In short
Waveform: The MKBHD Podcast - Episode Summary
Episode Title
Google might have to sell Chrome!
Hosts
- Marques Brownlee (MKBHD)
- Andrew Manganelli
- David Imel
Episode Overview
In this episode, the hosts dive into several tech news topics, primarily focusing on developments regarding Google, including potential monopoly actions involving the Chrome browser. They also touch upon electric vehicle (EV) news, specifically a major rebranding initiative from Jaguar, rumors about ChromeOS, and the Android 16 developer preview. The episode wraps up with a debate around Microsoft Teams' anticipated live translation feature and a trivia segment.
---
Key Topics Discussed
- Google's Chrome Potential Spin-off
- Background: Discussion revolves around a potential lawsuit from the DOJ that may compel Google to sell or spin off its Chrome browser as a means of addressing monopoly concerns.
- Impact on Market: The hosts speculate on what spinning off Chrome might mean for the browser market, including potential competition dynamics with browsers like Safari and Firefox.
- Electric Vehicle News
- Tesla V4 Superchargers:
- Announcement of V4 superchargers capable of 500 kilowatts.
- Discussion includes charging speed and infrastructure adaptations needed for Tesla's semi-trucks.
- Jaguar Rebranding:
- Overview of the recent Jaguar brand overhaul, including a redesigned logo and an unconventional advertising campaign.
- Hosts debate the effectiveness of the ad and its reception among the public.
- ChromeOS Rumors
- Rumors suggest Google may be looking to integrate ChromeOS more closely with Android, potentially to enhance its positioning against iPadOS and expand its tablet offerings.
- Android 16 Developer Preview
- Early insights into Android 16, including new features and privacy enhancements. The hosts note that these updates come sooner than expected after Android 15's recent release.
- Microsoft Teams Live Translation Feature
- Discussion on the upcoming feature that promises real-time translation during meetings.
- Skepticism from hosts regarding the practicality and effectiveness of live translation based on historical attempts by Microsoft and other companies.
---
Key Takeaways
- Market Dynamics: The potential spin-off of Google Chrome could reshape the browser market and challenge current market leaders.
- EV Innovation: Tesla's V4 superchargers represent a significant advancement in EV charging technology, although the practicality and infrastructure needs for semi-trucks remain in question.
- Branding Impact: Jaguar's branding strategy sparks debate regarding the balance between modern aesthetics and brand heritage.
- Android Advancements: The fast rollout of Android 16 suggests a shift towards quicker updates in the Android ecosystem, aiming for continuous innovation.
- Skepticism in Tech: The hosts express cautious optimism about Microsoft Teams' new features, highlighting the tech industry's history of ambitious promises that often fall short.
---
Trivia Segment The episode concludes with a trivia segment involving technical knowledge and insights, gauging reactions on various tech topics.
Links and Resources
- [Tesla Supercharger Details](https://bit.ly/4g1yyfR)
- [Bloomberg Google Leak](https://bit.ly/3COv0yW)
- [Jaguar Rebranding Video](https://bit.ly/4hXz8Nn)
- [Android 16 Dev Preview Information](https://bit.ly/4eY1Qet)
---
Social Media & Merchandise
- Merch Store: [Shop MKBHD](https://shop.mkbhd.com)
- Follow the Podcast: [Waveform on Twitter](https://twitter.com/WVFRM)
Final Notes The hosts deliver a blend of industry insights mixed with personal anecdotes, making for an engaging and informative episode rich in tech discussions and humor.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Rinse takes your laundry and hand delivers it to your door. expertly cleaned and folded. So you could take the time once spent folding and sorting and waiting to finally pursue a whole new version of you. Like tea time you. Mmm. Or this tea time you. Or even this tea time you. So did you hear about Dave? Or even tea time, tea time, tea time you. Mmm. So update on Dave. It's up to you. We'll take the laundry. Rinse. It's time to be great. No, they're not. Microsoft Teams is not adding live translate. I'm excited. Yes, they are. They're going to be the greatest. They're not. It's going to be amazing.
0:39Sorry, Ellis, are you speaking in Spanish?
0:47Yo, what is up, people of the internet? Welcome back to another episode of the Waveform Podcast. We're your hosts. I'm Marquez. I'm Andrew. And I'm David. This week, we have a car company rebrand that is sweeping the internet. We also have a new website that continues to sweep the internet. Newer website. Newer-ish. That's true. And also a ton of Google news from lawsuits to Android 16 early looks. But first, Tesla started rolling out V4 superchargers. Well, they didn't start rolling it out. They announced it, and then they're going to start rolling it out. V4 superchargers are going to do 500 kilowatts.
1:22Very exciting. For those who don't have the context of what exactly that means, 500 kilowatts. that would be um yeah so so electric car charging generally the faster the better and obviously there's a whole bunch of math with the charging curve it charges faster when you're at a lower state of charge and all that but basically v1 superchargers had i think a 75 kilowatt peak charging speed and v2s were like 125 kilowatts i might be getting the v1 and v2 numbers slightly wrong but generally the numbers have gone up over time which means faster charging that's this is the basic concept v3 superchargers 250 kilowatt max very very impressive but yeah you can add a thousand miles of battery a thousand miles of range to your battery in an hour so obviously you won't have to plug in for a whole hour to charge your whole battery which is great um v4 superchargers uh they announced the new cabinet and apparently cyber trucks will be able to do 500 kilowatts that's not necessarily twice as fast as 250 kilowatts but it is twice as much power and it shows i think uh there was a video clip that they put out where it was adding like 1300 miles per hour to the battery which is amazing um it also includes tesla semi support and the semi truck of course charges in megawatts they measure this in thousands of kilowatts so 1.2 megawatts would be 1200 kilowatts which is crazy is this a stupid question but i'm assuming a tesla semi truck isn't pulling up to a regular supercharger are they gonna have no yeah it literally wouldn't fit in the space right right they've had their own charging solutions in the past and apparently this new v4 cabinet will support the tesla semi you need a longer cable the whole higher power and all that but yeah this will this will also be fast for those this does though come with the longer cables right yeah mostly for cars that don't take the nacs port or well cars that now do take the nacs but have it at a different but i have a different spot there's too but they're also going to be including ccs connectors oh really at these stations cool yes so for cars that you know it's like you would have to buy a 2025 2026 model of a car that has the nacs and not everyone has committed to moving over to it but i think that tesla wants to be the gas station of electricity so and even the ones who did were seeing these like i mean cables being like you know trucks pulling up to be within like less than an inch of the charging thing and like it still is at like a 90 degree angle which cannot be good for that cord over time so like being able to put it in you know whether you're at the front or the back right or left anyone hopefully should be able to plug in yeah so for clearly they did start rolling out v4 charger charging stations this year but they didn't have the cabinets installed that allowed for this higher power gotcha so next year they're going to swap out a lot of the cabinets and then also just start rolling out way more v4 chargers sick so yeah that's we just had the uh the liado mega here which was also it supported 520 kilowatt charging and again the number might not mean a lot to everyone but the number that hit me the hardest was 10 to 80 percent in 10 minutes for your battery that's that's awesome that's like a full usable charge in not that much time so yeah hopefully a lot of cars will start being able to support that soon all right we should talk about this rebrand this Jaguar last minute addition to the the docket this morning lots of lots of talk on the internet lots of talk inside our own studio especially Tim our graphic because it's so good right it's fantastic everyone loves it yeah that's why it looks better bigger than a phone screen well i think let's get into it i don't think it is just the rebrand i think it's how the rebrand was launched and what was launched alongside of it that is why it's also i think so jaguar changed their logo it was an older typeface that was very it'd been around for decades correct might even say it's recognizable iconic even well the cool thing to do in the last couple years is take something super iconic and absolutely destroy brand recognition melt it down into a simple sans serif font and send it yeah that's that's what's been happening um so the new logo the new jaguar logo is just a different typeface yeah like we said everyone is kind of doing it i think if that were just it there would be backlash because when you have a singular thing for so long any change to it is going to feel weird and jaguar has been around forever and kind of known as you know the the old people car despite some of them i think looking very good but I don't think anyone disagrees with that right like it is kind of known as the old people car yeah the average Jaguar buyer is definitely 65 years old like factually I think a new typeface to kind of look newer in age isn't the worst idea but they they released it with this like commercial did you all watch the 30 second like ad it came with what were all of your thoughts on that can someone explain it or Ellis can you explain it as you're watching it yeah here can new live ellis has not seen it so these are his live reactions you haven't watched it yet oh i would love to watch you watch it it's a lot happening okay so
6:50what that was a card that was for a car yeah um wow okay uh look i'll start off with nice things all right i like i like the costumes that was really fun can you explain it to like for if someone hasn't seen it yet what happened i can try man but like so there's there's some people in some sort of like logan's runny like outfits and they're walking out on mars but it's pink and then it cuts to seemingly like a queen in in a royal gown she's moving flowingly then there's it says live vivid and then it cuts to a guy who looks sort of like andy warhol um he's spinning and he's painting as he spins it says delete ordinary but he's i don't okay i'm just gonna let's move on and then and then there's a woman in an orange dress in a blue room but she's upside down she's on the ceiling oh but then then she's not oh and then she has a hammer it's a yellow hammer so primary colors but then it says break molds which doesn't make sense because it's like a bauhaus primary it's okay um and then oh and then they're all together they're back on pink mars and they're sitting on a rock and they're they're doing these sort of twyla tharp asks looks to the side I don't get it man I don't really know what they're I don't know man when I was like a teenager my dream car like my absolute dream car was a 80s Jaguar XJS like I actually am like a huge passionate lover of vintage Jaguars and so I'm a little bit sad to see that we're not gonna get any more of those we're not gonna get like big classic classic, classy British steamboats.
8:44Yeah. But also, maybe we'll get cars that work. So... Yeah, a lot of reactions to this online. I think most people had the same initial reaction, which is, wait, this is a car company? What? It looks like it had nothing to do with cars. It's kind of just the beginning of a rebrand. It's a logo and a 30-second vibe, basically. It's not too different from nothing's marketing, I'm going to be honest. I was with the bugs and just the random Scandinavian people. This. Yeah. I think my issue with this is it felt Tim said this like at the end, it could have said Adobe instead of Jaguar. And it would have worked.
9:25It could have said anything. It could have said pretty much better Adobe. Yeah, for sure. Like this ad has just like nothing going on with it. It feels like they went into like a mid journey prompt and said, make me a 30 second ad. that feels like I'm thinking outside of the box and throw in a couple of sayings you would find on like a$5 TJ Maxx. Yeah. There's a chance. Is Jaguar announcing a car soon? Is that happening? Do we know? I think so. Are we going to get a car that like breaks molds and is like unexpected and looks totally crazy? Interestingly, the I-Pace came out a number of years ago, which was one of the earlier EVs that was on the market.
10:06That is true. But people generally did not like it. so yeah it was not that and did they just give up after that and now they're coming back so the crazy thing about the ipace i mentioned this a couple weeks ago is they still sell a lot of them to waymo and they're like lots of them on the road so they have a lot of electric cars out there so the waymos are ipaces yeah oh a lot of them i thought they were gas cars i thought they just changed i think they're starting to do they're gonna make their own cars too yeah but they're working on their own they haven't yeah they haven't made any new evs that i'm aware of since they've made hybrids they've made other cars but miles has reviewed another jaguar since then but i'll the other thing about this ad though is it's uh i mean we're talking about it on this podcast i don't remember the last time we talked about jaguar it's working like people are talking about jaguar the tweet just the tweet this isn't on blue sky or threads or on your instagram or just the tweet has a thousand retweets and 15 000 quote tweets i don't know if you guys are familiar with what a ratio is but that's a pretty strong statement people are just sharing the crap out of this 33 and a half million views um since yesterday 50 50 000 comments 50 000 comments so i don't know if jaguar could have made a more attention grabbing yeah uh ad if they tried yeah like imagine a regular car commercial getting 35 million views and 50 000 comments on twitter They'd have to do something insanely cool with the car.
11:33That very well may have been a point. They'd have to put hamsters in a Kia Soul. They'd have to go nuts. Like very, very cool cars have been announced that don't get nearly that attention. So Jaguar has the eyeballs on them. And that's probably honestly their main goal, even if they're getting roasted everywhere, is, hey, people are paying attention to Jaguar right now. So whatever their next car is, people will look at it. The funny thing is their logo and their banner image. I understand that it sort of looks like multiple layers of slightly different colored paint, but it kind of just looks like color banding it does um that's funny so you know also the banner and the profile picture are like the opposite right in the middle yeah looking at the website on ellis's computer here it's the first time that i went to or that he went to jaguar and i'm like looking at it i kind of like everything they're still using the old logo on their website that's what was going to be my nitpick though they're using the old logo on the top left that's so funny yeah but i don't know i kind of like it like as someone that doesn't know anything about cars and isn't in the car world and this is like my first real introduction to it i do understand that their old logo is very iconic it is also very very seated in like the 1980s for sure and i wonder if they're just like we are not selling any cars to younger people and we need to just do a full rebrand no matter what it is i think it's super reasonable to look for an updated rebrand And I just don't, I think my, I don't like the like cookie cutter.
12:59Guys, what are you talking about? Some of the most important celebrities to young people of all time have been Jaguar owners. Did you not know Frank Sinatra? Queen Elizabeth? Count Basie? Oh, I do like Count Basie. You don't think Gen Z cares about Count Basie? I'm looking at this website. I mean, it really feels like they're trying to get people to pay attention to whatever their next announcement is. That's really my take here. A new frontier is coming. Go bold. Something's happening. Oh, here, look. December 2nd, 2024. There's a date on the website. There's probably some other announcement.
13:38In some of the articles I saw about this logo, there was a car in the camo wrap that takes away the lines and prototype testing type of cars. So it does seem like they're coming up with something new. They're obviously not going to launch this just out of the blue. I paid two, baby. I got to ask. So what do we all think Jaguar is going to pull out that meets this criteria? That's disruptive. That breaks the mold. That's for the new generation. What's it going to be? Speculation station. An EV. Nothing. I don't think it's good. Nothing like car pay. Whatever car comes out is not going to match what this vibe is.
14:17I mean, if you're Jaguar and you're trying to reset a little bit, like remember we talked about Hyundai and Kia actually like successfully rebranding a little bit with their new EVs. And if you're Jaguar, you see that success and you're like, we got to do that to everyone who buys these cars is 60. We made a first EV like we have that heritage. Now we need to capitalize on it. Everyone knows about Jaguar. This might be what you would do. You might go, let's just turn over a new leaf. Abandon ship. We don't need any of this old, crusty old Jaguar heritage from the past hundred years. We're going to do this crazy new branding thing.
14:56We're going to change our logo, and we're going to just start with these EVs that are in a popular segment. Maybe it's a midsize crossover, and it's this colorful bunch of electric cars they come out with. I can see them doing that. On their site, it does say, the new era, a seismic change is coming. yeah so i also want to say car and driver says um that the automaker will unveil a design vision concept car during miami art week on december 2nd the concept will preview its first vehicle and jaguar's revitalized lineup which then goes to say this yet unnamed car will enter production by end of 2026 can i give my long wait time out of the box baby yeah listen what's the one thing that no auto manufacturer is doing.
15:39We have the midsize market. Sports car. No, sports car, the market's full. Midsize, market's full. SUV, market is definitely full. They gotta think bigger. I'm thinking 20 seats, 30 seats. Additional standing room for 30 more. Make it 35 feet long. Sell it exclusively to municipalities. Charge$2.50 to get on it. Preset routes. This is the market. The Jaguar bus. the jaguar bus i think we need to move on oh yeah all right it's blue sky time baby okay so get them david it really is it really is last week uh right as we were writing this episode it was reported that 15 million people had joined the service of blue sky previously the day before it was 14 million so that info had updated by the time i was editing the podcast dear viewer if you were watching the video it was up to 17 million yeah that was the screenshot that i so meta had been making a big deal over the fact that they were adding a million users to threads every single day and then all of a sudden a million users started getting added to blue sky every day and yes threads has almost 300 million people and blue sky is now sitting at about 20.7 million as of time of recording uh 20.6 actually as of time recording by the time you watch slash hear this it will probably be around 22 or so uh but yeah i mean it's growing very fast it seems like one of the main things that people are talking about on threads right now is blue sky and it's gotten to the point where people are arguing about which one is better which i find very funny because it's just it's the same thing as like android versus ios or sony versus playstation versus xbox people just love to be tribal about this stuff and there's all these people on threads being like i'm not going to blue sky because you can't grow your audience over there because you actually see your friends posts instead of random people seeing your posts and i'm like it's just hilarious anyway i'm very happy to see uh growth of another platform obviously it is not running on activity pub it's running on the at or at protocol but it is still a decentralized social network jay is working a lot with people like evan padromo to make there be more interoperability between blue Sky and the Fediverse.
17:58Jay is the CEO. Jay is the CEO of Blue Sky. There's something called Bridgy Fed right now, which basically bridges the Fediverse and the AT protocol universe. So, I know it's messy. Protocols are always messy. No, it's just, we're actually living in the timeline where it's like, oh, can you mastodon me? Oh, no. But if you hit me on Bridgy, or if you use your Bridgy Fed account, it'll make it all the way to my Blue Sky toot. It's like, no. Woof. We're getting back to woof again. Well, you know, we also live in the era where Hawk Tua Girl launches Pookie Tools was a headline from TechCrunch. That was a thing.
18:34You know. We didn't cover that, did we? I don't think we need to cover that. Is that like a React competitor? What? Is that a React competitor? React Native? Yeah, Pookie Tools. Pookie Tools. I don't know. Sounds more like a Pokemon competitor. Yeah, so if you're not on Blue Sky yet, you should get on it because it's fun. And if you do get on it, you should follow us. can i ask everyone a question here i think everyone at least in the last week has gone on to blue sky and kind of reactivated their accounts except ellis um i just want to pose a question what is one thing you're really liking about it and one thing you're disliking about the current state you're not allowed to say user base because we all know it's the lowest user base kind of all of them yeah i can go i can go first yeah go first yeah um i enjoy just the people that I follow being on there a chronological feed the discover feed needs some work for sure but it is nice that I can pop between them and every time I refresh it seems to remember that big like the thing I've been disliking lately and maybe this is just because of the influx is I keep getting these like suggested these threads posts whatever that are essentially making fun of threads by saying we have to make sure that blue sky doesn't turn into threads and the engagement farming like hellhole that it is um so we need to make sure everything is authentic and not just for farming engagement and then all of those threads have a ton of retweets and everything and feel like that is the engagement farming on blue sky is to make fun of engagement farming well i mean the same thing is happening on threads for sure people people are just saying blue sky sucks and then it has a ton of retweets and stuff it's just like guys get out of your echo chamber it's just like let's just just do what you want it to be and show with action let's not immediately start complaining and then piling on it because that just feels like yeah the same thing we've always had to deal with yeah i like that you can default to the following feed good one yeah i like that it's chronological and that you have multiple different feeds that you can jump between i love the starter packs those are really fun and interesting starter packs are basically these packs of accounts that you can build so that someone can just inject their starter pack directly into their account so that they're following all the people they want to be following.
20:48Can you show me how to do that real quick? Yeah. Or like if I wanted to find a starter pack. So it's under profile, starter packs, and you can create one. Okay. So I would go to a profile that I'm following already and see if they've created a starter pack. Or they'll skeet about it and then you can follow that. Forgot about that. I'm not going to say it. Yeah. I think that's super useful. I've been trying to figure out how to like I guess it mostly is the people but I'm trying to figure out what the difference in vibes are and I think on Blue Sky there's a lot of positive energy about this new growing thing and if you post something what I felt was that most of the replies were on topic about that thing which shouldn't be a surprise which is how it used to be but that's how I was like wow this is so refreshing that I posted about one thing and then the replies were about that one thing and then we engaged about that one thing and then moved on which is kind of how threads i think is trying to be because everything's combined with the thread but i think x is not like that at all so i feel like that that difference was striking to me and i don't know how long it's going to stay that way i think more people means less i think it will i think a lot of it comes down to incentives right it's like twitter x now pays people for engagement.
22:03So the reason that it goes off topic immediately is because if something gets a lot of likes or engagement, everyone else who wants to make money just posts some funny meme below it that's not even relevant to the post. It's like, what are you consuming here? It also helps that the people who want to make money are verified because you can only make money through verification. And now blue check is the top of post so they automatically get a to only fight with the other ones. And so, yeah, it's really hard to find, especially if you're a larger account like Marquez. Like, yeah, I used to go through your tweets all the time and read comments and like get useful feedback.
22:40Yeah. That hasn't happened in a while. It seems like it's the worst on X. Yeah, it is definitely the worst on X. Threads is also it's just this giant grinder of people that just throws people at you and none of them know who you are. And there's no like context about what you're talking about, about who you're talking to. and so there's a lot more fighting on threads i noticed last week someone posted about how final cut is like a really good value and how it's crazy that you only have to pay $299 once and you get it for life and it's a great value and i just commented yeah you know apple does that because it's more valuable for them to keep you on the macbook and the whole apple ecosystem so how dare you so they're willing so they're willing to like sell you a product once and not charge a subscription service because it keeps you in the ecosystem.
23:27And the person immediately started screaming at me and was like, how does that negate anything that I said about blah, blah? And I was like, dude, I literally commented, I'm not trying to fight you, man. I'm just like creating a dialogue about why Apple does this. I'm not saying it's good or bad. Yeah. I'm trying to start a thread, bro. Yeah, he eventually backed down. But I feel like the vibe on threads is that people are always yelling at each other. so people assume to be yelled at. Whereas on Blue Sky, because it's more focused on the people you follow and then like second level connections, like if Andrew were to comment on something on another person's post, I'd see that.
24:06That at least gives you some context as to like what you're communicating with and it's just a healthier dynamic. And that's been completely destroyed with most of the other social media networks, primarily because of incentives like making money. Threads also pays a lot of people to make money by posting, which is what has caused a lot of engagement bait. so uh yeah blue sky it's obviously like more like old twitter where you you don't make money on it it's more focused on your friends and right now they're not a public company so they don't have to grow their user base so rapidly like the other companies do uh hopefully it stays that way that's if they stayed private it would be the best thing ever please don't ipo please don't ipo even just that though more users always the more people we have the more chance there is for things we don't like also true also true it'll be the weird thing of like is this thing on to like i wish this thing was off yeah you gotta hit that middle there's also an irony where the chronicle chronological feed allows you to jump on look at the like eight posts that have been posted since the last time you were on and then be done true that's the red wants that to never happen they want to keep you on they want to keep you on the site as long as possible they want to keep you around engaging and hopefully showing you things as much as it's just like every other algorithmic feed they just want to show you things that will keep you happy and keep you on the site making the money through ads right whereas this makes me happy but i'm not on it as much whereas threads makes me sad and i'm on it too much have we had the conversation about how blue sky makes money well right now they don't so is that like a ticking time bomb type situation or do they can they have not make money they have talked about ads and like different things that they will do it's sort of like twitter right losing money right with servers yeah definitely the more they scale the more they grow the more it's going to cost them for sure, which is definitely a thing to think about.
25:56That is why we're still waiting for another server to pop up. Yeah. Right now, bluesky.social is the only server. It costs a lot of money to run a server. So for a company to run the infrastructure to run a server would be a lot. But you did think about Twitter. Twitter didn't really make money for quite a while. And they had this dual stake shareholder thing where Jack Dorsey owned a lot of the company. and I think he wasn't as focused on making money off of it but actually just creating healthy social media you can say what you want about Jack Dorsey but he did care about the health of a social media platform he's the one that actually like incubated blue sky at twitter and it was supposed to be the protocol that underlied twitter and then Elon bought twitter so that didn't happen so they spun off anyway if you want to know a lot more about blue sky and you're more interested we have this whole deep dive episode that we did like two or three months ago.
26:47So it's very relevant now. So go watch that. We can link it in the description. Also, I made a long form episodes playlist on the Waveform podcast channel. So if you go on the channel, you can watch all of them there. You can deep dive and then you can stay in our algorithmic feed. Never leave. Stay on the Waveform podcast. Exactly. Sick. Yeah. All right. Well, we should take a quick break. We're going to come back. We have a lot more to talk about with Google, But before we take a break, trivia.
27:19It's way more exciting. First question. Yeah. We all know that kilowatts is 1 ,000 watts. Oh my God, I might get this one. But which of these is bigger? Oh no. One deca-watt. Yoda-watt. Or one watt? Oh. Hmm. Deca-deca-deca-deca-watt. I'm just going by my Latin on it. Is this one of those things where like... It could be a fraction. Everyone outside the US are going to be like, I learned this in first grade. And we're all going to have three different answers. You're like, here, her, her. I learned about gold mining in first grade. So who's the real winner here? Yeah, we learned about freedom. You guys might have learned about science.
28:03But I got gold nuggets at home. That's funny. Fun fact. When David and I drive to work, we actually measure the drive's distance in gold nuggets. It takes approximately 137 gold nuggets for us to get to work. Yeah. Fortnites. You know, Fortnite is a measurement of time. Two weeks, right? Yeah. Two weeks. It's spelled differently in the game. It is spelled differently in the game. All right. We will come back after the break and the answers will be at the end like usual. See you in a bit. Fortnite.
28:41Support for this show comes from Shopify. When you're starting a new business, there's so much to do. Sometimes it can feel like you're playing in a Super Bowl, but you're the only one on your team. Shopify says they can help. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world, offering tools to help your one-man band play like a champion. Shopify says they can help your business grow with sales, design, marketing, and more. Can't design a website? No problem. Shopify offers beautiful, ready-to-use templates that fit your brand's style. Need extra support? Their AI-powered commerce tools can assist with everyday tasks like enhancing product photos, writing product descriptions, or generating discount codes.
29:16And if you get stuck, Shopify is always around to share advice with their award-winning 24-7 customer support. If you're ready to sell, you're ready for Shopify. You can turn your big business idea into with Shopify on your side. You can sign up for your$1 per month trial and start selling today at shopify.com slash waveform. So just go to Shopify.com slash waveform. Shopify.com slash waveform. Welcome back. Today we have a lot of Google news. A lot of googly, googly news. RIP Google News. It's still around. Google News? Yeah. Are you sure about that? Yeah. I use it all the time. Can we name this episode Great Google?
29:59Oh, sorry. Wait, what was the RSS thing called? Google Reader? Ah, sorry. Oh, yeah, that was a long time ago. RIP Google Reader. RIP Google Reader. Anyway. Anyway, okay, we got a lot of Google News. Now, this first story might break officially today. The story we're reporting on is a leak from Bloomberg that says that the story is supposed to actually come out, like the official ruling, today, today, the day of recording, Wednesday, November 20th. What the story is, is you might remember that back in August, a judge ruled that Google had been maintaining an illegal monopoly by paying search companies to be the default search engine.
30:37Remember that? We had a whole episode on it. And they'd say that was not cool. I thought the episode we had on, they have too many lawsuits. There's a lot of lawsuits. Okay, because we also did the Play Store one. We did. We did. There's quite a few. But that is the one in which they said Google is actually maintaining a monopoly. So we've been wondering what that remedy was going to be. And it turns out, at least according to this Bloomberg leak, again, the actual story might drop today, that the Department of Justice is going to be asking the judge to force Google to spin off Chrome, like the Chrome browser, specifically because Chrome represents a key access point in how people use Google search.
31:16Microsoft Chrome? Anyone? No. Okay, I've always wondered about these like spin off things like break up this big company into several smaller businesses, right? So Chrome is too big. Spin it off. It has to compete on level playing ground with Safari, Internet Explorer, Edge, everyone else. It's its own separate business, right? Yeah. What's preventing that talent who just worked for Google from collaborating with Google? Are there more laws that have to like drive a wedge between Google and Chrome? Or is it just they are technically separate by the books now? I don't really know how it works. It's that now Google can't tell Chrome how to operate.
31:58But they can still collaborate? They can, but Chrome can now collaborate with any other company or business organization. So they may get a better deal. The idea isn't that Chrome is so powerful and holds so much of the market that they need to be their own thing. It's that Google can use Chrome as leverage to control the entire corporate landscape. Because remember, Chrome is a free application, right? They spend a lot of money developing Chrome, but they use Chrome as a portal to all of Google's goods and services that actually do make money. It's not dissimilar to the Nexus 7, which they lost$50 on every Nexus 7 they sold just to get people to sign up for the Google Play Store.
32:37RIP. Yeah. RIP. So then at this point, somebody else in the market can come to Chrome and offer it. All that sweet, sweet user data that Chrome is collecting relentlessly, they could sell that to everybody now. yeah interesting so yeah yeah so the issue right now is like chrome is reportedly worth between 15 and 20 billion dollars so any company that could actually afford to buy chrome is also probably one of the giant companies i would say no one's gonna yeah they shouldn't buy chrome but if google splits from chrome and they're like dang they're really salty about it but they still want to use chrome as leverage they still cut special deals with the chrome business to continue to maintain Well, I mean, they're under this DOJ scrutiny, so I don't think they would allow that to happen.
33:25Interesting. Okay. Exactly. It's my only contribution. I guess I don't know the specifics of how those things work, and I'm curious. It's fine. Neither do they yet. Yeah, that's a good point. But I guess also in that is it'll be you can't cut special deals when you have other companies coming in with deals that are probably sweeter than that. So even if at the end of the day, well, you can, but it's less incentivizing, too. That's true. Everyone wants to make money. When Chrome is its own thing, they are going to want to make money. They won't give a damn that Google is like made them or whatever.
33:59They're going to ditch that and they're going to make as much money as possible. And even if it winds up being Google still is like the main connection to Chrome, all that, Google will probably have to pay more money in all of that. This is not dissimilar to how Android was originally started as an open source platform because they needed to get a bunch of OEMs to use Android, to grow Android. But as soon as Android became huge, they started tying all of these things that used to be an AOSP to Google Play Services so that you had to sign Google's license agreements, even though Android's open sourced.
34:33Like if you use Android, you're stuck on like Android 5.0 basically with all the stuff that they included in AOSP. Right. So that's a big reason why they needed to break them up. They're also asking the judge to force Google to license its search data and let publishers more easily opt out of training Gemini on their work, which they currently don't do. Yeah. So. Let me opt out, please. Yeah. That's the leak from this morning. So this could easily change by the time we're live with this podcast. but i'm interested in what the opt-out thing would be because it it feels like we need that one like base ruling to be able to reference in terms of opting out of ai stuff because it seems like every company right now is like we know it's coming let's get as much as we can before we have to actually do it previously they had this file called robots.txt that if in robots.txt you put a thing that said you cannot train on this you were supposed to adhere to that but then a bunch of companies like perplexity got caught basically just completely ignoring robots.txt and they would say like oh it wasn't us it was like one of our vendors that goes around collecting data but it's the exact same thing that happened with that pile data set where they were like yeah we're using the pile but we're not the ones that collected it it's like yeah i have a question about this sure so let's say chrome does get spun off and like this article says that a potential buyer could be like amazon yeah wouldn't that just make them the monopoly that's what that's what i was saying yeah like that's weird yeah so i mean yeah it's strange that they're even trying to make them like sell it as opposed to just spinning it off and having them be their own business obviously it might be a little bit difficult for them to just figure out how to make money out of nowhere that might be the main problem i'm sure they're going to be giving a timeline and a bunch of stuff like that but it is kind of problematic that they're worth 15 to 20 billion dollars they also make chromium which is now the underlying uh browser engine behind uh edge and then a bunch of other browsers firefox is like one of the only browsers right now that doesn't use chromium uh safari on webkit and then it's on web webkit yeah what i don't know if firefox is on webkit i know safari is i don't think firefox is on my kit but yeah safari safari and firefox are like some of the only browsers not on chromium arc is on chromium it's everywhere yeah so yeah fox is on quantum browser engine which is their own one yeah but again mozilla is a foundation so there's that and they like they weren't really making any money either besides selling uh letting google pay them to have them be the default search engine so i don't know how so how firefox is going to make money after this but either way yeah it's like it is kind of a foundational thing to have a browser with the most market share as a portal to all the Google goods and services because they just really plug in everything.
37:31You know, they're trying to make Gemini like a core part of the Chrome browser now. So that is going to play out throughout the week. We'll probably talk about it again. So play out through the next seven years. Episode 600 will have the final ruling of what happened to Chrome. Probably. But the next story is actually fairly relevant to this. Google story number two. Yes, Google's starting to. Google is reportedly ditching Chrome OS and making everything Android. That actually would make sense in conjunction with this. Because obviously Google can't really have Chrome OS when Chrome is Chrome and going to be a separate company potentially.
38:12So they want to, apparently they want to make everything Android because it would allow it to compete with the iPad a lot more easily. they don't really feel like Chrome OS really works on tablets and Android sort of is the only thing on tablets right now. And it doesn't, it doesn't make sense that they have such a fragmented ecosystem when it comes to. People have been taught. I feel like people have been talking about this for years. Like when are they going to merge? Are they going to merge? And if anyone ever asked Google, they'd be like, no, no, no, no, no, no, they're totally separate. Yeah.
38:38Chrome OS. I mean, you can put Android apps on it, but they're totally separate. It was always a little confusing. Yeah. And so this to me makes a lot of sense in general, just because of the user experience. So yeah. Okay. Yeah. put Android on everything. So, and they're also reportedly working on a new flagship Pixel laptop that will probably run Android. So my question becomes, Chrome OS is just this really awkward operating system with this vision that Google had where the internet was your computer. You always had Wi-Fi, Chromebooks, and that you were always going to store everything in the cloud and nothing needed to run locally so they can sell them cheaply, they can put them in schools, all of this stuff.
39:18I feel like we are quickly moving towards this world where that's not really the case anymore Apple has never shifted everything into the cloud they have some stuff in the cloud like your photos and all that stuff but they're all about local processing yeah and a lot of applications require a lot of local processing yeah so my question is like a premium pixel book pixel laptop that uses android if it's as expensive as a macbook air or like a mac mini or the last pixel book or the last well yeah the last pro pixel book was was very expensive and it's just you can't do that much on them you know yeah i i so chromebooks had a small niche of success and they had a lot of success yeah they depended on you obviously having an internet connection so like they are the most useful when you do have a reliable internet connection and they seem like a dumb idea when you don't yeah so but also applications that just don't run on them right you can't use photoshop also true you gotta use photoshop web and i think the argument would be like if you're a student or if it's if it's your first laptop or whatever 99 of the things you would ever do on a laptop are available through web apps like you have web apps that can edit photos you have web apps that can you know edit music you can make all kinds of things with them and so it was like yeah i'll I'll do everything on the Chromebook and I don't need to pay a ton for storage.
40:43I don't need to pay a ton for RAM. Like all the processing is happening elsewhere. I just saved a bunch of money and I always have an internet connection. So this is great. Yeah. So it made a lot of sense if you had a good internet connection, but that is an if. Right. That not everyone can say they have. Also, I kind of think that Google only really made Chromebooks to sell very cheaply to schools because exactly why the Department of Justice is suing Google over Chrome being this like way to get access to all the other goods and services that Google offers they're just onboarding children onto Google services so that there are they already have accounts by the time they're in high school right and you're not gonna like there's friction between switching everything from Google services to Apple or Amazon or whatever and so it's just like a way for them to get the next generation of people on Google stuff which makes sense because they always talk about the next billion users and like the young people are gonna be the next they're being born right now yeah and that's also that's not a new practice in the industry too i remember my dad telling me when he was studying cs at brown in the 80s that at one like his sophomore or junior year or something like that apple just came and gave brown like totally thousands of new computers yeah and no one at the time was using apple computers but the next six or seven graduated classes of brown yeah i'm so good no i'm i middle school apple always donated computers to us for our computer lab and they donated final cut final cut seven and they donated all this apple stuff i life i life i life i life yeah yeah i did unbox one of those many years later yeah this i guess my only question here is at what level is this because like chrome os made sense because it wasn't windows but if we're just doing a laptop that's trying to do things offline why is it not as windows because they're just making their this sounds more like a windows competitor than well google wants to have something from the ground up right google wants their windows yeah the problem is android is not windows and it's sort of i mean they're they're just like the vr headsets are barreling towards the smart glasses and the smart glasses are barreling towards vr headsets android phones are barreling towards being able to be computers that you can plug-in, and Android-based computers are barreling towards the ability to have touchscreens and use them like tablets.
Read the full transcript
43:03Wait, wait, wait. Android and Windows are not that different, right? I guess that's kind of... They both are prone to crashing a lot. They both have massive security flaws. Okay. They both can actually transfer files easily through a cable. Imagine that. I love installing the android file transfer app on every mac i've ever owned yeah i mean like pub g on both of them if google was like if they would just stop with all the cloud stuff and they were actually able to develop android applications that were actual competitors to things that people need to use every day this could be different but you know they just released this uh google online video editor where you can like tell ai to create a video for you and then you can do little edits but it's all in the cloud you know it's like they they're so against doing anything locally but i feel like when apple is is offering all of this local power and local storage and people need that and want that for professional work i just don't see how you can sell a really really high-end chrome google has tried this like five times they've tried the high-end pixel book chromebook thing and they never sell that many because they're super expensive and they're less useful yeah so these are these are diametrically opposed ideas on how to compute put as much of the power on the device as possible so that you always have the fastest local power all the time and that seems to work best for high-end applications and then get as much compute off the device as possible is the other side which is seems to be best for low-end applications yeah and so somewhere in the middle is this clashing point of like a high-end Chromebook doesn't really seem to be a good idea or a really low-end you know computer with everything local is also kind of a tough sell you still need all this power and all the storage and all this fast bandwidth and all that so it's like kind of challenging yeah so on either end of the spectrum it's more obvious but in the middle it's kind of like I guess it's not that compelling yeah one thing they might be thinking about is how the pixel line and android devices interact with their computers, right?
45:12Because they haven't really had a match to the parity that the iPhone and the MacBook communicate. And over the last few years, they've been making so Android phones and Windows computers and then Android phones and Chromebooks could communicate a little bit more seamlessly with file transfer and clipboard copying and that kind of stuff. So maybe if you're like a Pixel phone user, this new Pixel laptop that's premium will have a lot of interconnectivity features with your Pixel smartphone, that might be the draw that they're trying to bring people in with. I do have to, I would just say, I like see a bunch of you using iMessage on your laptop all of the time.
45:50I'm so jealous. I can't do that. I have like the messages.google in a tab. Google messages. But like, yeah, Google messages like in a tab that I can type. But you have to have it open and it doesn't have like good notifications and stuff like that. So I wish I just had a first party, obviously not first party, but a program inside of this. It is pretty nice. I always figured Google was like one step away from doing that. They never did like having, and there's just a rumor recently, I'll try to find the headline, but of like, Oh, Google messages should work with like the cloud and should work on a bunch of devices and sync in real time.
46:23But also, uh, when I had an old like pixel book, it would, there would be a couple of ties. You could like share the internet connection from your phone. There'd be like instant one click tethering. There'd be a couple things like you could use the phone as a webcam. There were just a few ties to the laptop, but it never felt like fully like a two-way street. Yeah, it wasn't really quite as integrated as Apple's done. I think this very much comes down to Google's structure and how they're built and all the teams that are spun off to make different things. There was a period of time, and this still might be the case, I'm not sure, where you couldn't use RCS and Google Messages web at the same time because they used different protocols.
47:02so you had to turn RCS off if you used Google Messages for one. Those teams are in different buildings. They've never met each other. And it was like, what are we doing? This is insane. So who knows? Okay, Google Store number three. Android 16 just dropped, which is crazy. That was fast. We were not expecting that. It kind of came out multiple months in advance as opposed to how it's come out in previous years. It launched in developer preview, so DP1. usually this doesn't even happen until like february or so of the of the next year so the fact that android 15 only officially came out literally last month and now we have yeah yeah just started getting it on everyone's pixels just got it and every other phone is slowly starting to get it right wow and now we just got dp1 for android 16 which is crazy um the google says that they're moving towards more frequent api releases to be able to deliver faster innovation in apps and devices.
48:00So far, there's not a lot of stuff that's really that different with Android 16. The main changes are that it's going to give access to the Android Photo Picker, which lets users select specific photos and videos they want to share with an app instead of their entire library. The iPhone has had this for a while on iOS. And it also includes the latest privacy sandbox and a preview of Android's Health Connect app, which supports health records and allows apps to read and write medical records in the standardized FHIR or Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources format, which basically I think they're just trying to have more interconnectivity with the way that actual doctors and hospitals read medical information because these devices that we're carrying every single day, using every single day, are collecting a lot more data than a doctor is able to just randomly collect at an appointment.
48:51So I think they're getting ready for a future where you're able to just like hand over your phone or send them a file and they instantly know all the health data about you that you've been using, which is pretty helpful. You can get system restored at the doctor's office. Yeah. I mean, that's a lot of smarts. Imagine you bring your error code into your primary care physician when you're not feeling good. It's, yeah. 404. These are neat things. These are cool features. They're useful. It's also, I mean, we said this about the last version of Android. It feels like it could be a.1 update. Like, why is this?
49:22Well, this is DP1. Often you don't see things until DP4. Sure, there could be way more bigger features coming. But even the last update, Android 15, felt like a.1 update to Android 14. Totally. So I'm curious what's coming. The big things I would like to see is we got to see the very beginnings of being a DeX-like experience, but just built into Android. Sure. We saw a very early version of that. See, remember the difference between Android 3.0 and 4.0? Yeah, but we're so mature now. That's what I'm saying. You don't have to have a huge new version number every year. Yeah. But they're so like, they just do it.
49:57Well, you do because they're promising. Are they promising years of security upgrades or versions? Years. Okay, cool. So they could go seven years and it can only be two version numbers and that'd be fine. It'd be seven years of things. It's like the difference between turning four and five and 44 and 45. Exactly. That's a really good, even younger. Lane at this point is like 12 months to 13 months is like multiple new upgrades. Firmware updates like every week. It's crazy. Now it's like, yeah, you don't really have to do too much. It's an S-curve after 25 when your brain finishes developing. And your knees start deteriorating.
50:31Yeah. We'll keep an eye out for future Android features that get updated for 16 or get announced for 16. But yeah, it feels like a.1 update to me. Yeah. It's.001, really. Yeah. All right. Well, there's a little bit more. We got a whole segment on Microsoft Teams after this. It's going to be incredible. Ellis wants to throw. It's kind of interesting. Yeah. Ellis wanted to throw one more thing. I have one more Google thing, which is that if any of you get the chance, we didn't have time to talk about this week, but David Streitfeld wrote a really great article in the New York Times about the Google antitrust suit, specifically about Google's great length they went to internally to delete all communications and evidence that everyone at Google knew they were a monopoly, including to the point where they would refer to certain conversations as Vegas.
51:18like they'd be like hey do you want to go to vegas and that meant let's talk about how we're monopoly um also the fact that no one at google knows what privileged means like before having a really toxic conversation where they admitted they were monopoly they'd just be like this is privileged and just assume that that meant lawyers couldn't look at it which is hilarious are you a cop you have to tell me it's like it is like that level of like i love clowning on fan companies and they make it, excuse me, manga companies. Manga, yeah. And they make it 2D. Also, NVIDIA is in there now. Get ready, NVIDIA.
51:51Locked and loaded. Man. Oh, yeah. Because Netflix was the end before. Anyway. Trivia! Name all of the companies. NVIDIA is most of... Name all the companies. Ready? I don't even know what you guys are talking about. McDonald's. Manga. Acura. It used to be Fang, which was Facebook, Apple, Netflix, Google. I've literally never heard of that. GameStop. And then they started expanding it to be like slightly more. Microsoft, Amazon, Netflix, Google, Apple. Netflix is in there and can't even have an actual streaming event. Yeah. They should get kicked out. There was a story that said it was the most streamed sports event of all time though.
52:30Most. Yeah. We were actually. No, no. Viewed. Streamed. Streamed. Streamed. Which Marquez and I were debating. That must mean internet streamed only. Yeah. Yeah. Which that makes sense. Which is a newer thing. TV. Obviously the Super Bowl. I don't know. 100 million views. That's broadcast, I guess. Yeah, it's broadcast, not streamed. Question number two. This is the last trivia question you guys will hear before we record trivia extravaganza later this afternoon. So if you can tell us right now what everyone's score is in trivia, you will get a point. You will get bonus points if you can name the scores on the board that are not the three of you.
53:14The scores or just the contestants? There are four contestants on the board who are not the three of you. I would like their scores. Oh, boy. Okay. That's tough. I'm going to need some time. As well as your scores. Okay. Your score isn't seven points to go. So you only get a bonus point if you name the contestant and their matching score. Yeah, and I'll give you a point per contestant score combo pair. Okay, cool. All right, well, we will do a lot of mental math and think about that, and we'll be back after the break. Better hear Adam be like, update on the score. Thank you.
54:22You don't have to be a home pro. You just have to hire one. You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app. Download today. Okay. Should I? Yeah, whatever. Okay. All right, welcome back. It's not that. F*** it. The world's burning. Go ahead and bring it back. Who cares? Welcome back. We are going to talk about Microsoft Teams. I wasn't joking before. This is the most exciting thing on this week's podcast. And that's because there's an article that Microsoft Teams, starting next year, allegedly, will help you speak in foreign languages during meetings. No, it won't.
55:01And we have some skeptics on the podcast, but let's at least break down what it's supposed to do before we get into our skepticism. Right. Have you ever been on a meeting where maybe you're the only person who speaks one language and everyone else speaks a different language? and if you could just speak in your normal language and maybe some AI magic could just make it sound like you're speaking the language of everyone else on the call, then you wouldn't have to think too hard. You could just talk. And then every time they spoke, it would translate it to your language and you could hear them and understand them and it would just be this magical AI translate feature.
55:32I don't know how many magical AI translate features we're gonna have to live through before one of them actually works, but this one could be built into Microsoft Teams in 2025 and it would be pretty sick if it worked. It won't. I think you hit the nail on the head there with we've seen this 100 times. Yeah. And I still have yet to see it kind of working in real life. I mean, the weird thing is every time a company usually comes out and says we do real life real time translation, it usually means speak. Wait three seconds. It comes out. Speak. Wait three seconds. It comes out, which is not real time.
56:06This, at least in their video, looked very close to real time. It's sort of like in one of those documentaries where a person that doesn't speak the language that you're listening to starts talking in their language. It ducks the audio and then they dub it over the top. It kind of looked like that. Whether or not it works seamlessly, I don't. Alice. Yeah. I don't like Microsoft either, but. Look, we did. Do you guys remember Waveform episode 206? Like this? The back of my hand. Yeah. There was a trivia question about this. There was a trivia question about specifically this, because Microsoft unveiled live translation in 2010 and then again in 2012 and then again in 2014.
56:48And then again, somewhere around 2017. They keep doing this. Everyone keeps doing this. They never actually delivered a product. No one has either. But at this point, if they... Remember the chain pin? I was just going to talk in my language and then let go and it would talk in their language. It was going to be great. I mean, it does do that. But like David said, it's really like fragmented. and it like, I'd argue the Humane Pin might be one of the best quote unquote live translators I've seen in person, but it is painfully slow to actually get through the entire thing. I understand your skepticism, Ellis.
57:18Guys, this was a feature they said would be baked into Skype in Windows 8.1. Yeah, but they didn't have ChatGPT back then. You can't take 8.1 seriously. I didn't know what they were doing. I understand your skepticism. I also think the specific advancements in AI that we have been making play specifically well to things like translation and AI voice modeling. They had tiny language models back then. I think, yes. Long, short-term memory. I do think it is much more viable now than it was in 2010. No, but this time he's going to change. At this point, I'd be... We have to make a bet. I am willing to make this bet.
57:54I would like you guys to make a bet. Yeah, what's the bet? So available early 2025 is the official promise from Microsoft, whether you want to bet it around that i don't i'm not betting the time i'm betting that it actually works okay what do we can do when it comes out when it comes out so regardless of when so if it comes out a hundred years from now yeah and it works you still witness bet yeah it has to be in teams though yeah uh yeah no you know what i'm feeling so confident about this i will make i will put the the time extension at the beginning of 2027 i will give you all of 2025 and 2026 for this to get added to Teams because I'm so confident it will not be.
58:36And if it does, I will give Microsoft's engineering team the biggest round of applause. I say, you guys did it. It only took you 15 years of lying to everyone to get this done. Here's the paragraph on Microsoft's website. Imagine being able to sound just like you in a different language. Because, you know, we've had AI dubbing before. Imagine being able to sound just like you in a different language. The interpreter agent in Teams provides real-time speech-to-speech interpretation during meetings, and you can opt to have it simulate your speaking voice for a more personal and engaging experience.
59:08Public preview coming in early 2025. Yeah. That's not a developer preview. That's a public preview. Yeah. It could be in our hands in like three months. Yeah. Damn. Get those hands warmed up, Dallas. You about to be clapping, boy. I will clap. I will clap. you know david i'm feeling so confident that i will that i'm willing to bet you right now if this comes out fully like as a full feature not not like a preview so not as a preview no no before 2027 before january 1st 2027 as a full shape his head no even worse i will use an android phone for a month really even worse even worse wow that's a crazy uh okay yeah and what will you do january 2027 when this doesn't ship david will shave ellis's head i want you to believe in this like really believe that it will happen i do believe this will happen so how much do you believe yeah how much do you believe well what does it do for me if you use an android phone it just makes our communications worse damn that's true that's a great point like that doesn't benefit me all right we'll think of the bet offline and we'll get back to you we'll go back in future weeks.
1:00:21We have two more quick stories. Marquez, I'd like you to pick which one because I think you'll find both of these interesting. Okay. We can either talk about the New Alex Goldman podcast, which officially starts this week, or knee airbags.
1:00:38Sounds like you need that. Marquez and I both have a couple things in common, and these nail them pretty well. Catch me with the Arcteryx exoskeleton and knee airbags. Let me do it at the same time. nothing can hurt me let me hear about these knee airbags i need to understand this all right so marquez you and i met playing ultimate you know i stopped it because i had three acl tears four knee surgeries so i'm a disc golfer i'm a lonely disc golfer now you still play incredibly competitively you're played at the biggest stages possible this year but you know you're on you're 30 your knees are you almost said a really tough sentence there no i did not you're 30 you're 30 you're starting to fall you're 30 you got to start worrying about your knees your birthday's coming up man each year after 30 those nears start creaking a little more miracle i'm still here so i found this new knee brace uh-huh it kind of works in the same way have you seen i still think this is one of the dumbest products ever but they're like the helmets that aren't a helmet you wear it around your neck and it's like a one i think it's a one-time use but it like as you're falling it goes up because i guess people are so hell-bent on not wearing a helmet they'd rather wear a super expensive neck brace i saw a demo of that where it didn't work so yeah i've seen it so yeah this feels like that so it's a knee brace and it has all these little airbags around it and if it basically uh detects any rotation or hyper extension within 30 milliseconds all the airbags like pop and straighten your knee out and prevent it from hyperextending or rotating which is what causes those internal knee issues or snappages i hate to say snapping because i immediately wince when i think of it yeah but do you think this would work listen i'm not here to say this is going to be real or work i'm just here to get your thoughts on it um because it seems wild okay i'm looking at it on the website and yeah it just looks like kind of like a roller skating knee pad but obviously if you if you fall do you know what it looks like it looks like the old football helmets the like leather ones that have like individual like padding all over it oh i don't think this is gonna work here's the other thing i saw the helmet thing which was like it was like a hoodie and then when you when it detects free fall yeah it's supposed to deploy the protection shield or whatever and then you land and your head's protected and that was like okay it should be easy to detect free fall and then a youtuber i don't know if it was right or written link or someone else but someone like got it put it on and just like fell onto a mat five or six times and it didn't trigger once.
1:03:12And then they finally got a trigger after they hit the gun. I was gonna say. So, damn. Imagine this. You like fall down, you tear your tail, you're on the ground, you're like, oh. And then it explodes. It's even worse. Yeah, I don't know if I have faith in this one. I like the idea. And I think this would do great on Shark Tank. And then I think we would all realize it's a bad idea. Just based on the website, it's called Hippo. I think it's an interesting idea because I do really like if you're getting into the age where knee issues are more prominent and that's usually the age where a knee injury can kind of take you out of whatever sport you're really into I mean especially basketball hockey football like ACLs are the things we're at a certain age there's a player right now Alex Ovechkin who's actually chasing one of Wayne Gretzky's record and he just had a knee injury the other day and people are are presuming it might be an ACL and he might not get the record now because he's already on that side of 30 which would be really sad but uh I think like this is kind of an interesting idea it is just pre-order and when you pre-order it says like enter in your email for a demo unit so I don't know how close it is but like man if I could have saved one of my ACLs and this just felt like a normal knee brace I think I'd be super into it honestly for I think AI has a lot of potential to help injury prevention and to and just like sports science and sports medicine in general like that's that's where it should be the most useful so i don't know if this exact product is necessarily a product of that or if it's a little early but in general i think stats and ai and numbers can help with athletic injury prevention at some point one of the things they do say is that it's which i'm guessing in terms of monitoring you would always have to be wearing this but it says part of the thing is analytics which measures like uh fatigue and strain and like being able to produce a workout plan to help you strengthen and keep because like yeah in all of these things i'm an idiot and i tore my acl probably because i did not do proper like strength training around your knee which is like super super important and when you play ultimate you play on the worst fields possible and just absolutely rip it up but uh yeah i don't know i thought it was kind of interesting and uh keep your knees safe man it's it sucks to confirm my knees have not been in great condition recently either and i'm not even 30 yet just you wait boy i've been doing pt for my knee since march really yeah oh my god it's a good time all right i'll go last one i have a wish he needs to fix this seriously wow maybe it's working as intended um last quick one i've talked about this before alex goldman former host of reply all a podcast that i would argue if it didn't exist wave form might not exist because it was like the first podcast i ever listened to as a weekly basis type of thing um alex goldman had released two pilot episodes of his new podcast called hyperfixed tomorrow which if you're listening to this was yesterday is it officially coming out on a twice a month basis and i cannot wait if you don't know about it it's pretty similar to something called two super tech support they used to do on reply all and they basically each episode is a problem someone brings to alex he tries to figure it out throws a bunch of cool anecdotes on the way he's just been great so far and i can't wait to just have like another normal podcast to like listen to on a regular basis cool cool i have you did you listen to the pilots are really good okay you should definitely listen If you want the nostalgia of Reply All, it's 100 % there.
1:06:53That's still my favorite podcast of all time. Yeah. Okay. Well, there's only one thing left to do here, and that is trivia.
1:07:05Yeah. All right. Update on the scores. Trivia. So quick update on the score. Question one. We all know that kilowatts is a thousand watts. But which one of these is bigger? One decowatt or one watt?
1:07:33David is deep in thought. I'm always deep in thought. Andrew looks angry. Correct. Marquez is doodling. I don't know what's going to happen. I'm going to be so mad if I'm wrong. I'm going to be so mad. I'm going to feel exactly the same either way, which is Matt. Flip him and read. What do we got? David? I put one what? Wrong. I also put what? Incorrect. Marquez? I put deca what? Correct. Because the prefix deca means 10. And it was slippery because desa, this prefix desa is a 10th. and I'm glad I got those look at Roman Emperor Marquez Brown I did know Decimente and every part of my brain was like this is too easy it can't be that easy that's why I was like I'm gonna be mad so it sounds like it wasn't that easy you had the thing to trick me on I just didn't know the other thing to get tricked on the original version of this was gonna be I was gonna say what's one kilohertz what is one kilohertz like how many hertz is it mm-hmm a thousand correct oh i was hoping you would get in your head uh did you get my thing the what thing what you should have drawn the oh now i get it it's one question mark got it hey i got a point guys that's sick that doesn't matter i think i'm at like
1:09:05question number two we've already hinted at it but how many points does everyone have also the other people or is that going to be after? Just give me everything. We need more time then. There is four people that are not you guys that are listed in our trivia scores. And you need to tell me what their score is. Wow. I didn't drink enough coffee this morning. I probably hear it in my voice.
1:09:39let's see it everyone else too how did you guys write so fast I was writing long before I started writing the minute I got the first one wrong is that cheating? probably I don't think so if you're ready to write it you can keep writing David I'll give you 10 more seconds right now to finish writing in the meantime 8 We're recording this podcast only like 38 minutes earlier than we normally record the podcast. But man, it just feels like the more it feels like we're morninging harder. It feels really morning. It will not when we record Trivia Extravaganza directly after this. I'm ready. I'm ready.
1:10:20All right, Marquez, I'm going to have you read everything first. OK, so Marquez, 21. OK, this is great. David, 25. Andrew 26 You thought that I was the fire of you? Apple 1 Ellis 1 What? And then another one has 1 Who? I don't know And then someone else also has 1 Other Okay Two people do have 1 But you did not say who So I cannot give you those points Can I go next? Marquez, yes you can Also Marquez, it's hilarious Almost every single guess you are off by 1 Wait, that makes me feel so good Alright, Andrew, let's see I have Marquez 24 That is correct as of his last point David at 24 That is also correct Andrew at 27 Oh my goodness Beth at 1 Google at negative 1 Google is at negative 3 Oh well he's written it already Andrew's gonna sweep us I have Becca at 1 We did not do trivia with Becca Oh we didn't do trivia with Becca And I have Adam as 1 okay i was on a roll there for a minute you missed one i missed there's one person who's on this list that you did not name is it like wait was adam on the list it's not it's not adam adam and becca are not on the trivia board but you said there's four others so i had to have missed two ellis google mystery mystery you did say ellis i did not say ellis you didn't i thought you did marcus said ellis oh what's the difference all right what'd you say david okay let's see it I put David 22.
1:12:00Wait, turn around. I don't believe you. Sorry. What? It's wrong. Oh, okay. Okay. Wow. Doesn't have any faith in me. David 22. Marquez 23. Andrew 27. Okay. Google negative one. Ellis one. And I put girl because I couldn't remember Beth's name. That didn't, you can't get that. If I don't get it for other. Sorry. Look, I got you, Beth. I don't think Beth ever responded to that, so I don't even know if she was in there. I got Andrew's point, at least. You did. So David gets one point, Andrew gets four points. Ellis, we have listed on the board as carry the one. I don't remember why we made that joke, but I guess I'm carrying the one this time.
1:12:43Probably because you're just at one. Wait, that's one. That's not right. I think you should give Marquez that. Wait, what? Well, if I have to give it to Marquez, I have to give it to David, too. That's true. And you should. No, for Ellis. No, for Ellis. One. Oh. I think carry the one is different that's bullshit nobody is going to put that it was a joke you're carrying the one because you've got one yes I agree I'll throw it out there I think if somebody wrote carry the one and they both put one then they should be wrong but since no one put carry the one and they put one I think they should be right carry the one was the joke that was on top of the one being the score I think we make the rules When you guys do trivia, then you can decide.
1:13:25Unbelievable. Google was minus three because of that time that they wrote that article on their own blog where they got three things wrong about Google. Hilarious. I forgot. And apparently now we know they do that because they don't keep any internal company records. How would they remember? Delete it all. And then the one you guys did not get was David Pierce scored one trivia point. I knew we had a guest that did it. Yeah. For some reason, I thought it was Becca. okay cool see my handwriting made it look like i wrote other but i actually wrote david pierce yeah other david that's what he put exactly that's what i meant to say that's fair well you know update on the score yeah all yeah maybe one last score update the final final score update before heading into trivia extravaganza marquez with 24 because i got you one andrew with 31 doesn't matter David with 25 doesn't matter yeah and all those will soon mean nothing because the next episode yeah is the trivia extravaganza season finale I don't know this is our third or fourth coming on I think it's like six wow I think it's like fifth yeah either way we've yeah that's the next trivia question did you know the first trivia extravaganza David was a host I was looking back and we had the old table that was a fun time before you sign off I just want to tell one funny story to get everyone hyped for Trivia Extravaganza which is that Marquez is a great boss he gives his employees lots of creative freedom to do their best work but the only creative disagreement that Marquez and I have ever gotten into in my three years of working here do you remember this Marquez?
1:15:04it was whether to call it Trivia Extravaganza or Trivia Bonanza this conversation lasted like two weeks if i remember correctly yeah wait can i tell one other funny story about trivia extravaganza so we have like a a work shared devices login um for apple id so there's like 20 different like random devices across the studio in it so they were doing a test run of trivia extravaganza last yesterday with three different members of the team i'm in the robot room doing a robot room with Brandon and just in the bottom corner this safari like icon pops up with a little ipad and it just says safari ipad i'm like what is this i've seen it pop up a couple times today and i click it and up pops a browser window of google drive and just trivia extravaganza doc loads in and i'm like no i quit out and i run over and as that's happening adam and Ellis are screaming and running out of the thing.
1:16:05And we're both like, did you just see? Like, did you see? I did not. All I saw was the title. He claims to not have read anything. He claims to have read trivia extravaganza and only trivia extravaganza. We caught him instantly because we were running the show. And Adam just goes, whoa, whoa, whoa. Why is Andrew in this doc? It's because we have not shared the doc with him. And so we instantly get up, abandon the test contestants, and run into the studio only to see Andrew running towards us like it's not what it looks like it's not what it looks like and if a bank accidentally deposited a million dollars into my account I'd totally go tell them that they shouldn't have done that I mean you should you should right yeah exactly that's what I meant well we take this very seriously as you can tell and obviously we have a lot of points at stake ideally like enough for me to get back into this thing but yeah stay tuned that will be the next episode and it will be a banger as it always is.
1:17:00Until next time, thanks for watching. Thanks for listening and catch you in the next one. Peace. Waveform was produced by Adam Molina and Ellis Hervin. We're partnered with Vox Media Podcast Network and our interaction with music was created by Vein.
1:17:26this won't work all right let's go teams is amazing why don't you believe i'm hopping in they have a video cut his mic i don't care
From the publisher
This week, Marques, Andrew, and David talk about a bunch of Google news including the DOJ possibly forcing it to sell off Chrome. But first, they go over some EV news and talk about the Jaguar rebrand that's taken the internet by storm. After that, they go over some ChromeOS rumors and talk about the Android 16 developer preview. Of course, they close out with a debate about whether or not Microsoft Teams will actually release live translation before getting into the last trivia questions before the Trivia Extravaganza episode drops next week! It's a fun one, enjoy!
Links:
Tesla supercharger: https://bit.ly/4g1yyfR
Bloomberg Google leak: https://bit.ly/3COv0yW
Google ditching ChromeOS: https://bit.ly/4ePOsJi
Android 16 Dev Preview: https://bit.ly/4eY1Qet
Jaguar Video: https://bit.ly/4hXz8Nn
TopGear Video: https://bit.ly/4eLJIEe
Verge Article about google: https://bit.ly/4fZvIaZ
Verge Microsoft Teams article: https://bit.ly/3Ok1dAQ
Knee Airbags: https://bit.ly/3CQjvXN
HyperFixed: https://www.hyperfixedpod.com/
Music provided by Epidemic Sound
Shop the merch:
https://shop.mkbhd.com
Socials:
Waveform: https://twitter.com/WVFRM
Waveform: https://www.threads.net/@waveformpodcast
Marques: https://www.threads.net/@mkbhd
Andrew: https://www.threads.net/@andrew_manganelli
David Imel: https://www.threads.net/@davidimel
Adam: https://www.threads.net/@parmesanpapi17
Ellis: https://twitter.com/EllisRovin
TikTok:
https://www.tiktok.com/@waveformpodcast
Join the Discord:
https://discord.gg/mkbhd
Music by 20syl:
https://bit.ly/2S53xlC
Waveform is part of the Vox Media Podcast Network.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
