In short
Part II of “What Medicaid Cuts Mean For Americans” explains how a Trump tax-and-spending law could reduce Medicaid coverage and destabilize health care. Key claims include: Medicaid will lose about $1 trillion over 10 years (CBO estimate) and up to 10 million people could be uninsured by 2034. The episode argues cuts will hit lawfully present immigrants by shrinking eligibility groups (from ~10–12 to 3 by Oct 2026), affect nursing homes by removing a funding mechanism tied to state “tax” contributions, and disrupt substance-use disorder treatment because Medicaid is the largest public payer.
Guests
Julie Rovner (KFF Health News; hosts “What the Health?”) and panelists Leo Cuello (Georgetown Center for Children and Families; Medicaid law expert) and Lori Strube (CEO, Focused Post-Acute Care Partners; operates 25 Texas skilled nursing facilities). Also featured: Keith Humphreys (Stanford psychiatry professor; former White House drug policy advisor).
Notable examples
ICE access to Medicaid data; nursing-home closures risk (Brown University estimate: 579 nationwide); West Virginia clinics/hospitals at risk (ACLU: 7).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOMedicaid Coverage for Lawfully Present Individuals
1:25 to 2:29
Explore how the new bill will affect those with legal status in the U.S.
“Julie Rovner is Chief Washington Correspondent for KFF Health News.”
Fact-Checking Medicaid Eligibility
2:30 to 3:22
Discussion on the fact-checking of Medicaid eligibility under the new rules.
“So, Julie, first let's do some fact-checking here.”
Implications for Non-Citizens
3:23 to 4:19
Understanding the implications for non-citizens under the new Medicaid rules.
“But no, there is no federal funding available for people who are not here with legal status.”
Impact on Lawfully Present Immigrants
4:20 to 5:48
Discuss how the bill restricts Medicaid for lawfully present immigrants.
“Leo, is it clear where the press secretary gets this$1.4 million number from?”
Effects on Health Care System
5:49 to 8:19
Analyzing the broader implications of Medicaid cuts on the healthcare system.
“And how is coverage being cut for noncitizens and other federal health programs?”
Vulnerable Populations Losing Coverage
8:20 to 9:22
Identifying vulnerable populations losing Medicaid under the new changes.
“Well, and Leo, I want us to be specific about who is able to access Medicaid under the current rules.”
ICE and Medicaid Data Sharing
9:23 to 10:26
Discussing the implications of ICE access to Medicaid data.
“Well, last month, the AP reported that Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, will be given access to Medicaid data.”
Public Health Concerns with ICE Access
10:27 to 12:23
Examining public health implications of sharing Medicaid data with ICE.
“There may be a grandparent that's here without documentation.”
The Chilling Effect on Health Care Use
12:24 to 14:03
Understanding the chilling effect on immigrant health care usage due to policy changes.
“is that we want people, particularly with communicable diseases, to come forward when they need emergency medical care.”
Impact of Immigration Policies on Healthcare Access
14:03 to 14:55
Learn how recent immigration policies are affecting healthcare enrollment for families with immigrants.
“data with ICE, as we just discussed, so that families with immigrants are afraid to enroll in health care.”
Show all 22 chapters
Challenges for Nursing Homes Amid Medicaid Cuts
15:30 to 19:20
Explore how Medicaid funding changes impact the operation and quality of care in nursing homes.
“Well, first, let's hear from Democratic Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island on what he thinks these cuts will mean for nursing homes.”
The Dual Impact of Medicaid Cuts and Workforce Shortages
19:20 to 23:03
Discover the broader impact of Medicaid cuts on nursing homes and the workforce, especially immigrants.
“So I just want to try to interpret what I'm hearing you say there, Lori.”
Navigating Medicaid Changes: Concerns and Reassurances
23:03 to 26:48
Understand how nursing homes are preparing for Medicaid changes and what families can expect.
“In 2022, Texas and Nebraska had the most nursing home closures of anywhere in the country, 22 closures out of the 135 across the U.S.”
The Role of Medicaid in Addiction Treatment
28:00 to 29:04
Learn how Medicaid serves as a primary payer for addiction services in the U.S.
“Well, it is, as you say, it is the largest payer.”
Impact of Medicaid Cuts on Treatment Services
29:04 to 30:32
Discover the potential consequences of Medicaid cuts on addiction treatment programs.
“And Keith, help us understand what kind of addiction services could be impacted.”
The Double Whammy of Cuts
30:32 to 31:38
Understand the combined effects of Medicaid and federal program cuts on drug treatment.
“These cuts and possible elimination target small and rural community hospitals in West Virginia.”
Ripple Effects of Medicaid Changes
31:38 to 33:24
Examine how cuts to Medicaid affect not just Medicaid patients but the entire healthcare system.
“And this is a basically, you know, taking this apart again.”
Trigger Laws and Expansion Risks
33:24 to 35:05
Learn about the implications of trigger laws on Medicaid expansion in states like Illinois.
“It's gotten stronger in the last 10 years.”
Consequences for Individuals in Recovery
35:05 to 36:37
Explore the potential dangers for individuals in recovery if treatment is disrupted.
“its funding for that expansion population, which is currently 90 percent, then those states would immediately cancel their expansions.”
Communities Most Affected by Cuts
36:37 to 37:49
Identify which communities will face the greatest loss of addiction services due to Medicaid cuts.
“or severely damage it or severely damage someone else's.”
Government Response to Medicaid Concerns
37:49 to 39:27
Analyze how the Trump administration justifies Medicaid cuts amidst rising concerns.
“It will be, you know, communities where there are a lot of low income people who depend on Medicaid or who depend on other federal programs.”
Legislative Efforts to Roll Back Cuts
39:27 to 40:58
Discuss the likelihood of legislative efforts to reverse Medicaid cuts and their implications.
“I mean, he did say, he has said repeatedly that he wouldn't cut Medicaid, but that's, of course, exactly what this bill does.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:07Medicaid is a cornerstone of the American health care system. The federal program provides health insurance to more than 70 million low-income people and people with disabilities. But that's about to change. According to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office, Medicaid will lose$1 trillion over the next 10 years, and 10 million Americans could become uninsured by 2034. This is the result of President Trump's signature tax and spending bill he signed into law earlier this month. You can find the podcast with our overview of these cuts in your podcast feed. However, we ran out of time to answer all of your questions, so we're bringing you a part two.
0:46Today, we look at three specific ways this bill could affect Medicaid coverage in the U.S. First, people in the country with legal status. They'll be hit hard by these changes. We discuss who loses eligibility for Medicaid under the new rules. Next, we hear from the CEO of 25 Nursing Homes in Texas, who says these cuts could upend the industry and leave seniors behind. And finally, how could changes to Medicaid cut off treatment for many across the U.S. struggling with substance use disorder? I'm Jen White. You're listening to the 1A Podcast. We'll meet our panel after this short break. Stay with us.
1:25Let's jump in and meet our panel. Julie Rovner is Chief Washington Correspondent for KFF Health News. She also hosts the weekly health policy news podcast, What the Health? Julie, thanks so much for coming back. Always a pleasure. And we're starting the conversation with a look at how these cuts will affect lawfully present people in the country. So here to talk us through that is Leo Cuello, research professor at the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families. He's an expert on Medicaid law and policy and worked for the National Health Law Program, which advocates for health care access for underserved groups.
1:57Leo, welcome to the program. Thanks for having me, Jen. And if you have questions about Medicaid changes, send them our way, 1A at WAMU.org. So let's first talk about coverage under the current rules. Here's Press Secretary Caroline Levitt talking about Trump's tax and spending bill and the changes it makes to Medicaid. The one big, beautiful bill also strengthens and protects Medicaid benefits, despite what Democrats are saying, for eligible American citizens who rely on it, like pregnant women, children, seniors, and people with disabilities, by eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse that threaten to destroy this program that was intended for the most vulnerable in our society.
2:36And every single Democrat in Congress is against rooting out that waste, fraud, and abuse and blocking the 1.4 million illegal aliens who are currently improperly receiving these benefits that should be going to American taxpaying citizens. So, Julie, first let's do some fact-checking here. Do people in the country without legal status qualify for Medicaid coverage? It depends. Basically, effectively, no, and they don't qualify for federal funding. There are a few states that cover people who are not here with legal status with using their own state money. This bill originally would have punished those states, but the Senate parliamentarian said that the Senate couldn't do that.
3:18So that part got dropped out. Although we do know that some of the states are cutting back anyway. But no, there is no federal funding available for people who are not here with legal status. So which non-citizens can access Medicaid coverage under the current rules? So this is a complicated issue that was fought over heatedly in 1996 when Congress passed a big welfare reform bill. If you recall, that was a Republican Congress and President Clinton. So it was a bipartisan bill. And they did cut back the availability of many benefits for people who are here with legal status but who are not citizens.
3:55So, you know, legal immigrants. And there were a lot of exceptions so that people who were here legally could get certain types of federal benefits, health care included, Medicaid included. This would cut back virtually all of that. So basically it says, I guess as the president's press secretary was saying, if you're not a citizen, you're not likely to be eligible for a lot of these programs. And that's a big change. Leo, is it clear where the press secretary gets this$1.4 million number from? It's not clear. And I think it obfuscates the broader point, right? The broader point is there are 10 million people who will lose health insurance.
4:36These are not undocumented people because, as Julie said, they are not eligible for full Medicaid coverage. The majority of them, the large majority, are U.S. citizens. And in terms of immigrants, which are a much smaller group, the bill does target immigrants, but those are all legal immigrants, people who are lawfully present here. And the bill will have a devastating impact for those lawful immigrants because of the specific policies in the law, but also in combination with the broader context of what else is going on. So how is coverage being cut for non-citizens who are currently covered by Medicaid?
5:11How does it narrow who's eligible? Right. So in Medicaid today, it's complicated, as Julie said, because you have lawfully present people who are eligible for Medicaid and you have lawfully present people who are not eligible for Medicaid. There are just some groups of lawfully present people who are eligible. So what this law does is reduce the number of groups eligible. So if you can kind of imagine that today there are 10 or 12 groups of lawfully present immigrants who can qualify for Medicaid under the law starting October 2026, there will only be three groups that qualify. So many groups of lawfully present immigrants will lose their Medicaid eligibility.
5:53And how is coverage being cut for noncitizens and other federal health programs? So thinking of things like CHIP, which is the Children's Health Insurance Program. So the CHIP rules mirror the Medicaid rules for this general immigrant eligibility. So it will be the same exact impact. The lawfully present children will lose coverage unless they're in one of the three groups that remain. In Medicare and Marketplace, they do similar things. They reduce the scope of eligibility from a broad range of lawfully present immigrants to only three groups of lawfully present immigrants, meaning a whole bunch of lawfully present immigrants will either lose their Medicare or, in the marketplace, lose the subsidies for marketplace coverage.
6:40Julie, we talked last week about how many of the changes in this bill will take months, if not years, to fully go into effect. What's the timeline for most of the significant changes to coverage for this population? This population is going to lose coverage much more quickly and combined, as we've been talking about, with new eligibility checks. So we would expect that this is probably going to be the first population that we're going to see some of these reductions. Leo, when we think about the landscape of health care and health care access in this country, what do these changes mean for the United States and its health care infrastructure?
7:23Yeah, so I think you have to think of this in a lot of ways. The first thing you need to realize is that the immigrants we are talking about are in families. And so this actually doesn't impact just individuals. It impacts entire families. For example, you may have a child that will be less likely to have health coverage because of what happens to a parent. So you're talking about our current workers, right, because immigrants make such an important part of our U.S. workforce. You're talking about our future in terms of the children who are one day going to be our leaders. When you also remove a lot of people from the health care system, of course, that is going to drive up uncompensated care for all of the health care providers, right, the hospitals that are taking care of people.
8:03And so what that means is a lot of instability in that system. It's going to mean more cost shifting, more losses for hospitals. And all Americans will see that through increased health care costs. Your premiums will go up. Your deductibles will go up. Your cost sharing will go up as those costs get passed back to everybody who does have insurance. Well, and Leo, I want us to be specific about who is able to access Medicaid under the current rules. When we talk about people in the country with legal status, what type of status are we describing? So the groups of people who are currently covered and will lose coverage are incredibly vulnerable groups.
8:44It includes refugees, people granted asylum, political asylum, victims of human trafficking, victims of domestic violence, and sometimes their children who can qualify for Medicaid. Individuals granted admission due to an urgent humanitarian reason and other groups. all of those groups will lose their Medicaid health insurance. And note, of course, these are people who follow the rules. They're here lawfully. But they're also generally being admitted to be a permanent part of our society. Almost all of them can be on a pathway to permanent residence. And if they choose, maybe one day citizenship.
9:19So as I said before, it's not a smart long-term strategy to be locking them out of the health system now. Well, last month, the AP reported that Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, will be given access to Medicaid data. Last week, the AP reported on an updated agreement that will, quote, allow ICE to receive identify, to receive identity and location information on aliens identified by ICE, end quote. ICE acting director Todd Lyons confirmed this reporting on CBS on Friday. What ICE is doing is working with all of our other federal partners to try to gain intelligence to locate these individuals that have been ordered, deported by a judge or have been released from a sanctuary jurisdiction like we talked about.
9:59That is what ICE is using that data for, whether it be data from the Department of Labor, data from health and human services, Medicaid. We are using that data to try to locate, again, the worst of the worst of those people that are lawfully deported. So I think that's what you're going to see that data used for. Julie, what more can you tell us about this agreement? Well, there's a couple of things going on here. First of all, there is a concern that people who remain eligible for health coverage won't get it because of this. because families, many families, as Leo said, are of mixed immigration status.
10:31The children may be citizens. The parents may be here legally. There may be a grandparent that's here without documentation. And we do know that ICE is basically collecting people who are not necessarily the worst of the worst. So there is definitely a concern about people not seeking health care as a result of this one change. Leo, federal health officials initially said the goal was to remove people who were improperly enrolled in the program, but what do we know about the data being shared and what it can be used for? Right, so HHS spokespeople have said that this is to, quote, make sure illegal aliens aren't getting Medicaid benefits, but we heard the quote you played where we have ICE saying it's to locate people for immigration enforcement.
11:15So that's two problems. Number one, they're taking what should be confidential health information that should be shared only for health purposes, and HHS is releasing it to immigration enforcement, not health. Huge legal problems with that. The second problem is it's obvious that HHS, what they're saying is not true here because it's not to make sure that illegal aliens don't get benefits. Most of the data shared is for citizens, sometimes lawful residents. And the only information that involves the undocumented is related to emergency treatment, which is permissible under the law. So the information that's being shared is addresses to find people for enforcement.
11:57It's not actually to identify any impermissible treatment because it's all for permissible coverage. Well, Julie, earlier this month, 20 states sued the Trump administration for sharing private Medicaid data to deportation officials. What's their legal argument? Well, the argument is really a public health argument that if people are afraid that their location data is going to be shared, they're not going to come forward for needed medical care. And the reason that Medicaid is allowed for people who are undocumented in emergency situations is that we want people, particularly with communicable diseases, to come forward when they need emergency medical care.
12:36The idea of driving people sort of under the shadows is not good for the health of everybody else who's here. So that's the main reason why immigration officials have not been allowed into health facilities traditionally, into community health centers, into hospital emergency rooms, because we want people who need care to come forward regardless of their legal status. The other thing is that we now have a number of populations in this country who've been here legally, who came here legally, whose legal status is being revoked by the Trump administration. So we have a number of people who were documented who suddenly aren't.
13:15So that's throwing things into a bit of an uproar, too. Leo, we can talk about rules changing and statistics and data. But when you look at this through a public health lens, what do you think we overlook in this conversation that we need to consider as these changes go into effect and we look at the impact of the changes into the future? I think it's important for listeners to understand that during the first Trump administration, we saw the administration reverse longstanding policies in a way that was just scary for immigrants, including U.S. families that have an immigrant in them, and scared them away from using health care.
13:54There was what you could call a strategy of creating a chilling effect for immigrant health care. And we see that happening again now in a lot of ways. First, the sharing of data with ICE, as we just discussed, so that families with immigrants are afraid to enroll in health care. But second, for example, the administration in January reversed immigration enforcement policies that were to avoid enforcement at sensitive locations, like churches, like schools, like health centers, because obviously it is bad policy to have members of a community avoiding their church, kids avoiding schools, and people going into labor avoiding going into an emergency room.
14:36Well, that's Leo Cueo. He's a research professor at the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families. He's an expert on Medicaid law and policy and worked for the National Health Law Program, which advocates for health care access for underserved groups. Leo, thanks so much for talking us through this. Thanks so much for having me. Let's take a quick pause here. We'll be back with the conversation in just a moment. Stay with us.
15:02And let's move now to an industry that some say could be totally upended by the Medicaid changes. Medicaid is the primary provider for 60 percent of nursing home residents. That's according to the American Health Care Association. Lori Strube is the CEO of Focused Post-Acute Care Partners. That's a long-term care provider that operates 25 skilled nursing facilities throughout Texas, including in rural areas. And she joins us now to talk about what these Medicaid cuts could mean for residents and the facilities. Lori, thanks for joining us. Thank you for having me. Well, first, let's hear from Democratic Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island on what he thinks these cuts will mean for nursing homes.
15:38Medicaid is a lifeline for seniors. More than 7 million seniors get care through Medicaid. And two in three nursing homes residents pay for that care with Medicaid. The bill we are voting today takes away key revenue sources for states and nursing homes. Brown University School of Public Health has estimated that 579 nursing homes nationwide would be at risk of closing because of this bill. And even if nursing homes do not close, then they will have to reduce their beds. Julie, quickly walk us through what's in this bill that could affect nursing homes. Well, one of the big pieces of this bill that nursing homes are very unhappy about it changes the way states are allowed to raise their share of the funding for Medicaid.
16:34And this is something that's common for nursing homes, also for hospitals, that states will basically levy a tax on the nursing homes. The nursing homes will pay the tax. The states will use that as part of their share of Medicaid to draw down the federal funding, and then it basically goes back to the nursing home. It's a gimmick. There's no question. But it's also the way Medicaid is funded. So without it, it's going to be really difficult for a lot of states to put up their share of what's needed. As we've just heard, Medicaid pays more than half of the nation's long-term care bill as it is.
17:11Lori, describe your organization and the communities your facilities serve. Well, we have 25 nursing homes throughout the state of Texas. We have a combination of homes that serve an urban population as well as a rural population. And we serve many of our anywhere from acute level patients to high acute level patients to behavioral patients. Well, we got this email from Mary who says, I'm most concerned about nursing home residents who are on Medicaid. Already, the owners of nursing homes say they are not getting enough reimbursements for the people who are residents. In Pittsburgh, many nursing homes have closed.
17:54There are not enough aids and services are strained. Residents are worried they will lose their places and have nowhere to go. And Tom emails, I suspect this will reduce available beds significantly in care facilities as many rely heavily on Medicaid funds. So, Lori, how might these new Medicaid changes affect the nursing homes you oversee? What are you anticipating? Well, I think that the issue really becomes how do we as a business best manage our revenue sources and cycles? And I think that the answer to that is we faced tough, challenging times before when people were screaming, the sky is falling.
18:31And at the end of the day, we're still providing quality care to our residents. But for the record, as an example, our Texas Medicaid rate covers our halls, our walls, and our food. In that, we also do nursing care activities, therapy, staffing, transportation for roughly the same amount of money that one would spend to stay at a Holiday Inn Express without any of the services that I mentioned. So I think we'll have to do what we did during the COVID pandemic, which is we're going to have to figure out a way to respond rather than to react. And yes, I do believe that there's going to be Medicaid cost shifting, and it will tighten future rate increases for us.
19:20So I just want to try to interpret what I'm hearing you say there, Lori. You're describing Medicaid basically covering the basics, the bricks and mortar, the food, the things that people need to survive. But the enrichment, the things that improve quality of life, that's where you'll feel the pinch most acutely?
19:43Absolutely. I believe that we cover all of that now with our current Medicaid rate, but that's just going to get tougher and tougher as the years go by and inflation hits us. Julie, what do we know about the national impact these Medicaid cuts could have on nursing homes and their residents? Well, of course, one of the things is that what we talked about in the last block, the immigration debate, is also going to impact this. because so many of the workers in these nursing homes are immigrants from, you know, doctors and nurses down to aides, particularly in rural areas. They're heavily staffed by immigrant workers.
20:23So if there are fewer immigrants, then they're going to have trouble finding staff. And if they have trouble finding staff, they may have to raise or try to raise wages. So there's this double whammy on nursing homes. But there is a real concern about what is going to happen. Medicaid, as we've heard, already pays less than many other payers and most other payers for nursing home care. It's barely enough for many facilities to continue. And if it gets cut off or if rates go down anymore, many nursing homes are simply not going to be able to keep their doors open. We got this question from Mary in Cincinnati who emails, I have a relative who needs to move full nursing care.
21:04If a facility has a large number of Medicaid recipients, is that facility more likely to close? Julie, what can you tell us? It depends. You know, sometimes facilities won't take people if they are about to, if they think they're coming in with Medicaid coverage, because they simply can't afford to have that many of their population in Medicaid beds. Often people spend down to Medicaid. They enter a nursing facility with some other sort of coverage, and then they basically spend all the way down and end up having Medicaid cover them. So that's also been an issue for nursing facilities. Let's listen to a voicemail we got from Dave in Colorado.
21:46I am retired, and I'm about to sign up for Medicare, and I would like to know how all the Medicaid cuts relate to me. Hopefully, I won't be in nursing home for many, many years, but that would be one possibility. But how does it interrelate to me? Are they trying to tell me I'm going to have to start working again or volunteering 20 hours a week? David, thanks for that question. Julie, let's first start with that work requirement concern David has. Yeah, the work requirement is for Medicaid. It's also for people only up to age, I believe it's 64. So if you're 65 and retired and on Medicare, the work requirement isn't going to impact you.
22:28However, you know, one out of every five Medicaid recipients also has Medicare. So Medicaid covers a lot of people who are elderly and low income. Basically, once you get on Medicare, if you spend, if you don't have any more money, then you can be on Medicaid as well. They're called dual eligibles. So there are a large number of people who get both Medicare and Medicaid. And so to that extent, people on Medicare could eventually be impacted by the Medicaid cuts because there are so many of them. In 2022, Texas and Nebraska had the most nursing home closures of anywhere in the country, 22 closures out of the 135 across the U.S.
23:13Lori, your organization has, as you said, facilities in both urban and rural areas. How are rural communities in Texas particularly vulnerable when it comes to these cuts? Well, I think that, you know, we do have to take that on a case-by-case basis. And it needs to be thoroughly studied, but that takes time. And we might have to find a way to repurpose or reconfigure ourselves to continue to offer the same services that we're offering today. And again, that takes time for us to respond to that appropriately as opposed to reacting to it appropriately. What are the questions you're asking yourself in relationship to these changes and what it means specifically for your rural facilities?
24:00Staffing. Staffing is a big question that I'm asking. how is it we're going to continue to staff, especially if we don't continue to receive rate increases because it's a fair assumption on our staff's part that they, and it's a fair expectation on their part that they continue to be compensated for the work that they do. And I need to have the funds in order to be able to staff. And if I don't have the staff, then what am I gonna do? And will I look at closing? And if I have to look at closing buildings, where are these people going to go? Julie, put this in context with some of the changes the Trump administration is considering for people who work in health care.
24:47They're thinking about rolling back certain Obama-era protections, including standard minimum wage, pay for overtime. How does that potentially exacerbate the availability of care, especially at long-term facilities? Well, again, as we mentioned with immigration, you know, they're rolling back a lot of these protections for workers as well. It's going to make it harder to get some of these workers. It's going to, you know, press some of these facilities to raise wages in order to get workers. You know, the idea behind these cuts at the federal level was that states should be stepping up more. and spending more.
25:25But unlike the federal government, states have to balance their budgets every year. States already pay, Medicaid is usually the second largest or in some cases the largest expenditure for states, either right before or right after K-12 education. So states are basically going to be faced with this difficult, do they want to raise taxes? Because that's the only way they can get more money. Do they want to cut services? That's basically where we are. And that's what we're looking at for a lot of these things. You know, this care is needed. I don't think the federal government, it says they're repealing anything that's unnecessary.
26:03They're just saying that they shouldn't, they, the federal government, shouldn't be paying for it anymore. Lori, what are you telling those who are concerned for their family members right now? I'm telling them the same thing that I mentioned to you. As long as their family member meets medical necessity and they qualify for Medicaid, then that isn't going to change. And we will get through it. We've, again, faced really tough, challenging times in the past, and we've come through it, and we're still here today. And we will continue to be here tomorrow. That's Lori Strube. She's the CEO of Focused Post-Acute Care Partners.
Read the full transcript
26:41That's a long-term care provider that operates 25 skilled nursing facilities throughout Texas. Lori, thanks for speaking with us. Thanks for having me. Let's take a quick pause here. We'll be back with the conversation in just a moment. Stay with us.
26:58Now back to our discussion about the Medicaid cuts in President Trump's new tax and spending bill. The Trump administration says these cuts are to reduce fraud, waste, and abuse. But Chris in West Virginia emails, the administration uses waste, fraud, and abuse as a magical incantation to justify its actions, as if there is no oversight activity at the federal level at all. The HHS inspector general and Congress's oversight agency are tasked with identifying waste, fraud, and abuse and have a body of work that could be used to refine existing safeguards or design new ones. Joining us now is Keith Humphreys.
27:35He's a professor of psychiatry at Stanford University in California. During the Obama administration, he worked as a senior policy advisor at the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy when the Affordable Care Act was passed. Keith, thanks for joining us. Very happy to be here. So Medicaid is the largest payer of behavioral health services across the country, including substance use disorder. That's according to the government's own data. Julie, how is Medicaid currently used for those and addiction programs? Well, it is, as you say, it is the largest payer. One in five Medicaid recipients have a diagnosed substance abuse disorder, some of it mild, some of it more serious.
28:14So it's very common in the Medicaid population, which is, of course, why Medicaid is the major payer. Medicaid pays for residential treatment, it pays for outpatient treatment, it pays for drug therapy. Medicaid basically is the utility player for a lot of this problem. More than a million people in the U.S. receive medical treatment for opioid addiction through Medicaid. That's according to a report released by Democrats on the Congressional Joint Economic Committee. Keith, when you look at the changes in Trump's tax and spending bill, what do you think that means for people in drug treatment programs?
28:50Yeah, it may be useful as context to say for many years the way addiction treatment was funded in the United States was through federal block grants, which were not much money and didn't really integrate substance use care with the rest of the health care system. So the change we made in the administration, partly through reforming private insurance, but even more so by expanding Medicaid, was to put that whole system on a stable financial basis so it would be more accessible, it would be higher quality, and when you got it, it would be integrated with all the other health care you needed for other conditions.
29:23And this is an undoing of that. So moving us back more to a system where the stability of programs is uncertain, the likelihood that your care will be paid for is less certain, and the ability also of your care providers to work with other care providers for the other health problems you're likely to have is going to be compromised. And Keith, help us understand what kind of addiction services could be impacted. Just give us a brief description. Sure. So, I mean, you know, you've got, there's things Julie mentioned, like residential programs. There's detoxification for people in acute crisis, for example, maybe the poisoning through alcohol or methamphetamine or cocaine.
30:04Then there's medications like, you know, methadone, I think most people know, naltrexone, campersate, some of the other ones. Counseling services, you know, for mental health. And then nursing services. Many, many people who, for example, inject drugs have infectious diseases for which they require care. So all of that is covered currently by Medicaid. As you mentioned, it is the biggest payer now in the public sector for this kind of care. We got this email from Avis who says, I am concerned about what the bill will mean for participants of substance abuse treatment programs or medication-assisted treatment programs with its expected and impending Medicaid cuts.
30:44These cuts and possible elimination target small and rural community hospitals in West Virginia. According to the ACLU, these cuts put at risk seven West Virginia hospitals. One is where my sister works at and assists with a medication-assisted treatment program in a state that was ravaged by the opioid epidemic. Julie, after two decades of rising overdose deaths, 2024 saw a 27 percent decline. And fortunately, overdose deaths seem to be rising again, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What do you think these cuts mean for the progress that was being made in drug treatment and recovery?
31:24Well, that's a big concern. And also, I mean, there are companion cuts going on in other federal programs aimed at substance abuse. So it's not just Medicaid. So it's sort of this double whammy of, you know, cutting all of these programs that are aimed at this. And, you know, as we've heard, what Medicaid has done, what we've done sort of in public health to bring substance abuse, to recognize it, substance abuse and all other mental health problems as health problems rather than as something separate has been enormously helpful. And this is a basically, you know, taking this apart again. Keith, I want you to help us better understand the ripple effects of these cuts.
32:06When we look at one piece or one rule change, typically there are other people or ways in which our health infrastructure is impacted, perhaps in ways that weren't anticipated when this legislation was written. But what ripple effects do you see from these changes to drug treatment programs? So what many people don't understand is you can't cut Medicaid without affecting non-Medicaid. In other words, you know, so if you have, let's say, a clinic, you know, you gave a voicemail from West Virginia, NEMA, that's where I grew up. And, you know, there'll be a clinic in West Virginia to say that, you know, a third of their patients are covered by Medicaid and then some are covered by county funds and some are self-pay and maybe a small number of them have, you know, private insurance.
32:54When the Medicaid goes away, then the clinic has to lay people off or maybe just close. And so it's not just the Medicaid patients who lose access. It's everybody. You know, yeah, maybe there's some other funding. The problem is there's no clinic anymore. There's no providers. Medicaid provides that sort of stable financial stream. So a clinic or a hospital knows that it can stay open for year to year. We'll see those kinds of ripples because, you know, the substance use sector, treatment sector is pretty fragile. You know, it's grown a lot. It's gotten stronger in the last 10 years. But relative to things like cancer care, like cardiology, it's always had a more marginal existence financially than the rest of the health care system.
33:38So this is a blow. And what other federal actions could compound these issues? I'm thinking about changes, for instance, to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Yeah. So that is where that agency, SAMHSA, is where what's called the block grant comes from, which is another support to states. Federal government gives to states to spend on substance use treatment. It's quite unclear what's going to happen with that. That agency has been announced it's going to be folded into a group of other agencies. It's not clear what the fate of those funds will be. Likewise, CDC does things like fund monitoring of substance use in communities.
34:17and has funded overdose rescue medication, those funds have also been cut back. So from every angle, this population and the sector is taking a beating, frankly. Well, sticking with this question about knock-on effects, Julie, we got this from Maureen in Illinois who says, would you explain what it means if a state like Illinois has a trigger law for Medicaid? Yes. Well, that's more about the expansion, which Congress didn't do. The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid, or it allowed states to expand Medicaid beyond its traditional populations to people who had low incomes but were not pregnant women or children or people with disabilities.
35:04And several states have trigger laws that said if Congress were to reduce its funding for that expansion population, which is currently 90 percent, then those states would immediately cancel their expansions. Congress had wanted to do it. The Republicans wanted to do it, both in the House and in the Senate. In the end, they ended up not being able to quite muster the votes to do it. So those trigger laws are not going to be in play, at least not at the moment. But there are, as we've said, other types of cuts, including, you know, we know about the cuts, the proposed cuts to SAMHSA. What we haven't yet talked about are the fact that the Trump administration is blocking a lot of the money that has been appropriated, that's supposed to be going out, that hasn't been.
35:49They've put up various roadblocks. Things have to be signed off by a political appointee, and there aren't enough political appointees. So we're seeing other types of funding not getting to where it's supposed to be going. Keith, I don't want to lose sight of the fact that when we're talking about cuts, what we're really talking about is people. What kinds of effects can these changes have on someone in recovery if treatment gets disrupted or taken away? Yeah, let's put this in the context of the fact that we've got the deadliest drug supply we've had in the history of the United States. We have extremely cheap, extremely potent methamphetamine over much of the country.
36:31We have fentanyl over pretty much all the country at this point. And what that means is a single day of use can end your life or severely damage it or severely damage someone else's. So it is not a trivial matter when someone, let's say they are in early recovery and early recovery is often a tender phase. It's very common to have slips. It's very common to have relapse before you get to where you want to go. And that one day where you show up and they say, you know, your insurance is gone, you don't get an appointment, you don't get your medication, and you go out and use, that could be the last thing you ever do, sadly.
37:12So it's really, it's hard to overstate the vulnerability people have when they're in addiction, when the drug supply is so toxic, and when the environment of services has now become so uncertain. And Julie, in what communities are we likely to see a contraction of services, a loss of the workforce in this space due to these Medicaid changes? Well, of course, it will be the most vulnerable communities. It will be rural communities. It will be some inner city communities. It will be, you know, communities where there are a lot of low income people who depend on Medicaid or who depend on other federal programs.
37:59I mean, those are the ones that are going to be hit the hardest. You know, the facility that it's well funded otherwise and has a drug treatment program is going to be able to spread money around if it's losing money. It's that clinic that you were talking about in West Virginia, that if they have to close and, you know, as we've heard, if that clinic closes, it's not just the people on Medicaid who are going to lose out. It's the people who rely on that clinic because it's the only clinic for miles around. So people with private insurance, people with Medicare, you know, Medicaid really sustains a lot of the health care system.
38:35And these cuts to Medicaid, as we've talked about now, are going to have ripple effects on everybody else who consumes health care. This is our second conversation with you, Julie, about these cuts. And we're hearing today from experts in very different areas. But how is the Trump administration responding to these concerns as they continue to be raised? They basically say this is for others to fill in, that people have, you know, states have not been carrying their share of the load. Individuals have not been carrying their share of the load. They continue to maintain, as we heard at the top, that a lot of this is fraud, waste, and abuse, and that the federal government shouldn't be paying a lot of this money.
39:15So that's basically been, you know, where they are on this. At some point, you know, if President Trump sees that these are his voters who are being hurt, perhaps he'll change his tune. I mean, he did say, he has said repeatedly that he wouldn't cut Medicaid, but that's, of course, exactly what this bill does. That's what this now new law does. We got this from John in Virginia, who says, Senator Hawley, Republican from Missouri, has voiced complaints about Medicaid cutbacks in the new law. If he gets his way, will any of the changes being discussed in today's program be changed or eliminated?
39:49And we should note here, Senator Hawley of Missouri voted in favor of this bill, Julie, despite his concerns. But is there any likelihood this will go to a vote and any of this could be rolled back? Well, of course, Senator Hawley has subsequently introduced legislation to roll some of this back. And as we mentioned, many of these cuts don't take effect for a couple of years. So there's going to be some furious lobbying between now and when some of these cuts are supposed to take effect to roll the back. We'll see if that happens. But that, you know, literally the week after Senator Hawley voted for this bill, he then introduced legislation saying, but we should take out the parts of this that I don't like.
40:31Missouri, of course, is in a fairly unique position. We talked about the trigger laws where states will repeal their Medicaid expansions if the federal government lowers its share. Well, Missouri passed its expansion by constitutional amendment. So even if the federal government were to cut back its share, Missouri could not eliminate its expansion without going back to the voters to get another constitutional amendment, which leaves Missouri in a peculiar financial bind, which may help explain why Senator Hawley is feeling so pressured on this. Keith, what are you watching, especially at clinics and communities that will be affected most by these cuts?
41:14I'm most concerned or most interested in what will happen with the ability, at least in legislation, to make an exemption for people who are in substance use disorder care from work requirements and whether the bureaucracy is even capable of accomplishing that because you're going to have to have the health bureaucracy and the welfare bureaucracy work together. The experience of work requirements in Arkansas and Georgia do not make me optimistic that that's actually going to work, but I'm going to do everything I can, and I know many other people will, to see that it does. That's Keith Humphreys.
41:45He's a professor of psychiatry at Stanford University. He also worked in the Obama administration. He was a senior policy advisor at the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy when the Affordable Care Act passed. Also with us today, Julie Rovner, the Chief Washington Correspondent for KFF Health News. She also hosts the weekly health policy news podcast, What the Health, thanks to you both. Today's producer was Michelle Harvin. This program comes to you from WAMU, part of American University in Washington, distributed by NPR. I'm Jen White. Thanks for listening, and we'll talk more soon.
42:17This is 1A.
42:24Thank you.
From the publisher
Now, addiction experts and nursing home leaders are sounding the alarm over cuts in President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill.
When the cuts occur, Medicaid will lose $1 trillion over the next 10 years and over 11 million Americans will become uninsured by 2034. That's according to estimates by The Congressional Budget Office.
We discuss what these cuts mean for some of the most vulnerable Americans.
Want to support 1A? Give to your local public radio station and subscribe to this podcast. Have questions? Connect with us. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy




