'If You Can Keep It': How Trump’s Getting Rich As President

17 Aug 2026 · 45 min · 21 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The scale of Donald Trump’s personal enrichment in his second term and how crypto, real estate, and Truth Social monetization may create conflicts of interest while he controls U.S. policy. The episode cites White House disclosures showing earnings rising from about $600M (2024) to over $2.2B (2025), largely from crypto.

Guest backgrounds

Russ Buettner is an investigative reporter at The New York Times covering the president’s finances. Michelle Conlon is a senior correspondent at Reuters covering Trump businesses and crypto. Lauren Harper is Daniel Ellsberg Chair on Government Secrecy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation.

Key claims

Most disclosed earnings come from crypto; World Liberty Financial (founded by Trump, Steve Witkoff, and their sons) drove about $800M. Trump also received about $600M from partners who sold his meme coin; investors lost $3.8B (NYT). Warren calls the bank charter “brazen” self-dealing. Truth Social plans to sell early access to posts for up to $100,000/month raise concerns about presidential records and market-moving influence.

Notable examples

World Liberty preliminary bank approval; foreign investors (about 75%); Trump’s Qatar-gifted $400M Boeing 747; Vietnam licensing golf/resort deal amid tariff negotiations; Truth Social subscription lawsuit.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Exploring Trump's Financial Gains

1:41 to 2:05

Discussion on President Trump's significant financial earnings during his presidency.

“Today, as part of our weekly series, If You Can Keep It, where we cover the health of our democracy, we dive into the scale of President Trump's personal enrichment in his second term and why you need to know about it.”

Introducing the Guests

3:11 to 3:30

Introduction of guests Russ Buettner and Michelle Conlon, who will discuss Trump's finances.

“Russ Buettner is an investigative reporter at the New York Times covering the president's finances.”

Unprecedented Self-Enrichment

3:30 to 5:25

Analyzing President Trump's self-enrichment and its historical context.

“All right, Russ, Michelle, we're going to talk about the president's personal wealth and about how family members use government policy and government contracts to profit while their father sits in the White House.”

Trump's Crypto Ventures

5:25 to 6:01

Discussion on Donald Trump's earnings from cryptocurrency and the World Liberty Financial firm.

“I think one lesson of the Trump administration is that typically these things have happened by norms, not by laws, but by norms.”

Investors Behind World Liberty Financial

6:01 to 7:11

Exploring the key investors in World Liberty Financial and their backgrounds.

“How has it made Donald Trump so much money?”

The Mystery of Babi Zhu

7:11 to 7:50

An investigation into Gurren Babi Zhu and his questionable financial background.

“There's another figure named Gurren Babi Zhu who you've been writing about.”

The Source of Mysterious Wealth

7:50 to 9:36

Analyzing the uncertain origins of funds coming into Trump's businesses.

“under investigation for money laundering in the United Kingdom.”

Risks of Anonymity in Crypto

9:36 to 12:05

Discussing the risks associated with anonymous investments in cryptocurrency and their implications.

“So I've spent a great amount of time on this.”

Trump's Wealth During His Presidency

14:11 to 14:58

Discussion on Trump's financial growth and ventures during his second term.

“The New Yorker's David Kirkpatrick estimates that by January of 2026, the president and his family had made more than$4 billion so far in his second term through ventures like the private club in Washington, D.C.”

World Liberty Financial's Bank Charter

14:58 to 17:40

Analysis of World Liberty Financial's bank approval and its implications.

“President Trump is now the first president in history to approve, operate and supervise his own bank.”
Show all 21 chapters

Hidden Financial Gains of Trump's Family

17:40 to 20:00

Exploring undisclosed financial ventures that enrich Trump's family.

“Or they'll say, oh, people say this is unprecedented for a president, and these ethics experts will tell me.”

The Clarity Act and Crypto Regulations

20:00 to 22:34

Discussion about the Clarity Act and its effect on crypto regulation.

“owns something on the order of 300 ,000 shares.”

The Impact of Truth Social

22:34 to 25:00

Examining the implications of Truth Social's subscription model and its legality.

“Well, let's go back to the run-up to the election.”

Truth Social's Financial Backing in Crypto

25:00 to 28:00

Discussion on Truth Social's investment in Bitcoin and its current business model.

“Let's add another voice to the conversation now.”

Truth Social's Financial Struggles and Bitcoin Investment

28:00 to 30:10

Learn about the financial challenges facing Truth Social and its Bitcoin investment strategy.

“We talked about on this show just several many months ago that Truth Social had made significant investment in Bitcoin last year.”

Assessing Trump's Wealth Growth and Ethical Concerns

31:26 to 40:06

Explore the implications of Trump's wealth increase through renovations and non-profit fundraising.

“Arctic Wolf combines AI-led security operations with human expertise, helping teams detect, investigate, and respond at machine speed without building it themselves.”

Trump's Foreign Real Estate Deals and Policy Influence

40:06 to 42:01

Examine how Trump's foreign real estate deals intersect with his policymaking.

“and the president and the vice president are exempt from the main criminal conflict of interest and solicitation statutes that apply to the rest of the executive branch.”

Trump's Licensing Deals and Financial Conflicts

42:01 to 43:20

Explore how Trump's foreign licensing deals impact his presidency and finances.

“The Vietnam deal you described was a licensing deal, and it's really been one of the most lucrative business lines in Donald Trump's history.”

The Global Impact of Executive Profiteering

43:20 to 45:31

Discussing the implications of executive power leading to personal wealth.

“I want to close out talking about what's at stake and what can be done about it.”

Calls for Reform and Oversight

45:31 to 47:31

Addressing potential reforms needed to prevent corruption in future administrations.

“Michelle, what are you watching for next?”

Calls for Reform and Oversight

48:01 to 48:28

Addressing potential reforms needed to prevent corruption in future administrations.

“This message comes from Working Forest's initiative.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:28This message comes from Angie. fortune while serving as president. In 2024, the year before his second term started, the president made about$600 million. In 2025, one year into his new term, that number jumped to more than$2.2 billion. The latest White House disclosures show that most of those earnings came from cryptocurrency and crypto-related businesses. A big driver? $800 million from the crypto investment firm World Liberty Financial, which the president founded along with Middle East envoy Steve Whitcoff and their sons. Also, about$600 million paid to the president last year by partners who sold his meme coin cryptocurrency.

1:11Investors in the meme coin lost$3.8 billion, according to the New York Times. And the president continues to make millions from real estate and golf deals, many of them in foreign countries, while they're negotiating with the U.S. government that he controls. That's just a glimpse at the cash. The latest disclosures don't include other enrichment for the president, like the$400 million Boeing 747 jet gifted for his personal use by the government of Qatar. I'm Todd Zwilich. You're listening to the 1A Podcast. Today, as part of our weekly series, If You Can Keep It, where we cover the health of our democracy, we dive into the scale of President Trump's personal enrichment in his second term and why you need to know about it.

1:56That's right after this.

2:01This message comes from Angie. If you're tackling a home project, check out Angie.com. From roofing to remodels and everything in between, Angie connects you with skilled pros who do such a good job, you might trust them to do other things, like pull out your tooth, or be your kid's godfather. Don't actually ask them to do those things. Just let them get the job done well. Angie, the one you trust to find the ones you trust. Find a pro for your projects at Angie.com. That's A-N-G-I dot com. This message comes from Capital One Commercial Bank. Your business requires commercial banking solutions that prioritize your long-term success.

2:41With Capital One, get a full suite of financial products and services tailored to meet your needs today and goals for tomorrow. Learn more at capital.one slash commercial. Member FDIC. This message comes from Working Forests Initiative. Working forest professionals in the U.S. plant more than they harvest while also caring for water, wildlife, and more. It's how a sustainable future is grown. Learn more at workingforestsinitiative.com. Let's meet our guest. Russ Buettner is an investigative reporter at the New York Times covering the president's finances. Russ, welcome. Good to be with you, Todd.

3:20Michelle Conlon is also here, senior correspondent at Reuters, where she covers the Trump businesses and crypto. Michelle, good to have you here. Thanks so much for having me. All right, Russ, Michelle, we're going to talk about the president's personal wealth and about how family members use government policy and government contracts to profit while their father sits in the White House. Is there any precedent, though, Russ, for this in American history? What stands out to you about the scope and the scale of President Trump's self-enrichment? Have we ever seen this before? No, I don't think there's ever been anything like this in our nation's history.

3:56I think for a recent point of reference, you can look at the things that the Trumps themselves and the rest of the Republican Party said about Hunter Biden sitting on the board of an energy company when his father, I believe, wasn't even in the office and making a little bit of money for selling some paintings. And you think about what they're doing right now, where they're collecting$600 million for selling basically an electronic trading card that has no value other than if somebody else wants to buy it. and that's just pure profit that goes right into the family's pocket. That alone would be something that was unheard of in our nation's history.

4:37Typically, presidents have avoided anything that might make it look like they were subject to influence or acting in their personal interests rather than the nation's interests. President Trump has said he feels like he did that during his first term and the lesson from that was that he thought nobody cared. So this time, all holds are off, and they're figuring out a multitude of ways to collect money in areas they have no real history or experience. I mean, Russ, one thing that comes to mind is just the example of Jimmy Carter. It was many decades ago, but he had a peanut farm when he got elected president, and I believe he sold it so that there wasn't an appearance of conflict of interest owning a peanut farm and being president.

5:20Yeah, Todd, that's sort of the spirit that these things have operated in for our nation's history. I think one lesson of the Trump administration is that typically these things have happened by norms, not by laws, but by norms. Presidents have just chosen to not do these things that might make it look like they had anything other than societal good in their mind. And that's no longer the case. Michelle, let's talk about Donald Trump's crypto earnings. Russ alluded to them. They make up the bulk of what's included in these latest financial disclosures from the White House. Much of that comes from one source.

5:59I mentioned it, World Liberty Financial. What is that company? How has it made Donald Trump so much money? Sure. Well, World Liberty Financial, you can think of it like a bank, but the Trump bank of crypto. And interestingly, just recently, World Liberty Financial got preliminary approval to actually become a bank. And we looked at, in our examination, we looked at the kind of the four of the main crypto ventures, World Liberty Financial being the biggest, and found that through April, so since the time Trump took office through April, the Trumps had pocketed$2.3 billion to their family fortune, while investors, many of them small retail investors, have lost$2.3 billion.

6:49And of the four crypto entities that we looked at, World Liberty Financial is by far the biggest money spinner in that universe of crypto companies. Russ, who's investing in World Liberty Financial? We've talked before about figures like Justin Sun, a foreign national who was under investigation by the SEC. until shortly after he made an investment of tens of millions of dollars into world liberty. There's another figure named Gurren Babi Zhu who you've been writing about. Who's Babi Zhu? Babi Zhu has been until recently sort of an enigma. He's a fellow, it turns out, who purchased or presides over a company, an upstart company in the United Arab Emirates that purchased$100 million worth of world liberty financial tokens.

7:43When he initially sort of hid his involvement in that, he had good reason to. It turns out he was under investigation for money laundering in the United Kingdom. When I started trying to find evidence of where his money might have came from, everything just melted in your hands. an editor at the paper described it as sort of the the talented what was that movie the talented mr ripley yeah matt damon yeah matt damon right where he he made all these announcements that he made it seem like he had access to great fortunes over the years um he had he had had a retail set of retail stores in the united kingdom that sold hardwood flooring that his father They're manufactured in China.

8:27Those businesses all went bankrupt. He started a crypto business that made these big announcements, including that it had a billion-dollar fund with a Chinese state-owned financial institution, that it had the support of entities tied to royal families in the United Arab Emirates. But when I contacted all those people, none of that was true. He had made it all up. And those people had told him to please stop using his name, But those announcements lived on and made it look like he had access to some money. So, Russ, if Bobby Zhu has no discernible source of massive wealth of his own, where's the money coming from?

9:07What does it say about the source of the money that he's funneling into Donald Trump, his company, and his personal fortune? It's an excellent question, Todd. I think the amazing part of this is that it shouldn't be really hard to figure out where$75 million, where that money comes from when it gets stuffed into the pocket of a United States president. That was the Trump family's take from that, about$75 million in one day. But when you look through his public record, there is no source of that, no business success and no alliances that have happened that you can see where that money came from.

9:46So I've spent a great amount of time on this. As near as I can tell, there is nothing there. They don't answer questions on it. The Trump family won't say if they're aware of where that money came from. And again, this was a company that he had moved to the United Arab Emirates under investigation for money laundering, still under investigation for there. And within about four months, after having left the United Kingdom without really any discernible money, suddenly had access to this fortune. And then has sort of gone dormant again since. So it does make you wonder who provided that and what their motives were and what the Trumps know about that.

10:23But none of them are talking about it. So, Michelle, we're talking about the president of the United States here, not just some, you know, more random business owner or investor. But how common is this phenomenon, mysterious sources of income, when we talk about the crypto business? Oh, it's the theme. It's the leitmotif. You know, because it's crypto, which is, you know, famous for money laundering and all sorts of other illicit activities, because it's really hidden behind code and numbers and digits. And it's an anonymous way that you can send millions, billions of dollars around the world.

11:06and because of that, I mean, we do know that a bulk of the investors, early investors, and for example, World Liberty Financial, for example, the Trump meme coin, we do know that about almost 75 % of those were foreign investors. We just don't know much more beyond that. We know that because you can track the exchanges that they use And through that, you can see how many of these were likely people in the USA, how many were likely foreign. So the fact that it's so much foreign money and the fact that it's hidden behind these numbers and digits and anonymous crypto code just begs all sorts of questions.

11:51It's just a dizzying situation that the United States has never been in before. Michelle, just briefly, though, you're describing a world of secret investors, cloaked cash, problematic in any financial market. With the president of the United States, what's the risk here for the people he represents? The risk is that some of this money is being used to influence policy, influence decisions, influence all sorts of decisions that have no transparency around them. Coming up, President Trump's social media company unveiled a subscription service that would let users view his posts early for as much as a$100 ,000 fee per month.

12:35Why this has some government transparency advocates more than a little concerned. The crypto business and a whole lot more. That's coming up.

12:46This message comes from Capital One Commercial Bank. Your business requires commercial banking solutions that prioritize your long-term success. With Capital One, get a full suite of financial products and services tailored to meet your needs today and goals for tomorrow. Learn more at Capital.One slash commercial. Member FDIC. This message comes from Betterment. Their automated investing and saving tools give you the quiet confidence of someone who knows where to put their money. with tax-smart tools that help grow your after-tax returns year-round. Get started today at Betterment.com. That's B-E-T-T-E-R-M-E-N-T dot com.

13:28Investing involves risk, performance not guaranteed. Betterment is not a tax advisor, nor should any information herein be considered tax advice. Please consult a qualified tax professional. This message comes from Granger. This is the story of The One. As a maintenance supervisor at a manufacturing facility, He knows keeping the line up and running is a top priority. That's why he chooses Grainger. Because when a drive belt gets damaged, Grainger makes it easy to find the exact specs for the replacement product he needs. And next day delivery helps ensure he'll have everything in place and running like clockwork.

14:02Call 1-800-GRAINGER, click grainger.com, or just stop by. Grainger, for the ones who get it done. Let's get back to our conversation on President Trump's growing wealth during his second term. The New Yorker's David Kirkpatrick estimates that by January of 2026, the president and his family had made more than$4 billion so far in his second term through ventures like the private club in Washington, D.C. that Donald Trump Jr. co-owns that promises access to administration officials and the luxury jet that Qatar gifted for the president's use as Air Force One and after his term. Michelle Conlon, you mentioned something before we took a break that World Liberty Financial has been granted preliminary approval by the Treasury Department of the Trump administration to operate as a federally chartered bank.

14:57Now, Elizabeth Warren, the senator who's the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, said this about that new charter. This is a quote. President Trump is now the first president in history to approve, operate and supervise his own bank. She goes on to say this is the most brazen act of self-dealing in our financial system has ever seen. Is that characterization by Elizabeth Warren fair? And what does it mean now for world liberty that it can be maybe that it's on the road to being a bank? It's a big deal because it will enable world liberty to grow. It will enable world liberty to take on institutional clients.

15:39It lends world liberty this veneer of federal approval. And so this is a huge step change for the company. I mean, since the company launched shortly before the 2024 election, it sort of tried out, made announcements it was going to do various things like an app. And that never materialized. And it's gone around and around on announcing that it would do different sorts of things. But it seems to be finding its groove now in terms of trying to get into the banking business. And, of course, they have their own stablecoin, USD1. And so the idea is with this preliminary approval, if it turns into permanent approval, World Liberty would then be able to juice much greater adoption of its stablecoin.

16:33So I'll leave out the characterization of brazen by Elizabeth Warren, but she says it's one of the biggest acts of self-dealing our financial system has ever seen. I mean, there's a lot of financial dealing in the history of the American financial system. Is she onto something, though? Is there a different level of self-dealing here that we haven't seen in American banking? I mean, certainly you now have a situation where the president of the United States' family essentially has a crypto bank. So the government that's supposed to regulate and oversee this bank is controlled by the administration of the president.

17:15And I think there's a fair argument to make from those who are super, super concerned about all of this crypto moneymaking on behalf of the Trump family that the conflicts of interest mount and just get more and more severe. And we're seeing an escalation and an intensification of the conflicts of interest. And in fact, when I talk to government ethics experts about this, they always say to me, conflict of interest, we don't even have a phrase in the English language right now to describe what this is. Or they'll say, oh, people say this is unprecedented for a president, and these ethics experts will tell me.

17:58That word doesn't capture it either, that the words aren't really there to sort of describe what this is. I think their minds are blown. That's what you're describing from the perspective of people who police ethics for a living. We're going to talk a little bit more about the ways in which some of this enrichment is interacting with U.S. policy that Donald Trump is in control of as president of the United States. But, Russ, I mentioned a figure as we came back from a break that the actual figure of enrichment for the Trump family may be as high as$4 billion, higher than the$2.2 billion included in the White House disclosures that were released under legal requirements.

18:39What ventures are not included in those disclosures? How much bigger is this universe than what's required under what the White House put out? I'm not sure I have a good answer for that question, Todd. I think that part of that may be that the Trump family, money that goes to Don Jr. and to Eric and to Barron would not necessarily be included in the Trump's financial disclosure form. So, for instance, there's a drone company that Don Jr. is on the board of. He was given several hundred thousand shares of that company for joining the board. had no experience with defense, had no experience in drones, obviously.

19:21But that has been very lucrative for him. He now owns shares that are worth somewhere north of$6 million, maybe as much as$10 million. And last week, the president announced he would have tariffs on drone equipment that was manufactured elsewhere. That greatly benefits the company that Don Jr. happens to sit on the board of. And so the stock rose in the double digits after that announcement. So those are things that would not be included on the financial disclosure form, but are greatly enriching the Trump family. The company is Unusual Machines, and I think its stock jumped about 25 percent after the president slapped tariffs on foreign drones with military applications.

20:07And I think that Don Jr. owns something on the order of 300 ,000 shares. So we're talking about big money, Russ. We're talking about big money. And again, to go to the good point Michelle made about people trying to find the right word for this stuff. And it's not that there's not a president. It's not the conflict of interest. I think you can think of world liberty if you take a step back. And most of these companies is essentially a billboard for bribery. There's a website, has the president's name on it, a picture on it, his name on it. At the bottom of the website, it says, if you buy this token, this is how much goes to the President of the United States.

20:45World Liberty, by law, keeps a register of the people who buy those tokens. So they know, but we don't know. And it's all hidden behind this veil of secrecy. And also another word that sort of doesn't fit this is we use the word investment for when people buy these tokens. But it's not an investment in a typical sense. You're not getting an equity stake in the company as you would if you bought a stock. You're buying a token. And that gives you some minimal amount of voting rights and their governance, but you don't have a share of their profits or their losses. Your only profit is going to be if you can sell those tokens for more.

21:20And so far, that's not working out for anyone except for the Trumps. If someone buys those tokens, they take the money right out the back door right away. And so they also have no vested interest in the company's success. And I think the critical thing that you just said so it doesn't blow by people is that the directors of World Liberty Financial know who purchases the tokens. They know who puts the millions in, even if we don't. That's exactly right. They have to keep a registry of that under something that's called know-your-customer rules that are meant to prevent money laundering. So, yeah, they know exactly who it is, is buying these things, is enriching the family, and is perhaps trying to curry favor with them as well.

21:59Brian emails this. We know he's grifting all he can. My question is, when will somebody do something about this? Well, Michelle, Senate Republicans have been pushing for a bill. It's called the Clarity Act. It aims to regulate the crypto industry. Democrats have criticized that bill for not putting limits on politicians profiting off of crypto, citing President Trump's own crypto earnings. What can you tell us about the Clarity Act and where accountability, the kind of accountability that Brian seems to be looking for may or may not be? Good question. Well, let's go back to the run-up to the election.

22:38You know, the crypto industry poured tens of millions of dollars into helping Donald Trump get elected. He gets elected. He gets inaugurated. Things look great. We're going to get the Clarity Act. This is very exciting for crypto proponents. And what you can see is that the chances of this bill passing, were very, very high as recently as January, and it now looks more and more unlikely that this is going to pass this term. And the closer we get to the midterms, the more this bill is in jeopardy. The bill was criticized by Democratic lawmakers because, well, for one, they didn't like the ethics provision, which basically would grandfather all of President Trump's crypto activity, his family's activity, and sort of make it okay.

23:34But Democrats were also really concerned about that they felt the bill was very weak on law enforcement tools, because of course we know crypto's great for things like money laundering, sanctions evasion, and all sorts of illicit activity. So even if this bill had passed or even if it does pass, as it stands the way it's written now, it doesn't have very sharp teeth in terms of enforcement and regulation. What does White House lobbying look like on this bill on Capitol Hill? Intense, furious, unprecedented, to put that word out there again. And, you know, the crypto industry really went all in on the Trump administration.

24:24And it's been high drama and high theater in Washington because it just looked like it was so likely to sail through. And I think today maybe you'd put the chances of it at, you know, 10 percent, very slim, which is really, you know, bad news for the crypto industry. But for people who are really concerned about the runaway train that crypto's been during the Trump administration, you know, perhaps that's better news for them. And then, of course, you know, we'll have the midterms. And, you know, if the Democrats retake one or two chambers, that'll reshuffle the whole game board on this. Let's add another voice to the conversation now.

25:02Lauren Harper is the Daniel Ellsberg chair on government secrecy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation. Been on 1A before. Lauren, great to see you again. Thank you. We've been talking about the president's self-enrichment this term. One thing that has come up that we haven't quite delved into too much is Truth Social, the president's social media company that he's heavily invested in, and Truth Social's his posting place. You and your organization have filed a lawsuit against Trump Media and Technology Group over this plan to sell early access to the president's posts on Truth Social for up to$100 ,000 a month.

25:41The company says that more than 10 customers have already signed up for that subscription service, mostly trading firms. Why does this new Truth Social service concern you and your group? Why are you suing? Sure, there are three reasons. So as you mentioned, Trump Media and Technology Group, which owns Truth Social, in which Trump is the largest shareholder has announced this new plan offering between$60 ,000 and$100 ,000 a month for this subscription service. And it is problematic for three reasons. The first is that the president's announcements on any third-party sites, whether that's True Social, X, or what have you, that concern government affairs, you know, anything from sweeping tariff announcements to military escalation in Iran to announcing cabinet change-ups, these are all presidential records, which means that they are public property.

26:28And True Social has no business selling public property at all, even if it's for a millisecond. The other problem that this presents is because these posts, especially in the age of algorithmic trading, can move global and financial markets, poly markets, this creates a financial risk that Trump might post the kind of things that could encourage more deep-pocketed donors to sign up or that might benefit any of Trump's holdings. And finally, it violates constitutional protections guaranteeing public equal access to official government statements. And at the same time this is happening, the administration is trying to gut the law that regulates access to presidential records, the PRA, the Presidential Records Act.

27:10Those are the reasons why FPF and The Intercept are suing. Martha asks this. How is selling early access to Trump's stated intentions and plans by subscription not a kind of insider trading and not already completely illegal? I agree. He shouldn't be doing it at all. And there's the other take, which, you know, Bloomberg and there are other subscription services for early access to records, but it's worth mentioning, you know, news outlets and other services like this are not the government. These other companies can report the news, but the president itself makes the news and makes policy. You know, a sitting president can't constitutionally privatize advanced access to official acts to enrich a company in which he is the majority stakeholder.

Read the full transcript

27:55Michelle, Truth Social is a social media company, but increasingly, it's also a crypto company. We talked about on this show just several many months ago that Truth Social had made significant investment in Bitcoin last year. What is Truth Social now? It's losing money in the social media business, but it's heavily invested in crypto. What is this business, really? Well, last summer, July 2025, remember that was kind of the, that was a very hot moment for Bitcoin and true social, Trump Media, the company had really kind of tried all these different things. It was going to be a social media app, but of course it's, you know, users are falling.

28:44It barely has any users. And so last July it said, okay, we're going to, you know, buy about$2 billion worth of Bitcoin. A lot of the shareholders in the company were really disappointed at that news. The company ended up buying that Bitcoin at the peak. That allocation is now worth around$1 billion. And as one Trump Media shareholder who's sitting on$700 ,000 in losses told me, it's essentially like this company has lit a billion dollars on fire and now it's gone. And on August 10th, Trump had its first ever earnings call, and the numbers were not good, a net loss of$644 million, citing that Bitcoin depreciation.

29:32The company has also announced that it's going to do a$6 billion merger with a nuclear fusion company. That nuclear fusion company has no reported revenue. We'll see if that deal goes through or not. But the one-time biggest fanboy of the stock who runs the largest retail investment group on True Social said, look, doing business with the Trumps is suicide. And now he's turned against the whole thing. Even while the president controls policy that could benefit the company directly. Yes. Russ, real quick, we're going to go to a break, but just can you give a sense of how important it would be for a company to spend$100 ,000 a month to get early access to President Trump's true social posts?

30:21How big of a financial leverage is that in the market? Look, if investors only need, these big companies only need a few seconds to make hundreds of millions of dollars, if you had access to that kind of cash to buy that, you would have to do it. For an edge in the market that, as Lauren says, could be realized just in milliseconds. Well, we have to take another quick break, but still to come, as President Trump's wealth grows, his many D.C. renovation projects are costing millions. Who's footing the bill and how are they influencing the process? And how does the president's self-enrichment compare to past administrations?

31:01Stay with us.

31:05This message comes from Capital One Commercial Bank. Your business requires commercial banking solutions that prioritize your long-term success. With Capital One, get a full suite of financial products and services tailored to meet your needs today and goals for tomorrow. Learn more at Capital.One slash Commercial. Member FDIC. This message comes from Arctic Wolf. Arctic Wolf combines AI-led security operations with human expertise, helping teams detect, investigate, and respond at machine speed without building it themselves. More at ArcticWolf.com slash NPR. Let's get back to talking about the president's wealth and how it's grown over the course of his second term.

31:49Lauren, we asked before what disclosures that the White House is required to release leave out about the universe of money and influence and the president's personal enrichment. What else do they leave out? One of the big blind spots of the financial disclosure report is Trump's unprecedented fundraising for nonprofits with which he is aligned. You know, for example, the Trump Presidential Library Foundation, the Trust for the National Mall, which is conducting fundraising for the White House ballroom. And these organizations have very few disclosure rules, so we don't have a full accounting of the donors, for example, or insight into how that money is being spent.

32:27But what we've seen so far does raise concerns that these nonprofits could be a conduit for quid pro quos. The most obvious examples are the 400 million Qatari luxury jet that was mentioned earlier. And then there's also all of the funding for the White House ballroom. And Public Citizen recently did a report, I think, underscoring the concerns here. Of the$350 million that have been raised, those entities which have contributed have already received$50 billion in federal contracts. And many of these entities have already had investigations, federal investigations, into some of their dealings paused or tossed.

33:01And the concern with all of these entities is that they could be conduits for potential corruption, all under the veneer of being engaged in kind of these pseudo-public works projects. And because they're nonprofits, they are not subject to federal disclosure rules. Well, we got this message in our voicemail inbox from Allen in Georgia. With the continual ornate and ridiculous building of ballrooms at the White House, constantly telling us that we need to cut our budgets is ridiculous. When are they going to impeach this man for all the corruption he has shown us and that Congress is turning their backs on the American people?

33:38Russ Allen mentions the Trump ballroom project. Construction was halted after a federal court announced congressional approval was needed. The president has now gone to the Supreme Court to try to get that construction project back on track. It'll cost about$400 million, just for the ballroom part, not including the bunker and security installations below it. The ballroom is one of this whole series of renovation projects across D.C. that the president has taken on. How do these projects and the funding of them fit into this conversation? Lauren mentioned some of it, of where the money is coming from.

34:13We're focused on the president's personal enrichment, but it's not the only kind of enrichment that somebody in his position can go after. Yeah, it's an excellent point Alan raises, Todd, that there's the strictly good government view of these sorts of things. Is it a good idea for a president of the United States to be taking money from people, not saying who's giving him the money or what interests they might have in garnering his favor? But there's also, there's just a political side to that as well. And I think Alan touches on that, that right now, you know, President Trump was elected on the idea that he was going to lower costs, that he was going to not get us into overseas wars that didn't make sense, and that he was going to do some stuff about immigration.

35:01But what Todd's talking about is like the disconnect between saying you're going to lower people's costs, you're paying too much for gasoline and eggs, not doing that, and instead focusing on these things that are essentially thrones to himself. President Trump has always liked to have things with his name on it. That was his career in business, was trying to build fancy things with his name on it. And he's using Washington, the taxpayers' money to some degree, and donations from people who we don't know who they are or what they want to sort of build this legacy to himself in ways that he's always understood and always embraced.

35:40Russ, Sandra wants to know why are so many politicians going along with this president. She mentions political fights over Todd Blanch or false claims about the 2020 election. But here we're talking about direct self-dealing, self-enrichment, covered politics for a long time myself. It's the kind of thing that in any other context would have driven lawmakers, politicians, operatives of all stripes onto television to denounce it because they would wanna make sure that they're being seen denouncing it because the appearance of so much corruption is bad for everybody. We don't really see that. Yeah, sure, some Democrats do it, of course.

36:20But what about everybody else? Yeah, I mean, it's an excellent commentary on where we are in our political life right now. I think back to when Richard Nixon left office. You know, Republicans came to him and said, this information is going to get out. You will be impeached. You will be kicked out of office. That was Republicans who came and made that point. He resigned the next day. You can't imagine that world happening right now. It speaks to a couple of things, I think. One, the steep divide, the sort of like tribal nature of our politics, where one side embraces whatever their side does and attacks whatever the other side does.

36:56And there's a media infrastructure to support that. You can live in that little bubble where if you believe, you want to believe that Donald Trump is good, you're not going to hear anything that criticizes him. And the other one is just the degree to which Donald Trump, for most of the last 10 years, has controlled the Republican Party. And you've seen what's happened to Republicans, a string of them, who have stood up against him, who have criticized him for his excesses, for his policies, on a variety of things. It just has not gone generally well for them. And politicians want to remain in office.

37:31They want to keep their jobs. Most of them do more than they want to worry about these kinds of larger issues. And I think that's what we're seeing. And that hold, whether that hold's going to loosen at all is just not clear. As we enter this last two years of his administration, it's a greater possibility, though. Michelle Conlon, I'm interested in your view on this as you've reported crypto businesses and other businesses, how influence appears to be bought and sold, sometimes anonymously, not anonymous to the president. What's your belief about this question of political influence and whether other elected officials are willing to call it out?

38:08Well, I think, you know, Russ made a great point about Trump's just lock hold on the party and how fearful and reticent anyone in the Republican Party has been to call some of this out. As far as the influence, I mean, look, we know that the private donors to those various Trump DC renovation projects have included big tech companies, Amazon, Apple, and Meta, Google, Microsoft, Coinbase, Ripple, they all have government dealing. They all have issues that they would like to see the government work favorably on their behalf. There's also wealthy individuals, Blackstone CEO Steve Schwartzman. And so this just, you know, there's some of what we can see, but we're only probably seeing, you know, inches.

39:01And then there's, you know, there's miles that we aren't seeing in terms of how this influence may or may not be working and how much these donations might be buying or purchasing policy, essentially. And a lot of that is just completely hidden from public view right now. And so you're at this kind of strange point in American history where the regulatory framework, the legal framework, the enforcement framework just hasn't really been built for a situation like this and hasn't caught up to it and wasn't even contemplating a situation like this when this infrastructure was built. Lauren? Yeah, Michelle's absolutely right.

39:47You know, we're in a complicated landscape right now, and nobody had a president like Trump in mind when they were designing the current rules, both in terms of Trump's complicated financial holdings and his proclivity for really testing the constraints of our legal system and our norms. You know, there are no laws to start that prohibit presidents from fundraising for nonprofits like the one that is a conduit for contributions to the ballroom. and the president and the vice president are exempt from the main criminal conflict of interest and solicitation statutes that apply to the rest of the executive branch.

40:20What the president is bound by is bans on insider trading, thefts of public money, and both of the emoluments clauses, both the foreign and domestic, which seek to prevent officials from further profiting off their time in office. But what the first term showed us, there were a couple of lawsuits filed under the emoluments clause, is that without real-time judicial enforcement, those clauses prove functionally unenforceable. This is complicated by the fact that presidents now have expanded immunity as a result of the 2024 SCOTUS ruling. You talk about the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution that foreign governments, princes, I think the Constitution says in Kings, can't give money to a sitting president.

40:59That's unconstitutional and grounds for impeachment. Russ, we talk so much about crypto, but some of the president's recent enrichment is old school. Let's talk about real estate real quick before we talk about solutions. President Trump reported earning$59 million last year from foreign real estate deals. That's up 71 % since 2024. And one particular deal comes to mind for me. Vietnam agreed to a$1.5 billion real estate project with the Trump Organization to build golf courses, hotels, other resort property in their country, all while they were negotiating with the Trump administration synonymously to get out from under high tariffs, up to 46 percent on their products imposed by Donald Trump during his during his tariff policymaking of last year, Liberation Day and the rest of it.

41:52Can you just talk a little bit about the president's foreign real estate deals and how they're intersecting with policymaking right now? It's a fascinating topic, Todd. The Vietnam deal you described was a licensing deal, and it's really been one of the most lucrative business lines in Donald Trump's history. He doesn't actually build those projects. He's not actually involved even in the design of them. They sign off with some things. They have a book that says we have an approval of sort of what kind of drapes and pillows you buy. But they're not running these things. It's just you use the name and you pay them a lot of money.

42:30Now, that obviously creates a lot of conflicts. During the first term, they said they would not enter into these foreign licensing deals because it presented the appearance that they might make policy for a country based on the fact they got a$5 million check. This time, they decided that doesn't matter at all. They didn't have new licensing deals when he was out of office. I think that's a testimony to the role that being president has played in his finances. Those dried up during that period of time. As soon as he won the Republican nomination, there was a wave of them, including some on the Arabian Peninsula.

43:05Saudi Arabia companies have been a big funder of him for these sorts of things. And every one of those creates the possibility that that's in the back of his mind when he's making judgments about what he should do in his official capacity. So Russ, extend that a little bit. I want to close out talking about what's at stake and what can be done about it. What happens in other countries when chief executives, people in control of so much of government influence, use it directly to funnel money into their bank accounts? What's the lesson learned for Americans here, Russ? I think there are a lot better students on that than I am, but I think this is more common than what you see in autocratic regimes or dictators.

43:48Vladimir Putin, obviously, himself and the oligarchs that have risen up in Russia have all benefited greatly from that. You see the same thing in Viktor Orban and other countries where being president means great riches for you and great riches for people who support you and are close to you. And not being close to the person, as we've seen with Donald Trump's legal retribution campaign, can have other great consequences. So this is just us taking a step more towards those kinds of countries that are so in opposition to the premise of the original founding of our country. James emails this, this amount of money is synonymous with power.

44:30It's not about buying a better car or a bigger house. It's the currency of influence and decision-making. That's the point, says James. Lauren, you mentioned that there are the big gaps in the laws. One of the president's favorite phrases when he's asked about this is, I'm allowed to do it. He says it all the time. It appears legally he's right. What role should Congress be playing in limiting the president's ability to profit from his office here? Certainly a larger one. And I think what connects all of the things that we're talking about is we are witnessing the creation of a parallel, basically privatized executive branch that is evading the Freedom of Information Act, ethics laws, and is essentially turning the presidency basically into an unregulated funding engine.

45:15And what we need to do, no matter who is the next president or who controls Congress after the midterms, is to tighten the rules and the enforcements around all of these vehicles to reduce the potential for corruption by any administration, not just Trump's, but any that might come after that are witnessing this and thinking, well, if you can do it, I can too. Michelle, what are you watching for next? I mean, after the abuses of the Nixon administration, there was public demand for real ethical reform, overhauling the Justice Department. It was a real moment for good government reform. Do you have a sense that the public is in a place to be demanding that here?

45:53Are we at a Watergate moment? Is the public asleep? What are you watching for next in terms of politics and potential reform here? Here's what's coming out of the government watchdog groups. Mandatory divestment and blind trusts on the part of the president. Enhanced financial transparency. Mandatory tax return disclosures. That was a norm, but Trump, of course, didn't abide by that norm. Enforcement of the emoluments clause in a more muscular and vigorous way. And then actually empowering the Office of Government Ethics. and also reforming pardon power and restricting appointee involvement in presidential business.

46:38Those are some of the themes coming out of the government watchdog groups. Lauren, what are you watching for next briefly? I mean, there's a long list of potential reforms. There's a wish list. Yeah. Realistically, what are you watching for? So certainly from my perspective, one of the key things here is getting greater access and ensuring access to presidential records, which will help us document really a lot of the conversations that are happening behind the scenes in the White House that we've been talking about and increasing transparency across the board. That's Lauren Harper, the Daniel Ellsberg Chair on Government Secrecy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation.

47:10Russ Buettner joined us from the New York Times and Michelle Conlon from Reuters. Great conversation, you guys. Thank you so much. We've only scratched the surface here, by the way. There's a lot we didn't get to with the Trump family and their investments from foreign mining operations, real estate deals to insider trading allegations. and we're going to keep covering these topics on our series if you can keep it. Today's producer was Arfi Getty. This program comes to you from WAMU, part of American University in Washington, distributed by NPR. I'm Todd Zwillick. We'll talk more soon. This is 1A.

48:01This message comes from Working Forest's initiative. Keeping a working forest growing takes a massive commitment. That's why working forest professionals plant over 1 billion seedlings annually in the U.S., ensuring more trees are planted than harvested. But it takes more than planting to sustain these ecosystems. It means caring for everything in the forest, from clean water to thriving wildlife. Because when forests are taken care of, they'll thrive for generations. Learn more at WorkingForestsInitiative.com. Hey, it's Mike Danforth, executive producer of Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me. Here's a great way to get the perks of being an NPR producer without doing any of the work.

48:39Join NPR+. With NPR +, you get extended interviews, inside looks at your favorite shows, and more. All while supporting NPR and never having to pull an all-nighter. Or if you work on one of the news shows, an all-morninger. Sign up at plus.npr.org.

From the publisher
Donald Trump is adding billions of dollars to his personal fortune while he serves as president.

In 2024, the president made about $600 million. In his first year of his second term in office, that number jumped to more than $2.2 billion. The latest White House disclosures show most of those earnings came from cryptocurrency and crypto-related businesses.

He also continues to make millions from real estate and golf deals, many in foreign countries negotiating with the U.S. government he controls. And he’s received $117 million in legal settlements.

In this edition of our series, “If You Can Keep It,” we take a look at the scale of President Trump’s personal enrichment during his second term. What happens when the line blurs between the president’s personal wealth and the interests of the country?

Find more of our programs online. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a.


See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.

NPR Privacy Policy

More from 1A

All 320 episodes
'If You Can Keep It': How Trump’s Getting Rich As President1A · 45 min
Listen in VO