Religion In The War On Iran

11 Mar 2026 · 42 min · 43 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: 1A - Religion In The War On Iran

Overview This episode of 1A explores the intersection of religion and politics, particularly in the context of the U.S.-Israel military operations against Iran. The discussion focuses on how religious language and beliefs are being used to justify military actions, highlighting concerns about the implications of this rhetoric within the Trump administration and the military.

Key Themes and Discussions

Political and Religious Rhetoric

  • Military Action and Religious Language: The episode begins with a discussion of remarks by political figures, such as Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who frame Iran's government as “religious fanatic lunatics.” This rhetoric is seen as a growing concern regarding the separation of church and state.
  • Apocalyptic Theology: There are allegations that some military leaders are using apocalyptic language in briefings about the conflict, suggesting that Trump is divinely anointed to incite Armageddon.

Panelists

  • Andrew Whitehead: Professor of sociology at Indiana University, author of *American Idolatry*, discusses the role of Christian nationalism in American politics.
  • Catherine Stewart: Journalist and author of *The Power Worshippers*, explores the intersection of faith and politics and highlights the militaristic rhetoric used by some military leaders.
  • Nadir Hashemi: Director of the Al-Walid Center for Muslim Christian Understanding at Georgetown University, compares the religious rhetoric used in the U.S. and Iran.

Christian Nationalism vs. Christian Zionism

  • Definitions:
  • Christian Nationalism: An ideology that merges conservative Christianity with American civic life, often resulting in exclusionary practices.
  • Christian Zionism: A belief that supports the return of Jews to Israel and is intertwined with notions of salvation.
  • Discussion on Influence: The panel discusses how both movements have influenced U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding support for Israel.

Military Influence and Religious Practices

  • Pentagon Prayer Meetings: Discussion of evangelical prayer meetings led by figures like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, raising questions about the appropriateness of religious activities within military settings.
  • Rhetoric of Violence: Hegseth's statements about U.S. military actions being a righteous endeavor resonate with Christian nationalist rhetoric, linking faith with militarism.

Public and Political Responses

  • Criticism from Political Figures: More than two dozen Democratic Congress members are calling for investigations into the military's use of religious rhetoric.
  • Email and Voicemail Feedback: Voices from the public express concern over the militaristic and religious framing of the conflict, emphasizing the risks of conflating faith with national identity.

Broader Implications

  • Religious Mobilization: The discussion identifies how religion is used as a vehicle to mobilize support for politically motivated agendas, rather than being a genuine driver of policy.
  • Potential for Escalation: Panelists express concerns regarding the ramifications of the war on the region, highlighting that the religious framing could exacerbate tensions.

Conclusion The episode ends with a call to recognize the complex interplay between religion and politics in the context of military actions. The conversations highlight the necessity for a critical examination of how religious ideologies are leveraged in political discourse and military strategy, and their implications for democracy and pluralism in American society.

Key Takeaways

  • The use of religious language in political rhetoric can blur the lines between church and state, raising concerns about democratic integrity.
  • Christian nationalism and Christian Zionism play significant roles in shaping U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding Iran and Israel.
  • Public sentiment is increasingly wary of the militarization of faith and the implications of apocalyptic rhetoric in justifying warfare.
  • The conversation emphasizes the need for diverse voices within religious communities to challenge extremist interpretations and practices.

Listening Information To hear this episode and more discussions, visit the 1A website or subscribe to 1A on your preferred podcast platform.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Religious Rhetoric in Military Action

0:36 to 2:02

Explore the intertwining of religion and politics in the context of the Iran conflict.

“As the military action in Iran grows, so does religious rhetoric.”

Examining Military Religious Rhetoric

2:46 to 4:26

Delve into how religious language is used by military leaders and its implications.

“She's a journalist covering the intersection of faith and politics.”

Mike Huckabee's Influence

4:26 to 8:06

Discuss Mike Huckabee's role in shaping U.S. foreign policy through his religious views.

“He has the Latin phrase Deus Vult, which means God wills it.”

Defining Christian Nationalism

8:06 to 9:23

Understand the concept of Christian nationalism and its distinction from Christian Zionism.

“We got this email from Jerry who says, I am an American.”

Religion and National Identity

9:23 to 11:23

Explore the intersection of religion and American national identity in current politics.

“And so Christian nationalism and Christian Zionism are not one and the same, but they are strongly related.”

Comparing Religious Mobilization

12:00 to 14:02

Analyze the different uses of religion as a tool for mobilization in the U.S. and Iran.

“We're discussing the role of religious rhetoric and beliefs in the U.S.-Israel war against Iran.”

Religion as a Mobilization Tool

14:02 to 14:17

Explore how religion is used differently in the U.S. and Iran regarding war support.

Secularization in Iranian Society

14:17 to 14:33

Understand the impact of secularization on Iranian responses to religion in conflict.

“One of the realities about contemporary Iranian society is that as a result of 47 years of religious authoritarianism, much of Iranian society has undergone a process of secularization.”

Iranian Nationalism and War

14:33 to 14:46

Learn how nationalism resonates more than religious claims in Iran during conflict.

“They do respond to claims of nationalism and patriotism in the context of an external attack and war.”

Support for the Islamic Republic

14:46 to 14:58

Discover the loyal religious base supporting the Iranian regime amid secular trends.

“Now, the Islamic Republic of Iran does have a core base of supporters that are very loyal and are very religious, and the regime does in those spaces draw upon religious theology and themes to mobilize support.”
Show all 43 chapters

Religious Justifications in Warfare

14:58 to 15:10

Analyze the extent to which U.S. and Iranian leaders invoke religion in justifying war.

Comparative Religious Rhetoric

15:10 to 15:22

Discover how the U.S. outpaces Iran in using religious rhetoric for mobilization.

“the United States and Iran, and to what extent they've drawn explicitly upon religion, quoted scripture, to justify and mobilize people for this war, I think the United States would clearly come out on top.”

Trump's Sacralization

15:22 to 15:42

Delve into the imagery of Trump as a biblical figure among religious supporters.

“Well, that leads us to this email we received from Mary, who says, we are just witnessing the next step in anointing Trump as the holy American emperor.”

Consequences of Mega Politics

15:42 to 16:07

Examine the implications of treating political leaders as anointed figures by God.

“What does that sort of imagery bring up for you?”

Public Perception of Trump’s Leadership

16:07 to 16:26

Assess how Trump's anointed image resonates with his loyal base versus the general public.

“And it's really important for that kind of mega politics.”

Voter Mobilization and Christian Nationalism

16:26 to 16:53

Learn about the role of Christian nationalism in mobilizing voters for Trump.

“disregard the Constitution, disregard any law he doesn't like, disregard international treaties, disregard his traditional alliances and processes that are supposed to guide international aggression.”

Violent Rhetoric in War Discourse

16:53 to 17:51

Explore how Christian nationalist leaders advocate violent rhetoric regarding war.

“But how sticky do you think that argument about Trump as this anointed leader, anointed by God, how sticky is that with the general public?”

Connection Between Nationalism and Militarism

17:51 to 18:33

Investigate the relationship between Christian nationalism and militaristic violence.

“He's also been criticized lately for violent rhetoric he's using to talk about the U.S.'s war in Iran.”

Cultural Elements of Christian Nationalism

18:33 to 19:11

Discuss how Christian nationalism advocates for authoritarian control and justifies violence.

“Yeah, there's a very strong link, and it's one that we find over and over across many different surveys.”

Historical Context of Christian Nationalism

19:11 to 19:53

Reflect on the historical roots of Christian nationalism in relation to U.S. identity.

“more likely to assert American innocence regarding conflict across the globe.”

The Role of Faith in Military Action

19:53 to 20:31

Analyze how faith is intertwined with U.S. military actions throughout history.

“heritage and declaration, uh, back in 1776.”

Guest Introduction: Andrew Whitehead

20:31 to 20:41

Meet Andrew Whitehead, a professor discussing the intersection of religion and politics.

“Well, Andrew, we know you have a class to teach, so we have to let you go.”

Email Insights from Listeners

20:41 to 20:51

Hear diverse listener perspectives on the role of religion in war and nationalism.

“Arthur emails, this administration claims Iran is full of religious fanatics when they are the religious fanatics they claim to hate.”

Race and Religious Nationalism

20:51 to 21:59

Explore how race intersects with Christian nationalism in American politics.

“Viewing white Christian nationalism as a superior religion is rooted in white supremacy.”

Islamophobia and National Identity

21:59 to 22:35

Understand how Islamophobia shapes notions of national identity among Christian nationalists.

“You know, we have many, you know, Congress men and women who have really been outspoken in terms of just bigoted Islamophobic sort of statements.”

Historical Influences on Modern Christian Nationalism

22:35 to 23:17

Learn about historical figures who influenced current trends in Christian nationalism.

“So that's how I see these things sort of playing out in contemporary American politics.”

Hierarchical Views in Religious Contexts

23:17 to 24:09

Discuss the theological underpinnings of hierarchies within Christian nationalism.

“He's a representative of a religious movement that draws from Christian Reconstructionism, whose godfather, Rousseau John Rushdeny, actually drew directly and quotes directly leaders of the Southern Presbyterian Church.”

Critique of Apocalyptic Theology

24:09 to 25:02

Examine critiques of apocalyptic theology within the context of U.S. foreign policy.

“and they're very hostile to the idea of what some of them will call woke Christianity or progressive Christianity.”

Criticism of Trump's War Justifications

25:02 to 25:57

Analyze criticism surrounding the Trump administration's inconsistent war messaging.

“God has not called Christians to initiate the apocalypse.”

Mobilization through Religious Identity

25:57 to 26:51

Learn how religious identity is used to distract from flawed arguments for war.

“I think exactly what you stated is actually the response to sort of shift attention away from that.”

Public Confusion on War Justifications

26:51 to 27:27

Discuss the public's confusion regarding the justifications for the war against Iran.

“Yeah, I mean, the big question hanging over this war is why.”

Military and Religious Blurring Lines

27:27 to 28:03

Examine concerns about the intertwining of religion and military narratives in the U.S.

“And I think so much of this remains a question for the American public.”

Teaser for Upcoming Discussion on Religion and Conflict

28:03 to 28:13

Learn about the connection between religion and the U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran.

“We'll talk more about those reports after the break and about how religion in the Middle East could stoke a wider conflict as the U.S.”

Listeners Share Perspectives on Religious Conflict

28:45 to 29:41

Hear diverse listener opinions on the dangers of religious conflicts in politics.

“Back to our conversation about the role religious rhetoric and belief is playing in the U.S.”

Investigating Military Religious Rhetoric

29:41 to 30:28

Explore claims of religious rhetoric in the U.S. military's approach to the Iran conflict.

“We also heard from Jason, who emails, I live in Fayetteville, North Carolina, home of Fort Bragg and the 82nd Airborne.”

Theological Movements and End Times Rhetoric

30:28 to 31:58

Understand the various theological perspectives influencing U.S. military rhetoric.

“But for people who are unfamiliar, can you just explain a little bit more about these in-time prophecies that people are referencing?”

Netanyahu's Religious References and Politics

31:58 to 33:50

Analyze how Netanyahu uses religious language to frame the conflict with Iran.

“He's got a big job within that organization.”

The Role of Religion in Geopolitical Strategy

33:50 to 35:21

Examine the interplay of religion and geopolitics in the U.S.-Iran conflict.

“They're using religion and religious references as a tool for mobilizing people to validate and promote those very secular political causes.”

Iran's Leadership Decisions through Political and Religious Lenses

35:21 to 37:59

Discover how Iran's leadership choices reflect both political power and religious considerations.

“Leadership there named Mujtaba Khamenei.”

The Relationship Between Religion and Political Power

37:59 to 39:26

Learn about the dynamics between religious nationalism and political authority in various countries.

“We're hearing from Andy in New York who emails, as the famous quote goes, religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false and by the rulers as useful.”

Moderates and Pushback Against Religious Political Trends

39:26 to 41:26

Explore how moderates can influence the increasing use of religion in politics.

“I want to get to another message we got here.”

The Potential Outcomes of the Iran Conflict

41:26 to 42:01

Discuss the anticipated implications of the ongoing war with Iran and its regional effects.

“a task force to counter what they called anti-Christian bias.”

Concerns Surrounding the War with Iran

42:01 to 43:33

The discussion focuses on the possible escalation of the war with Iran and its implications.

“It's of a piece with many of his other actions, not just internationally, but at home.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This message comes from Wealthfront. It's time your hard-earned money works harder for you. With Wealthfront's cash account, you earn a competitive APY on your cash from program banks higher than the average savings rate with free, instant withdrawals to eligible accounts. Go to Wealthfront.com. Cash account offered by Wealthfront Brokerage, LLC. Member FINRA SIPC, not a bank. Funds are swept to program banks where they earn the variable annual percentage yield.

0:36As the military action in Iran grows, so does religious rhetoric. They wanted to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, and they'd like to take us out as well. We're the great Satan in their analogy and their misguided religion. Iran is run by lunatics, religious fanatic lunatics. They have an ambition to have nuclear weapons. They intend to develop those nuclear weapons behind a program of missiles and drones and terrorism that the world will not be able to touch them for fear of those things. That was Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson and Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaking last week about Iran.

1:10But these assertions about faith in Iran comes amid increasing concerns about a crumbling of the separation between church and state in the Trump administration and the military. On Thursday, a group of evangelical pastors prayed over President Trump for his success in the war. We pray for your continued blessing and favor to rest upon him. We pray for wisdom from heaven to flood his heart, his mind, and Lord, you will guide him in these challenging times that we're facing today. And now more than two dozen Democratic Congress members are requesting an investigation into a report that some military leaders are using apocalyptic theology in briefings about the war in Iran, with language that asserts Trump is anointed by Jesus to cause Armageddon.

1:53I'm Jen White. You're listening to the 1A Podcast. Today, we discuss how religion is showing up in the U.S. and Israel's war against Iran. That's after this short break. Stay with us.

2:07This message comes from WISE, the app for international people using money around the globe. You can send, spend, and receive in up to 40 currencies with only a few simple taps. Be smart. Get WISE. Download the WISE app today or visit WISE.com. T's and C's apply. Welcome back. Let's get into our conversation and meet our panel today. Andrew Whitehead is a professor of sociology at Indiana University in Indianapolis. He's also a research fellow at the Charles F. Kettering Foundation and the author of American Idolatry, How Christian Nationalism Betrays the Gospel and Threatens the Church. Andrew, thanks for joining us.

2:45Great to be with you. Also with us is Catherine Stewart. She's a journalist covering the intersection of faith and politics. She's also the author of Money, Lies, and God, Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy, and The Power Worshippers, Inside the Dangerous Rise of Religious Nationalism. Catherine, welcome back to the program. Great to be here. And also joining us is Nadir Hashemi. He's a professor of Middle East politics and the director of the Al-Walid Center for Muslim Christian Understanding at Georgetown University. Nader, it's great to have you. Thanks for the invite. So we're hearing from lots of you already.

3:22Brian emails at the January service Hexeth read from Psalm 144 and said he studied the passage during the planning of the Venezuelan operation. And he read part of that passage again, we should note, on Tuesday during an Iran press briefing. Catherine, what sort of religious rhetoric from U.S. lawmakers is catching your ear right now?

3:40Joshua Johnson:Well, I think we just have to look at Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's rhetoric to see that there's an issue here. Under the Department of Defense, and this is even before the Iran involvement, they produced a number of promotional videos featuring Bible verses overlaid on clips of tanks and soldiers and fighter jets and missiles. The violence of Hegseth's rhetoric is often very religiously inflected. And it's really meant to appeal to a large base of Christian nationalist supporters of Donald Trump. The Baptist minister, Dr. Brian Kaler, has documented that Hegseth also holds monthly evangelistic Christian prayer meetings at the Pentagon during work hours.

4:26Joshua Johnson:And he also has a number of tattoos. We just need to look at him. Very crusader-like tattoos. He has the Latin phrase Deus Vult, which means God wills it. This is believed to have been a rallying cry of the first crusade in the 11th century, and it's been embraced in modern times by some white nationalist and extreme far-right groups. And we could go on. And I think, you know, this is just one example. But when we look at this war, you know, taking a step back in terms of America's internal political dynamics, I think it's basically meant to serve the political purpose of the Trump regime and the MAGA movement.

5:06I mean, it's very unlikely that Trump himself is pursuing an explicitly Christian nationalist agenda.

5:13Joshua Johnson:Hexeth is a different story. We'll get a little bit more into the politics in a moment, but I want to get to this message we got from Julie in Ohio. I think Mike Huckabee's role is not talked about enough. I think he's flying under the radar. I think he's not somebody you would have anticipated would want to fly under the radar. He would have probably wanted, his ego is big enough to want to fly on top of the radar. But I think his influence and his influence regarding faith and religion and end times theology is probably having a big impact on what's happening in the Middle East. Julie, thanks for that message.

5:54Anadar, Julie brings up Mike Huckabee. He's the U.S. ambassador to Israel. He's an evangelical Christian and an ordained Southern Baptist pastor. He spoke to NBC News in September 2025 and asserted the U.S. and Israel share a value system, and I'll quote him here, that is deeply rooted in a biblical understanding of a worldview. How do you think that worldview shows up in Huckabee's rhetoric and diplomatic relationship with Israel? It shows up all the time, every time he actually is asked to comment on the topic. more recently about two weeks ago he gave a famous interview where he was asked about Israel and its place in the region and he says that it would be perfectly fine if Israel took over the entire Middle East from the Nile to Euphrates because that's what the Bible in his understanding tells him to do and to support.

6:48So you know Huckabee is a Christian Zionist. He's also the American ambassador to Israel. And of course, that statement provoked a huge reaction within the region and leading Arab and Muslim states, specifically those that were allied and our allied with the United States in the West, had to issue a repudiation. And we should note here that that happened during an interview with Tucker Carlson, And the ambassador did try to sort of step back on those comments a bit and reframe them, talking about editing in the interview and et cetera. But you mentioned Christian Zionism. Will you define that for us, Nader?

7:29Sure. It's a particular interpretation of Christianity that sort of puts the question of Israel in support for the return of Jews back to their historic homeland at the center of Christian theology and ethics. effectively advancing an interpretation of scripture that in order to be a good Christian, in order to obtain salvation, you have to blindly and without question support the policies of the state of Israel. And this is a very powerful movement in the United States, especially in the Republican Party. And the best embodiment of this is really the figure that we're talking about, Mike Huckabee.

8:06We got this email from Jerry who says, I am an American. I am a Christian. they are not the same thing. The founders of this country experienced firsthand how toxic the combination of church and state were to both. Last month, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth invited Pastor Doug Wilson to lead a prayer service at the Pentagon. Now, Wilson is a controversial figure. He doesn't believe women should vote. He's a self-described Christian nationalist. Andrew, define Christian nationalism for us and how it differs from Christian Zionism. Well, Christian nationalism, as we studied across the American public, is an ideology that is committed to fusing a particularly conservative strain of Christianity with American civic life.

8:50And it demands that all levels of our government defend and preserve this fusion as central to our national identity and determining which Americans truly belong. And so while the goal of infusing, quote unquote, biblical principles into American civic life may seem innocuous to some Christians, it does raise questions that are kind of being highlighted already here. Which biblical principles? Whose biblical principles? And it also excludes many Americans who are not Christian and those that are not religious at all. And so with this idea of loving Jesus and stealing biblical principles, it really is about elevating a particular expression of Christianity as central and can chip away at this idea of a pluralistic democratic society.

9:37And so Christian nationalism and Christian Zionism are not one and the same, but they are strongly related. So as we study this across the American public with many different surveys, we do see that many Americans who strongly embrace Christian nationalism do talk about a support for the nation of Israel.

9:59But we also find, though, too, that when we ask about their support for Jewish people, it tends to wane. And so it really is about supporting this nation, and I think that's indicative of this idea of Christian Zionism. Catherine, we talk about religion in U.S. politics. It's not new. It is very common to hear presidents or other politicians, for instance, in speeches with God bless the United States of America. There is this longstanding connection between a certain type of patriotism and religion. Is there something different that you see happening in this moment?

10:41Joshua Johnson:Thanks for the question. You know, I think there are many politicians across the political spectrum who have acknowledged their faith in speeches and in public service, while still recognizing the diversity of our nation and not trampling on anyone's religious viewpoint. The difference is here we're seeing the insistence that a certain reactionary view of religion is representative of our nation and our national purpose. Christian nationalism is a kind of exclusionary kind of nationalism. It's really about insiders versus outsiders, who gets to properly belong in the country and who doesn't. Well, more to come after this short break.

11:25We'll be right back.

11:30This message comes from BetterHelp. International Women's Day is this March. Time to celebrate all women. The leaders, the caregivers, the hype friends, the how-do-you-do-it-all types. Women deserve to be reminded how much they matter, and that therapy offers a space to care for themselves. BetterHelp makes it simple by matching you with a qualified therapist based on your needs and preferences. Visit betterhelp.com slash NPR for 10 % off. Let's get back to our conversation. We're discussing the role of religious rhetoric and beliefs in the U.S.-Israel war against Iran. Michael in Michigan sent us this voicemail.

12:10Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that Iran is run by religious fanatic lunatics. Aren't the same people who are so worried about Muslims imposing the practice of a religious law called Sharia? the very same persons who are trying to impose religious law here in America, called either white Christian nationalism or dominionism. To be honest, I'm a strong Christian, but I don't want to live in a Christian theocracy. I support our Constitution, which guarantees that I have the right to practice my preferred religion and that the government will not favor one religion over another. Michael, thanks for that message.

12:48Andrew, why do you think we're seeing U.S. politicians, particularly on the right, leaning on religious language right now? Yeah, the use of religious language and rhetoric is extremely powerful. And so this isn't necessarily unique to the United States in this historical time period or even with Christianity. So looking across different nations, majority religions, wherever you may find it, a lot of times are used to legitimate what political leaders want to do in the will of the sacred. In doing so, really tends to draw really strong boundary lines of this is who we are. This is what we're all about and that the sacred is with us.

13:31And so it gives us a vision of where we're supposed to go and how we're supposed to get there. And so this is one reason why we see it happening here. And again, it isn't necessarily unique to this moment. It's something that's been with us in American politics even before the United States was formed. And we'll continue to see it going forward. Nader, how do you compare the way faith is being used in the U.S. as compared to how we're seeing it used in Iran around this war? Yeah, one of the interesting juxtapositions about this moment is that I see religion as a tool for mobilizing support for this war much more visible and at a much higher level in the United States today than I do see it in Iran.

14:19One of the realities about contemporary Iranian society is that as a result of 47 years of religious authoritarianism, much of Iranian society has undergone a process of secularization. They don't respond to these claims of religion as a mobilizing tool. They do respond to claims of nationalism and patriotism in the context of an external attack and war. That's what resonates in Iranian society today. Now, the Islamic Republic of Iran does have a core base of supporters that are very loyal and are very religious, and the regime does in those spaces draw upon religious theology and themes to mobilize support.

14:58support. But if one were to do just, for example, a content analysis, let's say, over the last 12 days since February 28th, in terms of the leaders of both countries, the United States and Iran, and to what extent they've drawn explicitly upon religion, quoted scripture, to justify and mobilize people for this war, I think the United States would clearly come out on top. Well, that leads us to this email we received from Mary, who says, we are just witnessing the next step in anointing Trump as the holy American emperor. It's terrifying. Now, Catherine, earlier we heard that clip of pastors laying hands on President Trump in the Oval Office to pray for his success during the U.S.

15:40and Israel's war on Iran. What does that sort of imagery bring up for you?

15:46Joshua Johnson:Well, it's important to understand that by sacralizing Trump, by considering him something like a biblical king, King Cyrus, who has been called to enact God's will. They're basically saying that his will matters and that's all that matters. And it's really important for that kind of mega politics. It's of a piece with this sort of anti-democratic agenda where they want us to think that democratic processes don't matter, the will of the people, voters don't matter. All that matters is the will of an anointed leader. And it provides a permission structure for Trump to disregard the Constitution, disregard any law he doesn't like, disregard international treaties, disregard his traditional alliances and processes that are supposed to guide international aggression.

16:44Joshua Johnson:And so it's really part of a larger, I would say, move toward a more dictatorial form of power. But how sticky do you think that argument about Trump as this anointed leader, anointed by God, how sticky is that with the general public? Like, yes, his MAGA base, very loyal, very connected, very supportive of almost everything the president does. But for the broader public, what do you think? Well, we have to remember that Trump didn't win by appealing to everybody. He won by appealing to a smaller number of a disproportionately mobilized, incredibly loyal base. He turned out that vote and the Christian nationalist movement, much of which functions as a voter turnout machine, turned out that movement and its adherence in disproportionate numbers.

17:43Joshua Johnson:And that's how he wins. Secretary of Defense Hegseth, who we've noted, has been linked to Christian nationalism. He's also been criticized lately for violent rhetoric he's using to talk about the U.S.'s war in Iran. This was never meant to be a fair fight, and it is not a fair fight. We are punching them while they're down, which is exactly how it should be. No one's putting us in danger. We're putting the other guys in danger. That's our job. So we're not concerned about that. We mitigate it as we need to. Our commanders factor all of this. But the only ones that need to be worried right now are Iranians that think they're going to live.

18:25Andrew, how much of a link do you see between Christian nationalism and this sort of violent rhetoric? Yeah, there's a very strong link, and it's one that we find over and over across many different surveys. So there really is an enduring link between Christian nationalism, militarism, and violence. Because within Christian nationalism, one of the key cultural elements of it is this desire for authoritarian social control, this belief that the world is constantly falling into chaos. And we need a strong ruler to come in and enforce order. And to do this, it's through the threat of violence or actual violence that it'll bring the world into order.

19:05And so studies show over and over that Americans who embrace Christian nationalism are much more likely to assert American innocence regarding conflict across the globe. They would see violence enacted on behalf of the United States as justifiable, that God requires our nation to, quote unquote, wage wars for good. And so when we talk about Christian nationalism and this religious rhetoric, it really does bring into mind this idea that the United States military is about dominance on the world stage in service of this Christian nation. Um, so as I think back to some research that I did for, for my first book, um, sitting in a, a church service around July 4th, where a pastor was talking about this link between our Christian heritage and declaration, uh, back in 1776.

19:57And the narrator saying any victories we claim are all because of him, God, and his faithfulness. And in the good times and bad, he, God has always been on our side. And so again, this vision of the United States and its military conquests being baptized, legitimated within the will of the sacred, and that America is always for good, no matter what. And so that's very powerful and really does bring into relief what these folks are doing is they're making decisions for where we wage wars and against who. Well, Andrew, we know you have a class to teach, so we have to let you go. That's Andrew Whitehead.

20:35He's a professor of sociology at Indiana University in Indianapolis. He's also a research fellow at the Charles F. Kettering Foundation and author of American Idolatry. Thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate it. Thank you very much. Let's hear from more of you. Arthur emails, this administration claims Iran is full of religious fanatics when they are the religious fanatics they claim to hate. Viewing white Christian nationalism as a superior religion is rooted in white supremacy. And to act like white Christian nationalism has not been the largest driver in the war in the past century is absurd.

21:08Nader, something we haven't spoken about is the way this religious ideology intersects with race. We're talking about white Christian nationalism. And so I'd be curious to hear your thoughts about the role race plays in this discussion. Well, there's a widespread sort of attitude in many of these Christian nationalist groups, Christian Zionist groups that sort of perceive people of color, Arabs and Muslims, immigrants generally as sort of a threat to the purity of society. And so the fact that most sort of Muslims, you know, are of a darker colored skin helps sort of mobilize people around the issue of race.

22:01You know, we have many, you know, Congress men and women who have really been outspoken in terms of just bigoted Islamophobic sort of statements. I mean, just recently Representative Andy Ogles from Tennessee, you know, said Muslims don't belong in American society. And this sort of overlaps with this idea that an authentic understanding of the United States is really the people who founded this country, the European settlers, and everyone else is sort of not really a member of this country. So the issue of Islamophobia overlaps with the issue of race in the sense that there's a sense of who are the proper and true members of this community and who are outsiders.

22:48So that's how I see these things sort of playing out in contemporary American politics. Catherine, in your reporting, where have you found this intersection between race and Christian nationalism?

22:59Joshua Johnson:Well, it's very direct, actually. Hegseth himself attends a church linked to the communion of reformed evangelical churches. It's a denomination co-founded by Doug Wilson, who you mentioned earlier, a pastor who has a number of churches, but his center is in Moscow, Idaho. He's a representative of a religious movement that draws from Christian Reconstructionism, whose godfather, Rousseau John Rushdeny, actually drew directly and quotes directly leaders of the Southern Presbyterian Church. People like James Thornwell and Robert Louis Dabney, who themselves were proponents of slavery and very upset about emancipation.

23:46Joshua Johnson:They considered democracy to be a heresy. Like Doug Wilson, they believed in hierarchies ordained by God, men over women, white people over black people. And in fact, Rush Duny cited these men and also reprinted one of them, Robert Louis Dabney, through his printing house. And you hear, listen, the movement draws on different strains of, Christian nationalism draws on different strains of theology. They're not all in agreement with everything, but they draw on different sort of strains of very reactionary religion that tend to advocate these kind of hierarchies as ordained by God, along with this idea of America as a Christian nation whose rulers should be properly Christians of a certain type.

24:39Joshua Johnson:and they're very hostile to the idea of what some of them will call woke Christianity or progressive Christianity. Some of them explicitly cite the social gospel as a heresy. I mean, this is how, frankly, most American Christians understand Christianity. I think most American Christians reject the politics of conquest and division that this movement represents. Well, we heard from Renee in St. Louis who emails, I am a Christian. I do not support the U.S. war against Iran. God has not called Christians to initiate the apocalypse. Pete Hegseth and other warmongers are misreading and misapplying the Bible.

Read the full transcript

25:14We'll get more into the sort of apocalyptic theology in a few minutes, but there's been a lot of criticism of the Trump administration that they have not shown a consistent thought process or had consistent messaging around justifying this war. And so I'm curious to hear from both of you how you think that's part of what we're hearing right now, that religion is being used to fill that gap because there isn't a clear message. Nader? No, I would totally agree with that framing. Look, it's very difficult. All of the stated reasons that we have heard from the Trump administration about why the United States and Israel had to attack Iran do not stand up to critical scrutiny.

25:57I think exactly what you stated is actually the response to sort of shift attention away from that. You try and mobilize people around a particular religious nationalist identity to deflect from those types of arguments that don't stand up to critical scrutiny. This is something that, in other words, the argument and the mobilization that you're seeing right now, it's not about responding to the criticism of the arguments that the Trump administration has made about an alleged imminent threat in nuclear weapons. This is about a larger sort of civilizational struggle that we are waging right now with darker forces on the other side of the world.

26:35In other words, it's sort of an updated version of the clash of civilizations 2.0 that was articulated in the 1990s by Samuel Huntington, but updated to fit this particular moment. So that's how I see it playing out.

26:50Joshua Johnson:Catherine, your thoughts? Yeah, I mean, the big question hanging over this war is why. It's a very difficult question to answer. Rubio and Trump have offered conflicting justifications. Even Eric Prince, he's the founder of Blackwater. He's the brother of former education secretary Betsy DeVos. He says he expressed his disagreement with the war and said it's going to uncork a can of worms. So, you know, it's the most, perhaps the most unrepresentative war in American history. It has very, very low support compared with other military actions. And there seems to be an absence of long-term strategic thinking.

27:30Joshua Johnson:And I think so much of this remains a question for the American public. We're discussing religion and the U.S. and Israel's war against Iran. We heard from Patty in South Carolina who emails, Coming from a military family, I am deeply disturbed to read of hundreds of military personnel reporting of officers saying this war in Iran is biblical, representing the second coming, and even Trump will be part of this. It's bad enough the line between religion and government is blurring, but spreading this biblical push into the military is wrong. We'll talk more about those reports after the break and about how religion in the Middle East could stoke a wider conflict as the U.S.

28:10and Israel's war against Iran plays out. We'll be right back.

28:17This message comes from BetterHelp. International Women's Day is this March. Time to celebrate all women, the leaders, the caregivers, the hype friends, the how-do-you-do-it-all types. Women deserve to be reminded how much they matter, and that therapy offers a space to care for themselves. BetterHelp makes it simple by matching you with a qualified therapist based on your needs and preferences. Visit BetterHelp.com slash NPR for 10 % off. Back to our conversation about the role religious rhetoric and belief is playing in the U.S. and Israeli war in Iran. Before we hear more from today's panelists, here are a few messages from you.

28:55Hello, I'm Carol, living in Arlington, grew up in a Muslim country, and I think this religious war is extremely dangerous. I think Hexeth should be. He's the worst defense secretary we've ever had. We need tolerance in this world. That's what Jesus preached. In fact, we don't need more religious conflict. We don't need hate. I believe that God is in charge of everything, and that impacts my take on the political situation right now. I think it's going to get worse before it gets better, but I trust God to lead us through it, and that's my stance. Thanks for those messages. We also heard from Jason, who emails, I live in Fayetteville, North Carolina, home of Fort Bragg and the 82nd Airborne.

29:50Crusader imagery is pervasive around here, from tattoos to t-shirts to bumper stickers. There's a sizable percentage of the military here that believe we are in a holy war and see their mission in Iran as a step towards bringing about Armageddon and the return of Christ. Now, more than two dozen Democratic Congress members are asking for an investigation into a claim that some military leaders are using biblical end times rhetoric in their briefings on the U.S. war in Iran. And this claim was made by the Military Religious Freedom Foundation. It's a nonprofit watchdog group. It says it received more than 200 complaints from service members of all branches about Christian extremist speech.

30:27Catherine will first note that these claims about rhetoric surrounding the U.S.-Israel war in Iran come from one watchdog group. And these complaints are anonymous. We haven't independently verified them. But for people who are unfamiliar, can you just explain a little bit more about these in-time prophecies that people are referencing?

30:49Joshua Johnson:Yeah, well, first, I just want to say I can't comment on the specifics of that report because I haven't seen the original source materials. I also want to note the U.S. military is a very large and diverse organization. And to be fair, I think some senior military leaders are against this, although we know that Hegseth and Trump purged a lot of generals who they saw as disloyal to them. But when it comes to the end times, I think, listen, the supporters of Christian nationalism represent different theological movements. And I think a smaller sliver, not the entire group, but a smaller sliver believe in end times theology.

31:27Joshua Johnson:And that kind of rhetoric might appeal to them. But I think that there's, frankly, a much larger group that, as Andrew noted earlier, see their religion as having to do with domination. This idea of, you know, God above everything. They adhere to a kind of almost like a punishing view of religion, which is set itself completely at odds with progressive Christianity and moderate forms of Christianity. In fact, you know, I was at a gathering, it's Turning Point USA's annual America Fest, 20 ,000 hardcore MAGA supporters at the Phoenix Convention Center, and the head of Turning Point USA Faith, Lucas Miles, spoke.

32:15Joshua Johnson:He's got a big job within that organization. And he titled his book, Woke Jesus, The Heresy, Destroying the Christian Church. I think I have that title right. And what did he identify as woke Jesus in heresy? Well, he specifically identified the social gospel. And he said that the answer to this is to form a new Nicene Creed and Council that's going to sort of purge wokeism from the American church. Again, we see a return to that kind of crusader era ideology or these ideas that, you know, there's a much harder and more militarized form of Christianity. But again, I think this is antithetical to how most American Christians see their faith.

33:04Well, as we hear U.S. lawmakers bringing faith into this conflict, we're also hearing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reference religion. My brothers and sisters, in two days we celebrate the holiday of Purim. 2 ,500 years ago in ancient Persia, an enemy rose against us with the exact same goal of destroying our people. So, Nader, the U.S. is not in this war alone. It's the U.S. and Israel. What stands out to you in what you heard Prime Minister Netanyahu say there and other rhetoric he's used around this war? the religious references might be different but the driving forces behind what netanyahu is saying is not that dissimilar from what we're hearing and seeing in the united states in other words the driver of these statements by netanyahu and american politicians the driver of it is um geopolitics it's about a sense of a desire for you know a contestation over political power in the Middle East and who will be dominant, who will be hegemonic.

34:13They're using religion and religious references as a tool for mobilizing people to validate and promote those very secular political causes. So in that sense, what Netanyahu is saying here is not that different than what we've been talking about here in the United States. And this is often a confusion over, you know, this particular topic. We hear that, you know, this is a religious conflict. You know, Senator Lindsey Graham has said that it's fundamentally a political conflict rooted in secular sort of political conceptions of power, hegemony, etc. But religion, as I said, is used as the mobilizing force.

34:52The way I like to frame it is that religion is the vehicle, not the driver of this particular conflict, but most sort of conflict that we're seeing. People are not, in other words, confronting the leaders of Israel or Iran or the United States. They're not looking at passages in the Bible and then trying to determine policy against their rivals. Religion is fundamentally, I think, being used here to mobilize constituencies to pursue very secular goals. Well, that brings us to Iran. Leadership there named Mujtaba Khamenei. He's the son of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to be the new supreme leader of Iran.

35:30A President Trump made clear that he wants to choose the new leader and said he's not happy with the choice. But Nader, I'm curious how you view that choice, both through a political and religious lens. Well, I think it was very much a political choice. Marco Rubio has recently stated that, look, we can't deal with Iran because these are religious fanatics who consult ancient religious texts and just can't have a rational conversation with them. The fundamental base reality, basic reality of the Islamic Republic of Iran is that it would not have survived for 47 years if it didn't make very cold, calculated decisions based on power considerations on how to survive.

36:13And if ever those decisions clashed with religious sort of views, it was always the reasons of state. It was always the need for the regime to survive that would take precedent. And in fact, you know, there's an interesting historical point here. The founder of the Iranian revolution, the Ayatollah Khomeini, before he passed away in January 1988, issued a very famous religious decree or fatwa that actually spoke specifically to this issue. I'll leave the back story, but the basic argument was that if ever the needs of the state required the Iranian regime to downplay or even revoke the provisions of religion, such as prayer, fasting, pilgrimage, that was the right thing to do because the state had to survive.

36:58In that sense, that's what's driving, I think, the Iranian political system. And that sort of informs the recent decision over who the next supreme leader would be. They wanted someone who had strong support within the institutions of repression in Iran, primarily the Revolutionary Guard and the intelligence services. And that happened to be the son of the former leader. That's, I think, fundamentally why he was chosen. In fact, his religious credentials, he's known as a mid-ranking cleric. And that actually is a mark against him because the whole premise of the Iranian revolution and the Islamic Republic was that a senior, knowledgeable cleric, someone on the equivalent of, in the Catholic tradition, it would be a cardinal or a pope.

37:38should be in that position of power. He doesn't have those credentials. But nonetheless, that didn't prohibit him from getting this appointment fundamentally because of the secular needs of this regime to survive and establish a smooth transition of power and also continuity of this regime at a time of war. We're hearing from Andy in New York who emails, as the famous quote goes, religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false and by the rulers as useful. That's all you need to know. And here's another voicemail from one of you. Yes, it is a religious war, but the only religion involved is the religion of the almighty dollar.

38:19Even the crusaders back in the day were nothing but a bunch of mercenaries who were in it for themselves. Thanks for that message. Catherine, what's your response to that?

38:30Joshua Johnson:Religious nationalism is not remotely unique to America, as we can see when leaders in Iran or when leaders like Putin in Russia or Orban in Hungary or so many other places, when these leaders want to consolidate more dictatorial forms of political power, they'll bind themselves very tightly to these ultra-conservative religious leaders. They're bubble wrapping themselves in sanctimony. They're saying, you can't touch me. I'm surrounded by the holy men. I have God on my side. And they're doing it in order to shelter any scrutiny of their crimes they're committing against their own people, against any kind of self-enrichment.

39:10Joshua Johnson:Often they're enriching themselves and their inner circle at the public's expense. And it's a way of dividing the population between the insiders and the outsiders, those who are with us and those who are against us. And by dividing their populations, they're keeping those populations from kind of getting together and acting in what is really the common national interest. I want to get to another message we got here. Anne emails, my representatives in Louisiana and others in the South have been actively and successfully using religion as a reason for many legislative efforts, from abortion to immigration to war.

39:47The Supreme Court has been a willful supporter. Without stepping on the individual's right to religion, what can moderates do to influence this trend? Catherine, I want to come to you on that, but first, Nader, are we seeing any pushback within religious communities to this conflation between patriotism and U.S. security and religion? Yeah, that's a good question, and it's a great opportunity to remind your listeners that, you know, religion doesn't speak with one voice. All religions are multivocal. There's always internal debates. There are always conservative, liberal, and many strands in between, and they're always in contestation.

40:32So that's just a truism about religion. And so I suspect if you were to go into all these religious communities today, you know, Jewish, Muslim, Christian, etc., you would find these types of debates and contestations taking place. Unfortunately, it's the more conservative voices that tend to be, in many ways, much more organized and much better financed. So you tend to hear their voices much more prominently and they have better connections to political power. The more liberal, human rights-oriented, international law-oriented interpretations of religion don't often have the publicity and the organizational capacity to sort of allow themselves to be heard in this very multi-vocal environment that we're living in.

41:17And Catherine, I'd love your thoughts, but I want to place it within the context of what we've seen from the Trump administration. Last year, the administration created the White House Faith Office, a task force to counter what they called anti-Christian bias. Trump also announced that in May, he plans to, quote, rededicate America as one nation under God. This is part of the year-long celebration of the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. So just place what we've been talking about across this discussion within the broader context of what we've seen from the Trump administration who he's signaling, and why.

41:53Joshua Johnson:Well, he wants to sort of create a more theocratic order in order to consolidate dictatorial power. It's of a piece with many of his other actions, not just internationally, but at home. It's a way of, you know, tearing down democracy itself. So as we continue this war with Iran, I'm curious briefly what you each are watching for as this continues to play out, not in just a sentence or two. Well, I'm watching to see how this war unfolds, whether there's any off-ramp, whether it could be de-escalated, or whether it's going to be intensified. If it's going to be intensified, there's talk of ground troops, et cetera.

42:37I'm very worried about the repercussions this is going to have on the region in terms of the mobilization that will take place. And of course, that mobilization will be a mobilization around religious themes and identities, sort of heightening conflict and tensions on a global level.

42:50Joshua Johnson:And Catherine, briefly? I'm also worried about the secondary and tertiary effects of this war, not just in Iran and America, but in the entire region. That's Catherine Stewart. She's a journalist covering the intersection of faith and politics. She's the author of Money, Lies and God, inside the movement to destroy American democracy and the power worshipers inside the dangerous rise of religious nationalism. and Nadir Hashemi. He's a professor of Middle East politics and the director of the Al-Walid Center for Muslim Christian Understanding at Georgetown University. Thanks to you both. Today's producer was Michelle Harvin.

43:25This program comes to you from WAMU, part of American University in Washington, distributed by NPR. I'm Jen White. Thanks for listening, and we'll talk again tomorrow. This is 1A.

43:54This message comes from Odoo. If you are currently overpaying on software to run your business, remember this number, 10 ,000. That's the number of new businesses that join Odoo per month. Join Odoo today at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com. The world's biggest story keeps getting bigger. This week on Up First, we're tracking the escalating war in Iran, rising oil prices, and a global economy on edge. As the conflict spills beyond Iran, our host Leila Fadal is on the ground in Iraq. Listen each morning for three stories you need to start your day on Up First, on the NPR app, or wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher
Religion keeps coming up when Trump administration officials discuss their joint military operation with Israel against Iran.

This kind of rhetoric comes as concerns grow over the crumbling of the separation between church and state in the Trump administration’s military. Now, more than two dozen democratic congresspeople are requesting an investigation into a report that some military leaders are using apocalyptic theology in briefings about the conflict – saying that Trump is anointed by Jesus to cause Armageddon.

How is religion showing up in the war against Iran?

Find more of our programs online. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a.

To manage podcast ad preferences, review the links below:

See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from 1A

All 320 episodes
Religion In The War On Iran1A · 42 min
Listen in VO