AI: The Data Center Debate, Part Two

4 Aug 2026 · 45 min · 17 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Part two of 1A’s “AI: The Data Center Debate,” focusing on why data centers have become a fast-moving political flashpoint, how public opinion shifted, and what lawmakers are proposing to regulate construction, energy, and water impacts.

Guests and backgrounds

Robinson Meyer, executive editor at Heatmap (climate/energy news) and a reporter who has polled Americans on data-center opposition. Amy Harder, national energy correspondent for Axios, covering energy and data-center policy. Later, Rep. Sam Liccardo (D-CA, 16th district; Bay Area tech hub; chair of the New Dems Innovation and Technology Working Group).

Key claims

Public opposition surged from roughly 40% opposing locally (last August) to 70% opposing (May). Politicians are backtracking due to voter backlash and concerns about electricity, water, transparency, and tax incentives. NDAs and opaque local deals helped fuel anger. New York’s Hochul issued a one-year hyperscale pause via executive order; Heatmap tracks hundreds of local moratoriums.

Notable examples

Protest actions in 125 cities; ads from candidates in Michigan/Florida; Texas Abbott approval pause pending grid impact; Colossus hyperscale sites near Memphis using temporary gas generation and alleged EPA violations; Utah permit approval tied to Kevin O’Leary; New York executive order; Sanders/AOC moratorium bills; union IBEW support for jobs.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Introduction to the Data Center Debate

0:08 to 1:24

Discussion on the growing backlash against AI data centers and the political implications.

“The backlash against AI data centers is growing.”

Pop Culture Mention

2:14 to 2:36

Brief mention of Spider-Man's new tone and upcoming discussion on NPR's Pop Culture Happy Hour.

“Please consult a qualified tax professional.”

Public Opinion on Data Centers

2:36 to 6:20

Exploring shifts in public opinion regarding data centers and their political implications.

“We're discussing data centers and why they've become such a political flashpoint.”

Political Responses to Data Centers

6:20 to 10:10

Discussion on how politicians are responding to public opposition to data centers.

“Data centers are starting to feature in political ads around the country.”

Community Concerns and Transparency

10:10 to 14:00

Community reactions and the lack of transparency in data center developments.

“Well, to that point, we got this message from Bob in Birmingham, Alabama, about our data center show last week.”

Introduction to Data Center Perspectives

14:00 to 14:22

Discussion on community impacts of data centers and insights from locals.

“and the way lawmakers and officials are responding.”

Transparency and Political Consequences

14:22 to 17:25

Exploration of transparency issues and political consequences surrounding data centers.

“We also got this message from Bob in Withville, Virginia.”

Jobs and Economic Development Debate

17:25 to 19:34

Debate on the job creation potential of data centers versus their economic implications.

“because of how fast public opinion has changed on this issue.”

Moratoriums on Data Center Construction

19:34 to 24:12

Discussion on moratoriums imposed on data center construction and the implications.

“Now, we could all be, many people could be proven wrong on that front.”

Complex Stakeholder Dynamics

24:12 to 28:00

Examination of the various stakeholders involved in data center decisions.

“And Governor Hochul isn't the only one who supports moratoriums on new construction.”
Show all 17 chapters

Diverse Opinions on NDAs in Data Centers

28:00 to 30:20

The data center industry reveals contrasting views on the use of NDAs among companies.

“data center industry about to what degree they should use NDAs.”

Governor Polis on Data Centers and Community Concerns

30:20 to 30:47

Governor Polis discusses the challenges and needs for data centers in Colorado amidst community opposition.

“But before we go, this message from one of you.”

Congressman Liccardo on Data Center Legislation

31:14 to 42:00

Congressman Liccardo discusses the need for legislation to protect communities amidst data center development.

“We're talking about data centers and the sudden political momentum around them.”

Infrastructure Investment for AI

42:00 to 42:20

Discussion on the importance of investing in infrastructure for AI.

“not build the interstate highway system, et cetera, we obviously would have a very different economy.”

Public Demand and AI Infrastructure

42:36 to 44:12

Exploring the public's appetite for AI and the implications for infrastructure.

“I quickly want to get both of your reactions to what we heard there, especially around this tension that the congressman points out.”

Funding and Political Dynamics

44:12 to 46:52

Insights on the funding behind data centers and the political landscape.

“The tech industry is pouring money into pushing for these data centers.”

Engaging the Audience

46:52 to 47:31

Encouragement for listeners to share their thoughts on AI and data centers.

“That's Robinson Meyer, executive editor of the climate news organization Heatmap, and Amy Harder, national energy correspondent for Axios.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This message comes from Workday, the enterprise AI platform with a deep understanding of your organization's context and guardrails. So every AI action is permission aware, giving you the ability to get work done right. It's a new work day.

0:22It's all over the news. The backlash against AI data centers is growing. These protesters behind me have been out here since 9 a.m. We talk about AI as if it lives in the cloud, but the cloud has a physical address. Data centers. Protesters showed up in 125 cities across the country on a single Saturday last month. Here's what one told WTKR News in Virginia. We are begging the politicians to listen to us and not the big money. Are the politicians listening? New polling suggests party leaders and voters may not be in sync on this issue, especially within the Democratic Party. Reporting shows data centers are bringing voters from both parties together in some states.

1:05We'll get into all of it today. It's part two of our data center deep dive here on 1A. And this time we're talking politics. Why have data centers become a political flashpoint so quickly? Who stands where on the issue and why? And who's actually calling the shot at the local, state, and federal levels? I'm Jen White. We'll be back with more after this short break. Stay with us.

1:31This message comes from Workday, the enterprise AI platform with a deep understanding of your organization's context and guardrails, so every AI action is permission-aware, giving you the ability to get work done right. It's a new Workday. This message comes from Betterment. You know when you sell a stock or any investing asset and start to feel the dread of getting a surprise tax bill? Betterment's Tax Impact Preview Tool shows you the estimated tax impact of the sale so you can make informed, tax-smart investing decisions. Get started today at Betterment.com. Investing involves risk, performance not guaranteed.

2:09Betterment is not a tax advisor, nor should any information herein be considered tax advice. Please consult a qualified tax professional. Zendaya and Tom Holland are back in Spider-Man Brand New Day, and the movie has a more grounded tone than we've seen from the franchise. But does it strike the right balance of fun and darkness? We'll talk about it on NPR's Pop Culture Happy Hour. Listen via the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back to the 1A podcast. We're discussing data centers and why they've become such a political flashpoint. Joining us are two reporters who've been covering the growing furor.

2:46Robinson Meyer is calling in from New York. He's the executive editor of the climate change news organization, Heatmap. Rob, welcome back. Thanks so much for having me. It's great to be here. And Amy Harder is national energy correspondent for Axios. She joins us from Seattle. Amy, welcome back. Hello. Great to be here. Later in the show, we hear from Democratic member of Congress representing Silicon Valley, Representative Sam Liccardo. Now, the data center fight has been moving incredibly quickly from these local zoning disputes to a national political movement in just a few years. Rob, what's driving the energy around this issue?

3:20Absolutely. Well, I think, first of all, this is just a massive infrastructure build-out. You know, there's going to be a trillion dollars of spending on new infrastructure across the country this year and next year. And what that means is a massive transformation of the landscape. There's just a huge amount of physical buildings that are being constructed, of electricity infrastructure, of new generation capacity that needs to be brought online. I think one thing about the AI boom that's happening is it's quite a physical transformation. And that is happening across the country. And it is actually changing the landscape of the country.

3:59And it is driving, I think, a very large response. Now, you've done public opinion polling on data centers. Broadly speaking, what are you learning about where the public is leaning on this issue? Yeah, absolutely. Well, the public has changed its mind on this issue, or at least found a new view on this issue extremely quickly. I think public polling on data centers has actually changed far more quickly than I thought the American public could change its mind about anything. So Heatmap News is a decarbonization climate and energy outlet, and we poll the American public, about 4 ,000 Americans, several times a year on a number of energy-related questions.

4:37And last summer, we started asking Americans, would you support or oppose a local data center being built in your area? It was very neutral language, just trying to get a sense of where people were coming out. And last summer, so last August, exactly a year ago, about 40 % of Americans said they would oppose, about 40 % said they would support, and the rest of Americans didn't know we were somewhere in between. Since then, we've pulled the question two more times, most recently in May, and we have seen a huge shift. So last August, again, 40 to 40 support oppose. In May of this year, 70 % of Americans, actually more than 70 % of Americans said they would oppose.

5:16And only 15 to 20 % of Americans said they would support. And so the sea change here has been enormous in public opinion. And are you able to glean why that massive shift happened so quickly? It's such an interesting question. I mean, I think partially it is just, you know, there have been more projects in the past few months. So they're more visible. Yeah, this went from being a kind of hypothetical issue to being something that maybe was happening in people's neighborhoods and that they did develop an opinion about. I think we can get into some of the other polling, but I think one of the big questions I have is, is this about AI?

5:55And we have some polling that indicates it is and that Americans are increasingly nervous or not sure how to think about AI. And data centers are the physical manifestation of AI. And so that's part of what's happening here. And then I think also there's just been a lot more messaging and social media activity and public discourse about data centers since last August. And people who maybe didn't have a view on them are now developing a view. Well, let's talk about some of that messaging. Data centers are starting to feature in political ads around the country. Let's listen to a few. Here's progressive congressional candidate Will Lawrence in Michigan, Republican Florida gubernatorial candidate Paul Renner, and Democratic Florida gubernatorial candidate David Jolly.

6:35I'm Will Lawrence, and tech billionaires want to turn this whole field into a massive data center that'll jack up our energy bills and ruin our home value. I'm running for U.S. Congress because I've never been afraid to stand up to corporate power. When I become governor in January of 2027, we're going to bring in the legislature next year and put a full halt to the construction of these hyperscale data centers, which will raise our electric rates, damage our water supply, and hurt our environment. Not on my watch. As governor on day one, I will issue a moratorium on data centers in the state of Florida until we have the environmental protections and the economic impact studies that actually could support their use in Florida.

7:18Now, Robinson laid out some of the shift in public opinion we've seen over the last year or so. But Amy, some politicians who were pro-Data Center are backtracking now. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, a Democrat, recruited data center investment for his state. Now he's proposing a pause on the state's data center tax incentives. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, positioned his state as a tech-friendly alternative to California. On Monday, he put a new data center approval on hold, all new data center approvals on hold, until that state can evaluate the impact on the grid. So we've got the public opinion shifting, but why is the political ground shifting so quickly?

7:55The political ground is shifting because of the groundswell of opposition around the country. I think this is a classic example of general opposition, both parties, all parties in the United States being opposed to something that is coming at them very fast and very big. I think one of the common arguments you hear from people who really support the data center industry and the AI sector and who are inside it is the argument that if we go too slow, that China will beat us. Well, talking with people who are directly affected by or who live near data centers, that argument doesn't hold any water.

8:35No pun intended, because water is in fact one of the biggest concerns that people have when it comes to data centers. And so it's almost refreshing just from a perspective of the politicians responding to their electorate that people are getting upset and politicians are changing their views in real time in response to that. I think the most stark one is Governor Abbott just yesterday, as you said, changing course. And I don't think there's any coincidence that this is all happening now, just a few months before the midterm elections. I wouldn't be surprised if some of these delays last through that time period.

9:14Well, that's the next question then. Is this a durable change or is this about getting to and through the midterms? I think it's a bit of both. I don't think, for example, this move by the Texas governor is going to be permanent by any means. Texas will remain, generally speaking, bullish on data centers. but the governor wants to make sure that these data center developers are following some of the requirements they've put in place around things like transparency and energy and water use. And the midterms are just injecting a level of political urgency into these very real concerns. I think other states, perhaps New York, it may be more enduring in terms of the time, a whole year, for example.

10:01Governor Abbott didn't put a time label on his pause. But I think this is a sign that it's not a political issue. Excuse me, it's a political issue. It's not a partisan issue. And that's pretty rare. Well, to that point, we got this message from Bob in Birmingham, Alabama, about our data center show last week. That was sort of the data center 101. And he's responding to this idea that resistance to data centers is one of the few things bringing left wing and right wing voters together. He disagrees. I feel like people's interest in holding people the likes of Jeffrey Epstein accountable, affordability, responsiveness of government, lower corruption in government, specifically around financial stuff.

10:43And I think there's quite a bit that we agree on. In a Gallup poll earlier this year, seven in 10 Americans polled opposed data center construction in their local areas. A majority of Democrats, independents and Republicans all opposed data centers locally. But we hear from our caller there that there are other issues that unite people regardless of their party. Amy, I mean, especially in the current political landscape, how—I don't want to use the word normal— how common is it to see this type of unity over an issue? Well, to the caller's comments about some other issues, affordability and the Epstein files, Yes, there's broad agreement that pedophilia is bad and everybody wants to afford their things in their lives that they need to buy.

11:30But when you go down a little bit deeper, there's actually a lot of disagreement about both of those things and also how to solve them. With data centers, there's for now, I will say, this is a fast moving story, so it could change, it will change in the next few months. But for now, there is a remarkable amount of bipartisan agreement that, hey, we need to slow this down and take just a review of what's happening with all these data centers being developed. And as Rob said, I think that one of the many notable things about this infrastructure buildout is just the sheer pace and scale of it, which dwarfs anything we've seen in modern history.

12:13And those two things together are creating this unusual bipartisan opposition. Up next, how are officials at every level of government thinking about regulating the booming data center industry? That's just ahead.

12:31This message comes from Workday. Guessing is for game shows, not your business. Especially when your margin for error is zero. Workday is the enterprise AI platform for HR, finance, and IT, with a deep understanding of your organization's context and guardrails, so every AI action is permission-aware, giving you accuracy 24-7 and the ability to not just get work done, but get it done right. It's a new workday. This message comes from Kachava. When adulting gets hard, it's easy to long for simpler times, like enjoying Saturday morning cartoons and savoring every last drop of sugary milk at the bottom of your cereal bowl.

13:11Well, Cachava's new Cinnamon French Toast All-in-One Nutrition Shake gives you all the nostalgic feels and benefits. Treat yourself to a childhood favorite. Go to cachava.com and use code NPR for 15 % off your first order. That's K-A-C-H-A-V-A dot com, code NPR. This is Terry Gross. When I was celebrating my 50th anniversary hosting Fresh Air, I asked my guest, Roastmaster General Jeff Ross, to roast me. Terry Gross, a barely living legend.

13:48Still at it. Listen to Fresh Air on the NPR app or wherever you get podcasts. Let's get back into the conversation. We're talking about the politics of data centers, the rapid shift in public opinion, and the way lawmakers and officials are responding. Amy Harder is still with us. She covers data centers and energy for Axios. And Robinson Meyer is executive editor of Heatmap. That's a climate news organization. And we're hearing from you. Here's IBEW union member Frias in Leesburg, Virginia. The data centers provide us work, good income for our families, plenty of jobs in the trades. We also got this message from Bob in Withville, Virginia.

14:31Bob says, quote, we're currently fighting with our county supervisor board. They spoke with a company for a year under an NDA and have negotiated and signed for a data center without any input from the public. We were told about it after it was really too late. And now there's a second started in that county. The county has no zoning, so they were able to do that. When we talk about how this conversation and debate over data centers first began to come to public knowledge, Robison, part of the discussion was about the lack of transparency about them being built in communities, that there were community boards that signed NDAs.

15:07How do you think that lack of transparency at the outset has shaped the conversation we're having today? Well, I think that there's a couple big things that have happened over the past few years, of this issue significantly and filter through this transparency question. The first, I was thinking back to the question you asked about like why have people changed their minds? And I think there have been a number of projects that were very large that were uniquely bad actors or at least distinctively bad actors, bad actors in such a way that they changed the national politics of this issue. And for that, in that category, I would hold up, for instance, the two XAI Colossus data centers near Memphis.

15:47They were big projects. they didn't have access to utility-scale power. And so at least Colossus 1, the first one, brought in basically temporary gas generation power plants on the back of trucks, the kind of thing that are supposed to run at construction sites, and then ran a full data center off them, which just sent pollution into the neighborhoods nearby. And I think that was such a... They were not really permitted, as far as we can tell. They violated EPA rules, and that was such a bad project. It totally changed, I think, the national politics of this issue. One thing we see at the local level is that there is some, you know, signing NDAs or entering some agreements with a county.

16:32That can happen in some forms of local economic development. It's that because data centers have become such an explosive issue, what would have been maybe not standard operating procedure, but something that counties would have felt a little bit more comfortable doing a few years ago is now becoming extremely explosive and not really working out in those counties' benefits. I think the big example there is in Utah, the state senate president or the longtime state senate president signed off on a data center that was sponsored in some way or invested in by Kevin O 'Leary from Shark Tank or Mr.

17:11Wonderful. And he approved a permit for this data center. He later changed his mind about the data center, but he actually lost a primary election because he had endorsed this massive data center. And I think that shows how what once would have been kind of normal economic development policymaking from local officials has suddenly become a real danger to their political lives, you know, livelihoods because of how fast public opinion has changed on this issue. Well, Amy, and we also heard from Frias who talked about jobs and income. How is this conversation about data centers intersecting with other hot issues right now, like affordability?

17:53The jobs question here is a really interesting one. Number one, yes, data centers, like all infrastructure projects, do create jobs, particularly in the construction phase. At the same time, they don't create that many jobs once they're fully built. I've even had some data center developers argue to me and in town halls where these are being built that some people like data centers because they bring economic development but without more people. And more people means traffic and crowded schools. And to me, that's an interesting argument to try to make that data centers can bring economic development without more people.

18:36Well, and how are they defining economic development? And is it just about the work generated by construction, or are they pointing to something that's related to just the existence of the data center in that place? The additional taxes, like property taxes that they pay, go into supporting schools and hospitals and things like that. But they don't create crowded streets. And to me, that's a sign that I don't want to use the word desperate, but some people might say a desperate argument on behalf of the data center industry to try to argue that people actually don't want jobs. They just want economic development.

19:10I think most of the time people do want jobs. I think here the unique challenge is that you're dealing with both the physical manifestation within data centers, but also the existential threat that AI poses to jobs of all kinds. And that argument so far really cuts against more jobs for people. Now, we could all be, many people could be proven wrong on that front. There's also arguments that AI could create more jobs. But for now, there's this existential angst layered on top of the real concerns about these massive infrastructure projects. Well, you mentioned the word desperation, and we know that municipal budgets are stretched incredibly, incredibly thin.

19:54And so as you're talking to, you know, county board supervisors and council members and even state lawmakers who are trying to figure out ways to bring more money into their states and their communities, What are they saying about that economic development argument tech is making right now? The way this is manifesting is really in the debate over the tax credits that a lot of data center developers get. And you're seeing many states pausing those tax credits, at least for the time being, while they reevaluate how these data centers should be built. Now, from my perspective as an energy reporter who's since started covering data centers, it's really quite astounding that these projects get tax incentives at all.

20:42These deep-pocketed companies really want to build these data centers. They probably don't even need these tax credits. And I think that's where politicians are starting to realize, like, hey, these people want to come into our communities already. ready, let's not give them even more incentive than they already have, because that's taking away from their county and local budgets. Robert, Tim, what are you hearing in your reporting? Yeah, I think in this context, it's helpful to think, it's helpful to like, think about how data centers almost as a piece of infrastructure have changed over the past few years.

21:15And so for a long time, I totally agree with Amy, like that we are seeing a huge change in like the tax status of these things. For a long time, I think data centers, well, for a long time, when we talked about data centers, we were talking about what we would now call cloud data centers, which are relatively, they didn't always have a massive footprint. They didn't have massive energy needs. These were the kinds of data centers that do things like serve Netflix or Gmail or Google. These, or your bank, you know? And I should say that data centers like cloud data centers are kind of all over the country.

21:52We don't really notice them. I've heard, for instance, that Netflix has three data centers, cloud data centers in New York City, basically so that everyone can watch Netflix faster because it's faster when you have a Netflix server closer to the place where people are watching. And those were relatively safe investments that were going to be in a community for a long time. And so I think a number of communities pass tax incentives for those kinds of facilities because they figured, look, we'll give them five years off their taxes or 10 years off their taxes, then they'll stick around for 30 years, and they'll be this long-term source of reliable tax revenue in our county or municipality.

22:30With data centers, because there's kind of a speculative aspect to the boom, and because these are much larger facilities, and because AI, unlike cloud, you know, cloud, kind of old school computing, let's call it for a lack of a better term, when you add users, you don't increase the amount of energy it uses. But AI, generally, as you add every additional user, the amount of energy required, because it's actually doing live computing for that user, increases linearly to really generalize here. And so these facilities require massive amounts of power, which then, of course, puts demands on the local grid, which requires all this backup infrastructure.

23:09And they're being invested in a much more speculative way. And I think that's driven the shift from towns where they go, these facilities are going to be here for a long time. They don't need to pay as much taxes in the beginning because they're going to pay taxes for a long time. We actually need these things to pay more than they would pay in taxes and to give us extra payments because it's kind of risky to accept these things. Well, last month, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed an executive order. It temporarily banned the construction of new hyperscale. Those are the very large data centers for a year, while the state comes up with a framework for regulating them.

23:44And it's the first ban of its kind in the U.S. She insists the pause is temporary. Here she's speaking at a roundtable with local officials last Wednesday. What I can promise you is a very thoughtful product in less than a year now that is going to really set the bar for the nation, help everybody get it right, whether you have a lot of ability to negotiate like some counties do or you're a tiny little community that does not. And Governor Hochul isn't the only one who supports moratoriums on new construction. Here's Senator Bernie Sanders speaking in December. I will be pushing for a moratorium on the construction of data centers that are powering this unregulated sprint to develop and deploy AI.

24:30This moratorium will give democracy a chance to catch up with the transformative changes that we are witnessing and make sure that the benefits of these technologies work for all of us, not just the wealthiest people on earth. Senator Sanders and Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez introduced bills in the House and Senate in March. Rob, what do you make of this move by New York to put a pause on the development of data centers in that state and potentially create a roadmap for other states to follow suit? Yeah, well, I would first say that New York isn't alone. It's the first state that's passed a moratorium on data centers.

25:16But at Heatmap, we track kind of the local regulatory environment for energy and data centers across the country. And what we found is that 530 different counties or municipalities or local governments of some kind have passed either a moratorium or a very restrictive law, a law that essentially works akin to a moratorium across the country on data centers that are active right now. And actually, 190 of those moratoriums have been passed just since June 1st. And if you include New York in the mix here, which we didn't in that count, but if you include New York, at this point, about 8 % of the counties in the United States basically block all data center construction.

Read the full transcript

25:54And so this is a nationwide trend. I think in New York's case, I think there's kind of two big questions here. I think, first of all, we saw a lot of counties actually first do this on renewable energy. And what's interesting is that this is now an issue that Democrats are really rallying around. But a lot of the rural opposition to data centers emerged from a movement that began as rural opposition to clean energy, you know, wind and solar energy. And they first fought solar farms, then they fought data centers. And so that's kind of interesting. And I think one thing we saw there is that counties or towns would pass moratoriums on a temporary basis.

26:31And they say they're temporary, but then in fact they stay on the books indefinitely because no official wants to reopen a controversial point. I think in New York's case, the governor has said certain things that makes me think it's more likely to be temporary. One thing she said she wants to do is make sure that towns that want to enter into agreements and negotiate with data center developers have the technical assistance to do so. That's actually something that already exists in southeastern states. It's not something that New York has. So she wants to make that possible in New York. She also didn't sign a state legislative moratorium, instead choosing to pass it as an executive order.

27:07And the terms of her order were in some way more generous than the terms of the state law that she didn't sign or state bill. And so I think it's more likely to be temporary in New York, but I think generally we're seeing a huge new set of moratoriums come up across the country. And I think those are not likely to be temporary. Well, Amy, I want to make sure we don't oversimplify this discussion into communities versus tech companies. Because if you look at the full picture, it's much more complicated. You have, you know, utilities, there are developers, there are labor unions, counties, environmental groups, energy companies, all with different interests.

27:44So who's actually in the room when these decisions are getting made. Well, part of the challenge with that is oftentimes we don't know because of the NDAs that you talked about earlier. And I think there's a big debate within the data center industry about to what degree they should use NDAs. Cloverleaf Infrastructure, a company based in Houston, categorically says they do not use NDAs. Other companies such as Google says that they need to use NDAs. And so even within the industry, you have a difference of opinions on that. So it's really a mix, a hodgepodge of how we know what's happening. But to answer your question, you know, it really is a huge mix of different interests.

28:32And so I think you have obviously local officials, you have the utility is a key one. But sometimes the utility is not even there if they're going building their own electricity on site. And so each one is so different that it's hard to really paint with a broad brush how these things are decided. But if we focus in on the politics again for a moment, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and other building trade unions have come out in favor of data center construction. They say, as we heard from a previous listener, these are good paying union jobs. So how are politicians, especially Democratic politicians, navigating this tension between their union base, which wants the jobs, and the broader community, which says we don't want these data centers here?

29:17I recently interviewed Governor Jared Polis, a Democrat from Colorado, on this very issue. And he's an interesting player in this space. Colorado is kind of ground zero for, you know, very purple politics and a big build out of data centers where water is scarce. So it's a very interesting state. And I told him this was right after Congressman Frank Pallone, the top Democrat on the Energy Committee, came out to call for a temporary ban on data centers nationwide. And I told that to Polis and Polis said, well, wow, I didn't know he said that. I'm going to have to give him a call. And he said, of course, we need to have data centers.

29:55We have to do it right. And I said to him, well, you know, 70 % of people don't want data centers near them. And he said, of course, they don't want data centers near them. We have to find a way to build them in places where people can support them. And so I think he's trying to walk a fine line. I wouldn't be surprised if his position changes, although he is leaving office next year. So maybe he won't have to. Well, we have to take a quick break. But before we go, this message from one of you. Seth writes, I am anti-data center until we figure out the environmental hit they will cause, including on the grid and our water sources.

30:31Well, coming up, we hear from Representative Sam Liccardo of California's 16th Congressional District about how he wants to keep building data centers and how he thinks it should be done. That's just ahead.

30:46This message comes from Workday. Guessing is for game shows, not your business, especially when your margin for error is zero. Workday is the enterprise AI platform for HR, finance, and IT with a deep understanding of your organization's context and guardrails. So every AI action is permission-aware, giving you accuracy 24-7 and the ability to not just get work done, but get it done right. It's a new Workday. Welcome back to the 1A podcast. We're talking about data centers and the sudden political momentum around them. Joining us now is California Democrat Representative Sam Liccardo. He represents California's 16th district in the Bay Area.

31:29It's home to the headquarters of tech giants like Meta and Google. He's also the chair of the New Dems Innovation and Technology Working Group. The New Dems are a caucus of moderate Democrats and self-described pragmatists who say they want to support a dynamic and inclusive digital economy. Congressman, thanks for joining us. Great to be with you, Jed. And we're hearing from so many of you, Diane in Houston envisions a more symbiotic relationship with data center companies, writing, quote, instead of us versus them, let's do it together and make data centers a part of our power grid infrastructure.

32:02Then we can tap their power in Texas when needed and maybe vice versa and have them link and provide free Internet access to all the schools. Well, we still want to hear from you. Email us at 1a at wamu.org. Congressman, I want to point to you some new polling from the Public Policy Institute of California. They found that 44 percent of adults in California say they are strongly opposed to new data centers. 29 percent say they somewhat oppose them. And this opposition cuts across political parties, geographic regions and income. Why do you think there's such a widespread backlash right now? Well, there's a lot of anxiety and fear around AI generally.

32:44And let's be clear, a lot of that fear and anxiety is reasonable. And Congress needs to step up. And for the most part, Congress hasn't stepped up to address any of those fears, whether it's around what data centers might do in communities or the impact of AI on jobs. And so we need to do our job by protecting local communities, for example, around data centers, making sure that tech companies pay their own way and deliver real local benefits. And the good news is some of those companies are willing to do that, but we need to put laws in place to ensure we have clear guardrails. And so give us a couple of examples of the types of laws you think Congress should move forward to try to put some guardrails around this development.

33:27Well, there are various options. I mean, Mike Levin's got a great bill right now on renewables. What I'm working on now is figuring out how we can carve out a third way, not capitulating to tech companies with tax breaks, which they don't need, I agree, or imposing moratorium. But by leveraging these massive capital investments to eliminate burdens on local rate payers, to ensure they pay their own way, the companies do, on electricity generation and battery storage and grid improvements, which are desperately needed throughout the country, ensuring that they're not drawing from local water supplies by implementing a lot of advanced cooling systems like closed-loop cooling.

34:10And so what we can ultimately get in the legislation I'm working on not only would provide those protections, but also provide community benefit fund for local communities to support things like job retraining. We don't need to give companies money or tax breaks. What they do want is permits, and they want clear timelines to get those permits. So it seems to me we have an opportunity to protect our local communities in exchange for essentially what the tech companies need, which is speed and providing a clear pathway to getting a permit if they satisfy those requirements. And so explain how that process would work under what you're proposing.

34:50How would you speed up tech companies being able to get these permits and build more quickly? Well, certainly local land use is up to local cities and counties. But the pinch point for a lot of companies has been getting interconnection to the grid. Those permits have been delayed, in some cases, three years, as long as five years. And that is a massive impact on the company's ability, obviously, to generate revenue and to get things up and operating. And so if we are, through federal law, able to provide a shot clock so that the local, what they call the ISOs and the regional utilities, regional utility organizations, are getting permits to the grid within a matter of months rather than years, we can demand a lot for local communities up front from those companies that want to move quickly.

35:45And so this is our opportunity. We tell them what the price tag is. We protect local communities. We get local investment that we all want. And the companies are able to move at the speed of business. When you talk about companies moving at the speed of business, some of the frustration from communities is focused on a lack of transparency around data center plans. And the speed of business may be very different than the speed of community input or community engagement. So how do you square that circle and ensure that communities, not just elected officials, not just county board members, but the people living in these communities feel like they've been engaged in a process and are not just victims, if you will, of the process?

36:32We can do this transparently and collaboratively with local communities. But it seems to me that the first thing we need to do is put in law the clear protections that local communities want to ensure ratepayers aren't bearing the burden for these massive investments in the draw, obviously, on energy and water and so forth. And ensuring that we have the local environmental protections in place as well. Those are things we can put in federal law so local communities don't have to fight over those things. So they have the leverage to be able to get what they want. Now, local communities still have the authority over local land uses, and that's important.

37:08But by having federal law in place that provides them that leverage, then they can go through their local processes and focus on whatever land use issues that are most of concern to that community. And we can all be certain that, at least with regard to many of the basics, we're protecting local communities. We got this message from a member of our tax club who writes, we live in a country currently controlled by billionaires. Data centers serve the interests of the rich. The working and poor people must take our country back. Congressman, you were endorsed by Leading the Future. That's a pro-artificial intelligence super PAC.

37:45You have not accepted the PAC's financial support. But what do you say to voters who feel tech money is playing too big a role in this issue and our political landscape more broadly? I think they're right. And there's too much money generally in politics and particularly around this issue. But what we need to do is to provide some confidence to Americans by actually leaning into this problem and acting in ways that provide clear protections. And Congress just hasn't been doing that. And I think that's why so many local communities feel that they're under assault. They don't need to enact moratoria if we're doing our job in Congress, which is providing the protections for ratepayers and local communities that they need.

38:28Is there the political appetite and will right now for Congress to work together on finding some solutions to this issue? I don't think it'll happen before Election Day here in November. But I'd like to think in this lame duck period that follows Election Day, there might be an opportunity here. And obviously, I'm hopeful for my own party's success in November and we'll have more opportunities in January. So the short answer is we know not much is getting done in Congress right now. But if there is impetus to do anything, it should be on this. When you talk to your constituents who are concerned with energy prices and other kitchen table issues, is your argument about this path forward as you see it to building data centers, is it landing with them?

39:18Certainly, there are folks all across the spectrum, and we know that there's going to be a lot of distrust around this issue. This isn't going to be something that suddenly persuades everybody tomorrow. That's what a political process is about. let's actually get legislation out on the floor to have these public discussions. Let's also acknowledge what every utility and renewable energy expert knows about our grid right now, which is our deteriorating grid is costing all of us an enormous amount of money. It's been driving a lot of utility rate hikes, particularly in California, and it's the biggest obstacle to our green energy future.

39:55And so I think if we're able to demonstrate through legal protections that we can mandate investments in the grid, both to protect ratepayers and to protect our environment, there's an awful lot we can do to enable data center development and obviously protect the communities we need to protect. It sounds to me, Congressman, as if there are a lot of questions that still need to be answered for communities around this issue, around data center development. With so many open questions, why aren't moratoria the right approach in this moment until those questions are answered? Because regardless of what moratoria get enacted, AI is coming.

40:40And AI is certainly going to be developed in the United States and abroad. and increasingly individuals and companies we all know are going to continue to use it at a faster and faster clip. This is infrastructure we all need. And the question is whether we are going to be crippled by our inability to build infrastructure or we're going to step up to the challenge and actually ensure our local communities are protected while we build the infrastructure. But that accepts, Congressman, forgive me, that accepts that AI adoption at a very large scale is inevitable. And I think when people hear that statement, they often feel, again, as if they are at the mercy of the technology rather than we, as citizens of this country, driving the way that technology is implemented into our lives.

41:35Well, every individual consumer and every individual business is driving that decision for themselves. and what they're overwhelmingly telling us, regardless of whatever our views are about AI, but what Americans are telling us is they want more AI. And so we need to address the fears, and those are very reasonable fears that people have. We have to address them squarely. But if we simply decided to shut down the grid, not build the interstate highway system, et cetera, we obviously would have a very different economy. We need to be able to invest in infrastructure that is critically needed in our economy.

42:14At the same time, we address squarely the very reasonable concerns that all of our local communities have. Well, that's Congressman Sam Liccardo from California's 16th District. Congressman, thank you for speaking with us. Thanks so much, Jen. And let's turn back now to Amy Harder, National Energy Correspondent for Axios, and Robinson Meyer, Executive Editor of Climate News Organization, Heatmap. I quickly want to get both of your reactions to what we heard there, especially around this tension that the congressman points out. He says Americans say they want more AI, and yet there is this pushback for the infrastructure that would make that access possible.

