'If You Can Keep It': ICE’s Latest Minnesota Killing

26 Jan 2026 · 43 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

1A Podcast Episode Notes

Episode Title

'If You Can Keep It': ICE’s Latest Minnesota Killing Podcast Description The *1A* podcast provides an insightful exploration of news events, focusing on deep issues beyond the headlines. This episode delves into the tragic events in Minnesota concerning ICE’s actions and its implications.

Key Summary

  • On a recent Saturday, ICE agents shot and killed 37-year-old Alex Pretti, an ICU nurse at a VA hospital in Minneapolis.
  • This incident follows the earlier shooting of poet Renee Macklin-Good by federal agents, prompting nationwide outrage and protests.
  • The Trump administration quickly labeled Pretti as a violent criminal, a narrative contradicted by video evidence.
  • Elected officials, including Senator Amy Klobuchar, have called for ICE to leave Minnesota, asserting that their presence does not enhance public safety.
  • The episode discusses the administration's narrative, Congress's lack of oversight, and calls for accountability from lawmakers.

Detailed Breakdown

Background of the Incident

  • Previous Incident: Pretti's death is the second shooting of a civilian by ICE agents in Minnesota within weeks, following the shooting of Renee Macklin-Good.
  • Narrative by Officials: Officials from the Trump administration labeled Pretti as dangerous, but video evidence contradicts these claims, showing him in a vulnerable position when shot.

Public Response

  • Outrage and Protests: Immediate public backlash occurred, leading to protests across the country, with local officials urging ICE to withdraw from Minnesota.
  • Statements from Officials: Local leaders, including the mayor and police chief, expressed concern over federal agents' actions and their impact on community safety.

Discussion with Matt Sepik

  • Community Perspective: Matt Sepik, a correspondent for Minnesota Public Radio, shares insights on local reactions, emphasizing a defiant stance from residents against federal aggression.
  • Governor's Press Conference: Governor Tim Walz condemned the administration's narrative and called for accountability, highlighting the importance of protecting citizens' rights.

Congressional Oversight

  • Congressional Actions: The episode raises questions about Congress's ability to exert oversight over federal agencies like ICE, especially under the current administration.
  • Impeachment Discussions: Representative Melanie Stansbury discusses potential impeachment articles being introduced against DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, as Democrats push for accountability.

Analysis of Local and National Politics

  • National Guard Deployment: Following the unrest, the Minnesota National Guard was activated to support local law enforcement, a move reflecting public safety concerns amidst rising tensions.
  • Shift in Congressional Attitudes: A small number of Republican lawmakers have begun to call for investigations into ICE's actions, indicating a shift in the political landscape concerning federal oversight.

Themes and Key Concepts

  • Power Dynamics: The episode highlights a growing tension between state and federal authorities, particularly regarding ICE's role in local law enforcement.
  • Civil Rights: The ramifications of federal actions on civil liberties and community trust are explored, suggesting a broader systemic issue within immigration enforcement.
  • Democracy and Accountability: The discussions emphasize the need for enhanced oversight and accountability mechanisms to protect democracy and uphold citizens' rights.

Conclusion The podcast episode presents a critical reflection on the implications of federal enforcement actions in local communities, the narratives constructed around these incidents, and the urgent calls for accountability and reform from various stakeholders. The continuing theme underscores the necessity for public vigilance and advocacy to uphold democratic principles and civil rights in the face of government actions.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Killing of Alex Preddy

0:45 to 2:14

Discussion about the shooting death of Alex Preddy and the distorted narratives surrounding it.

“The president's top advisor on immigration, Stephen Miller, called Preddy an assassin.”

Senator Klobuchar's Response

2:14 to 4:12

Senator Klobuchar's comments on the situation and calls for ICE to leave Minnesota.

“Let's get into the conversation with Matt Sepik.”

Community Reactions

4:12 to 6:24

Exploring how local residents are responding to the killing and the ongoing protests.

“pretty, quote, attacked officers at the scene.”

Federal and Local Tensions

6:24 to 9:21

Analysis of the tensions between federal agents and local authorities in the aftermath of the shooting.

“I mean, people are not being cowed by this.”

Governor Walz's Press Conference

9:21 to 11:03

Governor Walz addresses the media on the implications of the recent violence and federal actions.

“Isn't that remarkable that it even comes to this?”

National Guard Deployment

11:03 to 14:10

Discussion about the deployment of the National Guard in Minneapolis and their role.

“He spoke on Sunday at a press conference in Minneapolis, along with Minnesota Attorney General Keith Allison.”

National Guard Presence and Protest Dynamics

14:10 to 15:30

Learn about the National Guard's role during protests against ICE in Minneapolis.

“They have, you know, no reason to hide their identity and what they're doing.”

Minnesota's Response to Federal Demands

15:35 to 17:48

Explore Minnesota officials' rejection of federal demands regarding voter rolls and immigration enforcement.

“We got this question from Reed in Florida who says, can anyone comment on Pam Bondi's letter to Tim Walls indicating the ICE agents could be removed if Minnesota would turn over its voter roles.”

Congressional Reactions to ICE Killings

17:52 to 20:49

Understand the shift in reactions from some Republicans in Congress regarding ICE killings.

“Matt, one thing that's different in Alex Preddy's killing from Rene Good's killing just a couple of weeks ago is the reaction of a handful of Republicans in Congress.”

Alex Preddy's Shooting and Investigation Concerns

20:53 to 23:18

Discuss the implications of Alex Preddy's shooting and the investigation process.

“Matt, just a couple of additional questions.”
Show all 19 chapters

Interview with Matt Sepik

23:23 to 23:35

Hear insights from Matt Sepik regarding the ongoing situation surrounding ICE.

“And we really appreciate your time and reporting.”

Stansbury's Reaction to ICE Violence

24:05 to 26:21

Listen to Representative Stansbury's reaction to the recent killings by immigration agents.

“It feels like our democracy and truth is slipping away.”

Funding Battles in Congress

26:31 to 27:51

Examine the debate over DHS funding and its implications for ICE.

“She's a Democrat representing New Mexico's first congressional district in the House of Representatives.”

Congress and DHS Funding: Political Dynamics

28:08 to 30:09

Explore the dynamics of the Democratic caucus regarding DHS funding and accountability.

“One thing that happened, though, Hakeem Jeffries, the leader of your caucus, the leader of the Democrats in the House, he voted against that DHS funding, but he didn't whip it.”

Divided Perspectives on Law Enforcement and Ethics

30:11 to 31:49

Discuss the differing opinions on law enforcement actions and their implications for society.

“We got this message from Monica, apropos, who says, what do I want to see from Congress?”

Executive Power: Shifts in Congressional Authority

31:51 to 33:37

Analyze the increasing power of the presidency over Congress and its implications.

“our own government is attacking our communities.”

Historical Context: Congress's Response to Executive Overreach

33:39 to 37:58

Learn about Congress's historical actions to limit executive power after Watergate.

“It might be deeper than usual, but is it permanent?”

Party Politics and Voter Influence on Congressional Actions

37:59 to 41:49

Examine the relationship between party politics, voter influence, and legislative behavior.

“Now, a Democrat-backed War Powers Resolution that would have prevented the president from sending U.S.”

Public Concerns About Government Safety

42:02 to 42:31

Listeners express their concerns about the government's failure to ensure safety and order.

“Barbara emails, Speaker Johnson doesn't want to impede the president.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:07It's been less than three weeks since a federal ICE agent shot and killed 37-year-year-old poet Renee Macklin-Good in Minneapolis. The story from the Trump administration came swiftly. Macklin-Good was dangerous and the shooting was justified. But videos refute that story and protests erupted nationwide in reaction. Local officials called for calm and for ICE to leave their state. Now, a new killing by immigration agents on the streets of Minneapolis and the same pattern of false narrative from the Trump administration. Federal agents shot 37-year-old Alex Preddy to death on Saturday. And once again, the administration immediately jumped in, painting Preddy as a violent criminal.

0:50The president's top advisor on immigration, Stephen Miller, called Preddy an assassin. The vice president reposted that lie. Other officials said Preddy, who was an ICU nurse at a VA hospital, was on the streets to harm immigration agents. And once again, the video evidence undermines those claims, this time even more clearly than before. And again, lawmakers are calling for ICE to get out. We need ICE out of Minnesota. They are not making us more safe. As the tragic, tragic killing this morning, as people saw it viscerally on that video, shows us they are making us less safe. That was Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota on Saturday.

1:36On Monday, President Trump said that border czar Tom Homan will head to Minneapolis. For this installment of our weekly series, If You Can Keep It, about the health of our democracy, we start with the latest in Minneapolis. How has the operation the administration says is about immigration enforcement transformed into something else entirely? Later, we turn to Congress and how it's responding to this moment in Minnesota, and also how the legislative branch has lost, or in many cases, willingly given up power to this and previous presidents. How is this imbalance intensifying after decades, the executive branch growing its power?

2:13I'm Jen White. And I'm Todd Zwilling. You're listening to the 1A Podcast. All that and more right after this. Stay with us.

2:24Let's get into the conversation with Matt Sepik. He's a correspondent for Minnesota Public Radio. Matt, thanks for being here. Glad to be back. Matt, let's start with Alex Preddy. What do we know about him so far? Well, according to the obituary that my colleagues put together, which you can see at mprnews.org, M as in Minnesota, he's been being remembered as a person who was kind, competent, and quiet. He was 37 years old, worked as an ICU nurse at the Minneapolis VA Hospital, a government employee killed by the government he served. And some really poignant video has been making the rounds on social media of Preddy.

3:11This was from about a year ago, so December of 2024. for he is seen standing at the foot of a gurney in a hospital hallway giving a final salute to a 77-year-old veteran who had just died. And he says, today we remember that freedom is not free. Matt, I can hear that even as you're reading that. Yeah. It's tough stuff. It's tough stuff. And you are in Minneapolis. And watching all of this unfold, and I just want to read some of the statements we've heard from the administration so far. A tweet from the Department of Homeland Security's official ex-account says, quote, The officers attempted to disarm the suspect, but the armed suspect violently resisted.

4:00The head of Border Patrol, Gregory Bovino, said it, quote, Looks like Petty wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and FBI Director Kash Patel both claimed pretty, quote, attacked officers at the scene. And to be clear, there is no evidence that supports any of these claims from the administration. Not a shred, not a shred of evidence. There's video from multiple angles. He never unholsters that firearm. In fact, you know, one analysis, several analyses of these videos showing him being disarmed by an agent before he is shot on the ground as he is laying on the ground.

4:40I was on the air briefly on Saturday on the Bulwarks live stream just following the shooting. They were doing some breaking news. And one of the editors there, Jonathan V. Last, remarked that the shooting reminded him of a drug gang execution. And I heard a similar comparison from a friend who has some experience investigating street gangs. And I want to read a quote to you, and I think this is important. This is from Ruth Ben-Ghiat. She's certainly been making the rounds doing various media appearances over the past few years. She's an expert on authoritarianism, a historian at NYU, has particular expertise on fascist Italy.

5:22And this is what she wrote on her blog yesterday. These deliberate shows of extreme violence, which they know will be witnessed, filmed, and shared, are an attempt to traumatize and break the city's population and subjugate the city's elected leaders. We will execute your people until you stop. Your defiance is the message. End quote. They're from authoritarian scholar Ruth Ben-Ghiat. But I can tell you, this city has not been broken. We are holding our own here. And Professor Ben-Ghiat, of course, has been on this show and on If You Can Keep It many times. We value her expertise here. Local officials, the mayor, Jacob Fry, have spoken out, held a press conference police chief Brian O 'Hara over the weekend.

6:06Matt, but you said that residents might be seeing this message that resistance is futile or the tacit message of authoritarianism as Professor Ben-Ghiat describes it. What's been the response on the streets from Minneapolis residents over the last two days? It's been defiant. I mean, people are not being cowed by this. Of course, the day before the shooting on Friday, there were well over 10 ,000, 15 ,000, maybe more people who walked in sub-zero temperatures, gathered on the streets in downtown Minneapolis and marched peacefully through the streets. Mayor Jacob Fry remarked at a news conference on Saturday that not one window was broken and not one person was hurt.

6:51Now, after this shooting on Saturday, things did get tense. The police chief said that they did have to, at one point, declare an unlawful assembly because a crowd had surrounded local police at the scene of the shooting and police did use some chemical irritants to disperse that crowd. They did shut down that street. It's a stretch of Nicollet Avenue immediately south of downtown Minneapolis. But by Sunday morning, I saw an email from the city that said things had been peaceful. Things were quiet. So they reopened the street. There has not been rioting here. Certainly, the city is on edge. People are angry.

7:38People are mourning. But there has not been the violence that many people were expecting. And I would not describe what's happening here as a powder keg about to explode. I would say if you're not following the news, if you're not looking at social media, you could drive through much of this city and not really know what's going on because these actions by federal agents, and I'm not even going to call them law enforcement because that's not what this is. They're targeted in certain areas, and certainly the people in those areas have been going through untold amounts of trauma. But just something I noticed on Saturday, I was running from my office to City Hall for a couple of different news conferences with the mayor and police chief, another with the U.S.

8:26senators and others from the congressional delegation. while they were describing in the third floor press room what sounds really like something with all the hallmarks of a constitutional crisis. There was a wedding going on in the rotunda of City Hall downstairs as I had packed up and left. Normal life is continuing here for much of the city. Well, when we think about the case of Renee Macklingood, again, this is the woman who an ICE agent shot and killed in early January. Minnesota's State Investigative Bureau said that federal law enforcement blocked them from accessing evidence and case materials.

9:07What's happening in this case with Alex Preddy's shooting? What kind of access are local officials being given to the scene? And we should note that on Sunday, a U.S. District Court judge granted a temporary restraining order against DHS, barring it from altering or destroying evidence connected to the killing. Isn't that remarkable that it even comes to this? There's a lot playing out right now in the federal courts. And yes, that is one of the things. In fact, there's a hearing about that this afternoon in front of a judge in St. Paul. They've granted a temporary restraining order because the city, the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, the state police investigative agency, actually had to go to federal court and ask a judge to order.

9:54federal agents, federal agencies, not to destroy evidence in this shooting that happened on Saturday of Alex Preddy. Yeah, Matt, I did not understand that order because destroying or altering evidence is against the law. That's what I thought. You need a court order to tell you not to do that? Well, apparently, and that's where we are at this point. It's really quite remarkable. And the BCA, I mean, normally in most circumstances, the BCA Bureau of Criminal apprehension, works closely with the FBI. I mean, they've worked together on many cases over the years, and the feds have completely blocked them out.

10:34The BCA actually went and got a search warrant to go to this scene, and they were not able to get any access to evidence. I mean, federal agents here are defying a search warrant from a sovereign judge of a sovereign state. Incredible. Back with more in a moment.

10:57Getting back into the conversation about the latest in Minnesota, let's hear this clip of Governor Tim Walz. He spoke on Sunday at a press conference in Minneapolis, along with Minnesota Attorney General Keith Allison. And you know what you saw. And then you heard the most powerful people in the world, certainly in this country, President, Vice President Greg Bovino, Kristi Noem, narrate to you what you were looking at, that this was a domestic terrorist crazed running at law enforcement with the intent to kill massive numbers of them sullying his name within minutes of this event happening and then closing the crime scene sweeping away the evidence defying a court order and not allowing anyone to look at it i don't care if you are conservative and you are flying a donald trump flag you're a libertarian don't tread on me, you're a democratic socialist of America.

11:55This is an inflection point, America. If we cannot all agree that the smearing of an American citizen and besmirching everything they stood for and asking us not to believe what we saw, I don't know what else to tell you. That's Tim Walts, the governor of Minnesota, speaking on Sunday in Minneapolis. Now, Now, the governor also activated Minnesota's National Guard on Sunday, and Minneapolis officials said it was because its police force was stretched thin due to federal agents causing a, quote, disruption in public safety. Matt Sepik, what do we know about where those troops will be placed and what they will do and what the governor intends here?

12:36Well, they have been supporting local law enforcement as they did, I should say, belatedly after the killing of George Floyd back in 2020. And, of course, that's the important context here that you have to remember is that both the mayor of Minneapolis and Governor Walz five and a half, almost six years ago, really were raked over the coals for the slowness of their response in getting the National Guard out on the streets to protect the city from looting and burning and what we all saw. As I said, that has not happened here. There have been some points of tension in the streets, but the city has not erupted.

13:19There have not been riots. And the guard has been out, as I say, to support local law enforcement. The city of Minneapolis police force is around 600 people. There was a major wave of resignations after 2020, and Police Chief Brian O 'Hara has made it a priority here to rebuild that force. But keep in mind, we've got around 3 ,000 federal agents masked in this town. That is about, what, five times the size of the MPD. So the guard has been out. What's interesting, too, is they are wearing yellow reflective construction vests because they have military-style uniforms similar to what Border Patrol and ICE have been wearing.

14:09The Guard, of course, is not wearing face masks. They have, you know, no reason to hide their identity and what they're doing. But they have been out on the streets. It's not exactly clear how many are out right now, but they have been visible. Obviously, they're visible if they're wearing yellow reflective vests. One thing that I did note, a lot of them have been outside the Whipple Federal Building. And this is a building where ICE has a detention center and the immigration court for this area is located. It's just outside of Minneapolis, right on the edge of the International Airport. And that area has been the locus of many of these protests that we've seen.

14:54And there have been some tensions there. But the protests, I was down there briefly last week as people kind of lined up along the sidewalk with signs. Just a normal type of protest activity that you see. But interesting to note that I saw yesterday a couple of media outlets reported that National Guard members there in their yellow vests were handing out coffee and donuts. to anti-ICE protesters, a definite show of goodwill and definitely a way to send the message that they are there to keep the peace. And very good PR on the National Guard's part, I should say. We got this question from Reed in Florida who says, can anyone comment on Pam Bondi's letter to Tim Walls indicating the ICE agents could be removed if Minnesota would turn over its voter roles.

15:46Sounds like extortion to me. And they're referring to a letter from Attorney General Pam Bondy, and she outlined something Minnesota officials, things Minnesota officials could do to basically have immigration enforcement at least reduced in the state. And that includes the state sharing records on Medicaid and food nutrition services, repealing sanctuary policies, having state correction facilities cooperate with ICE, and also sharing voter registration roles with the federal government. How are state officials responding to that, Matt? Well, we got a big fat no from Steve Simon. He is the Secretary of State for Minnesota, a Democrat, and he oversees the elections here.

16:37And he has been fighting with DOJ in court, and this has been going on for a while, where they have sought voter rolls in Minnesota, which Simon and the state attorney general's office argues they have absolutely no legal authority to do. It's part of an effort on DOJ's part to craft a narrative that there is major voter fraud in Minnesota. President Trump claims several times that he has won the state three times. That is not true at all. There has not been any indication of widespread voter fraud here. I mean, there are cases, you know, piecemeal here and there, as there are in every state where people try to pull something.

17:28But we know about them because they have been prosecuted. But Steve Simon, in a statement, I believe over the weekend, said that, yeah, there's no legal authority for the state to go after – or the DOJ, rather, to go after Minnesota's voter rolls. And, in fact, they're protected by Minnesota law. You can't just hand that stuff out to anybody that asks. It is protected personal data. Matt, one thing that's different in Alex Preddy's killing from Rene Good's killing just a couple of weeks ago is the reaction of a handful of Republicans in Congress. Now, we're going to talk about Congress in just a few minutes here on the show.

18:10But there's a nexus here with what's going on in Minneapolis. a number of high-profile Republicans, including the chair of the House Homeland Security Committee, Andrew Garbarino, has now come out, demanded that leaders of ICE and CBP testify before Congress. Congressman Michael McCaul, who's retiring from Texas, has spoken out. A handful of Republican senators have demanded investigations, called for impartial joint federal investigations in one case. Even some Trump allies, Senator Pete Ricketts, called for transparency in the investigation. What do you think is changing in Minneapolis nationally from your standpoint that's leading, admittedly, a small but a noticeable handful of Republicans in Congress to transition from silence and acquiescence to at least pronouncing the sentences and the verbiage of investigation?

19:05Right. And I think it has a lot to do with that video. And the contrast between the lies and the coordinated campaign of disinformation and I call it on the air information warfare coming out of the Trump administration. You recall that right after Preddy was killed, the DHS put out a photo of the gun that they took from Preddy to imply that because he had a firearm, he was intent on killing federal agents, massacring federal agents, as one Trump administration official said. But as I mentioned earlier, he never even pulled that firearm out of his holster. And it's important to note here, too, he had no criminal record, just traffic tickets, as many of us do.

20:01He, as I said, Mr. Preddy, was a nurse at the VA hospital, and he had a permit to carry that firearm. And the implication was from Kash Patel, other administration officials, that he shouldn't have had that gun at the protest. And we talked with a longtime Second Amendment gun rights advocate here the other day, Rob Doerr, with the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus. And he says there's no law against carrying a firearm at a protest. He was well within his rights. Doerr said, you know, permit to carry holders, they're allowed to carry in public. There's nothing inherently criminal about that. And he said an important thing, too.

20:47You also don't have to choose between exercising your First Amendment rights or your Second Amendment rights. And that's what he was doing here. He's carrying a firearm legally. Matt, just a couple of additional questions. We got this from Charlie, who says, are the agents involved in the Petty shooting reassigned and still working? And again, these are Border Patrol agents involved in this incident. Do we know whether these agents are still working? No. We have no idea who they are, where they are, where they've been assigned, what their training is. I mean, typically when there is a shooting involving a member of law enforcement, you know, they are put on administrative leave.

21:30Certainly on the state and city level here, There is a process. They're put on leave. They're given time off while the investigation proceeds. So there's no interference or appearance of interference with an investigation. investigation, usually if it involves an officer. I mean, we saw that with the killing of George Floyd, the state investigators, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, and the feds worked together in the case of Derek Chauvin. He was charged with murder, convicted at trial on the state level, and later pleaded guilty on the federal level because the state and feds were working together with violating George Floyd's civil rights, and Chauvin serving around 20 years concurrent sentence on that.

22:15There is no indication of what kind of investigation may be happening. DHS says it's investigating the shooting itself, which is unheard of these days, for a law enforcement agency to investigate its own shooting. It's for transparency after high-profile police killings. There are usually outside agencies that do the investigation here in Minnesota. It would be BCA State Police. would investigate a shooting by a local officer. It's taken out of the hands of the local police. And there's no indication here of who is investigating or what, or what evidence they've collected. And the agents who shot Alex Preddy, they didn't stick around.

23:02They took off right after this shooting. They didn't preserve the scene. There were protesters there who gathered around to do what agents or any law enforcement is supposed to do is keep people from traipsing through and disrupting the scene so people can collect evidence. There was no police procedure followed here at all. Well, Matt, I'm sure we'll be checking in with you as this story continues to play out. And we really appreciate your time and reporting. Always glad to do it. It's an important story. Thanks, Matt. That's Matt Sepik. He's a correspondent for Minnesota Public Radio. And let's turn now to Representative Melanie Stansbury.

23:41She's a Democrat representing New Mexico's first congressional district, which includes Albuquerque. She's part of a group of House Democrats who introduced articles of impeachment earlier this month for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. And she joins us now from New Mexico. Representative Stansbury, welcome to the program. Great to be here. So first, I just want to get your brief reaction to this latest killing in Minneapolis by immigration agents. You know, I think we're all heartbroken and infuriated, but also terrified because what we're seeing out on the streets right now is not only the abuse of power, the use of violence against our communities, but also in the gaslighting that the administration is doing.

24:24It feels like our democracy and truth is slipping away. And I think for many Americans, this feels like a tipping point. Like, this is the point at which we can't go back. And that's why it's so important that Congress exercises its power and we take back our country right now. Congresswoman, one of the things that's happening in Congress now since this latest killing is that several Democrats in the Senate have said, we won't vote for any DHS funding upcoming that doesn't rein in ICE. We're done with this. We'll have a government shutdown. None of us are voting for it. That's not how this story started.

25:02Last week, seven of your Democratic colleagues voted to approve DHS funding after the killing of Renee Good. Why do you think enough Democrats voted for DHS funding with no additional oversight in this moment? What's going on with them? You know, I am of the opinion that our responsibility is to the Constitution, to the voters, to the constituents that we represent. And that means that in this moment when our democracy is imperiled, we have to use every single tool we have. That means impeachment. That means the power of the purse. That means legislation. That means oversight. That means using our voices.

25:42But I think it's important to understand that the Democrats in the House who did make a choice to vote for DHS funding were all in what they call frontline districts. Those are districts that Trump won. They're looking at the politics and the voices of their own communities. and I've seen multiple statements from my colleagues who are now saying, I didn't look at it through the lens as a referendum on the administration and I was wrong. And so I think what you've seen over the last week is that Democrats in all districts are now saying, if we don't do something to rein in this administration, we could lose everything.

26:16In other words, it wasn't obvious last week, but it's obvious now to those Democrats. Well, I can't speak for any of them. It was obvious to me that they made the choices that they made, and I think the American people have made their voices clear at this point. We're speaking to Representative Melanie Stansbury. She's a Democrat representing New Mexico's first congressional district in the House of Representatives. Tony writes, my husband and I are both veterans who chose to live in St. Paul, Minnesota, even though neither of us was originally from here. He's an Army retiree who gets his care at the Minneapolis VA.

26:49We were already reeling from Renee Good's murder to describe it as anything else's denying reality. Alex's murder just reaffirmed our desire to see ICE totally disbanded completely. There is no reforming this out-of-control paramilitary. And we heard from Tom, who says, My biggest fear is this convicted felon invoking the Insurrection Act and canceling all national voting in 2026. We need a 50-million-person march in this country. We need to shut down the country. We'll be right back with a representative in just a moment.

27:23Well, Congresswoman, we talked a little bit about shifting tides in the Congress over funding for the Department of Homeland Security, which includes ICE and Customs and Border Protection. Now, there was a government shutdown, people will remember, in the fall, largely over Affordable Care Act subsidies. And eventually, there was a group of Democrats in the Senate that voted to reopen the government, and those subsidies expired. They still haven't been renewed. Now there's another shutdown fight looming. DHS funding is part of it. We talked a little bit about how senators now say they're not voting for DHS without new restrictions on ICE and its activities and how seven of your Democratic House colleagues voted for that before the killing of Alex Preddy.

28:09One thing that happened, though, Hakeem Jeffries, the leader of your caucus, the leader of the Democrats in the House, he voted against that DHS funding, but he didn't whip it. In other words, he didn't insist to Democrats that we need unity on this vote. Everybody can vote how they see fit. Now that this issue is going to come back up and there's a shutdown, another potential shutdown in the offing here, Congresswoman, how far do you think your leadership in the House is willing to go on this issue of DHS and ICE. You know, yesterday our caucus met and we were briefed by both the governor and the AG of Minnesota, and we had a conversation about all of this.

Read the full transcript

28:50You know, the House caucus and the Senate caucus operate in our respective chambers, and I think our leadership has been very clear that we will stand and use every tool we have in the House to hold DHS accountable. And I think that you will see in the coming days an increasing and loud and unified voice for the impeachment of Noam and using the power of the purse to defund what DHS is doing. In the Senate, we've all seen the statements from Senator Schumer, who's the leader in the Senate. But, you know, the Senate has different rules. The Senate is made up differently. The way that caucus operates is different.

29:29But here's my message to our senators. hold the line. We cannot allow this administration to go forward. And so it's really important for all of us, whether you're lawmakers, members of the public, call your senators. And I want to make one other point, is that we are, as Democrats, in the minority, we do not have the votes to both pass our own legislation, but also to stop legislation, particularly in the House. Congresswoman, if all Democrats had voted against that DHS funding bill, it would have gone down. The other day. But the point I'm making here is that Republicans need to speak up as well.

30:09So that's my point. Understood. We got this message from Monica, apropos, who says, what do I want to see from Congress? Some backbone. Stand up for the rule of law, the Constitution, and your constituents, Congresswoman. We got that message from Monica. We also got this from Dan, who emails, reckless escalation resulting in reckless homicide of Alex Freddie, absolutely no reason why a disarmed man should be shot dead other than poor training and inexcusably unprofessional actions of officers. They obviously had no idea what they were doing other than trying to beat him into submission and got spooked, completely lost their cool and ended up shooting him.

