders, no consultants, just faster support and fewer tickets slowing everyone down.
1:11Unlike traditional automation tools, Serval doesn't require consultants or long implementation cycles. The platform is designed to eliminate repetitive tickets so IT can focus on strategic work instead of constantly firefighting. Serval positions IT as the AI-powered operational backbone of the company, not just a support function. Learn more or start a free four-week pilot at serval.com slash uncanny. That's S-E-R-V-A-L dot com slash uncanny. Serval dot com slash uncanny. The Colonel's cooked up a new$10 bucket of the day just for you. Monday, 10 wings for$10. Tuesday, 8-piece fried chicken for$10.
1:51Wednesday, 8 tenders for$10. Thursday, 10 wings for$10. Friday, 24 nuggets for... Ooh, you guessed it, didn't you? $10. The$10 bucket of the day deal. Every weekday. Only at KFC. It's finger-lickin' good. Prices and participation vary. Well, supplies last. Not available on third-party ordering platforms. Tax extra.
2:16From Wired, this is The Big Interview. I'm Katie Drummond. I'll admit, I don't have a ton of time for TV binging. But recently, I've gone all in on Fallout. It's based on a series of video games, of course, and is set in post-apocalyptic Los Angeles, where citizens are forced to live underground. Fallout is among a series of projects that director, writer, and producer Jonathan Nolan has helmed or worked on. His IMDb is a list of some of the most prescient representations of where we may be headed, from Memento to Interstellar, from Westworld to now Fallout. Jonah is one of few creatives in Hollywood who consistently evolves how tech, science, and AI are portrayed in film and TV.
2:59Despite, or maybe because of all this, the Oscar and Emmy nominated multi-hyphenate tells me he's still a techno-optimist, although he will never use AI to write for him. Here's our conversation.
3:17Jonathan Nolan, welcome to The Big Interview. Thank you for having me. Delighted that you're here, and here in person. We're sitting together. It's very cold. If you can't tell, if you're listening, it is, you're in New York right now, you're not always here. Yeah. It's like, and I'm from Canada, so my barometer is a little off. I'm from Chicago. Oh, yeah, you are from Chicago. I tend to think of New York as wimpy cold, but this is real cold. No, no, this is real. And also the older I get, the weaker and more frail. Yeah. So I just, I can't tolerate it. I've been in LA for 25 years, so I'm completely useless.
3:45So we're both totally useless. It's going to be a great conversation. And we always like to start these conversations. Actually, this might help today of all days with some very fast questions. So like a warmup for your brain. I like that. And maybe the rest of you, given how cold it is. Are you ready? The reason I became a writer is because I was no good at answering fast questions. Oh, good. I needed to go and take them aside and think about them for a while. So I'm just going to flub this. What is the most overused sci-fi trope? Ooh. Faster than light travel. Why?
4:18Because it's a sort of story convenience. I guess we use it in Interstellar, but we use it in a slightly backhanded way, which is a wormhole, which doesn't quite feel the same. but effectively it's the same thing. And it's just a way to skip the boring bits. Right. Accelerate the plot. Yeah. What's a book you go back to over and over? Of late, I go back to all of the Ian Banks culture books. Why those? Years ago, I was looking for positive portrayals of AI in science fiction. Oh, interesting. We're going to talk all about this. Yeah, keep going. And it was almost nothing. Really nothing. I mean, it's kind of James Cameron on one side and no one on the other side of the roster.
5:02And Ian Banks, who wrote those books over the course of 20 years, they are the most fully realized and brilliant depiction of a hybrid civilization where you've got people and you've got AI and they have sort of figured it out. What is the weirdest app on your phone right now? Ooh, there's got to be a good one. certainly the one that has captured the most of my attention and it's disastrous is uh is an app called bring a trailer which is for buying classic cars i emigrated to the states uh when i was 11 uh and when i got my driver's license i became an american i was like never going back to always love cars so you're a car guy yeah i did this i did not know this did not come up in my research yeah yeah so you're using an app to look at cars to potentially acquire yeah it sounds very classic old cars, those sorts of things.
5:53You know, I love electric cars. I've driven electric cars for years. They're fantastic. But it's very clear we're in this moment. Like, I miss the sort of the Cretaceous cell phone age, right? When you had like a million different shapes. You had the ones that flipped and rolled and did all that stuff. And then the iPhone came along and just, and that's just this banal, incredibly functional. That's what's happening in cars very soon. Like, vanishingly quick. Like Trump is trying to hold on. I mean, if you look at China, like the, you know, The barn door is wide open. Oh, for sure. Yeah. But you're looking for the eclectic, the diverse.
6:26Older internal combustion cars with manual transmissions. Wow. Okay, well, that is a weird app. What's harder to write, a perfect ending or a perfect pilot? Perfect pilot. Why? Perfect endings are more important, and so you ascribe value to them because if you don't have an ending, you don't have anything. Yeah. But in truth, a beginning without an ending is like a joke without a punchline, right? And I walked into J.J. Abrams' office one day. We talked about movies for a while. I walked out as a showrunner. Kind of, I liken the experience to getting my tie caught in a shredder. Right? It's like, oh, I'll do a little bit of dope.
7:01And, you know, 15, 16 years later, here I am. But writing pilots was a maddening experience. As a film writer, you're like, look at all this cool stuff I have. And you'll probably have to cut a few things out. No, no, no, the kind of floor with a pilot. It's okay. I got a hundred cool things. I'm going to show you four. And I have to pick the most strategically sound combination of those things. Very, very difficult. If you had to be trapped in one digital simulation, which would you choose? Oh, wow. We had fun with these. Yeah, no, no, no. Absolutely.
7:38A digital simulation of my, of my creation or a digital or extant digital simulation. I'm picking a sort of a universe. Either. The Fortnite universe. Yeah, exactly. Hard pass. Exactly. But if you're like, Westworld, I'm all in, you know. I think being able to, and every age is amazing, but being able to access, honestly, these years, right now, your kids, you're still, you're so close. And they're relying on you for everything. But they're filled with fascinating insights. And it's just incredible. And my brother's kids are older. I see how this goes. It's wonderful. the whole way through, but you never quite get this moment again.
8:15Well, don't make me cry right now. It's been like five minutes. So you would want to live in a digital simulation of your reality with relatively young kids who still love and adore you and think you're the best thing ever. Well, it's not going to get carried away. I'm not sure if they love and adore me, but they tolerate me. You want to live in a digital simulation where your kids still tolerate you. Yes. I'll take it. That hits. I would too. I would love to live in that world forever. Yeah. Ugh. For sure. Google search or chat GPT? Google search, for sure. Agree. Now, you wrote the short story that became the film Memento.
8:53Do you have any tattoos and what are they? My sister-in-law, Emma, and I, who produced that film, were talking during the production about getting tattoos. Yeah. And then we chickened out. Oh, come on. Well, if you don't get one when you're making that movie, you're never getting a tattoo. So never. We're done. Yep. A blank slate, as they say. What is the most Luddite part of your creative workflow? I wouldn't categorize it as Luddite, but we're still shooting everything on film. You are. Yes, you are very well known for this. Yeah. And the commitment remains. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, we'll come back to this later because it relates to the AI of it all.
9:24But the promise of digital cameras was that they would save enormous amounts of money. Yeah. My contention is, and this relates to AI as well, there is no technology that I've ever been presented with, and I've been doing this for 25 years, that has made anything that we do with phone or television cheaper, ever. and if you plot the economics of film or television over the last 50 years, I would challenge anyone to point to the inflection point where digital cameras came in and democratized it because they never did. So we shoot it on film because it costs the same. And it looks better. Costs the same and looks better.
9:54Yeah. Lastly, what is one must-have for your doomsday bunker? Oh, Nintendo Switch. And some games, I assume? Yeah, for sure. Do you have a doomsday bunker? If you have a doomsday bunker, I think like Fight Club, the first rule is you don't tell people if you have a doomsday bunker. I don't have a doomsday bunker. You don't have a doomsday bunker. There's no bunker. Not yet. I'm a techno optimist, sort of. We're going to talk about that too. So let me ask you, when I was getting ready to meet you and sit down and talk and thinking about your career, right, person of interest, reading about that really took me back.
10:30I was like, how many years ago was it since I watched that show? My husband and I used to watch it every week. Oh, no kidding. Oh, yeah. Interstellar, Fallout. But there aren't many people, I would say, in film and TV who have so consistently approached tech and science and AI with the consistency and the breadth that you have. Like, you have stuck with these themes. And I'm wondering why. Like, what keeps you coming back to those subjects, to those questions in all sorts of, right, different formats and different approaches and different, very different stories often? But what is it about that genre, so to speak?
11:05It's a very flattering way of maybe saying that I get a little stuck or repetitive. No, I don't. Come on. But no, I— It's a big field. To us, AI in particular. And I think it started for me, I wrote a film for my brother and David Heyman at Warner Brothers that never got made. But it was about AI. It was about sort of AI as a bad guy. And is this sort of like early 2000s? 2005. That you were writing about AI? 2005. Yeah. I got fascinated by the subject. I did a lot of research. I did a lot of looking into it. The next hit for me was, you know, the robot characters in Interstellar, which were being developed just shortly after that.
11:48I went from one project to the next. And I was like, wouldn't it be fun to write robots? You know, the tension of the robot crew member, whether it's alien or, you know, pretty much any version of this, is that they will eventually, you know, mutiny and murder everyone and they have a secret agenda. But what if they didn't? What if they were brave? self-sacrificing, sarcastic and funny, amazing leaders, you know, what if it just embodied those values the whole way through? And maybe you'd give the audience a slightly discomfort at first and this kind of interesting feeling of like, oh, okay, that's one path, right?
12:21It's not written that the path has to be this sort of, you know, I think a lot of that is rooted in sort of, you know, the usual human kind of xenophobia or rather, you know, movies about Terminators sell more tickets, right? And that idea that I've gotten fascinated with, where you have this firehose of data that's out there. What if something could pick through it and find patterns and find meaning? You know, the surveillance. That idea that proved certainly to be very prescient, I must say. We've got Snowden on the wall there. There he is. We wrote an episode in the first season that sort of had a very Snowden-like figure and debuted about six months before we learned about the Patriarch.
12:59In The Dark Knight, there is a plot twist about mass surveillance and pulling it all. You know, Batman kind of, Bruce Wayne builds this sort of very ethically challenged system of stealing information. And it was sort of wrestling with this idea of how much do we entrust the people protecting us outside of the comic book universe or with the government to surveil us? and what good could they put that to? And I think, you know, it definitely wasn't treated as an unalloyed, like, oh, that's a wonderful thing. It was, you know, at least he's kind of horrified when he sees that. So the idea of mass surveillance being sort of organized into and filtered into something that could help people was something I've been fascinated with.
13:44And that is an origin point for AI. It felt like a natural one. But I wrote a letter when we were trying to put together Westworld. Anthony Hopkins was interested and then as, you know, as always happens, the studio and the agents sort of kind of battle back and forth for a little bit too long and he started to, you know, we started to get a sense like, okay, we're losing Tony on this one. So I wrote him a letter and the letter that I wrote had a line and it was a thought that had occurred to me walking home one night and it went like this. He said, we live before, before what is a little harder to define, but you can feel it.
14:15You can feel this bump in the road, this inflection point. It's a really big one. You feel it coming very, very quickly. You can't quite figure out, you know, picture a big wave. You don't know what's on the far side of it, but you know it's coming. And for me, that has been about this moment that we're now standing in the middle of. So a little bit for me, we started writing these films and watching what was happening and series. This is the story of our time. So the question for me would be like, why would you write about anything else? Really? When you think about writing that letter and sort of feeling like you were on the precipice maybe of something that I think a lot of people had no idea they were on the precipice of, right?
14:55But you felt it. Yeah. And it shows through in your work. Now, to your point, we're standing in the middle of it. I think so. How do you feel standing in the middle of it, having been someone who years ago was pointing at it? Like, what is that experience like for you? Because I can't say I relate. I'm sorry, as the editor-in-chief of WIRED, to be saying that. But, you know, I was doing other stuff before this. I wasn't necessarily thinking about the inflection point with artificial intelligence all the time. Yeah. There's no trace of I told you so because I didn't know what to say. And I still don't know.
15:29I'm sort of, I think we're in the middle of that wave. But because, of course, a lot of what's happening right now is salesmanship. A lot of what's happening right now is hype. We're dealing with that in our business. We were very scared, you know, in film and television about what was right around the corner. And a lot of that was hype. We're two years into it now. We're up against the next contract negotiation. And it's like, okay, well, how much fruit has that borne? How much does that really change what we do? I think when we actually sit down to use these tools and think about what these tools do, I'm almost completely riven between two totally opposing worldviews.
16:01One, that this is really just, these tools are really just sort of a glorified browser, search function, right? With the right economic activity and brilliance being applied to them. I never imagined that consciousness, I don't believe that there's something specific or privileged about human consciousness. This is something, you know, we spend a lot of time thinking about this for Westworld. The flip side of that belief is that, yeah, something as simple as an LLM could give rise to cognition on a level that becomes increasingly hard to distinguish from human cognition. At which point, we are certainly in the middle of the thing that I was seeing.
16:36Absolutely. Because there have been so many false starts with AI over 100 years. Oh, so many. So many. It's the so-called sort of silver age or gold. You know, these moments where it was like, here it comes. Here it comes. And everyone kind of braces for it. We have a lot of conversations like this. And then a couple of years later, it sort of peters out a little bit. And you started hearing that around the release of GPT-5. It was like, oh, you know. Oh, right. It was a huge bummer. Everyone was very disappointed. But it has been, I would say, it was sort of right around when I started my job here at Wired.
17:04So like two and a half years ago, it was just all of a sudden the only thing anyone could talk about. And, of course, a lot of that was genuinely fascinating advances in this research and in these tools. And then to your point, it was marketing and hype and hyperbole and commercialization, right? The need for some of these companies to show a return on their investment. How do they do that? Will they release things like Sora 2 that are really sort of like wild and fun and crazy? But in terms of like, does that have staying power in 20 years? Will we all be sort of like generating little videos, you know, and sharing them on a social network like TBD?
17:45So it's really hard to make sense of it. How do you educate yourself when this is all moving so quickly, especially as someone who you don't want to be saying, I told you so. I don't you don't seem like you feel the need to be prescient. Right. You're just trying to tell great stories and sort of interrogate these questions. But obviously you want to stay ahead of the curve here. How do you try to distill hype from reality? It's tough. It's tough. one of the ways, and it wasn't anything we set out to do, but because of the success of Westworld. And it's, you know, HBO at the time was positioning itself as a tech company to try to get sold and compete with Netflix.
18:24And so the first time we showed that pilot was an event with Uri Milner at his enormous house. And we showed the pilot and then did a Q &A afterwards. And Sam Altman was the emcee. He had all his Y Combinator folks were there watching. I mean, so from the beginning, we were sort of picked up been tossed into that group of people. And so we wound up, in the course of making that show, we wound up becoming quite close with some of the people kind of leading the charge here. And, you know, I was hearing stories about 15 years ago and what was happening at DeepMind before Google acquired it. And, you know, and there is sort of criteria for when to terminate an experiment went straight into Westworld and getting kind of a weirdly, unintentionally winding up in a front row seat to a lot of what has transpired in the last 10 to 15 years.
19:07So staying close to it and listening to it. But even now, the pace, the pitch, the tenor of things is moving so quickly. We're in such a frothy moment, which I immediately distrust because I'm like, oh, this is... Yeah, I don't love froth. No. And it usually means, you know, a bubble burst or a lot of sleight of hand. But staying, you know, we're still invited to these conversations, these closed-door conversations with people who are, you know, again, leading the charge here. So you are still very close to that industry, sort of the people leading the charge. Yeah. So you're getting a front row seat.
19:39Yeah. Must be very interesting. It is fascinating. And I know these are closed door. I assume they're off the record. Yeah. Has anything come out of them, even a notion or something that nudged you in a certain direction or changed the way you were thinking about the technology? A hundred percent. Now that it's here. Yeah. Or at least one version. I mean, all the conversations about LLMs versus world models versus, you know, there's a lot that's going to happen in the next few years. And we may really wind up in a very different place to where we expect. I mean, almost certainly we will. I think an observation that I sort of started and then was bounced back and forth with a friend who's leading one of the leading companies was we spent a day working with a team talking about what you can do with these things.
20:22What are the applications for it? Because I think that is one of the bigger questions. And it occurred to me, it's like I think for the first time in a very long time, there may have been moments like this in the middle of the Second World War with so many technologies just kind of pouring out of the war effort. But this feels like one idea obviously expressed, you know, the amount of brilliance over 40 years to get to this place. You don't want to, you know, it's kind of like the overnight success, right? Right, right. The actor, Ange Nusinger, who, you know, finally gets the Oscar, Grammy, whatever, has been doing this for 20 years.
20:50So these, you know, neural nets have been around for a very, very long time. Not an overnight success, but pretty much to your point, two and a half years ago suddenly went from an obscure talking point for computer scientists to an everyday fact for all of our kids, everyone, everyone, all over the place. and it occurred to me that unlike some of these technologies over the years, this is more like an alien spaceship crash-landed on the face of the planet, and each of these companies and all of us are exploring the ruins of it, and we kind of walk into one room, and we're like, oh, shit, I can do teleportation.
21:26It's like, oh, I can make movies, right? It's less like we're making these things and more like we're sort of stumbling upon them because we've created something so powerful and so recursive that it can spew out almost weekly or monthly these wonders. I remember the first time I saw videos from Veo, and we spent an awful lot of money to build shots in Vizifex that look that good. I have a lot of friends in the gaming space. I know how much money they were spending to do stuff. And then you've got a product that's like, oh, it's a$10 subscription, and you can make this, this, this, you know, the thing.
21:59you know it is this extraordinary moment where instead of thinking of an application and then chasing it down over the course of you know years i think beyond the hype these technologies are genuinely transformative there's no question about it right they're a transformative culture they're already in the middle of doing that we haven't reckoned with the social consequences or the forget the genie back in the bottle how do we convince the genie not to you know destroy whole segments of the of the economy one of the smartest things i've ever seen in business was zuckerberg going before congress and saying regulate me.
22:26And then Sam Hallman did the same thing. And then their share price went boom, like that, right? And yet we're still waiting. You know what I mean? And yet we're still waiting. Yeah.
22:40I recently chatted with McKinsey's Dan Swan about how businesses successfully transitioned to AI, the coming agentic wave, and even the sad loss of tennis line judges. Here's a sneak peek. Some people are buying software and calling it a transformation. The people that are really getting the most value from it are fundamentally doing something very different, which is they're taking that technology and they're incorporating it with changing the capabilities of their people, fundamentally redesigning their processes, and tracking the impact through the bottom line. There's much more in the full interview with Dan Swan, which can be found in its entirety on Wired.com.
Read the full transcript
23:16Also, check out McKinsey's playbook, Rewired, available at your favorite bookseller.
23:46discount on NordLayer browser with the coupon code uncannyvalley10. That's nordlayer.com slash browser slash uncannyvalley and enter coupon code uncannyvalley10 at checkout. You know that feeling when you open your laptop in the morning and before you've even had coffee, you've already got 40 new emails, six new pings, and a browser with, honestly, I've stopped counting the tabs. I used to think that was just what work was supposed to feel like. Faster, louder, more, and everyone kept telling me AI was going to fix it. But every AI tool I tried just became one more tab, one more app to explain myself to, one more thing slowing me down.
24:27Then I found Superhuman Go. It's an AI chat that just lives on the side of your browser. It already knows what you're working on, so you're not starting from zero every time. You can draft an email, summarize a huge thread, even search across your other apps without ever leaving the page you're on. No new tabs, no context switching, no losing your place. That's AI that actually works with you, not on top of you. Check it out. Find out more at superhuman.com.
25:06Going back to sort of your analogy about the spaceship and you're going into different rooms and discovering, And what I was thinking about as you were saying that is what worries me is who has the keys to those rooms, right? And who doesn't? Who can unlock the door and who can't? Who can tell the genie what to do and what not to do? Yeah. And who is choosing to do it and not do it? Yeah. And that, I'm sure, is of top of mind for you. 100%. Even just in the context of your own industry, but much more broadly. I mean, again, you're a parent. Yeah. You're thinking about what this means for your kids in 20 years.
25:39Or next year. Or next year. Exactly. Yeah. Scary. It's scary. It's exciting. And certainly some of these folks and some of the products give you lots of good reasons to be cynical. But I've had a couple of conversations with people who are at the forefront of these things who really have a very clear and very compelling humanist perspective on this. Think about kids who are disadvantaged, who don't have access to the kinds of things that our kids may have access to. You know, the idea that these tools could be used to be, you know, a tutor who never forgets a question they've asked you. Yeah. Who, while you're sleeping, researches scholarships that might be the perfect way to get, you know, these sorts of things, especially for kids who don't have those advantages, might really be leveling, right, in terms of the playing field.
26:26Yeah, democratization. And these tools are largely free. So the paradox of this thing is you say, who has the keys to these things? And I'm very, I am very concerned about that. But one of the interesting things that's happening is that these tools are being given away essentially free to everyone. And I think that's a possibility I didn't quite see coming. I mean, you can see the promise so clearly, even just thinking about kids in education, right? You want so desperately, I want so desperately for that to like come true. Yeah. And it's almost like waiting to see if it does, right? One of the interesting comments that you made about AI, this was in an interview, I think with Semaphore, maybe last year, which was around how you use it.
27:07You reacted very viscerally. You said, quote, oh, God, no, that's crossing the Rubicon in terms of using AI to write. To write, yeah. Do you draw sort of a hard line in the sand there and just say sort of absolutely not? Like, where do you see AI in terms of art and creativity? How does that sit for you? Yeah, I guess there's one way to take that quote, which is that it's sort of a political thing, and it's not at all. It's more superstitious, right? I find writing—there are writers who love to write. I suffer through writing. I find writing exceptionally difficult. I love having written. There's nothing like the feeling of having written something and feeling, you know, that you got it.
27:43Exceptionally difficult. How does that look for you? A lot of sitting there and kind of bashing my head against the wall. Yeah. A lot of pacing, a lot of chocolate, a lot of walks. And that's the problem, right? I was writing the first movie I ever got paid to write, which was The Prestige. And we wrote it. I wrote that in 2001, and I started out smoking. And I realized that if I finished that script and I was still smoking, I would never quit. Right? Because it becomes a crutch that you use to, I think, many writers. If you're listening to this, you know exactly what he's talking about. And so I managed to quit cold turkey halfway through the script so that I could never point to that script.
28:18If it was a good script, if it worked, it was a pretty good script. as like, no, no, no, I've really got to go back. It would just pull you in every time. And I think about AI the same way. It's no assessment of its virtues as a writer, although I would happily dive into that topic. I just think if I let it into my creative process, which is already so fraught, that I would never find my way back. But it's terrific for research, right? It's amazing for research. You're researching, you know, so you're doing an adaptation or a reboot or something like that. You can get into it and you can ask your questions.
28:50Like, okay, tell me the book either, you know, series of books. Where's the book where, you know, such and such character first, you know, what do they talk about their childhood? Extraordinary on that level. Fizifex. Fizifex is in my business where we're probably going to see some significant enhancements. I'm not interested. I'm in this position right now with AI where in terms of what I do, there is a wonderful notion that we're going to save money somehow. Again, point to the moment in the history of film and television where it ever got cheaper, right? Right. The sort of like AAA productions, big movies, big shows.
29:21It's never gotten cheaper. I was talking to Todd Howard about this on the gaming side of things, right? And those games have just like big movies. They've just gotten bigger and bigger and bigger. Nothing ever makes it cheaper. Digital cameras didn't make it cheaper. You know, the digital post-production process didn't make it cheaper. So you think the idea that artificial intelligence could wipe out a bunch of jobs and just take costs down for film and TV production is a non-starter nonsense? No, no, no. It's entirely possible if, and there's this wonderful quote from the New Yorker, few months ago where it was about the gullibility of management of these companies if they think right that these tools can can you know replace everyone because they've been overhyped right because these folks have showed up in front of congress and be like please regulate me which is like the greatest pr boon ever right um and scared the crap out of everyone and managed to scare all of us during the strike i mean this is why you know this is part of the reason that strike went on so long, if they make bad decisions, it will absolutely, you know, it'll be, the consequences will be catastrophic for what we do.
30:20But assuming that the folks who are running things, assuming that people still want a certain number of big movies every year and a certain number of big shows every year, you know, there've been a lot of conversations in my town and God bless them that technology companies will come down to sort of make nice. I mean, it's literally like the delegation from Northern California comes to visit with the Southern California delegation and we'll sit, right? I mean, they barely bother with the New York delegation of journalists anymore. So I'm glad to hear they're still talking to you guys. For now.
30:47For now. For now. And sometimes those means are somewhat contentious. The last time I was one of those, someone sort of trotted out this metaphor of like, oh, they're Uber and we're taxi drivers. It's okay. Maybe. But maybe they're Uber and we're Formula One drivers. Oh, I like that. Not to sound self-aggrandizing. Oh, seize the power. Uber has no relevance to Ferrari to, you know, I'm a car guy, right? Uber has no relevance. Maybe Uber helps the fans get to the race, but it's not the race, right? Those technologies have nothing to do with the race. What these technologies will do, and I think they're incredible in this, is the next generation of filmmakers who don't even have access, but a tool that allows you to make a whole film just yourself sitting in a room prompting, that's extraordinary.
31:30And I think what it will do, and this is where I'm excited about these tools, is there's a generation of filmmakers who would never have got to Hollywood. And I think and I hope that Hollywood will remain an important epicenter of culture creation and filmmaking because these people will eventually get fed up with the prompt version of filmmaking and they will come and they will, as so many of us have done for 100 years now, try to convince someone who gives them some money to hire a proper Hollywood crew and go make a real movie. And I would point to Sean Baker, terrific filmmaker. And after he made Tangerine famously on an iPhone, the next year I was watching The Florida Project and I was taken aback.
32:09I was like, I've got to reconsider my whole position on film because this movie's beautiful. And then I got to the end and I Googled it and of course he shot it on 35. Yeah. He got there with an iPhone and his last three films have been shot on film because you use the tools that allow you to raise your hand and say, hey, look at me, look at what I'm doing. Yeah. And then, and this is my fervent hope, not because I love Hollywood or all of the gatekeeping and all the, you know, I think to myself if I'd arrived at a moment where I'd be defending the status quo in Hollywood, it i would be shocked right but just the ability you know to have a place a locus of talent where people come because film is ultimately a collaborative medium i think that's maybe the the scariest part to me these technologies they're not collaborative the isolationist aspect yeah yeah that's like writing writing sucks it does suck filmmaking is amazing because it's me and 800 of my friends it's a team sport it's amazing yeah but it's sort of this idea of like well how did you get your big break oh i i made a film with ai yeah you know what i mean and someone saw it Yeah, that's awesome.
33:07Sort of like that's more of the future. No, I think that's awesome. As long as it doesn't replace it, as long as we don't go through this moment where people think, oh, we can do all this content for peanuts. And it's like, well, no, you've always had the ability to do that. It's called B-movies. B-movies have always been there. There have always been, and independent films, which is where I started, right? You've always been able to make the lower cost version of it. But then there has always still been the AAA version of it. Movie stars, you know, I sometimes describe my job as photographing beautiful people in beautiful places, right?
33:38And the people part is important. The fact that the actors are real people. You think it matters to audiences? I think that matters a lot. The whole idea, the culture of celebrity, the idea of that connection you have to them. I then started working television and the bond that people have with television actors is different and much deeper. And that's crazy. You hang out in the airport with a movie star, hang out in the airport with a TV star. The way that people interact with you is completely different. This is a long lost member of their family. Oh, wow. Yeah, well, you hang out with them every week.
34:03Yeah. you are creating an extended family for millions of people. And I hope that that institution, that ability remains. And I trust it will. And I think part of the reason it will is for a million different things that touch on the midbrain rather than the neocortex. I want to ask you about Fallout in a minute, but a few things you have said reminded me, to make sure to ask you about this, you seem very sensitive about cost and the idea of spending less money to produce great work. And you gave a speech at the Saturn Awards. I think it was last year. The speech landed me in a little bit. You said, quote, as producers, we are not just here to save people money.
34:44The Times didn't include the expletive you apparently added to that line in a very Timesian move that just said he also swore something like that. And you're like, of course, New York Times is not going to print whatever bad word he said. But you were talking there in the context of bringing production back to California, which you did with the second season of Fallout. But I'm curious about how you think about the financial pressures of your industry and sort of the – you mentioned gatekeeping a minute ago, right? And sort of what kind of fight are you fighting to try to get the resources that you need to do the work you want to do?
35:19You know what I mean? It's funny. It's a great question. And it reminds me that there is one technology over the years that has radically altered the economics of film. And that technology is the tax rebate, right? Yes. An incredible innovation. Yeah. Yeah. And look, you know, as the recipient of funds from the great state of New York, the great state of California, the United Kingdom, Utah, you know, everywhere we go, if there's a rebate, we'll try to take advantage of it because, you know, this is how it works. You know, you want to put as much money on the screen as you can. But I do think that that is an example of an idea kind of run amok.
35:56part of the reason I was so worked up at that speech was not just the fire which had destroyed the homes of 10 of our crew members on Fallout and a dozen of our friends a lot of them are folks who worked with us on Westworld so we worked with some of these folks for a decade or more and these folks are the very best at what they do usually when we have a wrap party not so many people can make it because they're already in such high demand they're already on to the next thing we went to the wrap party for the second season of Fallout I was like oh no this is a problem everyone's at the wrap party.
36:28Oh, because they had nowhere else to go. They hadn't been hired. There's no production. It's been a catastrophe, an absolute catastrophe. And it's almost like a textbook example of watching not a new technology, but just government incentives from around the world and the complicity of studios and studio physical production heads and producers being willing to go along with like, okay, well, look, we could make this in California or New York, but we're going to make it in Hungary because, you know, we'll be able to do it for$30 or$40 million less and I don't like the studio happy. And I think that's been an incredibly short-sighted and foolish thing for us to do.
37:05The reason why Hollywood was such a force to be reckoned with, I mean, there's so much, you know, and your latest issue, all these questions about China and the U.S. and who has cultural... Oh, thank you for reading. Of course. Cultural dominance. Yeah. Can you imagine a dumber move than to gut Hollywood? Just give it all away. Yeah. for just this gradual marginal thing of like, oh, we save a little money here, we save a little money there. We love, I love, my brother loves, my sister-in-law, all of us love on-location shooting. We shot part of Fallout Season 1 in Namibia. It was extraordinary.
37:38It was an extraordinary experience for us, for the cast, for the crew, working with the South African and Namibian crew. And we shot Westworld in Singapore and Spain. Shooting around the world is fantastic. When you're there for a reason. We're in Namibia because it's the Skeleton Coast and they have all these abandoned German diamond factories that look nothing like anything else in the world. We shot in Spain for the architecture, Singapore, same reason. But shooting somewhere just to save someone else money is cynical. I understand it. If you've got a great movie and there are great filmmakers who are fighting to get things that were not terribly commercial and this is one of the tools they had in their arrows in their quiver was, okay, I can go make it somewhere else.
38:14But I think if you extend that logic across the entire industry, you take something that's the center of American, again, I don't mean this in just real politic terms, I mean this in creative terms, right? When you have these places, Silicon Valley being another great example, just up the road or Taiwan for semiconductors or you get in the process of how these places get so good at what they do, it is intensely local. And it is the collision of all these people who came to this place because they wanted to do this one thing and they're talking to each other and they're collaborating with each other and letting that go would be, you know you can't just have LA as the center of like finance for film.
38:51Right. That doesn't work. It sounds very boring. The New York Times story I'm referring to, by the way, is actually about you bringing the second season of Fallout to California. You move production back. Yeah. And you were really vocal about pushing for the industry to do the same with more projects, right? Have you seen progress in that direction since that push? It was following the fires and that gave, you know, the state legislators, I mean, a lot of them, I was very impressed I think it's very easy to sort of you know to be cynical about state politics and they were incredibly thoughtful and smart and in a year in which enormous challenges with the incoming Trump administration enormous challenges for the state of California and its budget they cleared a much bigger incentive to try to make sure that California remain competitive it's not big enough right you can always never be big enough Atlanta you know Georgia essentially has an uncapped one I mean you know but it was a huge shot in the arm.
39:51These things move slowly. It's a really big cruise ship. It turns really slowly. I think culturally it's sort of become how you make movies. You make a really big movie, you're certainly not making Los Angeles, which is crazy. So I think it'll take a while to undo some of the damage, but I'm hopeful that what the state legislator, what the governor was able to pass will give us the best shot for keeping Hollywood for another hundred years.
40:22AI is everywhere in the workplace, but which companies are really making it work? That's the question at the heart of Rewired, McKinsey's playbook for winning with technology and AI. When you think about it from a company or a CEO perspective, it's actually not any harder than it is when you've done any transformation in the past, right? You've got to go and understand what's the opportunity, how much is it worth, what's the investment required to get there, Is it going to be important for me to transform my business in that regard? But a lot of people don't actually go through that process of then understanding what are those two or three areas.
40:57And then making the hard call. Sometimes it's actually more difficult to say we're not doing four through six than it is to say we are doing one through three. There's much more in the full interview with Dan Swan, which can be found in its entirety on Wired.com. Also, check out McKinsey's playbook, Rewired, available at your favorite bookseller. NordLayer Browser is an enterprise browser built for the way modern teams work. It gives IT teams full visibility and control over browser activity, while employees continue working in a familiar browsing experience without disruption. It supports remote teams, contractors, and bring your own device access without disrupting workflows.
41:34Go to nordlayer.com slash browser slash uncannyvalley and unlock your 10 % discount on NordLayer Browser with the coupon code uncannyvalley10. That's nordlayer.com slash browser slash uncannyvalley and enter coupon code uncannyvalley10 at checkout. You know that feeling when you open your laptop in the morning and before you've even had coffee, you've already got 40 new emails, 6 new pings, and a browser with... Honestly, I've stopped counting the tabs. I used to think that was just what work was supposed to feel like. Faster, louder, more. And everyone kept telling me AI was going to fix it. But every AI tool I tried just became one more tab, one more app to explain myself to, one more thing slowing me down.
42:20Then I found Superhuman Go. It's an AI chat that just lives on the side of your browser. It already knows what you're working on, so you're not starting from zero every time. You can draft an email, summarize a huge thread, even search across your other apps without ever leaving the page you're on. No new tabs, no context switching, no losing your place. That's AI that actually works with you, not on top of you. Check it out. Find out more at superhuman.com.
42:59I have to ask you about Fallout. Yeah. So as listeners probably know, but in case you don't, the show is of course based on a video game franchise that has many, many decades of history. The second season, though, of the show premiered about a month ago, right? Mid-December. And new episodes are now coming out on Amazon every week. How do you describe the show to people who aren't familiar with the game? Who maybe don't have the years of lore and history and maybe haven't watched yet? I don't think I ever quite dialed in the elevator pitch. But it is along the lines of, you know, what if the world ended but it didn't completely end?
43:33I started as a fan of the games. I heard you. Yeah, you've said that you played, I think, Fallout 3. and it destroyed a year of your life, consumed a year of your life? Maybe it didn't destroy your life. It's the Annie Hall thing, right? There goes another novel. Yeah, yeah. These games are incredible. And one of the things about the games that Todd makes, and Todd Howard is this sort of creative mastermind behind the latter-day Fallout games, they're essentially infinite, right? I mean, you can just play them and play them and play them and play them. There's no end to these things. You can continue to explore.
44:02I mean, you've sort of seen the scripts of these things that are thousands of pages long, but it really is a simulated reality that you can just kind of jump into and you can steer it any way you want. You can be the proverbial bad guy or the good guy or anyone in between and our ensemble kind of tries to capture that. One of the things they had that I thought was very unique about them and it was a bit of a stretch for me as a filmmaker was that they are this combination of darkness and violence and interesting questions about technology and identity but they're also really weird and funny and Gonzo and Strange.
44:37There are lots of shows about the end of the world. But these ones are weirdly optimistic, right? It feels like they're more about the beginning of a new world. They're more about, okay, well, you know, culture would rebuild itself, right? How would it rebuild itself? And let's play in the mess that ensues. It's like a retro-futuristic world. I'll just describe it that way. Resembles the 1950s, right? Like the music, the imagery, this focus on traditionalism. You didn't make that choice, right? It was inherent in the franchise. But why do you think it's set in that time period, which I think is not representative of the experience of all Americans in the 1950s, right?
45:17I think it was actually like a very dark time. But there's this fixation on like the Pollyanna aspects of that, like 1950s Americana as this like perfect moment for the United States, at least in hindsight. Right. Do you how have you thought about that in in working on the show? The sort of common lore is what defines the fallout universe. They're all connected by this world. The world was before. And I think that world. Look, you've seen a whole political movement built out of the nostalgia for that world. Right. That world had a coherence and an appeal, even if it was rooted in all kinds of ugly, terrible shit.
45:54But there was, you know, an unadulterated vision of America as the victor in the Second World War and this force for good. Was it true? In so many ways, no. But in several important ways, yes. You know, they hadn't yoked the entire world under a Pax Americana. They found maybe a sneakier way to do it, right? They pulled everyone into the Bretton Woods system. They pulled everyone in this kind of like free-to-play, free-trade system, which American culture predominated. and American culture, again, had a lot of darkness in there, but largely spoke to values that I think a lot of us can get behind in terms of freedom and equity.
46:31And even if it was hypocrisy in the beginning, it's easy to be nostalgic about. And I think it's therefore kind of ripe fruit. But that moment extended, and one of the fascinating things, where if you extended that for 100 years and you took the promise of nuclear technology seriously, you had a nuclear-powered car, a nuclear-powered blender, and you had this kind of idealized version of it, what would come out of that. I always thought that was such a lovely and incisive and satirical place to start. Was anything surprising to you about how the show has been received? When it's based on this franchise that has such a fandom and lore and such history, it's a lot of pressure.
47:12A lot of pressure. I sort of trained at the DC school of fan pressure with the three Batman movies that I worked on with my brother. And I learned a lot of lessons there in terms of, you know, come at something because you love it, not trying to figure out why someone else loves it. And you have to trust that hopefully you're finding the right things in there. You're never going to please everyone. Don't read the comments as a general rule. Oh, God, no. Yeah, I gave up on that a long, long time ago. Yeah, I think you talked to GQ. You said your disappointment with the internet over the last 20 years is fucking bottomless.
47:45So I had to assume that you were no longer reading Reddit threads about your show. No, sadly, because I really love that community.
47:58I wanted to make sure to ask you a little bit about the politics of it all, which is to say that there are a lot of political themes that emerge in your work, right? There's a lot there in Fallout. We talked about surveillance, the tools of the state, right? The apparatus, all of that. When you are working on a show and you're weaving these themes in, how do you make determinations about how overt and obvious to be, right? As opposed to how much to weave those themes in in a more nuanced way, if that makes sense. 100%. I felt for a long time it was never clearer than on Batman. Look, fundamentally, philosophically, for me, I do not feel qualified to tell anyone how to believe, right?
48:41I'm much more interested in poking and asking questions and saying, well, should we believe this? Should we question this? I remember working on Batman, and I made this analogy to a friend, you know, with regards to politics and engaging with it. Working on Batman felt like being a Yankee, right? You don't play for the Yankees necessarily as a Democrat or Republican, right? You're a Yankee. And, you know, taking an American, a 60-year-old American icon and pressing that character into service for a specific, timely political point felt like a very fast path to losing relevance for the story. You want to be kind of looking beyond that a little bit.
49:19You know, if you're reading Dante's Inferno, it's kind of amazing. Look, it's to the test of time, but it's kind of amazing how much regional politics is still laced into the first three chapters, right? He's still pissed off with, like, his landlord is in the third level of hell, right? Oh, my God. Okay, come on. Let's get on to the next part. So, you know, for me, there was always felt like a bit of a responsibility, asking questions, not giving answers. But I have strong political beliefs. And I think, you know, as the world has started to feel more and more incoherent and making some of these things so hard to wait through and so hard to just talk to each other.
49:51It was really nice to work on a project like Fallout, where from the very beginning, I mean, Graham Wagner, one of our showrunners, is joking. The first game could have been written by adbusters. Like there's a strong point of view there and it's a strong political point of view. So this is the beauty of working in speculative fiction or in apocalyptic fiction is, you know, the world's gone, right? So we're not talking about this president. We're talking about a fictitious world 100 years in the future and 200 years after that. Everything has been blown to hell. But you get to pick up the bits, the detritus of our present political situation potentially and kind of look at it.
50:20And that gives you that longer view, which I think allows you to engage. I mean, you know, I would challenge anyone to watch both seasons of Fallout and not find a group that doesn't come in for a drubbing, right? Right, right. You know, there's this sort of like nativist progressivism of the vault, right? Where it's like, you know, freedom and safety for everyone, except we're not letting anyone in. And, you know, it's the kind of lifeboat progressivism. And then you have the wild libertarianism of the wasteland. So we get to look at all these different things. And again, I don't have any answers, but it's really fun at this moment in time to be able to poke a little more aggressively at some of these things.
50:55I wanted to ask if that was fun. And I don't want to put too much on you, but, you know, we're talking about this show that looks at the world after collapse at the hands of, you know, a very powerful conglomerate. Seeing some themes here. Maybe some other shadowy players there. Yeah, to the world that we live in now. So you're out there, you're talking about this show, you're working on the show, you're thinking about it all the time. You read the news. Is it hard for you as someone who you describe yourself at the start of the conversation as an optimist? Is it hard not to see collapse everywhere?
51:30Yeah. Yeah, it's what we it's kind of what we do, right? We look for the signs. I'm hopeful that we will pull ourselves back from the edge. We've managed to. I thought my brother's movie, Oppenheimer, ends brilliantly with that warning, right? It's not over yet. We haven't solved this problem yet. We may still yet destroy the world. And I think it's incredibly important for us to remember that always. And that's why working on a show like Fallout, the timing sadly felt good because as a gentle reminder that, okay, it may be amusing to live in the wasteland. I don't think any of us watch that show and wish to live in that world or hope no one wishes to live in that world.
52:12So I think, you know, with some thoughtfulness and a little compassion and maybe some slightly better heuristics for social media, we might make it. We shall see. Before we end, I would love to play a very quick game. If you have 60 seconds. It's a game we came up with. It's very powerful. It's called Control-Alt-Delete.
52:35So I want to know what piece of technology you would love to control. What piece would you alt, so alter or change? And what would you delete? What would you vanquish from the earth if given the opportunity? Got it. I would control AI generated video. All of it. Like I said, I think that I'm so excited for not necessarily what we can do with it. However, one of these conversations with the folks who come down occasionally and check in with us, you know, when asked, they pointed out, you know, they're like, no, no, no, we watermark very carefully every piece of video we generate. But it's totally invisible and no one could see it.
53:09Sure, yes. I said, probably the biggest social problem right now is that you need to make it extremely visible. Extremely visible. The fact that we've met these technologies, you go back to Blade Runner, right? And I always thought to myself, God, it's so weird that they don't want the replicants to live on Earth. It's just tragic. And now I totally understand. Right? Yeah. Like, if you can make a video of the president saying whatever you want, and it's indistinguishable from reality. If the president can make a video of himself saying whatever he wants. That has to be regulated yesterday. Yeah.
53:35It will create absolute chaos. And I think if we don't get a handle on that, imminently, we're in very, very serious trouble. Well, we're going to hand it to you, so you'll solve that one. Done. Done. Alt gene therapy CRISPR-based tools coming online. Lisa and I are very engaged with someone very close to us in our lives who has a condition caused by a novel nonsense gene. There are thousands of these sorts of conditions. They can have devastating results. And we're getting close enough to see. I think there's an assumption with everyone that, you know, hey, once we got the CRISPR, we just control V and, you know, away we go, right?
54:12And that's not how it's going to happen. You have these, you know, catastrophic diseases where the tool will be there, but the funding won't be there. The resources won't be there. And then it's really the game, the boring bit is just getting the business model right or abandoning the business model and saying, okay, is the government going to start funding some of these things, you know? Right. Delete. I would say social media, all of it. But I have enough conversations with friends who have kids who have special needs and this is their community. Okay, so maybe the algorithmic feed. Yeah. Gone.
54:44Dumpster fire. Dumpster fire. It's like trans fats or ringtones or all these things that. Trans fats, ringtones, and the algorithmic feed. Jonathan Nolan's three agents of destruction. That's it. I love it. Thank you so much. This was such a fascinating conversation. Thank you. Likewise.
55:07Thanks for checking out the show. We're taking a short break and coming back with a second season of Supercharged Guests. And we're adding all new video episodes. So now you can see me all the time. And I still won't be wearing makeup. We're still releasing new weekly episodes of Uncanny Valley on Thursdays. And if you haven't listened to all my interviews, you should start. We're talking Margaret Atwood, Melinda French-Gates, Matthew Prince, Hassan Piker, Matt Garman, Kara Swisher, and a whole lot more. This show is produced by Jessica Alpert with help from Adriana Tapia and Sam Egan. Sound design, mix, and original music by Pran Bandy.
55:42Kate Osborne is our executive producer. And I'm, of course, your host, Katie Drummond, Wired's Global Editorial Director. Thanks for listening.
56:04loss of tennis line judges. Here's a sneak peek. Some people are buying software and calling it a transformation. The people that are really getting the most value from it are fundamentally doing something very different, which is they're taking that technology and they're incorporating it with changing the capabilities of their people, fundamentally redesigning their processes, and tracking the impact through the bottom line. There's much more in the full interview with Dan Swan, which can be found in its entirety on Wired.com. Also, check out McKinsey's playbook, Rewired, available at your favorite bookseller.
56:39Comprehensive. Witty. Speculative. Critical. Insightful. Profound. Wide-ranging. Hopefully doesn't take itself too, too seriously. I'm David Remnick, and each week on the New Yorker Radio Hour, my colleagues and I try to make sense of what's happening in this chaotic world. I hope you'll join us for the New Yorker Radio Hour wherever you listen to podcasts. The thoughtful, exquisite, just, you know, real.
57:09Timberland Pro knows that NASCAR starts long before the green flag waves. Because behind every race are the doers, the people who show up to the track early and stay long after the race ends. And that's who Timberland Pro is built for. Durable, comfortable, and professional. These boots perform as hard as you do, on the job and often. real work, real people, real craft. Visit TimberlandPro.com and discover products that help workers perform at their best.
From the publisher
Katie sits down with the Westworld showrunner, Jonah Nolan for a wide ranging conversation about what keeps him coming back to sci-fi storytelling about technology and human nature. After decades of writing about Ai, Nolan explains why Ai may be good for burgeoning filmmakers, but won’t replace Hollywood as we know it.
Nolan’s past work includes Memento, The Prestige, The Dark Knight, Interstellar and Westworld.
This is a summer re-air! We are on a short vacation but back with fresh episodes very soon.
Join WIRED’s best and brightest on Uncanny Valley as they dissect the collision of tech, politics, finance, and business, from Alexis Ohanian's newest tech venture to the effects of inaccurate information from artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots on social protests.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




