Trump's 80s Movie Approach to Foreign Policy w/ Chris Hayes

24 Mar 2026 · 40 min · 18 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Uncanny Valley | WIRED

Episode Title

BIG INTV: Chris Hayes on Urgency and Attention

Episode Description In this first episode of the second season, host Katie Drummond interviews journalist Chris Hayes from MSNBC's *All In*. They discuss the pressures of covering an urgent news cycle, the dynamics of attention in media, and insights from Hayes' book *The Sirens’ Call: How Attention Became the World’s Most Endangered Resource*. The conversation highlights the intersection of technology, politics, and media.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. The Nature of Attention in Modern Media
  2. Attention as a Commodity: Hayes argues that attention is commodified in a way similar to labor during early industrial capitalism. It began with early media like billboards and penny press, evolving into today's digital platforms where metrics determine audience engagement.
  • Impact of the Digital Age: The shift from traditional media to digital has led to an increase in competition for attention, not only among news outlets but also against entertainment platforms.
  • Example: Hayes describes how political figures utilize media attention, likening it to "performing imperialism as content."
  1. The Urgency of Current Events
  2. Overwhelming News Cycle: The episode addresses the challenge of processing urgent news, such as wars and political strife, particularly in the context of a Trump-led administration.
  • Balancing Coverage: Hayes discusses strategies for media to avoid fueling attention-seeking behaviors of political figures, such as not giving them unduly significant airtime while still covering critical news.
  1. The Role of Technology in Politics
  2. Intersection of Tech and Politics: The conversation acknowledges the growing influence of Silicon Valley on political dynamics, particularly during the Trump era, and how elite tech figures have aligned more closely with governmental power.
  • Examples of Influence:
  • Hayes references how major tech leaders were present at significant political events, such as Trump's inauguration, showcasing a shift from insurgents to incumbents within the tech industry.
  1. AI and Its Societal Implications
  2. Concerns about Job Displacement: The discussion raises alarms about AI potentially automating jobs across various sectors, necessitating serious consideration from both media and political perspectives.
  • Regulatory Needs: Hayes emphasizes the importance of establishing regulations for AI to manage its societal impact, advocating for proactive measures to address potential job losses and economic dislocation.
  1. Media Strategies in a Changing Landscape
  2. Democratic Messaging: Hayes reflects on the Democratic Party's challenges in engaging voters, pointing out that an outdated strategy of relying solely on traditional media advertising may no longer be effective.
  • Evolving Tactics: He suggests a need for new approaches to reach and connect with constituents, citing examples from successful campaigns that engage audiences through innovative content rather than just paid ads.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Attention is a crucial resource in modern media, influencing political narratives and public perception.
  • The news cycle is increasingly urgent, requiring journalists to navigate complex topics while avoiding sensationalism.
  • Tech and politics are closely intertwined, with the potential for significant impacts on governance and societal norms.
  • AI's rise necessitates critical discussions about its implications for labor and the economy.
  • Democrats must adopt new strategies to engage voters and effectively communicate their messages in a crowded media landscape.

---

Conclusion This episode of *Uncanny Valley* provides a deep dive into the intersection of media, technology, and politics through the lens of Chris Hayes’ experiences and insights. The discussion emphasizes the urgent need for responsible media practices, awareness of technology's impacts, and innovative political strategies in an era defined by rapid change and complexity.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Introducing Chris Hayes

0:46 to 1:48

Chris Hayes discusses his background and the current news cycle.

“For many TV viewers in the U.S., Chris Hayes has become a familiar face and voice in the evening news cycle.”

The Urgency of News in Modern Times

1:49 to 4:21

A conversation about the overwhelming nature of current global events and how they affect attention.

“Chris Hayes, welcome to The Big Interview.”

Imperialism as Content

4:22 to 6:20

Hayes explains how contemporary imperialism is performed as content in the media.

“Well, I do think there is – I guess the first version of the answer I would give is that there is a way in which they perform imperialism as content.”

Historical Context of Attention

6:21 to 7:16

Discussion on the historical intertwining of media attention and imperialism.

“So it's sort of it's imperialist ambitions in a vertical video wrapper, in a social media always on content machine.”

The Commodification of Attention

7:17 to 11:04

Hayes explores the history and evolution of commodifying attention through various media.

“You wrote in a piece for The New York Times unrelated to Iran, I should say, quote, President Trump has a feral, almost pathological genius for getting people to talk about him.”

Navigating Attention in Media

11:05 to 14:04

Hayes shares insights on how to approach attention as a media professional.

“in the same way that labor was made a commodity in the early years of industrial capitalism.”

Navigating Attention in News Media

14:04 to 17:16

Explore the strategies journalists use to capture and maintain audience attention amid competition.

“And then how do you think about it strategically?”

The Shifting Dynamics of Political Campaigns

17:16 to 21:39

Understand the evolving strategies of political campaigns in relation to media consumption and audience reach.

“I want to ask you a little bit about the midterms because we are getting to be at that season.”

Intersection of Politics and Technology

23:06 to 28:00

Delve into the complex relationship between tech industry leaders and political power dynamics.

“Listen on bbc.com or wherever you get your podcasts.”

The Evolution of Internet Search

28:00 to 28:40

Explore how Google transformed internet usability and advertising ethics.

