In short
Up First Podcast Episode Summary
Podcast Title
Up First from NPR
Episode Title
Public Opinion on Immigration, New Power Plant Rules, College Cost Sharing
Episode Date
June 12th
---
Episode Overview In this episode of *Up First*, the hosts, Steve Inskeep and Michelle Martin, discuss three significant stories impacting the U.S.:
- Public Opinion on Immigration
- Environmental Policy Changes on Power Plants
- Proposed College Financial Responsibilities
Each topic offers insights into current political sentiments, environmental regulations, and educational funding reforms.
---
Key Discussions
- Public Opinion on Immigration
- Overview: Polling indicates a divided public regarding President Trump's immigration policies, showing fluctuating support for deportation based on specifics surrounding the individuals affected.
- Public Voices:
- Stefano Forte (NY Young Republican Club): Advocates for a pause on immigration, claiming America is "full."
- George Pita: A Hispanic independent voter expressing mixed feelings about deportation practices.
- Julie Cantwell: Emphasizes the need to protect families while focusing on deporting violent criminals.
- Catherine Katari: Calls for a strong military presence to combat crime in her community.
- Polling Insights:
- A Gallup poll found 55% of Americans favor reducing immigration, the highest since 2001.
- Approval ratings for Trump's deportation policies are mixed; a CBS poll showed 54% approval, while a Quinnipiac poll showed 56% disapproval.
- Political Implications:
- There is volatility in public sentiment regarding immigration, indicating an opportunity for political messaging to sway opinions.
- Democrats struggle to find a strong stance on immigration, with signs of a shift towards a more cohesive message.
---
- Environmental Policy Changes on Power Plants
- Overview: The Trump administration plans to repeal existing limits on greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel power plants, a step seen as a move to bolster the fossil fuel industry.
- Key Points:
- EPA's Argument: Claims that U.S. power plants contribute minimally to global emissions (approximately 3%).
- Contradictory Evidence: Analysis suggests that U.S. power plants would rank among the top contributors to global pollution if considered a separate country.
- Industry Reactions:
- Environmental groups criticize the repeal as laughable given the significant stakes involved in climate change.
- Fossil fuel companies support the shift, aiming to exploit more domestic resources amidst growing climate concerns.
---
- Proposed College Financial Responsibilities
- Overview: A new proposal within a Republican megabill aims to hold colleges accountable for student loans by implementing a risk-sharing model.
- Proposal Details:
- Colleges would bear part of the financial responsibility for unpaid loans based on their students’ performance across various programs.
- Penalties incurred would be recycled into bonuses for schools that effectively serve low-income students.
- Expert Perspectives:
- There is general support for accountability measures; however, concerns exist about the feasibility and data requirements for implementation.
- Key worries include that the proposal does not account for loans that go into default, which could undermine its effectiveness.
- Targeted Institutions:
- For-profit colleges and certain expensive private institutions, like USC, may face significant penalties under this plan.
---
Conclusion This episode of *Up First* provides a concise yet thorough analysis of pressing issues related to immigration, environmental policy, and educational financial responsibility. The discussions highlight the complexities and varying public sentiments surrounding these topics, revealing the broader implications for American society and governance.
---
Closing For more insights, listeners are encouraged to subscribe to *Consider This*, another NPR news podcast that delves deeper into pressing stories.
---
Production Credits
- Editors: Dana Farrington, Neela Banerjee, Nicole Cohen, Lisa Thompson, Alice Woefle
- Producers: Ziad Buchh, Nia Dumas, Christopher Thomas
- Technical Support: Neisha Heinis, Carleigh Strange
---
For further engagement and updates, consider supporting NPR through donations or subscribing to their newsletter.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Polling on President Trump's immigration policy shows a divided country. Support for deportation changes depending on exactly who is being deported and how the government does it. What are the numbers? I'm Steve Inskeep with Michelle Martin, and this is Up First from NPR News. The Trump administration plans to get rid of limits on greenhouse gases emitted from power plants. The EPA says this step will help fulfill a promise to unleash American energy. Some disagree. This action would be pretty laughable if the stakes weren't so high. So what are those stakes? And the Republican megabill proposes putting colleges on the hook for their students' loans.
0:42Will the math add up? Stay with us. We'll give you the news you need to start your day.
0:52This message comes from NPR sponsor FX. Presenting The Lowdown, starring Ethan Hawke. introducing you to Lee Raybon, a quirky journalist slash rare bookstore owner slash unofficial truth seeker who is always on the tail of his latest conspiracy. This time, his most recent expose puts him head to head with a powerful family that rules Tulsa, meaning only one thing. He must be on to something big. FX's The Lowdown. All new Tuesdays on FX. Stream on Hulu. This message comes from Schwab. At Schwab, how you invest is your choice, not theirs. That's why when it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices.
1:35You can invest and trade on your own. Plus, get advice and more comprehensive wealth solutions to help meet your unique needs. With award-winning service, low costs, and transparent advice, you can manage your wealth your way at Schwab. Visit schwab.com to learn more. This message comes from NPR sponsor Rosetta Stone, an expert in language learning for 30 years. Right now, NPR listeners can get Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership to 25 different languages for 50 % off. Learn more at rosettastone.com slash NPR. President Trump won a second term in part because of what he had to say about immigration.
2:15Now the country is seeing exactly how the administration is following through. The president's actions have provoked a lot of protest, as we've been hearing all week, and also considerable support. And we're going to start with the voices of Americans who generally support the president. Stefano Forte is president of the New York Young Republican Club. He says on immigration... We need to take a pause, and then later on down the line, we can decide if we want to open the United States up. But for right now, the United States is full. In Miami, George Pita says he's an independent, that he voted for Trump, and he's torn down the middle.
2:48It's rough because I'm Hispanic myself, and I see my people being treated like this. I'm in agreement with having to deport massly because a lot of illegals did come through. I just don't like the way it's being done. Julie Cantwell is a Republican running for state representative in Rineyville, Kentucky. They want to deport, you know, the violent criminals. But, you know, a lot of people also feel that as strong Republicans, that we don't want to rip families apart because, you know, we do believe in family values. Catherine Katari, a longtime Republican voter in Brooklyn, says she would welcome the Marines to her city.
3:27I say, oorrah, simplify, oorrah, lead the National Guard, sit them down on the sidelines and bring the Marine Corps in. My son-in-law has a business in Soho. We work hard for everything. And you're breaking my window? Hell no. So for more on public opinion about immigration and politics, we're going to turn to NPR's senior political editor and correspondent Domenico Montanaro. Domenico, good morning. Hey, Michelle. So where does the polling stand on this and how has it changed over time? Well, whether or not people think immigration should increase or decrease, you know, tends to depend on the number of immigrants who cross the border illegally.
4:03You know, what I mean by this is that Gallup has been polling for decades about this sentiment and found last year, for example, that in its latest survey with this question in it, that 55 % of people wanted immigration to decreased. That's the highest it's been since 2001. And that was a very different political moment just after 9-11. But it was also the last time encounters at the southern border were as high as they were in the last couple of years. So President Trump has certainly made immigration a key part of his message. I mean, that's, you know, since his first run for the presidency.
4:33But how do people view how he is handling it now? Well, we've gotten some conflicting messages from poll respondents on this across various surveys. For example, just this week, a CBS poll found 54 % approved of his deportation policies. But just yesterday, a Quinnipiac poll showed 56 % disapprove. What that tells us for people who watch politics closely is that there's volatility in the numbers. And that means a certain percentage of people are open to being swayed. And that's when circumstances and political messaging here are really important. Okay, what kinds of circumstances? Well, Trump certainly is at risk of going too far, you know, just because overall people say that they're in favor of deporting those without permanent legal status.
5:14There's a difference between the kinds of hardened criminals that the administration said it would focus on and those who are hardworking members of communities and construction or restaurants or elsewhere. we've seen some pushback from within the president's own party even, warning that it should be cautious in how far they go. But cultural hardliners in the White House, like Stephen Miller, disagree. They have the president's ear, and they're going to focus on any violence as a result of the protests and try and make that the focus. And what about how the Democrats talk about this? What are you hearing about how they should be responding?
5:47Well, Democrats had really been having trouble finding their sea legs in talking about immigration. Trump focused on immigration during the campaign, Democrats lost, and some of them have shied away from making a strong case in favor of immigration. But in this moment, there seems to be some early signs of coalescing about how Democrats should talk about this. Joel Payne's a Democratic strategist. He says that he's starting to see some Democrats talk about it in a way that he thinks is politically palatable. The American people, I think, want a Democratic party that understands the value of managing the border, but also does not abandon the value of supporting and uplifting immigrant communities.
6:28Shoycott Chakrabarty is a former chief of staff to Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. He's running for Congress in San Francisco against former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He thinks in general that Democrats have to fight harder on most things, but on immigration, he said he thinks that the party and people like California Governor Gavin Newsom are striking the right tone. I don't think anybody in the country sees a mom getting picked up from a school pickup line by masked agents in unmarked vans and think, ah, yeah, that's what I voted for. That's what I want. That's humane. I don't think that matters if you're progressive, moderate or Republican.
7:01I think that's just basic common sense about where we want the country to be. You know, with the deportation policy shift toward workplaces, the narrative from Republicans is changing from one about border security to targeting criminals, which polls very well, to something very different. And the further Trump goes, Democrats feel like the easier it is for them to have a message and appear to be united on this. That is NPR's Domenico Montano. Domenico, thank you. You're welcome.
7:33The Trump administration plans to repeal limits on greenhouse gas pollution from the country's fossil fuel power plants. These are coal and gas generators, and they are the second largest source of climate-heating greenhouse gases behind transportation. Jeff Brady is here from NPR's Climate Desk with more. Good morning, Jeff. Hello, Michelle. So what is the Trump administration proposing? They are removing any responsibility that fossil fuel power plants have under current rules to help with reigning in climate change. If this rule is finalized, there will be no limits on greenhouse gases for existing coal-fired power plants and new gas-fired ones.
8:11And this is all part of President Trump's effort to move away from the climate policies of the Biden administration and refocus on exploiting more domestic fossil fuels. Here's Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin at yesterday's announcement. Rest assured, President Trump is the biggest supporter of clean, beautiful coal. We will use coal for power generation, to mine for critical minerals, and to export to our allies. Today, we are taking an important step towards putting America back on track. To justify lifting these limits on climate pollution, the EPA argues that U.S. power plants are a small and declining part of global greenhouse gas emissions, around 3%.
8:53So the agency argues they're no longer a significant contributor to the problem. But, you know, I recently looked at one analysis that showed if U.S. power plants were a country, they'd be the sixth largest contributor to global climate change or global climate pollution, really. I see it. So what kind of reaction is this getting from the fossil fuel industry on the one hand and environmental groups on the other? I talked with Meredith Hankins, an attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council. This action would be pretty laughable if the stakes weren't so high. This administration is actually trying to argue that the largest industrial source of carbon pollution is somehow insignificant to the problem of climate change.
9:36Hengins and others say the Trump administration is propping up the coal industry at a time when Americans are experiencing the effects of a hotter planet. You know, more intense storms, flooding, heat waves and wildfires. Coal and gas companies, though, you know, they're big fans of the Trump administration's energy policies, including this one. And like the president, they see opportunity in tapping more of the country's fossil fuel reserves. And so where does this leave the U.S. in the global fight against climate change? These power plant rules have gone through a couple of different evolutions.
10:07They started with President Barack Obama's Clean Power Plan back in 2015. His administration took that proposal to the United Nations climate meeting in Paris that year to show that the U.S. was serious about addressing greenhouse gas pollution and to encourage other countries to sign the landmark Paris Climate Agreement, which, of course, they did. In that agreement, countries laid out how they're going to reduce their climate pollution to avoid the worst effects of a hotter planet. And Trump is once again removing the U.S. from the Paris Agreement. Repealing these limits on power plants is part of that withdrawal from the global fight against climate change.
10:41So what happens next with these power plant rules that the EPA has proposed? There's going to be a comment period, maybe a rule by the end of the year. And shortly after that, I suspect they're going to be challenged in court. That's NPR's Jeff Brady. Jeff, thank you. Thank you.
11:01Tucked inside House Republicans' mega bill is a bold idea to hold colleges accountable for student loans. The concept is called risk sharing. The college has to share the risk. The proposal would order colleges to assume some financial responsibility for the debt that their students do not pay off. The Congressional Budget Office estimates this full proposal could save the government more than$6 billion over the next decade if it gets through the Senate. With us now to talk more about this is NPR education correspondent Corey Turner. Corey, good morning. Good morning, Michelle. So how exactly do House Republicans want to hold colleges accountable here?
11:38Well, the proposal would divide up a school's student loan borrowers by program. So imagine separating English majors from biology or computer science majors. and then they'd calculate for each program in a given year how much borrowers were supposed to pay toward their federal student loans but didn't. After some more pretty complicated math, colleges would then have to reimburse the federal government for a share of that unpaid student loan debt. And Michelle, there's one extra twist here, which is that these penalties would then be recycled into bonuses to reward the schools that give low-income students the biggest bang for their buck.
12:18So, Corey, you talk to sort of experts who look at things like college financing all the time. What are they saying about this? Yeah, so there is pretty broad consensus around the idea that we need some kind of accountability for colleges. But I heard several really key worries about this plan. One of them is that it would require a ton of data. And the education department, which would have to collect it, has half the staff that it had before President Trump took office. There's another problem I heard with the math behind these school penalties. Dominique Baker at the University of Delaware says the math has a hole in it.
12:55The amount that would get charged for this would not include loan balances that were in default, which is very odd. That's right. The plan to punish schools for burying students in debt would exclude loans once they go into default. Multiple experts told me, Michelle, this was likely done out of fear that including defaults would basically make the penalties too painful for some schools. So do we know which colleges would be hardest hit by these changes? Yeah, we have some idea. The conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute has been crunching the numbers and estimates the schools on the hook for some of the biggest penalties would mostly fall into two categories.
13:38You've got the for-profit college chains like Strayer University and University of Phoenix, and then big private nonprofit schools, including the University of Southern California, or USC. Not because of their undergraduate debt, but because of their popular high-priced grad programs. So before I let you go, what are the chances of this plan getting through Congress? Well, I mean, it needs a simple majority to get through the Senate, but earlier this week, Republicans there released their own version of college accountability. So basically, like everything else in this bill, House and Senate Republicans are going to have to find a middle ground or give up on the idea.
14:16That is NPR's Corey Turner. Corey, thank you. You're welcome.
14:23And that's Up First for Thursday, June 12th. I'm Michelle Martin. And I'm Stephen Scape. For your next listen, Consider Consider This from NPR News. Up First gives you three big stories of the day. Consider This dives into a single news story and what it means to you in less than 15 minutes. Listen now on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. Today's episode of Up First was edited by Dana Farrington, Neela Banerjee, Nicole Cohen, Lisa Thompson, and Alice Wolfley. It was produced by Zia Bunch, Nia Dumas, and Christopher Thomas. We get engineering support from Nisha Hainas, and our technical director is Carly Strange.
14:55We hope you'll join us again tomorrow.
15:07This message comes from Michelin. More than a tire company, Michelin is an innovation company. Now taking on space, developing an airless wheel for space exploration. Motion for life. More at michelinman.com slash y hyphen Michelin slash innovation. Support for NPR and the following message come from Texas Mutual Insurance Company. They are committed to helping policyholders build strong and thriving businesses through their exceptional service. More at TexasMutual.com slash TexansDeliver. Texas Mutual. Texans get it. This message comes from Michelin. More than a tire company, Michelin is an innovation company.
15:51From connected mobility to clean materials. and now taking on one of the toughest mobility challenges, space. Developing an airless wheel for space exploration designed to withstand the extreme conditions at the moon's south pole, Michelin isn't just making exceptional tires, they're helping build a better future. Motion for life. More at michelinman.com slash y hyphen Michelin slash innovation.
From the publisher
Want more comprehensive analysis of the most important news of the day, plus a little fun? Subscribe to the Up First newsletter.
Today's episode of Up First was edited by Dana Farrington, Neela Banerjee, Nicole Cohen, Lisa Thomson and Alice Woefle. It was produced by Ziad Buchh, Nia Dumas and Christopher Thomas. We get engineering support from Neisha Heinis and our technical director is Carleigh Strange
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy
