Zelenskyy and Peace Promises, Abrego Garcia Release, Indiana Rejects Redistricting

12 Dec 2025 · 13 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Up First from NPR

Episode Title: Zelenskyy and Peace Promises, Abrego Garcia Release, Indiana Rejects Redistricting Release Date: December 12th

Episode Overview

This episode of *Up First* covers three main stories

  1. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's position on elections and territorial concessions to Russia.
  2. The release of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a man deported by the Trump administration.
  3. Indiana Republicans' rejection of a contentious redistricting proposal.

---

Key Stories

  1. Zelenskyy's Conditions for Peace
  2. Context: President Zelenskyy expresses willingness to hold elections in Ukraine if security can be ensured by the U.S. and allies.
  3. Territorial Concessions: Zelenskyy suggests that any discussions about territorial surrender to Russia must be conducted through a referendum, allowing Ukrainian citizens to decide.
  4. Pressure from Trump: The Trump administration's push for Ukraine to concede territory has influenced Zelenskyy's position, demonstrating a balancing act between negotiating peace and maintaining national integrity.
  5. Concerns Over Elections:
  6. Ukraine is currently under martial law, which prohibits elections.
  7. Public opinion indicates skepticism towards holding elections during wartime, with concerns about logistical and security challenges.
  8. Recent polls suggest that, if elections were held, Zelenskyy would maintain strong support among voters.
  1. Kilmar Abrego Garcia's Release
  2. Background: Abrego Garcia was illegally deported to El Salvador and faced a court ruling that deemed his previous deportation unlawful.
  3. Legal Proceedings: A judge criticized the government's arguments for keeping him detained and ruled in favor of his release.
  4. Government Appeal: The Trump administration intends to appeal the court's decision, continuing to create tensions between the executive branch and judicial rulings on immigration enforcement.
  5. Political Ramifications: Abrego Garcia's case has become emblematic of the broader immigration policy debates under the Trump administration, raising questions about compliance with court orders and the treatment of deportees.
  1. Indiana's Rejection of Redistricting
  2. Context: Indiana Republicans defied President Trump's directives to redraw congressional maps to benefit Republican candidates ahead of the midterm elections, contrasting with actions taken in other states like Texas and North Carolina.
  3. Vote Outcome: The proposed redistricting failed with a considerable bipartisan opposition, with many Republican senators expressing that such moves compromise electoral integrity.
  4. Political Influence: Trump's attempts to influence state lawmakers included threats of primary challenges against dissenting Republicans, illustrating the ongoing tension between local governance and federal party alignment.

---

Analysis and Discussion

  • Zelenskyy's Strategy: The Ukrainian president's navigation of domestic pressure and foreign influence underscores the complexities of war-time governance and public sentiment.
  • Abrego Garcia's Case Impact: His release highlights ongoing issues within U.S. immigration policy and enforcement, particularly the intersection of judicial authority and executive discretion.
  • Redistricting Conflict: Indiana's decision represents a significant moment in state politics, reflecting broader national trends of gerrymandering and the contentious nature of political maneuvering in the face of federal pressure.

---

Conclusion Today's episode of *Up First* provides insight into the overlapping spheres of international politics, immigration law, and state governance, revealing the intricate dynamics at play in current affairs.

Next Episode: Listeners are encouraged to tune in for further developments and discussions in upcoming episodes, including interviews and deeper dives into featured stories.

---

This summary encapsulates the essential discussions and implications of the key stories presented in the episode, providing context and analysis for listeners seeking to understand the broader implications of these events.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:02Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky says he is willing to hold elections. He is also willing to discuss giving up territory to Russia, but only if Ukrainians vote for it. How would that work? I'm Michelle Martin with Steve Inskeep, and this is Up First from NPR News. A man illegally deported by the Trump administration in March, and eventually returned, is now free from immigration custody. The Trump administration says it will appeal Kilmar Obrego Garcia's court-ordered release. Plus, Republicans in Indiana reject a redistricting proposal. Trump successfully pushed other states to help Republicans win next year's midterm elections.

0:40So why did Indiana's Republicans break with the president? Stay with us for the news you need to start your day.

1:06on cold medications, decongestants, and more. Easily compare prescription prices and find discounts up to 80%. GoodRx is not insurance, but works with or without it and could beat your copay price. Save on cold and flu prescriptions at goodrx.com slash upfirst. This message comes from NPR sponsor Odoo. Some describe Odoo like a magic beanstalk because it scales with you and is magically affordable. Odoo, exactly what a business needs. Sign up at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com. This message comes from Progressive Insurance. Fiscally responsible. Financial geniuses. Monetary magicians. These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to Progressive and save hundreds.

1:52Visit Progressive.com to see if you could save. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states or situations. Ukraine's president has an answer to pressure from the Trump administration. The U.S. wants Ukraine to surrender territory as part of a peace deal with Russia. Volodymyr Zelensky says for that to happen, the Ukrainian people would have to speak through a referendum. Zelensky and other Europeans are offering answers and alternatives to Trump's bid to end the war. The U.S. approach seems to favor Russia, although Russia has not accepted that either.

2:25NPR's Joanna Kikis is in Kiev as she has been through much of this war, and she's with us now. Good morning, Joanna. Anna. Good morning, Michelle. Why would Zelensky talk about elections now? Well, he is responding to pressure from President Trump, and he's also trying to work with Europeans. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Thursday that they are proposing a ceasefire that would be backed by strong security guarantees for Ukraine and Europe. He also said that Ukraine is willing to discuss territorial concessions, but that Trump must understand that the final decision is up to Ukrainians.

2:54Here's Merz.

2:59He's saying it would be a mistake to force the Ukrainian president into a peace that his people will not accept after four years of suffering and death. And then Zelensky says there would have to be a vote. Why say that? Well, Zelensky has been walking something of a tightrope, but he is engaging with even the most painful proposals by the Trump administration to show that Ukraine is negotiating in good faith. At the same time, he knows giving up territory has always been a red line for Ukrainians. You know, and this is interesting because Trump has been saying that Ukraine should hold elections.

3:29How does that fit in? Well, Trump said recently that Zelensky's government is using the war to avoid elections. And this echoes what the Kremlin has been saying, which they say Zelensky is not a legitimate president because his term expired last year. But there is also a good reason that there have not been Ukrainian elections. Ukraine is under martial law because of Russia's invasion. And Ukraine's constitution forbids holding elections during wartime. Nevertheless, Zelensky said he is examining the possibility of elections over the next 90 days, or even a referendum, on giving up parts of eastern Ukraine in exchange for ending the war.

4:08He's saying if this is something our key partner in Washington wants, we have to look into it. So could elections in Ukraine be imminent? Well, there are many obstacles to that. Ivana Klimpush-Tonsada, she's a member of Ukraine's parliament, she told me about a legal obstacle. During the martial law, it is prohibited to change the constitution. It's just like purely stated in law and in the constitution. And then she says there are huge logistical challenges like how four million Ukrainian refugees could vote or how soldiers on the front line could vote. Right. To that end, imagine security is a major issue.

4:43Yes, absolutely. Public opinion polls show most Ukrainians think holding elections now is actually a terrible idea. Yulia Kriip, who works in customer service here in Kiev, she told us Russia could attack voting precincts. It's very possible that they attack because they attack us every day. We have to gather many people in one place. It's dangerous. Now, Zelensky says elections could only happen during a ceasefire and with security guarantees from the West. And, Michelle, if elections were held soon, sometime soon, public opinion polls showed that Zelensky would still come in first. That is. And, Piazza, Joanna Kikis is in Kiev.

5:24Joanna, thank you so much. You're welcome.

5:35Kilmar Abrego-Garcia is walking free. He is the man illegally deported by the Trump administration in March and eventually returned. return. Abrego Garcia was released on Thursday. A judge ruled the government had not been able to produce a lawful order to remove him from the country. This ruling came just as lawmakers have been pressing the Homeland Security Secretary about President Trump's compliance with court orders. NPR's Jimena Bustio has been tracking this and she is with us now. Good morning, Jimena. Good morning. Tell us about how the judge who presided over this case explained her decision.

6:07Judge Paula Zinni of Maryland said that the government's arguments to keep him detained were, quote, troubling and that he had no current pending removal order to justify keeping him detained. Remember, this was a man who'd been living in the U.S. for more than 10 years. In 2019, an immigration judge had ruled that Abrego Garcia could not be removed to El Salvador, where he had argued that he could be tortured or persecuted. Then he was arrested and detained by immigration officers in Maryland earlier this year. But the Trump administration deported him to El Salvador, sending him to a notorious prison there.

6:41After months of public outcry, the administration brought Abrego Garcia back and immediately charged him with human smuggling in a separate case. He has pleaded not guilty to those charges. Now, government lawyers have also tried and failed to convince Zinis that they are trying to deport him to a third country like Uganda or Eswatini, but they haven't done so. So what's next in his case? So the White House has said that it will appeal, and lawyers for Abrego Garcia called the order to release him an extraordinary victory for their client and for due process. You know, Jimena, this seems like a lot of back and forth over one person.

7:17So how has the government justified its actions? A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security called the order, quote, naked judicial activism. Abrego Garcia has become one of the symbols of the Trump administration's fight with the judicial branch of government. Democrats say that it's an example of the administration going too far. Kristi Noem, the Homeland Security Secretary, happened to be testifying yesterday at a congressional hearing on worldwide threats. But Democrats took the opportunity to press her on domestic immigration enforcement and the following of court orders. Representative Sharif Anadar asked if she would comply with court orders, and here's how Noem responded.

7:56The Department of Homeland Security and this administration complies with all federal court orders. We always have and we always... Not true. and we will continue to appeal. The administration has consistently clashed with judges this year, especially on issues related to immigration. And I understand that lawmakers pressed Noam on other issues as well yesterday. What were they? Democrats raised numerous examples about how they believe the administration has overstepped its authority. Present in the audience were family members of people who had been deported or put in detention, invited there by Democrats as examples of the impact of immigration enforcement.

8:28Noam at one point turned to a man present at the hearing, and she said she would look into the case of his wife, an Irish woman who is detained. Democrats argue that she is in the U.S. legally, and her only criminal record is writing a$25 bad check 10 years ago. The administration has said it wants to remove anyone with a criminal record. Noam and Republicans doubled down on the administration's policies. Noam said she believed that the biggest threat to national security are the immigrants who entered the U.S. under former President Biden. Her department is reopening the cases of refugees who were admitted under Biden and is calling for a review of asylum applications during that time, too.

9:09So we're seeing enforcement focus on those here illegally and some legal categories, too. That is NPR's Ximena Bustillo. Ximena, thank you. Thank you.

9:24President Trump's nationwide effort to reshape the midterm elections in favor of Republicans has succeeded in Texas, Missouri, North Carolina, but not in Indiana. Yeah, Republicans in those other states obeyed the president's order to skew the elections in Republicans' favor. Republican state senators in my home state decided otherwise. The president and his allies threatened consequences for Indiana if they did not submit. After enough lawmakers ignored him, Trump minimized his defeat. Well, we won every other state. That's the only state. It's funny because I won Indiana all three times by a landslide.

9:59And I wasn't working on it very hard. Would have been nice. I think we would have picked up two seats if we did that. For more on this, we're joined by Ben Thorpe of WFYI in Indianapolis. Good morning, Ben. Good morning. And you were there. So thanks for getting up early because you were there in the state capitol pretty late. So tell us about the vote. Yeah, it was very suspenseful. There were protesters against redistricting in the capitol, and you could kind of hear them as senators debated for over three hours. The outcome, I think, was really unknown. And in the end, the redistricting bill failed by a vote of only 19 in favor and 31 opposed.

10:33It's important to mention that the Indiana Senate is heavily Republican. So of those 31 opposed, 21 were Republicans. Here's one of them. This is State Senator Spencer Deary, who said that redistricting just to get political gain went against his conservative values. I see no justification that outweighs the harms it would inflict upon the people's faith in the integrity of our elections and our system of government. He said he'd fight with, quote, his last breath to prevent the federal government from bullying a state. Others just said their constituents did not want this. So that state senator called it bullying.

11:09The Trump administration probably called it trying to be persuasive. So what did they do to try to steer this the president's way? Yeah, so it started months ago. Indiana lawmakers were brought to the White House. Vice President Vance went to Indiana. In fact, during the debate, Vance tweeted that Senate President Pro Tem Roger Bray was being dishonest in trying to defeat this bill. And Bray did ultimately vote against it. Trump and Republican Governor Mike Braun here threatened to back primary challenges against senators who didn't get on board. And the president's son, Donald Trump Jr., tweeted yesterday that he would come campaign here against them.

11:44You heard some of what Trump said there at the top. He also said he'd support someone to run against Bray. For his part, the governor Braun warned that, quote, decisions like this are going to carry political consequences. And what would this redistricting have done? Yeah, the state has seven Republican members of the House and two Democrats now. This would have redrawn the lines to help flip those last two seats. Supporters said it was legal, even though redistricting is normally done after the census at the start of the decade. They said Democratic-led states have gerrymandered like that in the past.

12:16But opponents said it would have divided up minority voters here in Indianapolis and put them in districts where their votes would be outnumbered by suburban and rural voters, basically diluting their vote. So where does President Trump's redistricting efforts stand now? So far, Republicans have been able to tilt a couple more seats their way than Democrats. Texas redistricted to help the GOP win maybe five seats there. Missouri and North Carolina each did one seat. California Democrats have countered by tilting five seats their way. But the question now is whether Republicans in other states where this is being considered, like Florida and Kansas, will go ahead with redistricting.

12:52That is Ben Thorpe in Indianapolis. Ben, thank you. Thank you so much.

13:00And that's up first for Friday, December 12th. I'm Michelle Martin. And I'm Steve Inskeep. On the radio, on Morning Edition, we're interviewing retired U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman about Ukraine's position on the battlefield, following up on the story you heard a moment ago. Also, the topic of this week's Sunday story is whether a platonic best friend can also be a life partner. Weekend Edition and Sunday story host Ayesha Roscoe has something to say about that. This year, she bought a house with her bestie, and together they are co-parenting their five kids. You know, some people say, is it like the Brady Bunch?

13:34Well, a little bit, because it really is a blended family. This weekend on The Sunday Story, a conversation between Aisha and author Raina Cohen about what happens when you put friendship at the center of your life. Listen to The Sunday Story right here on NPR's Up First podcast. Wow, wow, I want to hear that. Today's Up First was edited by Kate Bartlett, Anna Yukoninoff, Larry Kaplow, Alice Wolfley, and Arzu Rezvani. It was produced by Ziad Bocz, Nia Dumas, and Christopher Thomas. We get engineering support from the ever-supportive Stacey Abbott, and our technical director is the very direct Carly Strange.

14:06Our executive producer is Jay Shaler. Join us Monday. This message comes from Mint Mobile. Starting at$15 a month, make the switch at mintmobile.com slash switch. $45 upfront payment for three months. 5-gigabyte plan equivalent to$15 a month. Taxes and fees extra. First three months only. See terms. This message comes from GiveWell. When you give to a non-profit, how do you measure success? What is the real impact on people's lives? GiveWell researches the highest impact opportunities around the world. Over 150 ,000 donors have confidently used GiveWell's research, collectively saving an estimated 300 ,000 lives.

14:45Make a tax-deductible donation at givewell.org. First-time donors can have their donation matched up to$100 as long as matching funds last. Select Podcast and NPR at checkout. This message comes from Mint Mobile. Starting at$15 a month, make the switch at mintmobile.com slash switch. $45 upfront payment for three months. Five gigabyte plan equivalent to$15 a month. Taxes and fees extra. First three months only. See terms.

From the publisher
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says he’s willing to hold elections if the US and other allies help ensure security. Is that a promise Trump can make as he pushes Ukraine to surrender territory to Russia? Also, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a man illegally deported by the Trump administration in March and eventually returned, is now free from immigration custody. Plus, Republicans in Indiana have rejected a redistricting proposal. President Trump successfully pushed other states to redraw their congressional maps to help Republicans win next year’s midterm elections, so why did Indiana’s Republicans break with the president?

Want more analysis of the most important news of the day, plus a little fun? Subscribe to the Up First newsletter.

Today’s episode of Up First was edited by Kate Bartlett, Anna Yukhananov, Larry Kaplow and Alice Woelfle.

It was produced by Ziad Buchh, Nia Dumas and Christopher Thomas.

We get engineering support from Stacey Abbott. Our technical director is Carleigh Strange

Our Executive Producer is Jay Shaylor.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from Up First from NPR

All 887 episodes
Zelenskyy and Peace Promises, Abrego Garcia Release, Indiana Rejects RedistrictingUp First from NPR · 13 min
Listen in VO