What The Practice Of State Preemption Means For Our Democracy

6 May 2026 · 41 min · 21 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode explains how state preemption can override local democracy, using Louisiana’s move to eliminate the elected clerk of criminal court in New Orleans as the central example. Guest Calvin Duncan is the elected clerk of criminal court for Orleans Parish; he was incarcerated for 28 years for a murder conviction, later released and exonerated, and co-authored The Jailhouse Lawyer. He argues the clerk’s duties include preserving criminal records/evidence and serving as chief election officer, and that combining civil and criminal clerks will harm record preservation and access. He says Republican lawmakers claimed efficiency/cost savings (Sen. Jay Morris cited about $27,000) but that the change effectively nullifies voters’ choice. Duncan also criticizes AG Liz Murrill for challenging exonerations and compensation. Guests Katie Bellinger (Local Solutions Support Center) and Chris Goodman (Northern Illinois University) define preemption as coercive substitution of state priorities for local policymaking, cite abusive preemption across public health, LGBTQ school issues, and voting-related policies, and discuss Dillon’s Rule vs home rule. Notable examples include COVID/AI/data-center, housing/short-term rental limits, and ranked-choice voting funding denials.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Election of Calvin Duncan

0:23 to 1:24

Discover Calvin Duncan's journey to becoming the criminal court clerk.

“Last November, Calvin Duncan won an election to serve as the criminal court clerk for New Orleans.”

Calvin's Experience and Role

3:37 to 6:12

Calvin shares his thoughts on taking office amidst political turmoil.

“And a note that a 1A listener in New Orleans suggested Calvin Duncan's story to us.”

Educating Voters on the Court System

6:13 to 9:18

Calvin discusses the importance of educating voters about their rights.

“I could see if I wasn't affected by that system.”

Reflection on the Legislative Changes

9:19 to 11:15

Calvin reflects on the implications of the legislature abolishing his role.

“You know, you made this case to people who said, look, my vote doesn't count.”

Arguments for Efficiency in Law

11:16 to 13:12

Exploration of the arguments made by lawmakers for abolishing the office.

“That's not a new argument, though the push to eliminate your role happened in the months after you were elected, as you said.”

Calvin's Ongoing Legal Battle

13:21 to 14:02

Calvin discusses his ongoing legal challenges regarding his position.

“As a maintenance supervisor at a manufacturing facility, he knows keeping the line up and running is a top priority.”

Calvin's Legal Battle and Exoneration Journey

14:48 to 17:44

Calvin Duncan shares his experiences related to wrongful conviction and legal challenges.

“He's since sued over the move, and his job has now been taken up by the courts in Louisiana.”

Voter Sentiment and Electoral Integrity

17:44 to 22:31

Calvin discusses the reactions of voters to legislative changes affecting elections.

“And that's what's been something that I always wanted to do is become a lawyer and practice.”

Consequences of Eliminating the Clerk Position

22:31 to 24:24

Calvin explains the potential impacts of combining court clerk positions in New Orleans.

“It combines it with the clerk responsible for the civil court system.”

Introduction to State Preemption

24:52 to 26:18

Exploring the concept of state preemption and its implications for local governance.

“John in New Orleans emails, I'm a New Orleans voter and a veteran.”
Show all 21 chapters

Understanding the Effects of State Preemption

26:18 to 28:00

Experts discuss the impacts of state preemption on local policies and communities.

“Joining us from Nashville, Tennessee, is Katie Bellinger.”

Understanding State Preemption

28:00 to 28:46

Explore the nature of state preemption and its impact on marginalized communities.

“I could keep going, but again, it comes down to if you care about the health and well-being of people, there is a preemption issue out there where state governments are taking authority away.”

Local Governance Challenges

29:39 to 31:18

Discuss how state preemption affects local governance and community policies.

“IXL is an award-winning online learning platform.”

The Politics of Preemption

31:18 to 32:46

Analyze the bipartisan use of state preemption and its effects on democracy.

“And just for context, the Second Amendment sanctuary laws refer to local resolutions.”

Historical Context of Preemption

32:46 to 34:29

Examine the historical shifts in state preemption and its ideological implications.

“Katie, just to be clear, how are you defining abusive?”

Community Responses to Preemption

34:29 to 36:03

Learn how local communities are responding to state preemption decisions.

“That really changed the way that legislatures treated local governments, largely because a lot of those folks that got elected didn't have a lot of experience in local governments.”

Impact on National Politics

36:03 to 37:33

Discuss the link between state preemption and current national political dynamics.

“And it's usually the wrong choice for a state to preempt a city.”

Dillon's Rule and Local Authority

37:33 to 39:42

Understand Dillon's Rule and its implications for local governments in Virginia.

“We often say with our state and local partners that we have been fighting Project 2025 before that was in our vernacular.”

Reforming Local Governance

39:42 to 42:05

Explore potential reforms to empower local governments and address preemption issues.

“So Dillon's rule comes out of an 1868 court ruling that basically says that local governments only have the powers that states specifically grant them.”

The Need for Local Authority in Governance

42:05 to 43:01

Learn about the necessity for cities to have the authority needed to address unique challenges.

“the cities to have the authority they need to address their unique challenges.”

Impact of State Preemption on Local Democracy

43:01 to 44:27

Explore how state preemption affects local governments and their ability to respond to voter needs.

“Well, we heard from Pat in Indianapolis who says here in Indiana, the state legislature with the Republican supermajority often makes laws to reverse Democratic majority cities like Indianapolis and Fort Wayne.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This message comes from IDTech. Ready for summer? IDTech camps offer Camp Crunchlabs, battle bots, battle bots, and more for kids ages ages ages, 7 to save$10. and use code IDTECH to save$150.

0:23Last November, Calvin Duncan won an election to serve as the criminal court clerk for New Orleans. He received 68 % of the vote, beating out a powerful incumbent. Duncan ran on improving the court system, especially access to criminal records. His criticism of the system came from personal experience. He was incarcerated for a murder conviction in Louisiana's Angola State Prison for 28 years. He studied criminal law to advocate for his case, and after years of petitions, he was released and later exonerated. But now, the Republican-controlled Louisiana state legislature has moved to eliminate Duncan's position.

1:00In the weeks and days before he was set to take office on May 4th, The legislature voted to combine the civil and criminal court systems in New Orleans. State senators who supported the bill say it was to make the system more efficient. Louisiana's Republican governor, Jeff Landry, signed the bill into law over the weekend. Duncan sued, and a lawsuit over his role is now making its way through the courts. I'm Jen White. You're listening to the 1A Podcast. We'll be back with more after this short break. Stay with us.

1:32This message comes from Grainger. This is the story of The One. As a maintenance supervisor at a manufacturing facility, he knows keeping the line up and running is a top priority. That's why he chooses Grainger. Because when a drive belt gets damaged, Grainger makes it easy to find the exact specs for the replacement product he needs. And next day delivery helps ensure he'll have everything in place and running like clockwork. Call 1-800-GRAINGER, click grainger.com, or just stop by. Grainger, for the ones who get it done. This week on Up First, gas prices just jumped 30 cents per gallon in a single week.

2:10With the Strait of Hormuz still closed, the global energy shock is only getting deeper. Listen for overnight developments on Iran, plus primaries in Ohio and Indiana as midterm election season heats up. We'll have the very latest every morning on Up First. Listen on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. This message comes from IXL. IXL is an award-winning online learning platform. IXL makes it simple for kids to stay sharp during summer break. Receive an exclusive 20 % off IXL membership at IXL.com slash NPR. This message comes from Jerry. Are you tired of your car insurance rate going up, even with a clean driving record?

2:52That's why there's Jerry. your proactive insurance assistant. Jerry compares rates side-by-side from over 50 top insurers and helps you switch with ease. Jerry even tracks market rates and alerts you when it's best to shop. No spam calls, no hidden fees. Drivers who save with Jerry could save over$1 ,300 a year. Switch with confidence. Download the Jerry app or visit jerry.ai slash npr today. Welcome back to the 1A podcast. Joining us now from New Orleans is Calvin Duncan. He's the elected clerk of criminal court for Orleans Parish, which covers the city of New Orleans. He's also co-author with Sophie Cull of The Jailhouse Lawyer.

3:34Calvin, welcome to 1A. Yes, a pleasure. Thank you. And a note that a 1A listener in New Orleans suggested Calvin Duncan's story to us. We always want to hear about big stories happening where you live. Email us at 1a at wamu.org. So, Calvin, you've had a complicated couple of weeks. You took office on Monday after a court ruling over the weekend, put the changes we mentioned on hold, meaning your job would still exist. But that ruling has since been blocked. How would you describe this experience in the run-up to taking office with these questions about whether you'll be able to serve in the position to which you were elected?

4:09Well, it was a good experience. Although it was for three hours, it was one of the, it's going to be one of the best experiences since I've been really in my life. Because I've been trying to make it to that office pretty much all my life, most of my life. Because when I got arrested and was in prison, I used to try to get access to my records. and trying to help other people get access to their criminal records to see what actually was taking place in our cases, and we weren't able to do that. And while in prison, I became a jailhouse lawyer trying to get access to people's records to show the courts that they wasn't afforded a fair trial, and in some cases that they were innocent, and also to try to get access to the evidence.

4:59And we was always unsuccessful. And New Orleans was the only clerk court like that. Other parages, we was able to get people records, criminal court records, and litigate their cases to show the courts that they wasn't a fair trial. And in some cases, that they were innocent. But that wasn't the case here in New Orleans. So I can imagine that you have this high of winning the office in your election, being elected by New Orleans residents. but then the state legislature moving to eliminate that role. How did that feel when you saw the law passed and Governor Landry signed it into law? So to put it in perspective, for me, they didn't eliminate the office.

5:48They abolished the office. They did something that they did during Reconstruction time. When Blacks was elected to offices, they did away with it. So them doing it this time, it was really a shock because I learned about that in history, in my history books. And I thought we was past that. So they actually abolished the office. And what's really sad to me is that they would go to that elit. I could see if I wasn't affected by that system. I was, and I only want to make it better to make sure that people have access to the course and make sure that evidence is properly preserved so victims don't learn 20 and 30 years later that they had the wrong person in prison.

6:35So they actually abolished the clerk of criminal district court because I was elected to it. And the extent by which they did it was just really disheartening that they would go to that extent. right during this in 2026. Help us better understand the job of clerk of criminal court. What are the most important responsibilities of that role in your parish? The clerk of court is, they're responsible for the preservation of criminal records. They're the custodian of the records. The law requires the clerk of court to be the custodian of records and the custodian of evidence that's being introduced in criminal cases.

7:18And also the clerk job is I am the chief election officer. I supervise the election. And so those are the two duties to make sure that the clerk of court is the custodian of the records and the chief election officer here in New Orleans. What did you hear from voters when you campaigned, especially those who have experience dealing with the court system? So the voters, what we decided to do was educate the voters because we realized that a lot of people that run for office, the voters never know exactly what position they are being asked to be over or being elected to. So we educated the voters, and then we also educated, got allowed, not just allowed, but told the voters who I was, who the person is asking to actually take this position and do this job so that they can actually cast an intelligent vote as to who they want to be, the person that would be fulfilling that responsibility.

8:24So they got that. That was something that the voters hadn't gotten. I don't know if they ever got it. I know I've never heard politicians actually explain to the voters the role of the office and also who they were and to allow them to cast an intelligent vote. So then once they did that, and then as we was campaigning, a lot of people was telling us that their vote don't count and that they don't vote. And I'm convinced them that their vote do count, that voting is one of the most fundamental things in this country that a citizen could have and that we have to exercise it. And they went and registered a vote.

9:04And then being told that, well, we abolished in the office. Thank you for your vote. But we abolished in that office that Calvin just was elected, which amount to that their vote did not count. I'm curious to hear from you. You know, you made this case to people who said, look, my vote doesn't count. And you told them, yes. Yes, it actually does. It's important that you vote. It's important that you register. So to have this move by the state legislature to essentially nullify the decision of voters in New Orleans, as the person who made that argument, how are you feeling in this moment?

9:56Well, I didn't hear the entire question that you asked me. Yeah, we're having a little trouble on the line, but I said that you made this pitch to voters that their vote does count, that it matters. And to have these votes nullified by the state legislature, as the person who made that case to voters, how are you feeling in this moment?

10:24i feel well i don't know the proper description other than i'm really sad and disappointed that we are back to where we started during reconstruction whatever legal whatever description describes that to the perfectly is is is this heartening that we are way back i thought we made a lot of progress And people want to think that we made a progress and moving away from racist acts like this. And now for the people to actually see it up front again is disappointing, disheartening. And is this a sad thing that we have to experience this stuff all over again? Yeah. Republican state lawmakers who supported changing the criminal court system argued it needed to be more efficient and cost effective.

11:22That's not a new argument, though the push to eliminate your role happened in the months after you were elected, as you said. Here's Republican State Senator Jay Morris, who introduced the bill. Members, I think this bill is important to move forward, to combine these offices like everybody everywhere else in the state. We're combining the judicial expense fund. It's going to allow there to be one clerk and one judicial expense fund that will help pay for the criminal courts so the state of Louisiana won't have to pay as much. And the city of New Orleans will ultimately save some money as well.

12:00Calvin, what do you make of the argument that Republican lawmakers made for passing this law? Well, they made those arguments during Reconstruction as well. They did. Those are the same arguments. Efficiency, we're saving money. And when you ask Senator Morris how much they were saved, it's like$27 ,000. Well, New Orleans contributed a lot of money to the budget here in Louisiana. So they have saved that for every racist law, every law that has really caused a lot of harm and injury to people. They have always said, those are like the key phrases that they use. Like one of the senators on the floor repeated what Governor Wallace has said, but he just, he didn't use, Governor Wallace said, segregation then, segregation now and forevermore.

12:56Well, he repeated something similar to that, that the law is good, now the law is good, here and forever, some kind of the way he phrased it. Well, we have to take a quick break. When we come back, more from Calvin Duncan, and then a look at the trend of state preemption. That's where states limit what local governments can do. That's just ahead.

13:20This message comes from Grainger. This is the story of The One. As a maintenance supervisor at a manufacturing facility, he knows keeping the line up and running is a top priority. That's why he chooses Grainger. Because when a drive belt gets damaged, Grainger makes it easy to find the exact specs for the replacement product he needs. And next day delivery helps ensure he'll have everything in place and running like clockwork. Call 1-800-GRAINGER, click grainger.com, or just stop by. Grainger, for the ones who get it done. This message comes from IXL. IXL is an award-winning online learning platform.

13:58IXL makes it simple for kids to stay sharp during summer break. Receive an exclusive 20 % off IXL membership at IXL.com slash NPR. This message comes from Jerry. Many people are overpaying on car insurance. Why? Switching providers can be a pain. Jerry helps make the process painless. Jerry is the only app that compares rates from over 50 insurers in minutes and helps you switch fast with no spam calls or hidden fees. Drivers who save with Jerry could save over$1 ,300 a year. Before you renew your car insurance policy, download the Jerry app or head to jerry.ai.npr. Welcome back. We're speaking with Calvin Duncan.

14:43He's the elected clerk of criminal court for Orleans Parish, which covers New Orleans. Duncan's elected position was the target of elimination by the Louisiana State Legislature last week. He's since sued over the move, and his job has now been taken up by the courts in Louisiana. Calvin, I just want to share some background on your case for those who might not have followed it. You accepted a guilty plea to lesser charges in exchange for time served that allowed for your release from prison in 2011. Ten years later, you were exonerated on the original murder charge. Then last year, when you ran to unseat the incumbent clerk, Democrat Darren Lombard, he claimed you were never cleared of that 1981 murder conviction.

15:21And the current Republican Attorney General, Liz Murrell, claimed you shouldn't consider yourself exonerated from the crime, despite a letter from 160 legal scholars saying you were. So when you think about the messaging and rhetoric around your innocence, what do you make of this effort to push back against you as an exonerated person and now as an elected official in Louisiana's largest city? well um here in um in louisiana the attorney general liz morrow she has challenged every every exoneration when a person is exonerated under louisiana law that that person could file the petition to be compensated and she challenged every last one every every last one of those petitions she don't believe that a person could be wrongfully convicted and innocent because she challenged it she tried to her she has a definition of what that means in her head and it doesn't include being factually innocent because factually innocent of the crime factually innocent as to any participation of the crime she has challenged every the documents with the ever um the records would show that every person that was exonerated that when they filed a petition for compensation wrongful conviction compensation, she has challenged it.

16:42She has actually appealed the cases all the way to the Louisiana Supreme Court. And Louisiana Supreme Court constantly has to say that this person is exonerated. This person is factually innocent. Have you attempted to get compensated for the 28 years you spent in prison? Yeah, I did. After I was exonerated, I filed a petition to be compensated. and a day before my trial on a compensation suit, she threatened me. She sent a message to Leon Canizara, who works for her, and he said that, she said, she said several threatened messages, things that she was threatening me about. One, that she was going to have me indicted, but the last one was that she was going to report me.

17:33If I didn't dismiss the suit, She was going to report me to the boy association to prevent me from getting my license. And her position was that she would have argued that I don't meet the moral and character factor in getting my license. So to practice law. And that's what's been something that I always wanted to do is become a lawyer and practice. So what I did, hoping that she would go away, I dismissed her soon. But that obviously wasn't enough. And then she surfers again when I was running for office. A group of Democratic state representatives spoke from the House floor during the final vote on the bill on April 24th.

18:21A state representative, Candace Newell, is a Democrat who represents New Orleans. And she said this bill was part of a question of election integrity. If we pass this bill, we are telling people of Louisiana that their vote is not final and that it does not count. And it can be changed because the legislature can come back after the fact and alter the outcome. That is a dangerous message. It weakens confidence in elections. It opens the doors for future legislatures to revisit outcomes that they do not like or stop people who they do not like from taking office. Calvin, what are you hearing from voters since the news came out in April that the state legislature would try to eliminate your position and change the court system?

19:07They asked me what they could do. They are really shocked about what has happened. They really are. And there was a glimmer of hope when the court intervened, but then for them to take it right back. They just can't believe that in 2026, we are reliving what was lived by people during Reconstruction. They're asking me, Calvin, what can we do? This can't be an America. Do you have an answer for them when they ask what can they do? What do you say? Yes. What I've been telling voters is that we cannot accept that chilling effect that they are sending out. That is, that your vote don't count, that we control who gets elected and who runs.

19:55And so I've been telling the voters that to find people that's not registered to vote and make sure that they are registered and make sure that they get to the polls and vote. And also to make sure that we start paying attention to our lawmakers, what laws are being enacted at the legislature, because the laws is what actually govern our lives here, not just in Louisiana, but in the whole country. We have to be very vigilant because we see that they're trying to erode all of the civil liberties that we have. So I've been telling them, don't be discouraged because that's the Klansman. They did that during the Reconstruction to discourage blacks and other minorities from going out and vote.

20:38So I'm saying to them, continue to vote. Continue to exercise your fundamental right to vote because it is the most, to me, that's the most important liberty that we have in this country. So I've been actually being honest with them is that we just have to keep on. We just can't let them win at trying to intimidate us and not into thinking that our vote doesn't count. Do you feel, Calvin, though, in talking to people, that that message is landing? I'm thinking about the Supreme Court's recent decision gutting the Voting Rights Act. We had a show on it earlier this week. and the governor of Louisiana moved to cancel congressional primaries.

21:25Early voting already underway in Louisiana. So as people are watching what's playing out in your state, are they listening to your message and feeling hope in that message? Yeah, yeah, yeah, they are. Because they are telling me, look, I'm going to make sure that my whole household is registered. I'm going to make sure that my friends are registered. They are saying that I'm going to start contacting my friends in the rural areas, regardless of what race they are. And they are going to tell them, look, stop voting Republican just because you think that, you know, Republicans has always been the party that the family has voted for.

22:08So they are sending messages all throughout the state to their friends, their high school friends and colleagues saying, look, make sure everybody in your family, every friend that you know is registered to vote and go vote. Do not let them make us feel as though that we have no right to participate in this democratic process, this system. The bill the state legislature passed in Louisiana eliminates the elected clerk of criminal court position. It combines it with the clerk responsible for the civil court system. Beyond the impact on you as an individual, what do you see as the potential consequences of this move for New Orleans?

22:49So New Orleans has always had a problem with preserving the records and the evidence. Now, for them to actually appoint a person that has lots of knowledge and lots of experience in dealing with civil matters, Now it's the same person that's going to be responsible for making sure that the evidence is properly preserved and stored and the records are properly stored and preserved. And that is two different court systems. People get wrongfully convicted when we get it wrong. And we have gotten it wrong. Louisiana is the incarceration capital world. And most people that are incarcerated come from New Orleans.

23:37And New Orleans have the highest exoneration rate. And so having somebody over that have lots of knowledge, experience in a civil, then having that person also to have to deal with both courts, it's not manageable. because we already have a serious problem in our clerk of criminal district court. Everything is just outdated, and it's the only court in this state that's like that. And to have a person that has to deal with both, that is a lot. It's going to cost a lot, although they keep saying that it's not going to be expensive. It's going to cost a lot. We are so far behind in clerks of court here in New Orleans.

24:30It's unbelievable. I don't even know how we got away with it so long. Well, that's Calvin Duncan. He's the elected clerk of criminal court for Orleans Parish, which covers New Orleans. He's also co-author with Sophie Call of the Jailhouse Lawyer and founder of Light of Justice, which focuses on improving court access for incarcerated people. Calvin, thank you for speaking with us. You're welcome. Thank you. John in New Orleans emails, I'm a New Orleans voter and a veteran. I voted for Calvin Duncan. I too am angry that my vote was nullified. I would encourage your listeners to go watch Gary Chambers' statement to the Louisiana legislature as they are passing this bill to nullify Mr.

25:07Duncan's seat. Tell me whether it looks any different from people of color speaking to the legislature in 1952. We also heard from Stu in Michigan who emails, Calvin Duncan's story is a reminder that the Supreme Court was wrong in their belief that racism no longer exists in the South. Thanks to the listener who suggested 1A look into his situation. Thanks also to Calvin for sharing his story. And again, this is a story one of you suggested we dig into, and we always want to hear your pitches for 1A. Email us at 1A at wamu.org or call 855-236-1212. Now let's zoom out. Controlling police departments, blocking sanctuary city policies, undoing clean energy ordinances.

25:49Around the U.S., these moves are happening through a political fight that's gaining more attention between local governments and state legislatures. State preemption describes steps a state government takes to tell a local city or town council what they can and can't do. In states like Florida, Missouri, California, West Virginia, Michigan, and Louisiana, state preemption is becoming a common tool legislators use against cities. What's leading to more frequent and public fights between state legislatures and local governments? And what could defuse these battles? Joining us from Nashville, Tennessee, is Katie Bellinger.

26:23She's lead consultant for the Local Solutions Support Center. That's a nonprofit advocacy group focused on countering state preemption. Katie, welcome to 1A. Thank you so much for having me. And joining us from DeKalb, Illinois, is Chris Goodman. He's a professor of public administration at Northern Illinois University. Chris, welcome to you as well. Thank you for having me. So Chris, you study state preemptions. How do you define what a preemption is? So I take a little bit of a different approach than many of my law colleagues in that we define preemption as the use of coercive methods to substitute state priorities for local policymaking.

27:01Basically, anytime the state says to a local government, we don't like the way you're doing something, we're going to enact a law that prevents you from doing that, that would fall under our definition. And Katie, what are some examples where states have changed what local governments can do? We just heard one from Calvin Duncan. Absolutely. I mean, generally speaking, if you care about the health and well-being and if you care about our democracy and the people in our communities, there is a preemption issue out there. You listed quite a few. I want to add to the mix public health policies, whether it's during COVID time with mask mandates.

27:40We're seeing that still within vaccine laws. We have an emerging issue coming in AI and data center preemption as local communities are grappling with those issues. We also see rampant abusive preemption around LGBTQ plus issues, particularly targeting young children and their experience in schools. I could keep going, but again, it comes down to if you care about the health and well-being of people, there is a preemption issue out there where state governments are taking authority away. But Katie, how often can state preemptions produce positive or at least neutral outcomes? So preemption itself is a neutral tool, just like legislation and drafting bills.

28:27It is all about intent and impact for us. And that's why we focus on abuses of state preemption. And we consider it abusive when the policy is targeting and harming historically excluded communities, specifically BIPOC, LGBTQ plus people, women, immigrants, and working folks. We have to take another break. But before we go, Jimmy in Georgia says, I think localities should be able to make policy on their local housing market, including single family housing, like managing or limiting how many houses can be owned by investors. Still to come, what state preemption means for our system of hyper-partisan politics.

Read the full transcript

29:04Stay with us.

29:09This message comes from Granger. This is the story of The One. As a maintenance supervisor at a manufacturing facility, he knows keeping the line up and running is a top priority. That's why he chooses Grainger. Because when a drive belt gets damaged, Grainger makes it easy to find the exact specs for the replacement product he needs. And next day delivery helps ensure he'll have everything in place and running like clockwork. Call 1-800-GRAINGER, click grainger.com, or just stop by. Grainger, for the ones who get it done. This message comes from IXL. IXL is an award-winning online learning platform.

29:47IXL makes it simple for kids to stay sharp during summer break. Receive an exclusive 20 % off IXL membership at IXL.com slash NPR. Let's get back to our discussion about how states are taking control over local government. Before we get back to our guests, Mitch in Sedona, Arizona sent us this message. So Dona had a restriction. You couldn't rent out your house for less than 30 days. So that was good in terms of keeping neighborhoods still a resident owned and resident occupied. And at some point, the state legislature in Arizona ruled against that and said that the local municipalities could not restrict that.

30:29And so they did away with it. And as a result, over the course of about a year and a half, all the neighbors on our street became Airbnbs and we lost our entire neighborhood. It just became a rental town instead of a neighborhood town where people and residents live. Thanks for that message. Has your community passed an ordinance maybe on housing, minimum wage, civil rights protections, immigration, and then run into problems with the state? What do you want to know about how state preemption works or how to change this dynamic? Email us at 1a at wamu.org. We also heard from Fabrizio, who emails, if we're going to talk about Republican state legislature is preempting local governments, we should also mention the way blue states try to preempt conservative rural counties from doing things, like enacting Second Amendment sanctuary laws.

31:17Both parties are guilty of wanting to maximize their power at the state level. And just for context, the Second Amendment sanctuary laws refer to local resolutions. They're past declaring local governments will refuse to enforce federal or state gun laws or gun safety measures. Katie, your thoughts. Is this something that we see legislatures across the country using regardless of political party? Look, preemption itself is neutral and can be used for good purpose, and it can also be used to harm people or hold back progress. Again, it's all about intent and impact on our lens and the kinds of preemptions that we're looking at.

31:55are those that are targeting and harming historically excluded communities. Now, yes, blue states can still preempt local communities, but the reality is that today the abuses of preemption are happening with conservative state legislatures, their corporate special interests and backers, and the wealthy elite, who are using abusive preemption to consolidate power, to maximize profit on the backs of working people and to erode our democracy. And so, yes, things can be used in multiple ways, but what's happening today and the problem that we're seeing, we're tracking over 850 abusive preemption bills in 2026.

32:39That is a massive number of bills. And those are just the abusive preemption bills, to be very clear. So this is a rampant issue and folks really should be concerned about their state governments taking authority away from their local communities to address really important issues like public health, like voting rights in elections. Katie, just to be clear, how are you defining abusive? So abusive preemption is when the preemption is targeting and harming communities like BIPOC, LGBTQ people, women, immigrants, and working folks. So we're tracking all sorts of issues that are impacting these communities.

33:21And that's what our lens is around abuses of this particular tool. Chris, based on your research and other research on how local governance works, what do most instances of state preemptions have in common? So it varies over time. Our most recent, and I define recent as from 2010 to now, is a large smattering of things. In previous periods, it tended to be clustered around areas. In the 1970s, it was largely around taxes. And then late 80s and early 90s, it was on unfunded mandates, so forcing local governments to spend money but not providing any revenue for that. In the early 2000s, it was public health.

34:01So this current period is a much broader set of issues. And I agree with Katie's point that they tend to be more ideologically driven in this current period. When, Chris, did the form and the politics of state preemption change and start looking more like it does now? So we end up kind of focusing on kind of the Tea Party movement and the takeover of several state legislatures, the flipping from kind of historically blue state legislatures to very red around 2010. So 2010 and the 2012 elections. That really changed the way that legislatures treated local governments, largely because a lot of those folks that got elected didn't have a lot of experience in local governments.

34:51A traditional track for a state legislator is typically to have some kind of experience prior, usually in local government. And that era kind of broke that tradition in a really significant way. So it was a little unclear to new legislators who were elected with a mandate, to be clear, but didn't have a lot of experience of my decision on this thing is going to affect local governments in this way because I've never had experience in local government. Let's go back to our voicemail box. Here's a message we got from KJ, who served as a city counselor in Tulsa, Oklahoma. In 2019, we decided to pass a ban on single-use plastics, joining Norman, Oklahoma in their effort.

35:34Within a week, our state legislature decided to preempt our decision and say that no city in Oklahoma could ban single-use plastics. This year, I happened to talk to a legislator on Earth Day and mentioned this idea to him. And he asked, well, why did we do that? He was one that voted for it. I think sometimes these preemptions are more a reaction than sound policy. It's about partisanship. And it's usually the wrong choice for a state to preempt a city. KJ, thanks for that message. Chris, does that speak to perhaps a broader problem in how local governments and state governments work together, communicate, understand the needs at the state level and at the local level?

36:27Perhaps. There's always been a tension between the states and the locals. States create local governments, either directly in the case of counties or parishes, as we were just talking about, or through statute for municipalities and other local governments. So it's the state's role to regulate and kind of define the area of local governments. But there's always been that tension of what is the correct kind of purview of a municipality, for instance. And there's been a historic back and forth. This has been going on for at least 120 years of what is the role of a municipality? How should states regulate them?

37:11That just leads to conflict between the two levels. Well, Katie, how do you think this trend of ideologically driven state preemption relate to what we're seeing in our national politics right now? So I think that the abuses of state preemption, I completely agree with everything that Chris has said. And going back to 2010, I think that these abuses of preemption have really created the foundation of power consolidation and authoritarianism that the federal government is tapping into. We often say with our state and local partners that we have been fighting Project 2025 before that was in our vernacular.

37:53And so what we're seeing today is that the Trump administration is relying on the consolidation of power in conservative state legislatures. And now they are using that same tool to advance their own authoritarian agenda. And the most clear example of that is around immigration policies, where the Trump administration is relying on conservative legislatures to force local law enforcement to collaborate with ICE. Or to, I mean, here in Tennessee, last year, they voted to make it a felony for a local elected official to vote for a sanctuary city policy. That has since been overturned because it is completely unconstitutional based on the Tennessee state constitution.

38:42But that is the kind of effort that we are seeing today. We're talking to Katie Bellinger, lead consultant for the nonprofit group Local Solutions Support Center, and Chris Goodman. He's a professor of public administration at Northern Illinois University. Stephen emails, my state of Ohio just enacted a soft preemption, which denies funding to local governments that want to put ranked choice voting in place. Their main explanation is that they think people can't understand it. Ironically, it came shortly after March Madness, in which so many of us filled out brackets that are way more complicated than ranked choice voting.

39:16We heard from Anna in Fairfax County, Virginia. Please mention Dillon's Rule, a blanket preemption law enforced strictly in Virginia and a handful of other states that significantly limits what localities can do, a huge challenge for local government in Virginia. And Alex in Fredericksburg emails, would Virginia's Dillon's Rule fall into preemptions? Chris, can you first explain how Dillon's rule affects cities and places like Virginia? Sure. So Dillon's rule comes out of an 1868 court ruling that basically says that local governments only have the powers that states specifically grant them. This is in stark contrast to home rule, in which it's essentially the exact opposite, that local governments have as many powers as they would like to have as long as the state does not specifically prevent them from using it.

40:10So in the Virginia case, the concept of home rule doesn't really exist. They exist solely under Dillon's rule. So local governments in Virginia only have access to powers that the Commonwealth of Virginia specifically grants them, which is very different than other places. How common is home rule in laws governing cities across the country? So home rule is fairly common. It comes in a variety of different forms, constitutional or statutory. It gets a little complicated because there are flavors of home rule. The vast majority of states have some amount of home rule. Virginia is actually an outlier in that.

40:48But the strength of home rule within the state varies considerably. So for instance, my state of Illinois, we have constitutional home rule. It doesn't cover every municipality, but it is very strong. Some municipalities have broad leeway inside of that. And that's very different than, say, like Georgia, which also has constitutional home rule, but it is much less powerful. So for people concerned about state preemption power, Katie, does your organization see a way out of this? Absolutely. So first and foremost, what we are trying to build is a cross-movement collaboration that is lifting us up out of our individual issue silos to work on educating folks about the real intent and impact of what's happening here.

41:37It's not just preempting minimum wage or public health policies or environmental policies. These all add up to real harms for people and the erosion of our democracy. So that is one of the core elements of our strategies. And that is all aimed at long-term structural reform. What Chris is talking about with home rule, in states like Virginia, we need to actually reform the structures to allow the cities to have the authority they need to address their unique challenges. But how would that reform happen? Is this reform that has to pass through the state legislature? Is it voters? Okay, go ahead.

42:15Yes. So in Virginia, it would be a statutory change. And we're working with partners on the ground there who are building out that cross-movement coalition, who are doing the research to understand and demonstrate the consequences of Dillon's rule on real people and build the legislative support for that. In states that are home rule already, what we need to do is really look at rebalancing the power between the state and local government to really put the onus on the state. If you are going to preempt a locality, it needs to be in the service of equity, of public health, of civic participation, and you need to create floors that localities can go further to address their own unique needs and not stall their ability to act.

43:01Well, we heard from Pat in Indianapolis who says here in Indiana, the state legislature with the Republican supermajority often makes laws to reverse Democratic majority cities like Indianapolis and Fort Wayne. Some examples from Indianapolis that were blocked by the state removing the ability of cars to turn right at red lights and funding a transit system expansion. The state has also forced changes around how localities can spend money on public schools. But Chris, as you point out, state preemption is not new. This is a power that state legislatures have had at their disposal for centuries.

43:33So to your mind, why does preemption matter to our democratic system, especially in the way states are using it today? So one of the hallmarks of our American democracy, at least at the local level, is local variation. We empower local governments to be responsive to local voters and design their local system of governance to reflect their own priorities. Sometimes that ends up quite poorly, but a lot of the time that ends up working out very well. And when states preempt, they essentially eliminate any of that variation in whatever that policy area they're preempting. So if you take preemption to its complete end and you preempt away all powers of local governments, what you end up with is just a system of virtually identical municipalities that can't be responsive to local voters because they don't have the powers to do that.

44:28So it ends up being problematic for local democracy when you don't allow voters to express themselves and see that then expression shown up in their local governments. That's Chris Goodman. He's a professor of public administration at Northern Illinois University. Also with us today, Katie Bellinger, lead consultant for the Local Solutions Support Center. That's a nonprofit advising cities on state preemption laws. Katie, Chris, thanks for your time. Remember, we always want your voice to be part of 1A. You can use the 1A VoxPop app. It's free. It's a great and easy way to get your voice heard on the show.

45:02Find it wherever you get your apps. Today's producer was Michael Falero. This program comes to you from WAMU, part of American University in Washington, distributed by NPR. I'm Jen White. Thanks for listening. And we'll talk again tomorrow. This is 1A.

45:36This message comes from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, recognizing extraordinarily creative individuals whose ideas, solutions, and discoveries expand people's expectations of what's possible. Macfound.org

From the publisher
Last November, Calvin Duncan won an election to serve as the chief records keeper for the criminal courts of the parish that covers New Orleans.

He received 68 percent of the vote, beating out a powerful incumbent. He has some personal experience with Louisiana courts. He was incarcerated for a murder conviction for 28 years. He studied criminal law to advocate for himself, and a judge eventually found him innocent. He was freed in 2011.

But now, the Louisiana state legislature has moved to eliminate his position. State officials voted to combine his office with another in a move that state senators said was meant to save money. Duncan is taking legal action and a lawsuit over his role is now making its way through the courts. This situation is part of a larger trend across the nation where state legislatures are more and more often undoing decisions made by local officials.

“State preemption” describes steps a state government can take to tell a local city or town council it can’t do something. Legislators in states like Florida, Missouri, California, West Virginia, Michigan, and Louisiana have been using it to influence events and regulations in their communities.

What’s leading to more frequent, and public, fights between state legislatures and local governments? And what could defuse these fights?

Find more of our programs online. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a.

See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.

NPR Privacy Policy

More from 1A

All 320 episodes
What The Practice Of State Preemption Means For Our Democracy1A · 41 min
Listen in VO