“I was searching the Internet at the time.”
Show all 18 chapters

AI's Relationship with Government

28:40 to 30:10

Discuss the troubling connection between AI startups and government entities.

“collusion, you don't have to, but the sort of very close relationships that we see between someone like Sam Altman and the administration.”

The Financial Burden of AI Startups

30:10 to 31:00

Understand the financial pressures facing AI startups and their implications.

“To the tune of like many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many billions of dollars.”

Job Replacement Concerns with AI

31:00 to 32:00

Examine the potential job loss due to AI advancements and the left's response.

“you've got the doomers, you've got the boomers, very sort of overly simplified arguments.”

Personal Experiences with AI Tools

32:00 to 33:50

Discover personal use cases for AI and their implications for various professions.

“that there's like a head in the sand kind of.”

The Need for Regulation and Social Considerations

33:50 to 35:50

Delve into the need for AI regulation and societal impact discussions.

“And I don't think I'm going to have a job in a few years.”

Grassroots Resistance to AI Technology

35:50 to 36:50

Learn about grassroots movements against AI technology and their significance.

“What should they have a shot at in a wealthy society like ours?”

Control-Alt-Delete Game with Chris Hayes

37:50 to 41:30

Engage in a light-hearted game about technology preferences with Chris Hayes.

“I want to play a very quick game that we invented.”

The Dual Nature of Technology in Our Lives

42:19 to 42:45

Exploring how technology can both threaten and inspire innovation.

“Now more than ever, technology is a dominating force in our lives.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:04From Wired, this is The Big Interview. And we're in Season 2. I'm Katie Drummond, Wired's Global Editorial Director. Every week on Tuesdays, I'll be right here, bringing you in-depth conversations with influential figures in tech, culture, politics, business, science, and beyond. Together, we'll get to know interesting people and tackle the biggest subjects on the planet right now, all through a Wired lens. Lately, there's been a lot of talk from powerful and influential men, especially on X, who aren't happy with me and what Wired's doing right now. I'd like to have some of them on the show this season, but for a palate cleanser, we're going to start with another powerful man and fellow journalist who isn't mad.

0:43At least not at me.

0:45Chris Hayes:Good evening from New York, I'm Chris Hayes. For many TV viewers in the U.S., Chris Hayes has become a familiar face and voice in the evening news cycle. For over a decade, he's hosted All In with Chris Hayes, the evening news show on MSNBC, nowadays known as MSNOW. The show covers the latest news, and if you hadn't noticed, there's been no shortage of that this year. Tonight, despite the brutal cold, a massive crowd of anti-ice protesters flooding downtown Minneapolis. The Department of Justice releasing its remaining documents from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The U.S. and Israel have launched strikes on Iran, targeting its leadership and escalating tensions across the Middle East.

1:25That's why I wanted to talk to Chris. We're in this moment where everything feels incessantly urgent at the same time, all of it, all at once, piling on top of itself. Partially because we live in this deluge of information and opinion. And, of course, because we are in yet another Trump news cycle. Few people are better at cutting through the noise and distilling what really matters than Chris. Here's our conversation. Chris Hayes, welcome to The Big Interview.

1:52Chris Hayes:It's great to be here. I'm a big fan of Wired. I was just telling you that. You guys are doing amazing work over the last year. And I write about Wired. I'm fans of both iterations of Wired because I write about Wired in the book. I remember asking my parents for the subscription. I think it was like for Christmas and getting it. And I was like a diehard every single page. Wow. First issue through subscribers. This would have been, I don't want to age you, this early 2000s. Is that flattering or rude? I think it was probably 94, 95. Okay. I don't know when it started, but it was around then. Yeah, 93.

2:24Chris Hayes:Oh, you were a very early doctor. I think I subscribed at the age of, I would have been 14. And not to go all in on this, although I've been thinking a lot about this sort of wired past, present, future. I think that the very, very early wired had a very rebellious, countercultural spirit. And I would argue that today the wired that we are running has that same spirit, but it is directed at the industry that was born of the 1993 wire. Totally. And I think that's, you know, we think about who's the incumbent and who's the insurgent and the valence of that switching. Yes. Yeah, like that wired vibe was whole Earth electronic network, like the original sort of like big bulletin board, kind of post hippie cyber not kind of libertarian, but also kind of left coded, but definitely very like hopeful utopian and also very insurgent against the powers that be.

3:17Yeah.

3:17Chris Hayes:And what happened was the powers that be are the people that sat with the president at his inauguration. They sure did. And we sure did cover that. And control, you know, the most powerful. And so, like, yes, the insurgent vibe is now directed in a different direction. We're sitting down in New York. It's a Wednesday in early March. And we were just talking before we started taping that it was just a few days ago, hard to believe, when the United States and Israel launched an all out attack on Iran, which has escalated markedly very quickly. But I would be remiss not to mention that, you know, this is the second leader this year that President Trump has ousted, the first obviously being Maduro in Venezuela, and it's March.

3:57So what is happening in the Middle East, right? It's terrifying. It's sad. Hundreds of people dead, including U.S. service members. It is also, though, yet another all-consuming news cycle. It is like brain-melting, mind-numbing, reality-warping kind of pace of news. And I'm curious because we're going to spend a lot of time in this conversation talking about attention. How much to you, when you think about global conflict of war in the context of this era, in the context, I would say, of Trump in particular, how much of it is about attention?

4:31Chris Hayes:Well, I do think there is – I guess the first version of the answer I would give is that there is a way in which they perform imperialism as content. Sure. Absolutely. They very much like – when they started – the Trump administration has undertaken a series of strikes on boats on civilian boats. These are not military boats. They're civilian – they say drug traffickers, although in some cases it seems like they're fishermen. In some cases, it seems like maybe they're both. They're like fishermen who are paid. No, really, like they're fishermen who are paid some money to run a product somewhere, like people who are trying to make ends meet.

5:09Chris Hayes:Our forces have killed over 100 people this way. And what's been so striking about it, other than how I think both legally and morally indefensible it is to just essentially murder people in the high seas, is that from the beginning it has been produced as content. Like very Tom Clancy, the sort of unclassified. It looks like an 80s movie, which I think is exactly the kind of genre touchstone for Donald Trump. It's like right out of a Tom Clancy. So the first cut at that answer would be yes. They perform aggression, war, imperialism, foreign policy all as content, all as means of gaining attention, holding attention.

5:48Chris Hayes:I mean there's the iconic shot of they've got Twitter up during the Venezuela raid. Oh, yes. Like seeing who's tweeting about it. But then underneath that, there's also the fact that they see there are real bombs and real guns and real missiles and real people die. And there's real children numbering maybe as much as 150, 180 who are dead in Iran because our missiles or Israel's missiles, it's still not clear, killed them in a strike. They're doing it for intentional reasons, right, because the president likes to keep everybody's attention. He has to be at the center of attention. He has to be doing all the time.

6:18Chris Hayes:He has to have you thinking about him. And also they have very old school, I mean, pure 19th century, straight up, no chaser, imperialist ambitions. Yeah. So it's sort of it's imperialist ambitions in a vertical video wrapper, in a social media always on content machine. And I think there's actually kind of an interesting and profound point to that, which is that you can make the argument that these have always been intertwined. And if you look at the history of American imperialism and the Spanish-American War and the famous Hearst papers and the Yellow Press, that was as much about – that was both about conquest and producing content.

6:57Chris Hayes:I mean quite famously and in some ways is sort of the dawn of the American newspaper era. So I think these two things have always been twinned. And the sort of history of imperialism is also a history about kind of the propagandistic uses of it to capture and hold the attention of the masses. But I think, yes, their version of it is a very kind of 21st century postmodern vertical video scroll, doom scroll version of it. Right, right. On on tech steroids. You wrote in a piece for The New York Times unrelated to Iran, I should say, quote, President Trump has a feral, almost pathological genius for getting people to talk about him.

7:39You called it suffocating to his opponents. When you think about your role, our role as media, we're both journalists, to not be the foot soldiers helping to fuel that dynamic. When you go tape an episode of your show, let's say tonight, what decisions do you make about how to approach, let's say, what's happening in the Middle East to avoid sort of playing into that hand, to avoid playing into that imperialism on social media steroids?

8:06Chris Hayes:Well, the thing we can't do is ignore him or what he's doing. Right. So, like, the U.S. actually is at war with Iran. There are real human lives. The latest account is 1 ,000 plus Iranian civilians, not to mention we don't know how many combatants or members of the regime. You can decide whether political figures in a regime count as civilians or not. Human lives are human lives. Human lives are human lives. So in that sense, it's like he's the president of the United States. He has the nuclear codes. He's now launched multiple forms of extraterritorial killing, let's call it. Yeah. So the way that I think we do it is to try to, A, not do war porn.

8:45Chris Hayes:There is a subtle but unmistakable ideological substrate to certain forms of depictions of war. Try to avoid that. Also, don't let him set the terms of things, which is like we're not going to play huge chunks of whatever his nonsense is except to sort of set them up to show why they're lacking. But like there's no really avoiding it, I guess is what I would say in the end. Donald Trump having – being the president of the United States, which is the most powerful nation on earth, having access to nuclear codes and also the full force of the American military and also attempting to replace the constitutional order with essentially a presidentialist, personalist dictatorship is the top story of our time.

9:29Yeah.

9:30Chris Hayes:And I cover that story every night. And the question is on whose terms do you give attention and what you give attention to. So here's a great example. They made an amazing miscalculation in Minnesota. There was this viral right-wing video that was alleging to uncover fraud in Minnesota daycares run by either Somali immigrants or Somali Americans. Now, there actually was there has been this huge fraud network there. It's been prosecuted and investigated, in fact, by the U.S. attorney's office and by the very prosecutors who would later resign because they didn't like what the Trump administration was doing.

10:08Chris Hayes:Trump administration saw this and they were like, we want to bring more attention to this. We're sending Bovino and CBP and ICE there. What ended up happening was that they they kidnapped people and they killed two Americans in broad daylight on camera. Yeah. and that was where all the attention went and you could see there was this trump backpedaling where he was furiously posting on truth social like you should be talking about the fraud it's like you just killed two people we saw you all then you called them you slander them call the domestic terrorists you're you're kidnapping people's neighbors you're you're tear gassing high school students yeah marauding and we can all see it it's everywhere so that was a great example to me of like right you're not like were we paying attention to donald trump yes at some level was it on his terms now, right?

10:54Chris Hayes:I mean, I think that's basically the question we ask ourselves. Now, your book, Siren's Call, is out in paperback now. It's a great book. And it's all about this. It's about attention. And you argue that attention has become a commodity in the same way that labor was made a commodity in the early years of industrial capitalism. I'm curious about when you start the clock on that process, right? Like, when did the process of commodifying attention really start? How do you track that through history? You know, it probably starts with two technologies, commercial billboards and the penny press, the New York Sun, Benjamin Day's New York Sun.

11:30So that's like, you know, it's 19th

11:32Chris Hayes:century, basically, early to mid, depending on how sophisticated it gets. In both of those technologies, the idea was that you were selling an audience and you had to come up with metrics that you could measure that audience and then sell that audience to advertisers. So early technology and billboards, there would be people who would stand by the corner the billboard was on with clickers. Oh, wow. And they would go like this and they'd say, you know, we get 600 people an hour, you know, if you're talking about Times Square or something, or we get 25 people an hour, whatever it is. And then you can go to your advertiser and say, this is how many people are going to see it.

12:06Chris Hayes:The penny press, you know, the big innovation there is that you sell the paper for less than it costs to make the paper. You lose money on every paper, but then you sell the advertising. And so that's the initial process. It gets – there are multiple iterations. Magazines come in and then you get radio and then you get television and then you get social media and the internet. What has happened though is the global scale that you can sell it at is new, right? So no media company has ever had billions of users before like these attention companies do now. The amount of data you have about your viewer is orders of magnitude more.

12:48Chris Hayes:The microsecond auctions that you can run in each second about how you're going to serve that viewer. So you now have this sort of auction for eyeballs happening in nanoseconds, you know, constantly. And the thing about the algorithm is you don't have to have people making programming choices. You know, it's just there's just a ton of stuff up. You just see what people start to look and then you serve them that over and over. So, you know, the old model, which was what are we putting on the front page of our penny press, you know, the New York Sun? Or what are we putting the APM time slot on NBC?

13:23Right. What content will get you to spend eight or nine hours on TikTok is basically the calculus now. But they don't have to make the choice. People aren't making it. Exactly. And that is actually a huge difference. I'm curious, very much so in the book, you acknowledge your own sort of role in this economy, right? You're an attention merchant yourself. You're a TV anchor. You're also on social media, right? You film clips for your Instagram account for MS Now. Now, how do you navigate your own role in that sort of algorithmic attention landscape? Like, how do you, I think part of it is sort of how do you grapple with it as a human being?

14:04And then how do you think about it strategically?

14:06Chris Hayes:I think there's a few different ways depending on the platform or the medium. I mean, I think with my television show, I have a sense of what, where attention is flowing. And that's an imperative for me. I mean, I say in the book, it's necessary but never sufficient. If no one watches my show, then I haven't done my job. No, you have not. So the first level is that I have to get people's attention. And then the second level is I have to do something worthwhile with it. And sometimes those are intention. Because sometimes the best thing to get someone's attention is not that worthwhile to me. On a week when we just went to war, that has not been really a problem.

14:42Chris Hayes:Yeah. This is one of those weeks where I'm not real tortured about it. Like the audience's attention is flowing towards the fact we just started a war with Iran. I think that's the most important story. I'm not like internally torn. No, sure. And they come to you because you can help them cut through and understand what's going on. Right. But, you know, there was the period where the plane went missing. I was on air for that. Oh, yes, yes, yes. And that was a three-month story. And at a certain point, it's like, yes, it's an interesting story. It's certainly a newsworthy story. It's tragic, but.

15:10Chris Hayes:The plane is still gone. The plane is still gone. And the audience still wants you to talk about it. I mean, that was really a difficult thing. It really did. Like the signal and the noise was, just keep giving us a plane. You know, I still feel the pressures every day. And on my podcast, I feel the same way, too. Like, I just do what I'm interested in the podcast and I let the chips fall where they may. Social media is interesting. We've been doing more and more vertical video because everyone does. Everyone does. I think it's such a weird slot machine effect. Like, I did this thing the other day about there's a pretty little notice set of tariff votes in the House that Donald Trump lost that were House votes to overturn some of the tariffs, including the Canadian ones.

15:49Chris Hayes:And it actually happened before the Supreme Court struck him down. So I did a little thing about like this is kind of interesting. Like he's lost Republican votes on this. It blew up. Oh, there you go. And sometimes you're like this one's going to blow up and then it doesn't. You're like, well, what did I do wrong? And it's unclear to me. I guess if I put more time into this, if this my whole life was like playing the slot machine, remember I get better at playing the slot machine? Yeah. And obviously there are people like Mr. Beast. Sure. We're very good at it. Yeah. Well, and I think that's sort of one of the challenges as journalists or sort of purveyors, in my view, of accurate and newsworthy information is you are competing now not with a couple of other cable news shows.

16:29You're competing with Mr. Beast and with cooking videos and, I mean, with everything, every single thing in that feed.

16:36Chris Hayes:Every piece of content is at every moment pitted against every other piece of content ever created. Yeah. So in many ways, that tariff video doing well is like a little miracle. Yes. It's a miracle of the Internet. Right. But then I was like, I was really like feeling myself about it. And I was like, oh, it's awesome. And then my next one, I was like, yeah. But the thing is, you essentially have to participate, right? You know what I mean? Like you can't opt out of shooting host to camera vertical video anymore. I mean, right. You can. Well. But not if you are trying to. Are you trying to reach a mass audience with news about tariffs?

17:14Chris Hayes:Yeah. I mean, this is the problem. Vertical video ends up being a kind of terminal point in the development of attentional technologies just because it is very difficult to compete with. I want to ask you a little bit about the midterms because we are getting to be at that season. You wrote in that piece for The New York Times I mentioned, you argued that the Democrats' main problem isn't their message. You're reflecting on the Harris campaign. You said her core problem was her inability to get people to hear her message. It wasn't the message itself. So basically an attention deficit, which I would argue still a problem for the Democrats heading into the midterms.

17:50I'm curious about your view there and sort of your view on the Democrats' ability to galvanize an electorate online in the way Trump and the GOP were going into the 2024 election. Sort of has anything meaningfully changed there? Yeah.

18:07Chris Hayes:So the reason that I said that, I just think it's important. One of the most important pieces of data that we had from 2024 is that amongst voters who said they paid a lot of attention to the news, Harris won by five or six points. And as you moved further down, like sometimes to literally never, Trump's margin increased. Yeah. So – and I say this for two reasons. One is a lot of people like to blame the media for Trump's victory. And it's like, well, the people that consume the most like journalism and news media were the most Harris-inclined. So it doesn't – it complicates that story quite a bit.

18:44Chris Hayes:Right. The thing that comes after that is for a very long period of time, basically I would say from the 1980s until recently, there was a very straightforward kind of theory of attention and campaigns, which was you raise money and then you spend it on TV ads. Yeah. One of the points I was making there is like that's clearly broken down. You can't just say we're going to raise a lot of money and we're going to run a lot of ads on what the local news who's going to reach who exactly. Right. Right. Right. Some of the voters you need, you know, but a lot of voters that you need are not there. So you need to have a theory of like how do you reach the people that don't consume media, which is like we used to call like earned media.

19:21Oh, yes. Right. So it's like earned media is like you're interviewing me. Yeah.

19:25Chris Hayes:And then there's paid media, which is like you're running ads on TV. Chris did not pay for this interview. I did not pay for this interview. So it's like if they're not going to see your own media because they don't consume that and they're not going to see your own media, like you've got to come up with some theory. Do the Democrats have a theory? Well, I think they've gotten better at it. I mean, I think that the idea that Donald Trump kind of went everywhere in 2024 and talked to all kinds of different podcasters and made all sorts of content, including him like driving around that truck and serving McDonald's.

19:52Oh, yeah. Dude. Sorry, none of this is actually funny, but it's just absurd.

Read the full transcript

19:57Chris Hayes:Absurd and kind of comical and actually pretty effective. The kind of thing that like clearly reverberated out through the world past people that consume the news, past paid advertising. Daron Mondani obviously was like a huge innovator in this. He did an incredible job. The vertical videos. Now, it may be the case like Roy Cooper in North Carolina is incredibly well-known. He just won the nomination to be the Democratic nominee. He's going to go against Michael Watley, the Republican nominee for that Senate seat. Roy Cooper is super well known. He's been elected statewide, I want to say three or four times.

20:30Chris Hayes:He was the governor for two terms. Also, he's going to raise a ton of money. And it may be the case for Roy Cooper. He can just – he's got a theory. He's going to raise money and run ads. Roy Cooper. And people know who Roy Cooper is. But like James Tallarico. I was going to ask you about James Tallarico. Yeah. Yeah. So he's a – he's state rep. Jasmine Crockett. He defeated Jasmine Crockett in that contested Democratic primary in Texas. Now, Jasmine Crockett obviously has a theory of attention, which is – Well, I was going to say, I sort of I think that that is interesting to me because I feel like they both have theories of attention.

20:59They're just very different.

21:01Chris Hayes:They are very different, but they both had a sense of how do I how do I become known? How do I make sure that people whose votes I'm going to want or need know even who I am? My point is that you better have a theory of this. Right. Like that's based on who you are. That cannot be. What you cannot do is you cannot default to what had been the paint by numbers approach for literally decades. I'm going to raise a bunch of money and I'm going to run a bunch of local TV ads. That is not going to work.

21:38As a listener of Uncanny Valley, we know you want to stay on top of today's biggest stories in tech. And if you're curious about how tech and innovation are changing the health care landscape, check out Mayo Clinic's chart-topping podcast, Tomorrow's Cure. Back for a brand new season, host and award-winning journalist Kathy Wurzer dives into the breakthroughs, challenges, and human stories shaping the future of medicine, from advances in AI and cancer research to the rise of chronic disease and autoimmune disorders. Not sure where to start? we recommend the Season 4 premiere where dermatologist Dr.

22:14Saranya Wiles and biomedical engineer Dr. Adam Feinberg explore how 3D bioprinting is revolutionizing medical research and accelerating breakthroughs in healthcare. Whether you're a healthcare professional, patient, or simply curious about what's ahead, Tomorrow's Cure invites you to imagine what healthcare could look like and shows you the future is already here. Find Tomorrow's Cure on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you're listening now.

23:05Chris Hayes:bizarre ways people are using the internet. Listen on bbc.com or wherever you get your podcasts.

