In short
The episode is about a mid-decade redistricting fight in Texas that Republicans say will add five GOP-leaning U.S. House seats for the 2026 midterms, after President Trump publicly demanded more seats. Texas Republicans used special committees and a special-session process to redraw congressional maps using 2020 census data, shifting districts in the Rio Grande Valley, Dallas/Fort Worth, Central Texas (San Antonio–Austin corridor), and Houston. More than 50 Democratic lawmakers fled to Illinois to break quorum and block the vote; Texas Rep. Ann Johnson argues the Texas Constitution allows redistricting only once per decade and calls it a power grab tied to Trump.
Guests
Reed Wilson (Pluribus News founder/editor) explains the map mechanics and historical precedents (e.g., 2003 DeLay-era flight to Oklahoma/New Mexico). Texas Rep. Ann Johnson (fled to Illinois; faces fines and threats) says Abbott prioritized redistricting over flood recovery and wants an independent commission. Texas Rep. Brian Harrison (10th district; supports redistricting) claims legal changes, undercounting, population growth, and Hispanic voting shifts justify new lines. David Daly (FairVote senior fellow; author) argues the arms race worsens after Supreme Court limits on partisan-gerrymandering claims and proposes proportional representation plus ranked-choice voting.
Notable examples
2003 Texas lawmakers’ flight; Trump’s CNBC/Truth Social comments; Democrats’ quorum strategy; Newsom/California and other states considering responses. Key claims include “slow-motion coup/fascism” accusations by Democrats and listeners, and “we can” rationale by GOP officials.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Texas Redistricting Controversy
1:40 to 4:40
Discussion on the unusual redistricting efforts by Texas Republicans and reactions from Democrats.
“For today's installment of our politics series, If You Can Keep It, we talk about the fight over redistricting in Texas and what it means for the state of our democracy.”
Expert Analysis on Redistricting
4:50 to 8:00
Reed Wilson explains the implications of the new congressional maps and gerrymandering.
“Two that go all the way to the Oklahoma border.”
Listener Insight on Redistricting
8:00 to 8:20
A listener expresses concerns about the implications of gerrymandering for democracy.
“you will see accusations, you will see a replay of January 6th.”
Texas Legislators Respond
8:20 to 11:40
Texas Representative Ann Johnson discusses the consequences faced by lawmakers who fled the state.
“And that's a sentiment shared by Representative Diego Bernal, a Texas lawmaker who fled to Illinois.”
Desperation and Political Tactics in Texas
14:00 to 15:40
Learn about the desperate measures taken by Texas Republicans against Democrats.
“I mean, one, I think you're seeing how desperate they are.”
Texas Redistricting Explained by Brian Harrison
15:40 to 17:40
Hear Texas State Representative Brian Harrison's reasons for the redistricting push.
“who's fighting to push through these new congressional maps, Texas State Representative Brian Harrison.”
Concerns Over Redistricting Manipulation
17:40 to 19:55
Discussion on the implications of redistricting and control over elections.
“I think that by now they've been gone one week.”
Democratic Response to Texas Redistricting
19:55 to 22:40
Explore the Democratic response to the redistricting efforts in Texas.
“to say that we shouldn't do what Texas is trying to do right now.”
The Case for Independent Redistricting
22:40 to 24:30
Discussion on the necessity of independent commissions for fair redistricting.
“Our Monday shows, Representative, are focused on the stakes for our democracy.”
Impact of Census Changes on Redistricting
24:30 to 26:50
Learn about how proposed changes to the census could affect congressional makeup.
“So let's get rid of it, but let's do it nationwide.”
Show all 19 chapters
Redistricting in Texas and Beyond
28:00 to 30:05
Explore the national implications of Texas' redistricting efforts and the broader movement impacting other states.
“So what's happening in Texas is getting national attention right now, but it's part of a much larger movement.”
Consequences of Gerrymandering
30:05 to 32:00
Discuss the alarming trend of shrinking competitive districts and the push for reform in the face of gerrymandering.
“It just gets worse and worse because the number of competitive seats in the country just keeps dwindling.”
The For the People Act and Legislative Challenges
32:00 to 33:54
Understand the challenges faced by the For the People Act and its implications for anti-gerrymandering efforts.
“There was also a national effort at reform in 2021, The For the People Act was part of a push in Congress for election reform, voting reform, voting protections after January 6th.”
Diverging Tactics in Redistricting
33:54 to 36:54
Analyze the contrasting strategies of Republicans and Democrats in the current redistricting landscape.
“Reid, I want to come to you because we heard from Representative Ann Johnson of Texas just a little bit ago.”
The Need for National Solutions
36:54 to 38:41
Discuss the necessity of national reforms to address the partisan gerrymandering crisis and explore potential solutions.
“So Democrats in the states, they controlled, Republicans in the states, they controlled.”
Public Demand for Change
38:41 to 41:11
Explore how public outcry and voter engagement can influence redistricting processes and demand reform.
“Yeah, David makes a really interesting point there.”
Midterm Elections and Republican Strategies
41:11 to 42:00
Analyze the strategies of Republicans in the midterms and the implications for future elections.
“In the short term, Reid, just update us on what Donald Trump and Republicans are trying to prevent in the midterms here.”
The Narrow Majority and Impeachment Concerns
42:00 to 42:32
Explore the implications of Trump's narrow majority in the House of Representatives.
“Um, the problem here for Trump is that he's got such a narrow majority in the house.”
Guest Introductions and Program Wrap-Up
42:32 to 43:23
Meet the guests and learn about the program's production team and closing remarks.
“He's founder and editor of Pluribus News.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:07You're listening to the 1A Podcast. I'm Jen White. And I'm Todd Zwilich. An extraordinary fight is underway in Texas over redistricting. It's turning into a showdown that has nationwide implications. Today's conversation isn't just about redistricting, something that happens every decade or so in dozens of states across the country. It's about the House of Representatives. And it's about a president who has been vocal about his desire to consolidate power and shore up GOP prospects in the 2026 midterms. Here's what President Trump told CNBC last Tuesday. We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats.
0:42We have a really good governor and we have good people in Texas. And I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know. And we are entitled to five more seats. Republicans are entitled to five more seats based on the results of the last presidential election, the president says. That's not how representation is decided in this country. So what kicked all of this off? Last week, Republicans in Texas moved to give Donald Trump what he demanded. They executed a highly unusual plan to use their majorities and simply redraw state congressional maps to GOP advantage in the middle of the decade.
1:23And last week, more than 50 Democratic lawmakers in Texas fled the state to break quorum and prevent their statehouse from voting on those new redrawn congressional maps. The Democrats' revolt, threats of retaliation, and Texas Governor Greg Abbott's threats have intensified the fight. For today's installment of our politics series, If You Can Keep It, we talk about the fight over redistricting in Texas and what it means for the state of our democracy. That and more after this short break. Stay with us.
1:56Let's get into it with one of our favorite political experts, Reed Wilson. He's the founder and editor of Pluribus News. Reid, it's always great to have you on. Hi, Jen. Thanks for having me. So just about every election cycle, we discuss congressional districts, but they're not fixed, nor are they natural lines. Like borders of all countries, they are man-made. They are influenced by partisanship, bias, vested interest, and they are a right given to state legislators under the Constitution. Now, some states do have independent commissions to draw these lines. Most do not. And this fight has drawn plenty of confusion.
2:27Here's Barbara with a question that echoed many in our inbox. I'm confused on what the Texas laws are. Are they required to wait every 10 years, and that's what they're going from the census to the census, and that's what they're trying to break the law? Or is that just a common practice and not something that's required? And Kathleen emailed, what population stats is Texas using for this? If it's the 2020 census, why would it change? Did they just make it up? Okay, so Reed, the Texas legislature was not due to redraw the map this year. Where did these maps come from? These maps came from the state legislature itself.
3:02Governor Abbott and the House Speaker and the Lieutenant Governor created special redistricting committees that then drew up new proposed map lines. And the new map lines would shift at least five seats from Democratic control to probably Republican control. I mean, the elections still have to happen, but they would give – they would create five new districts that President Trump won by more than 10 percentage points in 2024. and this is not unusual for Texas. Let me say that a different way. It is unusual for a state to redraw district lines in the middle of a decade, but it's not unheard of.
3:40And in fact, it happened for the first real time in 2003 in Texas when then House Majority Leader Tom DeLay inspired Republicans in Austin to redraw map lines after they claimed control of the Texas legislature. Back then, 51 Democrats fled to Oklahoma and stayed there for a small hotel in Ardmore, Oklahoma for a couple of months. Senate Democrats then fled to New Mexico for 46 days. But at the end of the day, the governor kept calling special sessions. The Democrats eventually returned and the maps passed. And again, to Kathleen's question, what population stats is Texas using? They're still using data from the 2020 census.
4:17Excuse me, 2020 census. Yeah, there's no necessary reason to redraw these maps mid-decade, But there's nothing in the state law or state constitution that prohibits lawmakers from doing so. We're going to draw a line between what's going on in Texas now and what's been happening more broadly with the democracy and the one person, one vote principle in this country over the last 10, 20 years. But for now, let's talk about the maps themselves. Here's Democratic Texas Congresswoman Julie Johnson talking about the proposed news district lines in Texas. They have divided it into seven new congressional districts.
4:53Two that go all the way to the Oklahoma border. Two that go almost from Dallas to the Louisiana border. And then the others in a mishmash of rural Texas. Reid, Representative Johnson there is describing what's known as a gerrymander, a partisan gerrymander. What can you tell us about this specific map in Texas? What areas are Republicans changing and why? So they're focusing on sort of three distinct areas here. The first is the Rio Grande Valley, which is largely Hispanic. Republicans have been making inroads down there for the last several years. There are two Democratic-held districts, both of which went for President Trump by narrow margins in 2024 but elected Democratic members of Congress.
5:37Both of those districts would be redrawn to further advantage Republicans. There are a couple of districts, including Representative Johnson's district in the Dallas Metroplex, that they have redrawn those seats so that those two members, two Democratic members of Congress would face Republican incumbents in districts that are much more heavily Republican than the ones that they currently hold. And then they focused on Central Texas, basically the corridor between San Antonio and Austin, where there are two Democrats, Greg Cesar and Lloyd Doggett, who Doggett has been there for a thousand years.
6:13Cesar is a relatively newer member. They have redrawn those two members together, sort of consolidating two Democratic districts into one. And then there will be another district in Houston that is changed a little bit. That district is currently vacant. Former Congressman Al Green passed away earlier this year. Excuse me, former Congressman Sylvester Ray, Sylvester, I'm going to blank on his last name now, passed away earlier this year. But that would be another, the fifth district essentially. So when we talk about the voters most impacted by these proposed maps, and we know that minority voters are often at the heart of questions about whether redistricting maps are fair and representative of the people in that state, what do these maps do to the strength of those votes?
6:56So interestingly enough, these maps actually create more majority minority districts than the existing maps do. So under the current lines, there are 22 districts that are white majority in Texas, seven that are Hispanic majority, and nine where there's no particular racial majority. Under the new proposed maps, there are 24 white districts, so two more, eight Hispanic majority districts, so one more, and two black majority districts, as well as four that would remain with no particular vote. However, the changes in demographic voting patterns mean that some of these districts, even though they are more Hispanic-heavy, are going to favor Republicans more than they do currently.
7:35Well, let's go to our inbox. Here's listener Jack in Tampa, Florida. I appreciate all of the thoughtful analysis on, you know, the census and how often this should be done and what our practices are. But I think you're missing the most obvious picture here, and that is that this is part of the ongoing slow-motion coup. This is fascism in its legal phase. And if they fail to use methods like this to retain control of Congress in the midterms, you will see accusations, you will see a replay of January 6th. You'll see election fraud accusations and you'll see actions taken and whatever means necessary to not seat democratically or elected Democratic legislatures.
8:18So the Republicans retain control of Congress. Jack, thanks for that message. And that's a sentiment shared by Representative Diego Bernal, a Texas lawmaker who fled to Illinois. Here he is on MSNBC on Friday. Even if it does result in arrest, remember this, they're not arresting us to take us to jail. They're arresting us to take us back to the House floor to vote on maps that benefit them. If that's not fascism, I don't know what is. Reed, Jack in Tampa draws a line directly from what's going on in Texas back to January 6th, that Republicans no longer want to compete in elections. That's what January 6 was about.
8:56Donald Trump lost, tried to overturn it. Elected Republicans supported him and continued to support him in that effort. I get that gerrymandering happens on both sides all over America, but this situation is different in Texas midterm. Donald Trump said, I'm doing great in Texas. We deserve the seats. I think the difference is that Donald Trump said the quiet part loud. This is a practice that you mentioned gerrymandering. That comes from Elbridge Gary, the governor of Massachusetts who signed a bill that created a salamander-like district. Somebody called it a Jerry's salamander, a gerrymander.
9:29That's where the word comes from. That was back in 1812. In the very first election for U.S. House, Patrick Henry, who controlled the Virginia House of Delegates, created a map that pitted James Madison against James Monroe in an effort to keep Madison out of the U.S. House of Representatives. You know, back in the day, the Burton brothers, John Burton and Phil Burton in California, redrew their maps to favor the Democratic Party. So the quiet part loud, though, what's the quiet part? The quiet part is that drawing map lines is an inherently political exercise. And you're doing it, the people who control it will do it for their own benefit.
10:06So this is, I don't see a lot of difference here between what John and Phil Burton did in California in the 80s when John Burton would call it, some of these crazily drawn maps. He'd call it my contribution to modern art. So this is redrawing maps itself. I don't, you know, this is something that's happened throughout American history. This is just the most egregious example of it because they're saying we're doing this to win five extra seats, whereas most people don't actually say that out loud. Coming up, we speak to a Democratic lawmaker from Texas who fled the state to stop Republicans from implementing the map by denying the legislature a quorum.
10:42That's just ahead.
10:48Let's get back to the conversation with this message we got from one of you. Hey, this is Evan from Wisconsin. I think we need to rework the whole system. It seems like every time a party gets in power or has a majority, they redistrict, making it unfavorable for the other party to be able to regain the majority. Something that maybe needs to be considered is maybe we just need to start over with the maps and have it a little bit more fair for all. Thanks for that message. Now let's add another voice to the conversation. Texas State Representative Ann Johnson is among the dozens of state Democrats who are currently in Illinois.
11:22Representative Johnson, welcome to 1A. Thank you for the invitation. Honored to be with you. Now, Representative Johnson, you're facing a daily$500 fine for each day you're absent, plus a pro rata share of what the statehouse sergeant at arms spends in their efforts to compel you to return to the Capitol in Austin. There have also been bomb threats at the hotel where many of your colleagues have been staying in the Chicago area. As we know, the Texas House again failed to reach a quorum on Friday because Democrats refused to return to the state. The House reconvenes today, Monday. They'll try again.
11:53How long do you plan to fight this move? Well, right now we are in the first called special session by the governor, and our goal is to defeat this particular special session. The governor decides what's important for us to debate or talk about on behalf of the people of Texas. And despite the fact that we have had a devastating flood in central Texas where at least 137 people died, he has made it the priority that what we're supposed to do is redistrict mid-decade. It's actually a violation of our Texas Constitution. Our Texas Constitution says we only do this once every 10 years. And it is to the benefit of Trump.
12:33They want to steal five seats. And so when we should be debating other issues that are good public policy for Texans, they've got us there for this. And make no mistake, he has put 18 items on the call. He's put flooding on the call. They're talking about flooding now. But everybody needs to look at the fact that we were there for two weeks. There was only one bill that was actually brought up for hearing. That's redistricting. And they have sought our arrest on one bill and one bill only. And that's redistricting. Well, again, but Representative, how long are you planning to stay out of the state?
13:08Yeah, so the end of this session is August 19th, and that is our goal. Our goal is to be gone through this special session and defeat this special session. Governor Abbott gets to decide what happens next. He gets to decide if he calls another special, what are we brought in to talk about? And so it will be his move next after we get through this special session. Representative, the governor has also threatened to add, this is a quote, six, seven or eight new seats to GOP drawn maps as a as a punishment for what you and Democrats are doing. Texas Senator John Cornyn has said the FBI is coming after you, although I don't know if we've seen evidence of that.
13:46And other Republican representatives who will who we will hear from have urged the state to come and come and get and even arrest you and your colleagues. Is there a consequence, an incentive that will be enough to bring you back to the state now, aside from an end to the session? I mean, one, I think you're seeing how desperate they are. I mean, this is a virtual temper tantrum by the governor and now a U.S. sitting senator who is trying to get the FBI to come and get us. They have threatened our leadership positions. As you mentioned, the fine. We make$600 a month. We are a part-time legislature.
14:21and my Republican colleagues want to not only find me$500 a day, but as you said, they want me and my colleagues to pay the tab for the police officers they're putting out front of our houses, even though they know we're all out of state. Talk about a waste of taxpayer dollars. And now they've asked their supporters to hunt us down. We are receiving threats. And so as my colleagues sit on their hands silently and say nothing in this moment, in the manner in which they are doing each and everything they can. Literally to drag us back, as Representative Bernal said, they just want us to sit in our seats.
14:57They want us to sit, shut up, and have them pass this bill. But if they do, you silence the voice of voters. Just as you said, Governor Abbott's now saying, okay, now it's no longer five. I'm going to do more. They are telling Texans that they are going to rig the system before this next election to determine who your elected representatives are before you even walk into the ballot box. That is offensive to everybody, Republican and Democrat, and why I think we are grateful to spark a national conversation around the fact that we ought to do it differently. Let's eliminate gerrymandering. Let's go back to an independent commission to redraw the lines and let the people pick their voters.
15:37Well, Representative Johnson, Todd and I spoke just a little while ago to one of the Republicans who's fighting to push through these new congressional maps, Texas State Representative Brian Harrison. He represents the 10th district in the Texas House of Representatives, and we asked him to explain his reasons for this redistricting push. Here's some of what he shared. I have lots of reasons that inform my desire to do this. I'll rattle off just a few. I mean, number one, the laws have changed and Supreme Court cases have come out with regards to the way the law treats coalition districts. Number two, the Census Bureau itself has admitted to massively undercounting the population in the state of Texas.
16:16So there are people down here not getting the representation they deserve. Number three, we have had literally millions of people flood into the state of Texas since that census was conducted. Number four, we have had significant changes in voting trends here among Texas voters, particularly among Hispanic voters down south in the Rio Grande Valley area where voters have been fleeing the failed liberal policies of the Democrat Party in droves. So I have lots of very substantive reasons. And it's past time the state of Texas gets these maps done that more adequately reflect the will of the voters of the state of Texas.
16:56So you've been outspoken in wanting Democrats to be forcibly brought back to Texas for this redistricting vote. You've also called for their arrests. How do you expect arrest warrants to be enforced? Well, I don't exactly know. I mean, there's lots of legal machinations happening on that point right now. But, I mean, the easier solution would have been to stop this from happening in the first place. I mean, quite frankly, if elected Republican leadership in Texas had been bolder or actually wanted to stop it, they had all the tools available to stop it before they left or to have arrested them before they left the state.
17:30So it's admittedly much harder now that they're in another state's jurisdiction, but we need to be pursuing every possible means to have them arrested and brought back to Texas. I think that by now they've been gone one week. We should add one more Republican seat to the map for every week they're gone. I want to add one more Republican seat to this map. It's impossible to overstate the stakes here. I mean, they couldn't be higher. We're talking about the controls the United States Congress in next year's midterm elections. So the implications are, I mean, they can't get bigger. Representative Johnson, I'd love to hear your response to what your colleagues shared there.
18:09Yeah, there's a lot to unpack with Brian's statement there, but I think the first thing that scares the hell out of me is his suggestion that they want to redo data mid-district redistricting and pull seats from other states into Texas, where you now know Texas Republicans will bend the knee to whatever Trump's wishes are. And that should scare you, because you all recall after the election in which he lost, Trump picked up the phone, called Georgia Republicans and said, boys, I need you to find me 12 ,000 votes. And to their credit, they said, no, sir, that's a line too far. We won't do that for you.
18:46Problem is today, Trump is calling Texas Republicans and Governor Abbott and saying, boys, I need you to find me five new seats. And they said, does July work for you? It is only because Democrats stood up and said, no, we're not going to let you rig the next election that now we are in this position. That now they know that these Republicans will do anything he wants. The fact that they're talking about trying to change the system is what should scare everybody. He said it. They want to control the outcome of the next election. and it's about who controls it. Do the voters get to go to the ballot box in November, 2026 and fairly decide who they want as a check and balance on this administration?
19:31And Republicans out of Texas are saying, no, they're saying we'll take as many seats as we want because they think they can. And so we're standing up against it. I'm very proud of the Democrats, not only in Texas that are doing it, Democrats around the nation that are saying, look, if Texas is going to cheat like this, if they're going to go try to steal the next election, we're going to step up and we're going to respond. And you know what? They don't like that now, because now you have Republican congressmen out of blue states now trying to pass a law to say that we shouldn't do what Texas is trying to do right now.
20:05Well, let's hear from some of the governors in blue states who are responding to Texas Governor Greg Abbott and your Texas colleagues. Kathy Hochul of New York is one. Gavin Newsom in California is another. The ultimate determination will be by the people of the state of California. We will offer them the opportunity to make judgment for themselves again, only if Texas moves forward. They've triggered this response and we're not going to roll over and we're going to fight fire with fire. We also got this comment from Peter in Pennsylvania. Peter says, I find it ironic and disingenuous that the Democrats are painting themselves as defenders of democracy when they are the champions of silencing dissenting voices.
20:50They're guilty of gerrymandering. They wanted to eliminate the filibuster when they were in the majority, and they proposed stacking courts to impose their own policies on the rest of the country. Representative, that's what Peter has to say. I will just add that Democrats did not end the filibuster in the U.S. Senate. There were some who wanted to. They also did not stack the courts, although there were some who wanted to. But in the broader scope, hearing Governor Newsom and hearing from Peter there, what do you think? Yeah, I mean, I disagree with Peter and the idea that the Democrats have tried to do something around the filibuster or not played by a fair set of rules.
21:30Democrats, we notoriously will take the high road. Don't forget Republicans, when Merrick Garland was nominated for the United States Supreme Court, said, no, we can't elect him because we're in the middle of the election cycle. Hold the tape. We'll never do this. When Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away, Republicans raced at the last minute to try to replace her with Amy Comey Barrett and did it without a filibuster-proof vote. And so I think that's where we are right now as Democrats. Republicans have been fine with playing by their own set of rules, whether it's pushing nominees onto the United States Supreme Court and not allowing the same rules for Democrats, or here, where we're not supposed to do mid-decade redistricting, but Republicans have decided they will because Trump a few weeks ago said, it's a simple draw, go to Texas and you can get me five more seats.
22:24I appreciate that Governor Newsom has said he will only do it as a trigger, meaning a response to Texas. If Texas goes forward, then Democrats are saying we're going to fight back. It is up to Republicans if they're going to go back to the normalcy of the system in the process to allow the existing lines to maintain through this decade. Our Monday shows, Representative, are focused on the stakes for our democracy. And we got some other messages. Joe emailed us. Texas is just doing what the Democrats have done over the last few years. Rick says Oregon has been in the same situation, the difference being Democrats were in control.
22:58We've seen gerrymandering used by politicians on both sides of the aisle. But we're at a point when it feels like the stakes are higher right now. So to your mind, as a state legislator, what is the answer? I mean, I have thought the answer is an independent commission to redraw lines for a long time. That's legislation that I've offered multiple times and my Democratic colleagues always support it. We can't even get a hearing in Texas. And so I understand that you have states that are more red and more blue. And none of us like the idea that it's winner take all. And if it's a red state, then all your representatives are Republican or same in the blue states.
23:40And so the only way you can get around that is if you do some kind of a national commitment to independent commissions to redraw the lines, meaning you don't have me as an elected official drawing my lines for my next election to determine the outcome. You get an independent commission of citizens to draw the lines and then have us go compete on fair ideas and policy. And I would add in there, let's also add campaign finance reform because in Texas, we have zero limits. And so there are complexities to making this system more fair and we should absolutely do it. But it has to be commitment nationwide.
24:17You have between roughly nine and 15 states, including California, that have already done this. But when everybody's not playing by the same set of rules, it's not fair. And so I do think, hopefully, that is the ultimate spark to what's happening here in this debate where people are seeing and saying, whether you're Republican or Democrat, nobody likes gerrymandering. Nobody likes it. So let's get rid of it, but let's do it nationwide. I want to go back to our inbox. Here's a message we got from Kim in Kansas City, Missouri. My state, Missouri, everyone's been, both parties have gerrymandered lines.
Read the full transcript
24:52and tried to get partisan benefits. But I live in a purple district. That's why we can elect a moderate. When I disagree, it's with my neighbor. It's not a pure red or pure blue place where you're disagreeing with people far away who you don't care about. Reid, I want to put this in context with some other things we've seen out of the administration. Recently, President Trump on Thursday announced on Truth Social he wants to change the methodology for the census completely by excluding non-citizens from the census count to counter what the Constitution— that's counter, rather, to what the Constitution requires.
25:29And in 2019, the Supreme Court blocked the first Trump administration from adding a citizenship question to the census. So the next census is scheduled for 2030, but how might removing non-citizens from the count impact the makeup of Congress? It would certainly take a large number of voters away from the largest states. I mean, when you think about— Well, voters. Sorry, excuse me, excuse me. People, populations. The census is about a lot more than just redistricting and apportioning seats. It's about how federal money is distributed in something like 680 programs that the federal government administers, everything from education to agricultural funding, whatever.
26:07If you have X number of people, you get that share of federal dollars. So removing non-citizens from the count would impact a lot more than just where seats are apportioned. It impacts how much money goes to your local community, for your school, for your hospital, for whatever government service that you rely on. And by the way, for a lot of other things that you don't realize are actually funded by the government. As you say, the Constitution does not allow that. It requires the census to count the whole number of persons in any given state, and that doesn't matter if a person is a citizen or is a legal immigrant or an undocumented immigrant.
26:44It is a person, and that's what the courts have ruled in the past. Representative, as we wrap up here very briefly, what do you hope people across the country take away from this moment? Again, I hope that everybody recognizes the power to vote should be with the people. Their voice should be protected, and we should try to do something nationally to ensure that they start drawing lines and not partisan politicians. That's Representative Anne Johnson. Thank you for speaking with us. Thank you so much. Francois sent us this. I'm an area resident of Kerrville, Texas. I'm also a lifelong Republican who votes regularly.
27:17The issue of redistricting is an abomination on so many levels, most notably that the Texas legislature has determined that this power grab is more important than storm and flood warning systems, thus rendering moot. the loss of more than 140 adults and children in the July catastrophe. After the break, as the contentious 2026 midterms loom, how could a redistricting battle stretch well beyond Texas, New York, and Illinois?
27:46Let's add one more voice to our discussion. David Daly is the author of Anti-Democratic, inside the right's 50-year plot to control American elections. He's also a senior fellow at Fair Vote. That's a nonpartisan organization that researches and advances voting reforms. David, welcome to the program. Thank you for having me. So what's happening in Texas is getting national attention right now, but it's part of a much larger movement. Where else are we seeing these redistricting pushes around the country? That's absolutely right. What's happening in Texas is not going to stay in Texas. We've already seen that the governor of California is looking to suspend the independent redistricting commission there to try to counter what is happening in Texas.
28:30But Republicans have many more targets. They are already talking about picking up a district in Kansas City currently held by Democrats. So you're looking at a seat in Missouri. Governor DeSantis in Florida has been talking about mid decade redistricting. He's eyeing three Democratic held seats in South Florida. There's also districts in Tampa and Orlando that he could look at. Republicans are going to go into Ohio next. That is actually court mandated. The process in Ohio was so flawed back at the beginning of the decade that they only got a four-year map. Republicans are going to be in charge of that process.
29:11Once again, there are two Democratic districts that are leaning on a knife's edge that Republicans could probably pick up. If they wanted to keep going, they could look at North Carolina, they could look at Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, New Hampshire, Tennessee. The number of targets and opportunities on the map for Republicans, if this turns into an all-out redistricting battle ahead of the 2026 midterms, it simply really outnumbers the possible targets Democrats have on the board. Well, David, gerrymandering isn't new. You've spent your career on it, not the first time. Either Jen or myself have talked to you about it.
29:54But what's your take on the consequences of this momentum, this arms race, this mid-decade arms race that's been sparked right now? It just gets worse and worse because the number of competitive seats in the country just keeps dwindling. We are down to 37 districts that in 2024 were within 5 % one way or another for either party. You're looking at the prospect of that number of competitive seats dwindling even further, which I'd say it's already a shockingly low number. The idea that it could get worse ought to frighten us all. but this was fixable, I think. And I think what's so frustrating about this current moment is that there was so much momentum headed towards reform.
30:53Back in 2018, you had Michigan, Colorado, Ohio, Utah, state after state that went and red states, blue states, purple states, where they tried to get new procedures in the way to assure that these lines were going to be drawn in a fair and nonpartisan way. And the momentum that is behind this process, if you look at poll numbers, Democrats, Republicans, independents, they all hate gerrymandering. They all want politicians out of the business of drawing these lines and choosing their own voters. But this has now escalated to such an extent that you have politicians trying to unwind commissions that voters have established to take them out of the process.
31:47And it is hard to imagine how the current reform processes continue and pick up again after this process now has become so partisan and intense. David, you talk about reform. There was also a national effort at reform in 2021, The For the People Act was part of a push in Congress for election reform, voting reform, voting protections after January 6th. The For the People Act would have outlawed partisan gerrymandering across the country. What happened? It certainly would have. It essentially stalled in the Senate on a 50-50 party line vote. The 50 Democrats in favor. The 50 Republicans opposed.
32:32And the For the People Act went down. Now, Democrats decided not to break the filibuster in order to give this act a chance of passage. Everybody knew, I think, at the time that this was in many ways a messaging bill and not a bill that was actually with a serious chance of passing. what Democrats probably should have done in that moment and did not do is break apart individual pieces of that bill instead of trying to get this huge omnibus package that would never collect any Republican votes to try and put together at least a standalone anti-gerrymandering or anti-middecade gerrymandering bill.
33:22Nobody can say exactly how that would have passed, but at least they would have tried. And Democrats have had trifectas in 2009, just ahead of the big Republican redistricting push that occurred after the 2010 census. They had it again in 2021. And, you know, But both times they have failed to come up with what would have been popular legislation that would have prevented this. Reid, I want to come to you because we heard from Representative Ann Johnson of Texas just a little bit ago. And hearing her comments, and as someone who watches redistricting very closely across the country, what did you take away from what she had to say?
34:09So one of the things that Representative Johnson said and that David's getting to right now is that the two sides are playing by two different sets of rules. Republicans are using this moment as a way to solidify their power in Congress. Democrats have spent the last couple of decades backing a lot of these reform pushes that create independent commissions and ways to remove politicians from this process. Now when they decide that they're going to stop bringing the knife to the gunfight and they're actually going to fight fire with fire, to mix my metaphors, they are having to jump through a lot more hoops than the Republicans are.
34:45So Texas Republicans can go back and redistrict as much as they want. In California, you heard Governor Newsom in that clip you played refer to a ballot measure. Because they have an independent commission, they're going to have to go to voters in November and try to get voters to vote for gerrymandering. That's not something that plays terribly well on the ballot unless Governor Newsom can really sell it. In New York, they have a plan to redraw maps that's going to require a constitutional amendment that won't take effect until 2028. So that's another two years down the line. Democrats have really tied their own hands on this.
35:20And I think that's what Representative Johnson was talking about when she said there are really two different sets of rules that people are playing by. We're hearing from lots of people who have ideas about how to fix this. So we heard from Peter who says, creating congressional districts should be easy. A computer can be easily programmed to create fair, tight, ungerrymandered districts without the political infighting that comes with when legislators or so-called bipartisan commissions attempt that job. A computer can create updated congressional maps every 10 years faster, cheaper, and more fairly than the methodologies we rely on right now.
35:56And then another person says, how's this for an idea? get rid of all districts in a state and do statewide ranked choice voting so we can stop having these fights. And another shares, I think redistricting needs to be led by a national federal effort or laws where it is required to be performed by a third party and not a partisan effort. Well, David, the Constitution gives states and state legislatures in particular the power to set their own congressional districts. We're not in a vacuum here. We're in an authoritarian age and a highly partisan age and an arms race, what kind of reform is realistic to talk about right now?
36:31No, it's a great question. Let me just say first that we absolutely need a national solution to a national problem, and that one of the most important things here that hasn't come up yet is a 2019 decision by the Supreme Court in a case out of North Carolina that closed the doors to the federal courts on partisan gerrymandering claims. It was a 5-4 party line decision written by John Roberts. And really what that did, if you remember the scene in Ghostbusters where they have to turn off their containment packs and all the evil spirits fly out, that incentivized all of these states in the 2021 cycle to do their worst and to absolutely go for it.
37:12So Democrats in the states, they controlled, Republicans in the states, they controlled. And here we are in an absolute mess. I think what we're seeing is the limitation of independent commissions in this moment, because if governors feel that in a state of partisan emergency, they can simply unwind them, then that reform simply doesn't count enough. I think the reform we need has to be bigger picture. It has to be national. I think we have to be thinking really seriously in this moment about proportional representation. There is a bill by Jamie Raskin and Don Beyer called the Fair Representation Act, which to me is the real gold standard here.
37:57that if you could find a way to use proportional representation, larger multi-member districts in every state, and then rank choice voting within every district, what you would find is that every district in the country becomes a swing district, electing Democrats, Republicans, possibly even independents. This is how you end gerrymandering. You end it by putting an end to single-member, winner-take-all districts that put all of the power to determine winners and losers and where those lines go. Larger districts, the importance of the lines melt away. And most importantly, you actually get representation for everybody in every state.
38:40Read briefly. Yeah, David makes a really interesting point there. The problem, though, is that we have a set of politicians who make the rules. And when we're thinking about all this, there's a broader question that so many people bring up, so many of the commenters bring up today. what is fair? Is it fair to have, are we optimizing for competition? Are we optimizing for equal representation among the parties? Defining that term fair sort of comes first before all the rest of this. Well, Barbara shared this. Let's look at new ideas for voters, not parties reclaiming power. And so when we look at Michigan, that's an example of a state that shifted redistricting to an independent board.
39:18That came about through a statewide ballot measure initiated by voters. But 24 states in the U.S. don't allow any type of citizen initiative. So if you live in a state where you feel you're being redistricted out of having voting power and your state doesn't allow voters to have a say in how those maps are drawn, David, what do you suggest they do? That, I think, is really why we need a national solution to this problem. We have to look at this not at a state-by-state level, especially in this current moment in which if one state goes ahead and makes a reform, they almost look like a patsy because they are allowing other states that are not playing by the same rules to draw themselves big advantages.
40:04But a national approach driven by who? Who gets that going? Because if Congress has failed to do it so far... Yes, and that once again is the question of the federal courts and the U.S. Supreme Court having had a moment to really step in and fix this. Without the U.S. Supreme Court, this really does lie with Congress. I would suggest that enough voters hate this process. If you look at the reform process that happened in the state of Virginia back in 2018, 2019, 2020, they had to create a commission there by passing it through a Republican-controlled legislature first, then a Democratic-controlled legislature because it changed hands midway, and then take it to the voters.
41:00When enough voters stand up and say, we need change, politicians begin to listen. But this is going to have to be demanded by the people. In the short term, Reid, just update us on what Donald Trump and Republicans are trying to prevent in the midterms here. Donald Trump said at the top of the show, I did great in Texas. We're entitled to five seats. Texas Representative Mitch Little, Republican, went on television on CNN just the other day, was asked why they're doing this. He said, because we can. We have the votes. That's a quote. What does the polling say about the midterms right now in a fair fight?
41:40I hate using that word, but hey, in a fair fight, what would the midterms probably look like next year? Who would win? I know you don't know who would win, but what's the real state of play here? Well, historically, the president's midterm election is really bad for his party. Um, recall in 2018 after in president Trump's first term, uh, Democrats recaptured control of the house and the Senate. Um, the problem here for Trump is that he's got such a narrow majority in the house. They Republicans only have 219 seats. They'll have 220 after a special election in December. That's only two more than necessary to have a majority in the house of representatives.
42:17So even a small loss by historical standards would have Democrats control of the U S house of Representatives, and nobody needs to remind Donald Trump where impeachment inquiries begin. They begin in the House of Representatives. Well, lots more to discuss, but we'll have to leave the conversation there for now. That's Reid Wilson. He's founder and editor of Pluribus News. Also with us, David Daly. He's the author of Anti-Democratic, Inside the Rights 50-Year Plot to Control American Elections, and RET-EFT, Why Your Vote Doesn't Count. He's also a senior fellow at FairVote. And we were joined, of course, by 1A's Todd Zwillick.
42:52Thanks to you all. If you have an idea for our If You Can Keep It series, email us 1a at wamu.org. Today's producers were Maya Garg and Alexandra Botee. This program comes to you from WAMU, part of American University in Washington, distributed by NPR. I'm Jen White. Thanks for listening. And we'll talk again tomorrow. This is 1A.
43:21Thank you.
From the publisher
And it’s turning into a showdown that has nationwide implications for the House of Representatives. The situation paints another stroke in a portrait of a president who hasn’t been shy about his desire to consolidate power and shore up GOP prospects ahead of the 2026 midterms.
So, what kicked this off? Last week more than 50 Democratic lawmakers fled the state to break quorum and prevent their state House vote on new redrawn congressional maps. The Democrats’ revolt, threats of retaliation, and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s threats have intensified the fight and sparked a national conversation.
In this installment of our politics series, “If You Can Keep It,” we discuss the fight over redistricting in Texas what it means for the state of our democracy.
Find more of our programs online. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy




