America 250: One Nation Under God?

19 May 2026 · 46 min · 23 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

A live 1A episode (taped May 19, 2026, at American University) examining a White House-backed “Freedom/Rededication” prayer event for America’s 250th birthday—“one nation under God”—and whether it reflects Christian nationalism or founders’ religious freedom.

Guests and backgrounds

Jack Jenkins, NPR/Religion News Service national reporter covering religion-politics; author American Prophets. Asma Udin, assistant professor of law at Michigan State; author When Islam is Not a Religion. Mark David Hall, professor at Regent University; author Did America Have a Christian Founding? Jeffrey Rosen, CEO Emeritus of the National Constitution Center; professor at GW Law; Atlantic editor.

Key claims

The event linked American identity to Christianity (especially evangelical Christianity) and excluded many non-Christian faith leaders. A cited George Washington-at-Valley-Forge prayer story was described as historically dismissed. “Under God” is argued to have shifted meanings over time and is now defended via “history and tradition” rather than strict separation. Legal debates include claims that Islam is “not a religion.”

Notable examples

San Diego Muslim Center shooting after the event; Murfreesboro, Tennessee RLUIPA case arguing Islam isn’t a religion; Texas/Oklahoma “Sharia city” rhetoric; Hegseth’s “Pharisees” press reference; absence of Muslim, Hindu, and most mainline Protestant leaders; crowd MAGA imagery and Christian cross stage backdrop.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

America's Spiritual Identity

0:45 to 1:58

Exploration of America's belief in God and its implications for national identity.

“Woven into the fabric of America is a deep and persistent belief that we cannot persevere on our own, that we need God.”

Event Overview: Rededicating America to God

1:58 to 2:16

Discussion on the recent prayer gathering and its significance.

“How should we understand the separation of church and state and freedom of religion and what our founders intended?”

Christianity's Message at the Event

2:16 to 3:20

Insights into the messages conveyed by Christian leaders at the gathering.

“We're in front of a live, in-person and virtual audience in partnership with Religion News Service.”

The Crowd's Response at the Gathering

3:20 to 4:39

Reflections on the attitudes and beliefs of attendees at the prayer event.

“Yeah, I think it was very clearly, you know, the comments that you had earlier, those clips, I do think are emblematic of both what was conveyed from the stage and what was received by those in the crowd.”

Absence of Diverse Religious Voices

4:39 to 7:19

Discussing the noticeable lack of representation from various faiths at the event.

“What did you hear from the people you talked to?”

Nuances in Religious Coverage

7:19 to 9:48

Examining how different religious events are perceived and covered in media.

“There were black Protestant speakers, but leaders from traditionally and historically black Protestant denominations were notably absent.”

Debate on Founders' Intentions

11:45 to 14:00

The ongoing discussion about the founders' views on religion in America.

“Each week, you'll get thoughtful, in-depth analysis of both the stock and the bond markets.”

Understanding Religious Identity in America

14:56 to 17:01

Discussion on the implications of labeling America as a Christian nation.

“show in partnership with Religion News Service.”

Historical Context of America's Founding

17:01 to 19:10

Exploration of the founders' beliefs and the historical context of religious freedom.

“But then you also have this language that is more structural, right?”

The Debate Over Religious Freedom

19:10 to 21:48

Analysis of the Establishment Clause and the founders' views on religion in governance.

“Now, the founders disagreed about exactly how to treat the question of religious liberty.”
Show all 23 chapters

Christian Nationalism and Its Implications

21:48 to 23:52

Examination of the concept of Christian nationalism and its critics.

“and I think there's a nuance that you like to talk about, whether we were founded as a Christian nation or founded by Christian people.”

Legal Challenges Faced by Muslim Communities

23:52 to 26:30

Discussion on legal challenges faced by Islamic centers and communities in the U.S.

“or idea of what we want it to be moving forward is.”

Advocacy for Religious Rights

26:30 to 27:39

The role of Christians in advocating for the rights of various faiths.

“But I think we've heard a lot in what's happening in Texas with this housing development that has a mosque and an Islamic school being labeled by Governor Abbott as a quote-unquote Sharia city.”

Understanding the Lemon Test

27:39 to 28:01

Explanation of the Lemon Test and its relevance to the Establishment Clause.

“Jeff, I want to have you help us understand of this three-part framework that was established by the Supreme Court in Lemon v.”

Understanding the Establishment Clause

28:01 to 29:28

Learn about the purpose of the Establishment Clause and its historical context regarding church and state.

“Well, the Establishment Clause says that Congress shall make no law regarding an establishment of religion.”

Shifts in Supreme Court Doctrine

29:29 to 30:40

Explore the evolution of the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Establishment Clause and its implications.

“In that sense, the court embraced a new focus on history and tradition rather than questions about whether there's a secular purpose.”

Faith and Politics in America

33:00 to 34:31

Delve into the intersection of religion and American political discourse through history.

“In a special episode of 1A in front of a live audience, we're discussing faith in the state of our democracy in partnership with Religion News Service.”

Religious Rhetoric in Government

34:32 to 36:38

Examine the use of religious language in contemporary political speeches and its implications.

“He didn't even mention the fact that he was president.”

The Phrase 'Under God' in Context

36:39 to 42:05

Investigate how different generations interpret the phrase 'under God' and its constitutional implications.

“So it's complicated, as Mark David Hall says, and it's wrong for any single religion to claim that it has a monopoly on the truth.”

Historical Context of 'Under God'

42:05 to 43:59

Explore the historical implications of the phrase 'under God' in American governance and culture.

“And over the course of American history, a bunch of those traditions have accumulated, including putting under God on the Pledge of Allegiance.”

The Rise of the Religious Left

44:03 to 46:34

Discuss the emergence and impact of the religious left in American politics, focusing on figures like James Tallarico.

“Democrat James Tallarico is running for Senate in Texas.”

Thomas Paine's Legacy in Modern Politics

46:42 to 48:26

Analyze the evolving perception of Thomas Paine and his influence on contemporary political discourse.

“You could hear a lot of his rhetoric in a mainline Presbyterian seminary if you dropped in.”

The Importance of Civil Disagreement

48:28 to 49:06

Highlight the significance of civil disagreement in maintaining a healthy democratic discourse.

“The very essence of Madison's view is that you need access to a variety of views in order to ensure that truth can triumph over error.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab with its original podcast on investing. Each week, you'll get thoughtful, in-depth analysis of both the stock and the bond markets. Listen today and subscribe at schwab.com slash oninvesting or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, it's Nyla. A quick note before we start the show. Today's episode of the podcast was taped live in front of an audience at American University in Washington, D.C. on May 19, 2026. It was a fun one to do. I learned a lot. All right, let's get into it.

0:38I'm Nyla Boodoo. This is 1A. And this is what the National Mall in Washington, D.C. sounded like on Sunday. Woven into the fabric of America is a deep and persistent belief that we cannot persevere on our own, that we need God. This is God's country, and you can't celebrate God's country without celebrating God. There's no better way to kick off the birthday than this. So God bless America. That is so important, this divine reset. I came in from Texas just to be a part of this. Whatever walk in life or whatever denomination that you are in, it's good to be an American. So we know what God can do.

1:24But here's what we are to do. Sanctify yourselves. thousands attended a day-long conservative prayer gathering billed as a rededication of the U.S. as one nation under God for our nation's 250th birthday. The event was a public-private partnership backed by the White House and notably absent non-Christian voices of faith. Apart from one Jewish rabbi, all the speakers were Christian, most were evangelical, some were Trump cabinet members and lawmakers, which has us asking, what does one nation under God mean today? How should we understand the separation of church and state and freedom of religion and what our founders intended?

2:05Does the America of 2026 represent what our founding fathers wanted it to be? For today's show, we have moved out of the studio and we're coming to you from the Katzen Arts Center at American University. We're in front of a live, in-person and virtual audience in partnership with Religion News Service. Welcome, everybody.

2:30Thanks to all of you for being here. To start off, let's break down the events of the weekend with Jack Jenkins, national reporter for Religion News Service based in Washington. He covers the intersection of religion and politics and is also the author of American Prophets, The Religious Roots of Progressive Politics and the Ongoing Fight for the Soul of the Country. Jack, thanks for being here. Thanks so much for having me. Jack, Sunday's program included Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, House Speaker Mike Johnson. I was there for much of the day, as were you.

3:00And I will say, when I heard many of the Christian pastors, with a few notable exceptions, taking pains to say that they supported diversity in other religions, the politicians that were there, including Senator Tim Scott and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, who gave a prayer, had much more pro-Christian and overtly Christian messaging. From your perspective, what was the overarching message of the day? Yeah, I think it was very clearly, you know, the comments that you had earlier, those clips, I do think are emblematic of both what was conveyed from the stage and what was received by those in the crowd.

3:35It was this linking of religion in general to the American founding and the American story, Christianity in particular, and conservative Christianity even more in particular to that American story. That's why we heard several, like you mentioned, the politicians, Pete Hegseth actually recounted a story of George Washington kneeling and praying at Valley Forge. That story has actually been dismissed. Not factually accurate. Right. It's been dismissed by historians for a long time, but he was linking it as, oh, like, just like George Washington, we should pray like this today. We heard similar comments made by Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, and as you mentioned, Mike Johnson, just kind of linking American history to Christians in particular and faith in general as this sort of melding of American identity and a religious identity.

4:23And I should note that most of these comments were delivered from a stage that had a giant projected Christian cross in the center of it. So who, there were thousands of people in attendance, I will say, for a very hot day. It was in the 90s, and people were there out on the mall all day. What did you hear from the people you talked to? Yeah, so the people who I spoke with had come from all over. Folks had flown in and driven in from, you know, far-flung states to be a part of this. You know, I spoke to three women outside who were waiting in line. You all had One Nation Under God shirts on. And when I asked them why they were here, they mentioned that they thought that rededicating America to God was, in fact, long overdue.

5:02They saw this as an important step. But I'll note it was really interesting that they followed that by saying, I'm here to support my president, referring to President Donald Trump. And that came through a lot, that there was a lot of MAGA hats and things like that that were also sprinkled through the crowd. And that was happening alongside folks who had very emotional religious responses to this, who said that they believe that this version of history resonates with them both as an American but also as a Christian. That what they hear preached in their own pulpits about American history links to their own personal understanding of faith.

5:41And so you saw people as they were walking into the crowd with hands raised in prayer. We saw people kneel together to pray together. And while they were wearing clothes, they were emblazoned with red, white, and blue. So it was really kind of a synthesis of that that I was hearing from any number of people in the crowd. We're also hearing from you. Gemma emails, the issue is not whether America should be a Christian nation, but whether the president appears to be leveraging the support of the Christian church without meaningfully engaging with it. At times, it seems he is so confident in that support, he does not feel the need to show up or participate, or even to convincingly demonstrate his faith.

6:15I should note, the president was not there on Sunday after touting this event. Organizers played a video of the president reading a passage from the Bible that he had recorded for another event a few weeks ago. We will get to more of the president in a moment, but who else was notable for not being there? Yeah, I mean, the speakers who were on the stage were overwhelmingly evangelical Christians, both faith leaders and pastors who were evangelicals as well. And a lot of those evangelicals, I should note, were often advisors or supporters of President Trump. And many of the government leaders were also evangelical Christians.

6:53There was some Catholic representation. We had one cardinal and one bishop who were on stage, as well as some entertainers and political figures who were Catholic. But you didn't see any mainline Protestant figures who were up there, which is interesting given that this is supposed to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, and disproportionately represented in the signers of the Declaration of Independence were actually what we would call now mainline Protestant denominations. There were black Protestant speakers, but leaders from traditionally and historically black Protestant denominations were notably absent.

7:27In fact, the Progressive National Baptist Convention, which once claimed Reverend Martin Luther King as one of its members, actually issued a statement the day before suggesting that the event was emblematic of white Christian nationalism. So you didn't see those. You also didn't see much representation, if at all, from members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which is actually one of the most reliably Republican religious groups in the country. And of course, you know, there was one Jewish rabbi, but you didn't see anything of any representation from Muslim Americans, indigenous spiritual practitioners, Hindus, what have you.

8:03It's very much overwhelming, not only Christian, but evangelical Christian in particular. So this was part of Freedom 250, which is not to be confused with America 250, which is the bipartisan and congressionally mandated that sponsored actually another event on Saturday called the Good Neighbors America event, which did have many faith groups and did not get as much attention as the president's service on the mall on Sunday. What should we know about that and other things that happened over the past weekend, other ways we saw faith groups coming out? What I think is really interesting about this as a religion reporter is like what gets counted as a religion story, right?

8:43As you noted, there were definitely faith leaders there. There was also a significant protest in March that was faith-led in Selma, in Alabama, pushing back against the gutting of a provision of the Voting Rights Act that happened recently. And that was, you know, the Civil Rights Movement, even people said at this Freedom to Rededicate 250 event, mentioned this religious elements of the Civil Rights Movement and how crucial faith was to that effort. But there wasn't any mention, for instance, of the fact that the Voting Rights Act had just had a significant provision gutted, and the Voting Rights Act is, of course, one of the seminal achievements of the Civil Rights Movement.

9:21So it's interesting that this event is covered as a religious, gathering and that this is where religion is happening in America, as it were, whereas the gathering you mentioned, as well as these protests, don't tend to get the same level of attention as religion stories. Now, that's not true at a religion news service, of course, but I think that it is equally as notable to me that the religious actors are operating in those spaces as well. We just have about a minute before we go to a break, but I wanted to quickly ask you put a quote to you about the U.S., saying that the U.S. is, quote, more religious than secular Americans claim and less religious than Christian nationalists would have us believe.

10:01That's from Matthew Avery Sutton, a professor of history at Washington State University, who spoke to RNS's Bob Smintana about this. I wonder if the data backs that up. Yeah, we have seen that for quite some time. More than 60 percent of the country is Christian in general, and other other percentages are religious. But we do have a substantial population of religiously unaffiliated. I've often joked with Democrats in particular that when they run for office, they often have to politic to the most and least religious Americans at the same time. And while Republicans have a significantly higher percentage of religious Americans in their clientele, people who self - identify as Republican, they actually have a significant sliver of non-religious Americans as well.

10:45The reality is that it's significantly more complicated than any of these tidy narratives would want us to believe. So we are going to get past some of those tidy narratives and go into some of the nuances of that. We do have to take a quick break. We're going to be back with more to come with Jack Jenkins, national reporter for Religion News Service. We're also hearing from you. Nicholas emailed us, we have freedom of religion in the U.S. Our country was founded where everyone can worship however they feel. And Tim says, I'm a devout Christian and a full-time youth pastor. I found the National Prayer Service event to be an absolute disgrace.

11:19I'm a firm believer in the separation of church and state. And the event this past Sunday was just idolatry on full display. Keep the questions and comments in coming. You can email us 1a at wamu.org. Coming up, legal and government scholars from several faith traditions are joining us. Stick with us.

11:41This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab with its original podcast on investing. Each week, you'll get thoughtful, in-depth analysis of both the stock and the bond markets. Listen today and subscribe at schwab.com slash oninvesting or wherever you get your podcasts. This message comes from the United States Postal Service. In business, there's no room for guesswork. Every shipment and deadline matters. When you're trying to keep operations running smoothly, the last thing you need is uncertainty. That's why reliability is at the core of USPS Ground Advantage. Each package moves through a secure nationwide network, tracked from dock to door.

12:20It's delivery you can depend on. Visit USPS.com slash Ground Advantage to learn more about how you can start shipping with confidence. This message comes from Ali. Looking for more targeted support from your supplements? New Ali Precise Probiotics are formulated to go beyond general gut health, with options designed to support areas like skin, stress response, and metabolism. Get precise with your probiotics and choose support that aligns with your needs. With thoughtfully selected ingredients and specific benefits in mind, Ali helps make daily wellness feel more straightforward. Find Ali Precise Probiotics at a Walmart near you.

13:01Support for NPR and the following message come from ID Tech. ID Tech is where kids ages 7 to 17 find their people. The battle bots, game design, and more people. Go to IDTech.com and use code IDTech to save$150 this summer. This message comes from our NPR sponsor, Fort Myers. Islands, beaches, and neighborhoods. This summer, follow what feels right, like embracing your playful side on Fort Myers' white sand beaches. Direct flights arrive daily. Plan your trip at visitfortmyers.com. Welcome back to the 1A podcast. There's a long-running debate over the founders' intentions for religion in the United States, and it's once again been thrust into the spotlight as we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.

13:49This weekend, on the National Wall in Washington, D.C., the White House organized a national jubilee of prayer, praise, and thanksgiving, and a ceremony that overwhelmingly featured conservative Christian religious leaders and members of the Trump administration. Here are J.D. Vance, Marco Rubio, and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson. The morality and religion that formed the American consciousness were decidedly Christian, founded upon the principles and the divinity of Jesus Christ. America is still a young nation measured against the record of history. And from the beginning, we have carried the belief that our country represents something new in the world.

14:28But the soul of our nation has always been rooted in an ancient faith. We hereby rededicate the United States of America as one nation under God.

14:42But what does that mean for Americans of non-Christian faiths? And is the president promoting Christian nationalism rather than religious freedom? We're broadcasting in front of a live and virtual audience from the Katzen Auditorium at American University for this special show in partnership with Religion News Service. Here with me now, Asma Udine is a scholar of religious liberty and Muslim identity in America. She's an assistant professor of law at Michigan State University and also the author of When Islam is Not a Religion. Asma, thank you for being here with us. Thank you for having me. Mark David Hall is a professor at Regent University's Robertson School of Government.

15:17He's also the author of Did America Have a Christian Founding? Separating Modern Myth from Historical Truth. Mark, welcome. Thank you. And Jeffrey Rosen, CEO Emeritus of the National Constitution Center, a professor of law at George Washington Law School, and a contributing editor of The Atlantic. Jeff, welcome back to 1A. Great to be here. So there's no specific reference to any religion in the Constitution beyond the date, quote, in the year of our Lord, 1787. It does forbid religious tests for office holders, and the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights guarantees religious freedom and forbids establishment of any religion.

15:54We're going to get into all of that, but I'd love to just first hear your reaction to what we heard from the vice president, the secretary of state, and the speaker of the house, given especially the lens all three of you have as scholars of American history and the constitution. Asma, can I start with you? Yeah, I mean, you noted that I wrote a book called When Islam is Not a Religion, and it was rooted in, one, my work on religious liberty, including at the Supreme Court and, you know, absolutely an advocate for broad religious liberty, but at the same time noticing that there was this pattern where religious liberty was being, at least outside the courts, being advocated for one religion or certainly thinking about certain faiths that were going to be excluded and sort of came to me most prominently, like, most clearly when I was working on a case that essentially talked about Islam, but the argument in court was that Islam is not a religion.

16:46And so land use protections do not extend to Islam. And once I kind of noted that in its explicit form, I noticed the many ways that it was coming up in sort of less explicit ways. And I think when I hear this clip, that's exactly what I'm thinking about. Like, in the one hand, you have these, like, very sort of obvious attempts to carve out who gets protections and who doesn't. But then you also have this language that is more structural, right? When he's talking about, morality in this country is largely rooted in one religion. It's rooted in Christianity. I mean, the quote by J.D. Vance, he said exactly that, like singling one out.

17:21It basically says, we're rededicating this country to this particular vision. And those are the people who belong, and everyone else is just a guest. And I think the incident in San Diego yesterday and many other incidents tell us that not a very welcome guest. We did just get this email from Susan, who said the prayer event happened on Sunday. On Monday, a shooting occurred at the San Diego Muslim Center, killing three. Why are we not surprised? Susan, thanks for sharing that. Mark, your thoughts on what you heard from that clip we just played. Sure, I think if we want to understand the American founding, we have to understand the context.

17:57In the late 18th century, about 98 % of Americans of European descent are Protestant, 2 % are Roman Catholic, and you have about 2 ,000 Jews in four or five American cities. and for them they're just assuming a Christian environment. Jim Hudson of the Library of Congress used to speak of the founder's syllogism, that if we want a Republican form of government, we must have a moral people. If we want to have a moral people, we must have a religious people. In their imagination, religion equaled Christianity, but I think it's broader than that and we're obviously a far different country today and it's very reasonable to ask, is it not possible that other religions, other faith traditions can generate the sort of morality necessary for a Republican form of government.

18:37I think that it certainly is. The founders clearly wanted a robust understanding of religious liberty that protects all Americans. So we have Article VI, Prohibition of Religious Test. You have George Washington's wonderful letter to the Hebrew congregation in Newport, Rhode Island, where he makes it crystal clear that Jews in America have a right to the free exercise of religion. It's not a grant to the civil state, it's a right. Jeff, your thoughts on what you heard, and then I want to just ask you the big question, right, and have everyone else respond as well. Were we founded as a Christian nation?

19:09No, we were not founded as a Christian nation because the core value of the Establishment Clause is that it's not permissible to favor Christianity over any other religion. Now, the founders disagreed about exactly how to treat the question of religious liberty. and Madison, whose views were reflected in the First Amendment, insisted that the government should be non-cognizant of religion. And he developed this view during the central battle of his early career against religious establishments in Virginia. Patrick Henry wants a tax for all citizens to have to support the Christian church. Madison says the tax violates our natural rights of conscience, which are unalienable.

19:53There's a shift during the Enlightenment from the old view that we got our ideas of truth from the Pope or the King or centralized authority to the new view that citizens have to make up their own minds, and in order to do that, they need a variety of views about religion and politics to create a plausible marketplace of ideas. And Madison says, the opinions of men, being dependent on evidence contemplated by their own minds, cannot be controlled by other men. In other words, I can't give you or anyone and the power to control my thoughts because my thoughts are the product of reason and persuasion, not force or violence.

20:30So that is why religious freedom of conscience is unalienable. In the debate over the Bill of Rights, Madison thought about whether that broad view of religious freedom, which led him not to issue Thanksgiving proclamations, should, how broad it should be. And people like Roger Sherman, the Puritan theocrat theocrat who Mark David Hall has written the definitive biography of, and I really recommend to you, Sherman likes test oaths in Connecticut. He likes the idea of established congregationalist church, and he doesn't want Gouverneur Morris to serve as ambassador because he's a heretic. But Madison wins that debate.

21:08It's language from Virginia, from George Mason and Madison. So the central idea, this is the most important of the unalienable rights protected by the Declaration of Independence, that you can't tell anyone else how to think, and even if you want to, it won't work because we're products of reason, means that no one religion can prevail over another. Mark, I want to ask you about this. Your scholarship has challenged the idea that, you know, in the, you say that like in the mid-20th century, there was a consensus that most of our nation's founders were deist and created a godless constitution because they wanted to strictly separate church and state.

21:46Your scholarship has challenged that in a way, and I think there's a nuance that you like to talk about, whether we were founded as a Christian nation or founded by Christian people. Why do you think that's important, especially given, why do you think the idea that we are a Christian nation in that sense is so important, and why do you think that nuance needs to be talked about? I really do not like the language that America was founded as a Christian nation. But it sounds as if America was founded for Christians, and maybe we'll put up with non-Christians, but maybe we won't. The founders were crystal clear, and I've already mentioned evidence, Article 6, a letter to the Hebrew congregation.

22:23What I argue, and did America have a Christian founding, is the founders were influenced profoundly by Christian ideas in addition to other ideas, classical Republican ideas, Enlightenment ideas, and they created a nation that was to be open for all Americans. In their imagination, I don't think they could imagine and America would become as diverse as it is today. And if they were to come back, I think they would be shocked and many would be pleasantly surprised. I think they consciously built a nation that would be open to all, people of all faiths and no faith at all. Osmo Mark, I would love for you to respond to this question that we got from our Zoom room.

22:57Connect the dots for us. Why would this administration want to emphasize the connection between Christianity and democracy? What story are they trying to tell? Well, I can't, I mean, I can't sort of comment on the specific connection that they're thinking about, but certainly it's that, I think it was exactly what I had noted before, that there, in order for us to flourish, our idea of, like, who belongs is limited to a particular sort of conception of Christianity. I mean, even within Christianity, we're talking about, you know, Christianity versus Islam, but the people, mostly on the Mall, were conservative Christians, most of them were evangelical, And so it's saying, and to the extent that maps onto partisan divides, it's also noting that there are progressive Christians and a number of different minority interpretations of Christianity that are not included in this idea of what America is and what the image or idea of what we want it to be moving forward is.

23:55Yeah, Mark, can you connect the dots? And I know that many people think the idea that we're a Christian nation is a central tenant of Christian nationalism. So I want to acknowledge that as well and ask your thoughts on that. Yeah, so there's a lot I could say about that. I have a book on Christian nationalism. I think most of the critics of Christian nationalism vastly overstate the threat. But I think the promoters of Christian nationalism, the Stephen Wolfe, Doug Wilson, are profoundly in error. So I, as a Christian, has critiqued them on biblical and theological grounds, in addition to constitutional and prudential grounds.

24:28I have no idea what exactly the Trump administration was thinking or the officials from the Trump administration was thinking in putting this together. I do think, you know, to the extent to which the founders could have come back and participated in the events of Sunday, probably would have been surprised that there were two Catholics and a Jew speaking. Again, of Americans who are involved in political activities, going to state legislatures, drafting constitutions, ratifying constitutions. They're basically all Protestant. A couple of Catholics in Maryland, all Protestants. And they would have been shocked to see a bishop and a cardinal featured as well as a Jewish rabbi.

Read the full transcript

25:05Many would have been happy to see that, but that would have been a surprise to them. Asma, you know, we mentioned that there were no Muslim leaders at the day of prayer on Sunday. I want to just ask you a little bit more about the movement, as you've said, to say that Islam is not a religion. Can you give us some specific examples of how you're seeing these legal challenges throughout the U.S.? Yeah. I mean, when it first came to my attention, again, it was a case out of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, involving the Islamic Center in Murfreesboro, where the community there sought to build a full-on Islamic Center, a mosque and other sort of adjacent facilities.

25:44and they were granted a permit and the permit was challenged in court and the argument there was that this law called the Religious Land Use Institutionalized Persons Act and generally religious land use protections does not extend to the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro because Islam is not a religion. And those precise words were part of the argument and the U.S. Department of Justice at the time had to file a brief in that case and the brief was entirely dedicated to making clear that in the United States Islam is considered a religion. And so it seemed at the time to be a fringe case, but it sort of caught my attention because the DOJ did make a point to get involved in this tiny little case out of Murfreesboro, Tennessee.

26:27And then once I started thinking about it, I realized that it was manifesting in so many different ways. And so the precise claim can sound absurd, but when it gets brought into something such that a major civic organization in the Muslim community is labeled a foreign terrorist organization when it's, for example, coming up again right now in 2026 in Texas and in Oklahoma and Tennessee. But I think we've heard a lot in what's happening in Texas with this housing development that has a mosque and an Islamic school being labeled by Governor Abbott as a quote-unquote Sharia city. And so it's something that I've been tracing since 2010 and unfortunately is coming back.

27:07Mark, what role do you think Christians should be playing in situations like this? I think Christians should be advocating in the public square for the flourishing of the city, for the good of all. And so you think of something like the American Civil Rights Movement, where Christian leaders, reverends, but secular or laity as well, out there advocating in the public streets and Congress and state legislatures for justice is absolutely a duty of Christians. And I think Christians should be advocating for the rights of Muslims and Hindus and Sikhs and others. This is a country built for all Americans, not just Americans of one religion.

27:38So there's a test that's called the Lemon Test. Jeff, I want to have you help us understand of this three-part framework that was established by the Supreme Court in Lemon v. Kurtzman. This was a Supreme Court case from 1971 to establish the First Amendment's Establishment Clause. But before we get to the Lemon Test, what is the Establishment Clause? We've heard it referenced a couple times here. Well, the Establishment Clause says that Congress shall make no law regarding an establishment of religion. And the central purpose of the clause was to prevent Congress from setting up a national church and also to prevent it from disestablishing established churches like Anglicanism in Virginia and Congregationalism in Connecticut.

28:21And for this reason, and we get to use a great SAT word here, the Establishment Clause was an anti-disestablishment Daryanism provision. There's a big debate on the Supreme Court now about what the scope of the Establishment Clause is. That's what I was going to ask you. How are we seeing this now? Would you say that the test has been largely abandoned by the Supreme Court? Yes, no question about it. Justice Scalia a few years ago talked about it like a ghoul in a horror movie who keeps rising up at the last minute to reassert itself. But recent cases have essentially repudiated it. I have my cheat sheet here.

28:54And the Lemon Test originally said that government action has to, one, have a secular purpose, two, neither advance nor inhibit religion as its primary effect, and three, avoid excessive entanglement between church and state. The Roberts court has largely abandoned this. They see it as unworkable. And the central shift from strict separationism to accommodationism was a case called Kennedy versus Bremerton School District, which involved a coach who was allowed to pray. that was considered a voluntary act not sponsored by the state. In that sense, the court embraced a new focus on history and tradition rather than questions about whether there's a secular purpose.

29:42History and tradition is the centerpiece of originalism we're seeing in cases ranging from the Second Amendment to abortion. The court asking whether there's a history and tradition supporting the question. The court said that there is a tradition of voluntary prayers. It's also invoked history and tradition to support speeches before town meetings. And the new focus of the court is on coercion and history and tradition rather than on these mushier factors. And that's why the lemon test is essentially con. We'll have more to come with Jeffrey Rosen, CEO Emerita of the National Constitution Center, professor of law at George Washington University Law School.

30:22I want to thank also Asma Udin for joining us, an assistant professor of law at Michigan State University. Thank you, Asma. And Mark David Hall, an author and professor at Regent University's Robertson School of Government and director of the Center on Religion, Culture, and Democracy's Religious Liberty in the States. Mark, thank you. Coming up, how the phrase one nation under God has been viewed differently over the course of American history. We'll be right back. Stick with us.

30:52This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab with its original podcast, On Investing. It's hosted by Lizanne Saunders, Schwab's chief investment strategist, and Colin Martin, head of fixed income research and strategy for the Schwab Center for Financial Research. Each week, Lizanne, Colin, and their guests analyze economic developments and bring context to conversations around stocks, fixed income, the economy, and more. Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash oninvesting or wherever you get your podcasts. This message comes from the United States Postal Service. In business, there's no room for guesswork.

31:29Every shipment and deadline matters. When you're trying to keep operations running smoothly, the last thing you need is uncertainty. That's why reliability is at the core of USPS Ground Advantage. Each package moves through a secure nationwide network tracked from dock to door. It's delivery you can depend on. Visit usps.com slash groundadvantage to learn more about how you can start shipping with confidence. This message comes from Ali. Thinking more about gut health lately? Ali offers a range of science-backed supplements designed to support you and your family's daily wellness. From probiotics that help support digestive and immune health to fiber gummies made with kids in mind, Ali makes it easier to build simple habits into your routine.

32:15With options for different needs and lifestyles, finding the right fit can feel more manageable. Explore the full lineup at O-L-L-Y dot com. Support for NPR and the following message come from iDTECH. iDTECH is where kids ages 7 to 17 find their people. The battle bots, game design, and more people. Go to iDTECH.com and use code iDTECH to save$150 this summer. This message comes from our NPR sponsor, Fort Myers, Islands, Beaches, and Neighborhoods. This summer, follow what feels right, like embracing your playful side on Fort Myers' white sand beaches. Direct flights arrive daily. Plan your trip at visitfortmyers.com.

33:00Welcome back. In a special episode of 1A in front of a live audience, we're discussing faith in the state of our democracy in partnership with Religion News Service. Once again, we're joined by Jack Jenkins, national reporter for RNS, and Jeffrey Rosen, CEO Emeritus of the National Constitution Center and a professor of law at George Washington University Law School. I wanted to start by playing a clip from Minnesota Catholic Bishop Robert Barron on Sunday because I think it captures well a lot of the sentiment that I heard expressed and some of the things we've been talking about. And I would say as we reflect on our history from the founding through the trials of the civil war, to the struggle for civil rights, we can see this consistent thread, the conviction that human dignity, equality, rights, freedom, and the rule of law are all grounded in God.

33:55Jeff, your thoughts on that? In a sense, it's descriptively correct. The founders were Christians to various degrees, and religion was at the centerpiece of movements ranging from abolitionism to prohibition. But it is just as important to emphasize that the founders believed that the government should not favor one religion or another. Jefferson, in his Virginia Bill of Religious Freedom, which he thought was one of his three most important accomplishments, He put three on his tombstone, that bill, writing the declaration, and found in the University of Virginia. He didn't even mention the fact that he was president.

34:37He said that truth has nothing to fear from error as long as reason is free to combat it. So Jefferson sees no conflict between God and reason. And he insists that you need to hear a range of views about religion, even erroneous ones, so that people can make up their own mind. And Jefferson's views on religion are beautifully summarized in the greatest free speech opinion of all times, written by Louis Brandeis, one of my heroes, who'd been reading Jefferson over the summer of 1926. This is the Whitney versus California opinion. And as a party trick, I think I can do it from memory because I've done it a few times.

35:13Now you have to. Okay, here we go. This is Brandeis literally channeling Jefferson almost word for word. Those who won our revolution believed that the final end of the state was to make men free to develop their faculties, and that in its government, the deliberative forces should prevail over the arbitrary. They valued liberty both as an end and as a means. They believed liberty to be the secret of happiness and courage to be the secret of liberty. That's a quotation from Pericles' funeral oration. They believed that freedom to think as you will and speak as you think, that's from Tacitus, are means indispensable to the discovery and spread of political truth, that without free speech and assembly, discussion would be futile, that with it, discussion affords ordinarily adequate protection against the dissemination of noxious doctrine, that the greatest threat to freedom is an inert people, and that public discussion is a political duty.

36:05So you see in those gorgeous words, all of Jefferson's reasons for protecting free speech, we need it so that we can discover the truth, Citizens have to protect government and criticize their officials. We need autonomy to express our own views, and freedom of conscience is an unalienable right. So for all those reasons, although it's true historically that so many reform movements have been linked to a conception of the divine, it's not just a Christian nation. Even in the Brandeis quote, we heard quotations from Tacitus and Pericles, the ancient Greek and Roman authorities, and the Whig authorities, and the Christians who believe that faith is compatible with reason.

36:50So it's complicated, as Mark David Hall says, and it's wrong for any single religion to claim that it has a monopoly on the truth. Jack, you cover the intersection of religion and politics. What have we seen? I think a lot of people hear people say the Trump administration uses overtly Christian language. Can you give us an example of that? Secretary Hegseth also spoke on Sunday via video message. We've heard Secretary Hegseth use very overt Christian language, particularly as we're thinking about the most recent military war against Iran. Yeah, what we've seen a lot of is different pieces of the administration leaning heavily on religious language in general and Christian language in particular.

37:32The two most prominent examples of that are probably the Department of Homeland Security. There's been a lot of religious imagery shared on their social media feeds. For instance, you know, scripture being emblazoned on top of images of DHS agents conducting raids. and then we've also seen of course Pete Hegseth at the Defense Department. He is now hosting his own worship service. It is certainly not unprecedented for the Pentagon to host worship services. They have their own chaplaincy corps but he is hosting what is called on the signs the Sec War Secretary of War which is the title he uses a worship service and is calling in his own he calls in his own pastors because there's multiple pastors that he actually has to preach and to speak at those events and again kind of centering a specific kind of religious imagery in Christianity.

38:26And I'll note that... I was going to say, you were actually at... I want to ask about that. Go ahead. Just one quick thing I did want to say. To note how explicit this can be, I misspoke earlier. I said that there was no Hindu representation. That's not true. Tulsi Gabbard was a late addition to the event on Sunday. And she delivered a video message. During that video message, though, she did not appear to overtly reference her own Hinduism. Instead, she referred to the Lord's prayer, a Christian prayer. So the religious imagery, particularly Christian rhetoric and imagery seems to have come across pretty strongly across this administration and its ally.

39:03I was going to ask you about a biblical reference that Pete Hegseth made when you were in the room calling the media Pharisees. Can you tell us about that? Yeah, there was a recent press conference at the Pentagon where Pete Hegseth, he has often referenced faith and his faith during these press conferences, often kind of begins them with a sort of mini speech in which he will reference religious themes. And this one, he actually referenced a sermon that had been delivered at Christ Church, D.C., which is technically a worship service that is being run by a church in Moscow, Idaho that's run by Pastor Doug Wilson, who was a self-described Christian nationalist.

39:45And according to Hegseth, during the course of that sermon that was being preached at his church that Sunday, they had made reference to the Pharisees, these biblical figures that are often in opposition to Jesus in the biblical narrative. And then he looked up at the reporters, which included myself, and said, the press are just like these Pharisees. And I was the one guy in the back furiously typing. I'm like, this is a specific religious reference. and um but uh i'm not sure everyone else all the other reporters got it but he was clearly and he has used it since on social media he has doubled down on this idea that um you know the press are in fact emblematic of the uh biblical opponent of jesus christ um and that is that is not something we necessarily would have heard from any number of previous administrations so let's get back to this idea of under god i actually did a deep dive over the weekend i wrote about this on my sub stack about the inclusion of the phrase under God in the Pledge of Legions, which actually only happened in 1954.

40:48Jeff, can you explain a little bit of the context of the phrase under God, what that would have meant in 1954 versus what it meant? You know, we got a question from Mark who's saying, I've heard that Lincoln's use of under God really meant God willing, an expression that his country would be healed after the civil war rather than a declaration of theocracy. Mark is, of course, referring to the closing sentence of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address in November of 1863. How has this phrase under God, different generations interpreted it differently, you think? Well, Lincoln is interesting. He was referenced a lot at the rally.

41:26He did use a lot of religious imagery. He learned to read by reading the King James Bible by candlelight, so he'd imbued it. On the other hand, his personal faith, although deep was not conventional, and he was rather elliptical about how orthodox a Christian he was. Remember, if you go back to the founding, Madison, who is the most firm on this question, when he says government should take no cognizance of religion, he refused to issue Thanksgiving proclamations, and in theory, he would have opposed having a minister open Congress. He allowed congressional ministers as a kind of de minimis exception, the idea that it wasn't coercive in any particular way.

42:14And over the course of American history, a bunch of those traditions have accumulated, including putting under God on the Pledge of Allegiance. In the 40s, as you said, it meant something very different than it would have to Lincoln and to Madison. The question of whether these references to under God violate the Constitution came up before the Supreme Court a few years ago, and the court held that putting under God on the money doesn't violate the Constitution because it's rooted in tradition. And then there was a really interesting case where the town of Galway wanted to have different ministers from different faiths start their town meetings.

43:01And the court upheld that as well on the ground that there was a tradition of ministers in town meetings. So with this history and tradition approach, this court seems likely to approve certain references to under God, even though a strict vision of religion blindness that Madison embraced wouldn't tolerate it. But it certainly did not mean under a single God or a Christian God in a way that's being used today. We got this comment from a listener. I'm getting tired of hearing about originalism. We inherited a framework from the founders, but much like a story, it no longer belongs to the authors.

43:38Governance happens only at the consent of the govern, and the founders are not here anymore to consent. The government should be only what the current people want, and the least of us should have the same basic rights as anyone else. You can keep the questions and comments coming by emailing 1A at WAMU.org. We're talking to Jeffrey Rosen and Jack Jenkins. I'm Nyla Boodoo. You're listening to 1A. Jack, can I ask you about the other side of this? Democrat James Tallarico is running for Senate in Texas. He's a Presbyterian seminarian who has directly criticized Christian nationalism, saying that it has distorted his faith.

44:16He's made this a big part of his political brand. You've done a lot of reporting and writing on the religious left. Is James Tallarico the new face of this? I think he's certainly one emanation of it, right? I think the interesting thing about the religious left is that it is a, I often describe it as a coalition of coalitions. It is many things at once by design. And I think that's also just true of the left in general. but people often try to compare the religious left to the religious right, but there is nothing on the left that occupies the same political might and organization as the religious right.

44:47So the left in general focuses a coalition of coalitions of which the religious left is certainly a part. But Tallarico is interesting because, one, I think there's a very real chance he might win in Texas. I mean, that is not in any way prescriptive. I am not predicting an election. I'll be very clear. I do not do that. But it's interesting how much attention he is getting for his faith, when in many ways he's actually pretty archetypal for a lot of mainline Christians in the United States. It's notable that there has been a significant pushback to, for instance, this administration's immigration policies from particularly mainline Protestant leaders.

45:27The first day Trump was in office during the inaugural prayer service, he had that sermon preached to him by Bishop Marianne Buddy, the Episcopal Bishop of Washington, asking him to have mercy on immigrants, among other groups. And he, you know, that pattern has continued with, you know, some pastors being arrested protesting the Department of Homeland Security actions. We've had, you know, at least one pastor, a couple pastors actually shot in the head and face with pepper balls and pepper rounds, which apparently those are two different things, as I've come to learn. and while processing these administration policies.

46:00And so what I have seen over the last year is actually a significantly galvanized religious left that in terms of the activism space, and in addition to Tallarico, we have multiple other clergy that are running for office, both white mainliners and black Protestant pastors across the country, and just within the Christian space being really activated. And I've seen significant activism bubbling up among Muslim American and Jewish American communities as well. So I would just say Tallarico might be the one getting the most attention just because flipping Texas would be a significant achievement for Democrats, you know, flipping a Texas Senate seat.

46:34But in some ways, it's really interesting how much attention he's getting given that he's kind of a rank and file mainliner in a lot of ways. Let me put it this way. You could hear a lot of his rhetoric in a mainline Presbyterian seminary if you dropped in. Can I ask about your in-depth reporting that you did for RNS this week on the legacy of Thomas Paine? because as we were talking about founding fathers, Thomas Paine, of course, the English-born political writer who became one of the founding fathers, author of Common Sense 250 years ago. In modern politics, he's become a symbol, but actually for the left.

47:10Right. He's gone through a few different political, different groups have aligned with him politically over the course of the years. Ronald Reagan actually cited him a decent amount, but often he is more aligned progressive and activist groups. what I thought, the reason I ended up writing that piece is because it was striking to me that I was in for instance, Pete Hegseth's church that worship service I mentioned earlier and the inaugural sermon that was preached at when they started that worship service the pastor went out of his way to speak dismissively about Thomas Paine and I was like, who is still talking about Thomas Paine?

47:42and then of course then I was also covering a No Kings rally in which Representative Jamie Raskin stood up there and talked very positively about Thomas Paine And then I went to the National Conservatism Conference, and they again spoke dismissively about Thomas Paine. And that's what's called a trend story. And so I was like, but it's so interesting that, you know, part of it is that he was such a huge influence on the American Revolution. He also was intensely critical of organized religion. He was a deist. He was raised a Quaker, but very much died a deist. And wrote a whole book called The Age of Reason that really kind of historians argue kind of sullied his reputation at the end of his career.

48:18So he's an interesting, you know, kind of forgotten founding father who was controversial in his own lifetime, but now has kind of had a second life. Can I stop you just because we're almost out of time. And Jeff, I just want to ask you very quickly, are the arguments over Thomas Paine and everyone else that we've been talking about maybe the ultimate expression of the spirited debate our forefathers perhaps hoped we would be having today? Absolutely. The very essence of Madison's view is that you need access to a variety of views in order to ensure that truth can triumph over error. And this is a beautiful example of that.

48:52History is complicated. The more you learn, the more exciting it is, the more disagreement you see. But disagreement is not a bug in the system. It's a feature. And civil disagreement is exactly what has sustained the republic. Thank you so much. Thank you to Jeffrey Rosen, CEO of Meritus of the National Constitution Center, professor of law at George Washington University Law School. I want to thank Jack Jenkins, RNS national reporter, earlier. We heard from Asma Udine, who is also a fellow at the Freedom Forum, and Mark David Hall, a professor at Regent University's Roberson School of Government.

49:23Thank you to our live studio audience for joining us here at Katzen Hall at American University. Special thanks to our virtual audience on Zoom. RNS is grateful to have the Henry Luce Foundation for its generous support of this event. And special thank you to all the RNS and WAMU staff and volunteers who made this event possible. This program comes to you from WAMU, part of American University in Washington, distributed by NPR. I'm Nyla Boudou. This is 1A.

50:29Transcription by CastingWords the economy, and more. Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash oninvesting or wherever you get your podcasts.

51:00Sign up now and get 10 % off at BetterHelp.com slash NPR. That's BetterHelp.com slash NPR. Support for this podcast and the following message come from Dataiku. AI agents are transforming how enterprises work. The problem is many operate in secret. The right people rarely know what their agents are doing, if they're doing it right, or that they even exist at all. Dataiku gives companies one place to see, control, and measure every agent across the entire business. Visit dataiku.com slash NPR. That's D-A-T-A-I-K-U dot com slash NPR.

From the publisher
This week, thousands of Americans attended a day-long conservative prayer gathering. The event was billed as a rededication of the U.S. as “One Nation Under God” for our nation’s 250th birthday.

The gathering was a private-public partnership backed by the White House. Non-Christian voices of faith were notably absent, apart from one Jewish rabbi. Almost all the speakers featured were Christians and most were Evangelicals. Some were Trump cabinet members and lawmakers.

With the separation of church and state and the freedom of religion baked into the founding of our country, what does our nation’s relationship with faith look like today? Does the America of 2026 represent what our founding fathers intended?

In this special broadcast of 1A in partnership with Religion News Service, we leave our studio and head to American University in Washington D.C. where we sit down with a panel of experts in front of a live audience.

Find more of our programs online. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a.

See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.

NPR Privacy Policy

More from 1A

All 320 episodes
America 250: One Nation Under God?1A · 46 min
Listen in VO