23:19I want to ask you about where politics and technology sort of collide and come together. We talked a little bit about this at the top, but, you know, when I got to Wired, it was very obvious to me and I think to the team here that covering politics more closely was not an optional decision, right? It was an imperative. There was no space between Silicon Valley leaders and the government, particularly true after Trump took office. You've been a political journalist for a very long time. You spent your career, I think, observing and documenting how power shifts in government. How have you sort of seen that merging of power between those two spheres, between sort of the Silicon Valley elite, the tech industry, and politics and politicians?

24:02Chris Hayes:I thought the inauguration was such a shocking moment. Was that shocking to you when you saw them all sitting there? I'm genuinely curious. Yeah. I mean, the fact that the support wasn't shocking, but the we're all going to stand up here with him. And, you know, because there are downsides to those calculations. And usually they're thinking about those downsides. I think a few things happened. I think as the industry matured from an insurgent industry to an incumbent one, its politics got more right wing. This is not a very surprising trajectory. It does happen. It's like, yes. Like sometimes if you interview someone who's 23 trying to break into something and then you interview them when they're 63 and they make six figures or seven figures, like they have some different politics.

24:49Chris Hayes:For sure. And so I think part of it is that. I think part of it is they absolutely all cook their brains on the Internet and Twitter and with each other. I mean, I think they just like spun each other out. I think they like just pickled their brains in a brine of reaction. Huh. I really do. I just think they're like the same way that people talk about people talk about this all the time. They talk about this is a very common documented almost trope, which is relatives who were lost to Fox News. Oh, of course. You know, people that just, you know, they used to have a certain set of views. Maybe they're kind of right leading a Republican and they just started watching Fox all the time.

25:28Chris Hayes:And it almost did something at like a chemical level. They're just angrier and more irascible. And I just think there's a kind of right online version of that that happened to the tech elite. And then I think there's just a political economy of it. They are the most powerful and profitable corporations in the world. And then, of course, the big part of it is the AI bet, right? So that's like the final component. I think they were kind of cooking their brains. They were personally getting radicalized and kind of – I think there's a lot of like backlash reaction politics. I think they were mad at their woke workers.

26:04Chris Hayes:I'm putting that in air quotes. They were a mature industry that wanted to cozy up to power on the government. And then they had this technology that they think is the kind of make or break technology. and their relationship to the state is existential. That's all so interesting. I mean, I think I'm always curious to hear different people and sort of smart people who look at this in different ways about whether they see what has happened as more ideological, that these sort of tech elites, tech leaders, like genuinely moved to the right. And this is legitimately how they feel, that this is the right way to run a country, the right way to run a business, the right way to work with government, or whether it is simply like they are biting their tongues and holding on for four years and presenting the president with tchotchkes in the Oval Office when they need to because they have a fiduciary obligation to their shareholders.

26:59They have a huge base of employees that they need to support and pay and uphold. And that is just sort of this fundamental like, I hate this guy, but I have a business imperative.

27:10Chris Hayes:Yeah. And I think there's different individuals on different side of that. I mean, I think. Sure. Yeah. They're also not all the same person. I think Bezos has gotten very right wing. Yes. In his personal politics. I mean, I don't think he was ever a liberal by any stretch of the imagination. Obviously, Musk has got, you know. Elon be Elon. Yeah. Terminal brain worms. But like Tim Cook, I don't know. You know, I think that's an example. He looks deeply uncomfortable, but he won't say anything about it. Yes. You know, Sergey Brin and Larry Page's don't be evil model for Google. Right. But again, like that was, you know, it looks ridiculous now, but I think it was a genuinely felt at the time.

27:49Chris Hayes:And I also think they thought, you know, again, this sort of the trajectory of how this happens. When Google was created, it was the perfect example of like genuinely building a better mousetrap. I was searching the Internet at the time. All the searches were bad. Google came along and it was very good. So much better. And it was better in a way that transformed the usability of the Internet. And I think they thought, well, this is a we're providing a good service and we're going to sell advertising and like a pretty ethical business, which like, yeah, yeah, this works pretty well. You sell, you know, and then slowly over time.

28:27Right. Yeah. Things escalated from there. Things change. And here we are. I mean, when you think about looking at the next, I mean, we've got three more years of this administration and you think about the level of proximity, of collaboration, of I'll say collusion, you don't have to, but the sort of very close relationships that we see between someone like Sam Altman and the administration. Does that scare you? Yeah.

28:55Chris Hayes:I honestly was chilled to my core when there was, you know, there's a meeting between the head of Anthropic and the head of the Pentagon and which they can't come to terms on. Basically, it's a terms of service agreement of implementing Anthropics Claude model in Pentagon situations. and then the Pentagon throws this temper tantrum that sounds completely deranged. Yeah. Like Bond villain kind of thing. Yeah. And we're going to try to cut them off from all that are supply chain risk. Yeah. You can sell NVIDIA chips to the Chinese government. Yes. But God forbid. But you can't use – I mean, come on.

29:36Chris Hayes:Yeah. And then for Sam Altman to post this thing being like, hey, we've swooped in and we've made a deal. Look, these companies, particularly those two, which are the two that are startups, right? OpenAI and Anthropoc. They're not the legacy incumbents that have their own AI models like Gemini or whatever. They're on a treadmill. They got to run fast. And they got to raise money. And their revenues are increasing a lot, but their costs are increasing arguably faster. There's a sort of sense of desperation. And I think you people, the combination of people with a very powerful technology who are banking on making a world changing fortune, but also have a kind of like ghosts in Pac-Man, like financial burden trailing behind them.

30:27Chris Hayes:Yes. Is. To the tune of like many, many, many, many, many, many, many, many billions of dollars. Yes. That's a. Shocking amount. I would not say that that is the best setup for like ethical and responsible decision making or decision making that takes into account the stakeholders involved. And I think that's incredibly terrifying. It is really scary. It's scary. And I want to ask you a little bit more about how you're thinking about AI. I think you've called yourself a lame centrist. I would say I probably fall into a similar camp, at least in the context. You're saying on the AI debate. On the debate.

30:59Chris Hayes:Sorry. Yes. But the conversation around it, you know, very polarized. you've got the doomers, you've got the boomers, very sort of overly simplified arguments. I would say in general, I think we spend too much time like ping ponging between those two extreme views and maybe not enough time talking about the practical implications or like the potential future scenarios that we really should be taking seriously. You posted on Blue Sky that the left needs to, quote, start thinking seriously about the AI hype being true. Tell me more about that. You know, the thing that I'm most worried about is the job replacement issue.

31:38Chris Hayes:All of these jobs that people have right now, from coders to first-year law associates to the administrators who work at large health insurance companies, you know, the world in which those are automated in a relatively short period of time, it's going to cause some pretty profound dislocation. And do you – is your general sense that not enough people, maybe people on the left, are taking that seriously? that there's like a head in the sand kind of. I think there's an idea that if you take that seriously, you're ceding to their own propaganda about how useful their product is. I think there's a huge question about how quickly this is all going to happen.

32:14Chris Hayes:Yeah. But I also just like I can see it. I mean, I use I use several different LLMs for different things. And I was going to ask you a little bit about like your personal use cases. I have been using them more because I think I want to understand what they do. Yeah. For instance, like notebook LLM where you can upload sources. and then you can use it to navigate from those sources is extremely useful so that you're not getting hallucinations. And it's also citing back to something. So if I say like, oh, what date did this thing happen? This obscure historical detail that won't be Googleable, A, because Google no longer really works, but B, because it's embedded in a PDF of a scholarly article I've uploaded to you.

32:54Chris Hayes:So there's lots of useful ways of using it to me when you're bounding sources, particularly for research purposes. But it's just manifestly getting better. Like, obviously, I mean, it's just like this idea that it's not is insane. Yeah. And the idea that it's not going to start to touch jobs people do is also seems insane. I mean, I have a few friends who are very senior level software engineers who until very recently, maybe December, thought this was just so ridiculous. Yes. They were like, our CEOs won't stop talking about it. They're insufferable. This will never. This is just a ridiculous toy.

33:30It's the new metaverse. It's the latest tech fad. And then I think it was the Cloud Code release that all of a sudden they are writing book proposals. They are trying to use AI to, like, launch businesses. Like, they're trying to figure out, like, what's my next thing? Because I'm in my 50s and I want to work another 10 or 15 years. I need to work. And I don't think I'm going to have a job in a few years. And that, for me, just sitting and having a drink with them and listening to them talk about that was pretty jarring, actually.

34:00Chris Hayes:Yeah. And I think, again, you know, part of the problem is I think that we should have some clarity about the business case proposition of this technology is exactly this. Like the reason that they think they can sell this to people. I mean, think about how much money revenue that is for you, right, if you can sell that. And also it's a savings for them. And the only problem is that someone's out of a job, right? That's the business case. So like part of the problem is if you start to talk about that, it does feel like you're seeding. Well, I was about to say when you get that reaction from the left, it's like, but I don't like this and I don't want this to be the case.

34:39It cannot be the case that all of these elites and oligarchs in Silicon Valley are telling me that I'm not going to have a job. I don't accept that. And so what would it look like to you for, quote unquote, the left? to start to have, to start to take that more seriously? How does that manifest?

34:59Chris Hayes:I mean, I think you got to start thinking about, like, job protections. Like, how do we want to deal with that? You mean, like, meaningful regulation? Yeah, meaningful regulation. I mean, I'm laughing a little bit because I... First of all, we should be regulating AI. And I don't know how. I think the idea that it's, like, totally unregulated is insane. So partly that's going back to real blue sky thinking, to be thinking in a broad sense of like, well, if all these jobs were automatable, like if you didn't need people to do all these things, what do we want people doing? What does society do?

35:38Chris Hayes:Like we're just locked into like where are the good jobs going to be? And, you know, work has changed over time and productivity has increased. And the big thing is like, well, what do you want? What should a person have a shot at? What should they be guaranteed? What should they have a shot at in a wealthy society like ours? And how do we order the society fairly to do that? And that's like real first principle stuff. But I do think in some ways this calls for some real first principles thinking. And I don't know that I want Donald Trump to be the person, you know, making those calls. No. The timing is very unfortunate.

36:14Chris Hayes:No. And I think the saving grace is he's not going to make those calls because he's just going to let the AI companies run rampant and do whatever they want. Sure. But I also think that like small acts of resistance, I think like people at the grassroots level fighting data centers. Is that like the solution? No. But is it a way to operationalize the sentiment? It's like, wait a second. You're telling me this is going to replace all of us. This thing, it's driving up local electricity prices. It's intentionally being created as a technology that will move the distribution of national income from labor to capital.

36:48Chris Hayes:And you want to build one in my town? No. Like, that's a totally good, legitimate, actionable way to start. A small act of resistance in the context of data centers is a bit of a hopeful place for us to end.

37:09Chris Hayes:This week on the political scene from The New Yorker, Trump's rupture in the world order. Europe caught between two adversarial great powers. That's basically dialing back the clock to not only pre-World War II, but really it's a pre-20th century view of the world. And I would say it's a world of permanent insecurity that we're looking at. Join me, Evan Osnos, and my colleagues Jane Mayer and Susan Glasser every Friday on The Political Scene, available wherever you get your podcasts.

37:52I want to play a very quick game that we invented. It's called Control-Alt-Delete.

38:01so i want to know what piece of technology would you love to control what piece would you love to alt so alter or change and what would you love to delete and people have been very generous in their interpretations of that question someone tried to control the weather and i didn't have the heart

38:18Chris Hayes:to tell them that that is not technology i mean i guess i want to control ai yes well because Because, you know, I guess I trust myself maybe more than Sam Altman. Arguably, I would trust you more than most of the people involved in AI. So that sounds good to me. I mean, yeah, I guess if I could control it, I'd figure out a humane nothing. I'll be the one. It's Chris Hayes. I'm the one. He's in. Alt I've got, which is I would love to alter Internet search so that it works again. Yeah, what's your beef there? What's going on with your searches? I just think that it's gotten so bad. It's not great.

38:57Chris Hayes:It was, I think, the quality of the product of just Google search particularly. There's other ones that people, you know, suggest that I've used as well. But essentially it's all, you know, it's been displaced now by AI partly because search got so bad. Yeah. And so, but it's nice to search things and be able to find them. And that's become more and more difficult. Do you just get that big, like, AI box? Well, first you get the big ad box. And you have to X out of it. You also get the big ad box, but you also get overwhelmed by ads. And you also just the search does not surface things that you're looking for as well as it used to.

39:32Chris Hayes:Here's my delete. Okay. I just I want to get rid of cell phone calls and replace them with landline quality calls. I find cell phone cell talking on the cell technology is the highest level of failure that we tolerate from any technology in our lives. Just in terms of like the service being patchy. If your oven just shut off as often as a call dropped or you couldn't hear someone or your alarm didn't go off as many times or your computer just didn't turn on as many times as you can't hear someone or a call drops. It's insane. We would be in the streets. No one would tolerate it. No. And it's the reason people text all the time and don't talk.

40:20And the other thing that I hate about cell phone calls, you know, FaceTime audio can fix this, WhatsApp audio a little bit, is that they don't have what's called side tone.

40:31Chris Hayes:What is that? Okay. Okay. When you were in junior high, I think we're roughly same cohort, when you were in 12 or 13 or 14 and you would go home after school and talk on the phone for hours. Oh, yeah. You would be, when you were talking on that phone, that landline, you would be hearing your own voice through the receiver in what's called side tone. Because the way that a landline works is in the same way that when you have cans on and you're doing a podcast and you're getting your own voice in your ears. Yep. Okay. A landline does that. And it is such a better, more pleasurable way to talk to someone because you can calibrate your own volume.

41:06Chris Hayes:Cell phones don't have side tone, which is why people shout when they're on phones. Why people sound weird. Why you sound weird. Why you can't actually have good and intimate conversations on cell phones. It's why people always want to put their headphones in even though the headphone doesn't even give you side tone. So this is my big – I guess that's an alt because I like to bring side tone into cell. But I basically just want to delete cell vocal technology and start over. That is so specific and so well-studied. I really applaud that. I love that one. Chris Hayes, thank you so much. Thank you.

41:38This was fabulous. Thanks.

41:44The Big Interview is a production of Wired and Kaleidoscope Content. This episode was produced by Kate Osborne and Adriana Tapia. It was mixed by Pran Bandy, who was also our New York studio engineer. It was fact-checked by Matt Giles. Kate Osborne is our executive producer. And I'm, of course, your host, Katie Drummond, Wired's Global Editorial Director. Thanks for listening.

42:19Now more than ever, technology is a dominating force in our lives. Then there's the threat of AI everywhere. And yet, tech can be inspiring and help level playing fields. I mean, a YouTuber with a self-funded debut movie just dominated the box office.

42:37Chris Hayes:I thought, hey, if you interview me, it'd be good for your publication. And that's not ego. I just have a lot of followers. But it's that stigma. It's like YouTubers, they're not real. Join me, Lizzie O 'Leary, the host of What Next TBD. Slate's podcast focused on technology, power, and the future. Follow What Next TBD now wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

For the first episode of our second season, Katie sits down with fellow journalist MS Now’s All In Chris Hayes, to talk about covering the news and capturing attention during an all-consuming news cycle. Hayes also talks about his book, The Sirens’ Call: How Attention Became the World’s Most Endangered Resource.

Join WIRED’s best and brightest on Uncanny Valley as they dissect the collision of tech, politics, finance, and business, from Alexis Ohanian's newest tech venture to the effects of inaccurate information from artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots on social protests.


Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

More from Uncanny Valley | WIRED

All 135 episodes
Trump's 80s Movie Approach to Foreign Policy w/ Chris HayesUncanny Valley | WIRED · 40 min
Listen in VO