In short
Up First Podcast - Episode Summary
Podcast Title: Up First from NPR Episode Title: Trump And Iran, Iran's Nuclear Program, ICE Farm Raids Continue Release Date: [Insert Date Here] Hosts: Leila Fadel, Steve Inskeep, A Martinez Episode Duration: 10 minutes
Episode Overview This episode of NPR's Up First discusses three significant news stories: President Trump's rhetoric towards Iran, the conflicting views on Iran's nuclear program, and ongoing immigration enforcement related to agricultural workers in the U.S.
Key Stories Covered
- Trump's Position on Iran
- Escalating Rhetoric:
- President Trump is increasingly aligning himself with Israel regarding military actions against Iran.
- He has stated that Iran "cannot have a nuclear weapon" and hinted at possible U.S. military involvement.
- Domestic Political Implications:
- Trump's shift raises concerns among his political allies who fear entanglement in a foreign conflict, opposing his "America First" campaign stance.
- Mixed Reactions:
- Some conservative allies, including Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon, urge Trump to avoid involvement.
- Trump has pushed back against these criticisms, claiming Iran is close to developing nuclear capabilities.
- Conflicting Views on Iran's Nuclear Program
- Israeli vs. U.S. Intelligence:
- Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu claims Iran is progressing rapidly towards nuclear armament.
- U.S. intelligence reports suggest that Iran suspended its nuclear weapons program over 20 years ago.
- Expert Opinions:
- The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirms Iran has enriched uranium but not to weapons-grade levels.
- Current discussions revolve around the potential for a U.S. military strike on Iran’s fortified nuclear facilities.
- Military Capabilities:
- The U.S. possesses advanced bunker-busting bombs capable of targeting deep underground facilities, but effectiveness remains uncertain.
- Immigration Raids and Enforcement
- Ongoing Raids:
- The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) confirms continued enforcement actions targeting industries reliant on undocumented workers, particularly in agriculture and construction.
- Reactions from the Agricultural Sector:
- Farmers express concerns about losing their workforce through ICE raids, which have already led to arrests at various work sites.
- Mixed Signals from the Administration:
- President Trump has voiced support for protecting undocumented agricultural workers, but DHS enforces strict immigration policies, leading to uncertainty among employers and workers.
Key Takeaways
- Potential U.S. Military Involvement in Iran:
- Trump's dialogue signifies a potential shift towards increased U.S. military action, raising concerns among supporters who prioritize avoiding foreign conflicts.
- Iran's Nuclear Capability Debate:
- Disparities between Israeli claims and U.S. intelligence regarding Iran's nuclear ambitions highlight the complexity of the issue.
- Impact of Immigration Policy:
- The strain of immigration enforcement on industries that rely on undocumented labor underscores a significant conflict in U.S. immigration policy.
Conclusion In this episode of Up First, the convergence of foreign policy, national security, and immigration enforcement reflect the nuanced challenges facing the Trump administration. The discussions emphasize the need for clarity and consistency in policy-making amid conflicting perspectives from allies and industries.
Production Credits
- Editors: Dana Farrington, Andrew Sussman, Anna Yukhananov, Janaya Williams, Alice Woelfle
- Producers: Ziad Buchh, Claire Murashima, Christopher Thomas
- Technical Support: Stacey Abbott, Carleigh Strange
--- Note: For further details and in-depth analysis, listeners are encouraged to subscribe to the Up First newsletter and follow the podcast for daily updates.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02President Trump campaigned to get the United States out of foreign wars. He's now considering whether to join Israel's campaign against Iran. What are the risks abroad and the political costs at home? I'm Stephen Skeep with A. Martinez, and this is Up First from NPR News.
0:21Israel asserts that Iran is making a big new push to make a nuclear bomb and that they're on the verge of success. The U.S. intelligence community has said otherwise. They assert that Iran suspended its weapons program more than 20 years ago, so who's right? And the White House is sending mixed messages about how it'll enforce immigration orders for agricultural workers. President Trump promised to find solutions for farmers, but ICE officers are still targeting workplaces such as meatpacking plants and dairy farms. Stay with us. We've got all the news you need to start your day.
0:56This message comes from NPR sponsor FX presenting The Lowdown, starring Ethan Hawke, introducing you to Lee Raybon. A quirky journalist slash rare bookstore owner slash unofficial truth seeker who is always on the tail of his latest conspiracy. This time, his most recent expose puts him head to head with a powerful family that rules Tulsa, meaning only one thing. He must be on to something big. FX's The Lowdown. All new Tuesdays on FX. Stream on Hulu. This message comes from Mattress Firm. Tossing, turning, and waking up drenched. Sleeping hot can ruin your night and leave you feeling off the next day, too.
1:38Mattress Firm can help you finally cool things down. Their sleep experts will match you to the right cooling mattress like the Temper Breeze. This collection has advanced technology to deliver unmatched cooling comfort for deeper ease. For the great sleep you deserve, visit Mattress Firm and upgrade to cooling comfort. They make sleep easy. Support for NPR and the following message come from Washington Wise. Decisions made in Washington can affect your portfolio every day. Washington Wise from Charles Schwab is an original podcast that unpacks the stories making news and how they may affect your finances and portfolio.
2:14Host Mike Townsend and his guests explore policy initiatives for retirement savings, taxes, trade and more. Download the latest episode and follow at schwab.com slash Washington Wise or wherever you listen. President Trump once distanced himself from Israel's military action. Now he's taking some ownership. The president is talking in terms of we when he discusses Israel's war against Iran. He's even saying the United States could take out, his words, the supreme leader of Iran, calling Ayatollah the Khamenei an easy target who is only safe for now. The president has faced some pushback from his own political allies who oppose American involvement.
2:52NPR White House correspondent Franco Ordonez has been covering this. So, Franco, President Trump spent the afternoon yesterday with his national security team in the Situation Room. What are the chances of deeper United States involvement here? Yeah, A, that's the big question. And that was being debated in the Situation Room, you know, the future of U.S. action in this conflict. I mean, Trump has repeatedly said all options are on the table. He's drawn a red line if soldiers are targeted. But he's also signaling the U.S. is already more involved than the White House previously let on. Just as Steve was pointing out, he's boasting that, quote, we now have total, complete control of the skies over Iran.
3:29He's saying we know where the supreme leader is. I mean, he's repeatedly using that word we, blurring the line between Israel's objective and U.S. objectives. You know, and taking that kind of ownership has really raised more concerns of the U.S. getting more involved into another foreign conflict. Yeah, so that's interesting because some of the people who are most concerned about foreign involvement are allies of President Trump. So tell us more about this friction. Yeah, for someone who has such dedicated supporters, it's really notable that some of Trump's longtime backers are questioning his judgment here.
4:01Trump, of course, has long been known for his America First message. And some key conservative allies, such as former Fox News host Tucker Carlson and Trump's former White House aide Steve Bannon, see Trump straying from America First and are pressing him to stay out of this fight. Here's Carlson explaining his position on Bannon's podcast War Room. My interest is really simple. I don't want the United States enmeshed in another Middle Eastern war that doesn't serve our interests. Now, Trump campaigned on ending long wars, peace through strength, he would say. I also spoke with Brett Bruin, who served as the White House Director of Global Engagement in the Obama administration.
4:38He said Trump supporters thought they were getting a president who was going to disentangle the U.S. from overseas commitments. What they're seeing, however, is a president who is getting pulled back in to a foreign crisis that another country started and that the U.S. interests remain somewhat questionable. Okay, so how is President Trump responding to these criticisms? Well, he's pushing back, especially against Carlson. Trump posted on social media, quote, somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Vice President J.D. Vance has also weighed in on social media, saying Trump has shown restraint, but that Trump has right to decide whether to take further action to end Iranian enrichment.
5:26You know, you mentioned enrichment. I remember like a few weeks ago, Trump had actually been talking about a deal right before the most recent strike. So does this latest stance mean that that diplomacy is now completely over? Yeah, I mean, right now, Trump doesn't appear to be interested in diplomacy. He told reporters he's not in the mood to negotiate. What we don't know is whether at the same time this tough talk is part of his strategy to further pressure Iran, because he's also said he may send Vance and Special Envoy Steve Whitcoff to negotiate, though perhaps not right now. All right, that's a White House correspondent, Franco Ordonez.
6:01Thanks a lot. Thanks, Abe. All right, now we're going to take a closer look at Iran's nuclear program. Which matters a lot here because Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he ordered the attack on Iran because he believed Iran was marching very quickly toward a nuclear weapon. The U.S. intelligence community has been saying something else. It says Iran suspended its nuclear weapons program more than two decades ago and has never reversed that assessment. So who's right? To sort this out, we've called on NPR national security correspondent Greg Myrie. So Greg, there are clips, video clips of Benjamin Netanyahu saying that Iran is close to producing nuclear bombs.
6:36Those clips go back 30 years to 1995. Can you lay out the conflicting arguments here? Yeah, so Netanyahu has been saying time and again that Iran is on the verge of a bomb. And he's saying he ordered the attack now because Israel believes Iran was making a big new push to get there rapidly. He didn't provide details, but he claimed the intelligence was clear and was shared with the U.S. Now, the U.S. intelligence community has had a very different position. It says Iran suspended its weapons program back in 2003. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard stated this in congressional testimony in March, said Iran was still enriching uranium.
7:16But nothing really new. This was very familiar ground. Now Trump has contradicted Gabbard saying, quote, I don't care what she said. I think they, meaning the Iranians, were very close to having it. But here's the other thing, too, because international inspectors have been monitoring Iran's program for a long time, for years. So what do they have to say? Yeah, the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency, says Iran has enriched quite a bit of uranium to 60 percent purity. You need to get to 90 percent purity before it's considered weapons grade. But that change, that upgrade can be done very quickly.
7:54If Iran did this, it would have enough uranium to make around 10 nuclear weapons. Iran would still need to take several additional steps to make an actual bomb. Most experts think we're talking about a matter of months, though. And now, of course, everything is changing by the day. Israel has already hit a number of nuclear sites, and it's hard to make a full assessment at this point. Then if the U.S. decides to actually attack Iran, what action would it take? Israel wants the U.S. to do one big thing, And that's used its massive bunker-busting bombs to hit the Fordow nuclear facility, which has this enriched uranium.
8:32Now, this is a major challenge because Fordow is built into a mountainside, which is a little over 100 miles south of Tehran. If the U.S. strikes, the thinking is it would use this bomb that weighs 30 ,000 pounds, 15 tons. It's formally known as the GBU-57 or the Massive Ordnance Penetrator. It's so massive that only one U.S. plane can carry it, the B-2 bomber. And, you know, Israel relies almost entirely on U.S. planes and U.S. bombs, but it doesn't have this bomb or this plane. And Israel has repeatedly requested this weapon from the U.S., but the U.S. has always declined. So do we know if this bomb would, in fact, destroy a nuclear facility protected by a mountain?
9:19Yeah, that's an open question. We just don't know for sure, and there's lots of variables. The nuclear facility is believed to be about 300 feet under the mountain, and this is a mountain that consists of very hard rock, meaning it could be difficult to penetrate. Israel says it's taking control over the skies of Tehran, so U.S. planes could likely approach this nuclear facility facing little or no threat, but it's just not clear whether the site could be completely destroyed. It could take multiple bombing runs, and there are no guarantees this would be the outcome. All right, that's NPR's Greg Myrie.
9:53Thanks, Greg. Sure thing.
10:02Some other news now, a kind of clarification. The Department of Homeland Security says it is still targeting industries that employ lots of people without legal status. Employers in agriculture, construction, hospitality have worried about losing their workforces to immigration raids. And several raids last week heightened their concern. And even President Trump said he worried about losing, quote, very good longtime workers. Now DHS has clarified what they intend to do. NPR immigration policy reporter Jimena Bastillo is in our studios. Good to see you. Good morning. Is the administration acting on the president's concern by calling off some enforcement?
10:37You know, there really has been a lot of inconsistent messaging. And that really stems from there's two schools of thoughts, primarily within the Republican Party, on how to handle workers without legal status. The first faction is really understanding that their communities and industries are heavily reliant on workers without legal status and that if those workers were just to go away, entire local economies and supply chains would fall apart. And these are in areas that are very red, Republican and industries that generally back the president. But then there's this other group and it's the part of the base that wants to increase deportations no matter what, no matter who.
11:15And these are the folks that hold very high level positions within the administration, thinking like White House boarders are Tom Homan, Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. They're pushing immigration officials to arrest up to 3 ,000 people a day in order to achieve the president's goal of mass deportations. OK, so that's the conflict. What has actually been happening on the ground? So until recently, the agriculture sector had generally been left alone. But then last week, we saw several instances of immigration officers arresting and targeting the ag sector, particularly 70 people were arrested at a meatpacking plant in Nebraska.
11:54Several farms got targeted in California and a dairy farm in New Mexico as well. And that really sent employers and workers into high alert. The next day, President Trump once again promised to find solutions for farmers specifically, posting on Truth Social that these workers needed to be protected. But then again this week, we're seeing the Department of Homeland Security double down again, kind of a bit of a whiplash for this industry. Assistant Secretary of Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin has said that there's no safe spaces for industries who, quote, harbor violent criminals and that worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of their efforts.
12:31Meaning that these rates can go ahead. Anybody can be targeted at any time. Correct. So how are employers and employees preparing for that? So advocates representing employers have told me that they continue to be concerned. You know, they underscore that they want to follow the law and many times they believe that they are. But they say that even if they think all their employees have work authorization, they know that doesn't mean their families or their friends or people in their communities have legal status. And that is what leads us into what the administration is calling collateral arrests, which means if one person is targeted, anyone that happens to be around them at the time that they're arrested also gets arrested if they have, you know, lack legal status or something needs to be questioned.
13:15You know, we still don't know what the White House's solutions are for the farming industry, despite months of promises that there will be something. But that also means there will be continued pressure on, you know, coming from some of these key industries in the United States that could be a hurdle for what the president wants to do. NPR's Jimena Bastillo, thanks for the update. Thank you.
13:38And that's Up First for Wednesday, June 18th. I'm Amy Martinez. And I'm Steve Inskeep. Your next listen is Consider This from NPR News. Up First gives you three big stories of the day. Consider This drills down on one. Listen now on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. Today's episode of Up First was edited by Dana Farrington, Andrew Sussman, Anna Yukoninov, Alice Wolfley, and Jenea Williams. It was produced by Zia Butch, Claire Murashima, and Christopher Thomas. We get engineering support from Stacey Abbott. Our technical director is Carly Strange. Join us again tomorrow.
14:23This message comes from Charles Schwab. When it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices, like full-service wealth management and advice when you need it. You can also invest on your own and trade on Think or Swim. Visit schwab.com to learn more. Support for NPR and the following message come from Rosetta Stone, the perfect app to achieve your language learning goals no matter how busy your schedule gets. It's designed to maximize study time with immersive 10-minute lessons and audio practice for your commute. Plus, tailor your learning plan for specific objectives like travel.
14:56Get Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership for 50 % off and unlimited access to 25 language courses. Learn more at rosettastone.com slash NPR. This message comes from Michelin. More than a tire company, Michelin is an innovation company. Now taking on space, developing an airless wheel for space exploration. Motion for life. More at michelinman.com slash y hyphen michelin slash innovation.
From the publisher
Want more comprehensive analysis of the most important news of the day, plus a little fun? Subscribe to the Up First newsletter.
Today's episode of Up First was edited by Dana Farrington, Andrew Sussman, Anna Yukhananov, Janaya Williams and Alice Woelfle. It was produced by Ziad Buchh, Claire Murashima and Christopher Thomas. We get engineering support from Stacey Abbott. And our technical director is Carleigh Strange.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy
