In short
Animal Spirits Podcast - Episode 385: A Once in a Lifetime Investment Opportunity
Episode Overview In this episode of the Animal Spirits Podcast, hosts Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson delve into various investment topics and market dynamics. The discussion includes Warren Buffett's cash reserves, average stock performances, insights from the Polymarket whale, and the current state of college costs, among other financial themes.
Key Topics Discussed
- Warren Buffett's Cash Pile
- Buffett's cash reserves at Berkshire Hathaway have topped $300 billion.
- Discussion on Buffett's historical trend of raising cash before elections and what that indicates about market sentiment.
- The hosts argue that matching investment strategies to Buffett's age and circumstances might not be practical for the average investor.
- Stock Market Performance
- The S&P 500 has seen a year-to-date increase of approximately 21%, with the average stock up 15%.
- Insights into the disparity between average and median stock returns.
- Notable companies like NVIDIA dominate large portions of the S&P's gains, highlighting the concentration in top-performing stocks.
- Polymarket Insights
- Analysis of the "Polymarket whale," a significant player in the election betting markets.
- The hosts discuss the implications of such large bets on market perception and potential influence on actual election outcomes.
- Cost of College Education
- Recent findings indicate a decline in the cost of in-state tuition for public universities.
- After grant aid, students are paying significantly less than in previous years, a surprising trend given the general narrative around rising college costs.
- Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Trends
- Bitcoin's continued dominance as the leading cryptocurrency despite challenges from Ethereum and Solana.
- The hosts debate whether Bitcoin's price movements are driven by risk-on sentiment in traditional markets or regulatory concerns.
- Discussion on the potential for Bitcoin to continue thriving in various market conditions.
- Politics vs. Investing
- The hosts assert that politics should not dictate investment strategies.
- They reference past discussions where financial performance has been shown to be largely unaffected by political leadership.
- Perspectives on Debt and Economics
- A discussion on U.S. national debt and its perceived implications on the economy.
- Arguments presented that while debt is a concern, it is not necessarily a harbinger of economic collapse.
- Private Equity in Target-Date Funds
- The hosts consider the implications of private equity becoming more commonplace in retirement plans, viewing it as a potentially positive development.
Key Takeaways
- Market Sentiment: Understanding Buffett's investment behavior can provide insights, but individual strategies should align with personal timelines and risk tolerance.
- Diverse Stock Performance: Despite strong overall market performance, many stocks lag behind, emphasizing the difficulty of stock picking.
- Evolving Financial Narratives: Shifts in education costs and investment strategies indicate a dynamic financial landscape that requires continuous learning.
- Investment Mindset: Avoid letting political narratives cloud investment decisions; historical trends show markets generally perform regardless of the current administration.
Conclusion In this engaging episode, Batnick and Carlson explore a range of investment themes, providing listeners with substantial insights into current market conditions and investment strategies. The candid discussions challenge conventional wisdom and encourage a balanced approach to understanding financial markets.
Links
- [YCharts](https://go.ycharts.com/animal-spirits)
- [CME Group](https://cmegroup.com/equityfutures)
- [The Compound Newsletter](https://thecompoundnews.com/subscribe)
- [Animal Spirits Email](mailto:animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com)
Note The information shared in this podcast is for educational purposes and should not be considered as personalized investment advice. Always do your research before making investment decisions.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Today's Animal Spirits is brought to you by YCharts and CME Group. Michael, I did some research on White Shards the other day, and they have these comp tables. I don't know if you're familiar with this. Pick an index. You don't know if I'm familiar with comp tables. Hello? I pulled up the Russell 3000, and I broke it down by year-to-date return. How many stocks are up? How many stocks are down? How many stocks are up this much and that much? I'm slicing and dicing returns and comparing it from 2024 to 1999. Pretty cool feature. And some of those stats may surprise you. We're going to save it for the show, but very, very helpful.
0:32I use YCharts every single day. It's the first thing I check in the morning. It's the last thing I check before I go to bed, right? Got to check those Japan futures or something. No, I'm just kidding. I don't do that. YCharts is integral in everything that we do, though. So if you want to check out YCharts, you've never done it before, go to YCharts.com, tell them the animal spirit sent to you, get 20 % off your initial YCharts professional subscription. When the rest of the markets slow down, the futures market keeps moving. Did you know that CME Group S &P 500 and NASDAQ 100 futures trade nearly 24 hours with great liquidity?
1:08In the ETF markets, volume and liquidity lessens after 4 p.m. until the next morning. But with futures, you get trading opportunities both day and night. Learn more at cmegroup.com slash equity futures. Derivatives are not suitable for all investors and involve the risk of losing more than the amount originally deposited and any profit you might have made. This communication is not a recommendation or offer to buy, sell, or retain any specific investment or service.
1:40Welcome to Animal Spirits, a show about markets, life, and investing. Join Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson as they talk about what they're reading, writing, and watching. All opinions expressed by Michael and Ben are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions. Clients of Ritholtz Wealth Management may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.
2:10Welcome to Animal Spirits with Michael and Ben. It is Tuesday, November 5th, 943 Eastern. So by the time you're listening to this, I was about to say you'll know the results of the election. Maybe we will, maybe we won't. But anything that happens after this in terms of market reaction, obviously, we're not going to get to that today. But Josh, Ben, Callie, and myself are doing, we're coming to YouTube Wednesday evening to talk about what happens in the markets through the lens of the election. 4 p.m. Eastern at the compound, right? Yeah, so don't get mad at us if we don't have good election takes here.
2:50You can listen to that stuff from anyone, right? So we got one more programming note next week. Ben and I'm coming to the Midwest. Next week already. That's right. It's a week from tomorrow. Ben and I are speaking. We're doing a podcast with Alex Morris from FM Investments in the great city of Chicago. My second favorite city. I hadn't been to Chicago until 2017. What's your favorite city? The one that I live in. Oh, okay. That's a cop-out answer. How's that a cop-out answer? That's my answer. Okay. What's your favorite city? Can't be Grand Rapids. No offense, Grand Rapids. Well, yeah, because it's not the best city.
3:31With all due respect. You've never been here before, Mr. Cosuelitas. But anyway, I love Chicago, and I'm very excited to visit, as always. I can't wait. It's a night of, we're doing a live talker book with Alex Morris from FM Investments and cocktails afterwards. And I believe we'll put a link in the show notes. It's free. Is that right? That's what the link says. Maybe I'm wrong. So if you're in Chicago or you want to see us, come say hi. All right. Okay, Ben, who are you voting for? Warren Buffett's cash pile. Okay. Deal? You've seen all the stories about this. I feel like this is turning into a once every six month story now.
4:10Buffett's cash pile is at record highs. This is from CNBC. Berkshire Hathaway's cash fortress tops$300 billion as Buffett sells more stock, freezes buybacks. So the inclination here is, okay, Buffett's getting defensive. It's time for the market to get defensive. I saw a headline about Buffett getting conservative before the election. Yeah, that's what's happening. Warren Buffett, investor for 75 years, has invested through 16 elections. And of course, what does he do before every election? He raises cash. That's what Warren Buffett does, of course. How about this? The guy's 94 years old. Maybe he's conservative because he's that.
4:50He's obviously not investing for himself. But I think the point is, regardless of whether now is the right time to get defensive or not, like the market is up a lot, and that's probably why he's selling. But if you're going to try to match your time horizon to a 94-year-old billionaire who has an insurance conglomerate that always has a ton of cash on hand, I'm guessing he probably doesn't have the same time horizon as your 401k or brokerage account. Probably not. Just a thought. But that's my thinking. Also, his return on the investment in Apple, it could be the single greatest investment of all time just in terms of dollar for dollar.
5:26Yeah, not percent, just dollar for dollar. And Apple's like, I don't know, Apple's not doing so great. Like it's not like the revenue is not really growing. The company's not really growing that much. So he had an incredible return and he's taking some chips off the table. I would not read into this at all. It is kind of funny though. I remember when they bought Apple for the first time, no one was thrilled about it. No one was being like, oh, this is going to be the greatest investment ever. People were kind of like, oh, geez, has he kind of lost it? A little bit, he's buying Apple? Yeah, funny.
5:54It really was an amazing investment. Okay, let's talk about the stock market this year, so far, for where we are. There's a new sub stack I follow. This is a listener of the show. It's called Duality Research. Former finance person. I think he lives in Switzerland. We've got a lot of international audience here. You know that? I did. So he makes some of the coolest charts I've seen. He does this weekly dashboard of the S &P 500 and then each different sector. And so he just shows the total year-to-date return. This is through last week is 21%, 22%. Average stock is up 15 % this year, and median stock is up 14%.
6:29Equal weight's up 13%. So it's a good year. That's amazing. There's usually a bigger gap between the average stock return and the median stock return. I guess especially over the last 10 years when cap weight has dominated equally. That's what I, that, the median stock return actually surprised me. I thought it would be much lower. Because our chart kid, Matt, created this chart where he showed the top five stocks this year by performance overall in the index are NVIDIA, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Google. And they count for roughly half the gain in the S &P 500. And NVIDIA counts for 25 % of it itself.
7:01So the other$495 are like 11%. And then these five companies are 10 % or something. Which is pretty wild, but I guess that's how it works. what I was talking about with Y charts, though. So there are 2 ,700-ish stocks in the Russell 3000 now. How many do you think are down on the year? How many of those stocks in a year where the market is up 20%, how many of those stocks are down with negative returns so far this year? 18%. You know, I didn't do this. Give me a number. No, it's, sorry, I do have, it's higher than that. It's more than 1 ,000, it's like 1 ,100, so it's like 40 % of the total is down on the year.
7:40That's surprising, isn't it? That is surprising. I would guess that in the Russell 1000, it's lower. Yes, that must be some micro cap and small cap names. But there's more stocks down this year that are down 50 % or worse than are up 100 % or better. The funny thing is, I think that's pretty normal, actually. I think the number is 30 % to 40 % of stocks are down in a given year on average, even when the stock market itself is up. Yeah. Which is another one of the reasons that stock picking is very hard. Can you imagine if you had a ton of stock picks that were down this year? I probably do, if I'm being honest.
8:18Yeah, I was trying to think about the stocks that I own. Listen, Michael's rule number one, two and three. In a bull market, don't own stocks that are going down. That's fair. Said differently. You could try and buy dips in a bull market, I guess, stocks that aren't working. But if you have stocks in your portfolio that are red right now, that are down, There's probably a really good reason for that. You probably shouldn't own them. It's general, not specific advice. Buying the dip works better in markets than individual stocks, at least of late. Well, yeah, of course. All right. Toby Carlisle tweeted something that is a bit of a face blower here.
8:54He has a chart showing free cash flow, Fama French data from 1951 to August 2024. And he shows the most expensive versus the cheapest relative long-term performance. And the line goes up and to the right in terms of cheap stocks outperforming or the cheapest outperforming the most expensive. So this is top decile versus bottom decile? Yeah. And it goes up and to the right until, what is that, 2014 it peaks. and all of the relative outperformance since, geez, 1983 is gone. That's amazing. Wow. And so the drawdown, the relative drawdown of the most expensive versus the cheapest has been unprecedented.
9:44A lot of reasons for this. I certainly think that if you think about like what were the effects of QE, I think that this chart is a fair depiction of it. Like what else could you, what else could you, what else could explain this? Because again, this is not, this is not like growth versus value per se. This is not Apple versus DuPont. This is the most, this is the most expensive versus the cheapest. Have we reached a point where the highest quality companies are just going to be more expensive going forward? But I don't think that, I don't, but I reject that premise that the most expensive are also the highest quality.
10:25I don't think that there's a lot of overlap there. Okay. I would have to see the names. That's my guess, that the tech stocks have been the most expensive. Because if you see any of the S &P, the top 10 or X tech stocks, it's cheaper. So this is free cash flow. So that's the metric. I'd have to see the stocks, but the chart is pretty insane. I would love to see the names. Oh, actually, so he links to the data. I don't know if the names are in here. Let's see if we could find it. But wild chart, and I got to know more. I have questions, and I got to know more. All right, speaking of charts, ChartKid made a great chart for us showing that since July 10th, that's when tech peaked.
11:06So we're not just picking a random date. The price of tech fell 5%, but the earnings estimates have been revised higher by 6.7%, which is what you want to see in a bull market in consolidation. That's pretty good. Stocks are getting cheaper then. Yeah, exactly. Okay. That's a good chart. All right, last week we talked about gold, and I put one in here that Matt created for me by decade. So I updated this after our talk. And a lot of people said, hey, idiots, Nick Colas told you guys why gold's going up. We didn't listen beforehand, so we didn't know. But he was saying it's all central banks buying more gold because you can't confiscate it.
11:45Why aren't they all buying Bitcoin? Huh? Where's all the central banks buying Bitcoin? Central bankers don't want to lose their... The central bank of microstrategy is buying a lot of Bitcoin. More to come on that later. But so going back to the 70s, gold does really well. Stocks do poorly. Then stocks do well in the 80s and 90s. Gold does poorly. Reversed in the 2000s. Reversed again in the 2010s. This is the only decade over the past five, six decades where both of them are doing well. So gold is up 13 % per year this decade. Stocks are up 15 % per year. End of the decade, which one wins? stocks I don't know what do you expect me to say?
12:26I don't know I'm just yeah I'm just true I'm just asking it wouldn't surprise me if it was gold is all I'm saying shocker that you wouldn't be surprised at the outcome of of uncertain future yeah that's the point what would surprise you? let me hold your feet to the fire would anything surprise you? because we're this is this is an opinion show right? we have to give the audience some opinions some entertainment you can't just be on the fence about everything Come on, Ben. One of my early bosses in this business told me, it's okay to be surprised. Just don't be surprised that you are surprised.
13:00How's that? Huh? Is that good? I remember that one still. How about this? I have a take here. Everyone keeps worrying about the long end going up, right? Interest rates are rising. This must be bad because it means inflation is coming back and all these bad things. So I had Sean, a research guy, do the inverted yield curve when it was like the worst. I think it was in July of 2023. So the short end was way higher than the long end. This chart is, I'm sorry, this chart is so pretty. It is. Just aesthetically, right? It is beautiful. Sean did a good job. Also, my son had my phone the other day. He's seven.
13:40He's reading a lot, but he's still figuring out like the English language that we always complain about. And he goes, um, scene just texted you. I said, what? He said, your friend scene, he just texted you. And I said, don't you have any kids in your class named Sean anymore? I don't think that's a name for young kids. So he learned how to spell Sean S E A N. And I told him, I'm like, you know what? You're right. Cause he said mean is M E A N. Why wouldn't Sean be seen? Yeah. Sean, the spelling of Sean makes no sense. But yesterday i was uh how did this happen i'm trying to think so logan loves nothing else matters the song from metallica logan's five and he's a little munchkin he's very he's a very cute little boy so we're on youtube but i think i saw a video i can't remember but anyway i showed him i showed him the music video from nothing else matters and then i showed him like it in a concert so he could like see that they're real people and there's there's all the metallica concert videos are them in the rain this one was not in the rain but i yeah i know yes there were a lot of this so anyway logan turned looked at me and he smiled and he went like this and i started to like i just it was the cutest sweetest thing ever i literally was crying like not tears not teary-eyed i had tears coming down my face because i was just it was just so sweet and he's like no what are you it was so cute you're a bigger sap than i am even i thought i was pretty sappy that you're even even bigger.
15:04I cry all the time. Back to the yield curve. Okay. So the yield curve is getting more normalized where the long ends coming up. And I think this is actually a healthy development that like the long end of the curve is finally helping out a little bit and bringing things more into balance. And so people are worried about the fact that rates are going up a little bit. I get the worry is of course, borrowing and mortgages and, but isn't this a good thing? We're getting back into normalcy. Hold on, but it depends. I would like to agree with you in a vacuum that, yeah, like you want this. But if the narrative for why rates are going up is true, which we spoke about last week, I don't think it is true, but it's not like black or white.
15:46You know what I mean? Yes. But my point is it's okay to look at this side of it too and not just say it's bond vigilantes or the end of the world or inflation is coming back. It doesn't have to be those things. I agree. And also, it hurts if you're someone who's borrowing money. But if you're a fixed income investor, this is way better than the alternative of rates just immediately going back down. True. Right? You just had like the, from your hat, you had like the Peyton Manning line from your helmet. Oh, what is this? Oh, that's a new sweater. That's a new sweater. Okay. Good tweet from Modest Proposal.
16:24America Inc. is so big, the neighborhood paint store is worth$90 billion in In The Dow. Wait, which company is this? This is one of my companies, Ben. Sherwin-Williams? Yeah. You've been doing a pound of the tape. This is your renovation story? I do own Sherwin-Williams. I did not realize it's a$90 billion company. Do they pay a good dividend? Are you being paid to wait? I think it's like 2%, if I had to guess. I don't know. I don't really know. It is funny to think about it in these terms. I put a few in here. Our favorite corner burrito place is worth$80 billion. The coffee place on the corner of every city in America is a$110 billion company.
17:00There's an auto parts store, AutoZone, worth$51 billion. It is crazy when you put it in those terms. We've spoken about this in the past, that thinking about investing through the lens of market cap has probably cost investors a lot of money. Right? Oh, my God. It's a trillion-dollar company. You can't talk about the market cap without talking about the fundamentals, obviously. What's the revenue? What's the earnings per share? What's the growth? What's the buyback? Right. It would have seemed impossible to have$5 trillion companies a decade ago even. And now it's just, it's kind of normal. I remember in 2010, the market had bounced, I don't know, 70, 80 % from the lows.
17:43And I was, I got like a tax return or something. So I got like five grand to work with. And I'm going to go pick some stocks here. I think the brokerage I invested in doesn't even exist anymore. It was like one of the early zero free brokerages. And I'm looking at all these stocks and going like, I missed it. You know, I could have bought at the bottom a year ago and it's too late now. That was in 2010. I'm sure every one of those stocks I've looked at are up, I don't know, twofold since then? Threefold? Oh, that's another type of thing that has cost investors countless money over the years. I missed it.
18:14Yes. We're looking from the bottom or the top or whatever. And you know what's interesting about that? So, all right. So, what do you say, Mike? that you should just chase and buy everything and don't matter about valuation. That's not what I'm saying. But if you zoom out long enough, I guess that is what I'm saying. It always feels like you missed it. True. All right. This is from RBA at the CAIA Association. They wrote about what does a once-in-a-generation investment opportunity look like? I'm sorry. What's RBA? Richard Bernstein Advisors. Ah. Yeah. He was on CNBC yesterday. So they talk about some of the biggest generational asset class investments of the past 40, 50 years.
18:55So they said international stocks over U.S. stocks from 1967 to 1988, which is a period probably a lot of people don't realize the U.S. underperformed for a long time. U.S. stocks over cash from 1987 to 2000. That's when rates were coming down. Stock market did unbelievable, obviously. Energy stocks over the broad market from 2000 to 2008. So energy stocks did really well during the last decade. And then U.S. stocks over cash from 2009 to 2023. And they have all these good charts in here that show these things taking off and how they did. And then they kind of plot them all on the same chart and show the relative gain.
19:27And then how at the end of it, it reverses and you get some mean reversion, which is a cool chart. And they basically say, we think rebalancing into anything but large cap U.S. stocks could be a once in a lifetime opportunity right now. Small caps, international value stocks, anything that benefits from inflation. They're saying that global economy is currently undergoing major inflections across inflation rates, globalization, corporate profitability, demographics, government balance sheets. So they're saying all of this confluence of events means now it's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to diversify.
20:02Well, listen, if right here, right now, in November of 2024, if this is the peak of U.S. large-cap stocks on a relative or absolute basis, I wouldn't be surprised. Would you? The hard part here is that we've been saying this for seven years now. That's what makes it so hard. Yeah. But felt like a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for years. No, I wouldn't be. I would be more—no, I'd be more surprised if the U.S. outperforms again so considerably over the next decade. That would surprise me more. Me too. Well, what about more? if this continues for another decade, the 8 % annual app performance or whatever it is of U.S.
20:46large over pick anything else, yeah, that would surprise me. It really would. All right. So last week we talked about the election betting whale and people were giving theories about, like, what if this guy is betting in election markets to move them because they're relatively liquid, but he's also making other bets on the peso and different currencies and, well, the Wall Street Journal tracked this guy down. They give him Theo, they say, as a pseudonym. By the way, this Polymarket thing, it's built on Ethereum. Like, this is a blockchain-based betting platform. Yeah, so you can look at the trade.
21:23That's how they figure out who this guy was because they tracked the trades, right? I feel like that part of it is, like, not really being talked about. It's kind of cool. Yes, so they, I mean, we gave this guy too much credit, I think, because reading the story, it almost doesn't even seem real, but obviously the Wall Street Journal did their fact-checking here. He says, my intent is just making money. He said he's interested in the polling. He believes that pollsters, there was a shy Trump voter effect. So he says that's why he voted. That's why he's betting on Trump. And he says if Harris wins, he could lose most or all of his$30 million, which he described as the majority of his available liquid assets.
21:58Wait, what? I read that. I couldn't. It doesn't seem real. And it also says, like, if he wanted to blow out of his contracts now, he's such a big part of the market that he would crash the market. If he got worried about it, I don't know if he could do some hedging trades or what. You don't get$30 million in investable assets by being a dumbass. Well, what if he's a trust fund baby? That seems more plausible to me than him being like some Credit Suisse trader. Well, because whether or not the market really was underpriced, who in their right mind would go all in on such a thing? You know what I mean?
22:45He might as well go to put it on a roulette wheel, red or black. Right. Nobody does this. So I don't know. This smells a little bit. I'm sorry. I'm not buying it. But if it is real, then it's a fantastic story. Because what are you doing, bro? Even if he's right, this was a terrible decision. This guy accounts for 25 % of the contracts on Trump winning the Electoral College and 40 % of the contracts on Trump winning the popular vote. Oh, he bet on the popular vote too? See, Trump could win and he could lose the popular vote. Then this guy still loses money? Yeah, I'm not buying it. This guy is not my risk manager.
23:23You know something about Mary where Matt Dillon says to Ben Stiller, that's cute. I don't buy it. That's cute. That's my reaction to this guy. Sorry. Matt Dillon, underrated. This is from Puck News. Sorry, you and Josh and I were reading. From William Cohen. And they talk about kind of markets and everything. And it got me thinking. So he says, One long-time Wall Street trader worried that deep-pocketed friends of Trump are driving up the DTJ price, which is the truth social SPAC, I guess, that tied to Trump, to make a victory look apparent even though the stock market and battleground voting patterns are decidedly different animals.
23:57Someone like Elon could be buying the stock, he emailed me. No big deal money-wise for him. But the phony strength in DTJ stock gives the impression that Trump will win. This is obviously speculation. But it is interesting just how, like, the more markets we have and the more stuff you have to bet on, just the more narratives and, like, third-order effects people are willing to latch onto. Well, this could be a scenario where the tail really is whacking the dog, right? It seems like it. But then doesn't it all—could it all just come unraveled, though, and be like, oh, we were all looking at totally the wrong thing.
24:30Like bond yields were doing this and the peso in a dollar was doing it. Well, just from the lens of markets, one of the things that I'm excited to see about the outcome is like, was these betting marks that we were paying attention to was a complete noise, right? Or was it like, oh, they actually, they were right. The betting markets were right. Yeah. I guess it's hard to say anyone can be right after all this is said and done because everything is so close. So it's hard to, again, people putting money where their mouth is, they can be right or wrong. The predicting markets have been, have shown Trump with a lead for the last couple of weeks.
25:10Yeah, but it's a, it's a very minor lead and I think that's the - It's also, it's also, this is a sample size of one. So just because even if they do get this right, who's to say that they'll get the next one right? Right? That's the part. We don't, we don't have a hundred years of data on this that we can go back through and see or the liquidity and that's why my home. But we all speak for me, at least. I defer to the markets usually, right, about most things. Like for most asset classes, for most securities, the price on the screen, I just give it the benefit of the doubt. It's like, yeah, I guess that's right.
Read the full transcript
25:39Yeah, but you just read this guy accounts for 20 to 40, 25 to 40 % of the liquidity. Like this guy is literally moving the market. Very fair, very fair, of course. Okay, so over the years, I think we've, the financial blogosphere has put some arguments to bed. It's like we've written enough or talked enough about this. We don't need to have this discussion anymore. Index funds is the big one. We all used to write about index funds a lot. Nothing is ever put to bed. Nothing is ever put to bed. Okay, true. There's always new people coming along. But I feel like you've tried to put the CAPE ratio into bed.
26:09The fact that it's not very useful a million times. I think the last piece that I think I wrote about that was like, was it 2018? Like, I'm not writing about this anymore. But I think we can put politics and investing don't mix to bed. Like if my point is on putting something to bed, it's like there's enough information and talking points out there where if you still don't believe this, then that's on you. Okay. I think, I think that the politics, yeah, I think, I think that has the highest approval rating of everything that we would say is like put to bed among, amongst financial professionals, whatever your political affiliation is.
26:41I think most people would say, Hey, listen, this is, this is not the thing. Barry's been, Barry's been writing about politics and investing don't mix since when he was at the Washington Post. I put all my blog posts in here that I've written over the years. And there was like 10 of them. Sean can link to them in the show notes. But yeah, my point is like, if you're going to say, here's five stocks to pick if Trump wins or Harris wins in five talks, that line of thinking, if you're still doing that, then that's on you. Well, well, well, well, well, well, well. No, no, no. Not necessarily. Because the companies, we showed this chart last week, the companies that would be most impacted by Trump tariffs that have been going down in anticipation of a Trump victory, that's legitimate, as opposed to saying the market's going to do this or that.
27:24Here's the thing. Politicians talk a lot, and they don't always follow through, and that's the hard part about trying to tie policy to investing. I could give you the headlines for a year from now about what the policies are, and you still might be right. So it's possible that the markets are over-discounting a Trump victory and what his actual tariff policies would do. Yeah, that's fair. Yeah, that's my point. It's really hard to do. J.P. Morgan had a good one here about Like the economy and markets tend to fare well under all government configurations. Good chart. We've done a whole bunch of charts.
27:52I'm sure we'll go through some more on our live stream at the compound too. But that's my whole point is that like if you're still – if you're saying the economy is bad because a Democrat or Republican is in office, I'm going to sit out this market and I'm not going to invest. And that's on you. That's my point. But the other thing is in defense of those people who feel that way, they feel that way because it's their emotions talking. Right? I think that most people would intuitively understand if you show them the data that the president doesn't really impact the economy over the long run. But people get emotional.
28:24So this is from Greg Ibb at the Wall Street Journal. Here's the headline. The next president inherits a remarkable economy. The high quality of recent economic growth should put a wind at the back of the White House's next occupant. The contrarian in me kind of wants to short this opinion and just say that whoever is in the White House in the next four years is probably going to face some challenging economic times at some point. Yeah. It almost seems like things have been so good that taking the other side of this would be relatively easy. That's it? I'm trying to, yeah, I have nothing else to say.
29:02Yeah. Okay. Look at this. So this is real GDP per capita from Ernie Tedeschi. They show the projection. By the way, great name. It just sounds good. That isn't, yeah. That sounds like a movie character name, right? Come on, Tedeschi, get over here. Get in my office. Sounds like a broadcaster name, like CBS Anchor from the 80s. Yeah. So they show GDP per capita is, and they did the trend line from January 2020, what the projection was at the time. Obviously, back then, they didn't know anything that would happen from there, but they say it's 3.2 % above pre-pandemic expectations. The real GDP per capita.
29:40So that's inflation adjusted, which is just wild to me. So I think the way that I look at it is the president is kind of like parenting. It's way easier for them to screw something up than make it phenomenal. Right? Like, I don't think you can't make your kid be the greatest person in the world. You could help them be a better person. But I think it's way easier as a parent to screw up your child than it is to make them the best person in the world. I think that's the way that the president works for the economy. It's way easier to throw a monkey wrench into the economy and screw things up than it is for them to make it unbelievable.
30:16Fair? Yeah, I agree. Do you think about your parents differently now that you're a parent? Oh, all the time. I think about this. I remember my dad when he was the same age as me, and it changes my whole worldview of them. Yeah. I think about that all the time. Same. Yes. Like, eh, they were okay. Yeah. The passage of time still remains undefeated. All right. I want to talk about Twitter real quick. I feel like back in the day, Twitter replies, there's always been trolls on Twitter, but back in the day, the trolls that we used to get were, you know, now show Japan. They weren't psychotic, the replies, right?
30:56They were, the people might have been like a little bit psychotic, but the replies themselves were just trolly, not terrible, right? Today, now, the replies are just so psychotic. And I don't know if they're all bots or what, but this one definitely had me laughing. This is like, so I posted something last week, and I said, listen, unemployment rate is 4%. Inflation rate is 2.4%. Ten years at four-something percent. Real GDP growth is close to three. If there is such a thing as a sweet spot for the economy, we're basically in it right now. No predictions about the future. Nothing about politics there.
31:31I just said, if you looked at just those sets of numbers, you would say, oh, yeah, that's an economy that's humming along and it's in a perfect place. Right? If you had to pick those numbers, could you pick better numbers than that? Not much, right? Did you know this was going to go viral? Probably, right? You knew this was provocative. Not like this. I didn't think it like this, though. I was just looking at the data. And here's the numbers. I didn't make any projections one way or another. Yeah, but you knew how it would be received. Yeah, but the sad part is that it shouldn't be received the way it is, though.
32:02Yeah, no, I agree. Literally just data. Somebody responded to you, just try to order a breakfast sandwich and have it delivered. Can't leave work. It was$33. Inflation might not be down. The breakfast place was three blocks from me. And so you did this meme. I replied to him with the private taxi from our burrito meme, which we talked about a couple weeks ago, which is a perfect response, right? Usually I look at the responses for maybe five minutes. And if it goes viral like this, I mute the conversation because I know it's going to get bad. And then a bunch of other people jumped in and said, wait a minute.
32:34I live in New York. There's no way you got a breakfast sandwich for$33. You know what's funny? This guy was replying to everybody. Right? So I kept following the thread because I was interested. And eventually far enough down the thread, somebody goes, show me that order. I don't believe you. And he posted the order. and this is just chef's kiss, coup de gras, the whole shebang bang. He said, forgot that I was going to get hash browns. So the burrito was$16.50. He ordered hash browns, which was eight bucks, which is still, it's expensive, but it's not what he was claiming. This total is$24.50.
33:12And then the delivery fee, the service fee, the tax and the driver tip. Yeah, we've been on this DoorDash is crazy expensive for years now, But it's just, it's amazing. This person was just complaining and complaining and complaining. And then he's like, oh, I forgot. I ordered hash browns too. And this is the internet. This is the internet. It's cool to complain. When did it become cool to complain? It is the internet. It's like everything is just Yelp. I just - Well, but that's social media, right? You reward virality is for the negative. And so that's, it's funny. We've been trained by the algorithm to become more negative because the dopamine hit from having people respond to you reinforces like a death loop of negativity.
33:57It rewards bad behavior, rewards negativity. I just can't believe the amount of people who have just have the brain worms of, I don't trust the data. I don't trust the experts. I don't trust anything. I don't trust anything. It's brain worms from social media. Yeah, it is tough. Anyway, Bill McBride. I posted a chart last week of inflation by decade, comparing like 2020s up to now versus the 2010s. And Bill McBride did this by decade going back to 1970. And the shocking one to me is a couple of them. If you look at the 2020s so far, it's not that far off the trend line from the 1990s inflation, which is pretty surprising.
34:37But the other one is look at how high inflation was in the 80s. The 1980s blew the 2000s out of the water, like way above where it is. And then it kept going up. It's just funny to me how people look at the 80s as this like economic time of nirvana. And inflation was really high in the 80s, but I guess it just wasn't as high as it was in the 70s. You know, it's funny. Like if there was social media, like obviously the general population, if you adjust for social media, was way more unhappy about inflation in the 1980s. They just didn't have, they couldn't broadcast it to the world that we couldn't all in real time commiserate.
35:14Yeah, so the sentiment indicators maybe were a little not as bad as they... All right, good news on the inflation fund. My auto insurance fell this past six months. Progressive sent me a thing, a lower rate, great benefits just for you. And yeah, 4%. My policy rate was down. I remember a lot of people said, Ben, if you keep switching your policy rate, they're just going to jack it up next time. Guess what? Didn't happen. I have deflation in my auto insurance. How do you like them apples? I love those apples. A lot of people have been telling us about the climate stuff with insurance. You know, you guys aren't talking enough about the litigation.
35:48And there was actually an episode of Al Dots last week talking about how the litigation in Florida is so bad that all the insurance companies keep getting sued. And that's part of the reason that the costs are so much higher. And I guess they're making changes to that. So worth a listen if you haven't listened to that one yet. Did you catch that one? I did not, but I will. Somebody emailed us. This is sort of random, but you guys can forever cross off running out of oil from your list of things to worry about. I work for a major truck manufacturer And at a conference today, they said 15 years ago, we made 30 million gallons a year of renewable diesel because people had extra soybean oil they didn't know what to do with.
36:19This year, they made 6 billion gallons. Whoa. And we could within a decade scale up to the 100 billion we need to run every truck, tractor, train, boat, and airplane in America. The only reason we don't bother is because traditional oil is so cheap and available. You've seen the meme before about like investor guy says we're running out of natural resources. And then it points an arrow and it says some in middle of America finds a reserve of this resource of this resource. And we have plentiful for decades to come. And it just keeps going in a circle. Okay. That's I guess that's this meme. Okay.
36:54We got us. We got an email with the subject line. The deficit doesn't matter. So this person said, I've been listening to the pod for three and a half years. And Michael is always beating the strong when he can. I'd love to hear your thesis on why you hold this to be true rather than taking it as fact every time. 90 % of my portfolio is in crypto and crypto-related equity.
37:13I'm just, so he said, while Bitcoin's cycle-based performance can be attributed to a variety of things like global liquidity, easy monetary policies, following equities, ripping, etc., the core long-term thesis is that money printing does matter. Frankly, I'm just curious how charts like this could possibly be a nothing burger. And he shows a federal debt. total public debt. He's talking about Paul Trudor Jones. Maybe you don't agree with the USD's death spiral narrative, but to claim that the deficit will continue to have no impact on the economy and assets is a strong take. Okay. So I don't think that it doesn't matter.
37:47I guess I don't think that I know enough about, like honestly, about how the economy works and how deficits work and how it functions and all that sort of stuff. I guess my thing, if I could boil it down is that if you were to zoom in on this chart of total public debt, which is up to the right, at any point in time in 1970, in 1980, in 1940, in 1870, like at any point in time, if you were to zoom in in real time and look backwards, you'd be at the high point, right? So if you had a chart from 1950 to 1970, you'd be like, oh my God, this is unsustainable. And then from 1970 to 1990, and then to today, and I understand the steepness accelerated my point is if this is your reason for being an extreme position like this president's with crypto which obviously has worked out okay um and that's been a bad posture is if you use this as a reason to be negative on u.s equities or or to be like a doom and gloomer or a bear like the debt the debt the people have been saying this since the beginning of time that's my point so i'm not smart enough to say this doesn't matter because i frankly don't know and i think most people that that uses as a rhythm to be bearish, definitely don't know if I don't know.
39:01So what's the thesis here? Like, what's the catalyst? Like, that people are going to reject our treasuries? And if you show this, you have to adjust. Show assets. Like, show assets against liabilities. Show the total pie of wealth. If this is your chart, and this is the hill that you die on, and the debt is going to take us down, you're missing everything else. There was a magazine cover in 1973, and it had Uncle Sam with his hands out and his pocket's empty and it said, is the U.S. going broke? And to your point, that's, I think it's okay to say I'm not comfortable with the size of the U.S. debt, but also I don't think it's going to lead to a calamity because here's the things we have going for us in our favor.
39:42We can literally print our own currency. And if there is a strike against treasuries, guess what Japan did? They started buying their own bonds. 80 % of the government bonds in Japan are being bought by them. You think the treasury wouldn't do that if we needed to borrow money? Of course they would. And then, so I think the biggest constraint we have is just inflation. That's the biggest risk. It's not, I don't think there's going to be some end of days where people just decide we're not buying treasuries anymore because what's the alternative? Yeah. And it's weird in that what you just said, we'll piss some people, we'll piss people off in this camp.
40:15Yeah. You see, they're just going to buy our debt and it's just going to get worse. And then, then it's just the day of reckoning is going to be even worse. Yeah. No, but it'll be fine. No, no, no. you can't compare the U.S. budget to a household budget because we can literally print our own currency a household cannot do that although well I'm printing my own currency through HELOC loan does that count it does you know when Happy Gilmore hits the ball off uh Jaws the guy in gold and James Bond hits it off his foot and shooter says you gotta play the field as lies this is the world that you live in you don't live in an alternate universe where the debt is not what it is this is the field.
40:50Guess what? The debt's going to be higher in the future, but I don't, my whole thing is not that the debt isn't, like, you can't say you never worry about it. Of course you can worry about it, but I don't think it's going to be this reckoning where all of a sudden there's going to come a time and everyone's going to wise up and go, oh, time for the world to come to an end. I don't think that's going to happen. I'm talking to Colin Roche and ask the compound next week, and I'm going to ask him all these kind of questions. He knows this stuff better than I am. He knows a lot better than I am. I'm not saying it doesn't matter.
41:13I'm just saying, like, if that's your thing and, like, it's enough. Let's move on. New topic for the week in the Google Doc. See what I did here? I'm fighting against negativity. See my new topic here? Right under AI. Good news of the week. Okay, what is it? Good news of the week. Cost of college is going down. This is from thehill.com. This is surprising. The college board found in-state tuition for public universities down to$11 ,610 a year compared to$12 ,140 a decade ago. College has come down over the past decade. This is crazy. After grant aid is applied, the average student would pay$2 ,480, a decrease from a little more than$4 ,100 in 2014 to 2015.
41:55So the sticker price you see is not what you pay. Ron Lieber wrote a good book about this. For private schools, the net price is a little over$16 ,000, down from$19 ,000 back in 2006. So this is the average of what people actually pay, not the sticker prices, but what they pay after all aid is taken into account. way lower than you thought correct based on some of the numbers you see i don't trust it you don't trust it they're literally taking the numbers from the colleges i'm only teasing that's wild i know all right crypto i got a crypt i got a crypto question for you so over the last year bitcoin is destroying ethereum i think i ran this last week so probably not up to date but bitcoin over the last year bitcoin was up like 110 10%, Ethereum's up 46%.
42:41You know what else is destroying Ethereum? Solana, killing it, price-wise. So I looked at the market cap of this. I think the market cap of Bitcoin to ETH is like 80-20. Mm-hmm. And that's probably the long-term average-ish, and it's been going down. Is this surprising to you? Because to me, it is. Because I remember in 2017 and 2020, and it's like, listen, Ethereum is the HTTP of crypto, and you can literally buy the internet, and it's programmable contracts, and it's better than Bitcoin. And look where we are. Bitcoin is still king. Yeah. So ETH is still like four and a half times the size of Solana in terms of like market cap.
43:22But in terms of performance, I don't know enough about the space to talk intelligently, but Solana's killing ETH in terms of performance this year. I'm surprised that this is the case, that Bitcoin is still like the king of the hill here. Well, Bitcoin is dominating flows. I don't think there's much there's, you know, compared to Bitcoin, ETH flows are anemic. And I think that the Bitcoin rally is probably part Trump-related in terms of him being less hard on the regulatory side. Nah, it's risk-on. I'm putting that in a risk-on camp. I don't think this has anything. No, dude, no, no, you're wrong.
43:56Bitcoin is a risk-on asset and the stock market is rocking this year. Listen to me. You're out of your depth. Bitcoin have been acting like shit all year. The regulatory stuff has never mattered for crypto. Ever. Bitcoin, listen. Besides the ETF, that's it. There was a point this year when the Nasdaq was up 30 % and Bitcoin was flat, zero. It's not a risk-on thing. If this was a risk-on thing, Bitcoin would not have sucked shit all year. I think the regulatory stuff is a sideshow for crypto. People in crypto make a big deal out of it, but I don't think it's that big of a deal. It doesn't matter if it is or it isn't.
44:26That's a perception. Like, there was monster flows last week, I think, positioning for a Trump win. listen I don't know what it's hard to know why Bitcoin moves the way it does I'm just telling you that if it was merely a risk on thing Bitcoin would not have been sucking wind all year while the NASDAQ was going vertical it's not been sucking wind all year it's been going crazy this year listen I follow it closer than you do no offense it's up 110 % over the last year that's sucking wind 110 % alright you're going to make me do this going to Y charts See, you're believing into the narrative. Dude, I'm not.
45:07Everyone is a prisoner of narratives these days. Bitcoin has gone sideways from March until now. Like, it's gone sideways for seven months. Because it went up so much at the beginning of the year. But the NASDAQ was ripping. It was a risk-on market, and Bitcoin was going sideways to down. It's not going up because it's risk-on. All right, that makes no sense to me. Agree to disagree here. No, I'm right. It was up so much. It was up so much. It had a great run into the ETF, but for March now, it went sideways. How much is the stock market up over the same time? All right. You're making a little minutiae detail here.
45:45I'm not. I'm not. Bitcoin, okay, how about this? Dude, you can't say nothing matters. Sometimes things matter. Bitcoin - Yeah, 100 % return matters. Overlay a chart of Bitcoin, of DJT, and of Polymarket, and they all are moving the same direction. If you think that all three lines move in the same direction as a coincidence, then you're delusional. Okay. Crypto people think that it matters, but why was it up so much in the first two months of the year? The move of the goalpost. Well, because the ETF flows. That's why. Okay. So I would say the ETF flows matter more than what people think about politics.
46:19How's that? No. You can't just— The reason it went sideways is because all the ETF flows got sucked up early, and then there was nothing after that. Not every narrative is bullshit. Okay. Yeah, but you're looking at very, this is a toss-up election, and you're saying that that's causing Bitcoin to move? It's perception. All right. The prediction market— I'm saying Bitcoin will do fine under a Democrat or Republican. That's what I'm saying. Okay, complete non sequitur. I am not talking about anything other than Bitcoin, DJT, and the prediction market are all moving in the same direction over the last couple of weeks.
46:56So I'm not grasping at straws here. That's what's happening. Yeah, but over the last couple of weeks. That's a ton in the last year. Yes, yes. The election's tomorrow, dude. All right. We're arguing past each other. New highs again. New all-time highs for housing. Case-Shiller Home Price Index. Are we good now? That's our first fight we've had in a while. I'm over it. Can we wake up? All right. Don't go to bed mad at me. So I feel like every time I post about housing prices at all-time highs, someone must be like, dude, Dude, you can't think that having housing prices at all-time highs is a good thing.
47:30How is that possible? Little sun there? Duncan must love this. Yeah, I'm in the dark. You're in the light. We are the angel and the devil right now. Hold on. I have to put the air on. It's boiling here. The sun is blasting on my face. I can see, like, the lines of sun. All right. So every time I talk about housing prices being at all-time highs being a good thing, because I think that's better than the alternative, people say, no, no, you can't look at that as a good thing. Obviously, people buying homes, it's bad for them. And I agree, but it's kind of like the lesser of two evils thing. I remember living through the housing crash last time.
48:06That was not good for anyone. That took the economy down. And I think housing prices being at all-time highs, while not fun for people buying houses, is way better than the alternative of housing prices being down 30%. How's that? Yeah, I mean, not to, now I'm afraid to push back, but who's saying prices down 30 % are better than prices at ultimate highs? People who want to buy a house are saying that. Duncan's probably saying that. Okay, good one from Axios on the age of homebuyers. And they look at repeat buyers, all buyers, and first-time buyers going back to the early 2000s. and repeat buyers has gone from roughly 40 years old to 61 now on average.
48:51The average age of all buyers has gone from mid-30s to 56, and first-time buyers has gone from 30 years old to 38 years old. All of these are moving up. I guess, is this just boomers swallowing everything and young people being pushed out further and further? Well, the repeat buyers, I mean, that makes a lot of sense, right? Yes, they have tons of equity. Yeah. They're moving for retirement, whatever it is. The first-time buyers. That makes sense to me, too. It's gone up a lot in the last couple of years. Yeah, this is. That you'd have to be more established to have a little more money to buy.
49:28Life is more expensive than it used to be. And you know one of the reasons why? Like, sort of, this isn't really true, but like, I'm sort of afraid to say this, but. everyone has everything. When everyone has everything, everything's expensive. And of course not everyone has everything. But my point is like a lot of people, they have a house, they have two cars, they want to go on vacation. They want to do this. And if you want to do everything, everything's really expensive. So it makes sense that it's, people are getting married later in life, that it's, you're getting a house later in life because it's, everything's expensive.
50:09Here, here. All right, Ben. You're going to love this. This is an article from Pensions and Investments. KKR sets its sights on 401k plans via target date funds. KKR reported$624 billion in AUM, up 18 % year over year. They managed$14 billion in its K-series suite of products, which were designed for individual investors, up from$5 billion a year ago. And next, they want to get into target date funds. Thoughts? Honestly, if you're going to invest in private equity in a retail channel, this is probably the best way to do it because it's in a retirement plan that should be illiquid and you can match it off with other…
50:57So, I actually don't hate this if you're really wanting to invest in private equity. Yeah. You thought I was going to hate it. The time horizon works. Well, I just thought you were going to hit the target date aspect of it. I thought that was sacred to you. probably not necessary, but if people are going to want it, that would seem to be actually a reasonable way to do it. We're going to put 5 % private equity in all these target date funds. I guess it kind of makes sense. So PitchBook puts out a weekly link, a weekly email on all stuff happening like private credit markets and the leverage loan market.
51:31So I thought this was interesting. In a sign of today's bullish credit market times, the ranks of US leverage loan weakest link, which is a harbinger of default activity, just hit a two-year low. But as PitchBook LCD's Rochelle Kacouris explains, this ostensibly cheery news is largely a result of the proliferation of the liability management exercises by distressed issuers. As well, private credit lenders, which have the reputation of being less averse to risk than Wall Street banks have stepped in to meet the refinancing needs of challenged debt issuers. So this is a very, very interesting story, right?
52:16So it's like, oh, wow, the weakest links is at a two-year low in terms of like who might default. But it's because these private credit companies, the Apollos of the world, the KKRs of the world, are working more closely with their borrowers to make sure that they don't default as opposed to the bank loans, which is syndicated. And it's sort of every man and woman for themselves. So let's just get what we can. So again, this is another area where I don't have enough expertise to say, this is good, this is bad. Maybe it's in the middle. The financial companies would say, this is a good thing because look what we can do.
52:48We have the ability to change things if they're not going our way. Yeah, so the ability to like work with a company in periods of distress and be flexible with the covenants and whatever and get them through is probably a good thing. I think the, I see the other side of it, which would be like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. This is going to end badly. You're propping up these zombie companies. Like, so I see that. So I don't know. I don't know. Do we have a private credit index yet that we can look to? Like, here's the index of private credit. Here's the average across all. That's what I want to see.
53:19I want an index of private credit. I don't know. These loans are just so, they're just so infrequently traded. That's the thing. There's not enough information. That's, that's, I guess that's, they're private. All right, Bane. It's quarter season, and I listened to the MicroStrategy call, and it was wild. You were slacking us about this the other day, and credit to you for listening to this, because I would have done it. Yeah. I was watching Sunday Night Football on mute, listening to Michael said, and Robin's like, what are you listening to? I was like, go upstairs.
53:52So, all right. So the company, the actual software business, which is really a sideshow, lost$18.5 million in the most recent quarter, which, again, totally irrelevant. I just thought it was interesting. So in their deck, they show the Bitcoin holdings since they implemented the strategy in the third quarter of 2020. It went from$38 ,000 up to$250 ,000 Bitcoin today. Kind of wild. But here's the thing, Ben. They call this intelligent leverage. And they talk about like, they call it like a, is it a Bitcoin yield? Is that what they call it? So they say that the total Bitcoin has increased 33 % year over year, while diluted shares outstanding was only up 13%.
54:42So they're issuing shares to buy more Bitcoin, more shares, more Bitcoin, more shares, more Bitcoin. So they say our track record, this is from Andrew Kang, who's a CFO. He said, our track record of using equity debt and excess cash to acquire Bitcoin as part of our treasury operations has resulted in value creation for our shareholders and establishes the foundation to execute on our 21-21 capital plan, which is$21 billion in debt and equity. And that's because it's Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, the number 42, whatever, to buy more Bitcoin. So our objective continues to be to accumulate Bitcoin holdings at a faster rate than we issue shares.
55:22And we have demonstrated a solid track record of doing so. To assess our performance in achieving this strategic objective, we introduced a new key performance indicator last quarter, which we refer to as BTC yield. We define BTC yield as a period-to-period percentage change in the ratio of our total Bitcoin holdings to our assumed diluted shares outstanding. We use this KPI to help assess the achievement of our strategic objective and to evaluate capital allocation decisions. If we increase our total Bitcoin holdings over a given period at a faster pace than we increase our assumed donated shares outstanding, we achieve a positive BTC yield.
56:02And I'm listening to this and I'm thinking like - This is very galaxy brain. The John Reilly, like what in the world are they f***ing talking about? However. For their credit, their stock is going nuts. However, listen, it's working. Okay, so I'm confused. I don't get it. Maybe you don't get it. And not to be too results oriented. But in this case, I have to tip my cap because they had a plan and they executed the plan and it f***ing worked. So MicroStrategy, over the last four years, annualized is up 105%. 5%. Bitcoin's up 53%. Max 7, 28%, 14 % for the S &P 500. Some more slides from the deck.
56:47It's beaten every company in the S &P 500 since they adopted their Bitcoin strategy by a lot. In 2020, yeah. It's up almost 2 ,000%. So Michael Saylor said, the more capital we gather, the more powerful we become, and the more we enrich our own shareholders, it's totally counterintuitive because everybody else in the world thinks if you sell equity, you dilute the shareholders. That's true if you don't have a use of proceeds that grows faster and yields more than the S &P 500. The cost of capital is the S &P 500. Later, he says, MicroStrategy has pioneered this by combining capital markets activity with Bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset with the embrace of BTC yield.
57:29And the BTC yield shows that, in fact, we acquired the capital in a manner that was accretive to our shareholders as opposed to dilutive. And that means when we're actually engaging in capital markets activity, we're doing it in an accretive velocity fashion. So it's just, it sounds like a pyramid, a Ponzi on top of a pyramid. It works until it doesn't. It works until Bitcoin crashes, right? So this is, all right, here's the final word for Michael Saylor for me. He said, Bitcoin is growing 50%. We don't know what it will do in the future. But my personal long-term view is over 21 years, Bitcoin is going to grow 29 % AOR.
58:12So that would mean, I did some math here, Ben. That would mean that Bitcoin will be at$14 million a coin. And it would have a 281, and I know there's like coins coming to market. So this is not exact. $281 trillion market cap, which sounds like a lot of money. Sounds like, is that more than all the assets in the world? Here's a stance for you. I don't believe this prediction. There you go. There you go. I'm willing to go out on a limb and say that. I'm guessing that's not going to happen. Yeah, just really fascinating. Like, the largest ATM equity issuance in the history of capital markets is being used by Michael Settler to buy Bitcoin.
58:54I would think if Bitcoin grows at 10 % per year over the next 21 years, you should be pretty happy. If it just equates long-term stock market averages, I think that would be happy as a crypto person. It's wild. Really, really fascinating. All right, Ben, somebody sent us this Primerica Household Budget Index, which is a monthly index illustrating the purchasing power of middle-income households with income between $30 ,000 and$130 ,000, which seems like a very wide range. But the chart that we're looking at shows that anything over$100 ,000 means that households may have extra money left over at the end of the month that can be applied to things like entertainment, savings, or debt reduction.
59:32and the trend is higher, which is a good thing since 2014, up and to the right. In 2022, we went all the way down to 86 % because things were so expensive. Now we've rebounded. And in August, 102%, which is a good thing. It's interesting it was so low in 2015. That doesn't make any sense to me. I guess people are still recovering from the crisis. Ben, somebody emailed us this photo from their baseball field. And it says, reminders from your child. I'm a kid. It's just a game. My coach is a volunteer. The officials are human. No college scholarships will be handed out today. I love it. We have signs like this in a lot of our fields and everyone ignores them.
1:00:17You read the sign and you go, oh, that's great. I'm going to post it on Instagram. Then you yell the ref, right? It's got to be so humiliating for the spouse of these maniacs. Yes. I always think of that too. Aren't they embarrassed? Like, do these people go home the next day or that either like, that was, I... I think people think they're right. It's like they assume it's a comment section on the internet. Like, I let them have it. That was my right. All right, here's one from Gary Rogers, 73 years old in our comments. One year's time is 173rd. That relationship is what causes us to feel that time is speeding up as we age.
1:00:50Duh. It's a short year. Your life each year is a shorter percentage of your overall lifetime. That's what makes it feel like it's going faster. Are you doing the Zach Galifianakis right now? Think about it. I am. You've lived long enough, and then each successive year is a shorter and shorter period of relative time in your whole life. That's why it feels like it's going faster. Okay. It's hard for my brain to process. There's a lot of fog up there. Okay. So somebody emailed us. There's a homeowner checklist email that goes out every week. Because last week I spoke about, like, I don't know that there's all these filters.
1:01:24How many? So many filters. So I subscribe to this. It's like a weekly reminder like, hey, dumbass, you got to do this. Okay. Let me know what I got to do. If you're like me and you're home challenged, for lack of a better phrase, this is for you. All right. This is why I think you just buy a new house because then you don't have to worry about any stuff for like seven years. It's fine. All right. Our dog is teething because she's a puppy. She's like four years, four months old. and I'm not going to name any names, but my wife was watching her yesterday and let her out of her sight for a little bit and she's chewing on stuff because she's teething and she ate a cord that hooks up our modem to the Ethernet thing.
1:02:08Totally ate through the cord, Internet and Hollow House goes out and it's like a weird data cord where it's not an Ethernet cord, but it's kind of like a phone jack thing. I didn't even know we had this and I couldn't find it anywhere. I went to Best Buy, I went to Ace Hardware, Radio Shack doesn't exist anymore, went to Walmart, no one had it. So this is last night at like five at night. We're like, crap, we have no internet. So I bought it on Amazon. Overnight delivery. It was here by four in the morning. We ordered it at 6 p.m. It's at our house by four in the morning. Plug in the wall. We have internet again in the morning.
1:02:39Amazon delivery is incredible. I ordered something yesterday. They're same day delivery for stuff now. Do you want to know why people complain so much? We have so much convenience in our life that if anything ever rocks the boat and makes our lives inconvenient, we can't believe it. We're up in arms. Yes. This is the whole thing. Things are so good that we have the luxury. Complaining is a luxury. Yes, it is. All right. So Friday night, I go to crack on a bottle of wine. I'm going to put Sideways on. Every couple of years, I watch Sideways. Have a little glass of red wine. I'm a big red wine guy now.
1:03:12By the way, by the way, who's that guy from Washington that sent us a case of wine that has great wine? Yeah, Foolhardy Venters. I'm on their wine club. And once a quarter, they send me a case of wine. I need to get on that. That's great wine. What's it called? It's so good. Fool Hardy. Fool Hardy Vinters. Vinters. My favorite red wine right now. I drink it all the time. So I'm going to, I messed up. I did the cork thing, and I didn't put it in far enough, and I go to Poland and I accidentally did this, and the wine cork breaks. And there's two-thirds of it came off, one-third of it's still in there.
1:03:40And I'm trying to get, the teeth won't get it. The teeth just won't get it, and it's getting down and down and down. And now it's halfway down the stem of the bottle. I'm like, oh, crap. And so I go get a screwdriver and I'm slowly but surely tapping it and tapping it and tapping it and as you know To push it in? Yeah, I'm trying to get it out. That's when I'm trying to push it in because I can't get out Yeah And I push it and I push it and finally I give it a good hit and there's pressure So the thing just literally explodes Out the top, whine everywhere, in my face, on my shirt, up on the cupboards, all over the wall And I'm sure there's a way I could google this Like, but someone has to have a good, one of our listeners has to have a good way to get the cork out if it gets stuck in there.
1:04:20What's the trick? There has to be a trick. I don't know. But one time in my waiting days, this couple brought their own bottle and it was an expensive bottle. And I messed up the, I did what you did. And I was, I panicked. I remember it. I was getting very sweaty. I was very nervous. I was like, oh my God. Oh my God. Oh my God. I was like, guys, guys, guys. I was like, somebody's coming here. I broke the cork. Were they mad? Broke the cork. I don't remember. You know what I got good at as not just a waiter, but being in the service industry for a long time? Caddy, Cabana Boy, valet parker, waiter.
1:04:54The list goes on. And smiling at people's bad jokes. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. Right? That makes sense. Yeah. You got to get used to it. I was at the bagel place today, the bagel store today. And this is what I call a counter small talk. So the guy behind the counter, obviously this person is a regular, goes, hey, how you doing? and everything good? And the guy goes, I'll settle for status quo. Ew. It was just like, what? That's a cousin of living the dream. Yeah. Right? Yeah. There's a lot of people out there like that. Like they have those little things and it's just so uncomfortable. Like, huh, yeah.
1:05:34Nailed it. Ben, I have a bone to pick with people who say goodbye but don't hang up their phone. Okay. Who like they just assume that you're going to hang up. Grant, for example, is guilty of that. I'm pretty sure that happened to you and I last week. I think my phone is in my pocket. I have my AirPods in. And I look back and there's like six minutes. I think neither of us hung up. No, no, no. It was a standoff. No, no, no, no, no. I hang up. I press end. Are you sure? Because I know there's people out there like you who I have no tolerance for those sort of people. You press buy, you hang up.
1:06:05But if the phone is in your bag or in your pocket or something and you're carrying stuff, like sometimes it's hard to do. I guess, could you say Siri hang up for me or something? No, no. If your phone is unreachable, you say to the person, hey, bye. Do you mind hanging up because my phone's out of reach? That's what you say. Because why would you just assume that the other person's going to hang up? It's like the you get the sponge, you know? It's a standoff. I don't know. I'm fine with that. All right, how about this? If we're ever on the phone, you don't need to ask me though. That's the thing.
1:06:36I hang up. All right, I swear last week that did not happen. Duncan asked who talks on the phone in 2024. for. We're old. We still talk on the phone. I talk on the phone. Alright, Ben. I'm going to start with recommendations. Okay. I saw... Oh, before we get to what I saw. So, Tom Cruise is running it back. A Days of Thunder sequel. I got to tell you. Days of Thunder is not a good movie. Yeah, you're not going to... You might be surprised about this. I'm not a fan of Days of Thunder. It was just Top Gun on wheels and it was okay. It wasn't like one of my favorites. It's way down the list of Tom Cruise movies for me.
1:07:09Yeah, it's not a good movie. There was an article in Sherwood about horror, about Jason Blum. And over the past decade, the horror movie genre has doubled. It's taken to the box office, now raking about a billion dollars in ticket sales each year. The Cape ratio of horror movies has to be like 36 right now. I feel like I'm shining, man. I'm winning, right? They're making movies for me. Yeah, all the time. So Blum said, and I think there's a lot of truth to this. He said, horror is the one thing that doesn't work as well on streaming. If you're not forced to sit and stare at a horror movie, it's never a scare.
1:07:43Horror gets people to the theaters. That makes sense to me. It's just a better experience at a theater with a horror movie. And it's also, it's cheap. Like, you don't need to pay actors, like brand name actors to be in it. In the article, they actually went into the psychology, which I spoke about last year. Like, why do I like this shit so much? Am I demented? Yes, I am. So anyway, okay. I went to the theater this week and I saw what is probably my favorite movie of the year that I think should be nominated for Best Picture. Okay. The movie is – it's a Neon movie. Neon did long legs. Neon is like an A24 competitor.
1:08:20The movie is called Enora and it was amazing. Okay. It felt like Uncut Gems a little bit. it's been described as an uncut gems, which I thought about in the theater. I didn't think about the other part, the pretty woman part. Uncut gems and pretty woman crossover. It's also somehow laugh out loud funny. So the premise of the story is Mikey Madison, who was in Scream and what else was she in? She's been in, I can't, what else was she in? Whatever. She plays a stripper and a Russian kid comes into the strip club and he starts paying her to be his girlfriend, to be an escort, his girlfriend. And he's a son of a Russian oligarch.
1:09:02And so he's living the life by himself in a mansion in Brooklyn and she's his girlfriend. And the Russians come to annul the marriage and it was so good. Okay. I've never heard of it. I can't possibly raise the bar high enough like then you would be disappointed. But it's not a horror movie. Not a horror movie. No. Okay. I told you, I'm worried that my son is going to be falling down the Michael rabbit hole of movies as opposed to the Ben because he went as Ghostface for Halloween from Scream. He hasn't seen any of the Screams, right? You can't show him that. No, but I'm going to eventually. He loves that stuff.
1:09:42So what is the right age? So how old is George? You see? He's seven. Six? Seven? I'm more liberal about the movies than my wife is sometimes. Like, I don't, I think it's fine. you know what they said in Tarantino in Tarantino's book I can't remember the exact quote but his parents brought him to movies very young and he was seeing very adult movies and I think one of the times he asked his parents like are you sure I should be watching these movies and they said I would rather have you watch movies than the news and I think that because the movies aren't real is what they said so yeah but I do remember like seeing Freddy at a young age like it really rocked me like I don't know if I don't know if in a good way like it's I remember being scared so I was very proud of my son the other day because I can't remember what action movie we were watching, but every action movie, like especially Indiana Jones, you dive under the wall before it comes down on you to crush you or the door before it shuts.
1:10:31Every action movie has that scene where you dive under and you, oh, you just made it. And we see a scene where these guys are running for something and he goes, oh, they're going to make it. They always make it in action movies. I'm like, oh, he figured it out. That's pretty good, man. All right. I'm still watching Disclaimer, which I still think you should not watch. But we're on the, we just watched the penultimate, not second to last episode. Is that the Sasha Baron Cohen show? Yes, with Cate Blanchett. And it's a roller coaster show in that it's very frustrating and very annoying, but I really want to know what happens.
1:11:02So I'm like, I hate myself for watching it half the time. The other time it's like, oh, this is actually pretty good, but I need to watch the end now because I got to see what happens because there's some twist or something coming. All right, we've been watching 90s movies with our kids. It was Mrs. Doubtfire last week, I think we said. League of Their Own this week. All the kids absolutely loved it. And my wife and I both said, God, they really just don't make movies like this anymore. No, no. Feel good, family movie, but both people can like it. Gina Davis has to be on the all-time underrated list.
1:11:32She is just fantastic in that movie. I kind of looked it up, and it said once she hit her 40s, she stopped getting roles, which I don't know why. I think, well, you know, it's Hollywood. Like her... This, yeah. She had Meg Ryan and Julia Roberts and Sandra Bullock. She had a lot of competition. Do you remember the Long Kiss Good Night? Oh, I love that. with Samuel L. Jackson. I saw that one in the theater. Okay, so I saw it once. I remember seeing it at my dad's house, at my dad's apartment, actually. And I haven't seen it in 20 years. No, God, we're all f***ing 30 years. Underrated action movie.
1:12:02Really good. I just, I don't, this is not a hot take by any means because it's very, a lot of people have it. Like, there's no better actor in a decade than Tom Hanks was in the 90s. He is so unbelievably good in The League of Their Own. You almost, like, forget how good he was back in the day. Yeah. Go. All right. Tune in next week if the world doesn't come to an end from the election. I told you I'm shorting vol. Hopefully I'm wrong about that. Why would you say that? I was driving by a street corner the other day and a guy had a huge sign and all it said was vote for decency. There was no names.
1:12:44It was just vote for decency. You know what? That's something I can get behind. How's that? I hope people are decent to each other. Remember, Chicago, November 13th. If you're around, check out our live Animal Spirits. AdvisorUnlock.com for more financial advisor stuff. Thanks to the production team as always. Animal Spirits pod at gmail.com. No. Is that it? No. AnimalSpirits at the compoundnews.com. That's it. Goodbye.
1:13:19You
From the publisher
On episode 385 of Animal Spirits, Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson discuss: Warren Buffett's massive cash pile, the performance of the average stock this year, the Polymarket whale, markets in everything, Twitter replies now and then, the cost of college is going down, Bitcoin is still king, private equity in targetdate funds, politics vs. investing, and much more!
This episode is sponsored by YCharts and CME Group.
Get 20% off your initial YCharts Professional subscription when you start your free trial through Animal Spirits (new customers only). Sign up at: https://go.ycharts.com/animal-spirits
Access CME Group's valuable educational materials and trading tools and learn more about what adding futures can do for you at: cmegroup.com/equityfutures
Sign up for The Compound newsletter and never miss out: thecompoundnews.com/subscribe
Subscribe to The Unlock newsletter: https://www.advisorunlock.com/subscribe
Find complete show notes on our blogs:
Ben Carlson’s A Wealth of Common Sense
Michael Batnick’s The Irrelevant Investor
Feel free to shoot us an email at animalspirits@thecompoundnews.com with any feedback, questions, recommendations, or ideas for future topics of conversation.
Investing involves the risk of loss. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be or regarded as personalized investment advice or relied upon for investment decisions. Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson are employees of Ritholtz Wealth Management and may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this video. All opinions expressed by them are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management.
The Compound Media, Incorporated, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here https://ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The information provided on this website (including any information that may be accessed through this website) is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information.
Obviously nothing on this channel should be considered as personalized financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. See our disclosures here:
https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
