In short
The episode examines “disposable workers”—people employers treat as easy to replace—amid rising contract, gig, and part-time work, and how AI uncertainty may worsen it. Guests argue that “disposable” describes employer intent, not worker value.
Guest backgrounds
Paul Osterman is MIT Sloan professor emeritus and author of Disposable Workers. Bridget Schulte is a journalist and author of Overwork. Brianna Caza is a management professor at UNC Greensboro.
Key claims
Osterman defines disposable workers as contractors, freelancers, and “marginal workers” (e.g., adjunct faculty, staff attorneys, many part-time roles) where employers make no commitment to careers or benefits. He estimates about 35% of the workforce fits this. He cites McKinsey’s claim that 95% of value comes from 5% of employees to explain employer attitudes. Caza defines gig work as project-based knowledge work across temporary contracts (e.g., consultants, designers, software engineers, editors). Schulte calls the broader trend “crapification,” linking precarity to stress and layoffs.
Notable examples
Rebecca (Wisconsin contractor lacking benefits/healthcare affordability at 62); higher hospital infection rates when cleaning is contracted; adjunct faculty and staff attorneys as “marginal” workers; home-care workers in Washington State improving pay/benefits via state-union-employer action.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Changing Nature of Work
0:25 to 1:55
Explore how work dynamics have shifted, particularly post-pandemic.
“The way we work has changed dramatically over the last decade.”
Introduction to Disposable Workers
1:55 to 2:48
Introduction to the term 'disposable worker' and its implications in today's labor market.
“This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab.”
Introduction to Disposable Workers
2:52 to 3:09
Introduction to the term 'disposable worker' and its implications in today's labor market.
“Carvana believes selling your car should be easy.”
Defining Disposable Workers
3:50 to 5:50
Professor Osterman defines the characteristics and categories of disposable workers.
“based on your definition, what kinds of workers fall under that umbrella?”
The Gig Economy and Its Workers
5:50 to 7:12
Discussion on gig workers and their classification beyond traditional roles.
“I went back and forth quite a bit with the publisher about that term.”
The Crapification of Work
7:12 to 10:46
Bridget Schulte explains the concept of the crapification of work and its implications.
“And when we talk about skilled knowledge workers, we're talking about people who've acquired a level of expertise through education or training or whose work involves mental labor as opposed to physical labor.”
Statistics on Disposable Workforce
10:46 to 12:08
A look at statistics and personal stories illustrating the plight of disposable workers.
“I finally accepted a contract position for half my prior wage.”
Disposable Workers and Public Consequences
14:00 to 15:10
Learn how disposable work affects job satisfaction and public health.
“someone with benefits and legal protections.”
Choosing Independence: Empowered vs. Forced Workers
15:10 to 17:11
Explore the dichotomy between workers who choose independence and those forced into it.
“And so there's a public consequence to this, and there's a personal consequence for the folks who are disposable.”
Historical Context of Temporary Work in America
17:11 to 19:28
Understand the historical reasons behind the rise of temporary and contract work.
“And I also think that it changes as workers move up in their careers.”
Show all 24 chapters
Economic Pressures and the Shift in Worker Power
19:28 to 21:44
Discover how economic pressures have shifted power from workers to corporations.
“Yes, it gives you independence and some freedom, but a lot of women run very small, you know, very small businesses, and you've taken all of that risk on yourself then.”
Defining Disposable Workers More Broadly
21:44 to 24:11
Examine the definition of disposable workers beyond just freelancers.
“So you've got economists at RAND who looked at wealth transfer.”
The Instability of Low-Wage Part-Time Work
24:11 to 26:51
Analyze how part-time work creates instability and unpredictability for workers.
“I care about people who firms use and treat in a disposable way.”
Essential Yet Disposable: A Paradox Revealed
26:51 to 28:00
Uncover the paradox of essential workers being treated as disposable during crises.
“say, in retail or in the lower-wage work, hourly workforce, they also come with really unpredictable hours.”
Essential or Disposable? The Reality of Workers
28:00 to 30:10
Explore the paradox of essential workers being viewed as disposable by employers.
“that these essential workers, as they were deemed during the pandemic.”
Terry Gross and Gloria Steinem
30:10 to 30:34
Terry Gross introduces a special episode honoring Gloria Steinem.
“I interviewed feminist icon Gloria Steinem several times over the years, and we've compiled a special episode to celebrate her life and legacy.”
AI's Impact on Workforce Dynamics
30:34 to 31:45
Discussion on how AI is influencing the trend of disposable workers.
“And Professor Osterman, you argue that the shift towards disposable workers happened long before AI became a concern.”
Worker Commitment and Employer Costs
31:45 to 33:59
Understanding how disposability affects worker commitment and employer costs.
“I have data in my survey asking people how much extra effort they are willing to make for their place where they work, how committed they are to their organization's success.”
Precarity and the Gig Economy
33:59 to 36:28
Exploring the feelings of insecurity and disposability across various job types.
“Yeah, I mean, all of this is exactly what people, you know, so much of what people are feeling right now.”
The Value of Standard Work
36:28 to 38:31
Analyzing the importance of standard employment in a changing job market.
“And the growth of AI is one of the things that they're now feeling replaced by.”
Creating Hope for Disposable Workers
38:31 to 41:17
Initiatives to empower disposable workers and improve their conditions.
“So work is getting worse, and people are right to perceive that.”
The Future of Work and Training
41:17 to 42:01
Discussing the need for training workers for non-traditional employment.
“I am a little bit mixed about putting the onus on workers themselves to create these communities and these scaffolds.”
Improving Standard Work and Care Jobs
42:01 to 44:24
Explore how to enhance the quality of standard work through policy and community efforts.
“our emerging workers to think about what their lives would look like if they are independent and not going to work for an organization.”
Incentivizing Better Practices for Workers
44:24 to 45:14
Discuss strategies to encourage firms to improve working conditions through regulations and incentives.
“I think that the policy, the solution is a combination of carrots and sticks.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab. Financial decisions can be tricky. Your biases can lead you astray. Financial Decoder, an original podcast from Charles Schwab, can help. Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash financial decoder.
0:25The way we work has changed dramatically over the last decade. Using AI is quickly becoming the norm in many workplaces, but just a few years ago, it felt closer to science fiction. And the hybrid work model that began during the pandemic has made remote work much more common. We've also seen shifts around what it means to be an essential worker. It's a term that became widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic, but has largely fallen out of our vocabulary. This category included health care and government workers, those in transportation, food and agriculture, water and waste management. Today, MIT professor Paul Osterman has a different name for a growing segment of the work population that includes those we once deemed essential, disposable.
1:09My name's Rebecca. I live in Greene County, Wisconsin. I'm a contractor. I definitely feel disposable. I have no benefit. I have no voice in the company. My work is fine. I get paid well. Fortunately, though, in the last few years with the changes in our government, I'm unable to afford health care. Even though I'm paid well, it just doesn't make sense for me to get health insurance at the rate I was quoted because I'm 62. So, yeah, definitely feeling disposable. Unlike essential workers, the disposable workforce isn't defined by the services they offer, but by the weakening contract between them and their employers.
1:46I'm Jen White. You're listening to the 1A Podcast. In honor of Labor Day Week, we're discussing what it means to be disposable in today's labor market and what you can do about it. Stay with us.
2:01This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab. Financial decisions can be tricky. Your biases can lead you astray. Financial Decoder, an original podcast from Charles Schwab, can help. Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash financial decoder. This message comes from BetterHelp. Imagine carrying a backpack every day. Inside it, every conversation, every mistake, every expectation. It is easy not to notice how heavy it is until someone asks if you want to put it down. Sometimes feeling better starts exactly like that. Better isn't one size fits all. Better is personal.
2:40It's therapy tailored to the individual to help lighten what you carry. Match with a therapist who truly understands. Visit betterhelp.com slash NPR. This message comes from NPR sponsor Carvana. Carvana believes selling your car should be easy. Get a real offer down to the penny, picked up from your driveway. You may keep waiting for a catch. There isn't one. Sell today at Carvana.com. Pickup fees may apply. Let's meet our guests. Paul Osterman joins us. He's Professor Emeritus of Human Resources and Management at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He's also the author of the new book, Disposable Workers, the Transformation of Employment.
3:23Professor Osterman, welcome back to the program. Jen, it's a pleasure to be here. Thank you for having me. Also with us is Bridget Schulte. She's a journalist and author of Overwork, Transforming the Daily Grind and the Quest for a Better Life. Bridget, it's great to have you back. Oh, it's good to be here. And Brianna Caza. She's a professor of management at the University of North Carolina, Greensboro. Professor Caza, welcome to the program. Thank you so much for having me. Now, Professor Osterman, I want to start with this term, disposable worker. based on your definition, what kinds of workers fall under that umbrella?
3:57Sure. So the general definition is that a disposable worker is someone who, when they're hired, the employer has no interest in keeping them. We're all employees at will. We can be fired normally. But usually, for most people, for standard workers, when they're hired, the employer intends to keep them around. Disposable workers, that's just not true. So let me give you three categories or three examples. So contractors, like the woman we just, Rebecca, we just heard from. A contractor could be a building cleaner at the low end. It could be a travel nurse at the high end. They work for a staffing agency.
4:38They're not attached to the firm for whom they work. Freelancers. So freelancers could be an Uber driver, a DoorDash driver. It could also be a freelance journalist they are 1099s they don't pay they don't receive any benefits from an employer and then another category that i make uh salient in the book and which is new to the conversation or what i term marginal workers these folks are w-2s they're attached to an employer in that sense but the employer has no intention of building careers for them adjunct faculty is an example Staff attorneys are examples. Many part-time jobs are examples of marginal workers and low-wage service workers.
5:26The employer hires them but does not invest in training, does not give them a pension. Adjunct faculty have no chance for a tenure. Staff attorneys will never be even considered for partnerships and so on. So those are examples of disposable workers. I think most people will have a visceral reaction to using the term disposable when talking about human beings. Why did you choose that term to describe the relationship between certain workers and their employer? Well, that's very interesting. I went back and forth quite a bit with the publisher about that term. My original thought was to use the term spare parts, but they told me that was even more offensive.
6:10but but i'm talking about it from the point of view of the employer it's not my judgment about these folks it's what the employer thinks about them and to give you a kind of an illustration of how employers think now you may i hope you ask me what what are the motivations of employers for doing this but just to give you an illustration mckinsey which is kind of the exemplar of of Business in America issued a report two years ago in which it said that 95 % of a firm's value is produced by 5 % of its employees. Now, think about what that means about the firm's attitude towards those other people who are not 5%.
6:53They're disposable. Lack of respect. And so that's why I use that term. It reflects what the employer is thinking, not what I'm thinking. We'll get into motivations a little later, but Professor Kaza, I want to bring you in here because roughly one in four skilled knowledge workers freelanced or worked independently in 2024. And when we talk about skilled knowledge workers, we're talking about people who've acquired a level of expertise through education or training or whose work involves mental labor as opposed to physical labor. And all that's according to a 2025 study from Upwork. When we use the term gig worker, though, I think we often think of, say, ride share drivers or food delivery drivers.
7:37But how do you define who gig workers are in the current economy and the type of work that term encompasses? I think that's a great question. I do think that we often conflate gig work with app-managed low wage service roles, like maybe the rideshare drivers or delivery workers. But in our research, we actually look at white-collar professionals, so highly skilled, highly educated knowledge workers like corporate consultants, graphic designers, software engineers, independent scientists, and very often editors who will operate on a project basis. So there are a growing segment of the economy that is project-based knowledge work.
8:18So, you know, gig work to us is any arrangement where an independent worker delivers a defined project-based task or a service, and they do it across temporary client contracts rather than through traditional full-time employment with one particular organization. So, I really appreciated Paul's categorization, and I think my colleagues and I would think of all of those three categories as gig workers because they are working on a gig basis as opposed to an ongoing traditional employment basis. We'll get more into how we got here later, but Bridget, you have a term of your own called the crapification of work, and this is less about a particular group of workers and more about the way work in the U.S.
9:03has changed more broadly. What does the crapification of work look like? Yeah, well, everything that we've been talking about is a big part of it. You know, people seem to, you know, we talk about with nostalgia a time when, you know, you could work with one company and you retired at, say, IBM and you got your gold watch at 50 years. You know, where you had a lot of stability and predictability. Or, you know, we talk about blue collar jobs when they paid enough for you to own a home and you could afford a car and you could afford your life and even a vacation sometimes. And a lot of those jobs really are gone.
9:43When I talk about the crapification, we have, as we're talking about, far more contract, involuntary part-time gig work. But even that precarity that you talked about in white-collar jobs, there's some really interesting studies on stress, kind of work-related stress. and the levels, you used to be protected in the white collar professions because there was so much stability there and you are no longer protected. The stress levels are also really high there because think about it. I mean, how many times do we open the newspaper or listen to the news in the morning and there's another layoff at some, you know, you're not sort of protected anymore.
10:24And then it's very difficult in the United States in many professions and particularly certain ages or women or particularly older women, And once you're laid off, it's very difficult to get back in, very difficult to get back in at that same level. Well, that echoes this email we got from Paula who says, I'm a highly qualified analyst with a graduate degree. I've been looking for a permanent position for a year and a half. I'm in my late 50s and can't even get interviews. I finally accepted a contract position for half my prior wage. I'm overqualified, bored by the position, and never felt more disposable.
10:57Maybe it's time to retire. I mean, Professor Osterman, when you hear a message like that, how does it fit into your analysis of how employers' thinking about the workforce has changed? Sure. So let me just make a couple of comments. One is I should have added that I have data. I interviewed 6 ,000 people. And my estimate is that 35 % of the workforce is disposable in the categories that I just described. That's a huge number of people. uh staying on the on the definition point for a second if you think of gigs now everyone uses that term differently and there's no quote right or wrong way to use that term and what brianna said is perfectly reasonable definition but if you think of it as narrow you know uber drivers door dash drivers those kinds of jobs or people who get their work on their their assignments on upwork or some website like that those folks account for just two percent of the workforce And that's my data, but that's other people's data too.
12:01And so I think this disposable category more generally is a much bigger, bigger deal. We have to take a quick break, but we'll hear more from our guests and from you after this.
12:17Tanya, I think you did the best interview that I've done. Seriously. Oh, that's a great question. I think I'm going to think about that question for the rest of my life. Oh, good question. This is Tanya Mosley, co-host of Fresh Air, and the questions are only the half of it. Listen to Fresh Air on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. History is intriguing, but unlike the present, it can feel far off. On NPR's ThruLine, we bring it back to life and put you in the middle of it. Go inside the stories from then that shape the world we live in now. Find NPR's ThruLine wherever you get your podcasts.
13:06Hey, it's Ray from Car Talk. Are you tired of all the depth and thoughtful care that goes into NPR shows? Want some good old-fashioned goofing around and stumbling to figure out what's going on? Well, I've been taking occasional car questions again. you can hear them by signing up for NPR Plus, along with lots of other bonus content. Just go to plus.npr.org. This message comes from the NPR Wine Club, which has generated over$1.75 million to support NPR. Whether buying a few bottles or joining the club, learn more at nprwineclub.org slash podcast. Must be 21 or older to purchase. Back to our discussion about what it means to be disposable in today's labor market.
13:52Professor Osterman, I want to better understand what makes this group of disposable workers, as you've described them, more vulnerable than what you would call a standard employee, someone with benefits and legal protections. Sure. So the point is that the employer makes no commitment to these folks. And one of the main motivations is saving costs, which often means reducing wages and not paying benefits. So I want to be clear, there's heterogeneity. So travel nurses who are contractors are buying, and I interviewed a bunch, are by and large happy campers, right? They can live where they want to live, often in warm places in the winter and beach places in the summer.
14:35But in general, my data show that compensation is lower for disposable workers, that job satisfaction is lower. And I should also add that there's a consequence for the public. So a great study showed that in hospitals, the rate of infections among patients in the hospital is higher if the hospital is using contractors to do the cleaning. Why? Because the contractors receive less training, They have poor communication channels with the other folks in the hospital, and that leads to infections. And that's also true for industrial accidents. And so there's a public consequence to this, and there's a personal consequence for the folks who are disposable.
15:19Professor Kaza, I'm curious whether there's also a class of worker who looks at the current state of our economy and our work environments and say, you know what, I want to develop a different relationship with my employer. I want more independence. I want more choice about who I work for and for how long. I think that that is definitely true. We have found in our research that it is a very heterogeneous population, as was mentioned. And in particular, some people feel like it's an empowered choice to be independent. So travel nurses, I think, is such an excellent example. We know, especially during the pandemic, that they were very much in demand, could command a very high salary.
16:09And they very much felt liberated by the option to work on a contract basis. But there are some, and in particular parts of the economy, certain industries, that feel like it's a forced reality, that they don't have options. And so, you know, they're overqualified, and yet they're still disposable because they're at the whim of the organization to do one particular project. They don't feel like the organization wants to keep them on an ongoing basis. So we really feel like it's a split between workers who freely choose independent work and those who find it to be kind of more of a tradeoff for them, that they have gained autonomy and freedom from internal corporate politics, that sort of thing.
16:54But in exchange, they have no institutional safety net. They don't have formal grievance structures. They don't have kind of predictable, prepackaged workplace relationships that they can rely on when they're trying to move their career forward. So I think it's a really kind of complex narrative. And I also think that it changes as workers move up in their careers. So at some point, it could feel like it's more of a choice. And then other times, it definitely feels like it is more of a forced reality. Well, we got this email from Rodney who says, it sounds like a disposable worker is no different from that of the early industrial age, where they hired workers whenever they needed a project to be done.
17:34And when the project was done, they're basically let go. And there was usually no form of health or protection if they had an accident or died. So it sounds like we're going back to that. Now, we should acknowledge temporary and contract work has been a part of the American story in the American labor market for a very long time. An estimated 64 million Americans did freelance work in 2024, and that's up from 4 million people from 2022. That's also according to the Upwork Research Institute. The independent job platform MBO Partners estimates that more than 72 million Americans are freelancing in some capacities.
18:08So that's half, close to half of the entire workforce. I mean, Bridget, why are so many people working outside of the standard employee model. How did we get here? Well, for some people, they've been forced into that. As we've been talking, I've been thinking a lot about women or people with care responsibilities. In labor and data figures, we talk about how women-owned businesses are the fastest growing part of the economy, and they have been for years. Well, one of the main reasons why, or a key reason why, is because the corporate structures don't work for them. Work does not work for people, for many people who have care responsibilities or, you know, we don't have public policies that would promote paid time off of work in order to care or child care.
18:58We don't support child care. Or now as the population continues to grow older, we don't have benefits that would help people combine work and care. So women for decades have just left to kind of create their own businesses or their own situation. The danger with that is then again you look at, well, who raises the money? Who's able to make a good living that way? You've traded stability and hopefully good wages for a lot of unpredictability. Yes, it gives you independence and some freedom, but a lot of women run very small, you know, very small businesses, and you've taken all of that risk on yourself then.
19:46You know, and how we got here, you know, a couple things. The United States, in the United States, jobs are really expensive because employers are expected to pay for health insurance. That's a huge reason why you have a lot of jobs than going overseas. We've seen that over the past couple decades, you know. And a lot of people think, well, that's just the way it has to be here. But that was really an artifact of the Second World War. People don't understand. That was supposed to be a temporary measure, and then it just became ingrained. And so that's made jobs incredibly expensive. It's made people try to hang on to jobs that they don't like.
20:22So it's called job lock, just so that you can have health insurance. So I think that's one part of it, that jobs are expensive. So employers are always looking for places to cut. and they're looking for places to cut sort of for the second reason that jobs have become so crummy out of a host. It's a complicated story, but I guess another key thing that I would say is corporations became very interested in focusing on how do we return profits for shareholders rather than how do we ensure that our workforce is educated and well-trained and they have the benefits they need to survive and thrive outside of work.
21:01So that's one of the reasons that drives layoffs because then if you reduce your labor costs, your books look better for your quarterly earnings reports for your shareholders on Wall Street. And so we have these forces that have sort of led people. Then you put tax policy on top of that. It's a complicated picture, but basically what's really ended up happening is a transfer of power from workers. It's a transfer of control from workers to the ownership class. You can see that in wage stagnation compared to productivity. As productivities continue to rise, wages have not kept pace for the most part with that.
21:44So you've got economists at RAND who looked at wealth transfer. They figured there's something like$5 trillion in wealth that's transferred from the lowest percentiles of wealth to the upper percentiles of wealth just because of some of these. So we've incentivized corporations to invest less in their workforces because we've made it more expensive because of health care to maintain what we consider standard employees. But they're also incentivized to pay more to their shareholders. We got this email from Dee who says, your definition of disposable is too narrow. In many food service jobs, for example, employees are carefully kept under the threshold for benefits.
22:33Reduced hours mean that these workers need multiple jobs to survive. Decent health insurance is too expensive for these people. And so, Professor Osterman, what Dee is arguing here is that they don't plan on letting these workers go. They just plan to keep them below the threshold at which they'd have to pay for health insurance. Can you see a little more expansive of a definition around this idea of who's disposable? Let me say, if I can make just three points, including responding to that. We need to be very careful about the data. So the Upwork data that you're citing give numbers that are quite wild with respect to employers.
23:13And I can distinguish in my research between people who are freelancers for organizations versus people who are freelancers because they're walking your dog or helping take care of your mother or cleaning your gutters. Those are all freelancers, but they're not disposable in the way we're talking about here. They're not working for an employer in a disposable way. So we need to be, I think, more precise about the data. But when you say, for instance, a dog walker, that can be an independent contractor or they can work as part of a company. Same thing with a caregiver. They may work for a company that lets people hire out caregivers.
23:52So how are you making the distinction? By asking people the question in my survey, which is, for whom do you work? And so I can make that distinction. And so these are people who may be working independently to, say, provide caregiving services as opposed to working for a caregiving agency. Right. They're not disposable. They're not disposable, as I'm using the term. I care about people who firms use and treat in a disposable way. Second point, and then I'll come back to you about the part-time. The second point is I want to be clear that there's a section in the book called The Kids Are Okay.
24:27The rhetoric that young people today don't want careers, they want to be entrepreneurs, they want to jump around, that's just wrong. That reflects a small slice of America. In general, people do want careers. They do want stable jobs. In terms of the part-time, I completely agree with the person who wrote to you. And I spend time on this. Officially, people make a distinction between voluntary and involuntary part-time labor. That's what the Department of Labor data are. But in fact, firms create part-time jobs for the reason you said or the reason your listener said to avoid benefits. And they also create part-time jobs because part-time work is much higher turnover.
25:10And so they're not making any commitment to people because they know they're going to be gone soon. So part-time work, not all part-time jobs, but many are what I consider to be disposable jobs. Professor Kaz, I'd love your thoughts as well. I think that one of the things that comes up as I hear Professor Osterman talking is that I think that disposable workers seem to be those who are more dependent on a single firm or organization as opposed to those who might be working across employers. So in the example he gave of a dog walker or somebody who was providing caregiving service, they have multiple employers.
25:51And so even though they are still on a contract basis for those multiple employers, if they were to lose one, they're not really feeling the pain as much as if they are a part-time employee for one single organization. And in that case, they are much more disposable from the organization's perspective. Well, Bridget, I want to turn to you here because we hear a lot from people who are forced to cobble together multiple freelance or temporary jobs just to approach, you know, a standard of financial security that a standard full-time job would provide. Where do they fit into this conversation around disposability?
26:31Yes, really, they're a really important part of it. Honestly, we are creating jobs that are simply not big enough to support a human life, you know, with all of these jobs that are just under the 30-hour threshold, so then you don't have to pay for benefits. You don't have to invest. You don't have to provide a career path or a ladder forward. You know, many of these jobs, say, in retail or in the lower-wage work, hourly workforce, they also come with really unpredictable hours. There's a lot of schedule, volatility, unpredictability, so you not only, You don't know when you're going to work. You don't know how many hours you're going to work.
Read the full transcript
27:10You know, and so there's a wonderful group, the Shift Project up at Harvard, that they really study a lot of this unpredictable, you know, the schedules and what impact that has on people. And what they found is that disorganized time, you know, not only do you have this volatile income, you know, and your rent doesn't shift 30 % like your income might, but just having disorganized time is also incredibly stressful. You can't plan for anything. You can't sort of live your life. So you're really trapped in a lot of ways. We got this email from Eric who says, when I realized during the pandemic that many of the positions our society considered essential are some of the worst paid, I became so disillusioned.
27:52The people that we forced to go to work in the most frightening days of the pandemic should be the best paid, not the worst. And we mentioned earlier, Professor Osterman, that these essential workers, as they were deemed during the pandemic. These are people who had to work when most other people were at stay-at-home orders. We were, you know, in our homes. But you argue even though we labeled them essential, they were actually disposable. How so? Well, you and I thought they were essential. And almost everyone who dealt with them, who needed their help, thought they were essential. But firms thought they were disposable.
28:32And it's very important to understand what's going on here, which is the disposable term is not a value judgment. It's a description of how employers think about these people. And the point that the bridge just made about part-time and unpredictable schedules is very important because that leads to the turnover I described. Remember, employers want part-time work because those folks are gone soon. They're not making a commitment to those folks. Well, if their schedules are unclear, uncertain, unpredictable, those people are going to have much higher turnover. So it's all part of a package of strategies.
29:12Well, we're hearing from so many of you. Ben emails, I've been an adjunct professor since 2006. I've dealt with the frustration of trying to prove yourself to a college that you are invested in your work and genuinely want to be part of the team. I've certainly been treated like a disposable worker at times. For the past four years, I have worked completely remotely for four different colleges. Three of them are public state-run universities. I'm in the union at all three and now have a certain amount of job security, even though I work full-time for each college. I work about 20 hours a week and make between$85 ,000 and$90 ,000 a year.
29:45So I could honestly say it's gotten much better, but only because of unions. We also heard from Melissa who says, when my CPA told me I was paying my workers too much and that I was too generous in bonuses, I made him disposable. After 35 years and almost no turnover in staff, I know who was right. Back with more in just a moment.
30:09This is Terry Gross, host of Fresh Air. I interviewed feminist icon Gloria Steinem several times over the years, and we've compiled a special episode to celebrate her life and legacy. Women become ourselves after 50. We drop a lot of baggage and really become much more our true selves. Find it on the NPR app or wherever you listen to Fresh Air. It's difficult to have this conversation right now without talking about artificial intelligence. And Professor Osterman, you argue that the shift towards disposable workers happened long before AI became a concern. But how is AI perhaps accelerating this shift?
30:51So let me say two things about AI. First off, anyone who claims that they really know what's happening with AI is making it up. No one knows. But here's what I think. There's so much uncertainty around the impact of AI that firms feel that uncertainty. They don't know what their staffing needs will be. They don't know how many people they will need. They don't know what mix of skills they will need. faced with that uncertainty the logical thing for firms to do is to make even more use of disposable workers because those people are easy to get rid of if you turns out you don't need them so i'm not making any predictions about the overall impact of ai on the level of employment how many jobs there are in the economy but i do believe that ai will exacerbate the disposable worker problem.
31:44Let me just say, if I could, just one other thing about firms, which is that they pay a price for this policy also. I have data in my survey asking people how much extra effort they are willing to make for their place where they work, how committed they are to their organization's success. And there is no question that disposable workers show much less willingness to put an extra effort for their employer. They're much less committed to the firm's success. So it's not just they who pay a price, and it's not just the public. My example earlier of infections in hospitals. Employers also pay a price.
32:29Well, let's hear from more of you. Lou emails, I was let go from a company I'd worked for for eight years because of a substantial mistake I made with the company accounting. I had untreated ADHD, which wasn't diagnosed until nine years later when I was 56. I tried temp work, which had led to full-time jobs in two separate instances, but this time I needed part-time afternoon assignments because of my fibromyalgia, and they just weren't coming in. Eventually, I turned to Upwork to try my hand at being a professional freelance editor, but if I'd had my druthers, I'd still be working for the company that fired me.
33:02I loved that job. So yes, I was forced into gig work. We also heard from Clary, who says, in what world does the modern employer not treat their full employees as disposable as well? This conversation isn't very helpful if we are giving bad employers all these technical outs, like they only treat these people as disposable when most employers actually treat most of their entire labor force as disposable. And I kind of want to hear from everyone on this because if you talk to people about their jobs, and we hear from lots of people during the program about their relationship to work. And I would say it's a pretty common theme that people don't feel valued at the least, disposable at the worst.
33:50And these are full-time employees. And so, you know, how much of what we are discussing right now is not just about disposable workers, but more broadly, how workers feel about the current economy, stagnant wages, and the fact that they are at a moment where, you know, look, if I lose my job, there is someone who will right away step in and my job may actually pay them less than they're paying me. Bridget? Yeah, I mean, all of this is exactly what people, you know, so much of what people are feeling right now. and you can just, you know, you don't have to go very far to hear these kinds of stories.
34:30You know, what we've got in the United States is we have a culture that has always valued work and we've always valued effort and hard work. And we have this story that we reward your hard work. I mean, how many times have you heard, if you work hard and you play by the rules, you'll get ahead. And so we believe that this story is true. But then what we have are these sort of broken work systems, broken workplaces. And you've got people who are working harder and harder and harder and not able to make enough money to put food on the table. You talked about people cobbling jobs together. You know, I studied the phenomenon of overwork and working, you know, more than sort of standard hours.
35:12And what we've done is for, because of their, you know, precarity, the feeling of being disposable or not respected or wanting to make sure that you're proving yourself, that you're a good worker. So what's happening is for knowledge workers, you tend to overwork in one job to try to prove yourself, to make yourself, you know, indisposable so that they can't get rid of you on the next layoff. But for people with hourly or low-wage work, you tend to, what I've found in interviewing a number of people is you tend to overwork in a number of different jobs, and number of like part-time side gigs and different kinds of hustles where you kind of put things together and you're not really, you're just trying to survive.
35:55You know, you're just sort of barely holding on by your fingernails. Professor Kazza, your thoughts? I think that the callers that we've heard from in this part of the show have really emphasized how subjective insecurity or precarity is really a universal baseline across all different types of work at this point and not just this binary condition that is only defining gig work or independent work. So I think that all workers to some extent feel disposable or replaceable. And the growth of AI is one of the things that they're now feeling replaced by. And again, this is not just lower wage work, but AI is taking over other parts or at least the threat of it of professional work as well.
36:42And I think that workers who are both employees of an organization can feel like they can be let go at whim or, you know, for maybe a reasonable cause, but that they can't get back in. And so they feel like spreading out their labor will help them to feel more secure. And then at the same time, we know that gig workers, even professional ones who are highly educated and can command a high salary, can also feel very insecure and precarious because they don't know what projects might be coming up for them. Professor Osterman, how does this fit into a broader conversation about the change in that contract?
37:20So not just for gig workers or temporary workers, but the relationship between employer and employee more broadly. Has that shifted in some fundamental way in the U.S.? Yeah, I think it's important. The answer is yes, but be careful about this. So work, as both the other folks on this call have said, is getting worse for people across the board. I think there's no question about that. But it still is valuable to be a standard worker. A standard worker gets health care. A standard worker gets protections around harassment at the workplace. A standard worker is legally able to form a union if he or she wants to.
38:03So standard work has, even though there's this broad sense that work is getting worse in many ways that were just described by your listeners and by Bridget and Brianna, standard work is still valuable relative to being disposable. And we shouldn't lose sight of that. People have fought for standard work, have fought for these benefits, have fought for the protections inherent in standard work. It's not the same as saying all jobs are terrible, so we shouldn't make the distinctions. Having said that, what we have seen basically from the mid-1970s on is employers have systematically sought to chip away at workplace protections, have sought to chip away at unions, have sought to chip away and increase more disposability.
38:55So work is getting worse, and people are right to perceive that. But it's still valuable to be a standard worker. One of you says, I work as an adjunct faculty member at a liberal arts college in Cambridge, Massachusetts. We are completely disposable within the gig economy. Work is not steady and is unreliable. Sometimes I teach semesters where I am just under the threshold of being considered a full-time faculty member. other semesters. I only teach one class. You also heard from Rebecca who emails, I have a BA in environmental science. I was writing my thesis when I had to stop to take care of my children.
39:29I also have six months of a law degree. Then the law school shut down. I applied for jobs after my kids were able to be in school, but because I had been out of the workforce for 10 years, my degree and work experience prior to that were considered worthless. I can't obtain Pell grants or subsidized loans to go back to school and get a new degree. So I'm worthless. My experience is worthless and my degrees are worthless. No one cares. Professor Kazza, when you hear a story like what Rebecca shares, I mean, what does it make you think about the plight of workers and the options that are available to people?
40:09Well, first, it's heartbreaking to hear from so many adjunct faculty members as being a member of the university for some time, I think that it's really a shame that the firm highly undervalues them. I do think that colleagues, even more permanent faculty members, really highly value adjunct faculty members. But it does make me think that we need to figure out some way to create interventions or create some hope for workers who either by choice or not by choice have found themselves disposable or in temporary employment opportunities. And I do think that there are a lot of hopeful stories out there about workers who have done quite well and feel empowered by independent work.
40:56We studied a number of people who have chosen to work in this way and do feel like they have maybe a radical responsibility, as my colleague Sue Ashford talks about, but they also then can create highly meaningful work for themselves because they're working on the projects that they want to work on. They can see the direct impact of these projects. Right now, I'm working with some colleagues to try to create micro-interventions to provide some social scaffolding for these types of workers so that they can deal with some of the challenges that we've talked about regarding precarity and organizational challenges, structural challenges, relational challenges, to try to help them.
41:37I am a little bit mixed about putting the onus on workers themselves to create these communities and these scaffolds. And I think that that does free up firms' responsibility even more. So I definitely feel a bit mixed on providing certain interventions. I also think at the university level, we need to start training our emerging workers to think about what their lives would look like if they are independent and not going to work for an organization. At this point, I don't know that we have a lot of classes that are training people for careers outside of organizations. Bridget, anything to add there?
42:17So I think the point that Paul makes is so important, that there is such value in standard work. And I think one of the things that I discovered in a lot of the reporting in my book is that there are ways to move from where we are, to improve standard work, to, you know, the way we organize work is a choice. And we have made a series of choices to get where we are. We can choose to move beyond where we are as well. And I think one of the most hopeful stories that I came across in some of my reporting, I was looking at home care workers. Now, they are some of the lowest paid workers out there. and with the aging population, this is a rapidly expanding workforce.
43:01So soon we will have sort of the largest profession in the economy in the United States, unless we intercede, will be one of the lowest wage. So that just speaks volumes about what we value. And many of these workers, high rates of turnover, just what Paul is saying, not a lot of investment in people, lots of turnover, lots of precarity and chaos. And so I found this mother-daughter pair, and the daughter made about two or three times as much as the mother did. They were both home care workers. The daughter had access to training. She had access to retirement benefits. She had access to paid leave and paid sick days.
43:43And the whole reason why is because she lived in Washington State and her mom lived in Arkansas. And in Washington State, employers, the state, and the unions, the worker unions got together and said, how can we make these jobs better? And if we do make them better and we raise wages and we stabilize hours and we make sure that there are benefits, some through the company, through the state, they made them better jobs. The turnover was a lot lower. The quality of care was a lot higher. And so Professor Osterman, very briefly, as we wrap up here, are there ways to incentivize firms to take a different approach to their workers?
44:24I think that the policy, the solution is a combination of carrots and sticks. We need to build guardrails around how people are treated, and we need to raise the standards in the workforce, and that's regulation, that's legal. And we then also have to convince employers that they're paying a price for this policy. That's what I said earlier about commitment and effort is lower for these folks. So you want to play the game two ways. You want to have carrots and sticks. And yes, there are, and the example just given is a best practice example for home healthcare workers. We'll have to leave the conversation there for now.
45:06That's Paul Osterman. He's the author of the new book, Disposable Workers, the Transformation of Employment. Also with us, Bridget Schulte, author of Overwork, Transforming the Daily Grind and the Quest for a Better Life, and Brianna Caza, professor of management at the University of North Carolina, Greensboro. Thanks to you all. This week, we're also discussing the case for quitting, not just your job, but in general. You'll find that conversation at the1a.org. Today's producer was Haley Blassingate. This program comes to you from WAMU, part of American University in Washington, distributed it by NPR.
45:39I'm Jen White. Thanks for listening. And we'll talk again tomorrow. This is 1A.
46:02on NPR's wildcard podcast musician Sarah Bareilles on being a crier my mom is a big crier too and she loves to take credit for my crying mom my crying is mine watch or listen to that wild card conversation on the NPR app, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts
From the publisher
We’ve also seen shifts around what it means to be an “essential worker.” It’s a term that emerged during the pandemic, but has largely fallen out of our vocabulary. This category included nurses and doctors, government workers, those in transportation, food and agriculture, water, and waste management.
But there’s a different name for a growing segment of the work population that includes those we once deemed essential — the “disposable” worker. Unlike their “essential” counterparts, the disposable workforce isn’t defined by the services they offer, but by the weakening contract between them and their employers.
In honor of Labor Day week, we discuss what it means to be disposable in today’s labor market — and what happens when people abandon traditional work arrangements altogether.
Find more of our programs online. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a.
See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.
NPR Privacy Policy




