In short
Animal Spirits Podcast: Business Optimism Crashes (EP.307)
Episode Overview In this episode of the Animal Spirits Podcast, hosts Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson discuss a variety of topics, including:
- Regional bank failures
- Confidence in the Federal Reserve (Fed)
- International diversification in investing
- Labor market recovery
- Vibes vs. data in the economy
- The best companies in the world
- Insights on middle age
The episode is sponsored by YCharts, which will host a webinar on their Scenarios Tool on May 24th at 12:30 PM ET.
Key Themes and Discussions
- Regional Bank Failures
- Historical Context: The hosts compare recent regional bank failures to those during the 2008 financial crisis, noting the similarities in asset sizes between banks like Signature Bank, Silicon Valley Bank, and First Republic Bank.
- *Key Point*: Although the assets involved are significant, the causes of failure differ markedly from those of 2008, which were characterized by high leverage and widespread risk.
- Confidence in the Federal Reserve
- Interest Rate Decisions: The Fed's decision to raise interest rates amidst regional banking failures is debated.
- *Argument for Caution*: Some believe it is irresponsible to continue raising rates while banks are failing, as this could exacerbate credit conditions.
- *Counterpoint*: Others suggest the Fed may be acting to prevent inflation from spiraling, emphasizing the delicate balance they must maintain.
- International Diversification
- Investment Strategies: The hosts reference a piece by AQR arguing that international diversification remains relevant, even amidst a long period of U.S. outperformance.
- *Key Stats*: Historical data shows a significant shift in U.S. valuations compared to international markets, suggesting that diversification may still provide value.
- Labor Market Dynamics
- V-Shaped Recovery: The labor market is noted to have experienced a V-shaped recovery, contrasting with the stock market performance.
- *Employment Trends*: Full-time employment rates for prime-age workers (ages 25-54) are at historical highs, indicating a robust labor recovery.
- Market Sentiments vs. Economic Data
- Optimism vs. Pessimism: Despite strong employment data, small business optimism is at its lowest since 2013, raising concerns about future economic growth.
- *Discussion Point*: The hosts explore how consumer sentiments can diverge from actual economic performance, suggesting that consumer psychology plays a crucial role in shaping market dynamics.
- Middle Age Reflections
- Personal Insights: Michael and Ben share humorous anecdotes about their experiences with aging and how their perspectives have changed as they confront middle age.
Key Takeaways
- Banking Crisis Comparison: While recent bank failures raise alarms, they may not pose the same systemic risks as those in 2008.
- Federal Reserve's Tightrope: The Fed's current policies are criticized for potentially being overly aggressive while failing banks exist.
- Value of Diversification: Historical analysis suggests that maintaining international exposure in investment portfolios can still be prudent.
- Labor Market Strength: A strong labor market recovery contrasts with mixed signals from small business sentiment.
- Aging and Perspective: Personal stories illustrate the humor and challenges of aging, contributing to a light-hearted discussion amidst serious topics.
Conclusion This episode presents a nuanced view of current economic conditions, blending humor with critical analysis. The discussions reveal the complexity of market dynamics and the interplay between data, sentiment, and personal experiences as they relate to investing and life.
For more insights, visit [Ben Carlson’s A Wealth of Common Sense](https://awealthofcommonsense.com) and [Michael Batnick’s The Irrelevant Investor](https://theirrelevantinvestor.com).
Contact For feedback or questions, reach out to the hosts at [animalspiritspod@gmail.com](mailto:animalspiritspod@gmail.com).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Today's Animal Spirits is brought to you by our friends at YCharts. Big news coming up. rwmcoo nick majuli of of dollars and data fame also has his new book a newish book just keep buying that's that's not a new book sorry i said newish newish uh this year right maybe last year uh why charts will be discussing their scenario tool with a big emphasis on how it helps streamline financial planning process with nick on may 24th at 12 30 eastern i just pulled up the scenario analysis tool this morning just to try it out again. It's been a while since I used it. $5 ,000 initial investment I put in the S &P 500.
0:37So SPY, 1998,$500 a month after that. Okay. What do you end up with April, 2023? $5 ,000 in 98,$500 a month from there on until April, 2023. What do you end up with? Total investments is like 157 ,000. I got it. $685 ,000. You're pretty close. It was like right around 600K. The funny thing is by March 2009, you had contributed$72 ,000 out of savings. Your market value was$50 ,000. So you're underwater after more than a decade. And now you're - That's why you should just keep buying. Come what may. That's right. So that's the thing. People don't realize like a bad market is a good market for savers.
1:23Anyway, we'll have a link in our show notes to sign up for this webinar with Nick. And if you want to try out Y-charts for the first time, you never tried them out before, tell them Animal Spirits sent you and get 20 % off that initial subscription. Welcome to Animal Spirits, a show about markets, life, and investing. Join Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson as they talk about what they're reading, writing, and watching. All opinions expressed by Michael and Ben are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for any investment decisions.
1:58Clients of Ritholtz Wealth Management may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast.
2:06Welcome to Animal Spirits with Michael and Ben. In the intro, Ben mentioned Nick's new book, which is not new, but it reminded me of something. This week, I was on a phone call. Actually, it was, I'm sorry, was it Friday? Last Friday. Speaking of time dilation, I'm losing track of time. Okay, so on Friday, Ben, I was on a phone call. Middle-aged catching up with you. Seriously, I was on a Zoom call on Friday, and the guy goes, how was your weekend? And I repeated the question. I said, how was my weekend? He goes, yep. And I took half a second. I was like, it's good. Thank you. Now, I'm assuming he meant how was your week, right?
2:49But I repeated the question. And he confirmed that was, in fact, the question that he asked. So I was a bit taken back. That's actually – maybe that's a move. If you talk to somebody on Friday, I saw how the other weekend was. See what sort of response you get. Okay. Maybe he's just like one of those hustle bros who, you know, he uses his weekend in like four-hour increments, right? He slows time down. I'm hustling. Look at this jug. Yeah. We were on a call yesterday, and you opened up your water jug, and it was like the most aggressive open I've ever seen in my life. I mean – How so? Well, it did – Yeah.
3:32It's aggressive for a call right next to a microphone. So Robin got this from me. I'm back on a diet. I sent her a video. Actually, Ben, you were with me. I sent her a video. It's not too flattering. There was a little bit of belly hanging out. I said, all right, all right. So she got me this. I took said video. You took that video. I took that video. Wasn't that bad. All right. Do you want to talk about it now or save it for like the forehead? What happened to your head? What? Oh, it went onto my head. This actually, it looks a lot worse than it is. So for people that are listening, I've got like two red dots on my head.
4:08It looks like someone took a stapler to your forehead. Yeah, a little bit of a scab. So bald people, when you put on a hat, you lose your peripheral vision. and I was boating on Saturday. This is not a good story, but I was boating on, since you asked, I was boating on Saturday and on a boat, there's like a little rack up top with some places, some holders to put the fishing rod in, you know? And I stepped up and I got whacked in the head. I whacked myself in the head because I couldn't see it with my brim. And it wasn't bad. I mean, it was a bit of a ding, but it could have been much worse. Okay.