30:44Now, we should say, Congresswoman, that there are people who watch that video or listen to the statements of the administration and come away with a very different conclusion. So beyond party politics, beyond the midterm elections, how do we heal a country that is so deeply divided? We can't even agree on what we see in a video where agents shoot and kill a person. Yeah. Well, I come away even with a different point of view, which is that it's not just poor training. I think that the White House and the administration have been giving dog whistles to these agents. And when you pull a gun and shoot a man from the back 10 times when he is not even in possession of a firearm at that point, you are committing murder.

31:29And I think we all need to be very clear about that. I mean, we are still in the midst of a full-scale attack by this administration on our communities. And so at this point, we're not in the healing mode. We are in the how do we protect our communities. And I think that is incumbent on us to organize in Congress, in the courts, and in our communities. And I do believe that when this is all over, we will need a truth and healing and a reconciliation across this country, unfortunately, as we've seen in other countries in post-conflict situations, because our own administration, our own government is attacking our communities.

32:06And so I think we will have to use the tools that other countries have used in these situations. That's Democratic Representative Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico. Congresswoman, thank you for speaking with us. Thank you. Whether it's the Trump administration's expansion of tariffs, military operations in the Caribbean or Venezuela, firing federal workers or deploying the National Guard, Republican leaders in Congress have made clear what kind of oversight they think Congress should exercise against the president. Here's House Speaker Mike Johnson. I have no intention of getting in the way of President Trump and his administration and how they've been using this very effectively.

32:44I mean, you're talking about, I think it's$10 trillion or more. I don't know the exact total, but trillions of dollars have been brought into the U.S. in one year's time since President Trump took over. The U.S. economy is growing. Gas prices are at a five-year low. The inflation rate is coming down. You've heard all this articulated here today. We will be touting those wins over the coming days, and part of this is because of the president's strategy. It is working, and no one can dispute that. And he has used the tariff power that he has under Article 2 very effectively. The Article I branch, he has not exceeded his authority.

33:18There's no reason in my view for the Article I branch to intervene in that. And we'll have to see how it plays out. Important to note the claim of the familiar talking point that the president has brought in trillions through tariff policy or otherwise is false. But this shift in power from Congress to the presidency and a speaker of the House that you just heard there who's very satisfied to give up a lot of that power, isn't necessarily new. It might be deeper than usual, but is it permanent? And if so, what's at stake here? Joining us is Sarah Bender. She's a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution and a professor of political science at Georgetown University.

33:54Sarah, welcome back to the program. Sure. Thanks for having me. Also with us is Chris Stein, senior politics reporter for The Guardian US. Chris, it's great to have you. Thanks for having me. Now, Sarah, this trend of increasing presidential power didn't start with President Trump. Briefly, where would you place the beginning of this trend where presidents encroached on the powers and responsibilities that Congress historically claimed? Well, I would put it initially the beginning of the 20th century, World War I, World War II, Great Depression, times of crisis. Congress willingly, often willingly, gave authority to the president in all sorts of ways.

34:33So it's not just that the presidents have sort of expropriated or taken power away from Congress. Congress is often the ones who've delegated authority on trade, on the economy, on war powers, on national security, on intelligence. And those powers go to the president and are very, very hard for Congress to take them back. Meanwhile, the power to spend, though, in my time as a congressional reporter, was very, very jealously guarded by many, many lawmakers. It's right there in Article 1. It's their top power. And Chris, let's talk about it a little bit. I mean, President Trump unilaterally froze or blocked billions of dollars of funds mandated by laws passed by Congress.

35:18He eliminated USAID as an agency, cut billions from foreign aid. He's begun taking revenues from Venezuelan oil sales and keeping them in a Qatari bank account that he controls, not Congress. That's unprecedented. So why does it matter that Congress controls the power to decide how the government spends its money? And what's happening to that power right now? Well, it's clearly spelled out in Article 1 of the Constitution, which is what underscores Congress's powers, among some other parts, some of the amendments and some rulings by the Supreme Court. You know, what we're seeing here is essentially a big expansion of executive power, at least attempt at expansion of executive power under President Trump, to which the Republican-led Congress has not pushed back.

36:12And pushing back in this case would be writing into law that what he's doing they won't abide by. And that's just simply not happening in major ways, which basically is punting the question to the courts, where we're seeing fairly long and tortuous legal battles over his policies that are winding up at the Supreme Court. Thus far, they have not, the Supreme Court, where conservatives hold a majority on the bench, hasn't made very many significant rulings against the powers that he's now claiming for himself. Not everything that you mentioned has gone up to them, but thus far they haven't really shown a ton of interest in curbing what he's trying to do, at least not in substantive ways.

36:58We could talk about lots of other ways in which this presidency has clawed power from Congress or Congress has willingly given that power over to the president. But, Sarah, there is a period in recent history that was different when Congress pushed back on a president. That's the early 1970s after Watergate and the scandals around President Richard Nixon. What did Congress do to limit the executive branch after the Watergate scandal? So Congress did two things. First, they attacked on the question of war powers, and then they did it on the budget. Just briefly on the war powers, essentially, Congress layered on a new set of rules to give Congress a toehold to try to force the president to come to Congress before he used military force abroad, but also to create a process for Congress to tell the president, after six days, if we don't approve it, you've got to withdraw those troops.

37:56So that's one. And we still see Congress trying to use some form of the War Powers Resolution most recently on the question of the president's use of force in Venezuela. Now, a Democrat-backed War Powers Resolution that would have prevented the president from sending U.S. troops to Venezuela had failed in the House last week. But please go ahead. Sure. On the power of the purse side, Congress did quite a bit more, which is until the 1970s, the Congressional Budget Act, there had never been a formal congressional role in writing a budget. And so what this did, it created a process. It created an appropriations process that centralized, created a budget committee, and basically said, okay, president, you already have the right to write a budget, But Congress is going to give ourselves information, create the commercial budget office.

38:49We're going to create budgets. We're going to create the process of reconciliation. All the things we're familiar with today to give Congress a much stronger role in deciding where and how the global budget will be spent. So, Chris, I'm curious about the role of party politics here. There is this example of Congress guarding its authority from presidents, even of their own party. Has something shifted that makes it less likely that members of Congress will push back against presidents of their party? I think I can speak to the way that President Trump has behaved in his second term. You know, basically the consequence for crossing him is he goes on social media and says you should be voted out of office.

39:30And we can see that just earlier this month in the Senate when five Republican senators voted to advance a war powers resolution that would have prevented future hostilities against Venezuela without congressional approval. Five Republicans, the five Republicans who voted to advance that, it wasn't even to pass it, it was just a procedural vote, he quickly went on True Social and said they should never hold office again, I think was the quote. And two of them, or three of them, are kind of known for voting against Trump, but two of them are more or less Republican allies. And it was those two who, I think the following week, changed their votes and prevented that measure from going further and kind of put an end to that in the Senate.

40:16So that's sort of the dynamic here is lawmakers who vote against Trump, he goes after, he goes after them personally. You can see that with Thomas Massey, the Republican Congressman for Kentucky, who has voted against the president on major questions since the start of this Congress. He's been going after him forcefully for months. And there's now talk that he wants to back, or he publicly said he'd like to back a challenger to Bill Cassidy, the Republican senator of Louisiana, who was one of the Republicans to vote to convict him and has criticized him on other issues, voted to convict him in his second impeachment.

40:49So he has the long memory and he is more forceful than previous presidents in going after those who cross him. So I think if you're a rank and file Republican or just a Republican lawmaker who want to keep their job, that has to be in the back of your mind as you think, do I want to get crosswise with him on this particular issue. Chris, just your thoughts about the role, if any, voters have to play here. We get lots of questions from our listeners about what they should do. What are you hearing from people who work in that space? Voters are going to have to decide if they want to, you know, in Louisiana, for instance, if you're a Republican primary voter, you're going to be asked to decide whether or not you want to keep Senator Bill Cassidy, who is perhaps a more independent voice than a primary challenger who's supported by President Trump because he doesn't like a senator who voted against him on certain issues.

41:41That's one that kind of jumps right into my mind is for Republican voters, are they going to want to back these primary challengers that the president is enabling? Well, that's Chris Stein. He's senior politics reporter for The Guardian U.S. and Sarah Bender, a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution and a professor of political science at George Washington University who specializes in Congress. Thanks to you both. We'll end with your thoughts. Barbara emails, Speaker Johnson doesn't want to impede the president. Congress was elected just as the president was. It's their duty to stand up and represent the American people, and we the people are sick of his policies, including foreign war making and the use of ICE as an American Gestapo.

42:19And Ken emails, The first obligation of government is to keep its citizens safe. This administration has proven incompetent over and over again and has willfully failed to deliver on this basic responsibility. They must be impeached and removed as soon as possible to restore law and order and basic safety. It's that simple. Today's producer was Michael Falero. This program comes to you from WAMU, part of American University in Washington, distributed by NPR. I'm Jen White. And I'm Todd Zwilling. Thanks for listening, and we'll talk again tomorrow. This is 1A.

From the publisher
On Saturday, Border Patrol and ICE agents deployed to Minneapolis wrestled a member of the public to the ground and then shot him multiple times. Alex Pretti, 37, died as a result.

Pretti was a Minneapolis resident and an ICU nurse at a local VA hospital. It’s the second killing by federal agents in the state this month, and the third shooting.

The message from elected officials in Minneapolis and in Minnesota was simple: enough.

We look at how this operation, one the Trump administration says is about immigration enforcement, transformed into something else. Then, we turn to Congress and its lack of oversight of the Trump’s agenda. And we hear from a Democratic member of Congress about what she wants her colleagues to do in this moment.

Find more of our programs online. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from 1A

All 320 episodes
'If You Can Keep It': ICE’s Latest Minnesota Killing1A · 43 min
Listen in VO