42:52Amy? I did find that an interesting comment. I think it's an open question whether the American population as a whole really wants AI, particularly at the level that we're getting it with some of these massive hyperscaler-sized data centers. Of course, I use AI every day. I bet Rob does and maybe your team at NPR does as well. Or maybe not. You're shaking your head. And so, you know, and this is an argument that I hear from the AI tech industry constantly. They say that we all use it. They say that our data centers are needed so you can call 911, which is not true. The data centers that were being talked about today are for AI, not so we can call 911.

43:40They're trying to put it all into one basket because it's more politically palpable that way. But I do think there's an open question about whether or not our population wants AI on a whole. I will also say that a lot of the AI applications that many of us are using are being achieved with the amount of data centers we have today. And so even if there was a national pause, we would still be doing a lot more on AI than we ever were before. And so it's not really all or nothing. Robinson, I'm also curious to hear your thoughts about the money driving this conversation. The tech industry is pouring money into pushing for these data centers.

44:22What are you seeing there? Well, I guess I would, so first of all, what we do know is that I think, first of all, the tech industry was a little taken by surprise by the scale of the pushback here. And I think they're only now starting to kind of rev up spending on PR campaigns, on ads, on public messaging to kind of get people to see the other side of this issue. We know the Data Center Coalition, which is a trade group in Washington, D.C., has just started an online campaign, basically, to get people to kind of see the other side of the data center issue. I do think, I mean, I think it's interesting because we also know that, like, for instance,

45:03voters seem to know where they stand on this. And so regardless of the amount of money, anti-data center candidates are winning elections. And so there can, I think, I'm always, I'm never quite sure where to come out because I think there's like a lot of, there's too much money in politics. And also, you know, no matter how much money there is in politics, the politicians on the popular side of the issue seem to win. I think where there's like an interesting side of this kind of question around data center buildout, around public demand for AI, is that for a long time, the build-out of data centers was running ahead of AI.

45:40There were more data centers being built than there was demand for AI. I think since the beginning of this year, we've seen that reversed. And there is now more demand for AI than there is necessarily capacity, and that is driving compute prices, as they say, up. I also think there's this very interesting divide that is between local policymakers and national policymakers, where local policymakers are very responsive to what voters want to do in their areas. And that makes sense. At the national scale, I think, you know, for instance, we know in just the internet browser Firefox, there were 271 bugs discovered by the frontier mythos model from Anthropic on just the first day it looked.

46:22And we only know that because Firefox is open sourced. We know there's AI models finding thousands of bugs across extremely important software. And I think for national policymakers, they go, we need to make sure that AI has the resources it has because we don't want there to be bugs in our software. That's like a big public safety issue because it's water software, it's electricity software, et cetera. And so there's this divide between local and national interests that I think no one knows how to play out yet. Well, lots more to watch. That's Robinson Meyer, executive editor of the climate news organization Heatmap, and Amy Harder, national energy correspondent for Axios.

47:01We also want to hear from you. Are you involved in politics? If so, how are you thinking about data centers and AI regulations? We'll be coming back to this topic soon, so reach us by text, voicemail, or email. Find out all the ways to connect with us under the Talk to 1A tab at the1a.org. Today's producer was Claire Muffson with help from Lauren Hamilton. And this program comes to you from WAMU, part of American University in Washington, distributed by NPR. I'm Jen White. Thanks for listening, and we'll talk more soon. This is 1A.

47:54This message comes from Workday, the enterprise AI platform with a deep understanding of your organization's context and guardrails, so every AI action is permission-aware, giving you the ability to get work done right. It's a new workday. This message comes from Kachava. When adulting gets hard, it's easy to long for simpler times, like enjoying Saturday morning cartoons and savoring every last drop of sugary milk at the bottom of your cereal bowl. Well, Kachava's new cinnamon French toast all-in-one nutrition shake gives you all the nostalgic feels and benefits. Treat yourself to a childhood favorite.

48:32Go to cachava.com and use code NPR for 15 % off your first order. That's K-A-C-H-A-V-A dot com, code NPR. Instead of scrolling mindlessly, engage mindfully with the NPR app. With a mix of on-demand news, stories from this station, and your favorite podcast, you can relax without shutting off your brain. Download the NPR app today.

From the publisher
Data centers.

They’ve been all over the news. Last month, protesters showed up in 125 cities across the country on a single Saturday to demonstrate against these structures, either proposed or completed.

But are the politicians listening? We sit down for the second part of our data center deep dive. This time, we talk politics. Why have data centers become a political flashpoint so quickly? And who is calling the shots at the local, state, and federal level?

Find more of our programs online. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a.

See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.

NPR Privacy Policy

More from 1A

All 320 episodes
AI: The Data Center Debate, Part Two1A · 45 min
Listen in VO