4:43We had that in our, not me, but my youngest daughter, Kate, was just running down a hill, like six foot hill, running. And you know when you're a kid, you don't have no control over your body. You just flail. She ran faster than her body could carry her. That's scary. I've had that before. I saw her doing it in slow motion, and she landed on her face, and her face was the fulcrum for a somersault. Her whole body, just on her face. So her whole side of her face was just a sidewalk rash. Oh, no. All sorts of blood. a little bit. She's good. She's tough. She did just say, why didn't you catch me?
5:23So really just hit me in the dad, you know, but it was not going to, anyway. Speaking of road rash, regional banks. Did you see this chart here? Boom. Good transition there, right? Yep. All right. Mike Bostock tweeted this, and this shows bank failures by year, and you can see all these little banks in 2008, 2009, 2010. And he has them. So I don't know how he created this chart. I love these graphics. They're really, they really get the bubbles. I wish I could create something like this. Uh, Washington mutual is the biggest circle in 2008. And then it shows the ones from this year, signature bank, Silicon Valley bank, first Republic bank, all pretty similar size to that.
6:02And it, I don't know, this, this is just one of those, a picture speaks a thousand words kind of things. Very good. Here's another one from the New York Times. It kind of shows a similar thing just in bar chart form. Circles are better, but basically just showing that like these three banks, this is a huge, so the three banks held a total of 532 billion assets. That's more than the 526 billion when adjusted for inflation that helped by the 25 banks that collapsed in 2008 at the height of the global financial crisis. Saying that like, this is, this was a kind of a big deal that these big banks failed.
6:35and I guess it's almost surprising that there hasn't been more carnage from this. Well, okay, a few things. Yes, maybe the assets size were the same, but there's a lot of other things that mattered here. I don't think this is exactly apples to apples. The banks back then - The reasons for 2008 were, it was much different. Way more leverage and everybody was pretty much screwed and everybody was in the same boat of shit. Whereas this time, it really is centered on either a concentrated deposit base or geography, which I guess is saying the same thing. And the failure of these banks was – what got wiped out was the equity and ostensibly most of the bondholders.
7:26It wasn't like – I guess what I'm saying is – yeah, I'm not minimizing it. It's just this is not 2008, even though the assets might be the same size. You could also say that - These regional banks are not going to take down, are not potentially going to take down the global financial system. But I think the smoothness of this transition or how this has been handled probably doesn't happen about 2008. I think the fact that 2008 happened made it easier to save the banks this time around, where it could have been a lot messier had that not happened. So I pulled up the S &P Regional Banking ETF, KRE.
7:59The inception of this ETF is like 2006. And I did total returns. So this is including dividends because most of the bank returns come from dividends in a lot of ways. It's up 17 % in total going back to whenever it came out in 2006. The S &P is up 355 % since then. The ag is up 68 % in that time. This thing has basically gone nowhere for close to two decades. So this is true and indisputable. But this is sort of like that Bess and Bender stuff that we were talking about. you know what I mean? Where it's like, yes, obviously KRE bitch. By the way, I bought on Thursday. Fully disclosed. Really? What's your timeline on that time horizon?
8:42It's 12 hours. Short. No, I'm going to, I'm going to give it a week. This is short. This is, well, we'll say, I don't know. We'll say I jumped out of the airplane without a parachute type of deal. You know what I mean? You should wait until you get your dividend at least. So here's, here's the, here's the thing about catching a falling knife. I'm, well, I guess I am guilty of this. I've tried to catch a fallen knife a lot of times, but I think there's a difference between buying a stock that's in a 60 % drawdown where it's just a melting ice cube and it's been going lower for the better part of 18 months or whatever the case may be versus buying an ETF that got of regional banks that got cut in half in like three weeks.
9:26You know what I mean? So anyway, what I'm saying is I'm more apt to buy panic than I am a stock that's just in a 70 % drawdown and probably will never recover. Does that make sense? That's fair. Even though you literally tried to do that twice with Facebook and Netflix. Successfully, I might add. But to your point about - But wait, hold on. Hang on. The Netflix buy was not, I did not buy that on the way down. I bought it after it had already bounced. And the Facebook, that was a special situation. You had somebody on TV crying about how wrong he was. And it just felt like peak pessimism. So special situation, Ben.
10:15Okay. But a lot of those tech stocks have had huge bounces. So Shopify, for instance, was down 85 % from the highs. It's up 85 % this year. it's still down 60 % or whatever from the all-time highs. So the falling knife thing depends on the timing always. But your point about the best of mine to study - Yeah. This thing came public in 2007. So what did it lose in the GFC? Well, yeah, of course, it had the bank crisis. But the point is you can have a sector like this that goes nowhere and the stock market can still do fine. That's my big takeaway here is that you can have these, you could pick the wrong sector and be screwed, but you could have that sector be part of what you're investing in and you're still going to be okay.
10:58I mean, I think most of that is probably in the Russell 2000 as opposed to S &P, but still. So Ben, from 2010, for example, through most of 2018, KRE and SPY or the S &P 500 both gave you the same returns. They were up 170 % over the same time period. Now, of course, there's been a gigantic divergence to say the least since then. But my point is, as you well know, starting and the start date and the end date, you know, is everything. Tell you when any, any argument about the markets. So my whole thing you mentioned, of course, obviously this is not 2008. It would be silly to make that comparison, even though some people do, even if everything works out fine with a banking crisis.
11:38And it's kind of seems like it will even, I mean, maybe the, the effects down the line are contraction credit or whatever, which is what the fed wants. Even if it works out fine, raising rates twice while these big regional banks are failing is still dumb in my eyes. Like for the Fed, the fact that they're still doing it is like, it's, it's an unnecessary risk to take when they could have just said, we're going to pause for a little bit to see how this shakes out. And then maybe we'll raise a few months from now. I just think it's, it's like an irresponsible risk to take while these banks are failing.
12:09I just, I don't understand it. All right, here's a counterpoint. And I'm not, I'm, I'm going to say these words. I don't necessarily believe them, but just, I'm going to give you the other side. So what if the Fed is thinking, these regional banks that are failing, we can backstop them like that, right? But if we pause now and we still think that the risk of inflation is to the upside and we pause now before we want to and inflation ramps up again, that is a much bigger, greater risk than whatever potential contagion can happen from these banks failing. I mean, what else could they be thinking?
12:48Like they understand that banks are failing. I think part of it is they don't want to go back on their word. And they don't want to look like – for some reason, I feel like they drew this line in the sand. And they think that like they have to follow it. And they don't want to be seen as going back on their word, which is bizarre. Perhaps I'm giving them too much credit. But I genuinely believe that, well. Could it also be that they don't mind having a mini banking crisis that slows credit and slows the economy, which could slow inflation. That seems like a dangerous game to play to me, though.
13:21I mostly believe that they're doing this because they think it's the right thing, not because they're worried about credibility. Okay, most people do not agree with them. A Gallup poll released Tuesday shows 36 % of U.S. adults say they have a great deal or fair amount of confidence in Jerome Powell, and that's the lowest of anyone. You can see this chart here. It was highest for Alan Greenspan in 2001, which is kind of funny. It was almost 80%. Powell has the lowest approval rating. What percentage of adults in America do you think know who Jerome Powell is? Two? I mean, it's got to be a small amount, right?
13:53Like if you ask your wife, who is Jerome Powell? There's no way she'd have a clue, right? My wife either. Zero percent chance. Ten percent of the population knows who he is? Maybe. No. No. What? You think that's high? How would one out of ten people know who Jerome Powell is? How many people work in the finance industry? I don't know. A couple – ten million? I don't know. What is it? I don't know. It's got to be a larger number, though. All right. The one thing they're doing, obviously, though, is they are giving savers a free pass here, it seems like. How about this? That's such a great point.
14:26We spent the last 10 years, not you and I, but people spent the last 10 years saying the Fed is punishing savers. You don't hear them saying that the Fed is, what would be the opposite of punishing? Rewarding? The Fed is rewarding savers. They're punishing the bond market. So this is from Julian Climocho. Sorry if I pronounced your name wrong. For the first time in history, investment-grade corporate bonds yield less than three-month T-bills. Wait, what? How? Investment-grade corporate bonds yield less than three-month T-bills. Look at this chart. So the spread historically has probably averaged 3 % to 4 % for corporate bonds.
15:02Oh, I was going to say I don't get it. This just has to be – this is just the yield curve. I'm not minimizing. This is insane. But this is not Treasury's yield curve. This is corporate bonds. No, I understand. But the corporate bonds follow the yield curve as well. Do they? But corporate bonds should have a spread to treasuries. No, I understand. And treasuries should have a spread to T-bills. So this is like a double inversion. Yes. My point is - Like double secret probation. This is double inversion. My point is that these U.S. investment grade bonds have a higher duration, a longer duration than three months.
15:42Significantly so, right? And because the yield curve is so inverted and things are so wacky. But yeah, it's insane. So the bond market still does not agree with the Fed at all. Like at all. The 10-year is still at 3.5, which in the three months right now is 5.2. Hey, wait a minute. I haven't really thought about the corporate bond yield curve, but I would just assume, and please feel free to inbox us, I would just assume that corporate bond yields actually do not follow the treasury yield curve. In other words, there's no inversion in corporate bond yields, right? You're not going to – there's no way.
16:21Yeah, that's true. You don't really see that. I don't know. Yeah, you're right. There's no way. Yeah. Is there a way? No, because spreads blow out. there should be a spread, but then spreads blow out. I'm not talking about spread. I've never seen a corporate bond yield curve before. Right. Can that invert? No, because the corporations are not going to increase what they're paying on short-term paper like the Fed is. They're not that dumb. They would never do that. No, but what if investors demand it? I'm not saying that they would issue it that way. But that's the thing. The reason that the treasury yield curve is so inverted is not because investors are demanding higher deposit rates.
17:03It's because the Fed is jacking up short-term rates to try to stop inflation. All right, we have gotten a ton of questions over the years about why diversify internationally. Why own foreign stocks when U.S. stocks are obviously the only game in town and they've outperformed for a long time now. AQR wrote a good piece on this. Did you read this at all or not? I did not. International diversification is still not crazy after all these years from Cliff Asnes and a couple of his colleagues at AQR. It was really well done. So they showed basically since 1990, go back that far, and the U.S. has outperformed so much that if you own international stocks, it doesn't seem to make any sense.
17:39You and I think have shown it was pretty much international indices from MSCI started in 1970. So it was like 1970 to 2012 or so. They're basically break even. And then from 2013 on, that's when it looks silly to own international stocks. Here's from AQR. Since 1990, the vast majority of the U.S.'s outperformance versus the MSCI IFA of a whopping 4.6 % per year. So that's a lot, obviously, was due to changes in valuations. In 1990, U.S. valuations were about half of IFA, which had a lot to do with Japan at the time, obviously. Japanese valuations were so high. At the end of 2022, there were 1.5 times IFA.
18:15Once you control for this tripling of relative valuations, the 4.6 % return advantage falls to 1.2%. I'm sorry. I don't know if that makes sense to me. Look at this chart. Look at the chart. That's like take Durant, Clay, and Steph off that Warriors team, and they barely beat the Cavs. Okay, so here's the conclusion. International diversification is still worth it, even if it hasn't delivered. Most of the outperformance in this period reflects richening relative valuations, hardly a reason for raising or even retaining U.S. overweights today. If anything, historically wide relative valuations point the other way.
18:50Well, I agree with the conclusion. this is i love this quote this is the kind of thing i wish i would have written a diversified portfolio that you hold today might look completely sensible tomorrow it'll look full of mistakes i think we you and i might take for granted the fact that like diversification is is so obviously i did i'm not going to use the phrase free lunch i don't know what else to call it the the sensible approach to investing um it's a way it's a risk management strategy do you think Do you think that a lot of people would agree with that statement, that diversification is prudent?
19:25I think people – I mean, everyone knows the whole you don't put your eggs in one basket. That's a pretty well-known phrase. But I don't think people – I think people have varying degrees of their definition of diversification. Well, because you and I would say that the S &P 500 is one basket. Other people might argue that it's – what do you mean? It's 500 of the largest companies in the United States. Right. I looked at it last week too. Apple and Microsoft now make up almost 14 % of the total index, which is nuts. The top 10 stocks in the S &P make up 29 % of the index, which is the highest it's been since probably the 60s or 70s.
20:01Kind of crazy to think. And I do think you'd be fine if you owned the whole U.S. stock market and could handle it. But I think that owning other strategies, other types of investments, other geographies, just can help you if you have bad luck and you happen to catch the crappy period for the US at the worst possible time. That's the whole thing of diversification for me. We're also talking about diversification through the lens of returns. But what about the psychological impact of going all in on one investment? Now, diversification is not easy either because if you're diversified and you own global stocks, you're like, what the hell am I doing?
20:38So it's all about trade-offs. The Brian Portnoy quote, I think he said this is like, it means always having to say you're sorry about something. But it's you're damned if you do and damned if you don't kind of thing. Yeah. This episode is brought to you by State Farm. Listening to this podcast, smart move. Being financially savvy, smart move. Another smart move, having State Farm help you create a competitive price when you choose to bundle home and auto. Bundling, just another way to save with a personal price plan. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. Prices are based on rating plans that vary by state.
21:13Coverage options are selected by the customer. Availability, amount of discounts and savings, and eligibility vary by state. Next up is a little song from CarMax about selling a car your way. You want to sell those wheels. You want to get a CarMax instant offer. So fast. Want to take a sec to think about it. Or like a month. Want to keep tabs on that instant offer. With OfferWatch. Wanna have CarMax pick it up from your driveway? Wanna get it? Touch it? You wanna do it? So, wanna drive? CarMax. Pickup not available everywhere. Restrictions and fee may apply. Alright, remember the Dave Portnoy ETF?
21:52VanEck Social Sentiment ETF, ticker BUZZ. Emery Akakmak, did I say that right? I don't know. Twitter. Looks right today. they show that uh the the fund is down 50 and it's lost 90 of its assets from its peak shortly after launch in march 2021 AUM went from 500 million to 50 million which some some there's a lot of stuff in the markets that's really hard to predict this kind of stuff coming out when it did i guess it seems relatively easy to predict yeah like we didn't know the timing on when arc would would blow up, but we knew it would, right? That was a pretty easy prediction. I think the same thing is true of an ETF like this.
22:35And I never heard him really mention it after he talked about it at the beginning. I don't know what the relationship was. Yeah, me either. Anyway. All right. You remember how when this bear market got going a little bit and it felt different from the get-go? You said, listen, we're not going to get a V-shaped recovery this time. You planted the flag on that pretty early. You were right. Well, we got a V-shaped recovery. It just wasn't in the stock market. Look at this. This is prime age, which is 25 to 54 employment rate versus pre-recession peak. And this is from Scan to Amarnath, who had a great tweet thread on the labor market and how strong it is.
23:09We did get a V-shaped recovery. It just was in the labor market and not the stock market. It's like we kind of chose this time because of fiscal policy or whatever, however things shook out, we chose to have a V-shaped recovery, but it was in the unemployment rate. We spoke about this a couple of months ago. We did too little in the aftermath of the GFC to stimulate the economy. And we paid the price in terms of a really sluggish recovery. I don't know how long it took to get all the jobs back. Oh, it's right here. It feels like it was 10 years, right? Yeah. It took a really long time. OK, and so we obviously were in the opposite side of the boat this time around, and the economy is fine, better than fine, too strong, too fine, in fact.
23:56And the price that we paid for this recovery is higher consumer prices. Right. Worth it? Supply chain stuff. Yeah. He also shows that labor force participation rate continues to rise for people 25 to 54. Because the reason you show 25 to 54 is because the baby boomer demographic is so large now that the labor force participation rate overall is going to slow or go down because people are retiring en masse, right? So it makes sense to look at prime age. And he says we're not running out of workers if this labor force participation rate continues to climb. He also says that full-time workers, so this is 25 to 54 full-time employment population, is about as high as it's been since 2000.
24:39which is way better than it's been the last two decades. So it's not just people having part-time jobs and doing DoorDash on the side or Uber or whatever. This is people with full-time jobs. This is my thing about the Fed, though, is that them raising rates, I think inflation is falling despite them, not because of them. The Fed can control borrowing rates, and they can control the yield savers earn, and they can step in as a lender of last resort in a crisis, but they can't control the labor market or inflation like they want to. Their interest rates are like a blunt tool, and the labor market has not cared at all what the Fed has done.
Read the full transcript
25:20Hey, let me ask you a question. Those are all good points. I agree with all of them. So this blunt tool word phrase that we throw around, can you explain what it means? Because I'm not quite sure that I get it. It's blunt. It's not very precise, right? It's – they're trying to – let me think. No, like literally – like, okay, I'm Googling a blunt tool. Think about it. A blunt tool is a hammer. Yeah, they're using a hammer, yeah, to try to hit a pin, right? Exactly. That's what you do with a hammer. So my point – I don't think that phrase makes sense. I think it's the opposite. A blunt tool will get the job done.
26:01not if you're trying to do something that that requires precision and a little bit of a care right they're they're just haphazardly raising rates to five and a half percent and hoping all i'm saying you'll never hear me say interest rates are a blunt tool okay all right i'm gonna hold you i think we need to i just i just i just incepted it into your you're gonna say it in like five minutes and not realize it all right here's another one this is i think this is good uh from The New York Times, average hourly earnings climbed 4.4 % in the year through April. That compared to 4.3 % in previous months and more than was expected.
26:37Powell says, you know, the labor market is still tight. But look at this chart. We've talked about this before. Wage growth in green has been lower than the consumer price index since inflation took off in 2021. And now these two numbers are converging. Isn't this a good thing? Inflation is falling and wages are ticking back up a little bit. What's wrong with that? If let's say wages go above inflation, if that's possible, that hasn't happened yet in this whole time. Isn't that a good thing? Should we be celebrating that? Real wage gains? Yeah. Yes. Right? I think this would be a good thing. You're doing a lot of defense on the Fed today.
27:14I'm just pointing this out. Is the shoe on the other foot? I don't know. You're defending the Fed a lot today. I'm just saying. I'm not saying everything they've done is bad and they've been in a pretty precarious situation. Because people have asked us, and we've mentioned this, isn't the way to fight fiscal policy like this just to raise taxes? And no politician in their right mind is going to raise taxes to fight inflation. So the Fed is – that's the blunt tool thing. They're the only ones – they're the only game in town now that are trying to stop this. No politician is trying to stop inflation.
27:44Politicians would probably make it worse. So I do give the Fed credit because they're the only ones who are even trying to do something, even though the tools that they have don't work as well as they would like. It doesn't feel like I'm defending the Fed. What it feels like is this is not an easy job to – It's not. My whole thing is it feels like they're not even trying for a soft landing. Why don't they just chill out a little bit and let things – see what happens. Let things settle a little bit. It's like when you get a new pizza and it looks so delicious and you know if you take a bite, you're going to burn the top of your mouth.
28:22You just know it. And every time you still take that bite because, eh, what if it doesn't? And it still burns your mouth. Like, just let it cool off for 10 minutes. See what happens so you don't burn the top of your mouth. I feel like the Fed is way too quick to burn the top of their mouth every time. In both directions. I think they're done. What is a— I hope so. They should be. So target rate probabilities for June. All right, 88%, say 500 to 525. All right, here's a question for you. Since you use this way more than I do, the probabilities. How do they calculate that? It's like Fed Funds Futures.
28:57Okay. So I can't tell you. Who controls those? Who's trading Fed Funds Futures? Traders. I can't tell you how it's calculated, but. Okay. You don't want to see how the sausage is made. I'm just asking how the sausage is made here. Can't tell you. I mean, you're a big Fed guy, so you should know. How about this? Well, there's a methodology. See, we've reversed roles. I used to be the Fed guy, the Fed apologist. You're the Fed apologist now. All right, here we go. The probability of a rate hike is calculated by adding the probabilities of all target rate levels above or below the current target rate.
29:28Probabilities of possible Fed funds target rates are based on Fed funds futures contract prices, assuming that rate hikes or cuts are uniformly. OK, so there it is. Do I need to keep going? Man, good enough. I didn't really care. I was just curious, you know. Well, I think I think I did, sir. All right. So they spoke at the meeting about, I think Powell said something along the lines of, he does not expect a recession. And I think Yellen said something similar. So from the Atlanta Fed, on May 4th, the GDP now model, now cast of real GDP growth in Q2 2023 is 2.7%. See, this is my point. Maybe everything the Fed's doing, it's useless and doesn't matter.
30:11We don't have a counterfactual, but if the Fed were to stop at 3 % or 4%, maybe we would just be in the same situation and it just wouldn't be as expensive for people to borrow or they wouldn't be getting as high yields on their T-bills. We don't know. If they stopped at 3%, we just don't know. Here's another one. San Francisco Fed, approximately, and I think, I know we've spoken about this so much that maybe it's gone from over-communicated to under-communicated. San Francisco Fed, approximately$500 billion of excess savings remaining in the aggregate economy. Should the recent pace of drawdowns persist, excess savings would likely continue to support household spending at least into Q4.
30:49I don't know, man. I don't know if our session's coming. I think we're spending that savings down to the bone. There's no way people are hanging on to that excess savings. Right? It's going away. Here's another one. The ISM spring 2023 semi-annual economic forecast finds that amid continuing uncertainties, purchasing and supply executives in the U.S., manufacturing and services sector still expect growth in production capacity, revenues, and employment. Okay. However - I'm telling you, 2025 recession is still on the table. However, the small business index, U.S. small business optimism fell to the lowest since April 2013.
31:32Okay. I don't see how this - Now, okay. Counterpoint to my previous points. I don't see how this doesn't show up in the data eventually. Now, this is like the vibes thing. Like, don't worry about how people feel. Worry about like the hard data versus the soft data. But if small businesses are so pessimistic on the economy, this is going to change their habits and impact the economy. No, how does it not? Haven't we been saying that for over a year, though? Didn't we say last year, like we could talk ourselves into recession last year and it didn't happen? Yes. So I don't know. the thing everyone else the the thing the really gloomy people would say is listen the fed operates on their monetary policy operates on a lag just wait that's a fact that's a fact it's going to happen and also every time there's not a recession today there could be one in the future that's also a fact like duh something could happen in the future it's not happening today things are still pretty good that that's where i stand things are still pretty darn good in the economy as they stand today could they get worse in the future yes they could always get worse uh we also talk about a recession like yes no right in in black or white as if there's not 50 shades of gray see what i did there never saw that movie i read the book remember that yeah i read the first book i'm not i'm not proud of it i i kind of wanted to see what the all the hubbub was about and uh it was a mistake how about this will there ever be a bubble in a book again by the way i'm just I'm picturing what Duncan and John are going to do to Fifty Shades of Grey here for the Photoshop.
33:08Will there ever be another Da Vinci Code? Oh, yeah. What do you mean? Yeah, of course there will. Yeah. That takes the nation, the globe, by storm? People don't read books anymore. I think it's easier for books to do that than movies these days even. I don't think. You don't think there's going to be some sort of Hunger Games sort of thing? I don't know. I don't know. Do people read anymore? I got a book recommendation for today. I've been watching many movies because movies stink. All the movies stink these days. So I've been reading more. Okay. All right. So getting back to the shades of gray, Nick Gurley tweeted, looks like a recession is starting in the South.
33:49Southern states lost jobs for the third straight month in April, according to ADP. Meanwhile, Pacific Northeast had huge job gains. Big implications for real estate. Okay. So this is a great chart. Listen, there's not one economy, right? Yes, it's a very big dynamic. It's interesting that the West Coast is seeing gains because they probably saw losses forever. So now it's shifting. Yeah. I mean, this is kind of like, if you look at this, this is kind of like the housing market. Like there are spots where the housing market is still on fire and spots where the housing market is falling off. We're going to talk about that in a minute, but yeah.
34:20Dan Greenhouse tweeted, Truly amazing how many consumer packaged good companies are able to still pass through significant price increases. Kraft is the latest here in the U.S. prices were up 13%, but volumes were down 6.5%. I think we spoke about this with Chipotle, even though they're not nearly that bad of an offender, but like McDonald's, Pepsi, and the like. I don't know. Didn't Pepsi say they're done? I think so. I can still feed a family of five at McDonald's for like$25. I still think McDonald's is pretty darn cheap relative to everything else. I saw Burger King has like$7 meals or$6. Have it your way, the commercial.
34:58By the way, speaking of commercial, Verizon. You texted me that you saw that Verizon commercial? The not to brag? I mean, that was egregious. Cease and desist, Seth Meyers. Stay away. 95 times out of 100, I'm like, you know, if people do something similar, I'm like, yeah, it's a coincidence. We're not the, you know. But that was a bit much. I think the greedflation thing just shows. The thing is, it's not like corporations ever get more or less greedy. I think they just take advantage of being greedy when they can. And right this period, they've been able to take advantage of being greedy because people hear about supply chain stuff and rising costs and rising wages.
35:31And there's going to be a time when they're not going to be able to take advantage. I feel like corporations don't get more or less greedy. They pick their spots depending on the environment. And they've been greedy now, but it's not like they've been the cause of inflation. You've probably seen this chart before. Andrew Lokanath tweeted this. We were just talking about Pepsi and consumer staples. 11 companies that own everything. So it's Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, Unilever, Pepsi, Kellogg's. I didn't realize that Kellogg's was in this vein. Mars, General Mills, Mondelez, Johnson & Johnson, Kraft Heinz, and Nestle.
36:04And these 11 companies own more or less everything that you see at like Stop & Shop or ShopRite. This is our don't short junk food, right? Yeah. By the way, do those names mean anything to you? Are those national chains, Stop & Shop and ShopRite? No. Or are they regional? Nope. I don't know. Are there national grocery stores other than like Whole Foods or is everything regional? I think most things are regional, right? Yeah. We have Publix in Florida. We have Meyer here, which is like a Midwest thing. What do you have? We used to have Walbams back in the day. That place was great. What do we have?
36:43We have local stuff. Like, yeah, regional stuff. All right. So speaking of the real estate thing. So this is a tweet from Connor Hughes. It shows a bunch of people in a line, lying out the door, trying to find a house in 2023, lying out the door for an open house. I think I'm just going to take my wife and baby and move back with my mom. Sadly, I hear there's already five similar offers. I think he said this is in New Jersey. Those are dad shorts. Yeah, those are definitely dad shorts. Respect. I think this is... Guy needs a pair of bird dogs. Yeah, not the starch khakis. I think this is why it's so hard to do a national housing thing right now.
37:20Because there are certainly markets like this where there's going to be multiple bids still because supply is so low. But there's going to be other markets where prices are falling and people say, no, no, no, real estate is dead. And it's all crashing. And I think that's why, like, you jumble it all up and we're kind of in, like, this going nowhere, steady state, sideways kind of real estate market. But if you happen to be in the wrong market, you're going to think – You saw that someone sent us that Instagram or TikTok video of the guy rapping about like, where's this big crash in housing prices?
37:48And it was actually pretty good for as far as those kind of videos go. I laughed a little bit. I just think the 2008 system resetting that people wanted is just not going to happen. There's too many people that want to get a house. All right. Here's a good pie chart. you should be this is like a legitimate pie chart what do you mean a legitimate pie chart when do you think I made that pie chart what year do you think I made that 2015, 2016, 2017 what did we do for the 10th anniversary I don't know I'm just saying it was kind of an illegitimate pie chart this is from the FI couple on Twitter 67 % of homeowners in the United States that's bullshit I'm sorry that pie chart is properly labeled and it shows exactly what it says it shows with no intent to mislead.
38:44Just because some people have reading comprehension issues, I will not apologize for that. I think you should read How to Lie with Statistics. I did. Good book. Good book. All right. 67 % of homeowners in the United States have, by the way, hard word to say, statistics. Hard to say fast. 67 % of homeowners in the United States have a paid off home or at least 50 % equity in their home. So almost 39 % own their home free and clear. Hello, boomers. And then nearly 29 % have greater than 50 % equity in their home. So this is the reason why I think people, we've talked forever about low mortgage rates are going to be trapped in that low rate.
39:21This is the reason why low mortgage rates won't last forever though, in terms of trapping people. I mean, you and I say we're trapped in these, like I have a 3 % mortgage and mortgage rates, even if they go to 5%, you're going to say, why would I trade out of the 3 % mortgage? As you build equity, you mean? Eventually, if you have 50 % equity in your home, you're going to go, if you need to move, and we've heard from a lot of people who say, listen, my family is growing. This is what happened to us. My wife and I said for our first house, we were there for 10 years. We had conversations like this could be our forever home.
39:49And then we had twins unexpectedly, and we moved because we needed more room. That's going to happen to people. And eventually, you'll look at your 50 % equity in your home, and you'll go, I'm going from 3 % to 5.5%, but you know what? The payment is not that much different because of the equity I have in the home if I roll it over into the new place. And I think that's what's going to, eventually, it's going to be a slow thaw of this, but eventually that's going to happen. Very slow. But it's going to happen eventually where life gets in the way and people are going to want to move and they're going to say, you know what?
40:20I'm not staying here any longer just because I have this 3 % mortgage. I'd be more comfortable taking 5%, rolling the dice that I'll be able to refinance lower and I'm going to move. It's going to happen. Eventually. Maybe.
40:37People get married. People get divorced. People die. People have kids. This stuff happens and life will go on. Let's do some quarter stuff. By the way, guys, I've been listening to tons of earnings calls the last week. Performing your channel checks? No big deal. the quarter desktop app, although I do these on the go, but I use the desktop app for the transcript stuff. It's really incredible. The search function is great. That's my favorite part, for sure. All right, so what was that data point we had about the earnings? Earnings coming in pretty well, huh? Earnings season, earnings season, looking for it.
41:16Here we go. Sam Rowe tweeted, this is from Bank of America, revision to consensus first quarter earnings since the start of April. Heck of a chart. S &P 500 earnings revisions since Q1 are up 5%. Isn't this always the case, though, where, like, earnings come in better than expected because they just sandbag and lowball? Do you ever see, like, 70 % of companies missed expectations? It's always... Uh-uh, uh-uh. No, no, no. This is versus, like, analyst estimates, I think. Okay. But are the companies getting the analysts to sandbag so they can beat expectations? Isn't that always what happens? No.
41:56I mean, maybe in normal times, but Josh and I spoke about this a lot in 2021 or two, that analysts estimates are still way too high. And they came in pretty aggressively. So S &P 500 revisions up 5%, materials up 16%, discretionary up 15%, 14%. All right, this is interesting. And this also looks like it's from Bank of America. Goodbye, cost-cutting, hello, productivity. Margin expansion from globalization and cheap financing is behind us, but productivity gains could be the next multi-year bulk case for margins and multiples. This quarter is rife with evidence. Efficiency mentions jump 27 % year over year.
42:33It is dangerous to underestimate corporate America's margin preservation skills. Let me repeat that for emphasis. It is dangerous to underestimate corporate America's margin preservation skills. These companies are really freaking good at making money this is the this is like the one thing jeremy grantham taught us that seems to be disproven that like uh mean reversion and margins is like the gravity no it's not ethos of capitalism and it hasn't been and i think i think he made sense wrong it made sense i i i don't i'm not i don't fault him for being wrong there just something changed technology technology we You spoke about this.
43:14I spoke with Josh talking about like AWS and the ability for companies to quickly dial up or down how much they need versus like – think about what it went into like ramping up and slowing down factories, for example. You know what I mean? Like you could have just turned on a dime. Now you literally could say, you know what? I'm going to take less data. We need less storage, less software. The simple thing for me that I've been telling my kids lately is I used to go buy a CD, a full compact disc for one song that I liked on the radio and like roll the dice that I was going to like the other songs.
43:45And most of the time you didn't. My kids can listen to any song they want on demand right now on like any device. And it's like just just think about something simple like that, how much easier it is to get access to to things these days than you could in the past because of technology. All right. So Ben, before we talk about some of these companies, I had a self-realization in terms of the type of stocks that I'm attracted to, not just like trades, but like stocks that I actually plan on holding. I'm not going to sit here and say that I'm going to hold any of these stocks for years, right? If I have a 100 % gain, I'm out.
44:22But anyway, the stocks in my portfolio all have something in common. So let me read you these stocks. Zillow, Spotify, Schwab is not a good example of this, Netflix, and I just recently added Airbnb and Disney. We have some overlap there. So what these have in common, I buy great brands. And if they are founder-led, all the better. Now, these are not cheap companies by any stretch of the imagination. That sounded like a really good CNBC pitch there. Thank you. Like talking about your ethos. But those are the companies that - I buy great brands. Like I believe in Rich Barton. So let's get into like Zillow, for example.
45:06All right, over 80%, and I especially like to buy those stocks after they got killed. I should mention that. Over 80 % of people who go to Zillow go there direct. Isn't that kind of nuts? They do have the brand in real estate as far as the United States goes. they said housing is a growth industry with$300 billion in transaction fees. $300 billion in transaction fees. 67 % of US home buyers use Zillow today. I'm not even in the market for a house and I'm on Zillow all the time still. So yeah, of course. All right, so some charts. Number one, US online residential real estate app by wide margin, daily active app users.
45:53So here's a pie chart. In terms of people that use an app for home searching, 63 % use Zillow, 20 % use Realtor.com, 13 % use Redfin, and then the rest is Crumbs. All right, housing is a growth industry. I showed you that. Look, but look at this. The average industry commission, this blew my face, 4 % average annual growth. In commissions? The average industry commission. Now, why? This is not rocket science. Existing home transactions value. So the dollar amounts goes up because home prices go up. It's not like the percentage. So they show significant long-term growth opportunity. I wonder if it's a Redfin still down 90%.
46:40Why doesn't Zillow just buy them? Or would that be taking too much of the market? Don't know. I don't know how they view them in terms of competition. All right. So they have a chart showing the significant long-term growth opportunity. By 2025, their financial targets are$5 billion in revenue and 45 % adjusted EBITDA. So that would be like, let's see, almost a double-ish from where they are today. So yeah, they're projecting to go from$2 billion to$5 billion by 2025. This reminded me a little bit of that scene in Succession where the CFO, Carl, said to Ken, if you f*** me, I'm going to squeal like a pig.
47:16Right? He said, like, don't throw bullshit numbers on the screen. and I saw this and I said, a little bit optimistic. True. Where are you at in succession? I'm all caught up. I'm weak behind. Okay. I thought the first five episodes were like all A, A pluses, and the last two have been Bs, but I feel like they're setting the stage, and I'm at the point where. Oh, I loved the one two weeks ago. Okay. After the Newark, I thought they just cooled off a little. I mean, they're like great shows in terms of TV, but I'm grading a curve for other Succession episodes. I thought they were, but they were like setting the plate.
47:54But my only conclusion is that like there's zero chance that this show ends like with a smile. Like that is going to end happy. It's going to end so, it's going to be hard to watch. Yes, but I'm fully on board wherever they take me. All right, check this chart out. Moving is offline, complicated, time-consuming, stressful, inexpensive. And for people listening, there's real estate agents, inspector, mortgage lender, appraiser, title co, escrow, mover. They say it's estimated$26 ,000 to$40 ,000 to move. I was talking to Benny Marks about this. He's asking me about buying a house. I'm like, dude, you don't buy a house for the short term.
48:38That's not what this is. I think you're underestimating the cost involved, the headache. I would say seven years minimum should be your starting point, right? I mean, again, life gets in the way it happens, but that should be where you – because it's true. This number might be low in terms of cost to move. Yeah, I don't know what the number is in terms of how many years, but you should buy a house with no intention of moving, right? It's not realistic to think that the first house that you buy, you're going to stay in forever, but you should buy the house with no intention to get out of it anytime soon.
49:08Right. Michael McDonough from Bloomberg tweeted, the AI revolution is unmistakably underway as evidenced by the significant increase in AI-related mentions during earnings calls and company transcripts. I mean, look at this. It was basically, it went from effectively zero to all the way up. Which companies haven't said anything? Like, that'd be interesting to me. Like, Apple probably hasn't said anything yet. I'd love to hear some of the big companies that haven't said it yet. So they asked. Still biding their time. I did listen to Apple. They asked Tim Cook about AI, and he was pretty vague, pretty noncommittal with his comments.
49:40But I had, I don't know if an epiphany is the right word, but a realization, and I could be way out of bounds here. But hearing Tim Cook talk about Apple and how they're bettering the world and all this sort of things that struck me as nonsense, like he's like the bad guy from Jurassic World. Like the bad, you know, the latest Jurassic World. Apple has not made your life better. AirPods, Apple Watch, iPhone. It has totally made your life better. Love it. But no, I'm saying like, do you think that the bad guy in Jurassic World was modeled after Tim Cook? Because he looks exactly like him. They do kind of look.
50:16They have the same mannerisms. I agree. Okay. Apple Q2 revenues. By the way, I was talking, it seems so long ago, on the compounded friends, I was saying that like, the stock market looked really kind of shaky going into Apple's earnings calls. I don't know. I know you're not a stock market guy, Ben, but just take my word for it. It looked kind of shaky. And I think I said something to the effect. You're not a stock market guy. I'm not a chart guy. How's that? I said something to the effect of I don't think – or what I intended to say was I don't think that Apple can necessarily save – I don't think that Apple beanie will like be a boon to the market.
50:53But I think if Apple misses, it could definitely like take the market down 5 % in a hurry. And I was 100 % wrong because on the day after Apple reported, the S &P on Friday was up 2%. So thank you, Apple. Thank you, Tim Apple. All right. So Q2 revenues, not quite at a record, but right there. Who made this chart? I can't remember this from the transcript to somebody else. Category revenue. you. I don't understand, Ben, how they are doing almost$7 billion a quarter with just the iPad alone. That absolutely blows my mind. The iPad is a$7 billion a quarter. Because every parent buys one for their kid now.
51:38So when they go out to eat, they can have a meal in peace. That's how it works. Go on your iPad, scram. It's unbelievable. What else did they say? So I think I saw a tweet like this is two consecutive quarters of Apple revenue being down year over year. I don't know if that's exactly right, but it was something like that. And the implication was, in fact, the president explicitly said that Apple is no longer a growth company. They are kicking butt and taking names in emerging markets. There was a lot of talk on the call about India. If you're the biggest company in the world, isn't it hard to be a growth company just by definition?
52:13Like you're past the growth stage. You're more mature. Yeah, that would stand to reason with the$2.6 trillion market cap. Anyway, Apple is still killing it. All right, Coinbase. It's the most impressive company in history. We might have said this before. At least in our history. I don't have any experience with the East Dutch trading firm or whatever. So South Sea, all that stuff. Ben and I recorded a listener mailbag episode with Fidelity Digital Assets that's coming out on Monday. And in the intro, Ben, you and I were talking about Coinbase and how in the earnings call, Brian Armstrong was talking about people are unhappy with the current financial system and they're making it faster and cheaper.
52:55And then I told you the story about trying to buy USDC with a near 4 % commission. Consumer trading volume was$20 billion. I'm sorry, yeah,$20 billion in the most recent quarter. Institutional trading was$124 billion. So there were six times as much volume from institutional traders as there were from retail. Transaction revenue, Ben, for consumers was$350 million versus$22 million for institutions. So institutions trade six times as much volume, but consumers pay 15 times. Is my math right? I don't know. Between 15 and 20 times what institutions pay. This has always been my bear case for Coinbase is just fees coming down.
53:49That's, I mean, maybe they're the only game in town now and that holds that off, but that's been my, since they became public, I thought that the fees coming down is, is the problem with them. oh wait here here's here's a quote on the consumer side we had an increase we we had increased our spread in the second quarter so i guess they're like i kind of i kind of assumed that a commission was static which i don't know why i assumed that but it sounds like it flexes based on whatever they want to do all right here's a crypto thing for you 48 of u.s adults say they're concerned about their money at banks including 19 were very concerned 29 were mildly concerned.
54:2730 % are not worried at all, or 20 % are not worried at all. 30 % are not too worried. So 50 % or so are worried about banks. This is an interesting one. This is from Apollo. Less than 1 % of bank accounts have a balance higher than 250K. So more people are worried than should be worried. How's that sound? That's exactly right. And I would follow that up with, of those people that are extremely worried or very worried, how many of them have moved their money. Right. Or will. Yeah, exactly. All right. Here's a good one for middle ages in Wall Street Journal. The age when you stop feeling young.
55:00OK. A lot of people have commented lately how it's really funny to see in real time. Michael realize that he's reached middle age. Have you slowly hit that realization? The early 40s, specifically 42, is when the average American starts noticing physical signs of aging, including achy joints and gray hair, according to a September poll conducted on behalf of found a weight management company. I turned 42 in three months and I feel great, but I do occasionally feel like I have like some sort of like tendonitis or something like after lifting weights, I'll have like a sore joint for like a month and then I'll just kind of go away.
55:34But that's happened two or three times to me where I'll just be really sore in certain spots, knees or elbows or stuff. It's funny you mentioned this yesterday. I was tying my sneakers on the couch. And I felt something in my knee. Pop is too strong of a word, but I don't know. What's between nothing and pop? Felt something. And then I was like, what was that? And it doesn't hurt anymore, but it bothered me for the rest of the day. Tying my sneakers. It happens. Did you see this thread from Airbnb? About their new... That's the one I try to listen to, the Airbnb call every quarter. So that's tonight.
56:13I'm going to listen. Brian Chesky tweeted, you told us what you don't like about Airbnb. Here are 50 things we're doing about it. There's a tweet thread of 50 things that are changing. For example, you said checkout instructions can be a surprise when you get to your Airbnb. Now all checkout instructions can be viewed on the listings page before you book. And again, there's 50 of these things. Yeah, I like it. They seem very consumer friendly. Beyond the guy next to us in Florida who yelled at us for being too loud at the pool. He's not an Airbnb fan. Oh, I got something. Okay. Two things from Texas.
56:45On the way to the airport or from the Uber driver had a live rear view mirror, which I feel like I've seen before. I think I want to get that. What do you mean a live rear view? Like on the screen? The rear view mirror is video of behind you. So instead of looking to your rear view mirror to see what's behind you, like with a mirror, there's a camera, I guess, that goes in the back of your car. And I don't know if it's a wireless connection where you can literally see the cars behind you in your rear view mirror. So my new Jeep Wrangler does not have the side alerts where there's a light comes on.
57:22So instead of looking up, you're looking down? What? So instead of looking up in the rearview mirror, you're just looking down at the screen? No, the screen appears on your rearview mirror. Oh, okay. Instead of it being a mirror, somehow it's a camera to the cars behind you. It's a view of the cars behind you. What happens in a speed situation where someone loops in a video of a different background and someone's really coming up behind you. I'm just saying. Ben, I don't know if you saw this speech, and I can't even remember if it was from Alison Levine or Eric Maddox, but I'm thinking it was Alison Levine just given the nature of the quote.
57:58Talking about how a lot of people are, or maybe it was Jason Karp. I don't even know if it was, I don't remember who said this quote, forgive me. But they're talking about why so many people with money are not happy. And the quote was this. I think it was Jason Karp, actually. He said, I got to the top of the mountain and there was nothing to say. Yes. And boom, there it is. For wealthy people. That was very good. For people that are chasing money that thinks that money is going to somehow change how they feel about, I don't know, their happiness situation. It's just. So Jason Karp was a hedge fund manager, investor who became a, who started his own health food company.
58:37And it was interesting because he talked about how he doesn't like all the processed foods, you know, like, see it's naturally. and he's talking about like how much of an endemic it is that we have this obesity in this country and then someone asked him at the end, well, what does your diet look like? Do you eat fully healthy and natural all the time? And he says, well, I have like the 85-15 rule. 85 % of the time I eat clean and 15 % of the time I eat burgers and fries and pizza and stuff because I don't think, he said, I basically think you go crazy if you live at the extremes like that. And I subscribe to that notion as well, where you need to have a little bit of balance in there.
59:13All right. Recommendations. Ben, somebody recommended this to me. It's a show called The Juror on Amazon Prime, and it's got a great premise. Do you know about the show? No. So there's a jury. There are so many shows right now. You've got a judge. You've got the defendant. You've got some prosecutors. And you've got a jury. Everybody on the show is an actor except for one dude who doesn't know that it's rigged. Oh, it's a reality show. It's a great premise and apparently like things go nuts. But here's the problem. It's on Amazon Prime on this service called like Freevi and there's commercials and I can't watch it.
59:51Also, The Juror was not a bad movie. Alec Baldwin and Demi Moore. Was that a John Grisham? I think so. I never saw that one. Not bad. Okay, I was listening to the Town Podcast with – I don't remember who it was with. I think it might have been – I don't remember who it was with. And I learned that the Meg 2 is coming out. Are you kidding me? So many people tag us on Twitter for this. I also learned that the first one did over$500 million in global box office. See, you're part of the problem. You're the reason we can't have nice movies anymore. I'm not going to see the Meg 2. Yeah, you will. I also think the reason we don't have – if you watch a show like Succession, I think you just realize that people have decided, why would I write one single movie anymore when I can write 10 episodes of a TV show that could be four or five seasons?
1:00:42I think all the good writers that used to write good movies are now writing TV shows. That's the only – it has to be. So I caught a little bit of Ghost. What year did Ghost, the movie, come out? For younger listeners, this is Patrick Swayze, Demi Moore, and Whoopi Goldberg. 89? 80s? 90. Okay. so I don't know when I saw this I was young I was maybe like 6 or 7 or 8 I don't know if I was probably 6 that's probably too young let's say that I was 8 or 9 and I think this movie like taught me about death like in a real way you know what I mean like I don't exactly remember how I felt when I watched it but if you haven't seen this movie what an incredible movie holy moly it really is I mean Whoopi Goldberg is so good at that movie yeah I am very excited for The Confident, the Guy Ritchie movie which doesn't really seem like a Guy Ritchie type of movie it's Jake Gyllenhaal in the Army and I saw a commercial like it said coming to digital access today on May 9th this movie came out in the theaters two weeks ago I actually almost saw it instead of Evil Dead but I saw Evil Dead And I was reminded of bootlegs.
1:01:59Remember bootlegs? I was walking through Times Square in like 2004 maybe and bought a bootleg copy of Gothica. We went and watched it and it was a guy literally videotaped it. Yep, and Robert Downey Jr. Yeah, that was the thing. And a guy literally videotaped it. And it was pretty good camera work, except when you'd see someone walk in front of him in the row. In 2000, what year was it? I'm going to guess like 2000. 2007, 2008, I was working at a restaurant. And I did that for about two years, full time, no big deal. And there was a guy that would come with bootleg DVDs. And I remember very, very vividly seeing No Country for Old Men on bootleg.
1:02:46And there will be blood on bootleg. That's what we had to do before streamers existed. So this is what we had to do back in the day. But it was always like a roulette wheel to figure out – you popped it in and like was it some dude holding a camera? But 50-50, sometimes it was like legit, like just a great copy, which was thrilling. Like that was thrilling to be able to see those movies at home for like five bucks. Yeah. Claudie is always so bad. Never did it. No, I'm saying I got a bunch of good ones. I had a guy. All right. Lastly, I heard – or saw – I don't know, commercial, whatever. There's a movie coming out called Blackberry.
1:03:22which is literally about BlackBerry, like Research in Motion. And I don't know how I feel about this. What's going on? I don't know. I never had one, so I think I'll skip this one. I have no nostalgia here. So there was the run of TV shows about like the WeWork TV show, the Uber TV show. I'm on record at saying it's too much. So now is Air going to kick off a run of these type of movies? I'd rather have to be a movie than a TV show. I've, we've been catching up on TV. I've been out of town and doing stuff. So I've been watching much and all the movies these days stink. No good movies. There's just no good movies anymore.
1:04:01In the theater or what? Yeah. When's the last time a good new release came out? Well, evil dad, scream. I'll watch scream a little bit of Paramount. Barbarian. I've been reading more. So Amazon Kindle finally got me. I have the Kindle where it has the ads on it every time you open it up. And forever, it recommended me this book called Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow by Gabrielle Zeben. and I think it's been a really good bestseller. It finally got me, it wore me down. I read it and it's great. It's about three friends who start a video game company and it goes from like when they're young to when they're older and all these things that happen in between and it talks about how they develop these video games and it's not like anything I read usually, but I really liked it.
1:04:38True story? Very good book. No, not a true story. I'm only fiction these days. Send us an email, annalspiritspod at gmail.com. Michael will come back next week with a healed up head. I think Logan's sick Alright Good luck You have the worst luck with that Alright Animal Spirits Pod At the Gmail See you next week
From the publisher
On today's show we discuss regional bank failures, confidence in the Fed, international diversification, the V-shaped recovery in the labor market, vibes vs. data in the economy, the best company in the world, middle age and much more. Thanks to YCharts for sponsoring this episode! YCharts will be discussing the Scenarios Tool with a big emphasis on how it helps streamline the financial planning process for advisors with RWM COO Nick Maggiulli on May 24th at 12:30pm ET. Register at: https://ycharts.zoom.us/webinar/register/6316832319210/WN_hZWZbN3fSGm_ax8f92h9RA#/registrationFind complete shownotes on our blogs...
Ben Carlson’s A Wealth of Common Sense
Michael Batnick’s The Irrelevant Investor
Feel free to shoot us an email at animalspiritspod@gmail.com with any feedback, questions, recommendations, or ideas for future topics of conversation.
Check out the latest in financial blogger fashion at The Compound shop: https://www.idontshop.com
Investing involves the risk of loss. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be or regarded as personalized investment advice or relied upon for investment decisions. Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson are employees of Ritholtz Wealth Management and may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this video. All opinions expressed by them are solely their own opinion and do not reflect the opinion of Ritholtz Wealth Management.
Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here https://ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. The information provided on this website (including any information that may be accessed through this website) is not directed at any investor or category of investors and is provided solely as general information.
Obviously nothing on this channel should be considered as personalized financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any securities. See our disclosures here:
https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

