Top 10 marketing and behavioural science insights with Nudge host, Phill Agnew

18 Dec 2023 · 1 h 2 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

```markdown

Podcast Episode Notes

Uncensored CMO - Top 10 Marketing and Behavioural Science Insights with Nudge Host, Phill Agnew

Episode Overview

  • Podcast Title: Uncensored CMO
  • Episode Title: Top 10 Marketing and Behavioural Science Insights with Nudge Host, Phill Agnew
  • Description: Jon Evans talks with Phill Agnew, a senior product marketer at Buffer and host of the Nudge podcast. They share 5 behavioural science nudges and 5 marketing lessons learned from their respective careers.

Key Guests

  • Jon Evans: Host of Uncensored CMO.
  • Phill Agnew: Senior product marketer at Buffer and host of the Nudge podcast.

Timestamps

  • 00:00 - Intro
  • 01:19 - How did Phill get into podcasting
  • 04:03 - Bonus Nudge: The Halo Effect
  • 06:29 - Nudge 5: The Labour Illusion
  • 09:40 - Marketing Lesson 5: The Power of Getting Fired
  • 13:25 - Nudge 4: The Pratfall Effect
  • 19:26 - Marketing Lesson 4: The Power of Purpose
  • 24:49 - Nudge 3: The Curiosity Gap
  • 30:03 - Marketing Lesson 3: Be Distinctive
  • 35:26 - Nudge 2: Social Proof
  • 41:14 - Marketing Lesson 2: The Power of Creativity
  • 45:10 - Nudge 1: Fresh Start Date
  • 48:59 - Marketing Lesson 1: The Power of Consistency

Key Insights and Discussions

  1. Introduction to Podcasting
  2. Phill Agnew shares his journey into podcasting, highlighting the disconnect between theoretical marketing education and practical application.
  3. Emphasis on behavioural science as a vital element in effective marketing.
  1. Behavioural Science Insights
  2. Halo Effect: Influence of being associated with high-status figures or brands. Example: Phill's experiment with his podcast logo.
  3. Labour Illusion (Nudge 5):
  4. People value products/services more if they perceive effort was invested in them.
  5. Example: Steve Jobs highlighted effort in presentations, influencing customer perception and value.
  6. Pratfall Effect:
  7. Showcasing flaws can increase likability and credibility.
  8. Example: Revealing personal failures can attract interest and relatability.
  9. Curiosity Gap (Nudge 3):
  10. Human brains are wired to crave completion of information.
  11. Techniques like cliffhangers maintain audience interest.
  12. Social Proof (Nudge 2):
  13. People look to others to guide their behavior.
  14. Example: Use of testimonials or popularity indicators in marketing boosts credibility.
  15. Fresh Start Date (Nudge 1):
  16. Leveraging significant dates (e.g., New Year) can enhance consumer commitment to change or new behaviors.
  1. Marketing Lessons
  2. Power of Getting Fired:
  3. Embracing failure as a learning experience can lead to personal growth and opportunity.
  4. Networking and building relationships become pivotal post-failure.
  5. Power of Purpose:
  6. Brands with a clear mission attract consumers' loyalty. Authenticity in purpose strengthens brand reputation.
  7. Be Distinctive:
  8. Importance of standing out in the crowded market to enhance memorability.
  9. Use of unique branding elements fosters recognition (e.g., Compare the Meerkat).
  10. Power of Creativity:
  11. Creativity is essential for problem-solving in business and marketing beyond advertising.
  12. Power of Consistency:
  13. Consistent messaging fosters brand recognition and loyalty. Familiarity breeds comfort and trust among consumers.
  1. Integrative Takeaways
  2. The intertwining of behavioural science with marketing practices enhances understanding of consumer psychology.
  3. Both hosts advocate for a balance between creativity and consistency in marketing strategies.
  4. Engaging storytelling and authentic communication are fundamental to effective marketing.

Conclusion This episode highlights the significance of understanding behavioural science in marketing, the value of consistency, and the importance of creativity. By integrating these insights, marketers can improve engagement and foster deeper connections with their audiences.

Links

  • [Nudge Podcast](https://www.nudgepodcast.com)
  • [Jon's LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/uncensoredcmo/)
  • [Jon's Twitter](https://twitter.com/uncensoredcmo)
  • [Phill's LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/phill-agnew-22213187/)
  • [Phill's Twitter](https://twitter.com/p_agnew)

Action Items

  • Implement the discussed behavioural nudges and marketing lessons in your own strategies.
  • Experiment with incorporating storytelling and distinctiveness in your content creation for improved audience engagement.

```

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:06Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to the Uncensored CMO. Now, hopefully you enjoy listening to this podcast, but if you were to listen to another marketing podcast, then maybe I'd recommend Nudge by Phil Agnew. Now, the reason for that is Phil is a master of behavioural science and in particular, applying behavioural science techniques to marketing to help you deliver better results. And I thought it'd be a lot of fun to get Phil on this podcast to ask him what are the top five things he's learnt about behavioural science that you can use in your marketing. And in return, I thought I'd have a think through all the episodes that I've done, all the experts that I've met, and try and pull out the five most important things I've learned as well.

0:45This episode was a lot of fun, and I know you're going to enjoy it. So, Phil, welcome to the show. Thank you, John. I should say, welcome to each other's shows. Yes, correct. Shouldn't I, actually? Because I'll probably put this on my show as well. That'll be fun. We'll get a bit more listeners to it, which will be nice. Why not? Yeah, no, I think that was a very nice welcome. but I feel the same about you. I love your show. I'm really excited to be on here. Yeah, it's good. I've been looking forward to this a lot, actually. And we're going to talk about the biggest nudges that you've discovered as a course of your show.

1:16And I'll try and bring the biggest marketing theories to the table as well. So it'd be quite exciting. But just to introduce you, if anyone's not listened, how did you get into podcasting and why? Yeah. So I did, like most idiots, I decided to study marketing at university. One of the worst decisions that I've made. I spent£50 ,000 is what I spent on that degree. And it was kind of hilarious because I spent, I did that. I did that for four years, went into my first marketing job, was given the most basic tasks, write a blog, write an email subject line, found myself absolutely inept at that task and was unable to do it at a successful point.

1:55None of the theory you'd studied was like, they didn't tell me how to do this. Turns out four Ps doesn't actually help you in any tactical marketing role. And I basically had this period of my marketing life, maybe two, three years, where I just had no idea what I was doing. I felt quite frustrated because in most other degrees, what you study are these laws and these principles that then you hold and you apply throughout your career. And the opposite felt true in marketing. I felt like I'd studied very vague strategy that I'd instantly forgotten and then had no application throughout my career.

2:25And eventually, after about three years, I discovered the world of behavioural science, psychology and consumer psychology and realized that these things I wanted these principles these laws I could apply to my work did exist but in this totally different field of psychology and since then I've sort of spent every bit of moments every moment I could in my marketing career learning about this field and then in 2019 decided I want to learn even more so did the cliche thing of thinking I'll just start a podcast on it so I can interview people about it and so interview experts in the behavioral science space, marketing pioneers who apply this stuff and have been doing that show for about four years, applying a lot of this stuff myself as well, which has helped the show grow to one of the leading marketing podcasts in the UK.

3:10I mean, one of the leading is maybe an understatement actually, because you've exceeded 1 million downloads, I believe, haven't you? Yeah, that's right. We're on for a million this year, actually, which is quite exciting. Million in one year. Yeah. I don't know if we'll get there if we conclude YouTube, but yeah, I don't know if quite get there but almost there. That's very impressive. What's the highest ranking you've achieved in business as well because you sort of mix it with some pretty well-known figures don't you? Yeah I've been up in the top 10 quite a few times. It's an interesting metric because a lot of it is based on the acceleration of growth so you can get above you know big names Tim Ferriss you know a lot of the others in the space they're a lot bigger than me but if you have this acceleration of growth you can sort of shoot up there so I've got in the top 10 before.

3:51And I was saying to you before as well very impressed with the way you shared that news as well because you you did a video scroll didn't you showing you know here's Stephen Bartlett oh look there I am just below so you're keeping some very good company well that is that is a pure nudge there that is a psychological hack because there's this principle known as the halo effect which you'll know John which is when you're in the sort of company of others you can benefit from just being in that company it's actually comes from a study which I didn't believe it was a study done with luxury retailers and they looked at if you set up a shop a new luxury shop with an unknown brand but you placed it next to other luxury retailers like Gucci and Chanel that shop will do better when you're next to those stores simply from the halo effect simply being near other luxury stores will make your shop perform better and this study I think it was done in the labs it wasn't in real world but they predicted huge increases of revenue and I just thought this has to be BS like there's nothing different about this store why should more people go to it just because it's next to a Gucci so I thought I'd test it and I ran this test on Google survey it went out to about 100 ,000 people and all of the people were asked would you listen to this podcast both showed an image of my logo half though were shown just the image on its own of my logo podcast logo the others half saw my logo but dimly in the background there was the logos of very other popular shows so diary of a CEO, off-menu, Desert Island Discs.

5:19And I wanted to see if just merely being in the presence of those others made my show more likely, people more likely to listen. And it 3X'd the amount of people that would listen. So the control was about 6.4 % said, yeah, I'll try to show. With the variant, which had the halo effect, 15.8%, I think, said they would listen. So when you tell people that you're a top show, picture the other shows you're around, because that will make it even more impactful. That's amazing. That's amazing. and and look you know again it's it's referencing a much bigger category in business as well isn't it so you know reaching more people much broader audience as well than than i say just marketing obviously you know we're here to do a marketing podcast but it also means you probably draw in a bigger audience don't you because more people see it than would have seen it before exactly that's exactly it exactly yeah well congratulations on that that's um very very impressive and long may it continue um let's get into the top five nudges so what we thought we'd do just for fun listeners and viewers.

6:13I've come up with five lessons I've learned since doing this podcast. Phil's come up with five of the most powerful nudges to transform business. And we're going to do a bit of nudge marketing tennis between us and see how we get on. So give us your number five. Why did you pick it? And what is it? And what can we learn from it? The first one I wanted to talk about is a very powerful one that I've used a lot in my shows. I think you'd probably use it as well. It's known as the labour illusion. And this is the idea that if we see the effort that has gone into creating something, we will value it more highly.

6:44And the most, I think, famous person who applied this was Steve Jobs. Whenever he started a keynote presentation at Apple, he would start by saying, we've been working on this feature for years. We've built something which will revolutionize the industry. There was one where I think he came back to Apple as the CEO and he said, if you'd been around the car parks of the Apple offices in the weekend, you would have seen they were full of people. Really making the point consistently across multiple keynotes to emphasize the work that went into something he knew what he was doing because there's a lot of evidence that backs this up so there's a start study by someone called moreles who essentially showed participants um lists these participants were people who were looking to buy a house and he showed them lists of these these houses um the lists were identical but some people were told oh the real estate agent has spent all night preparing this list of houses for you do you think there's any house on here that suits your needs whereas the others were told the real estate agent used a computer to generate this list in 30 minutes is there any that you think you'd need turns out unsurprisingly of course but something that's important for us to know the one that people thought took more effort was valued much higher so people are far more likely to say oh my god i love this house in the list that the real estate agent spent a long time preparing and so you can apply this to marketing you can apply this to podcasts one of the best ways i applied this was in a reddit ad and i did two ads identical ads links to my show one said learn the six best things i've heard from marketers this year the other said i've spent 480 minutes listening to marketing experts this year here's what i learned lo and behold the one that suggested that i had spent 480 minutes that was true by the way yeah that one performed far better i think it was 2x the number of clicks so this labor illusion yeah yeah i love that i love that a lot um in In fact, I've listened to Stephen Bartlett talk about how he made his podcast successful.

8:34I don't know whether I entirely believe what he says, but the amount of work he claims goes into it. I mean, for example, he talks about the team have 120 KPIs. And I'm like, really? Now, I don't know whether it's an exaggeration or not, but I mean, it just signals the amount of effort and work and quality control that goes into making the show. And like you say, that just means, well, it must be good. I mean, if they care that much about 120 things, surely it's good. And you should apply this in lots of ways. So you're applying this right now with this beautiful studio setup that's showcasing to people.

9:06And it really is, to everyone watching or listening, this is very impressive. You put a lot of effort into this. People can see that. They'll value it more. And there's other ways you can do it. If you go on a brewery tour, studies have shown that if you go on a brewery tour at Guinness, you will value the beer that you'll serve at the end much higher because you've seen the effort that goes into it. Any company should be showcasing the work they're doing, showcasing the effort they put in, showcasing the money invested. all of that will make them value the product more very good well i might use your beer analogy to pivot to my number five right so here we go here's here's a here's a little pivot so um in a number five um it might be surprising but the power of getting fired yeah so in fact i was at an event last night and i was talking about the backgrounds the podcast and how i set it up and the fact that actually the only reason i set the podcast up actually because i i got fired from my job at Brewdog and I found myself freelancing.

9:57And one of the questions that people kept asking me, I was working for a number of different agencies helping on business development. And they all asked me the same thing. They said, John, can you introduce me to your CMO mates? I'm like, well, funnily enough, I don't have a long list of CMO mates that I, you know, hang out on Friday afternoon with kind of thing. It's not how it works. I'm usually pretty busy, you know, doing the job sort of thing. And I thought, well, actually setting up a podcast would be a pretty cool thing to do because a bit like you in terms of what you're doing with behavioural science is it allows me to meet the right kind of people and find out from them, learn from them and make some content they might kind of like.

10:31And it's a great networking tool. So anyway, so I was at this networking thing last night and said, you know, I told the story about how I got fired from Brewdog and how that's actually why I ended up being a kind of podcaster. And anyway, someone answered me and said, congratulations on getting fired. Oh, geez, thank you. You know, but anyway, but reflecting more seriously on it, actually, And being fired or failing is something that people find hard to talk about. And, you know, it's funny. It's a bit of an English thing as well, I think. You know, we couldn't possibly mention the things that have gone wrong.

11:04But actually, in my experience, you learn so much when things go wrong, don't you? And I think it's something that we can all benefit from because, you know, when things go wrong, that's when you learn and that's when you can improve. And any biography I've read of a really successful person, like half the book will be about all the startups that failed and how they went again and all this kind of thing. So the first thing I thought in terms of getting fired is see it as an opportunity to learn and see it as fuel. Because the other thing that happened to me as well, in fact, I got fired twice.

11:33So my claim to fame is in one year I got fired twice. You know, so I'm thinking of inventing the fired twice club just to kind of, you know, hey, you haven't tried. if you haven't been fired more than once, you're not trying hard enough sort of thing. But the second thing I learned about being fired was actually there's a lot of people out there that are very generous with their time. So when I suddenly found myself unemployed, the amount of businesses that were keen to give me a job or consult or whatever was amazing. But I did this thing where I basically had a 100-day plan to meet 100 people in 100 days.

12:05And I thought, I think I started with about 30. And the idea was every time I met someone, I'd go, introduce me to someone that you think might be quite useful for what I'm trying to do. And what I discovered is the generosity of the network. When you're out on your own and you're trying to find a job, people will be so generous. But when you're in a corporate role, in all the muck and bullets of the job, you forget that people are more likely to try and sort of, you know, criticise you or make you fail, but actually out there in the real world, particularly with start-ups. I found with start-ups and scale-ups and VCs, everyone wants you to succeed.

12:39And it was a really powerful thing. So that was my next learning. And then my next learning after being fired, something I felt very profoundly is it's more important who you work with than what you do. Because I think actually we like to talk about purpose and, you know, working for the right type of company, that kind of thing. But actually, it's the people that you are working with that determine your success, I think, more than what you exactly do. Do they inspire you? Do they have you back? You know, have you got the right kind of team? Are you all going in the same direction? And so I kind of reflected that actually I wish if I did my career again, I thought much more about the people I was working with and whether our values were aligned and whether we were kind of had the same vision than necessarily the brand above the door, which can be quite easy to go for.

13:25I think that's I've got a theory actually John about you I've got a theory that the way how open you are about that period of your life directly correlates to your success now and I think it's a really important thing actually it's one of the things I wanted to talk about anyway so it's a nice link to one of my nudges because you being so open about the fact that you were fired from Brewdog I think only benefits you yeah which is irrational because most people would think I should not tell people I've been fired because they will associate me with being poor at my job and why would they listen to my podcast if I'm poor at my job but the opposite is true there's something called the pratfall effect which I'm sure you'll know I love that the fact that is that if I had to pick a favorite I'm owning this by the way ladies and gentlemen well rightly so because it works so the pratfall effect is this idea for those of for those listening who don't know that if you showcase your flaws you you flaunt your flaws you're actually appear you appear to be more likable not only more likable potentially even more charismatic more intelligent all these amazing things and that comes from revealing a weakness there's a great study by joe sylvester from cardiff university and she um she got people to apply to a bunch of different jobs sending in cvs and then going through the interview rounds but the research assistants who are applying for these jobs would do one of two things half of them would only share strengths during the interview process they would make sure that their education their their experience was identical to try and keep it as identical as possible but some would only show strength like the opposite of what you're doing but some would show their weaknesses as well so like you're doing being really frank and transparent and she found conversely which we wouldn't expect the people who showed their weaknesses were more likely to get the job that shouldn't happen why should that shouldn't happen at all because by showing a weakness you you are revealing a flaw but it does work and it makes you more like i think it's believability so The one thing I hate in interviews, I'm interviewing somebody and I go, give me an example of a weakness.

15:22And they'll say something like, I'm a perfectionist. Yeah. You know what I mean? And I just go, come on. Like that's a strength, right? So that's not really a weakness. But it's also, I think the importance of it is that it's how well you know yourself. And if you know yourself and you know your weaknesses, you can compensate for them. And the people that I found most difficult to work with are those that don't recognize the things they're not good at. because we're not perfect, are we? It's interesting, actually, I've probably told the story a bit too much already, but I was in Tel Aviv a few years ago and I met the founder of the biggest venture capital company in Tel Aviv, in Israel, I think.

16:00And he was just amazing to listen to. But when he vetted potential people to invest in, he says, and I'm paraphrasing, not necessarily quite right, but the essence of what he said is, if you haven't failed, I won't invest in you. And the reason he said is he said that it's so important that I want people that can deal with failure because it's going to happen. Right. And anyone who's failed and picked themselves up and learned and rebuilt, that's the kind of character I want. If you've been lucky enough never to have any challenges, you're probably not going to be well equipped for when it does happen.

16:33And I thought, man, but it's interesting. He did say he struggles when he goes to the UK because at a dinner party, he'll, you know, happily chat about, oh yeah, this business went under and we, you know, we face this and people look at him a bit like, you did what? Why would you say that? You know, so as it goes, it is a cultural thing, but well, it also makes you memorable as well. That's the other thing. Hence the girl last night who said, oh yeah, congratulations on being fired. So it, it, it creates a story that people can. it makes you memorable and it makes it gives people a reason to engage with you and i think it's one of the strengths of your podcast is that's people remember you and they think oh i have to listen to that i would love to know that guy that got fired yeah i ran it i mean you're going to hear me say this way too often on this show but i did run a test on the practical effect which i think showcased this again reddit ads reddit it's really easy to test with and quite cheap which is what i like but i did two ads and they were so simple one said five reasons why you should listen to nudge and then some reasons you know i've interviewed rory sutherland it's all these different things it's a bunch of rubbish really and then the other said five reasons why you shouldn't listen to nudge just telling people not to listen the five reasons were a bit tongue in cheek like um you'll get so much knowledge about marketing you'll piss off your colleagues or something like that but they were still i was still actively telling people don't listen to this show so trying to really focus on a flaw a weakness and you'll have guessed the answer that version where i said people don't listen to the show was far more popular now why is that why did more people click on that it's because it it it goes against your expectations it's far more memorable it's far more eye-catching it's different from what people usually hear because like you say in britain people hide hide their flaws rather than flaunting them and it captures attention and made that ad far more popular so this is a long-winded way of saying embracing your flaws is a definite way to help your podcast and linked to that isn't there also um is it the mean tweets idea that richard also got that if you can do a negative review by somebody that your audience don't associate with it it can all is almost a kind of reverse psychology so if you're a guardian reader and the daily mail gave it a one star actually you'd promote the one star review in the guardian from what the mail said and if you go to the mail you go oh rated one star by the guardian sort of thing and it's it's the kind of you know yeah very another another kind of similar away have you seen that same kind of nudge it's the classic snowbird ski resort ad and they're they're a very technical ski resort with some really steep slopes i don't ski but apparently that's that's what it's like and they did a full page ad in a magazine which read one star too technical couldn't ski it and they just put that out and that ad i think the impressions they must have got from that because the amount it's been shared online is unbelievable in the millions for probably a 500 ad spend and it's it's a great example that's really clever i really really like But so should we move on to your number four?

19:22Yeah, well, I did Prattful. Oh, Prattful is number four. I'm giving that as well. So I'm happy for you to go next. Are you bouncing back? Okay, cool. All right. So number four lesson, I think, for the last three or four years, the power of purpose and backing yourself. If I look at where I get the most energy doing this podcast from, it's been talking to startup founders. And the thing that startup founders have is this such clear idea of what they want to do in the world. and it's just so inspiring um whether it's like tony's chocolate lonely wanting to you know position themselves as slave free chocolate i'm like that's freaking genius i didn't know slavery was involved in chocolate production some say you know and then suddenly you reposition the entire category around well is your chocolate stay free in fact i've been to trade shows where the tony's reps are going around all the other chocolates go oh quick interview are you slave free as if they were kind of reporting for the news or something i'm like whoa what a way to disrupt the kind of whole market um or i had luke from lucky saint on recently and um he got very obsessed about creating the alcohol-free beer category because he'd traveled around europe and discovered that in most markets up to 10 percent of beer sales are non-alcoholic and it's just perfectly normal and acceptable and the quality of beer is the same you know whereas here i think it was half a percent and they were always like this is might there might be some behavioral science in this because um they were like the 0 version of full alcohol beers and so you had this compact side by side comparison where you could go oh yeah it's peroni but without the alcohol so it looks a bit less whereas he wanted to create a dedicated brand that only did alcohol free firstly because well back to your effort point so much effort went into finding the perfect alcohol free and that's all you do so it becomes you know becomes bit but there's no reference you can't have lucky saint full alcohol um but but what i loved about that as another example is just the the clarity of purpose that founders have i really admire and i think as i reflected on the kind of three or four years doing this that's what i want i want i want to you know any brand that you manage or you as a person how clear are you about the difference you want to make in the world and probably my one of my favorite guests actually has been Niels Leonard from Uncommon.

21:33Although he does say that his wife told him off because he was talking about purpose one day and his wife said, firemen have purpose, you sell cheese. Which is a bit of a comedown. But you look at what he and the team at Uncommon have done amazingly is they've left the WPP kind of super network of agencies, created an independent agency and been phenomenally successful. And they're really passionate about wanting to work with brands that want to see a change in the world and it's really clear and you feel that and so anyway so i thought for me looking back i think the power of your purpose i mean not necessarily social purpose and all have to save the planet but the power of your own purpose and then backing yourself because only i admire anyone who jumps from the kind of safety of a corporate role into you know into a startup and backs themselves i think that's just incredibly inspiring yeah it's a really good point i think the interesting thing with purpose probably is because you've got two camps.

22:30You've got people that really do purpose. Like, we were founded to solve this problem, right? And then you've got people that will make up some statistic, like 75 % of Gen Z care that their coffee is sourced from an ethical plantation or whatever. You know what I mean? And you look at it and you just go, well, of course you tick the box. I mean, like, who wouldn't want that? You know what I mean? It's just sort of slightly fabricated, you know, as a communication message sort of thing. But I'm all in on the authentic purpose and what are you here to do? What difference do you want to make? and is it legitimately what you can do?

23:00Like Tony's Chocolonely, you look at their annual report, their annual report focuses on the change they're making in the supply chain, not the profit they're making. It's really clear in terms of, even if something as boring as the financial statement talks about that, and you think, right, okay, you've nailed it. I think a lot of that is down to skin in the game as well. So there's one thing in having a purpose and claiming that you care about slavery. Patagonia is an example that I often think about. claiming that you care about the environment but Patagonia put skin in the game where they actively turn down opportunities in order to showcase their care towards this purpose so they will not sell Patagonia gilets and jumpers to companies that they think are disrupting the environment and ruining the environment so if you work at a big mining company and you want to get your staff these beautiful Patagonia gilets with your brand on them you will not be allowed to they will not sell to you which is kind of irrational because they're turning down money and that money could be used reinvested by patagonia to help the environment but it showcases skin in the game they clearly care about this purpose and they're making active choices to care about this purpose and that makes us believe them more well it's that's the reason to about being fired as well it's the believability because you then go i i actually believe what they're saying because they're they're telling me something that costs them because everyone can say we're for the environment but you know purpose isn't purpose unless until it's cost you something and so what that speaks and probably they get a million more fans off the back of making that you know taking that position than the thousand they might have lost through the the corporate deal yeah brilliant love it okay bring us your uh we're on number three i think yeah and we're gonna go from one of probably your brilliant high level no this is good this is really strategic and i'm gonna go to one of the most basic no this is what i love about you because it's evidence-based and it's just really like you can go and implement it tomorrow yeah so i want to talk about the curiosity gap which is essentially cliffhangers and the idea of how you pique someone's interest because i think it's i mean it is important at all levels of marketing but especially at a tactical level so this sort of was first discovered by a social psychologist called zygonik and she was i think down the pub with some mates or basically at a restaurant and she was with fellow psychologists and they were ordering food from a waiter.

25:18And the waiter wasn't taking any notes on a notepad to write down the orders, but he still remembered the order absolutely perfectly. And they were shocked by how good this waiter's memory was because he was going around to multiple tables doing the same thing. And being social psychologists, which they were, they thought, well, let's test a theory. Their theory was the brain is better at remembering things when the task isn't finished. So when the task still needs to be completed. So she basically was thinking, wow, this guy not only remembers all our orders, but remembers to bring us the right plates and put the chicken at my table and the fish at yours, whatever it is.

25:56And that's incredible. And so what she did is she let the waiter serve this meal and then they all got out their tablecloths and covered what they had ordered. And then just as the waiter was walking away, they said, hold on, hold on. Can you just try and remember what our orders were again? Because he just perfectly put them down in front of their table. and as soon as he tried to remember once the order had been completed once they'd all been given their food he totally forgot he wasn't able to remember i had the chicken his brain was geared up just just until the the the job had been done and then the brain kind of then goes into relax mode goes okay i don't need to be in that state of focus and that is a very very small application of a much wider thing that the brain does which is when information is unknown or incomplete we have a desire to fill that information.

26:43When our curiosity is piqued, we have a desire to satisfy that curiosity. And this is the story of clickbait and cliffhangers. And you think, oh, clickbait is a new thing invented by BuzzFeed. It's not. It's been around for millennia almost. Arabian Nights, that story was written with cliffhangers and released in parts. All of Charles Dickens' work, at least when he was publishing in newspapers, would have cliffhangers at the end. The reason behind Shakespeare's success is arguably down to this curiosity gap. So Hamlet as a story was known before Shakespeare. He didn't write that story. He adapted it.

27:16And the difference he made was usually at the start of these stories, the information about the character was given up front. So they would say Hamlet is a madman and this is his story. Whereas Shakespeare hid that. He hid that information and he sparked curiosity. You didn't know whether Hamlet was insane or not, whether he'd lost his mind or not. And that made me people more likely to watch it. So this is not a new thing. and it's something that I think is a bit of an ancient storytelling technique, but we're very quick to discredit it these days. We sort of throw it under that category of, well, that's just a nasty tactic BuzzFeed uses.

27:46It's not. It's a really important psychological bias. Yeah. And as I will mention constantly throughout this interview, it's something I have tested, and I thought I want to, I've never done TikTok before. I still don't really do it. I don't really understand it. But I thought I want to test this ancient storytelling technique on TikTok. I want to see if it works. So I created 20 videos for TikTok. half of them had a curiosity gap inspired intro so they would say something like i've just discovered the best persuasion tactic i've ever found and i'll share it in a bit or something like that probably a little bit better than that and then the other half would just get right into it and say this is the best persuasion tactic in the world or something compared them both put them both up looked at the amount of followers they drove the amount of clicks the amount of viewers and the difference was genuinely 10x the ones that had the curiosity gap inspired opening got far more views, far more comments, far more likes, led to eventually getting around 11 ,000 followers on TikTok, whereas the ones that didn't were largely unknown, didn't get the same engagement whatsoever.

28:44And it just shows that this tactic, which is as old as time, it's been used by everyone from Charles Dickens to Shakespeare, still works and still is arguably the most important thing you can use if you're trying to gain attention in your marketing, still works today on the most modern platforms on the planet. It probably explains Stephen Bartlett's title as well. Because he plays that curiosity gap a lot, doesn't he, in terms of like, I mean, he's got very click-bait recently, hasn't he, in terms of his content. And apparently he also A-B tests all his titles as well, you know, and puts them out there to see what the response they get.

29:16But thank you, because you've explained why. And I never knew why at restaurants, like, someone would come around, and I feel like I'm going to say, like, excuse me, are you writing this down? Because have you got my kind of, you know, specific requirements here? You know, amazing that. And you'll notice it as work as well. As soon as you finish a project at work, you completely forget it. As soon as you've done an exam at school, you can forget it. I remember that. I did an economics and finance degree. And in my first job, someone actually, I don't know why, asked me about the capital asset pricing model, which is well known in econometrics.

29:46and i was like i i couldn't tell you and and that was the core part of one of my modules that i could have literally like written a thesis on at the time and like no brain has scrubbed that one so that's not your next tip then is it no it's not my next tip exactly exactly um although this does my next tip does link to memory and i was thinking actually i've reflected a lot on this that if I were to start a brand today, or the podcast being a bit of a brand itself, the power of distinctiveness as well. So, I mean, most marketing students will have read Byron Sharpe's How Brands Grow and Distinctive Brand Assets and Ehrenberg Bass Institute and the importance they put on being distinctive, standing out in the crowd.

30:30And then my colleague Orlando Woods has written a lot of things. He calls them fluent devices. I mean, his focus on advertising and what he means by fluent device This is a repeatable character like Kevin the Carrot in Audi or a repeatable scenario. Should have gone spec savers or you're not you and you're hungry, that sort of thing. But something that is unique to you that stands out and creates a relationship with the audience. And if I were to invent a brand today, I would obsess about those things. Because what we've seen in the research on our system one is over the last 10, 15 years, the use of those things has been in rapid decline, actually.

31:06And we've lost the ability to stand out, be distinctive and create consistent characters over time. Meerkats is a great example, actually. I mean, you think, why on earth would you have a Russian sounding meerkat? But what you do in a very clever way is you entertain the audience because it's surprising. So you go, oh, why is there a Russian meerkat? The joke on the compare the market, compare the meerkat. I mean, the first out they did is, I think it's still the best, where you've got Alexander going, basically saying, oh, we failed to drive any traffic to compare the meerkat. They've all gone to compare the market.

31:40This is really annoying. What are we going to do about it? I want to compare the meerkats. Anyway, but it's just like an inversion of the joke, but it's really, really cleverly done. But it sticks in your memory, doesn't it? Because it's distinctive. We argue about difference versus distinctiveness, but being distinctive, I think, is so important. In fact, I'm going to piggyback off that, and that's going to be one of mine as well, because I think distinctiveness is so well proven in the world of behavioural science in terms of the effect it has. This goes right back to von Resterhoff's studies in the 1930s.

32:08She ran tests where she showed people lists of letters that they needed to remember, different combinations of letters like Z, W, X, D, another set of letters, another set of letters, another set of letters. She needed to see how many they would remember. but within that list she would put a combination of four numbers one seven two three whatever it might be and then at the end she would say write down as many of these combinations as you would remember the numbers because they were the distinct thing within the list were 30 times more likely to be remembered than the letters she would switch it to prove that it wasn't just that numbers were more memorable where numbers would be the common thing to remember and then there would be a set of letters and then the letters were more 30 times more memorable and it's this finding basically that being distinct it boosts recall boosts memorability and Richard Shorten he updated this in 2018 did it with brands and I think this is a really interesting application that people need to remember because he did a study where he showed people 10 brands from the same category so 10 automotive brands Ford Chrysler whatever else it is and then showed them one brand from a different category so fast food so showed them Burger King did the same test as restaurant got them to look at it spent some time doing something else oh which which brands do you remember the distinct brand within that group the fast food brand was four times more likely to be remembered so being distinct within your environment is more memorable and this brings us back to the meerkat because what was really impressive about compare the meerkat was not just that they were doing something different it's that they were doing something which was totally distinct within their industry confused.com what's the up one money supermarket all of them were doing the same very utilitarian ads where they were saying, we're cheaper, we're faster, we've got better customer service.

33:53And Compare the Meerkat said, no, we're going to do something completely different. And what's hilarious, and this is really where us marketers need to hang our heads in shame, is what the competitors then did. Because every single competitor in that set copied Compare the Meerkat and started to do these really weird, radical ads. They had opera singing, people talking about car insurance, or men dressed in high heels dancing because they got such a good deal and they haven't learned anything from compare the milk or richard stotten or von westerhoff because the learning there is be distinct within your space do something that the others aren't doing because that'll make that will boost your recall but by copying compare the milk they're actually lessening their recall they're getting less so it's a really important really that's really really important i've presented alongside richard a few times actually and i do love and use this as well i love that we were talking about the an environmental study we were both taking part in the other day at the Festival of Marketing.

34:44And there's a really difficult question from the audience, which I sort of slightly blag my way through. And then Richard goes, well, it connects nicely to Van Restroff effect in the 1952, where, you know, this study proved that... I was just like, dude, man, that is just like Jedi martial tricks, mate. Like, how can anyone argue with you when you've quoted someone who sounds clever? He's dead. You know, I'm like... Prosecuted by the Nazis. I mean, you just owned the answer there, mate. It made me look really thick. But I mean, part of the reason I love behavioral science is you've got these fascinating experiments done over time, which kind of tell you.

Read the full transcript

35:24That's really fascinating. So what would be your next one on your list? I'll do my one next, which is a classic, but I think it's really important for the marketers to remember, and it's social proof. So social proof, as almost everybody listening will know, is the idea that we follow the actions of others. So this is an evolutionary trait. If you're a caveman and you see people running away from a cave, you don't go in that cave because there's probably something in there you don't want to go into. So we've evolved to have this trait and it affects all of us when we go on holiday now and you're walking along the lovely boulevard and you see a queue outside a restaurant, you get in the queue for that restaurant because you think, oh, this must be good.

36:02You follow the actions of others. And there's lots of wonderful ways this is applied the most basic is if you go to a restaurant and you see a menu and there's a most popular dish on that menu the orders for that dish will go up even if it's more expensive there's wonderful ways it can be applied by brands so mcdonald's famously said one billion big macs served that definitely helped them by showcasing social proof you've got other examples as well of an example of a company that should do this but they don't carling in the uk carling i think are the most popular beer brand in the uk largely hated by most people though so i have no idea how they should be leaning into that and saying you know maybe maybe a bit of a bit yeah yeah you might not like us but we're the most popular that would be a really good slogan there we go to carling if you're listening that's free by the way to carling if you're listening it feels available for a small fee yeah exactly i've tested this as well on ads two identical ads with either an image of my logo or an image of my logo with some five star reviews around it you won't be surprised to hear that the one with the five star review performs much better and this is this is a this is an age-old idea that if you showcase that lots of people are doing a behavior people will be likely to follow that behavior so it's a really smart thing that any marketer can think of and I think you can almost base your whole strategy around it your whole strategy as a company could be how can I make this company look like lots of other people are doing this thing and and and you know like fire festival if you remember that festival which went awfully wrong that's a bit of an example of how social proof can be so powerful they really made it look like this would be the most popular festival in the world lots of scarcity lots of influences so many social posts from very high high net worth individuals saying this would be fantastic and you can convince people that the world's worst festival is incredibly popular and should be something you visit simple simply by the social proof so that's a nice that i really love that's really good i mean you're right i i i did i think i did a post on the podcast with like a lot of five-star reviews and then i chucked in a one-star just for fun yeah you know because i occasionally you get like somebody that decides to send you a one-star yeah and um it was it was something like someone has said like the grizzled old adland guy or something he called me i just thought it was really funny anyway so i tucked that in the bottom but you know you're right like um yeah i feel really awkward about that i'm like oh i'm just like showing off now right but actually people really like that respond people respond to the you know the confidence or the what other people say about you is uh yeah it's quite good yeah it's a much wider field of psychology called mimetic desire which is a a theory that all of our life's decisions are based on the desires of other people and those desires are on other people and those desires are based on other people and we are all following models so i come to this lovely studio and i see your lovely microphone suddenly i want this microphone my desire to get this is purely fueled by looking at some what somebody else has and i think that tells if you the author of this book luke burges wrote this book called wanting all about mimetic desire he asks you to review all of the decisions you've made in your life all of the purchases you've made and if you really critically look at them you can probably see a influencer a friend a rival who has taken that decision or made that decision and it's influenced you to take it you would be shocked by how much of the decisions you think you've made on your own because it's also you wouldn't want to admit it would you so you're probably you're probably conning yourself you know why did you buy those trainers you know actually versus versus the story you tell but yeah oh as you know, they have bigger quality, you know.

39:38Really? Yeah. He would say the wife you pick, the husband you pick, is also down to that. Really? Yeah. Even at that level? Even at that level. Even at that. The child's name you pick. That'll be down to the names that you think are socially acceptable and what other people would think of them and maybe what an influence was done. Whether I was doing reverse psychology, I tried to pick ones outside the top 100. But maybe that's social proof in itself. Well, it's distinctiveness. I was going for distinctive rather than social proof. Or maybe there's a rival you have in your life, someone you don't like, who gave their child a really common name.

40:08It's something different from them. The thing I found weird with child, often tangent, aren't we? But with child naming is that names that I have such strong associations with the name and someone I know with that name. Do you know what I mean? It's like, if you think of a name, you just think of the person that you know with that name and that kind of changes how you think about that name, which is probably something as well. So maybe you could reverse it and go, you know, what was the person behind the name that gives you the association that you think that name's, you know, so good? That's why I called my podcast Nudge, because there's a very famous book on the exact topic with the same title.

40:40You did. And it's, I think, really helped. People don't get confused that it's the same thing. There's a different visual identity and it's not the same medium, but they instantly get what it's about. And they have a lot of positive associations with the podcast. I think that was genius by you, actually, because it so clearly owns the category as well. Like, I mean, the nudge unit as well, you know, famous, that's famous, you know, application of behavioral science to solve a big challenge about an election. So I just think that word is really associated. And it's also a very apt description of what you talk about on your show as well.

41:12So you know exactly what you're getting. Yeah, that was good. That was really, really impressive. Well, let's hear your next tip. Right. My next one, again, on the list of not surprising things, I might say, but have learned again and again and again. So my number two was the power of creativity. but the insight here is we know it but we don't apply it and that's why i think it's quite interesting i've had lots of people on the show talking about creativity i mean sir john hegarty from bbh obviously you know uh he's even got a course on it now the business of creativity teaching others how to be creative talking to some of the you know most creative people in the world um you know and i also did an exercise where i looked at um my i tried to write down the five most successful moments in my career and why and creativity was at the absolute heart of all of them and what i realized is it was like think thinking of a different way to solve a business problem and interestingly they weren't all in fact very few of them involved advertising because we think of creative creative as advertising but actually creativity in its broader sense in terms of solving a problem in a different way is i think the most important thing to apply to business challenges and it's so competitive that to give you advantage i think creativity is important if you look at culture i mean i had megan farren from kfc and that did you remember the um oh this there might be some behavioral thinking in this do you remember when they um ran out of chicken yeah yeah and they did the fck response genius absolutely bloody awesome wasn't it you know there must be so many but yeah there must be some behavioral sciences things going on there in terms of changing the words around and being authentic, a bit like the being fired thing.

42:48Or pratfall. Maybe it's the ultimate pratfall as well. I just spoke to a researcher called Sarah Moore, and she's done a bunch of studies on reviews, online reviews that feature profanity. So she researched, she looked at 300 ,000 reviews across Amazon and Yelp. Amazon don't allow profanity. It censors it, but Yelp do. And she found that any review that includes profanity is considered more believable, more likable, gets more upvotes, helpful votes, all these things. So why is that? Why is that? Well, if you use profanity, you're doing two things. One, you're showcasing your emotion. You're being quite obviously strong.

43:26So you're clearly showing that you care about this issue. But more importantly, it's a bit of skin in the game that we spoke about earlier. Because profanity is a taboo word, you're taking a social risk, which means you must be really invested in this point of view. So KFC are kind of genius, because by saying FCK, they're taking a taboo risk. They're potentially harming their brand. They're also showcasing a flaw as well. But all of that makes them more believable, makes them more likable. And it's actually something, I'd love to know if you spoke to Megan about this, but they use this all the time.

43:55They had a campaign back in 2019 called Cluck the Fuck, 199, Cluck the Fuck. Repeat that, edit that out. What the Cluck, 199 for your lunch. and that got actually banned but probably actually got a lot more. Well, after the tango tactic, that's what tango used to do back in the day. Get banned and get talked about. And have you seen KFC's later SAD all across the underground about their chips? No, no, no. It says, finally effing good. And you read it and you think, oh my God, they can't do that. They're just admitting that everything that went before was terrible. That too, but also, is that not a swear?

44:30But underneath the chips, where the chips are over, it's effing. So it sort of looks like it's covered. It actually says finger licking. if you sort of really squint and look beneath so then get away with it yeah but it's very smart because all this profanity it's distinct grabs attention it's a social risk makes people makes you more believable actually makes you more trusting and it can be a really smart thing you can add to marketing so yeah i can see how i love that one that's really good oh that's that's brilliant it does explain why mark ritson is so successful yeah yeah as well yeah big time yeah and i'm surprised you don't lean into it more seeing as you are the uncensored i know i know I did get a review on me once and just said, come on, where's the swearing?

45:08Right, so that brings us to number one, doesn't it? What have you got? Well, I've got a kind of... We're recording this in November, the New Year's coming up, and it's just quite a simple tip that has a lot of psychological basis. So there's a researcher called Katie Milkman. She's written a fantastic book called How to Change. It's all about changing people's habits. What are we as marketers trying to do? We're trying to change people's habits. We're desperate to get people to buy different laundry detergent, whatever it might be. And her findings show that there is a lot of value in, of course, the content that you create, the message you put out.

45:43But there is almost just as much value in when you ask people to make the change. It's something that we never really think about as marketers. We always ask them to do something immediately. We say, go to this movie now, buy this laundry detergent now, drink this beer now. And her finding is that, no, if you ask them to do something on a future date, which is significant, they'll be more likely to make that change. So she did, honestly, dozens of studies on students where she would try and get them to, say, go to the gym or start saving or start studying. And in each of these studies, she would give them two types of dates in the future.

46:14She would say, can you do this on Monday next week? Or can you do this on Tuesday the 17th of March? For one group, they're normal dates, let's call them. And then for the other group, she would use what she calls a fresh start date. Now these fresh start dates have labels attached to them which give these dates meaning and significance but they are at the end of the day dates. So a fresh start date would be the start of the new term or in the new year or even this Halloween, these dates which have significance in our mind. And she would compare how likely people were to go to the gym or start saving or start studying and when she asked people to do it on a fresh start date they were far more likely to agree.

46:55I decided to test this, of course. So I went on Google surveys, ran a test. I said, would you listen to my podcast? Here's what it's all about. And then the question was, would you listen to this podcast next Monday? Whereas the other one was, would you listen to this podcast in the new week? So fresh start date. People were two times more likely to say, I would listen on the fresh start date. It's a very simple tactic, but can have some quite big impacts for your marketing. So if you're producing a movie and you've got a movie trailer coming out, don't say it's out on the 17th of March say it's out in fall or something like that and then say you can watch it from the 17th if you're doing a big campaign in the new year to get people to use your product encourage them to set a new year's resolution around that product or if you're just trying to get people to listen to this podcast John, tell them give them a teaser and say it airs next week listen on your Monday morning commute or something like that that would be a better way of convincing someone to listen than just simply saying listen now That's really good, really really good um link is actually one of my favorite um uh behavioral science stories i think i was reading a malcolm gladwell book i wish i'd kind of remembered quite where i heard this and i may not get it exactly right but it was it was i think there was an outbreak of some disease on a cat on a campus in a university somewhere and they decided the lecturers got together and decided that basically they had to communicate that the students needed to get vaccinated for this particular thing and so um on the first day they basically did this announcement saying we've had outbreak of this thing.

48:19And please, can you all go and get vaccinated? Right. And they literally, no one turned up at the doctor and doctor's surgery or whatever. No, nothing. And they thought, well, maybe the message wasn't strong enough. So the next time they went up and they put a really graphic image of what would happen if you didn't get vaccinated. And I thought, that's going to sort it right. Anyway, went down, doctor, no one turned up. Oh, geez. Anyway, And someone came up with the idea. Does anyone know where the doctor's surgery is? So on the third day, they just put up a map and go, this is where the doctor is.

48:53And they all went. And that was it. We can overthink problems, can't we? Us marketers, we get into the weeds. It's often simpler than we think. Exactly. I love that one. That was rude. Okay. Number one. Now, there's maybe an anticlimax and it's perhaps a slightly boring, but boy, is it true. And have I learned it over the last three or four years? The power of consistency. or persistence maybe or just sticking to it and and it's really interesting so just take the podcast for example is you know the cumulative effect of doing the same things again and again and again and consistently so when you're going to a weekly schedule adding youtube you know all those things that we've done on the podcast actually that consistency has just built it and built it over time and i just think with so many certainly for me having been fired twice and you know all the rest of it um you tend to move on from a job at just the point that maybe it's starting to work and i don't know the average tenure of a cmo is probably about you know two years or something it takes a while to get to know the job work out what you can do learn from failure all the rest of it and it seems to me we tend to move on just the point it's working and it turns out it's the same for advertising so we did this experiment actually um at system one working with one of the biggest advertisers in the world.

50:10Can't say who. All confidential, exactly. But we took 50 of their ads that we had tested over the last five years, right? And it spanned different brands, different times of year, different media spends, different copy lengths. We looked at every variable, right? When in the year, the whole thing, right? We retested those ads, right? All 50. And we found that with the exception, I think, of two or three, the score in terms of how the public reacted to the creative went up so ads that had been playing out like with millions of pounds of spend over time it turns out that rather than wearing out they'd worn in and and that contradicts almost an entire industry of we must make the new ad for next season we must kind of we know we must change the creative because it's been running for six months you know and it's striking actually because we're chatting in the middle of christmas ads you know frenzy at the moment and actually the top three ads that we've tested this year coke holidays are coming 25 years old aldi kevin the carrot been going for six years and actually m &s have done a great job m &s have um they've brought back dawn french as the fairy so it turns out that actually familiarity breeds contentment not contempt and it's one of those very boring insights but actually you're better off becoming familiar than you are necessarily becoming radically, you know, doing something radically new.

51:33Yeah. And it's very important because it's something, you know, as marketers, we want to change strategy every quarter. And it's the worst thing we can do. And there's the psychology behind that. It does have a name, of course, is known as the mere exposure effect. I knew you'd have something for me. Of course I would. You're not going to let me down. Come on. It's been study. So that's Zay? No, not Zay. I'm going to forget his name. Robert Zayonks, I think, is the research behind this. He showed American students in an American university, Chinese Mandarin characters. An American student's got no idea what those characters mean.

52:04But he did something really smart with his test. He showed some of the characters more often than others. And this was over the course of a few, I think, hour or so, this test. Turns out, he asked him at the end, which characters do you like the look of the most? Didn't know the meaning. The ones they saw more often, they liked more. That's like very basic. You see something more often, you like it. There's a much more interesting version of this study, which I'm probably going to butcher. but it was about impressionist art this is in hitmakers a book by derek thompson and there's this idea that saison's art was hated during his lifetime and really only became popular because one art dealer really loved it and then put in his will that he wanted it to be in an art gallery and then it became popular through familiarity and a researcher got obsessed with this he was like i want to be able to prove that saison's art is not popular because people love it because it's familiar so in his full lecture for a full year he did an art history lecture but he ran this experiment where instead of showing the students the most popular art and he did that by you know what's in the national gallery sort of thing the art that is widely loved he instead showed students very unknown art like eight out of the ten pieces of art they would see would be very unknown two out of ten would be the saison to this world they're very famous but because students they didn't know and then at the end of the six months or something he then asks them which which paintings do you like the most of course they say the unknown stuff because that's the stuff because they've not been exposed to it prior and these are people who have studied the tenets of what makes great art yeah but they would still pick the unknown stuff so even at that point even if something is subjective as appreciating art often comes down to what you're And if that works for Cezanne, it should work for Aldi and M &S as well.

53:51It should. Actually, it ties to an interesting point as well. So Tom Goodwin, popular guest on the show, has launched his own podcast. And he put a tweet out the other day going, can how interesting a guest is compensate for their lack of fame or lack of recognition? And it got me thinking, actually, that's a really, really interesting question. But if I were to kind of look at the data in what is the most popular episodes versus the least popular episodes, the reach of this podcast would be number one, right? So a bad episode today would absolutely trounce the best episode a year ago, right? So the reach of the podcast or familiarity with the podcast itself would be number one.

54:31number two would be whether or not the guest shares the uh the episode so the extent to which they engage in in the topic and and amplify it through their kind of number two the the fame of the guests would be number three and i'll actually put how interesting the content is at number four which i really hate right because i'm like i want that to be number one i'm like please please please can you know can the unknown artist with the really interesting kind of thing beat the suzanne i have to go the data tells me suzanne so the data would suggest that the profile of the guest whether they share it their reach your reach as a media channel is actually most important but that's not to say of course neither of us would be here unless our content was interesting so maybe the interesting you know maybe the guest has to be interesting as a hygiene factor is my get out of jail on the on what i think the data is telling me but yeah no i think it's familiarity of the guest i think i agree with all of that hugely important but i'm gonna i'm gonna disagree with you on one point please do I'd love that come on let's not agree on everything what's the point so we're going to now have our argument to end the show end on a hike well this is a behavioural science thing peak end rule peak end rule exactly the peak is an argument where I say consistency is great because you learn the trade and you put in the reps and you get better as a podcaster so let's talk about this solely from a podcasting point of view us two podcasters and there might be people listening who think yes we now narrowed the audience down to five so the five still listening or you know they want to create a blog or a newsletter or or even start a project at work and get get a team going whatever it might be there is this rhetoric that consistency is all you need if you do something 10 times oh you're bigger than 10 % of the podcasts in the world because most podcasts don't even publish 10 episodes this really pisses me off it really pisses me off because it gives this framework of all you have to focus on is doing the thing and doing the thing is enough and it's actually I think quite self-obsessed and what you should be desperately caring about and thinking about is your listeners and what do they what value will they get and what will they get out of it and i think i my whole thing is consistency does not trump effort energy actual quality of work and if i was talking to somebody who was starting a podcast tomorrow i would say to them yeah sure i record 10 episodes but ditch the six that are crap and just put four out which are really good because i think there is something in in a world where everybody's now trying to be consistent you can be distinct and trying to be fantastic so here's here's a theory then are podcasts consistent because they're good and the podcasts are inconsistent because they're bad in other words if you have a bad podcast doesn't do very well you're likely to stop yeah so maybe the correlation is that is maybe that's what it is is a great podcast are successful therefore consistent that's probably true that might that might explain it because i because i can't disagree with you actually i mean but there's something about sticking to something because if you stick to it long enough you i mean we're talking about this earlier weren't we if you know you if you do something consistently enough it has to be a high standard but then you get some some podcasts go viral or whatever i mean that's a bit of a silly word you know i mean but but some some bring in a new audience then you keep going and then another one will bring in a new audience you don't always know what those are yeah and and it's you know you put i probably put the same effort and put the same preparation to every episode but they they perform differently of course and you kind of don't know that until you keep going yeah and if you've given up at episode three or five or whatever you never have got that tipping point of course and you need to learn the craft and that's how you're going to get there yeah but i think if you look at i think the youtube and this is now we're inside podcasts here and it's way too meta and everyone stopped listening but i do think that youtube is a great like test that people can look at and view because what you see with podcasts is you get consistent listeners because people subscribe and they will listen to every episode.

58:19Consistency pays off because they're there anyway. On YouTube, the way you get viewers is not through subscribers anymore. It's all through the algorithm. So you have to create fantastic content in order to be seen. And what does that mean? Consistency has gone out the window. Nobody would say on YouTube, all you have to do is do 10 videos. That's enough. It's not. They would say, spend all your time creating one thing that is incredible and that will get the views that you need. That will propel you to virality and then you know what if you want to take three months to do the next thing do you can say the same about artists you can say that you know the best artists in the world don't release a painting or a song or a poem every week they do something which they think is incredible and i would push people within marketing in our space to do that yeah yeah focus on quality yeah can't disagree i think we've landed in a good place actually we haven't really disagreed no i know i know i was yeah i do wonder sometimes on this right when i should relaunch and like one of my favorite episodes from the first season i'll go man that was quality so i had um adam was it adam morgan adam what i love adam morgan he wrote eat the big fish about challenger brands and he was episode number two and uh i had him back on recently and i said like in one day the downloads that we did on the episode today was more than the downloads over last three years that our episode number two did because because the way podcasting works is that people will as your audience grows they'll listen to your recent stuff very few people go back to the back catalogue and you get some and it's lovely when you get a message from someone I've listened to all 106 of your episodes really this is quite impressive my word you need a mug we'll send you a 100 mug I've done it but it's interesting that the reach of the podcast was so much bigger when I had Anne on again three years later that that trumped it didn't matter how interesting the second episode was and it was really interesting John I really want you to do this though and I want you to run a test and tell me how it goes.

1:00:11Okay, let's test this. So here's the test I want you to run. I want you to republish that podcast. I want you to record an intro and say, I've done, how many episodes have you done? 106. I've done 106 episodes. I want to be brutally honest. Sorry, every other guest. Sorry, Phil. This one is my favourite. Yeah. Because then what you're doing is you're, oh my God, that's distinct. Labour illusion. He's gone back through this. I just maybe say, I recently listened to my whole category. This was the best. Oh, got to put the work in, haven't I? I sat down for 1 ,000 hours over the weekend and re-listened to everything.

1:00:401 ,000 hours over the weekend. Exactly. Definitely say that. Get the accuracy right. And then say, and then call that episode. We've done 106 or 107. I think this is the best. Yeah. And I would almost be certain that would be your most downloaded episode. Okay. Because I think it will stand out. I think it will be distinct. I think it will benefit from the labour illusion. It covers a lot of the points we've covered today. In one post. Brilliant. I love this. I'd love to see how that goes. We've got our peak end. Yeah. Thank you. Or call this episode that as well. You can do that. You can say this is your favorite as well, if you prefer.

1:01:11Ooh, let's, ooh, ooh, ooh. Actually, no, don't do it. Tips from the, yeah. That was me just trying to get. There's some pressure on us now, isn't there? We've just done the, these are our top tips from three, four years, meeting the expert, like the world's best marketing experts. We're going to apply it to the launch of this episode. No pressure, mate. Do it for the other one. I'd be really interested. Yeah, yeah, yeah. That'd be kind of cool. Brilliant. Phil, it's been amazing, mate. Thank you so much. Thanks so much for having me on. I've really enjoyed it. Thank you very much for listening or watching Uncensored CMO.

1:01:35I hope you enjoyed that. If you did, please do hit the subscribe button wherever you get your podcast. If you're watching, hit subscribe there as well. I'd also love to get a review. Reviews make a big difference on other people discovering the show. So please do leave a review wherever you get your podcast. If you want to contact me, you can do. I'm over on x at Uncensored CMO or on LinkedIn, where I'm under my own name, John Evans. Thanks for listening and watching. I'll see you next time. Thank you.

From the publisher

Today I'm joined by Phill Agnew, senior product marketer at Buffer and host of Nudge, the only podcast dedicated to consumer psychology, and the other podcast that regularly hits the top spot of the UK marketing charts. In this episode we share 5 behavioural science "nudges" and 5 marketing lessons that we've taken from our respective podcasts and careers.

Links

Timestamps

00:00 - Intro
01:19 - How did Phill get into podcasting
04:03 - Bonus Nudge - The Halo Effect
06:29 - Nudge 5 - The Labour Illusion
09:40 - Marketing Lesson 5 - The Power of Getting Fired
13:25 - Nudge 4 - The Pratfall Effect
19:26 - Marketing Lesson 4 - The Power of Purpose
24:49 - Nudge 3 - The Curiosity Gap
30:03 - Marketing Lesson 3 - Be Distinctive
35:26 - Nudge 2 - Social Proof
41:14 - Marketing Lesson 2 - The Power of Creativity
45:10 - Nudge 1 - Fresh Start Date
48:59 - Marketing Lesson 1 - The Power of Consistency

More from Uncensored CMO

All 210 episodes
Top 10 marketing and behavioural science insights with Nudge host, Phill AgnewUncensored CMO · 1 h 2 min
Listen in VO